politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » The Ashcroft poll finds that the LDs have lost nearly three quarters of the public sector workers who voted for them in 2010
One of the great things about having a large overall sample, as Lord Ashcroft generally does, is that the sub-samples are based on numbers that give more confidence in the findings. This is why Lord Ashcroft polls in this way.
So the conclusion is the coalition should remove the vote from public sector workforce?
Isn't the conclusion that turkey's don't vote for christmas or rather public sector workers don't vote for parties who have cut their salaries in real terms.....
Is it because public sector lid dem voters are likely to be more socialist (due to their type of job) than liberal and therefore more wanting of the lib dems to have had a coalition with labour than the tories? The true liberals in the lib dem party probably view the tories as being more liberal than labour (id cards etc) and hence carry on their support for the yellows
To bring up Sheffield Hallam, for those expecting Nick Clegg to lose Hallam Labour, if the public sector LD > Lab swing of 15% was uniform in the seat, Labour would still fail to take the seat.
From ComRes Do you or would trust to see the country through the current economic situation? Y N DN
Chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne 26% 53% 21% Prime Minister, David Cameron 32% 50% 18% Deputy Prime Minister, Nick Clegg 15% 66% 19% Leader of the Opposition, Ed Miliband 22% 58% 20%
Shadow Chancellor, Ed Balls 17% 60% 23%
Leader of the UK Independence Party, Nigel Farage 15% 61% 24%
So Nigel Farage is even less trusted than Ed Balls. Incredible.
The British people are wise not to put their trust in any politicians but the gap in the level of distrust between Balls and Osborne is growing ever wider.
So the conclusion is the coalition should remove the vote from public sector workforce?
Isn't the conclusion that turkey's don't vote for christmas or rather public sector workers don't vote for parties who have cut their salaries in real terms.....
How much is enough?
"The average public sector worker benefits from a 6.1% pay ‘premium’, meaning that they can earn as much as £1,400 a year more than someone in the private sector, taking into account age, gender, full time and part time work, region, qualifications and length of employment. This represents almost a 20% and 8% rise respectively in the premium compared to the same quarters of 2007 and 2010."
So Nigel Farage is even less trusted than Ed Balls. Incredible.
Kippers are morphing into the tea party - an unelectable, noisy and uncompromising minority.
This interpretation is, of course, precisely what Dave wants. Farage must, if he is to succeed, move heaven and earth to purge his party of its looniest / nastiest fringe and support only the most sensible. Getting the odd coup such as his new press officer helps with this.
So the conclusion is the coalition should remove the vote from public sector workforce?
Start by reducing the public sector workforce - which is underway.
I see there is a ComRes poll out tonight.
John Rentoul @JohnRentoul 12m Record high in optimism about the economy: ComRes poll for ITV News tonight pic.twitter.com/ZVd7BKjMPj
Think that's a bit of a Goodhart. The issue is more a question of identity than employment. So if someone thinks of themselves as a civil servant / local government employee / teacher / nurse / soldier etc then that's more relevant than whether they're actually doing that job at the time i.e. a recently-redundant social worker is a public sector worker with a grievance.
Over time, as those made redundant find work elsewhere and differential recruitment rates change the workforce balance between the public and private sectors, the shift might have a political impact.
From ComRes Do you or would trust to see the country through the current economic situation? Y N DN
Chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne 26% 53% 21% Prime Minister, David Cameron 32% 50% 18% Deputy Prime Minister, Nick Clegg 15% 66% 19% Leader of the Opposition, Ed Miliband 22% 58% 20%
Shadow Chancellor, Ed Balls 17% 60% 23%
Leader of the UK Independence Party, Nigel Farage 15% 61% 24%
So Nigel Farage is even less trusted than Ed Balls. Incredible.
The British people are wise not to put their trust in any politicians but the gap in the level of distrust between Balls and Osborne is growing ever wider.
Except if you ask about who'll be best for individuals & families you find the Tories 6% behind.
From ComRes Do you or would trust to see the country through the current economic situation? Y N DN
Chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne 26% 53% 21% Prime Minister, David Cameron 32% 50% 18% Deputy Prime Minister, Nick Clegg 15% 66% 19% Leader of the Opposition, Ed Miliband 22% 58% 20%
Shadow Chancellor, Ed Balls 17% 60% 23%
Leader of the UK Independence Party, Nigel Farage 15% 61% 24%
So Nigel Farage is even less trusted than Ed Balls. Incredible.
The British people are wise not to put their trust in any politicians but the gap in the level of distrust between Balls and Osborne is growing ever wider.
Those numbers show Mr Farage is as "trusted to see the country through the current economic situation" as the Deputy Prime Minister.
These numbers show no faith in any of the options. Singling out Mr Farage is silly.
The last chart is especially interesting and demonstrates once again the success of Mandleson's scare campaign directed at public sector workers in 2010.
By 2015 there should be approximately 1m fewer public sector workers and nearly 3 m more private sector workers. There will also be several hundred thousand fewer working in the third sector paid for by the government.
I agree with David Herdson that there is no immediate cross over in these figures and many who have been bought out of their public sector berths at very considerable expense may still feel bitter but this country is changing in ways that I am not entirely sure the pollsters pick up.
From ComRes Do you or would trust to see the country through the current economic situation? Y N DN
Chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne 26% 53% 21% Prime Minister, David Cameron 32% 50% 18% Deputy Prime Minister, Nick Clegg 15% 66% 19% Leader of the Opposition, Ed Miliband 22% 58% 20%
Shadow Chancellor, Ed Balls 17% 60% 23%
Leader of the UK Independence Party, Nigel Farage 15% 61% 24%
So Nigel Farage is even less trusted than Ed Balls. Incredible.
The British people are wise not to put their trust in any politicians but the gap in the level of distrust between Balls and Osborne is growing ever wider.
Except if you ask about who'll be best for individuals & families you find the Tories 6% behind.
The most significant change in the Rentool twitpic table is the increase in respondents saying that they expect their personal financial situation to improve in 2014. Yes increases by 5% and No decreases by the same amount (Y - 30%, N - 50%, DK - 20%).
The change is from the previous poll of 17th December, so a major shift in under a month.
The two Eds have really mistimed the cost of living "crisis" attack. As every month passes the public will see more recovery than crisis.
Still Osborne has to continue to deliver growth through the year and that is not yet a given.
Labour = free money for public sector workers, at least that's what they think anyway. I have a feeling they might feel slightly differently by 2020.
I doubt it. Labour will win in 2015 and will shower their gratitude on their clientele. The national debt and deficit will take the heat intially, followed by anyone with a mortgage as the markets react. But the core vote clientele will be looked after.
Labour = free money for public sector workers, at least that's what they think anyway. I have a feeling they might feel slightly differently by 2020.
I doubt it. Labour will win in 2015 q
Exactly. When Labour lose control and call in the IMF I don't think the public sector are going to be getting the amount of money that they're expecting.
Edit. Replying to the rest of your post, I think the finances of the country are worse than people think. I don't think things will hold together for 5 years of Balls throwing money at everything.
From ComRes Do you or would trust to see the country through the current economic situation? Y N DN
Chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne 26% 53% 21% Prime Minister, David Cameron 32% 50% 18% Deputy Prime Minister, Nick Clegg 15% 66% 19% Leader of the Opposition, Ed Miliband 22% 58% 20%
Shadow Chancellor, Ed Balls 17% 60% 23%
Leader of the UK Independence Party, Nigel Farage 15% 61% 24%
So Nigel Farage is even less trusted than Ed Balls. Incredible.
