politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » The biggest cheer shadow chancellor McDonnell got was when he
Comments
-
£1,000 per adult we're told. They'll realise eventually.MarqueeMark said:
But even if we accept your premise that Brexit will be a fuck up, they won't be worse off, in terms of seeing less money in their pocket. The just won't have as much as some smart arse Remainers will tell them they could have had. And those Remainers will have as much of a hearing from the working class as they had in the summer of 2016.....Monksfield said:
What they will give a toss about, however is when the clusterfuck that is Brexit leaves them thousands of pounds worse off. Of course they'll forget they voted for it st that point and blame the eejits who lied to them. Ho ho ho.chestnut said:
Labour could do with someone who can speak a foreign language - working class.Monksfield said:Well, one of the few things that made me shed tears this year was the murder of Jo Cox, so I'm ecstatic that the nazi scumbag that killed her has been locked up for life. Good riddance. Hopefully the security services will focus a bit more attention on these morons.
As for Labour, in view of their problems up front could they put in a big money bid for Caroline Lucas?
The working class really don't give a toss about climate change, carbon footprints, transgender issues and the troubles in Palestine.
0 -
Trump says he’s going to get Apple to “build a big plant” in US
Trump indicated to columnist Thomas Friedman that he is going to double-down on bringing factory jobs back to America, especially in the Rust Belt from Michigan to Pennsylvania.
FRIEDMAN: Are you worried, though, that those companies will keep their factories here, but the jobs will be replaced by robots?
TRUMP: They will, and we'll make the robots, too. [laughter]
http://arstechnica.com/apple/2016/11/trump-says-hes-going-to-get-apple-to-build-a-big-plant-in-us/
Trump going to build a big wall-ie
0 -
An apple tree?FrancisUrquhart said:Trump says he’s going to get Apple to “build a big plant” in US
http://arstechnica.com/apple/2016/11/trump-says-hes-going-to-get-apple-to-build-a-big-plant-in-us/
See, he does care about the environment.0 -
I know we're not getting a second referendum, but if we did, I reckon this would be a referendum winning slogan
'Brexit will cost £58.7bn. Let's spend it on the NHS instead.'0 -
On the side of a vehicle of some kind, perhaps...TheScreamingEagles said:I know we're not getting a second referendum, but if we did, I reckon this would be a referendum winning slogan
'Brexit will cost £58.7bn. Let's spend it on the NHS instead.'0 -
All the figures are lies, they should all be ignored.TheScreamingEagles said:I know we're not getting a second referendum, but if we did, I reckon this would be a referendum winning slogan
'Brexit will cost £58.7bn. Let's spend it on the NHS instead.'0 -
And that's why Labour are going nowhere useful. Cloth ears. They don't like their voters.Monksfield said:
What they will give a toss about, however is when the clusterfuck that is Brexit leaves them thousands of pounds worse off. Of course they'll forget they voted for it st that point and blame the eejits who lied to them. Ho ho ho.chestnut said:
Labour could do with someone who can speak a foreign language - working class.Monksfield said:Well, one of the few things that made me shed tears this year was the murder of Jo Cox, so I'm ecstatic that the nazi scumbag that killed her has been locked up for life. Good riddance. Hopefully the security services will focus a bit more attention on these morons.
As for Labour, in view of their problems up front could they put in a big money bid for Caroline Lucas?
The working class really don't give a toss about climate change, carbon footprints, transgender issues and the troubles in Palestine.0 -
Or about 5 years of our net EU contributions. After which we'll have broken even on the whole thingTheScreamingEagles said:I know we're not getting a second referendum, but if we did, I reckon this would be a referendum winning slogan
'Brexit will cost £58.7bn. Let's spend it on the NHS instead.'
0 -
After having just completed a number of plane trips across to and round the USA I was wondering if people here are recliners or non recliners.
The reason I ask is I believe there is a clue here to the mentality of people who vote Trump or Brexit...are they selfish, miserable, cannot give a fuck about other people who recline down without a care in the world....and I think more likely to support Trump/Brexit; or are they compassionate considerate folk who wouldn't dream of invading the space/upsetting a fellow human being....a Remainer or Liberal.
I think this is an interesting social survey.0 -
'The Remain supporting chancellor has cost us £61.3bn let's spend it on the NHS instead'TheScreamingEagles said:I know we're not getting a second referendum, but if we did, I reckon this would be a referendum winning slogan
'Brexit will cost £58.7bn. Let's spend it on the NHS instead.'0 -
That cannot be genuine. Can it?TheScreamingEagles said:
For comedy value, I used to follow some creationists, nothing will ever top thisfoxinsoxuk said:
Ceationism is fascinating.TheScreamingEagles said:
Holy feck sticks, Ben Carson is an evolution denier, and thinks Charles Darwin came up with evolution thanks to Satan.foxinsoxuk said:
Nah. They are full of grain from the seven good harvests.TheScreamingEagles said:
Oh God, he's going to start putting America's homeless in pyramids isn't he?MP_SE said:Ben Carson has accepted HUD secretary role. I am sure he will quickly be smeared with allegations of being a white nationalist anti-Semite...
https://twitter.com/dmartosko/status/801532341718044674
That's the same moronic thinking that creationists come up with to deny gravity by saying flowers grow upwards.
It is best seen as the prototype conspiracy theory, about which any facts can be twisted or ignored. It is why it is so common amongst alt.right types. Believe that bunkum and you are a sucker for the remainder of their post truth politics.
And 'no chance to survive as a species'? They were around for millions of years!0 -
Do people really believe the NHS matters that much to voters, still?TheScreamingEagles said:I know we're not getting a second referendum, but if we did, I reckon this would be a referendum winning slogan
'Brexit will cost £58.7bn. Let's spend it on the NHS instead.'
If it did, Labour would have waltzed home in 2010 and 2015.0 -
There's no evidence that people will be thousands of pounds worth off.Monksfield said:
What they will give a toss about, however is when the clusterfuck that is Brexit leaves them thousands of pounds worse off. Of course they'll forget they voted for it st that point and blame the eejits who lied to them. Ho ho ho.chestnut said:
Labour could do with someone who can speak a foreign language - working class.Monksfield said:Well, one of the few things that made me shed tears this year was the murder of Jo Cox, so I'm ecstatic that the nazi scumbag that killed her has been locked up for life. Good riddance. Hopefully the security services will focus a bit more attention on these morons.
As for Labour, in view of their problems up front could they put in a big money bid for Caroline Lucas?
The working class really don't give a toss about climate change, carbon footprints, transgender issues and the troubles in Palestine.
You're asking us to take it on faith. Rather like creationism.0 -
Unspoofabletyson said:After having just completed a number of plane trips across to and round the USA I was wondering if people here are recliners or non recliners.
The reason I ask is I believe there is a clue here to the mentality of people who vote Trump or Brexit...are they selfish, miserable, cannot give a fuck about other people who recline down without a care in the world....and I think more likely to support Trump/Brexit; or are they compassionate considerate folk who wouldn't dream of invading the space/upsetting a fellow human being....a Remainer or Liberal.
I think this is an interesting social survey.0 -
If Brexit is a success, many more people will remember voting for it. If it is a clusterfuck, many will indeed forget voting for it. I'm working on my defence already, just in case.Monksfield said:
What they will give a toss about, however is when the clusterfuck that is Brexit leaves them thousands of pounds worse off. Of course they'll forget they voted for it st that point and blame the eejits who lied to them. Ho ho ho.chestnut said:
Labour could do with someone who can speak a foreign language - working class.Monksfield said:Well, one of the few things that made me shed tears this year was the murder of Jo Cox, so I'm ecstatic that the nazi scumbag that killed her has been locked up for life. Good riddance. Hopefully the security services will focus a bit more attention on these morons.
As for Labour, in view of their problems up front could they put in a big money bid for Caroline Lucas?
The working class really don't give a toss about climate change, carbon footprints, transgender issues and the troubles in Palestine.0 -
Genuine comments from creationistskle4 said:
That cannot be genuine. Can it?TheScreamingEagles said:
For comedy value, I used to follow some creationists, nothing will ever top thisfoxinsoxuk said:
Ceationism is fascinating.TheScreamingEagles said:
Holy feck sticks, Ben Carson is an evolution denier, and thinks Charles Darwin came up with evolution thanks to Satan.foxinsoxuk said:
Nah. They are full of grain from the seven good harvests.TheScreamingEagles said:
Oh God, he's going to start putting America's homeless in pyramids isn't he?MP_SE said:Ben Carson has accepted HUD secretary role. I am sure he will quickly be smeared with allegations of being a white nationalist anti-Semite...
https://twitter.com/dmartosko/status/801532341718044674
That's the same moronic thinking that creationists come up with to deny gravity by saying flowers grow upwards.
It is best seen as the prototype conspiracy theory, about which any facts can be twisted or ignored. It is why it is so common amongst alt.right types. Believe that bunkum and you are a sucker for the remainder of their post truth politics.
And 'no chance to survive as a species'? They were around for millions of years!0 -
I Brexited and would not dream of invading someone's personal space, I'd put up with anything short of another person jabbing their elbow into my face to avoid disturbing them.tyson said:After having just completed a number of plane trips across to and round the USA I was wondering if people here are recliners or non recliners.
The reason I ask is I believe there is a clue here to the mentality of people who vote Trump or Brexit...are they selfish, miserable, cannot give a fuck about other people who recline down without a care in the world....and I think more likely to support Trump/Brexit; or are they compassionate considerate folk who wouldn't dream of invading the space/upsetting a fellow human being....a Remainer or Liberal.
I think this is an interesting social survey.
