Skip to content

British voters agree with J.D. Vance (after a fashion)– politicalbetting.com

SystemSystem Posts: 12,981
edited March 3 in General
British voters agree with J.D. Vance (after a fashion) – politicalbetting.com

By 49% to 28%, Britons are opposed to the US military action against IranNet support by 2024 voteReform: +33Con: +14Lab: -45Lib Dem: -49Green: -59yougov.com/en-gb/daily-…

Read the full story here

«1345678

Comments

  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 86,776
    edited March 3
    Do we ?

    I am not convinced by "..the difference is that back then we had dumb presidents.."
    That sounds arse about.

    "Difference" ?
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 54,463
    edited March 3
    Second! Like he isn’t
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 126,598
    Not to alarm you all or anything, I am currently working on the banking/financial service stress tests, and well I want to go back on holiday.
  • wooliedyedwooliedyed Posts: 16,112
    https://www.pollcheck.co.uk/locals-2026

    Another projection site for the locals.
    Tories hold Bexley is bold (as is only 3 wards between Norfolk and Suffolk)
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 126,598
    Nigelb said:

    Do we ?

    We have a dumb president.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 63,402
    Someone is bold:


  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 86,776
    TheScreamingEagles said:

    Nigelb said:

    Do we ?

    We have a dumb president.
    "..the difference is that back then we had dumb presidents.."
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 86,776
    rcs1000 said:

    Someone is bold:


    Or well armed...
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 77,941
    TheScreamingEagles said:

    Not to alarm you all or anything, I am currently working on the banking/financial service stress tests, and well I want to go back on holiday.

    Won't that make things worse?
  • WhisperingOracleWhisperingOracle Posts: 11,020
    edited March 3
    Or perhap most likely, someone is in touch with Israel.and the U.S. A possible regime emissary.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 126,598
    Nigelb said:

    TheScreamingEagles said:

    Nigelb said:

    Do we ?

    We have a dumb president.
    "..the difference is that back then we had dumb presidents.."
    I’ve added ‘after a fashion) to the headline.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 37,787
    Farage is tied to Trump's coat tails so he can't really do much other than fawn over Trump and Bibi.

    Badenoch, and disappointingly Hunt, could have kept their counsel until they could see where the wind blows. Trump is talking about an imminent unprecedentedly enormous attack on Iran. Some of the places I am looking are asking will this bigly attack involve nukes? To mark his place in history it wouldn't surprise me. As for Kemi, sometimes silence is golden.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 86,776
    TheScreamingEagles said:

    Nigelb said:

    TheScreamingEagles said:

    Nigelb said:

    Do we ?

    We have a dumb president.
    "..the difference is that back then we had dumb presidents.."
    I’ve added ‘after a fashion) to the headline.
    How could we not support it, since it is evidently divinely ordained ?

    U.S. Troops Were Told Iran War Is for “Armageddon,” Return of Jesus
    Advocacy group reports commanders giving similar messages at more than 30 installations in every branch of the military
    https://jonathanlarsen.substack.com/p/us-troops-were-told-iran-war-is-for
  • eekeek Posts: 32,703
    TheScreamingEagles said:

    Not to alarm you all or anything, I am currently working on the banking/financial service stress tests, and well I want to go back on holiday.

    Any new scenarios - I haven't looked which is why I'm asking.
  • FF43FF43 Posts: 19,020
    A bit like that Conclave film that people thought was preposterous

    Israel attacked the 88 council members while they were voting to choose the next supreme leader.


    ‪https://bsky.app/profile/shipwreck75.bsky.social/post/3mg5xqv47fs2l
  • StuartinromfordStuartinromford Posts: 21,774
    Nigelb said:

    TheScreamingEagles said:

    Nigelb said:

    Do we ?

    We have a dumb president.
    "..the difference is that back then we had dumb presidents.."
    Oh for the good old days when Presidents were merely dumb.
  • FF43FF43 Posts: 19,020
    Mexicanpete said:

    Farage is tied to Trump's coat tails so he can't really do much other than fawn over Trump and Bibi.

    Badenoch, and disappointingly Hunt, could have kept their counsel until they could see where the wind blows. Trump is talking about an imminent unprecedentedly enormous attack on Iran. Some of the places I am looking are asking will this bigly attack involve nukes? To mark his place in history it wouldn't surprise me. As for Kemi, sometimes silence is golden.

    Badenoch is fascinatingly bad. You know where you are with Farage. He's a charlatan and a grifter. Badenoch really isn't, but still comes up with these grotesquely stupid takes.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 70,494
    Donald Trump struggles to explain why he launched another Middle Eastern war

    Reason for conflict that has already killed hundreds of Iranians and six US soldiers remains unclear

    https://www.ft.com/content/fd31c6ad-39f0-4fae-851c-fadf44f006eb?accessToken=zwAAAZy0cFPJkdP9McatOfBPrtOFHPrfRPAG6w.MEYCIQCsG5pfrLFIyETnJd3c7ZsEOQCMRidaRWbVMW5gyGP8LwIhAOTT-t5tWLlE8-ez6r3p10JW27_XXNsthj57355qtOul&segmentId=e95a9ae7-622c-6235-5f87-51e412b47e97&shareType=enterprise&shareId=ede1a946-9fdc-47f3-a8e3-a9e72c8e3258
  • StuartinromfordStuartinromford Posts: 21,774
    wooliedyed said:

    https://www.pollcheck.co.uk/locals-2026

    Another projection site for the locals.
    Tories hold Bexley is bold (as is only 3 wards between Norfolk and Suffolk)

    Respect to them for describing their methodology.

    But if you offered Labour only losing 1/3 of their seats, they would be well advised to bite your arm off.

    Havering looks odd as well- Reform not even largest party. Be blooming funny if that is what happens- I wonder who they would blame?
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 35,335
    Nigelb said:

    TheScreamingEagles said:

    Nigelb said:

    TheScreamingEagles said:

    Nigelb said:

    Do we ?

    We have a dumb president.
    "..the difference is that back then we had dumb presidents.."
    I’ve added ‘after a fashion) to the headline.
    How could we not support it, since it is evidently divinely ordained ?

    U.S. Troops Were Told Iran War Is for “Armageddon,” Return of Jesus
    Advocacy group reports commanders giving similar messages at more than 30 installations in every branch of the military
    https://jonathanlarsen.substack.com/p/us-troops-were-told-iran-war-is-for
    Bibi's going to look a bloody fool then.
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 31,534
    Nigelb said:

    TheScreamingEagles said:

    Nigelb said:

    TheScreamingEagles said:

    Nigelb said:

    Do we ?

    We have a dumb president.
    "..the difference is that back then we had dumb presidents.."
    I’ve added ‘after a fashion) to the headline.
    How could we not support it, since it is evidently divinely ordained ?

    U.S. Troops Were Told Iran War Is for “Armageddon,” Return of Jesus
    Advocacy group reports commanders giving similar messages at more than 30 installations in every branch of the military
    https://jonathanlarsen.substack.com/p/us-troops-were-told-iran-war-is-for
    Christian eschatology is always underplayed as a motive for US Middle East policy.
    These are the headcases Farage and Badenoch want us to row in behind.
  • RogerRoger Posts: 22,366
    edited March 3
    There's a good centre left grouping coming together. Now that Starmer is following his MPs and not slavishly following Trump a 'NEW LABOUR' could be at its centre. If he can't resist the pull towards Farage he can and will be replaced. He's got roughly 10 weeks to show he's the person to lead this grouping otherwise he'll be out. This I believe to be a fact.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 126,598
    eek said:

    TheScreamingEagles said:

    Not to alarm you all or anything, I am currently working on the banking/financial service stress tests, and well I want to go back on holiday.

    Any new scenarios - I haven't looked which is why I'm asking.
    Planes no longer flying in that area/getting shot down. ME countries might not have the weapons to stop the missiles/drones.

    Think the Ever Given on speed.

    Very little oil leaving the area so the West seizes up.

    A limited US invasion of Iran to open the Straits of Hormuz.

    Increase in fuel prices destroys demands and savings defaults increase.

    A nuke/dirty bomb being deployed by either side.

    Not quite Threads.

    MERS 2.

    So the world economy seizes up.
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 70,191
    Roger said:

    There's a good centre left grouping coming together. Now that Starmer is following his MPs and not slavishly following Trump a 'NEW LABOUR' could be at its centre. If he can't resist the pull towards Farage he can and will be replaced. He's got roughly 10 weeks to show he's the person to lead this grouping otherwise he'll be out. This I believe to be a fact.

    Replaced by whom ?
  • nico67nico67 Posts: 7,151
    I see the latest attempt to win hearts and minds is to completely flatten Tehran .
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 86,776
    dixiedean said:

    Nigelb said:

    TheScreamingEagles said:

    Nigelb said:

    TheScreamingEagles said:

    Nigelb said:

    Do we ?

    We have a dumb president.
    "..the difference is that back then we had dumb presidents.."
    I’ve added ‘after a fashion) to the headline.
    How could we not support it, since it is evidently divinely ordained ?

