Options
LAB still has clear lead in the 40 “Red Wall” seats – politicalbetting.com

Of the 40 seats that R&K include in the poll the Tories gained 39 at GE2019. The other seat polled, Hartlepool, was picked up by ‘Johnson’s party in the by-election last year.
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
But that doesn't mean that - right now - UK unconventional resources are economic. Because they're not.
All the well data from the hydraulically fracked onshore tight gas formations in the UK has been very disappointing. Even before the ban on fracking, the shares of iGas and others had fallen 90%.
Now, it doesn't mean there isn't a way forward. But the problem is that right now costs are probably around $100/mmcf, with a path (if things go well) to get it down to $20.
Costs, by contrast, for new projects are $6-7 on the North West Shelf of Australia, sub $4 for Qatar, and well under $10 for Israel and LNG. And these are fully loaded figures, including the cost of LNG liquification plants.
It would have been easier had the result been announced on a Thursday.
For the most part, Truss has been speaking to the Conservative membership and the invective used is of course music to the average member's ears but out in the real world it's not going to win her as many friends.
Like many new leaders, she may feel she needs to be tough and stamp her authority on the party before trying to do the same to the country and with only a third of MPs having supported her in the ballots, she might be forgiven for having some "doubts" about her colleagues and no doubt she will be choosing the loyalist of MPs to the Whips Office to ensure the slightest sign of rebellion is suppressed.
None of this makes her sound like a unifier, a conciliator or a re-builder. It's quite clear there will be a new "war" against the Unions which might work in some instances but won't against the nurses or other health workers. As to the rest of us, I'll offer an early prediction based on a few hunches - in contrast to this summer, this winter is going to be very wet and questions about flooding and flood prevention will dominate by February.
The government has nothing to lose by announcing the UK resources are a mirage, I don't see why they don't.
Going on the supposed claim of ten years per death then 30k deaths = 300k life years from the end of people's lives lost on aggregate, on your "30k for 1 week" figure.
10mn losing 1/40th of a year's education each is 250k education years lost.
Since I think a year's childhood and education is worth more than a year at the end of people's lives, yes I would 100% say the cost on education is too much. Even without non-education costs.
How many life years do you think 250k education years is worth?
1.08 Liz Truss 93%
13.5 Rishi Sunak 7%
Next Conservative leader
1.07 Liz Truss 93%
14 Rishi Sunak 7%
Tell you what. I’ll break it down to a clear Faustian bargain that’s pretty accurate on numbers.
The father of a school child is magically struck by a fatal curse. He’s 44 years old.
The curse will be lifted if the secondary school his child is at (average size for the UK) shifts to two weeks of distance learning.
Should they do it?
And no, there’s no third option, no concern about capitulating to threats or encouraging the dark magician. It’s also one school only.
It’s a straight equation - one parent will lose forty years of life, or one thousand pupils have two weeks or distance learning.
Even under your numbers, if 75,000 people lose an average of 10 years of life at 10% infected, how many will die at 100% infected?
Now adjust for the fact that the vast majority of 2 million severely ill to the point of needing hospitalisation (including hundreds of thousands under fifty years old) will not get any hospital assistance. No CPAP, no fluids, no steroids, no care, just aiming to drink chicken soup at home. How many more on top out of those now non-hospitalised will die?
Even with your figures, and even with a magical expanded healthcare system by a factor of ten or more, it still weighs positive.
There's a chunk of thought-space that has been going on about fracking for a while. That it's the solution to our problems and the fault of Greens that we haven't done it. If it's not economic in the UK right now, that's a problem for that belief system. Hard to 'fess up to being not right, even if for innocent reasons.
It would be awfully nice if we could flick a switch and get cheap gas in the UK tomorrow.
But we’re in a period of strong positive Northern Hemisphere Westerlies (North Atlantic / Arctic Oscillation) so one of those atmospheric rivers chucking hundreds of mm on Cumbria or North Wales within a day of two might well be a possibility, while the Thames Valley enjoys springlike mild weather.
It is worth considering whether this statement is actually true.
I think it is not true. In fact, I think you could make an argument for the converse.
