Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » After the ice. The Lib Dems’ prospects for 2024

SystemSystem Posts: 11,002
edited April 2020 in General

imagepoliticalbetting.com » Blog Archive » After the ice. The Lib Dems’ prospects for 2024

Nemesis followed hubris so quickly for Jo Swinson, they were able to pass the relay baton in the exchange zone. No sooner had she mooted the possibility of her being the next Prime Minister than she found herself dumped out of Parliament. It is a short step from the sublime to the ridiculous.

Read the full story here


«1345678

Comments

  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 23,926
    The LibDems really are irrelevant. Without looking, can anyone remember when their new leader will be elected? Next year some time is all I can recall.

    The LibDems' real problem is the rise of the SNP. Even in the 1960s and 70s when the Liberals won around a dozen seats each election (only six in 1970) they were the third-largest party in the House of Commons. That meant they were taken seriously by the media and would be invited to news and current affairs programmes.

    With the same number of seats, they are now only our fourth party, trailing the SNP by a distance, and the invitations have dried to a trickle. Maybe not even fourth as the DUP did well at 2015 and 17. In short, whatever their stand on Brexit, whatever their stand on economics (and Ed Davey seemed to want to position the party somewhat to the right of the Conservatives), the LibDems do not matter.

    But they might in 2024 if a resurgent Labour Party can force the LibDems to be kingmakers, perhaps once more propping up their right wing allies in return for a meaningless title and empty promises.
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 23,926
    OT Matt Hancock's rollercoaster ride has been remarkable. In just two or three weeks, he went from zero to hero, maybe even favourite to succeed Boris, now zero again after looking done in and apparently blaming medics for wasting PPE.
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 49,614
    Third like the Lib Dems SNP.

    Happy Easter everyone!
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 39,748
    Imcoming 'but the LDs big mistake in 2015 was not to make more of their part in the coalition'..5..4..3..2..1..

  • TGOHF666TGOHF666 Posts: 2,052
    Didn’t the LDs get smashed because Swinson wanted to overturn democratic votes ?
    Plus they lost the ethnic vote to Labour because a) Labour went all Trump on the Jews and b) The whole transgender its ok to have men in the toilets beside your little girls thing.

    They should run on legalising weed - forget about rejoining the EU.
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 23,926

    Imcoming 'but the LDs big mistake in 2015 was not to make more of their part in the coalition'..5..4..3..2..1..

    The coalition should have been dissolved at the end of 2014, and I fully expected it would, in order to allow the parties to differentiate themselves before the election. Their big mistake in 2015 was not to invent a time machine and go back to 2010 to negotiate properly. It was reported the Conservatives knew more about the LibDem manifesto than the yellow team.
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 23,926
    TGOHF666 said:

    Didn’t the LDs get smashed because Swinson wanted to overturn democratic votes ?
    Plus they lost the ethnic vote to Labour because a) Labour went all Trump on the Jews and b) The whole transgender its ok to have men in the toilets beside your little girls thing.

    They should run on legalising weed - forget about rejoining the EU.

    No, on all points. Even the premise is wrong although to be fair, it fooled Jo Swinson too. The LibDems were not smashed in 2019. They won 11 seats which is only one fewer than 12 in 2017 and more than eight in 2015. People think the LibDems were smashed because they lost a dozen or so seats of late defectors to the party: seats they'd never won in the first place.
  • TGOHF666TGOHF666 Posts: 2,052

    TGOHF666 said:

    Didn’t the LDs get smashed because Swinson wanted to overturn democratic votes ?
    Plus they lost the ethnic vote to Labour because a) Labour went all Trump on the Jews and b) The whole transgender its ok to have men in the toilets beside your little girls thing.

    They should run on legalising weed - forget about rejoining the EU.

    No, on all points. Even the premise is wrong although to be fair, it fooled Jo Swinson too. The LibDems were not smashed in 2019. They won 11 seats which is only one fewer than 12 in 2017 and more than eight in 2015. People think the LibDems were smashed because they lost a dozen or so seats of late defectors to the party: seats they'd never won in the first place.
    Going from 12 to 11 when up against Corbyn is a terrible result.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 66,740
    Scotland is mentioned, but Wales should be mentioned too. In 2005 they held four seats in Wales which made them, remarkably, the second largest party. They also had a large number of good second places. Now they not only have zero seats, they also have only one seat (Brecon and Radnor) that may be considered a realistic target and only in one other seat (Montgomery) are they even in second place. One of the seats they won in 2005 (Cardiff Central) is now Labour’s safest seat in Wales, while Montgomery would be a strong contender for the Tories’ safest seat given the lack of volatility in its electorate. They have somehow lost three quarters of their voters, mainly to the Conservatives.

    I do not see a way back for them in Wales. The Tories are the leading unionists, Plaid have swept up the old Welsh language vote, and Labour continue to rely on habit (although Brecon and Radnor suggested that was a habit that was breaking). So that’s a very long standing banker for the party lost.
  • SockySocky Posts: 404
    I remember well before the coalition, speculating that the worst thing that could happen to the LDs would be electoral success. I based this hypothesis in large part on their willingness to self identify as whatever the local voter was looking for. They were helped in this by a supportive media that let them get away with blatant hypocrisy.

    In my then locality they presented themselves as pragmatic Conservatives, worried about efficiency and getting the (local) job done. Elsewhere they were non-loony-leftists, or sandal wearing dope-smokers. I am not sure that is possible for them to return to those green fields of pre-coalition. Voters have been there, and got the scars.

    If I were advising them, I would suggest picking a handful of popular issues to own that the two big parties cower away from, and then just banging on about them. Some examples: legalising drugs, legalising prostitution, constitutional reform, localism, hypothecated taxes.

    I would also suggest banning the words: Europe, gender, and pan-sexual.
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 23,926
    TGOHF666 said:

    TGOHF666 said:

    Didn’t the LDs get smashed because Swinson wanted to overturn democratic votes ?
    Plus they lost the ethnic vote to Labour because a) Labour went all Trump on the Jews and b) The whole transgender its ok to have men in the toilets beside your little girls thing.

    They should run on legalising weed - forget about rejoining the EU.

    No, on all points. Even the premise is wrong although to be fair, it fooled Jo Swinson too. The LibDems were not smashed in 2019. They won 11 seats which is only one fewer than 12 in 2017 and more than eight in 2015. People think the LibDems were smashed because they lost a dozen or so seats of late defectors to the party: seats they'd never won in the first place.
    Going from 12 to 11 when up against Corbyn is a terrible result.
    Even if true, the net loss of a single seat hardly constitutes getting smashed.
  • SockySocky Posts: 404

    You can trace the rise and fall of the LibDems to one key moment out of all the others: the decision unilaterally to Revoke Article 50. It even pissed off a lot of LibDems like me. It was incredibly ill-conceived, displaying a breathtaking conceit and disregard both for democracy and the British people.

    Quite, given they were so obviously neither liberal nor democratic, it does raise an obvious question as to their actual purpose.
  • SockySocky Posts: 404
    edited April 2020

    The net loss of a single seat hardly constitutes getting smashed.

    Unless you are telling people that you believe you have a realistic shot at being PM.
  • squareroot2squareroot2 Posts: 6,287
    I don't recall anything about the LD viewpoint bar not leave the EU. The LD were pretty much anonymous to.me. i didn't want Boris to win but Corbyn was an even worse outcome. I still voted LD as I was, note was, a remainer and he Tory woild win anyway .
    LDs are going to be irrelevan for some time now the Tories face a reasonable candidate in voters eyes
  • squareroot2squareroot2 Posts: 6,287
    edited April 2020
    I should have added that leave or remain is sooooo last year. Its over.
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 23,926
    Socky said:

    I remember well before the coalition, speculating that the worst thing that could happen to the LDs would be electoral success. I based this hypothesis in large part on their willingness to self identify as whatever the local voter was looking for. They were helped in this by a supportive media that let them get away with blatant hypocrisy.

    In my then locality they presented themselves as pragmatic Conservatives, worried about efficiency and getting the (local) job done. Elsewhere they were non-loony-leftists, or sandal wearing dope-smokers. I am not sure that is possible for them to return to those green fields of pre-coalition. Voters have been there, and got the scars.

    If I were advising them, I would suggest picking a handful of popular issues to own that the two big parties cower away from, and then just banging on about them. Some examples: legalising drugs, legalising prostitution, constitutional reform, localism, hypothecated taxes.

    I would also suggest banning the words: Europe, gender, and pan-sexual.

    Tbh I'd want to be convinced the average voter cares very much about drugs or prostitution, and the ones who do care have opposing views. Legalising drugs, for instance, would need to be carefully developed and sold on defeating gangs, ending turf wars and county lines, as well as the old liberal line that adults should be free to choose. Otherwise, as a slogan, it risks alienating voters who are afraid of gang violence and its influence on their sons and daughters.