Also, though I do not share this aspect of it, don't most Brexiters (and no few Remainers) worry about immigrants taking up their personal space?0 -
"Tyson" - that's what chavs call their staffs.tyson said:After having just completed a number of plane trips across to and round the USA I was wondering if people here are recliners or non recliners.
The reason I ask is I believe there is a clue here to the mentality of people who vote Trump or Brexit...are they selfish, miserable, cannot give a fuck about other people who recline down without a care in the world....and I think more likely to support Trump/Brexit; or are they compassionate considerate folk who wouldn't dream of invading the space/upsetting a fellow human being....a Remainer or Liberal.
I think this is an interesting social survey.0 -
I reckon it will all come down to if we go Hard Brexit/WTO rulesMaxPB said:
'The Remain supporting chancellor has cost us £61.3bn let's spend it on the NHS instead'TheScreamingEagles said:I know we're not getting a second referendum, but if we did, I reckon this would be a referendum winning slogan
'Brexit will cost £58.7bn. Let's spend it on the NHS instead.'0 -
Or that could be a spoof image?Pulpstar said:
All Abrahamic extremists seem to be raging homophobes !TheScreamingEagles said:
For comedy value, I used to follow some creationists, nothing will ever top thisfoxinsoxuk said:
Ceationism is fascinating.TheScreamingEagles said:
Holy feck sticks, Ben Carson is an evolution denier, and thinks Charles Darwin came up with evolution thanks to Satan.foxinsoxuk said:
Nah. They are full of grain from the seven good harvests.TheScreamingEagles said:
Oh God, he's going to start putting America's homeless in pyramids isn't he?MP_SE said:Ben Carson has accepted HUD secretary role. I am sure he will quickly be smeared with allegations of being a white nationalist anti-Semite...
https://twitter.com/dmartosko/status/801532341718044674
That's the same moronic thinking that creationists come up with to deny gravity by saying flowers grow upwards.
It is best seen as the prototype conspiracy theory, about which any facts can be twisted or ignored. It is why it is so common amongst alt.right types. Believe that bunkum and you are a sucker for the remainder of their post truth politics.0 -
Genuine question - how do you tell the difference between a man and a lady T-Rex?0
-
I wouldn't know. I'm not one.chestnut said:
And that's why Labour are going nowhere useful. Cloth ears. They don't like their voters.Monksfield said:
What they will give a toss about, however is when the clusterfuck that is Brexit leaves them thousands of pounds worse off. Of course they'll forget they voted for it st that point and blame the eejits who lied to them. Ho ho ho.chestnut said:
Labour could do with someone who can speak a foreign language - working class.Monksfield said:Well, one of the few things that made me shed tears this year was the murder of Jo Cox, so I'm ecstatic that the nazi scumbag that killed her has been locked up for life. Good riddance. Hopefully the security services will focus a bit more attention on these morons.
As for Labour, in view of their problems up front could they put in a big money bid for Caroline Lucas?
The working class really don't give a toss about climate change, carbon footprints, transgender issues and the troubles in Palestine.
0 -
Proof please.TheScreamingEagles said:
Genuine comments from creationistskle4 said:
That cannot be genuine. Can it?TheScreamingEagles said:
For comedy value, I used to follow some creationists, nothing will ever top thisfoxinsoxuk said:
Ceationism is fascinating.TheScreamingEagles said:
Holy feck sticks, Ben Carson is an evolution denier, and thinks Charles Darwin came up with evolution thanks to Satan.foxinsoxuk said:
Nah. They are full of grain from the seven good harvests.TheScreamingEagles said:
Oh God, he's going to start putting America's homeless in pyramids isn't he?MP_SE said:Ben Carson has accepted HUD secretary role. I am sure he will quickly be smeared with allegations of being a white nationalist anti-Semite...
https://twitter.com/dmartosko/status/801532341718044674
That's the same moronic thinking that creationists come up with to deny gravity by saying flowers grow upwards.
It is best seen as the prototype conspiracy theory, about which any facts can be twisted or ignored. It is why it is so common amongst alt.right types. Believe that bunkum and you are a sucker for the remainder of their post truth politics.
And 'no chance to survive as a species'? They were around for millions of years!0 -
Michigan:
https://twitter.com/greggiroux/status/801540659681394688
Should be called by AP soon enough.0 -
George Osborne said it, and the Autumn statement seemed to confirm it?Sean_F said:
There's no evidence that people will be thousands of pounds worth off.Monksfield said:
What they will give a toss about, however is when the clusterfuck that is Brexit leaves them thousands of pounds worse off. Of course they'll forget they voted for it st that point and blame the eejits who lied to them. Ho ho ho.chestnut said:
Labour could do with someone who can speak a foreign language - working class.Monksfield said:Well, one of the few things that made me shed tears this year was the murder of Jo Cox, so I'm ecstatic that the nazi scumbag that killed her has been locked up for life. Good riddance. Hopefully the security services will focus a bit more attention on these morons.
As for Labour, in view of their problems up front could they put in a big money bid for Caroline Lucas?
The working class really don't give a toss about climate change, carbon footprints, transgender issues and the troubles in Palestine.
You're asking us to take it on faith. Rather like creationism.0 -
Treating dinosaurs as one species is amusing in itself. Dim bulbs.TheScreamingEagles said:
Genuine comments from creationistskle4 said:
That cannot be genuine. Can it?TheScreamingEagles said:
For comedy value, I used to follow some creationists, nothing will ever top thisfoxinsoxuk said:
Ceationism is fascinating.TheScreamingEagles said:
Holy feck sticks, Ben Carson is an evolution denier, and thinks Charles Darwin came up with evolution thanks to Satan.foxinsoxuk said:
Nah. They are full of grain from the seven good harvests.TheScreamingEagles said:
Oh God, he's going to start putting America's homeless in pyramids isn't he?MP_SE said:Ben Carson has accepted HUD secretary role. I am sure he will quickly be smeared with allegations of being a white nationalist anti-Semite...
https://twitter.com/dmartosko/status/801532341718044674
That's the same moronic thinking that creationists come up with to deny gravity by saying flowers grow upwards.
It is best seen as the prototype conspiracy theory, about which any facts can be twisted or ignored. It is why it is so common amongst alt.right types. Believe that bunkum and you are a sucker for the remainder of their post truth politics.
And 'no chance to survive as a species'? They were around for millions of years!0 -
Yes, I think it does, which is why the £350 million bus slogan worked. In my pre referendum anecdata I reported several overheard patient conversations on that meme.chestnut said:
Do people really believe the NHS matters that much to voters, still?TheScreamingEagles said:I know we're not getting a second referendum, but if we did, I reckon this would be a referendum winning slogan
'Brexit will cost £58.7bn. Let's spend it on the NHS instead.'
If it did, Labour would have waltzed home in 2010 and 2015.
Social conservatism in Britain is not creationist, anti-abortion or racist as it is in Trumpland. It is mostly about harkening back to well paying jobs that required little formal education, backed up by council housing, the NHS and State pensions.
Remember that only a small minority of Britons use private medicine and that the shared social endeavour of the NHS is part of the reason it is so valued. The minority with any pension other than the state one is not much bigger.
0 -
Very droll.Monksfield said:
George Osborne said it, and the Autumn statement seemed to confirm it?Sean_F said:
There's no evidence that people will be thousands of pounds worth off.Monksfield said:
What they will give a toss about, however is when the clusterfuck that is Brexit leaves them thousands of pounds worse off. Of course they'll forget they voted for it st that point and blame the eejits who lied to them. Ho ho ho.chestnut said:
Labour could do with someone who can speak a foreign language - working class.Monksfield said:Well, one of the few things that made me shed tears this year was the murder of Jo Cox, so I'm ecstatic that the nazi scumbag that killed her has been locked up for life. Good riddance. Hopefully the security services will focus a bit more attention on these morons.
As for Labour, in view of their problems up front could they put in a big money bid for Caroline Lucas?
The working class really don't give a toss about climate change, carbon footprints, transgender issues and the troubles in Palestine.
You're asking us to take it on faith. Rather like creationism.
Osborne said it and some economists' forecast backed him up.0 -
Do people care more about the money being sent to the EU, or the money being sent to the NHS?foxinsoxuk said:
Yes, I think it does, which is why the £350 million bus slogan worked. In my pre referendum anecdata I reported several overheard patient conversations on that meme.chestnut said:
Do people really believe the NHS matters that much to voters, still?TheScreamingEagles said:I know we're not getting a second referendum, but if we did, I reckon this would be a referendum winning slogan
'Brexit will cost £58.7bn. Let's spend it on the NHS instead.'
If it did, Labour would have waltzed home in 2010 and 2015.
Social conservatism in Britain is not creationist, anti-abortion or racist as it is in Trumpland. It is mostly about harkening back to well paying jobs that required little formal education, backed up by council housing, the NHS and State pensions.
Remember that only a small minority of Britons use private medicine and that the shared social endeavour of the NHS is part of the reason it is so valued. The minority with any pension other than the state one is not much bigger.0 -
Yeah, but I don't think hard Brexit will be £122bn bad. The government just had a huge set piece for expectations management and set an incredibly low baseline for Brexit to be considered a success. Just think, in the run up to 2020, even if its a crap deal the government would still be able to call it a success based on these figures that came immediately after the referendum.TheScreamingEagles said:
I reckon it will all come down to if we go Hard Brexit/WTO rulesMaxPB said:
'The Remain supporting chancellor has cost us £61.3bn let's spend it on the NHS instead'TheScreamingEagles said:I know we're not getting a second referendum, but if we did, I reckon this would be a referendum winning slogan
'Brexit will cost £58.7bn. Let's spend it on the NHS instead.'0 -
I'm on a work laptop, so I'm not googling it, but I think searching something along the lines of 'creationist dinosaur museum homosexuality' will point you in the right direction.Luckyguy1983 said:
Proof please.TheScreamingEagles said:
Genuine comments from creationistskle4 said:
That cannot be genuine. Can it?TheScreamingEagles said:
For comedy value, I used to follow some creationists, nothing will ever top thisfoxinsoxuk said:
Ceationism is fascinating.TheScreamingEagles said:
Holy feck sticks, Ben Carson is an evolution denier, and thinks Charles Darwin came up with evolution thanks to Satan.foxinsoxuk said:
Nah. They are full of grain from the seven good harvests.TheScreamingEagles said:
Oh God, he's going to start putting America's homeless in pyramids isn't he?MP_SE said:Ben Carson has accepted HUD secretary role. I am sure he will quickly be smeared with allegations of being a white nationalist anti-Semite...
https://twitter.com/dmartosko/status/801532341718044674
That's the same moronic thinking that creationists come up with to deny gravity by saying flowers grow upwards.
