Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Betting on Time’s person of the year

1246

Comments

  • (Edit)

    YouGov: "How well or badly do you the government are doing at negotiating Britain's exit from the European Union?
    Last polling was 20% well, 61% badly (Remainers 11% well 77% badly, Leavers 33% well, 66% badly).

    Presumably in the next polling the position of Remainers and Leavers will be reversed. Your "grown up" mode amounts to a full on capitulation to the Commission that gives them everything they could have hoped for and more.
    Sorry Southam I totally missed up that attempted editing.
  • Mr. Divvie, tiny sums for cosmetic changes would be a reasonable model, probably. It is bizarre it still makes a loss given what a major site it is.
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549

    10 years at 10 billion = 100 billion

    Exit costs to ensure we accept our legal obligations and obtain a trade deal but end free movement and provide flexibilty for us to trade with whoever we want - 50 billion

    So 50 billion in the kitty over the 10 years and our reputation for doing a fair deal retained

    Clearly you are not talking about annual payments like Norway does and financial passport.
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,767

    A while back the government was telling journos they had legal advice that they didn't owe anything.

    Success equals performance minus anticipation.
    Success equals performance minus anticipation

    George stopped the deficit yet ?
  • TonyETonyE Posts: 938

    Yep, this could have been sorted months ago. Willy-waving Brexiteers in the Cabinet prevented it.

    What prevented it, is that there had to be a negotiation. You can guarantee that the EU wanted the £89bn, plus the pensions, plus a defence union etc. THis is what a negotiated settlement looks like. It's reasonable from both sides now. Nothing or £89bn nett + would not have been.
    The process is working.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,647

    Spectator certainly seems to have it in for the Duchess of Sussex.
    The Speccie is a crappy read these days (or was in the days a year or two ago when I stopped my subscription).
  • F1: Alfa-Romeo apparently becoming Sauber's title sponsor, so it'll be Alfa-Romeo Sauber next year:
    https://twitter.com/SportmphMark/status/935817554601357312

    This tallies with a rumour Sauber was going to become akin to Toro Rosso, only for Ferrari rather than Red Bull.
  • I'd rather lay than back on this market, so I'm sitting it out. Donald Trump is, regrettably the man of the year but I expect Time will go for someone different. For the reasons others have given, Colin Kaepernick might well get the nod.
  • Success equals performance minus anticipation

    George stopped the deficit yet ?
    He would have done by 2020 had Mrs May not foolishly sacked him.

    Still thanks to Osborne’s jobs miracle, he landed on his feet.
  • felixfelix Posts: 15,180
    calum said:

    Jo Swinson's expenses being investigated by police

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-42164478

    Must be an error - the LDs never do corruption of any kind - hypocrisy mind- that's another matter :)
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 50,969
    Charles said:

    More detailed explanation of what I was aiming at. Thanks

    On council tax I think central mandated obligations should be funded from this, but local council responsibilities should be CT funded (otherwise they just become delivery agencies rather than democratic bodies with a purpose and authority)
    Certainly local responsibilities should, as far as possible, be funded locally, and if local authorities do the collecting and can vary the rate then this would do this. There will continue to be a need for some adjustments to transfer funds from wealthy to less wealthy areas, as with any system of local tax collection.

    The other point is that, to disincentivise rolling up the tax liability except where people do not have the income to cover it right away, rolled up liabilities should at least be indexed, and it may be sensible to consider a modest real interest rate as well.

    The biggest challenge, as with any significant shift in the tax burden, would be in trying to minimise the shock effect of the transition. Certainly, phase it in slowly. Falling property prices will disadvantage the most those who bought most recently, a risk they are already exposed to if the market turns downwards for other reasons. It is hard to see what compensation could easily be offered here, that wouldn't be complicated (e.g. some sort of graduated transitional rebate depending on purchase date).
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,767

    He would have done by 2020 had Mrs May not foolishly sacked him.

    Still thanks to Osborne’s jobs miracle, he landed on his feet.
    yeah, it was meant to be 2015
  • ElliotElliot Posts: 1,516

    I have no problem with people who do not share my views. I have big problems with bone idle chancers like Davis, Johnson and Fox being involved in shaping this country’s future. I am glad they seem to have been sidelined, so that people whose views I do not share, but are grown-up and are prepared to put the work in, can get on with things.

