politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Updated EURef polling tale and a reminder about tomorrow ni
Comments
-
Fair enough, although I would call your judgement into question.Indigo said:
Hardly, I have had no time for Cameron for years before the referendum came on the scene. My views of Cameron would make Mr Brooke's views of Osborne rank as a generous tribute.JosiasJessop said:
I'd rather listen to the views of Cameroons than the vapid rantings of so-called Conservatives who want Cameron damaged just because it might help leave in the referendum.Indigo said:
Where have the Cameroon's gone, I think we should know the party line on thisPlato_Says said:
Pathetic.
Would you have preferred Brown to win in 2010, or Miliband in 2015, over Cameron? For if the Conservatives had been led by someone like IDS or Davis, they would have lost.0 -
Two points:rcs1000 said:
If the other 55% don't turn up, you've won.HYUFD said:
YES had all the passion in indyref too, passion gets you to 45-50%, but you need to win the argument too to get to 50%+1SeanT said:
or... they just won't vote. Which is what (rightly) terrifies the REMAINIANSRobD said:
Still a large fraction of undecideds. As ever, they'll decide the outcome:SeanT said:Not sure why so many LEAVERS seem discouraged. These polls are painfully tight for the goverment and the huge 20+ poll leads for REMAIN are consigned to history.
LEAVE are just a couple of migration crises and well-timed terrorist outrages from an improbable victory.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:UK_EU_referendum_polling.svg
The LEAVERS have all the passion. I have met lots of passionate LEAVERS in the last few weeks, and not one single passionate REMAINER.
All you get on the europhile side is a begrudging "oh, yes, I'll probably vote IN, under protest".
I still think REMAiN will win, but I'm seeing headlines like "REMAIN has that in the bag" which is total bollocks. Cameron is clearly a worried man, and is right to be so.
The Remain vote is very soft.
(Interestingly, I think that if it was presented as EFTA/EEA vs EU, it would be won at a canter by Leave. The current mixed messages, and the fact that a lot of EFTA/EEA supporters are EFTA/EEA > EU > Completely Out means that many will vote Remain despite preferring another arrangement. Indeed, I fear Remain will win, because EFTA/EEA is not explicitly on the table.)
(1) Leave would need to big up the EEA emergency break for the immigration worried crowd
(2) Leave would need to square the EFTA members on the record first because I think Remain have statements ready to roll out that both the EU/EEA/EFTA would all go tell us to go and fuck ourselves if that became the public campaign position (although totally untrue)0 -
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/04/07/donald-trump-just-did-something-very-smart
Donald Trump is not a dumb man. He didn't get to where he is -- in this presidential race and in life generally -- by not grasping when things are slipping away from him and making the necessary changes to correct the problem.
That's exactly what Trump did Thursday afternoon when he announced that Paul Manafort, an old political hand not previously affiliated with the real estate mogul's campaign, would serve as "convention manager" -- a position from which he "will oversee, manage, and be responsible for all activities that pertain to Mr. Trump’s delegate process and the Cleveland Convention."
No, you are not the only one thinking that such a job description makes it sound a lot like Manafort is being put in charge of Trump's entire operation. The reason you think that is because that's what is happening.0 -
I actually know a few people who think a narrow Remain is the best for the countryHYUFD said:
My ideal result would be Remain by 0.01%!Casino_Royale said:
To be honest, even Richard Nabavi, JohnO and TSE think this. Hell, even Alastair Meeks wasn't thrilled about coming off the fence for Remain.SeanT said:
or... they just won't vote. Which is what (rightly) terrifies the REMAINIANSRobD said:
Still a large fraction of undecideds. As ever, they'll decide the outcome:SeanT said:Not sure why so many LEAVERS seem discouraged. These polls are painfully tight for the goverment and the huge 20+ poll leads for REMAIN are consigned to history.
LEAVE are just a couple of migration crises and well-timed terrorist outrages from an improbable victory.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:UK_EU_referendum_polling.svg
The LEAVERS have all the passion. I have met lots of passionate LEAVERS in the last few weeks, and not one single passionate REMAINER.
All you get on the europhile side is a begrudging "oh, yes, I'll probably vote IN, under protest".
I still think REMAiN will win, but I'm seeing headlines like "REMAIN has that in the bag" which is total bollocks. Cameron is clearly a worried man, and is right to be so.
There are solid pro-EU'ers around (like Wodger and Steven Whately) but they are a small, small minority.
If most Brits felt there was a pain-free way out, they'd jump at it.0 -
Remain must hope that the Petition Map is not positively related to Referendum Turnout - if it is, then Leave will win by at least 10 lengths.0
-
Not surprising to me.Speedy said:
There are some surprises, look at Wigan which is an ultra safe Labour seat and look at Bolton West which is an ultra Tory marginal, they have the same number of petitioners.RoyalBlue said:
I expect turnout in the Valleys will be extremely low.Casino_Royale said:
Based on that map, it doesn't look like Leave will win Wales.MonikerDiCanio said:
The pitchforks are coming for Dave.MarqueeMark said:
The Tory shires are pissed!AndyJS said:Looks like the petition will easily reach 100,000 tonight.
http://petitionmap.unboxedconsulting.com/?petition=116762
Conversely the Shire and Home Counties look better.
It looks like Leave should be trying for 100% turnout in Lincolnshire!
Andy Burnham's seat seems to be the most euroskeptic seat in Greater Manchester0 -
Rather predictably....
John Mann, a backbench Labour MP on the Treasury committee, said Mr Cameron should resign. He said: 'He covered-up and misled. How he got his shares is irrelevant. He has no choice but to resign.'0 -
On 2, I think that if we said "Can we join your club while we decide what we want?", then yes they probably would tell us where to go.Casino_Royale said:
Two points:rcs1000 said:
If the other 55% don't turn up, you've won.HYUFD said:
YES had all the passion in indyref too, passion gets you to 45-50%, but you need to win the argument too to get to 50%+1SeanT said:
or... they just won't vote. Which is what (rightly) terrifies the REMAINIANSRobD said:
Still a large fraction of undecideds. As ever, they'll decide the outcome:SeanT said:Not sure why so many LEAVERS seem discouraged. These polls are painfully tight for the goverment and the huge 20+ poll leads for REMAIN are consigned to history.
LEAVE are just a couple of migration crises and well-timed terrorist outrages from an improbable victory.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:UK_EU_referendum_polling.svg
The LEAVERS have all the passion. I have met lots of passionate LEAVERS in the last few weeks, and not one single passionate REMAINER.
All you get on the europhile side is a begrudging "oh, yes, I'll probably vote IN, under protest".
I still think REMAiN will win, but I'm seeing headlines like "REMAIN has that in the bag" which is total bollocks. Cameron is clearly a worried man, and is right to be so.
The Remain vote is very soft.
(Interestingly, I think that if it was presented as EFTA/EEA vs EU, it would be won at a canter by Leave. The current mixed messages, and the fact that a lot of EFTA/EEA supporters are EFTA/EEA > EU > Completely Out means that many will vote Remain despite preferring another arrangement. Indeed, I fear Remain will win, because EFTA/EEA is not explicitly on the table.)
(1) Leave would need to big up the EEA emergency break for the immigration worried crowd
(2) Leave would need to square the EFTA members on the record first because I think Remain have statements ready to roll out that both the EU/EEA/EFTA would all go tell us to go and fuck ourselves if that became the public campaign position (although totally untrue)
Which is why we need to properly commit to it.0 -
No choice?FrancisUrquhart said:Rather predictably....
John Mann, a backbench Labour MP on the Treasury committee, said Mr Cameron should resign. He said: 'He covered-up and misled. How he got his shares is irrelevant. He has no choice but to resign.'0 -
Slip on moccasins with tassels, the ultimate in tacky footwearLuckyguy1983 said:
I've never had monogrammed slippers (or a palace or a wife), but I think when a version of something appears in H&M it loses its cache.SeanT said:
No. The only acceptable slip-on is a velvet loafing slipper, for decadent evenings at home, with one's mistress. Never when out-and-about.Theuniondivvie said:
Not necessarily, Chuck has been known to wear the odd pair of slip ons.SeanT said:
THOSE are not the shoes of a gentleman.Speedy said:Panama Scandal ALERT:
https://twitter.com/VinnyITV/status/7181. 29146119995392
A bad day for Cameron gets worse.
An Englishman ALWAYS laces.
But those loafers do look a bit M&S-y.
This is OK if you are in your palace and about to boff a comely wifelet
http://www.shipton.com/media/catalog/product/cache/2/image/9df78eab33525d08d6e5fb8d27136e95/s/-/s-eagle2head-side-600_1_1.jpg
This is just naff:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2187719/Dave-Nick-start-wrong-foot-Cleggs-sandals-Camerons-office-shoes.html
He's just really bad at SHOES.0 -
The big difference is that in 1975 YES was an effective crossparty campaign. REMAIN is just Cameron and his cronies.CD13 said:It's beginning to feel like 1975 with a few differences.
Like then, there's not even a pretence of a level playing field. Even then I, as a Europhilic youth (oh, alright, 25 then) thought the referendum hugely biased in our favour.
But this time the sides are much more even to begin with.
Then it was Establishment and almost everyone vs a few Loons like Tony Benn.
Now it's the Establishment, the Political Union supporters and the Naïve vs the Experienced, the Cynical and a sprinkling of Loons.
And Cameron, the poster boy for Remain, is taking a beating of his own making.0 -
With Scotland voting Remain by a modest margin - just enough to give us a fully fledged constitutional crisis. England votes to leave the EU. What are you going to do, Prime Minister?HYUFD said:
My ideal result would be Remain by 0.01%!Casino_Royale said:
To be honest, even Richard Nabavi, JohnO and TSE think this. Hell, even Alastair Meeks wasn't thrilled about coming off the fence for Remain.SeanT said:
or... they just won't vote. Which is what (rightly) terrifies the REMAINIANSRobD said:
Still a large fraction of undecideds. As ever, they'll decide the outcome:SeanT said:Not sure why so many LEAVERS seem discouraged. These polls are painfully tight for the goverment and the huge 20+ poll leads for REMAIN are consigned to history.
LEAVE are just a couple of migration crises and well-timed terrorist outrages from an improbable victory.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:UK_EU_referendum_polling.svg
The LEAVERS have all the passion. I have met lots of passionate LEAVERS in the last few weeks, and not one single passionate REMAINER.
All you get on the europhile side is a begrudging "oh, yes, I'll probably vote IN, under protest".
I still think REMAiN will win, but I'm seeing headlines like "REMAIN has that in the bag" which is total bollocks. Cameron is clearly a worried man, and is right to be so.
There are solid pro-EU'ers around (like Wodger and Steven Whately) but they are a small, small minority.
If most Brits felt there was a pain-free way out, they'd jump at it.0 -
I am shocked, shocked that he was not calling on Jeremy Corbyn to resign.FrancisUrquhart said:Rather predictably....
