politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Trump’s Gallup approval rating drops a net minus nine in a wee
politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Trump’s Gallup approval rating drops a net minus nine in a week
We’ve now got the first Gallup approval ratings for the period entirely after the immigration clampdown that saw children being forcibly separated from their parents.
Comments
-
First.
The whole Trump situation is a circus, and makes the US look an absolute joke. It'd be nice to sit back and watch except for the risk it creates for the rest of the world.0 -
-
TBH, looking at that graph the drop in Trump's approval ratings doesn't look outside the normal range of fluctuations. If anything, the previous rating looks like a slight outlier and this looks more like a reversion to trend.0
-
I still think it is possible for Trump in 2020 to lose the popular vote by an even larger margin than in 2016 and still win the Electoral College.0
-
I've staked £30 on Iran to win this.0
-
How much do you think the Iranian goalkeeper has bet?TheScreamingEagles said:I've staked £30 on Iran to win this.
0 -
When I said Iran, I meant Morocco. AhemDavidL said:
How much do you think the Iranian goalkeeper has bet?TheScreamingEagles said:I've staked £30 on Iran to win this.
0 -
Morocco !0
-
The previous rating may also have been a reaction to positive headlines about North Korea. Whether those would naturally have decayed and how rapidly is hard to say for sureRichard_Nabavi said:TBH, looking at that graph the drop in Trump's approval ratings doesn't look outside the normal range of fluctuations. If anything, the previous rating looks like a slight outlier and this looks more like a reversion to trend.
0 -
Mark Lawrenson commentary horrendously bias to Iran here0
-
That makes a little more sense. For all their attractive football and control of the ball the Spaniards look surprisingly unthreatening to me.TheScreamingEagles said:
When I said Iran, I meant Morocco. AhemDavidL said:
How much do you think the Iranian goalkeeper has bet?TheScreamingEagles said:I've staked £30 on Iran to win this.
0 -
538 has him at 42/52, a level where you'd expect the Dems to take the House, but still possibly lose some Red State Senators.Richard_Nabavi said:TBH, looking at that graph the drop in Trump's approval ratings doesn't look outside the normal range of fluctuations. If anything, the previous rating looks like a slight outlier and this looks more like a reversion to trend.
0 -
Wooo the battle of the bastards last 16 match between Luis Suarez and Pepe is back on.0
-
Unlikely given he won Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin by less than 1%.TheScreamingEagles said:I still think it is possible for Trump in 2020 to lose the popular vote by even larger margin than in 2016 and still win the Electoral College.
Ironically the reverse may be the case especially if Sanders is his opponent, in areas of California like Orange County that voted for Hillary but are normally GOP his approval rating is up to 50% while nationally it is down to 41%. It is possible Sanders could win Pennsylvania and enough upper Midwest and rustbelt states to narrowly win the Electoral College but narrowly lose the popular vote to Trump as some suburban independents and moderate Republicans in New York and California who voted for Hillary over Trump hold their nose and vote for Trump to keep out Sanders0 -
Nah, it was on Iran, Carlos Queiroz knocking out Portugal is written in the starsDavidL said:
That makes a little more sense. For all their attractive football and control of the ball the Spaniards look surprisingly unthreatening to me.TheScreamingEagles said:
When I said Iran, I meant Morocco. AhemDavidL said:
How much do you think the Iranian goalkeeper has bet?TheScreamingEagles said:I've staked £30 on Iran to win this.
0 -
Wonder where he is planning to retire?TheScreamingEagles said:
Nah, it was on Iran, Carlos Queiroz knocking out Portugal is written in the starsDavidL said:
That makes a little more sense. For all their attractive football and control of the ball the Spaniards look surprisingly unthreatening to me.TheScreamingEagles said:
When I said Iran, I meant Morocco. AhemDavidL said:
How much do you think the Iranian goalkeeper has bet?TheScreamingEagles said:I've staked £30 on Iran to win this.
0 -
Did we not have that when Ronaldo took on Ramos? But Ramos is not allowed to break the bones of Real Madrid players.TheScreamingEagles said:Wooo the battle of the bastards last 16 match between Luis Suarez and Pepe is still back on.