The British people are wise not to put their trust in any politicians but the gap in the level of distrust between Balls and Osborne is growing ever wider.
Except if you ask about who'll be best for individuals & families you find the Tories 6% behind.
I wonder if that is still true. the ComRes results show astonishing changes over a single month. Those who think the economy will do well this year are up 12% and those who don't are down 13% in a single month.
There is not a direct equivalent but those worried that they or their partner might lose their job are down 2% and those not worried are up 10%, again in a single month. People are clearly becoming much more confident (although it is noteworthy that the net confidence figures are still quite low) both for the country and themselves.
So Nigel Farage is even less trusted than Ed Balls. Incredible.
Kippers are morphing into the tea party - an unelectable, noisy and uncompromising minority.
Unelectable?? The Tea Party are the reason Republicans control the HoR.
You betting on a Rep president in 2016 ?
That'd depend on the odds but only a fool would write off the possibility. Clearly, much will depend on the candidates on both sides but Romney - hardly the most inspiring of nominations - was not all that far off winning. Don't the Republicans need about a 3% swing to take the White House?
The last time one Democrat won election when another Democrat retired as president was before the Civil War, I think? (Though Gore got close)
The issue is more a question of identity than employment. So if someone thinks of themselves as a civil servant / local government employee / teacher / nurse / soldier etc then that's more relevant than whether they're actually doing that job at the time i.e. a recently-redundant social worker is a public sector worker with a grievance.
Exactly. I worked in the public sector for two years, around seven years ago. Otherwise my employment history has been entirely within SMEs and, now, self-employed. Yet I still retain a lot of respect for the people with whom I worked, doing a difficult job in the face of some (putting this politely) extreme muppetry on the part of their "clients".
So although I may no longer work there, public sector-bashing and cries of "we need to strip out all the bloat" aren't likely to win my vote - quite the opposite. (FWIW I found the public sector and the private sector roughly as efficient as each other; roughly speaking, my public sector job wasted more time on meetings, while my private sector jobs have wasted more time swinging between the latest half-baked ideas of management.)
Labour = free money for public sector workers, at least that's what they think anyway. I have a feeling they might feel slightly differently by 2020.
Public sector workers do not think this, especially after enduring pay restraint and efficiency drives while Brown was still Chancellor.
What they do think, with some justification, is that the Tories loathe them.
A lot of public sector workers could be natural Tory voters. They are "small c" conservatives with a sense of civic duty, fair play and respect for authority.
The Tories decided to alienate these voters when they swallowed the mantra that the public sector is always bad, always the enemy.
FWIW I found the public sector and the private sector roughly as efficient as each other; roughly speaking, my public sector job wasted more time on meetings, while my private sector jobs have wasted more time swinging between the latest half-baked ideas of management.
From what I've seen, the public sector has well caught up on the last of those in the last few years.
So Nigel Farage is even less trusted than Ed Balls. Incredible.
Kippers are morphing into the tea party - an unelectable, noisy and uncompromising minority.
Unelectable?? The Tea Party are the reason Republicans control the HoR.
You betting on a Rep president in 2016 ?
I expect a Republican to win in 2016. I'm not sure yet how much the unfolding and unending disaster of Obamacare is being reflected in the polls. It will get alot worse as the design is ultimately not workable. There's alot of very angry and disillusioned Yanks out there!
Labour = free money for public sector workers, at least that's what they think anyway. I have a feeling they might feel slightly differently by 2020.
Public sector workers do not think this, especially after enduring pay restraint and efficiency drives while Brown was still Chancellor.
What they do think, with some justification, is that the Tories loathe them.
A lot of public sector workers could be natural Tory voters. They are "small c" conservatives with a sense of civic duty, fair play and respect for authority.
The Tories decided to alienate these voters when they swallowed the mantra that the public sector is always bad, always the enemy.
Yeah they hate it as they only spend £700bn on it each year.
The Tories vaguely try and reign in spending a little bit, which for their clients means that they "must loathe them" or something. After 13 years of having money thrown at them it must have been a bit of a shock so is understandable to an extent.
Edit: Oh and as for "especially after enduring pay restraint and efficiency drives while Brown was still Chancellor." excuse me while I die laughing.
That'd depend on the odds but only a fool would write off the possibility. Clearly, much will depend on the candidates on both sides but Romney - hardly the most inspiring of nominations - was not all that far off winning. Don't the Republicans need about a 3% swing to take the White House?
A Republican win in 2016 is certainly a reasonable possibility, especially if they were to choose Chris Christie as their candidate (that might be a big 'If', of course). There is also the Obamacare wildcard. Although some of the issues have been teething problems, the bigger problem that Obamacare relies on forcing millions of Americans to pay more for worse cover, in order to subsidise those who couldn't previously get insurance, is more fundamental.
I have never grasped why the Conservatives have gone out of their way to annoy public sector workers,many of whom have solid Tory values but seem to have deserted the coalition because they think they are not out there batting for them. Around 2 in 5 of all workers are in the public sector, so it's unwise to irritate them.
So the conclusion is the coalition should remove the vote from public sector workforce?
Isn't the conclusion that turkey's don't vote for christmas or rather public sector workers don't vote for parties who have cut their salaries in real terms.....
How much is enough?
"The average public sector worker benefits from a 6.1% pay ‘premium’, meaning that they can earn as much as £1,400 a year more than someone in the private sector, taking into account age, gender, full time and part time work, region, qualifications and length of employment. This represents almost a 20% and 8% rise respectively in the premium compared to the same quarters of 2007 and 2010."
I want one of those public sector jobs! I earn 28 grand a year, had a 2% payrise in around 5 years, but had significant increases in pension. I suppose my tax has been monkied around with to my benefit, but we lost child tax credits, so I'm probably about where I was in take home pay before the pay freeze, maybe a bit less in real terms.
There's alot of very angry and disillusioned Yanks out there!
Enough to overturn the democrats' inbuilt black/hispanic/blue collar coalition? I very much doubt it.
Since the passage of Civil Rights, only three Democrats have won presidential elections: Carter, aided greatly by being up against the unelected, bumbling Ford; Clinton, aided by the intervention of Ross Perot; and Obama, aided by a significant increase in registration / turnout among black voters.
Demographics may be trending the Democrats' way but I'm far from convinced that there's an in-built majority for either party at the moment.
Probably uses the term 'civilians' to describe those not in the police.
I am uncertain where my sympathy lies in this incident.
It is clear the Police Sergeant has exceeded his authority and acted in an improper manner, but the photographer was taking pictures of a fatal accident involving an 86 year old woman.
We don't know what the first request from the policeman was nor the initial response from the photographer.
One best left to an independent inquiry to judge on the basis of the full facts rather than trial by media.
There's alot of very angry and disillusioned Yanks out there!
Enough to overturn the democrats' inbuilt black/hispanic/blue collar coalition? I very much doubt it.
Since the passage of Civil Rights, only three Democrats have won presidential elections: Carter, aided greatly by being up against the unelected, bumbling Ford; Clinton, aided by the intervention of Ross Perot; and Obama, aided by a significant increase in registration / turnout among black voters.
Demographics may be trending the Democrats' way but I'm far from convinced that there's an in-built majority for either party at the moment.
The Democrats lost in 2000 because Al Gore was a useless candidate and they were complacent.
