Skip to content

The Great Reform Pact – politicalbetting.com

SystemSystem Posts: 13,177
edited April 10 in General
The Great Reform Pact – politicalbetting.com

Tory MP responds to colleagues who might be open to a deal:“Absolutely fucking not. Farage wants our voters, our candidates, and our party, and in return we’d get nothing but chaos and a mini-Trump totalitarian personality cult. No way.”

Read the full story here

«13456

Comments

  • StillWatersStillWaters Posts: 13,461
    edited April 10
    Yah!

    Edit: sorry @malcolmg
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 79,514
    *Checks watch*

    You've published at the wrong time, Mr Eagles. Should have been at two minutes after half past six in the evening.
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 63,577
    edited April 10
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvgkv1x149eo

    Can I put my hand up to run the inquiry into the judge led inquiry into why this turned into a disaster?
  • BattlebusBattlebus Posts: 3,286

    The Tory MP you mention has it right.

    The Tories would not survive a pact with Reform. They may not survive without one, but them the breaks

    The LibDems survived a pact with the Tories - but only just.

    Perhaps there should be a Tories-Reform pact as we all know who are the bigger sharks.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 63,936
    ydoethur said:

    Good morning, everyone.

    So, the downsides for the blues would be:
    1) firm tactical voting against Reform would extend to them
    2) necessarily giving up on some seats giving Reform a far greater chance
    3) record of failure of Faragist political vehicles
    4) surrendering leadership of the right to an incoming party
    5) loss of the centre

    Upsides:
    1) slightly better chance in a small number of seats?

    It's up there with: "Are you stupid?" or: "Would you like to attack Iran for no reason and with no plan for the Straits of Hormuz?" as an intelligence test.

    I'm willing to at least consider voting for a Badenoch led Conservative Party.

    It will be a cold day in Hell before I even consider voting for a party associated in any way whatsoever with Mr Toad. That includes electoral pacts.
    That's my own position as well. No taken with Badenoch but I'll see how she and the party stands come the election. I don't want the diet Pepsi of Trump in power here.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 25,494
    If only David Cameron had campaigned for AV, the Tories and Reform would be benefiting from each other's second preferences.

    As it is, it is gratifying to see them splitting the right of centre vote. A problem we have long had to deal with on the left.

    Reform has got their act together in Bradford, fielding full slates of candidates. Unlike the LibDems, who can only manage a single candidate rather than the requisite three per ward.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 128,614
    ydoethur said:

    *Checks watch*

    You've published at the wrong time, Mr Eagles. Should have been at two minutes after half past six in the evening.

    Yay, somebody spotted my subtle Great Reform Act pun.
  • MattWMattW Posts: 33,557
    edited April 10
    Are the residential addresses of candidates in Local Elections published?

    There could be some interesting analysis as to where the paper candidates live. I know one place where on a previous occasion a candidate lived in France, and we just had the one who lived at the other end of Cornwall.

    Someone (not me) will need to be gearing up their resignations spreadsheet - I'm predicting 100-200 Ref UK Councillor resignations over the next 12 months. *

    Or we could adopt one measure of the Welsh system, where candidates are required to be local - but that has downsides.

    * This is supplementary to the ones who back out first. They have already lost 9 in the Senedd and Holyrood elections.
    https://www.facebook.com/reel/26414229408247791
  • nico67nico67 Posts: 8,327
    The Tories should hold their nerve . Reform won’t be able to avoid scrutiny in the run up to the next GE and Farage is very thin skinned .

    If there was a miracle and the Tories won I’d be disappointed but not fearful about what could happen to the country.

    A Reform win would be a catastrophe for the country.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 79,514

    ydoethur said:

    *Checks watch*

    You've published at the wrong time, Mr Eagles. Should have been at two minutes after half past six in the evening.

    Yay, somebody spotted my subtle Great Reform Act pun.
    Subtle? SUBTLE?

    *As shock gathers, fades to Grey*
  • FF43FF43 Posts: 19,661
    Interesting article about Dubai and why it's likely to see off the current attacks from Iran thanks to a highly successful economy based on immigration and a massive sovereign wealth fund.

    https://time.com/article/2026/04/09/iran-war-dubai-survive-abide/

    On topic the Tories won't do a deal with Farage until they do one.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 79,514
    FF43 said:

    Interesting article about Dubai and why it's likely to see off the current attacks from Iran thanks to a highly successful economy based on immigration and a massive sovereign wealth fund.

    https://time.com/article/2026/04/09/iran-war-dubai-survive-abide/

    On topic the Tories won't do a deal with Farage until they do one.

    And when they do a deal, they can do one.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 79,514
    Of course, one thing we are all forgetting is Farage himself. He's likely to be 64 come the next election and he notoriously has the attention span of a concussed goldfish. He may disappear off. Can anyone see Jenrick or Tice having the same appeal?

    As against this, becuase he's not done very much actual work for decades he's probably much fresher than -say - Michael Howard or even Keir Starmer. And he's nakedly ambitious so if he thinks he can win he may want to stay on.
  • bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 21,023
    Have we done https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cgld65x396go ?

    White House staff told not to place bets on prediction markets
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 39,848
    I am not sure any arrangement between Badenoch Conservatives and Reform can be described as a "centre" right pact.
  • boulayboulay Posts: 8,928
    The production line of Israeli government spokespeople must have a record for consistency unmatched elsewhere. Their absolute grimness is identical whichever one comes on. Have the Israelis ever considered some sort of updated media training for them?
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 25,494
    MattW said:

    Are the residential addresses of candidates in Local Elections published?

    There could be some interesting analysis as to where the paper candidates live. I know one place where on a previous occasion a candidate lived in France, and we just had the one who lived at the other end of Cornwall.

    Someone (not me) will need to be gearing up their resignations spreadsheet - I'm predicting 100-200 Ref UK Councillor resignations over the next 12 months. *

    Or we could adopt one measure of the Welsh system, where candidates are required to be local - but that has downsides.

    * This is supplementary to the ones who back out first. They have already lost 9 in the Senedd and Holyrood elections.
    https://www.facebook.com/reel/26414229408247791

    I was represented by a councillor living in the Dominican Republic.

    Candidates need to have some link to the council area they are standing in. Either through residence, owning property, or a place of work.

  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 47,927

    Have we done https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cgld65x396go ?

    White House staff told not to place bets on prediction markets

    ‘That’s below your pay grade’
  • StuartinromfordStuartinromford Posts: 22,894
    Forget about a formal pact, even a 'oppsie, we left our list of target seats in the gents in St Stephens Tavern' arrangement that Labour and the Lib Dems definitely didn't have in 2024 is surely beyond the Conservatives and Reform.

    There are some Conservative seats where Reform don't have an earthly, but they are ones in the Waitrose belt where a RefCon deal sees the Lib Dems romp home. Otherwise, Reform are targeting the sort of seats where Conservatives need to win- consider where all their gains in 2024 came from. Even Runcorn and Helsby had Conservatives in a solid second place before Nigel came along.
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 23,227
    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    *Checks watch*

    You've published at the wrong time, Mr Eagles. Should have been at two minutes after half past six in the evening.

    Yay, somebody spotted my subtle Great Reform Act pun.
    Subtle? SUBTLE?

    *As shock gathers, fades to Grey*
    To be fair, I’m busy, off to work shortly, looking after the boy aged 3 and a bit) and so distracted BUT I didn’t clock it on first read.

    As TSE puns go that was almost subtle. Almost.
  • FeersumEnjineeyaFeersumEnjineeya Posts: 5,318
    I dunno about Reform, but it's looking like we (Lib Dems) have managed to field a full set of 101 candidates across Brum after a bit of frantic activity over the last couple of days (trying to find nominators in wards where we got about 2% of the vote last time).
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 79,514

    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    *Checks watch*

    You've published at the wrong time, Mr Eagles. Should have been at two minutes after half past six in the evening.

    Yay, somebody spotted my subtle Great Reform Act pun.
    Subtle? SUBTLE?

