Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Boris’s big Christmas gamble – politicalbetting.com

13»

Comments

  • IanB2 said:

    We need to get on with the vaccines at super high speed as it is Covid meltdown central at the moment.

    A friend's father, 89, who lives in London, got a call today asking him to come in for the vaccine on Friday. Things are moving, although people are having to travel and drop everything at short notice to get it.
    Good news, worth taking the opportunity 👍
  • MortimerMortimer Posts: 14,114

    stodge said:

    The inability of a significant number of people in some areas of the country to observe even the most basic of public health precautions in a desperate attempt to live what they consider a "normal" life has brought us to the point when even a 4-week national "lockdown" (albeit much looser than that in March and April) has failed to significantly slow the virus in some areas and in others case numbers are rising sharply.

    There's probably a significant element of truth to that argument, but it may also be that any form of lockdown short of herding people into their homes and nailing or welding the doors shut for a month simply isn't that effective, and may to an extent even be counter-productive. Going in hard and early has failed abysmally in Wales, which probably has a lot to do with incarcerating a lot of not particularly well-off people in cramped, low quality housing with nothing much to do but watch TV. The disease runs through individual households like a dose of salts and then gets passed around when they all get lonely and/or bored to tears, and start visiting each others' houses - something that the authorities, save in truly egregious cases like massive house parties, are essentially powerless to prevent.

    In the final analysis, more cautious folk (especially old or rich cautious folk, who may have the luxury of not being forced to go out to work each morning) can exercise discretion, but the disease is going to keep on propagating itself through those who don't care or can't afford to care for the rest of the Winter. I'm still not at all sure how much or how little of the improvement we saw through late Spring and into Summer was to do with all the desperate measures enacted to suppress the virus, and how much was the product of the warm weather. But I suspect that it is mainly the latter.

    In short, more and lengthier lockdowns (and I'm as sure as I can be that everyone will be following the Welsh example in fairly short order after Christmas) may take the edge off the illness - at horrendous economic cost - but the only way we're getting any real relief is when a very substantial proportion of the population has been immunised and/or when the warm weather returns. The rest of the Winter is going to be fucking terrible.
    Wales has not failed because its lockdown was too early and too hard. It has failed because the lockdown was too short and the exit was too liberal.

    I write this from the discomfort of my damp coastal Welsh cave.
    A month in lockdown and Dorset figures have plummeted, to the extent that we ought to be in Tier 1. Wealthier and better at dealing with outside activity (the urban areas are all coastal) than many other places must help.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,190

    Foxy said:

    Foxy said:

    Foxy said:

    Stocky said:

    @stodge

    I`ve just had an email from my local LibDem Chair. He say`s he hadn`t heard of the term "woke" until yesterday. He had to look it up. Are you surprised that local party activists have their heads up there arses or is this a common thing in your experience?

    Generally speaking, people assume that everyone else is familiar with the language of their circle. I've certainly never heard anyone use the term and I've mainly seen it on PB, but I gather that in right-wing circles it's in common use, always pejoratively. As with "political correctness", the origin was left-wing usage, but it's long since disappeared in any context other than reactionary derision.
    A few months ago I saw some newspaper comment pages from 1990.

    Did you know what the Mail and Sun called political correctness gone mad?

    Equality for gay people.
    Attitudes were very different then. And the direction can go both ways.

    There were those who thought the paedophile exchange was a good idea in the 70s, and marriage a repressive and outdated institution in the 90s, which civil partnerships would wholly replace one day. And the trans debate/gender identity debate now isn't simple either.

    It's good to test the arguments of those making arguments for major social change.
    A large part of the PIE issue in the Seventies and Eighties was the usage of the law to criminalise young gay men, as the age of consent was 21 years at the time.
    Might have seemed like foresight had they just campaigned to lower it to 16.

    Unfortunately, they were campaigning to abolish the age of consent outright, and legalise sex between adults and children; a PIE survey of its members in 1978 and 1979 found that its members were most attracted to girls aged 8–11 and boys aged 11–15.
    I am sure that is the case. The more mainstream support was because of the way the law was being used for gay persecution.

    It is worth noting that in the age of sexual liberation lusting after nuble youths was also mainstream. John Peel used to have "Schoolgirl of the year" slot in his programme, for example. Some of the other stuff would raise eyebrows now, but was just considered OK at the time.

    https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/john-peel-allegations-metoo-radio-1-jimmy-savile-a9097866.html
    Yeah I know. That's was kind of my point.

    Social reformers can overreach and get it wrong, so I think the challenge is good to test the arguments.
    Are you really putting "equal rights for gay people" alongside those who support child abuse? Describing them both as "social reformers"?

    Really?

    Are you really?

    Christ.
    It just shows how society has changed. We are simultaneously both more puritanical and more liberated than we used to be in the Seventies.

    The attitude to casual violence has changed a lot too. It used to be much more tolerated then.
    This is very true.

