Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » The echoes of 2008? A cartoon first published in 2008 and it c

124»

Comments

  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 29,911
    FF43 said:

    https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/933835125539864576

    I think the local byelection previews on Britain Elects are just wonderful. Andrew Teale goes deep into each ward that is up for election, describing its geography, demographic make up, the candidates and election history. A true labour of love.

    Indeed. Informative, quirky and enlightening.
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    FF43 said:

    https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/933835125539864576

    I think the local byelection previews on Britain Elects are just wonderful. Andrew Teale goes deep into each ward that is up for election, describing its geography, demographic make up, the candidates and election history. A true labour of love.

    I knew EM was very WWC in a clasic postwar council estate, but only via Britain Elects who Eyres Monsell was. Impressive!
  • Booming German industry is helping our manufacturing exports. Good news for us unless we do something that puts up new borders...
    But we're not going to be putting up borders to exports.
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548

    But we're not going to be putting up borders to exports.
    Who knows? Brexit means Brexit, WTO means WTO...
  • sladeslade Posts: 2,158

    I knew EM was very WWC in a clasic postwar council estate, but only via Britain Elects who Eyres Monsell was. Impressive!
    But who was Gumbold in Gumbolds Ash and Avening?
  • MortimerMortimer Posts: 14,187
    edited November 2017

    But we're not going to be putting up borders to exports.
    I'm still yet to be convinced that many of those who rail against Brexit understand the detail of:

    - our trade deficit with Europe
    - the detail of customs duties (i.e. who pays them)
    - how export markets work
    - and that they're different to importing
  • TOPPING said:

    And so surely not the time to be cutting ourselves adrift from leading a large trading bloc that will move forward in this new paradigm.
    Or surely the.perfect time to embrace free trade with the billions that are growing fast rather than hide behind a protectionist curtain of yesterday's nations.
  • dixiedean said:

    Can't really be a "swing" if they don't stand though? More accurately, the Tories didn't pick up many Kippers, and lost some of their own voters.
    Kippers didn't stand in our byelection either. Well, the party didn't. The Tory candidate was a Kipper until very recently. From our perspective turnout was up, and we took 67% of the increased vote.
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548

    Or surely the.perfect time to embrace free trade with the billions that are growing fast rather than hide behind a protectionist curtain of yesterday's nations.
    Wot? like India?

    https://twitter.com/Telegraph/status/933760814049247232
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 79,204
    Did I hear Alan Johnson right ?
    We're paying for the EBA and EMA to relocate o_O ?
  • Who knows? Brexit means Brexit, WTO means WTO...
    Its the country which is importing which puts up the barriers.

    And whatever the trading terms if a country wants to restrict imports it will find a few ways of doing so.

    In my experience while the French are supposed to be good at such restrictions they're actually pretty fair but the Germans can be difficult with typical teutonic efficiency when it suits them.

    I don't doubt that our friend Alanbrooke can tell tales on this subject.
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548

    Its the country which is importing which puts up the barriers.

    And whatever the trading terms if a country wants to restrict imports it will find a few ways of doing so.

    In my experience while the French are supposed to be good at such restrictions they're actually pretty fair but the Germans can be difficult with typical teutonic efficiency when it suits them.

    I don't doubt that our friend Alanbrooke can tell tales on this subject.
    If we are on WTO terms with the EU27, then the Germans are obligated to apply WTO terms to us, as for any third country.
  • MortimerMortimer Posts: 14,187
    edited November 2017
    Deleted
  • sladeslade Posts: 2,158
    Amazing result in Herefordshire where the Greens take a Conservative seat which was previously held with over 60% of the vote.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 24,189
    @Ishmael_Z ,@archer101au

    I worked in IT in the 90's (and arguably the noughties and teens, but let's not go there: it's painful) and did two Y2K contracts, so I may be able to explain.

    From about the 60's to very approximately the 90's, the majority of the world's code[1] was written and located on mainframes, large white wardrobes in a Freon-protected room in the company basement, on operating systems such as IBM's MVS/XA and Unix. The programs were written and accumulated with little documentation, formal or otherwise.People stayed in post for two-three years then moved into management, so code accumulated. Bear in mind that banks and insurance societies keep customers for decades and records for centuries. Numerical data on such systems were held in formats[2] such as COMP-3 or packed decimal, where the numbers were held not as bytes but in the bits within bytes.

    As the decade wore on, it became obvious that these formats would not easily cope with dates moving from two-numbers to four numbers, and in cases where it would - COMP-3 would hold a two digit date across two bytes as three nibbles (a nibble is 4bits) and a sign, hence '098C' - it would behave counterintuitively. So people had to go thru each line of ~~billions of lines of code and work out ways of handling it. Ways were worked out (eg "if date < 30 then newdate = date+2000 else newdate = date+1900") and automated code correction software written but it took time.

