Starmer now a 74% betting chance to be PM after next election – politicalbetting.com

Inevitably given the way the opinion polls have moved so sharply to Labour then Keir starmer has moved up in the betting to be the prime minister after the next general election.
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
So, who tipped lab maj at 5/1? On here, so's you could all see.
Labour 53%
Conservatives 19%
@PeoplePolling Oct 12
https://twitter.com/GoodwinMJ/status/1580656789015891969
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/tories-plot-to-replace-truss-with-rishi-sunak-and-penny-mordaunt-wjdfwzzvk
Since The Times won't be doing an obit, I will.
Pompey boy, uncle went down on the Hood, joined the RN at 16, qualified as an artificer, worked subsequently mainly as a helicopter mechanic for Bristows.
Serial obsessive which included rock climbing, Nordic skiing, cycling, playing the flute, jazz, opera, birdwatching, life drawing, photography, neolithic stones.
Abiding passions Wagner, Blake, art and dressing well.
Complicated love life.
And just to keep it real for PB, detested the Tories and all they stand for.
- Really?
- Oh, no, sorry. The Tories' poll rating is in the high teens.
https://twitter.com/DavidMills73/status/1580650576345694208
https://twitter.com/afneil/status/1580663139401465856
https://twitter.com/thetimes/status/1580658752457707521
“I’m proud of the achievements of my government. We had a very successful induction day. Our first tea run went smoothly. I personally scored 84% on the health & safety at work assessment.”
https://twitter.com/KirstyStricklan/status/1580663857697415168
Sounds an interesting fellow.
Grandees think they can arrange a coronation *if* Rishi Sunak and Penny Mordaunt agree to team up
YouGov polling finds almost half of 2019 Tories want Truss ousted
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/eb045534-4b2e-11ed-8b55-aaf85c581598?shareToken=3130b41ff617eb0423ded1d66208e71c
The kind of ongoing test they had was to make a perfect metal cube one inch on every side, by hand tools only.
Is there anything he can do to help save her?
Green, May, Hunt, Cox, Julian Smith, Brady, Barclay.
Anyway, Truss seems doomed, but equally there is no good way out for the party.
If they try and get rid, even a coronation, its going to look awful and the members will rightly throw an absolute fit. They voted for Truss and they get..... Sunak? Mordaunt? Johnson! May!? Crazy. The party will be punished both by members ripping up their cards and leaving, and at the upcoming election which is now surely lost (though I'll always caveat it with 'events dear boy events').
If they stick with Truss, its becoming more and more obvious that she isn't fit to be Prime Minister (some example of the Peter Principle here.... and maybe even more than that). She could lurch from crisis to crisis in the next two years before finally getting thrashed at the polls. But whether the country can cope with her for two years is another question.
One thing I've not necessarily seen mentioned, is that, just like in the summer with Johnson's removal, the Leader of the Opposition has a role to play here.
If I was Starmer, I'd call a Parliamentary VoNC. Force the Conservatives to back her.... or not.
If the perceived wisdom is a GE is needed, then calling the VoNC will force backbenches to rally behind her. And Starmer can remind them of that at every opportunity.
And if they don't.... then its a November GE.... one that Labour could win.
But I'm not sure Starmer is up to this. He wasn't in the summer......
.....HMQ steps out of the shower to meet the new PM.
How many times?
LAB: 53% (+1)
CON: 19% (-1)
Via @PeoplePolling, 12 Oct.
Changes w/ 6 Oct.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2022/10/13/just-nine-per-cent-have-favourable-view-liz-truss/
It wouldn't surprise me if the Tory gain here. There are some strange politics in the area at the moment. This area was one of the centres of the recent communal violence.
Green - who?
May - we got rid of her once already, no thanks
Hunt - unacceptable to both types of Brexit ultra
Cox - really? My daughters think he is some kind of comedy parody of a Tory
Smith - Hmm, hadn't though of him. I know he made a decent fist of NI so must have some ability, but I have no idea who he is actually
Brady - too smarmy
Barclay - too anonymous, not a leader
"Russia 1985-1999: TraumaZone
What it felt like to live through the collapse of communism and democracy. A series of films by Adam Curtis.
7 Episodes Available"
https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episodes/p0d3hwl1/russia-19851999-traumazone
And which two would be sent to the membership?
It may need a penalty shootout.
🔓 This front page story is currently free to read 👇
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2022/10/13/kwasi-kwarteng-insists-not-going-anywhere-liz-truss-set-reverse/
In addition, you have to bear in mind that the Lib Dem effort is not going to be evenly distributed throughout the whole country. There are seats where the result will be much better for the Lib Dems than you think.