0 -
Manchester, he'll be Mourinho's replacement when Jose has his inevitable meltdown.DavidL said:
Wonder where he is planning to retire?TheScreamingEagles said:
Nah, it was on Iran, Carlos Queiroz knocking out Portugal is written in the starsDavidL said:
That makes a little more sense. For all their attractive football and control of the ball the Spaniards look surprisingly unthreatening to me.TheScreamingEagles said:
When I said Iran, I meant Morocco. AhemDavidL said:
How much do you think the Iranian goalkeeper has bet?TheScreamingEagles said:I've staked £30 on Iran to win this.
0 -
I thought you were going to talk abou Brexiteer infighting.TheScreamingEagles said:Wooo the battle of the bastards last 16 match between Luis Suarez and Pepe is back on.
0 -
This is about the last thread.
I reckon Wigmore and Farage are full of piss and wind.
There's no way you can poll 60,000 people in a short space of time, no pollster has that capability.
https://twitter.com/carolecadwalla/status/1011235762795372544
0 -
-
I'm never sure of that.SquareRoot said:
They may have a different terminology for the main and sidekick commentator, but both are usually listed as commentators for the game, and are talking about the same amount of time, so I don't think any distinction is really necessary.0 -
'What made this particularly challenging for him were the TV pictures and sounds of the crying children on being taken away from their parents. It was a lot harder for the normal Trump response of “fake news”'
Not that much harder, though.
'In June 2018 social media users began circulating a heart-rending photograph depicting a sobbing toddler clutching the bars of a cage in which he is confined, usually accompanied by commentary stating that the image depicted a boy who had been detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in 2018... the photograph was taken on 10 June 2018, but it did not show a child confined by immigration authorities to a cage. Rather, it was snapped during a protest staged in front of Dallas City Hall' (1)
'In May 2018, a photograph of two children sleeping inside a fenced enclosure was widely circulated via social media with accompanying text stating that it pictured a “kids’ concentration camp” in the U.S.... This photograph dates from 2014 (during the Obama administration) and was not directly related to a mid-2018 controversy over Trump administration policy of separating children from undocumented migrant parents at the U.S. border.' (2; this was tweeted by Obama speechwriter Jon Favreau and subsequently deleted when he was informed of its provenance).
Then, of course, we have the Time cover of a crying young girl who was brutally separated from her family - by her mother, who abandoned her husband and three of her children in Honduras and paid $6,000 to a people smuggler to get her across the US border, presumably taking only the youngest of her children because she expected it to give her the best chance of claiming asylum.0 -
Nah, that's the scuffle of the scoundrels. Remainer infighting is the clash of the curs.williamglenn said:
I thought you were going to talk abou Brexiteer infighting.TheScreamingEagles said:Wooo the battle of the bastards last 16 match between Luis Suarez and Pepe is back on.
It's important to keep these things clear,0 -
And so is Carole.TheScreamingEagles said:This is about the last thread.
I reckon Wigmore and Farage are full of piss and wind.
There's no way you can poll 60,000 people in a short space of time, no pollster has that capability.
https://twitter.com/carolecadwalla/status/10112357627953725440 -
Lovely goal from Portugal.0
-
At the time Isabel Oakeshott said it was 10,000.TheScreamingEagles said:This is about the last thread.
I reckon Wigmore and Farage are full of piss and wind.
There's no way you can poll 60,000 people in a short space of time, no pollster has that capability.
https://twitter.com/carolecadwalla/status/1011235762795372544
https://twitter.com/isabeloakeshott/status/746421771830583296?s=210 -
Ben Page says it is possible but unlikely.FrancisUrquhart said:
And so is Carole.TheScreamingEagles said:This is about the last thread.
I reckon Wigmore and Farage are full of piss and wind.
There's no way you can poll 60,000 people in a short space of time, no pollster has that capability.
https://twitter.com/carolecadwalla/status/1011235762795372544
As for Carole, she's letting her views cloud her judgment.
Wake me up when Michael Crick starts running stories on this.
That's when Leavers should get worried.0 -
It’s theoretically possible, but highly unlikely.TheScreamingEagles said:I still think it is possible for Trump in 2020 to lose the popular vote by an even larger margin than in 2016 and still win the Electoral College.
0 -
You have a heart of stone.Chelyabinsk said:'What made this particularly challenging for him were the TV pictures and sounds of the crying children on being taken away from their parents. It was a lot harder for the normal Trump response of “fake news”'
Not that much harder, though.
