politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Just 19% of current LAB voters think the vote to leave the EU was wrong
Just 19% of Labour voters in today’s YouGov poll think that the decision to leave the EU was right with 72% saying wrong. I think this is the widest split there’s been.
I do agree it is weird it hasn't - and probably won't - become an issue for the leadership. Yes, opposition's aren't going to be judged as harshly as government as is only right and fair, but even so.
I do agree it is weird it hasn't - and probably won't - become an issue for the leadership. Yes, opposition's aren't going to be judged as harshly as government as is only right and fair, but even so.
I see that Juncker and Barnier were in Dublin today. The speech is linked to here in full. Doesn't sound to me as if the EU will be stitching up Ireland.
I see that Juncker and Barnier were in Dublin today. The speech is linked to here in full. Doesn't sound to me as if the EU will be stitching up Ireland.
I do agree it is weird it hasn't - and probably won't - become an issue for the leadership. Yes, opposition's aren't going to be judged as harshly as government as is only right and fair, but even so.
Team Corbyn seem to have moved from ambivalence to actively attacking Remain activists. It’s not sustainable.
Why not? Will not the Tories 'own' Brexit? As angry as some Remain voters might be, why would they move away from Labour en masse now if they haven't before, or why stay home?
And just think what the nuumbers would have been if lots of Remainers hadn't already split. Corbyn's a clown and his chances of ever winning an election are zero.
I see that Juncker and Barnier were in Dublin today. The speech is linked to here in full. Doesn't sound to me as if the EU will be stitching up Ireland.
The problem is most of those Labour voters are concentrated in heavily Remain, safe Labour inner city and university town seats. As Corbyn proved in Lewisham East last week he can afford to see the Labour vote down 17% in such seats in favour of the more pro soft Brexit and pro EEA LDs and still hold the seat.
However of the top 10 Labour marginal seats targeted by the Tories 8 voted Leave and of the top 10 Tory marginal seats targeted by Labour 8 also voted Leave and it is in those key marginal seats the next general election will be decided under FPTP
Team Corbyn seem to have moved from ambivalence to actively attacking Remain activists. It’s not sustainable.
Why not? Will not the Tories 'own' Brexit? As angry as some Remain voters might be, why would they move away from Labour en masse now if they haven't before, or why stay home?
As long as Tory policy is being driven by the headbangers and they continue to make a complete balls up of Brexit there will be no pressure on Labour to shift its position.
And Tory policy will continue to be driven by the headbangers and they will continue to make a complete balls up of Brexit.
Team Corbyn seem to have moved from ambivalence to actively attacking Remain activists. It’s not sustainable.
Why not? Will not the Tories 'own' Brexit? As angry as some Remain voters might be, why would they move away from Labour en masse now if they haven't before, or why stay home?
Corbyn has always favoured Brexit, and calculates that Continuity Remainers have nowhere else to go that could hurt Labour.
Team Corbyn seem to have moved from ambivalence to actively attacking Remain activists. It’s not sustainable.
Why not? Will not the Tories 'own' Brexit? As angry as some Remain voters might be, why would they move away from Labour en masse now if they haven't before, or why stay home?
As long as Tory policy is being driven by the headbangers and they continue to make a complete balls up of Brexit there will be no pressure on Labour to shift its position.
And Tory policy will continue to be driven by the headbangers and they will continue to make a complete balls up of Brexit.
Those "headbangers" being the Tories that think the EU is going to give us a super souper special deal like as recently proposed in the single market for goods and outside for services.
Interestingly heavily Remain London has now overtaken the Leave backing North as Labour's safest region in the UK (no doubt the lack of home owners in London compared to the North has also had an impact).
Labour lead the Tories by 22%, 53% to 30% in London but only lead the Tories by 12%, 50% to 38% in the North.
And just think what the nuumbers would have been if lots of Remainers hadn't already split. Corbyn's a clown and his chances of ever winning an election are zero.
According to that piece earlier, Corbyn gained 20% of Tory Remainers. If he can hold them while either regaining or neutralising Labour Leavers that churned the other way, Job Done.
A feature of this World Cup: almost everyone has struggled against almost everyone. Almost no games have been won by more than a single goal. And then Croatia go and put 3 past Argentina. OK, not the best Argetina side ever, but still a side with one of the top two footballers in the world in it. Well played Croatia.
Team Corbyn seem to have moved from ambivalence to actively attacking Remain activists. It’s not sustainable.
Why not? Will not the Tories 'own' Brexit? As angry as some Remain voters might be, why would they move away from Labour en masse now if they haven't before, or why stay home?
As long as Tory policy is being driven by the headbangers and they continue to make a complete balls up of Brexit there will be no pressure on Labour to shift its position.
And Tory policy will continue to be driven by the headbangers and they will continue to make a complete balls up of Brexit.
Those "headbangers" being the Tories that think the EU is going to give us a super souper special deal like as recently proposed in the single market for goods and outside for services.
Well I actually meant the headbangers who want to take us over the cliff, but whichever. There are hardly any realists in today's Tory party.