    *As shock gathers, fades to Grey*
    To be fair, I’m busy, off to work shortly, looking after the boy aged 3 and a bit) and so distracted BUT I didn’t clock it on first read.

    As TSE puns go that was almost subtle. Almost.
    Was it as subtle as my pun?
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 23,227
    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    *Checks watch*

    You've published at the wrong time, Mr Eagles. Should have been at two minutes after half past six in the evening.

    Yay, somebody spotted my subtle Great Reform Act pun.
    Subtle? SUBTLE?

    *As shock gathers, fades to Grey*
    To be fair, I’m busy, off to work shortly, looking after the boy aged 3 and a bit) and so distracted BUT I didn’t clock it on first read.

    As TSE puns go that was almost subtle. Almost.
    Was it as subtle as my pun?
    Yours was sadly as obvious as a massive clunking sign.

    And now off to persuad kids to study pharmacy with me…
  • nico67nico67 Posts: 8,327

    I dunno about Reform, but it's looking like we (Lib Dems) have managed to field a full set of 101 candidates across Brum after a bit of frantic activity over the last couple of days (trying to find nominators in wards where we got about 2% of the vote last time).

    What does Lib Dem HQ think about their prospects in East Sussex ?

    I’m hoping the Tories and Reform will split the vote allowing the Lib Dem’s to come through .

    Is that doable ?
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 103,831
    A pact won't work as they cannot agree who will be senior partner (and they won't be equal), they aren't geographically distinct to divide efforts that way, and a minority won't accept it.

    It works in theory, but not yet in practice.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 66,631
    From The Spectator today. Congratulations to Ed Miliband:


    "Well done to Ed Miliband for this one. OpenAI is halting its Stargate data centre project in Britain, citing high energy costs. The ChatGPT maker announced a partnership with Nvidia and Nscale last September, at the time of Donald Trump’s state visit. The investment was worth £31 billion in all and the Prime Minister hailed it as a ‘generational step change’. Sadly, OpenAI seems to have realised that Britain’s industrial electricity prices are the highest in the developed world.


    A spokesman for the company said it would ‘move forward when the right conditions – such as regulation and the cost of energy – enable long-term infrastructure investment’. It’s all pretty bleak for Starmer’s repeatedly stated ambition that we should be an ‘AI superpower’. "
  • MelonBMelonB Posts: 17,363
    kle4 said:

    A pact won't work as they cannot agree who will be senior partner (and they won't be equal), they aren't geographically distinct to divide efforts that way, and a minority won't accept it.

    It works in theory, but not yet in practice.

    Mirror image of why a Labour-Green pact couldn’t work.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 55,453
    edited April 10

    MattW said:

    Are the residential addresses of candidates in Local Elections published?

    There could be some interesting analysis as to where the paper candidates live. I know one place where on a previous occasion a candidate lived in France, and we just had the one who lived at the other end of Cornwall.

    Someone (not me) will need to be gearing up their resignations spreadsheet - I'm predicting 100-200 Ref UK Councillor resignations over the next 12 months. *

    Or we could adopt one measure of the Welsh system, where candidates are required to be local - but that has downsides.

    * This is supplementary to the ones who back out first. They have already lost 9 in the Senedd and Holyrood elections.
    https://www.facebook.com/reel/26414229408247791

    I was represented by a councillor living in the Dominican Republic.

    Candidates need to have some link to the council area they are standing in. Either through residence, owning property, or a place of work.

    But it's up to the candidate whether their address goes on the ballot paper, or is replaced with "An address in X constituency/ward/local government area" and, increasingly, candidates are opting for the latter. There is, however, a downside, particularly in local elections (especially first tier), where candidates who allow their address onto the ballot paper have a clear advantage over those who seek to withhold where they live. At town/parish level, you'd expect many voters to know, anyway, so trying to conceal it just makes the candidate look dodgy.
  • TazTaz Posts: 28,251
    Four young Brits have been apprehended crossing the Canada US border.

    Probably an accident as it’s happened a few times before.

    https://x.com/visegrad24/status/2042416755453157669?s=61
  • MelonBMelonB Posts: 17,363

    From The Spectator today. Congratulations to Ed Miliband:


    "Well done to Ed Miliband for this one. OpenAI is halting its Stargate data centre project in Britain, citing high energy costs. The ChatGPT maker announced a partnership with Nvidia and Nscale last September, at the time of Donald Trump’s state visit. The investment was worth £31 billion in all and the Prime Minister hailed it as a ‘generational step change’. Sadly, OpenAI seems to have realised that Britain’s industrial electricity prices are the highest in the developed world.


    A spokesman for the company said it would ‘move forward when the right conditions – such as regulation and the cost of energy – enable long-term infrastructure investment’. It’s all pretty bleak for Starmer’s repeatedly stated ambition that we should be an ‘AI superpower’. "

    OpenAI is in quite serious financial trouble so this is perhaps not surprising. You call off your most marginal investments first and it sounds like this one was marginal.

    We’re going to see a clearout of AI competition over the next couple of years, just as we did during dot-com.
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 61,708
    FF43 said:

    Interesting article about Dubai and why it's likely to see off the current attacks from Iran thanks to a highly successful economy based on immigration and a massive sovereign wealth fund.

    https://time.com/article/2026/04/09/iran-war-dubai-survive-abide/

    On topic the Tories won't do a deal with Farage until they do one.

    Somewhat more positive than most articles written about Dubai in the past six weeks, many of which written by people who had never been here for more than a week’s holiday.
  • boulayboulay Posts: 8,928
    Breaking news, Melania Trump announces she never had a relationship with Donald Trump.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 60,441

    Have we done https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cgld65x396go ?

    White House staff told not to place bets on prediction markets

    Those that have already done so no longer need to work...
  • MattWMattW Posts: 33,557

    Forget about a formal pact, even a 'oppsie, we left our list of target seats in the gents in St Stephens Tavern' arrangement that Labour and the Lib Dems definitely didn't have in 2024 is surely beyond the Conservatives and Reform.

    There are some Conservative seats where Reform don't have an earthly, but they are ones in the Waitrose belt where a RefCon deal sees the Lib Dems romp home. Otherwise, Reform are targeting the sort of seats where Conservatives need to win- consider where all their gains in 2024 came from. Even Runcorn and Helsby had Conservatives in a solid second place before Nigel came along.

    I think that 1997 would be the model for Lib-Lab.

    Ref-Con - I'm not sure.
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 27,958
    edited April 10
    MelonB said:

    From The Spectator today. Congratulations to Ed Miliband:


    "Well done to Ed Miliband for this one. OpenAI is halting its Stargate data centre project in Britain, citing high energy costs. The ChatGPT maker announced a partnership with Nvidia and Nscale last September, at the time of Donald Trump’s state visit. The investment was worth £31 billion in all and the Prime Minister hailed it as a ‘generational step change’. Sadly, OpenAI seems to have realised that Britain’s industrial electricity prices are the highest in the developed world.


    A spokesman for the company said it would ‘move forward when the right conditions – such as regulation and the cost of energy – enable long-term infrastructure investment’. It’s all pretty bleak for Starmer’s repeatedly stated ambition that we should be an ‘AI superpower’. "

    OpenAI is in quite serious financial trouble so this is perhaps not surprising. You call off your most marginal investments first and it sounds like this one was marginal.

    We’re going to see a clearout of AI competition over the next couple of years, just as we did during dot-com.
    They were forecast to need to burn through hundreds of billions in losses over the next few years even before the energy prices increased. The blame for the energy price spike is with Trump not Starmer.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 56,886
    MelonB said:

    From The Spectator today. Congratulations to Ed Miliband:


    "Well done to Ed Miliband for this one. OpenAI is halting its Stargate data centre project in Britain, citing high energy costs. The ChatGPT maker announced a partnership with Nvidia and Nscale last September, at the time of Donald Trump’s state visit. The investment was worth £31 billion in all and the Prime Minister hailed it as a ‘generational step change’. Sadly, OpenAI seems to have realised that Britain’s industrial electricity prices are the highest in the developed world.