    This might horrify you but I once thought I might be a liberal democrat because of my attitudes to capital and corporal punishment - very anti.

    But, you'll be pleased to hear I grew out of that fairly quickly.
    You are Priti Patel, and I claim my cat o'nine tails.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,774
    Mortimer said:

    stodge said:

    The inability of a significant number of people in some areas of the country to observe even the most basic of public health precautions in a desperate attempt to live what they consider a "normal" life has brought us to the point when even a 4-week national "lockdown" (albeit much looser than that in March and April) has failed to significantly slow the virus in some areas and in others case numbers are rising sharply.

    There's probably a significant element of truth to that argument, but it may also be that any form of lockdown short of herding people into their homes and nailing or welding the doors shut for a month simply isn't that effective, and may to an extent even be counter-productive. Going in hard and early has failed abysmally in Wales, which probably has a lot to do with incarcerating a lot of not particularly well-off people in cramped, low quality housing with nothing much to do but watch TV. The disease runs through individual households like a dose of salts and then gets passed around when they all get lonely and/or bored to tears, and start visiting each others' houses - something that the authorities, save in truly egregious cases like massive house parties, are essentially powerless to prevent.

    In the final analysis, more cautious folk (especially old or rich cautious folk, who may have the luxury of not being forced to go out to work each morning) can exercise discretion, but the disease is going to keep on propagating itself through those who don't care or can't afford to care for the rest of the Winter. I'm still not at all sure how much or how little of the improvement we saw through late Spring and into Summer was to do with all the desperate measures enacted to suppress the virus, and how much was the product of the warm weather. But I suspect that it is mainly the latter.

    In short, more and lengthier lockdowns (and I'm as sure as I can be that everyone will be following the Welsh example in fairly short order after Christmas) may take the edge off the illness - at horrendous economic cost - but the only way we're getting any real relief is when a very substantial proportion of the population has been immunised and/or when the warm weather returns. The rest of the Winter is going to be fucking terrible.
    Wales has not failed because its lockdown was too early and too hard. It has failed because the lockdown was too short and the exit was too liberal.

    I write this from the discomfort of my damp coastal Welsh cave.
    A month in lockdown and Dorset figures have plummeted, to the extent that we ought to be in Tier 1. Wealthier and better at dealing with outside activity (the urban areas are all coastal) than many other places must help.
    I am sure there will be some relaxation announced tomorrow. Top of the list will be the northern cities where numbers are falling going into T2
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,427
    IanB2 said:

    Mortimer said:

    stodge said:

    The inability of a significant number of people in some areas of the country to observe even the most basic of public health precautions in a desperate attempt to live what they consider a "normal" life has brought us to the point when even a 4-week national "lockdown" (albeit much looser than that in March and April) has failed to significantly slow the virus in some areas and in others case numbers are rising sharply.

    There's probably a significant element of truth to that argument, but it may also be that any form of lockdown short of herding people into their homes and nailing or welding the doors shut for a month simply isn't that effective, and may to an extent even be counter-productive. Going in hard and early has failed abysmally in Wales, which probably has a lot to do with incarcerating a lot of not particularly well-off people in cramped, low quality housing with nothing much to do but watch TV. The disease runs through individual households like a dose of salts and then gets passed around when they all get lonely and/or bored to tears, and start visiting each others' houses - something that the authorities, save in truly egregious cases like massive house parties, are essentially powerless to prevent.

    In the final analysis, more cautious folk (especially old or rich cautious folk, who may have the luxury of not being forced to go out to work each morning) can exercise discretion, but the disease is going to keep on propagating itself through those who don't care or can't afford to care for the rest of the Winter. I'm still not at all sure how much or how little of the improvement we saw through late Spring and into Summer was to do with all the desperate measures enacted to suppress the virus, and how much was the product of the warm weather. But I suspect that it is mainly the latter.

    In short, more and lengthier lockdowns (and I'm as sure as I can be that everyone will be following the Welsh example in fairly short order after Christmas) may take the edge off the illness - at horrendous economic cost - but the only way we're getting any real relief is when a very substantial proportion of the population has been immunised and/or when the warm weather returns. The rest of the Winter is going to be fucking terrible.
    Wales has not failed because its lockdown was too early and too hard. It has failed because the lockdown was too short and the exit was too liberal.

    I write this from the discomfort of my damp coastal Welsh cave.
    A month in lockdown and Dorset figures have plummeted, to the extent that we ought to be in Tier 1. Wealthier and better at dealing with outside activity (the urban areas are all coastal) than many other places must help.
    I am sure there will be some relaxation announced tomorrow. Top of the list will be the northern cities where numbers are falling going into T2
    You think?
  • Black_RookBlack_Rook Posts: 8,905
    IanB2 said:

    Mortimer said:

    stodge said:

    The inability of a significant number of people in some areas of the country to observe even the most basic of public health precautions in a desperate attempt to live what they consider a "normal" life has brought us to the point when even a 4-week national "lockdown" (albeit much looser than that in March and April) has failed to significantly slow the virus in some areas and in others case numbers are rising sharply.