John Mann, a backbench Labour MP on the Treasury committee, said Mr Cameron should resign. He said: 'He covered-up and misled. How he got his shares is irrelevant. He has no choice but to resign.'0 -
NO never went bellow 41 for years in the polls it's support was hard and high, here we have Remain regularly scoring bellow that number and in a long term decline.HYUFD said:
YES had all the passion in indyref too, passion gets you to 45-50%, but you need to win the argument too to get to 50%+1SeanT said:
or... they just won't vote. Which is what (rightly) terrifies the REMAINIANSRobD said:
Still a large fraction of undecideds. As ever, they'll decide the outcome:SeanT said:Not sure why so many LEAVERS seem discouraged. These polls are painfully tight for the goverment and the huge 20+ poll leads for REMAIN are consigned to history.
LEAVE are just a couple of migration crises and well-timed terrorist outrages from an improbable victory.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:UK_EU_referendum_polling.svg
The LEAVERS have all the passion. I have met lots of passionate LEAVERS in the last few weeks, and not one single passionate REMAINER.
All you get on the europhile side is a begrudging "oh, yes, I'll probably vote IN, under protest".
I still think REMAiN will win, but I'm seeing headlines like "REMAIN has that in the bag" which is total bollocks. Cameron is clearly a worried man, and is right to be so.
It doesn't tell us something that we don't know, Remain is soft and Leave is a rock and both a tad lower than NO during the scottish ref. campaign.0 -
Is the quote function playing up? Can't use it at present0
-
Imagine if Cameron had just said this to begin with...
I did own stocks and shares in the past - quite naturally because my father was a stockbroker. Myself and my wife bought shares in April 1997 for £12,497 and sold it in January 2010 for £31,500. I sold them all in 2010, because if I was going to become Prime Minister I didn't want anyone to say you have other agendas, vested interests. I properly paid income tax on the dividends. I now own no shares in any companies, I own a house and my only income is my salary, rent on the home I let out and some interest on my savings.
The press would have gone nuts for one day and I think that would of been it.0 -
At least he's helped me make up my mind: I now believe Cameron has done nothing wrong.FrancisUrquhart said:Rather predictably....
John Mann, a backbench Labour MP on the Treasury committee, said Mr Cameron should resign. He said: 'He covered-up and misled. How he got his shares is irrelevant. He has no choice but to resign.'
(Re Panama)0 -
Indeed.rcs1000 said:
On 2, I think that if we said "Can we join your club while we decide what we want?", then yes they probably would tell us where to go.Casino_Royale said:
Two points:rcs1000 said:
If the other 55% don't turn up, you've won.HYUFD said:
YES had all the passion in indyref too, passion gets you to 45-50%, but you need to win the argument too to get to 50%+1SeanT said:
or... they just won't vote. Which is what (rightly) terrifies the REMAINIANSRobD said:
Still a large fraction of undecideds. As ever, they'll decide the outcome:SeanT said:Not sure why so many LEAVERS seem discouraged. These polls are painfully tight for the goverment and the huge 20+ poll leads for REMAIN are consigned to history.
LEAVE are just a couple of migration crises and well-timed terrorist outrages from an improbable victory.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:UK_EU_referendum_polling.svg
The LEAVERS have all the passion. I have met lots of passionate LEAVERS in the last few weeks, and not one single passionate REMAINER.
All you get on the europhile side is a begrudging "oh, yes, I'll probably vote IN, under protest".
I still think REMAiN will win, but I'm seeing headlines like "REMAIN has that in the bag" which is total bollocks. Cameron is clearly a worried man, and is right to be so.
The Remain vote is very soft.
(Interestingly, I think that if it was presented as EFTA/EEA vs EU, it would be won at a canter by Leave. The current mixed messages, and the fact that a lot of EFTA/EEA supporters are EFTA/EEA > EU > Completely Out means that many will vote Remain despite preferring another arrangement. Indeed, I fear Remain will win, because EFTA/EEA is not explicitly on the table.)
(1) Leave would need to big up the EEA emergency break for the immigration worried crowd
(2) Leave would need to square the EFTA members on the record first because I think Remain have statements ready to roll out that both the EU/EEA/EFTA would all go tell us to go and fuck ourselves if that became the public campaign position (although totally untrue)
Which is why we need to properly commit to it.
And it's probably too near the referendum to get such assurances now. Leave should have been doing this groundwork in the last few years. Their failure to do so and their general unpreparedness makes it look as though they didn't believe Cameron would give them a referendum.0 -
I think labour need to be careful over David Cameron's current problems as his resignation would deal a serious blow to remain. Also perversely his colleagues in leave may be happy to see his resignation. Dangerous times for DC but also for remain0
-
My mother can't get broadband. She lives 3 miles South of Consett. Distance from the exchange is the most important factor.Philip_Thompson said:
Is that seriously true today in 2016 and with the era of everyone and their child having a smartphone?AndyJS said:
Poor areas are less likely to have broadband access.OldKingCole said:
Why?AndyJS said:
Internet access is probably way below average there.Plato_Says said:The petition vote in Port Talbot seat is pretty puny
AndyJS said:
And Wales is probably more likely to vote Leave as a result of the steel crisis.SeanT said:Not sure why so many LEAVERS seem discouraged. These polls are painfully tight for the goverment and the huge 20+ poll leads for REMAIN are consigned to history.
LEAVE are just a couple of migration crises and well-timed terrorist outrages from an improbable victory.
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/04/05/port-talbot-town-despair-determined-leave-eu/0 -
What gets me if the futility of the entire exercise. With the eurozone federalising, and the UK determined not to join the Euro, its only a matter of time, maybe 5-10 years, maybe not even that long, before the differences are too large to paper over, and we will have no choice but to leave. Everything that is true about leaving now will be true then, only more so, it will be a bigger shock, be more economically risky, and we will have more points of contact to unpick and replace. So what do we gain by putting off the evil hour. Its not good for the country, its not good for the EU, the only thing that gets any benefit from it is (briefly) Cameron's place in the history books. Is this what we have come to ?rcs1000 said:I actually know a few people who think a narrow Remain is the best for the country
This all presupposes the other two elephants squeezing into this very small room, namely migration (and especially migration mandated by the EU) and terrorism don't force our hand earlier. I have often wondered how many acts of terrorism it would take within a short timescale, maybe a couple of months, before freedom of movement is completely politically untenable, I think maybe three. How many sleepers were supposed to be being infiltrated into the EU again ?
0 -
As far as I can tell, "London Has Fallen" is a sequel to "Olympus Has Fallen". Is it worthwhile watching LHF without having already seen OHF?0
-
The press would have gone nuts for one day and I think that would of been it.FrancisUrquhart said:Imagine if Cameron had just said this to begin with...
I did own stocks and shares in the past - quite naturally because my father was a stockbroker. Myself and my wife bought shares in April 1997 for £12,497 and sold it in January 2010 for £31,500. I sold them all in 2010, because if I was going to become Prime Minister I didn't want anyone to say you have other agendas, vested interests. I properly paid income tax on the dividends. I now own no shares in any companies, I own a house and my only income is my salary, rent on the home I let out and some interest on my savings.
John Mann seemed to accuse David Cameron of failure to declare his shares at the GE in 2010 but he had sold them in January before the May election so I do not understand his point0 -
Mr S junior,
"At least he's helped me make up my mind: I now believe Cameron has done nothing wrong."
He's handled it clumsily. He's a toff and toffs will have some good schemes going. Had he come straight out and said ... "My dad set us up with a few things, that's what dads do." He'd have been fine.
Labour would whinge because that's what they do, and there'll be enough of them at the trough to make them look like hypocrites.
But as usual, he's ashamed of his toffness and made it look worse.0 -
Would soothe Scottish nationalism, why worry about independence when you can dictate the future of the whole United Kingdom but would put a rocket boost under English nationalism. Certainly would boost calls for an English ParliamentMarqueeMark said:
With Scotland voting Remain by a modest margin - just enough to give us a fully fledged constitutional crisis. England votes to leave the EU. What are you going to do, Prime Minister?HYUFD said:
My ideal result would be Remain by 0.01%!Casino_Royale said:
To be honest, even Richard Nabavi, JohnO and TSE think this. Hell, even Alastair Meeks wasn't thrilled about coming off the fence for Remain.SeanT said:
or... they just won't vote. Which is what (rightly) terrifies the REMAINIANSRobD said:
Still a large fraction of undecideds. As ever, they'll decide the outcome:SeanT said:Not sure why so many LEAVERS seem discouraged. These polls are painfully tight for the goverment and the huge 20+ poll leads for REMAIN are consigned to history.
LEAVE are just a couple of migration crises and well-timed terrorist outrages from an improbable victory.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:UK_EU_referendum_polling.svg
The LEAVERS have all the passion. I have met lots of passionate LEAVERS in the last few weeks, and not one single passionate REMAINER.
All you get on the europhile side is a begrudging "oh, yes, I'll probably vote IN, under protest".
I still think REMAiN will win, but I'm seeing headlines like "REMAIN has that in the bag" which is total bollocks. Cameron is clearly a worried man, and is right to be so.
There are solid pro-EU'ers around (like Wodger and Steven Whately) but they are a small, small minority.
If most Brits felt there was a pain-free way out, they'd jump at it.0 -
John Mann often engages mouth before brain....Big_G_NorthWales said:
The press would have gone nuts for one day and I think that would of been it.FrancisUrquhart said:Imagine if Cameron had just said this to begin with...
I did own stocks and shares in the past - quite naturally because my father was a stockbroker. Myself and my wife bought shares in April 1997 for £12,497 and sold it in January 2010 for £31,500. I sold them all in 2010, because if I was going to become Prime Minister I didn't want anyone to say you have other agendas, vested interests. I properly paid income tax on the dividends. I now own no shares in any companies, I own a house and my only income is my salary, rent on the home I let out and some interest on my savings.
John Mann seemed to accuse David Cameron of failure to declare his shares at the GE in 2010 but he had sold them in January before the May election so I do not understand his point0 -
Precisely, it wasn't a lottery win sized investment to worry about.FrancisUrquhart said:
Imagine if Cameron had just said this to begin with...
I did own stocks and shares in the past - quite naturally because my father was a stockbroker. Myself and my wife bought shares in April 1997 for £12,497 and sold it in January 2010 for £31,500. I sold them all in 2010, because if I was going to become Prime Minister I didn't want anyone to say you have other agendas, vested interests. I properly paid income tax on the dividends. I now own no shares in any companies, I own a house and my only income is my salary, rent on the home I let out and some interest on my savings.