    Can the LibDems go back to being all things to all voters? Actually, the Conservative victory might encourage them. Otherwise the problem is not that LibDems are inconsistent as irrelevant. Why vote for the Tories' little helpers, their opponents on either side ask? If you want a Conservative government, why not vote Conservative? If you want Labour, you have to vote Labour because of what happened in 2010. There is no reason to vote LibDem if you have strong views about another party. And if you actually like LibDem policies then so what? You cannot trust them and Nick Clegg said as much in so many words.
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 23,926
    Socky said:

    The net loss of a single seat hardly constitutes getting smashed.

    Unless you are telling people that you believe you have a realistic shot at being PM.
    As per my earlier post, Swinson's hubris was ill-founded. Swinson made the same mistake as some pundits in forgetting that half the LibDem MPs were late defectors. These were not seats the LibDems had won. The LibDems lost one seat net. Margin of error stuff.
  • TGOHF666TGOHF666 Posts: 2,052
    Socky said:



    I would also suggest banning the words: Europe, gender, and pan-sexual.

    This is great advice - surely there most be another option for leader than moron Moran or dim Davey ?
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 60,933
    Good morning, everyone.

    Mr. Socky, indeed, many here (including me) said at the time it was a stupid decision.

    It was particularly foolish given how long the odds were on the Lib Dems getting the majority necessary to implement that policy.

    Far likelier to occur, and more palatable to the electorate, was a second referendum run along informed consent (rather than the bullshit 'People's vote') line.
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,879
    edited April 2020
    LibDem success will largely depend on perceptions of Labour and its leader. If possible KibDem to Tory switchers are terrified of Labour winning they’ll stick with the Tories. If they’re not, there’s a decent chance they won’t.
  • rkrkrkrkrkrk Posts: 7,881
    Great piece and agree with the dilemma.
    Ultimately the way to be relevant is be in govt or look like you will be. The only way I see that happening is if Lib Dems take seats off the Tories.
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,879

    OT Matt Hancock's rollercoaster ride has been remarkable. In just two or three weeks, he went from zero to hero, maybe even favourite to succeed Boris, now zero again after looking done in and apparently blaming medics for wasting PPE.

    I actually feel very sorry for Matt Hancock. He is overwhelmed. I doubt anyone could be doing better given the tools he has at his disposal. The issue is why these are the tools. But that is for another day. People who are overwhelmed will say and do silly things.

  • MysticroseMysticrose Posts: 4,688
    edited April 2020
    Southam, that's the issue now. Keir Starmer has made it strikingly clear that he's dragging Labour back to the centre-left. So once again the LibDems are in a squeeze. With Europe now dead as an issue in the electorate, there's really nothing else the LibDems stand for and no relevance. Last time this happened they disastrously (for them) went into coalition with the tories.

    The situation is compounded because Boris isn't a right-winger. He's a libertarian of soft-right persuasion and an internationalist.

    So there's no room on the platform for the LibDems.
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,879

    Southam, that's the issue now. Keir Starmer has made it strikingly clear that he's dragging Labour back to the centre-left. So once again the LibDems are in a squeeze. With Europe now dead as an issue in the electorate, there's really nothing else the LibDems stand for and no relevance. Last time this happened they disastrously (for them) went into coalition with the tories.

    The situation is compounded because Boris isn't a right-winger. He's a libertarian of soft-right persuasion and an internationalist.

    So there's no room on the platform for the LibDems.

    Exactly the same happened with Blair, but the LDs prospered. If voters are comfortable with Labour as a party of government and if they want to kick the Tories out, the LDs will do well. As Alastair points out, almost all LD target seats are Tory held.

  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,008

    I'm not sure Alastair quite hits the spot.

    You can trace the rise and fall of the LibDems to one key moment out of all the others: the decision unilaterally to Revoke Article 50. It even pissed off a lot of LibDems like me. It was incredibly ill-conceived, displaying a breathtaking conceit and disregard both for democracy and the British people.

    It was hubris.

    Both on that and on saying Jo Swinson: your next Prime Minister they massively overplayed their hand and made themselves a laughing stock.

    I'd say their best bet in 2024 to capture seats is to play it cool with good media coverage. They effectively need to be yellow fiscal conservatives with a libertarian bent on the powers and scope of the state. Be the only sensible show in town on public spending. Don't refight old battles on Brexit (as they will be sorely tempted to) but consider the national/international cooperation issues as they come up in the context of 2024 and have something to say about them. They need also a good leader who's a media whore.

    That could net them 15-16% of the vote and about 20-25 seats in Tory/LD seats, particularly in southern England.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,008

    LibDem success will largely depend on perceptions of Labour and its leader. If possible KibDem to Tory switchers are terrified of Labour winning they’ll stick with the Tories. If they’re not, there’s a decent chance they won’t.

    This is also a very big factor and beyond their control.

    Labour success is their success.
  • MysticroseMysticrose Posts: 4,688

    Southam, that's the issue now. Keir Starmer has made it strikingly clear that he's dragging Labour back to the centre-left. So once again the LibDems are in a squeeze. With Europe now dead as an issue in the electorate, there's really nothing else the LibDems stand for and no relevance. Last time this happened they disastrously (for them) went into coalition with the tories.

    The situation is compounded because Boris isn't a right-winger. He's a libertarian of soft-right persuasion and an internationalist.

    So there's no room on the platform for the LibDems.

    Exactly the same happened with Blair, but the LDs prospered. If voters are comfortable with Labour as a party of government and if they want to kick the Tories out, the LDs will do well. As Alastair points out, almost all LD target seats are Tory held.

    There's some truth in this but, again, I don't think it quite hits the spot.

    The 1992-7 Major was on its knees almost before it began, something only compounded by Black Wednesday. From then on the tories were doomed to be routed at the General Election. Following that Blair landslide the tories lurched to the right - under William Hague, Ian Duncan Smith and Michael Howard. That left room for the LibDems on the platform.

    The circumstances now are very different. Notwithstanding coronavirus, Boris Johnson is clearly NOT lurching to the right and he is extremely popular.

    So if the LibDems are intending to gain momentum by capturing a non-existent vacancy on the soft-right, they could be waiting a very long time.
  • SockySocky Posts: 404


    Tbh I'd want to be convinced the average voter cares very much about drugs or prostitution, and the ones who do care have opposing views. Legalising drugs, for instance, would need to be carefully developed and sold on defeating gangs, ending turf wars and county lines, as well as the old liberal line that adults should be free to choose. Otherwise, as a slogan, it risks alienating voters who are afraid of gang violence and its influence on their sons and daughters.

    I didn't explain my point very well. For the LDs they need to think: "When life gives you lemons, make lemonade".

    The two big parties have the huge advantage that they might actually form a government. This can also be an anchor, as we saw with T. May's social care plans.

    The LDs can use the fact they are unlikely to have to do implementation as a plus. They should actively seek out controversial polices, it will get some voters enthused, others angry. But best of all it will get the LDs talked about.
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 41,673

    I'm not sure Alastair quite hits the spot.

    You can trace the rise and fall of the LibDems to one key moment out of all the others: the decision unilaterally to Revoke Article 50. It even pissed off a lot of LibDems like me. It was incredibly ill-conceived, displaying a breathtaking conceit and disregard both for democracy and the British people.

    Step forward Swinson , thick as mince and no talent but ego the size of a planet.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 66,740
    malcolmg said:

    I'm not sure Alastair quite hits the spot.

    You can trace the rise and fall of the LibDems to one key moment out of all the others: the decision unilaterally to Revoke Article 50. It even pissed off a lot of LibDems like me. It was incredibly ill-conceived, displaying a breathtaking conceit and disregard both for democracy and the British people.

    Step forward Swinson , thick as mince and no talent but ego the size of a planet.
    Morning Malc.
  • StockyStocky Posts: 9,653
    Socky said:

    I remember well before the coalition, speculating that the worst thing that could happen to the LDs would be electoral success. I based this hypothesis in large part on their willingness to self identify as whatever the local voter was looking for. They were helped in this by a supportive media that let them get away with blatant hypocrisy.

    In my then locality they presented themselves as pragmatic Conservatives, worried about efficiency and getting the (local) job done. Elsewhere they were non-loony-leftists, or sandal wearing dope-smokers. I am not sure that is possible for them to return to those green fields of pre-coalition. Voters have been there, and got the scars.

    If I were advising them, I would suggest picking a handful of popular issues to own that the two big parties cower away from, and then just banging on about them. Some examples: legalising drugs, legalising prostitution, constitutional reform, localism, hypothecated taxes.