Let's take the US, for example.
The poor states all vote Republican. The rich states all vote Democrat.
Yet, if Johnny Voter behaved as you suggest, the converse would be true.
Many people actually do vote against their own self-interest.
But on second glance, it’s been very similar gap and ratings for a very long time, none of the “events” indicators seem to gain much reaction, in fact as you mention the energy proposal Labour just lower after it.
My thoughts are, electorates are made up of all different groupings, age, income, education etc, firstly it could be this particular subset - Brexit voters who have waited for levelling up for generations - love Boris, Brexit and levelling up so much, they should be a tough win for Starmer’s Labour, but secondly they clearly have moved from the last election, low hanging fruit for Labour at least, so we should watch this particular piece of polling for likely signs of drift back now if they are stubbornly not moving anywhere right now.
Weatherwise, a brave call. Most seasonal models suggest a lot of dry weather over the winter months.
Now, if we happen to have a cold winter, in the 1947 or 1963 league, that would dominate.
Again the only way you make it seem even considered appropriate is dividing 1000 people's lost education over 1 person's life. Lying with statistics.
Try dividing it the other way to see how preposterous your proposal is, would you expel 8 children at random at age 10 and ban them from having any secondary schooling at all despite having done nothing wrong if that would give just a solitary extra day to each of every other child's parents?
The Trouble could take many forms. If the contest didn’t go to members then Liz and her supporters and policies have been soundly beaten by Sunak. If you look at Liz % of final MPs vote, could she have trouble whipping her policies through parliament? The electorate could come to take a dislike to her policies and her performance, with % polling stubbornly going nowhere.
It’s not going to be quiet political period is it?
10 million people lost 17 weeks of education each. So 17 million weeks of education were lost. You have deemed 1 week = 1 year, so that's 17 million years. Going off the ballpark figure of 1 death = 10 years (I dispute this, but lets be generous), then using your "realistically" figures you've deemed the lockdown we did for education as "realistically" the equivalent of 1.7 million deaths.
https://twitter.com/RedfieldWilton/status/1562110191218425857?s=20&t=CbrHZOXdYPN5r2lRRNHqiQ
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_United_States_presidential_election#Electoral_results
The irony is that the only way that the trade off looks remotely sensible is its stealing from the many, to give to the few.
Its like saying if the 99% give just a bit extra each, then the 1% can afford an extra Porsche.
Seeing people like Kinabalu wanting to take from the many to give to the few is quite amusing.
So far, he's correct.
That's no different to telling 1000 kids they need to lose their education in order to protect 1 adult, its the exact same principle but the other way around.
https://twitter.com/AdamBienkov/status/1562157820828684288?s=20&t=CbrHZOXdYPN5r2lRRNHqiQ
Anyone who wouldn't be ready to do it, isn't fit to be PM.
One of the minor things that also leads to civil unrest.
Most mobile phone and broadband companies have a clause in their terms of condition that say every April they can increase your bills based on December's CPI + 3.9%.
So it won't be uncommon to see people's BB and mobile bills go up close to 20% next April and that's going to lead to disconnections for non payment.
I think its important to acknowledge when you've made mistakes. Its how we learn, those who refuse to do so, don't learn from them.
Bring it on
William Wallace was dragged naked to Smithfield today in 1305. He was strangled, castrated, disembowled & his insides burnt. Then beheaded & quartered. His crime, according to Edward I, High Treason. His retort: "I could not be a traitor to Edward, for I was never his subject.”
https://twitter.com/thehistoryguy/status/1562172071236575236
I also, as it happens, do not believe that it’s remotely a linear equation. Four weeks lost per pupil is more than four times as bad as one week lost.
A full term lost is more than twice as bad as a half-term lost. And a school year lost per pupil is more than three times as bad as one term lost per pupil.
And the entirety of five school years of secondary school lost per pupil is more than fifteen times as bad as one term lost per pupil.
Because there’s less and less chance to catch up, and the loss builds upon itself.
Anyway, you’ve ignored the fact that your own equation leaves it worthwhile to avoid half a million deaths with the closures we had.