Whatever you might say about the Republicans, they are not complacent, and that may make the difference in 2016.
Lib to Lab switchers will have differing impacts in Lib-Lab, Lib-Con, and Con-Lab marginals. In Lib-Lab marginals they won't affect the Conservative seat total, but in Lib-Con marginals they could lower the Lib Dem vote enough to let the Conservatives in, or swing the seat over to Labour, and so on.
Is there much data on how the :Lib-Lab switchers, and public sector workers, are distributed among the various types of marginal?
This is a genuine question, not a smartarse attempt to catch you out: I remember reading somewhere that a high proportion of firemen have second jobs and one of the sources of friction re overtime and scheduling arrangements was the impact it might have on these second jobs. Is that right? Do you? Is your fireman income your only income?
...and thanks for keeping us all safe BTW - much appreciated...
I have never grasped why the Conservatives have gone out of their way to annoy public sector workers,many of whom have solid Tory values but seem to have deserted the coalition because they think they are not out there batting for them. Around 2 in 5 of all workers are in the public sector, so it's unwise to irritate them.
Can you give us an example of what you mean by the Conservatives going "out of their way to annoy public sector workers"?
I realise times are tough and political perceptions will be influenced by current conditions, but we really need evidence here to sort out myth from facts.
There's alot of very angry and disillusioned Yanks out there!
Enough to overturn the democrats' inbuilt black/hispanic/blue collar coalition? I very much doubt it.
Neither side has an inbuilt majority. The last four Presidential election results have been (in percentage terms) pretty close-run affairs.
The Republicans are likely to take back the Senate in November (given the nature of the seats that are being contested). They could certainly win in 2016 with the right candidate.
Afternoon people. I was interested to see this morning that Jack's Arse is still expecting a Tory victory next year. I wonder what effect the increased confidence being tweeted will have on the voting intention in this evening's ComRes poll.
More than ever I have a growing feeling we none of us will have a true idea of the final result until around 1am on the Friday morning after the GE. It feels more and more like 1992 every day.
Probably uses the term 'civilians' to describe those not in the police.
I am uncertain where my sympathy lies in this incident.
It is clear the Police Sergeant has exceeded his authority and acted in an improper manner, but the photographer was taking pictures of a fatal accident involving an 86 year old woman.
We don't know what the first request from the policeman was nor the initial response from the photographer.
One best left to an independent inquiry to judge on the basis of the full facts rather than trial by media.
Are there any laws against taking photographs of such situations ?
That'd depend on the odds but only a fool would write off the possibility. Clearly, much will depend on the candidates on both sides but Romney - hardly the most inspiring of nominations - was not all that far off winning. Don't the Republicans need about a 3% swing to take the White House?
A Republican win in 2016 is certainly a reasonable possibility, especially if they were to choose Chris Christie as their candidate (that might be a big 'If', of course).
This is a genuine question, not a smartarse attempt to catch you out: I remember reading somewhere that a high proportion of firemen have second jobs and one of the sources of friction re overtime and scheduling arrangements was the impact it might have on these second jobs. Is that right? Do you? Is your fireman income your only income?
...and thanks for keeping us all safe BTW - much appreciated...
Its true, some do have second jobs. I don't, but in the past I have painted houses, laboured on building sites and done racetrack medical cover when my kids were young, and my wife wasn't working.
I have never, and this is genuinely true, known of any of my colleagues to let their second job get in the way. On my watch, we have 12, of them, I know of 4 who have regular second jobs (electrician, builder, wedding photographer, diving instructor). As for overtime and scheduling, that's down to our employer, and they certainly wouldn't take other jobs into account!
Gove is driving teachers mad and the NHS reorganisation is wasting huge amounts of time and money in the health service.
That is a bit of a woolly answer, TLBS.
Shouldn't you be adopting the motto of your organisation, "Be Prepared!".
Neither the Gove educational reforms nor the Lansley NHS reorganisation, to the best of my knowledge, had the aims of "annoying public sector workers" although I accept that teachers and medics may be annoyed by them.
What I am looking for is evidence that the Conservatives had an intent to annoy public sector workers, which was after all your original allegation.
Gove is driving teachers mad and the NHS reorganisation is wasting huge amounts of time and money in the health service.
Gove's attacks on teachers are all part of his bid to in the 2015 CON leadership contest and nothing to do with education.
His slagging off of an entire profession is costing the Tories dear. Tom Montgomerie has been right to raise his conerns. It's not just those in the state sector who are furious at his constant denigration of them but private sector ones as well. They are a big voting blog and many will use their votes on May 7 2015 to get rid of Gove.
There are about 900-1000 teachers in each constituency.
A Republican win in 2016 is certainly a reasonable possibility, especially if they were to choose Chris Christie as their candidate (that might be a big 'If', of course). There is also the Obamacare wildcard. Although some of the issues have been teething problems, the bigger problem that Obamacare relies on forcing millions of Americans to pay more for worse cover, in order to subsidise those who couldn't previously get insurance, is more fundamental.
From the political chat on a bunch of left-leaning US websites, I get the general impression that most Democratic activists think the teething troubles have been grossly exaggerated by their Republican opposition, if not completely invented, and that there can be no rational doubt the US electorate will swiftly fall in love with Obamacare. (They remind me of some of the last ditch defenders of the Poll Tax here, a generation ago.)
I don't know what the actual truth of the situation is, but that's not an healthy attitude. If the party as a whole is that complacent about the popularity of Obamacare, they're not likely to do a good job of defending it against Republican attacks, whether or not those attacks are fact based, and that will cost them votes.
Probably uses the term 'civilians' to describe those not in the police.
I am uncertain where my sympathy lies in this incident.
It is clear the Police Sergeant has exceeded his authority and acted in an improper manner, but the photographer was taking pictures of a fatal accident involving an 86 year old woman.
We don't know what the first request from the policeman was nor the initial response from the photographer.
One best left to an independent inquiry to judge on the basis of the full facts rather than trial by media.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe there are no legal restrictions on photography in a public place, and there is no presumption of privacy for individuals in a public place.
And if the subject matter was unsettling, I don't recall the police being appointed the arbiters of decency or taste.
I have never grasped why the Conservatives have gone out of their way to annoy public sector workers,many of whom have solid Tory values but seem to have deserted the coalition because they think they are not out there batting for them. Around 2 in 5 of all workers are in the public sector, so it's unwise to irritate them.
And yet the evidence from the graphic is that that's not what's happening. At the election, 26% of public sector workers voted Tory, to 25% who backed the Lib Dems. The Tory share has dropped but not by much and roughly in line with the overall picture. It seems to be the Lib Dems' action which has been the biggest driver of movement.
Probably uses the term 'civilians' to describe those not in the police.
I am uncertain where my sympathy lies in this incident.
It is clear the Police Sergeant has exceeded his authority and acted in an improper manner, but the photographer was taking pictures of a fatal accident involving an 86 year old woman.
We don't know what the first request from the policeman was nor the initial response from the photographer.
One best left to an independent inquiry to judge on the basis of the full facts rather than trial by media.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe there are no legal restrictions on photography in a public place, and there is no presumption of privacy for individuals in a public place.
And if the subject matter was unsettling, I don't recall the police being appointed the arbiters of decency or taste.
Probably uses the term 'civilians' to describe those not in the police.
I am uncertain where my sympathy lies in this incident.
It is clear the Police Sergeant has exceeded his authority and acted in an improper manner, but the photographer was taking pictures of a fatal accident involving an 86 year old woman.
