The current PB server, which I shall call Icarus, has been doing excellent service for six years. But is now beginning to show its age. With this year having both US elections and UK elections, it’s time for an upgrade.
Just been watching Putin's War on the iPlayer. Quite gripping and also terrifying even though we've been watching it in real time. Boris, Liz and baldy Ben come over well - but MRD applies
It does seem like the Conservatives have decided “don’t let Starmer take us back to square one” is a good slogan that will turn the election round for them. Here it is seen in the wild again today:
Good luck! I say this as a full-time server admin! If you need any help just shout and I am more than capable of rolling my eyes and whistling through my teeth. Possibly even a sarcastic comment or two before actually helping...
It does seem like the Conservatives have decided “don’t let Starmer take us back to square one” is a good slogan that will turn the election round for them. Here it is seen in the wild again today:
It does seem like the Conservatives have decided “don’t let Starmer take us back to square one” is a good slogan that will turn the election round for them. Here it is seen in the wild again today:
It does seem like the Conservatives have decided “don’t let Starmer take us back to square one” is a good slogan that will turn the election round for them. Here it is seen in the wild again today:
It does seem like the Conservatives have decided “don’t let Starmer take us back to square one” is a good slogan that will turn the election round for them. Here it is seen in the wild again today:
My 50,000th post on PB since we went to Vanilla. I thought I might give you something insightful, original or witty. But then, I thought, why break the habits that have got me this far?
It does seem like the Conservatives have decided “don’t let Starmer take us back to square one” is a good slogan that will turn the election round for them. Here it is seen in the wild again today:
My 50,000th post on PB since we went to Vanilla. I thought I might give you something insightful, original or witty. But then, I thought, why break the habits that have got me this far?
The problem is that you can now never post again. Once you do, that 50k mark is gone for ever.
Good luck! I say this as a full-time server admin! If you need any help just shout and I am more than capable of rolling my eyes and whistling through my teeth. Possibly even a sarcastic comment or two before actually helping...
I've just been struggling with RSA keys, having previously been password only.
My 50,000th post on PB since we went to Vanilla. I thought I might give you something insightful, original or witty. But then, I thought, why break the habits that have got me this far?
The problem is that you can now never post again. Once you do, that 50k mark is gone for ever.
My 50,000th post on PB since we went to Vanilla. I thought I might give you something insightful, original or witty. But then, I thought, why break the habits that have got me this far?
The problem is that you can now never post again. Once you do, that 50k mark is gone for ever.
As someone who spent five and a half hours today failing to achieve a simple task on a corporate IT system I say hurrah for server upgrades!
Planned site maintenance: Due to the change of National Lottery operator, planned maintenance will take place from 11pm on 31st January. National Lottery games will be available again on 1st February. https://www.national-lottery.co.uk/
My 50,000th post on PB since we went to Vanilla. I thought I might give you something insightful, original or witty. But then, I thought, why break the habits that have got me this far?
The problem is that you can now never post again. Once you do, that 50k mark is gone for ever.
Hasn't he already done that in remarking on it?
No, he remarked on it in his 50,000th post.
Oh, is that counter updated retrospectively for even previous posts? Hadn't realised. Thanks.
A depressingly high number of technical problems can be solved with this sophisticated 2 step troubleshooting routine, developed over years of practical experience.
A depressingly high number of technical problems can be solved with this sophisticated 2 step troubleshooting routine, developed over years of practical experience.
1. Is it plugged in?
2. Is it switched on?
My bill is in the post...
My top secret troubleshooting sauce was to have bookmarked the status pages of various infrastructure providers, so when an alert came in I could quickly say, not our fault, Cloudflare's DNS is down, or some such.
A depressingly high number of technical problems can be solved with this sophisticated 2 step troubleshooting routine, developed over years of practical experience.
1. Is it plugged in?
2. Is it switched on?
My bill is in the post...
