Skip to content

Noch out. Will it be curtains for Kemi? – politicalbetting.com

SystemSystem Posts: 13,172
edited May 6 in General
Noch out. Will it be curtains for Kemi? – politicalbetting.com

While the main headlines on Friday will likely be about Labour’s woes, the Conservatives are also set for a tough time, potentially losing 500-1,000 councilors in England and falling behind Reform in Scotland and Wales.

Read the full story here

«134

Comments

  • Sweeney74Sweeney74 Posts: 635
    Can we all behave this afternoon?
  • Leon_VotedForStarmerLeon_VotedForStarmer Posts: 69,000
    Sweeney74 said:

    Can we all behave this afternoon?

    No
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 63,526
    edited May 6
    @Sweeney74 - no

    OT - in the case of all the party leaders, the real question is who would have higher ratings, if they replaced the leader.

    In the case of Labour, there are a couple of candidates. In the case of the Conservatives, who polls better?

    Replacing the leader, to do the same or worse, won’t happen in any party.
  • Sweeney74Sweeney74 Posts: 635
    This is probably right strategically. The Tory problem is not mainly Badenoch; it is that voters still remember the last Conservative government, which seems unsporting of them but there we are.

    The locals are also being fought on some very unhelpful previous baselines, so heavy losses are not automatically proof that a different leader would do better. A leadership contest now risks reminding voters of exactly the chaos they threw out in 2024.

    The difficulty is that Tory MPs are not famous for calmly distinguishing structural decay from leadership failure. If the result is bad enough, Bob Blackman’s postbox may still require reinforced concrete.
  • Sweeney74Sweeney74 Posts: 635
    Leon said:

    Sweeney74 said:

    Can we all behave this afternoon?

    No
    Sigh
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 128,568
    Well the Tory Party is an absolute monarchy moderated by regicide.

    Look at the bar chart in this header.

    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2026/02/09/one-party-has-form-for-ousting-leaders-the-other-less-so/
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 41,579
    Leon said:

    MaxPB said:

    Leon said:

    Seems to be pure anecdotage but might nonetheless be useful info for bettors:


    "The Polanski negative vibe shift is crazy. Just been chatting to some student baristas and they said their whole lecture group has totally gone off him and will now vote Labour or Reform. What's going on"

    https://x.com/landofangle/status/2051973132928344570?s=20

    It was questioning police tactics on stopping a terrorist attack that did it IMO. Everyone could see how scary that was for everyone involved and then to have a third rate politician question that has made people turn against that and start questioning all the other nonsense he's been spouting.
    Yes, and I saw a tweet from pollster Luke Tryl (I might try and find it later when less busy) making exactly your point. He said he'd done focus groups in the north (IIRC) and he was really surprised how much Golders Green had cut through, when other attacks don't. Perhaps BECAUSE we had that video of the attacker, after nearly butchering two Jews

    Any sane person understood exactly why the coppers did what they did, he still had the knife, he was still resisting, he had not surrendered after tasering, he was actively trying to kill people. In 99% of countries he'd have been shot dead at that point

    Only fools and anti-Semites found it questionable, Polanski is certainly in the first category, and proved it at that moment
    The way I see it, ordinary people empathise with the person being stabbed and worry about them. Polanski has shown us he's empathising with a potential terrorist and is worried about the rights of a perpetrator.

    For most people it's beyond the pale to advocate for someone who's just stabbed two people and put the blame on the police who for once did a good job under the circumstances to eliminate a threat before anyone died.

    It shows us one of two things, either Polanski has a completely empathy compass (probably true) or he's calculated that supporting a Muslim terrorist vs Jews will win him votes (maybe true). Either one shows he's unfit for office but as we've been discussing, many young women seem to let all of the facts wash over them and seem to want to put their own feel good factor first, right now voting for the greens makes them feel good about themselves. That may change over time but probably not in the short term.
  • BattlebusBattlebus Posts: 3,244

    Well the Tory Party is an absolute monarchy moderated by regicide.

    Look at the bar chart in this header.

    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2026/02/09/one-party-has-form-for-ousting-leaders-the-other-less-so/

    Not a LibDem chart then.
  • Wulfrun_PhilWulfrun_Phil Posts: 5,208
    On the subject of the party of the supposed "loyal apparatchiks who stick by their leader, however bad things get", I don't buy in to that. MPs did turn on Blair (eventually) and also Corbyn.

    There's an interesting piece in the New Statesman today, by its Editor, which has a genuine feel unlike all those Times and Telegraph "exclusives". Paywall, but here are some extracts:
    ------------------------
    Angela vs Andy vs Wes vs Keir
    Rayner is prepared to risk it all
    By Tom McTague

    https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk-politics/2026/05/angela-vs-andy-vs-wes-vs-keir

    ...Angela Rayner is likely to be a decisive figure. She has let it be known she will not stand aside should Streeting launch a leadership bid before Burnham’s return to parliament. While Rayner is not hostile to Streeting on a personal level, she believes his victory would be a continuation of what she sees as the Labour right’s disastrous control of the party, which she blames for the infighting that has led it where it finds itself today. Rayner is determined to see a leader who can unite the Labour Party. But she is also known to be sceptical of the idea that the members of the NEC who rejected Burnham’s attempt to return to parliament in January will allow him back now......

    ... And so, the question turns to Rayner’s own ambitions.....Politics is not merely counting, but having the instincts to seize opportunities, and to make virtues of vices. Those around Rayner have been struck by her confidence.....Rayner believes modern politics demands characters who are unafraid of being divisive, of making enemies and even of nurturing them. The theatre of Donald Trump dressing down those he opposes has not gone unnoticed among her team, who believe the executives of water companies deserve similar treatment. Though Rayner bristles at those who dislike her for her upbringing or accent, she does not resent those who hold her in disdain for her politics. Indeed, she believes it would be a source of strength in power. She is also prepared to risk it all.
  • Sweeney74Sweeney74 Posts: 635

    Well the Tory Party is an absolute monarchy moderated by regicide.

    Look at the bar chart in this header.

    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2026/02/09/one-party-has-form-for-ousting-leaders-the-other-less-so/

    what are the odds on KB being ousted before SKS?
  • BattlebusBattlebus Posts: 3,244
    maxh said:

    FPT:

    Roger said:

    nico67 said:

    Why does Polanski continue to dig a deeper hole for himself ?

    I think the vast majority of the public couldn’t care less if the perpetrator was kicked in the head . If you attempt to kill people then refuse to hand over the knife you get what you deserve !

    If I’m thinking this as a so called leftie liberal then I think Polanski has really scored a spectacular own goal !

    If the man is schitzophrenic and has no control over his actions isn't it better that we have authorities who still care about his safety? We could always do it the American way and just shoot him but surely if at all possible the other way must be better? It made me feel rather queasy just beating up and kicking someone who was clearly not in control of himself
    This is facile. In that situation there are a lot of people who deserve to have their safety cared about, not least the police themselves who were presumably at risk of being stabbed next.

    We can have a sensible discussion about motive, blame, punishment etc. But to argue that the police should have held back from whatever they needed to do to disarm him is to see only one tiny part of the picture of potential harms here.
    The state reserves violence to itself. Sometimes that message has to be explicit if we are to maintain order. If you don't back them, then don't expect people to volunteer to do it. (And fund the courts)
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 41,579
    maxh said:

    FPT:

    Roger said:

    nico67 said:

    Why does Polanski continue to dig a deeper hole for himself ?

    I think the vast majority of the public couldn’t care less if the perpetrator was kicked in the head . If you attempt to kill people then refuse to hand over the knife you get what you deserve !

    If I’m thinking this as a so called leftie liberal then I think Polanski has really scored a spectacular own goal !

    If the man is schitzophrenic and has no control over his actions isn't it better that we have authorities who still care about his safety? We could always do it the American way and just shoot him but surely if at all possible the other way must be better? It made me feel rather queasy just beating up and kicking someone who was clearly not in control of himself
    This is facile. In that situation there are a lot of people who deserve to have their safety cared about, not least the police themselves who were presumably at risk of being stabbed next.

    We can have a sensible discussion about motive, blame, punishment etc. But to argue that the police should have held back from whatever they needed to do to disarm him is to see only one tiny part of the picture of potential harms here.
    I can just imagine the scene, a terrorist is on a stabbing spree in a train station, pc plod turns up and instead of rushing to disarm him they get on the megaphone and ask "are you a schizo?"

    Some people just don't live in the real world, Roger is one of them. I think sometimes he's still on the set of that Lebanese advert with bikini clad women singing this praises hoping for a passport.
  • maxhmaxh Posts: 2,033
    Sweeney74 said:

    Well the Tory Party is an absolute monarchy moderated by regicide.

    Look at the bar chart in this header.

    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2026/02/09/one-party-has-form-for-ousting-leaders-the-other-less-so/

    what are the odds on KB being ousted before SKS?
    The Tories would be fools to do so in my view. The party brand is the problem, not their leader. Ousting her only reminds the public of the nadir of the party.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 89,631
    A good header.

    And while it seems highly unlikely that it will be Badenoch ordering the new Downing St curtains in three years time, as the headline seems to suggest, you never know.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 28,768
    Sweeney74 said:

    anyone know a good location for public Holyrood Constituency odds/markets?