The press would have gone nuts for one day and I think that would of been it.0 -
He is still the ace in the Remain campCasino_Royale said:
I haven't disputed Remain will win this because of Cameron.HYUFD said:
Who won that Tory victory? Who leads Remain?Casino_Royale said:
True, but in the interests of fairness I could Remind you of how you poo-poo'ed those who predicted a narrow Tory victory, including me and JackW.MikeSmithson said:
Remind us Mike. How many MPs was UKIP going to get at the last general election? I recall you predicting 50+MikeK said:
I believe that turnout will be closer to 47%-50% and that the vast majority of stay-at-homes will be Remain supporters. Hence Leavers will win.Speedy said:
No way turnout is higher than in the GE.HYUFD said:
I am sticking to 52 Remain 48 Leave and turnout 65 to 70%Speedy said:
That we are now arguing about turnout, as it's the Remain campaign's biggest concern, is telling that we both feel this is 50/50 at this point.HYUFD said:
Glastonbury does not really start until the Friday, polling day is Thursday. It is also the same time as the European Football Championships which may distract the Leave inclined working classSpeedy said:As to the point why Cameron trying to convince students to vote Remain is a bit like Corbyn trying to convince the elderly to vote Remain:
https://twitter.com/MichaelPDeacon/status/718033421562417152
https://twitter.com/MichaelPDeacon/status/718034606151352320
Turnout will be the same as a highly publicized contested by-election, around 50%.0 -
It would have been dropped, willingly or otherwise, if there was a coalition, which for most people was the most likely result.JosiasJessop said:
Indeed.rcs1000 said:
On 2, I think that if we said "Can we join your club while we decide what we want?", then yes they probably would tell us where to go.Casino_Royale said:
Two points:rcs1000 said:
If the other 55% don't turn up, you've won.HYUFD said:
YES had all the passion in indyref too, passion gets you to 45-50%, but you need to win the argument too to get to 50%+1SeanT said:
or... they just won't vote. Which is what (rightly) terrifies the REMAINIANSRobD said:
Still a large fraction of undecideds. As ever, they'll decide the outcome:SeanT said:Not sure why so many LEAVERS seem discouraged. These polls are painfully tight for the goverment and the huge 20+ poll leads for REMAIN are consigned to history.
LEAVE are just a couple of migration crises and well-timed terrorist outrages from an improbable victory.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:UK_EU_referendum_polling.svg
The LEAVERS have all the passion. I have met lots of passionate LEAVERS in the last few weeks, and not one single passionate REMAINER.
All you get on the europhile side is a begrudging "oh, yes, I'll probably vote IN, under protest".
I still think REMAiN will win, but I'm seeing headlines like "REMAIN has that in the bag" which is total bollocks. Cameron is clearly a worried man, and is right to be so.
The Remain vote is very soft.
(Interestingly, I think that if it was presented as EFTA/EEA vs EU, it would be won at a canter by Leave. The current mixed messages, and the fact that a lot of EFTA/EEA supporters are EFTA/EEA > EU > Completely Out means that many will vote Remain despite preferring another arrangement. Indeed, I fear Remain will win, because EFTA/EEA is not explicitly on the table.)
(1) Leave would need to big up the EEA emergency break for the immigration worried crowd
(2) Leave would need to square the EFTA members on the record first because I think Remain have statements ready to roll out that both the EU/EEA/EFTA would all go tell us to go and fuck ourselves if that became the public campaign position (although totally untrue)
Which is why we need to properly commit to it.
And it's probably too near the referendum to get such assurances now. Leave should have been doing this groundwork in the last few years. Their failure to do so and their general unpreparedness makes it look as though they didn't believe Cameron would give them a referendum.0 -
Maybe he was embarrassed to admit just how little money he had invested....I am sure Osborne is in regards to his shareholding in the family firm which is worth hardly anything. He would have saved himself a lot of bother if he had just surrendered them in 2010 like Dave.CD13 said:Mr S junior,
"At least he's helped me make up my mind: I now believe Cameron has done nothing wrong."
He's handled it clumsily. He's a toff and toffs will have some good schemes going. Had he come straight out and said ... "My dad set us up with a few things, that's what dads do." He'd have been fine.
Labour would whinge because that's what they do, and there'll be enough of them at the trough to make them look like hypocrites.
But as usual, he's ashamed of his toffness and made it look worse.0 -
Had No won just 41% Yes would have won a big victory so I don't see the point? In the end No won by 10%Speedy said:
NO never went bellow 41 for years in the polls it's support was hard and high, here we have Remain regularly scoring bellow that number and in a long term decline.HYUFD said:
YES had all the passion in indyref too, passion gets you to 45-50%, but you need to win the argument too to get to 50%+1SeanT said:
or... they just won't vote. Which is what (rightly) terrifies the REMAINIANSRobD said:
Still a large fraction of undecideds. As ever, they'll decide the outcome:SeanT said:Not sure why so many LEAVERS seem discouraged. These polls are painfully tight for the goverment and the huge 20+ poll leads for REMAIN are consigned to history.
LEAVE are just a couple of migration crises and well-timed terrorist outrages from an improbable victory.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:UK_EU_referendum_polling.svg
The LEAVERS have all the passion. I have met lots of passionate LEAVERS in the last few weeks, and not one single passionate REMAINER.
All you get on the europhile side is a begrudging "oh, yes, I'll probably vote IN, under protest".
I still think REMAiN will win, but I'm seeing headlines like "REMAIN has that in the bag" which is total bollocks. Cameron is clearly a worried man, and is right to be so.
It doesn't tell us something that we don't know, Remain is soft and Leave is a rock and both a tad lower than NO during the scottish ref. campaign.
0 -
Regularly?Speedy said:
NO never went bellow 41 for years in the polls it's support was hard and high, here we have Remain regularly scoring bellow that number and in a long term decline.HYUFD said:
YES had all the passion in indyref too, passion gets you to 45-50%, but you need to win the argument too to get to 50%+1SeanT said:
or... they just won't vote. Which is what (rightly) terrifies the REMAINIANSRobD said:
Still a large fraction of undecideds. As ever, they'll decide the outcome:SeanT said:Not sure why so many LEAVERS seem discouraged. These polls are painfully tight for the goverment and the huge 20+ poll leads for REMAIN are consigned to history.
LEAVE are just a couple of migration crises and well-timed terrorist outrages from an improbable victory.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:UK_EU_referendum_polling.svg
The LEAVERS have all the passion. I have met lots of passionate LEAVERS in the last few weeks, and not one single passionate REMAINER.
All you get on the europhile side is a begrudging "oh, yes, I'll probably vote IN, under protest".
I still think REMAiN will win, but I'm seeing headlines like "REMAIN has that in the bag" which is total bollocks. Cameron is clearly a worried man, and is right to be so.
It doesn't tell us something that we don't know, Remain is soft and Leave is a rock and both a tad lower than NO during the scottish ref. campaign.
You mean twice0 -
Yes, in Europe but a clear statement the voters will not accept further integration by the UKrcs1000 said:
I actually know a few people who think a narrow Remain is the best for the countryHYUFD said:
My ideal result would be Remain by 0.01%!Casino_Royale said:
To be honest, even Richard Nabavi, JohnO and TSE think this. Hell, even Alastair Meeks wasn't thrilled about coming off the fence for Remain.SeanT said:
or... they just won't vote. Which is what (rightly) terrifies the REMAINIANSRobD said:
Still a large fraction of undecideds. As ever, they'll decide the outcome:SeanT said:Not sure why so many LEAVERS seem discouraged. These polls are painfully tight for the goverment and the huge 20+ poll leads for REMAIN are consigned to history.
LEAVE are just a couple of migration crises and well-timed terrorist outrages from an improbable victory.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:UK_EU_referendum_polling.svg
The LEAVERS have all the passion. I have met lots of passionate LEAVERS in the last few weeks, and not one single passionate REMAINER.
All you get on the europhile side is a begrudging "oh, yes, I'll probably vote IN, under protest".
I still think REMAiN will win, but I'm seeing headlines like "REMAIN has that in the bag" which is total bollocks. Cameron is clearly a worried man, and is right to be so.
There are solid pro-EU'ers around (like Wodger and Steven Whately) but they are a small, small minority.
If most Brits felt there was a pain-free way out, they'd jump at it.0 -
Still no reason to drop the ball and not press forward with what you can.Indigo said:
It would have been dropped, willingly or otherwise, if there was a coalition, which for most people was the most likely result.JosiasJessop said:
Indeed.rcs1000 said:On 2, I think that if we said "Can we join your club while we decide what we want?", then yes they probably would tell us where to go.
Which is why we need to properly commit to it.
And it's probably too near the referendum to get such assurances now. Leave should have been doing this groundwork in the last few years. Their failure to do so and their general unpreparedness makes it look as though they didn't believe Cameron would give them a referendum.0 -
I think Mann has confused himself is his zeal to be the man putting the boot in. The key questions are has Cameron correctly paid the tax for it, which we will know when he publishes his tax returns as promised, and did he declare it as an interest, since he has been an MP since 2001 and was Leader of HMO since 2005.Big_G_NorthWales said:
John Mann seemed to accuse David Cameron of failure to declare his shares at the GE in 2010 but he had sold them in January before the May election so I do not understand his point0 -
There was a little bit of passion amongst the elderly, there is a little bit of passion amongst some of the young for the EU but in both referendums it is Yes/No respectively who have the most fired up supportersPhilip_Thompson said:
Yes did not have all the passion in IndyRef though they may have appeared to by drowning out others. There are many (especially the elderly) who are passionate about the country, my grandfather (English but his ancestry is Scottish) who grew up in WWII and served in the RAF afterwards almost had tears in his eyes asking why anyone was trying to break up his country when I discussed it with him. A whole generation whether Scottish or English fought for this country and believe in it even if younger generations who are out on the streets may be more vocal.HYUFD said:
YES had all the passion in indyref too, passion gets you to 45-50%, but you need to win the argument too to get to 50%+1SeanT said:
or... they just won't vote. Which is what (rightly) terrifies the REMAINIANSRobD said:
Still a large fraction of undecideds. As ever, they'll decide the outcome:SeanT said:Not sure why so many LEAVERS seem discouraged. These polls are painfully tight for the goverment and the huge 20+ poll leads for REMAIN are consigned to history.
LEAVE are just a couple of migration crises and well-timed terrorist outrages from an improbable victory.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:UK_EU_referendum_polling.svg
The LEAVERS have all the passion. I have met lots of passionate LEAVERS in the last few weeks, and not one single passionate REMAINER.
All you get on the europhile side is a begrudging "oh, yes, I'll probably vote IN, under protest".
I still think REMAiN will win, but I'm seeing headlines like "REMAIN has that in the bag" which is total bollocks. Cameron is clearly a worried man, and is right to be so.
I doubt anyone has the passion for the EU that my grandfather and so may of his generation has for the UK.0 -
A narrow Remain result would almost certainly mean a Leave win in England. Maybe a statement of the obvious but important nonetheless.HYUFD said:
My ideal result would be Remain by 0.01%!Casino_Royale said:
To be honest, even Richard Nabavi, JohnO and TSE think this. Hell, even Alastair Meeks wasn't thrilled about coming off the fence for Remain.SeanT said:
or... they just won't vote. Which is what (rightly) terrifies the REMAINIANSRobD said:
Still a large fraction of undecideds. As ever, they'll decide the outcome:SeanT said:Not sure why so many LEAVERS seem discouraged. These polls are painfully tight for the goverment and the huge 20+ poll leads for REMAIN are consigned to history.
LEAVE are just a couple of migration crises and well-timed terrorist outrages from an improbable victory.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:UK_EU_referendum_polling.svg
The LEAVERS have all the passion. I have met lots of passionate LEAVERS in the last few weeks, and not one single passionate REMAINER.
All you get on the europhile side is a begrudging "oh, yes, I'll probably vote IN, under protest".
I still think REMAiN will win, but I'm seeing headlines like "REMAIN has that in the bag" which is total bollocks. Cameron is clearly a worried man, and is right to be so.