    That's not true. If someone supports Brexit you automatically believe they have every vice and not a single virtue. I lurked for several years before I started posting and I always thought you were one of the best posters on here. But on Brexit you lose all sense of reason. To be fair, the same can be said of much of the media
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 50,969
    felix said:

    Must be an error - the LDs never do corruption of any kind - hypocrisy mind- that's another matter :)
    Anyone can complain and the Police always have to look into it. So far, there is no story here.
  • felixfelix Posts: 15,180
    IanB2 said:

    Anyone can complain and the Police always have to look into it. So far, there is no story here.
    And yet it's there on the BBC. you think you'd say the same if it was a Tory MP?
  • yeah, it was meant to be 2015
    Blame the Lib Dems. The county understood, that’s why they gave Dave and George a majority.
  • archer101auarcher101au Posts: 1,612
    surbiton said:

    Good. How do you intend to achieve those aims with no borders in Irealnd / Northern Ireland ?
    It is easy. It is illegal for anyone to enter the UK from the ROI (or anywhere else) who does not have a valid visa or permission to enter (eg ROI citizens). Every employer should be legally responsible for checking the legal status of any employee (we are in Australia, it is pretty easy). No benefits can be claimed by people not entitled to enter as you should have to provide your residency status prior to claiming. Banks KYC rules will stop any such person operating a bank account. Anyone found in the country without a valid visa goes to jail and is then deported.

    So, you can't work, claim benefits or operate a bank account. Not sure there will be a lot of demand for this.
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,504

    F1: Alfa-Romeo apparently becoming Sauber's title sponsor, so it'll be Alfa-Romeo Sauber next year:
    https://twitter.com/SportmphMark/status/935817554601357312

    This tallies with a rumour Sauber was going to become akin to Toro Rosso, only for Ferrari rather than Red Bull.

    Interesting when you consider that Ferrari started with Alfa Romeos.
  • Incidentally, saw an interesting segment on the news about the serious problem of space junk. Of course, if the government had funded my additional research into space cannon technology, this would be a simple matter of point and shoot.
  • Mr. 86, that, coupled with the McLaren engine shift, could make things more competitive next time. That said, I hope Toro Rosso find the Honda a bit better than McLaren did.
  • It is easy. It is illegal for anyone to enter the UK from the ROI (or anywhere else) who does not have a valid visa or permission to enter (eg ROI citizens). Every employer should be legally responsible for checking the legal status of any employee (we are in Australia, it is pretty easy). No benefits can be claimed by people not entitled to enter as you should have to provide your residency status prior to claiming. Banks KYC rules will stop any such person operating a bank account. Anyone found in the country without a valid visa goes to jail and is then deported.

    So, you can't work, claim benefits or operate a bank account. Not sure there will be a lot of demand for this.
    You really don’t know the UK do you.

    Employers already have to check if their employees are entitled to work in the UK.

    https://www.gov.uk/check-job-applicant-right-to-work
  • 'It's beginning to feel a lot like Mordor..'

    https://twitter.com/HadleyFreeman/status/935604741643669505
  • felix said:

    And yet it's there on the BBC. you think you'd say the same if it was a Tory MP?
    Afternoon thread sorted.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 54,519

    You really don’t know the UK do you.

    Employers already have to check if their employees are entitled to work in the UK.

    https://www.gov.uk/check-job-applicant-right-to-work
    I’ve only just realised that the ‘au’ means Australia. What is it with Antipodean Brexiteers?
  • I’ve only just realised that the ‘au’ means Australia. What is it with Antipodean Brexiteers?
    He’s not Andrew Lilico is he ?
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,623

    Incidentally, saw an interesting segment on the news about the serious problem of space junk. Of course, if the government had funded my additional research into space cannon technology, this would be a simple matter of point and shoot.

    And if humankind hadn't put all the shite there in the first place, there wouldn't be a problem.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 50,969
    felix said:

    And yet it's there on the BBC. you think you'd say the same if it was a Tory MP?
    Guarantee you the police will shortly say no further action is justified.
  • Elliot said:

    That's not true. If someone supports Brexit you automatically believe they have every vice and not a single virtue. I lurked for several years before I started posting and I always thought you were one of the best posters on here. But on Brexit you lose all sense of reason. To be fair, the same can be said of much of the media

    I think you are seeing what you want to see. I doubt I have ever accused Richard Tyndall, for example, of anything. He takes the opposite view to me on Brexit and always has, but we have very reasonable exchanges.

  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 56,022
    edited November 2017

    It is easy. It is illegal for anyone to enter the UK from the ROI (or anywhere else) who does not have a valid visa or permission to enter (eg ROI citizens). Every employer should be legally responsible for checking the legal status of any employee (we are in Australia, it is pretty easy). No benefits can be claimed by people not entitled to enter as you should have to provide your residency status prior to claiming. Banks KYC rules will stop any such person operating a bank account. Anyone found in the country without a valid visa goes to jail and is then deported.