We don't know what the first request from the policeman was nor the initial response from the photographer.
One best left to an independent inquiry to judge on the basis of the full facts rather than trial by media.
Are there any laws against taking photographs of such situations ?
Dunno, but that sort of thing really upsets me. The rise of decent quality cameras on phones has turned every bystander into a news cameraman, and I've been filmed many times at jobs, something that is off putting, and more importantly, upsetting for casualties and people involved in the incident. I've even been filmed giving CPR at the roadside. Some things shouldn't be filmed, and that's one of 'em.
Probably uses the term 'civilians' to describe those not in the police.
I am uncertain where my sympathy lies in this incident.
It is clear the Police Sergeant has exceeded his authority and acted in an improper manner, but the photographer was taking pictures of a fatal accident involving an 86 year old woman.
We don't know what the first request from the policeman was nor the initial response from the photographer.
One best left to an independent inquiry to judge on the basis of the full facts rather than trial by media.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe there are no legal restrictions on photography in a public place, and there is no presumption of privacy for individuals in a public place.
And if the subject matter was unsettling, I don't recall the police being appointed the arbiters of decency or taste.
Probably uses the term 'civilians' to describe those not in the police.
I am uncertain where my sympathy lies in this incident.
It is clear the Police Sergeant has exceeded his authority and acted in an improper manner, but the photographer was taking pictures of a fatal accident involving an 86 year old woman.
We don't know what the first request from the policeman was nor the initial response from the photographer.
One best left to an independent inquiry to judge on the basis of the full facts rather than trial by media.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe there are no legal restrictions on photography in a public place, and there is no presumption of privacy for individuals in a public place.
And if the subject matter was unsettling, I don't recall the police being appointed the arbiters of decency or taste.
A Republican win in 2016 is certainly a reasonable possibility, especially if they were to choose Chris Christie as their candidate (that might be a big 'If', of course). There is also the Obamacare wildcard. Although some of the issues have been teething problems, the bigger problem that Obamacare relies on forcing millions of Americans to pay more for worse cover, in order to subsidise those who couldn't previously get insurance, is more fundamental.
From the political chat on a bunch of left-leaning US websites, I get the general impression that most Democratic activists think the teething troubles have been grossly exaggerated by their Republican opposition, if not completely invented, and that there can be no rational doubt the US electorate will swiftly fall in love with Obamacare. (They remind me of some of the last ditch defenders of the Poll Tax here, a generation ago.)
I don't know what the actual truth of the situation is, but that's not an healthy attitude. If the party as a whole is that complacent about the popularity of Obamacare, they're not likely to do a good job of defending it against Republican attacks, whether or not those attacks are fact based, and that will cost them votes.
The teething troubles probably will be ironed out. The problem for the Democrats comes with the fact that quite a lot of people are just discovering that their existing policies no longer comply with the legislation, and they have to take out more expensive policies.
Gove is driving teachers mad and the NHS reorganisation is wasting huge amounts of time and money in the health service.
Gove's attacks on teachers are all part of his bid to in the 2015 CON leadership contest and nothing to do with education.
His slagging off of an entire profession is costing the Tories dear. Tom Montgomerie has been right to raise his conerns. It's not just those in the state sector who are furious at his constant denigration of them but private sector ones as well. They are a big voting blog and many will use their votes on May 7 2015 to get rid of Gove.
There are about 900-1000 teachers in each constituency.
Mike
We need to see the evidence of Gove's "attacks on teachers" and "slagging off of an entire profession".
Some direct quotes might help advance the argument beyond partisan prejudice.
It is one thing to disagree both with a policy and its impact on teachers and quite another to conclude that it is a pre-meditated attempt to attack and demean.
Probably uses the term 'civilians' to describe those not in the police.
I am uncertain where my sympathy lies in this incident.
It is clear the Police Sergeant has exceeded his authority and acted in an improper manner, but the photographer was taking pictures of a fatal accident involving an 86 year old woman.
We don't know what the first request from the policeman was nor the initial response from the photographer.
One best left to an independent inquiry to judge on the basis of the full facts rather than trial by media.
Are there any laws against taking photographs of such situations ?
Dunno, but that sort of thing really upsets me. The rise of decent quality cameras on phones has turned every bystander into a news cameraman, and I've been filmed many times at jobs, something that is off putting, and more importantly, upsetting for casualties and people involved in the incident. I've even been filmed giving CPR at the roadside. Some things shouldn't be filmed, and that's one of 'em.
The copper could have asked him to stop taking photos politely then. "I don't have the legal power to do enforce this, but I ask you out of respect to please stop photographing this scene." Something like that.
The copper could have asked him to stop taking photos politely then. "I don't have the legal power to do enforce this, but I ask you out of respect to please stop photographing this scene." Something like that.
Does such behaviour (by the photographer) not count as provocative and likely to cause a breach of the peace?
The teething troubles probably will be ironed out. The problem for the Democrats comes with the fact that quite a lot of people are just discovering that their existing policies no longer comply with the legislation, and they have to take out more expensive policies.
If the Democrats recognise that is a problem, they can at least try and overcome it. The impression I'm getting is that a significant chunk of their activist base believe that's just Republican scaremongering spread by the Murdoch 'propaganda machine', an attitude which seems to me dangerously complacent.
If they don't understand why people might not love Obamacare like they do, they're not likely to be mentally well prepared to defend it.
Probably uses the term 'civilians' to describe those not in the police.
I am uncertain where my sympathy lies in this incident.
It is clear the Police Sergeant has exceeded his authority and acted in an improper manner, but the photographer was taking pictures of a fatal accident involving an 86 year old woman.
We don't know what the first request from the policeman was nor the initial response from the photographer.
One best left to an independent inquiry to judge on the basis of the full facts rather than trial by media.
Are there any laws against taking photographs of such situations ?
Dunno, but that sort of thing really upsets me. The rise of decent quality cameras on phones has turned every bystander into a news cameraman, and I've been filmed many times at jobs, something that is off putting, and more importantly, upsetting for casualties and people involved in the incident. I've even been filmed giving CPR at the roadside. Some things shouldn't be filmed, and that's one of 'em.
The copper could have asked him to stop taking photos politely then. "I don't have the legal power to do enforce this, but I ask you out of respect to please stop photographing this scene." Something like that.
So in a situation where somebody has died suddenly in a accident , the photographer (who is taking photos od something very personal )is whinging because some policeman said something nasty to him? Not only that the policeman is being hauled over the coals for it? Have I got this straight? When did we become so precious in this country?
The copper could have asked him to stop taking photos politely then. "I don't have the legal power to do enforce this, but I ask you out of respect to please stop photographing this scene." Something like that.
Does such behaviour (by the photographer) not count as provocative and likely to cause a breach of the peace?
You may be right. The UK's reluctance to pass proper privacy laws may well have resulted in other laws being used as a proxy.
The copper could have asked him to stop taking photos politely then. "I don't have the legal power to do enforce this, but I ask you out of respect to please stop photographing this scene." Something like that.
Does such behaviour (by the photographer) not count as provocative and likely to cause a breach of the peace?
Then he should have been arrested for 'breach of the peace' if the police officer thought that was appropriate. "Sir I am arresting you for breach of the peace... quote relevant bits of PACE..." Not "I'll make your life a living hell".
I'm a fan of the police unlike TSE, but this incident does them no favours.