    U.S. Troops Were Told Iran War Is for “Armageddon,” Return of Jesus
    Advocacy group reports commanders giving similar messages at more than 30 installations in every branch of the military
    https://jonathanlarsen.substack.com/p/us-troops-were-told-iran-war-is-for
    Christian eschatology is always underplayed as a motive for US Middle East policy.
    These are the headcases Farage and Badenoch want us to row in behind.
    Hegseth, as well as being dumber than his boss, is also a religious nutter.
    Genuine nutter, that is, being a follower of this guy:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_Wilson_(theologian)
  • wooliedyedwooliedyed Posts: 16,112
    FF43 said:

    Mexicanpete said:

    Farage is tied to Trump's coat tails so he can't really do much other than fawn over Trump and Bibi.

    Badenoch, and disappointingly Hunt, could have kept their counsel until they could see where the wind blows. Trump is talking about an imminent unprecedentedly enormous attack on Iran. Some of the places I am looking are asking will this bigly attack involve nukes? To mark his place in history it wouldn't surprise me. As for Kemi, sometimes silence is golden.

    Badenoch is fascinatingly bad. You know where you are with Farage. He's a charlatan and a grifter. Badenoch really isn't, but still comes up with these grotesquely stupid takes.
    Her take on the attack on Akrotiri is spot on. Our failure to even offer a token retaliation of any kind invites future attacks on UK bases and forces.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 77,941
    DecrepiterJohnL said:

    Nigelb said:

    TheScreamingEagles said:

    Nigelb said:

    TheScreamingEagles said:

    Nigelb said:

    Do we ?

    We have a dumb president.
    "..the difference is that back then we had dumb presidents.."
    I’ve added ‘after a fashion) to the headline.
    How could we not support it, since it is evidently divinely ordained ?

    U.S. Troops Were Told Iran War Is for “Armageddon,” Return of Jesus
    Advocacy group reports commanders giving similar messages at more than 30 installations in every branch of the military
    https://jonathanlarsen.substack.com/p/us-troops-were-told-iran-war-is-for
    Bibi's going to look a bloody fool then.
    Some things never change.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 66,871
    Guys. Re the whole bat plague thing on the last thread. You’re just embarrassing yourselves now

    @bondegezou claiming the Wuhan CDC is somehow irrelevant

    @rcs claiming the Wuhan CDC had nothing to do with bats “but I can’t be sure”

    Can’t be sure eh?

    “The Wuhan CDC collected and housed many bats in collaboration with the WIV. It issued a contract for the disposal of 2 tons of hazardous medical waste generated in its labs in June 2019. This waste ‘has not been effectively treated from 1994 to 2019’, the announcement conceded.”

    “The CDC ‘hosted animals in laboratories for research purpose, one of which was specialized in pathogens collection and identification’.

    A lead researcher there at the CDC collected 10,000 bats and revealed ‘he was once attacked by bats and the blood of a bat shot on his skin...'”

    https://x.com/mattwridley/status/1630863115540676608?s=46

    Seriously. Just stop. It’s comical. I’ve now been there. The big dodgy place with thousands of bats which helped the WIV do all the dangerous bat virus research is THREE MINUTES WALK from the market. I know this coz I just walked it

    Give it up. It’s over
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 77,941
    Leon said:

    Guys. Re the whole bat plague thing on the last thread. You’re just embarrassing yourselves now

    I do wish people would stop saying things like this. I really can't afford the new irony meters, and they keep going bang like Hizbollah's pagers.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 66,871
    Is there anything else PB would like solved now I’ve solved Covid?

    I’ve got a couple of spare weeks

    Maybe the mind/body problem. Free will v determinism?

    Jam or cream first?
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 77,941
    Leon said:

    Is there anything else PB would like solved now I’ve solved Covid?

    I’ve got a couple of spare weeks

    Maybe the mind/body problem. Free will v determinism?

    Jam or cream first?

    Whut? Are you suggesting there are people out there who put the cream on first?
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 22,125
    Leon said:

    Guys. Re the whole bat plague thing on the last thread. You’re just embarrassing yourselves now

    @bondegezou claiming the Wuhan CDC is somehow irrelevant

    @rcs claiming the Wuhan CDC had nothing to do with bats “but I can’t be sure”

    Can’t be sure eh?

    “The Wuhan CDC collected and housed many bats in collaboration with the WIV. It issued a contract for the disposal of 2 tons of hazardous medical waste generated in its labs in June 2019. This waste ‘has not been effectively treated from 1994 to 2019’, the announcement conceded.”

    “The CDC ‘hosted animals in laboratories for research purpose, one of which was specialized in pathogens collection and identification’.

    A lead researcher there at the CDC collected 10,000 bats and revealed ‘he was once attacked by bats and the blood of a bat shot on his skin...'”

    https://x.com/mattwridley/status/1630863115540676608?s=46

    Seriously. Just stop. It’s comical. I’ve now been there. The big dodgy place with thousands of bats which helped the WIV do all the dangerous bat virus research is THREE MINUTES WALK from the market. I know this coz I just walked it

    Give it up. It’s over

    Hmm - who to think might be best to trust on this. Exhibit A, a collection of scientists who have looked at research papers on the topic and considered scenarios or Exhibit B, a self confessed sensationalist, thrill seeker who also think UFO's are about to be revealed as alien visitors?
  • JohnLilburneJohnLilburne Posts: 7,974
    Leon said:

    Is there anything else PB would like solved now I’ve solved Covid?

    I’ve got a couple of spare weeks

    Maybe the mind/body problem. Free will v determinism?

    Jam or cream first?

    As you're Cornish, I imagine you have a ready solution for the final one.

    (Personally I butter the scone first, after which it is natural to apply first jam and then cream)
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 90,222
    OBR projecting an extra £18bn in welfare spending. We are spinning up an entire NASA (annual budget $24.4bn) worth of welfare this year, bringing our annual spend to around 18 NASAs. By end of the decade it is set to reach 22 NASAs per year.

    https://x.com/peterrhague/status/2028831892586254664?s=20
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 86,776
    turbotubbs said:

    Leon said:

    Guys. Re the whole bat plague thing on the last thread. You’re just embarrassing yourselves now

    @bondegezou claiming the Wuhan CDC is somehow irrelevant

    @rcs claiming the Wuhan CDC had nothing to do with bats “but I can’t be sure”

    Can’t be sure eh?

    “The Wuhan CDC collected and housed many bats in collaboration with the WIV. It issued a contract for the disposal of 2 tons of hazardous medical waste generated in its labs in June 2019. This waste ‘has not been effectively treated from 1994 to 2019’, the announcement conceded.”

    “The CDC ‘hosted animals in laboratories for research purpose, one of which was specialized in pathogens collection and identification’.

    A lead researcher there at the CDC collected 10,000 bats and revealed ‘he was once attacked by bats and the blood of a bat shot on his skin...'”

    https://x.com/mattwridley/status/1630863115540676608?s=46

    Seriously. Just stop. It’s comical. I’ve now been there. The big dodgy place with thousands of bats which helped the WIV do all the dangerous bat virus research is THREE MINUTES WALK from the market. I know this coz I just walked it

    Give it up. It’s over

    Hmm - who to think might be best to trust on this. Exhibit A, a collection of scientists who have looked at research papers on the topic and considered scenarios or Exhibit B, a self confessed sensationalist, thrill seeker who also think UFO's are about to be revealed as alien visitors?
    Don't; you're just encouraging him.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 77,941
    TheScreamingEagles said:

    eek said:

    TheScreamingEagles said:

    Not to alarm you all or anything, I am currently working on the banking/financial service stress tests, and well I want to go back on holiday.

    Any new scenarios - I haven't looked which is why I'm asking.
    Planes no longer flying in that area/getting shot down. ME countries might not have the weapons to stop the missiles/drones.

    Think the Ever Given on speed.

    Very little oil leaving the area so the West seizes up.

    A limited US invasion of Iran to open the Straits of Hormuz.

    Increase in fuel prices destroys demands and savings defaults increase.

    A nuke/dirty bomb being deployed by either side.

    Not quite Threads.

    MERS 2.

    So the world economy seizes up.
    One thing that really puzzles me about Trump is why he would launch this eight months before the midterms so the price rises from downstream effects are most vicious just before the voting begins.

    But maybe, despite Leon's arguments to the contrary, he is just as thick as pigshit.
  • RogerRoger Posts: 22,366



    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2sS96BAiOWI
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 77,941
    edited March 3
    FrancisUrquhart said:

    OBR projecting an extra £18bn in welfare spending. We are spinning up an entire NASA (annual budget $24.4bn) worth of welfare this year, bringing our annual spend to around 18 NASAs. By end of the decade it is set to reach 22 NASAs per year.

    https://x.com/peterrhague/status/2028831892586254664?s=20

    Will it give us the space to deal with social ills?

    Or is it just that spending is rocketing?
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 63,402
    Leon said:

    Guys. Re the whole bat plague thing on the last thread. You’re just embarrassing yourselves now

    @bondegezou claiming the Wuhan CDC is somehow irrelevant

    @rcs claiming the Wuhan CDC had nothing to do with bats “but I can’t be sure”

    Can’t be sure eh?

