The next London mayoral election is scheduled to take place in 2028 and under first past the vote anything could happen, it is entirely possible the winning candidate polls sub 20% as the centre-left vote fractures. I cannot see any value here other than say a cheeky tenner on Jeremy Corbyn at 20/1 or Ant Middleton at 12/1.
Comments
Rants against the modern world. My MIL died in January. SSE are now threatening to cut her off.
They have sent a letter saying "please get in touch if you need help"
No phone number.
Go on their website and they say that the customer number on their letter is too short.
Chat has an option of speak to an advisor. When you click on it you can go back or close. No other options.
Advising re bereavement is an option but nothing happens.
We are changing our account.
Morning all.
Britain Elects model has forecast the by election as follows (and they caveat by saying much less polling data than theyd have liked). They rate Reform beating Labour as possible but unlikely. Same for SNP not winning.
SNP 34
Lab 28
Ref 23
Con 7
Green 3
LD 3
Others 2
Question one is whether Sadiq goes for a fourth term. I hope someone is saying "Maaaahte" to him if that is his plan. Boredom, if nothing else, points to Labour needing a fresh face next time.
Assuming that Sadiq is sensible, who replaces him in the Labour process? Flip knows, but they ought to be favourite.
So I blame Sadiq Khan for the fact I came fourth
Weirdly four out of the ten candidates are from the right (Ref, UKIP, SCons & Family Party) assuming you don’t count SLab and their invisible Orange Order candidate as such.
People were slagging Adrian Chiles's columns a while back. I've always enjoyed his writing TBH and this week's column is especially good. I even learned something useful from it.
Be interesting to see if the Greens, LDs or even SCons end up behind one of the fringe lot
We were all used in the olden days of the contemptuous indifference of monopolies like gas board, telephones etc; one of the reasons for the support there was for Thatcher's revolution, now 40 years old.
One of its central points was that good service drives out bad, and in so many fields this works. Food retailers are keen to be open, accessible, and not poison you.
Accessing big outfits can be so difficult - no email address, phones not answered, websites don't work or respond etc - while at the same time they swamp you with peremptoryy demands.
I wonder why the invisible hand is not working better.
I actually remember when I first encountered Edgelord. It was in 2016 in that famous twitter article on how the trains on the Island of Sodor had voted in the Brexit referendum. Henry, I believe, voted Leave purely to be an Edgelord.
Of course all providers in the energy supply market face the same incentives, unless one differentiates itself by going for the higher quality service market at higher prices. But I'm not sure that's a viable strategy.
Customers won’t pay a premium for better customer service or more leg room.
They *say* that they will in surveys. And then they decide based on price. Companies are being rational.
The London local elections next year will be informative as to the state of opinion in the capital and may not be positive for either Labour or the Conservatives but that's for a different thread.
The Find Out Now London polling from a month ago had, for a Mayoral election with unnamed candidates, Labour on 33%, Reform and the Conservatives tied on 20%, the Greens on 13% and the LDs on 10%. In 2024, despite all the post-election Twitter-driven nonsense, Khan easily beat Hall by eleven points.
That said, I'd put Hall's result up there with Jeremy Hunt holding his seat at the GE as the best Conservative electoral performances of 2024. She got 33%, a weeks later the Party got 21% while, for all the talk about how disliked he was, Labour at the GE polled about the same as Khan.
What will Khan do? I've long stated in 2020, when he decided to run for another term, he made an enormous personal miscalculation. He believed at that point Labour were doomed to be in opposition for at least another term. There was no point him going into the Commons as an opposition backbench MP at an election in 2023 or 2024 while he could remain London Mayor with all the publicity that engenders.
As with most of us, Khan did not foresee the implosion of the Conservatives and the rise of Starmer - Khan COULD now be a prominent Labour MP (perhaps even in the Cabinet) but instead he's just the Mayor of London.
Will he decide to jump to the Commons next time? Time isn't on his side - he'll be 58 by the time of the next election but if he had any thought he would lose a London Mayoral election, I could see him seeking out one of the "safe" London seats (East Ham perhaps?).
A different Labour candidate would probably win but who? I think a "celebrity" is unlikely - I sometimes wonder if Newham's Mayor, Roksana Fiaz, has ambitions beyond her Borough but we'll see. It's not a market anyone should play until we know much more about Khan's intentions.
The Reform and Conservative choices will also be interesting - Reform will do well in some parts of London next year but not in others but probably not in enough parts to win the Mayoralty. The Conservatives are shattered and if they lose further ground next year, who would want the candidacy? Cleverly might see himself as a Party leader but a leader of what? The Greens, LDs and Corbyn will nibble round the edges but in the end Labour's support is deep enough and broad enough to win a fragmented race - against a single non-Labour candidate it would be different.
I pay more for my internet provider because I value their customer service (they're a small business with a technical focus); but for most things I'm in the "pick on cost" brigade with everybody else. And unless you've specifically searched out the small customer focused niche business that matches your needs, you'll end up with one where customer service is a cost centre to be shrunk as much as feasible.
Ukraine says it destroyed one and damaged two Iskander launchers that were preparing to fire ballistic missiles at Kyiv from Klintsy, Russia.
Unless I am mistaken, this is the first successful Ukrainian hit on an Iskander TEL since the war began.
Can't see that surviving tribunals
The egregious example here is, of course, water companies, where there is no choice. I've never been really clear (someone will probably enlighten me) as to why we can't have for water a similar setup to what we have for energy, where the customer facing companies are essentially, billing, admin and energy-futures companies. Perhaps because we don't have a national grid for water so there's less fungibility? Same, in some areas, with trains (East Coast is a happy exception here, so are some other places). If we can't have real competition then it becomes increasingly hard to see the argument for private ownership.
