Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Tonight’s special congressional election in Ohio could be a go

1235»

Comments

  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 51,099
    HYUFD said:

    Yes, if the Alliance is seen to be moderate nationalist rather than moderate unionist or at least non sectarian it will find itself falling well behind the SDLP and UUP never mind not being able to challenge the DUP and SF
    Lol @ "at least"
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 54,529
    Sean_F said:

    The Tories under Boris would face a ticking time bomb of scandal in the way the Liberals faced one under Thorpe.
    I doubt that. It would have come out when he was London Mayor if so.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,703
    Charles said:

    @ydoethur

    On the last thread you said that Germans were only allowed to vote for the Nazis

    Quite the contrary: the below ballot paper (from Austria) clearly shows voters had the right to vote against Hitler if they wished...

    https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Stimmzettel-Anschluss.jpg

    Was that before or after Hitler went a bit mad?
  • Aren't the Muslim women who choose the extreme face wear also actually enabling the suppression of the women who don't want it but are forced into it?
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 51,099

    What are you going to do with West Belfast?
    Will HY be the Sykes or Picot of the modern era?
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,703
    edited August 2018
    re NI my feeling is that as and when the numbers dictate it, the whole polity, will go to the Republic. Of course that will unleash hell from certain sections of society. It is also of course the desire not to rock the boat that renders the current negotiations so important.
  • IanB2 said:

    Will HY be the Sykes or Picot of the modern era?
    The Radcliffe.
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    Pulpstar said:

    I know Elon's not flavour of the month, but I for one am glad to see how the Tesla shorters' balls have been crushed recently.
    (I hold no position in Tesla)

    If that was Musk’s objective he’s guilty of market abuse
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 51,099

    Boris’s are so big he can’t escape them.
    They're down at Big Yellow.
  • Aren't the Muslim women who choose the extreme face wear also actually enabling the suppression of the women who don't want it but are forced into it?

    And @JosiasJessop aren't you doing exactly the same by comparing your entirely voluntarily worn headgear to excuse that which I'm sure you must know is used in some cases to suppress women?
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 51,099

    The Radcliffe.
    I remember him from the viceroy's mansion
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 51,099
    edited August 2018
    "Theresa May has rebuked Boris Johnson over his claim that Muslim women in burqas resemble letter boxes and bank robbers, urging the former foreign secretary to apologise after he defied an order to do so by Tory chiefs."

    "..it is clear that the language that Boris used has offended people.”, Mrs May said.
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    Ishmael_Z said:

    If they both owned the lands and administered a fairly uniform system of law in them, that is surely quite a long way towards coming to the same thing.
    Not really - there wasn’t a government as such just a landowner with different feudal rights
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 45,345

    And @JosiasJessop aren't you doing exactly the same by comparing your entirely voluntarily worn headgear to excuse that which I'm sure you must know is used in some cases to suppress women?
    In some case it is; in others it is done out of free will. Personally as an agnostic I find it hard to believe, but nonetheless it's true. Religion can do funny things to people ...

    As I've said before, I could support a ban on the Niqab , and especially the burka, in limited cases, e.g. in courts. But I fail to see how a general public ban would 'help' anyone; in fact, it would hurt many women who (mistakenly IMO) put wearing one above their own welfare.
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    IanB2 said:

    The fact that the Anschluss ballot generally had to be filled in in plain sight of the officials, rather than in a ballot booth, helped concentrate minds somewhat, however.
    What’s wrong with transparency?
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 45,345

    I guess if you've got a really freaky face I might prefer that you insist on it
    What is a 'freaky face' in your view? I think we should be told ... :)
  • What are you going to do with West Belfast?
    Easy.

    Glenavy ward connects West Belfast to Lough Neagh. You can see these on my sectarian headcount interesting maps based on the 2001 Census.

    http://cain.ulst.ac.uk/images/maps/map12.htm
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    TOPPING said:

    Was that before or after Hitler went a bit mad?
    Was he ever sane?

    To be fair (ugh) he was just tidying up a loose end from Bismarck
  • surby said:

    All counties except Armagh , Down and Antrim must have a vote. If the six counties can secede from Ireland, counties from Northern Ireland can also rejoin Ireland.
    What do you mean "except Armagh"? Armagh is majority Catholic.
  • The Radcliffe.
    "The Brits partitioned MY country too, you know!" :lol:
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 35,295
    Charles said:

    Was he ever sane?

    To be fair (ugh) he was just tidying up a loose end from Bismarck
    Think you're missing the reference to Ken L.
  • NEW THREAD

  • justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527
    HYUFD said:

    The 19% Thorpe got for the Liberals in 1979 was the highest since the 23.6% Lloyd George got in 1929.
    Thorpe was not leader in 1979!
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 127,009
    justin124 said:

    Thorpe was not leader in 1979!
    Feb 1974 then
This discussion has been closed.