    “The Wuhan CDC collected and housed many bats in collaboration with the WIV. It issued a contract for the disposal of 2 tons of hazardous medical waste generated in its labs in June 2019. This waste ‘has not been effectively treated from 1994 to 2019’, the announcement conceded.”

    “The CDC ‘hosted animals in laboratories for research purpose, one of which was specialized in pathogens collection and identification’.

    A lead researcher there at the CDC collected 10,000 bats and revealed ‘he was once attacked by bats and the blood of a bat shot on his skin...'”

    https://x.com/mattwridley/status/1630863115540676608?s=46

    Seriously. Just stop. It’s comical. I’ve now been there. The big dodgy place with thousands of bats which helped the WIV do all the dangerous bat virus research is THREE MINUTES WALK from the market. I know this coz I just walked it

    Give it up. It’s over

    A lead researcher there at the CDC collected 10,000 bats and revealed ‘he was once attacked by bats and the blood of a bat shot on his skin...'”

    You do know that those things happened to Tian Junhua when he was out in the wild, right? Collecting samples. They didn't happen at the CDC.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 90,222
    edited March 3
    UK to send HMS Dragon and helicopters with counter-drone capabilities to protect Cyprus.
  • AnneJGPAnneJGP Posts: 4,872
    JohnLilburne said:

    Leon said:

    Is there anything else PB would like solved now I’ve solved Covid?

    I’ve got a couple of spare weeks

    Maybe the mind/body problem. Free will v determinism?

    Jam or cream first?

    As you're Cornish, I imagine you have a ready solution for the final one.

    (Personally I butter the scone first, after which it is natural to apply first jam and then cream)
    I don't apply butter so naturally the cream is first.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 86,776
    West Wing, 20 odd years ago.
    https://x.com/LemonLymancom/status/2028828694739824730
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 24,628
    wooliedyed said:

    https://www.pollcheck.co.uk/locals-2026

    Another projection site for the locals.
    Tories hold Bexley is bold (as is only 3 wards between Norfolk and Suffolk)

    Looking at Bradford:

    Labour: 11 (6-15) -35

    I would call that a shellacking
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 22,125
    Nigelb said:

    turbotubbs said:

    Leon said:

    Guys. Re the whole bat plague thing on the last thread. You’re just embarrassing yourselves now

    @bondegezou claiming the Wuhan CDC is somehow irrelevant

    @rcs claiming the Wuhan CDC had nothing to do with bats “but I can’t be sure”

    Can’t be sure eh?

    “The Wuhan CDC collected and housed many bats in collaboration with the WIV. It issued a contract for the disposal of 2 tons of hazardous medical waste generated in its labs in June 2019. This waste ‘has not been effectively treated from 1994 to 2019’, the announcement conceded.”

    “The CDC ‘hosted animals in laboratories for research purpose, one of which was specialized in pathogens collection and identification’.

    A lead researcher there at the CDC collected 10,000 bats and revealed ‘he was once attacked by bats and the blood of a bat shot on his skin...'”

    https://x.com/mattwridley/status/1630863115540676608?s=46

    Seriously. Just stop. It’s comical. I’ve now been there. The big dodgy place with thousands of bats which helped the WIV do all the dangerous bat virus research is THREE MINUTES WALK from the market. I know this coz I just walked it

    Give it up. It’s over

    Hmm - who to think might be best to trust on this. Exhibit A, a collection of scientists who have looked at research papers on the topic and considered scenarios or Exhibit B, a self confessed sensationalist, thrill seeker who also think UFO's are about to be revealed as alien visitors?
    Don't; you're just encouraging him.
    I can't help myself, its like Tourette's.
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 70,191
    FrancisUrquhart said:

    UK to send HMS Dragon and helicopters with counter-drone capabilities to protect Cyprus.

    So 5 - 7 days before on station

    Never mind, the Greek and French navy are there
  • StuartinromfordStuartinromford Posts: 21,774
    ydoethur said:

    TheScreamingEagles said:

    eek said:

    TheScreamingEagles said:

    Not to alarm you all or anything, I am currently working on the banking/financial service stress tests, and well I want to go back on holiday.

    Any new scenarios - I haven't looked which is why I'm asking.
    Planes no longer flying in that area/getting shot down. ME countries might not have the weapons to stop the missiles/drones.

    Think the Ever Given on speed.

    Very little oil leaving the area so the West seizes up.

    A limited US invasion of Iran to open the Straits of Hormuz.

    Increase in fuel prices destroys demands and savings defaults increase.

    A nuke/dirty bomb being deployed by either side.

    Not quite Threads.

    MERS 2.

    So the world economy seizes up.
    One thing that really puzzles me about Trump is why he would launch this eight months before the midterms so the price rises from downstream effects are most vicious just before the voting begins.

    But maybe, despite Leon's arguments to the contrary, he is just as thick as pigshit.
    He's clearly not stupid (Trump, not Leon), or he wouldn't have achieved all the things he has done.

    He doesn't think more than one move ahead, which is why he has blown up all his achievements in fairly short order. But in some situations, that's a handy cognitive shortcut. Boris was much the same.

    I'd go with clever, but not wise, and of the two wisdom is way more useful. Besides, his brain is clearly turning into Angel Delight, so the cleverness is going.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 90,222
    edited March 3
    Big_G_NorthWales said:

    FrancisUrquhart said:

    UK to send HMS Dragon and helicopters with counter-drone capabilities to protect Cyprus.

    So 5 - 7 days before on station

    Never mind, the Greek and French navy are there
    Starmer probably thought if fighter jets don't launch from Cyprus there wouldn't be any issues like incoming rockets and drones as that would be against the law....
  • Brixian59Brixian59 Posts: 1,061
    edited March 3
    AnneJGP said:

    JohnLilburne said:

    Leon said:

    Is there anything else PB would like solved now I’ve solved Covid?

    I’ve got a couple of spare weeks

    Maybe the mind/body problem. Free will v determinism?

    Jam or cream first?

    As you're Cornish, I imagine you have a ready solution for the final one.

    (Personally I butter the scone first, after which it is natural to apply first jam and then cream)
    I don't apply butter so naturally the cream is first.
    As a #brumdevonian which after 8 years is more accepted than a grockle and developing to become a "blow in" and with cirnish friends I have developed my own scone version

    Half is cream bottom jam top the other half is jam bottom cream too... They sell very well on Tamar Bridge
  • carnforthcarnforth Posts: 8,415
    JohnLilburne said:

    Leon said:

    Is there anything else PB would like solved now I’ve solved Covid?

    I’ve got a couple of spare weeks

    Maybe the mind/body problem. Free will v determinism?

    Jam or cream first?

    As you're Cornish, I imagine you have a ready solution for the final one.

    (Personally I butter the scone first, after which it is natural to apply first jam and then cream)
    Butter is for sultana scones. And jam and cream should only be used on plain scones. And we should find another name for cheese scones, because savoury things shouldn't be in the same universe as sweet things.
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 40,648
    wooliedyed said:

    https://www.pollcheck.co.uk/locals-2026

    Another projection site for the locals.
    Tories hold Bexley is bold (as is only 3 wards between Norfolk and Suffolk)

    I have to say, those seat numbers seem quite optimistic for both the Conservatives and Labour. They are projected to lose about one third each of the seats which they are defending, despite Labour losing one half of its vote share, compared to 2022, and the Conservatives losing two fifths.

    My view is that seat losses will at the very least, match losses in vote share.
  • numbertwelvenumbertwelve Posts: 8,823
    SandyRentool said:

    wooliedyed said:

    https://www.pollcheck.co.uk/locals-2026

    Another projection site for the locals.
    Tories hold Bexley is bold (as is only 3 wards between Norfolk and Suffolk)

    Looking at Bradford:

    Labour: 11 (6-15) -35

    I would call that a shellacking
    Bradford is all up this year, isn’t it?

    It’s between there and Barnsley for which is going to deliver the biggest Labour shellacking of the night I think (at least in England - Wales could be appalling too).
  • Brixian59Brixian59 Posts: 1,061
    FrancisUrquhart said:

    OBR projecting an extra £18bn in welfare spending. We are spinning up an entire NASA (annual budget $24.4bn) worth of welfare this year, bringing our annual spend to around 18 NASAs. By end of the decade it is set to reach 22 NASAs per year.

    https://x.com/peterrhague/status/2028831892586254664?s=20

    Boris wave NEETS

    Made worse by

    Boris Wave illegal immigrants

    Made worse by

    Boris wave unchecked non validated ADHD and Autism diagnosis.

    Fucking Boris Johnson
  • MattWMattW Posts: 32,411
    Peculiar video of the day.

    "Ranking cities of more than 1 million in the Anglosphere by degree of Car Free"

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cx7BqoZ_Kzg
  • DopermeanDopermean Posts: 2,410
    nico67 said:

    I see the latest attempt to win hearts and minds is to completely flatten Tehran .

    If Israel is running the show then that shouldn't be a surprise
  • LeonLeon Posts: 66,871
    carnforth said:

    JohnLilburne said:

    Leon said:

    Is there anything else PB would like solved now I’ve solved Covid?