Team Corbyn seem to have moved from ambivalence to actively attacking Remain activists. It’s not sustainable.
Why not? Will not the Tories 'own' Brexit? As angry as some Remain voters might be, why would they move away from Labour en masse now if they haven't before, or why stay home?
Corbyn has always favoured Brexit, and calculates that Continuity Remainers have nowhere else to go that could hurt Labour.
And quite possibly "miscalculated" that a large part of his GE election vote may have been a protest vote convinced that there was no chance of him actually winning.
Team Corbyn seem to have moved from ambivalence to actively attacking Remain activists. It’s not sustainable.
Why not? Will not the Tories 'own' Brexit? As angry as some Remain voters might be, why would they move away from Labour en masse now if they haven't before, or why stay home?
As long as Tory policy is being driven by the headbangers and they continue to make a complete balls up of Brexit there will be no pressure on Labour to shift its position.
And Tory policy will continue to be driven by the headbangers and they will continue to make a complete balls up of Brexit.
Those "headbangers" being the Tories that think the EU is going to give us a super souper special deal like as recently proposed in the single market for goods and outside for services.
Well I actually meant the headbangers who want to take us over the cliff, but whichever. There are hardly any realists in today's Tory party.
No Tory wants to take us over the cliff. The headbangers in your words, just think the only/best deal is third country with an FTA and always have done. The problem is the idiots that thought we could have our cake fifty times over. i.e the Tory remainers, the EU will be nice to us we can have a financial services deal, a single market deal a customs deal, a cake deal with millions and millions on top have poisoned the well, which now means the cliff is a reality, albeit a 5% one.
I see that Juncker and Barnier were in Dublin today. The speech is linked to here in full. Doesn't sound to me as if the EU will be stitching up Ireland.
And just think what the nuumbers would have been if lots of Remainers hadn't already split. Corbyn's a clown and his chances of ever winning an election are zero.
According to that piece earlier, Corbyn gained 20% of Tory Remainers. If he can hold them while either regaining or neutralising Labour Leavers that churned the other way, Job Done.
Team Corbyn seem to have moved from ambivalence to actively attacking Remain activists. It’s not sustainable.
Why not? Will not the Tories 'own' Brexit? As angry as some Remain voters might be, why would they move away from Labour en masse now if they haven't before, or why stay home?
Corbyn has always favoured Brexit, and calculates that Continuity Remainers have nowhere else to go that could hurt Labour.
And quite possibly "miscalculated" that a large part of his GE election vote may have been a protest vote convinced that there was no chance of him actually winning.
Considering that today's Yougov was Con 42, Lab 40, it seems that theory is debunked. A year long affiliation with a party is not an isolated protest vote.
And just think what the nuumbers would have been if lots of Remainers hadn't already split. Corbyn's a clown and his chances of ever winning an election are zero.
According to that piece earlier, Corbyn gained 20% of Tory Remainers. If he can hold them while either regaining or neutralising Labour Leavers that churned the other way, Job Done.
He won't.
That is what Toxic Theresa thought last year. And she is more popular than her minions.
And just think what the nuumbers would have been if lots of Remainers hadn't already split. Corbyn's a clown and his chances of ever winning an election are zero.
According to that piece earlier, Corbyn gained 20% of Tory Remainers. If he can hold them while either regaining or neutralising Labour Leavers that churned the other way, Job Done.
He won't.
Why couldn't he? They might be disappointed, but if that was a reason to switch it's still a reason to punish the Tories.
And just think what the nuumbers would have been if lots of Remainers hadn't already split. Corbyn's a clown and his chances of ever winning an election are zero.
According to that piece earlier, Corbyn gained 20% of Tory Remainers. If he can hold them while either regaining or neutralising Labour Leavers that churned the other way, Job Done.
He won't.
That is what Toxic Theresa thought last year. And she is more popular than her minions.
And just think what the nuumbers would have been if lots of Remainers hadn't already split. Corbyn's a clown and his chances of ever winning an election are zero.
According to that piece earlier, Corbyn gained 20% of Tory Remainers. If he can hold them while either regaining or neutralising Labour Leavers that churned the other way, Job Done.
He won't.
That is what Toxic Theresa thought last year. And she is more popular than her minions.
No she didn't, as Corbyn hadn't gained them at that point!
Team Corbyn seem to have moved from ambivalence to actively attacking Remain activists. It’s not sustainable.
Why not? Will not the Tories 'own' Brexit? As angry as some Remain voters might be, why would they move away from Labour en masse now if they haven't before, or why stay home?
As long as Tory policy is being driven by the headbangers and they continue to make a complete balls up of Brexit there will be no pressure on Labour to shift its position.
And Tory policy will continue to be driven by the headbangers and they will continue to make a complete balls up of Brexit.
Those "headbangers" being the Tories that think the EU is going to give us a super souper special deal like as recently proposed in the single market for goods and outside for services.
Well I actually meant the headbangers who want to take us over the cliff, but whichever. There are hardly any realists in today's Tory party.