There are solid pro-EU'ers around (like Wodger and Steven Whately) but they are a small, small minority.
If most Brits felt there was a pain-free way out, they'd jump at it.0 -
Post crash the Tories may still have been largest partyJosiasJessop said:
Fair enough, although I would call your judgement into question.Indigo said:
Hardly, I have had no time for Cameron for years before the referendum came on the scene. My views of Cameron would make Mr Brooke's views of Osborne rank as a generous tribute.JosiasJessop said:
I'd rather listen to the views of Cameroons than the vapid rantings of so-called Conservatives who want Cameron damaged just because it might help leave in the referendum.Indigo said:
Where have the Cameroon's gone, I think we should know the party line on thisPlato_Says said:
Pathetic.
Would you have preferred Brown to win in 2010, or Miliband in 2015, over Cameron? For if the Conservatives had been led by someone like IDS or Davis, they would have lost.0 -
Haven't seen LHF, but I rather guiltily enjoyed Olympus has Fallen enough to watch it twice on my PVR. it was better than the other, similar film that was out at the same time; White House Down.JohnLoony said:As far as I can tell, "London Has Fallen" is a sequel to "Olympus Has Fallen". Is it worthwhile watching LHF without having already seen OHF?
But the reviews of LHF were dire, and the special effects on the trailer laughable. I doubt you'd need much to watch LHF aside from a frontal lobotomy.0 -
Trying to extrapolate the Referendum results and the turnout from the petition is tricky.LewisDuckworth said:Remain must hope that the Petition Map is not positively related to Referendum Turnout - if it is, then Leave will win by at least 10 lengths.
First of all where do you draw the line, at 150 signatures? 175? 200?
Well if you use the ORB online poll which has a sample large enough to draw conclusions, from the regions with more than 200 respondents, there are complications for the comparison.
They do show Leave with a 20 point lead in the East, which is comparable with the petition map and they do show Remain with a 4 point lead in the N.W, however they have Remain with a 1 point lead in the S.E. excluding London which is definitely incompatible with the petition results.
And they have London with a 12 point Remain lead which would set the bar pretty low for the petition map.
I guess that the bar is around 160 signatures per seat for it to be at the Leave camp.0 -
Antoine Fuqua kept well away from directing the sequel....JosiasJessop said:
Haven't seen LHF, but I rather guiltily enjoyed Olympus has Fallen enough to watch it twice on my PVR. it was better than the other, similar film that was out at the same time; White House Down.JohnLoony said:As far as I can tell, "London Has Fallen" is a sequel to "Olympus Has Fallen". Is it worthwhile watching LHF without having already seen OHF?
But the reviews of LHF were dire, and the special effects on the trailer laughable. I doubt you'd need much to watch LHF aside from a frontal lobotomy.0 -
I doubt it. The Conservatives badly needed a new direction, which Cameron provided. Although I think that Labour's infighting rather than the crash was Labour's biggest vote loser in 2010.HYUFD said:
Post crash the Tories may still have been largest partyJosiasJessop said:
Fair enough, although I would call your judgement into question.Indigo said:
Hardly, I have had no time for Cameron for years before the referendum came on the scene. My views of Cameron would make Mr Brooke's views of Osborne rank as a generous tribute.JosiasJessop said:
I'd rather listen to the views of Cameroons than the vapid rantings of so-called Conservatives who want Cameron damaged just because it might help leave in the referendum.Indigo said:
Where have the Cameroon's gone, I think we should know the party line on thisPlato_Says said:
Pathetic.
Would you have preferred Brown to win in 2010, or Miliband in 2015, over Cameron? For if the Conservatives had been led by someone like IDS or Davis, they would have lost.0 -
https://www.instagram.com/p/BD6SKImGhQt/ "New York values"0
-
Dealer boots, monk shoes?SeanT said:
No. The only acceptable slip-on is a velvet loafing slipper, for decadent evenings at home, with one's mistress. Never when out-and-about.Theuniondivvie said:
Not necessarily, Chuck has been known to wear the odd pair of slip ons.SeanT said:
THOSE are not the shoes of a gentleman.Speedy said:Panama Scandal ALERT:
https://twitter.com/VinnyITV/status/718129146119995392
A bad day for Cameron gets worse.
An Englishman ALWAYS laces.
But those loafers do look a bit M&S-y.
This is OK if you are in your palace and about to boff a comely wifelet
http://www.shipton.com/media/catalog/product/cache/2/image/9df78eab33525d08d6e5fb8d27136e95/s/-/s-eagle2head-side-600_1_1.jpg
This is just naff:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2187719/Dave-Nick-start-wrong-foot-Cleggs-sandals-Camerons-office-shoes.html
He's just really bad at SHOES.
The trouble with most lace ups is that they look crap with jeans. If you're going to wear your shiny black Oxfords with jeans you might as well go the whole hog - buy a rugby shirt and call yourself Tim.
0 -
Just in the above Table of the thread I count 7 times bellow 41% for Remain.rcs1000 said:
Regularly?Speedy said:
NO never went bellow 41 for years in the polls it's support was hard and high, here we have Remain regularly scoring bellow that number and in a long term decline.HYUFD said:
YES had all the passion in indyref too, passion gets you to 45-50%, but you need to win the argument too to get to 50%+1SeanT said:
or... they just won't vote. Which is what (rightly) terrifies the REMAINIANSRobD said:
Still a large fraction of undecideds. As ever, they'll decide the outcome:SeanT said:Not sure why so many LEAVERS seem discouraged. These polls are painfully tight for the goverment and the huge 20+ poll leads for REMAIN are consigned to history.
LEAVE are just a couple of migration crises and well-timed terrorist outrages from an improbable victory.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:UK_EU_referendum_polling.svg
The LEAVERS have all the passion. I have met lots of passionate LEAVERS in the last few weeks, and not one single passionate REMAINER.
All you get on the europhile side is a begrudging "oh, yes, I'll probably vote IN, under protest".
I still think REMAiN will win, but I'm seeing headlines like "REMAIN has that in the bag" which is total bollocks. Cameron is clearly a worried man, and is right to be so.
It doesn't tell us something that we don't know, Remain is soft and Leave is a rock and both a tad lower than NO during the scottish ref. campaign.
You mean twice0 -
God knows what you lot would make of my dress sense (or lack thereof).Theuniondivvie said:
Dealer boots, monk shoes?SeanT said:
No. The only acceptable slip-on is a velvet loafing slipper, for decadent evenings at home, with one's mistress. Never when out-and-about.Theuniondivvie said:
Not necessarily, Chuck has been known to wear the odd pair of slip ons.SeanT said:
THOSE are not the shoes of a gentleman.Speedy said:Panama Scandal ALERT:
https://twitter.com/VinnyITV/status/718129146119995392
A bad day for Cameron gets worse.
An Englishman ALWAYS laces.
But those loafers do look a bit M&S-y.
This is OK if you are in your palace and about to boff a comely wifelet
http://www.shipton.com/media/catalog/product/cache/2/image/9df78eab33525d08d6e5fb8d27136e95/s/-/s-eagle2head-side-600_1_1.jpg
This is just naff:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2187719/Dave-Nick-start-wrong-foot-Cleggs-sandals-Camerons-office-shoes.html
He's just really bad at SHOES.
The trouble with most lace ups is that they look crap with jeans. If you're going to wear your shiny black Oxfords with jeans you might as well go the whole hog - buy a rugby shirt and call yourself Tim.0 -
I think it equally certain that in the event of Leave that within 10 years there would be a strong movement to rejoinn the EU.Indigo said:
What gets me if the futility of the entire exercise. With the eurozone federalising, and the UK determined not to join the Euro, its only a matter of time, maybe 5-10 years, maybe not even that long, before the differences are too large to paper over, and we will have no choice but to leave. Everything that is true about leaving now will be true then, only more so, it will be a bigger shock, be more economically risky, and we will have more points of contact to unpick and replace. So what do we gain by putting off the evil hour. Its not good for the country, its not good for the EU, the only thing that gets any benefit from it is (briefly) Cameron's place in the history books. Is this what we have come to ?rcs1000 said:I actually know a few people who think a narrow Remain is the best for the country
This all presupposes the other two elephants squeezing into this very small room, namely migration (and especially migration mandated by the EU) and terrorism don't force our hand earlier. I have often wondered how many acts of terrorism it would take within a short timescale, maybe a couple of months, before freedom of movement is completely politically untenable, I think maybe three. How many sleepers were supposed to be being infiltrated into the EU again ?
60 years of Euro hokey-cokey is not going to end on June 25th!0 -
Want to see some bad shoes / dress sense....JosiasJessop said:
God knows what you lot would make of my dress sense (or lack thereof).Theuniondivvie said:
Dealer boots, monk shoes?SeanT said:
No. The only acceptable slip-on is a velvet loafing slipper, for decadent evenings at home, with one's mistress. Never when out-and-about.Theuniondivvie said:
Not necessarily, Chuck has been known to wear the odd pair of slip ons.SeanT said:
THOSE are not the shoes of a gentleman.Speedy said:Panama Scandal ALERT:
https://twitter.com/VinnyITV/status/718129146119995392
A bad day for Cameron gets worse.
An Englishman ALWAYS laces.
But those loafers do look a bit M&S-y.
This is OK if you are in your palace and about to boff a comely wifelet
http://www.shipton.com/media/catalog/product/cache/2/image/9df78eab33525d08d6e5fb8d27136e95/s/-/s-eagle2head-side-600_1_1.jpg
This is just naff:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2187719/Dave-Nick-start-wrong-foot-Cleggs-sandals-Camerons-office-shoes.html
He's just really bad at SHOES.
The trouble with most lace ups is that they look crap with jeans. If you're going to wear your shiny black Oxfords with jeans you might as well go the whole hog - buy a rugby shirt and call yourself Tim.
http://cdn.sandiegouniontrib.com/img/photos/2016/01/12/2016-01-11T003929Z_581400153_NOCID_RTRMADP_3_PGA-HYUNDAI-TOU_r900x493.JPG?122770e84b36f1c039d5c4c2ca15c2d8bc4ecd520 -
To leave now would definitely injure our economy and help Labour. We should remain and make extra efforts to strengthen our economy whilst chivvying the EU to reform. We will have to consider another EUref eventually, but leaving is not right for now.Indigo said:
What gets me if the futility of the entire exercise. With the eurozone federalising, and the UK determined not to join the Euro, its only a matter of time, maybe 5-10 years, maybe not even that long, before the differences are too large to paper over, and we will have no choice but to leave. Everything that is true about leaving now will be true then, only more so, it will be a bigger shock, be more economically risky, and we will have more points of contact to unpick and replace. So what do we gain by putting off the evil hour. Its not good for the country, its not good for the EU, the only thing that gets any benefit from it is (briefly) Cameron's place in the history books. Is this what we have come to ?rcs1000 said:I actually know a few people who think a narrow Remain is the best for the country
This all presupposes the other two elephants squeezing into this very small room, namely migration (and especially migration mandated by the EU) and terrorism don't force our hand earlier. I have often wondered how many acts of terrorism it would take within a short timescale, maybe a couple of months, before freedom of movement is completely politically untenable, I think maybe three. How many sleepers were supposed to be being infiltrated into the EU again ?