It is best seen as the prototype conspiracy theory, about which any facts can be twisted or ignored. It is why it is so common amongst alt.right types. Believe that bunkum and you are a sucker for the remainder of their post truth politics.
And 'no chance to survive as a species'? They were around for millions of years!0 -
Both, in my experience.RobD said:
Do people care more about the money being sent to the EU, or the money being sent to the NHS?foxinsoxuk said:
Yes, I think it does, which is why the £350 million bus slogan worked. In my pre referendum anecdata I reported several overheard patient conversations on that meme.chestnut said:
Do people really believe the NHS matters that much to voters, still?TheScreamingEagles said:I know we're not getting a second referendum, but if we did, I reckon this would be a referendum winning slogan
'Brexit will cost £58.7bn. Let's spend it on the NHS instead.'
If it did, Labour would have waltzed home in 2010 and 2015.
Social conservatism in Britain is not creationist, anti-abortion or racist as it is in Trumpland. It is mostly about harkening back to well paying jobs that required little formal education, backed up by council housing, the NHS and State pensions.
Remember that only a small minority of Britons use private medicine and that the shared social endeavour of the NHS is part of the reason it is so valued. The minority with any pension other than the state one is not much bigger.
Of course it is not a zero sum game. While we stop paying the contributions (at least in some forms of Brexit) the money has vanished like the morning mist because of slower growth.
The truth is that there never will be any £350 million for the NHS nor anything else. It is gone with the wind.0 -
Hardly. The Autumn Statement points to continued economic growth.Monksfield said:
George Osborne said it, and the Autumn statement seemed to confirm it?Sean_F said:
There's no evidence that people will be thousands of pounds worth off.Monksfield said:
What they will give a toss about, however is when the clusterfuck that is Brexit leaves them thousands of pounds worse off. Of course they'll forget they voted for it st that point and blame the eejits who lied to them. Ho ho ho.chestnut said:
Labour could do with someone who can speak a foreign language - working class.Monksfield said:Well, one of the few things that made me shed tears this year was the murder of Jo Cox, so I'm ecstatic that the nazi scumbag that killed her has been locked up for life. Good riddance. Hopefully the security services will focus a bit more attention on these morons.
As for Labour, in view of their problems up front could they put in a big money bid for Caroline Lucas?
The working class really don't give a toss about climate change, carbon footprints, transgender issues and the troubles in Palestine.
You're asking us to take it on faith. Rather like creationism.0 -
I've never heard a soul say they voted Leave because of this. Not one. I suspect some people are humouring their audience, especially if they perceive them to be pro-EU, when they say it did.foxinsoxuk said:which is why the £350 million bus slogan worked.
0 -
Not as dim as people who see an image with some bullet points and instantly believe it to be a genuine tract from a group of people on the basis of zero evidence. Apart from anything else, do you really think that dour, homophobic God-botherers go in for depictions of gay dinosaur sex?Monksfield said:
Treating dinosaurs as one species is amusing in itself. Dim bulbs.TheScreamingEagles said:
Genuine comments from creationistskle4 said:
That cannot be genuine. Can it?TheScreamingEagles said:
For comedy value, I used to follow some creationists, nothing will ever top thisfoxinsoxuk said:
Ceationism is fascinating.TheScreamingEagles said:
Holy feck sticks, Ben Carson is an evolution denier, and thinks Charles Darwin came up with evolution thanks to Satan.foxinsoxuk said:
Nah. They are full of grain from the seven good harvests.TheScreamingEagles said:
Oh God, he's going to start putting America's homeless in pyramids isn't he?MP_SE said:Ben Carson has accepted HUD secretary role. I am sure he will quickly be smeared with allegations of being a white nationalist anti-Semite...
https://twitter.com/dmartosko/status/801532341718044674
That's the same moronic thinking that creationists come up with to deny gravity by saying flowers grow upwards.
It is best seen as the prototype conspiracy theory, about which any facts can be twisted or ignored. It is why it is so common amongst alt.right types. Believe that bunkum and you are a sucker for the remainder of their post truth politics.
And 'no chance to survive as a species'? They were around for millions of years!
Bigoted hatetheists believing any old shite because it massages their prejudices - exactly what they accuse others of.0 -
The money has only vanished if growth is permanently lower. The forecast today had it going back to trend towards the end of the forecast period. So we'll be growing at a similar rate, without having to pay however many billions per year on aid to other EU countries. Sounds like a net gain for the economy.foxinsoxuk said:
Both, in my experience.RobD said:
Do people care more about the money being sent to the EU, or the money being sent to the NHS?foxinsoxuk said:
Yes, I think it does, which is why the £350 million bus slogan worked. In my pre referendum anecdata I reported several overheard patient conversations on that meme.chestnut said:
Do people really believe the NHS matters that much to voters, still?TheScreamingEagles said:I know we're not getting a second referendum, but if we did, I reckon this would be a referendum winning slogan
'Brexit will cost £58.7bn. Let's spend it on the NHS instead.'
If it did, Labour would have waltzed home in 2010 and 2015.
Social conservatism in Britain is not creationist, anti-abortion or racist as it is in Trumpland. It is mostly about harkening back to well paying jobs that required little formal education, backed up by council housing, the NHS and State pensions.
Remember that only a small minority of Britons use private medicine and that the shared social endeavour of the NHS is part of the reason it is so valued. The minority with any pension other than the state one is not much bigger.
Of course it is not a zero sum game. While we stop paying the contributions (at least in some forms of Brexit) the money has vanished like the morning mist because of slower growth.
The truth is that there never will be any £350 million for the NHS nor anything else. It is gone with the wind.0 -
So how did you manage to post the image in the first place?TheScreamingEagles said:
I'm on a work laptop, so I'm not googling it, but I think searching something along the lines of 'creationist dinosaur museum homosexuality' will point you in the right direction.Luckyguy1983 said:
Proof please.TheScreamingEagles said:
Genuine comments from creationistskle4 said:
That cannot be genuine. Can it?TheScreamingEagles said:
For comedy value, I used to follow some creationists, nothing will ever top thisfoxinsoxuk said:
Ceationism is fascinating.TheScreamingEagles said:
Holy feck sticks, Ben Carson is an evolution denier, and thinks Charles Darwin came up with evolution thanks to Satan.foxinsoxuk said:
Nah. They are full of grain from the seven good harvests.TheScreamingEagles said:
Oh God, he's going to start putting America's homeless in pyramids isn't he?MP_SE said:Ben Carson has accepted HUD secretary role. I am sure he will quickly be smeared with allegations of being a white nationalist anti-Semite...
https://twitter.com/dmartosko/status/801532341718044674
That's the same moronic thinking that creationists come up with to deny gravity by saying flowers grow upwards.
It is best seen as the prototype conspiracy theory, about which any facts can be twisted or ignored. It is why it is so common amongst alt.right types. Believe that bunkum and you are a sucker for the remainder of their post truth politics.
And 'no chance to survive as a species'? They were around for millions of years!0 -
I certainly overheard it in conversations in the waiting room, though obviously conversations are more likely to turn that way amongst patients watching overstretched staff, compared with conversations elsewhere.chestnut said:
I've never heard a soul say they voted Leave because of this. Not one. I suspect some people are humouring their audience, especially if they perceive them to be pro-EU, when they say it did.foxinsoxuk said:which is why the £350 million bus slogan worked.
0 -
I had it saved on here a while backLuckyguy1983 said:
So how did you manage to post the image in the first place?TheScreamingEagles said:
I'm on a work laptop, so I'm not googling it, but I think searching something along the lines of 'creationist dinosaur museum homosexuality' will point you in the right direction.Luckyguy1983 said:
Proof please.TheScreamingEagles said:
Genuine comments from creationistskle4 said:
That cannot be genuine. Can it?TheScreamingEagles said:
For comedy value, I used to follow some creationists, nothing will ever top thisfoxinsoxuk said:
Ceationism is fascinating.TheScreamingEagles said:
Holy feck sticks, Ben Carson is an evolution denier, and thinks Charles Darwin came up with evolution thanks to Satan.foxinsoxuk said:
Nah. They are full of grain from the seven good harvests.TheScreamingEagles said:
Oh God, he's going to start putting America's homeless in pyramids isn't he?MP_SE said:Ben Carson has accepted HUD secretary role. I am sure he will quickly be smeared with allegations of being a white nationalist anti-Semite...
https://twitter.com/dmartosko/status/801532341718044674
That's the same moronic thinking that creationists come up with to deny gravity by saying flowers grow upwards.
It is best seen as the prototype conspiracy theory, about which any facts can be twisted or ignored. It is why it is so common amongst alt.right types. Believe that bunkum and you are a sucker for the remainder of their post truth politics.