    @Sweeney74

    Oddschecker no, Befair Exchange no, Betfair Sportsbook no, PredictIt no, Smarkets no, Polymarket no, Kalshi no, SpreadEx no, Sporting index no, Ladbrokes YES, William Hill no, Paddypower no.

    https://www.ladbrokes.com/en/sports/event/politics/uk/scottish-politics/2026-scottish-parliamentary-election-constituency-betting/255351594/main-markets

  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 89,631
    This will be why Trump is TACO-ing.

    Just to emphasize how bad of a hole the Trump Administration is in right now, (his approval rating on) gas prices this morning literally plummeted so far we had to fix the Y axis of this chart.
    https://x.com/davidshor/status/2051782989894361406
  • Sweeney74Sweeney74 Posts: 635
    viewcode said:

    Sweeney74 said:

    anyone know a good location for public Holyrood Constituency odds/markets?

    @Sweeney74

    Oddschecker no, Befair Exchange no, Betfair Sportsbook no, PredictIt no, Smarkets no, Polymarket no, Kalshi no, SpreadEx no, Sporting index no, Ladbrokes YES, William Hill no, Paddypower no.

    https://www.ladbrokes.com/en/sports/event/politics/uk/scottish-politics/2026-scottish-parliamentary-election-constituency-betting/255351594/main-markets


    Diamond
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 61,687
    Kemi’s having a great week so far.

    Yes the elections will be difficult, but the big story will indeed be the Labour losses.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 136,861
    edited May 6
    What will help Kemi is most of the seats are tomorrow were last fought in 2022 when Labour beat the Conservatives in NEV so the results should be better than last year when all the seats up were in county councils last fought in 2021 when the Conservatives won the NEV clearly. So in 2025 there were more seats in England for the Tories to lose than there will be this year. In Wales and Scotland there will likely be bigger Tory losses as those seats were last up in 2021, though in both of those nations unlike England the Tories did not even win most seats in 2021.

    Kemi's approval ratings have now improved too and she clearly polls better than Starmer, Farage and Polanski on a net approval rating basis and about level with Davey. So I expect she now probably survives, her main rival Jenrick has defected to Reform and while Cleverly is now the likely Tory reserve leader he seems to be looking towards running for London Mayor and only in the event of a Tory disaster ie coming well behind both Reform and Labour on NEV and maybe even falling behind the LDs and Greens on seats won would a VONC and a Cleverly coronation come into prospect
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 136,861
    edited May 6

    @Sweeney74 - no

    OT - in the case of all the party leaders, the real question is who would have higher ratings, if they replaced the leader.

    In the case of Labour, there are a couple of candidates. In the case of the Conservatives, who polls better?

    Replacing the leader, to do the same or worse, won’t happen in any party.

    Yes, I think if Burnham does replace Starmer before the next general election then Kemi may be in trouble as the Tories could fall to a poor third behind Reform and Labour. However that does not look likely while the NEC still blocks a Burnham come back to parliament, so as long as Starmer stays Labour leader and PM and Burnham is not an MP again Kemi should be safe
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 89,631
    Sandpit said:

    Kemi’s having a great week so far.

    Yes the elections will be difficult, but the big story will indeed be the Labour losses.

    The Guardian did her a big favour by pushing hard on the Farage story, to the extent that the BBC eventually gave it significant exposure, which they had been avoiding.
  • bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 20,949
    Sandpit said:

    Kemi’s having a great week so far.

    Yes the elections will be difficult, but the big story will indeed be the Labour losses.

    The counting is drawn out (from Thursday evening through to Saturday day), so there are a lot of headlines to fill. There will be space for more than one message. The biggest story will be Labour losses, but there will be room to talk about the Tories too (and Reform, the Greens, the LibDems, SNP and Plaid).
  • isamisam Posts: 44,230
    I saw a clip the other day of the last time Tottenham were relegated, under manager Keith Burkinshaw in the late seventies. Funny, I thought, he was the manager when they won the FA Cup in 81 8& 82, and the UEFA Cup in 84. You rarely see loyalty like that these days

    I like Kemi and would be disappointed if she were ousted. I also think it would be the wrong decision. The argument that she has them on lower VI than the GE is an easy one to make, but it applies to every other leader bar Farage as well; the market has been blown up by the TNT that is Reform and the Greens, but the best thing to do is wait for the dust to settle and plough on. Same goes for Sir Keir and Labour. We live in a disposable culture which is not necessarily healthy and it would be good if a couple of leaders suffered the hard times and came out the other side stronger
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 28,768
    Gareth of the Vale (@GarethoftheVale2 / @Garethofthevale or whatever moniker) has been doing some good articles recently, and I'm sure the Vale is lucky to have him. Here are some of them

    The "Challenge" series

    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2025/06/02/the-challenge-for-labour/
    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2025/06/12/the-challenge-for-plaid-cymru/
    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2025/06/21/the-challenge-for-reform-uk/
    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2025/07/11/the-challenge-for-the-liberal-democrats/
    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2025/07/22/challenge-for-the-snp/
    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2025/09/08/the-challenge-for-the-green-parties/
    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2025/09/20/the-challenge-for-the-conservatives/

    Other (2024)

    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2024/09/24/persepolis-now-looking-at-the-future-of-iran/
    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2024/10/15/the-butterfly-effect-bush-vs-gore-revisited/
    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2024/10/29/senatus-populusque-previewing-novembers-other-elections/
    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2024/11/25/trumped-why-the-democrats-lost-and-what-they-need-to-do-next/

    Other (2025)

    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2025/01/08/the-law-of-unintended-consequences/
    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2025/01/08/rebuild-copy-or-destroy-how-should-we-deal-with-our-cities-history/
    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2025/03/07/the-seventy-five-years-war-how-to-fix-israel-and-palestine/
    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2025/04/22/papa-dont-preach-looking-at-the-contenders-to-be-next-pope/
    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2025/10/03/analysing-the-september-2025-yougov-mrp/
    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2025/11/11/will-tactical-voting-stop-reform-im-not-convinced/
    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2025/11/19/the-first-cut-is-the-lightest/

    Other (2026)

    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2026/01/13/wipeout-in-wales-could-labour-get-0-seats-in-the-senedd/
    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2026/02/05/rage-against-the-machine-charting-the-rise-of-outsider-parties/
    https://www.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2026/04/15/knives-out-will-labour-mps-remove-sir-keir-starmer/
    https://www.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2026/05/06/noch-out-will-it-be-curtains-for-kemi/
  • Sweeney74Sweeney74 Posts: 635
    viewcode said:

    Sweeney74 said:

    anyone know a good location for public Holyrood Constituency odds/markets?

    @Sweeney74

    Oddschecker no, Befair Exchange no, Betfair Sportsbook no, PredictIt no, Smarkets no, Polymarket no, Kalshi no, SpreadEx no, Sporting index no, Ladbrokes YES, William Hill no, Paddypower no.

    https://www.ladbrokes.com/en/sports/event/politics/uk/scottish-politics/2026-scottish-parliamentary-election-constituency-betting/255351594/main-markets


    Thanks!

    Ladbrokes have Glasgow Kelvin & Maryhill as SNP (1/2), but suggestions that Greens are winning here (such as MiC's MRP). Greens at 6/4 looks value.
  • sladeslade Posts: 2,369
    Just come across this phrase in Robert Harris' Precipice ( Excellent book by the way) - "politics is merely a process of replacing one problem with another." Reminds me of "history is just one damned thing after another."
  • FF43FF43 Posts: 19,655
    Kemi Badenoch appears to be much more popular with Reform voters than her party is. Neither party nor leader are popular with anyone else. Which is perhaps not surprising given Badenoch's ideology is the same as Reform's.

    As long as she is more popular than the party she leads it does make sense to hang onto her in case Reform supporters get fed up with Farage.
  • JohnLilburneJohnLilburne Posts: 8,260

    maxh said:

    FPT:

    Roger said:

    nico67 said:

    Why does Polanski continue to dig a deeper hole for himself ?

    I think the vast majority of the public couldn’t care less if the perpetrator was kicked in the head . If you attempt to kill people then refuse to hand over the knife you get what you deserve !

    If I’m thinking this as a so called leftie liberal then I think Polanski has really scored a spectacular own goal !

    If the man is schitzophrenic and has no control over his actions isn't it better that we have authorities who still care about his safety? We could always do it the American way and just shoot him but surely if at all possible the other way must be better? It made me feel rather queasy just beating up and kicking someone who was clearly not in control of himself
    This is facile. In that situation there are a lot of people who deserve to have their safety cared about, not least the police themselves who were presumably at risk of being stabbed next.

    We can have a sensible discussion about motive, blame, punishment etc. But to argue that the police should have held back from whatever they needed to do to disarm him is to see only one tiny part of the picture of potential harms here.
    The authorities did show care for the perpetrator - instead of shooting him (most countries with routinely armed police) or destroying a grid square (America), the police tazered him, then gave him some kicks until he gave up the knife.