    A spokesman for the company said it would ‘move forward when the right conditions – such as regulation and the cost of energy – enable long-term infrastructure investment’. It’s all pretty bleak for Starmer’s repeatedly stated ambition that we should be an ‘AI superpower’. "

    OpenAI is in quite serious financial trouble so this is perhaps not surprising. You call off your most marginal investments first and it sounds like this one was marginal.

    We’re going to see a clearout of AI competition over the next couple of years, just as we did during dot-com.
    More electricity for the rest of us at lower prices too, through reduced demand.
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 27,958
    Foxy said:

    MelonB said:

    From The Spectator today. Congratulations to Ed Miliband:


    "Well done to Ed Miliband for this one. OpenAI is halting its Stargate data centre project in Britain, citing high energy costs. The ChatGPT maker announced a partnership with Nvidia and Nscale last September, at the time of Donald Trump’s state visit. The investment was worth £31 billion in all and the Prime Minister hailed it as a ‘generational step change’. Sadly, OpenAI seems to have realised that Britain’s industrial electricity prices are the highest in the developed world.


    A spokesman for the company said it would ‘move forward when the right conditions – such as regulation and the cost of energy – enable long-term infrastructure investment’. It’s all pretty bleak for Starmer’s repeatedly stated ambition that we should be an ‘AI superpower’. "

    OpenAI is in quite serious financial trouble so this is perhaps not surprising. You call off your most marginal investments first and it sounds like this one was marginal.

    We’re going to see a clearout of AI competition over the next couple of years, just as we did during dot-com.
    More electricity for the rest of us at lower prices too, through reduced demand.
    Extremely unlikely demand for AI drops from here whether we see consolidation or not.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 79,514
    boulay said:

    Breaking news, Melania Trump announces she never had a relationship with Donald Trump.

    I think it's fair to say from her point of view it's been entirely Barron.
  • FF43FF43 Posts: 19,661
    ydoethur said:

    FF43 said:

    Interesting article about Dubai and why it's likely to see off the current attacks from Iran thanks to a highly successful economy based on immigration and a massive sovereign wealth fund.

    https://time.com/article/2026/04/09/iran-war-dubai-survive-abide/

    On topic the Tories won't do a deal with Farage until they do one.

    And when they do a deal, they can do one.
    As things stand, the Conservatives are only likely to be in government after 2029 as a junior partner to Reform. There is little ideological difference between Badenoch and Farage. Would they really say No, if the situation arises?

    The situation may not arise, if Reform don't need the Conservatives, the Conservatives manage to displace Reform or centre/left parties form the next government. But if Reform can form a government only with the Tories, I am pretty sure they will say, Yes.
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 72,210
    FF43 said:

    Interesting article about Dubai and why it's likely to see off the current attacks from Iran thanks to a highly successful economy based on immigration and a massive sovereign wealth fund.

    https://time.com/article/2026/04/09/iran-war-dubai-survive-abide/

    On topic the Tories won't do a deal with Farage until they do one.

    They wont
  • nico67nico67 Posts: 8,327
    Sandpit said:

    FF43 said:

    Interesting article about Dubai and why it's likely to see off the current attacks from Iran thanks to a highly successful economy based on immigration and a massive sovereign wealth fund.

    https://time.com/article/2026/04/09/iran-war-dubai-survive-abide/

    On topic the Tories won't do a deal with Farage until they do one.

    Somewhat more positive than most articles written about Dubai in the past six weeks, many of which written by people who had never been here for more than a week’s holiday.
    There has been a lot of hysterical media about some exodus from Dubai . When the reality is even during the last month everyday life has gone on as normal for the vast majority of people .
  • I honestly think Google played the AI race extremely intelligently. They weren’t the first to make it big but they used their long-developed models and iteratively improved them over time to now from what I can see be at least on par with OpenAI. They also have the fallback of having a massive business with which to fund it that isn’t AI.

    OpenAI has nothing.

    Apple has virtually stayed out altogether and I can see why.

    No doubt AI is going to be around but when the bubble bursts - and it will - we will finally get some proper and rational discussion about what AI is for. OpenAI I think, will be one of the first casualties.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 25,494
    IanB2 said:

    MattW said:

    Are the residential addresses of candidates in Local Elections published?

    There could be some interesting analysis as to where the paper candidates live. I know one place where on a previous occasion a candidate lived in France, and we just had the one who lived at the other end of Cornwall.

    Someone (not me) will need to be gearing up their resignations spreadsheet - I'm predicting 100-200 Ref UK Councillor resignations over the next 12 months. *

    Or we could adopt one measure of the Welsh system, where candidates are required to be local - but that has downsides.

    * This is supplementary to the ones who back out first. They have already lost 9 in the Senedd and Holyrood elections.
    https://www.facebook.com/reel/26414229408247791

    I was represented by a councillor living in the Dominican Republic.

    Candidates need to have some link to the council area they are standing in. Either through residence, owning property, or a place of work.

    But it's up to the candidate whether their address goes on the ballot paper, or is replaced with "An address in X constituency/ward/local government area" and, increasingly, candidates are opting for the latter. There is, however, a downside, particularly in local elections (especially first tier), where candidates who allow their address onto the ballot paper have a clear advantage over those who seek to withhold where they live. At town/parish level, you'd expect many voters to know, anyway, so trying to conceal it just makes the candidate look dodgy.
    My address is not on the ballot. I don't want nutters turning up on my doorstep.
  • Brixian59Brixian59 Posts: 2,240
    The Tories and Reform will gorge and eat each other alive at the next GE

    LD and Labour will do what they always do, coerce quietly and possibly hand each other 10-15 net seats each in the process.

    Particularly in the SW where Labour did very well in 2024 and will likely lose a number of seats that were not really Labour seats you can certainly anticipate a lot of Labour to LD switchers to keep Tories out. I don't detect ANY real Green surge in Devon and Cornwall at the moment , May will be interesting to see where the "anti Government protest vote goes" in places like Plymouth and Exeter .The Tories will never be forgiven for "Tree night" in Plymouth so Reform may do very well there in the military seats.

    The green surge may well turn decidedly brown and autumunal between 2026 and 2028 as Polanski is exposed for what he is, a Member of Your Party who has taken over the Greens with a cunning and quite brilliantly executed coup d'etat.

    The Tories will have to decide if losing more than 500 Councillors in May and definitely is losing north of 750 seasts whether they want to be a nasty argumentative Twitter Party or a serious and credible Opposition under a serious and credible Leader like Hunt or Cleverley.

    I cannot see any scenario south of 2000 seat losses where Starmer is challenged now, his danger period will be early 2027 IF the global situation has eased and mellowed.

    In the meantime he is the only credible war time Leader in any Party in the UK and doing as good a job as anyone could do or have imagined in both keeping us OUT of war , in what is left of NATO and edging to closer ties to the EU and non US/Israeli Global influences.

    It's interesting to be back in a vibrant and contented Labour Lichfield, very promising signs in the Shopping Centre and around the Town and neighbouring areas of improvements, early regeneration and new Green field Housing . Just a bloody shame that HS2 track to no where has decimated part of the east side of the City Boundaries.

    May be bump in to the "mop" today, dear Michael is stll aroun, affable but eccentric as ever!
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 59,842
    What have we got in common with the Yanks anyway?

    * They drive on the wrong side of the road
    * They don't play football with a round ball
    * They don't play cricket
    * They're a republic
    * They mispronounce basic words like "water"
    * They can't spell basic words like "colour"
    * They're a bunch of gun nuts.
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 27,958

    IanB2 said:

    MattW said:

    Are the residential addresses of candidates in Local Elections published?

    There could be some interesting analysis as to where the paper candidates live. I know one place where on a previous occasion a candidate lived in France, and we just had the one who lived at the other end of Cornwall.

    Someone (not me) will need to be gearing up their resignations spreadsheet - I'm predicting 100-200 Ref UK Councillor resignations over the next 12 months. *

    Or we could adopt one measure of the Welsh system, where candidates are required to be local - but that has downsides.