    There's probably a significant element of truth to that argument, but it may also be that any form of lockdown short of herding people into their homes and nailing or welding the doors shut for a month simply isn't that effective, and may to an extent even be counter-productive. Going in hard and early has failed abysmally in Wales, which probably has a lot to do with incarcerating a lot of not particularly well-off people in cramped, low quality housing with nothing much to do but watch TV. The disease runs through individual households like a dose of salts and then gets passed around when they all get lonely and/or bored to tears, and start visiting each others' houses - something that the authorities, save in truly egregious cases like massive house parties, are essentially powerless to prevent.

    In the final analysis, more cautious folk (especially old or rich cautious folk, who may have the luxury of not being forced to go out to work each morning) can exercise discretion, but the disease is going to keep on propagating itself through those who don't care or can't afford to care for the rest of the Winter. I'm still not at all sure how much or how little of the improvement we saw through late Spring and into Summer was to do with all the desperate measures enacted to suppress the virus, and how much was the product of the warm weather. But I suspect that it is mainly the latter.

    In short, more and lengthier lockdowns (and I'm as sure as I can be that everyone will be following the Welsh example in fairly short order after Christmas) may take the edge off the illness - at horrendous economic cost - but the only way we're getting any real relief is when a very substantial proportion of the population has been immunised and/or when the warm weather returns. The rest of the Winter is going to be fucking terrible.
    Wales has not failed because its lockdown was too early and too hard. It has failed because the lockdown was too short and the exit was too liberal.

    I write this from the discomfort of my damp coastal Welsh cave.
    A month in lockdown and Dorset figures have plummeted, to the extent that we ought to be in Tier 1. Wealthier and better at dealing with outside activity (the urban areas are all coastal) than many other places must help.
    I am sure there will be some relaxation announced tomorrow. Top of the list will be the northern cities where numbers are falling going into T2
    It's all academic. It'll be back into yet another full national lockdown shortly after Christmas.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 77,891

    IanB2 said:

    Mortimer said:

    stodge said:

    The inability of a significant number of people in some areas of the country to observe even the most basic of public health precautions in a desperate attempt to live what they consider a "normal" life has brought us to the point when even a 4-week national "lockdown" (albeit much looser than that in March and April) has failed to significantly slow the virus in some areas and in others case numbers are rising sharply.

    There's probably a significant element of truth to that argument, but it may also be that any form of lockdown short of herding people into their homes and nailing or welding the doors shut for a month simply isn't that effective, and may to an extent even be counter-productive. Going in hard and early has failed abysmally in Wales, which probably has a lot to do with incarcerating a lot of not particularly well-off people in cramped, low quality housing with nothing much to do but watch TV. The disease runs through individual households like a dose of salts and then gets passed around when they all get lonely and/or bored to tears, and start visiting each others' houses - something that the authorities, save in truly egregious cases like massive house parties, are essentially powerless to prevent.

    In the final analysis, more cautious folk (especially old or rich cautious folk, who may have the luxury of not being forced to go out to work each morning) can exercise discretion, but the disease is going to keep on propagating itself through those who don't care or can't afford to care for the rest of the Winter. I'm still not at all sure how much or how little of the improvement we saw through late Spring and into Summer was to do with all the desperate measures enacted to suppress the virus, and how much was the product of the warm weather. But I suspect that it is mainly the latter.

    In short, more and lengthier lockdowns (and I'm as sure as I can be that everyone will be following the Welsh example in fairly short order after Christmas) may take the edge off the illness - at horrendous economic cost - but the only way we're getting any real relief is when a very substantial proportion of the population has been immunised and/or when the warm weather returns. The rest of the Winter is going to be fucking terrible.
    Wales has not failed because its lockdown was too early and too hard. It has failed because the lockdown was too short and the exit was too liberal.

    I write this from the discomfort of my damp coastal Welsh cave.
    A month in lockdown and Dorset figures have plummeted, to the extent that we ought to be in Tier 1. Wealthier and better at dealing with outside activity (the urban areas are all coastal) than many other places must help.
    I am sure there will be some relaxation announced tomorrow. Top of the list will be the northern cities where numbers are falling going into T2
    You think?
    Personally I'd rather everywhere was kept at least where it was till after christmas.
  • GaussianGaussian Posts: 831
    MaxPB said:

    Nigelb said:

    Blimey, someone has something nice to say about Wales.
    https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/1339260042378424322

    Isn't that the UK plan target than specific to Wales?
    Yes but only Wales has case levels similar to the US. For now.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,774

    IanB2 said:

    Mortimer said:

    stodge said:

    The inability of a significant number of people in some areas of the country to observe even the most basic of public health precautions in a desperate attempt to live what they consider a "normal" life has brought us to the point when even a 4-week national "lockdown" (albeit much looser than that in March and April) has failed to significantly slow the virus in some areas and in others case numbers are rising sharply.