2011 AV referendum:
No2AV = 68%
Yes2AV = 32%
The idea of a First Past the Vote voting system is intriguing.
Really, as with Thames Water and OFWAT, this is an OFGEM problem. They know perfectly well that all the major companies are swindling their customers and refusing to provide proper customer contact arrangements but they never actually do anything about it.
Heck, it took two years, a press campaign and threats from the parliamentary select committee to get them to pause the force-fitting of prepayment meters based on forged court documents.
*possibly slightly counter-productive - if we could reallocate travel budget then we'd be more likely to be more price-conscious and move things to pay for extra staff time to look at the interesting sub-questions that emerge during research, being more flexible/not requiring return of underspends could mean the money being used in more productive ways.
Though yes AV would help Labour in London where the Greens are likely to poll especially well and they would hope to gain most LD preferences too that would be less so UK wide given Reform are their main opponents and would pick up some Tory preferences
Those who don't join get more money (as they don't pay in their contributions or indeed the employer's contributions which would save the authority money as well) so it's not a question of being penalised.
Kent would continue to have obligations to the LGPS (as indeed do all councils) for decades to come.
I think you would be looking at changing contracts from a legal point of view (which the authority could do at a cost).
I'm also not sure of the legality of a mandatory "opt out" - a mandatory "opt in" would be eqaully wrong but offering staff an informed choice would be best.
A better market would be if the customer could switch every day to the cheapest supply. Lets say company A has a lot of solar electricity (as its the sunniest month for 100 years) they can flog their electricity cheap and you can buy it cheap. Then the weather turns dull but windy and company B, who have a lot of turbines, can sell you it cheaper so you switch.
That would be a proper market where the invisible hand might have a chance.
If Mr Tice really does believe in cutting taxpayer costs, then shouldn’t all five Reform UK MPs withdraw from the MPs’ generous, and expensive, defined benefit (DB) pension scheme?
This is the stuff of social workers and bin emptiers strikes.
I'm not sure that was how the system was meant to work...
Merz then replies: "Please! I like America! Fancy schmancy! What a cinch! Go fly a kite! Cat got your tongue! Hill of beans! Karoline Leavitt, what a dish! Marjorie Taylor-Greene, nice gams!"
Wrt Cleverly, I guess it depends on how he sees his chances in Braintree next time. Not good i'd imagine, its ripe Reform territory (I lived up the road in Pritis Witham once upon a moon). London stands a chance of being the only place in the UK the rump tories go forwards (in seats) next time (actually winning anything in Wales notwithstanding!) - Cleverly might fancy leading that from a position as leader of the Tory group in city hall and 'runner up' in the mayoralty - then he could stand in a London seat the following year perhaps. All a bit time tight though. I've got the Tories currently on 6 to max 15 London seats next time probably settling on about 10 and a moderate progression from 2024 compared to a likely retreat or at least fracturing elsewhere in England
I think it’s a bit rich to call employment tribunal claims as “lawfare”. It’s just ordinary people asserting the rights given to them by Parliament
https://x.com/paulg/status/1930194301129994394?s=46&t=bulOICNH15U6kB0MwE6Lfw
How sad
SNP 38.4%
RefUK 29.6%
Lab 19.7%
Con 4.5%
Green 3.8%
LD 2.1%
Others 1.9%
'When asked who they thought would do a good job as leader of the Conservatives in the future, Mr Johnson polled best but with a score of just 28%. This was better than Reform’s Mr Farage (25%), former foreign secretary James Cleverly (20%), Shadow Justice Secretary Robert Jenrick (18%), Shadow Foreign Secretary Priti Patel (14%) and former home secretary Suella Braverman (12%).
Among current Conservative supporters, there is high regard for former PM Mr Cameron. More than three in four (76%) think he did a good job – a higher rating than that enjoyed by Rishi Sunak (71%), Mr Johnson (69%), Mrs May (56%) and Ms Truss (8%).'
https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/2064463/boris-johnson-reform-uk-poll
That was in the period when they didn't issue a numbered paying in slip any more - trying to force people to go online, which of course was (a) completely useless with folk like my elderly father and (b) meant that trillions of bank payments now had no positive HMRC issued transaction identifying number so must have got lost.
https://x.com/YouGov/status/1930211910881820719
The bar for doing a good job must have sunk towards the ground through May, Johnson, Truss, Sunak and Starmer if people think that was a "good job".
But it was Robert Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary, who was the most popular candidate for Tory leadership among Reform voters, with 35 per cent thinking he would do a good job.'
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/06/04/boris-cant-win-back-voters-who-turned-to-farage-poll-finds/
They then started using the queries to the chatbot to specify new capabilities in the online system - and raised the number further.
All those posters that pretended to like Emacs were definitely Edgelords.
There was one set of changes in 2008 and another in 2014 and it's nowhere near as "gold plated" as some would have you believe.
The loss of one million local Government roles from 2012 also had an impact but there are a lot of retired former local Government workers out there (I'm one) and the different pension schemes (such as the ones for Teachers, the ones for Firefighters) all work differently so going on about "public sector pensions" betrays an ignorance of the subject.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/may/21/gary-lineker-was-once-my-rival-i-feel-no-shame-in-saying-i-was-beaten-by-the-best
I know what it’s like to be part of a family trying to make ends meet.
My Plan for Change will make life easier for hard working people across our country.
We are providing free school meals to more than half a million more children, and putting £500 back in parents' pockets.
As for leaving after the Brexit vote - he had to. He had tied himself to the mast of remain and lost. His authority was gone. If he had been neutral and said that he would do as 'instructed, whether leave or remain' then he could have carried on. But he didn't.