    I’ve got a couple of spare weeks

    Maybe the mind/body problem. Free will v determinism?

    Jam or cream first?

    As you're Cornish, I imagine you have a ready solution for the final one.

    (Personally I butter the scone first, after which it is natural to apply first jam and then cream)
    Butter is for sultana scones. And jam and cream should only be used on plain scones. And we should find another name for cheese scones, because savoury things shouldn't be in the same universe as sweet things.
    I agree. You absolutely don’t put butter on a Cornish scone. Or Devon for that matter. They don’t need them. They are rich and sweet enough as is

    I’m Cornish but I’d say this anyway. It’s jam then cream on top. The jam pastes the scone and acts as a glue to keep the cream above stable. And it’s more satisfying to bite through the softer cream to the juicier jam to the lovely doughy scone

    You don’t put the foam on a cappuccino at the bottom do you? Same principle
  • MattWMattW Posts: 32,411
    carnforth said:

    JohnLilburne said:

    Leon said:

    Is there anything else PB would like solved now I’ve solved Covid?

    I’ve got a couple of spare weeks

    Maybe the mind/body problem. Free will v determinism?

    Jam or cream first?

    As you're Cornish, I imagine you have a ready solution for the final one.

    (Personally I butter the scone first, after which it is natural to apply first jam and then cream)
    Butter is for sultana scones. And jam and cream should only be used on plain scones. And we should find another name for cheese scones, because savoury things shouldn't be in the same universe as sweet things.
    I agree with a Cumbrian person.

    For the OP, I recommend the National Trust Book of Scones.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 77,941
    edited March 3
    Stuartinromford said:

    ydoethur said:

    TheScreamingEagles said:

    eek said:

    TheScreamingEagles said:

    Not to alarm you all or anything, I am currently working on the banking/financial service stress tests, and well I want to go back on holiday.

    Any new scenarios - I haven't looked which is why I'm asking.
    Planes no longer flying in that area/getting shot down. ME countries might not have the weapons to stop the missiles/drones.

    Think the Ever Given on speed.

    Very little oil leaving the area so the West seizes up.

    A limited US invasion of Iran to open the Straits of Hormuz.

    Increase in fuel prices destroys demands and savings defaults increase.

    A nuke/dirty bomb being deployed by either side.

    Not quite Threads.

    MERS 2.

    So the world economy seizes up.
    One thing that really puzzles me about Trump is why he would launch this eight months before the midterms so the price rises from downstream effects are most vicious just before the voting begins.

    But maybe, despite Leon's arguments to the contrary, he is just as thick as pigshit.
    He's clearly not stupid (Trump, not Leon), or he wouldn't have achieved all the things he has done.

    He doesn't think more than one move ahead, which is why he has blown up all his achievements in fairly short order. But in some situations, that's a handy cognitive shortcut. Boris was much the same.

    I'd go with clever, but not wise, and of the two wisdom is way more useful. Besides, his brain is clearly turning into Angel Delight, so the cleverness is going.
    It's true, his achievements are remarkable.

    I still do not understand how he could bankrupt a casino while owning it.
  • Brixian59Brixian59 Posts: 1,061
    wooliedyed said:

    FF43 said:

    Mexicanpete said:

    Farage is tied to Trump's coat tails so he can't really do much other than fawn over Trump and Bibi.

    Badenoch, and disappointingly Hunt, could have kept their counsel until they could see where the wind blows. Trump is talking about an imminent unprecedentedly enormous attack on Iran. Some of the places I am looking are asking will this bigly attack involve nukes? To mark his place in history it wouldn't surprise me. As for Kemi, sometimes silence is golden.

    Badenoch is fascinatingly bad. You know where you are with Farage. He's a charlatan and a grifter. Badenoch really isn't, but still comes up with these grotesquely stupid takes.
    Her take on the attack on Akrotiri is spot on. Our failure to even offer a token retaliation of any kind invites future attacks on UK bases and forces.
    Utter bullshit.

    We retaliate and the relatiation increases 10 fold on our bases and 10 fold in our towns and cities.
  • TazTaz Posts: 25,666
    FrancisUrquhart said:

    OBR projecting an extra £18bn in welfare spending. We are spinning up an entire NASA (annual budget $24.4bn) worth of welfare this year, bringing our annual spend to around 18 NASAs. By end of the decade it is set to reach 22 NASAs per year.

    https://x.com/peterrhague/status/2028831892586254664?s=20

    Yet SKS tried to slow the rate of growth, not cut it just slow the rate of growth, and just couldn’t get it past his backbenchers, many of whom didn’t come into politics to make people poorer take a difficult decision.
  • rkrkrkrkrkrk Posts: 9,145
    Roger said:

    There's a good centre left grouping coming together. Now that Starmer is following his MPs and not slavishly following Trump a 'NEW LABOUR' could be at its centre. If he can't resist the pull towards Farage he can and will be replaced. He's got roughly 10 weeks to show he's the person to lead this grouping otherwise he'll be out. This I believe to be a fact.

    I think that ship has sailed sadly.
    Starmer has lost the left permanently.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 90,222
    Leon said:

    carnforth said:

    JohnLilburne said:

    Leon said:

    Is there anything else PB would like solved now I’ve solved Covid?

    I’ve got a couple of spare weeks

    Maybe the mind/body problem. Free will v determinism?

    Jam or cream first?

    As you're Cornish, I imagine you have a ready solution for the final one.

    (Personally I butter the scone first, after which it is natural to apply first jam and then cream)
    Butter is for sultana scones. And jam and cream should only be used on plain scones. And we should find another name for cheese scones, because savoury things shouldn't be in the same universe as sweet things.
    I agree. You absolutely don’t put butter on a Cornish scone. Or Devon for that matter. They don’t need them. They are rich and sweet enough as is

    I’m Cornish but I’d say this anyway. It’s jam then cream on top. The jam pastes the scone and acts as a glue to keep the cream above stable. And it’s more satisfying to bite through the softer cream to the juicier jam to the lovely doughy scone

    You don’t put the foam on a cappuccino at the bottom do you? Same principle
    You clearly haven't seen Mrs U wrestle with the coffee machine.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 86,776
    Leon said:

    carnforth said:

    JohnLilburne said:

    Leon said:

    Is there anything else PB would like solved now I’ve solved Covid?

    I’ve got a couple of spare weeks

    Maybe the mind/body problem. Free will v determinism?

    Jam or cream first?

    As you're Cornish, I imagine you have a ready solution for the final one.

    (Personally I butter the scone first, after which it is natural to apply first jam and then cream)
    Butter is for sultana scones. And jam and cream should only be used on plain scones. And we should find another name for cheese scones, because savoury things shouldn't be in the same universe as sweet things.
    I agree. You absolutely don’t put butter on a Cornish scone. Or Devon for that matter. They don’t need them. They are rich and sweet enough as is

    I’m Cornish but I’d say this anyway. It’s jam then cream on top. The jam pastes the scone and acts as a glue to keep the cream above stable. And it’s more satisfying to bite through the softer cream to the juicier jam to the lovely doughy scone

    You don’t put the foam on a cappuccino at the bottom do you? Same principle
    Clotted cream isn't foam, though.
    TBH, I really don't care which way round, so long as the three ingredients are of decent quality.
  • Brixian59Brixian59 Posts: 1,061
    Big_G_NorthWales said:

    Roger said:

    There's a good centre left grouping coming together. Now that Starmer is following his MPs and not slavishly following Trump a 'NEW LABOUR' could be at its centre. If he can't resist the pull towards Farage he can and will be replaced. He's got roughly 10 weeks to show he's the person to lead this grouping otherwise he'll be out. This I believe to be a fact.

    Replaced by whom ?
    Rayner PM
    Miliband Deputy
    Jones Chancellor
    Rest as they are, all are whopping Tories

    Starmer to Lords as Attorney General
    Reeves to Lords
    Lammy London Mayor
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 57,984
    Brixian59 said:

    wooliedyed said:

    FF43 said:

    Mexicanpete said:

    Farage is tied to Trump's coat tails so he can't really do much other than fawn over Trump and Bibi.

    Badenoch, and disappointingly Hunt, could have kept their counsel until they could see where the wind blows. Trump is talking about an imminent unprecedentedly enormous attack on Iran. Some of the places I am looking are asking will this bigly attack involve nukes? To mark his place in history it wouldn't surprise me. As for Kemi, sometimes silence is golden.

    Badenoch is fascinatingly bad. You know where you are with Farage. He's a charlatan and a grifter. Badenoch really isn't, but still comes up with these grotesquely stupid takes.
    Her take on the attack on Akrotiri is spot on. Our failure to even offer a token retaliation of any kind invites future attacks on UK bases and forces.
    Utter bullshit.

    We retaliate and the relatiation increases 10 fold on our bases and 10 fold in our towns and cities.
    You sound like Nick Griffin. Are you seriously suggesting that not all of our communities would be loyal to Britain in the event of a military confrontation?
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 77,941
    Brixian59 said:

    FrancisUrquhart said:

    OBR projecting an extra £18bn in welfare spending. We are spinning up an entire NASA (annual budget $24.4bn) worth of welfare this year, bringing our annual spend to around 18 NASAs. By end of the decade it is set to reach 22 NASAs per year.

    https://x.com/peterrhague/status/2028831892586254664?s=20

    Boris wave NEETS

    Made worse by

    Boris Wave illegal immigrants

    Made worse by

    Boris wave unchecked non validated ADHD and Autism diagnosis.