    I would also suggest banning the words: Europe, gender, and pan-sexual.

    That`s an excellent post Socky. The LDs need go back to basics - liberalism. Many people are liberals, the LDs are punching well below their weight. They "should" have done better in the last GE, by attracting remain votes, but were victims of a classic two-party squeeze.

    My support has been waning badly for months, and if Moran becomes leader that will do it for me. I`ll then be politically homeless. I`d vote for the Liberal Party (the true liberals) but they don`t stand a candidate in my seat.
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 41,673

    OT Matt Hancock's rollercoaster ride has been remarkable. In just two or three weeks, he went from zero to hero, maybe even favourite to succeed Boris, now zero again after looking done in and apparently blaming medics for wasting PPE.

    I actually feel very sorry for Matt Hancock. He is overwhelmed. I doubt anyone could be doing better given the tools he has at his disposal. The issue is why these are the tools. But that is for another day. People who are overwhelmed will say and do silly things.

    Would help if they stopped lying and told people what was really happening. They seem pathologically unable to just tell it as it is.
    People are fed up being lied to and to then blame it on the NHS staff is just unbelievable.
  • MysticroseMysticrose Posts: 4,688
    edited April 2020
    Almost the only hope for the LibDems is to go into coalition with the Greens and recast themselves as a radical eco party, appealing especially to the youth. In about 20 years time those of Greta's age may have forgiven them for the student fees sell-out.

    (I'm using third person because I'm pissed off with the party. The unilateral Revocation of Article 50 blew it for me. Then competing against Remain candidates told me a lot more.)
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,879

    Southam, that's the issue now. Keir Starmer has made it strikingly clear that he's dragging Labour back to the centre-left. So once again the LibDems are in a squeeze. With Europe now dead as an issue in the electorate, there's really nothing else the LibDems stand for and no relevance. Last time this happened they disastrously (for them) went into coalition with the tories.

    The situation is compounded because Boris isn't a right-winger. He's a libertarian of soft-right persuasion and an internationalist.

    So there's no room on the platform for the LibDems.

    Exactly the same happened with Blair, but the LDs prospered. If voters are comfortable with Labour as a party of government and if they want to kick the Tories out, the LDs will do well. As Alastair points out, almost all LD target seats are Tory held.

    There's some truth in this but, again, I don't think it quite hits the spot.

    The 1992-7 Major was on its knees almost before it began, something only compounded by Black Wednesday. From then on the tories were doomed to be routed at the General Election. Following that Blair landslide the tories lurched to the right - under William Hague, Ian Duncan Smith and Michael Howard. That left room for the LibDems on the platform.

    The circumstances now are very different. Notwithstanding coronavirus, Boris Johnson is clearly NOT lurching to the right and he is extremely popular.

    So if the LibDems are intending to gain momentum by capturing a non-existent vacancy on the soft-right, they could be waiting a very long time.
    We’ll see. Post-crisis, the Tories are going to have some very big decisions to make on tax and public spending. Politically, that’s when it will become interesting. They will not be able to please everyone.

  • StockyStocky Posts: 9,653

    Socky said:

    You can trace the rise and fall of the LibDems to one key moment out of all the others: the decision unilaterally to Revoke Article 50. It even pissed off a lot of LibDems like me. It was incredibly ill-conceived, displaying a breathtaking conceit and disregard both for democracy and the British people.

    Quite, given they were so obviously neither liberal nor democratic, it does raise an obvious question as to their actual purpose.
    True liberals would be picking up on some of the themes of Douglas Murray in the Madness of Crowds and questioning the dogma of identity politics: labelling everyone by race, gender and sexuality as the most important thing and using righteous racism as a tool of anti-racism.

    True liberals would focus on moving to treating everyone as an individual where their colour, caste or sex is irrelevant and building a unity around that point of view - taking the heat out of socially divisive cultural theories.
    Spot on. Not with Moran though. Ed Davey, the last orange-booker standing, would be my choice by a mile. He should have beaten Swinson.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,008

    Imcoming 'but the LDs big mistake in 2015 was not to make more of their part in the coalition'..5..4..3..2..1..

    The coalition should have been dissolved at the end of 2014, and I fully expected it would, in order to allow the parties to differentiate themselves before the election. Their big mistake in 2015 was not to invent a time machine and go back to 2010 to negotiate properly. It was reported the Conservatives knew more about the LibDem manifesto than the yellow team.
    Their polling collapsed within weeks of joining the coalition. It would have done so had they joined with Gordon Brown as well the other way.

    They had accumulated a motley collection of parliamentary seats due to fortunate peaks and troughs since 1992. That was never sustainable unless they never did anything - ever - and even then that wasn't guaranteed. They still probably would have been washed away be the polarisation later in the 2010s.

    They need to find a solid base of 15%+ of the electorate and 20+ seats that stick with them through thick and thin under multiple FPTP elections because their MPs do a very good job and they stand for something distinctive and important on the national stage.

    It's hard to see what that is at the moment.
  • TGOHF666TGOHF666 Posts: 2,052
    edited April 2020

    Almost the only hope for the LibDems is to go into coalition with the Greens and recast themselves as a radical eco party, appealing especially to the youth. In about 20 years time those of Greta's age may have forgiven them for the student fees sell-out.

    (I'm using third person because I'm pissed off with the party. The unilateral Revocation of Article 50 blew it for me. Then competing against Remain candidates told me a lot more.)

    Will anyone give a toss about the pound shop global crisis of patch my occasional warming that Gretaism Is pushing after we’ve had a proper global crisis ?
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 44,055
    edited April 2020

    TGOHF666 said:

    TGOHF666 said:

    Didn’t the LDs get smashed because Swinson wanted to overturn democratic votes ?
    Plus they lost the ethnic vote to Labour because a) Labour went all Trump on the Jews and b) The whole transgender its ok to have men in the toilets beside your little girls thing.

    They should run on legalising weed - forget about rejoining the EU.

    No, on all points. Even the premise is wrong although to be fair, it fooled Jo Swinson too. The LibDems were not smashed in 2019. They won 11 seats which is only one fewer than 12 in 2017 and more than eight in 2015. People think the LibDems were smashed because they lost a dozen or so seats of late defectors to the party: seats they'd never won in the first place.
    Going from 12 to 11 when up against Corbyn is a terrible result.
    Even if true, the net loss of a single seat hardly constitutes getting smashed.
    Seats are always difficult in FPTP, particularly when the appeal of the party is changing, but the Lib Dems were not smashed, they stalled. The percentage increas in vote went up by 4% and 1 580 000 votes.

    The rescind A50 policy was ill-conceived, but I understand the context. It was suited to the situation of the time where No Deal Brexit was going to happen on 31 October. Once there was a further extension (remember when Johnson was going to die in a ditch?), and a Deal it was obsolete. A referendum on the Deal then became possible again.

    A lot depends these next years how government and opposition go after the pandemic. In 1990 the LDs famously went to zero in an opinion poll, in 1997 50+ seats.

    There has always been a place for an internationalist party with financially sane policies and a social conscience, and there always will be.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 49,958

    Southam, that's the issue now. Keir Starmer has made it strikingly clear that he's dragging Labour back to the centre-left. So once again the LibDems are in a squeeze. With Europe now dead as an issue in the electorate, there's really nothing else the LibDems stand for and no relevance. Last time this happened they disastrously (for them) went into coalition with the tories.

    The situation is compounded because Boris isn't a right-winger. He's a libertarian of soft-right persuasion and an internationalist.

    So there's no room on the platform for the LibDems.

    Exactly the same happened with Blair, but the LDs prospered. If voters are comfortable with Labour as a party of government and if they want to kick the Tories out, the LDs will do well. As Alastair points out, almost all LD target seats are Tory held.

    And for that reason, Boris will not be remotely squeamish about doing all he can to crush the LibDems.

    No more Mister Nice Tories....
  • not_on_firenot_on_fire Posts: 4,340

    I'm not sure Alastair quite hits the spot.

    You can trace the rise and fall of the LibDems to one key moment out of all the others: the decision unilaterally to Revoke Article 50. It even pissed off a lot of LibDems like me. It was incredibly ill-conceived, displaying a breathtaking conceit and disregard both for democracy and the British people.

    It is another example of the stupidity of letting party members directly decide policy (or anything else for that matter)
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 49,958

    Almost the only hope for the LibDems is to go into coalition with the Greens and recast themselves as a radical eco party, appealing especially to the youth. In about 20 years time those of Greta's age may have forgiven them for the student fees sell-out.

    (I'm using third person because I'm pissed off with the party. The unilateral Revocation of Article 50 blew it for me. Then competing against Remain candidates told me a lot more.)