And 'no chance to survive as a species'? They were around for millions of years!0 -
Rupert Murdoch says that under the reign of Trump the strongest voice in the White House after the vice-president's may belong to a man who owns a New York skyscraper with the address 666 Fifth Avenue. The building houses the headquarters of the man's business empire, and according to Forbes magazine it has mezuzahs over every office door. (That's a lot of instances of the words that say in Hebrew "Hear, O Israel: the Lord our God, the Lord is one".) Oh and this powerful man in the "impeccably tailored suit" is married to Trump's daughter. Yes, it's Jared Kushner.
The article I just linked to is partly puff but it's interesting for its information about just how hot Donald Trump's campaign actually was.
Marine Le Pen is a politican and in that respect not comparable to Donald Trump. One needs to watch for her running a similarly hot campaign, and if she does I doubt whether many media commentators on either side of the Channel will be able to get their heads round it.
0 -
@Tyson
I doubt you can divide voters by reclining etiquette (!) but here goes my 2p.
I Brexited but wouldn't have Trumped. However, I do believe in reclining rules. Always look behind, never ever sudden movements (drinks can go everywhere), full reclining unless empty behind a no no. moderation in all so maybe a two notch recline is acceptable to sleep without cramping up the seat occupant behind?0 -
It depends whether growth will turn out to be lower.foxinsoxuk said:
Both, in my experience.RobD said:
Do people care more about the money being sent to the EU, or the money being sent to the NHS?foxinsoxuk said:
Yes, I think it does, which is why the £350 million bus slogan worked. In my pre referendum anecdata I reported several overheard patient conversations on that meme.chestnut said:
Do people really believe the NHS matters that much to voters, still?TheScreamingEagles said:I know we're not getting a second referendum, but if we did, I reckon this would be a referendum winning slogan
'Brexit will cost £58.7bn. Let's spend it on the NHS instead.'
If it did, Labour would have waltzed home in 2010 and 2015.
Social conservatism in Britain is not creationist, anti-abortion or racist as it is in Trumpland. It is mostly about harkening back to well paying jobs that required little formal education, backed up by council housing, the NHS and State pensions.
Remember that only a small minority of Britons use private medicine and that the shared social endeavour of the NHS is part of the reason it is so valued. The minority with any pension other than the state one is not much bigger.
Of course it is not a zero sum game. While we stop paying the contributions (at least in some forms of Brexit) the money has vanished like the morning mist because of slower growth.
The truth is that there never will be any £350 million for the NHS nor anything else. It is gone with the wind.0 -
Hammond is just so boring. Its really hard to listen to him as he carefully reads what others have written for him.0
-
We would only regain the money if growth accelerated post Brexit, over historic trend and forecasts, in order to cross the slopes have to be not parallel.RobD said:
The money has only vanished if growth is permanently lower. The forecast today had it going back to trend towards the end of the forecast period. So we'll be growing at a similar rate, without having to pay however many billions per year on aid to other EU countries. Sounds like a net gain for the economy.foxinsoxuk said:
Both, in my experience.RobD said:
Do people care more about the money being sent to the EU, or the money being sent to the NHS?foxinsoxuk said:
Yes, I think it does, which is why the £350 million bus slogan worked. In my pre referendum anecdata I reported several overheard patient conversations on that meme.chestnut said:
Do people really believe the NHS matters that much to voters, still?TheScreamingEagles said:I know we're not getting a second referendum, but if we did, I reckon this would be a referendum winning slogan
'Brexit will cost £58.7bn. Let's spend it on the NHS instead.'
If it did, Labour would have waltzed home in 2010 and 2015.
Social conservatism in Britain is not creationist, anti-abortion or racist as it is in Trumpland. It is mostly about harkening back to well paying jobs that required little formal education, backed up by council housing, the NHS and State pensions.
Remember that only a small minority of Britons use private medicine and that the shared social endeavour of the NHS is part of the reason it is so valued. The minority with any pension other than the state one is not much bigger.
Of course it is not a zero sum game. While we stop paying the contributions (at least in some forms of Brexit) the money has vanished like the morning mist because of slower growth.
The truth is that there never will be any £350 million for the NHS nor anything else. It is gone with the wind.0 -
chestnut said:
"Tyson" - that's what chavs call their staffs.tyson said:After having just completed a number of plane trips across to and round the USA I was wondering if people here are recliners or non recliners.
The reason I ask is I believe there is a clue here to the mentality of people who vote Trump or Brexit...are they selfish, miserable, cannot give a fuck about other people who recline down without a care in the world....and I think more likely to support Trump/Brexit; or are they compassionate considerate folk who wouldn't dream of invading the space/upsetting a fellow human being....a Remainer or Liberal.
I think this is an interesting social survey.
You must have missed the bit about being 122bn worse off Sean. Or did you file it away as yesterdays news like the 350m for the NHS.Sean_F said:
Hardly. The Autumn Statement points to continued economic growth.Monksfield said:
George Osborne said it, and the Autumn statement seemed to confirm it?Sean_F said:
There's no evidence that people will be thousands of pounds worth off.Monksfield said:
What they will give a toss about, however is when the clusterfuck that is Brexit leaves them thousands of pounds worse off. Of course they'll forget they voted for it st that point and blame the eejits who lied to them. Ho ho ho.chestnut said:
Labour could do with someone who can speak a foreign language - working class.Monksfield said:Well, one of the few things that made me shed tears this year was the murder of Jo Cox, so I'm ecstatic that the nazi scumbag that killed her has been locked up for life. Good riddance. Hopefully the security services will focus a bit more attention on these morons.
As for Labour, in view of their problems up front could they put in a big money bid for Caroline Lucas?
The working class really don't give a toss about climate change, carbon footprints, transgender issues and the troubles in Palestine.
You're asking us to take it on faith. Rather like creationism.0 -
Does that ignore the fact we will no longer be sending billions a year to the EU? After not being in the EU for a hundred years we will have not sent on the order of a trillion pounds. So if growth is the same, where did that money go?foxinsoxuk said:
We would only regain the money if growth accelerated post Brexit, over historic trend and forecasts, in order to cross the slopes have to be not parallel.RobD said:
The money has only vanished if growth is permanently lower. The forecast today had it going back to trend towards the end of the forecast period. So we'll be growing at a similar rate, without having to pay however many billions per year on aid to other EU countries. Sounds like a net gain for the economy.foxinsoxuk said:
Both, in my experience.RobD said:
Do people care more about the money being sent to the EU, or the money being sent to the NHS?foxinsoxuk said:
Yes, I think it does, which is why the £350 million bus slogan worked. In my pre referendum anecdata I reported several overheard patient conversations on that meme.chestnut said:
Do people really believe the NHS matters that much to voters, still?TheScreamingEagles said:I know we're not getting a second referendum, but if we did, I reckon this would be a referendum winning slogan
'Brexit will cost £58.7bn. Let's spend it on the NHS instead.'
If it did, Labour would have waltzed home in 2010 and 2015.
Social conservatism in Britain is not creationist, anti-abortion or racist as it is in Trumpland. It is mostly about harkening back to well paying jobs that required little formal education, backed up by council housing, the NHS and State pensions.
Remember that only a small minority of Britons use private medicine and that the shared social endeavour of the NHS is part of the reason it is so valued. The minority with any pension other than the state one is not much bigger.
Of course it is not a zero sum game. While we stop paying the contributions (at least in some forms of Brexit) the money has vanished like the morning mist because of slower growth.
The truth is that there never will be any £350 million for the NHS nor anything else. It is gone with the wind.0 -
Italy — 22 consecutive polls with No in the lead, although it's not large in most of them:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_Italian_constitutional_referendum,_20160 -
Chocolate covered Brussels Sprouts.TheScreamingEagles said:Twenty three days too late for Halloween
https://twitter.com/johnestevens/status/8015230840083251200 -
I did indeed miss that our economy will decline by £122 bn from today.Monksfield said:chestnut said:
"Tyson" - that's what chavs call their staffs.tyson said:After having just completed a number of plane trips across to and round the USA I was wondering if people here are recliners or non recliners.
The reason I ask is I believe there is a clue here to the mentality of people who vote Trump or Brexit...are they selfish, miserable, cannot give a fuck about other people who recline down without a care in the world....and I think more likely to support Trump/Brexit; or are they compassionate considerate folk who wouldn't dream of invading the space/upsetting a fellow human being....a Remainer or Liberal.
I think this is an interesting social survey.
You must have missed the bit about being 122bn worse off Sean. Or did you file it away as yesterdays news like the 350m for the NHS.Sean_F said:
Hardly. The Autumn Statement points to continued economic growth.Monksfield said:
George Osborne said it, and the Autumn statement seemed to confirm it?Sean_F said:
There's no evidence that people will be thousands of pounds worth off.Monksfield said:
What they will give a toss about, however is when the clusterfuck that is Brexit leaves them thousands of pounds worse off. Of course they'll forget they voted for it st that point and blame the eejits who lied to them. Ho ho ho.chestnut said:
Labour could do with someone who can speak a foreign language - working class.Monksfield said:Well, one of the few things that made me shed tears this year was the murder of Jo Cox, so I'm ecstatic that the nazi scumbag that killed her has been locked up for life. Good riddance. Hopefully the security services will focus a bit more attention on these morons.
As for Labour, in view of their problems up front could they put in a big money bid for Caroline Lucas?
The working class really don't give a toss about climate change, carbon footprints, transgender issues and the troubles in Palestine.