Almost anything can be fixed by taking it apart, cleaning it, and putting it back together again.
Except children. They frown on that with children.
As someone who spent five and a half hours today failing to achieve a simple task on a corporate IT system I say hurrah for server upgrades!
Planned site maintenance: Due to the change of National Lottery operator, planned maintenance will take place from 11pm on 31st January. National Lottery games will be available again on 1st February. https://www.national-lottery.co.uk/
Speaking of the National Lottery, something odd has just happened. Tonight's winning numbers are: 5 10 11 22 27 54
Three pairs of numbers where the second is double the first! Unfortunately there is no prize for spotting that.
It does seem like the Conservatives have decided “don’t let Starmer take us back to square one” is a good slogan that will turn the election round for them. Here it is seen in the wild again today:
Well, I'm convinced. Otherwise ... urm... we might be at square 4? Or -3? Or... something?
How does Rishi's spreadsheet work again?
Square minus three is the same as square three of course.
Which got me thinking.
2^2.1 is =4.287 (to 3dp) but -2^2.1 is not a number (according to Excel and my calculator). But:
1. How can you logically multiply 2 by itself a non-integer number of times? And...
2. If you can, shouldn't the answer to -2^2.1 be ±4.287 (to 3dp) where only the sign is indeterminant? It's got to have a value of 4.287 we just don't know if it's positive or negative.
Then again -2^2.1 is maybe 10% (0.1) of the way from positive (^2) to negative (^3), but that would imply that -2^2.5 = zero.
Then again I could just be spouting b*ll*cks. Again.
Look at the bright side. I have had a HDD drive failure that will cost me hundreds if not thousands to reconstruct involving a clean room, plus a rather hurried lawyer consultation to ensure that the (work related!) surgical/medical imagery on there does not constitute obscenity. Incidentally, apparently the only bright point is the fact that as it's an old HDD they can clone it, but if I had splurged for a SSD they couldn't have without proprietary software. Back up your data, padawans, back up your data.
It does seem like the Conservatives have decided “don’t let Starmer take us back to square one” is a good slogan that will turn the election round for them. Here it is seen in the wild again today:
Well, I'm convinced. Otherwise ... urm... we might be at square 4? Or -3? Or... something?
How does Rishi's spreadsheet work again?
Square minus three is the same as square three of course.
Which got me thinking.
2^2.1 is =4.287 (to 3dp) but -2^2.1 is not a number (according to Excel and my calculator). But:
1. How can you logically multiply 2 by itself a non-integer number of times? And...
2. If you can, shouldn't the answer to -2^2.1 be ±4.287 (to 3dp) where only the sign is indeterminant? It's got to have a value of 4.287 we just don't know if it's positive or negative.
Then again -2^2.1 is maybe 10% (0.1) of the way from positive (^2) to negative (^3), but that would imply that -2^2.5 = zero.
Then again I could just be spouting b*ll*cks. Again.
It's the antilog of (2.1*loge2). Kids today, what do they teach you in schools... 😃
It does seem like the Conservatives have decided “don’t let Starmer take us back to square one” is a good slogan that will turn the election round for them. Here it is seen in the wild again today:
Well, I'm convinced. Otherwise ... urm... we might be at square 4? Or -3? Or... something?
How does Rishi's spreadsheet work again?
Square minus three is the same as square three of course.
Which got me thinking.
2^2.1 is =4.287 (to 3dp) but -2^2.1 is not a number (according to Excel and my calculator). But:
1. How can you logically multiply 2 by itself a non-integer number of times? And...
2. If you can, shouldn't the answer to -2^2.1 be ±4.287 (to 3dp) where only the sign is indeterminant? It's got to have a value of 4.287 we just don't know if it's positive or negative.
Then again -2^2.1 is maybe 10% (0.1) of the way from positive (^2) to negative (^3), but that would imply that -2^2.5 = zero.
Then again I could just be spouting b*ll*cks. Again.