    Boris will own the Green Industrial Revolution by the time of the next election.

    Book mark this post.
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 41,673
    ydoethur said:

    malcolmg said:

    I'm not sure Alastair quite hits the spot.

    You can trace the rise and fall of the LibDems to one key moment out of all the others: the decision unilaterally to Revoke Article 50. It even pissed off a lot of LibDems like me. It was incredibly ill-conceived, displaying a breathtaking conceit and disregard both for democracy and the British people.

    Step forward Swinson , thick as mince and no talent but ego the size of a planet.
    Morning Malc.
    Morning Ydoethur,

    I imagine your huge organ is not getting much action nowadays.
  • StockyStocky Posts: 9,653
    Foxy said:

    TGOHF666 said:

    TGOHF666 said:

    Didn’t the LDs get smashed because Swinson wanted to overturn democratic votes ?
    Plus they lost the ethnic vote to Labour because a) Labour went all Trump on the Jews and b) The whole transgender its ok to have men in the toilets beside your little girls thing.

    They should run on legalising weed - forget about rejoining the EU.

    No, on all points. Even the premise is wrong although to be fair, it fooled Jo Swinson too. The LibDems were not smashed in 2019. They won 11 seats which is only one fewer than 12 in 2017 and more than eight in 2015. People think the LibDems were smashed because they lost a dozen or so seats of late defectors to the party: seats they'd never won in the first place.
    Going from 12 to 11 when up against Corbyn is a terrible result.
    Even if true, the net loss of a single seat hardly constitutes getting smashed.
    Seats are always difficult in FPTP, particularly when the appeal of the party is changing, but the Lib Dems were not smashed, they stalled. The percentage increas in vote went up by 4% and 1 580 000 votes.

    The rescind A50 policy was ill-conceived, but I understand the context. It was suited to the situation of the time where No Deal Brexit was going to happen on 31 October. Once there was a further extension (remember when Johnson was going to die in a ditch?), and a Deal it was obsolete. A referendum on the Deal then became possible again.

    A lot depends these next years how government and opposition go after the pandemic. In 1990 the LDs famously went to zero in an opinion poll, in 1997 50+ seats.

    There has always been a place for an internationalist party with financially sane policies and a social conscience, and there always will be.
    "There has always been a place for an internationalist party with financially sane policies and a social conscience, and there always will be."

    Yes, but the trouble is that this is where Starmer will be positioning the Labour Party. The LDs need to hope that Labour continues its drift into group-think and wokey wackiness which will make liberals` stomachs turn.

    On the Con side, the LDs need to bang on about what liberalism is - to educate the droves of liberals who "incorrectly" vote for the Tories.
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 41,673

    Southam, that's the issue now. Keir Starmer has made it strikingly clear that he's dragging Labour back to the centre-left. So once again the LibDems are in a squeeze. With Europe now dead as an issue in the electorate, there's really nothing else the LibDems stand for and no relevance. Last time this happened they disastrously (for them) went into coalition with the tories.

    The situation is compounded because Boris isn't a right-winger. He's a libertarian of soft-right persuasion and an internationalist.

    So there's no room on the platform for the LibDems.

    Exactly the same happened with Blair, but the LDs prospered. If voters are comfortable with Labour as a party of government and if they want to kick the Tories out, the LDs will do well. As Alastair points out, almost all LD target seats are Tory held.

    And for that reason, Boris will not be remotely squeamish about doing all he can to crush the LibDems.

    No more Mister Nice Tories....
    Good morning Mark
    Show me a nice Tory and I will show you a lying toerag.
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,879

    Southam, that's the issue now. Keir Starmer has made it strikingly clear that he's dragging Labour back to the centre-left. So once again the LibDems are in a squeeze. With Europe now dead as an issue in the electorate, there's really nothing else the LibDems stand for and no relevance. Last time this happened they disastrously (for them) went into coalition with the tories.

    The situation is compounded because Boris isn't a right-winger. He's a libertarian of soft-right persuasion and an internationalist.

    So there's no room on the platform for the LibDems.

    Exactly the same happened with Blair, but the LDs prospered. If voters are comfortable with Labour as a party of government and if they want to kick the Tories out, the LDs will do well. As Alastair points out, almost all LD target seats are Tory held.

    And for that reason, Boris will not be remotely squeamish about doing all he can to crush the LibDems.

    No more Mister Nice Tories....
    We’ll see what happens. Big decisions coming up on taxing and spending.

  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 44,055
    TGOHF666 said:

    Almost the only hope for the LibDems is to go into coalition with the Greens and recast themselves as a radical eco party, appealing especially to the youth. In about 20 years time those of Greta's age may have forgiven them for the student fees sell-out.

    (I'm using third person because I'm pissed off with the party. The unilateral Revocation of Article 50 blew it for me. Then competing against Remain candidates told me a lot more.)

    Will anyone give a toss about the pound shop global crisis of patch my occasional warming that Gretaism Is pushing after we’ve had a proper global crisis ?
    Yes, indeed the pandemic is finishing off the consumerist world. Localism, traceable production, staycation rather than vacation are the future, as indeed will the public health approach to society. There will be a financial squeeze, but also a windfall early inheritance for many. The pandemic will transform things in many ways, and it is very unlikely that we will merely pick up where we left off.
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 41,673
    Stocky said:

    Socky said:

    I remember well before the coalition, speculating that the worst thing that could happen to the LDs would be electoral success. I based this hypothesis in large part on their willingness to self identify as whatever the local voter was looking for. They were helped in this by a supportive media that let them get away with blatant hypocrisy.

    In my then locality they presented themselves as pragmatic Conservatives, worried about efficiency and getting the (local) job done. Elsewhere they were non-loony-leftists, or sandal wearing dope-smokers. I am not sure that is possible for them to return to those green fields of pre-coalition. Voters have been there, and got the scars.

    If I were advising them, I would suggest picking a handful of popular issues to own that the two big parties cower away from, and then just banging on about them. Some examples: legalising drugs, legalising prostitution, constitutional reform, localism, hypothecated taxes.

    I would also suggest banning the words: Europe, gender, and pan-sexual.

    That`s an excellent post Socky. The LDs need go back to basics - liberalism. Many people are liberals, the LDs are punching well below their weight. They "should" have done better in the last GE, by attracting remain votes, but were victims of a classic two-party squeeze.

    My support has been waning badly for months, and if Moran becomes leader that will do it for me. I`ll then be politically homeless. I`d vote for the Liberal Party (the true liberals) but they don`t stand a candidate in my seat.
    Moron winning it would be the final nail in the coffin. Maybe if they tried being even a little bit Liberal and Democratic things might improve. Also keeping lying cheating toerags like Carmichael in place shows them up for what they are are , sandal wearing Tories.
  • SockySocky Posts: 404

    It is another example of the stupidity of letting party members directly decide policy (or anything else for that matter)

    Yes. Political parties are shops and the voters customers, and we all know who is king in that relationship.
  • logical_songlogical_song Posts: 9,669
    TGOHF666 said:

    Almost the only hope for the LibDems is to go into coalition with the Greens and recast themselves as a radical eco party, appealing especially to the youth. In about 20 years time those of Greta's age may have forgiven them for the student fees sell-out.

    (I'm using third person because I'm pissed off with the party. The unilateral Revocation of Article 50 blew it for me. Then competing against Remain candidates told me a lot more.)

    Will anyone give a toss about the pound shop global crisis of patch my occasional warming that Gretaism Is pushing after we’ve had a proper global crisis ?
    You do talk a lot of tosh.
    The pandemic is more immediate, but the Climate Emergency is more of a threat over the next decades.
  • MysticroseMysticrose Posts: 4,688

    Almost the only hope for the LibDems is to go into coalition with the Greens and recast themselves as a radical eco party, appealing especially to the youth. In about 20 years time those of Greta's age may have forgiven them for the student fees sell-out.

    (I'm using third person because I'm pissed off with the party. The unilateral Revocation of Article 50 blew it for me. Then competing against Remain candidates told me a lot more.)

    Boris will own the Green Industrial Revolution by the time of the next election.

    Book mark this post.
    You could be right, although I will point out that Margaret Thatcher already planted the flag over 30 years ago.

    I was no great fan of Maggie, and I think her belief that the private sector was the solution was massively naive or deliberately mischievous, but that was still a quite astounding speech. It's well worth listening to it again and you'll realise that for all her mistakes she was a giant.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VnAzoDtwCBg

    Boris lacks Thatcher's oratory skills but he's much more socially libertarian than her. Pace Max Hastings, Boris could go far ;)
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 44,055
    Stocky said:

    Foxy said:

    TGOHF666 said:

    TGOHF666 said:

    Didn’t the LDs get smashed because Swinson wanted to overturn democratic votes ?
    Plus they lost the ethnic vote to Labour because a) Labour went all Trump on the Jews and b) The whole transgender its ok to have men in the toilets beside your little girls thing.