You're asking us to take it on faith. Rather like creationism.0 -
The money never existed because the economy was smaller throughout.RobD said:
Does that ignore the fact we will no longer be sending billions a year to the EU? After not being in the EU for a hundred years we will have not sent on the order of a trillion pounds. So if growth is the same, where did that money go?foxinsoxuk said:
We would only regain the money if growth accelerated post Brexit, over historic trend and forecasts, in order to cross the slopes have to be not parallel.RobD said:
The money has only vanished if growth is permanently lower. The forecast today had it going back to trend towards the end of the forecast period. So we'll be growing at a similar rate, without having to pay however many billions per year on aid to other EU countries. Sounds like a net gain for the economy.foxinsoxuk said:
Both, in my experience.RobD said:
Do people care more about the money being sent to the EU, or the money being sent to the NHS?foxinsoxuk said:
Yes, I think it does, which is why the £350 million bus slogan worked. In my pre referendum anecdata I reported several overheard patient conversations on that meme.chestnut said:
Do people really believe the NHS matters that much to voters, still?TheScreamingEagles said:I know we're not getting a second referendum, but if we did, I reckon this would be a referendum winning slogan
'Brexit will cost £58.7bn. Let's spend it on the NHS instead.'
If it did, Labour would have waltzed home in 2010 and 2015.
Social conservatism in Britain is not creationist, anti-abortion or racist as it is in Trumpland. It is mostly about harkening back to well paying jobs that required little formal education, backed up by council housing, the NHS and State pensions.
Remember that only a small minority of Britons use private medicine and that the shared social endeavour of the NHS is part of the reason it is so valued. The minority with any pension other than the state one is not much bigger.
Of course it is not a zero sum game. While we stop paying the contributions (at least in some forms of Brexit) the money has vanished like the morning mist because of slower growth.
The truth is that there never will be any £350 million for the NHS nor anything else. It is gone with the wind.
You are correct in saying that the amount of money would stretch to a trillion in time, if the growth remained on the same slope as before, but delayed by a couple of years. That is the magic of compounding (or in the case of Brexit a delay in compounding).
Or to put it another way, I can never catch up with my brothers age no matter how long we both live!0 -
I think you'll struggle to find anyone on this small planet with any economic credibility saying that Brexit makes economic sense....Sean_F said:
It depends whether growth will turn out to be lower.foxinsoxuk said:
Both, in my experience.RobD said:
Do people care more about the money being sent to the EU, or the money being sent to the NHS?foxinsoxuk said:
Yes, I think it does, which is why the £350 million bus slogan worked. In my pre referendum anecdata I reported several overheard patient conversations on that meme.chestnut said:
Do people really believe the NHS matters that much to voters, still?TheScreamingEagles said:I know we're not getting a second referendum, but if we did, I reckon this would be a referendum winning slogan
'Brexit will cost £58.7bn. Let's spend it on the NHS instead.'
If it did, Labour would have waltzed home in 2010 and 2015.
Social conservatism in Britain is not creationist, anti-abortion or racist as it is in Trumpland. It is mostly about harkening back to well paying jobs that required little formal education, backed up by council housing, the NHS and State pensions.
Remember that only a small minority of Britons use private medicine and that the shared social endeavour of the NHS is part of the reason it is so valued. The minority with any pension other than the state one is not much bigger.
Of course it is not a zero sum game. While we stop paying the contributions (at least in some forms of Brexit) the money has vanished like the morning mist because of slower growth.
The truth is that there never will be any £350 million for the NHS nor anything else. It is gone with the wind.0 -
Many apologies - was out this morning - hadn't looked two threads down.Saltire said:
Mike this was the subject of the thread this morning. The general consensus is that this is pretty weak and is going nowhere.MikeL said:"Hillary Clinton urged to call for election vote recount in battleground states"
"Alleged irregularities in key states of Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin prompt demands for audit amid concerns over ‘foreign hackers’"
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/23/hillary-clinton-election-vote-recount-michigan-pennsylvania-wisconsin0 -
Euro chocolates! Not good old imperal anglophone ones...dr_spyn said:
Chocolate covered Brussels Sprouts.TheScreamingEagles said:Twenty three days too late for Halloween
https://twitter.com/johnestevens/status/8015230840083251200 -
Look how many times the £4,300 figure has been quoted as though it would be a loss. When in reality it was based on a difference between two scenarios of 31% and 37% growth by 2030. Not that we should take any long term economic forecasts seriously.Sean_F said:I did indeed miss that our economy will decline by £122 bn from today.
0 -
It is perfectly possible the quotes are genuine and somebody uploaded it onto a satirical image for effect. Though I have trouble believing the quotes are real in the absence of proof, your predilection for conspiracy theories makes your outrage less impactful; most theorists seem to think there can be only two options - either it is entirely true, or entirely false - when perhaps there's a bit more nuance to it.Luckyguy1983 said:
Not as dim as people who see an image with some bullet points and instantly believe it to be a genuine tract from a group of people on the basis of zero evidence. Apart from anything else, do you really think that dour, homophobic God-botherers go in for depictions of gay dinosaur sex?Monksfield said:
Treating dinosaurs as one species is amusing in itself. Dim bulbs.TheScreamingEagles said:
Genuine comments from creationistskle4 said:
That cannot be genuine. Can it?TheScreamingEagles said:
For comedy value, I used to follow some creationists, nothing will ever top thisfoxinsoxuk said:
Ceationism is fascinating.TheScreamingEagles said:
Holy feck sticks, Ben Carson is an evolution denier, and thinks Charles Darwin came up with evolution thanks to Satan.foxinsoxuk said:
Nah. They are full of grain from the seven good harvests.TheScreamingEagles said:
Oh God, he's going to start putting America's homeless in pyramids isn't he?MP_SE said:Ben Carson has accepted HUD secretary role. I am sure he will quickly be smeared with allegations of being a white nationalist anti-Semite...
https://twitter.com/dmartosko/status/801532341718044674
That's the same moronic thinking that creationists come up with to deny gravity by saying flowers grow upwards.
It is best seen as the prototype conspiracy theory, about which any facts can be twisted or ignored. It is why it is so common amongst alt.right types. Believe that bunkum and you are a sucker for the remainder of their post truth politics.
And 'no chance to survive as a species'? They were around for millions of years!
Bigoted hatetheists believing any old shite because it massages their prejudices - exactly what they accuse others of.
And yes, before you ask, I don't care about upsetting Creationists with mockery; I know deeply deeply religious people who do the same, so I feel I'm on safe ground.0 -
Bring Back Balls!0
-
That was a bit mean of me. I apologise.kle4 said:
It is perfectly possible the quotes are genuine and somebody uploaded it onto a satirical image for effect. Though I have trouble believing the quotes are real in the absence of proof, your predilection for conspiracy theories makes your outrage less impactful; most theorists seem to think there can be only two options - either it is entirely true, or entirely false - when perhaps there's a bit more nuance to it.Luckyguy1983 said:
Not as dim as people who see an image with some bullet points and instantly believe it to be a genuine tract from a group of people on the basis of zero evidence. Apart from anything else, do you really think that dour, homophobic God-botherers go in for depictions of gay dinosaur sex?Monksfield said:
Treating dinosaurs as one species is amusing in itself. Dim bulbs.TheScreamingEagles said:
Genuine comments from creationistskle4 said:
That cannot be genuine. Can it?TheScreamingEagles said:
For comedy value, I used to follow some creationists, nothing will ever top thisfoxinsoxuk said:
Ceationism is fascinating.TheScreamingEagles said:
Holy feck sticks, Ben Carson is an evolution denier, and thinks Charles Darwin came up with evolution thanks to Satan.foxinsoxuk said:
Nah. They are full of grain from the seven good harvests.TheScreamingEagles said:
Oh God, he's going to start putting America's homeless in pyramids isn't he?MP_SE said:Ben Carson has accepted HUD secretary role. I am sure he will quickly be smeared with allegations of being a white nationalist anti-Semite...
https://twitter.com/dmartosko/status/801532341718044674
That's the same moronic thinking that creationists come up with to deny gravity by saying flowers grow upwards.
It is best seen as the prototype conspiracy theory, about which any facts can be twisted or ignored. It is why it is so common amongst alt.right types. Believe that bunkum and you are a sucker for the remainder of their post truth politics.
And 'no chance to survive as a species'? They were around for millions of years!
Bigoted hatetheists believing any old shite because it massages their prejudices - exactly what they accuse others of.
And yes, before you ask, I don't care about upsetting Creationists with mockery; I know deeply deeply religious people who do the same, so I feel I'm on safe ground.0 -
What are you afraid your search would throw up?TheScreamingEagles said:
I'm on a work laptop, so I'm not googling it, but I think searching something along the lines of 'creationist dinosaur museum homosexuality' will point you in the right direction.Luckyguy1983 said:
Proof please.TheScreamingEagles said:
Genuine comments from creationistskle4 said:
That cannot be genuine. Can it?TheScreamingEagles said:
For comedy value, I used to follow some creationists, nothing will ever top thisfoxinsoxuk said:
Ceationism is fascinating.TheScreamingEagles said:
Holy feck sticks, Ben Carson is an evolution denier, and thinks Charles Darwin came up with evolution thanks to Satan.foxinsoxuk said:
Nah. They are full of grain from the seven good harvests.TheScreamingEagles said:
Oh God, he's going to start putting America's homeless in pyramids isn't he?MP_SE said:Ben Carson has accepted HUD secretary role. I am sure he will quickly be smeared with allegations of being a white nationalist anti-Semite...
https://twitter.com/dmartosko/status/801532341718044674
That's the same moronic thinking that creationists come up with to deny gravity by saying flowers grow upwards.
It is best seen as the prototype conspiracy theory, about which any facts can be twisted or ignored. It is why it is so common amongst alt.right types. Believe that bunkum and you are a sucker for the remainder of their post truth politics.
And 'no chance to survive as a species'? They were around for millions of years!0 -
@Kle4
I believe the quotes are from Ken Ham, who is a creationist, who in the past has said things like dinosaurs were on the Ark with Noah.