    * This is supplementary to the ones who back out first. They have already lost 9 in the Senedd and Holyrood elections.
    https://www.facebook.com/reel/26414229408247791

    I was represented by a councillor living in the Dominican Republic.

    Candidates need to have some link to the council area they are standing in. Either through residence, owning property, or a place of work.

    But it's up to the candidate whether their address goes on the ballot paper, or is replaced with "An address in X constituency/ward/local government area" and, increasingly, candidates are opting for the latter. There is, however, a downside, particularly in local elections (especially first tier), where candidates who allow their address onto the ballot paper have a clear advantage over those who seek to withhold where they live. At town/parish level, you'd expect many voters to know, anyway, so trying to conceal it just makes the candidate look dodgy.
    My address is not on the ballot. I don't want nutters turning up on my doorstep.
    Whyever not, you seem to cope with us lot ok......
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 72,210

    IanB2 said:

    MattW said:

    Are the residential addresses of candidates in Local Elections published?

    There could be some interesting analysis as to where the paper candidates live. I know one place where on a previous occasion a candidate lived in France, and we just had the one who lived at the other end of Cornwall.

    Someone (not me) will need to be gearing up their resignations spreadsheet - I'm predicting 100-200 Ref UK Councillor resignations over the next 12 months. *

    Or we could adopt one measure of the Welsh system, where candidates are required to be local - but that has downsides.

    * This is supplementary to the ones who back out first. They have already lost 9 in the Senedd and Holyrood elections.
    https://www.facebook.com/reel/26414229408247791

    I was represented by a councillor living in the Dominican Republic.

    Candidates need to have some link to the council area they are standing in. Either through residence, owning property, or a place of work.

    But it's up to the candidate whether their address goes on the ballot paper, or is replaced with "An address in X constituency/ward/local government area" and, increasingly, candidates are opting for the latter. There is, however, a downside, particularly in local elections (especially first tier), where candidates who allow their address onto the ballot paper have a clear advantage over those who seek to withhold where they live. At town/parish level, you'd expect many voters to know, anyway, so trying to conceal it just makes the candidate look dodgy.
    My address is not on the ballot. I don't want nutters turning up on my doorstep.
    Neither should it be
  • MattWMattW Posts: 33,557
    edited April 10
    A look at the USA-Canada dynamics around Niagara, from a pro-Canada Channel "Guard the Leaf".

    Reduced tourism, USA businesses refocussing domestically, and the Billionaire with a local Bridge Monopoly who tried to use Trump-links to undermine a new bridge built by the Canadian Government to Detroit is about to come a slow cropper. And an annoyed Canadian.

    Bridge tolls are quite something - $7 to $27 per axle for a lorry.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g3idhTKQams

    (And the most persistent background cat in Youtube history.)
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 56,886

    What have we got in common with the Yanks anyway?

    * They drive on the wrong side of the road
    * They don't play football with a round ball
    * They don't play cricket
    * They're a republic
    * They mispronounce basic words like "water"
    * They can't spell basic words like "colour"
    * They're a bunch of gun nuts.

    They think cheese comes in plastic sheets.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 89,726

    Have we done https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cgld65x396go ?

    White House staff told not to place bets on prediction markets

    Because that's the exclusive preserve of the Trump crime family ?
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 61,708
    MelonB said:

    From The Spectator today. Congratulations to Ed Miliband:


    "Well done to Ed Miliband for this one. OpenAI is halting its Stargate data centre project in Britain, citing high energy costs. The ChatGPT maker announced a partnership with Nvidia and Nscale last September, at the time of Donald Trump’s state visit. The investment was worth £31 billion in all and the Prime Minister hailed it as a ‘generational step change’. Sadly, OpenAI seems to have realised that Britain’s industrial electricity prices are the highest in the developed world.


    A spokesman for the company said it would ‘move forward when the right conditions – such as regulation and the cost of energy – enable long-term infrastructure investment’. It’s all pretty bleak for Starmer’s repeatedly stated ambition that we should be an ‘AI superpower’. "

    OpenAI is in quite serious financial trouble so this is perhaps not surprising. You call off your most marginal investments first and it sounds like this one was marginal.

    We’re going to see a clearout of AI competition over the next couple of years, just as we did during dot-com.
    Yes, OAI are billions in debt and making very little in revenue.

    They’re also facing a lawsuit from former partners led by Elon Musk, after they moved from a non-profit to a commercial business model.

    None of the other large players wants to acquire them, they’re all happy to wait for the bankruptcy and bid for the pieces of what’s left.

    That all said, it’s a massive loss to the UK that this contract was cancelled. UK should be in a great place to benefit from being outside EU regulations on AI. Expect more and similar stories if the government can’t get to grips with the price of energy.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 89,726

    IanB2 said:

    MattW said:

    Are the residential addresses of candidates in Local Elections published?

    There could be some interesting analysis as to where the paper candidates live. I know one place where on a previous occasion a candidate lived in France, and we just had the one who lived at the other end of Cornwall.

    Someone (not me) will need to be gearing up their resignations spreadsheet - I'm predicting 100-200 Ref UK Councillor resignations over the next 12 months. *

    Or we could adopt one measure of the Welsh system, where candidates are required to be local - but that has downsides.

    * This is supplementary to the ones who back out first. They have already lost 9 in the Senedd and Holyrood elections.
    https://www.facebook.com/reel/26414229408247791

    I was represented by a councillor living in the Dominican Republic.

    Candidates need to have some link to the council area they are standing in. Either through residence, owning property, or a place of work.

    But it's up to the candidate whether their address goes on the ballot paper, or is replaced with "An address in X constituency/ward/local government area" and, increasingly, candidates are opting for the latter. There is, however, a downside, particularly in local elections (especially first tier), where candidates who allow their address onto the ballot paper have a clear advantage over those who seek to withhold where they live. At town/parish level, you'd expect many voters to know, anyway, so trying to conceal it just makes the candidate look dodgy.
    My address is not on the ballot. I don't want nutters turning up on my doorstep.
    How do you think voters feel about being canvassed ?
  • TresTres Posts: 3,674
    Pic of the day

  • StillWatersStillWaters Posts: 13,461
    Battlebus said:

    The Tory MP you mention has it right.

    The Tories would not survive a pact with Reform. They may not survive without one, but them the breaks

    The LibDems survived a pact with the Tories - but only just.

    Perhaps there should be a Tories-Reform pact as we all know who are the bigger sharks.
    Did the LibDems survive? It’s too early to tell.

    You could make an argument that they have been fatally wounded; they don’t just realize it yet.

    20 years ago they would have been the obvious candidate to benefit from the current political turmoil. Today they are an after thought.
  • squareroot2squareroot2 Posts: 7,965
    Tres said:

    Pic of the day

    I've seen 202.9. It'll be 240 probably at clackett lane on the m25
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 60,441
    ydoethur said:

    Good morning, everyone.

    So, the downsides for the blues would be:
    1) firm tactical voting against Reform would extend to them
    2) necessarily giving up on some seats giving Reform a far greater chance
    3) record of failure of Faragist political vehicles
    4) surrendering leadership of the right to an incoming party
    5) loss of the centre

    Upsides:
    1) slightly better chance in a small number of seats?

    It's up there with: "Are you stupid?" or: "Would you like to attack Iran for no reason and with no plan for the Straits of Hormuz?" as an intelligence test.

    I'm willing to at least consider voting for a Badenoch led Conservative Party.

    It will be a cold day in Hell before I even consider voting for a party associated in any way whatsoever with Mr Toad. That includes electoral pacts.
    Ditto.
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 61,708

    I honestly think Google played the AI race extremely intelligently. They weren’t the first to make it big but they used their long-developed models and iteratively improved them over time to now from what I can see be at least on par with OpenAI. They also have the fallback of having a massive business with which to fund it that isn’t AI.

    OpenAI has nothing.

    Apple has virtually stayed out altogether and I can see why.

    No doubt AI is going to be around but when the bubble bursts - and it will - we will finally get some proper and rational discussion about what AI is for. OpenAI I think, will be one of the first casualties.

    Apart from NVidia, Apple has played the best game so far on AI.