    There's probably a significant element of truth to that argument, but it may also be that any form of lockdown short of herding people into their homes and nailing or welding the doors shut for a month simply isn't that effective, and may to an extent even be counter-productive. Going in hard and early has failed abysmally in Wales, which probably has a lot to do with incarcerating a lot of not particularly well-off people in cramped, low quality housing with nothing much to do but watch TV. The disease runs through individual households like a dose of salts and then gets passed around when they all get lonely and/or bored to tears, and start visiting each others' houses - something that the authorities, save in truly egregious cases like massive house parties, are essentially powerless to prevent.

    In the final analysis, more cautious folk (especially old or rich cautious folk, who may have the luxury of not being forced to go out to work each morning) can exercise discretion, but the disease is going to keep on propagating itself through those who don't care or can't afford to care for the rest of the Winter. I'm still not at all sure how much or how little of the improvement we saw through late Spring and into Summer was to do with all the desperate measures enacted to suppress the virus, and how much was the product of the warm weather. But I suspect that it is mainly the latter.

    In short, more and lengthier lockdowns (and I'm as sure as I can be that everyone will be following the Welsh example in fairly short order after Christmas) may take the edge off the illness - at horrendous economic cost - but the only way we're getting any real relief is when a very substantial proportion of the population has been immunised and/or when the warm weather returns. The rest of the Winter is going to be fucking terrible.
    Wales has not failed because its lockdown was too early and too hard. It has failed because the lockdown was too short and the exit was too liberal.

    I write this from the discomfort of my damp coastal Welsh cave.
    A month in lockdown and Dorset figures have plummeted, to the extent that we ought to be in Tier 1. Wealthier and better at dealing with outside activity (the urban areas are all coastal) than many other places must help.
    I am sure there will be some relaxation announced tomorrow. Top of the list will be the northern cities where numbers are falling going into T2
    It's all academic. It'll be back into yet another full national lockdown shortly after Christmas.
    But it's politics - some recognition for the improvement up north, and trying to address the perceived unfairness given the length of their restrictions. If they make the relaxation from the weekend, it'll make little difference anyway, as you say. For the same reason there might be some extra areas in T1.
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 49,586

    IanB2 said:

    Mortimer said:

    stodge said:

    The inability of a significant number of people in some areas of the country to observe even the most basic of public health precautions in a desperate attempt to live what they consider a "normal" life has brought us to the point when even a 4-week national "lockdown" (albeit much looser than that in March and April) has failed to significantly slow the virus in some areas and in others case numbers are rising sharply.

    There's probably a significant element of truth to that argument, but it may also be that any form of lockdown short of herding people into their homes and nailing or welding the doors shut for a month simply isn't that effective, and may to an extent even be counter-productive. Going in hard and early has failed abysmally in Wales, which probably has a lot to do with incarcerating a lot of not particularly well-off people in cramped, low quality housing with nothing much to do but watch TV. The disease runs through individual households like a dose of salts and then gets passed around when they all get lonely and/or bored to tears, and start visiting each others' houses - something that the authorities, save in truly egregious cases like massive house parties, are essentially powerless to prevent.

    In the final analysis, more cautious folk (especially old or rich cautious folk, who may have the luxury of not being forced to go out to work each morning) can exercise discretion, but the disease is going to keep on propagating itself through those who don't care or can't afford to care for the rest of the Winter. I'm still not at all sure how much or how little of the improvement we saw through late Spring and into Summer was to do with all the desperate measures enacted to suppress the virus, and how much was the product of the warm weather. But I suspect that it is mainly the latter.

    In short, more and lengthier lockdowns (and I'm as sure as I can be that everyone will be following the Welsh example in fairly short order after Christmas) may take the edge off the illness - at horrendous economic cost - but the only way we're getting any real relief is when a very substantial proportion of the population has been immunised and/or when the warm weather returns. The rest of the Winter is going to be fucking terrible.
    Wales has not failed because its lockdown was too early and too hard. It has failed because the lockdown was too short and the exit was too liberal.

    I write this from the discomfort of my damp coastal Welsh cave.
    A month in lockdown and Dorset figures have plummeted, to the extent that we ought to be in Tier 1. Wealthier and better at dealing with outside activity (the urban areas are all coastal) than many other places must help.
    I am sure there will be some relaxation announced tomorrow. Top of the list will be the northern cities where numbers are falling going into T2
    You think?
    R calculated from case numbers is going up pretty much everywhere

    image
  • Black_RookBlack_Rook Posts: 8,905
    IanB2 said:

    IanB2 said:

    Mortimer said:

    stodge said:

    The inability of a significant number of people in some areas of the country to observe even the most basic of public health precautions in a desperate attempt to live what they consider a "normal" life has brought us to the point when even a 4-week national "lockdown" (albeit much looser than that in March and April) has failed to significantly slow the virus in some areas and in others case numbers are rising sharply.