I like your thinking. Soon you'll find the lost chord. Eat your heart out Schnozzle Durante
A depressingly high number of technical problems can be solved with this sophisticated 2 step troubleshooting routine, developed over years of practical experience.
1. Is it plugged in?
2. Is it switched on?
My bill is in the post...
3. Have you tried switching it off and switching it on again?
Good luck! I say this as a full-time server admin! If you need any help just shout and I am more than capable of rolling my eyes and whistling through my teeth. Possibly even a sarcastic comment or two before actually helping...
Happy to volunteer for similar reasons. After all there is nothing more conducive to things going wrong than 2 people with half a clue stood behind watching your every move while whispering "Don't think you wanted to do that"...
Good luck! I say this as a full-time server admin! If you need any help just shout and I am more than capable of rolling my eyes and whistling through my teeth. Possibly even a sarcastic comment or two before actually helping...
I've just been struggling with RSA keys, having previously been password only.
It does seem like the Conservatives have decided “don’t let Starmer take us back to square one” is a good slogan that will turn the election round for them. Here it is seen in the wild again today:
Well, I'm convinced. Otherwise ... urm... we might be at square 4? Or -3? Or... something?
How does Rishi's spreadsheet work again?
Square minus three is the same as square three of course.
Which got me thinking.
2^2.1 is =4.287 (to 3dp) but -2^2.1 is not a number (according to Excel and my calculator). But:
1. How can you logically multiply 2 by itself a non-integer number of times? And...
2. If you can, shouldn't the answer to -2^2.1 be ±4.287 (to 3dp) where only the sign is indeterminant? It's got to have a value of 4.287 we just don't know if it's positive or negative.
Then again -2^2.1 is maybe 10% (0.1) of the way from positive (^2) to negative (^3), but that would imply that -2^2.5 = zero.
Then again I could just be spouting b*ll*cks. Again.
It's the antilog of (2.1*loge2). Kids today, what do they teach you in schools... 😃
Thanks for clearing that up. I must have been bunking off during that A level maths lesson.
It is a potential record! Darwin Nunez has now become the first player on record (since 2003-04) to hit the woodwork four times in a single Premier League match.
The BBC stats team has survived their server upgrade.
A depressingly high number of technical problems can be solved with this sophisticated 2 step troubleshooting routine, developed over years of practical experience.
1. Is it plugged in?
2. Is it switched on?
My bill is in the post...
The IT bods come in half an hour before the rest of us to unplug and switch off kit, just to make themselves look clever.
I dislike the idea of any unpleasant language being treated as criminal.
Racist language? Yes, ok maybe but I am not sure. But this? No. Taunting over Hillsborough or Munich? No.
Being a knob should have all sorts of consequences in life (in my latter two examples, being banned from football clubs perhaps) but not criminal records.
It does seem like the Conservatives have decided “don’t let Starmer take us back to square one” is a good slogan that will turn the election round for them. Here it is seen in the wild again today:
Well, I'm convinced. Otherwise ... urm... we might be at square 4? Or -3? Or... something?
How does Rishi's spreadsheet work again?
Square minus three is the same as square three of course.
Which got me thinking.
2^2.1 is =4.287 (to 3dp) but -2^2.1 is not a number (according to Excel and my calculator). But:
1. How can you logically multiply 2 by itself a non-integer number of times? And...
2. If you can, shouldn't the answer to -2^2.1 be ±4.287 (to 3dp) where only the sign is indeterminant? It's got to have a value of 4.287 we just don't know if it's positive or negative.
Then again -2^2.1 is maybe 10% (0.1) of the way from positive (^2) to negative (^3), but that would imply that -2^2.5 = zero.
Then again I could just be spouting b*ll*cks. Again.