0 -
I've always scoffed at the hysteria that greeted Cameron's previous 'scandals'. It was mostly opportunistic cant from a bored media or a desperate opposition. But I have to agree with the posters below. Tonight Cameron is mortally wounded and his reputation in tatters. Those shoes were awful!0
-
Now 90,000. Still suspect 100000 will come after the News.0
-
I think it could get a million signatures in time for the 10 o' clock news and it would hardly get a mention....weejonnie said:Now 90,000. Still suspect 100000 will come after the News.
0 -
A pair of monk shoes or tassel loafers go really well with chinos.Theuniondivvie said:
Dealer boots, monk shoes?SeanT said:
No. The only acceptable slip-on is a velvet loafing slipper, for decadent evenings at home, with one's mistress. Never when out-and-about.Theuniondivvie said:
Not necessarily, Chuck has been known to wear the odd pair of slip ons.SeanT said:
THOSE are not the shoes of a gentleman.Speedy said:Panama Scandal ALERT:
https://twitter.com/VinnyITV/status/718129146119995392
A bad day for Cameron gets worse.
An Englishman ALWAYS laces.
But those loafers do look a bit M&S-y.
This is OK if you are in your palace and about to boff a comely wifelet
http://www.shipton.com/media/catalog/product/cache/2/image/9df78eab33525d08d6e5fb8d27136e95/s/-/s-eagle2head-side-600_1_1.jpg
This is just naff:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2187719/Dave-Nick-start-wrong-foot-Cleggs-sandals-Camerons-office-shoes.html
He's just really bad at SHOES.
The trouble with most lace ups is that they look crap with jeans. If you're going to wear your shiny black Oxfords with jeans you might as well go the whole hog - buy a rugby shirt and call yourself Tim.0 -
And you think that either the EU or indeed UK governments would take any heed of that? You're kidding yourself.HYUFD said:
Yes, in Europe but a clear statement the voters will not accept further integration by the UKrcs1000 said:
I actually know a few people who think a narrow Remain is the best for the countryHYUFD said:
My ideal result would be Remain by 0.01%!Casino_Royale said:
To be honest, even Richard Nabavi, JohnO and TSE think this. Hell, even Alastair Meeks wasn't thrilled about coming off the fence for Remain.SeanT said:
or... they just won't vote. Which is what (rightly) terrifies the REMAINIANSRobD said:
Still a large fraction of undecideds. As ever, they'll decide the outcome:SeanT said:Not sure why so many LEAVERS seem discouraged. These polls are painfully tight for the goverment and the huge 20+ poll leads for REMAIN are consigned to history.
LEAVE are just a couple of migration crises and well-timed terrorist outrages from an improbable victory.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:UK_EU_referendum_polling.svg
The LEAVERS have all the passion. I have met lots of passionate LEAVERS in the last few weeks, and not one single passionate REMAINER.
All you get on the europhile side is a begrudging "oh, yes, I'll probably vote IN, under protest".
I still think REMAiN will win, but I'm seeing headlines like "REMAIN has that in the bag" which is total bollocks. Cameron is clearly a worried man, and is right to be so.
There are solid pro-EU'ers around (like Wodger and Steven Whately) but they are a small, small minority.
If most Brits felt there was a pain-free way out, they'd jump at it.0 -
The press would have gone nuts for one day and I think that would of been it.FrancisUrquhart said:Imagine if Cameron had just said this to begin with...
I did own stocks and shares in the past - quite naturally because my father was a stockbroker. Myself and my wife bought shares in April 1997 for £12,497 and sold it in January 2010 for £31,500. I sold them all in 2010, because if I was going to become Prime Minister I didn't want anyone to say you have other agendas, vested interests. I properly paid income tax on the dividends. I now own no shares in any companies, I own a house and my only income is my salary, rent on the home I let out and some interest on my savings.
Politicians can't give straight answers.0 -
Hunt insists he will impose new contract on NHS doctors
The matter is closed, says the health secretary, who is refusing to budge over the new contract for junior medics as their two-day strike comes to an end
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/apr/07/hunt-insists-he-will-impose-new-contract-on-nhs-doctors0 -
I love the site of England going dark red for once.FrancisUrquhart said:
I think it could get a million signatures in time for the 10 o' clock news and it would hardly get a mention....weejonnie said:Now 90,000. Still suspect 100000 will come after the News.
I suspect there is a VERY strong correlation between population density and diversity enrichment areas and Pro Leave (other than London).0 -
To be fair, Cameron did just that during expenses scandal and made people screaming blue murder about his wisteria problem look rather silly. Perhaps he would have been better doing the same this time.Fenster said:
The press would have gone nuts for one day and I think that would of been it.FrancisUrquhart said:Imagine if Cameron had just said this to begin with...
I did own stocks and shares in the past - quite naturally because my father was a stockbroker. Myself and my wife bought shares in April 1997 for £12,497 and sold it in January 2010 for £31,500. I sold them all in 2010, because if I was going to become Prime Minister I didn't want anyone to say you have other agendas, vested interests. I properly paid income tax on the dividends. I now own no shares in any companies, I own a house and my only income is my salary, rent on the home I let out and some interest on my savings.
Politicians can't give straight answers.0 -
From the left, agree. It's the twisting and squirming that's damaging him.Plato_Says said:Precisely, it wasn't a lottery win sized investment to worry about.
FrancisUrquhart said:Imagine if Cameron had just said this to begin with...
I did own stocks and shares in the past - quite naturally because my father was a stockbroker. Myself and my wife bought shares in April 1997 for £12,497 and sold it in January 2010 for £31,500. I sold them all in 2010, because if I was going to become Prime Minister I didn't want anyone to say you have other agendas, vested interests. I properly paid income tax on the dividends. I now own no shares in any companies, I own a house and my only income is my salary, rent on the home I let out and some interest on my savings.
The press would have gone nuts for one day and I think that would of been it.
Mind, again from the left it's quite enjoyable to see "call me Dave" twisting and squirming. And, the fact that things are being drawn out suggests there IS more to come.0 -
I always wear a tie pin at work. I think the current fashion for no tie and flapping collar with a suit just slovenly.Omnium said:
Your 'the only acceptable (shoe)' surely is based around one's attire. I'm not prone to leopard-skin clingyness, but if I was then clearly an otherwise admirable pair of black brogues would look out of place.SeanT said:
No. The only acceptable slip-on is a velvet loafing slipper, for decadent evenings at home, with one's mistress. Never when out-and-about.Theuniondivvie said:
Not necessarily, Chuck has been known to wear the odd pair of slip ons.SeanT said:
THOSE are not the shoes of a gentleman.Speedy said:Panama Scandal ALERT:
https://twitter.com/VinnyITV/status/718129146119995392
A bad day for Cameron gets worse.
An Englishman ALWAYS laces.
But those loafers do look a bit M&S-y.
This is OK if you are in your palace and about to boff a comely wifelet
http://www.shipton.com/media/catalog/product/cache/2/image/9df78eab33525d08d6e5fb8d27136e95/s/-/s-eagle2head-side-600_1_1.jpg
This is just naff:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2187719/Dave-Nick-start-wrong-foot-Cleggs-sandals-Camerons-office-shoes.html
He's just really bad at SHOES.
I would suggest to you that in fact the shoes of a gentleman are those that he finds himself in.
If you are wearing a nice suit then of course you are right. There are all sorts of things associated with such attire. I, for example, hate tie clips - it seems all wrong. However I rather regret the lack of a handy pocket on shirts I bought some years ago now that I use glasses and dress informally.
So long as you can (and do) tie your own bow tie...
However no jacket or long sleeves at work is uniform policy (bare below the elbows for washing) and a tie flaps around a bit in consequence, particularly when examining patients, hence the tie pin.
I wear Solovair dealer boots most days too. I do a lot of walking in my job and bouncy soles are very comfy.0 -
Ted Cruz going down like cold sick in New York. Who'd have thunk it !0
-
He had to bite.
"GOsborneGenius @GOsborneGenius 22s22 seconds ago
@ShippersUnbound Cameron and the horse was peak Cameron, until the Villa/West Ham fan Cameron became peak Cameron."0 -
No, but it is interesting to see the numbers of the seat map, for instance not only is Andy Burnahm's seat apparently the most euroskeptic seat in Greater Manchester but also Yvette Cooper's in West Yorkshire.FrancisUrquhart said:
I think it could get a million signatures in time for the 10 o' clock news and it would hardly get a mention....weejonnie said:Now 90,000. Still suspect 100000 will come after the News.
Owen Patterson's seat in the W.Midlands is no surprise that is apparently the most euroskeptic in that region.0 -
They will have to, like it or not, the Dutch referendum is just further evidence of that, by the end of 2017 Wilders and Le Pen could have come first in the Dutch and French elections and the AfD won significant seats in the Bundestag, the EU ref result could just be the first big wave in a tidal force sweeping across the continent.runnymede said:
And you think that either the EU or indeed UK governments would take any heed of that? You're kidding yourself.HYUFD said:
Yes, in Europe but a clear statement the voters will not accept further integration by the UKrcs1000 said:
I actually know a few people who think a narrow Remain is the best for the countryHYUFD said:
My ideal result would be Remain by 0.01%!Casino_Royale said:
To be honest, even Richard Nabavi, JohnO and TSE think this. Hell, even Alastair Meeks wasn't thrilled about coming off the fence for Remain.SeanT said:
or... they just won't vote. Which is what (rightly) terrifies the REMAINIANSRobD said:
Still a large fraction of undecideds. As ever, they'll decide the outcome:SeanT said:Not sure why so many LEAVERS seem discouraged. These polls are painfully tight for the goverment and the huge 20+ poll leads for REMAIN are consigned to history.
LEAVE are just a couple of migration crises and well-timed terrorist outrages from an improbable victory.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:UK_EU_referendum_polling.svg
The LEAVERS have all the passion. I have met lots of passionate LEAVERS in the last few weeks, and not one single passionate REMAINER.
All you get on the europhile side is a begrudging "oh, yes, I'll probably vote IN, under protest".
I still think REMAiN will win, but I'm seeing headlines like "REMAIN has that in the bag" which is total bollocks. Cameron is clearly a worried man, and is right to be so.
There are solid pro-EU'ers around (like Wodger and Steven Whately) but they are a small, small minority.
If most Brits felt there was a pain-free way out, they'd jump at it.0 -
Davis would not have polled as high as Cameron but I could see a result something like Tory 33%, Labour 29%, LD 27% in 2010JosiasJessop said:
I doubt it. The Conservatives badly needed a new direction, which Cameron provided. Although I think that Labour's infighting rather than the crash was Labour's biggest vote loser in 2010.HYUFD said:
Post crash the Tories may still have been largest partyJosiasJessop said:
Fair enough, although I would call your judgement into question.Indigo said:
Hardly, I have had no time for Cameron for years before the referendum came on the scene. My views of Cameron would make Mr Brooke's views of Osborne rank as a generous tribute.JosiasJessop said:
I'd rather listen to the views of Cameroons than the vapid rantings of so-called Conservatives who want Cameron damaged just because it might help leave in the referendum.Indigo said:
Where have the Cameroon's gone, I think we should know the party line on thisPlato_Says said:
Pathetic.
