Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

The key driver of the Brexit vote cannot be dismissed as an embittered aide – politicalbetting.com

245

Comments

  • Pagan2Pagan2 Posts: 10,027
    edited July 2021
    eek said:

    Pagan2 said:

    eek said:

    Pagan2 said:

    Pagan2 said:

    Judging by the polls, 71% of my fellow citizens are happy to turn me into a second class citizen with vaxx passports. No clubs (as if), pubs, theatres or maybe even work for me come the autumn.

    I think my last hope is the economy. Can the Johnson regime get Britain up to anything like full speed under this settlement?

    We shall see.

    Some would argue you have chosen to be a second class citizen. If one choses not to have internet connectivity and/or a smartphone one denies oneself services. This is not the majority denying the person. It is a simple self-imposed refusal to adapt to the times.
    Fuck right off right now....when did having a smart phone suddenly become a requisite for being a full citizen. You have one because it suits you. Why the fuck should I have to have one because it suits the governement. I neither need nor want one.
    Calm down! I was simply presenting a point of view that I am not sure I agree with, but it has some rationality to it. I am somewhat amused that anti-vaxxers think they have been injected with monitoring devices but still use social media and smartphones. The tech giants don't need to inject you with a device, you mainly choose to carry one on your person everyday and leave your IP address every time you visit an internet site to read the latest conspiracy theory website, lol.
    a) I am not an antivaxxer
    b) I have a mobile phone though not a smart phone purely because I recieve less calls on it than I do a landline of the nuisance nature
    c) I dont use social media
    d) for most sites I use tor
    e) I dont carry my phone with me when i go out
    f) I dont subscribe to any conspiracy theories. Not wanting the uk to slowly turn into china where we are tracked for everything is not a conspiracy theory. Vaxports are the first step on the road
    Surely vaxports are taking us nearer to Germany, France or Austria where they have ID cards rather than full on China surveillance.

    The issue with ID cards was never the card itself it was the massive database that Labour planned to build against it.
    vaxports are far worse than id cards, I don't necessarily have an objection to id cards on two proviso's

    1) they can't be demanded on whim by any jumped up jobsworth
    2) while you may need to show them you arent recorded.

    Sadly vaxports fail certainly on the second as they will bear the responsibility to scan in and out giving the government a clear view on where you go and how long you were there.

    Now dont get me wrong I dont suspect the current tory government would abuse it, nor do I suspect the current labour shadow government would either...a government in 20 or 30 years time with a health nazi in charge...not so much. I know I come across as strident but in my view once you cross the rubicon of too much it is too late and better to stop the journey before it begins
    So you worry is that you will need to register to enter premises in the exact same why you currently have to do when you use the NHS app.
    I dont have the nhs app nor have I never registered to go anywhere
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 43,515

    Foxy said:

    Foxy said:

    Interesting swing of opinion by Labour Members. Blair now more popular than Corbyn...


    Kinnock up from net 27 to 56! Not heard from him in years, so assume this is almost wholly a change in membership than a change in opinion of him? Or is Corbyn so toxic relatively everyone else is better now?
    Change in membership IMO. I draw two conclusions:

    1) The next leader will not be of the hard Left
    2) Labour are beginning to be serious about regaining power.
    You do not regain power by having SKS as leader and going bankrupt.
    And you don't regain power by having an anti-Semite as leader, especially when he causes problems that cost the party heavily in legal fees and payouts.

    True, he might attract subs from hard-left nasties in the same way a fox's carcass attracts blow flies, but that doesn't make him a good party leader. Only someone who attracts fellow nasties.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 72,315
    Excited to share our preprint demonstrating that ACE2 binding is a deep ancestral trait of sarbecoviruses with plastic evolutionary potential. A fun collaboration with @jbloom_lab ... etc
    https://twitter.com/tylernstarr/status/1417500552091553793

    More circumstantial evidence for natural origins of the virus.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,419
    Foxy said:

    ping said:

    Eh?

    Completely bonkers article on the bbc;

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-scotland-57867125

    Key point: Doctors say it’s unrelated to COVID.

    I mean, poor kid, but, seriously. Fails the basic journalism test.

    The story should be: we have an epidemic of people attributing things to COVID that aren’t COVID.

    Covid toes are part of the vasculitic syndrome in young children that occurs after the viral phase of covid. They have been reported worldwide.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7806462/
    JCVI need more data 😒 though..
  • northern_monkeynorthern_monkey Posts: 1,640
    Leon said:

    MaxPB said:

    Leon said:

    MaxPB said:

    Leon said:

    Andy_JS said:

    Leon said:

    I am now able to report from the Covid Freedom Day Front Line AKA the gastropubs of Highgate

    Verdict: a disappointing lack of jubilation, or, indeed, Freedom. You weren't allowed to order at the bar, you had to check in at the door, the staff were mostly wearing masks, it was table service only

    Almost nothing has changed

    Indeed I've just been out shopping in Camden and if anything there seem to be MORE masks, people look even more nervous. for the first time ever I saw someone wearing the full Covid monty: mask, visor and disposable blue nitrile gloves WHILE WALKING DOWN THE STREET

    Have we terrified humanity - or at least the British part of it - into some ridiculous, unnecessary dystopia?

    Maybe you could do another report from a working-class area to see if there any differences. Basildon or Harlow for example.
    Camden - down by the Tube - really isn't posh in any sense. It is all of humankind, rich, poor, middling, homeless, trustafarian, Muslim, atheist, Goth, emo, Gen X Gen Z Gen Lambda, 50-something flint knappers buying laksa ingredients

    This is a big reason I am attached to it, I like the grittiness and the melee (tho I am glad I live at the slightly posher end, we are all human)

    So Camden is probably quite representative - at least of London as a whole (and Highgate felt very similar). Dunno about the UK

    I used to agree about Camden. Then the Monarch closed down, just the latest "gritty" late night bar to close and be replaced with yet another wanky cocktail bar. It's become as sterile as the places it used to mock. Sadly there aren't many places left in London that capture the essence of what the city used to be, maybe the Queen's Crescent area of Kentish Town and a few bits of Archway still have some of the magic but London is over.
    On bad days I agree with you. I wonder if London can recover from Covid (and everything else)

    But then you get a sunny day and the parks fill up and the beer gardens sing and there is, still, a distinct and glorious energy, perhaps made bubblier by the toughness of the times. And it is a very contemporary London energy, not like Paris or NYC or LA

    When I am not fretting about all the closed restaurants and bars (and they are worrying) I've also noticed that London literally seems younger, after Covid. The average age on the street and in the shops is down about 5 years. The kidz have taken over. I can see why - the old have fled or are hiding, the middle aged are working from home - and hiding - it will be fascinating to see where it goes from here.

    Is London Rome in 440AD? Or Paris in 1944?
    I think part of the issue is that the next generation coming up is so much more sterile than mine was. I was talking to a guy selling us some mandy pre-lockdown and he said that his walk ups are predominantly over 30 and he struggles to get under 30s to buy any kind of party drugs because they're all too concerned with health and other such inanities. I expect after COVID it will just get worse.

    Who in the next generation is going to do a line of charlie and become a complete c*** to their mates and everyone around them? Those experiences just won't happen now but it's part of growing up and the next generation is just completely missing out because they've become conditioned by social media and influencers that being anything than 100% straight up will be a disaster.

    Even outside of that stuff I just think London is becoming a shadow of it's former self and I say that as someone who has just spent a 7 figure number buying a house here.
    Some truth in that

    The Boris-hating waitress in my Highgate pub said she hated Boris because "my Mum does". I put it to her that she should be rebellious, at her age, not just following her Mum's opinions and she looked utterly bewildered at this concept and she said "oh, No, my Mum would kill me"

    The under 30s are a notably conformative and censorious bunch, especially by the standards of my generation, which was outrageously misbehaved. And still is, at times. Ahem

    But then, my cohort had it so much easier. Student GRANTS, cheaper property, lad magazines, sex everywhere, exciting new drugs, a permissive society, no apocalyptic worries about climate change and all that, and, maybe most importantly, no social media to cancel us (and Jeez, we would have been cancelled a thousand times a year for some of the shit we did)

    So I also have sympathies for the young. They are forced to be dull, it's not their choice. But they ARE rather dull

    And now I am definitely walking. A bientot
    My nephew’s 16 next week and he’s a great lad but will he fuck have a beer. Not like in my day…
  • alex_alex_ Posts: 7,518
    eek said:

    alex_ said:

    Leon said:

    Judging by the polls, 71% of my fellow citizens are happy to turn me into a second class citizen with vaxx passports. No clubs (as if), pubs, theatres or maybe even work for me come the autumn.

    I think my last hope is the economy. Can the Johnson regime get Britain up to anything like full speed under this settlement?

    We shall see.

    I'm in favour of vaccine passports. Have been all along, and said so on here, throughout. Am I "happy" about this? Of course not. Vaxports are an ugly necessity, in a time of trouble, that is all. Like blackouts during the Blitz.

    If we want to save the economy from still further, maybe irreversible damage, we need to give people confidence to go out and shop, drink, eat, watch plays, movies, bands, and so on. Vaxports will do that.

    As soon as the Covid crisis is over, we ditch them, the same way we ended the blackout as soon as the war was obviously finished

    "on 30 April 1945, the day Hitler committed suicide, Big Ben was lit up: 5 years and 123 days after the Blackout was first imposed"


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackout_(wartime)
    I continue to have trouble understanding the argument that vaccinated people require vaxports to have confidence to go out and socialise etc. If they don’t understand that their protection comes from the vaccine, not from reduced exposure to unvaccinated people, then I don’t see them going out much anyway.

    If anything, pushing for vaxports logically undermines confidence in vaccines.
    But the vaccine doesn't stop you getting the virus it just means that the consequences of getting the virus is less severe symptoms and a vastly reduced risk of ending up in hospital. Vaccination also seems to reduce the period of time some is infectious.

    So I can see why, if you are risk adverse you would only want to visit venues that insist on a vaxport.
    If you are that risk averse I don’t see you going to a club anyway. If vaccines don’t prevent you getting the virus and don’t prevent you transmitting it, then only socialising with vaccinated people won’t keep you totally safe. And you’re probably in greater danger of getting drunk and being run over by a car.
  • Nigel_ForemainNigel_Foremain Posts: 14,352
    Pagan2 said:

    Pagan2 said:

    Pagan2 said:

    Judging by the polls, 71% of my fellow citizens are happy to turn me into a second class citizen with vaxx passports. No clubs (as if), pubs, theatres or maybe even work for me come the autumn.

    I think my last hope is the economy. Can the Johnson regime get Britain up to anything like full speed under this settlement?

    We shall see.

    Some would argue you have chosen to be a second class citizen. If one choses not to have internet connectivity and/or a smartphone one denies oneself services. This is not the majority denying the person. It is a simple self-imposed refusal to adapt to the times.
    Fuck right off right now....when did having a smart phone suddenly become a requisite for being a full citizen. You have one because it suits you. Why the fuck should I have to have one because it suits the governement. I neither need nor want one.
    Calm down! I was simply presenting a point of view that I am not sure I agree with, but it has some rationality to it. I am somewhat amused that anti-vaxxers think they have been injected with monitoring devices but still use social media and smartphones. The tech giants don't need to inject you with a device, you mainly choose to carry one on your person everyday and leave your IP address every time you visit an internet site to read the latest conspiracy theory website, lol.
    a) I am not an antivaxxer
    b) I have a mobile phone though not a smart phone purely because I recieve less calls on it than I do a landline of the nuisance nature
    c) I dont use social media
    d) for most sites I use tor
    e) I dont carry my phone with me when i go out
    f) I dont subscribe to any conspiracy theories. Not wanting the uk to slowly turn into china where we are tracked for everything is not a conspiracy theory. Vaxports are the first step on the road
    While I share your concern about the creeping powers of government I think you are indulging in hyperbole. We are a long long way from being anything close to the surveillance society that is China. Showing proof of vaccination does not need to be that onerous. Personally, on balance, I prefer to have the freedom to know I can go to an event where there is limited chance of me catching Covid, even if the odds are I won't be hospitalised.

    You having the freedom to refuse the vaccine and still go to the theatre or a rock concert is not a freedom worth literally dying in a ditch/hospital bed for. Sorry, but that is the way it is. If you want to be a conscientious objector in the middle of a national crisis and refuse to play your part you shouldn't bleat about the fact others don't support you.
    You claim hyperbole but China didnt suddenly become that way, it was a series of baby steps and each time people like you said "don't be so hyperbolic". We know civil servants want us all tracked and ided for everything we do and say. That has been obvious for years its why the id card keeps coming back, its why the original track and trace app had a huge database behind it. It is why every home office minister keeps coming out with the same bull no matter what party
    Well, as far as I am aware, China did suddenly become that way. Most of us on here would have our IP addresses tracked and we would mysteriously disappear for "re-educating" or the firing squad. Like with most things in life there is a balance between being aware of the creeping state and also being fairly proud that we have the rule of law, which is the fundamental guardian of our freedoms, not the system that we call "democracy".
  • contrariancontrarian Posts: 5,818
    edited July 2021

    Pagan2 said:

    Pagan2 said:

    Judging by the polls, 71% of my fellow citizens are happy to turn me into a second class citizen with vaxx passports. No clubs (as if), pubs, theatres or maybe even work for me come the autumn.