    Y2K contracts started being issued ~1992 and peaked ~1996, but by 1998 they tailed off and by early 1999 it was over.

    But journalists and the general public interpreted "computers" as the white box on their office desk or weird things like "War Games", and interpreted "expensive and important" as some big bad things that take place instantaneously (plane crashes, nuclear meltdowns) instead of many small bad things over a longer period, and the gossip and headlines reflected this. So when Y2K came and went with no explosions, it was taken as a sign of fraud, rather than their misconception.

    Technology changed: mainframes were supplanted by servers were supplanted by cloud computing, relational by noSQL, Assembler by Cobol by C by VB by C++ by Java by R, but it in the end it's always the same: some schmuck wading thru lines of code whilst drinking cold coffee.

    I assume Brexit will go the same way: everybody is expecting explosions, food shortages, wrath of God (and given the short notice, not impossible) but its true cost will be lots of things getting a bit worse for longer. Drive a plane into a building and kill three thousand people and you warp politics for a decade, but kill 200 more people in car crashes per week and nobody notices, even though it's a lot deadlier. People find it very difficult to conceptualise risk and cost, but in the end somebody always pays.

    [1] This depends on how you count spreadsheets
    [2] http://www.3480-3590-data-conversion.com/article-cobol-comp.html
  • MortimerMortimer Posts: 14,187
    slade said:

    Amazing result in Herefordshire where the Greens take a Conservative seat which was previously held with over 60% of the vote.

    PB getting excited about winter council elections, part 2893.....
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 29,911

    Kippers didn't stand in our byelection either. Well, the party didn't. The Tory candidate was a Kipper until very recently. From our perspective turnout was up, and we took 67% of the increased vote.
    Excellent1 A satisfying result then. Congratulatins.
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 29,911
    Mortimer said:

    PB getting excited about winter council elections, part 2893.....
    Far, far too much is read into council by-elections. Each has their own peculiairity.
    Last week we heard much about a TMay revival and "Peak Corbyn".
    Doubtless these results will be equally indicative.
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    dixiedean said:

    Excellent1 A satisfying result then. Congratulatins.
    Massive swing against Tories to everyone else:

    https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/933843800019095553
  • Massive swing against Tories to everyone else:

    https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/933843800019095553
    Good result for lib dems in particular
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 121,575
    edited November 2017
    Times/YouGov poll

    Labour 41% (down 2 points), Con 39% (down 1 point) Liberal Democrats 7% (up 1 point)

    Fieldwork appears to be post budget
  • If we are on WTO terms with the EU27, then the Germans are obligated to apply WTO terms to us, as for any third country.
    As I said Alanbrooke will be able to tell tales.
  • Times/YouGov poll

    Labour 41% (down 2 points), Con 39% (down 1 point) Liberal Democrats 7% (up 1 point)

    Fieldwork appears post budget

    Little net change then
  • A YouGov poll for The Times found that the budget triggered a modest improvement in Mr Hammond’s ratings, with his net approval up from minus 20 to minus 12, while 34 per cent thought the budget was fair against 23 who thought it unfair. About 40 per cent are braced for their own financial situation to deteriorate in the next year and 51 per cent think the economic predicament of the country will get worse.
  • QuincelQuincel Posts: 4,042
    edited November 2017
    DavidL said:

    She is looking stronger now than at any time since that catastrophic election result. Good for at least another 2 years I reckon and I don’t say that with any particular enthusiasm.
    I've got a series of bets on both the next election and Mays departure being later than people seem to think, some at 2020 or later and some (at 5/1 or longer) on 2022.

    At the moment May is oddly safe, as everyone wants her gone but no-one wants the risk of another election or the Brexit talks being wrecked by the handover. Even if switching PMs now didn't actually harm the talks, if we switched and then ran out of time or they collapsed it would be an easy narrative to take hold (especially given the Tories chose to have an election after A50). I wouldn't completely rule out the government just collapsing, since so many pretenders to the crown circle and May has no particular power-base or success in the job, but I think she'll survive 2018.

    Ultimately even if people decided it was worth the risk, with no clear successor neither Hard, Soft, or Non-Brexiters in the Tory party are that likely to risk the wrong faction running the negotiations.

    2019 is therefore a real risk. I think we will more than likely either No Deal or Transition Deal (probably with some outlines of a trade deal agreed in principle). At that point, oddly, all factions are willing to risk anyone running the talks. Either we've crashed out, so it's too late to worry about those talks, or we've got the basics agreed so the 'wrong' faction can't derail things. Also, I think that trade talks will clearly be a long-term thing once we leave in 2019, either because the transition trade deal may drag on or because we will have dozens of deals to negotiate after a No Deal Brexit and thus know it will take years. We can only stay obsessed about trade talks for so long. With the A50 period over, I think which faction runs No 10 won't be as all consuming a focus, so people might be willing to axe May even if their faction isn't certain to take over.