Would you have preferred Brown to win in 2010, or Miliband in 2015, over Cameron? For if the Conservatives had been led by someone like IDS or Davis, they would have lost.0 -
While I don't feel sorry for doctors in general over this, I do feel for A&E guys. They are seeing a huge pay cut, and they are the speciality with the worst retention rates already.FrancisUrquhart said:Hunt insists he will impose new contract on NHS doctors
The matter is closed, says the health secretary, who is refusing to budge over the new contract for junior medics as their two-day strike comes to an end
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/apr/07/hunt-insists-he-will-impose-new-contract-on-nhs-doctors0 -
I disagree, if that is the bar then Cameron surely tried to pass it today:dr_spyn said:He had to bite.
"GOsborneGenius @GOsborneGenius 22s22 seconds ago
@ShippersUnbound Cameron and the horse was peak Cameron, until the Villa/West Ham fan Cameron became peak Cameron."
https://twitter.com/mashable/status/718043930152009728
The Cotswolds are of course notoriously frosty in late June (jokingly).0 -
Although it is when remembering that more than half of Wilders supporters agree with the proposition "The Euro has been good for the Netherlands"HYUFD said:
They will have to, like it or not, the Dutch referendum is just further evidence of that, by the end of 2017 Wilders and Le Pen could have come first in the Dutch and French elections and the AfD won significant seats in the Bundestag, the EU ref result could just be the first big wave in a tidal force sweeping across the continent.runnymede said:
And you think that either the EU or indeed UK governments would take any heed of that? You're kidding yourself.HYUFD said:
Yes, in Europe but a clear statement the voters will not accept further integration by the UKrcs1000 said:
I actually know a few people who think a narrow Remain is the best for the countryHYUFD said:
My ideal result would be Remain by 0.01%!Casino_Royale said:
To be honest, even Richard Nabavi, JohnO and TSE think this. Hell, even Alastair Meeks wasn't thrilled about coming off the fence for Remain.SeanT said:
or... they just won't vote. Which is what (rightly) terrifies the REMAINIANSRobD said:
Still a large fraction of undecideds. As ever, they'll decide the outcome:SeanT said:Not sure why so many LEAVERS seem discouraged. These polls are painfully tight for the goverment and the huge 20+ poll leads for REMAIN are consigned to history.
LEAVE are just a couple of migration crises and well-timed terrorist outrages from an improbable victory.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:UK_EU_referendum_polling.svg
The LEAVERS have all the passion. I have met lots of passionate LEAVERS in the last few weeks, and not one single passionate REMAINER.
All you get on the europhile side is a begrudging "oh, yes, I'll probably vote IN, under protest".
I still think REMAiN will win, but I'm seeing headlines like "REMAIN has that in the bag" which is total bollocks. Cameron is clearly a worried man, and is right to be so.
There are solid pro-EU'ers around (like Wodger and Steven Whately) but they are a small, small minority.
If most Brits felt there was a pain-free way out, they'd jump at it.0 -
I don't think North Shropshire is particularly Euro-sceptic compared to places like Cannock Chase, Tamworth, Dudley, North Warwickshire. You're probably getting a higher number of signatures where people are more politically engaged like Paterson's constituency.Speedy said:
No, but it is interesting to see the numbers of the seat map, for instance not only is Andy Burnahm's seat apparently the most euroskeptic seat in Greater Manchester but also Yvette Cooper's in West Yorkshire.FrancisUrquhart said:
I think it could get a million signatures in time for the 10 o' clock news and it would hardly get a mention....weejonnie said:Now 90,000. Still suspect 100000 will come after the News.
Owen Patterson's seat in the W.Midlands is no surprise that is apparently the most euroskeptic in that region.0 -
Fat chance. Where does the source of this desire come from?foxinsoxuk said:
I think it equally certain that in the event of Leave that within 10 years there would be a strong movement to rejoinn the EU.Indigo said:
What gets me if the futility of the entire exercise. With the eurozone federalising, and the UK determined not to join the Euro, its only a matter of time, maybe 5-10 years, maybe not even that long, before the differences are too large to paper over, and we will have no choice but to leave. Everything that is true about leaving now will be true then, only more so, it will be a bigger shock, be more economically risky, and we will have more points of contact to unpick and replace. So what do we gain by putting off the evil hour. Its not good for the country, its not good for the EU, the only thing that gets any benefit from it is (briefly) Cameron's place in the history books. Is this what we have come to ?rcs1000 said:I actually know a few people who think a narrow Remain is the best for the country
This all presupposes the other two elephants squeezing into this very small room, namely migration (and especially migration mandated by the EU) and terrorism don't force our hand earlier. I have often wondered how many acts of terrorism it would take within a short timescale, maybe a couple of months, before freedom of movement is completely politically untenable, I think maybe three. How many sleepers were supposed to be being infiltrated into the EU again ?
60 years of Euro hokey-cokey is not going to end on June 25th!0 -
EFTA/EEA members show no great desire to join the full EU.Philip_Thompson said:
Fat chance. Where does the source of this desire come from?foxinsoxuk said:
I think it equally certain that in the event of Leave that within 10 years there would be a strong movement to rejoinn the EU.Indigo said:
What gets me if the futility of the entire exercise. With the eurozone federalising, and the UK determined not to join the Euro, its only a matter of time, maybe 5-10 years, maybe not even that long, before the differences are too large to paper over, and we will have no choice but to leave. Everything that is true about leaving now will be true then, only more so, it will be a bigger shock, be more economically risky, and we will have more points of contact to unpick and replace. So what do we gain by putting off the evil hour. Its not good for the country, its not good for the EU, the only thing that gets any benefit from it is (briefly) Cameron's place in the history books. Is this what we have come to ?rcs1000 said:I actually know a few people who think a narrow Remain is the best for the country
This all presupposes the other two elephants squeezing into this very small room, namely migration (and especially migration mandated by the EU) and terrorism don't force our hand earlier. I have often wondered how many acts of terrorism it would take within a short timescale, maybe a couple of months, before freedom of movement is completely politically untenable, I think maybe three. How many sleepers were supposed to be being infiltrated into the EU again ?
60 years of Euro hokey-cokey is not going to end on June 25th!0 -
That is why it's a bit difficult to make an assumption based on that map.AndyJS said:
I don't think North Shropshire is particularly Euro-sceptic compared to places like Cannock Chase, Tamworth, Dudley, North Warwickshire. You're probably getting a higher number of signatures where people are more politically engaged like Paterson's constituency.Speedy said:
No, but it is interesting to see the numbers of the seat map, for instance not only is Andy Burnahm's seat apparently the most euroskeptic seat in Greater Manchester but also Yvette Cooper's in West Yorkshire.FrancisUrquhart said:
I think it could get a million signatures in time for the 10 o' clock news and it would hardly get a mention....weejonnie said:Now 90,000. Still suspect 100000 will come after the News.
Owen Patterson's seat in the W.Midlands is no surprise that is apparently the most euroskeptic in that region.
But it looks generally correct at least by region.0 -
Well tie-pins and tie clips are different animals.foxinsoxuk said:
I always wear a tie pin at work. I think the current fashion for no tie and flapping collar with a suit just slovenly.Omnium said:
Your 'the only acceptable (shoe)' surely is based around one's attire. I'm not prone to leopard-skin clingyness, but if I was then clearly an otherwise admirable pair of black brogues would look out of place.SeanT said:
No. The only acceptable slip-on is a velvet loafing slipper, for decadent evenings at home, with one's mistress. Never when out-and-about.Theuniondivvie said:
Not necessarily, Chuck has been known to wear the odd pair of slip ons.SeanT said:
THOSE are not the shoes of a gentleman.Speedy said:Panama Scandal ALERT:
https://twitter.com/VinnyITV/status/718129146119995392
A bad day for Cameron gets worse.
An Englishman ALWAYS laces.
But those loafers do look a bit M&S-y.
This is OK if you are in your palace and about to boff a comely wifelet
http://www.shipton.com/media/catalog/product/cache/2/image/9df78eab33525d08d6e5fb8d27136e95/s/-/s-eagle2head-side-600_1_1.jpg
This is just naff:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2187719/Dave-Nick-start-wrong-foot-Cleggs-sandals-Camerons-office-shoes.html
He's just really bad at SHOES.
I would suggest to you that in fact the shoes of a gentleman are those that he finds himself in.
If you are wearing a nice suit then of course you are right. There are all sorts of things associated with such attire. I, for example, hate tie clips - it seems all wrong. However I rather regret the lack of a handy pocket on shirts I bought some years ago now that I use glasses and dress informally.
So long as you can (and do) tie your own bow tie...
However no jacket or long sleeves at work is uniform policy (bare below the elbows for washing) and a tie flaps around a bit in consequence, particularly when examining patients, hence the tie pin.
I wear Solovair dealer boots most days too. I do a lot of walking in my job and bouncy soles are very comfy.
I happen to work in a place where we have almost no external visitors. I rather think I have a 'pajama' dress code for most of my life currently. I went to a ballet at the ROH recently and dressed to the standard I would have done every day of my life before around 2003 (so just 'the city'), and people just simply failed to get that. (as in it was my 'normal' attire some while ago)
I've seen nice looking tie pins. I'd not wear one mind you - it clearly damages the tie.
I wish you the joy of your Solovairs
0 -
STOP CAMERON spending British taxpayers’ money on Pro-EU Referendum leaflets
92,094 signatures0 -
Possibly, and the beauty of such questions is that we'll never know.HYUFD said:
Davis would not have polled as high as Cameron but I could see a result something like Tory 33%, Labour 29%, LD 27% in 2010JosiasJessop said:
I doubt it. The Conservatives badly needed a new direction, which Cameron provided. Although I think that Labour's infighting rather than the crash was Labour's biggest vote loser in 2010.HYUFD said:
Post crash the Tories may still have been largest partyJosiasJessop said:
Fair enough, although I would call your judgement into question.Indigo said:
Hardly, I have had no time for Cameron for years before the referendum came on the scene. My views of Cameron would make Mr Brooke's views of Osborne rank as a generous tribute.JosiasJessop said:
I'd rather listen to the views of Cameroons than the vapid rantings of so-called Conservatives who want Cameron damaged just because it might help leave in the referendum.Indigo said:
Where have the Cameroon's gone, I think we should know the party line on thisPlato_Says said:
Pathetic.
Would you have preferred Brown to win in 2010, or Miliband in 2015, over Cameron? For if the Conservatives had been led by someone like IDS or Davis, they would have lost.