    I think my last hope is the economy. Can the Johnson regime get Britain up to anything like full speed under this settlement?

    We shall see.

    Some would argue you have chosen to be a second class citizen. If one choses not to have internet connectivity and/or a smartphone one denies oneself services. This is not the majority denying the person. It is a simple self-imposed refusal to adapt to the times.
    Fuck right off right now....when did having a smart phone suddenly become a requisite for being a full citizen. You have one because it suits you. Why the fuck should I have to have one because it suits the governement. I neither need nor want one.
    Calm down! I was simply presenting a point of view that I am not sure I agree with, but it has some rationality to it. I am somewhat amused that anti-vaxxers think they have been injected with monitoring devices but still use social media and smartphones. The tech giants don't need to inject you with a device, you mainly choose to carry one on your person everyday and leave your IP address every time you visit an internet site to read the latest conspiracy theory website, lol.
    a) I am not an antivaxxer
    b) I have a mobile phone though not a smart phone purely because I recieve less calls on it than I do a landline of the nuisance nature
    c) I dont use social media
    d) for most sites I use tor
    e) I dont carry my phone with me when i go out
    f) I dont subscribe to any conspiracy theories. Not wanting the uk to slowly turn into china where we are tracked for everything is not a conspiracy theory. Vaxports are the first step on the road
    While I share your concern about the creeping powers of government I think you are indulging in hyperbole. We are a long long way from being anything close to the surveillance society that is China. Showing proof of vaccination does not need to be that onerous. Personally, on balance, I prefer to have the freedom to know I can go to an event where there is limited chance of me catching Covid, even if the odds are I won't be hospitalised.

    You having the freedom to refuse the vaccine and still go to the theatre or a rock concert is not a freedom worth literally dying in a ditch/hospital bed for. Sorry, but that is the way it is. If you want to be a conscientious objector in the middle of a national crisis and refuse to play your part you shouldn't bleat about the fact others don't support you.
    But you have had two vaccines though. You are protected. Apparently.

    And why can't have 'open' and 'closed concerts where the unvaccinated are/are not allowed? Why can't we choose?

    The government's proposing a blanket ban. Go to your 'vaxxed only' concert if you want. Why can't we have the option of 'open' mass gatherings.

  • squareroot2squareroot2 Posts: 6,845
    Huge attention in the media does not equate to the nation paying attention to a venal embittered man.
  • TheWhiteRabbitTheWhiteRabbit Posts: 12,454
    "On Thursday 22 July, vaccination uptake for the UK, nations and Scottish local authorities will be updated to use the mid-2020 population estimates."

    Is that effectively NIMS or a third system?
  • Nigel_ForemainNigel_Foremain Posts: 14,352
    Pagan2 said:

    eek said:

    Pagan2 said:

    eek said:

    Pagan2 said:

    Pagan2 said:

    Judging by the polls, 71% of my fellow citizens are happy to turn me into a second class citizen with vaxx passports. No clubs (as if), pubs, theatres or maybe even work for me come the autumn.

    I think my last hope is the economy. Can the Johnson regime get Britain up to anything like full speed under this settlement?

    We shall see.

    Some would argue you have chosen to be a second class citizen. If one choses not to have internet connectivity and/or a smartphone one denies oneself services. This is not the majority denying the person. It is a simple self-imposed refusal to adapt to the times.
    Fuck right off right now....when did having a smart phone suddenly become a requisite for being a full citizen. You have one because it suits you. Why the fuck should I have to have one because it suits the governement. I neither need nor want one.
    Calm down! I was simply presenting a point of view that I am not sure I agree with, but it has some rationality to it. I am somewhat amused that anti-vaxxers think they have been injected with monitoring devices but still use social media and smartphones. The tech giants don't need to inject you with a device, you mainly choose to carry one on your person everyday and leave your IP address every time you visit an internet site to read the latest conspiracy theory website, lol.
    a) I am not an antivaxxer
    b) I have a mobile phone though not a smart phone purely because I recieve less calls on it than I do a landline of the nuisance nature
    c) I dont use social media
    d) for most sites I use tor
    e) I dont carry my phone with me when i go out
    f) I dont subscribe to any conspiracy theories. Not wanting the uk to slowly turn into china where we are tracked for everything is not a conspiracy theory. Vaxports are the first step on the road
    Surely vaxports are taking us nearer to Germany, France or Austria where they have ID cards rather than full on China surveillance.

    The issue with ID cards was never the card itself it was the massive database that Labour planned to build against it.
    vaxports are far worse than id cards, I don't necessarily have an objection to id cards on two proviso's

    1) they can't be demanded on whim by any jumped up jobsworth
    2) while you may need to show them you arent recorded.

    Sadly vaxports fail certainly on the second as they will bear the responsibility to scan in and out giving the government a clear view on where you go and how long you were there.

    Now dont get me wrong I dont suspect the current tory government would abuse it, nor do I suspect the current labour shadow government would either...a government in 20 or 30 years time with a health nazi in charge...not so much. I know I come across as strident but in my view once you cross the rubicon of too much it is too late and better to stop the journey before it begins
    So you worry is that you will need to register to enter premises in the exact same why you currently have to do when you use the NHS app.
    I dont have the nhs app nor have I never registered to go anywhere
    You have not been obliged to have it, so you have chosen not to participate. Hardly The People's Republic now is it?
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,419
    alex_ said:

    eek said:

    alex_ said:

    Leon said:

    Judging by the polls, 71% of my fellow citizens are happy to turn me into a second class citizen with vaxx passports. No clubs (as if), pubs, theatres or maybe even work for me come the autumn.

    I think my last hope is the economy. Can the Johnson regime get Britain up to anything like full speed under this settlement?

    We shall see.

    I'm in favour of vaccine passports. Have been all along, and said so on here, throughout. Am I "happy" about this? Of course not. Vaxports are an ugly necessity, in a time of trouble, that is all. Like blackouts during the Blitz.

    If we want to save the economy from still further, maybe irreversible damage, we need to give people confidence to go out and shop, drink, eat, watch plays, movies, bands, and so on. Vaxports will do that.

    As soon as the Covid crisis is over, we ditch them, the same way we ended the blackout as soon as the war was obviously finished

    "on 30 April 1945, the day Hitler committed suicide, Big Ben was lit up: 5 years and 123 days after the Blackout was first imposed"


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackout_(wartime)
    I continue to have trouble understanding the argument that vaccinated people require vaxports to have confidence to go out and socialise etc. If they don’t understand that their protection comes from the vaccine, not from reduced exposure to unvaccinated people, then I don’t see them going out much anyway.

    If anything, pushing for vaxports logically undermines confidence in vaccines.
    But the vaccine doesn't stop you getting the virus it just means that the consequences of getting the virus is less severe symptoms and a vastly reduced risk of ending up in hospital. Vaccination also seems to reduce the period of time some is infectious.

    So I can see why, if you are risk adverse you would only want to visit venues that insist on a vaxport.
    If you are that risk averse I don’t see you going to a club anyway. If vaccines don’t prevent you getting the virus and don’t prevent you transmitting it, then only socialising with vaccinated people won’t keep you totally safe. And you’re probably in greater danger of getting drunk and being run over by a car.
    Lowers probabilities...
    That's all we can do ;)
  • stodgestodge Posts: 13,995
    eek said:


    But the vaccine doesn't stop you getting the virus it just means that the consequences of getting the virus is less severe symptoms and a vastly reduced risk of ending up in hospital. Vaccination also seems to reduce the period of time some is infectious.

    So I can see why, if you are risk adverse you would only want to visit venues that insist on a vaxport.

    Getting a flu jab doesn't stop you catching flu either. Yes, we're comparing apples and nuclear weapons but, and I suspect a little misinformation here, the notion double vaccination = complete immunity did get some traction.

    That doesn't make an argument for vaccination passports - indeed, it flies in the face of notions of personal and collective self-responsibility which were being trumpeted by the PM and his allies not so long ago.

    Personal risk assessment is all - if you want to go to a nightclub or a crowded pub, there are risks, fewer if you are doubly vaccinated but still risks. It's your choice and your decision - I thought the Conservatives were a party who believed in personal responsibility and choice.
  • contrariancontrarian Posts: 5,818
    alex_ said:

    eek said:

    alex_ said:

    Leon said:

    Judging by the polls, 71% of my fellow citizens are happy to turn me into a second class citizen with vaxx passports. No clubs (as if), pubs, theatres or maybe even work for me come the autumn.

    I think my last hope is the economy. Can the Johnson regime get Britain up to anything like full speed under this settlement?

    We shall see.

    I'm in favour of vaccine passports. Have been all along, and said so on here, throughout. Am I "happy" about this? Of course not. Vaxports are an ugly necessity, in a time of trouble, that is all. Like blackouts during the Blitz.

    If we want to save the economy from still further, maybe irreversible damage, we need to give people confidence to go out and shop, drink, eat, watch plays, movies, bands, and so on. Vaxports will do that.

    As soon as the Covid crisis is over, we ditch them, the same way we ended the blackout as soon as the war was obviously finished

    "on 30 April 1945, the day Hitler committed suicide, Big Ben was lit up: 5 years and 123 days after the Blackout was first imposed"


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackout_(wartime)
    I continue to have trouble understanding the argument that vaccinated people require vaxports to have confidence to go out and socialise etc. If they don’t understand that their protection comes from the vaccine, not from reduced exposure to unvaccinated people, then I don’t see them going out much anyway.

    If anything, pushing for vaxports logically undermines confidence in vaccines.
    But the vaccine doesn't stop you getting the virus it just means that the consequences of getting the virus is less severe symptoms and a vastly reduced risk of ending up in hospital. Vaccination also seems to reduce the period of time some is infectious.

    So I can see why, if you are risk adverse you would only want to visit venues that insist on a vaxport.
    If you are that risk averse I don’t see you going to a club anyway. If vaccines don’t prevent you getting the virus and don’t prevent you transmitting it, then only socialising with vaccinated people won’t keep you totally safe. And you’re probably in greater danger of getting drunk and being run over by a car.
    I don;t mind if vaccinated people only want to socialise with vaccinated people. That's up to them. But the government is not proposing that.

    The government is proposing to freeze unvaccinated people out of society with a blanket ban. No travel. No pub. No restaurant. No theatre. Maybe even no job.

  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,046

    I have just been doing a bit of tidying up in the garden and found £20.

    Happy days.

    Have you been planting banknotes again?
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 124,051
    edited July 2021
    stodge said:

    eek said:


    But the vaccine doesn't stop you getting the virus it just means that the consequences of getting the virus is less severe symptoms and a vastly reduced risk of ending up in hospital. Vaccination also seems to reduce the period of time some is infectious.

    So I can see why, if you are risk adverse you would only want to visit venues that insist on a vaxport.

    Getting a flu jab doesn't stop you catching flu either. Yes, we're comparing apples and nuclear weapons but, and I suspect a little misinformation here, the notion double vaccination = complete immunity did get some traction.

    That doesn't make an argument for vaccination passports - indeed, it flies in the face of notions of personal and collective self-responsibility which were being trumpeted by the PM and his allies not so long ago.

    Personal risk assessment is all - if you want to go to a nightclub or a crowded pub, there are risks, fewer if you are doubly vaccinated but still risks. It's your choice and your decision - I thought the Conservatives were a party who believed in personal responsibility and choice.
    No, the Conservative Party is a conservative party, hence the title. It believes the state has a role in enforcing rules to protect society.

    The LDs may oppose Vax passports for nightclubs and crowded venues as would accord with their liberal ideology, the Conservatives rightly do not.

    In fact the new more socially conservative but economically centrist white working class base of the Tories means the Tory Party is less libertarian than it was if anything
  • Nigel_ForemainNigel_Foremain Posts: 14,352

    Pagan2 said:

    Pagan2 said:

    Judging by the polls, 71% of my fellow citizens are happy to turn me into a second class citizen with vaxx passports. No clubs (as if), pubs, theatres or maybe even work for me come the autumn.

    I think my last hope is the economy. Can the Johnson regime get Britain up to anything like full speed under this settlement?

    We shall see.