'In June 2018 social media users began circulating a heart-rending photograph depicting a sobbing toddler clutching the bars of a cage in which he is confined, usually accompanied by commentary stating that the image depicted a boy who had been detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in 2018... the photograph was taken on 10 June 2018, but it did not show a child confined by immigration authorities to a cage. Rather, it was snapped during a protest staged in front of Dallas City Hall' (1)
'In May 2018, a photograph of two children sleeping inside a fenced enclosure was widely circulated via social media with accompanying text stating that it pictured a “kids’ concentration camp” in the U.S.... This photograph dates from 2014 (during the Obama administration) and was not directly related to a mid-2018 controversy over Trump administration policy of separating children from undocumented migrant parents at the U.S. border.' (2; this was tweeted by Obama speechwriter Jon Favreau and subsequently deleted when he was informed of its provenance).
Then, of course, we have the Time cover of a crying young girl who was brutally separated from her family - by her mother, who abandoned her husband and three of her children in Honduras and paid $6,000 to a people smuggler to get her across the US border, presumably taking only the youngest of her children because she expected it to give her the best chance of claiming asylum.0 -
You think any Republican let alone Trump can will California or New York. I wouldn't even be so sure about Arizona or Texas.HYUFD said:
Unlikely given he won Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin by less than 1%.TheScreamingEagles said:I still think it is possible for Trump in 2020 to lose the popular vote by even larger margin than in 2016 and still win the Electoral College.
Ironically the reverse may be the case especially if Sanders is his opponent, in areas of California like Orange County that voted for Hillary but are normally GOP his approval rating is up to 50% while nationally it is down to 41%. It is possible Sanders could win Pennsylvania and enough upper Midwest and rustbelt states to narrowly win the Electoral College but narrowly lose the popular vote to Trump as some suburban independents and moderate Republicans in New York and California who voted for Hillary over Trump hold their nose and vote for Trump to keep out Sanders0 -
-
Michael has also been known to lose sense of perspective from time to time...I remember the infamous Crewe by-election where he had a conspiracy theory about the Tory doing something dodgy with canvasing data. And of course the Battle Bus story, he went way OTT on that, conflating all sorts of things in order to come with talk that so many results of seats could have been null and void that the GE2015 result could have been under threat.TheScreamingEagles said:
Ben Page says it is possible but unlikely.FrancisUrquhart said:
And so is Carole.TheScreamingEagles said:This is about the last thread.
I reckon Wigmore and Farage are full of piss and wind.
There's no way you can poll 60,000 people in a short space of time, no pollster has that capability.
https://twitter.com/carolecadwalla/status/1011235762795372544
As for Carole, she's letting her views cloud her judgment.
Wake me up when Michael Crick starts running stories on this.
That's when Leavers should get worried.0 -
That Ronaldo - he's no Harry Kane......0
-
Justice done. That was never a penalty.0
-
Yer fecking what?
If you're from Manchester, Leeds or Sheffield, this professor thinks you're a southerner
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/youre-manchester-leeds-sheffield-professor-127785300 -
The wisdom of Diane James.Scott_P said:
https://twitter.com/dianejamesmep/status/1011274340061646850?s=210 -
Did I read that graphic of Ronaldo's penalties for Portugal as 8 scored and 5 now 6 missed ?
With a record like that he's allowed to take them ???0 -
The one thing the world cup has shown is that England doesn't have the worst referees in the world.0
-
It has also shown you can score a Portuegese wonder goal and still be a total wanker......TheScreamingEagles said:The one thing the world cup has shown is that England doesn't have the worst referees in the world.
0 -
I've known that since Ronaldo joined Manchester United in 2003.MarqueeMark said:
It has also shown you can score a Portuegese wonder goal and still be a total wanker......TheScreamingEagles said:The one thing the world cup has shown is that England doesn't have the worst referees in the world.
0 -
Well, let's not be in a Russia to judge them.TheScreamingEagles said:The one thing the world cup has shown is that England doesn't have the worst referees in the world.
0 -
The defender only had eyes for Ronaldo. He had no intention of gaining possession of the ball.DavidL said:0 -
-
VAR, as useful as a chocolate fire guard.0
-
They really need a challenge system like cricket / tennis.0
-
Wow0
-
Spain really don't want to play Uruguay!0
-
Spain vs Uruguay should be a tasty game.
That Moroccan who scored the brilliant own goal must now be feeling even sicker.0 -
-
It's really spoiling this game. In fairness, this is the worst I have seen it.FrancisUrquhart said:VAR, as useful as a chocolate fire guard.