Few people want to go over the cliff.
But, it may be the case that no deal can be reached.
Team Corbyn seem to have moved from ambivalence to actively attacking Remain activists. It’s not sustainable.
Why not? Will not the Tories 'own' Brexit? As angry as some Remain voters might be, why would they move away from Labour en masse now if they haven't before, or why stay home?
Corbyn has always favoured Brexit, and calculates that Continuity Remainers have nowhere else to go that could hurt Labour.
They've been hoist by their own petard since GE2015.
It was the election of both Corbyn that year, and a Conservative Majority Government, that made Brexit possible.
Without the former, it wouldn't have happened. This is the sort of "black swan" event that you'd probably have got 500/1 on in 2013.
Am I the only person who is so utterly fed-up with hearing about Heathrow that they no longer care if they expand it, close it or do nothing at all as long as they stop talking about it.
Team Corbyn seem to have moved from ambivalence to actively attacking Remain activists. It’s not sustainable.
Why not? Will not the Tories 'own' Brexit? As angry as some Remain voters might be, why would they move away from Labour en masse now if they haven't before, or why stay home?
Corbyn has always favoured Brexit, and calculates that Continuity Remainers have nowhere else to go that could hurt Labour.
They've been hoist by their own petard since GE2015.
It was the election of both Corbyn that year, and a Conservative Majority Government, that made Brexit possible.
Without the former, it wouldn't have happened. This is the sort of "black swan" event that you'd probably have got 500/1 on in 2013.
If Corbyn were a strong Remainer, Leave would have lost.
FPT - softening Brexit is both Eire's and the EU's mutual interest.
Eire, because most of its trade with the rest of Europe goes through the UK and it needs the easiest possible customs and regulatory processes for its goods transiting through it.
The EU, because it wants the UK as close to its orbit as possible, whilst conceding as little as possible, pour encourager les autres. Northern Ireland really is a sideshow, and it's being leveraged - somewhat shamelessly - because of its political potency.
The EU is putting on a show about all how this is all about the EU being on the side of plucky little Ireland, because it's in its interests to do so and to contrast the "influence" Eire has now with the lack of influence the UK will have once it leaves. But it is only a show. The interests are coincident, not driven from the bottom up.
Eire will experience the firm smack of federalism as soon as Brexit's over, and the EU gets round to interrogating and challenging its corporation tax rates again, whereupon it will easily be outvoted or pressured into concessions.
Team Corbyn seem to have moved from ambivalence to actively attacking Remain activists. It’s not sustainable.
Why not? Will not the Tories 'own' Brexit? As angry as some Remain voters might be, why would they move away from Labour en masse now if they haven't before, or why stay home?
Corbyn has always favoured Brexit, and calculates that Continuity Remainers have nowhere else to go that could hurt Labour.
They've been hoist by their own petard since GE2015.
It was the election of both Corbyn that year, and a Conservative Majority Government, that made Brexit possible.
Without the former, it wouldn't have happened. This is the sort of "black swan" event that you'd probably have got 500/1 on in 2013.
Indeed which is why it will be hard Brexit, or close to it, guaranteed for the best part of the next decade. Whoever wins out of the Tory leader at the next general election or Corbyn neither will take us back into the single market let alone the EU or leave free movement in place.
Until a pro EEA figure like Umunna either succeeds Corbyn as Labour leader or leads a new UK 'En Marche' style party, perhaps merged with the LDs, continuity Remainers are screwed
Team Corbyn seem to have moved from ambivalence to actively attacking Remain activists. It’s not sustainable.
Why not? Will not the Tories 'own' Brexit? As angry as some Remain voters might be, why would they move away from Labour en masse now if they haven't before, or why stay home?
As long as Tory policy is being driven by the headbangers and they continue to make a complete balls up of Brexit there will be no pressure on Labour to shift its position.
And Tory policy will continue to be driven by the headbangers and they will continue to make a complete balls up of Brexit.
Those "headbangers" being the Tories that think the EU is going to give us a super souper special deal like as recently proposed in the single market for goods and outside for services.
Well I actually meant the headbangers who want to take us over the cliff, but whichever. There are hardly any realists in today's Tory party.
Few people want to go over the cliff.
But, it may be the case that no deal can be reached.
At least there is legal certainty over Brexit following the passage of the EU Withdrawal Act.
Of course, there are many details to be confirmed, and infrastructure to be established, but it's a start for an orderly departure.
FY 2010/11 OBR prediction £149bn Actual out-turn £136bn
FY 2011/12 OBR prediction £116bn Actual out-turn £117bn
FY 2012/13 OBR prediction £89bn Actual out-turn £121bn
FY 2013/14 OBR prediction £60bn Actual out-turn £98bn
FY 2014/15 OBR prediction £37bn Actual out-turn £90bn
FY 2015/16 OBR prediction £20bn Actual out-turn £72bn
Over the six years the initial OBR prediction was £164bn too low.
Your comparison in the prior thread was comparing the March of that year, March and November of the prior year etc with the turnout. Not comparing 5 years prior. I don't believe the OBR was predicting £20bn in Mar 2016. Or Nov 2015.