    Fucking Boris Johnson
    I've always criticised people who claim its existence, but in light of this post I am forced to concede that Boris Derangement Syndrome is actually real.
  • LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 22,665
    ydoethur said:

    TheScreamingEagles said:

    eek said:

    TheScreamingEagles said:

    Not to alarm you all or anything, I am currently working on the banking/financial service stress tests, and well I want to go back on holiday.

    Any new scenarios - I haven't looked which is why I'm asking.
    Planes no longer flying in that area/getting shot down. ME countries might not have the weapons to stop the missiles/drones.

    Think the Ever Given on speed.

    Very little oil leaving the area so the West seizes up.

    A limited US invasion of Iran to open the Straits of Hormuz.

    Increase in fuel prices destroys demands and savings defaults increase.

    A nuke/dirty bomb being deployed by either side.

    Not quite Threads.

    MERS 2.

    So the world economy seizes up.
    One thing that really puzzles me about Trump is why he would launch this eight months before the midterms so the price rises from downstream effects are most vicious just before the voting begins.

    But maybe, despite Leon's arguments to the contrary, he is just as thick as pigshit.
    Trump was always going to use the awesome might of the US military again after the success of the Venezuela operation. And the sequel was always likely to be more difficult.

    It could have been worse. It could have been Greenland.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 77,941
    Brixian59 said:

    Big_G_NorthWales said:

    Roger said:

    There's a good centre left grouping coming together. Now that Starmer is following his MPs and not slavishly following Trump a 'NEW LABOUR' could be at its centre. If he can't resist the pull towards Farage he can and will be replaced. He's got roughly 10 weeks to show he's the person to lead this grouping otherwise he'll be out. This I believe to be a fact.

    Replaced by whom ?
    Rayner PM
    Miliband Deputy
    Jones Chancellor
    Rest as they are, all are whopping Tories

    Starmer to Lords as Attorney General
    Reeves to Lords
    Lammy London Mayor
    Why would Starmer need to go to the Lords to be Attorney General?
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 63,402
    ydoethur said:

    Stuartinromford said:

    ydoethur said:

    TheScreamingEagles said:

    eek said:

    TheScreamingEagles said:

    Not to alarm you all or anything, I am currently working on the banking/financial service stress tests, and well I want to go back on holiday.

    Any new scenarios - I haven't looked which is why I'm asking.
    Planes no longer flying in that area/getting shot down. ME countries might not have the weapons to stop the missiles/drones.

    Think the Ever Given on speed.

    Very little oil leaving the area so the West seizes up.

    A limited US invasion of Iran to open the Straits of Hormuz.

    Increase in fuel prices destroys demands and savings defaults increase.

    A nuke/dirty bomb being deployed by either side.

    Not quite Threads.

    MERS 2.

    So the world economy seizes up.
    One thing that really puzzles me about Trump is why he would launch this eight months before the midterms so the price rises from downstream effects are most vicious just before the voting begins.

    But maybe, despite Leon's arguments to the contrary, he is just as thick as pigshit.
    He's clearly not stupid (Trump, not Leon), or he wouldn't have achieved all the things he has done.

    He doesn't think more than one move ahead, which is why he has blown up all his achievements in fairly short order. But in some situations, that's a handy cognitive shortcut. Boris was much the same.

    I'd go with clever, but not wise, and of the two wisdom is way more useful. Besides, his brain is clearly turning into Angel Delight, so the cleverness is going.
    It's true, his achievements are remarkable.

    I still do not understand how he could bankrupt a casino while owning it.
    To be fair, that one is fairly easy. All you need to do is to accrue too much debt while building it, such that the profits from the casino are unable to cover your interest payments.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 86,776
    ydoethur said:

    Stuartinromford said:

    ydoethur said:

    TheScreamingEagles said:

    eek said:

    TheScreamingEagles said:

    Not to alarm you all or anything, I am currently working on the banking/financial service stress tests, and well I want to go back on holiday.

    Any new scenarios - I haven't looked which is why I'm asking.
    Planes no longer flying in that area/getting shot down. ME countries might not have the weapons to stop the missiles/drones.

    Think the Ever Given on speed.

    Very little oil leaving the area so the West seizes up.

    A limited US invasion of Iran to open the Straits of Hormuz.

    Increase in fuel prices destroys demands and savings defaults increase.

    A nuke/dirty bomb being deployed by either side.

    Not quite Threads.

    MERS 2.

    So the world economy seizes up.
    One thing that really puzzles me about Trump is why he would launch this eight months before the midterms so the price rises from downstream effects are most vicious just before the voting begins.

    But maybe, despite Leon's arguments to the contrary, he is just as thick as pigshit.
    He's clearly not stupid (Trump, not Leon), or he wouldn't have achieved all the things he has done.

    He doesn't think more than one move ahead, which is why he has blown up all his achievements in fairly short order. But in some situations, that's a handy cognitive shortcut. Boris was much the same.

    I'd go with clever, but not wise, and of the two wisdom is way more useful. Besides, his brain is clearly turning into Angel Delight, so the cleverness is going.
    It's true, his achievements are remarkable.

    I still do not understand how he could bankrupt a casino while owning it.
    Because he has less judgment than a bucket of pigshit.
    He has skills, but rational analysis isn't among them.
  • wooliedyedwooliedyed Posts: 16,112
    Brixian59 said:

    wooliedyed said:

    FF43 said:

    Mexicanpete said:

    Farage is tied to Trump's coat tails so he can't really do much other than fawn over Trump and Bibi.

    Badenoch, and disappointingly Hunt, could have kept their counsel until they could see where the wind blows. Trump is talking about an imminent unprecedentedly enormous attack on Iran. Some of the places I am looking are asking will this bigly attack involve nukes? To mark his place in history it wouldn't surprise me. As for Kemi, sometimes silence is golden.

    Badenoch is fascinatingly bad. You know where you are with Farage. He's a charlatan and a grifter. Badenoch really isn't, but still comes up with these grotesquely stupid takes.
    Her take on the attack on Akrotiri is spot on. Our failure to even offer a token retaliation of any kind invites future attacks on UK bases and forces.
    Utter bullshit.

    We retaliate and the relatiation increases 10 fold on our bases and 10 fold in our towns and cities.
    Not much point having an armed forces then.
    Its a view
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 37,787
    Nigelb said:

    TheScreamingEagles said:

    Nigelb said:

    TheScreamingEagles said:

    Nigelb said:

    Do we ?

    We have a dumb president.
    "..the difference is that back then we had dumb presidents.."
    I’ve added ‘after a fashion) to the headline.
    How could we not support it, since it is evidently divinely ordained ?

    U.S. Troops Were Told Iran War Is for “Armageddon,” Return of Jesus
    Advocacy group reports commanders giving similar messages at more than 30 installations in every branch of the military
    https://jonathanlarsen.substack.com/p/us-troops-were-told-iran-war-is-for
    Praise the Lord (or Mike Huckerbee)!
  • OmniumOmnium Posts: 12,599
    FrancisUrquhart said:

    Big_G_NorthWales said:

    FrancisUrquhart said:

    UK to send HMS Dragon and helicopters with counter-drone capabilities to protect Cyprus.

    So 5 - 7 days before on station

    Never mind, the Greek and French navy are there
    Starmer probably thought if fighter jets don't launch from Cyprus there wouldn't be any issues like incoming rockets and drones as that would be against the law....
    John Healey is also the worst Healey at defence. Doing worse than a man whose wikipedia entry says 'He was best known for his economising, liquidating most of Britain's military role outside of Europe' and he scrapped the TSR-2!
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 77,941
    edited March 3
    rcs1000 said:

    ydoethur said:

    Stuartinromford said:

    ydoethur said:

    TheScreamingEagles said:

    eek said:

    TheScreamingEagles said:

    Not to alarm you all or anything, I am currently working on the banking/financial service stress tests, and well I want to go back on holiday.

    Any new scenarios - I haven't looked which is why I'm asking.
    Planes no longer flying in that area/getting shot down. ME countries might not have the weapons to stop the missiles/drones.

    Think the Ever Given on speed.

    Very little oil leaving the area so the West seizes up.

    A limited US invasion of Iran to open the Straits of Hormuz.

    Increase in fuel prices destroys demands and savings defaults increase.

    A nuke/dirty bomb being deployed by either side.

    Not quite Threads.

    MERS 2.

    So the world economy seizes up.
    One thing that really puzzles me about Trump is why he would launch this eight months before the midterms so the price rises from downstream effects are most vicious just before the voting begins.

    But maybe, despite Leon's arguments to the contrary, he is just as thick as pigshit.
    He's clearly not stupid (Trump, not Leon), or he wouldn't have achieved all the things he has done.