You can better understand why -2^2.1 does not produce a real number by rewriting the power of 2.1 as a rational number i.e 21/10. Then 21 is the power and 10 is the root. Now an odd power of any negative number always gives you a negative number. eg The cube of -2^3=-8, -2^4=16, -2^5=-32 and so on, alternating between positive and negative results. That means that -2^21 gives you a negative number. Now to get a number to root 10 you first take the result of the number to root 2 (SQuare RooT), then take the square root of that result and keep going until you get the 10th root. But that means you are trying to take the square root of a negative number (several times over), and that can't give a real solution.
The same reasoning explains why -2^2.2 gives a real result, because -2^22 gives a positive result as 22 is even, so you do not subsequently have to take repeated square roots of a negative number.
A depressingly high number of technical problems can be solved with this sophisticated 2 step troubleshooting routine, developed over years of practical experience.
1. Is it plugged in?
2. Is it switched on?
My bill is in the post...
I remember the time an elderly family friend called me in because the PC from a local independent specialist wasn't working properly despite having just beem checked and delivered. Took me over an hour to spot the almost invisible slider switch on the bottom of the keyboard that switched on the IR beam. MInd, I got a roast pork dinner for my pains.
It does seem like the Conservatives have decided “don’t let Starmer take us back to square one” is a good slogan that will turn the election round for them. Here it is seen in the wild again today:
Well, I'm convinced. Otherwise ... urm... we might be at square 4? Or -3? Or... something?
How does Rishi's spreadsheet work again?
Square minus three is the same as square three of course.
Which got me thinking.
2^2.1 is =4.287 (to 3dp) but -2^2.1 is not a number (according to Excel and my calculator). But:
1. How can you logically multiply 2 by itself a non-integer number of times? And...
2. If you can, shouldn't the answer to -2^2.1 be ±4.287 (to 3dp) where only the sign is indeterminant? It's got to have a value of 4.287 we just don't know if it's positive or negative.
Then again -2^2.1 is maybe 10% (0.1) of the way from positive (^2) to negative (^3), but that would imply that -2^2.5 = zero.
Then again I could just be spouting b*ll*cks. Again.
You can better understand why -2^2.1 does not produce a real number by rewriting the power of 2.1 as a rational number i.e 21/10. Then 21 is the power and 10 is the root. Now an odd power of any negative number always gives you a negative number. eg The cube of -2^3=-8, -2^4=16, -2^5=-32 and so on, alternating between positive and negative results. That means that -2^21 gives you a negative number. Now to get a number to root 10 you first take the result of the number to root 2 (SQuare RooT), then take the square root of that result and keep going until you get the 10th root. But that means you are trying to take the square root of a negative number (several times over), and that can't give a real solution.
The same reasoning explains why -2^2.2 gives a real result, because -2^22 gives a positive result as 22 is even, so you do not subsequently have to take repeated square roots of a negative number.
A depressingly high number of technical problems can be solved with this sophisticated 2 step troubleshooting routine, developed over years of practical experience.
1. Is it plugged in?
2. Is it switched on?
My bill is in the post...
3. Have you tried switching it off and switching it on again?
I can guarantee 100% that if you switch it on, then off, it still won't work.
I'm amazed that he's interviewing new lawyers, even if he's firing that complete fool Habba.
Who'd be desperate enough for work to appear for him?
He never follows advice. He never pays. And he always loses because his cases are pretty much slam dunk.
Very good news for the plaintiff that he hopes to appeal though. It means she will get her money, as he has to deposit it with the court to appeal.
Since Habbadabbadoo has copped around $3-4m, if she has been paid and most of it sticks to her she may step back and be a good little Maga Housewifey. Perhaps.
It is a potential record! Darwin Nunez has now become the first player on record (since 2003-04) to hit the woodwork four times in a single Premier League match.
The BBC stats team has survived their server upgrade.
And by missing a penalty and gettng a yellow card, he scored -1 points in my Fantasy Football team.