    They should run on legalising weed - forget about rejoining the EU.

    No, on all points. Even the premise is wrong although to be fair, it fooled Jo Swinson too. The LibDems were not smashed in 2019. They won 11 seats which is only one fewer than 12 in 2017 and more than eight in 2015. People think the LibDems were smashed because they lost a dozen or so seats of late defectors to the party: seats they'd never won in the first place.
    Going from 12 to 11 when up against Corbyn is a terrible result.
    Even if true, the net loss of a single seat hardly constitutes getting smashed.
    Seats are always difficult in FPTP, particularly when the appeal of the party is changing, but the Lib Dems were not smashed, they stalled. The percentage increas in vote went up by 4% and 1 580 000 votes.

    The rescind A50 policy was ill-conceived, but I understand the context. It was suited to the situation of the time where No Deal Brexit was going to happen on 31 October. Once there was a further extension (remember when Johnson was going to die in a ditch?), and a Deal it was obsolete. A referendum on the Deal then became possible again.

    A lot depends these next years how government and opposition go after the pandemic. In 1990 the LDs famously went to zero in an opinion poll, in 1997 50+ seats.

    There has always been a place for an internationalist party with financially sane policies and a social conscience, and there always will be.
    "There has always been a place for an internationalist party with financially sane policies and a social conscience, and there always will be."

    Yes, but the trouble is that this is where Starmer will be positioning the Labour Party. The LDs need to hope that Labour continues its drift into group-think and wokey wackiness which will make liberals` stomachs turn.

    On the Con side, the LDs need to bang on about what liberalism is - to educate the droves of liberals who "incorrectly" vote for the Tories.
    it is the absence of financial sanity, and also the centralised corporatism of Labour that will differentiate. Lib Dems do well with an electable Labour Party though, and vice versa.

    I also think that the pandemic will make the appeal of stronger relations with Europe than either China or USA a no brained.
  • nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483

    Southam, that's the issue now. Keir Starmer has made it strikingly clear that he's dragging Labour back to the centre-left. So once again the LibDems are in a squeeze. With Europe now dead as an issue in the electorate, there's really nothing else the LibDems stand for and no relevance. Last time this happened they disastrously (for them) went into coalition with the tories.

    The situation is compounded because Boris isn't a right-winger. He's a libertarian of soft-right persuasion and an internationalist.

    So there's no room on the platform for the LibDems.

    Exactly the same happened with Blair, but the LDs prospered. If voters are comfortable with Labour as a party of government and if they want to kick the Tories out, the LDs will do well. As Alastair points out, almost all LD target seats are Tory held.

    And for that reason, Boris will not be remotely squeamish about doing all he can to crush the LibDems.

    No more Mister Nice Tories....
    Which one was that?
  • geoffwgeoffw Posts: 8,092
    Happy Easter, bunnies.
  • felixfelix Posts: 15,124
    A very sound analysis.
  • MysticroseMysticrose Posts: 4,688
    edited April 2020
    TGOHF666 said:

    Almost the only hope for the LibDems is to go into coalition with the Greens and recast themselves as a radical eco party, appealing especially to the youth. In about 20 years time those of Greta's age may have forgiven them for the student fees sell-out.

    (I'm using third person because I'm pissed off with the party. The unilateral Revocation of Article 50 blew it for me. Then competing against Remain candidates told me a lot more.)

    Will anyone give a toss ... after we’ve had a proper global crisis ?
    But you told us it was a hoax and that daily deaths in the UK would be fewer than those of suicide: 16.

    Many missed the mark but you sent the moon rocket to the Mariana trench.

    Bravo.
  • squareroot2squareroot2 Posts: 6,287
    malcolmg said:

    Southam, that's the issue now. Keir Starmer has made it strikingly clear that he's dragging Labour back to the centre-left. So once again the LibDems are in a squeeze. With Europe now dead as an issue in the electorate, there's really nothing else the LibDems stand for and no relevance. Last time this happened they disastrously (for them) went into coalition with the tories.

    The situation is compounded because Boris isn't a right-winger. He's a libertarian of soft-right persuasion and an internationalist.

    So there's no room on the platform for the LibDems.

    Exactly the same happened with Blair, but the LDs prospered. If voters are comfortable with Labour as a party of government and if they want to kick the Tories out, the LDs will do well. As Alastair points out, almost all LD target seats are Tory held.

    And for that reason, Boris will not be remotely squeamish about doing all he can to crush the LibDems.

    No more Mister Nice Tories....
    Good morning Mark
    Show me a nice Tory and I will show you a lying toerag.
    ..and the sainted nicola never lies does she Malc...
  • Dura_AceDura_Ace Posts: 12,880
    The tories should be the first to be in favour of legalising ganja as they already have the Stage 2 Hypertension Hyundai i20 driving vote locked up. It's the younger voters they need.
  • SockySocky Posts: 404
    Foxy said:

    I also think that the pandemic will make the appeal of stronger relations with Europe than either China or USA a no brainer.

    Are you not guilty of predicting what you want to happen?

    I suspect a period of relative isolationism is likely in all countries.
  • felixfelix Posts: 15,124

    I'm not sure Alastair quite hits the spot.

    You can trace the rise and fall of the LibDems to one key moment out of all the others: the decision unilaterally to Revoke Article 50. It even pissed off a lot of LibDems like me. It was incredibly ill-conceived, displaying a breathtaking conceit and disregard both for democracy and the British people.

    It was hubris.

    Both on that and on saying Jo Swinson: your next Prime Minister they massively overplayed their hand and made themselves a laughing stock.

    I'd say their best bet in 2024 to capture seats is to play it cool with good media coverage. They effectively need to be yellow fiscal conservatives with a libertarian bent on the powers and scope of the state. Be the only sensible show in town on public spending. Don't refight old battles on Brexit (as they will be sorely tempted to) but consider the national/international cooperation issues as they come up in the context of 2024 and have something to say about them. They need also a good leader who's a media whore.

    That could net them 15-16% of the vote and about 20-25 seats in Tory/LD seats, particularly in southern England.
    Sadly, even under Davey they keep banging on about transgender rights and drugs. I'm really not clear that path will lead them anywhere but backwards.
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 20,812
    edited April 2020
    The Lib Dems are pretty much over.

    They put everything on the demented revoke policy, tried to run a Prime Ministerial campaign around the unprepossessing Jo Swindon, and targeted their seats badly.

    The “stalling” hides the fact that the circumstances for the Lib Dems were hardly better. “Par” was indeed to get into the 20s.

    Daisy Cooper is their only hope now, as ridiculous as it sounds. Davey is just a less interesting Keir Starmer, and Layla Moran is pansexually batshit.

    Policy-wise, there is still a niche for radicalism with a conservative face. Please stay the fuck away from gender politics, it will end you. Ditto Europe: you (we) lost; we should now be arguing for EEA.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 49,958
    malcolmg said:

    Southam, that's the issue now. Keir Starmer has made it strikingly clear that he's dragging Labour back to the centre-left. So once again the LibDems are in a squeeze. With Europe now dead as an issue in the electorate, there's really nothing else the LibDems stand for and no relevance. Last time this happened they disastrously (for them) went into coalition with the tories.

    The situation is compounded because Boris isn't a right-winger. He's a libertarian of soft-right persuasion and an internationalist.

    So there's no room on the platform for the LibDems.

    Exactly the same happened with Blair, but the LDs prospered. If voters are comfortable with Labour as a party of government and if they want to kick the Tories out, the LDs will do well. As Alastair points out, almost all LD target seats are Tory held.

    And for that reason, Boris will not be remotely squeamish about doing all he can to crush the LibDems.

    No more Mister Nice Tories....
    Good morning Mark
    Show me a nice Tory and I will show you a lying toerag.
    Thought you would malcy!

    Morning to you and yours. Another cracking day down here in Devon.
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 41,673

    malcolmg said:

    Southam, that's the issue now. Keir Starmer has made it strikingly clear that he's dragging Labour back to the centre-left. So once again the LibDems are in a squeeze. With Europe now dead as an issue in the electorate, there's really nothing else the LibDems stand for and no relevance. Last time this happened they disastrously (for them) went into coalition with the tories.

    The situation is compounded because Boris isn't a right-winger. He's a libertarian of soft-right persuasion and an internationalist.

    So there's no room on the platform for the LibDems.

    Exactly the same happened with Blair, but the LDs prospered. If voters are comfortable with Labour as a party of government and if they want to kick the Tories out, the LDs will do well. As Alastair points out, almost all LD target seats are Tory held.