    Some would argue you have chosen to be a second class citizen. If one choses not to have internet connectivity and/or a smartphone one denies oneself services. This is not the majority denying the person. It is a simple self-imposed refusal to adapt to the times.
    Fuck right off right now....when did having a smart phone suddenly become a requisite for being a full citizen. You have one because it suits you. Why the fuck should I have to have one because it suits the governement. I neither need nor want one.
    Calm down! I was simply presenting a point of view that I am not sure I agree with, but it has some rationality to it. I am somewhat amused that anti-vaxxers think they have been injected with monitoring devices but still use social media and smartphones. The tech giants don't need to inject you with a device, you mainly choose to carry one on your person everyday and leave your IP address every time you visit an internet site to read the latest conspiracy theory website, lol.
    a) I am not an antivaxxer
    b) I have a mobile phone though not a smart phone purely because I recieve less calls on it than I do a landline of the nuisance nature
    c) I dont use social media
    d) for most sites I use tor
    e) I dont carry my phone with me when i go out
    f) I dont subscribe to any conspiracy theories. Not wanting the uk to slowly turn into china where we are tracked for everything is not a conspiracy theory. Vaxports are the first step on the road
    While I share your concern about the creeping powers of government I think you are indulging in hyperbole. We are a long long way from being anything close to the surveillance society that is China. Showing proof of vaccination does not need to be that onerous. Personally, on balance, I prefer to have the freedom to know I can go to an event where there is limited chance of me catching Covid, even if the odds are I won't be hospitalised.

    You having the freedom to refuse the vaccine and still go to the theatre or a rock concert is not a freedom worth literally dying in a ditch/hospital bed for. Sorry, but that is the way it is. If you want to be a conscientious objector in the middle of a national crisis and refuse to play your part you shouldn't bleat about the fact others don't support you.
    But you have had two vaccines though. You are protected. Apparently.

    And why can't have 'open' and 'closed concerts where the unvaccinated are/are not allowed? Why can't we choose?

    The government's proposing a blanket ban. Go to your 'vaxxed only' concert if you want. Why can't we have the option of 'open' mass gatherings.

    A good question. I am slightly on the fence. I think you are a fool not to have the vaccine, but it is your prerogative to be so if you chose. I am not sure it is a human right to go to a rock concert or a footy match though, if you chose to deny one of the entry criteria.
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 39,064
    Leon said:

    MaxPB said:

    Leon said:

    MaxPB said:

    Leon said:

    Andy_JS said:

    Leon said:

    I am now able to report from the Covid Freedom Day Front Line AKA the gastropubs of Highgate

    Verdict: a disappointing lack of jubilation, or, indeed, Freedom. You weren't allowed to order at the bar, you had to check in at the door, the staff were mostly wearing masks, it was table service only

    Almost nothing has changed

    Indeed I've just been out shopping in Camden and if anything there seem to be MORE masks, people look even more nervous. for the first time ever I saw someone wearing the full Covid monty: mask, visor and disposable blue nitrile gloves WHILE WALKING DOWN THE STREET

    Have we terrified humanity - or at least the British part of it - into some ridiculous, unnecessary dystopia?

    Maybe you could do another report from a working-class area to see if there any differences. Basildon or Harlow for example.
    Camden - down by the Tube - really isn't posh in any sense. It is all of humankind, rich, poor, middling, homeless, trustafarian, Muslim, atheist, Goth, emo, Gen X Gen Z Gen Lambda, 50-something flint knappers buying laksa ingredients

    This is a big reason I am attached to it, I like the grittiness and the melee (tho I am glad I live at the slightly posher end, we are all human)

    So Camden is probably quite representative - at least of London as a whole (and Highgate felt very similar). Dunno about the UK

    I used to agree about Camden. Then the Monarch closed down, just the latest "gritty" late night bar to close and be replaced with yet another wanky cocktail bar. It's become as sterile as the places it used to mock. Sadly there aren't many places left in London that capture the essence of what the city used to be, maybe the Queen's Crescent area of Kentish Town and a few bits of Archway still have some of the magic but London is over.
    On bad days I agree with you. I wonder if London can recover from Covid (and everything else)

    But then you get a sunny day and the parks fill up and the beer gardens sing and there is, still, a distinct and glorious energy, perhaps made bubblier by the toughness of the times. And it is a very contemporary London energy, not like Paris or NYC or LA

    When I am not fretting about all the closed restaurants and bars (and they are worrying) I've also noticed that London literally seems younger, after Covid. The average age on the street and in the shops is down about 5 years. The kidz have taken over. I can see why - the old have fled or are hiding, the middle aged are working from home - and hiding - it will be fascinating to see where it goes from here.

    Is London Rome in 440AD? Or Paris in 1944?
    I think part of the issue is that the next generation coming up is so much more sterile than mine was. I was talking to a guy selling us some mandy pre-lockdown and he said that his walk ups are predominantly over 30 and he struggles to get under 30s to buy any kind of party drugs because they're all too concerned with health and other such inanities. I expect after COVID it will just get worse.

    Who in the next generation is going to do a line of charlie and become a complete c*** to their mates and everyone around them? Those experiences just won't happen now but it's part of growing up and the next generation is just completely missing out because they've become conditioned by social media and influencers that being anything than 100% straight up will be a disaster.

    Even outside of that stuff I just think London is becoming a shadow of it's former self and I say that as someone who has just spent a 7 figure number buying a house here.
    Some truth in that

    The Boris-hating waitress in my Highgate pub said she hated Boris because "my Mum does". I put it to her that she should be rebellious, at her age, not just following her Mum's opinions and she looked utterly bewildered at this concept and she said "oh, No, my Mum would kill me"

    The under 30s are a notably conformative and censorious bunch, especially by the standards of my generation, which was outrageously misbehaved. And still is, at times. Ahem

    But then, my cohort had it so much easier. Student GRANTS, cheaper property, lad magazines, sex everywhere, exciting new drugs, a permissive society, no apocalyptic worries about climate change and all that, and, maybe most importantly, no social media to cancel us (and Jeez, we would have been cancelled a thousand times a year for some of the shit we did)

    So I also have sympathies for the young. They are forced to be dull, it's not their choice. But they ARE rather dull

    And now I am definitely walking. A bientot
    Yeah I definitely get that their dullness is partly because of the situation they're in wrt the future being so much more difficult for them than even my generation who are now all finally getting on the property ladder (at least my friends are).

    I was in the final year to only pay £1k per year in fees, my wife went to university in Switzerland and got paid an annual grant and then got a grant here for her master's degree. The freedom of not having £50k in debt the day you graduate is definitely something the current generation are missing. The politicians and old c**** who decided that getting an 8% pension increase was more important than keeping university affordable. Even when I speak to my juniors about it the £45-50k debt they've got definitely figures into their subconscious way of life. It's £35k I didn't have to pay back which helped me get on the housing ladder and these lot are all on relatively decent salaries for their age but the idea of them actually saving any money let alone buying a flat seems completely out of reach.

    Along with the fear of social media cancellation I can see why they're so boring. My years as a junior banker and before that a software developer were incredible. I would never have met my wife without them as I would simply have not had the social skills to attract her. One of my juniors is 24 and basically "holy shit, cheat on your wife" worthy (not that I would, of course, though you probably would lol) but she just has no social skills and is incapable of holding even the most basic conversation without looking at her phone or worrying about what people on her social media are saying. I don't see any guy being interested in her for more than two minutes and it's sad because she's really lovely otherwise, super smart, funny in her own way and as I said, very good looking.
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 43,515

    I have just been doing a bit of tidying up in the garden and found £20.

    Happy days.

    We found a load of ten pound notes during our lockdown spring clean.

    Unfortunately they're the old ones. A trip to the bank looms. Eventually.
  • Pagan2 said:

    Pagan2 said:

    Pagan2 said:

    Judging by the polls, 71% of my fellow citizens are happy to turn me into a second class citizen with vaxx passports. No clubs (as if), pubs, theatres or maybe even work for me come the autumn.

    I think my last hope is the economy. Can the Johnson regime get Britain up to anything like full speed under this settlement?

    We shall see.

    Some would argue you have chosen to be a second class citizen. If one choses not to have internet connectivity and/or a smartphone one denies oneself services. This is not the majority denying the person. It is a simple self-imposed refusal to adapt to the times.
    Fuck right off right now....when did having a smart phone suddenly become a requisite for being a full citizen. You have one because it suits you. Why the fuck should I have to have one because it suits the governement. I neither need nor want one.
    Calm down! I was simply presenting a point of view that I am not sure I agree with, but it has some rationality to it. I am somewhat amused that anti-vaxxers think they have been injected with monitoring devices but still use social media and smartphones. The tech giants don't need to inject you with a device, you mainly choose to carry one on your person everyday and leave your IP address every time you visit an internet site to read the latest conspiracy theory website, lol.
    a) I am not an antivaxxer
    b) I have a mobile phone though not a smart phone purely because I recieve less calls on it than I do a landline of the nuisance nature
    c) I dont use social media
    d) for most sites I use tor
    e) I dont carry my phone with me when i go out
    f) I dont subscribe to any conspiracy theories. Not wanting the uk to slowly turn into china where we are tracked for everything is not a conspiracy theory. Vaxports are the first step on the road
    While I share your concern about the creeping powers of government I think you are indulging in hyperbole. We are a long long way from being anything close to the surveillance society that is China. Showing proof of vaccination does not need to be that onerous. Personally, on balance, I prefer to have the freedom to know I can go to an event where there is limited chance of me catching Covid, even if the odds are I won't be hospitalised.

    You having the freedom to refuse the vaccine and still go to the theatre or a rock concert is not a freedom worth literally dying in a ditch/hospital bed for. Sorry, but that is the way it is. If you want to be a conscientious objector in the middle of a national crisis and refuse to play your part you shouldn't bleat about the fact others don't support you.
    You claim hyperbole but China didnt suddenly become that way, it was a series of baby steps and each time people like you said "don't be so hyperbolic". We know civil servants want us all tracked and ided for everything we do and say. That has been obvious for years its why the id card keeps coming back, its why the original track and trace app had a huge database behind it. It is why every home office minister keeps coming out with the same bull no matter what party
    China during the Cultural Revolution = Land of freedom?
  • FishingFishing Posts: 5,141
    HYUFD said:

    stodge said:

    eek said:


    But the vaccine doesn't stop you getting the virus it just means that the consequences of getting the virus is less severe symptoms and a vastly reduced risk of ending up in hospital. Vaccination also seems to reduce the period of time some is infectious.

    So I can see why, if you are risk adverse you would only want to visit venues that insist on a vaxport.

    Getting a flu jab doesn't stop you catching flu either. Yes, we're comparing apples and nuclear weapons but, and I suspect a little misinformation here, the notion double vaccination = complete immunity did get some traction.

    That doesn't make an argument for vaccination passports - indeed, it flies in the face of notions of personal and collective self-responsibility which were being trumpeted by the PM and his allies not so long ago.

    Personal risk assessment is all - if you want to go to a nightclub or a crowded pub, there are risks, fewer if you are doubly vaccinated but still risks. It's your choice and your decision - I thought the Conservatives were a party who believed in personal responsibility and choice.
    No, the Conservative Party is a conservative party, hence the title. It believes the state has a role in enforcing rules to protect society.

    The LDs may oppose Vax passports for nightclubs and crowded venues as would accord with their liberal ideology, the Conservatives rightly do not.

    In fact the new more socially conservative but economically centrist white working class base of the Tories means it is less libertarian than it was if anything
    There has always been a libertarian strain in the Conservative Party as well as an authoritarian one, and indeed many people who take different stances on different issues. The Party is a broad coalition - as you have to be, to get 40+ per cent of the votes in an increasingly diverse country.
  • RogerRoger Posts: 19,985
    "An embittered aide"

    AKA My Hero of 2021
  • stodgestodge Posts: 13,995
    HYUFD said:


    No, the Conservative Party is a conservative party, hence the title. It believes the state has a role in enforcing rules to protect society.

    The LDs may oppose Vax passports for nightclubs and crowded venues as would accord with their liberal ideology, the Conservatives rightly do not.

    In fact the new more socially conservative but economically centrist white working class base of the Tories means the Tory Party is less libertarian than it was if anything

    I must confess I seemed to recall Margaret Thatcher speaking a lot about "personal responsibility". Do you not think individuals have a responsibility to themselves and their families?

    Yes, the State has a role to play in providing information, guidance and advice and we used to have a strong public health function to carry out that task but ultimately should not the individual be the one making the choice rather than the State making it for them?

  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,991

    Huge attention in the media does not equate to the nation paying attention to a venal embittered man.

    The largely Remain-voting media hated Dom with a passion. Witness his road trip to Barnard Castle and their collective glee at putting the boot in.

    And NOW they hang on his every word.

    Funny old world, Greavsie.....
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 49,197
    RobD said:

    I have just been doing a bit of tidying up in the garden and found £20.

    Happy days.

    Have you been planting banknotes again?
    How else do you plant a magic money tree?
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 124,051
    stodge said:

    HYUFD said:


    No, the Conservative Party is a conservative party, hence the title. It believes the state has a role in enforcing rules to protect society.

    The LDs may oppose Vax passports for nightclubs and crowded venues as would accord with their liberal ideology, the Conservatives rightly do not.