It is a potential record! Darwin Nunez has now become the first player on record (since 2003-04) to hit the woodwork four times in a single Premier League match.
The BBC stats team has survived their server upgrade.
And by missing a penalty and gettng a yellow card, he scored -1 points in my Fantasy Football team.
Good luck! I say this as a full-time server admin! If you need any help just shout and I am more than capable of rolling my eyes and whistling through my teeth. Possibly even a sarcastic comment or two before actually helping...
I've just been struggling with RSA keys, having previously been password only.
I'm amazed that he's interviewing new lawyers, even if he's firing that complete fool Habba.
Who'd be desperate enough for work to appear for him?
He never follows advice. He never pays. And he always loses because his cases are pretty much slam dunk.
Very good news for the plaintiff that he hopes to appeal though. It means she will get her money, as he has to deposit it with the court to appeal.
Any lawyer worth their money will be demanding an up front payment I should think. Even he's surely not silly enough to treat the lawyers handling his criminal cases like he does the ones in the civil cases?
A depressingly high number of technical problems can be solved with this sophisticated 2 step troubleshooting routine, developed over years of practical experience.
1. Is it plugged in?
2. Is it switched on?
My bill is in the post...
I remember the time an elderly family friend called me in because the PC from a local independent specialist wasn't working properly despite having just beem checked and delivered. Took me over an hour to spot the almost invisible slider switch on the bottom of the keyboard that switched on the IR beam. MInd, I got a roast pork dinner for my pains.
I ended up on a train sitting behind 2 consultants from a rival IT outsourcing company on their way to an "important client meeting" to give an "important presentation" but they had run into a snag...
The presentation was on laptop A, but they needed it on laptop B.
The only mechanism for transfer they could come up with was IR, but neither of them could find the transceivers on either laptop.
I was able to put them out of their misery, but unable to collect my HUGE fee for doing so.
A depressingly high number of technical problems can be solved with this sophisticated 2 step troubleshooting routine, developed over years of practical experience.
A depressingly high number of technical problems can be solved with this sophisticated 2 step troubleshooting routine, developed over years of practical experience.
1. Is it plugged in?
2. Is it switched on?
My bill is in the post...
I remember the time an elderly family friend called me in because the PC from a local independent specialist wasn't working properly despite having just beem checked and delivered. Took me over an hour to spot the almost invisible slider switch on the bottom of the keyboard that switched on the IR beam. MInd, I got a roast pork dinner for my pains.
I ended up on a train sitting behind 2 consultants from a rival IT outsourcing company on their way to an "important client meeting" to give an "important presentation" but they had run into a snag...
The presentation was on laptop A, but they needed it on laptop B.
The only mechanism for transfer they could come up with was IR, but neither of them could find the transceivers on either laptop.
I was able to put them out of their misery, but unable to collect my HUGE fee for doing so.
I remember being in Dixons many years ago. Someone looking at a typewriter (yes). Salesperson wandered over sensing a sale.
"Urm - is this IBM compatible? I need it to be IBM compatible. For 'the disks'?"
...
"Yes! Sure! It's 100% IBM compatible!"
Ker-ching!
The same shop used to sell more Amiga's than AtariST's as they always advised potential customers it was easy to get pirate Amiga software down the local market. Kickback's all the way...
I remember being in Dixons many years ago. Someone looking at a typewriter (yes). Salesperson wandered over sensing a sale.
"Urm - is this IBM compatible? I need it to be IBM compatible. For 'the disks'?"
...
"Yes! Sure! It's 100% IBM compatible!"
Ker-ching!
The same shop used to sell more Amiga's than AtariST's as they always advised potential customers it was easy to get pirate Amiga software down the local market. Kickback's all the way...
I don't think I ever bought a single game for the Amiga (nor anyone in my family), despite the family owning two in the house.
My brother still has an Amiga 1200 - working, and I believe modified to connect to the interwebs.