So, with the current energy crisis, do we finally have a question to which he has the answer?
Is there any scheme like that for water whereby the company isn't allowed to disconnect?
So to let it wash over 70 million people in a controlled way will lead to about 700 000 deaths. We'll leave aside the possibility that classic Coivd didn't give perfect immunity to variants, so the washing over wouldn't have been the end of the matter.
Now 0.7 million is less than 1.7 million, though not massively so. But the key phrase is "in a controlled way". The reason "squash the sombrero" was ditched because it turned out there was simply no way of making 70 million people poorly, 7(ish) million hospitalised and 0.7 million dead over a season without society falling over. The numbers didn't remotely work. Had we tried, the 1 percent would have pretty quickly grown to a much bigger number... thank goodness we never did the experiment to find out what. Compared with what was needed for herd immunity by infection, the sombrero had to be squashed to a beret. Which is what we did.
And yes, it sucked. Please let it be the worst thing that happens to our generations. But it was (by the time we got to those infection levels) the least bad thing. To take the US Declaration of Indepdendence, Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. You don't have much liberty and can't persue happiness from the grave.
Trump 74 million votes
What new version of hell is this?
So Madame Whiplash will give CUP and UK more than a bit of stick?
If I had to guess, Linconshire.
o2, Vodafone, Tesco Mobile, Sky Mobile, and soon EE have contracts where the contract is split the handset cost and the airtime plan, the handset is done via a CCA, so miss payments/default on that and that's your credit score ruined for six years.
The fear is people cannot do mobile banking which leads to even more financial problems.
Frontrunner understood to want the Tory peer to run the Cabinet Office...
But his pals say discussions are ongoing and no agreement has been reached.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/politics/19596630/brexit-guru-david-frost-comeback/
I think the shortlist is between Ireland, Canada, Sweden, and France.
"Pals"?!
Have we been catapulted into a 1970s edition of the Beano?
She says that she will redirect £13billion from the health and social care levy away from the NHS and into social care
She suggests that she won't appoint an independent ethics adviser. 'You can't outsource ethics,' she says.
https://twitter.com/steven_swinford/status/1562156479611904000?s=21&t=Sa5Lcxp30VsQ5vlen2X6SA
I only wish I were joking.
Jim Murphy is apparently selling consultancy services about how to win elections.
LOL
I'm eminently qualified.
Canada has energy, a health service, and is climate-change-ready.
Highlights the next threat for the Conservatives, though. If Farage decides he wants a pop, we really could be looking at a Canada scenario.
I chose London for the (then) free degree.
And here I am.
Rishi Sunak suggests that UK “aid programmes” should be cut in countries which refuse to accept deportations of “failed asylum seekers” to Britain.
But as Sam Freedman points out, three of the biggest aid recipients are Yemen, Afghanistan and Somalia…
The Tories now inhabit an alternative reality, but even so, why is Rishi even bothering with these half-cock announcements? They merely serve to show him as Ill-fitted to run the country as Liz Truss.
'Sunak will “turbo charge” energy security and efficiency meaning under his leadership millions of homes would benefit from loft and cavity wall insulation, saving people up to £400 off bills. He adds that he will “create an innovative economy to create small modular reactors to power homes in a cleaner, cheaper way”.'
I didn't ignore the fact, I explicitly said that I would value the time of education as worth more than time at end of life. Losing 170 million weeks of education is at a 1:1 ratio the equivalent of 425k extra excess deaths, so at a 1:1 ratio it might be worthwhile, if it was the only cost to consider, to avoid half a million extra excess deaths.
However
1: I've repeatedly said I value education as more than 1:1, so that would change the factor.
2: I don't think a Swedish-style advise but let people decide reaction to Covid would have caused half a million extra excess deaths. The excess deaths we had, we had with lockdown, so it'd have to be additional extra excess deaths on top of those we had.
3: Education wasn't the only thing that lockdown cost.
But yes, since I value education as more than 1:1, I would prefer we'd had 500k extra excess deaths and no hit to education than 17 weeks of education each sacrificed by ten million children to avoid your suggested half a million extra excess deaths.