    He doesn't think more than one move ahead, which is why he has blown up all his achievements in fairly short order. But in some situations, that's a handy cognitive shortcut. Boris was much the same.

    I'd go with clever, but not wise, and of the two wisdom is way more useful. Besides, his brain is clearly turning into Angel Delight, so the cleverness is going.
    It's true, his achievements are remarkable.

    I still do not understand how he could bankrupt a casino while owning it.
    To be fair, that one is fairly easy. All you need to do is to accrue too much debt while building it, such that the profits from the casino are unable to cover your interest payments.
    Well, yes, but you know, it's extraordinarily difficult to run up sufficient debts to not cover interest on a building where people are literally giving you money for nothing.

    That is a genius given to few.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 90,222
    rcs1000 said:

    ydoethur said:

    Stuartinromford said:

    ydoethur said:

    TheScreamingEagles said:

    eek said:

    TheScreamingEagles said:

    Not to alarm you all or anything, I am currently working on the banking/financial service stress tests, and well I want to go back on holiday.

    Any new scenarios - I haven't looked which is why I'm asking.
    Planes no longer flying in that area/getting shot down. ME countries might not have the weapons to stop the missiles/drones.

    Think the Ever Given on speed.

    Very little oil leaving the area so the West seizes up.

    A limited US invasion of Iran to open the Straits of Hormuz.

    Increase in fuel prices destroys demands and savings defaults increase.

    A nuke/dirty bomb being deployed by either side.

    Not quite Threads.

    MERS 2.

    So the world economy seizes up.
    One thing that really puzzles me about Trump is why he would launch this eight months before the midterms so the price rises from downstream effects are most vicious just before the voting begins.

    But maybe, despite Leon's arguments to the contrary, he is just as thick as pigshit.
    He's clearly not stupid (Trump, not Leon), or he wouldn't have achieved all the things he has done.

    He doesn't think more than one move ahead, which is why he has blown up all his achievements in fairly short order. But in some situations, that's a handy cognitive shortcut. Boris was much the same.

    I'd go with clever, but not wise, and of the two wisdom is way more useful. Besides, his brain is clearly turning into Angel Delight, so the cleverness is going.
    It's true, his achievements are remarkable.

    I still do not understand how he could bankrupt a casino while owning it.
    To be fair, that one is fairly easy. All you need to do is to accrue too much debt while building it, such that the profits from the casino are unable to cover your interest payments.
    There are quite a few Vegas casinos who have got in serious financial trouble over the years.
  • wooliedyedwooliedyed Posts: 16,112
    edited March 3
    SandyRentool said:

    wooliedyed said:

    https://www.pollcheck.co.uk/locals-2026

    Another projection site for the locals.
    Tories hold Bexley is bold (as is only 3 wards between Norfolk and Suffolk)

    Looking at Bradford:

    Labour: 11 (6-15) -35

    I would call that a shellacking
    Brutal.
    Its got some very odd results though. Tories almost wiped out in East Anglia but hold Solihull, Bexley, Fareham and largest party on Hampshire and West Sussex.........
  • FF43FF43 Posts: 19,020
    ydoethur said:

    TheScreamingEagles said:

    eek said:

    TheScreamingEagles said:

    Not to alarm you all or anything, I am currently working on the banking/financial service stress tests, and well I want to go back on holiday.

    Any new scenarios - I haven't looked which is why I'm asking.
    Planes no longer flying in that area/getting shot down. ME countries might not have the weapons to stop the missiles/drones.

    Think the Ever Given on speed.

    Very little oil leaving the area so the West seizes up.

    A limited US invasion of Iran to open the Straits of Hormuz.

    Increase in fuel prices destroys demands and savings defaults increase.

    A nuke/dirty bomb being deployed by either side.

    Not quite Threads.

    MERS 2.

    So the world economy seizes up.
    One thing that really puzzles me about Trump is why he would launch this eight months before the midterms so the price rises from downstream effects are most vicious just before the voting begins.

    But maybe, despite Leon's arguments to the contrary, he is just as thick as pigshit.
    Similarities and differences between Trump and Galtieri. Discuss.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 77,941
    FrancisUrquhart said:

    rcs1000 said:

    ydoethur said:

    Stuartinromford said:

    ydoethur said:

    TheScreamingEagles said:

    eek said:

    TheScreamingEagles said:

    Not to alarm you all or anything, I am currently working on the banking/financial service stress tests, and well I want to go back on holiday.

    Any new scenarios - I haven't looked which is why I'm asking.
    Planes no longer flying in that area/getting shot down. ME countries might not have the weapons to stop the missiles/drones.

    Think the Ever Given on speed.

    Very little oil leaving the area so the West seizes up.

    A limited US invasion of Iran to open the Straits of Hormuz.

    Increase in fuel prices destroys demands and savings defaults increase.

    A nuke/dirty bomb being deployed by either side.

    Not quite Threads.

    MERS 2.

    So the world economy seizes up.
    One thing that really puzzles me about Trump is why he would launch this eight months before the midterms so the price rises from downstream effects are most vicious just before the voting begins.

    But maybe, despite Leon's arguments to the contrary, he is just as thick as pigshit.
    He's clearly not stupid (Trump, not Leon), or he wouldn't have achieved all the things he has done.

    He doesn't think more than one move ahead, which is why he has blown up all his achievements in fairly short order. But in some situations, that's a handy cognitive shortcut. Boris was much the same.

    I'd go with clever, but not wise, and of the two wisdom is way more useful. Besides, his brain is clearly turning into Angel Delight, so the cleverness is going.
    It's true, his achievements are remarkable.

    I still do not understand how he could bankrupt a casino while owning it.
    To be fair, that one is fairly easy. All you need to do is to accrue too much debt while building it, such that the profits from the casino are unable to cover your interest payments.
    There are quite a few Vegas casinos who have got in serious financial trouble over the years.
    Isn't that because the staff and owners turned out to be crooks and were nicking all the money? Which does not of course apply to Tru...ah, hang on.
  • TazTaz Posts: 25,666
    numbertwelve said:

    SandyRentool said:

    wooliedyed said:

    https://www.pollcheck.co.uk/locals-2026

    Another projection site for the locals.
    Tories hold Bexley is bold (as is only 3 wards between Norfolk and Suffolk)

    Looking at Bradford:

    Labour: 11 (6-15) -35

    I would call that a shellacking
    Bradford is all up this year, isn’t it?

    It’s between there and Barnsley for which is going to deliver the biggest Labour shellacking of the night I think (at least in England - Wales could be appalling too).
    They will get a battering in Sunderland too. Deservedly so.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 90,222
    edited March 3
    ydoethur said:

    rcs1000 said:

    ydoethur said:

    Stuartinromford said:

    ydoethur said:

    TheScreamingEagles said:

    eek said:

    TheScreamingEagles said:

    Not to alarm you all or anything, I am currently working on the banking/financial service stress tests, and well I want to go back on holiday.

    Any new scenarios - I haven't looked which is why I'm asking.
    Planes no longer flying in that area/getting shot down. ME countries might not have the weapons to stop the missiles/drones.

    Think the Ever Given on speed.

    Very little oil leaving the area so the West seizes up.

    A limited US invasion of Iran to open the Straits of Hormuz.

    Increase in fuel prices destroys demands and savings defaults increase.

    A nuke/dirty bomb being deployed by either side.

    Not quite Threads.

    MERS 2.

    So the world economy seizes up.
    One thing that really puzzles me about Trump is why he would launch this eight months before the midterms so the price rises from downstream effects are most vicious just before the voting begins.

    But maybe, despite Leon's arguments to the contrary, he is just as thick as pigshit.
    He's clearly not stupid (Trump, not Leon), or he wouldn't have achieved all the things he has done.

    He doesn't think more than one move ahead, which is why he has blown up all his achievements in fairly short order. But in some situations, that's a handy cognitive shortcut. Boris was much the same.

    I'd go with clever, but not wise, and of the two wisdom is way more useful. Besides, his brain is clearly turning into Angel Delight, so the cleverness is going.
    It's true, his achievements are remarkable.

    I still do not understand how he could bankrupt a casino while owning it.
    To be fair, that one is fairly easy. All you need to do is to accrue too much debt while building it, such that the profits from the casino are unable to cover your interest payments.
    Well, yes, but you know, it's extraordinarily difficult to run up sufficient debts to not cover interest on a building where people are literally giving you money for nothing.

    That is a genius given to few.
    You will be surprised. Currently, Caesars Entertainment is in massive financial doo doo.
  • RogerRoger Posts: 22,366
    rkrkrk said:

    Roger said:

    There's a good centre left grouping coming together. Now that Starmer is following his MPs and not slavishly following Trump a 'NEW LABOUR' could be at its centre. If he can't resist the pull towards Farage he can and will be replaced. He's got roughly 10 weeks to show he's the person to lead this grouping otherwise he'll be out. This I believe to be a fact.

    I think that ship has sailed sadly.
    Starmer has lost the left permanently.
    I have have it on unimpeachable authority that Burnham is going for a seat again in May
  • TazTaz Posts: 25,666
    Dopermean said:

    nico67 said:

    I see the latest attempt to win hearts and minds is to completely flatten Tehran .