    Be the guy selling shovels and sieves in the gold rush.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 89,726
    Sandpit said:

    MelonB said:

    From The Spectator today. Congratulations to Ed Miliband:


    "Well done to Ed Miliband for this one. OpenAI is halting its Stargate data centre project in Britain, citing high energy costs. The ChatGPT maker announced a partnership with Nvidia and Nscale last September, at the time of Donald Trump’s state visit. The investment was worth £31 billion in all and the Prime Minister hailed it as a ‘generational step change’. Sadly, OpenAI seems to have realised that Britain’s industrial electricity prices are the highest in the developed world.


    A spokesman for the company said it would ‘move forward when the right conditions – such as regulation and the cost of energy – enable long-term infrastructure investment’. It’s all pretty bleak for Starmer’s repeatedly stated ambition that we should be an ‘AI superpower’. "

    OpenAI is in quite serious financial trouble so this is perhaps not surprising. You call off your most marginal investments first and it sounds like this one was marginal.

    We’re going to see a clearout of AI competition over the next couple of years, just as we did during dot-com.
    Yes, OAI are billions in debt and making very little in revenue.

    They’re also facing a lawsuit from former partners led by Elon Musk, after they moved from a non-profit to a commercial business model.

    None of the other large players wants to acquire them, they’re all happy to wait for the bankruptcy and bid for the pieces of what’s left.

    That all said, it’s a massive loss to the UK that this contract was cancelled.
    UK should be in a great place to benefit from being outside EU regulations on AI. Expect more and similar stories if the government can’t get to grips with the price of energy.
    Those two sentences seem slightly at odds.
  • StillWatersStillWaters Posts: 13,461
    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    *Checks watch*

    You've published at the wrong time, Mr Eagles. Should have been at two minutes after half past six in the evening.

    Yay, somebody spotted my subtle Great Reform Act pun.
    Subtle? SUBTLE?

    *As shock gathers, fades to Grey*
    Do you need a cup of tea, luv?
  • Sandpit said:

    I honestly think Google played the AI race extremely intelligently. They weren’t the first to make it big but they used their long-developed models and iteratively improved them over time to now from what I can see be at least on par with OpenAI. They also have the fallback of having a massive business with which to fund it that isn’t AI.

    OpenAI has nothing.

    Apple has virtually stayed out altogether and I can see why.

    No doubt AI is going to be around but when the bubble bursts - and it will - we will finally get some proper and rational discussion about what AI is for. OpenAI I think, will be one of the first casualties.

    Apart from NVidia, Apple has played the best game so far on AI.

    Be the guy selling shovels and sieves in the gold rush.
    Apple clearly don’t care about AI, they’ve only done it because they think they have to.

    There’s no passion or creativity in it.

    Steve Jobs said once that Apple only goes into businesses they feel they can play a productive role in. AI is not one of those.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 56,886

    Battlebus said:

    The Tory MP you mention has it right.

    The Tories would not survive a pact with Reform. They may not survive without one, but them the breaks

    The LibDems survived a pact with the Tories - but only just.

    Perhaps there should be a Tories-Reform pact as we all know who are the bigger sharks.
    Did the LibDems survive? It’s too early to tell.

    You could make an argument that they have been fatally wounded; they don’t just realize it yet.

    20 years ago they would have been the obvious candidate to benefit from the current political turmoil. Today they are an after thought.
    72 MPs is the largest third party representation in a century, so they clearly survived. Likely to have a good set of May elections in England too, though will be overshadowed in the headlines by the Reform and Green surges, and Con and Labour meltdown.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 89,726
    On topic, is the supposed "deadline" for defections genuine, or simply a piece of political theatre ?

    My view inclines to the latter.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 25,494
    Nigelb said:

    IanB2 said:

    MattW said:

    Are the residential addresses of candidates in Local Elections published?

    There could be some interesting analysis as to where the paper candidates live. I know one place where on a previous occasion a candidate lived in France, and we just had the one who lived at the other end of Cornwall.

    Someone (not me) will need to be gearing up their resignations spreadsheet - I'm predicting 100-200 Ref UK Councillor resignations over the next 12 months. *

    Or we could adopt one measure of the Welsh system, where candidates are required to be local - but that has downsides.

    * This is supplementary to the ones who back out first. They have already lost 9 in the Senedd and Holyrood elections.
    https://www.facebook.com/reel/26414229408247791

    I was represented by a councillor living in the Dominican Republic.

    Candidates need to have some link to the council area they are standing in. Either through residence, owning property, or a place of work.

    But it's up to the candidate whether their address goes on the ballot paper, or is replaced with "An address in X constituency/ward/local government area" and, increasingly, candidates are opting for the latter. There is, however, a downside, particularly in local elections (especially first tier), where candidates who allow their address onto the ballot paper have a clear advantage over those who seek to withhold where they live. At town/parish level, you'd expect many voters to know, anyway, so trying to conceal it just makes the candidate look dodgy.
    My address is not on the ballot. I don't want nutters turning up on my doorstep.
    How do you think voters feel about being canvassed ?
    Relieved that it isn't a Jehovah's Witness?
  • ydoethur said:

    Good morning, everyone.

    So, the downsides for the blues would be:
    1) firm tactical voting against Reform would extend to them
    2) necessarily giving up on some seats giving Reform a far greater chance
    3) record of failure of Faragist political vehicles
    4) surrendering leadership of the right to an incoming party
    5) loss of the centre

    Upsides:
    1) slightly better chance in a small number of seats?

    It's up there with: "Are you stupid?" or: "Would you like to attack Iran for no reason and with no plan for the Straits of Hormuz?" as an intelligence test.

    I'm willing to at least consider voting for a Badenoch led Conservative Party.

    It will be a cold day in Hell before I even consider voting for a party associated in any way whatsoever with Mr Toad. That includes electoral pacts.
    Ditto.
    I was up for Reform until they backed this war and then decided to back the triple lock.

    If Badenoch is what is needed to stop Farage then she has my support. But unfortunately I think the country is going to vote Reform anyway.
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 61,708
    Nigelb said:

    Sandpit said:

    MelonB said:

    From The Spectator today. Congratulations to Ed Miliband:


    "Well done to Ed Miliband for this one. OpenAI is halting its Stargate data centre project in Britain, citing high energy costs. The ChatGPT maker announced a partnership with Nvidia and Nscale last September, at the time of Donald Trump’s state visit. The investment was worth £31 billion in all and the Prime Minister hailed it as a ‘generational step change’. Sadly, OpenAI seems to have realised that Britain’s industrial electricity prices are the highest in the developed world.


    A spokesman for the company said it would ‘move forward when the right conditions – such as regulation and the cost of energy – enable long-term infrastructure investment’. It’s all pretty bleak for Starmer’s repeatedly stated ambition that we should be an ‘AI superpower’. "

    OpenAI is in quite serious financial trouble so this is perhaps not surprising. You call off your most marginal investments first and it sounds like this one was marginal.

    We’re going to see a clearout of AI competition over the next couple of years, just as we did during dot-com.
    Yes, OAI are billions in debt and making very little in revenue.

    They’re also facing a lawsuit from former partners led by Elon Musk, after they moved from a non-profit to a commercial business model.

    None of the other large players wants to acquire them, they’re all happy to wait for the bankruptcy and bid for the pieces of what’s left.

    That all said, it’s a massive loss to the UK that this contract was cancelled.
    UK should be in a great place to benefit from being outside EU regulations on AI. Expect more and similar stories if the government can’t get to grips with the price of energy.
    Those two sentences seem slightly at odds.
    Not at all, the project was still worth billions to the UK even if OAI eventually goes bust. The data centre would have been built, and eventually operated by someone.
  • BatteryCorrectHorseBatteryCorrectHorse Posts: 7,162
    edited April 10
    Nigelb said:

    On topic, is the supposed "deadline" for defections genuine, or simply a piece of political theatre ?

    My view inclines to the latter.

    I still don’t really see why they decided to allow any Tory defections at all. Okay at best it makes zero difference but at worst it puts actual credibility behind the idea the people that broke the country now want another go to “fix it”.