    And for that reason, Boris will not be remotely squeamish about doing all he can to crush the LibDems.

    No more Mister Nice Tories....
    Good morning Mark
    Show me a nice Tory and I will show you a lying toerag.
    ..and the sainted nicola never lies does she Malc...
    You are under a very big misconception there Squareroot. She is up to her neck in the Salmond saga and the clock is ticking , Corona is saving her skin at present.
  • StockyStocky Posts: 9,653

    Almost the only hope for the LibDems is to go into coalition with the Greens and recast themselves as a radical eco party, appealing especially to the youth. In about 20 years time those of Greta's age may have forgiven them for the student fees sell-out.

    (I'm using third person because I'm pissed off with the party. The unilateral Revocation of Article 50 blew it for me. Then competing against Remain candidates told me a lot more.)

    Boris will own the Green Industrial Revolution by the time of the next election.

    Book mark this post.
    I hope you are right MarqueeMark.

    The Tories mustn`t underestimate the number of pro-EU fanatics out there. They have turned vindictive and have fugured out that the only way to get back into the EU, or at least keep us in permanant transition, is to defeat the Tories at the next GE.

    They will have figured out two routes: firstly to urge the LDs to be selective in a GE, targeting Tory seats, and secondly to develop deplorable negative narratives around the Tories handling of the pandemic.

    Some ugly politics ahead I fear.
  • squareroot2squareroot2 Posts: 6,287
    malcolmg said:

    malcolmg said:

    Southam, that's the issue now. Keir Starmer has made it strikingly clear that he's dragging Labour back to the centre-left. So once again the LibDems are in a squeeze. With Europe now dead as an issue in the electorate, there's really nothing else the LibDems stand for and no relevance. Last time this happened they disastrously (for them) went into coalition with the tories.

    The situation is compounded because Boris isn't a right-winger. He's a libertarian of soft-right persuasion and an internationalist.

    So there's no room on the platform for the LibDems.

    Exactly the same happened with Blair, but the LDs prospered. If voters are comfortable with Labour as a party of government and if they want to kick the Tories out, the LDs will do well. As Alastair points out, almost all LD target seats are Tory held.

    And for that reason, Boris will not be remotely squeamish about doing all he can to crush the LibDems.

    No more Mister Nice Tories....
    Good morning Mark
    Show me a nice Tory and I will show you a lying toerag.
    ..and the sainted nicola never lies does she Malc...
    You are under a very big misconception there Squareroot. She is up to her neck in the Salmond saga and the clock is ticking , Corona is saving her skin at present.
    I am v glad you are not so.one eyed as i thought...
  • nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483
    Tory Robot on Ridge at the moment second division as well.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 49,958
    A very warm night, flat calm and the moon behind high cloud made for a ridiculous number of moths - 42 species including 13 new for the year. Moth du jour was probably the Purple Thorn.


  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 41,673

    malcolmg said:

    Southam, that's the issue now. Keir Starmer has made it strikingly clear that he's dragging Labour back to the centre-left. So once again the LibDems are in a squeeze. With Europe now dead as an issue in the electorate, there's really nothing else the LibDems stand for and no relevance. Last time this happened they disastrously (for them) went into coalition with the tories.

    The situation is compounded because Boris isn't a right-winger. He's a libertarian of soft-right persuasion and an internationalist.

    So there's no room on the platform for the LibDems.

    Exactly the same happened with Blair, but the LDs prospered. If voters are comfortable with Labour as a party of government and if they want to kick the Tories out, the LDs will do well. As Alastair points out, almost all LD target seats are Tory held.

    And for that reason, Boris will not be remotely squeamish about doing all he can to crush the LibDems.

    No more Mister Nice Tories....
    Good morning Mark
    Show me a nice Tory and I will show you a lying toerag.
    Thought you would malcy!

    Morning to you and yours. Another cracking day down here in Devon.
    Bit overcast here at present but hopefully will clear up , it is mild though.
  • StockyStocky Posts: 9,653

    The Lib Dems are pretty much over.

    They put everything on the demented revoke policy, tried to run a Prime Ministerial campaign around the unprepossessing Jo Swindon, and targeted their seats badly.

    The “stalling” hides the fact that the circumstances for the Lib Dems were hardly better. “Par” was indeed to get into the 20s.

    Daisy Cooper is their only hope now, as ridiculous as it sounds. Davey is just a less interesting Keir Starmer, and Layla Moran is pansexually batshit.

    Policy-wise, there is still a niche for radicalism with a conservative face. Please stay the fuck away from gender politics, it will end you. Ditto Europe: you (we) lost; we should now be arguing for EEA.

    Yes.

    Some good posts this morning.
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 23,926

    Imcoming 'but the LDs big mistake in 2015 was not to make more of their part in the coalition'..5..4..3..2..1..

    The coalition should have been dissolved at the end of 2014, and I fully expected it would, in order to allow the parties to differentiate themselves before the election. Their big mistake in 2015 was not to invent a time machine and go back to 2010 to negotiate properly. It was reported the Conservatives knew more about the LibDem manifesto than the yellow team.
    Their polling collapsed within weeks of joining the coalition. It would have done so had they joined with Gordon Brown as well the other way.

    They had accumulated a motley collection of parliamentary seats due to fortunate peaks and troughs since 1992. That was never sustainable unless they never did anything - ever - and even then that wasn't guaranteed. They still probably would have been washed away be the polarisation later in the 2010s.

    They need to find a solid base of 15%+ of the electorate and 20+ seats that stick with them through thick and thin under multiple FPTP elections because their MPs do a very good job and they stand for something distinctive and important on the national stage.

    It's hard to see what that is at the moment.
    Yes but it was more than that. Joining the coalition did not just upset left-inclined voters, with a hypothetical equal and opposite reaction if they'd gone into coalition with Labour. It was a visceral act of betrayal for actual LibDem supporters. First, there was an immediate repudiation of what the LibDems had spent most of their time campaigning on -- student fees and the rest. Then, to rub salt in voters' wounds, Nick Clegg went on telly and told LD voters they were idiots to have believed him in the first place.

    All that mattered, it seemed, were red boxes and ministerial cars. Anything else could and would be traded away for the personal ambition of Nick Clegg. Even his price for the coalition were means to that end -- reform of the voting system to cement the LibDems into office.

    And it was done so badly. There was no need to give away the crown jewels. It is not as if student fees and loans were an indispensible plank of the Conservative platform. David Cameron was holding no-one's feet to the fire on this. No, the problem was Clegg's team had not even read their own manifesto.

    It was all for nothing.
  • SockySocky Posts: 404
    felix said:

    Sadly, even under Davey they keep banging on about transgender rights and drugs. I'm really not clear that path will lead them anywhere but backwards.

    Sometimes presentation is everything.

    How about: "freedom, tolerance, and fairness for all" and "the state shouldn't be acting like a Victorian father".

  • felixfelix Posts: 15,124
    edited April 2020
    I'm unconvinced with the comparisons to the Blair era somehow guaranteeing that LDs will prosper if Labour improve. Depsite my background in the subject History has to be taken with a pich of salt. Like investments past performance is no guarantee of blah, blah, blah.. Truth is none of us really have a clue how things will pan out over the next few weeks, months or years. Our PM almost lost his life last week apparently. We liuve in times that are very strange for all of us - even us oldies.
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 41,673

    A very warm night, flat calm and the moon behind high cloud made for a ridiculous number of moths - 42 species including 13 new for the year. Moth du jour was probably the Purple Thorn.


    Stunning picture
  • Pagan2Pagan2 Posts: 8,629
    Socky said:

    Foxy said:

    I also think that the pandemic will make the appeal of stronger relations with Europe than either China or USA a no brainer.

    Are you not guilty of predicting what you want to happen?

    I suspect a period of relative isolationism is likely in all countries.
    Which is why I think the labour vote even under Starmer will continue to decline when it is clear that he still is a staunch proponent of free movement
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 23,926
    geoffw said:

    Happy Easter, bunnies.

    Where are you spending Easter this year? The living room or the kitchen?
  • malcolmg said:

    Southam, that's the issue now. Keir Starmer has made it strikingly clear that he's dragging Labour back to the centre-left. So once again the LibDems are in a squeeze. With Europe now dead as an issue in the electorate, there's really nothing else the LibDems stand for and no relevance. Last time this happened they disastrously (for them) went into coalition with the tories.

    The situation is compounded because Boris isn't a right-winger. He's a libertarian of soft-right persuasion and an internationalist.

    So there's no room on the platform for the LibDems.

    Exactly the same happened with Blair, but the LDs prospered. If voters are comfortable with Labour as a party of government and if they want to kick the Tories out, the LDs will do well. As Alastair points out, almost all LD target seats are Tory held.