    He ended up in court with a few cuts and bruises. As opposed to dead, or dead along with random bystanders.
    They also didn't use their batons.
  • AnneJGPAnneJGP Posts: 5,444
    MaxPB said:

    Leon said:

    MaxPB said:

    Leon said:

    Seems to be pure anecdotage but might nonetheless be useful info for bettors:


    "The Polanski negative vibe shift is crazy. Just been chatting to some student baristas and they said their whole lecture group has totally gone off him and will now vote Labour or Reform. What's going on"

    https://x.com/landofangle/status/2051973132928344570?s=20

    It was questioning police tactics on stopping a terrorist attack that did it IMO. Everyone could see how scary that was for everyone involved and then to have a third rate politician question that has made people turn against that and start questioning all the other nonsense he's been spouting.
    Yes, and I saw a tweet from pollster Luke Tryl (I might try and find it later when less busy) making exactly your point. He said he'd done focus groups in the north (IIRC) and he was really surprised how much Golders Green had cut through, when other attacks don't. Perhaps BECAUSE we had that video of the attacker, after nearly butchering two Jews

    Any sane person understood exactly why the coppers did what they did, he still had the knife, he was still resisting, he had not surrendered after tasering, he was actively trying to kill people. In 99% of countries he'd have been shot dead at that point

    Only fools and anti-Semites found it questionable, Polanski is certainly in the first category, and proved it at that moment
    The way I see it, ordinary people empathise with the person being stabbed and worry about them. Polanski has shown us he's empathising with a potential terrorist and is worried about the rights of a perpetrator.

    For most people it's beyond the pale to advocate for someone who's just stabbed two people and put the blame on the police who for once did a good job under the circumstances to eliminate a threat before anyone died.

    It shows us one of two things, either Polanski has a completely empathy compass (probably true) or he's calculated that supporting a Muslim terrorist vs Jews will win him votes (maybe true). Either one shows he's unfit for office but as we've been discussing, many young women seem to let all of the facts wash over them and seem to want to put their own feel good factor first, right now voting for the greens makes them feel good about themselves. That may change over time but probably not in the short term.
    I doubt that someone completely empathy-focussed would have started his sentence with I was completely traumatised by ....
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 59,775
    Due to having fessed up to suffering from excessive boredom during the Local Election campaign, PB's resident flint-knapper @Leon was commissioned by CCHQ to knap the perfect sculpture of Kemi Badenoch! Finally able to take a break from knapping strangely shaped sex-toys, he accepted the work in a heartbeat, and got to sculpting the same day. It was arduous work, but he felt that, over the course of several weeks of almost continuous knapping, that he got it almost completely spot on with just a little bit more required.

    However, Leon had found that he had knapped so meticulously that his hands were thoroughly knackered and sore. He wondered about taking some time off in order to finish off his masterpiece at a later date. Kemi's office phoned him back reasonably promptly, but to Leon's horror, he was told in no uncertain terms that he would lose his fee if he stopped work!

    "Why?" asked Leon on the phone incredulously.

    "Simple!" Kemi's underling replied. "You're not entitled to any..." He paused for effect. "...Statue-Tory Sick Pay!"

    I thank you!

  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 23,193
    AnneJGP said:

    MaxPB said:

    Leon said:

    " rel="MaxPB">
    Leon said:

    Seems to be pure anecdotage but might nonetheless be useful info for bettors:


    "The Polanski negative vibe shift is crazy. Just been chatting to some student baristas and they said their whole lecture group has totally gone off him and will now vote Labour or Reform. What's going on"

    https://x.com/landofangle/status/2051973132928344570?s=20

    It was questioning police tactics on stopping a terrorist attack that did it IMO. Everyone could see how scary that was for everyone involved and then to have a third rate politician question that has made people turn against that and start questioning all the other nonsense he's been spouting.
    Yes, and I saw a tweet from pollster Luke Tryl (I might try and find it later when less busy) making exactly your point. He said he'd done focus groups in the north (IIRC) and he was really surprised how much Golders Green had cut through, when other attacks don't. Perhaps BECAUSE we had that video of the attacker, after nearly butchering two Jews

    Any sane person understood exactly why the coppers did what they did, he still had the knife, he was still resisting, he had not surrendered after tasering, he was actively trying to kill people. In 99% of countries he'd have been shot dead at that point

    Only fools and anti-Semites found it questionable, Polanski is certainly in the first category, and proved it at that moment
    The way I see it, ordinary people empathise with the person being stabbed and worry about them. Polanski has shown us he's empathising with a potential terrorist and is worried about the rights of a perpetrator.

    For most people it's beyond the pale to advocate for someone who's just stabbed two people and put the blame on the police who for once did a good job under the circumstances to eliminate a threat before anyone died.

    It shows us one of two things, either Polanski has a completely empathy compass (probably true) or he's calculated that supporting a Muslim terrorist vs Jews will win him votes (maybe true). Either one shows he's unfit for office but as we've been discussing, many young women seem to let all of the facts wash over them and seem to want to put their own feel good factor first, right now voting for the greens makes them feel good about themselves. That may change over time but probably not in the short term.
    I doubt that someone completely empathy-focussed would have started his sentence with I was completely traumatised by ....

    Relevant https://x.com/history99917180/status/2051972269463756934
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 72,364
    Steven Swinford
    @Steven_Swinford
    Zack Polanski is the most unpopular he has been since becoming Green leader in the wake of his intervention over the Golders Green stabbings, a YouGov poll has found

    Before that intervention - on 28-29 April - 39% of Britons held an unfavourable view of Polanski

    That has now risen to 47% based on polling conducted on 4-5 May
    https://x.com/Steven_Swinford/status/2052012588838293684

  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 136,861
    edited May 6
    FF43 said:

    Kemi Badenoch appears to be much more popular with Reform voters than her party is. Neither party nor leader are popular with anyone else. Which is perhaps not surprising given Badenoch's ideology is the same as Reform's.

    As long as she is more popular than the party she leads it does make sense to hang onto her in case Reform supporters get fed up with Farage.

    Cleverly does poll better with Labour voters though, -34% to -61% for Kemi and with LDs, -34% to -51% for Kemi and with Greens, -34% to -48% for Kemi.

    So if the Tories are not back in front of Reform by the time of the next general election, Cleverly could still be swapped for Kemi in order to squeeze Labour. LD and Green tactical votes for Tories in Tory held seats. Farage on -77% with Labour voters, -81% with LDs and -86% with Greens is still toxic for supporters of left and liberal voters and far more unpopular with them than Sir James, though less so relative to Kemi.

    For the moment though as you say Kemi has a positive rating with Reform and Tory voters, +18% and +54% respectively, while Cleverly is on -21% with Reform voters

    https://ygo-assets-websites-editorial-emea.yougov.net/documents/Internal_Favourability_260421.pdf
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 72,364
    edited May 6
    Just great. It seems the rat virus nightmare may now involve secondary infections.

    Let's hope that turns out not to be the case.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 89,631
    It's not all killer robots.

    Buddhist sect welcomes humanoid robot Gabi with precept ceremony

    https://www.koreatimes.co.kr/southkorea/society/20260506/buddhist-sect-welcomes-humanoid-robot-gabi-with-precept-ceremony
    Under a roof of paper lanterns strung across Jogye Temple in downtown Seoul, a group of monks from the Jogye Order, Korea's largest Buddhist sect, sat across from a postulant awaiting a precept ceremony — except that postulant was the country's first humanoid robot to take part in the ritual.

    Clad in humble black shoes and the Buddhist order's ceremonial gray and brown robe, the 1.3-meter-tall robot stood in front of Buddhist monks and nuns as it pledged to commit itself to Buddhism in the ceremony held Wednesday, ahead of Buddha's Birthday later this month.

    The robot folded its hands together and bowed to the monks officiating the ceremony, as one of the monks carefully hung a 108-bead rosary and attached a sticker instead of the original ritual where one has to slightly burn his arms near an incense stick.

    Will you devote yourself to the holy Buddha?" one of the monks asked.

    "Yes, I will devote myself," the robot replied in an audible voice.

    "Will you devote yourself to the holy teaching?" the monk asked.

    "Yes, I will devote myself," the robot answered.

    The monk then laid out five precepts, or common vows, for a Buddhist to live by that were altered for the robot.

    They included respecting life and not hurting it, not damaging other robots and objects, following humans and not talking back to them, not behaving or speaking in a deceptive manner, and saving energy and not overcharging...
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 63,526

    maxh said:

    FPT:

    Roger said:

    nico67 said:

    Why does Polanski continue to dig a deeper hole for himself ?

    I think the vast majority of the public couldn’t care less if the perpetrator was kicked in the head . If you attempt to kill people then refuse to hand over the knife you get what you deserve !

    If I’m thinking this as a so called leftie liberal then I think Polanski has really scored a spectacular own goal !

    If the man is schitzophrenic and has no control over his actions isn't it better that we have authorities who still care about his safety? We could always do it the American way and just shoot him but surely if at all possible the other way must be better? It made me feel rather queasy just beating up and kicking someone who was clearly not in control of himself
    This is facile. In that situation there are a lot of people who deserve to have their safety cared about, not least the police themselves who were presumably at risk of being stabbed next.