    There's probably a significant element of truth to that argument, but it may also be that any form of lockdown short of herding people into their homes and nailing or welding the doors shut for a month simply isn't that effective, and may to an extent even be counter-productive. Going in hard and early has failed abysmally in Wales, which probably has a lot to do with incarcerating a lot of not particularly well-off people in cramped, low quality housing with nothing much to do but watch TV. The disease runs through individual households like a dose of salts and then gets passed around when they all get lonely and/or bored to tears, and start visiting each others' houses - something that the authorities, save in truly egregious cases like massive house parties, are essentially powerless to prevent.

    In the final analysis, more cautious folk (especially old or rich cautious folk, who may have the luxury of not being forced to go out to work each morning) can exercise discretion, but the disease is going to keep on propagating itself through those who don't care or can't afford to care for the rest of the Winter. I'm still not at all sure how much or how little of the improvement we saw through late Spring and into Summer was to do with all the desperate measures enacted to suppress the virus, and how much was the product of the warm weather. But I suspect that it is mainly the latter.

    In short, more and lengthier lockdowns (and I'm as sure as I can be that everyone will be following the Welsh example in fairly short order after Christmas) may take the edge off the illness - at horrendous economic cost - but the only way we're getting any real relief is when a very substantial proportion of the population has been immunised and/or when the warm weather returns. The rest of the Winter is going to be fucking terrible.
    Wales has not failed because its lockdown was too early and too hard. It has failed because the lockdown was too short and the exit was too liberal.

    I write this from the discomfort of my damp coastal Welsh cave.
    A month in lockdown and Dorset figures have plummeted, to the extent that we ought to be in Tier 1. Wealthier and better at dealing with outside activity (the urban areas are all coastal) than many other places must help.
    I am sure there will be some relaxation announced tomorrow. Top of the list will be the northern cities where numbers are falling going into T2
    It's all academic. It'll be back into yet another full national lockdown shortly after Christmas.
    But it's politics - some recognition for the improvement up north, and trying to address the perceived unfairness given the length of their restrictions. If they make the relaxation from the weekend, it'll make little difference anyway, as you say. For the same reason there might be some extra areas in T1.
    We all know that this bullshit is going on for another five or six months. Such gestures are hollow and meaningless and almost nobody will be taken in by them.
  • kjhkjh Posts: 11,695

    Pulpstar said:

    Have to wonder what the hell people are doing once the circuit breakers run out.

    The evidence surely is that, with no vaccine, the virus was always going to do what the virus was going to do, whatever any administration does. Just like any large scale natural phenomenon.

    Maybe we have slowed the virus down and spaced it out, at the cost of enormous collateral damage. But the notion of 'saving lives' is clearly utterly bogus. We may have 'delayed deaths' but at the cost of hastening other deaths, and maybe causing many unnecessary deaths.

    Re your 2nd para do you actually think of the logic of what you say? If a hospital gets 10 covid patients in, in a day and another gets a 1000 in, in a day which do you think will result in most deaths both for covid and other causes.

    Clearly the hospital that can cope will have less covid deaths because it won't have an overflowing ICU, knackered staff and lack of ventilators. It will also be able to cope better with other potential causes of death such as accidents, cancer etc. So the notion is not bogus, it is blindingly obvious to anyone with half a brain.

    You do talk tosh.

    And the delayed deaths comment has been covered numerous times, but I will give it another go. The average life expectancy for an 80 year old is 10 years. It is not a 'delayed death' except in the obvious sense of the word.

    Even an 80 year old obese man with heart disease has a life expectancy of 5 years (credit More or Less)

    Do you know how life expectancy works? With every day you get older your life expectancy increases by a small amount.
  • IanB2 said:

    Mortimer said:

    stodge said:

    The inability of a significant number of people in some areas of the country to observe even the most basic of public health precautions in a desperate attempt to live what they consider a "normal" life has brought us to the point when even a 4-week national "lockdown" (albeit much looser than that in March and April) has failed to significantly slow the virus in some areas and in others case numbers are rising sharply.

    There's probably a significant element of truth to that argument, but it may also be that any form of lockdown short of herding people into their homes and nailing or welding the doors shut for a month simply isn't that effective, and may to an extent even be counter-productive. Going in hard and early has failed abysmally in Wales, which probably has a lot to do with incarcerating a lot of not particularly well-off people in cramped, low quality housing with nothing much to do but watch TV. The disease runs through individual households like a dose of salts and then gets passed around when they all get lonely and/or bored to tears, and start visiting each others' houses - something that the authorities, save in truly egregious cases like massive house parties, are essentially powerless to prevent.

    In the final analysis, more cautious folk (especially old or rich cautious folk, who may have the luxury of not being forced to go out to work each morning) can exercise discretion, but the disease is going to keep on propagating itself through those who don't care or can't afford to care for the rest of the Winter. I'm still not at all sure how much or how little of the improvement we saw through late Spring and into Summer was to do with all the desperate measures enacted to suppress the virus, and how much was the product of the warm weather. But I suspect that it is mainly the latter.