    Farage for his many faults has never been able to enact anything. All the defectors have and did.

    Like Robert Jenrick, who literally boasted about opening migrant hotels.
  • FeersumEnjineeyaFeersumEnjineeya Posts: 5,318
    edited April 10
    nico67 said:

    I dunno about Reform, but it's looking like we (Lib Dems) have managed to field a full set of 101 candidates across Brum after a bit of frantic activity over the last couple of days (trying to find nominators in wards where we got about 2% of the vote last time).

    What does Lib Dem HQ think about their prospects in East Sussex ?

    I’m hoping the Tories and Reform will split the vote allowing the Lib Dem’s to come through .

    Is that doable ?
    I have no idea; I'm only a small cog up in Birmingham. Here, we're hoping to take advantage of both the spilt in the right wing vote and the collapse of Labour. But so, of course, are the Greens and Independents.
  • stodgestodge Posts: 16,704
    edited April 10
    Morning all :)

    I think there's something on the nomination that states whether you live in the Council area but location even within very small Wards in rural areas can matter - "the only candidate from the village" syndrome if you like.

    I've discussed this before, not that the Conservatives on here want to in all honesty any more than the LDs would want to talk about propping up a minority Labour Government but I call it "the Amber Valley Question".

    Amber Valley was Conservative in the Thatcher years then went Labour but in 2019 the Conservatives won it back. In 2024, their candidate ended up third behind Labour and Reform but close enough so you could argue they'd have a chance. The Conservatives have been more or less expunged from the County Council and have lost ground locally to Reform.

    For the Conservative voter, therefore, it's a conundrum - tactically vote Labour to keep Reform out, tactically vote Reform to get Labour out or vote Conservative and hope for the best.

    A choice for the deep blue C between two Devils you might argue?

    Badenoch will, if she has any sense, (which she does) say nothing about any possible support for a minority Reform Government before an election but she will be asked about it repeatedly if it appears the Conservatives will lose half their seats but be in a position to provide Confidence & Supply to a minority Reform Government. As others have said, the slightest hint a Conservative Party led by her would enable Prime Minister Farage and the support will collapse.

    Even if she could enable a non-Labour Government, should she? Who are the real opponents for the Conservatives - the Reform threat is existential, Labour will always be there in some form? The Party has been quite happy with the latter for a century or more, the former is the challenge.

    A second Labour term, a single chaotic Farage administration - both might open the door wide for a Conservative return in 2034?
  • StillWatersStillWaters Posts: 13,461
    Foxy said:

    Battlebus said:

    The Tory MP you mention has it right.

    The Tories would not survive a pact with Reform. They may not survive without one, but them the breaks

    The LibDems survived a pact with the Tories - but only just.

    Perhaps there should be a Tories-Reform pact as we all know who are the bigger sharks.
    Did the LibDems survive? It’s too early to tell.

    You could make an argument that they have been fatally wounded; they don’t just realize it yet.

    20 years ago they would have been the obvious candidate to benefit from the current political turmoil. Today they are an after thought.
    72 MPs is the largest third party representation in a century, so they clearly survived. Likely to have a good set of May elections in England too, though will be overshadowed in the headlines by the Reform and Green surges, and Con and Labour meltdown.
    You are taking too short term a view.

    They did well in a generational melt down for the Tories.

    But if they are supplanted as the natural left party of protest what’s their USP?
  • LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 24,249
    A pact could work really well for the Tories, depending on its terms. If it gets Reform to stand aside in all the seats where the Tories were ahead of Reform in 2024, then it could save a bunch of existing Tory MPs, and also save a bunch of Tory second places, which will be important for the election after next.

    The Tories can then stand aside for Reform in a bunch of seats where Reform will lose to the Left.

    I suspect that Farage doesn't want a pact, but he wants the Tories to be responsible for refusing one.
  • https://x.com/steven_swinford/status/2042484922657464394

    Sir Tony Blair has accused Ed Miliband of taking an “ideological” approach to net zero and called on him to approve new oil and gasfields in the North Sea to protect households and businesses from energy price shocks

    The Tony Blair Institute, the former prime minister’s think tank, said the government should approve new licences for the drilling of the Jackdaw gasfield and the Rosebank oilfield to help address Britain’s “systematic energy crisis”

    The report, which was endorsed by Blair, argues that Britain needs to pursue a two-track approach by producing more clean energy while accelerating domestic oil and gas production to reduce Britain’s exposure to global markets

    Tone Langengen, a policy adviser at the Tony Blair Institute (TBI) and author of the paper, also said the UK risked falling behind global competitors by solely focusing on clean power

    “If the government doubles down on the wrong parts of the system, the UK will remain exposed to the same vulnerabilities,” he said

    “But this is also an opportunity to reset — including by accelerating domestic supply to reduce reliance on volatile imports and support UK jobs and tax revenues.”

    Tony Blair is correct.
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 61,708
    nico67 said:

    Sandpit said:

    FF43 said:

    Interesting article about Dubai and why it's likely to see off the current attacks from Iran thanks to a highly successful economy based on immigration and a massive sovereign wealth fund.

    https://time.com/article/2026/04/09/iran-war-dubai-survive-abide/

    On topic the Tories won't do a deal with Farage until they do one.

    Somewhat more positive than most articles written about Dubai in the past six weeks, many of which written by people who had never been here for more than a week’s holiday.
    There has been a lot of hysterical media about some exodus from Dubai . When the reality is even during the last month everyday life has gone on as normal for the vast majority of people .
    Correct. A lot of companies are WFH, to avoid half the company being in the same place if something happens. Multinationals had longstanding disaster plans to evacuate key staff, which was done immediately the situation started.

    I don’t know anyone who’s quit a salaried job. A few of the digital nomad and ‘influencer’ types have left temporarily, as have a number of wives and kids as schools are also remote.

    Hospitality sector is struggling with the lack of tourists, and there have been some furloughs there. On the other hand the fancy hotel resorts are doing some fantastic resident offers at the moment, 5* resort for £150-£200 a night.

    The death toll in UAE is 10 for a population of 11m. That’s a couple of days’ worth of road accidents. Obviously sad for those affected, but perspective…
  • bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 21,023

    Battlebus said:

    The Tory MP you mention has it right.

    The Tories would not survive a pact with Reform. They may not survive without one, but them the breaks

    The LibDems survived a pact with the Tories - but only just.

    Perhaps there should be a Tories-Reform pact as we all know who are the bigger sharks.
    Did the LibDems survive? It’s too early to tell.

    You could make an argument that they have been fatally wounded; they don’t just realize it yet.

    20 years ago they would have been the obvious candidate to benefit from the current political turmoil. Today they are an after thought.
    Biggest third party in the Commons since... the 1923 election?
  • We have a lot of people here who would never vote Farage and are sort of never Farage Tories.

    However I feel that in the country this is a lot more unlikely, sadly.
  • Sandpit said:

    nico67 said:

    Sandpit said:

    FF43 said:

    Interesting article about Dubai and why it's likely to see off the current attacks from Iran thanks to a highly successful economy based on immigration and a massive sovereign wealth fund.

    https://time.com/article/2026/04/09/iran-war-dubai-survive-abide/

    On topic the Tories won't do a deal with Farage until they do one.

    Somewhat more positive than most articles written about Dubai in the past six weeks, many of which written by people who had never been here for more than a week’s holiday.
    There has been a lot of hysterical media about some exodus from Dubai . When the reality is even during the last month everyday life has gone on as normal for the vast majority of people .
    Correct. A lot of companies are WFH, to avoid half the company being in the same place if something happens. Multinationals had longstanding disaster plans to evacuate key staff, which was done immediately the situation started.

    I don’t know anyone who’s quit a salaried job. A few of the digital nomad and ‘influencer’ types have left temporarily, as have a number of wives and kids as schools are also remote.

    Hospitality sector is struggling with the lack of tourists, and there have been some furloughs there. On the other hand the fancy hotel resorts are doing some fantastic resident offers at the moment, 5* resort for £150-£200 a night.