A depressingly high number of technical problems can be solved with this sophisticated 2 step troubleshooting routine, developed over years of practical experience.
1. Is it plugged in?
2. Is it switched on?
My bill is in the post...
3. Try google
I've seen IT professionals do it, and why not?
It is true these days that knowing what to Google (sic) is at least as useful as knowing the answer.
It is also true that no IT professional in search of an answer to a problem will use Bing...
A depressingly high number of technical problems can be solved with this sophisticated 2 step troubleshooting routine, developed over years of practical experience.
1. Is it plugged in?
2. Is it switched on?
My bill is in the post...
I remember the time an elderly family friend called me in because the PC from a local independent specialist wasn't working properly despite having just beem checked and delivered. Took me over an hour to spot the almost invisible slider switch on the bottom of the keyboard that switched on the IR beam. MInd, I got a roast pork dinner for my pains.
A roast pork dinner? Ah, the Dell Replicator 2000.
Majority went down to under 2k in 2017, that seat is a goner unless there's epic confusion over the main challenger.
That'll be up to 86 MPs standing down so far, almost dead on the average between 1979-2010. But considering in 1997 it was 117 and in 2010 it was 149, I'm almost surprised it is not even more at this stage.
Turnover in the Commons is actually a lot higher than my memory makes it seem - even in 2017 15% seats changed MP one way or another.
One interesting calculation would be length of service of those standing down - according to the Commons Library it was around 18.5 years in 2019, but some youthful ones have definitely jumped this time.
It does seem like the Conservatives have decided “don’t let Starmer take us back to square one” is a good slogan that will turn the election round for them. Here it is seen in the wild again today:
Well, I'm convinced. Otherwise ... urm... we might be at square 4? Or -3? Or... something?
How does Rishi's spreadsheet work again?
Square minus three is the same as square three of course.
Which got me thinking.
2^2.1 is =4.287 (to 3dp) but -2^2.1 is not a number (according to Excel and my calculator). But:
1. How can you logically multiply 2 by itself a non-integer number of times? And...
2. If you can, shouldn't the answer to -2^2.1 be ±4.287 (to 3dp) where only the sign is indeterminant? It's got to have a value of 4.287 we just don't know if it's positive or negative.
Then again -2^2.1 is maybe 10% (0.1) of the way from positive (^2) to negative (^3), but that would imply that -2^2.5 = zero.
Then again I could just be spouting b*ll*cks. Again.
It's the antilog of (2.1*loge2). Kids today, what do they teach you in schools... 😃
Thanks for clearing that up. I must have been bunking off during that A level maths lesson.
A depressingly high number of technical problems can be solved with this sophisticated 2 step troubleshooting routine, developed over years of practical experience.
1. Is it plugged in?
2. Is it switched on?
My bill is in the post...
3. Try google
I've seen IT professionals do it, and why not?
It is true these days that knowing what to Google (sic) is at least as useful as knowing the answer.
It is also true that no IT professional in search of an answer to a problem will use Bing...
Republicans against Trump @RpsAgainstTrump · 3h NEW Quinnipiac poll 2024 GE:
Biden- 50% Trump- 44%
If only someone had predicted that Biden's numbers would improve as it became obvious that (a) the economy is doing far better than projected and (b) Trump is losing even more court cases than expected.
Even Fox News reports that the economy is in a sweet spot with good growth but not so much as to reignite inflation.
I remain of the view that these economic performance figures are going to drive Biden's popularity northwards during the coming months. If we end up with a Biden Trump rematch (and I think we will) it will not be as close as it was in 2020.
A depressingly high number of technical problems can be solved with this sophisticated 2 step troubleshooting routine, developed over years of practical experience.
1. Is it plugged in?
2. Is it switched on?
My bill is in the post...
As I’ve mentioned previously, in the instructions for a pre-WWI gunnery fire control table (early electro mechanical computer) I found online, if a problem occurred -
1) switch off 2) restore dials to start position 3) wait a few seconds 4) switch on
Over a century of “switch it off, wait, switch it on”
I dislike the idea of any unpleasant language being treated as criminal.