    So, you can't work, claim benefits or operate a bank account. Not sure there will be a lot of demand for this.
    Yes. People are *STILL* getting confused between “Freedom of Movement” and what happens at borders.

    FoM refers to the ability to get an NI number, to work, claim benefits and access healthcare.

    Between the UK and RoI there is a Common Travel Area (CTA). The rules of the CTA determine who can enter the Area with a passport and who needs a visit visa. This is different from who has a right to reside and work. Like with Schengen on mainland Europe, people of any nationality can travel freely between UK and RoI. No-one is suggesting that this will change after Brexit.

    Any land border between UK and RoI after Brexit will be purely for checking goods, not checking passports.
  • Mr. Rentool, and if mankind hadn't put the satellites up there we wouldn't enjoy the technological progress we currently have.
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453

    'It's beginning to feel a lot like Mordor..'

    https://twitter.com/kat4obama/status/935759095721791489
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 45,127

    Incidentally, saw an interesting segment on the news about the serious problem of space junk. Of course, if the government had funded my additional research into space cannon technology, this would be a simple matter of point and shoot.

    A space cannon would just make matters worse by creating more debris, hence the dismay about ASAT tests. But I'm far from sure your comment was serious. ;)
  • IanB2 said:

    Guarantee you the police will shortly say no further action is justified.
    No police investigation is ever completed "shortly" eg Stokes.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 50,969

    I think you are seeing what you want to see. I doubt I have ever accused Richard Tyndall, for example, of anything. He takes the opposite view to me on Brexit and always has, but we have very reasonable exchanges.

    I haven't seen SO be anything other than reasonable. But I guess it depends on your perspective. Time will reveal who lost their sense of reason. So far, the 'go whistlers' would appear to be one down?
  • Increasingly seeing stories like this in the news more and more: https://twitter.com/ameliagentleman/status/935582982689165312
  • Just put a few quid on Joe Kennedy for Dem candidate for POTUS 2020. Not spectacular odds - 12 on BF sportsbook (exchange doesn't even feature him).

    Unlikely at this stage of his career, but just a little feeling I have. DYOR.
  • archer101auarcher101au Posts: 1,612

    You really don’t know the UK do you.

    Employers already have to check if their employees are entitled to work in the UK.

    https://www.gov.uk/check-job-applicant-right-to-work
    So, you agree that ending FOM is perfectly possible without a hard NI border? Excellent.
  • The_ApocalypseThe_Apocalypse Posts: 7,830
    edited November 2017
    IanB2 said:

    I haven't seen SO be anything other than reasonable. But I guess it depends on your perspective. Time will reveal who lost their sense of reason. So far, the 'go whistlers' would appear to be one down?
    +1.
  • archer101auarcher101au Posts: 1,612

    <

    I’ve only just realised that the ‘au’ means Australia. What is it with Antipodean Brexiteers?

    Well, we realise from experience that it is perfectly possible to control your own border, maintain your sovereignty and trade with most of the World on WTO terms whilst still not having a recession for 20+ years. Eg all the things that Remainers seem to think are impossible.
  • FF43FF43 Posts: 17,814
    The billions are fine. "Extortionate Brexit is better than no Brexit" or "Crap Brexit is better than cataclysmally stupid Brexit". We are all on the same page. Time to move on.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,623

    Mr. Rentool, and if mankind hadn't put the satellites up there we wouldn't enjoy the technological progress we currently have.

    I believe I have out-Luddited you for once, Mr D!
  • So, you agree that ending FOM is perfectly possible without a hard NI border? Excellent.
    No, I agree you’re full of wrongness and keep on hiking up Mount Wrong.
  • Why not Meghan for Times person of the year?
    I haven't seen Suits, is it that good?
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 50,969
    edited November 2017

    Well, we realise from experience that it is perfectly possible to control your own border, maintain your sovereignty and trade with most of the World on WTO terms whilst still not having a recession for 20+ years. Eg all the things that Remainers seem to think are impossible.
    Having no land borders with any other country, more immigrants than most other countries, and a shed load of almost every mineral resource known to man, can't do any harm, though? Just add water ;)
  • The_ApocalypseThe_Apocalypse Posts: 7,830
    edited November 2017
    Re that Meghan Markle Spectator piece: I’m not surprised. We know exactly what Brendan O’Neil is like.
  • TonyE said:

    Certainly I have heard some German commentators openly push this line. Pull the govt to the edge, humiliate them, run down the clock some more, then still don't agree, make it their fault, more young voters added to ER - and we'll turn the result over out of fear. And then we will never be asked again, and no other country will ever dare to ask.