    If Israel is running the show then that shouldn't be a surprise
    Trump is a bit part player here. This is Bibi’s game and Trump is dancing to his tune.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 86,776
    Good lord.

    Bill Clinton looks like Dick van Dyke, but older.
    https://x.com/BrandyZadrozny/status/2028830538400731430
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 77,941
    Taz said:

    Dopermean said:

    nico67 said:

    I see the latest attempt to win hearts and minds is to completely flatten Tehran .

    If Israel is running the show then that shouldn't be a surprise
    Trump is a bit part player here. This is Bibi’s game and Trump is dancing to his tune.
    That sounds very dangerous. I mean, Trump's age and health and the cocktail of drugs he's on, any exertion could lead to President Vance.
  • MattWMattW Posts: 32,411
    Nigelb said:

    Leon said:

    carnforth said:

    JohnLilburne said:

    Leon said:

    Is there anything else PB would like solved now I’ve solved Covid?

    I’ve got a couple of spare weeks

    Maybe the mind/body problem. Free will v determinism?

    Jam or cream first?

    As you're Cornish, I imagine you have a ready solution for the final one.

    (Personally I butter the scone first, after which it is natural to apply first jam and then cream)
    Butter is for sultana scones. And jam and cream should only be used on plain scones. And we should find another name for cheese scones, because savoury things shouldn't be in the same universe as sweet things.
    I agree. You absolutely don’t put butter on a Cornish scone. Or Devon for that matter. They don’t need them. They are rich and sweet enough as is

    I’m Cornish but I’d say this anyway. It’s jam then cream on top. The jam pastes the scone and acts as a glue to keep the cream above stable. And it’s more satisfying to bite through the softer cream to the juicier jam to the lovely doughy scone

    You don’t put the foam on a cappuccino at the bottom do you? Same principle
    Clotted cream isn't foam, though.
    TBH, I really don't care which way round, so long as the three ingredients are of decent quality.
    You sound like that guy who would put the cream at the bottom of a trifle.

    I nearly reported that last paragraph.
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 70,191
    Brixian59 said:

    wooliedyed said:

    FF43 said:

    Mexicanpete said:

    Farage is tied to Trump's coat tails so he can't really do much other than fawn over Trump and Bibi.

    Badenoch, and disappointingly Hunt, could have kept their counsel until they could see where the wind blows. Trump is talking about an imminent unprecedentedly enormous attack on Iran. Some of the places I am looking are asking will this bigly attack involve nukes? To mark his place in history it wouldn't surprise me. As for Kemi, sometimes silence is golden.

    Badenoch is fascinatingly bad. You know where you are with Farage. He's a charlatan and a grifter. Badenoch really isn't, but still comes up with these grotesquely stupid takes.
    Her take on the attack on Akrotiri is spot on. Our failure to even offer a token retaliation of any kind invites future attacks on UK bases and forces.
    Utter bullshit.

    We retaliate and the relatiation increases 10 fold on our bases and 10 fold in our towns and cities.
    Akrotiri air base has come under drone attack, probably from Lebanon, to the point the Greek and French navies have been deployed to shoot down these drones. Finally in a week or so the Royal Navy will arrive to do the same

    Appeasement never works
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 90,222
    edited March 3
    Trump life story can be easily understood when you think of him as the extreme of the classic brash arrogant rich New Yorker. Must be heard, must be seen, must tell everybody he is the richest, smartest, best person in the room. The New Yorker version of the Harry Enfield character, "I am considerably rich than uuuuuuuuuwww".
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 63,402
    ydoethur said:

    rcs1000 said:

    ydoethur said:

    Stuartinromford said:

    ydoethur said:

    TheScreamingEagles said:

    eek said:

    TheScreamingEagles said:

    Not to alarm you all or anything, I am currently working on the banking/financial service stress tests, and well I want to go back on holiday.

    Any new scenarios - I haven't looked which is why I'm asking.
    Planes no longer flying in that area/getting shot down. ME countries might not have the weapons to stop the missiles/drones.

    Think the Ever Given on speed.

    Very little oil leaving the area so the West seizes up.

    A limited US invasion of Iran to open the Straits of Hormuz.

    Increase in fuel prices destroys demands and savings defaults increase.

    A nuke/dirty bomb being deployed by either side.

    Not quite Threads.

    MERS 2.

    So the world economy seizes up.
    One thing that really puzzles me about Trump is why he would launch this eight months before the midterms so the price rises from downstream effects are most vicious just before the voting begins.

    But maybe, despite Leon's arguments to the contrary, he is just as thick as pigshit.
    He's clearly not stupid (Trump, not Leon), or he wouldn't have achieved all the things he has done.

    He doesn't think more than one move ahead, which is why he has blown up all his achievements in fairly short order. But in some situations, that's a handy cognitive shortcut. Boris was much the same.

    I'd go with clever, but not wise, and of the two wisdom is way more useful. Besides, his brain is clearly turning into Angel Delight, so the cleverness is going.
    It's true, his achievements are remarkable.

    I still do not understand how he could bankrupt a casino while owning it.
    To be fair, that one is fairly easy. All you need to do is to accrue too much debt while building it, such that the profits from the casino are unable to cover your interest payments.
    Well, yes, but you know, it's extraordinarily difficult to run up sufficient debts to not cover interest on a building where people are literally giving you money for nothing.

    That is a genius given to few.
    Trump made a ... minor ... miscalculation. He thought people would flock to Atlantic City because it was near(-ish) to New York.

    Unfortunately for him, it turned out that if you want to actually travel to a Sin City, then Las Vegas is barely any less convenient than Atlantic City. And if you didn't want to travel far, then a bunch of other options (Indian Reservations, etc) exist.

    Meaning all Atlantic City could bring in was retirees on buses playing 1 cent slot machines and sipping margaritas, rather than the high rollers he dreamed of.

  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 70,191
    Roger said:

    rkrkrk said:

    Roger said:

    There's a good centre left grouping coming together. Now that Starmer is following his MPs and not slavishly following Trump a 'NEW LABOUR' could be at its centre. If he can't resist the pull towards Farage he can and will be replaced. He's got roughly 10 weeks to show he's the person to lead this grouping otherwise he'll be out. This I believe to be a fact.

    I think that ship has sailed sadly.
    Starmer has lost the left permanently.
    I have have it on unimpeachable authority that Burnham is going for a seat again in May
    But he has to win it and where ?
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 90,222
    edited March 3
    rcs1000 said:

    ydoethur said:

    rcs1000 said:

    ydoethur said:

    Stuartinromford said:

    ydoethur said:

    TheScreamingEagles said:

    eek said:

    TheScreamingEagles said:

    Not to alarm you all or anything, I am currently working on the banking/financial service stress tests, and well I want to go back on holiday.

    Any new scenarios - I haven't looked which is why I'm asking.
    Planes no longer flying in that area/getting shot down. ME countries might not have the weapons to stop the missiles/drones.

    Think the Ever Given on speed.

    Very little oil leaving the area so the West seizes up.

    A limited US invasion of Iran to open the Straits of Hormuz.

    Increase in fuel prices destroys demands and savings defaults increase.

    A nuke/dirty bomb being deployed by either side.

    Not quite Threads.

    MERS 2.

    So the world economy seizes up.
    One thing that really puzzles me about Trump is why he would launch this eight months before the midterms so the price rises from downstream effects are most vicious just before the voting begins.

    But maybe, despite Leon's arguments to the contrary, he is just as thick as pigshit.
    He's clearly not stupid (Trump, not Leon), or he wouldn't have achieved all the things he has done.

    He doesn't think more than one move ahead, which is why he has blown up all his achievements in fairly short order. But in some situations, that's a handy cognitive shortcut. Boris was much the same.

    I'd go with clever, but not wise, and of the two wisdom is way more useful. Besides, his brain is clearly turning into Angel Delight, so the cleverness is going.
    It's true, his achievements are remarkable.

    I still do not understand how he could bankrupt a casino while owning it.
    To be fair, that one is fairly easy. All you need to do is to accrue too much debt while building it, such that the profits from the casino are unable to cover your interest payments.
    Well, yes, but you know, it's extraordinarily difficult to run up sufficient debts to not cover interest on a building where people are literally giving you money for nothing.

    That is a genius given to few.
    Trump made a ... minor ... miscalculation. He thought people would flock to Atlantic City because it was near(-ish) to New York.

    Unfortunately for him, it turned out that if you want to actually travel to a Sin City, then Las Vegas is barely any less convenient than Atlantic City. And if you didn't want to travel far, then a bunch of other options (Indian Reservations, etc) exist.

    Meaning all Atlantic City could bring in was retirees on buses playing 1 cent slot machines and sipping margaritas, rather than the high rollers he dreamed of.

    Also have you been to Atlantic City.....For a place with a beach that is normally something positive, it f##king awful. Its makes Weston Super Mare look classy.
  • AnneJGPAnneJGP Posts: 4,872
    Leon said:

    Nigelb said:

    Leon said:

    carnforth said:

    JohnLilburne said:

    Leon said:

    Is there anything else PB would like solved now I’ve solved Covid?