    We can have a sensible discussion about motive, blame, punishment etc. But to argue that the police should have held back from whatever they needed to do to disarm him is to see only one tiny part of the picture of potential harms here.
    The authorities did show care for the perpetrator - instead of shooting him (most countries with routinely armed police) or destroying a grid square (America), the police tazered him, then gave him some kicks until he gave up the knife.

    He ended up in court with a few cuts and bruises. As opposed to dead, or dead along with random bystanders.
    They also didn't use their batons.
    Baton strikes to the head could easily have been lethal. See a number of cases in the US.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 64,490
    edited May 6
    MaxPB said:

    Leon said:

    MaxPB said:

    Leon said:

    Seems to be pure anecdotage but might nonetheless be useful info for bettors:


    "The Polanski negative vibe shift is crazy. Just been chatting to some student baristas and they said their whole lecture group has totally gone off him and will now vote Labour or Reform. What's going on"

    https://x.com/landofangle/status/2051973132928344570?s=20

    It was questioning police tactics on stopping a terrorist attack that did it IMO. Everyone could see how scary that was for everyone involved and then to have a third rate politician question that has made people turn against that and start questioning all the other nonsense he's been spouting.
    Yes, and I saw a tweet from pollster Luke Tryl (I might try and find it later when less busy) making exactly your point. He said he'd done focus groups in the north (IIRC) and he was really surprised how much Golders Green had cut through, when other attacks don't. Perhaps BECAUSE we had that video of the attacker, after nearly butchering two Jews

    Any sane person understood exactly why the coppers did what they did, he still had the knife, he was still resisting, he had not surrendered after tasering, he was actively trying to kill people. In 99% of countries he'd have been shot dead at that point

    Only fools and anti-Semites found it questionable, Polanski is certainly in the first category, and proved it at that moment
    The way I see it, ordinary people empathise with the person being stabbed and worry about them. Polanski has shown us he's empathising with a potential terrorist and is worried about the rights of a perpetrator.

    For most people it's beyond the pale to advocate for someone who's just stabbed two people and put the blame on the police who for once did a good job under the circumstances to eliminate a threat before anyone died.

    It shows us one of two things, either Polanski has a completely empathy compass (probably true) or he's calculated that supporting a Muslim terrorist vs Jews will win him votes (maybe true). Either one shows he's unfit for office but as we've been discussing, many young women seem to let all of the facts wash over them and seem to want to put their own feel good factor first, right now voting for the greens makes them feel good about themselves. That may change over time but probably not in the short term.
    Leaving aside the question of motivation, the man who was getting kicked still had the knife, no?

    This isn't a case of someone on the ground, unarmed and defenceless, being beaten to a pulp by police.

    Now, if they had kept beating him after he was disarmed, then we could have a discussion about this. And, certainly, the police shouldn't use more force than is necessary. But this doesn't seem to be one of those cases where the police have a case to answer: it was a volatile, mentally ill, armed man who needed to be disarmed and restrained before he could hurt others.
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 41,579

    Just great. It seems the rat virus nightmare may now involve secondary infections.

    Let's hope that turns out not to be the case.

    Well at least they're all on one boat.
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 63,526
    edited May 6
    FPT

    https://x.com/JackElsom/status/2051944339002003618

    Zack Polanski wrongly claimed on @BBCr4today that the Golders Green suspect was "handcuffed" when he was kicked by officers.

    That's simply not right... his hands were free and he was holding a knife!

    Polanski to Nick Robinson: "I was traumatised by seeing someone handcuffed and repeatedly kicked in the head”.

    Lying arse needs to be called out constantly.
    Polanski was traumatised by what he *thought he saw*

    As Professor R L Gregory pointed out, in his excellent books on the eye and the brain, much of what we perceive is heavily edited by the brain. This is often how optical illusions work.

    In this case Zack wanted to see (subconsciously) police brutality. So his internal LLM did the job for him.

    It’s probably punching down to insist he uses objective facts. That would traumatise him further.

  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 64,490
    Nigelb said:

    This is a bit awkward for the Thatcherite economists.

    Britain has eight big North European neighbours.
    Of them Britain has,
    1/ The weakest economy.
    2/ The lowest taxes.
    3/ The lowest marginal tax rate on labour at high incomes.
    The right should be less confident sneering at the idea of "taxing for growth".

    https://x.com/thomasforth/status/2051763318222659963

    The main takeaway from that is that smaller countries are more efficiently run.
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 26,293
    Nigelb said:

    This is a bit awkward for the Thatcherite economists.

    Britain has eight big North European neighbours.
    Of them Britain has,
    1/ The weakest economy.
    2/ The lowest taxes.
    3/ The lowest marginal tax rate on labour at high incomes.
    The right should be less confident sneering at the idea of "taxing for growth".

    https://x.com/thomasforth/status/2051763318222659963

    LOL

    You think UK has a Thatcherite economy ?
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 50,691
    IMO Kemi Badenoch is almost certain to lead into the next GE whereas Keir Starmer is almost certain not to. But both me and my book hope he will survive this year.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 59,853
    Nigelb said:

    This is a bit awkward for the Thatcherite economists.

    Britain has eight big North European neighbours.
    Of them Britain has,
    1/ The weakest economy.
    2/ The lowest taxes.
    3/ The lowest marginal tax rate on labour at high incomes.
    The right should be less confident sneering at the idea of "taxing for growth".

    https://x.com/thomasforth/status/2051763318222659963

    It's a stretch to call the Netherlands a big neighbour, let alone Norway and Denmark. France and Germany are the only really comparable economies on the list.
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 59,775

    FPT

    https://x.com/JackElsom/status/2051944339002003618

    Zack Polanski wrongly claimed on @BBCr4today that the Golders Green suspect was "handcuffed" when he was kicked by officers.

    That's simply not right... his hands were free and he was holding a knife!

    Polanski to Nick Robinson: "I was traumatised by seeing someone handcuffed and repeatedly kicked in the head”.

    Lying arse needs to be called out constantly.
    Polanski was traumatised by what he *thought he saw*

    As Professor R L Gregory pointed out, in his excellent books on the eye and the brain, much of what we perceive is heavily edited by the brain. This is often how optical illusions work.

    In this case Zack wanted to see (subconsciously) police brutality. So his internal LLM did the job for him.

    It’s probably punching down to insist he uses objective facts. That would traumatise him further.

    "You see, but you do not observe." - Sherlock Holmes.
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 72,144
    Good thread

    I support Kemi because she is the best the conservatives have and it is undeniable she has improved her ratings and is being noticed

    As with all leaders, she has her faults but is refeshing and should be given the time to change the brand

    As for Cleverly he had his chance and sabotaged it all by himself !!!!

    Furthermore, he is yestedays news and if anyone is looking for successors to Kemi than one from Claire Coutinho, Laura Trott and Katie Lam are far more likely - the world has suffered from too many men in positions of power

  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 72,364
    MaxPB said:

    Just great. It seems the rat virus nightmare may now involve secondary infections.

    Let's hope that turns out not to be the case.

    Well at least they're all on one boat.
    Two left, one of whom has died.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 59,853
    rcs1000 said:

    Nigelb said:

    This is a bit awkward for the Thatcherite economists.

    Britain has eight big North European neighbours.
    Of them Britain has,
    1/ The weakest economy.
    2/ The lowest taxes.
    3/ The lowest marginal tax rate on labour at high incomes.
    The right should be less confident sneering at the idea of "taxing for growth".

    https://x.com/thomasforth/status/2051763318222659963

    The main takeaway from that is that smaller countries are more efficiently run.
    More efficiently run or disproportionately benefit from the larger countries enforcing rules (particularly on themselves)?
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 28,768
    Nigelb said:

    It's not all killer robots.

    Buddhist sect welcomes humanoid robot Gabi with precept ceremony

    https://www.koreatimes.co.kr/southkorea/society/20260506/buddhist-sect-welcomes-humanoid-robot-gabi-with-precept-ceremony
    Under a roof of paper lanterns strung across Jogye Temple in downtown Seoul, a group of monks from the Jogye Order, Korea's largest Buddhist sect, sat across from a postulant awaiting a precept ceremony — except that postulant was the country's first humanoid robot to take part in the ritual.

    Clad in humble black shoes and the Buddhist order's ceremonial gray and brown robe, the 1.3-meter-tall robot stood in front of Buddhist monks and nuns as it pledged to commit itself to Buddhism in the ceremony held Wednesday, ahead of Buddha's Birthday later this month.

    The robot folded its hands together and bowed to the monks officiating the ceremony, as one of the monks carefully hung a 108-bead rosary and attached a sticker instead of the original ritual where one has to slightly burn his arms near an incense stick.

    Will you devote yourself to the holy Buddha?" one of the monks asked.

    "Yes, I will devote myself," the robot replied in an audible voice.

    "Will you devote yourself to the holy teaching?" the monk asked.

    "Yes, I will devote myself," the robot answered.

    The monk then laid out five precepts, or common vows, for a Buddhist to live by that were altered for the robot.

    They included respecting life and not hurting it, not damaging other robots and objects, following humans and not talking back to them, not behaving or speaking in a deceptive manner, and saving energy and not overcharging...