Can anyone clarify - are these voters who are in the public sector now, or were in 2010? If the former, then given the reduction in public sector workers/transfers to the private sector, we would need to know how those have changed their voting intention to see the full picture. Not saying it is likely, but it is at least possible that those who have gone to the private sector might break differently.
Two thoughts on public sector workers. First, they don't feel the effect of income tax in the way that the self-employed in particular do - it is this latter group which promoted the "taxation is theft" meme in the 1970s and 1980s and which may well resent not only the tax they pay but the accountants' fees they have to pay in order to avoid paying more tax. And self-employment is likely to become more and more the norm as the years roll by.
What are the respective besetting sins of people in the two sectors? I suggest, in the private: greed and in the public: anger. (A desire to cure illness or to educate children can be seen as a rationalisation of anger at disease or ignorance.)
If I wanted to argue for the slimming down of the public sector I would focus on the selfishness of managers who seek to control others whilst not actually paying them themselves. But then, I think the desire to control another human being, in whatever circumstances, is pretty much Satanic.
Probably uses the term 'civilians' to describe those not in the police.
I am uncertain where my sympathy lies in this incident.
It is clear the Police Sergeant has exceeded his authority and acted in an improper manner, but the photographer was taking pictures of a fatal accident involving an 86 year old woman.
We don't know what the first request from the policeman was nor the initial response from the photographer.
One best left to an independent inquiry to judge on the basis of the full facts rather than trial by media.
Are there any laws against taking photographs of such situations ?
Dunno, but that sort of thing really upsets me. The rise of decent quality cameras on phones has turned every bystander into a news cameraman, and I've been filmed many times at jobs, something that is off putting, and more importantly, upsetting for casualties and people involved in the incident. I've even been filmed giving CPR at the roadside. Some things shouldn't be filmed, and that's one of 'em.
The copper could have asked him to stop taking photos politely then. "I don't have the legal power to do enforce this, but I ask you out of respect to please stop photographing this scene." Something like that.
So in a situation where somebody has died suddenly in a accident , the photographer (who is taking photos od something very personal )is whinging because some policeman said something nasty to him? Not only that the policeman is being hauled over the coals for it? Have I got this straight? When did we become so precious in this country?
To balance it out I said the police were precious when Mitchell (did or did not) call one of their number a 'pleb' as well. Why have we become so self centred and childish?
The valid votes in the final round were 132. I don't know how many members the Con Association has but 132 voters don't seem to suggest a high interest among the general public (assuming Con members have the standard turnout)
The teething troubles probably will be ironed out. The problem for the Democrats comes with the fact that quite a lot of people are just discovering that their existing policies no longer comply with the legislation, and they have to take out more expensive policies.
If the Democrats recognise that is a problem, they can at least try and overcome it. The impression I'm getting is that a significant chunk of their activist base believe that's just Republican scaremongering spread by the Murdoch 'propaganda machine', an attitude which seems to me dangerously complacent.
If they don't understand why people might not love Obamacare like they do, they're not likely to be mentally well prepared to defend it.
That kind of wilful blindness seems to be an occupational hazard among political activists. The Republicans threw away 4 or 5 Senate seats in 2010/12 because of it. Those Democrats who, for example, attack Mark Pryor in Arkansas because he refuses to support gun control, or Mary Landrieu in Louisiana because she doesn't support gay marriage, are in danger of doing the same thing.
Probably uses the term 'civilians' to describe those not in the police.
I am uncertain where my sympathy lies in this incident.
It is clear the Police Sergeant has exceeded his authority and acted in an improper manner, but the photographer was taking pictures of a fatal accident involving an 86 year old woman.
We don't know what the first request from the policeman was nor the initial response from the photographer.
One best left to an independent inquiry to judge on the basis of the full facts rather than trial by media.
Are there any laws against taking photographs of such situations ?
Dunno, but that sort of thing really upsets me. The rise of decent quality cameras on phones has turned every bystander into a news cameraman, and I've been filmed many times at jobs, something that is off putting, and more importantly, upsetting for casualties and people involved in the incident. I've even been filmed giving CPR at the roadside. Some things shouldn't be filmed, and that's one of 'em.
The copper could have asked him to stop taking photos politely then. "I don't have the legal power to do enforce this, but I ask you out of respect to please stop photographing this scene." Something like that.
He could, and should have done that, but incidents like that are emotional, and the emergency services, professional as they are, do get affected by events. We're all guilty of shouting at gawpers and rubber neckers, I expect. The cameraman should ask himself "Would I be happy having my mum/dad/son/daughter filmed in such a situation?" They probably wouldn't.
Probably uses the term 'civilians' to describe those not in the police.
I am uncertain where my sympathy lies in this incident.
It is clear the Police Sergeant has exceeded his authority and acted in an improper manner, but the photographer was taking pictures of a fatal accident involving an 86 year old woman.
We don't know what the first request from the policeman was nor the initial response from the photographer.
One best left to an independent inquiry to judge on the basis of the full facts rather than trial by media.
Are there any laws against taking photographs of such situations ?
Dunno, but that sort of thing really upsets me. The rise of decent quality cameras on phones has turned every bystander into a news cameraman, and I've been filmed many times at jobs, something that is off putting, and more importantly, upsetting for casualties and people involved in the incident. I've even been filmed giving CPR at the roadside. Some things shouldn't be filmed, and that's one of 'em.
The copper could have asked him to stop taking photos politely then. "I don't have the legal power to do enforce this, but I ask you out of respect to please stop photographing this scene." Something like that.
So in a situation where somebody has died suddenly in a accident , the photographer (who is taking photos od something very personal )is whinging because some policeman said something nasty to him? Not only that the policeman is being hauled over the coals for it? Have I got this straight? When did we become so precious in this country?
The police need the most incredible and amazing patience in their job. Every time I watch a demo I emotionally feel like I'm on the police's side. If this one is losing it over a photographer how about when he is actually in a 'pressure' situation ?
I have never grasped why the Conservatives have gone out of their way to annoy public sector workers,many of whom have solid Tory values but seem to have deserted the coalition because they think they are not out there batting for them. Around 2 in 5 of all workers are in the public sector, so it's unwise to irritate them.
Can you give us an example of what you mean by the Conservatives going "out of their way to annoy public sector workers"?
I realise times are tough and political perceptions will be influenced by current conditions, but we really need evidence here to sort out myth from facts.
Constant denigration of the public sector and those who work in it is a constant theme of too many PB Conservatives on this site. Countless threads could serve as your example.
Those numbers show Mr Farage is as "trusted to see the country through the current economic situation" as the Deputy Prime Minister.
These numbers show no faith in any of the options. Singling out Mr Farage is silly.
That 15% of people say they trust Mr Clegg to see us through the crisis means that we now know that - as a general rule - 15% of survey respondents don't take surveys seriously.
I have never grasped why the Conservatives have gone out of their way to annoy public sector workers,many of whom have solid Tory values but seem to have deserted the coalition because they think they are not out there batting for them. Around 2 in 5 of all workers are in the public sector, so it's unwise to irritate them.
Can you give us an example of what you mean by the Conservatives going "out of their way to annoy public sector workers"?
I realise times are tough and political perceptions will be influenced by current conditions, but we really need evidence here to sort out myth from facts.
Constant denigration of the public sector and those who work in it is a constant theme of too many PB Conservatives on this site. Countless threads could serve as your example.
We are mostly a bunch of bloggers with a penchant for provocation.
What I am looking for is direct evidence that Gove (or for that matter any official member of the government) is deliberately seeking to denigrate workers in the public sector.