    In short, more and lengthier lockdowns (and I'm as sure as I can be that everyone will be following the Welsh example in fairly short order after Christmas) may take the edge off the illness - at horrendous economic cost - but the only way we're getting any real relief is when a very substantial proportion of the population has been immunised and/or when the warm weather returns. The rest of the Winter is going to be fucking terrible.
    Wales has not failed because its lockdown was too early and too hard. It has failed because the lockdown was too short and the exit was too liberal.

    I write this from the discomfort of my damp coastal Welsh cave.
    A month in lockdown and Dorset figures have plummeted, to the extent that we ought to be in Tier 1. Wealthier and better at dealing with outside activity (the urban areas are all coastal) than many other places must help.
    I am sure there will be some relaxation announced tomorrow. Top of the list will be the northern cities where numbers are falling going into T2
    It's all academic. It'll be back into yet another full national lockdown shortly after Christmas.
    A national lockdown is nailed on from 28 Dec. We will be up to 60,000 daily cases by then.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,190
    Mortimer said:

    stodge said:

    The inability of a significant number of people in some areas of the country to observe even the most basic of public health precautions in a desperate attempt to live what they consider a "normal" life has brought us to the point when even a 4-week national "lockdown" (albeit much looser than that in March and April) has failed to significantly slow the virus in some areas and in others case numbers are rising sharply.

    There's probably a significant element of truth to that argument, but it may also be that any form of lockdown short of herding people into their homes and nailing or welding the doors shut for a month simply isn't that effective, and may to an extent even be counter-productive. Going in hard and early has failed abysmally in Wales, which probably has a lot to do with incarcerating a lot of not particularly well-off people in cramped, low quality housing with nothing much to do but watch TV. The disease runs through individual households like a dose of salts and then gets passed around when they all get lonely and/or bored to tears, and start visiting each others' houses - something that the authorities, save in truly egregious cases like massive house parties, are essentially powerless to prevent.

    In the final analysis, more cautious folk (especially old or rich cautious folk, who may have the luxury of not being forced to go out to work each morning) can exercise discretion, but the disease is going to keep on propagating itself through those who don't care or can't afford to care for the rest of the Winter. I'm still not at all sure how much or how little of the improvement we saw through late Spring and into Summer was to do with all the desperate measures enacted to suppress the virus, and how much was the product of the warm weather. But I suspect that it is mainly the latter.

    In short, more and lengthier lockdowns (and I'm as sure as I can be that everyone will be following the Welsh example in fairly short order after Christmas) may take the edge off the illness - at horrendous economic cost - but the only way we're getting any real relief is when a very substantial proportion of the population has been immunised and/or when the warm weather returns. The rest of the Winter is going to be fucking terrible.
    Wales has not failed because its lockdown was too early and too hard. It has failed because the lockdown was too short and the exit was too liberal.

    I write this from the discomfort of my damp coastal Welsh cave.
    A month in lockdown and Dorset figures have plummeted, to the extent that we ought to be in Tier 1. Wealthier and better at dealing with outside activity (the urban areas are all coastal) than many other places must help.
    Covid is the least of my worries. A "Dingle" managing the Baggies is exercising me more!
  • GaussianGaussian Posts: 831

    IanB2 said:

    Mortimer said:

    stodge said:

    The inability of a significant number of people in some areas of the country to observe even the most basic of public health precautions in a desperate attempt to live what they consider a "normal" life has brought us to the point when even a 4-week national "lockdown" (albeit much looser than that in March and April) has failed to significantly slow the virus in some areas and in others case numbers are rising sharply.

    There's probably a significant element of truth to that argument, but it may also be that any form of lockdown short of herding people into their homes and nailing or welding the doors shut for a month simply isn't that effective, and may to an extent even be counter-productive. Going in hard and early has failed abysmally in Wales, which probably has a lot to do with incarcerating a lot of not particularly well-off people in cramped, low quality housing with nothing much to do but watch TV. The disease runs through individual households like a dose of salts and then gets passed around when they all get lonely and/or bored to tears, and start visiting each others' houses - something that the authorities, save in truly egregious cases like massive house parties, are essentially powerless to prevent.

    In the final analysis, more cautious folk (especially old or rich cautious folk, who may have the luxury of not being forced to go out to work each morning) can exercise discretion, but the disease is going to keep on propagating itself through those who don't care or can't afford to care for the rest of the Winter. I'm still not at all sure how much or how little of the improvement we saw through late Spring and into Summer was to do with all the desperate measures enacted to suppress the virus, and how much was the product of the warm weather. But I suspect that it is mainly the latter.