    In fact the new more socially conservative but economically centrist white working class base of the Tories means the Tory Party is less libertarian than it was if anything

    I must confess I seemed to recall Margaret Thatcher speaking a lot about "personal responsibility". Do you not think individuals have a responsibility to themselves and their families?

    Yes, the State has a role to play in providing information, guidance and advice and we used to have a strong public health function to carry out that task but ultimately should not the individual be the one making the choice rather than the State making it for them?

    Yes, they also have a responsibility to get jabbed and to protect others

  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 39,064
    On the subject of boring young people, if I were the Lib Dems I'd campaign on young people paying £9k per year for fees and the government claiming poverty over reducing them and compare that to the ongoing cost of the triple lock. I feel as though there are probably a lot of votes for them now that Nick Clegg is gone.
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 43,443
    edited July 2021
    RobD said:

    I have just been doing a bit of tidying up in the garden and found £20.

    Happy days.

    Have you been planting banknotes again?
    Magic money arboriculture?

    Edit: Foxy got his dig in first, I see.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,736

    I have just been doing a bit of tidying up in the garden and found £20.

    Happy days.

    SKS's Labour would appreciate your generosity
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 124,051
    Fishing said:

    HYUFD said:

    stodge said:

    eek said:


    But the vaccine doesn't stop you getting the virus it just means that the consequences of getting the virus is less severe symptoms and a vastly reduced risk of ending up in hospital. Vaccination also seems to reduce the period of time some is infectious.

    So I can see why, if you are risk adverse you would only want to visit venues that insist on a vaxport.

    Getting a flu jab doesn't stop you catching flu either. Yes, we're comparing apples and nuclear weapons but, and I suspect a little misinformation here, the notion double vaccination = complete immunity did get some traction.

    That doesn't make an argument for vaccination passports - indeed, it flies in the face of notions of personal and collective self-responsibility which were being trumpeted by the PM and his allies not so long ago.

    Personal risk assessment is all - if you want to go to a nightclub or a crowded pub, there are risks, fewer if you are doubly vaccinated but still risks. It's your choice and your decision - I thought the Conservatives were a party who believed in personal responsibility and choice.
    No, the Conservative Party is a conservative party, hence the title. It believes the state has a role in enforcing rules to protect society.

    The LDs may oppose Vax passports for nightclubs and crowded venues as would accord with their liberal ideology, the Conservatives rightly do not.

    In fact the new more socially conservative but economically centrist white working class base of the Tories means it is less libertarian than it was if anything
    There has always been a libertarian strain in the Conservative Party as well as an authoritarian one, and indeed many people who take different stances on different issues. The Party is a broad coalition - as you have to be, to get 40+ per cent of the votes in an increasingly diverse country.
    Yes to an extent but many of the upper middle class liberals who backed Cameron are now actually voting Liberal Democrat and many of the white working class social conservatives who voted for Brown and for UKIP are now voting Tory so there has been a clear shift from liberalism to social conservatism in the voting coalition that makes up the Conservative Party in the last 5 years
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    Of course he can.

    Maskwatch v2 - Kids finished school today and took them to Smyths Toy Store to celebrate that and them both getting great report cards. Masks were almost entirely unheard of in the store - the security guard by the front door wore one, but none of the other staff did. About 90% of the parents in the store were not wearing them either, and as normal none of the kids were.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,943
    .

    Huge attention in the media does not equate to the nation paying attention to a venal embittered man.

    The largely Remain-voting media hated Dom with a passion. Witness his road trip to Barnard Castle and their collective glee at putting the boot in.

    And NOW they hang on his every word.

    Funny old world, Greavsie.....
    No MM, he is still a barsteward. Always was, always will be.
  • IshmaelZIshmaelZ Posts: 21,830

    Huge attention in the media does not equate to the nation paying attention to a venal embittered man.

    The largely Remain-voting media hated Dom with a passion. Witness his road trip to Barnard Castle and their collective glee at putting the boot in.

    And NOW they hang on his every word.

    Funny old world, Greavsie.....
    Because they hate Johnson too. It's not that paradoxical.
  • contrariancontrarian Posts: 5,818
    stodge said:

    HYUFD said:


    No, the Conservative Party is a conservative party, hence the title. It believes the state has a role in enforcing rules to protect society.

    The LDs may oppose Vax passports for nightclubs and crowded venues as would accord with their liberal ideology, the Conservatives rightly do not.

    In fact the new more socially conservative but economically centrist white working class base of the Tories means the Tory Party is less libertarian than it was if anything

    I must confess I seemed to recall Margaret Thatcher speaking a lot about "personal responsibility". Do you not think individuals have a responsibility to themselves and their families?

    Yes, the State has a role to play in providing information, guidance and advice and we used to have a strong public health function to carry out that task but ultimately should not the individual be the one making the choice rather than the State making it for them?

    Don't bother trying to work out HYUFD's increasingly strained attempts to pretend the conservatives still stand for something.

    Think closet socialists and naked opportunists. There is nothing else. Nothing.
  • pingping Posts: 3,805
    edited July 2021

    Huge attention in the media does not equate to the nation paying attention to a venal embittered man.

    The largely Remain-voting media hated Dom with a passion. Witness his road trip to Barnard Castle and their collective glee at putting the boot in.

    And NOW they hang on his every word.

    Funny old world, Greavsie.....
    Nobody is hanging on his every word.

    I suspect he knows this and is reacting to the collective shrug of the shoulders by saying more and more outrageous things.
  • Nigel_ForemainNigel_Foremain Posts: 14,352
    IshmaelZ said:

    Huge attention in the media does not equate to the nation paying attention to a venal embittered man.

    The largely Remain-voting media hated Dom with a passion. Witness his road trip to Barnard Castle and their collective glee at putting the boot in.

    And NOW they hang on his every word.

    Funny old world, Greavsie.....
    Because they hate Johnson too. It's not that paradoxical.
    Ah, "Dr" Walter Mitty (Oxon) I assume? How are ya?
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 42,722
    Pagan2 said:

    kinabalu said:

    Pagan2 said:

    kinabalu said:

    Pagan2 said:

    kinabalu said:

    Andy_JS said:

    MaxPB said:

    Leon said:

    Andy_JS said:

    Leon said:

    I am now able to report from the Covid Freedom Day Front Line AKA the gastropubs of Highgate

    Verdict: a disappointing lack of jubilation, or, indeed, Freedom. You weren't allowed to order at the bar, you had to check in at the door, the staff were mostly wearing masks, it was table service only

    Almost nothing has changed

    Indeed I've just been out shopping in Camden and if anything there seem to be MORE masks, people look even more nervous. for the first time ever I saw someone wearing the full Covid monty: mask, visor and disposable blue nitrile gloves WHILE WALKING DOWN THE STREET

    Have we terrified humanity - or at least the British part of it - into some ridiculous, unnecessary dystopia?

    Maybe you could do another report from a working-class area to see if there any differences. Basildon or Harlow for example.
    Camden - down by the Tube - really isn't posh in any sense. It is all of humankind, rich, poor, middling, homeless, trustafarian, Muslim, atheist, Goth, emo, Gen X Gen Z Gen Lambda, 50-something flint knappers buying laksa ingredients

    This is a big reason I am attached to it, I like the grittiness and the melee (tho I am glad I live at the slightly posher end, we are all human)

    So Camden is probably quite representative - at least of London as a whole (and Highgate felt very similar). Dunno about the UK

    I used to agree about Camden. Then the Monarch closed down, just the latest "gritty" late night bar to close and be replaced with yet another wanky cocktail bar. It's become as sterile as the places it used to mock. Sadly there aren't many places left in London that capture the essence of what the city used to be, maybe the Queen's Crescent area of Kentish Town and a few bits of Archway still have some of the magic but London is over.
    Anarchist band Scritti Politti used to live in a squat at 1 Carol Street, Camden Town back in the late 70s / early 80s. Useless fact.
    Nothing useless about that fact at all. I'll tell you a useless fact. There's a strong correlation between life expectancy and being able to sit in the lotus position.
    As in if you desire to sit in the lotus position you are probably tired off life?
    From that, I'm sensing you can't. A great pity. There are downsides but the benefits outweigh them easily.
    I wouldn't know because never bothered trying or wanted to try....why the hell would I.....hey here is an idea sit in a totally unnatural and uncomfortable position because....why?
    Because it's great for both body and spirit. If you persevere it ends up feeling completely natural, so no problem there. And it does add years to life. Not that I should talk, I can't manage it either. If I'd started doing it whilst young and kept it up - just a few minutes a day - I'd be able to do it now, but I didn't, so I can't. It's too late for me, sadly, but perhaps for you it isn't.
    Source of a reputable study showing it adds years to life or are you merely another rural voter peddling snake oil
    There are studies - good ones - but tbf they show correlation not causation. Take 100 people who can and do sit in the lotus position and cf with 100 of the same age who can't or don't. The 1st group live quite a bit longer. But this could to an extent be because of other factors, eg if you are very lazy and unfit you'll be both more likely to die early AND be unable to do the lotus. So it's next to impossible to unravel the bollocks from the real impact. I did say it was a useless fact. 🙃
  • squareroot2squareroot2 Posts: 6,845
    ping said:

    Huge attention in the media does not equate to the nation paying attention to a venal embittered man.

    The largely Remain-voting media hated Dom with a passion. Witness his road trip to Barnard Castle and their collective glee at putting the boot in.

    And NOW they hang on his every word.

    Funny old world, Greavsie.....
    Nobody is hanging on his every word.

    I suspect he knows this and is reacting to the collective shrug of the shoulders by saying more and more outrageous things.
    Quite... the thread has largely been about vaccines. Noone gives a fuck about a lying shit like Cummings. They will fpthive Boris most things.he got the nation out of Europe as he promised.⁷
  • TazTaz Posts: 15,062

    Huge attention in the media does not equate to the nation paying attention to a venal embittered man.

    The largely Remain-voting media hated Dom with a passion. Witness his road trip to Barnard Castle and their collective glee at putting the boot in.

    And NOW they hang on his every word.

    Funny old world, Greavsie.....
    The guardian hated Dubya at the time of the Iraq war, their view was far more benevolent when he was Putting the boot in to Trump.

    My enemies enemy is my friend.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,419
    Remember Phil didn't catch covid from his covid+ double vaxxed wife.
    This is in a nutshell the argument for covid passports.
    Lower chance of catching the virus, lower chance of transmission. Not zero but it is either this, closed clubs or superspreader clubs.
  • RogerRoger Posts: 19,985

    Huge attention in the media does not equate to the nation paying attention to a venal embittered man.

    The largely Remain-voting media hated Dom with a passion. Witness his road trip to Barnard Castle and their collective glee at putting the boot in.

    And NOW they hang on his every word.

    Funny old world, Greavsie.....
    We all get it wrong sometimes!
  • Nigel_ForemainNigel_Foremain Posts: 14,352
    kinabalu said:

    Huge attention in the media does not equate to the nation paying attention to a venal embittered man.

    The largely Remain-voting media hated Dom with a passion. Witness his road trip to Barnard Castle and their collective glee at putting the boot in.

    And NOW they hang on his every word.

    Funny old world, Greavsie.....
    No conflict there. He's dishing the dirt and it's fascinating. You don't only listen to people you like.
    Indeed, I think he is a complete Cnut, but the real pleasure in seeing him making so much mischief is the pain it is giving all the Johnson fanbois lol.
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,572

    Leon said:



    So I also have sympathies for the young. They are forced to be dull, it's not their choice. But they ARE rather dull

    And now I am definitely walking. A bientot

    My nephew’s 16 next week and he’s a great lad but will he fuck have a beer. Not like in my day…
    There's a bit of generation gap in all this - kids aren't like we used to be, etc. - but there's also a cultural shift. Young people today seem pretty much like the Danish kids I knew at uni in the 70s - sexually relaxed, happy to have some drinks and pot, politically correct before it was fashionable, but basically down-to-earth types who wanted to get good degrees and settle down. Uni was free so no money worries, and on the whole a much less angsty society than Britain seemed to be then.

    About a third were (like me) very left-wing and deeply engaged, the rest were mostly vaguely leftish but didn't give it much thought, a few were hippies. We heard about British and American kids being a lot wilder, and basically felt not for us, but why not if that's what they like - that low-key tolerance was a defining national trait.

    Foreigners found us a baffling mixture of sexy and boring. People would visit and demand to see Deep Throat as it was showing there when it was banned everywhere else, but then they'd visit a cafe and see kids sitting around chatting, and wonder why they looked so quiet.

    It's not better or worse, it's just different.