I have never grasped why the Conservatives have gone out of their way to annoy public sector workers,many of whom have solid Tory values but seem to have deserted the coalition because they think they are not out there batting for them. Around 2 in 5 of all workers are in the public sector, so it's unwise to irritate them.
Can you give us an example of what you mean by the Conservatives going "out of their way to annoy public sector workers"?
I realise times are tough and political perceptions will be influenced by current conditions, but we really need evidence here to sort out myth from facts.
Constant denigration of the public sector and those who work in it is a constant theme of too many PB Conservatives on this site. Countless threads could serve as your example.
The worst critics seem to be public sector workers themselves..
Probably uses the term 'civilians' to describe those not in the police.
I am uncertain where my sympathy lies in this incident.
It is clear the Police Sergeant has exceeded his authority and acted in an improper manner, but the photographer was taking pictures of a fatal accident involving an 86 year old woman.
We don't know what the first request from the policeman was nor the initial response from the photographer.
One best left to an independent inquiry to judge on the basis of the full facts rather than trial by media.
Are there any laws against taking photographs of such situations ?
Dunno, but that sort of thing really upsets me. The rise of decent quality cameras on phones has turned every bystander into a news cameraman, and I've been filmed many times at jobs, something that is off putting, and more importantly, upsetting for casualties and people involved in the incident. I've even been filmed giving CPR at the roadside. Some things shouldn't be filmed, and that's one of 'em.
The copper could have asked him to stop taking photos politely then. "I don't have the legal power to do enforce this, but I ask you out of respect to please stop photographing this scene." Something like that.
So in a situation where somebody has died suddenly in a accident , the photographer (who is taking photos od something very personal )is whinging because some policeman said something nasty to him? Not only that the policeman is being hauled over the coals for it? Have I got this straight? When did we become so precious in this country?
The police need the most incredible and amazing patience in their job. Every time I watch a demo I emotionally feel like I'm on the police's side. If this one is losing it over a photographer how about when he is actually in a 'pressure' situation ?
Did he 'lose it' or just (rightly it seems) tell him off?
Probably uses the term 'civilians' to describe those not in the police.
I am uncertain where my sympathy lies in this incident.
It is clear the Police Sergeant has exceeded his authority and acted in an improper manner, but the photographer was taking pictures of a fatal accident involving an 86 year old woman.
We don't know what the first request from the policeman was nor the initial response from the photographer.
One best left to an independent inquiry to judge on the basis of the full facts rather than trial by media.
Are there any laws against taking photographs of such situations ?
Dunno, but that sort of thing really upsets me. The rise of decent quality cameras on phones has turned every bystander into a news cameraman, and I've been filmed many times at jobs, something that is off putting, and more importantly, upsetting for casualties and people involved in the incident. I've even been filmed giving CPR at the roadside. Some things shouldn't be filmed, and that's one of 'em.
The copper could have asked him to stop taking photos politely then. "I don't have the legal power to do enforce this, but I ask you out of respect to please stop photographing this scene." Something like that.
So in a situation where somebody has died suddenly in a accident , the photographer (who is taking photos od something very personal )is whinging because some policeman said something nasty to him? Not only that the policeman is being hauled over the coals for it? Have I got this straight? When did we become so precious in this country?
The police need the most incredible and amazing patience in their job. Every time I watch a demo I emotionally feel like I'm on the police's side. If this one is losing it over a photographer how about when he is actually in a 'pressure' situation ?
Just a quick comment to say I agreed 100% with your post on how the policeman "should" have handled the situation.
Gove is driving teachers mad and the NHS reorganisation is wasting huge amounts of time and money in the health service.
Gove's attacks on teachers are all part of his bid to in the 2015 CON leadership contest and nothing to do with education.
His slagging off of an entire profession is costing the Tories dear. Tom Montgomerie has been right to raise his conerns. It's not just those in the state sector who are furious at his constant denigration of them but private sector ones as well. They are a big voting blog and many will use their votes on May 7 2015 to get rid of Gove.
There are about 900-1000 teachers in each constituency.
Mike
We need to see the evidence of Gove's "attacks on teachers" and "slagging off of an entire profession".
Some direct quotes might help advance the argument beyond partisan prejudice.
It is one thing to disagree both with a policy and its impact on teachers and quite another to conclude that it is a pre-meditated attempt to attack and demean.
Just about everything he does is seen as a denigration of teachers who loathe him. If you don't see that you are a fool.
Probably uses the term 'civilians' to describe those not in the police.
I am uncertain where my sympathy lies in this incident.
It is clear the Police Sergeant has exceeded his authority and acted in an improper manner, but the photographer was taking pictures of a fatal accident involving an 86 year old woman.
We don't know what the first request from the policeman was nor the initial response from the photographer.
One best left to an independent inquiry to judge on the basis of the full facts rather than trial by media.
Are there any laws against taking photographs of such situations ?
Dunno, but that sort of thing really upsets me. The rise of decent quality cameras on phones has turned every bystander into a news cameraman, and I've been filmed many times at jobs, something that is off putting, and more importantly, upsetting for casualties and people involved in the incident. I've even been filmed giving CPR at the roadside. Some things shouldn't be filmed, and that's one of 'em.
The copper could have asked him to stop taking photos politely then. "I don't have the legal power to do enforce this, but I ask you out of respect to please stop photographing this scene." Something like that.
So in a situation where somebody has died suddenly in a accident , the photographer (who is taking photos od something very personal )is whinging because some policeman said something nasty to him? Not only that the policeman is being hauled over the coals for it? Have I got this straight? When did we become so precious in this country?
The policeman is (rightly) being hauled over the coals for an abuse of power. Members of the public have the right to act like idiots. Others have the right to criticise them for it. What the police don't have the power to do is lock them up and confiscate / destroy their property simply because someone's acting insensitively.
Probably uses the term 'civilians' to describe those not in the police.
I am uncertain where my sympathy lies in this incident.
It is clear the Police Sergeant has exceeded his authority and acted in an improper manner, but the photographer was taking pictures of a fatal accident involving an 86 year old woman.
We don't know what the first request from the policeman was nor the initial response from the photographer.
One best left to an independent inquiry to judge on the basis of the full facts rather than trial by media.
Are there any laws against taking photographs of such situations ?
Dunno, but that sort of thing really upsets me. The rise of decent quality cameras on phones has turned every bystander into a news cameraman, and I've been filmed many times at jobs, something that is off putting, and more importantly, upsetting for casualties and people involved in the incident. I've even been filmed giving CPR at the roadside. Some things shouldn't be filmed, and that's one of 'em.
The copper could have asked him to stop taking photos politely then. "I don't have the legal power to do enforce this, but I ask you out of respect to please stop photographing this scene." Something like that.
So in a situation where somebody has died suddenly in a accident , the photographer (who is taking photos od something very personal )is whinging because some policeman said something nasty to him? Not only that the policeman is being hauled over the coals for it? Have I got this straight? When did we become so precious in this country?
The police need the most incredible and amazing patience in their job. Every time I watch a demo I emotionally feel like I'm on the police's side. If this one is losing it over a photographer how about when he is actually in a 'pressure' situation ?
Did he 'lose it' or just (rightly it seems) tell him off?
Just about everything he does is seen as a denigration of teachers who loathe him. If you don't see that you are a fool.
Here's an example:
Every day I also give thanks for the amazing work being done by the teachers who are starting the new school year this week.