    And for that reason, Boris will not be remotely squeamish about doing all he can to crush the LibDems.

    No more Mister Nice Tories....
    Good morning Mark
    Show me a nice Tory and I will show you a lying toerag.
    I thought you thought I was a nice tory Malc
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 41,673

    malcolmg said:

    Southam, that's the issue now. Keir Starmer has made it strikingly clear that he's dragging Labour back to the centre-left. So once again the LibDems are in a squeeze. With Europe now dead as an issue in the electorate, there's really nothing else the LibDems stand for and no relevance. Last time this happened they disastrously (for them) went into coalition with the tories.

    The situation is compounded because Boris isn't a right-winger. He's a libertarian of soft-right persuasion and an internationalist.

    So there's no room on the platform for the LibDems.

    Exactly the same happened with Blair, but the LDs prospered. If voters are comfortable with Labour as a party of government and if they want to kick the Tories out, the LDs will do well. As Alastair points out, almost all LD target seats are Tory held.

    And for that reason, Boris will not be remotely squeamish about doing all he can to crush the LibDems.

    No more Mister Nice Tories....
    Good morning Mark
    Show me a nice Tory and I will show you a lying toerag.
    I thought you thought I was a nice tory Malc
    G , of course I do , there are lots of misguided decent ones about but I have to generalise on the nasties we see that have climbed the greasy pole and so comment on the worst of the worst. You just need to look at which schools these clowns went to , very few grew up in council houses, silver spoons and privilege are the order of the day for these grasping gits.
  • HOC to return on the 21st April
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 60,933
    Mr. NorthWales, is that in a virtual sense?

    Because otherwise it sounds crackers.
  • felixfelix Posts: 15,124
    Socky said:

    felix said:

    Sadly, even under Davey they keep banging on about transgender rights and drugs. I'm really not clear that path will lead them anywhere but backwards.

    Sometimes presentation is everything.

    How about: "freedom, tolerance, and fairness for all" and "the state shouldn't be acting like a Victorian father".

    Indeed - but they are nowhere near saying anything so sensible. I speak as a gay man who knoew what it was like for us pre 1967. The trans agenda is nothing short of fascism.
  • geoffwgeoffw Posts: 8,092
    edited April 2020

    geoffw said:

    Happy Easter, bunnies.

    Where are you spending Easter this year? The living room or the kitchen?
    Hard to decide. Perhaps I'll apply Hurwicz's rule. *

    * edit: "It provides a formula for balancing pessimism and optimism in decision-making under uncertainty".
  • nunu2nunu2 Posts: 1,453

    A very warm night, flat calm and the moon behind high cloud made for a ridiculous number of moths - 42 species including 13 new for the year. Moth du jour was probably the Purple Thorn.


    Looks more red to me.....
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    edited April 2020
    FPT I find these false appeals to authority extremely irritating. The fact that he is an NHS consultant has no bearing on his following statement. He has no knowledge about government policy that other members of the public don’t as well. He’s entitled to his opinion, of course, but why should it have special weight?


  • nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483

    HOC to return on the 21st April

    But will they take the opportunity to revolutionize how parliament works, bring it into the 21st century, break down the archaic and meaningless traditions and realize Westminster s not fit for purpose? I doubt it, too many of them benefit from how it is now. Shame the uk could become a modern democracy with its parliament fit for purpose.
  • StockyStocky Posts: 9,653
    malcolmg said:

    malcolmg said:

    Southam, that's the issue now. Keir Starmer has made it strikingly clear that he's dragging Labour back to the centre-left. So once again the LibDems are in a squeeze. With Europe now dead as an issue in the electorate, there's really nothing else the LibDems stand for and no relevance. Last time this happened they disastrously (for them) went into coalition with the tories.

    The situation is compounded because Boris isn't a right-winger. He's a libertarian of soft-right persuasion and an internationalist.

    So there's no room on the platform for the LibDems.

    Exactly the same happened with Blair, but the LDs prospered. If voters are comfortable with Labour as a party of government and if they want to kick the Tories out, the LDs will do well. As Alastair points out, almost all LD target seats are Tory held.

    And for that reason, Boris will not be remotely squeamish about doing all he can to crush the LibDems.

    No more Mister Nice Tories....
    Good morning Mark
    Show me a nice Tory and I will show you a lying toerag.
    I thought you thought I was a nice tory Malc
    G , of course I do , there are lots of misguided decent ones about but I have to generalise on the nasties we see that have climbed the greasy pole and so comment on the worst of the worst. You just need to look at which schools these clowns went to , very few grew up in council houses, silver spoons and privilege are the order of the day for these grasping gits.
    Another cut-out-and-keep post from Malcy. I have quite a collection now. Useful when a visiting foreign family member asks what Scottish people are like!
  • Very mature interview by Starmer on Sophy.

    Such a breath of fresh air from the torrid days of Corbyn and his cabal

    He did not rise to the bait on Sophy's attempts to get him to attack HMG

    It is good to see an opposition that looks as if it could cleanse itself of the Corbyn era and contribute greatly to the political discourse
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 66,740
    malcolmg said:

    ydoethur said:

    malcolmg said:

    I'm not sure Alastair quite hits the spot.

    You can trace the rise and fall of the LibDems to one key moment out of all the others: the decision unilaterally to Revoke Article 50. It even pissed off a lot of LibDems like me. It was incredibly ill-conceived, displaying a breathtaking conceit and disregard both for democracy and the British people.

    Step forward Swinson , thick as mince and no talent but ego the size of a planet.
    Morning Malc.
    Morning Ydoethur,

    I imagine your huge organ is not getting much action nowadays.
    It’s been fully deflated for weeks.

    I can’t even tug out the eight foot horn because the neighbours complain.
  • StockyStocky Posts: 9,653

    Very mature interview by Starmer on Sophy.

    Such a breath of fresh air from the torrid days of Corbyn and his cabal

    He did not rise to the bait on Sophy's attempts to get him to attack HMG

    It is good to see an opposition that looks as if it could cleanse itself of the Corbyn era and contribute greatly to the political discourse

    Yes he`s made an impressive start, sounding intelligent, moderate and sane. It follows from this that he`ll have big trouble in the ranks below. Should be fun.
  • Black_RookBlack_Rook Posts: 8,905

    Southam, that's the issue now. Keir Starmer has made it strikingly clear that he's dragging Labour back to the centre-left. So once again the LibDems are in a squeeze. With Europe now dead as an issue in the electorate, there's really nothing else the LibDems stand for and no relevance. Last time this happened they disastrously (for them) went into coalition with the tories.

    The situation is compounded because Boris isn't a right-winger. He's a libertarian of soft-right persuasion and an internationalist.

    So there's no room on the platform for the LibDems.

    Exactly the same happened with Blair, but the LDs prospered. If voters are comfortable with Labour as a party of government and if they want to kick the Tories out, the LDs will do well. As Alastair points out, almost all LD target seats are Tory held.

    There's some truth in this but, again, I don't think it quite hits the spot.

    The 1992-7 Major was on its knees almost before it began, something only compounded by Black Wednesday. From then on the tories were doomed to be routed at the General Election. Following that Blair landslide the tories lurched to the right - under William Hague, Ian Duncan Smith and Michael Howard. That left room for the LibDems on the platform.

    The circumstances now are very different. Notwithstanding coronavirus, Boris Johnson is clearly NOT lurching to the right and he is extremely popular.

    So if the LibDems are intending to gain momentum by capturing a non-existent vacancy on the soft-right, they could be waiting a very long time.
    We’ll see. Post-crisis, the Tories are going to have some very big decisions to make on tax and public spending. Politically, that’s when it will become interesting. They will not be able to please everyone.

    I would not be at all surprised to see the Tories bite the bullet at the end of all this and soak the middle classes.

    At the end of this disaster we're going to be in a position where the state is heavily indebted and may not be able to afford to borrow any more to fund the deficit; where people with means have been forced by regulation and by necessity to get used to less lavish lifestyles; and where the public services and the NHS in particular are lionised.

    Events will also be playing against a background in which the Government is being lambasted for its various failings in the handling of the epidemic, and economic suffering is widespread (and disproportionately concentrated amongst its new voters in less well-off areas.)

    In short, people who have money will have to be made to cough it up. Just gunning for the super-rich won't cut it - there are too few of them and it's too easy for them to run away - and ditto for the next tier below, which includes now untouchable figures like wealthy hospital consultants. Thus I would imagine that, in broad-brush terms, everyone earning more than the median wage is going to have to pay much more tax. That should be affordable for the large slice of that income bracket that is now working from home, and finds itself magically in possession of all that extra money that was previously wasted on commuting, but it's going to cause serious hardship for a lot of families that are mortgaged to the hilt and were only just about managing before this started.