Dinosaurs first existed around 6,000 years ago. Because dinosaurs were land animals, and God made all the land animals on day six of the creation week, dinosaurs were created on day six. Dinosaurs could not have died out before this time because death, bloodshed, disease and suffering is a result of Adam's sin. Adam and Eve were also made on day six alongside the dinosaurs - so dinosaurs lived with people.
Representatives of all the KINDS of land animals, including the dinosaur kinds went on board Noah's ark. All those that were left behind drowned in the cataclysmic circumstances of the Flood - many of their remains became fossils. After the Flood (around 4,500 years ago), the land animals (including dinosaurs) came off the ark and lived in the present world, beside people. Because of sin, the judgement of the curse and the effects of the Flood have greatly changed the earth. Since the Flood, many animals have died out from diseases, a lack of food, etc. The dinosaurs, like many other creatures, seem to have also died out
https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Ken_Ham#Great_Dinosaur_Mystery_Solved.21_.282000.29
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ken_Ham
He also came out with this doozie
The Bible states that two of every kind of land animal and seven of some went onto the Ark. It doesn’t say two of every species went onto the Ark but “kinds.” There are thousands of species of dinosaurs, but there are only about fifty families of dinosaurs. And since the biblical kind is thought to correspond to the family level in most cases, there would have been only about one hundred dinosaurs on the Ark—not thousands.
For instance, there are many different long-neck sauropods, such as Brachiosaurus, Camarasaurus, Saltasaurus, and Diplodocus, but only two needed to go onto the Ark if they were just one kind. This fact dramatically reduces the estimated number of dinosaurs on the Ark. Also, even though some dinosaurs grew to be large creatures, the average size was only about the size of a large sheep or bison. Even the largest dinosaurs were quite small when hatched. The Lord may have selected younger (and therefore smaller) representatives of some of the larger kinds, so there was plenty of room for all of the dinosaur kinds aboard the Ark.
If dinosaurs sailed on the Ark, where are they today? Different animal species become extinct every day for various reasons. After the Flood, the environment and habitat were drastically changed. Many dinosaurs may not have been as suited to the post-Flood world because of these changes. Interestingly, it appears that some of the dinosaur kinds that did survive a long time after the Flood became known as dragons. Dragon legends abound all over the world.
http://www.oneplace.com/ministries/answers-in-genesis/read/articles/dinosaurs-on-the-ark-16285.html0 -
Economically, there's not much in it either way.tyson said:
I think you'll struggle to find anyone on this small planet with any economic credibility saying that Brexit makes economic sense....Sean_F said:
It depends whether growth will turn out to be lower.foxinsoxuk said:
Both, in my experience.RobD said:
Do people care more about the money being sent to the EU, or the money being sent to the NHS?foxinsoxuk said:
Yes, I think it does, which is why the £350 million bus slogan worked. In my pre referendum anecdata I reported several overheard patient conversations on that meme.chestnut said:
Do people really believe the NHS matters that much to voters, still?TheScreamingEagles said:I know we're not getting a second referendum, but if we did, I reckon this would be a referendum winning slogan
'Brexit will cost £58.7bn. Let's spend it on the NHS instead.'
If it did, Labour would have waltzed home in 2010 and 2015.
Social conservatism in Britain is not creationist, anti-abortion or racist as it is in Trumpland. It is mostly about harkening back to well paying jobs that required little formal education, backed up by council housing, the NHS and State pensions.
Remember that only a small minority of Britons use private medicine and that the shared social endeavour of the NHS is part of the reason it is so valued. The minority with any pension other than the state one is not much bigger.
Of course it is not a zero sum game. While we stop paying the contributions (at least in some forms of Brexit) the money has vanished like the morning mist because of slower growth.
The truth is that there never will be any £350 million for the NHS nor anything else. It is gone with the wind.
0 -
Britain needs an opposition far better than Labour is providing
If only we had Dim Farron0 -
A few months ago, for a PB thread I was writing, I googled 'Do bears have foreskins' and it brought up all sorts of gay hook up sites WITH PICTURES AND VIDEOS because I forgot a bear is a certain type of gay man.Charles said:
What are you afraid your search would throw up?TheScreamingEagles said:
I'm on a work laptop, so I'm not googling it, but I think searching something along the lines of 'creationist dinosaur museum homosexuality' will point you in the right direction.Luckyguy1983 said:
Proof please.TheScreamingEagles said:
Genuine comments from creationistskle4 said:
That cannot be genuine. Can it?TheScreamingEagles said:
For comedy value, I used to follow some creationists, nothing will ever top thisfoxinsoxuk said:
Ceationism is fascinating.TheScreamingEagles said:
Holy feck sticks, Ben Carson is an evolution denier, and thinks Charles Darwin came up with evolution thanks to Satan.foxinsoxuk said:
Nah. They are full of grain from the seven good harvests.TheScreamingEagles said:
Oh God, he's going to start putting America's homeless in pyramids isn't he?MP_SE said:Ben Carson has accepted HUD secretary role. I am sure he will quickly be smeared with allegations of being a white nationalist anti-Semite...
https://twitter.com/dmartosko/status/801532341718044674
That's the same moronic thinking that creationists come up with to deny gravity by saying flowers grow upwards.
It is best seen as the prototype conspiracy theory, about which any facts can be twisted or ignored. It is why it is so common amongst alt.right types. Believe that bunkum and you are a sucker for the remainder of their post truth politics.
And 'no chance to survive as a species'? They were around for millions of years!0 -
0
-
Someone commenting on that tweet suggested Gary Gritter.TheScreamingEagles said:I'm going for Gritty McGritface
https://twitter.com/OldhamCouncil/status/8015311077957263380 -
But that would only do minor roads?MP_SE said:
Someone commenting on that tweet suggested Gary Gritter.TheScreamingEagles said:I'm going for Gritty McGritface
https://twitter.com/OldhamCouncil/status/8015311077957263380 -
OR....TheScreamingEagles said:I know we're not getting a second referendum, but if we did, I reckon this would be a referendum winning slogan
'Brexit will cost £58.7bn. Let's spend it on the NHS instead.'
"Brexit has already cost £58.7bn. We have a Budget to prove it. But that was a small price to pay, to epically piss off the French..."0 -
I Googled. The statements originate from the forum here:TheScreamingEagles said:
I had it saved on here a while backLuckyguy1983 said:
So how did you manage to post the image in the first place?TheScreamingEagles said:
I'm on a work laptop, so I'm not googling it, but I think searching something along the lines of 'creationist dinosaur museum homosexuality' will point you in the right direction.Luckyguy1983 said:
Proof please.TheScreamingEagles said:
Genuine comments from creationistskle4 said:
That cannot be genuine. Can it?TheScreamingEagles said:
For comedy value, I used to follow some creationists, nothing will ever top thisfoxinsoxuk said:
Ceationism is fascinating.TheScreamingEagles said:
Holy feck sticks, Ben Carson is an evolution denier, and thinks Charles Darwin came up with evolution thanks to Satan.foxinsoxuk said:
Nah. They are full of grain from the seven good harvests.TheScreamingEagles said:
Oh God, he's going to start putting America's homeless in pyramids isn't he?MP_SE said:Ben Carson has accepted HUD secretary role. I am sure he will quickly be smeared with allegations of being a white nationalist anti-Semite...
https://twitter.com/dmartosko/status/801532341718044674
That's the same moronic thinking that creationists come up with to deny gravity by saying flowers grow upwards.
It is best seen as the prototype conspiracy theory, about which any facts can be twisted or ignored. It is why it is so common amongst alt.right types. Believe that bunkum and you are a sucker for the remainder of their post truth politics.
And 'no chance to survive as a species'? They were around for millions of years!
http://www.landoverbaptist.net/showthread.php?t=88288
Which is a SPOOF website and forum:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landover_Baptist_Church
Without even looking it up this was OBVIOUSLY satire; you'd have to be deluded to think anything else.
0 -
The Boulder Mobile, driven by Rock and Gravel.....TheScreamingEagles said:I'm going for Gritty McGritface
https://twitter.com/OldhamCouncil/status/8015311077957263380 -
There is this:TheScreamingEagles said:@Kle4
I believe the quotes are from Ken Ham, who is a creationist, who in the past has said things like dinosaurs were on the Ark with Noah.
Dinosaurs first existed around 6,000 years ago. Because dinosaurs were land animals, and God made all the land animals on day six of the creation week, dinosaurs were created on day six. Dinosaurs could not have died out before this time because death, bloodshed, disease and suffering is a result of Adam's sin. Adam and Eve were also made on day six alongside the dinosaurs - so dinosaurs lived with people.
Representatives of all the KINDS of land animals, including the dinosaur kinds went on board Noah's ark. All
https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Ken_Ham#Great_Dinosaur_Mystery_Solved.21_.282000.29
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ken_Ham
He also came out with this doozie
The Bible states that two of every kind of land animal and seven of some went onto the Ark. It doesn’t say two of every species went onto the Ark but “kinds.” There are thousands of species of dinosaurs, but there are only about fifty families of dinosaurs. And since the biblical kind is thought to correspond to the family level in most cases, there would have been only about one hundred dinosaurs on the Ark—not thousands.
For instance, there are many different long-neck sauropods, such as Brachiosaurus, Camarasaurus, Saltasaurus, and Diplodocus, but only two needed to go onto the Ark if they were just one kind. This fact dramatically reduces the estimated number of dinosaurs on the Ark. Also, even though some dinosaurs grew to be large creatures, the average size was only about the size of a large sheep or bison. Even the largest dinosaurs were quite small when hatched. The Lord may have selected younger (and therefore smaller) representatives of some of the larger kinds, so there was plenty of room for all of the dinosaur kinds aboard the Ark.