    Which commentators specifically?
  • TonyETonyE Posts: 938

    No, I agree you’re full of wrongness and keep on hiking up Mount Wrong.
    Ending FOM in its current form is perfectly possible without a hard border. FOM isn't about movement, but about rights that exist for those who move. Remove the rights, and you remove most of the pull. In the end, the EU isn't a warzone in Africa. People only move if they are better off by doing so. Restricting the right to the things that came with citizenship (free healthcare/in work benefits etc) removes much of the financial incentive to take low paid work in the UK.
  • archer101auarcher101au Posts: 1,612

    No, I agree you’re full of wrongness and keep on hiking up Mount Wrong.
    Oh dear! You really have run out of things to say.
  • TonyE said:

    Ending FOM in its current form is perfectly possible without a hard border. FOM isn't about movement, but about rights that exist for those who move. Remove the rights, and you remove most of the pull. In the end, the EU isn't a warzone in Africa. People only move if they are better off by doing so. Restricting the right to the things that came with citizenship (free healthcare/in work benefits etc) removes much of the financial incentive to take low paid work in the UK.

    It also makes retiring to Spain and other places in the sun a lot less attractive; which will be the quid pro quo, of course.

  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 79,096

    Just put a few quid on Joe Kennedy for Dem candidate for POTUS 2020. Not spectacular odds - 12 on BF sportsbook (exchange doesn't even feature him).

    Unlikely at this stage of his career, but just a little feeling I have. DYOR.

    I'm torn about this punt - technically it is horrible (So I won't be investing) - but yes I think Joe will become president at some point in the future. The name/bloodlines are too strong a pull for him not to be I feel. One to add to the exchange and try to back at long odds (13.0 is too short) perhaps.
  • Mr. Rentool, only in theoretical Ludditeism. I bet you own a mobile telephone, you decadent capitalist pigdog!
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,623
    I've just been checking anagrams for Meghan Markle. Best option looks like:


    Legman Hark Me


    Clearly Harry is a leg man.
  • felixfelix Posts: 15,180

    Increasingly seeing stories like this in the news more and more: https://twitter.com/ameliagentleman/status/935582982689165312

    You're reading the wrong newspapers.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,623

    Mr. Rentool, only in theoretical Ludditeism. I bet you own a mobile telephone, you decadent capitalist pigdog!

    Yes, but not a smartphone. And I'm not on social media. And I've never read an e-book. And I don't have a sat-nav. And I've never used netflix. And, and, and...
  • TonyETonyE Posts: 938

    It also makes retiring to Spain and other places in the sun a lot less attractive; which will be the quid pro quo, of course.

    Except these benefits don't exist for ex pats in Spain.
  • LOL. All that energy, all that campaigning verve, all the pure joy at being part of the Jezza surge towards No 10...

    And yet:

    "In some areas in England not enough [Labour] applicants have been attracted to fill a shortlist."

    "Two selections in Wales have had to be postponed due to lack of interest,"


    http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/labour-set-to-miss-corbyn-christmas-deadline-for-selecting-76-target-marginal-seats_uk_5a1da185e4b06a14100a7008?kmt&amp;utm_hp_ref=uk-homepage&amp;ncid=newsletter-ukThe Waugh Zone 291117
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,623
    TonyE said:

    Except these benefits don't exist for ex pats in Spain.
    Migrants, not 'ex-pats'.
  • TonyETonyE Posts: 938

    Which commentators specifically?
    Mainly stuff from Twitter, but there was a speech made in the UK by a German MEP that intimated that (albeit in more subtle language).
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,767

    Blame the Lib Dems. The county understood, that’s why they gave Dave and George a majority.
    No intention of blaming the LDs, George made his statement when in coalition
  • FF43FF43 Posts: 17,814
    DavidL said:

    There is something a bit weird about this case. Anyone who has lived continuously in the UK for 20 years, whether lawfully or not, is entitled to indefinite leave to remain on application. The relevant regulation is paragraph 277ADE(1) (iii) of the Immigration rules. She clearly has not made such an application but can now do so.
    According to this article, the 20 year rule only allows you to start qualifying for indefinite leave to remain which takes a further ten years, during which you are not eligible for any welfare. So clearly not a good option for a woman who has made her life here.

    It looks like Paulette Wilson's reason for not applying for PR is the cost of the application. To be fair she has never needed it so far.

  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 30,488
    50 billion to maintain circumstances which were never favourable anyway.

    The country continues to be bled dry - it's been happening with little respite since 1914.