  • Nigel_ForemainNigel_Foremain Posts: 14,352
    kinabalu said:

    Pagan2 said:

    kinabalu said:

    Pagan2 said:

    kinabalu said:

    Pagan2 said:

    kinabalu said:

    Andy_JS said:

    MaxPB said:

    Leon said:

    Andy_JS said:

    Leon said:

    I am now able to report from the Covid Freedom Day Front Line AKA the gastropubs of Highgate

    Verdict: a disappointing lack of jubilation, or, indeed, Freedom. You weren't allowed to order at the bar, you had to check in at the door, the staff were mostly wearing masks, it was table service only

    Almost nothing has changed

    Indeed I've just been out shopping in Camden and if anything there seem to be MORE masks, people look even more nervous. for the first time ever I saw someone wearing the full Covid monty: mask, visor and disposable blue nitrile gloves WHILE WALKING DOWN THE STREET

    Have we terrified humanity - or at least the British part of it - into some ridiculous, unnecessary dystopia?

    Maybe you could do another report from a working-class area to see if there any differences. Basildon or Harlow for example.
    Camden - down by the Tube - really isn't posh in any sense. It is all of humankind, rich, poor, middling, homeless, trustafarian, Muslim, atheist, Goth, emo, Gen X Gen Z Gen Lambda, 50-something flint knappers buying laksa ingredients

    This is a big reason I am attached to it, I like the grittiness and the melee (tho I am glad I live at the slightly posher end, we are all human)

    So Camden is probably quite representative - at least of London as a whole (and Highgate felt very similar). Dunno about the UK

    I used to agree about Camden. Then the Monarch closed down, just the latest "gritty" late night bar to close and be replaced with yet another wanky cocktail bar. It's become as sterile as the places it used to mock. Sadly there aren't many places left in London that capture the essence of what the city used to be, maybe the Queen's Crescent area of Kentish Town and a few bits of Archway still have some of the magic but London is over.
    Anarchist band Scritti Politti used to live in a squat at 1 Carol Street, Camden Town back in the late 70s / early 80s. Useless fact.
    Nothing useless about that fact at all. I'll tell you a useless fact. There's a strong correlation between life expectancy and being able to sit in the lotus position.
    As in if you desire to sit in the lotus position you are probably tired off life?
    From that, I'm sensing you can't. A great pity. There are downsides but the benefits outweigh them easily.
    I wouldn't know because never bothered trying or wanted to try....why the hell would I.....hey here is an idea sit in a totally unnatural and uncomfortable position because....why?
    Because it's great for both body and spirit. If you persevere it ends up feeling completely natural, so no problem there. And it does add years to life. Not that I should talk, I can't manage it either. If I'd started doing it whilst young and kept it up - just a few minutes a day - I'd be able to do it now, but I didn't, so I can't. It's too late for me, sadly, but perhaps for you it isn't.
    Source of a reputable study showing it adds years to life or are you merely another rural voter peddling snake oil
    There are studies - good ones - but tbf they show correlation not causation. Take 100 people who can and do sit in the lotus position and cf with 100 of the same age who can't or don't. The 1st group live quite a bit longer. But this could to an extent be because of other factors, eg if you are very lazy and unfit you'll be both more likely to die early AND be unable to do the lotus. So it's next to impossible to unravel the bollocks from the real impact. I did say it was a useless fact. 🙃
    I think it is fairly easy to explain. The average person capable of doing the lotus position is likely to be lean and probably fairly fit. In UK, 28% of people are obese, and 36% are overweight. The longer life expectancy of a lotus position practitioner is likely to be considerably longer than 64% of the population.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,943

    ping said:

    Huge attention in the media does not equate to the nation paying attention to a venal embittered man.

    The largely Remain-voting media hated Dom with a passion. Witness his road trip to Barnard Castle and their collective glee at putting the boot in.

    And NOW they hang on his every word.

    Funny old world, Greavsie.....
    Nobody is hanging on his every word.

    I suspect he knows this and is reacting to the collective shrug of the shoulders by saying more and more outrageous things.
    Quite... the thread has largely been about vaccines. Noone gives a fuck about a lying shit like Cummings. They will fpthive Boris most things.he got the nation out of Europe as he promised.⁷
    I won't fpthive Boris anything because he got the nation out of Europe as he promised. Neither will I forgive Cummings for selling the Brexit pup in the first place.
  • IshmaelZIshmaelZ Posts: 21,830

    IshmaelZ said:

    Huge attention in the media does not equate to the nation paying attention to a venal embittered man.

    The largely Remain-voting media hated Dom with a passion. Witness his road trip to Barnard Castle and their collective glee at putting the boot in.

    And NOW they hang on his every word.

    Funny old world, Greavsie.....
    Because they hate Johnson too. It's not that paradoxical.
    Ah, "Dr" Walter Mitty (Oxon) I assume? How are ya?
    Ah! Captain nanopenis, as I live and breathe.

    I have an Oxford degree, a PhD from Exeter. You think I am lying about that, and I have bet you £10k that I am telling the truth. And ooh, it turns out that you "don't bet", just as I assume that people who go to the pub with you soon learn that you don't buy rounds.

    Take the bet, or admit that your penis is converging on the Planck length. I mean why wouldn't you? Free money, surely?
  • nico679nico679 Posts: 6,277
    The Leave campaign couldn’t win without Johnson so as a Remainer I will always utterly loathe Johnson . I have no time for Cummings who is a horrible creature . The long term leavers in parliament I dislike but do not loathe because even though I hate Brexit they had a position on the EU which didn’t change according to what would help their career enhancement .

  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 124,051
    71% of Britons support people being required to show proof of double vaccination to get into nightclubs as the government proposes.

    Those in favour include 90% of over 65s and even 57% of 18 to 24s as well as 78% of Tories.

    https://twitter.com/YouGov/status/1417512312378990602?s=20
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,591
    edited July 2021
    ping said:

    Huge attention in the media does not equate to the nation paying attention to a venal embittered man.

    The largely Remain-voting media hated Dom with a passion. Witness his road trip to Barnard Castle and their collective glee at putting the boot in.

    And NOW they hang on his every word.

    Funny old world, Greavsie.....
    Nobody is hanging on his every word.

    I suspect he knows this and is reacting to the collective shrug of the shoulders by saying more and more outrageous things.
    If that isn't what he is doing then he might want to reconsider his strategy of stringing things out like this. And adding in juicy but irrelevant details like how he considered ousting the PM.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,943
    .
    nico679 said:

    The Leave campaign couldn’t win without Johnson so as a Remainer I will always utterly loathe Johnson . I have no time for Cummings who is a horrible creature . The long term leavers in parliament I dislike but do not loathe because even though I hate Brexit they had a position on the EU which didn’t change according to what would help their career enhancement .

    You are as bitter and twisted a Remoaner as I am. I live with the full expectation that we will be proven right, probably years after I have shuffled off the twig.
  • Nigel_ForemainNigel_Foremain Posts: 14,352
    IshmaelZ said:

    IshmaelZ said:

    Huge attention in the media does not equate to the nation paying attention to a venal embittered man.

    The largely Remain-voting media hated Dom with a passion. Witness his road trip to Barnard Castle and their collective glee at putting the boot in.

    And NOW they hang on his every word.

    Funny old world, Greavsie.....
    Because they hate Johnson too. It's not that paradoxical.
    Ah, "Dr" Walter Mitty (Oxon) I assume? How are ya?
    Ah! Captain nanopenis, as I live and breathe.

    I have an Oxford degree, a PhD from Exeter. You think I am lying about that, and I have bet you £10k that I am telling the truth. And ooh, it turns out that you "don't bet", just as I assume that people who go to the pub with you soon learn that you don't buy rounds.

    Take the bet, or admit that your penis is converging on the Planck length. I mean why wouldn't you? Free money, surely?
    Took a while to respond Walter! I couldn't give a shit about your very small minded life and your qualifications you pompous little creep or where you got them from.

    By the way, why are you ashamed you didn't get your PhD from Oxford? Was mummy disappointed? I have spent a good part of my recent career using a methodology to spot charlatans and bullshitters, for which I have been paid sums that would disturb your sense of entitlement. The corporations that paid for them would be no doubt unconcerned that a pathetic and unpleasant little weasel with a penis size fixation from PB who wanted to pretend he had a PhD from an Oxford college though I was "not very bright" Lol.

    You are a pathetic specimen. Whatever your PhD is in from Exeter it clearly wasn't studying anything that has made you a decent human being. Keep taking the tablets Walter!
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,259
    Thinking back over the years, a summary of my finds:

    10p in a phone box when I was about 9 or 10.
    £5 on the floor of a cinema in Richmond on Thames.
    £10 in a gutter in Darlington.
    £20 in my own garden.

    When I was a student I also found a record down the side of a seat in the student union bar. The The. (Sold for £5)

    And one earring in the safe in a hotel room when on holiday. (Handed in to reception)

    And two wallets on different occasions, both in Loughborough. (Handed in to the police)

  • DayTripperDayTripper Posts: 137

    Andy_JS said:

    "Dominic Cummings: I discussed ousting PM after 2019 election landslide"

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-57880118

    I didn't realise Cummings was an elected politician in a position to discuss deposing someone who had just won a big election victory.

    Delusions of grandeur:

    Mr Cummings said he and his allies began to fear for their positions by January 2020 and started discussing Mr Johnson's future.

    "[People] were already saying, 'By the summer, either we'll all have gone from here or we'll be in the process of trying to get rid of [Mr Johnson] and get someone else in as prime minister'," he said.
    As somebody else has said, Johnson (whatever you think of him, which in my case is not much) was elected. Cummings was not. The way to get rid of Johnson is via the ballot box. Cummings, on the other hand, could be fired any time.

    SPADs discussing removing elected politicians is undemocratic. Cummings should have been put in his place, especially when he tried to dictate who ministers should be able to use as *their* advisers (congratulations to Javid for not kowtowing to him). Castle Barnard was just the icing on the cake for the arrogant bastard. Should have been fired long before and certainly then.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 124,051
    57% support increasing NI to pay for social care, including 82% of over 65s and 63% of 50-65s

    https://twitter.com/YouGov/status/1417517568257101824
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 43,443
    It must be sweatier than a sumo wrestler's mawashi down south. People seem to have been a lot grumpier on PB this last few days.
  • stodgestodge Posts: 13,995
    HYUFD said:

    71% of Britons support people being required to show proof of double vaccination to get into nightclubs as the government proposes.

    Those in favour include 90% of over 65s and even 57% of 18 to 24s as well as 78% of Tories.

    https://twitter.com/YouGov/status/1417512312378990602?s=20

    If it were simply and exclusively about nightclubs, I wouldn't mind as it's an issue of no personal interest.

    If the plan were to extend vaccination passports to pubs, restaurants, racecourses and the like, I would be opposed.

    Has there been polling on whether, for example, there should be vaccination passports for going to pubs and restaurants?
  • https://twitter.com/joepike/status/1417541618798837760

    This is excellent news. Keir Starmer has saved our party
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 43,443
    stodge said:

    HYUFD said:

    71% of Britons support people being required to show proof of double vaccination to get into nightclubs as the government proposes.

    Those in favour include 90% of over 65s and even 57% of 18 to 24s as well as 78% of Tories.

    https://twitter.com/YouGov/status/1417512312378990602?s=20

    If it were simply and exclusively about nightclubs, I wouldn't mind as it's an issue of no personal interest.

    If the plan were to extend vaccination passports to pubs, restaurants, racecourses and the like, I would be opposed.

    Has there been polling on whether, for example, there should be vaccination passports for going to pubs and restaurants?
    And clubs. The other kind, the kind HYUFD presumably goes to. Epping Forest Conservative Club.
  • OnlyLivingBoyOnlyLivingBoy Posts: 15,903
    MaxPB said:

    Leon said:

    MaxPB said:

    Leon said:

    MaxPB said:

    Leon said:

    Andy_JS said:

    Leon said:

    I am now able to report from the Covid Freedom Day Front Line AKA the gastropubs of Highgate

    Verdict: a disappointing lack of jubilation, or, indeed, Freedom. You weren't allowed to order at the bar, you had to check in at the door, the staff were mostly wearing masks, it was table service only

    Almost nothing has changed

    Indeed I've just been out shopping in Camden and if anything there seem to be MORE masks, people look even more nervous. for the first time ever I saw someone wearing the full Covid monty: mask, visor and disposable blue nitrile gloves WHILE WALKING DOWN THE STREET

    Have we terrified humanity - or at least the British part of it - into some ridiculous, unnecessary dystopia?

    Maybe you could do another report from a working-class area to see if there any differences. Basildon or Harlow for example.
    Camden - down by the Tube - really isn't posh in any sense. It is all of humankind, rich, poor, middling, homeless, trustafarian, Muslim, atheist, Goth, emo, Gen X Gen Z Gen Lambda, 50-something flint knappers buying laksa ingredients

    This is a big reason I am attached to it, I like the grittiness and the melee (tho I am glad I live at the slightly posher end, we are all human)

    So Camden is probably quite representative - at least of London as a whole (and Highgate felt very similar). Dunno about the UK

    I used to agree about Camden. Then the Monarch closed down, just the latest "gritty" late night bar to close and be replaced with yet another wanky cocktail bar. It's become as sterile as the places it used to mock. Sadly there aren't many places left in London that capture the essence of what the city used to be, maybe the Queen's Crescent area of Kentish Town and a few bits of Archway still have some of the magic but London is over.
    On bad days I agree with you. I wonder if London can recover from Covid (and everything else)

    But then you get a sunny day and the parks fill up and the beer gardens sing and there is, still, a distinct and glorious energy, perhaps made bubblier by the toughness of the times. And it is a very contemporary London energy, not like Paris or NYC or LA

    When I am not fretting about all the closed restaurants and bars (and they are worrying) I've also noticed that London literally seems younger, after Covid. The average age on the street and in the shops is down about 5 years. The kidz have taken over. I can see why - the old have fled or are hiding, the middle aged are working from home - and hiding - it will be fascinating to see where it goes from here.