Racist language? Yes, ok maybe but I am not sure. But this? No. Taunting over Hillsborough or Munich? No.
Being a knob should have all sorts of consequences in life (in my latter two examples, being banned from football clubs perhaps) but not criminal records.
As the great philosopher Simon Phoenix once stated:
You can't take away people's right to be assholes
In more legally expressions, emotive political subjects will engender a certain amount of obnoxious and insulting commentary, but to lose that would also mean much useful commentary may be lost, as valid points can be made in offensive ways.
Just rambling about Tory scum is not very useful or edgy in most cases, but the offence of 'using threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour with intent' does seem rife for overuse.
Comments
Is this the new letter sign-off replacing Your humble servant?
It does seem like the Conservatives have decided “don’t let Starmer take us back to square one” is a good slogan that will turn the election round for them. Here it is seen in the wild again today:
https://x.com/mailonline/status/1752491416993857760?s=46
How does Rishi's spreadsheet work again?
For over three weeks, the D.C. Circuit has been sitting on a potentially decisive question.
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/01/31/trump-trial-immunity-delay-00138688
I say hurrah for absolutely anything that isn't another meeting at this stage.
But I seem to have surmounted that issue :-)
Due to the change of National Lottery operator, planned maintenance will take place from 11pm on 31st January. National Lottery games will be available again on 1st February.
https://www.national-lottery.co.uk/
1. Is it plugged in?
2. Is it switched on?
My bill is in the post...
https://twitter.com/AdamKinzinger/status/1752690235895410788
After she possibly put her bar license on the line.
https://twitter.com/CalltoActivism/status/1752759146309444010
Except children. They frown on that with children.
We’re all counting on you.
Three pairs of numbers where the second is double the first! Unfortunately there is no prize for spotting that.
Alina Habba on Donald Trump:
“He is the most ethical American I know.”
(July, 2023)
https://twitter.com/RpsAgainstTrump/status/1752753505905869246
Who'd be desperate enough for work to appear for him?
He never follows advice. He never pays. And he always loses because his cases are pretty much slam dunk.
Very good news for the plaintiff that he hopes to appeal though. It means she will get her money, as he has to deposit it with the court to appeal.
2^2.1 is =4.287 (to 3dp) but -2^2.1 is not a number (according to Excel and my calculator). But:
1. How can you logically multiply 2 by itself a non-integer number of times? And...
2. If you can, shouldn't the answer to -2^2.1 be ±4.287 (to 3dp) where only the sign is indeterminant? It's got to have a value of 4.287 we just don't know if it's positive or negative.
Then again -2^2.1 is maybe 10% (0.1) of the way from positive (^2) to negative (^3), but that would imply that -2^2.5 = zero.
Then again I could just be spouting b*ll*cks. Again.
The BBC stats team has survived their server upgrade.
It might be rude, and indeed unreasonable - but should it be criminalised ?
DPP appeals to supreme court in case of protesters who called MP ‘Tory scum’
Exclusive: Move follows high court ruling that it was reasonable for them to have called Iain Duncan Smith the term
https://www.theguardian.com/law/2024/jan/31/dpp-supreme-court-appeal-protesters-tory-scum-iain-duncan-smith
Racist language? Yes, ok maybe but I am not sure. But this? No. Taunting over Hillsborough or Munich? No.
Being a knob should have all sorts of consequences in life (in my latter two examples, being banned from football clubs perhaps) but not criminal records.
Disk drive error warning.
Anyone remember where its from?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PsCI_gOG_ks
Now an odd power of any negative number always gives you a negative number. eg The cube of -2^3=-8, -2^4=16, -2^5=-32 and so on, alternating between positive and negative results.
That means that -2^21 gives you a negative number.