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Laws_of_Robotics
  • Sweeney74Sweeney74 Posts: 635

    Good thread

    I support Kemi because she is the best the conservatives have and it is undeniable she has improved her ratings and is being noticed

    As with all leaders, she has her faults but is refeshing and should be given the time to change the brand

    As for Cleverly he had his chance and sabotaged it all by himself !!!!

    Furthermore, he is yestedays news and if anyone is looking for successors to Kemi than one from Claire Coutinho, Laura Trott and Katie Lam are far more likely - the world has suffered from too many men in positions of power

    Agreed, Cleverly is not the answer. Not even the right question.
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 35,223
    Nigelb said:

    This is a bit awkward for the Thatcherite economists.

    Britain has eight big North European neighbours.
    Of them Britain has,
    1/ The weakest economy.
    2/ The lowest taxes.
    3/ The lowest marginal tax rate on labour at high incomes.
    The right should be less confident sneering at the idea of "taxing for growth".

    https://x.com/thomasforth/status/2051763318222659963

    You regard this as a piece of analysis do you?
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 64,490

    rcs1000 said:

    Nigelb said:

    This is a bit awkward for the Thatcherite economists.

    Britain has eight big North European neighbours.
    Of them Britain has,
    1/ The weakest economy.
    2/ The lowest taxes.
    3/ The lowest marginal tax rate on labour at high incomes.
    The right should be less confident sneering at the idea of "taxing for growth".

    https://x.com/thomasforth/status/2051763318222659963

    The main takeaway from that is that smaller countries are more efficiently run.
    More efficiently run or disproportionately benefit from the larger countries enforcing rules (particularly on themselves)?
    Actually, I think it's something subtly different.

    Large countries try to bake in resilience. So, they'll have a plan for diversified energy generation, for example. Or they'll have a big army or navy to defend their interests overseas.

    Small countries can't afford to do that.

    The smaller countries, therefore, end up with greater volatility, but higher growth.

    The greatest examples of all of this are places like Hong Kong. When the wind blows the wrong way, boy do they hurt. But over time it's the right strategy.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 136,861

    Good thread

    I support Kemi because she is the best the conservatives have and it is undeniable she has improved her ratings and is being noticed

    As with all leaders, she has her faults but is refeshing and should be given the time to change the brand

    As for Cleverly he had his chance and sabotaged it all by himself !!!!

    Furthermore, he is yestedays news and if anyone is looking for successors to Kemi than one from Claire Coutinho, Laura Trott and Katie Lam are far more likely - the world has suffered from too many men in positions of power

    Lam is just Jenrick in a skirt, nobody has heard of Trott or Countinho beyond political obsessives.

    If the Tories are still trailing Reform by the next GE it would be former Home Secretary and Foreign Secretary with appeal to tactical anti Reform Labour and LD voters Sir James Tory MPs would turn to not any of those 3
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 136,861
    Nigelb said:

    This is a bit awkward for the Thatcherite economists.

    Britain has eight big North European neighbours.
    Of them Britain has,
    1/ The weakest economy.
    2/ The lowest taxes.
    3/ The lowest marginal tax rate on labour at high incomes.
    The right should be less confident sneering at the idea of "taxing for growth".

    https://x.com/thomasforth/status/2051763318222659963

    Try Switzerland, even lower taxes than the UK and higher gdp per capita than all those 8
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 72,144
    edited May 6
    HYUFD said:

    Good thread

    I support Kemi because she is the best the conservatives have and it is undeniable she has improved her ratings and is being noticed

    As with all leaders, she has her faults but is refeshing and should be given the time to change the brand

    As for Cleverly he had his chance and sabotaged it all by himself !!!!

    Furthermore, he is yestedays news and if anyone is looking for successors to Kemi than one from Claire Coutinho, Laura Trott and Katie Lam are far more likely - the world has suffered from too many men in positions of power

    Lam is just Jenrick in a skirt, nobody has heard of Trott or Countinho beyond political obsessives.

    If the Tories are still trailing Reform by the next GE it would be former Home Secretary and Foreign Secretary with appeal to tactical anti Reform Labour and LD voters Sir James Tory MPs would turn to not any of those 3
    Yesterdays news

    Cleverly best chance is London mayor vote

  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 64,490
    edited May 6
    HYUFD said:

    Nigelb said:

    This is a bit awkward for the Thatcherite economists.

    Britain has eight big North European neighbours.
    Of them Britain has,
    1/ The weakest economy.
    2/ The lowest taxes.
    3/ The lowest marginal tax rate on labour at high incomes.
    The right should be less confident sneering at the idea of "taxing for growth".

    https://x.com/thomasforth/status/2051763318222659963

    Try Switzerland, even lower taxes than the UK and higher gdp per capita than all those 8
    But it's also a disturbingly highly regulated country (outside of banking).
  • BatteryCorrectHorseBatteryCorrectHorse Posts: 7,128
    @rcs1000 are you planning to resolve the frequent site down errors please?
  • maxhmaxh Posts: 2,033
    edited May 6
    Cookie said:

    AnneJGP said:

    MaxPB said:

    Leon said:

    " rel="MaxPB">
    Leon said:

    Seems to be pure anecdotage but might nonetheless be useful info for bettors:


    "The Polanski negative vibe shift is crazy. Just been chatting to some student baristas and they said their whole lecture group has totally gone off him and will now vote Labour or Reform. What's going on"

    https://x.com/landofangle/status/2051973132928344570?s=20

    It was questioning police tactics on stopping a terrorist attack that did it IMO. Everyone could see how scary that was for everyone involved and then to have a third rate politician question that has made people turn against that and start questioning all the other nonsense he's been spouting.
    Yes, and I saw a tweet from pollster Luke Tryl (I might try and find it later when less busy) making exactly your point. He said he'd done focus groups in the north (IIRC) and he was really surprised how much Golders Green had cut through, when other attacks don't. Perhaps BECAUSE we had that video of the attacker, after nearly butchering two Jews

    Any sane person understood exactly why the coppers did what they did, he still had the knife, he was still resisting, he had not surrendered after tasering, he was actively trying to kill people. In 99% of countries he'd have been shot dead at that point

    Only fools and anti-Semites found it questionable, Polanski is certainly in the first category, and proved it at that moment
    The way I see it, ordinary people empathise with the person being stabbed and worry about them. Polanski has shown us he's empathising with a potential terrorist and is worried about the rights of a perpetrator.

    For most people it's beyond the pale to advocate for someone who's just stabbed two people and put the blame on the police who for once did a good job under the circumstances to eliminate a threat before anyone died.

    It shows us one of two things, either Polanski has a completely empathy compass (probably true) or he's calculated that supporting a Muslim terrorist vs Jews will win him votes (maybe true). Either one shows he's unfit for office but as we've been discussing, many young women seem to let all of the facts wash over them and seem to want to put their own feel good factor first, right now voting for the greens makes them feel good about themselves. That may change over time but probably not in the short term.
    I doubt that someone completely empathy-focussed would have started his sentence with I was completely traumatised by ....
    Relevant https://x.com/history99917180/status/2051972269463756934
    Aside from anything else, it massively trivialises the word 'traumatised'.

    "I was traumatised by seeing my comrades lying dead round me after the shell hit, their bodies still twitching" - seems the right sort of level. Or else "I was traumatised by years of abuse, never knowing what mood he was going to be in when I got home".

    "I was traumatised by seeing something I think I saw on telly, but it turns out I just hallucinated something which met my political prejudices" is not an adequate use of the word.

    ETA: quotes a bit broken, my response to Cookie below.

    Completely agree. That and the 35k likes per minute on Bluesky suggests Polanski is a disappointing caricature of the very online left.

    What's wrong with: 'It was a pretty uncomfortable watch that at first sight appeared to echo some of the heavy handed law enforcement tactics seen elsewhere. Having fully analysed the situation and considered the alternative actions the police and attacker may have taken, I am delighted he is still alive to face the consequences of his actions and the treatment he needs.'
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 59,853
    HYUFD said:

    Good thread

    I support Kemi because she is the best the conservatives have and it is undeniable she has improved her ratings and is being noticed

    As with all leaders, she has her faults but is refeshing and should be given the time to change the brand

    As for Cleverly he had his chance and sabotaged it all by himself !!!!

    Furthermore, he is yestedays news and if anyone is looking for successors to Kemi than one from Claire Coutinho, Laura Trott and Katie Lam are far more likely - the world has suffered from too many men in positions of power

    Lam is just Jenrick in a skirt, nobody has heard of Trott or Countinho beyond political obsessives.

    If the Tories are still trailing Reform by the next GE it would be former Home Secretary and Foreign Secretary with appeal to tactical anti Reform Labour and LD voters Sir James Tory MPs would turn to not any of those 3
    Cleverly's polling during the last leadership election was terrible for someone who had been Home Secretary and Foreign Secretary, and what support he did have was quite male biased.

    https://deltapoll.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Deltapoll-Conservative-leadership-241007.pdf
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 136,861
    edited May 6

    HYUFD said:

    Good thread

    I support Kemi because she is the best the conservatives have and it is undeniable she has improved her ratings and is being noticed

    As with all leaders, she has her faults but is refeshing and should be given the time to change the brand

    As for Cleverly he had his chance and sabotaged it all by himself !!!!