    Is London Rome in 440AD? Or Paris in 1944?
    I think part of the issue is that the next generation coming up is so much more sterile than mine was. I was talking to a guy selling us some mandy pre-lockdown and he said that his walk ups are predominantly over 30 and he struggles to get under 30s to buy any kind of party drugs because they're all too concerned with health and other such inanities. I expect after COVID it will just get worse.

    Who in the next generation is going to do a line of charlie and become a complete c*** to their mates and everyone around them? Those experiences just won't happen now but it's part of growing up and the next generation is just completely missing out because they've become conditioned by social media and influencers that being anything than 100% straight up will be a disaster.

    Even outside of that stuff I just think London is becoming a shadow of it's former self and I say that as someone who has just spent a 7 figure number buying a house here.
    Some truth in that

    The Boris-hating waitress in my Highgate pub said she hated Boris because "my Mum does". I put it to her that she should be rebellious, at her age, not just following her Mum's opinions and she looked utterly bewildered at this concept and she said "oh, No, my Mum would kill me"

    The under 30s are a notably conformative and censorious bunch, especially by the standards of my generation, which was outrageously misbehaved. And still is, at times. Ahem

    But then, my cohort had it so much easier. Student GRANTS, cheaper property, lad magazines, sex everywhere, exciting new drugs, a permissive society, no apocalyptic worries about climate change and all that, and, maybe most importantly, no social media to cancel us (and Jeez, we would have been cancelled a thousand times a year for some of the shit we did)

    So I also have sympathies for the young. They are forced to be dull, it's not their choice. But they ARE rather dull

    And now I am definitely walking. A bientot
    Yeah I definitely get that their dullness is partly because of the situation they're in wrt the future being so much more difficult for them than even my generation who are now all finally getting on the property ladder (at least my friends are).

    I was in the final year to only pay £1k per year in fees, my wife went to university in Switzerland and got paid an annual grant and then got a grant here for her master's degree. The freedom of not having £50k in debt the day you graduate is definitely something the current generation are missing. The politicians and old c**** who decided that getting an 8% pension increase was more important than keeping university affordable. Even when I speak to my juniors about it the £45-50k debt they've got definitely figures into their subconscious way of life. It's £35k I didn't have to pay back which helped me get on the housing ladder and these lot are all on relatively decent salaries for their age but the idea of them actually saving any money let alone buying a flat seems completely out of reach.

    Along with the fear of social media cancellation I can see why they're so boring. My years as a junior banker and before that a software developer were incredible. I would never have met my wife without them as I would simply have not had the social skills to attract her. One of my juniors is 24 and basically "holy shit, cheat on your wife" worthy (not that I would, of course, though you probably would lol) but she just has no social skills and is incapable of holding even the most basic conversation without looking at her phone or worrying about what people on her social media are saying. I don't see any guy being interested in her for more than two minutes and it's sad because she's really lovely otherwise, super smart, funny in her own way and as I said, very good looking.
    Very good looking people are frequently boring, for obvious reasons. Also, she may be getting creepy older guy vibes off you and looking at her phone to make you go away!
  • BigRichBigRich Posts: 3,492
    HYUFD said:

    57% support increasing NI to pay for social care, including 82% of over 65s and 63% of 50-65s

    https://twitter.com/YouGov/status/1417517568257101824

    Over 65s dont pay NI, (IIRC) so good on the 18% of over 65s who don't support the tax incress that they will not pay.
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    HYUFD said:

    57% support increasing NI to pay for social care, including 82% of over 65s and 63% of 50-65s

    https://twitter.com/YouGov/status/1417517568257101824

    82% of over-65s support a tax increase that is only paid by under-65s, in order to provide more funding to over 65s?

    Well blow me down with a feather!

    There is no greater love than this: that a person would rob his grandchildren for the sake of himself.
  • In a decade we will see this as a turning point, when Labour was brought back from the brink and began to be relevant once again.
  • OnlyLivingBoyOnlyLivingBoy Posts: 15,903
    On topic, I am not terribly fussed by anything Cummings says, because (a) none of it is surprising and (b) he is not a conspicuously truthful person. I appreciate its popcorn value but I don't think it will shift the dial much.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 124,051
    edited July 2021
    stodge said:

    HYUFD said:

    71% of Britons support people being required to show proof of double vaccination to get into nightclubs as the government proposes.

    Those in favour include 90% of over 65s and even 57% of 18 to 24s as well as 78% of Tories.

    https://twitter.com/YouGov/status/1417512312378990602?s=20

    If it were simply and exclusively about nightclubs, I wouldn't mind as it's an issue of no personal interest.

    If the plan were to extend vaccination passports to pubs, restaurants, racecourses and the like, I would be opposed.

    Has there been polling on whether, for example, there should be vaccination passports for going to pubs and restaurants?
    Yes, 45% overall and 55% of Tories would even make vaccination passports compulsory to go to pubs.

    55% overall back making them compulsory to go to the theatre, 59% to attend a sporting event and 61% to attend a concert and 71% for foreign travel as now

    https://twitter.com/JoeTwyman/status/1417174405277442052?s=20
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826

    In a decade we will see this as a turning point, when Labour was brought back from the brink and began to be relevant once again.

    I keep asking you, but I'm not sure if you've answered or not . . . if this is a serious move by Starmer then which MPs do you expect to see expelled from the party?

    John "lynch her" McDonnell? Burgon? Sultana?

    Who is it that you're expecting to see gone?
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,519
    HYUFD said:

    57% support increasing NI to pay for social care, including 82% of over 65s and 63% of 50-65s

    https://twitter.com/YouGov/status/1417517568257101824

    Well yeah because the selfish so and sos wont have to pay it
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 39,064

    MaxPB said:

    Leon said:

    MaxPB said:

    Leon said:

    MaxPB said:

    Leon said:

    Andy_JS said:

    Leon said:

    I am now able to report from the Covid Freedom Day Front Line AKA the gastropubs of Highgate

    Verdict: a disappointing lack of jubilation, or, indeed, Freedom. You weren't allowed to order at the bar, you had to check in at the door, the staff were mostly wearing masks, it was table service only

    Almost nothing has changed

    Indeed I've just been out shopping in Camden and if anything there seem to be MORE masks, people look even more nervous. for the first time ever I saw someone wearing the full Covid monty: mask, visor and disposable blue nitrile gloves WHILE WALKING DOWN THE STREET

    Have we terrified humanity - or at least the British part of it - into some ridiculous, unnecessary dystopia?

    Maybe you could do another report from a working-class area to see if there any differences. Basildon or Harlow for example.
    Camden - down by the Tube - really isn't posh in any sense. It is all of humankind, rich, poor, middling, homeless, trustafarian, Muslim, atheist, Goth, emo, Gen X Gen Z Gen Lambda, 50-something flint knappers buying laksa ingredients

    This is a big reason I am attached to it, I like the grittiness and the melee (tho I am glad I live at the slightly posher end, we are all human)

    So Camden is probably quite representative - at least of London as a whole (and Highgate felt very similar). Dunno about the UK

    I used to agree about Camden. Then the Monarch closed down, just the latest "gritty" late night bar to close and be replaced with yet another wanky cocktail bar. It's become as sterile as the places it used to mock. Sadly there aren't many places left in London that capture the essence of what the city used to be, maybe the Queen's Crescent area of Kentish Town and a few bits of Archway still have some of the magic but London is over.
    On bad days I agree with you. I wonder if London can recover from Covid (and everything else)

    But then you get a sunny day and the parks fill up and the beer gardens sing and there is, still, a distinct and glorious energy, perhaps made bubblier by the toughness of the times. And it is a very contemporary London energy, not like Paris or NYC or LA

    When I am not fretting about all the closed restaurants and bars (and they are worrying) I've also noticed that London literally seems younger, after Covid. The average age on the street and in the shops is down about 5 years. The kidz have taken over. I can see why - the old have fled or are hiding, the middle aged are working from home - and hiding - it will be fascinating to see where it goes from here.

    Is London Rome in 440AD? Or Paris in 1944?
    I think part of the issue is that the next generation coming up is so much more sterile than mine was. I was talking to a guy selling us some mandy pre-lockdown and he said that his walk ups are predominantly over 30 and he struggles to get under 30s to buy any kind of party drugs because they're all too concerned with health and other such inanities. I expect after COVID it will just get worse.

    Who in the next generation is going to do a line of charlie and become a complete c*** to their mates and everyone around them? Those experiences just won't happen now but it's part of growing up and the next generation is just completely missing out because they've become conditioned by social media and influencers that being anything than 100% straight up will be a disaster.

    Even outside of that stuff I just think London is becoming a shadow of it's former self and I say that as someone who has just spent a 7 figure number buying a house here.
    Some truth in that

    The Boris-hating waitress in my Highgate pub said she hated Boris because "my Mum does". I put it to her that she should be rebellious, at her age, not just following her Mum's opinions and she looked utterly bewildered at this concept and she said "oh, No, my Mum would kill me"

    The under 30s are a notably conformative and censorious bunch, especially by the standards of my generation, which was outrageously misbehaved. And still is, at times. Ahem

    But then, my cohort had it so much easier. Student GRANTS, cheaper property, lad magazines, sex everywhere, exciting new drugs, a permissive society, no apocalyptic worries about climate change and all that, and, maybe most importantly, no social media to cancel us (and Jeez, we would have been cancelled a thousand times a year for some of the shit we did)

    So I also have sympathies for the young. They are forced to be dull, it's not their choice. But they ARE rather dull

    And now I am definitely walking. A bientot
    Yeah I definitely get that their dullness is partly because of the situation they're in wrt the future being so much more difficult for them than even my generation who are now all finally getting on the property ladder (at least my friends are).

    I was in the final year to only pay £1k per year in fees, my wife went to university in Switzerland and got paid an annual grant and then got a grant here for her master's degree. The freedom of not having £50k in debt the day you graduate is definitely something the current generation are missing. The politicians and old c**** who decided that getting an 8% pension increase was more important than keeping university affordable. Even when I speak to my juniors about it the £45-50k debt they've got definitely figures into their subconscious way of life. It's £35k I didn't have to pay back which helped me get on the housing ladder and these lot are all on relatively decent salaries for their age but the idea of them actually saving any money let alone buying a flat seems completely out of reach.

    Along with the fear of social media cancellation I can see why they're so boring. My years as a junior banker and before that a software developer were incredible. I would never have met my wife without them as I would simply have not had the social skills to attract her. One of my juniors is 24 and basically "holy shit, cheat on your wife" worthy (not that I would, of course, though you probably would lol) but she just has no social skills and is incapable of holding even the most basic conversation without looking at her phone or worrying about what people on her social media are saying. I don't see any guy being interested in her for more than two minutes and it's sad because she's really lovely otherwise, super smart, funny in her own way and as I said, very good looking.
    Very good looking people are frequently boring, for obvious reasons. Also, she may be getting creepy older guy vibes off you and looking at her phone to make you go away!
    She's very interesting once she's put her phone away. On the latter I can only give you a virtual eyeroll, but would do it in person if I could.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 124,051

    HYUFD said:

    57% support increasing NI to pay for social care, including 82% of over 65s and 63% of 50-65s

    https://twitter.com/YouGov/status/1417517568257101824

    82% of over-65s support a tax increase that is only paid by under-65s, in order to provide more funding to over 65s?

    Well blow me down with a feather!

    There is no greater love than this: that a person would rob his grandchildren for the sake of himself.
    The grandchildren will still inherit the house ultimately if no dementia tax
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,824

    IshmaelZ said:

    IshmaelZ said:

    Huge attention in the media does not equate to the nation paying attention to a venal embittered man.

    The largely Remain-voting media hated Dom with a passion. Witness his road trip to Barnard Castle and their collective glee at putting the boot in.

    And NOW they hang on his every word.

    Funny old world, Greavsie.....
    Because they hate Johnson too. It's not that paradoxical.
    Ah, "Dr" Walter Mitty (Oxon) I assume? How are ya?
    Ah! Captain nanopenis, as I live and breathe.

    I have an Oxford degree, a PhD from Exeter. You think I am lying about that, and I have bet you £10k that I am telling the truth. And ooh, it turns out that you "don't bet", just as I assume that people who go to the pub with you soon learn that you don't buy rounds.