If dinosaurs sailed on the Ark, where are they today? Different animal species become extinct every day for various reasons. After the Flood, the environment and habitat were drastically changed. Many dinosaurs may not have been as suited to the post-Flood world because of these changes. Interestingly, it appears that some of the dinosaur kinds that did survive a long time after the Flood became known as dragons. Dragon legends abound all over the world.
http://www.oneplace.com/ministries/answers-in-genesis/read/articles/dinosaurs-on-the-ark-16285.html
http://worldnewsdailyreport.com/homosexuality-led-to-extinction-of-dinosaurs-claims-top-scientist/
Though the world news daily report does not seem to be part of the MSM.
0 -
Don't apologise for being mean, apologise for being wrong.kle4 said:
That was a bit mean of me. I apologise.0 -
No it isn't, because it's another satire site!foxinsoxuk said:
There is this:TheScreamingEagles said:@Kle4
I believe the quotes are from Ken Ham, who is a creationist, who in the past has said things like dinosaurs were on the Ark with Noah.
Dinosaurs first existed around 6,000 years ago. Because dinosaurs were land animals, and God made all the land animals on day six of the creation week, dinosaurs were created on day six. Dinosaurs could not have died out before this time because death, bloodshed, disease and suffering is a result of Adam's sin. Adam and Eve were also made on day six alongside the dinosaurs - so dinosaurs lived with people.
Representatives of all the KINDS of land animals, including the dinosaur kinds went on board Noah's ark. All
https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Ken_Ham#Great_Dinosaur_Mystery_Solved.21_.282000.29
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ken_Ham
He also came out with this doozie
The Bible states that two of every kind of land animal and seven of some went onto the Ark. It doesn’t say two of every species went onto the Ark but “kinds.” There are thousands of species of dinosaurs, but there are only about fifty families of dinosaurs. And since the biblical kind is thought to correspond to the family level in most cases, there would have been only about one hundred dinosaurs on the Ark—not thousands.
For instance, there are many different long-neck sauropods, such as Brachiosaurus, Camarasaurus, Saltasaurus, and Diplodocus, but only two needed to go onto the Ark if they were just one kind. This fact dramatically reduces the estimated number of dinosaurs on the Ark. Also, even though some dinosaurs grew to be large creatures, the average size was only about the size of a large sheep or bison. Even the largest dinosaurs were quite small when hatched. The Lord may have selected younger (and therefore smaller) representatives of some of the larger kinds, so there was plenty of room for all of the dinosaur kinds aboard the Ark.
If dinosaurs sailed on the Ark, where are they today? Different animal species become extinct every day for various reasons. After the Flood, the environment and habitat were drastically changed. Many dinosaurs may not have been as suited to the post-Flood world because of these changes. Interestingly, it appears that some of the dinosaur kinds that did survive a long time after the Flood became known as dragons. Dragon legends abound all over the world.
http://www.oneplace.com/ministries/answers-in-genesis/read/articles/dinosaurs-on-the-ark-16285.html
http://worldnewsdailyreport.com/homosexuality-led-to-extinction-of-dinosaurs-claims-top-scientist/
Though the world news daily report does not seem to be part of the MSM.
http://realorsatire.com/worldnewsdailyreport-com/
0 -
That would be one hell of a Guy Pride parade though, if those boys turned up in rainbow hot pants.....kle4 said:
That cannot be genuine. Can it?TheScreamingEagles said:
For comedy value, I used to follow some creationists, nothing will ever top thisfoxinsoxuk said:
Ceationism is fascinating.TheScreamingEagles said:
Holy feck sticks, Ben Carson is an evolution denier, and thinks Charles Darwin came up with evolution thanks to Satan.foxinsoxuk said:
Nah. They are full of grain from the seven good harvests.TheScreamingEagles said:
Oh God, he's going to start putting America's homeless in pyramids isn't he?MP_SE said:Ben Carson has accepted HUD secretary role. I am sure he will quickly be smeared with allegations of being a white nationalist anti-Semite...
https://twitter.com/dmartosko/status/801532341718044674
That's the same moronic thinking that creationists come up with to deny gravity by saying flowers grow upwards.
It is best seen as the prototype conspiracy theory, about which any facts can be twisted or ignored. It is why it is so common amongst alt.right types. Believe that bunkum and you are a sucker for the remainder of their post truth politics.
And 'no chance to survive as a species'? They were around for millions of years!0 -
It is amusing to see guardianistas now believing Osborne's borrowing predictions are Holy Writ.Sean_F said:
Economically, there's not much in it either way.tyson said:
I think you'll struggle to find anyone on this small planet with any economic credibility saying that Brexit makes economic sense....Sean_F said:
It depends whether growth will turn out to be lower.foxinsoxuk said:
Both, in my experience.RobD said:
Do people care more about the money being sent to the EU, or the money being sent to the NHS?foxinsoxuk said:
Yes, I think it does, which is why the £350 million bus slogan worked. In my pre referendum anecdata I reported several overheard patient conversations on that meme.chestnut said:
Do people really believe the NHS matters that much to voters, still?TheScreamingEagles said:I know we're not getting a second referendum, but if we did, I reckon this would be a referendum winning slogan
'Brexit will cost £58.7bn. Let's spend it on the NHS instead.'
If it did, Labour would have waltzed home in 2010 and 2015.
Social conservatism in Britain is not creationist, anti-abortion or racist as it is in Trumpland. It is mostly about harkening back to well paying jobs that required little formal education, backed up by council housing, the NHS and State pensions.
Remember that only a small minority of Britons use private medicine and that the shared social endeavour of the NHS is part of the reason it is so valued. The minority with any pension other than the state one is not much bigger.
Of course it is not a zero sum game. While we stop paying the contributions (at least in some forms of Brexit) the money has vanished like the morning mist because of slower growth.
The truth is that there never will be any £350 million for the NHS nor anything else. It is gone with the wind.
0 -
It doesn't matter in a post truth world. We can all have our own facts to justify our own opinions.Luckyguy1983 said:
No it isn't, because it's another satire site!foxinsoxuk said:
There is this:TheScreamingEagles said:@Kle4
I believe the quotes are from Ken Ham, who is a creationist, who in the past has said things like dinosaurs were on the Ark with Noah.
Dinosaurs first existed around 6,000 years ago. Because dinosaurs were land animals, and God made all the land animals on day six of the creation week, dinosaurs were created on day six. Dinosaurs could not have died out before this time because death, bloodshed, disease and suffering is a result of Adam's sin. Adam and Eve were also made on day six alongside the dinosaurs - so dinosaurs lived with people.
Representatives of all the KINDS of land animals, including the dinosaur kinds went on board Noah's ark. All
https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Ken_Ham#Great_Dinosaur_Mystery_Solved.21_.282000.29
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ken_Ham
He also came out with this doozie
The Bible states that two of every kind of land animal and seven of some went onto the Ark. It doesn’t say two of every species went onto the Ark but “kinds.” There are thousands of species of dinosaurs, but there are only about fifty families of dinosaurs. And since the biblical kind is thought to correspond to the family level in most cases, there would have been only about one hundred dinosaurs on the Ark—not thousands.
For instance, there are many different long-neck sauropods, such as Brachiosaurus, Camarasaurus, Saltasaurus, and Diplodocus, but only two needed to go onto the Ark if they were just one kind. This fact dramatically reduces the estimated number of dinosaurs on the Ark. Also, even though some dinosaurs grew to be large creatures, the average size was only about the size of a large sheep or bison. Even the largest dinosaurs were quite small when hatched. The Lord may have selected younger (and therefore smaller) representatives of some of the larger kinds, so there was plenty of room for all of the dinosaur kinds aboard the Ark.
If dinosaurs sailed
http://www.oneplace.com/ministries/answers-in-genesis/read/articles/dinosaurs-on-the-ark-16285.html
http://worldnewsdailyreport.com/homosexuality-led-to-extinction-of-dinosaurs-claims-top-scientist/
Though the world news daily report does not seem to be part of the MSM.
http://realorsatire.com/worldnewsdailyreport-com/
And as a Christian I am very happy taking the mickey out of creationists. They give Christianity a bad name by misunderstanding and mis-stating what the fundamentals of Christianity are.0 -
Since we are having fun tonight with gay dinosaurs, naming gritter trucks and ambassador Farage, my contribution:
https://twitter.com/senatorshoshana/status/8014670502124257280 -
YJ66 VHC?TheScreamingEagles said:I'm going for Gritty McGritface
https://twitter.com/OldhamCouncil/status/801531107795726338
It's a grifter, not a stuffed toy in an infants school.0 -
Guy Pride?MarqueeMark said:
That would be one hell of a Guy Pride parade though, if those boys turned up in rainbow hot pants.....kle4 said:
That cannot be genuine. Can it?TheScreamingEagles said:
For comedy value, I used to follow some creationists, nothing will ever top thisfoxinsoxuk said:
Ceationism is fascinating.TheScreamingEagles said:
Holy feck sticks, Ben Carson is an evolution denier, and thinks Charles Darwin came up with evolution thanks to Satan.foxinsoxuk said:
Nah. They are full of grain from the seven good harvests.TheScreamingEagles said:
Oh God, he's going to start putting America's homeless in pyramids isn't he?MP_SE said:Ben Carson has accepted HUD secretary role. I am sure he will quickly be smeared with allegations of being a white nationalist anti-Semite...
https://twitter.com/dmartosko/status/801532341718044674
That's the same moronic thinking that creationists come up with to deny gravity by saying flowers grow upwards.
It is best seen as the prototype conspiracy theory, about which any facts can be twisted or ignored. It is why it is so common amongst alt.right types. Believe that bunkum and you are a sucker for the remainder of their post truth politics.