The draft Electoral Commission's report concludes that Vote Leave and another smaller campaign group did break the rules, the BBC understands, and is expected to recommend at least one fine.
An Electoral Commission spokesperson said: "In accordance with its Enforcement Policy, the Electoral Commission has written to Vote Leave, Mr Darren Grimes and Veterans for Britain to advise each campaigner of the outcome of the investigation announced on 20 November 2017.
"The campaigners have 28 days to make representations before final decisions are taken.
"The commission will announce the outcome of the investigation and publish an investigation report once this final decision has been taken."
One source said that the draft report was "bizarre" and had "gone way off track" by focusing on the original information that has already been pored over, rather than additional evidence.
Lawyer Tamsin Allen, who acts for Mr Sanni, Mr Wylie and a third whistleblower, said "The legal opinion and evidence submitted to the EC demonstrated the grounds for suspecting that Vote Leave and BeLeave conducted an unlawful spending scheme.
"If the Electoral Commission has indeed found those in the scheme guilty of electoral offences, this is vindication for the whistleblowers, but a serious blow for the public and for the integrity of the referendum vote."
Am I the only person who is so utterly fed-up with hearing about Heathrow that they no longer care if they expand it, close it or do nothing at all as long as they stop talking about it.
I think that is a forlorn hope. As far as I am concerned just get it built and add a fourth runway
The draft Electoral Commission's report concludes that Vote Leave and another smaller campaign group did break the rules, the BBC understands, and is expected to recommend at least one fine.
An Electoral Commission spokesperson said: "In accordance with its Enforcement Policy, the Electoral Commission has written to Vote Leave, Mr Darren Grimes and Veterans for Britain to advise each campaigner of the outcome of the investigation announced on 20 November 2017.
"The campaigners have 28 days to make representations before final decisions are taken.
"The commission will announce the outcome of the investigation and publish an investigation report once this final decision has been taken."
One source said that the draft report was "bizarre" and had "gone way off track" by focusing on the original information that has already been pored over, rather than additional evidence.
Lawyer Tamsin Allen, who acts for Mr Sanni, Mr Wylie and a third whistleblower, said "The legal opinion and evidence submitted to the EC demonstrated the grounds for suspecting that Vote Leave and BeLeave conducted an unlawful spending scheme.
"If the Electoral Commission has indeed found those in the scheme guilty of electoral offences, this is vindication for the whistleblowers, but a serious blow for the public and for the integrity of the referendum vote."
And as we know from GEs, if a side breached spending rules, it invalidates everything entirely.
That said, if rules are broken there should be punishment.
Am I the only person who is so utterly fed-up with hearing about Heathrow that they no longer care if they expand it, close it or do nothing at all as long as they stop talking about it.
My own pet theory as to why the polls are not moving significantly in any direction is this:
Everything that has happened since the Brexit vote has hardened opinions on both sides of the argument. People have got used to not changing their minds on the biggest issue of the day and are now pretty "comfortable" not changing their minds on any other issues either.
I don't really buy into the argument that it's because half the country hate the Conservatives and the other half are terrified of Corbyn coming to power. I think we've simply elevated stubbornness to a form of fine art. Brexit has made us all think that we're totally correct in all of the opinions that we hold.
The draft Electoral Commission's report concludes that Vote Leave and another smaller campaign group did break the rules, the BBC understands, and is expected to recommend at least one fine.
An Electoral Commission spokesperson said: "In accordance with its Enforcement Policy, the Electoral Commission has written to Vote Leave, Mr Darren Grimes and Veterans for Britain to advise each campaigner of the outcome of the investigation announced on 20 November 2017.
"The campaigners have 28 days to make representations before final decisions are taken.
"The commission will announce the outcome of the investigation and publish an investigation report once this final decision has been taken."
One source said that the draft report was "bizarre" and had "gone way off track" by focusing on the original information that has already been pored over, rather than additional evidence.
Lawyer Tamsin Allen, who acts for Mr Sanni, Mr Wylie and a third whistleblower, said "The legal opinion and evidence submitted to the EC demonstrated the grounds for suspecting that Vote Leave and BeLeave conducted an unlawful spending scheme.
"If the Electoral Commission has indeed found those in the scheme guilty of electoral offences, this is vindication for the whistleblowers, but a serious blow for the public and for the integrity of the referendum vote."
And as we know from GEs, if a side breached spending rules, it invalidates everything entirely.
That said, if rules are broken there should be punishment.
The remain campaign spent far more than the leave campaign - even ignoring the £10m head start it got with the Govt leaflet to every household.
I agree that fines may be in order - but they aren't really any basis on which to question the actual result. Still it's nice of the bureaucrats at the Electoral Commission sitting in their cosy London offices to be fining our vets!
The draft Electoral Commission's report concludes that Vote Leave and another smaller campaign group did break the rules, the BBC understands, and is expected to recommend at least one fine.