    In short, more and lengthier lockdowns (and I'm as sure as I can be that everyone will be following the Welsh example in fairly short order after Christmas) may take the edge off the illness - at horrendous economic cost - but the only way we're getting any real relief is when a very substantial proportion of the population has been immunised and/or when the warm weather returns. The rest of the Winter is going to be fucking terrible.
    Wales has not failed because its lockdown was too early and too hard. It has failed because the lockdown was too short and the exit was too liberal.

    I write this from the discomfort of my damp coastal Welsh cave.
    A month in lockdown and Dorset figures have plummeted, to the extent that we ought to be in Tier 1. Wealthier and better at dealing with outside activity (the urban areas are all coastal) than many other places must help.
    I am sure there will be some relaxation announced tomorrow. Top of the list will be the northern cities where numbers are falling going into T2
    It's all academic. It'll be back into yet another full national lockdown shortly after Christmas.
    A national lockdown is nailed on from 28 Dec. We will be up to 60,000 daily cases by then.
    Still doesn't make sense to lock down Cornwall when cases in London are going through the roof. Introducing a localised tier 4 would be useful though.

  • Gaussian said:

    IanB2 said:

    Mortimer said:

    stodge said:

    The inability of a significant number of people in some areas of the country to observe even the most basic of public health precautions in a desperate attempt to live what they consider a "normal" life has brought us to the point when even a 4-week national "lockdown" (albeit much looser than that in March and April) has failed to significantly slow the virus in some areas and in others case numbers are rising sharply.

    There's probably a significant element of truth to that argument, but it may also be that any form of lockdown short of herding people into their homes and nailing or welding the doors shut for a month simply isn't that effective, and may to an extent even be counter-productive. Going in hard and early has failed abysmally in Wales, which probably has a lot to do with incarcerating a lot of not particularly well-off people in cramped, low quality housing with nothing much to do but watch TV. The disease runs through individual households like a dose of salts and then gets passed around when they all get lonely and/or bored to tears, and start visiting each others' houses - something that the authorities, save in truly egregious cases like massive house parties, are essentially powerless to prevent.

    In the final analysis, more cautious folk (especially old or rich cautious folk, who may have the luxury of not being forced to go out to work each morning) can exercise discretion, but the disease is going to keep on propagating itself through those who don't care or can't afford to care for the rest of the Winter. I'm still not at all sure how much or how little of the improvement we saw through late Spring and into Summer was to do with all the desperate measures enacted to suppress the virus, and how much was the product of the warm weather. But I suspect that it is mainly the latter.

    In short, more and lengthier lockdowns (and I'm as sure as I can be that everyone will be following the Welsh example in fairly short order after Christmas) may take the edge off the illness - at horrendous economic cost - but the only way we're getting any real relief is when a very substantial proportion of the population has been immunised and/or when the warm weather returns. The rest of the Winter is going to be fucking terrible.
    Wales has not failed because its lockdown was too early and too hard. It has failed because the lockdown was too short and the exit was too liberal.

    I write this from the discomfort of my damp coastal Welsh cave.
    A month in lockdown and Dorset figures have plummeted, to the extent that we ought to be in Tier 1. Wealthier and better at dealing with outside activity (the urban areas are all coastal) than many other places must help.
    I am sure there will be some relaxation announced tomorrow. Top of the list will be the northern cities where numbers are falling going into T2
    It's all academic. It'll be back into yet another full national lockdown shortly after Christmas.
    A national lockdown is nailed on from 28 Dec. We will be up to 60,000 daily cases by then.
    Still doesn't make sense to lock down Cornwall when cases in London are going through the roof. Introducing a localised tier 4 would be useful though.

    Frankly we need Tier 6 in London at the moment 😠
  • Black_RookBlack_Rook Posts: 8,905
    Gaussian said:

    IanB2 said:

    Mortimer said:

    stodge said:

    The inability of a significant number of people in some areas of the country to observe even the most basic of public health precautions in a desperate attempt to live what they consider a "normal" life has brought us to the point when even a 4-week national "lockdown" (albeit much looser than that in March and April) has failed to significantly slow the virus in some areas and in others case numbers are rising sharply.

    There's probably a significant element of truth to that argument, but it may also be that any form of lockdown short of herding people into their homes and nailing or welding the doors shut for a month simply isn't that effective, and may to an extent even be counter-productive. Going in hard and early has failed abysmally in Wales, which probably has a lot to do with incarcerating a lot of not particularly well-off people in cramped, low quality housing with nothing much to do but watch TV. The disease runs through individual households like a dose of salts and then gets passed around when they all get lonely and/or bored to tears, and start visiting each others' houses - something that the authorities, save in truly egregious cases like massive house parties, are essentially powerless to prevent.

    In the final analysis, more cautious folk (especially old or rich cautious folk, who may have the luxury of not being forced to go out to work each morning) can exercise discretion, but the disease is going to keep on propagating itself through those who don't care or can't afford to care for the rest of the Winter. I'm still not at all sure how much or how little of the improvement we saw through late Spring and into Summer was to do with all the desperate measures enacted to suppress the virus, and how much was the product of the warm weather. But I suspect that it is mainly the latter.