    Take the bet, or admit that your penis is converging on the Planck length. I mean why wouldn't you? Free money, surely?
    Took a while to respond Walter! I couldn't give a shit about your very small minded life and your qualifications you pompous little creep or where you got them from.

    By the way, why are you ashamed you didn't get your PhD from Oxford? Was mummy disappointed? I have spent a good part of my recent career using a methodology to spot charlatans and bullshitters, for which I have been paid sums that would disturb your sense of entitlement. The corporations that paid for them would be no doubt unconcerned that a pathetic and unpleasant little weasel with a penis size fixation from PB who wanted to pretend he had a PhD from an Oxford college though I was "not very bright" Lol.

    You are a pathetic specimen. Whatever your PhD is in from Exeter it clearly wasn't studying anything that has made you a decent human being. Keep taking the tablets Walter!
    You can’t get a PhD at Oxford. Only a DPhil.
  • stodgestodge Posts: 13,995
    HYUFD said:

    stodge said:

    HYUFD said:

    71% of Britons support people being required to show proof of double vaccination to get into nightclubs as the government proposes.

    Those in favour include 90% of over 65s and even 57% of 18 to 24s as well as 78% of Tories.

    https://twitter.com/YouGov/status/1417512312378990602?s=20

    If it were simply and exclusively about nightclubs, I wouldn't mind as it's an issue of no personal interest.

    If the plan were to extend vaccination passports to pubs, restaurants, racecourses and the like, I would be opposed.

    Has there been polling on whether, for example, there should be vaccination passports for going to pubs and restaurants?
    Yes, 45% overall and 55% of Tories would even make vaccination passports compulsory to go to pubs.

    55% overall back making them compulsory to go to the theatre, 59% to attend a sporting event and 61% to attend a concert and 71% for foreign travel as now

    https://twitter.com/JoeTwyman/status/1417174405277442052?s=20
    The field work is over a month old so these numbers might have changed considerably.

    Hardly a convincing basis on which to build an argument.
  • BigRichBigRich Posts: 3,492

    Thinking back over the years, a summary of my finds:

    10p in a phone box when I was about 9 or 10.
    £5 on the floor of a cinema in Richmond on Thames.
    £10 in a gutter in Darlington.
    £20 in my own garden.

    When I was a student I also found a record down the side of a seat in the student union bar. The The. (Sold for £5)

    And one earring in the safe in a hotel room when on holiday. (Handed in to reception)

    And two wallets on different occasions, both in Loughborough. (Handed in to the police)

    I lost my wallet in a national park in California, it was posted back to me in the UK, probably using my driving licence to get the address, and with everything still it, (except the coins, which at a push may have been enough to pay the postage.)

    Made me very happy, but there was no note in it so I have to this day been unable to thank the individual who did that.

    Instead I thank anybody who retunes a wallet they find anywhere to its owner.

    Thank you SandyRentool :)
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,519
    edited July 2021
    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    57% support increasing NI to pay for social care, including 82% of over 65s and 63% of 50-65s

    https://twitter.com/YouGov/status/1417517568257101824

    82% of over-65s support a tax increase that is only paid by under-65s, in order to provide more funding to over 65s?

    Well blow me down with a feather!

    There is no greater love than this: that a person would rob his grandchildren for the sake of himself.
    The grandchildren will still inherit the house ultimately if no dementia tax
    Not if they get put into a care home, dementia tax or no dementia tax.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,943
    Carnyx said:

    It must be sweatier than a sumo wrestler's mawashi down south. People seem to have been a lot grumpier on PB this last few days.

    Demob happy and itching for a fight now Boris has vanquished Covid?
  • Andy_CookeAndy_Cooke Posts: 5,039
    edited July 2021
    Surprisingly good news for restaurants and pubs in June 2021 (not so good for bars alone).
    In comparison with June 2019, overall sales were UP for restaurants, and down only a couple of percent for pubs. Bars down 10%.

    image
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    57% support increasing NI to pay for social care, including 82% of over 65s and 63% of 50-65s

    https://twitter.com/YouGov/status/1417517568257101824

    82% of over-65s support a tax increase that is only paid by under-65s, in order to provide more funding to over 65s?

    Well blow me down with a feather!

    There is no greater love than this: that a person would rob his grandchildren for the sake of himself.
    The grandchildren will still inherit the house ultimately if no dementia tax
    So the grandchildren should be facing even more taxes while struggling to raise a deposit to pay for their own home, or to pay to put food on the table for their own children, in the hopes that in a few decades their own parents die and can have an inheritance? 🤔

    You're perverted if you think that's right.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 124,051

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    57% support increasing NI to pay for social care, including 82% of over 65s and 63% of 50-65s

    https://twitter.com/YouGov/status/1417517568257101824

    82% of over-65s support a tax increase that is only paid by under-65s, in order to provide more funding to over 65s?

    Well blow me down with a feather!

    There is no greater love than this: that a person would rob his grandchildren for the sake of himself.
    The grandchildren will still inherit the house ultimately if no dementia tax
    Not if they get put into a care home, dementia tax or no dementia tax.
    Yes but the dementia tax extended the government taking your house to at home care too
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 124,051
    stodge said:

    HYUFD said:

    stodge said:

    HYUFD said:

    71% of Britons support people being required to show proof of double vaccination to get into nightclubs as the government proposes.

    Those in favour include 90% of over 65s and even 57% of 18 to 24s as well as 78% of Tories.

    https://twitter.com/YouGov/status/1417512312378990602?s=20

    If it were simply and exclusively about nightclubs, I wouldn't mind as it's an issue of no personal interest.

    If the plan were to extend vaccination passports to pubs, restaurants, racecourses and the like, I would be opposed.

    Has there been polling on whether, for example, there should be vaccination passports for going to pubs and restaurants?
    Yes, 45% overall and 55% of Tories would even make vaccination passports compulsory to go to pubs.

    55% overall back making them compulsory to go to the theatre, 59% to attend a sporting event and 61% to attend a concert and 71% for foreign travel as now

    https://twitter.com/JoeTwyman/status/1417174405277442052?s=20
    The field work is over a month old so these numbers might have changed considerably.

    Hardly a convincing basis on which to build an argument.
    Yougov today suggests they wouldn't
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,591

    HYUFD said:

    57% support increasing NI to pay for social care, including 82% of over 65s and 63% of 50-65s

    https://twitter.com/YouGov/status/1417517568257101824

    82% of over-65s support a tax increase that is only paid by under-65s, in order to provide more funding to over 65s?

    Well blow me down with a feather!

    There is no greater love than this: that a person would rob his grandchildren for the sake of himself.
    Interesting that 25-49 have lower net support than 18-24.

    It's better than doing nothing I suppose, and the oldies like it so much perhaps the government will not worry about those bleating about manifestoes.
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 43,515
    FPT: bird located in a box containing a Lego police plane. Perhaps it was trying to assemble it to fly away.

    It was a wren, and it is now ?safely? outside in a thunderstorm.

    Unfortunately it left a couple of little deposits in the box as well. They will have to be removed before the little 'un thinks they're a new flexible Lego piece ...
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 17,699

    Thinking back over the years, a summary of my finds:

    10p in a phone box when I was about 9 or 10.
    £5 on the floor of a cinema in Richmond on Thames.
    £10 in a gutter in Darlington.
    £20 in my own garden.

    When I was a student I also found a record down the side of a seat in the student union bar. The The. (Sold for £5)

    And one earring in the safe in a hotel room when on holiday. (Handed in to reception)

    And two wallets on different occasions, both in Loughborough. (Handed in to the police)

    I once found a wallet stuffed to the gunnels with notes in a hotel. At the time I was visiting a manufacturer to see their kit as we were about to spend £400,000. My colleague still thinks I turned down the bribe... In reality I think it belonged to one of the very rich looking middle eastern chaps also at the hotel. I handed it in to reception.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 124,051
    edited July 2021

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    57% support increasing NI to pay for social care, including 82% of over 65s and 63% of 50-65s

    https://twitter.com/YouGov/status/1417517568257101824

    82% of over-65s support a tax increase that is only paid by under-65s, in order to provide more funding to over 65s?

    Well blow me down with a feather!

    There is no greater love than this: that a person would rob his grandchildren for the sake of himself.
    The grandchildren will still inherit the house ultimately if no dementia tax
    So the grandchildren should be facing even more taxes while struggling to raise a deposit to pay for their own home, or to pay to put food on the table for their own children, in the hopes that in a few decades their own parents die and can have an inheritance? 🤔

    You're perverted if you think that's right.
    Grandparents and parents can help with a deposit too and of course the NI the young and middle aged pay will fund the social care many of them will get when they get to old age.

    I am a Tory and a conservative and not a liberal like you as I believe in family and preserving assets in the family
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 43,443
    edited July 2021

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    57% support increasing NI to pay for social care, including 82% of over 65s and 63% of 50-65s

    https://twitter.com/YouGov/status/1417517568257101824

    82% of over-65s support a tax increase that is only paid by under-65s, in order to provide more funding to over 65s?

    Well blow me down with a feather!

    There is no greater love than this: that a person would rob his grandchildren for the sake of himself.
    The grandchildren will still inherit the house ultimately if no dementia tax
    So the grandchildren should be facing even more taxes while struggling to raise a deposit to pay for their own home, or to pay to put food on the table for their own children, in the hopes that in a few decades their own parents die and can have an inheritance? 🤔

    You're perverted if you think that's right.
    I couldn't possibly comment on the last point. But in recent years the Conservative governments have made changes to IHT which suggest that they are indeed highly focussed on that very scenario, albeit for approved families only (no nephews or nieces need apply). It is after all where their core voters are at.

    It's an interesting point you imply, however, whether those 2.4 adult children outweigh 2 - or increasingly just 1- of their parents voting wise.

    Of course, maybe those elderly voters might leave some dosh to the kind benevolent Party while they are at it - this time relieved at 100% of IHT liability.
  • IshmaelZIshmaelZ Posts: 21,830

    IshmaelZ said:

    IshmaelZ said:

    Huge attention in the media does not equate to the nation paying attention to a venal embittered man.

    The largely Remain-voting media hated Dom with a passion. Witness his road trip to Barnard Castle and their collective glee at putting the boot in.

    And NOW they hang on his every word.

    Funny old world, Greavsie.....
    Because they hate Johnson too. It's not that paradoxical.
    Ah, "Dr" Walter Mitty (Oxon) I assume? How are ya?
    Ah! Captain nanopenis, as I live and breathe.

    I have an Oxford degree, a PhD from Exeter. You think I am lying about that, and I have bet you £10k that I am telling the truth. And ooh, it turns out that you "don't bet", just as I assume that people who go to the pub with you soon learn that you don't buy rounds.

    Take the bet, or admit that your penis is converging on the Planck length. I mean why wouldn't you? Free money, surely?
    Took a while to respond Walter! I couldn't give a shit about your very small minded life and your qualifications you pompous little creep or where you got them from.

    By the way, why are you ashamed you didn't get your PhD from Oxford? Was mummy disappointed? I have spent a good part of my recent career using a methodology to spot charlatans and bullshitters, for which I have been paid sums that would disturb your sense of entitlement. The corporations that paid for them would be no doubt unconcerned that a pathetic and unpleasant little weasel with a penis size fixation from PB who wanted to pretend he had a PhD from an Oxford college though I was "not very bright" Lol.

    You are a pathetic specimen. Whatever your PhD is in from Exeter it clearly wasn't studying anything that has made you a decent human being. Keep taking the tablets Walter!
    Sorry, microdick, you can't do this. At all, but especially not on a wagering website. You call me a liar, you take the bet. I suspect the original sum was a bit more overfacing for you than it is for me, so shall we say £100?

    Oxford does not award PhDs. Oxford colleges don't award degrees at all, the University does. I'd expect you to know both those facts, if you interview job applicants with Oxford doctorates? My guess is that in reality you are the paid secretary of a failing downmarket golf club in the shittier end of Essex, on a commensurate salary.

    But you really need to take that bet. No way round it.
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 43,443
    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    57% support increasing NI to pay for social care, including 82% of over 65s and 63% of 50-65s

    https://twitter.com/YouGov/status/1417517568257101824

    82% of over-65s support a tax increase that is only paid by under-65s, in order to provide more funding to over 65s?

    Well blow me down with a feather!

    There is no greater love than this: that a person would rob his grandchildren for the sake of himself.
    The grandchildren will still inherit the house ultimately if no dementia tax
    Not if they get put into a care home, dementia tax or no dementia tax.
    Yes but the dementia tax extended the government taking your house to at home care too
    Point of order: it did no such thing. It never existed. 'Would have' is the operative wording.
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    I think if a penny is to be added to National Insurance in order to further featherbed Boomers then I would be OK with that on one condition: all age-related and other exemptions to National Insurance are abolished. So NI is charged on pensions, dividend income etc and not just salaries.