    Furthermore, he is yestedays news and if anyone is looking for successors to Kemi than one from Claire Coutinho, Laura Trott and Katie Lam are far more likely - the world has suffered from too many men in positions of power

    Lam is just Jenrick in a skirt, nobody has heard of Trott or Countinho beyond political obsessives.

    If the Tories are still trailing Reform by the next GE it would be former Home Secretary and Foreign Secretary with appeal to tactical anti Reform Labour and LD voters Sir James Tory MPs would turn to not any of those 3
    Cleverly's polling during the last leadership election was terrible for someone who had been Home Secretary and Foreign Secretary, and what support he did have was quite male biased.

    https://deltapoll.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Deltapoll-Conservative-leadership-241007.pdf
    On that poll Cleverly led with Tory voters, Labour voters and was tied with Kemi with Reform voters, while trailing Tugendhat with LDs. Hardly terrible
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 50,691

    Nigelb said:

    This is a bit awkward for the Thatcherite economists.

    Britain has eight big North European neighbours.
    Of them Britain has,
    1/ The weakest economy.
    2/ The lowest taxes.
    3/ The lowest marginal tax rate on labour at high incomes.
    The right should be less confident sneering at the idea of "taxing for growth".

    https://x.com/thomasforth/status/2051763318222659963

    You regard this as a piece of analysis do you?
    It's merely a counter to the hackneyed chant of "you can't tax your way to growth".
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 36,342
    MaxPB said:

    maxh said:

    FPT:

    Roger said:

    nico67 said:

    Why does Polanski continue to dig a deeper hole for himself ?

    I think the vast majority of the public couldn’t care less if the perpetrator was kicked in the head . If you attempt to kill people then refuse to hand over the knife you get what you deserve !

    If I’m thinking this as a so called leftie liberal then I think Polanski has really scored a spectacular own goal !

    If the man is schitzophrenic and has no control over his actions isn't it better that we have authorities who still care about his safety? We could always do it the American way and just shoot him but surely if at all possible the other way must be better? It made me feel rather queasy just beating up and kicking someone who was clearly not in control of himself
    This is facile. In that situation there are a lot of people who deserve to have their safety cared about, not least the police themselves who were presumably at risk of being stabbed next.

    We can have a sensible discussion about motive, blame, punishment etc. But to argue that the police should have held back from whatever they needed to do to disarm him is to see only one tiny part of the picture of potential harms here.
    I can just imagine the scene, a terrorist is on a stabbing spree in a train station, pc plod turns up and instead of rushing to disarm him they get on the megaphone and ask "are you a schizo?"

    Some people just don't live in the real world, Roger is one of them. I think sometimes he's still on the set of that Lebanese advert with bikini clad women singing this praises hoping for a passport.
    Here are the three police head-kick lines I have heard. I do not know that any has taken off.

    1) the stabber was on the ground and had been tasered
    2) possibly the reason he did not let go of the knife was the taser meant his knife-holding muscles were in spasm
    3) authorities were too quick to play up the antisemitism angle and ignored that he'd stabbed a Muslim man the same day

    As well as the pro-police lines already mentioned, it has also been suggested the head-kicking coppers feared he had a suicide bomb.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 136,861
    edited May 6

    HYUFD said:

    Good thread

    I support Kemi because she is the best the conservatives have and it is undeniable she has improved her ratings and is being noticed

    As with all leaders, she has her faults but is refeshing and should be given the time to change the brand

    As for Cleverly he had his chance and sabotaged it all by himself !!!!

    Furthermore, he is yestedays news and if anyone is looking for successors to Kemi than one from Claire Coutinho, Laura Trott and Katie Lam are far more likely - the world has suffered from too many men in positions of power

    Lam is just Jenrick in a skirt, nobody has heard of Trott or Countinho beyond political obsessives.

    If the Tories are still trailing Reform by the next GE it would be former Home Secretary and Foreign Secretary with appeal to tactical anti Reform Labour and LD voters Sir James Tory MPs would turn to not any of those 3
    Yesterdays news

    Cleverly best chance is London mayor vote

    An election not for 2 years and Seb Coe also being lined up for the Tory nomination too
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 72,144
    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    Good thread

    I support Kemi because she is the best the conservatives have and it is undeniable she has improved her ratings and is being noticed

    As with all leaders, she has her faults but is refeshing and should be given the time to change the brand

    As for Cleverly he had his chance and sabotaged it all by himself !!!!

    Furthermore, he is yestedays news and if anyone is looking for successors to Kemi than one from Claire Coutinho, Laura Trott and Katie Lam are far more likely - the world has suffered from too many men in positions of power

    Lam is just Jenrick in a skirt, nobody has heard of Trott or Countinho beyond political obsessives.

    If the Tories are still trailing Reform by the next GE it would be former Home Secretary and Foreign Secretary with appeal to tactical anti Reform Labour and LD voters Sir James Tory MPs would turn to not any of those 3
    Cleverly's polling during the last leadership election was terrible for someone who had been Home Secretary and Foreign Secretary, and what support he did have was quite male biased.

    https://deltapoll.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Deltapoll-Conservative-leadership-241007.pdf
    On that poll Cleverly led with Tory voters, Labour voters and was tied with Kemi with Reform voters, while trailing Tugendhat with LDs. Hardly terrible
    Quoting an October 2024 poll is outdated and irrelevant
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 136,861

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    Good thread

    I support Kemi because she is the best the conservatives have and it is undeniable she has improved her ratings and is being noticed

    As with all leaders, she has her faults but is refeshing and should be given the time to change the brand

    As for Cleverly he had his chance and sabotaged it all by himself !!!!

    Furthermore, he is yestedays news and if anyone is looking for successors to Kemi than one from Claire Coutinho, Laura Trott and Katie Lam are far more likely - the world has suffered from too many men in positions of power

    Lam is just Jenrick in a skirt, nobody has heard of Trott or Countinho beyond political obsessives.

    If the Tories are still trailing Reform by the next GE it would be former Home Secretary and Foreign Secretary with appeal to tactical anti Reform Labour and LD voters Sir James Tory MPs would turn to not any of those 3
    Cleverly's polling during the last leadership election was terrible for someone who had been Home Secretary and Foreign Secretary, and what support he did have was quite male biased.

    https://deltapoll.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Deltapoll-Conservative-leadership-241007.pdf
    On that poll Cleverly led with Tory voters, Labour voters and was tied with Kemi with Reform voters, while trailing Tugendhat with LDs. Hardly terrible
    Quoting an October 2024 poll is outdated and irrelevant
    Even now the April 2026 poll as I said showed Cleverly polled better than Kemi with Labour and LD and Green voters, though Kemi clearly outpolled Cleverly with Reform voters
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 64,490

    @rcs1000 are you planning to resolve the frequent site down errors please?

    Is the problem with posting (as some people have) or with viewing the main site.

    I'm planning a server migration this weekend, which will hopefully solve the posting issue.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 64,490

    MaxPB said:

    maxh said:

    FPT:

    Roger said:

    nico67 said:

    Why does Polanski continue to dig a deeper hole for himself ?

    I think the vast majority of the public couldn’t care less if the perpetrator was kicked in the head . If you attempt to kill people then refuse to hand over the knife you get what you deserve !

    If I’m thinking this as a so called leftie liberal then I think Polanski has really scored a spectacular own goal !

    If the man is schitzophrenic and has no control over his actions isn't it better that we have authorities who still care about his safety? We could always do it the American way and just shoot him but surely if at all possible the other way must be better? It made me feel rather queasy just beating up and kicking someone who was clearly not in control of himself
    This is facile. In that situation there are a lot of people who deserve to have their safety cared about, not least the police themselves who were presumably at risk of being stabbed next.

    We can have a sensible discussion about motive, blame, punishment etc. But to argue that the police should have held back from whatever they needed to do to disarm him is to see only one tiny part of the picture of potential harms here.
    I can just imagine the scene, a terrorist is on a stabbing spree in a train station, pc plod turns up and instead of rushing to disarm him they get on the megaphone and ask "are you a schizo?"

    Some people just don't live in the real world, Roger is one of them. I think sometimes he's still on the set of that Lebanese advert with bikini clad women singing this praises hoping for a passport.
    Here are the three police head-kick lines I have heard. I do not know that any has taken off.

    1) the stabber was on the ground and had been tasered
    2) possibly the reason he did not let go of the knife was the taser meant his knife-holding muscles were in spasm
    3) authorities were too quick to play up the antisemitism angle and ignored that he'd stabbed a Muslim man the same day

    As well as the pro-police lines already mentioned, it has also been suggested the head-kicking coppers feared he had a suicide bomb.
    You don't know why someone has not let go of the knife. You only know that the person still has the weapon and therefore continues to be a danger.

    Now, in an ideal world, you probably kick the knife out of the attacker's hands. But this isn't an ideal world: it's a guy with a knife whose stabbed people, and you want to disarm him as soon as possible (while opening yourself up to as little risk as possible).
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 59,853
    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    Good thread

    I support Kemi because she is the best the conservatives have and it is undeniable she has improved her ratings and is being noticed

    As with all leaders, she has her faults but is refeshing and should be given the time to change the brand

    As for Cleverly he had his chance and sabotaged it all by himself !!!!