Neil Henderson
@hendopolis
·
3m
TELEGRAPH:
@KwasiKwarteng insists: I’m not going anywhere
#TomorrowsPapersToday
One Tory MP tells me “it seems quite sensible”, another questions the exact combo but tells me some sort of unity ticket is the only option.
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/eb045534-4b2e-11ed-8b55-aaf85c581598?shareToken=5c148679c14899be060c29bc9ce8f199
Tories now having a market whitey, kneeling in front of the toilet, room spinning.
https://twitter.com/rafaelbehr/status/1580669278558167041
#Chloe4Leader
You lost, get over it. You can’t just vote again if you don’t like the first result.
https://twitter.com/Herring1967/status/1580670067184144385
Analysis for @skynews @ 10 https://twitter.com/SamCoatesSky/status/1580670199090581505/video/1
The charm team, with added TV-friendliness and likeability.
In the end though, the activists, MPs and donors are more important.
I think they’re up to it. And I think there’s enough buy-in to Starmers competent centrist managerialism that even the Speccie, the Mail and the express will fall into line, or at least be ambivalent.
Perhaps not? They might take on their readers. They may go super-low and double down on the saville smears and whatever other dirt they can use.
I don’t think so, though. I think Labour have this in the bag.
We’ll see.
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/ff4fb2ce-4b0e-11ed-8b55-aaf85c581598?shareToken=0551be613a8e3d533e047576833e9435
"It’s roughly 100% irrelevant to UK/US interests whether eastern UKR is controlled by the Putin-oligarchs-KGB-mafia or the Zelensky-oligarchs-KGB-mafia.
‘International law and the rules based order’? You mean the ‘rules based order’ that applied to us invading Iraq?
‘Humanitarian concern’? You mean the ‘concern’ we showed when millions got slaughtered in the middle of Africa, and we sat on our asses watching TV?
‘His tanks will keep going across Europe’? You mean the army that has failed so badly in Ukraine is going to defeat the whole of Europe and America using conventional weapons?
(...)
Every Deep State person I ask says the same thing: there is no fucking plan, the idiots in No10 just keep saying Putin must fail, Truss wants us to recapture Crimea starting World War III, the MoD has got even shitter than ever in 2022.
(...)
But now Professors at Oxbridge and Harvard are happy to tweet gloatingly drone footage of Russian ‘orcs’ being blown to pieces, resembling the 4chan Nazi teens they’re normally so down on. Before the war, Congress defined Azov as a neo-Nazi organisation and banned funds going to it — now our 4chan Profs retweet their propaganda while we shovel zillions to them and rebrand them as … anti-Putin so … anti-Nazi!
People who suggest that threatening hundreds of Auschwitz’s in an hour is justified only by the most existential of interests are denounced as KGB agents and insufficiently full of hate for the enemy, sometimes by the same crowd who called me ‘mad’ for saying Putin may have blown up the Moscow flats himself to justify the Chechnya war.
(...)
I’ve been called mad for 20 years. My warnings, year after year, that our Idiocracy could blunder into pandemics and nuclear escalation was seen as so mad it wasn’t worth arguing with. I didn’t expect that the evidence finally convincing elite media and academia that I’m insane and/or a Putin-agent, would be my suggestion that JFK’s handling of the Cuban missile crisis (including rejecting military advice to escalate and bomb) is highly relevant to avoiding hundreds of Auschwitz’s, and that I would finally be seen as ‘beyond the pale’ for saying things like ‘welcome Russians fleeing Putin, don’t ban them from sports and arts, aren’t we supposed to oppose inflicting punishments on ethnic/national groups simply for belonging to such a group?’."
A problem is that DC seems to think the reason the current line is being taken is the idiocy of those who parrot it. It's not, though. They'll parrot whatever they're told. But 1-2 quibbles aside, all minor, he is right on the essential. And it's good to see that someone else remembers the Moscow flat bombs of 1999, which considerably assisted with Putin's ascendance to the presidency. ISTR Blair told Putin hey we know you understand our 911 pain because it's just like yours after those bombs. Funny how nobody ever called him a Putin stooge...
The media-bond-market complex are trying to stop economic change of tack. I'm not sure the country is in as parlous a state as some like to paint it as.
https://twitter.com/BethRigby/status/1580673263662833664
https://twitter.com/hzeffman/status/1580663980984762368
A tiny group of appalling people who shouldn't have been allowed within 1000 miles of the decision, and won't again.
... what does our Idiocracy do, other than hope that he’s shot and replaced by a Russian version of AOC who applies for EU membership and leads LGBTQ++ marches through Red Square with Zelensky live tweeting, finally resolving the long debate about whether ‘Russia is a European country’…? Assume he gets shot. What do we do if the person who shoots him is no AOC lookalike but a Kadyrov lookalike who says ‘Putin f**ked up by not solving this in 2014, he was too weak, I will solve it’?