    That way there is a 1p tax rise on those working and a 13p tax rise on pensioners etc

    Lets see how popular an NI tax rise is then with over 65s once they're expected to pay it themselves?
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,824

    FPT: bird located in a box containing a Lego police plane. Perhaps it was trying to assemble it to fly away.

    It was a wren, and it is now ?safely? outside in a thunderstorm.

    Unfortunately it left a couple of little deposits in the box as well. They will have to be removed before the little 'un thinks they're a new flexible Lego piece ...

    Could have been worse, it could have been a Dragon in there.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,259

    Surprisingly good news for restaurants and pubs in June 2021 (not so good for bars alone).
    In comparison with June 2019, overall sales were UP for restaurants, and down only a couple of percent for pubs. Bars down 10%.

    image

    What's the difference between a pub and a bar?
  • LeonLeon Posts: 56,606
    MaxPB said:

    MaxPB said:

    Leon said:

    MaxPB said:

    Leon said:

    MaxPB said:

    Leon said:

    Andy_JS said:

    Leon said:

    I am now able to report from the Covid Freedom Day Front Line AKA the gastropubs of Highgate

    Verdict: a disappointing lack of jubilation, or, indeed, Freedom. You weren't allowed to order at the bar, you had to check in at the door, the staff were mostly wearing masks, it was table service only

    Almost nothing has changed

    Indeed I've just been out shopping in Camden and if anything there seem to be MORE masks, people look even more nervous. for the first time ever I saw someone wearing the full Covid monty: mask, visor and disposable blue nitrile gloves WHILE WALKING DOWN THE STREET

    Have we terrified humanity - or at least the British part of it - into some ridiculous, unnecessary dystopia?

    Maybe you could do another report from a working-class area to see if there any differences. Basildon or Harlow for example.
    Camden - down by the Tube - really isn't posh in any sense. It is all of humankind, rich, poor, middling, homeless, trustafarian, Muslim, atheist, Goth, emo, Gen X Gen Z Gen Lambda, 50-something flint knappers buying laksa ingredients

    This is a big reason I am attached to it, I like the grittiness and the melee (tho I am glad I live at the slightly posher end, we are all human)

    So Camden is probably quite representative - at least of London as a whole (and Highgate felt very similar). Dunno about the UK

    I used to agree about Camden. Then the Monarch closed down, just the latest "gritty" late night bar to close and be replaced with yet another wanky cocktail bar. It's become as sterile as the places it used to mock. Sadly there aren't many places left in London that capture the essence of what the city used to be, maybe the Queen's Crescent area of Kentish Town and a few bits of Archway still have some of the magic but London is over.
    On bad days I agree with you. I wonder if London can recover from Covid (and everything else)

    But then you get a sunny day and the parks fill up and the beer gardens sing and there is, still, a distinct and glorious energy, perhaps made bubblier by the toughness of the times. And it is a very contemporary London energy, not like Paris or NYC or LA

    When I am not fretting about all the closed restaurants and bars (and they are worrying) I've also noticed that London literally seems younger, after Covid. The average age on the street and in the shops is down about 5 years. The kidz have taken over. I can see why - the old have fled or are hiding, the middle aged are working from home - and hiding - it will be fascinating to see where it goes from here.

    Is London Rome in 440AD? Or Paris in 1944?
    I think part of the issue is that the next generation coming up is so much more sterile than mine was. I was talking to a guy selling us some mandy pre-lockdown and he said that his walk ups are predominantly over 30 and he struggles to get under 30s to buy any kind of party drugs because they're all too concerned with health and other such inanities. I expect after COVID it will just get worse.

    Who in the next generation is going to do a line of charlie and become a complete c*** to their mates and everyone around them? Those experiences just won't happen now but it's part of growing up and the next generation is just completely missing out because they've become conditioned by social media and influencers that being anything than 100% straight up will be a disaster.

    Even outside of that stuff I just think London is becoming a shadow of it's former self and I say that as someone who has just spent a 7 figure number buying a house here.
    Some truth in that

    The Boris-hating waitress in my Highgate pub said she hated Boris because "my Mum does". I put it to her that she should be rebellious, at her age, not just following her Mum's opinions and she looked utterly bewildered at this concept and she said "oh, No, my Mum would kill me"

    The under 30s are a notably conformative and censorious bunch, especially by the standards of my generation, which was outrageously misbehaved. And still is, at times. Ahem

    But then, my cohort had it so much easier. Student GRANTS, cheaper property, lad magazines, sex everywhere, exciting new drugs, a permissive society, no apocalyptic worries about climate change and all that, and, maybe most importantly, no social media to cancel us (and Jeez, we would have been cancelled a thousand times a year for some of the shit we did)

    So I also have sympathies for the young. They are forced to be dull, it's not their choice. But they ARE rather dull

    And now I am definitely walking. A bientot
    Yeah I definitely get that their dullness is partly because of the situation they're in wrt the future being so much more difficult for them than even my generation who are now all finally getting on the property ladder (at least my friends are).

    I was in the final year to only pay £1k per year in fees, my wife went to university in Switzerland and got paid an annual grant and then got a grant here for her master's degree. The freedom of not having £50k in debt the day you graduate is definitely something the current generation are missing. The politicians and old c**** who decided that getting an 8% pension increase was more important than keeping university affordable. Even when I speak to my juniors about it the £45-50k debt they've got definitely figures into their subconscious way of life. It's £35k I didn't have to pay back which helped me get on the housing ladder and these lot are all on relatively decent salaries for their age but the idea of them actually saving any money let alone buying a flat seems completely out of reach.

    Along with the fear of social media cancellation I can see why they're so boring. My years as a junior banker and before that a software developer were incredible. I would never have met my wife without them as I would simply have not had the social skills to attract her. One of my juniors is 24 and basically "holy shit, cheat on your wife" worthy (not that I would, of course, though you probably would lol) but she just has no social skills and is incapable of holding even the most basic conversation without looking at her phone or worrying about what people on her social media are saying. I don't see any guy being interested in her for more than two minutes and it's sad because she's really lovely otherwise, super smart, funny in her own way and as I said, very good looking.
    Very good looking people are frequently boring, for obvious reasons. Also, she may be getting creepy older guy vibes off you and looking at her phone to make you go away!
    She's very interesting once she's put her phone away. On the latter I can only give you a virtual eyeroll, but would do it in person if I could.
    Why is misbehaviour so funny?

    It's an odd thing, but certainly true. At lunch yesterday I was swapping stories with a friend, and the one that really cracked him up was the one, a couple of weeks ago in Spain, where I was at an official wine tasting and I got so drunk I decided to take a "short cut" back to the hotel THROUGH the vineyard as it seemed the quickest way, and when I woke up I only realised what I'd done when I saw my car was covered with crushed grapes

    We told lots of stories but that one got the biggest laugh, despite it being really quite juvenile and wanky

    So, why do we laugh so hard at bad behaviour? And how will young people make each other laugh, in that hard, satisfying way, if they have no outrageous stories?
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,591
    So is the Bezos story better than the Branson story?
  • Nigel_ForemainNigel_Foremain Posts: 14,352
    ydoethur said:

    IshmaelZ said:

    IshmaelZ said:

    Huge attention in the media does not equate to the nation paying attention to a venal embittered man.

    The largely Remain-voting media hated Dom with a passion. Witness his road trip to Barnard Castle and their collective glee at putting the boot in.

    And NOW they hang on his every word.

    Funny old world, Greavsie.....
    Because they hate Johnson too. It's not that paradoxical.
    Ah, "Dr" Walter Mitty (Oxon) I assume? How are ya?
    Ah! Captain nanopenis, as I live and breathe.

    I have an Oxford degree, a PhD from Exeter. You think I am lying about that, and I have bet you £10k that I am telling the truth. And ooh, it turns out that you "don't bet", just as I assume that people who go to the pub with you soon learn that you don't buy rounds.

    Take the bet, or admit that your penis is converging on the Planck length. I mean why wouldn't you? Free money, surely?
    Took a while to respond Walter! I couldn't give a shit about your very small minded life and your qualifications you pompous little creep or where you got them from.

    By the way, why are you ashamed you didn't get your PhD from Oxford? Was mummy disappointed? I have spent a good part of my recent career using a methodology to spot charlatans and bullshitters, for which I have been paid sums that would disturb your sense of entitlement. The corporations that paid for them would be no doubt unconcerned that a pathetic and unpleasant little weasel with a penis size fixation from PB who wanted to pretend he had a PhD from an Oxford college though I was "not very bright" Lol.

    You are a pathetic specimen. Whatever your PhD is in from Exeter it clearly wasn't studying anything that has made you a decent human being. Keep taking the tablets Walter!
    You can’t get a PhD at Oxford. Only a DPhil.
    Indeed! Walter Mitty aka IshmaelZ attempted to suggest he was "Dr. IshmaelZ PhD (Oxon)", which was a bit of a give away that he is a bullshitter. Sad little creep wanted people to believe he had a doctorate from Oxford, which is extremely sad because who cares? Now he wants us to all know his actual qualifications (if we can believe him) and again; who cares? I suppose we should feel sorry for him really. When I pointed it out to him (after he inferred I was "not very bright") he got a bit upset and then said he was joking, but I don't recall him making the correction.
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    57% support increasing NI to pay for social care, including 82% of over 65s and 63% of 50-65s

    https://twitter.com/YouGov/status/1417517568257101824

    82% of over-65s support a tax increase that is only paid by under-65s, in order to provide more funding to over 65s?

    Well blow me down with a feather!

    There is no greater love than this: that a person would rob his grandchildren for the sake of himself.
    The grandchildren will still inherit the house ultimately if no dementia tax
    So the grandchildren should be facing even more taxes while struggling to raise a deposit to pay for their own home, or to pay to put food on the table for their own children, in the hopes that in a few decades their own parents die and can have an inheritance? 🤔

    You're perverted if you think that's right.
    Grandparents and parents can help with a deposit too and of course the NI the young and middle aged pay will fund the social care many of them will get when they get to old age.

    I am a Tory and a conservative and not a liberal like you as I believe in family and preserving assets in the family
    You believe in robbing the working in order to preserve assets for those who could pay for their own care but would rather not.

    If punishing people who work in order to protect the wealth of the elite is your version of "conservativism" then I want nothing to do with it.
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 39,064

    Surprisingly good news for restaurants and pubs in June 2021 (not so good for bars alone).
    In comparison with June 2019, overall sales were UP for restaurants, and down only a couple of percent for pubs. Bars down 10%.

    image

    What's the difference between a pub and a bar?
    If you don't know by now then you never will.
  • Nigel_ForemainNigel_Foremain Posts: 14,352
    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    57% support increasing NI to pay for social care, including 82% of over 65s and 63% of 50-65s

    https://twitter.com/YouGov/status/1417517568257101824

    82% of over-65s support a tax increase that is only paid by under-65s, in order to provide more funding to over 65s?

    Well blow me down with a feather!

    There is no greater love than this: that a person would rob his grandchildren for the sake of himself.
    The grandchildren will still inherit the house ultimately if no dementia tax
    So the grandchildren should be facing even more taxes while struggling to raise a deposit to pay for their own home, or to pay to put food on the table for their own children, in the hopes that in a few decades their own parents die and can have an inheritance? 🤔

    You're perverted if you think that's right.
    Grandparents and parents can help with a deposit too and of course the NI the young and middle aged pay will fund the social care many of them will get when they get to old age.

    I am a Tory and a conservative and not a liberal like you as I believe in family and preserving assets in the family
    Philip is lots of things but he is not a liberal or a Liberal.
  • BigRichBigRich Posts: 3,492
    Indeed: LD +4

    Could this be Libertarians moving/returning to the LD because of there opposition to COVID Passports?

    or just noise?

    Probably just noise,
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,824
    kle4 said:

    So is the Bezos story better than the Branson story?

    Well, they were both somewhat disappointing as both appear to have returned to Earth rather than taking advantage of the opportunity to return head off to another planet.
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    57% support increasing NI to pay for social care, including 82% of over 65s and 63% of 50-65s

    https://twitter.com/YouGov/status/1417517568257101824

    82% of over-65s support a tax increase that is only paid by under-65s, in order to provide more funding to over 65s?

    Well blow me down with a feather!

    There is no greater love than this: that a person would rob his grandchildren for the sake of himself.
    The grandchildren will still inherit the house ultimately if no dementia tax
    So the grandchildren should be facing even more taxes while struggling to raise a deposit to pay for their own home, or to pay to put food on the table for their own children, in the hopes that in a few decades their own parents die and can have an inheritance? 🤔

    You're perverted if you think that's right.
    Grandparents and parents can help with a deposit too and of course the NI the young and middle aged pay will fund the social care many of them will get when they get to old age.

    I am a Tory and a conservative and not a liberal like you as I believe in family and preserving assets in the family
    Philip is lots of things but he is not a liberal or a Liberal.
    In what way do you think I am illiberal?
This discussion has been closed.