    Furthermore, he is yestedays news and if anyone is looking for successors to Kemi than one from Claire Coutinho, Laura Trott and Katie Lam are far more likely - the world has suffered from too many men in positions of power

    Lam is just Jenrick in a skirt, nobody has heard of Trott or Countinho beyond political obsessives.

    If the Tories are still trailing Reform by the next GE it would be former Home Secretary and Foreign Secretary with appeal to tactical anti Reform Labour and LD voters Sir James Tory MPs would turn to not any of those 3
    Cleverly's polling during the last leadership election was terrible for someone who had been Home Secretary and Foreign Secretary, and what support he did have was quite male biased.

    https://deltapoll.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Deltapoll-Conservative-leadership-241007.pdf
    On that poll Cleverly led with Tory voters, Labour voters and was tied with Kemi with Reform voters, while trailing Tugendhat with LDs. Hardly terrible
    Quoting an October 2024 poll is outdated and irrelevant
    Even now the April 2026 poll as I said showed Cleverly polled better than Kemi with Labour and LD and Green voters, though Kemi clearly outpolled Cleverly with Reform voters
    On the poll you quoted, Cleverly has lower a total favourable number among Labour and LD voters than Kemi. It's only the higher number of don't knows that flatters his headline figure.
  • LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 24,198
    Sweeney74 said:

    maxh said:

    Sweeney74 said:

    Well the Tory Party is an absolute monarchy moderated by regicide.

    Look at the bar chart in this header.

    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2026/02/09/one-party-has-form-for-ousting-leaders-the-other-less-so/

    what are the odds on KB being ousted before SKS?
    The Tories would be fools to do so in my view. The party brand is the problem, not their leader. Ousting her only reminds the public of the nadir of the party.
    I agree. The Tory problem is structural, not Badenoch. The brand is still toxic, Reform is eating their right flank, the LDs are strong in their old southern hunting grounds, and voters have not yet forgotten the last government.

    Changing leader now risks reminding the public of the exact chaos they voted against. The counterpoint is that Tory MPs have spent the last decade mistaking leadership changes for strategy, so “fools to do so” is not exactly a disqualifying condition.
    The other factor is that Tory MPs have reason to panic. The polls currently point to them losing more seats at the next general election and falling way behind Reform. The future existence of the party is at stake.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 64,490
    kinabalu said:

    Nigelb said:

    This is a bit awkward for the Thatcherite economists.

    Britain has eight big North European neighbours.
    Of them Britain has,
    1/ The weakest economy.
    2/ The lowest taxes.
    3/ The lowest marginal tax rate on labour at high incomes.
    The right should be less confident sneering at the idea of "taxing for growth".

    https://x.com/thomasforth/status/2051763318222659963

    You regard this as a piece of analysis do you?
    It's merely a counter to the hackneyed chant of "you can't tax your way to growth".
    Growth is complicated.

    And a lot of things that were once tailwinds to growth -like falling birthrates and increased life expectancy- are now headwinds. And at the same time, we (as in the developed world) are no longer the only purchasers of raw materials; now we need to compete with China, India and a host of other rapidly developing nations. That means we're paying more for commodities at the same time that every worker is supporting more and more retirees.

    If there were easy answers, then politicians would have already implemented them.
  • BattlebusBattlebus Posts: 3,244
    rcs1000 said:

    kinabalu said:

    Nigelb said:

    This is a bit awkward for the Thatcherite economists.

    Britain has eight big North European neighbours.
    Of them Britain has,
    1/ The weakest economy.
    2/ The lowest taxes.
    3/ The lowest marginal tax rate on labour at high incomes.
    The right should be less confident sneering at the idea of "taxing for growth".

    https://x.com/thomasforth/status/2051763318222659963

    You regard this as a piece of analysis do you?
    It's merely a counter to the hackneyed chant of "you can't tax your way to growth".
    Growth is complicated.

    And a lot of things that were once tailwinds to growth -like falling birthrates and increased life expectancy- are now headwinds. And at the same time, we (as in the developed world) are no longer the only purchasers of raw materials; now we need to compete with China, India and a host of other rapidly developing nations. That means we're paying more for commodities at the same time that every worker is supporting more and more retirees.

    If there were easy answers, then politicians would have already implemented them.
    Doesn't stop them offering easy answers and the public believing them.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 136,861

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    Good thread

    I support Kemi because she is the best the conservatives have and it is undeniable she has improved her ratings and is being noticed

    As with all leaders, she has her faults but is refeshing and should be given the time to change the brand

    As for Cleverly he had his chance and sabotaged it all by himself !!!!

    Furthermore, he is yestedays news and if anyone is looking for successors to Kemi than one from Claire Coutinho, Laura Trott and Katie Lam are far more likely - the world has suffered from too many men in positions of power

    Lam is just Jenrick in a skirt, nobody has heard of Trott or Countinho beyond political obsessives.

    If the Tories are still trailing Reform by the next GE it would be former Home Secretary and Foreign Secretary with appeal to tactical anti Reform Labour and LD voters Sir James Tory MPs would turn to not any of those 3
    Cleverly's polling during the last leadership election was terrible for someone who had been Home Secretary and Foreign Secretary, and what support he did have was quite male biased.

    https://deltapoll.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Deltapoll-Conservative-leadership-241007.pdf
    On that poll Cleverly led with Tory voters, Labour voters and was tied with Kemi with Reform voters, while trailing Tugendhat with LDs. Hardly terrible
    Quoting an October 2024 poll is outdated and irrelevant
    Even now the April 2026 poll as I said showed Cleverly polled better than Kemi with Labour and LD and Green voters, though Kemi clearly outpolled Cleverly with Reform voters
    On the poll you quoted, Cleverly has lower a total favourable number among Labour and LD voters than Kemi. It's only the higher number of don't knows that flatters his headline figure.
    Kemi has far higher negative ratings with Labour and LD voters than Cleverly on that poll
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 136,861

    Sweeney74 said:

    maxh said:

    Sweeney74 said:

    Well the Tory Party is an absolute monarchy moderated by regicide.

    Look at the bar chart in this header.

    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2026/02/09/one-party-has-form-for-ousting-leaders-the-other-less-so/

    what are the odds on KB being ousted before SKS?
    The Tories would be fools to do so in my view. The party brand is the problem, not their leader. Ousting her only reminds the public of the nadir of the party.
    I agree. The Tory problem is structural, not Badenoch. The brand is still toxic, Reform is eating their right flank, the LDs are strong in their old southern hunting grounds, and voters have not yet forgotten the last government.

    Changing leader now risks reminding the public of the exact chaos they voted against. The counterpoint is that Tory MPs have spent the last decade mistaking leadership changes for strategy, so “fools to do so” is not exactly a disqualifying condition.
    The other factor is that Tory MPs have reason to panic. The polls currently point to them losing more seats at the next general election and falling way behind Reform. The future existence of the party is at stake.
    Which is why if Kemi has not reovertaken Reform by the next general election a switch to Cleverly is likely, if only as he is more likely to get Labour and LD tactical votes for Tory MPs against Reform than she is
  • carnforthcarnforth Posts: 9,233
    edited May 6
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1k2jnx8gmlo

    Ted Turner - Mr CNN and Mr Jane Fonda, dead at 87.
  • TazTaz Posts: 28,133
    carnforth said:

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1k2jnx8gmlo

    Ted Turner - Mr CNN and Mrs Jane Fonda, dead at 87.

    One of the most influential people when it comes to pro wrestling in the last fifty years and it’s something he would have little interest in.

    RIP Ted, and god bless WCW and thank you.
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 46,466
    rcs1000 said:

    @rcs1000 are you planning to resolve the frequent site down errors please?

    Is the problem with posting (as some people have) or with viewing the main site.

    I'm planning a server migration this weekend, which will hopefully solve the posting issue.
    Not had any issues at all, they need to buy decent hardware
  • MelonBMelonB Posts: 17,363
    Battlebus said:

    rcs1000 said:

    kinabalu said:

    Nigelb said:

    This is a bit awkward for the Thatcherite economists.

    Britain has eight big North European neighbours.
    Of them Britain has,
    1/ The weakest economy.
    2/ The lowest taxes.
    3/ The lowest marginal tax rate on labour at high incomes.
    The right should be less confident sneering at the idea of "taxing for growth".

    https://x.com/thomasforth/status/2051763318222659963

    You regard this as a piece of analysis do you?
    It's merely a counter to the hackneyed chant of "you can't tax your way to growth".
    Growth is complicated.

    And a lot of things that were once tailwinds to growth -like falling birthrates and increased life expectancy- are now headwinds. And at the same time, we (as in the developed world) are no longer the only purchasers of raw materials; now we need to compete with China, India and a host of other rapidly developing nations. That means we're paying more for commodities at the same time that every worker is supporting more and more retirees.

    If there were easy answers, then politicians would have already implemented them.
    Doesn't stop them offering easy answers and the public believing them.
    Also doesn’t mean there aren’t some relatively easy answers out there that could help at least marginally. It’s the total transformation narrative that’s the fairytale.