0 -
No but if Trump won a million more votes in each of California and New York he could win the national popular vote even if the Democratic candidate still won both states comfortably.surby said:
You think any Republican let alone Trump can will California or New York. I wouldn't even be so sure about Arizona or Texas.HYUFD said:
Unlikely given he won Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin by less than 1%.TheScreamingEagles said:I still think it is possible for Trump in 2020 to lose the popular vote by even larger margin than in 2016 and still win the Electoral College.
Ironically the reverse may be the case especially if Sanders is his opponent, in areas of California like Orange County that voted for Hillary but are normally GOP his approval rating is up to 50% while nationally it is down to 41%. It is possible Sanders could win Pennsylvania and enough upper Midwest and rustbelt states to narrowly win the Electoral College but narrowly lose the popular vote to Trump as some suburban independents and moderate Republicans in New York and California who voted for Hillary over Trump hold their nose and vote for Trump to keep out Sanders
Though of course Giuliani and Schwarzanneger and Pataki all won New York city, California or New York state at some point in the last 25 years for the Republicans0 -
0
-
Ref is called by VAR on a possible red card incident. So how come he gets to give a yellow?0
-
The first two are totally predictable, but so much for Benjamin claims of being a classical liberal (as he argued when interviewed by Dave Rubin).williamglenn said:LOL
twitter.com/jimwaterson/status/1011313290306293762?s=210 -
He probably has more face furniture than the entire remaining UKIP membership combined.....williamglenn said:0 -
Hillary Clinton trashes both populists and the Electoral College in Oxford speech
https://news.grabien.com/story-england-hillary-trashes-americas-electoral-college0 -
He's well set up for a jump start anyway.MarqueeMark said:
He probably has more face furniture than the entire remaining UKIP membership combined.....williamglenn said:0 -
VAR again....this is bloody stupid.0
-
Bitter loser.HYUFD said:Hillary Clinton trashes both populists and the Electoral College in Oxford speech
https://news.grabien.com/story-england-hillary-trashes-americas-electoral-college0 -
So its going to be Ronaldo vs Suarez now.0
-
This is beyond farce. What utter nonsense.0
-
My map is a northern area defined as ‘not London,’ where London’s sphere of influence extends over most of the country - determined by two-hour commuting patterns which is becoming the normTheScreamingEagles said:Yer fecking what?
If you're from Manchester, Leeds or Sheffield, this professor thinks you're a southerner
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/youre-manchester-leeds-sheffield-professor-12778530
...what was wrong with a geographic definition, albeit a fuzzy one?
Oh gods Iran, you were so close there.0 -
Hands up who thinks VAR is a good idea ?0
-
Oh my god how did he miss that...0
-
Must be one of the biggest misses in this World Cup.FrancisUrquhart said:Oh my god how did he miss that...
I honestly thought he'd got it.0 -
By the same logic, if you’re from south of the river you should count as a northerner.TheScreamingEagles said:Yer fecking what?
If you're from Manchester, Leeds or Sheffield, this professor thinks you're a southerner
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/youre-manchester-leeds-sheffield-professor-127785300 -
-
Puts hands up. There are counter examples where it has been utilised well at this very world cup, and handled quicker. The problems are related to operation, not the principle. For instance, the VAR officials are overly harsh on situations where someone heads a ball into someone else's arm which they couldn'tt possibly avoid, and when they call over the ref to review it the expectation is they should overturn.FrancisUrquhart said:Hands up who thinks VAR is a good idea ?
0 -
Hey, if it dumped Portugal out the cup.....FrancisUrquhart said:Hands up who thinks VAR is a good idea ?
0 -
The weird thing is that if this referee did not have VAR he might have had a decent game. He has got things right first time and then made truly perverse decisions looking at the replays.FrancisUrquhart said:Hands up who thinks VAR is a good idea ?
0 -
That Iranian tosser cost me wonga.FrancisUrquhart said:Oh my god how did he miss that...
0 -
It has to be a challenge based system. The current rules are just chaos.kle4 said:
Puts hands up. There are counter examples where it has been utilised well at this very world cup, and handled quicker. The problems are related to operation, not the principle. For instance, the VAR officials are overly harsh on situations where someone heads a ball into someone else's arm which they couldn'tt possibly avoid, and when they call over the ref to review it the expectation is they should overturn.FrancisUrquhart said:Hands up who thinks VAR is a good idea ?