    I’ve got a couple of spare weeks

    Maybe the mind/body problem. Free will v determinism?

    Jam or cream first?

    As you're Cornish, I imagine you have a ready solution for the final one.

    (Personally I butter the scone first, after which it is natural to apply first jam and then cream)
    Butter is for sultana scones. And jam and cream should only be used on plain scones. And we should find another name for cheese scones, because savoury things shouldn't be in the same universe as sweet things.
    I agree. You absolutely don’t put butter on a Cornish scone. Or Devon for that matter. They don’t need them. They are rich and sweet enough as is

    I’m Cornish but I’d say this anyway. It’s jam then cream on top. The jam pastes the scone and acts as a glue to keep the cream above stable. And it’s more satisfying to bite through the softer cream to the juicier jam to the lovely doughy scone

    You don’t put the foam on a cappuccino at the bottom do you? Same principle
    Clotted cream isn't foam, though.
    TBH, I really don't care which way round, so long as the three ingredients are of decent quality.
    But think of all the other pudding-y examples. It’s always cream on top

    It is one of British cuisine’s greatest inventions. One of the best meals I’ve ever had in my life was a long sunny April Dartmoor hike I did with a friend and my daughter and his daughter then age 8 and 9 and it was long and tough and we all got back to the Two Bridges pub at about 4pm. And they were serving cream teas with fresh just-made scones, so we all ordered one cream tea each


    Honestly. The moment the teas arrived and we all prepared our scones (jam first) and then we all bit into the sweet jammy creamy scone-y loveliness at the same time and this kind of heavenly satisfied silence settled over us all. It was quasi religious

    One of my favourite food memories ever. Also one of my favourite parenting memories
    You remind me of the occasion when I arrived at my rented flat after work to find the owner's family sitting round the tea table in the garden, just about to tuck into dishes of strawberries & cream. As they all looked up at my entry, a seagull swooped low over the table and splattered its waste into their bowls.
  • wooliedyedwooliedyed Posts: 16,112
    edited March 3
    Roger said:

    rkrkrk said:

    Roger said:

    There's a good centre left grouping coming together. Now that Starmer is following his MPs and not slavishly following Trump a 'NEW LABOUR' could be at its centre. If he can't resist the pull towards Farage he can and will be replaced. He's got roughly 10 weeks to show he's the person to lead this grouping otherwise he'll be out. This I believe to be a fact.

    I think that ship has sailed sadly.
    Starmer has lost the left permanently.
    I have have it on unimpeachable authority that Burnham is going for a seat again in May
    Important distinction here though. Imminent resignation nowish and by election in May? Or MP resignation after the locals?
    If the latter, Streeting or Rayner has time to possibly oust SKS via forcing resignation and the leadership contest is underway before Burnham is eligible.........
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 86,776
    edited March 3
    Leon said:

    Nigelb said:

    Leon said:

    carnforth said:

    JohnLilburne said:

    Leon said:

    Is there anything else PB would like solved now I’ve solved Covid?

    I’ve got a couple of spare weeks

    Maybe the mind/body problem. Free will v determinism?

    Jam or cream first?

    As you're Cornish, I imagine you have a ready solution for the final one.

    (Personally I butter the scone first, after which it is natural to apply first jam and then cream)
    Butter is for sultana scones. And jam and cream should only be used on plain scones. And we should find another name for cheese scones, because savoury things shouldn't be in the same universe as sweet things.
    I agree. You absolutely don’t put butter on a Cornish scone. Or Devon for that matter. They don’t need them. They are rich and sweet enough as is

    I’m Cornish but I’d say this anyway. It’s jam then cream on top. The jam pastes the scone and acts as a glue to keep the cream above stable. And it’s more satisfying to bite through the softer cream to the juicier jam to the lovely doughy scone

    You don’t put the foam on a cappuccino at the bottom do you? Same principle
    Clotted cream isn't foam, though.
    TBH, I really don't care which way round, so long as the three ingredients are of decent quality.
    But think of all the other pudding-y examples. It’s always cream on top

    It is one of British cuisine’s greatest inventions. One of the best meals I’ve ever had in my life was a long sunny April Dartmoor hike I did with a friend and my daughter and his daughter then age 8 and 9 and it was long and tough and we all got back to the Two Bridges pub at about 4pm. And they were serving cream teas with fresh just-made scones, so we all ordered one cream tea each

    Honestly. The moment the teas arrived and we all prepared our scones (jam first) and then we all bit into the sweet jammy creamy scone-y loveliness at the same time and this kind of heavenly satisfied silence settled over us all. It was quasi religious

    One of my favourite food memories ever. Also one of my favourite parenting memories
    I rememberer my first Cornish scone on a family holiday over half a century back.
    Same thing.

    The cream went on first as I recall.

    The Howtown Hotel at the side of Ullswater used to do an exceptional cream tea with scones, around the same time.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 86,776
    MattW said:

    Nigelb said:

    Leon said:

    carnforth said:

    JohnLilburne said:

    Leon said:

    Is there anything else PB would like solved now I’ve solved Covid?

    I’ve got a couple of spare weeks

    Maybe the mind/body problem. Free will v determinism?

    Jam or cream first?

    As you're Cornish, I imagine you have a ready solution for the final one.

    (Personally I butter the scone first, after which it is natural to apply first jam and then cream)
    Butter is for sultana scones. And jam and cream should only be used on plain scones. And we should find another name for cheese scones, because savoury things shouldn't be in the same universe as sweet things.
    I agree. You absolutely don’t put butter on a Cornish scone. Or Devon for that matter. They don’t need them. They are rich and sweet enough as is

    I’m Cornish but I’d say this anyway. It’s jam then cream on top. The jam pastes the scone and acts as a glue to keep the cream above stable. And it’s more satisfying to bite through the softer cream to the juicier jam to the lovely doughy scone

    You don’t put the foam on a cappuccino at the bottom do you? Same principle
    Clotted cream isn't foam, though.
    TBH, I really don't care which way round, so long as the three ingredients are of decent quality.
    You sound like that guy who would put the cream at the bottom of a trifle.

    I nearly reported that last paragraph.
    Don't be daft.
    No one in their right mind would do that.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 86,776
    Nigelb said:

    Good lord.

    Bill Clinton looks like Dick van Dyke, but older.
    https://x.com/BrandyZadrozny/status/2028830538400731430

    Hillary is still as sharp as a tack.
    https://x.com/PettyLupone/status/2028691856200991039
  • FishingFishing Posts: 6,105
    FrancisUrquhart said:

    OBR projecting an extra £18bn in welfare spending. We are spinning up an entire NASA (annual budget $24.4bn) worth of welfare this year, bringing our annual spend to around 18 NASAs. By end of the decade it is set to reach 22 NASAs per year.

    https://x.com/peterrhague/status/2028831892586254664?s=20

    You'd almost think we'd have a government that got its votes from welfare junkies and needs as many of them as possible or something.

    Tax and waste, that's this government's only impulse.

    That and a bit of gaslighting about growth.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 37,787
    edited March 3
    Big_G_NorthWales said:

    Roger said:

    rkrkrk said:

    Roger said:

    There's a good centre left grouping coming together. Now that Starmer is following his MPs and not slavishly following Trump a 'NEW LABOUR' could be at its centre. If he can't resist the pull towards Farage he can and will be replaced. He's got roughly 10 weeks to show he's the person to lead this grouping otherwise he'll be out. This I believe to be a fact.

    I think that ship has sailed sadly.
    Starmer has lost the left permanently.
    I have have it on unimpeachable authority that Burnham is going for a seat again in May
    But he has to win it and where ?
    Somewhere in Madchester and I suspect he'll win this time around, moreso than he might have in Gorton. There will have to be a mayoral election afterwards even though one is not required. The Mayoralty goes Reform...or Green.

    N.B. Lucy Powell being the anticipated waste of space we all thought she was.
  • TazTaz Posts: 25,666
    ydoethur said:

    Taz said:

    Dopermean said:

    nico67 said:

    I see the latest attempt to win hearts and minds is to completely flatten Tehran .

    If Israel is running the show then that shouldn't be a surprise
    Trump is a bit part player here. This is Bibi’s game and Trump is dancing to his tune.
    That sounds very dangerous. I mean, Trump's age and health and the cocktail of drugs he's on, any exertion could lead to President Vance.
    Watching him now. Bizarre. He’s just rambling
  • SelebianSelebian Posts: 9,959
    Big_G_NorthWales said:

    Roger said:

    rkrkrk said:

    Roger said:

    There's a good centre left grouping coming together. Now that Starmer is following his MPs and not slavishly following Trump a 'NEW LABOUR' could be at its centre. If he can't resist the pull towards Farage he can and will be replaced. He's got roughly 10 weeks to show he's the person to lead this grouping otherwise he'll be out. This I believe to be a fact.

    I think that ship has sailed sadly.
    Starmer has lost the left permanently.
    I have have it on unimpeachable authority that Burnham is going for a seat again in May
    But he has to win it and where ?
    Burnham to stand for Green Party? :lol:
Sign In or Register to comment.

© Vanilla Keystone Theme 2026