I am fortunate as Education Secretary because we have the best generation of teachers ever in our classrooms - including the very best generation ever of young teachers - those who have entered our classrooms over the last few years.
Whenever I can, I give thanks for their work - not just privately, but on any public platform I’m given. Including this one.
This government is determined to do all it can to support the teaching profession.
Because there can never have been a more important time to be a teacher.
Teachers hold in their hands the success of our country and the wellbeing of its citizens; they are the key to helping every child in this country to realise their full potential.
Teachers are the most important fighters in the battle to make opportunity more equal.
Teachers are the critical guardians of the intellectual life of the nation.
Teachers give children the tools by which they can become authors of their own life story and builders of a better world.
It is teachers, not poets, who are the unacknowledged legislators of mankind.
Gove is driving teachers mad and the NHS reorganisation is wasting huge amounts of time and money in the health service.
Gove's attacks on teachers are all part of his bid to in the 2015 CON leadership contest and nothing to do with education.
His slagging off of an entire profession is costing the Tories dear. Tom Montgomerie has been right to raise his conerns. It's not just those in the state sector who are furious at his constant denigration of them but private sector ones as well. They are a big voting blog and many will use their votes on May 7 2015 to get rid of Gove.
There are about 900-1000 teachers in each constituency.
Mike
We need to see the evidence of Gove's "attacks on teachers" and "slagging off of an entire profession".
Some direct quotes might help advance the argument beyond partisan prejudice.
It is one thing to disagree both with a policy and its impact on teachers and quite another to conclude that it is a pre-meditated attempt to attack and demean.
Just about everything he does is seen as a denigration of teachers who loathe him. If you don't see that you are a fool.
Mind you, I can't remember a Conservative Secretary of State for Education who wasn't disliked by teachers.
Sorry going to call bollocks on this. Given how much footage we are subjected to by camera crews following emergency services around with the full cooperation of those emergency services. Scenes which often show injured people or even CPR then the emergency services really have no leg to stand on in claiming this is a "decency issue"
We live in a world where journalism is becoming democratised. Learn to live with it because I am damn sure that the policeman in question would not have approached a bbc camera crew in that frame of mind and would more likely have given them an interview
Probably uses the term 'civilians' to describe those not in the police.
I am uncertain where my sympathy lies in this incident.
It is clear the Police Sergeant has exceeded his authority and acted in an improper manner, but the photographer was taking pictures of a fatal accident involving an 86 year old woman.
We don't know what the first request from the policeman was nor the initial response from the photographer.
One best left to an independent inquiry to judge on the basis of the full facts rather than trial by media.
Are there any laws against taking photographs of such situations ?
Dunno, but that sort of thing really upsets me. The rise of decent quality cameras on phones has turned every bystander into a news cameraman, and I've been filmed many times at jobs, something that is off putting, and more importantly, upsetting for casualties and people involved in the incident. I've even been filmed giving CPR at the roadside. Some things shouldn't be filmed, and that's one of 'em.
The copper could have asked him to stop taking photos politely then. "I don't have the legal power to do enforce this, but I ask you out of respect to please stop photographing this scene." Something like that.
He could, and should have done that, but incidents like that are emotional, and the emergency services, professional as they are, do get affected by events. We're all guilty of shouting at gawpers and rubber neckers, I expect. The cameraman should ask himself "Would I be happy having my mum/dad/son/daughter filmed in such a situation?" They probably wouldn't.
Comments
I see there is a ComRes poll out tonight.
John Rentoul @JohnRentoul 12m
Record high in optimism about the economy: ComRes poll for ITV News tonight pic.twitter.com/ZVd7BKjMPj
To avoid allegations of being too draconian, they should limit it to the fraction of the workforce on less than, say, £80k/year.
Do you or would trust to see the country through the current economic situation?
Y
N
DN
Chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne
26%
53%
21%
Prime Minister, David Cameron
32%
50%
18%
Deputy Prime Minister, Nick Clegg
15%
66%
19%
Leader of the Opposition, Ed Miliband
22%
58%
20%
Shadow Chancellor, Ed Balls
17%
60%
23%
Leader of the UK Independence Party, Nigel Farage
15%
61%
24%
So Nigel Farage is even less trusted than Ed Balls. Incredible.
The British people are wise not to put their trust in any politicians but the gap in the level of distrust between Balls and Osborne is growing ever wider.
"The average public sector worker benefits from a 6.1% pay ‘premium’, meaning that they can earn as much as £1,400 a year more than someone in the private sector, taking into account age, gender, full time and part time work, region, qualifications and length of employment. This represents almost a 20% and 8% rise respectively in the premium compared to the same quarters of 2007 and 2010."
http://www.policyexchange.org.uk/publications/category/item/public-and-private-sector-pay-2013-update
The Tea Party are the reason Republicans control the HoR.
Over time, as those made redundant find work elsewhere and differential recruitment rates change the workforce balance between the public and private sectors, the shift might have a political impact.
These numbers show no faith in any of the options. Singling out Mr Farage is silly.
By 2015 there should be approximately 1m fewer public sector workers and nearly 3 m more private sector workers. There will also be several hundred thousand fewer working in the third sector paid for by the government.
I agree with David Herdson that there is no immediate cross over in these figures and many who have been bought out of their public sector berths at very considerable expense may still feel bitter but this country is changing in ways that I am not entirely sure the pollsters pick up.
The change is from the previous poll of 17th December, so a major shift in under a month.
The two Eds have really mistimed the cost of living "crisis" attack. As every month passes the public will see more recovery than crisis.
Still Osborne has to continue to deliver growth through the year and that is not yet a given.
Edit. Replying to the rest of your post, I think the finances of the country are worse than people think. I don't think things will hold together for 5 years of Balls throwing money at everything.
There is not a direct equivalent but those worried that they or their partner might lose their job are down 2% and those not worried are up 10%, again in a single month. People are clearly becoming much more confident (although it is noteworthy that the net confidence figures are still quite low) both for the country and themselves.
The last time one Democrat won election when another Democrat retired as president was before the Civil War, I think? (Though Gore got close)
So although I may no longer work there, public sector-bashing and cries of "we need to strip out all the bloat" aren't likely to win my vote - quite the opposite. (FWIW I found the public sector and the private sector roughly as efficient as each other; roughly speaking, my public sector job wasted more time on meetings, while my private sector jobs have wasted more time swinging between the latest half-baked ideas of management.)
What they do think, with some justification, is that the Tories loathe them.
A lot of public sector workers could be natural Tory voters. They are "small c" conservatives with a sense of civic duty, fair play and respect for authority.
The Tories decided to alienate these voters when they swallowed the mantra that the public sector is always bad, always the enemy.
PBers know I'm a long standing critic of the police.
Want to see another one in action?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/10555381/Abusive-policeman-threatens-to-make-photographers-day-a-living-hell.html
http://www.wiltsglosstandard.co.uk/news/10917210.Police_commisioner_Martin_Surl_questions_investigation_into_complaint_by_photographer_who_says_he_was_threatened_and_abused_by_policeman/
The Tories vaguely try and reign in spending a little bit, which for their clients means that they "must loathe them" or something. After 13 years of having money thrown at them it must have been a bit of a shock so is understandable to an extent.
Edit: Oh and as for "especially after enduring pay restraint and efficiency drives while Brown was still Chancellor." excuse me while I die laughing.
Enough to overturn the democrats' inbuilt black/hispanic/blue collar coalition? I very much doubt it.