0 -
Yes, they haven't sorted out the best approach prior to this world cup. But it can work, and does not seem beyond even the remedial wit of Fifa to figure it out.FrancisUrquhart said:
It has to be a challenge based system. The current rules are just chaos.kle4 said:
Puts hands up. There are counter examples where it has been utilised well at this very world cup, and handled quicker. The problems are related to operation, not the principle. For instance, the VAR officials are overly harsh on situations where someone heads a ball into someone else's arm which they couldn'tt possibly avoid, and when they call over the ref to review it the expectation is they should overturn.FrancisUrquhart said:Hands up who thinks VAR is a good idea ?
0 -
The ref has had a shocker. Don't they realise stuff ALWAYS looks worse on slow Mo ?DavidL said:
The weird thing is that if this referee did not have VAR he might have had a decent game. He has got things right first time and then made truly perverse decisions looking at the replays.FrancisUrquhart said:Hands up who thinks VAR is a good idea ?
0 -
Wait until England go out to a crazy VAR decision before deciding!kle4 said:
Puts hands up. There are counter examples where it has been utilised well at this very world cup, and handled quicker. The problems are related to operation, not the principle. For instance, the VAR officials are overly harsh on situations where someone heads a ball into someone else's arm which they couldn'tt possibly avoid, and when they call over the ref to review it the expectation is they should overturn.FrancisUrquhart said:Hands up who thinks VAR is a good idea ?
0 -
2 penalties that weren't and a truly ridiculous booking for Ronaldo.Pulpstar said:
The ref has had a shocker. Don't they realise stuff ALWAYS looks worse on slow Mo ?DavidL said:
The weird thing is that if this referee did not have VAR he might have had a decent game. He has got things right first time and then made truly perverse decisions looking at the replays.FrancisUrquhart said:Hands up who thinks VAR is a good idea ?
0 -
How have Spain got such a long unbeaten run with such a crap defence ?0
-
All three of those were quite moderate Republicans in their day, and might as well be Democrats by today's standards. And don't forget that Sanders or someone like him will bring the Jill Steiners etc back to the Dems, whilst not a few of the voters that they might drive away from the Dems would similarly go to other non-Trump parties like the Libertarians.HYUFD said:
No but if Trump won a million more votes in each of California and New York he could win the national popular vote even if the Democratic candidate still won both states comfortably.surby said:
You think any Republican let alone Trump can will California or New York. I wouldn't even be so sure about Arizona or Texas.HYUFD said:
Unlikely given he won Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin by less than 1%.TheScreamingEagles said:I still think it is possible for Trump in 2020 to lose the popular vote by even larger margin than in 2016 and still win the Electoral College.
Ironically the reverse may be the case especially if Sanders is his opponent, in areas of California like Orange County that voted for Hillary but are normally GOP his approval rating is up to 50% while nationally it is down to 41%. It is possible Sanders could win Pennsylvania and enough upper Midwest and rustbelt states to narrowly win the Electoral College but narrowly lose the popular vote to Trump as some suburban independents and moderate Republicans in New York and California who voted for Hillary over Trump hold their nose and vote for Trump to keep out Sanders
Though of course Giuliani and Schwarzanneger and Pataki all won New York city, California or New York state at some point in the last 25 years for the Republicans0 -
Looks like Javid is serious about the leadership.Scott_P said:0 -
Surprising. If anyone didn't realise he was a complete cu*t by now they must be without sentience0
-
Does not add up, why go to the amateur part of the leave campaign when the professionals are available.williamglenn said:
Looks like Javid is serious about the leadership.Scott_P said:0 -
Looks like something important NATO related to be announced wet Boris being in Afghanistan. Soubrys tweet hasn't aged well today.0
-
The professionals are toxic and have egos that would get in the way. By going for the young hired help with unimpeachable leave credentials he can wrap hope to wrap up the Brexiteer vote without compromising his own room for manoeuvre.ralphmalph said:
Does not add up, why go to the amateur part of the leave campaign when the professionals are available.williamglenn said:
Looks like Javid is serious about the leadership.Scott_P said:0 -
Vanilla acts very strangely on my PC using Windows 7. With Chrome it runs ragged, but does let me sign in.
With Explorer it doesn't let me even do that.
