politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » For the 3rd successive month YouGov Brexit tracker has “wrong

The chart shows the latest YouGov Brexit tracker in which the question is whether those polled think that in insight it was wrong or right for Britain to have voted to leave EU.
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
Yes, I'm certainly of this opinion for one.
A close to 10% lead maybe.
1. Mercedes – 1’09.202
2. Ferrari – 1’09.744 +0.54
3. Red Bull – 1’09.750 +0.55
Let us say there's another referendum and Remain wins, Leavers will argue for another referendum.
Much better to Leave and then argue to Rejoin after the country experiences what being outside of the EU means.
I doubt it.
Stop inventing straw men.
https://twitter.com/ProfChalmers/status/928970425228582912?s=17
I find it hard to believe it could accelerate that much
2. That's true but the legal framework is already in place. There's no need for a full ratification as the existing EU treaties - A50 specifically - already provide the mechanism and legal basis. Also, Britain is seeking to exit rather than join so (a) it's a short-term deal, so of less lasting import, and (b) Britain starts off already in alignment with the EU.
1 Norway has $750 billion in the bank from investing some of its oil revenue. For 5 million people.
2 Switzerland looks after half the world's money in return for a few S.Fr. For 8-9 milion people.
3 Liechtenstein is a much smaller version of Switzerland, except for having a monarch.
4 Iceland is surrounded by fish a.k.a. the North Atlantic and has almost free geothermal heating. For 300,000 people.
The UK has ... ??
But correlation doesn’t imply causation.
I mean, Iceland's financial crash anyone??!
That said - I do have some doubts about whether things will be resolved in December.
Just have to wait and see.
I wonder how late businesses can really wait without knowing what will happen?
I suspect it's a bit later than they are letting on.
Clearly it isn't.
https://twitter.com/YouGov/status/925648309880066053
Mandarin has the most speakers of any language but it is not widespread geographically.
"Production rose by 0.7% compared with the month before, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) said, boosted by machinery and equipment output.
Separate data showed the UK's trade deficit in goods and services narrowed by more than expected in September.
However, construction output fell by 1.6% in the month, the ONS said."
The bizarre reporting of construction continues. It falls every month and yet increases every year. A reduction in the trade deficit is welcome but there is a very long way to go.
I am not really that bothered.
https://www.betfair.com/exchange/plus/politics/market/1.130766060
First time since 1994? It is really shameful.
Whether the City is the biggest financial centre in Europe is neither here nor there. What matters is the contribution it makes to the UK's economy. If high paid jobs go elsewhere in Europe and services are relocated so as to keep them inside the single market, the tax take we get from the City will fall.
And it quite clearly said Mandarin was the world's most widely spoken language.
For the purposes of this market leaving the EU is defined as the date when the treaties of the EU cease to apply to the UK. Examples of when this might occur include, but are not limited, to: the date specified in a withdrawal agreement between the UK and the EU; the end of the two year negotiating period (29/03/2019) as set out by Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty (or any extension to this time period); or the date of the repeal of the 1972 European Communities Act. If more than one of these events were to occur, this market will be settled on the first of these events to occur. In the case of the two year time period in Article 50 being extended, via a unanimous vote by all EU Member States, we will settle this market on the extended date.
Mr. Price/Mr. Nabavi, does look long. Got a few pounds on at 1.7.
Also backed a second EU referendum earlier today on Ladbrokes, with boost, before 2020 at 6.5.
Mr. L, it'd be interesting to see how economic lopsidedness in geographical and sector terms has improved or worsened over that time. I remember someone posting an interesting set of political transport stats, with every decision-making bigwig living in the south, and 9/10 living in London/the South-east.