An Electoral Commission spokesperson said: "In accordance with its Enforcement Policy, the Electoral Commission has written to Vote Leave, Mr Darren Grimes and Veterans for Britain to advise each campaigner of the outcome of the investigation announced on 20 November 2017.
"The campaigners have 28 days to make representations before final decisions are taken.
"The commission will announce the outcome of the investigation and publish an investigation report once this final decision has been taken."
One source said that the draft report was "bizarre" and had "gone way off track" by focusing on the original information that has already been pored over, rather than additional evidence.
Lawyer Tamsin Allen, who acts for Mr Sanni, Mr Wylie and a third whistleblower, said "The legal opinion and evidence submitted to the EC demonstrated the grounds for suspecting that Vote Leave and BeLeave conducted an unlawful spending scheme.
"If the Electoral Commission has indeed found those in the scheme guilty of electoral offences, this is vindication for the whistleblowers, but a serious blow for the public and for the integrity of the referendum vote."
And as we know from GEs, if a side breached spending rules, it invalidates everything entirely.
That said, if rules are broken there should be punishment.
It certainly means we are in for another tedious round of demands from the usual suspects for the referendum result to be annulled.
My own pet theory as to why the polls are not moving significantly in any direction is this:
Everything that has happened since the Brexit vote has hardened opinions on both sides of the argument. People have got used to not changing their minds on the biggest issue of the day and are now pretty "comfortable" not changing their minds on any other issues either.
I don't really buy into the argument that it's because half the country hate the Conservatives and the other half are terrified of Corbyn coming to power. I think we've simply elevated stubbornness to a form of fine art. Brexit has made us all think that we're totally correct in all of the opinions that we hold.
For some that is true as evidenced on this forum but I have a reasonably open mind as long as the vote is respected and we leave, and this after I voted remain.
My own pet theory as to why the polls are not moving significantly in any direction is this:
Everything that has happened since the Brexit vote has hardened opinions on both sides of the argument. People have got used to not changing their minds on the biggest issue of the day and are now pretty "comfortable" not changing their minds on any other issues either.
I don't really buy into the argument that it's because half the country hate the Conservatives and the other half are terrified of Corbyn coming to power. I think we've simply elevated stubbornness to a form of fine art. Brexit has made us all think that we're totally correct in all of the opinions that we hold.
My theory is that it's not stubbornness so much as stasis and a taboo about changing your view unless in an election cycle. Lot's of people who speak to who would tell pollsters they haven't changed their minds have actually moved quite substantially below the surface. There's also an element of "careless talk costs lives" where some people think they need to be seen to get behind Brexit even if they wish it would go away.
Team Corbyn seem to have moved from ambivalence to actively attacking Remain activists. It’s not sustainable.
Why not? Will not the Tories 'own' Brexit? As angry as some Remain voters might be, why would they move away from Labour en masse now if they haven't before, or why stay home?
Obviously because they thought that Labour was anti-Tory and also in favour of remaining. You have to give it to Corbyn, the way he managed to be all things to all men, and hardly anybody called him out. But he cannot keep up his tricks for ever - not even Mrs May can do that. And sooner or later they will both come crashing down. The sooner the better.
My theory is that it's not stubbornness so much as stasis and a taboo about changing your view unless in an election cycle. Lot's of people who speak to who would tell pollsters they haven't changed their minds have actually moved quite substantially below the surface. There's also an element of "careless talk costs lives" where some people think they need to be seen to get behind Brexit even if they wish it would go away.
If there are changes going on below the surface then how soon do you expect them to show up above the surface? It wouldn't surprise me if we were to go another whole year with the Conservatives and Labour both dancing close to the 40% point.
Changing your mind has never been seen as taboo before - usually a year into a parliament the polls would be significantly different to the previous election result in some way or other.
For the moment I'm going to stick with my stubbornness theory - due me being, you know, a bit stubborn!
Your comparison in the prior thread was comparing the March of that year, March and November of the prior year etc with the turnout. Not comparing 5 years prior. I don't believe the OBR was predicting £20bn in Mar 2016. Or Nov 2015.
Do you have a like for like comparison?
Hope this helps - the borrowing predictions were steadily increasing throughout 2015 and 2016 reaching a peak in November 2016 since when the OBR has been reducing them but not quickly enough to match the actual out-turn.
FY 2016/17 Mar 2015 prediction £39.4bn Jul 2015 prediction £43.1bn Nov 2015 prediction £49.9bn Mar 2016 prediction £55.5bn Nov 2016 prediction £68.2bn Mar 2017 prediction £51.7bn Actual out-turn £45.7bn
FY 2017/18 Mar 2015 prediction £11.5bn Jul 2015 prediction £24.3bn Nov 2015 prediction £24.8bn Mar 2016 prediction £38.8bn Nov 2016 prediction £59.0bn Mar 2017 prediction £58.3bn Nov 2017 prediction £49.9bn Mar 2018 prediction £45.2bn Actual out-turn £39.5bn
FY 2018/19 Mar 2015 prediction £5.2bn surplus Jul 2015 prediction £6.4bn Nov 2015 prediction £4.6bn Mar 2016 prediction £21.4bn Nov 2016 prediction £46.5bn Mar 2017 prediction £40.8bn Nov 2017 prediction £39.5bn Mar 2018 prediction £37.1bn
Team Corbyn seem to have moved from ambivalence to actively attacking Remain activists. It’s not sustainable.