And 'no chance to survive as a species'? They were around for millions of years!
Your Freudian slip is showing...0 -
I think it will tern out to make UK and the wider would happier, wealthier and freer than we would otherwise be. now you can dismiss me as being an odd libertarian with no economic credibility if you wish, however Professor Sir Patrick Minford and a dozen other professional economists in 'Economists for Brexit' agree and for similar reasons.tyson said:
I think you'll struggle to find anyone on this small planet with any economic credibility saying that Brexit makes economic sense....Sean_F said:
It depends whether growth will turn out to be lower.foxinsoxuk said:
Both, in my experience.RobD said:
Do people care more about the money being sent to the EU, or the money being sent to the NHS?foxinsoxuk said:
Yes, I think it does, which is why the £350 million bus slogan worked. In my pre referendum anecdata I reported several overheard patient conversations on that meme.chestnut said:
Do people really believe the NHS matters that much to voters, still?TheScreamingEagles said:I know we're not getting a second referendum, but if we did, I reckon this would be a referendum winning slogan
'Brexit will cost £58.7bn. Let's spend it on the NHS instead.'
If it did, Labour would have waltzed home in 2010 and 2015.
Social conservatism in Britain is not creationist, anti-abortion or racist as it is in Trumpland. It is mostly about harkening back to well paying jobs that required little formal education, backed up by council housing, the NHS and State pensions.
Remember that only a small minority of Britons use private medicine and that the shared social endeavour of the NHS is part of the reason it is so valued. The minority with any pension other than the state one is not much bigger.
Of course it is not a zero sum game. While we stop paying the contributions (at least in some forms of Brexit) the money has vanished like the morning mist because of slower growth.
The truth is that there never will be any £350 million for the NHS nor anything else. It is gone with the wind.0 -
They were posted on Landover but they did not originate there. Here is the image posted months earlier on another forum.Luckyguy1983 said:
I Googled. The statements originate from the forum here:TheScreamingEagles said:
I had it saved on here a while backLuckyguy1983 said:
So how did you manage to post the image in the first place?TheScreamingEagles said:
I'm on a work laptop, so I'm not googling it, but I think searching something along the lines of 'creationist dinosaur museum homosexuality' will point you in the right direction.Luckyguy1983 said:
Proof please.TheScreamingEagles said:
Genuine comments from creationistskle4 said:
That cannot be genuine. Can it?TheScreamingEagles said:
For comedy value, I used to follow some creationists, nothing will ever top thisfoxinsoxuk said:
Ceationism is fascinating.TheScreamingEagles said:
Holy feck sticks, Ben Carson is an evolution denier, and thinks Charles Darwin came up with evolution thanks to Satan.foxinsoxuk said:
Nah. They are full of grain from the seven good harvests.TheScreamingEagles said:
Oh God, he's going to start putting America's homeless in pyramids isn't he?MP_SE said:Ben Carson has accepted HUD secretary role. I am sure he will quickly be smeared with allegations of being a white nationalist anti-Semite...
https://twitter.com/dmartosko/status/801532341718044674
That's the same moronic thinking that creationists come up with to deny gravity by saying flowers grow upwards.
It is best seen as the prototype conspiracy theory, about which any facts can be twisted or ignored. It is why it is so common amongst alt.right types. Believe that bunkum and you are a sucker for the remainder of their post truth politics.
And 'no chance to survive as a species'? They were around for millions of years!
http://www.landoverbaptist.net/showthread.php?t=88288
Which is a SPOOF website and forum:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landover_Baptist_Church
Without even looking it up this was OBVIOUSLY satire; you'd have to be deluded to think anything else.
http://emptyclosets.com/forum/current-events-world-news-lgbt-news/80090-homosexuality-killed-dinosaurs.html
I'm not saying it isnt a spoof but you haven't found the source.
0 -
FFsake Jill Stein is delaying payouts on Michigan/Electoral college once again.0
-
Well it won't affect Pennsylvania, Trump's victory margin is too large for a recount to be granted.Pulpstar said:FFsake Jill Stein is delaying payouts on Michigan/Electoral college once again.
And don't forget the results have to certified by Dec. 13th regardless of any recount attempts.0 -
0
-
Thus tracing it back to that well-known creationist blog, Memewhore. http://memewhore.tumblr.com/post/39808127777Alistair said:
They were posted on Landover but they did not originate there. Here is the image posted months earlier on another forum.
http://emptyclosets.com/forum/current-events-world-news-lgbt-news/80090-homosexuality-killed-dinosaurs.html
I'm not saying it isnt a spoof but you haven't found the source.0 -
@debmattinson: Voters' greatest disappointment with #AutumnStatement is lack of £ for NHS. 'Why not use the £350m?' Asked one in @BritainThinks focus group0
-
Re the vote fraud claims in the USA.
Here are the Democrat to Republican swings in the rust belt states:
WV 7.7%
IO 7.7%
OH 5.8%
MI 4.9%
MO 4.8%
IN 4.5%
WN 3.9%
KY 3.6%
PN 3.2%
MN 3.1%
IL 0.4%
Now if you had to select a couple for vote fraud checks which would you pick ?
0 -
He'd had the idea after seeing it on a busScott_P said:@debmattinson: Voters' greatest disappointment with #AutumnStatement is lack of £ for NHS. 'Why not use the £350m?' Asked one in @BritainThinks focus group
0 -
We should ask for her to be appointed the USA ambassador to the UK. If he can choose ours then we can choose his! And like Farage she represents a minor party.Pulpstar said:FFsake Jill Stein is delaying payouts on Michigan/Electoral college once again.
0 -
Stein is going to hit that $2.5 million target quite quickly actually.
The probability of Michigan getting flipped is close to zero, mind.
0 -
Curious that Cook County swings toward Hillary, yet Detroit, Philly and Milwaukee don't...another_richard said:Re the vote fraud claims in the USA.
Here are the Democrat to Republican swings in the rust belt states:
WV 7.7%
IO 7.7%
OH 5.8%
MI 4.9%
MO 4.8%
IN 4.5%
WN 3.9%
KY 3.6%
PN 3.2%
MN 3.1%
IL 0.4%
Now if you had to select a couple for vote fraud checks which would you pick ?0 -
I've got a mate doing his nut because he bought Trump for a substantial figure on SpreadEx's ECV market which won't settle until all of the states are officially called.Pulpstar said:Stein is going to hit that $2.5 million target quite quickly actually.
The probability of Michigan getting flipped is close to zero, mind.0 -
IO=IA, PN=PA. I think!another_richard said:Re the vote fraud claims in the USA.
Here are the Democrat to Republican swings in the rust belt states:
WV 7.7%
IO 7.7%
OH 5.8%
MI 4.9%
MO 4.8%
IN 4.5%
WN 3.9%
KY 3.6%
PN 3.2%
MN 3.1%
IL 0.4%
Now if you had to select a couple for vote fraud checks which would you pick ?0 -
Obama effect.Pulpstar said:
Curious that Cook County swings toward Hillary, yet Detroit, Philly and Milwaukee don't...another_richard said:Re the vote fraud claims in the USA.
Here are the Democrat to Republican swings in the rust belt states:
WV 7.7%
IO 7.7%
OH 5.8%
MI 4.9%
MO 4.8%
IN 4.5%
WN 3.9%
KY 3.6%
PN 3.2%
MN 3.1%
IL 0.4%
Now if you had to select a couple for vote fraud checks which would you pick ?0 -
I was just testing ;-)RobD said:
IO=IA, PN=PA. I think!another_richard said:Re the vote fraud claims in the USA.
Here are the Democrat to Republican swings in the rust belt states:
WV 7.7%
IO 7.7%
OH 5.8%
MI 4.9%
MO 4.8%
IN 4.5%
WN 3.9%
KY 3.6%
PN 3.2%
MN 3.1%
IL 0.4%
Now if you had to select a couple for vote fraud checks which would you pick ?
0 -
Rotherham Labour party maintaining its high standards:
' A COUNCILLOR has been convicted of sexually touching a fellow elected member.
Andrew Roddison (41) was found guilty under the Sex Offences Act after a trial at Leeds Magistrates' Court.
The offence, against a female councillor, happened at an event at Rotherham Town Hall in May.
Roddison, of Flatts Lane, Treeton, denied squeezing the woman's buttocks but district judge David Kitson said he found the councillor’s account “unconvincing”.
Roddison, elected to Rotherham Borough Council in 2011 and currently suspended by Labour, was bailed ahead of sentencing on December 1. '
http://www.rotherhamadvertiser.co.uk/news/105160/councillor-squeezed-buttocks-of-fellow-elected-member.aspx
0 -
Only if Obama had a negative personal vote in Illinois.MaxPB said:
Obama effect.Pulpstar said:
Curious that Cook County swings toward Hillary, yet Detroit, Philly and Milwaukee don't...another_richard said:Re the vote fraud claims in the USA.
Here are the Democrat to Republican swings in the rust belt states:
WV 7.7%
IO 7.7%
OH 5.8%
MI 4.9%
MO 4.8%
IN 4.5%
WN 3.9%
KY 3.6%
PN 3.2%
MN 3.1%
IL 0.4%
Now if you had to select a couple for vote fraud checks which would you pick ?
Though Hilary does actually come from Chicago so maybe she had a personal vote there.
0 -
I'm -2.4k to win ~260 on the various Michigan & proxies.MaxPB said:
I've got a mate doing his nut because he bought Trump for a substantial figure on SpreadEx's ECV market which won't settle until all of the states are officially called.Pulpstar said:Stein is going to hit that $2.5 million target quite quickly actually.
The probability of Michigan getting flipped is close to zero, mind.0