    I don't blame the EU, I blame our politicians.
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @PaulBrandITV: Excellent analogy of Britain as a ship wreck. https://twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/935832798371504129
  • Scott_P said:
    Let's get the ship off the rocks, so that we can steer it towards that massive iceberg.
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @nickeardleybbc: The President of America has just retweeted the deputy leader of far-right group Britain First
  • AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670
    edited November 2017
    Absolutely off the wall bonkers. Celebrating the reopening of dodgy "vitamin supplement" pushers.
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    Scott_P said:

    @nickeardleybbc: The President of America has just retweeted the deputy leader of far-right group Britain First

    three times so far...
  • Scott_P said:

    three times so far...
    Just a normal day in the White House.

    At least while he's fiddling with Twitter, he can't put his finger on the nuclear button.
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 38,370

    It also makes retiring to Spain and other places in the sun a lot less attractive; which will be the quid pro quo, of course.

    Why would anyone want to retire to Spain when you have Camber Sands?
  • AndrewAndrew Posts: 2,900


    I must confess I was pleasantly surprised by Windows 10 - after horrendous bloat Microsoft finally came up with an OS that didn't consume half your hard drive and was quick & easy-ish to use. I even got it to run pretty well on a decade old notebook which had been struggling on XP.....

    Yep - they had to slim it down, to fit on tablets and very low power notebooks. I bought a throwaway tablet/notebook combo for £125, just 2GB ram, runs basic stuff no problems.
  • Scott_P said:

    three times so far...
    https://twitter.com/GuidoFawkes/status/935837019837779968
  • AndrewAndrew Posts: 2,900


    I haven't seen Suits, is it that good?

    Not really. It's glossy and well made, but it ran out of ideas after the first season and became a soap opera (and given it's now on season 7.......)

  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 50,969
    Scott_P said:
    "no capability to influence" doesn't fly, with her aunt running the country and her previous claims to be a spokesperson for the regime (now dropped from her website)
  • https://twitter.com/GuidoFawkes/status/935837019837779968
    The BBC have just sent out a news notification about this....
  • The BBC have just sent out a news notification about this....
    Unfortunately I suspect all this will double their membership overnight.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,623

    The BBC have just sent out a news notification about this....
    BBC describes them as "inflammatory anti-Muslim videos". That's one way to put it.
  • Yes, but not a smartphone. And I'm not on social media. And I've never read an e-book. And I don't have a sat-nav. And I've never used netflix. And, and, and...
    PB is the thinking man's and woman's social mediim.
  • DecrepitJohnLDecrepitJohnL Posts: 13,300
    edited November 2017
    Budget housing sleight of hand shock. HuffPo says Hammond and May's extra £2 billion for housing is just diverted from other schemes.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/housing-theresa-may-affordable-crisis_uk_5a1d6874e4b071403b28fdd1
  • Unfortunately I suspect all this will double their membership overnight.
    Yep, sadly I wouldn’t be surprised to see that either.
  • AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670
    Andrew said:

    Not really. It's glossy and well made, but it ran out of ideas after the first season and became a soap opera (and given it's now on season 7.......)

    The first Season is good though. Entertaining lite fair.

    No point watching any more though.
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 45,127

    Just a normal day in the White House.

    At least while he's fiddling with Twitter, he can't put his finger on the nuclear button.
    Oh God, don't give Twitter ideas ...
  • Miaow from Emily Thornberry.
  • AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670
    Yeah, the point is to obliquely direct your readership therebso they 'discover' it themselves. Not directly quote them. That breaks the plausible deniability to your racism.
  • Ishmael_ZIshmael_Z Posts: 8,981

    Oh God, don't give Twitter ideas ...
    My "twitter for person of the year" suggestion looks quite prescient, by my standards.
  • Can you imagine FDR retweeting Oswald Mosley?
  • TonyETonyE Posts: 938
    Asking the DPM to answer Questions to the Health Secretary? Interesting strategy.
  • Ishmael_Z said:

    My "twitter for person of the year" suggestion looks quite prescient, by my standards.
    Could be. Although in recent years Time have done Zuckerberg and before that 'You' (the latter being a reference to then emerging social media and all that audience generated content - they even had a mirror on the front page to reflect the reader's face).
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 50,969
    I hope she has some better targeted questions down the page
  • AnorakAnorak Posts: 6,621
    Reading leavers' Damascene conversion on paying an exit bill has been jolly funny this morning. All the way from "the undemocratic EUSSR shouldn't get a bean" to "it's only fair, we owed it anyway" in such a short space of time...

    If only Theresa had known the Brexiteers had the backbone of a soggy cornflake, this could have been resolved months and months ago.
  • Ugh this has turned into a shite performance from Lady Nugee.
This discussion has been closed.