Part of the problem is that Cameron's presence as a potential PM might have caused or accentuated Labour's problems. Had they been facing Davis or IDS they might have had a few extra points in the polls, and in turn Brown would have had more breathing room. They might not have made many of the mistakes that led to them losing - do you really think McBride et al would have bothered with their sick scheme against IDS or Davis?0 -
I wonder if a eurozone country will withdraw from the EU but keep the euro.rcs1000 said:
Although it is when remembering that more than half of Wilders supporters agree with the proposition "The Euro has been good for the Netherlands"HYUFD said:
They will have to, like it or not, the Dutch referendum is just further evidence of that, by the end of 2017 Wilders and Le Pen could have come first in the Dutch and French elections and the AfD won significant seats in the Bundestag, the EU ref result could just be the first big wave in a tidal force sweeping across the continent.runnymede said:
And you think that either the EU or indeed UK governments would take any heed of that? You're kidding yourself.HYUFD said:
Yes, in Europe but a clear statement the voters will not accept further integration by the UKrcs1000 said:
I actually know a few people who think a narrow Remain is the best for the countryHYUFD said:
My ideal result would be Remain by 0.01%!Casino_Royale said:
To be honest, even Richard Nabavi, JohnO and TSE think this. Hell, even Alastair Meeks wasn't thrilled about coming off the fence for Remain.SeanT said:
or... they just won't vote. Which is what (rightly) terrifies the REMAINIANSRobD said:
Still a large fraction of undecideds. As ever, they'll decide the outcome:SeanT said:Not sure why so many LEAVERS seem discouraged. These polls are painfully tight for the goverment and the huge 20+ poll leads for REMAIN are consigned to history.
LEAVE are just a couple of migration crises and well-timed terrorist outrages from an improbable victory.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:UK_EU_referendum_polling.svg
The LEAVERS have all the passion. I have met lots of passionate LEAVERS in the last few weeks, and not one single passionate REMAINER.
All you get on the europhile side is a begrudging "oh, yes, I'll probably vote IN, under protest".
I still think REMAiN will win, but I'm seeing headlines like "REMAIN has that in the bag" which is total bollocks. Cameron is clearly a worried man, and is right to be so.
There are solid pro-EU'ers around (like Wodger and Steven Whately) but they are a small, small minority.
If most Brits felt there was a pain-free way out, they'd jump at it.
They certainly can, but it's tantalizing as a theory of the euro still existing after the EU disintegrates.
It will be a bit like the Sterling zone or the Franc zone after the corresponding empires ceased to exist, the Euro will probably go for a while longer.0 -
JohnLoony said:
As far as I can tell, "London Has Fallen" is a sequel to "Olympus Has Fallen". Is it worthwhile watching LHF without having already seen OHF?
Watch "White House Down" instead. Much better film.
0 -
It won't hit 100,000 by 10pm. Shame!Tykejohnno said:STOP CAMERON spending British taxpayers’ money on Pro-EU Referendum leaflets
92,094 signatures
0 -
Nonce Finder General on the case....
Labour: Cameron's answer on offshore trust 'unacceptable'
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-35990100
Surprised he isn't accusing Blairmore of being a cover for an international paedo ring.
0 -
London Has Fallen... is that when Dave loses after a long winning streak on Candy Crush?MarkHopkins said:JohnLoony said:As far as I can tell, "London Has Fallen" is a sequel to "Olympus Has Fallen". Is it worthwhile watching LHF without having already seen OHF?
Watch "White House Down" instead. Much better film.0 -
I think we know that Ed would be PM vs Davis don't we?JosiasJessop said:
Possibly, and the beauty of such questions is that we'll never know.HYUFD said:
Davis would not have polled as high as Cameron but I could see a result something like Tory 33%, Labour 29%, LD 27% in 2010JosiasJessop said:
I doubt it. The Conservatives badly needed a new direction, which Cameron provided. Although I think that Labour's infighting rather than the crash was Labour's biggest vote loser in 2010.HYUFD said:
Post crash the Tories may still have been largest partyJosiasJessop said:
Fair enough, although I would call your judgement into question.Indigo said:
Hardly, I have had no time for Cameron for years before the referendum came on the scene. My views of Cameron would make Mr Brooke's views of Osborne rank as a generous tribute.JosiasJessop said:
I'd rather listen to the views of Cameroons than the vapid rantings of so-called Conservatives who want Cameron damaged just because it might help leave in the referendum.Indigo said:
Where have the Cameroon's gone, I think we should know the party line on thisPlato_Says said:
Pathetic.
Would you have preferred Brown to win in 2010, or Miliband in 2015, over Cameron? For if the Conservatives had been led by someone like IDS or Davis, they would have lost.
Part of the problem is that Cameron's presence as a potential PM might have caused or accentuated Labour's problems. Had they been facing Davis or IDS they might have had a few extra points in the polls, and in turn Brown would have had more breathing room. They might not have made many of the mistakes that led to them losing - do you really think McBride et al would have bothered with their sick scheme against IDS or Davis?
0 -
93,140 it will be touch and go ...RoyalBlue said:
It won't hit 100,000 by 10pm. Shame!Tykejohnno said:STOP CAMERON spending British taxpayers’ money on Pro-EU Referendum leaflets
92,094 signatures0 -
The main shift would have been from voters who backed Blair to Clegg rather than Cameron, Davis would have got about the same score as Howard in 2005JosiasJessop said:
Possibly, and the beauty of such questions is that we'll never know.HYUFD said:
Davis would not have polled as high as Cameron but I could see a result something like Tory 33%, Labour 29%, LD 27% in 2010JosiasJessop said:
I doubt it. The Conservatives badly needed a new direction, which Cameron provided. Although I think that Labour's infighting rather than the crash was Labour's biggest vote loser in 2010.HYUFD said:
Post crash the Tories may still have been largest partyJosiasJessop said:
Fair enough, although I would call your judgement into question.Indigo said:
Hardly, I have had no time for Cameron for years before the referendum came on the scene. My views of Cameron would make Mr Brooke's views of Osborne rank as a generous tribute.JosiasJessop said:
I'd rather listen to the views of Cameroons than the vapid rantings of so-called Conservatives who want Cameron damaged just because it might help leave in the referendum.Indigo said:
Where have the Cameroon's gone, I think we should know the party line on thisPlato_Says said:
Pathetic.
Would you have preferred Brown to win in 2010, or Miliband in 2015, over Cameron? For if the Conservatives had been led by someone like IDS or Davis, they would have lost.
Part of the problem is that Cameron's presence as a potential PM might have caused or accentuated Labour's problems. Had they been facing Davis or IDS they might have had a few extra points in the polls, and in turn Brown would have had more breathing room. They might not have made many of the mistakes that led to them losing - do you really think McBride et al would have bothered with their sick scheme against IDS or Davis?0 -
Perhaps, though if even half of the largest party oppose the Euro that is still a big blow to the Eurozone in the Netherlands, one of the EEC's founder membersrcs1000 said:
Although it is when remembering that more than half of Wilders supporters agree with the proposition "The Euro has been good for the Netherlands"HYUFD said:
They will have to, like it or not, the Dutch referendum is just further evidence of that, by the end of 2017 Wilders and Le Pen could have come first in the Dutch and French elections and the AfD won significant seats in the Bundestag, the EU ref result could just be the first big wave in a tidal force sweeping across the continent.runnymede said:
And you think that either the EU or indeed UK governments would take any heed of that? You're kidding yourself.HYUFD said:
Yes, in Europe but a clear statement the voters will not accept further integration by the UKrcs1000 said:
I actually know a few people who think a narrow Remain is the best for the countryHYUFD said:
My ideal result would be Remain by 0.01%!Casino_Royale said:
To be honest, even Richard Nabavi, JohnO and TSE think this. Hell, even Alastair Meeks wasn't thrilled about coming off the fence for Remain.SeanT said:
or... they just won't vote. Which is what (rightly) terrifies the REMAINIANSRobD said:
Still a large fraction of undecideds. As ever, they'll decide the outcome:SeanT said:Not sure why so many LEAVERS seem discouraged. These polls are painfully tight for the goverment and the huge 20+ poll leads for REMAIN are consigned to history.
LEAVE are just a couple of migration crises and well-timed terrorist outrages from an improbable victory.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:UK_EU_referendum_polling.svg
The LEAVERS have all the passion. I have met lots of passionate LEAVERS in the last few weeks, and not one single passionate REMAINER.
All you get on the europhile side is a begrudging "oh, yes, I'll probably vote IN, under protest".
I still think REMAiN will win, but I'm seeing headlines like "REMAIN has that in the bag" which is total bollocks. Cameron is clearly a worried man, and is right to be so.
There are solid pro-EU'ers around (like Wodger and Steven Whately) but they are a small, small minority.
If most Brits felt there was a pain-free way out, they'd jump at it.0 -
Police in Denmark have detained four suspected ISIS operatives and seized weapons and ammunition during raids linked to their arrest in Copenhagen.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3528600/Danish-police-arrest-four-ISIS-suspects-travelled-Syria-seize-weapons-ammunition-raids-linked-addresses.html0 -
It's not really a sequel - just the same characters and same plot in a different location.JohnLoony said:As far as I can tell, "London Has Fallen" is a sequel to "Olympus Has Fallen". Is it worthwhile watching LHF without having already seen OHF?
I went to see it with my wife, and we both really enjoyed it. I believe she liked seeing various UK landmarks blown up. I quite liked what happened to the French...0 -
Yeah, but it's something like 80:20 for the country as a whole on Euro membership, so I wouldn't expect any serious moves against it from the Netherlands.HYUFD said:
Perhaps, though if even half of the largest party oppose the Euro that is still a big blow to the Eurozone in the Netherlands, one of the EEC's founder membersrcs1000 said:
Although it is when remembering that more than half of Wilders supporters agree with the proposition "The Euro has been good for the Netherlands"HYUFD said:
They will have to, like it or not, the Dutch referendum is just further evidence of that, by the end of 2017 Wilders and Le Pen could have come first in the Dutch and French elections and the AfD won significant seats in the Bundestag, the EU ref result could just be the first big wave in a tidal force sweeping across the continent.runnymede said:
And you think that either the EU or indeed UK governments would take any heed of that? You're kidding yourself.HYUFD said:
Yes, in Europe but a clear statement the voters will not accept further integration by the UKrcs1000 said:
I actually know a few people who think a narrow Remain is the best for the countryHYUFD said:
My ideal result would be Remain by 0.01%!Casino_Royale said:
To be honest, even Richard Nabavi, JohnO and TSE think this. Hell, even Alastair Meeks wasn't thrilled about coming off the fence for Remain.SeanT said:or... they just won't vote. Which is what (rightly) terrifies the REMAINIANS
The LEAVERS have all the passion. I have met lots of passionate LEAVERS in the last few weeks, and not one single passionate REMAINER.
All you get on the europhile side is a begrudging "oh, yes, I'll probably vote IN, under protest".
I still think REMAiN will win, but I'm seeing headlines like "REMAIN has that in the bag" which is total bollocks. Cameron is clearly a worried man, and is right to be so.
There are solid pro-EU'ers around (like Wodger and Steven Whately) but they are a small, small minority.
If most Brits felt there was a pain-free way out, they'd jump at it.