Why not? Will not the Tories 'own' Brexit? As angry as some Remain voters might be, why would they move away from Labour en masse now if they haven't before, or why stay home?
Obviously because they thought that Labour was anti-Tory and also in favour of remaining. You have to give it to Corbyn, the way he managed to be all things to all men, and hardly anybody called him out. But he cannot keep up his tricks for ever - not even Mrs May can do that. And sooner or later they will both come crashing down. The sooner the better.
Both May and Corbyn are offering a Brexit broadly similar to that promoted by the Leave campaign during the referendum. But it is May who will eventually have to admit that it was all a fantasy and cannot be delivered.
Survation's final 2 EU referendum polls were Remain 45% Leave 42% and Remain 45% Leave 44%, their general election polls are better than their referendum polls it seems
Your comparison in the prior thread was comparing the March of that year, March and November of the prior year etc with the turnout. Not comparing 5 years prior. I don't believe the OBR was predicting £20bn in Mar 2016. Or Nov 2015.
Do you have a like for like comparison?
Hope this helps - the borrowing predictions were steadily increasing throughout 2015 and 2016 reaching a peak in November 2016 since when the OBR has been reducing them but not quickly enough to match the actual out-turn.
FY 2016/17 Mar 2015 prediction £39.4bn Jul 2015 prediction £43.1bn Nov 2015 prediction £49.9bn Mar 2016 prediction £55.5bn Nov 2016 prediction £68.2bn Mar 2017 prediction £51.7bn Actual out-turn £45.7bn
FY 2017/18 Mar 2015 prediction £11.5bn Jul 2015 prediction £24.3bn Nov 2015 prediction £24.8bn Mar 2016 prediction £38.8bn Nov 2016 prediction £59.0bn Mar 2017 prediction £58.3bn Nov 2017 prediction £49.9bn Mar 2018 prediction £45.2bn Actual out-turn £39.5bn
FY 2018/19 Mar 2015 prediction £5.2bn surplus Jul 2015 prediction £6.4bn Nov 2015 prediction £4.6bn Mar 2016 prediction £21.4bn Nov 2016 prediction £46.5bn Mar 2017 prediction £40.8bn Nov 2017 prediction £39.5bn Mar 2018 prediction £37.1bn
Thanks for that breakdown, it's interesting to see the difference from November 2016 to actuals and the current forecast. Already I can count a £43bn Brexit surplus vs OBR forecasts from November 2016. A nice dividend for the NHS I guess!
If the EU wants its largest future export market, post Brexit UK, to join its largest current export market, Trump's USA and slap heavy tariffs on its goods then so be it
Your comparison in the prior thread was comparing the March of that year, March and November of the prior year etc with the turnout. Not comparing 5 years prior. I don't believe the OBR was predicting £20bn in Mar 2016. Or Nov 2015.
Do you have a like for like comparison?
Hope this helps - the borrowing predictions were steadily increasing throughout 2015 and 2016 reaching a peak in November 2016 since when the OBR has been reducing them but not quickly enough to match the actual out-turn.
FY 2016/17 Mar 2015 prediction £39.4bn Jul 2015 prediction £43.1bn Nov 2015 prediction £49.9bn Mar 2016 prediction £55.5bn Nov 2016 prediction £68.2bn Mar 2017 prediction £51.7bn Actual out-turn £45.7bn
FY 2017/18 Mar 2015 prediction £11.5bn Jul 2015 prediction £24.3bn Nov 2015 prediction £24.8bn Mar 2016 prediction £38.8bn Nov 2016 prediction £59.0bn Mar 2017 prediction £58.3bn Nov 2017 prediction £49.9bn Mar 2018 prediction £45.2bn Actual out-turn £39.5bn
FY 2018/19 Mar 2015 prediction £5.2bn surplus Jul 2015 prediction £6.4bn Nov 2015 prediction £4.6bn Mar 2016 prediction £21.4bn Nov 2016 prediction £46.5bn Mar 2017 prediction £40.8bn Nov 2017 prediction £39.5bn Mar 2018 prediction £37.1bn
Thanks for that breakdown, it's interesting to see the difference from November 2016 to actuals and the current forecast. Already I can count a £43bn Brexit surplus vs OBR forecasts from November 2016. A nice dividend for the NHS I guess!
I make it a £51.4bn reduction from the November 2016 to the actual out-turns for 2016/17, 2017/18 and the most recent prediction for 2018/19.
By comparison between March 2015 and March 2016 the predicted borrowing for the three years increased by £70bn.
If the EU wants its largest future export market, post Brexit UK, to join its largest current export market, Trump's USA and slap heavy tariffs on its goods then so be it
WTO tarrifs presumably, and we would be obliged to put all other countries on the same rate.