    But deposing a sitting PM is harder than it looks, and I think May has a decent chance of hanging on like Brown did until an election can't be avoided.
  • A YouGov poll for The Times found that the budget triggered a modest improvement in Mr Hammond’s ratings, with his net approval up from minus 20 to minus 12, while 34 per cent thought the budget was fair against 23 who thought it unfair. About 40 per cent are braced for their own financial situation to deteriorate in the next year and 51 per cent think the economic predicament of the country will get worse.

    As a matter of interest any ratings for May and Corbyn
  • dixiedean said:

    Far, far too much is read into council by-elections. Each has their own peculiairity.
    Last week we heard much about a TMay revival and "Peak Corbyn".
    Doubtless these results will be equally indicative.
    There are two constants.

    LibDems get excited by local byelections.

    LibDems do worse in May local elections than local byelections predicted.
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 29,911
    dixiedean said:

    Far, far too much is read into council by-elections. Each has their own peculiairity.
    Last week we heard much about a TMay revival and "Peak Corbyn".
    Doubtless these results will be equally indicative.
    And now a swing to Cons in Stroud. From Green to Tory.
    Sound and fury signifying nothing.
    Consistent gains over a period, not individual, or even week-by-week swings are what matters.
    Although if you are personally involved like @RochdalePioneers, a pat on the back is earned.
  • MikeLMikeL Posts: 7,771
    edited November 2017
    Swings from Lab to Con in both Wakefield and Stroud:

    Britain Elects‏ @britainelects · 7m7 minutes ago

    Wakefield West (Wakefield) result:

    LAB: 49.6% (+7.1) HOLD.
    CON: 41.4% (+12.5)
    YORK: 6.9% (+6.9)
    LDEM: 2.0% (+2.0)

    Britain Elects‏ @britainelects · 22m22 minutes ago

    Chalford (Stroud) result:

    CON: 45.2% (+8.6) HOLD.
    LAB: 25.4% (-6.1)
    GRN: 20.6% (-11.3)
    LDEM: 8.8% (+8.8)
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 24,189

    Sorry to hear that
    Talking of medical stuff, how did your operation go after?
  • viewcode said:

    Talking of medical stuff, how did your operation go after?
    Thanks for asking but not having my op until Monday but expect to be home same day if all goes well
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548

    A YouGov poll for The Times found that the budget triggered a modest improvement in Mr Hammond’s ratings, with his net approval up from minus 20 to minus 12, while 34 per cent thought the budget was fair against 23 who thought it unfair. About 40 per cent are braced for their own financial situation to deteriorate in the next year and 51 per cent think the economic predicament of the country will get worse.

    Hammond is to long at 25 for next leader.

    He has responded to Brexiteer bile, by turning the other cheek. Good bloke.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 24,189

    Thanks for asking but not having my op until Monday but expect to be home same day if all goes well
    Oh, my bad, apols. Hope it all goes well.
  • Hammond is to long at 25 for next leader.

    He has responded to Brexiteer bile, by turning the other cheek. Good bloke.
    I lacked confidence that he wouldn't make a horlicks of the budget but to be fair he called it as it is and maybe if May and Hammond can bury any problems, we may see a period of more stable government
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
  • viewcode said:

    Oh, my bad, apols. Hope it all goes well.
    No need to apologise - it was very nice and thoughtful for you to ask - all the best
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 83,371
    edited November 2017
    COLLLLLLAPSEEEEEEEEE...Now if only we had Ben Stokes to come in.
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    England buggering it up in Brisbane.
  • What the f##k was that.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 79,204
    Left Green on England
    Benched Marvin Jones Jr
    Going back to sleep
  • I fear that in 2 days we will still be fielding and 300 behind.
  • rkrkrkrkrkrk Posts: 8,628
    If claims Gove has won the day on divergence from EU rules then I don’t see how there can be any substantial deal with the EU. They will want to know how things will be different and I presume he hasn’t got the answer to all of that just yet. That could fit with a rapid deal though.

    Perhaps govt will declare a very limited pta a success and then move on.

    And in actual fact, if you are going to Brexit and don’t mind about short term economic disruption, this sort of makes some kind of sense. Not sure if the public will see things this way though.
  • rkrkrkrkrkrk Posts: 8,628

    I fear that in 2 days we will still be fielding and 300 behind.

    Decent start *touch wood*.
    But Smith is in now...
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,336
    New thread
  • RogerRoger Posts: 20,399
    edited November 2017

    Wot? like India?

    https://twitter.com/Telegraph/status/933760814049247232
    That'll cheer up the good folk of Hartlipool.
This discussion has been closed.