The country where these is the most Euro-scepticism (as in scepticism of the benefits of the Euro...) is Italy: that's the 50:50 country.0 -
Small countries (from Monaco sized up to Estonia or even the Netherlands) tend to be much more Euro-positive than big ones. Simply because - even before they joined the Euro - their governments had to borrow in foreign currencies.Speedy said:
I wonder if a eurozone country will withdraw from the EU but keep the euro.rcs1000 said:
Although it is when remembering that more than half of Wilders supporters agree with the proposition "The Euro has been good for the Netherlands"HYUFD said:
They will have to, like it or not, the Dutch referendum is just further evidence of that, by the end of 2017 Wilders and Le Pen could have come first in the Dutch and French elections and the AfD won significant seats in the Bundestag, the EU ref result could just be the first big wave in a tidal force sweeping across the continent.runnymede said:
And you think that either the EU or indeed UK governments would take any heed of that? You're kidding yourself.HYUFD said:
Yes, in Europe but a clear statement the voters will not accept further integration by the UKrcs1000 said:
I actually know a few people who think a narrow Remain is the best for the countryHYUFD said:
My ideal result would be Remain by 0.01%!Casino_Royale said:
To be honest, even Richard Nabavi, JohnO and TSE think this. Hell, even Alastair Meeks wasn't thrilled about coming off the fence for Remain.SeanT said:or... they just won't vote. Which is what (rightly) terrifies the REMAINIANS
The LEAVERS have all the passion. I have met lots of passionate LEAVERS in the last few weeks, and not one single passionate REMAINER.
All you get on the europhile side is a begrudging "oh, yes, I'll probably vote IN, under protest".
I still think REMAiN will win, but I'm seeing headlines like "REMAIN has that in the bag" which is total bollocks. Cameron is clearly a worried man, and is right to be so.
There are solid pro-EU'ers around (like Wodger and Steven Whately) but they are a small, small minority.
If most Brits felt there was a pain-free way out, they'd jump at it.
They certainly can, but it's tantalizing as a theory of the euro still existing after the EU disintegrates.
It will be a bit like the Sterling zone or the Franc zone after the corresponding empires ceased to exist, the Euro will probably go for a while longer.0 -
JJ said - "Possibly, and the beauty of such questions is that we'll never know. "
Hardly original, but distills everything really.0 -
94K.0
-
Cameron does not need this rumbling on during the EUref.He needs to appreciate the NHS Panzer brigade are next in line for a confrontation,the Consultants.Nurses have had enough too after the bursary ban.He would wise to sack Jeremy Hunt,remove the contractual imposition and do what all governments have had to do with the medical profession-fill their mouths with gold and buy out the contract.rcs1000 said:
While I don't feel sorry for doctors in general over this, I do feel for A&E guys. They are seeing a huge pay cut, and they are the speciality with the worst retention rates already.FrancisUrquhart said:Hunt insists he will impose new contract on NHS doctors
The matter is closed, says the health secretary, who is refusing to budge over the new contract for junior medics as their two-day strike comes to an end
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/apr/07/hunt-insists-he-will-impose-new-contract-on-nhs-doctors
As a patient all I want is the matter resolved so the doctors go back to working normally.Cameron needs to get a grip to secure this too.Boris Johnson would be my choice of a replacement.0 -
"It also emerged last night that the firm which printed the Government’s leaflet is owned by a German company given repeated hand-outs by the European Commission." (Telegraph)RoyalBlue said:
It won't hit 100,000 by 10pm. Shame!Tykejohnno said:STOP CAMERON spending British taxpayers’ money on Pro-EU Referendum leaflets
92,094 signatures
What was that again about Mr Cameron urging councils to buy British-Made Steel?
You couldn't make it up.0 -
Wonder who it was that got the £500k to put the thing together, for something with just 7 pages of text and a few piccies...that is an insane amount.weejonnie said:
"It also emerged last night that the firm which printed the Government’s leaflet is owned by a German company given repeated hand-outs by the European Commission." (Telegraph)RoyalBlue said:
It won't hit 100,000 by 10pm. Shame!Tykejohnno said:STOP CAMERON spending British taxpayers’ money on Pro-EU Referendum leaflets
92,094 signatures
You couldn't make it up.0 -
Surely a tie, even with a pin, has material implication for HAI?foxinsoxuk said:
I always wear a tie pin at work. I think the current fashion for no tie and flapping collar with a suit just slovenly.Omnium said:
Your 'the only acceptable (shoe)' surely is based around one's attire. I'm not prone to leopard-skin clingyness, but if I was then clearly an otherwise admirable pair of black brogues would look out of place.SeanT said:
No. The only acceptable slip-on is a velvet loafing slipper, for decadent evenings at home, with one's mistress. Never when out-and-about.Theuniondivvie said:
Not necessarily, Chuck has been known to wear the odd pair of slip ons.SeanT said:
THOSE are not the shoes of a gentleman.Speedy said:Panama Scandal ALERT:
https://twitter.com/VinnyITV/status/718129146119995392
A bad day for Cameron gets worse.
An Englishman ALWAYS laces.
But those loafers do look a bit M&S-y.
This is OK if you are in your palace and about to boff a comely wifelet
http://www.shipton.com/media/catalog/product/cache/2/image/9df78eab33525d08d6e5fb8d27136e95/s/-/s-eagle2head-side-600_1_1.jpg
This is just naff:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2187719/Dave-Nick-start-wrong-foot-Cleggs-sandals-Camerons-office-shoes.html
He's just really bad at SHOES.
I would suggest to you that in fact the shoes of a gentleman are those that he finds himself in.
If you are wearing a nice suit then of course you are right. There are all sorts of things associated with such attire. I, for example, hate tie clips - it seems all wrong. However I rather regret the lack of a handy pocket on shirts I bought some years ago now that I use glasses and dress informally.
So long as you can (and do) tie your own bow tie...
However no jacket or long sleeves at work is uniform policy (bare below the elbows for washing) and a tie flaps around a bit in consequence, particularly when examining patients, hence the tie pin.
I wear Solovair dealer boots most days too. I do a lot of walking in my job and bouncy soles are very comfy.0 -
The 50% + of the population that currently poll for Remain, bolstered by a significant number of Leavers with buyers remorse when they realise that they have been sold a lie...Philip_Thompson said:
Fat chance. Where does the source of this desire come from?foxinsoxuk said:
I think it equally certain that in the event of Leave that within 10 years there would be a strong movement to rejoinn the EU.Indigo said:
What gets me if the futility of the entire exercise. With the eurozone federalising, and the UK determined not to join the Euro, its only a matter of time, maybe 5-10 years, maybe not even that long, before the differences are too large to paper over, and we will have no choice but to leave. Everything that is true about leaving now will be true then, only more so, it will be a bigger shock, be more economically risky, and we will have more points of contact to unpick and replace. So what do we gain by putting off the evil hour. Its not good for the country, its not good for the EU, the only thing that gets any benefit from it is (briefly) Cameron's place in the history books. Is this what we have come to ?rcs1000 said:I actually know a few people who think a narrow Remain is the best for the country
This all presupposes the other two elephants squeezing into this very small room, namely migration (and especially migration mandated by the EU) and terrorism don't force our hand earlier. I have often wondered how many acts of terrorism it would take within a short timescale, maybe a couple of months, before freedom of movement is completely politically untenable, I think maybe three. How many sleepers were supposed to be being infiltrated into the EU again ?
60 years of Euro hokey-cokey is not going to end on June 25th!0 -
I think it's an interesting thought, because in the absence of free currency or with currency manipulation, in the long run the only route is protectionism or mercantilism as the only tools to stabilize an economy.rcs1000 said:
Small countries (from Monaco sized up to Estonia or even the Netherlands) tend to be much more Euro-positive than big ones. Simply because - even before they joined the Euro - their governments had to borrow in foreign currencies.Speedy said:
I wonder if a eurozone country will withdraw from the EU but keep the euro.rcs1000 said:
Although it is when remembering that more than half of Wilders supporters agree with the proposition "The Euro has been good for the Netherlands"HYUFD said:
They will have to, like it or not, the Dutch referendum is just further evidence of that, by the end of 2017 Wilders and Le Pen could have come first in the Dutch and French elections and the AfD won significant seats in the Bundestag, the EU ref result could just be the first big wave in a tidal force sweeping across the continent.runnymede said:
And you think that either the EU or indeed UK governments would take any heed of that? You're kidding yourself.HYUFD said:
Yes, in Europe but a clear statement the voters will not accept further integration by the UKrcs1000 said:
I actually know a few people who think a narrow Remain is the best for the countryHYUFD said:Casino_Royale said:
TSeanT said:or... they just won't vote. Which is what (rightly) terrifies the REMAINIANS
.
They certainly can, but it's tantalizing as a theory of the euro still existing after the EU disintegrates.
It will be a bit like the Sterling zone or the Franc zone after the corresponding empires ceased to exist, the Euro will probably go for a while longer.
It's not a coincidence that protectionist tendencies are rising globally, it's due to currency manipulations and currency unions distorting global trade to a phenomenal degree.
In this case if you can't leave the eurozone but you still need to protect your industry from German competition, then leaving the EU and imposing tariffs on German products is an option.0 -
up another 1K, in 10 minutes.0
-
I think Dave's bad week is going to get worse. A former Indy journo is publishing something on Sunday that could be rather difficult.0
-
No evidence at all!Charles said:
Surely a tie, even with a pin, has material implication for HAI?foxinsoxuk said:
I always wear a tie pin at work. I think the current fashion for no tie and flapping collar with a suit just slovenly.Omnium said:
Your 'the only acceptable (shoe)' surely is based around one's attire. I'm not prone to leopard-skin clingyness, but if I was then clearly an otherwise admirable pair of black brogues would look out of place.SeanT said:
No. The only acceptable slip-on is a velvet loafing slipper, for decadent evenings at home, with one's mistress. Never when out-and-about.Theuniondivvie said:
Not necessarily, Chuck has been known to wear the odd pair of slip ons.SeanT said:
THOSE are not the shoes of a gentleman.Speedy said:Panama Scandal ALERT:
https://twitter.com/VinnyITV/status/718129146119995392
A bad day for Cameron gets worse.
An Englishman ALWAYS laces.
But those loafers do look a bit M&S-y.
This is OK if you are in your palace and about to boff a comely wifelet
http://www.shipton.com/media/catalog/product/cache/2/image/9df78eab33525d08d6e5fb8d27136e95/s/-/s-eagle2head-side-600_1_1.jpg
This is just naff:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2187719/Dave-Nick-start-wrong-foot-Cleggs-sandals-Camerons-office-shoes.html
He's just really bad at SHOES.
I would suggest to you that in fact the shoes of a gentleman are those that he finds himself in.
If you are wearing a nice suit then of course you are right. There are all sorts of things associated with such attire. I, for example, hate tie clips - it seems all wrong. However I rather regret the lack of a handy pocket on shirts I bought some years ago now that I use glasses and dress informally.
So long as you can (and do) tie your own bow tie...
However no jacket or long sleeves at work is uniform policy (bare below the elbows for washing) and a tie flaps around a bit in consequence, particularly when examining patients, hence the tie pin.
I wear Solovair dealer boots most days too. I do a lot of walking in my job and bouncy soles are very comfy.
And my hospital has an excellent record on these things. For example no MRSA infections for over a year in a large busy teaching hospital.0 -
Don't tell us details, just tell us if it will effect the chances of Remain.FrancisUrquhart said:I think Dave's bad week is going to get worse. A former Indy journo is publishing something on Sunday that could be rather difficult.
0