Options
politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » The 100/1 bet on the next Labour leader that quite a few of

Earlier on this week I decided to back Richard Burgon to be the next Labour leader at 100/1.
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
His perceived lack of ability is not necessarily a deciding consideration: cf IDS, Andrea Leadsom and Jeremy Corbyn himself.
Producer capture is a real issue with regulatory authorities.
[Src.: http://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21704743-bacteria-may-be-key-turning-graphene-semiconductor-bugs]
Could someone please explain how this is possible? Is it a Schroedingers Cat thingy...?
edit: just to be clear, this isn't a criticism, just a statement of fact.
More like corduroy apparently.
http://www.materialstoday.com/carbon/news/bacteria-wrinkle-graphene-electronic-properties/
Start with an enthusiastic rush but then reality bites.
:randon=/=predicatable:
A more useful bet might be on when Jez will finally go. He's getting on, is failing badly and is clearly very confused by all the hate coming his way even from his own side (remember in his own esteem he's always been the good guy, and most of the party until now kept thanking him for keeping the old ways alive).
In 2019 he will be 70. There might be value in a bet for him to leave on that date if he wins again. However, that is dependent on him being allowed to go on his own terms because like most arrogant but not very bright people he's very stubborn. If the PLP continue to try and remove him, he'll stay until the next election and probably fight Emily Thornberry like ferrets in a sack for a seat in Islington.
And I believe neither of your other weird statements.
We try to subvert it.
He's so apparently thick that he demonstrates that a Cambridge education is a worthless exercise.
He makes Diane Abbott look like a visionary of our age.
I know Labour are on some mass suicide mission at the moment and for some years to come as evidenced by an idiot like him being in the shadow cabinet, but really
It proves past all doubt that she is a great intellectual of our time, up there with Nick Clegg and Tristram Hunt, and not a vacuous whinger with some kind of messiah complex.
Edit: They aren't even there to interpret the law, that's for the judges.
Indiana - Clinton 44 .. Trump 44
http://howeypolitics.com/
I guess they're saying that unaltered graphene conducts equally well in all directions and bacteria can be used to add wrinkles.
Seleucus and Lysimachus were in their 70s when they contested mastery of the world at Corupedium. I do wonder if Lysimachus hadn't had such a poisonous second wife whether things might have been different [she drove him against his son, Agathocles, whom he slew, the son's wife fleeing to Seleucus].
I have put a small sum on Burgon, though, to be honest, I feel it almost inconceivable a 50/1 political bet could possibly come off. It's hard to think of any such example.
That said, Patel and Greening were 51 to become Conservative leader.
http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/06/04/clueless-mike-smithson-is-betting-that-barack-obama-will-take-hillary-clinton-on-the-democratic-ticket/
OGH kept that quiet, who knew ?!?!?!?!?!?! ....
Totally outside my comfort zone!
Edit - Although isn't it a bit harsh to include Clegg? All of the others more or less got away with it.
"He WAS the droid I was looking for!"
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-37072736
Please let something replace Labour.
https://twitter.com/MSmithsonPB/status/764740001846398976
http://www.firstnews.co.uk/site_data/images/137759110_4f2138e09be88.jpg
Edited extra bit: errant question mark axed.
Islam’s real challenge to Western society is not terrorism. With a bit of resolve and common sense we can always defeat this filthy thing, and most Muslims would (in my view) be as happy as us if we did.
No, the challenge comes from Islam’s near-total monopoly on things we used to value quite a bit and then totally gave up – female modesty being one of them. And yes, I know that plenty of other things, much more controversial, come with the package.
Pictures of Egypt’s veiled and covered Doaa Elghobashy, right, competing against bikini-clad Western opponents in the Olympic beach volleyball, are very thought-provoking.
You don’t have to go more than 100 years back to find Western women who would have had much more in common – in attitudes and dress – with Ms Elghobashy than they did with her near-naked rivals.
I often wonder if our society will sicken and tire of its seemingly endless relaxation of rules. Such things have happened before. If it does, the Muslim religion may be very well-positioned to lead the counter-revolution. I don’t want this to happen. I just think it might.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-3739538/PETER-HITCHENS-Grammar-wreckers-KNEW-make-schools-worse.html
Grammar schools stood for adult authority, for discipline, for tradition, for hard work first and reward afterwards, and for self-improvement.
Old-fashioned Labour saw the point of this. They realised that it helped the poor become better-off.... Labour councils used to build new grammar schools and be proud of them.
But the modern liberal Left don’t like any of these ideas. They would rather teach children how to have sex than teach them to believe in God.
Especially they don’t think parents or teachers should have any authority over the young. The State should be trusted to tell them what to think.....
The people who smashed up more than a thousand of the best state secondary schools in the world didn’t do it to make education better. They knew it would make it worse for bright children.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-3739538/PETER-HITCHENS-Grammar-wreckers-KNEW-make-schools-worse.html
:"Denmark-based academic Ulrik Pram Gad has suggested the UK could seek inspiration from Greenland, which withdrew from the EEC in 1985 while the rest of the Kingdom of Denmark remained.”
It’s from an Irish newspaper and apparently St Nicola’s in favour of it.
I make no comment, I simply report!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australia_at_the_Olympics
They're on 22 right now = 7th
All post Sydney lack of momentum/investment?
You get a top flight education at supposedly the top university. You become a professional, a lawyer indeed. And yet you spout the biggest load of crap. How does it happen. Is it an act? Or something else?
I would prefer that to the other way around.
It's fun, but a bit weird.