Probably uses the term 'civilians' to describe those not in the police.
I earn 28 grand a year, had a 2% payrise in around 5 years, but had significant increases in pension. I suppose my tax has been monkied around with to my benefit, but we lost child tax credits, so I'm probably about where I was in take home pay before the pay freeze, maybe a bit less in real terms.
Chris Gayle is phenomenal... The rest of the Windies team are mediocre at best. In T20 terms they are pretty much the definition of a One-Man Team.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I cant have that at all... Dwayne Bravo, Darren Sammy, Kieron Pollard, Andre Russell and Sunil Narine are all top quality t20 players
Demographics may be trending the Democrats' way but I'm far from convinced that there's an in-built majority for either party at the moment.
It is clear the Police Sergeant has exceeded his authority and acted in an improper manner, but the photographer was taking pictures of a fatal accident involving an 86 year old woman.
We don't know what the first request from the policeman was nor the initial response from the photographer.
One best left to an independent inquiry to judge on the basis of the full facts rather than trial by media.
Whatever you might say about the Republicans, they are not complacent, and that may make the difference in 2016.
Is there much data on how the :Lib-Lab switchers, and public sector workers, are distributed among the various types of marginal?
This is a genuine question, not a smartarse attempt to catch you out: I remember reading somewhere that a high proportion of firemen have second jobs and one of the sources of friction re overtime and scheduling arrangements was the impact it might have on these second jobs. Is that right? Do you? Is your fireman income your only income?
...and thanks for keeping us all safe BTW - much appreciated...
I realise times are tough and political perceptions will be influenced by current conditions, but we really need evidence here to sort out myth from facts.
Gove is driving teachers mad and the NHS reorganisation is wasting huge amounts of time and money in the health service.
The Republicans are likely to take back the Senate in November (given the nature of the seats that are being contested). They could certainly win in 2016 with the right candidate.
More than ever I have a growing feeling we none of us will have a true idea of the final result until around 1am on the Friday morning after the GE. It feels more and more like 1992 every day.
I have never, and this is genuinely true, known of any of my colleagues to let their second job get in the way. On my watch, we have 12, of them, I know of 4 who have regular second jobs (electrician, builder, wedding photographer, diving instructor).
As for overtime and scheduling, that's down to our employer, and they certainly wouldn't take other jobs into account!
Shouldn't you be adopting the motto of your organisation, "Be Prepared!".
Neither the Gove educational reforms nor the Lansley NHS reorganisation, to the best of my knowledge, had the aims of "annoying public sector workers" although I accept that teachers and medics may be annoyed by them.
What I am looking for is evidence that the Conservatives had an intent to annoy public sector workers, which was after all your original allegation.
His slagging off of an entire profession is costing the Tories dear. Tom Montgomerie has been right to raise his conerns. It's not just those in the state sector who are furious at his constant denigration of them but private sector ones as well. They are a big voting blog and many will use their votes on May 7 2015 to get rid of Gove.
There are about 900-1000 teachers in each constituency.
I don't know what the actual truth of the situation is, but that's not an healthy attitude. If the party as a whole is that complacent about the popularity of Obamacare, they're not likely to do a good job of defending it against Republican attacks, whether or not those attacks are fact based, and that will cost them votes.
And how many parents? Is Gove driving them mad?
And if the subject matter was unsettling, I don't recall the police being appointed the arbiters of decency or taste.
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200809/cmhansrd/cm090401/halltext/90401h0005.htm
I was coming at this much more from the position of decency and taste.
A remarkably high number. Perhaps Michael Gove cannot add up.
If it's an issue, let Parliament debate and change the law. It's not up to PC Plod.
Labour activist @JasminAmelia has tweeted that she wants every producer of Channel 4 dead. If that was a UKIP activist...
Its amazing how these surveys always seem to concentrate on the producer of the service, and not the consumer.
I can't remember a poll on whether parents have seen changes in their kids' education since 2010.
What do parents who send their kids to academies think of them? likewise, free schools.
We need to see the evidence of Gove's "attacks on teachers" and "slagging off of an entire profession".
Some direct quotes might help advance the argument beyond partisan prejudice.
It is one thing to disagree both with a policy and its impact on teachers and quite another to conclude that it is a pre-meditated attempt to attack and demean.
Something like that.
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jameskirkup/100253217/how-much-would-you-pay-to-reduce-immigration/
Amazing that Labour and their supporters justify working class people being unemployed or on lower wages by corporations getting bigger profits
If they don't understand why people might not love Obamacare like they do, they're not likely to be mentally well prepared to defend it.
So in a situation where somebody has died suddenly in a accident , the photographer (who is taking photos od something very personal )is whinging because some policeman said something nasty to him? Not only that the policeman is being hauled over the coals for it?
Have I got this straight? When did we become so precious in this country?
A messy and inadequate solution to the problem.
Not "I'll make your life a living hell".
I'm a fan of the police unlike TSE, but this incident does them no favours.
What are the respective besetting sins of people in the two sectors? I suggest, in the private: greed and in the public: anger. (A desire to cure illness or to educate children can be seen as a rationalisation of anger at disease or ignorance.)
If I wanted to argue for the slimming down of the public sector I would focus on the selfishness of managers who seek to control others whilst not actually paying them themselves. But then, I think the desire to control another human being, in whatever circumstances, is pretty much Satanic.
Why have we become so self centred and childish?
http://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/News/Lucy-Frazer-faces-uncertain-future-as-South-East-Cambridgeshire-Conservative-candidate-amid-claim-miscount-meant-Heidi-Allen-was-real-winner-of-primary-20140107060500.htm
The valid votes in the final round were 132. I don't know how many members the Con Association has but 132 voters don't seem to suggest a high interest among the general public (assuming Con members have the standard turnout)
The cameraman should ask himself "Would I be happy having my mum/dad/son/daughter filmed in such a situation?"
They probably wouldn't.
The police need the most incredible and amazing patience in their job. Every time I watch a demo I emotionally feel like I'm on the police's side. If this one is losing it over a photographer how about when he is actually in a 'pressure' situation ?
What I am looking for is direct evidence that Gove (or for that matter any official member of the government) is deliberately seeking to denigrate workers in the public sector.
Do you have any quotes you can share with us?
http://www.insidetheenvironmentagency.co.uk/
Hardly following any guidelines is it ?
Every day I also give thanks for the amazing work being done by the teachers who are starting the new school year this week.
I am fortunate as Education Secretary because we have the best generation of teachers ever in our classrooms - including the very best generation ever of young teachers - those who have entered our classrooms over the last few years.
Whenever I can, I give thanks for their work - not just privately, but on any public platform I’m given. Including this one.
This government is determined to do all it can to support the teaching profession.
Because there can never have been a more important time to be a teacher.
Teachers hold in their hands the success of our country and the wellbeing of its citizens; they are the key to helping every child in this country to realise their full potential.
Teachers are the most important fighters in the battle to make opportunity more equal.
Teachers are the critical guardians of the intellectual life of the nation.
Teachers give children the tools by which they can become authors of their own life story and builders of a better world.
It is teachers, not poets, who are the unacknowledged legislators of mankind.
http://www.policyexchange.org.uk/modevents/item/michael-gove-keynote-speech-on-the-importance-of-teaching
We live in a world where journalism is becoming democratised. Learn to live with it because I am damn sure that the policeman in question would not have approached a bbc camera crew in that frame of mind and would more likely have given them an interview