Now to get a number to root 10 you first take the result of the number to root 2 (SQuare RooT), then take the square root of that result and keep going until you get the 10th root.
But that means you are trying to take the square root of a negative number (several times over), and that can't give a real solution.
The same reasoning explains why -2^2.2 gives a real result, because -2^22 gives a positive result as 22 is even, so you do not subsequently have to take repeated square roots of a negative number.
Er... is that a wind-up?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-63716064
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11457739/Heckler-allegedly-called-Prince-Andrew-sick-old-man-not-face-court-prosecutors-say.html
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-68161937
No need to thank me for leading you down yet another rabbithole.... ;-)
The presentation was on laptop A, but they needed it on laptop B.
The only mechanism for transfer they could come up with was IR, but neither of them could find the transceivers on either laptop.
I was able to put them out of their misery, but unable to collect my HUGE fee for doing so.
https://x.com/finchleytories/status/1752801834144608298?s=46&t=CW4pL-mMpTqsJXCdjW0Z6Q
I've seen IT professionals do it, and why not?
https://x.com/afzal4gorton/status/1751564104848777520?s=46&t=CW4pL-mMpTqsJXCdjW0Z6Q
"Urm - is this IBM compatible? I need it to be IBM compatible. For 'the disks'?"
...
"Yes! Sure! It's 100% IBM compatible!"
Ker-ching!
The same shop used to sell more Amiga's than AtariST's as they always advised potential customers it was easy to get pirate Amiga software down the local market. Kickback's all the way...
My brother still has an Amiga 1200 - working, and I believe modified to connect to the interwebs.
It is also true that no IT professional in search of an answer to a problem will use Bing...
@RpsAgainstTrump
·
3h
NEW Quinnipiac poll 2024 GE:
Biden- 50%
Trump- 44%
That'll be up to 86 MPs standing down so far, almost dead on the average between 1979-2010. But considering in 1997 it was 117 and in 2010 it was 149, I'm almost surprised it is not even more at this stage.
Turnover in the Commons is actually a lot higher than my memory makes it seem - even in 2017 15% seats changed MP one way or another.
One interesting calculation would be length of service of those standing down - according to the Commons Library it was around 18.5 years in 2019, but some youthful ones have definitely jumped this time.
Republican Accountability
@AccountableGOP
·
2h
Reporter: “Are you thinking of trying to use campaign funds to pay some of the penalties?”
Trump: “What penalties?”
Reporter: “In the New York fraud case and the defamation case.”
Trump: “I didn't do anything wrong. I mean, that's been proven as far as I'm concerned.”
https://twitter.com/AccountableGOP/status/1752789598496076229
Oh, wait a minute, I think I did.
January 26
US economy grows 3.3% on an annualised basis in the 4th quarter and by 2.5% in 2023 as a whole. The latest growth was driven by consumption and reflects a surge in consumer confidence: https://www.cnbc.com/2024/01/19/consumer-sentiment-surges-while-inflation-outlook-dips-university-of-michigan-survey-shows.html
Even Fox News reports that the economy is in a sweet spot with good growth but not so much as to reignite inflation.
I remain of the view that these economic performance figures are going to drive Biden's popularity northwards during the coming months. If we end up with a Biden Trump rematch (and I think we will) it will not be as close as it was in 2020.
1) switch off
2) restore dials to start position
3) wait a few seconds
4) switch on
Over a century of “switch it off, wait, switch it on”
You can't take away people's right to be assholes
In more legally expressions, emotive political subjects will engender a certain amount of obnoxious and insulting commentary, but to lose that would also mean much useful commentary may be lost, as valid points can be made in offensive ways.
Just rambling about Tory scum is not very useful or edgy in most cases, but the offence of 'using threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour with intent' does seem rife for overuse.
Must be at least as pretty as my daughter and open to be grabbed by the fanny.
Will be paid on a no win no fee basis or not at all.