Arguing among themselves over an option which the other side have not indicated they are ever going to accept anyway? Who do they think they are, the British Cabinet?
If the EU wants its largest future export market, post Brexit UK, to join its largest current export market, Trump's USA and slap heavy tariffs on its goods then so be it
WTO tarrifs presumably, and we would be obliged to put all other countries on the same rate.
If the EU wants its largest future export market, post Brexit UK, to join its largest current export market, Trump's USA and slap heavy tariffs on its goods then so be it
WTO tarrifs presumably, and we would be obliged to put all other countries on the same rate.
Fine, we can do a deal with Trump as he said after Brexit if the EU refuse to compromise at all
If the EU wants its two largest export markets, post Brexit UK and Trump's USA to slap heavy tariffs on its goods then so be it
It's enshrined in UK law that we cannot create a customs border with Ireland as a result of Brexit, so good luck with that.
Nope, all UK law comes from Westminster as Parliamentary Sovereignty is the basis of the entire UK constitution and Westminster can do whatever it likes so if Westminster passes a law to create a hard border and customs border with the Republic of Ireland tomorrow as that is the only way to ensure the Brexit it has already legislated for it can do precisely that.
If Varadkar wants tariffs and refuses to compromise, he will get tariffs
Did their question on a referendum on the final deal clarify if that would include a 'reject deal and remain' option?
I've come around on thinking we need a referendum on the deal, but what the question would be is unclear.
I am, however, quite surprised that soft and hard brexit are so close, and even how close no deal being good is to bad.
"When the negotiations are complete, to what extent would you support or oppose holding a referendum asking the public if they will accept or reject the deal?"
If the EU wants its two largest export markets, post Brexit UK and Trump's USA to slap heavy tariffs on its goods then so be it
It's enshrined in UK law that we cannot create a customs border with Ireland as a result of Brexit, so good luck with that.
Nope, all UK law comes from Westminster as Parliamentary Sovereignty is the basis of the entire UK constitution and Westminster can do whatever it likes so if Westminster passes a law to create a hard border and customs border with the Republic of Ireland tomorrow as that is the only way to ensure the Brexit it has already legislated for it can do precisely that
If the EU wants its largest future export market, post Brexit UK, to join its largest current export market, Trump's USA and slap heavy tariffs on its goods then so be it
WTO tarrifs presumably, and we would be obliged to put all other countries on the same rate.
Fine, we can do a deal with Trump as he said after Brexit if the EU refuse to compromise at all
Have you not been paying even the slightest bit of attention?! The only deal Trump would do is one that completely screws us over in America's favour.
Comments
I do agree it is weird it hasn't - and probably won't - become an issue for the leadership. Yes, opposition's aren't going to be judged as harshly as government as is only right and fair, but even so.
One lucky goal, and two very good ones.
However of the top 10 Labour marginal seats targeted by the Tories 8 voted Leave and of the top 10 Tory marginal seats targeted by Labour 8 also voted Leave and it is in those key marginal seats the next general election will be decided under FPTP
http://www.electionpolling.co.uk/battleground/targets/conservative
http://www.electionpolling.co.uk/battleground/targets/labour
Perhaps, while they think it wrong, they just don’t care all that much ?
And Tory policy will continue to be driven by the headbangers and they will continue to make a complete balls up of Brexit.
Labour lead the Tories by 22%, 53% to 30% in London but only lead the Tories by 12%, 50% to 38% in the North.
https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/qzm7srmkvi/TimesResults_180612_VI_Trackers_w.pdf
The Tories lead Labour in the South, the Midlands/Wales and Scotland.
Spread Shit Phil attacks BJ
The problem is the idiots that thought we could have our cake fifty times over. i.e the Tory remainers, the EU will be nice to us we can have a financial services deal, a single market deal a customs deal, a cake deal with millions and millions on top have poisoned the well, which now means the cliff is a reality, albeit a 5% one.
But, it may be the case that no deal can be reached.
It was the election of both Corbyn that year, and a Conservative Majority Government, that made Brexit possible.
Without the former, it wouldn't have happened. This is the sort of "black swan" event that you'd probably have got 500/1 on in 2013.
http://obr.uk/docs/junebudget_annexc.pdf
FY 2010/11
OBR prediction £149bn
Actual out-turn £136bn
FY 2011/12
OBR prediction £116bn
Actual out-turn £117bn
FY 2012/13
OBR prediction £89bn
Actual out-turn £121bn
FY 2013/14
OBR prediction £60bn
Actual out-turn £98bn
FY 2014/15
OBR prediction £37bn
Actual out-turn £90bn
FY 2015/16
OBR prediction £20bn
Actual out-turn £72bn
Over the six years the initial OBR prediction was £164bn too low.
Eire, because most of its trade with the rest of Europe goes through the UK and it needs the easiest possible customs and regulatory processes for its goods transiting through it.
The EU, because it wants the UK as close to its orbit as possible, whilst conceding as little as possible, pour encourager les autres. Northern Ireland really is a sideshow, and it's being leveraged - somewhat shamelessly - because of its political potency.