    A few examples which the data tell us should work:

    - sorting out the distorted marginal tax rates and thresholds that inhibit labour market participation
    - Tilting tax and monetary policy to encourage more consumer spending, business spending, investment in riskier but higher yielding assets and discourage saving in low yield assets
    - Liberalisation of planning rules for infrastructure
    - restructuring the energy market to allow regional pricing
    - Providing fully state run (rather than subsidised) early years childcare for working parents
    - Rejoining the single market
    - Cutting corporation tax to 15%

    And so on. Aggregation of marginal gains
  • Sweeney74Sweeney74 Posts: 635

    Sweeney74 said:

    maxh said:

    Sweeney74 said:

    Well the Tory Party is an absolute monarchy moderated by regicide.

    Look at the bar chart in this header.

    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2026/02/09/one-party-has-form-for-ousting-leaders-the-other-less-so/

    what are the odds on KB being ousted before SKS?
    The Tories would be fools to do so in my view. The party brand is the problem, not their leader. Ousting her only reminds the public of the nadir of the party.
    I agree. The Tory problem is structural, not Badenoch. The brand is still toxic, Reform is eating their right flank, the LDs are strong in their old southern hunting grounds, and voters have not yet forgotten the last government.

    Changing leader now risks reminding the public of the exact chaos they voted against. The counterpoint is that Tory MPs have spent the last decade mistaking leadership changes for strategy, so “fools to do so” is not exactly a disqualifying condition.
    The other factor is that Tory MPs have reason to panic. The polls currently point to them losing more seats at the next general election and falling way behind Reform. The future existence of the party is at stake.
    Well yes, but KB's relative popularity (at the moment) would suggest that the problem is not her.
  • BatteryCorrectHorseBatteryCorrectHorse Posts: 7,128
    edited May 6
    rcs1000 said:

    @rcs1000 are you planning to resolve the frequent site down errors please?

    Is the problem with posting (as some people have) or with viewing the main site.

    I'm planning a server migration this weekend, which will hopefully solve the posting issue.
    When you access https://vf.politicalbetting.com/, the site frequently is down. I think the cause is the same as posting in that the site goes down/API doesn't respond in time when people post, so you get duplicates as people re-submit their post thinking it has failed.
  • TazTaz Posts: 28,133
    Last minute SNP to Labour swing in Holyrood elections from More In Common

    Both list and seat

    https://x.com/polliticsuk/status/2052027072923525295?s=61
  • BatteryCorrectHorseBatteryCorrectHorse Posts: 7,128
    Taz said:

    Last minute SNP to Labour swing in Holyrood elections from More In Common

    Both list and seat

    https://x.com/polliticsuk/status/2052027072923525295?s=61

    Still think a Labour recovery under Burnham or Streeting is very likely.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 136,861
    edited May 6

    Taz said:

    Last minute SNP to Labour swing in Holyrood elections from More In Common

    Both list and seat

    https://x.com/polliticsuk/status/2052027072923525295?s=61

    Still think a Labour recovery under Burnham or Streeting is very likely.
    If Labour are second tomorrow on seats and NEV GB wide and come second on the Holyrood constituency vote as MiC now forecasts and helps deprive the SNP of a majority at Holyrood then SKS is staying put anyway
  • TazTaz Posts: 28,133

    Taz said:

    Last minute SNP to Labour swing in Holyrood elections from More In Common

    Both list and seat

    https://x.com/polliticsuk/status/2052027072923525295?s=61

    Still think a Labour recovery under Burnham or Streeting is very likely.
    Initially, probably, but longer term depending on the policies and what happens, who knows,

    Our borrowing costs need to be considered and Burnhams ‘fuck the Bond markets’ attitude doesn’t help.
  • CiceroCicero Posts: 4,469
    edited May 6
    rcs1000 said:

    @rcs1000 are you planning to resolve the frequent site down errors please?

    Is the problem with posting (as some people have) or with viewing the main site.

    I'm planning a server migration this weekend, which will hopefully solve the posting issue.
    Could read the headers, not the threads, if that helps. Could read, if on laptop, not on mobile
  • BatteryCorrectHorseBatteryCorrectHorse Posts: 7,128
    Taz said:

    Taz said:

    Last minute SNP to Labour swing in Holyrood elections from More In Common

    Both list and seat

    https://x.com/polliticsuk/status/2052027072923525295?s=61

    Still think a Labour recovery under Burnham or Streeting is very likely.
    Initially, probably, but longer term depending on the policies and what happens, who knows,

    Our borrowing costs need to be considered and Burnhams ‘fuck the Bond markets’ attitude doesn’t help.
    Initially is enough for a winning bet from Labour poll lead
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 50,691
    rcs1000 said:

    kinabalu said:

    Nigelb said:

    This is a bit awkward for the Thatcherite economists.

    Britain has eight big North European neighbours.
    Of them Britain has,
    1/ The weakest economy.
    2/ The lowest taxes.
    3/ The lowest marginal tax rate on labour at high incomes.
    The right should be less confident sneering at the idea of "taxing for growth".

    https://x.com/thomasforth/status/2051763318222659963

    You regard this as a piece of analysis do you?
    It's merely a counter to the hackneyed chant of "you can't tax your way to growth".
    Growth is complicated.

    And a lot of things that were once tailwinds to growth -like falling birthrates and increased life expectancy- are now headwinds. And at the same time, we (as in the developed world) are no longer the only purchasers of raw materials; now we need to compete with China, India and a host of other rapidly developing nations. That means we're paying more for commodities at the same time that every worker is supporting more and more retirees.

    If there were easy answers, then politicians would have already implemented them.
    Exactly so. It's impacted mainly by global and other factors outside the control of our domestic politicians. Hence why I turn off when I hear "we're going to grow the economy" as some political leader's big idea.
  • BatteryCorrectHorseBatteryCorrectHorse Posts: 7,128
    https://x.com/Telegraph/status/2052051935776198700

    Reform UK are battling to win the East of England, a traditional Conservative heartland, in the upcoming local elections.

    The Telegraph's Political Editor, @Tony_Diver was given access to a day on the campaign trail with Robert Jenrick, travelling across Norfolk, Suffolk and Essex.

    Can the former Conservative MP help turn one of the bluest areas in England teal?

    What exactly is "raising kids in the British way"? I promise I am not being obtuse here but I didn't really understand what she meant. Are kids raised in the UK very different to kids raised in say Italy or Spain?
  • BatteryCorrectHorseBatteryCorrectHorse Posts: 7,128
    HYUFD said:

    Taz said:

    Last minute SNP to Labour swing in Holyrood elections from More In Common

    Both list and seat

    https://x.com/polliticsuk/status/2052027072923525295?s=61

    Still think a Labour recovery under Burnham or Streeting is very likely.
    If Labour are second tomorrow on seats and NEV GB wide and come second on the Holyrood constituency vote as MiC now forecasts and helps deprive the SNP of a majority at Holyrood then SKS is staying put anyway
    He's not HYUFD. The game is over.
  • Sweeney74Sweeney74 Posts: 635
    edited May 6
    HYUFD said:

    Taz said:

    Last minute SNP to Labour swing in Holyrood elections from More In Common

    Both list and seat

    https://x.com/polliticsuk/status/2052027072923525295?s=61

    Still think a Labour recovery under Burnham or Streeting is very likely.
    If Labour are second tomorrow on seats and NEV GB wide and come second on the Holyrood constituency vote as MiC now forecasts and helps deprive the SNP of a majority at Holyrood then SKS is staying put anyway
    a big IF, but yes, if that happens I'd say the putsch is off
  • berberian_knowsberberian_knows Posts: 199
    Cicero said:

    rcs1000 said:

    @rcs1000 are you planning to resolve the frequent site down errors please?

    Is the problem with posting (as some people have) or with viewing the main site.

    I'm planning a server migration this weekend, which will hopefully solve the posting issue.
    Could read the headers, not the threads, if that helps. Could read, if on laptop, not on mobile
    On my iphone it's the "verifying you are a human" cloudfare jobby. If I go to www.pol... I frequently get no comments until I revisit vf.pol.... and get verified again. It might be when my iphone bounces between wifi and mobile (just a guess).
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 136,861
    edited May 6

    HYUFD said:

    Taz said:

    Last minute SNP to Labour swing in Holyrood elections from More In Common

    Both list and seat

    https://x.com/polliticsuk/status/2052027072923525295?s=61

    Still think a Labour recovery under Burnham or Streeting is very likely.
    If Labour are second tomorrow on seats and NEV GB wide and come second on the Holyrood constituency vote as MiC now forecasts and helps deprive the SNP of a majority at Holyrood then SKS is staying put anyway
    He's not HYUFD. The game is over.
    Nope, if Labour is second tomorrow and beat the Tories, Greens and LDs on seats and NEV No 10 will spin that as a triumph far exceeding expectations by Friday night even if Reform win as expected and Starmer survives another year. Especially given Labour MPs are hopeless at removing leaders normally
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 72,364
    rcs1000 said:

    @rcs1000 are you planning to resolve the frequent site down errors please?

    Is the problem with posting (as some people have) or with viewing the main site.

    I'm planning a server migration this weekend, which will hopefully solve the posting issue.
    Ok. Many thanks for your work Robert.

    What's the situation with costs of running the site? I don't think we've had a whip around recently?
This discussion has been closed.