    Still, if we want a more Scandiwegian social dispensation then people must finally come to terms with the fact that they have to pay for it themselves, rather than expecting other people to do all the heavy lifting. This will create both winners and losers, which is tough on the losers - but public policy always does that.

    Finally, there is one important and obvious factor working in favour of the Government: no economically liberal, low-tax party sitting to the right of them, and little prospect of such a thing emerging. The Brexit Party is a busted flush and the Liberal Democrats are too left-wing in temperament to move to occupy that space.
  • nichomar said:

    HOC to return on the 21st April

    But will they take the opportunity to revolutionize how parliament works, bring it into the 21st century, break down the archaic and meaningless traditions and realize Westminster s not fit for purpose? I doubt it, too many of them benefit from how it is now. Shame the uk could become a modern democracy with its parliament fit for purpose.
    The country is fighting a destructive and vile virus with people dying and many suffering and you think now is the time for a revolution in how parliament organises itself
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 25,043

    I just left an easter egg outside a woman’s house. This is covid-19 dating.

    Hope it doesn't result in an egg-sually transmitted disease.
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 25,043
    Happy Easter!
  • StockyStocky Posts: 9,653
    edited April 2020

    Southam, that's the issue now. Keir Starmer has made it strikingly clear that he's dragging Labour back to the centre-left. So once again the LibDems are in a squeeze. With Europe now dead as an issue in the electorate, there's really nothing else the LibDems stand for and no relevance. Last time this happened they disastrously (for them) went into coalition with the tories.

    The situation is compounded because Boris isn't a right-winger. He's a libertarian of soft-right persuasion and an internationalist.

    So there's no room on the platform for the LibDems.

    Exactly the same happened with Blair, but the LDs prospered. If voters are comfortable with Labour as a party of government and if they want to kick the Tories out, the LDs will do well. As Alastair points out, almost all LD target seats are Tory held.

    There's some truth in this but, again, I don't think it quite hits the spot.

    The 1992-7 Major was on its knees almost before it began, something only compounded by Black Wednesday. From then on the tories were doomed to be routed at the General Election. Following that Blair landslide the tories lurched to the right - under William Hague, Ian Duncan Smith and Michael Howard. That left room for the LibDems on the platform.

    The circumstances now are very different. Notwithstanding coronavirus, Boris Johnson is clearly NOT lurching to the right and he is extremely popular.

    So if the LibDems are intending to gain momentum by capturing a non-existent vacancy on the soft-right, they could be waiting a very long time.
    We’ll see. Post-crisis, the Tories are going to have some very big decisions to make on tax and public spending. Politically, that’s when it will become interesting. They will not be able to please everyone.

    I would not be at all surprised to see the Tories bite the bullet at the end of all this and soak the middle classes.

    At the end of this disaster we're going to be in a position where the state is heavily indebted and may not be able to afford to borrow any more to fund the deficit; where people with means have been forced by regulation and by necessity to get used to less lavish lifestyles; and where the public services and the NHS in particular are lionised.

    Events will also be playing against a background in which the Government is being lambasted for its various failings in the handling of the epidemic, and economic suffering is widespread (and disproportionately concentrated amongst its new voters in less well-off areas.)

    In short, people who have money will have to be made to cough it up. Just gunning for the super-rich won't cut it - there are too few of them and it's too easy for them to run away - and ditto for the next tier below, which includes now untouchable figures like wealthy hospital consultants. Thus I would imagine that, in broad-brush terms, everyone earning more than the median wage is going to have to pay much more tax. That should be affordable for the large slice of that income bracket that is now working from home, and finds itself magically in possession of all that extra money that was previously wasted on commuting, but it's going to cause serious hardship for a lot of families that are mortgaged to the hilt and were only just about managing before this started.

    Still, if we want a more Scandiwegian social dispensation then people must finally come to terms with the fact that they have to pay for it themselves, rather than expecting other people to do all the heavy lifting. This will create both winners and losers, which is tough on the losers - but public policy always does that.

    Finally, there is one important and obvious factor working in favour of the Government: no economically liberal, low-tax party sitting to the right of them, and little prospect of such a thing emerging. The Brexit Party is a busted flush and the Liberal Democrats are too left-wing in temperament to move to occupy that space.
    Foxy made a good point this morning, that there will sadly be a lot of cash prematurely going to the younger generation. Perhaps IHT needs looking at fast? I`ve never understood people`s aversion to this tax (second most unpopular after council tax). IHT is my favourite tax. I`d much rather pay tax when I`m dead than when I`m alive.
  • Mr. NorthWales, is that in a virtual sense?

    Because otherwise it sounds crackers.

    JRM announced it this morning so I assume they will sit subjct to safe spacing but it does look as if it is a token gesture
  • numbertwelvenumbertwelve Posts: 5,414
    edited April 2020
    Watching the video again to remind myself, I’m afraid one of the problems was Swinson. Unfortunately she just didn’t have “it”. I understand what she was going for - a grown up between Corbyn and Johnson, trying to promote a sense of decency. Unfortunately, the “grown up” style came across as hectoring and people just couldn’t reconcile this attitude with the pledge to immediately cancel Brexit. Presentationally I think she was very poor. A shame as I think perhaps in different times she could have had a good stab at being leader, but these were exceptional times and she wasn’t the right person for the job.
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 41,673
    Stocky said:

    malcolmg said:

    malcolmg said:

    Southam, that's the issue now. Keir Starmer has made it strikingly clear that he's dragging Labour back to the centre-left. So once again the LibDems are in a squeeze. With Europe now dead as an issue in the electorate, there's really nothing else the LibDems stand for and no relevance. Last time this happened they disastrously (for them) went into coalition with the tories.

    The situation is compounded because Boris isn't a right-winger. He's a libertarian of soft-right persuasion and an internationalist.

    So there's no room on the platform for the LibDems.

    Exactly the same happened with Blair, but the LDs prospered. If voters are comfortable with Labour as a party of government and if they want to kick the Tories out, the LDs will do well. As Alastair points out, almost all LD target seats are Tory held.

    And for that reason, Boris will not be remotely squeamish about doing all he can to crush the LibDems.

    No more Mister Nice Tories....
    Good morning Mark
    Show me a nice Tory and I will show you a lying toerag.
    I thought you thought I was a nice tory Malc
    G , of course I do , there are lots of misguided decent ones about but I have to generalise on the nasties we see that have climbed the greasy pole and so comment on the worst of the worst. You just need to look at which schools these clowns went to , very few grew up in council houses, silver spoons and privilege are the order of the day for these grasping gits.
    Another cut-out-and-keep post from Malcy. I have quite a collection now. Useful when a visiting foreign family member asks what Scottish people are like!
    Stocky, easier just to say cute and cuddly , also warm and welcoming even to Tories , nasty as they are.
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 23,926

    OT Matt Hancock's rollercoaster ride has been remarkable. In just two or three weeks, he went from zero to hero, maybe even favourite to succeed Boris, now zero again after looking done in and apparently blaming medics for wasting PPE.

    I actually feel very sorry for Matt Hancock. He is overwhelmed. I doubt anyone could be doing better given the tools he has at his disposal. The issue is why these are the tools. But that is for another day. People who are overwhelmed will say and do silly things.

    Hancock is, no doubt, doing his best. What the government needs is a wartime-era Minister of Production who can coordinate manufacture and supply of the tools needed on the front lines. Someone who can ask what the clinicians (and everyone) need; ask where to buy it; then negotiate with those suppliers or find alternatives, even if that means buying IP.

    Of course, the government is already doing all of these things, and more. It is looking for new technology, new designs, and for new makers of existing products, at home and abroad.

    But the effort is leaving ministers (and presumably civil servants) exhausted, and it is not being done very well or very quickly.

    Trouble is, the only person who can create a new ministry is Boris who is not here, and the person who might urge action on these lines, who has been critical of government logistics for years, is Dominic Cummings who has handed in his own sicknote.
  • nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483

    nichomar said:

    HOC to return on the 21st April

    But will they take the opportunity to revolutionize how parliament works, bring it into the 21st century, break down the archaic and meaningless traditions and realize Westminster s not fit for purpose? I doubt it, too many of them benefit from how it is now. Shame the uk could become a modern democracy with its parliament fit for purpose.
    The country is fighting a destructive and vile virus with people dying and many suffering and you think now is the time for a revolution in how parliament organises itself
    You could make a start by going electronic for debates and voting, quite sensible sat this point in time and then take it from there. To have people sat in that museum which can’t even accommodate them all is ludicrous and first steps could be made.
This discussion has been closed.