The EU is putting on a show about all how this is all about the EU being on the side of plucky little Ireland, because it's in its interests to do so and to contrast the "influence" Eire has now with the lack of influence the UK will have once it leaves. But it is only a show. The interests are coincident, not driven from the bottom up.
Eire will experience the firm smack of federalism as soon as Brexit's over, and the EU gets round to interrogating and challenging its corporation tax rates again, whereupon it will easily be outvoted or pressured into concessions.
Until a pro EEA figure like Umunna either succeeds Corbyn as Labour leader or leads a new UK 'En Marche' style party, perhaps merged with the LDs, continuity Remainers are screwed
Of course, there are many details to be confirmed, and infrastructure to be established, but it's a start for an orderly departure.
Do you have a like for like comparison?
I don't expect the OBR to be any better at forecasting the future than any "magic" investment fund manager.
But, I do expect the MSM to treat their forecasts with a pinch of salt, not as gospel.
The draft Electoral Commission's report concludes that Vote Leave and another smaller campaign group did break the rules, the BBC understands, and is expected to recommend at least one fine.
An Electoral Commission spokesperson said: "In accordance with its Enforcement Policy, the Electoral Commission has written to Vote Leave, Mr Darren Grimes and Veterans for Britain to advise each campaigner of the outcome of the investigation announced on 20 November 2017.
"The campaigners have 28 days to make representations before final decisions are taken.
"The commission will announce the outcome of the investigation and publish an investigation report once this final decision has been taken."
One source said that the draft report was "bizarre" and had "gone way off track" by focusing on the original information that has already been pored over, rather than additional evidence.
Lawyer Tamsin Allen, who acts for Mr Sanni, Mr Wylie and a third whistleblower, said "The legal opinion and evidence submitted to the EC demonstrated the grounds for suspecting that Vote Leave and BeLeave conducted an unlawful spending scheme.
"If the Electoral Commission has indeed found those in the scheme guilty of electoral offences, this is vindication for the whistleblowers, but a serious blow for the public and for the integrity of the referendum vote."
That said, if rules are broken there should be punishment.
Everything that has happened since the Brexit vote has hardened opinions on both sides of the argument. People have got used to not changing their minds on the biggest issue of the day and are now pretty "comfortable" not changing their minds on any other issues either.
I don't really buy into the argument that it's because half the country hate the Conservatives and the other half are terrified of Corbyn coming to power. I think we've simply elevated stubbornness to a form of fine art. Brexit has made us all think that we're totally correct in all of the opinions that we hold.
I agree that fines may be in order - but they aren't really any basis on which to question the actual result. Still it's nice of the bureaucrats at the Electoral Commission sitting in their cosy London offices to be fining our vets!
Changing your mind has never been seen as taboo before - usually a year into a parliament the polls would be significantly different to the previous election result in some way or other.
For the moment I'm going to stick with my stubbornness theory - due me being, you know, a bit stubborn!
FY 2016/17
Mar 2015 prediction £39.4bn
Jul 2015 prediction £43.1bn
Nov 2015 prediction £49.9bn
Mar 2016 prediction £55.5bn
Nov 2016 prediction £68.2bn
Mar 2017 prediction £51.7bn
Actual out-turn £45.7bn
FY 2017/18
Mar 2015 prediction £11.5bn
Jul 2015 prediction £24.3bn
Nov 2015 prediction £24.8bn
Mar 2016 prediction £38.8bn
Nov 2016 prediction £59.0bn
Mar 2017 prediction £58.3bn
Nov 2017 prediction £49.9bn
Mar 2018 prediction £45.2bn
Actual out-turn £39.5bn
FY 2018/19
Mar 2015 prediction £5.2bn surplus
Jul 2015 prediction £6.4bn
Nov 2015 prediction £4.6bn
Mar 2016 prediction £21.4bn
Nov 2016 prediction £46.5bn
Mar 2017 prediction £40.8bn
Nov 2017 prediction £39.5bn
Mar 2018 prediction £37.1bn
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_United_Kingdom_European_Union_membership_referendum
They lose Richmond Park and St Ives to the Libdems, Southampton Itchen to Labour and Stirling to the SNP.
Not much change on GE2017.
https://twitter.com/AllieHBNews/status/1009915341328220160
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/jun/21/eu-is-getting-ready-for-no-deal-brexit-says-jean-claude-juncker
What a load of total absolute fake news.
I've come around on thinking we need a referendum on the deal, but what the question would be is unclear.
I am, however, quite surprised that soft and hard brexit are so close, and even how close no deal being good is to bad.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/jun/21/eu-admits-no-african-country-has-agreed-to-host-migration-centre
By comparison between March 2015 and March 2016 the predicted borrowing for the three years increased by £70bn.
Night all.
If Varadkar wants tariffs and refuses to compromise, he will get tariffs
http://survation.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/GMB-Final-Tables.pdf
No detail as yet (apart from an average cost of c.£45k), but no doubt that will come in time...