    The death toll in UAE is 10 for a population of 11m. That’s a couple of days’ worth of road accidents. Obviously sad for those affected, but perspective…
    So are you pro WFH? I thought you’d be the kind of person to say get back to the office but maybe I’m wrong and happy to say so.
  • Good morning from Pamphylia


  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 22,035
    Having a data centre isn’t particularly economically useful (other than being a large consumer of electricity). When it comes to AI the only technology worth having is the frontier models themselves. We have none of them so we’ve missed the boat.
  • AugustusCarp2AugustusCarp2 Posts: 649

    Battlebus said:

    The Tory MP you mention has it right.

    The Tories would not survive a pact with Reform. They may not survive without one, but them the breaks

    The LibDems survived a pact with the Tories - but only just.

    Perhaps there should be a Tories-Reform pact as we all know who are the bigger sharks.
    Did the LibDems survive? It’s too early to tell.

    You could make an argument that they have been fatally wounded; they don’t just realize it yet.

    20 years ago they would have been the obvious candidate to benefit from the current political turmoil. Today they are an after thought.
    Biggest third party in the Commons since... the 1923 election?
    ..... and likely to have the second largest number of local councillors in May.
  • Having a data centre isn’t particularly economically useful (other than being a large consumer of electricity). When it comes to AI the only technology worth having is the frontier models themselves. We have none of them so we’ve missed the boat.

    Sunak seems to go on about AI a lot and yet as far as I can tell when he was in government did absolutely bugger all.

    At one point he was this sort of “AI tech bro”. Empty substance.
  • StockyStocky Posts: 10,499

    Sandpit said:

    nico67 said:

    Sandpit said:

    FF43 said:

    Interesting article about Dubai and why it's likely to see off the current attacks from Iran thanks to a highly successful economy based on immigration and a massive sovereign wealth fund.

    https://time.com/article/2026/04/09/iran-war-dubai-survive-abide/

    On topic the Tories won't do a deal with Farage until they do one.

    Somewhat more positive than most articles written about Dubai in the past six weeks, many of which written by people who had never been here for more than a week’s holiday.
    There has been a lot of hysterical media about some exodus from Dubai . When the reality is even during the last month everyday life has gone on as normal for the vast majority of people .
    Correct. A lot of companies are WFH, to avoid half the company being in the same place if something happens. Multinationals had longstanding disaster plans to evacuate key staff, which was done immediately the situation started.

    I don’t know anyone who’s quit a salaried job. A few of the digital nomad and ‘influencer’ types have left temporarily, as have a number of wives and kids as schools are also remote.

    Hospitality sector is struggling with the lack of tourists, and there have been some furloughs there. On the other hand the fancy hotel resorts are doing some fantastic resident offers at the moment, 5* resort for £150-£200 a night.

    The death toll in UAE is 10 for a population of 11m. That’s a couple of days’ worth of road accidents. Obviously sad for those affected, but perspective…
    So are you pro WFH? I thought you’d be the kind of person to say get back to the office but maybe I’m wrong and happy to say so.
    The WFH thing is being misunderstood. Many are not against it per se but are cross that people (particularly the more senior with power, inc public sector) cynically used the pandemic to refuse to return to their prior workplace in order to improve their terms and conditions (with no loss of salary). Many of these people are still WFH.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 22,035

    Having a data centre isn’t particularly economically useful (other than being a large consumer of electricity). When it comes to AI the only technology worth having is the frontier models themselves. We have none of them so we’ve missed the boat.

    Sunak seems to go on about AI a lot and yet as far as I can tell when he was in government did absolutely bugger all.

    At one point he was this sort of “AI tech bro”. Empty substance.
    It’s funny because DeepMind was founded in the UK before being acquired by Google in 2014 so that’s more UK technology disappearing with little economic benefit.
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 72,210

    We have a lot of people here who would never vote Farage and are sort of never Farage Tories.

    However I feel that in the country this is a lot more unlikely, sadly.

    I really do not think it is

    Farage is toxic and he has 3 years ahead of him of deep dislike in a very changed environment

    I expect the shine to come off both Farage and Polanski by GE29
  • Stocky said:

    Sandpit said:

    nico67 said:

    Sandpit said:

    FF43 said:

    Interesting article about Dubai and why it's likely to see off the current attacks from Iran thanks to a highly successful economy based on immigration and a massive sovereign wealth fund.

    https://time.com/article/2026/04/09/iran-war-dubai-survive-abide/

    On topic the Tories won't do a deal with Farage until they do one.

    Somewhat more positive than most articles written about Dubai in the past six weeks, many of which written by people who had never been here for more than a week’s holiday.
    There has been a lot of hysterical media about some exodus from Dubai . When the reality is even during the last month everyday life has gone on as normal for the vast majority of people .
    Correct. A lot of companies are WFH, to avoid half the company being in the same place if something happens. Multinationals had longstanding disaster plans to evacuate key staff, which was done immediately the situation started.

    I don’t know anyone who’s quit a salaried job. A few of the digital nomad and ‘influencer’ types have left temporarily, as have a number of wives and kids as schools are also remote.

    Hospitality sector is struggling with the lack of tourists, and there have been some furloughs there. On the other hand the fancy hotel resorts are doing some fantastic resident offers at the moment, 5* resort for £150-£200 a night.

    The death toll in UAE is 10 for a population of 11m. That’s a couple of days’ worth of road accidents. Obviously sad for those affected, but perspective…
    So are you pro WFH? I thought you’d be the kind of person to say get back to the office but maybe I’m wrong and happy to say so.
    The WFH thing is being misunderstood. Many are not against it per se but are cross that people (particularly the more senior with power, inc public sector) cynically used the pandemic to refuse to return to their prior workplace in order to improve their terms and conditions (with no loss of salary). Many of these people are still WFH.
    I work from home more than I did before the pandemic, I’m fairly senior in my current organisation. That’s the policy of my current company.

    I can’t see the point in companies like Amazon forcing people in every day, can you?
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 72,210
    edited April 10

    https://x.com/steven_swinford/status/2042484922657464394

    Sir Tony Blair has accused Ed Miliband of taking an “ideological” approach to net zero and called on him to approve new oil and gasfields in the North Sea to protect households and businesses from energy price shocks

    The Tony Blair Institute, the former prime minister’s think tank, said the government should approve new licences for the drilling of the Jackdaw gasfield and the Rosebank oilfield to help address Britain’s “systematic energy crisis”

    The report, which was endorsed by Blair, argues that Britain needs to pursue a two-track approach by producing more clean energy while accelerating domestic oil and gas production to reduce Britain’s exposure to global markets

    Tone Langengen, a policy adviser at the Tony Blair Institute (TBI) and author of the paper, also said the UK risked falling behind global competitors by solely focusing on clean power

    “If the government doubles down on the wrong parts of the system, the UK will remain exposed to the same vulnerabilities,” he said

    “But this is also an opportunity to reset — including by accelerating domestic supply to reduce reliance on volatile imports and support UK jobs and tax revenues.”

    Tony Blair is correct.

    Not just Blair but Kemi, the SNP, the unions, labour mps and Reeves
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 79,514

    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    *Checks watch*

    You've published at the wrong time, Mr Eagles. Should have been at two minutes after half past six in the evening.

    Yay, somebody spotted my subtle Great Reform Act pun.
    Subtle? SUBTLE?

    *As shock gathers, fades to Grey*
    Do you need a cup of tea, luv?
    I don’t need Jack, but a cup of tea is always appreciated if you can Russell one up.
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 36,386
    ydoethur said:

    *Checks watch*

    You've published at the wrong time, Mr Eagles. Should have been at two minutes after half past six in the evening.

    Actual footage of ydoethur in the 8 Out of 10 Cats audience:-
    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/CWYR0wedSJk
  • Leon_VotedForStarmerLeon_VotedForStarmer Posts: 69,000
    edited April 10
    Sandpit said:

    nico67 said:

    Sandpit said:

    FF43 said:

    Interesting article about Dubai and why it's likely to see off the current attacks from Iran thanks to a highly successful economy based on immigration and a massive sovereign wealth fund.

    https://time.com/article/2026/04/09/iran-war-dubai-survive-abide/

    On topic the Tories won't do a deal with Farage until they do one.