Concerning Trump, let me just say that his face would look good on a three dollar bill.0 -
Javid feels exposed because he heavily flirted as a eurosceptic prior to the referendum, and then backed Remain.ralphmalph said:
Does not add up, why go to the amateur part of the leave campaign when the professionals are available.williamglenn said:
Looks like Javid is serious about the leadership.Scott_P said:0 -
Sorry, just wrong. Leave.EU was the dreggs of the leave campaign. Basically Banks and Farage with the support of Cash, Jenkin, Bone or the old dinosaurs. Vote Leave were the professionals and also stuffed full of Tory Spads, afterwards a few were appointed to the T May team. So they are much better connected to the Tory Party than anybody who worked for Leave.EU.williamglenn said:
The professionals are toxic and have egos that would get in the way. By going for the young hired help with unimpeachable leave credentials he can wrap hope to wrap up the Brexiteer vote without compromising his own room for manoeuvre.ralphmalph said:
Does not add up, why go to the amateur part of the leave campaign when the professionals are available.williamglenn said:
Looks like Javid is serious about the leadership.Scott_P said:
Cummings is still involved with Boris and Gove.0 -
He'll brainwash this young whipper-snapper into supporting his Brexit betrayal in no time.Casino_Royale said:
Javid feels exposed because he heavily flirted as a eurosceptic prior to the referendum, and then backed Remain.ralphmalph said:
Does not add up, why go to the amateur part of the leave campaign when the professionals are available.williamglenn said:
Looks like Javid is serious about the leadership.Scott_P said:
0 -
That is a picture of Mark Meechan not Paul Joseph Watson. The latter has a lot more you tube followers than UKIP has voters these days.MarqueeMark said:
He probably has more face furniture than the entire remaining UKIP membership combined.....williamglenn said:0 -
If he calls you, then I’ll be worried.williamglenn said:
He'll brainwash this young whipper-snapper into supporting his Brexit betrayal in no time.Casino_Royale said:
Javid feels exposed because he heavily flirted as a eurosceptic prior to the referendum, and then backed Remain.ralphmalph said:
Does not add up, why go to the amateur part of the leave campaign when the professionals are available.williamglenn said:
Looks like Javid is serious about the leadership.Scott_P said:0 -
Put me in the camp of those pissed off about the Swansea Tidal Lagoon project.
I thought it was an extremely exciting new technology, with potential big wins for UK plc and pure energy security.
Yes, it’s unproven and a bit pricey upfront (what new tech isn’t?) but i think it was worthy of further work, and would help regenerate some of our more deprived/isolated regions as well.0 -
Unusually, I completely agree with you. It's just crazy.Casino_Royale said:Put me in the camp of those pissed off about the Swansea Tidal Lagoon project.
I thought it was an extremely exciting new technology, with potential big wins for UK plc and pure energy security.
Yes, it’s unproven and a bit pricey upfront (what new tech isn’t?) but i think it was worthy of further work, and would help regenerate some of our more deprived/isolated regions as well.
Well, I guess we'll just have to content ourselves with HS2.
And Brexit.0 -
I know very little about it but I think I agree.Casino_Royale said:Put me in the camp of those pissed off about the Swansea Tidal Lagoon project.
I thought it was an extremely exciting new technology, with potential big wins for UK plc and pure energy security.
Yes, it’s unproven and a bit pricey upfront (what new tech isn’t?) but i think it was worthy of further work, and would help regenerate some of our more deprived/isolated regions as well.0 -
VAR is only for grown-ups. You can use it in rugby (both codes) but as Pablo says, in football, all you'll get is the children playing to the camera.
They don't understand that it still comes down to subjective decisions in some cases.0 -
CR they wanted a strike price agreed for 90 years. 90 years! New nuclear only wants 35Casino_Royale said:Put me in the camp of those pissed off about the Swansea Tidal Lagoon project.
I thought it was an extremely exciting new technology, with potential big wins for UK plc and pure energy security.
Yes, it’s unproven and a bit pricey upfront (what new tech isn’t?) but i think it was worthy of further work, and would help regenerate some of our more deprived/isolated regions as well.0 -
Today's Tesco Strawberry score is a disappointing six:
Aberdeenshire
Angus
Staffordshire
Herefordshire
Surrey
Kent
There seems to be a pattern of low scores at the start of the working week slowly increasing to a weekend peak.0 -
But wasn't it for a lot lower energy output ?TheWhiteRabbit said:
CR they wanted a strike price agreed for 90 years. 90 years! New nuclear only wants 35Casino_Royale said:Put me in the camp of those pissed off about the Swansea Tidal Lagoon project.
I thought it was an extremely exciting new technology, with potential big wins for UK plc and pure energy security.
Yes, it’s unproven and a bit pricey upfront (what new tech isn’t?) but i think it was worthy of further work, and would help regenerate some of our more deprived/isolated regions as well.0