    Somewhat more positive than most articles written about Dubai in the past six weeks, many of which written by people who had never been here for more than a week’s holiday.
    There has been a lot of hysterical media about some exodus from Dubai . When the reality is even during the last month everyday life has gone on as normal for the vast majority of people .
    Correct. A lot of companies are WFH, to avoid half the company being in the same place if something happens. Multinationals had longstanding disaster plans to evacuate key staff, which was done immediately the situation started.

    I don’t know anyone who’s quit a salaried job. A few of the digital nomad and ‘influencer’ types have left temporarily, as have a number of wives and kids as schools are also remote.

    Hospitality sector is struggling with the lack of tourists, and there have been some furloughs there. On the other hand the fancy hotel resorts are doing some fantastic resident offers at the moment, 5* resort for £150-£200 a night.

    The death toll in UAE is 10 for a population of 11m. That’s a couple of days’ worth of road accidents. Obviously sad for those affected, but perspective…
    Out here in Turkey the view of government people - I’ve met a couple - is that Dubai is somewhat fucked. They are in part talking their own book, so a pinch of Aegean Sea salt is required - they want Erdogan’s Istanbul airport to replace Dubai airport as a hub (and Doha etc)

    However there is also some conviction in their words. They think the damage to Dubai’s reputation for safety is long term and considerable (and could of course get a lot worse)

    For Dubai to prosper as it did, it needs a pacified Iran that won’t ever kick off again. That seems distant
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 89,726
    Sandpit said:

    Nigelb said:

    Sandpit said:

    MelonB said:

    From The Spectator today. Congratulations to Ed Miliband:


    "Well done to Ed Miliband for this one. OpenAI is halting its Stargate data centre project in Britain, citing high energy costs. The ChatGPT maker announced a partnership with Nvidia and Nscale last September, at the time of Donald Trump’s state visit. The investment was worth £31 billion in all and the Prime Minister hailed it as a ‘generational step change’. Sadly, OpenAI seems to have realised that Britain’s industrial electricity prices are the highest in the developed world.


    A spokesman for the company said it would ‘move forward when the right conditions – such as regulation and the cost of energy – enable long-term infrastructure investment’. It’s all pretty bleak for Starmer’s repeatedly stated ambition that we should be an ‘AI superpower’. "

    OpenAI is in quite serious financial trouble so this is perhaps not surprising. You call off your most marginal investments first and it sounds like this one was marginal.

    We’re going to see a clearout of AI competition over the next couple of years, just as we did during dot-com.
    Yes, OAI are billions in debt and making very little in revenue.

    They’re also facing a lawsuit from former partners led by Elon Musk, after they moved from a non-profit to a commercial business model.

    None of the other large players wants to acquire them, they’re all happy to wait for the bankruptcy and bid for the pieces of what’s left.

    That all said, it’s a massive loss to the UK that this contract was cancelled.
    UK should be in a great place to benefit from being outside EU regulations on AI. Expect more and similar stories if the government can’t get to grips with the price of energy.
    Those two sentences seem slightly at odds.
    Not at all, the project was still worth billions to the UK even if OAI eventually goes bust. The data centre would have been built, and eventually operated by someone.
    There was serious doubt about that from the start.
    The AI companies are struggling to build even all of the ones they have planned in the US.
  • StuartinromfordStuartinromford Posts: 22,894

    Foxy said:

    Battlebus said:

    The Tory MP you mention has it right.

    The Tories would not survive a pact with Reform. They may not survive without one, but them the breaks

    The LibDems survived a pact with the Tories - but only just.

    Perhaps there should be a Tories-Reform pact as we all know who are the bigger sharks.
    Did the LibDems survive? It’s too early to tell.

    You could make an argument that they have been fatally wounded; they don’t just realize it yet.

    20 years ago they would have been the obvious candidate to benefit from the current political turmoil. Today they are an after thought.
    72 MPs is the largest third party representation in a century, so they clearly survived. Likely to have a good set of May elections in England too, though will be overshadowed in the headlines by the Reform and Green surges, and Con and Labour meltdown.
    You are taking too short term a view.

    They did well in a generational melt down for the Tories.

    But if they are supplanted as the natural left party of protest what’s their USP?
    The Waitrose Belt National Party. Not so much a protest party as a mild grumbling party. It's a decent slice of the electorate and of the country. Maybe 100 seats next time. It doesn't get the Lib Dems anywhere near a majority, but that's no change on the last century.

    It's one of the curious things about current politics- the growth of "People Like Us" parties. It started with the Nats in Scotland, now in Wales as well. The Lib Dem map is a bit like that, except their nation is like one of those crazy old counties with loads on enclaves and exclaves. The Greens seem to be heading that way; especially under Polanski, they seem to be settling as the Voice of Funky Young Urbanites.

    Not sure why it's happened, but it doesn't feel like a good thing. It will be an absolute bugger if these fairly parochial groups need to agree a plan for national government.
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 41,579
    Sandpit said:

    I honestly think Google played the AI race extremely intelligently. They weren’t the first to make it big but they used their long-developed models and iteratively improved them over time to now from what I can see be at least on par with OpenAI. They also have the fallback of having a massive business with which to fund it that isn’t AI.

    OpenAI has nothing.

    Apple has virtually stayed out altogether and I can see why.

    No doubt AI is going to be around but when the bubble bursts - and it will - we will finally get some proper and rational discussion about what AI is for. OpenAI I think, will be one of the first casualties.

    Apart from NVidia, Apple has played the best game so far on AI.

    Be the guy selling shovels and sieves in the gold rush.
    I don't think giving Google $20bn per year for Gemini is a particularly great strategy win, but it's probably better than spending $200bn on a custom model that's worse than the competition - the Microsoft route I like to call that.

    Google have clearly played the best game for AI, they have been in it longest and have their own hardware which eliminates their reliance on Nvidia and they've managed to sidestep the soaring costs for RAM because Tensor has a much lower usage of RAM than H100s or AMD/Intel CPUs.

    OpenAI is, IMO, going to be gone this time next year. ChatGPT is a shite, Sora is dead, their enterprise offering is 2-3 steps behind Anthropic and sucking up to the US government has probably only bought them a year of runway. My understanding is that their $150bn funding round only unlocks $40bn in immediate cash, which they will burn through in about 8-9 months even if energy prices start to fall that will only buy them an extra few months. ChatGPT is the default consumer LLM but consumers don't want to pay $100 per month for it and companies would rather pay Anthropic $150 per licence or get Gemini with a Google workspace subscription.

    Also, OpenAI still have the looming threat of Elon Musk, his lawsuit against them hasn't been thrown out despite numerous attempts to do so and he has got a real case. He gave them billions in startup funding to be a non-profit, they converted to a profit making business but gave him zero equity despite the initial seed funding. I wouldn't be surprised if the courts rule in his favour and force OpenAI to hand him a very big chunk of equity or pay him out tens of billions in recompense.
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 29,526
    Comments are working again !!!

    Has anyone else not been able to see comments for a few days ?
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 63,936

    Having a data centre isn’t particularly economically useful (other than being a large consumer of electricity). When it comes to AI the only technology worth having is the frontier models themselves. We have none of them so we’ve missed the boat.

    Sunak seems to go on about AI a lot and yet as far as I can tell when he was in government did absolutely bugger all.

    At one point he was this sort of “AI tech bro”. Empty substance.
    Sunak had prepared a new AI supercomputer project, I think in Scotland, which was going ahead until Starmer got in and cancelled it (I believe a near-identical scheme was then funded later...).
  • StockyStocky Posts: 10,499
    Masters golf: Kitayama is at a disrespectful price at 54/1 (bf) and worth a couple of quid.
  • Comments are working again !!!

    Has anyone else not been able to see comments for a few days ?

    Why don’t you just use Vanilla. It’s literally superior in every way.
This discussion has been closed.