    In short, more and lengthier lockdowns (and I'm as sure as I can be that everyone will be following the Welsh example in fairly short order after Christmas) may take the edge off the illness - at horrendous economic cost - but the only way we're getting any real relief is when a very substantial proportion of the population has been immunised and/or when the warm weather returns. The rest of the Winter is going to be fucking terrible.
    Wales has not failed because its lockdown was too early and too hard. It has failed because the lockdown was too short and the exit was too liberal.

    I write this from the discomfort of my damp coastal Welsh cave.
    A month in lockdown and Dorset figures have plummeted, to the extent that we ought to be in Tier 1. Wealthier and better at dealing with outside activity (the urban areas are all coastal) than many other places must help.
    I am sure there will be some relaxation announced tomorrow. Top of the list will be the northern cities where numbers are falling going into T2
    It's all academic. It'll be back into yet another full national lockdown shortly after Christmas.
    A national lockdown is nailed on from 28 Dec. We will be up to 60,000 daily cases by then.
    Still doesn't make sense to lock down Cornwall when cases in London are going through the roof. Introducing a localised tier 4 would be useful though.

    You can advance that argument about Wales where the North is being whacked with the same mallet as the South, doesn't mean it won't also happen in England. Nobody's going to make fine distinctions between different local authority areas when the Government is in a state of blind panic and the medics everywhere are issuing continuous deafening screams.
  • Black_RookBlack_Rook Posts: 8,905

    Gaussian said:

    IanB2 said:

    Mortimer said:

    stodge said:

    The inability of a significant number of people in some areas of the country to observe even the most basic of public health precautions in a desperate attempt to live what they consider a "normal" life has brought us to the point when even a 4-week national "lockdown" (albeit much looser than that in March and April) has failed to significantly slow the virus in some areas and in others case numbers are rising sharply.

    There's probably a significant element of truth to that argument, but it may also be that any form of lockdown short of herding people into their homes and nailing or welding the doors shut for a month simply isn't that effective, and may to an extent even be counter-productive. Going in hard and early has failed abysmally in Wales, which probably has a lot to do with incarcerating a lot of not particularly well-off people in cramped, low quality housing with nothing much to do but watch TV. The disease runs through individual households like a dose of salts and then gets passed around when they all get lonely and/or bored to tears, and start visiting each others' houses - something that the authorities, save in truly egregious cases like massive house parties, are essentially powerless to prevent.

    In the final analysis, more cautious folk (especially old or rich cautious folk, who may have the luxury of not being forced to go out to work each morning) can exercise discretion, but the disease is going to keep on propagating itself through those who don't care or can't afford to care for the rest of the Winter. I'm still not at all sure how much or how little of the improvement we saw through late Spring and into Summer was to do with all the desperate measures enacted to suppress the virus, and how much was the product of the warm weather. But I suspect that it is mainly the latter.

    In short, more and lengthier lockdowns (and I'm as sure as I can be that everyone will be following the Welsh example in fairly short order after Christmas) may take the edge off the illness - at horrendous economic cost - but the only way we're getting any real relief is when a very substantial proportion of the population has been immunised and/or when the warm weather returns. The rest of the Winter is going to be fucking terrible.
    Wales has not failed because its lockdown was too early and too hard. It has failed because the lockdown was too short and the exit was too liberal.

    I write this from the discomfort of my damp coastal Welsh cave.
    A month in lockdown and Dorset figures have plummeted, to the extent that we ought to be in Tier 1. Wealthier and better at dealing with outside activity (the urban areas are all coastal) than many other places must help.
    I am sure there will be some relaxation announced tomorrow. Top of the list will be the northern cities where numbers are falling going into T2
    It's all academic. It'll be back into yet another full national lockdown shortly after Christmas.
    A national lockdown is nailed on from 28 Dec. We will be up to 60,000 daily cases by then.
    Still doesn't make sense to lock down Cornwall when cases in London are going through the roof. Introducing a localised tier 4 would be useful though.

    Frankly we need Tier 6 in London at the moment 😠
    Nothing will work short of a hard reset of the whole country. Close down industry, close all the shops, turn the army out on the streets, shoot anybody seen out of their house on sight. Continue for a month.

    That element of the population that hasn't frozen or starved to death should then be free of the virus.

    All you can do with any measure short of that is just slow it down a little.
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 27,575
    edited December 2020
    IanB2 said:

    IanB2 said:

    Mortimer said:

    stodge said:

    The inability of a significant number of people in some areas of the country to observe even the most basic of public health precautions in a desperate attempt to live what they consider a "normal" life has brought us to the point when even a 4-week national "lockdown" (albeit much looser than that in March and April) has failed to significantly slow the virus in some areas and in others case numbers are rising sharply.

    There's probably a significant element of truth to that argument, but it may also be that any form of lockdown short of herding people into their homes and nailing or welding the doors shut for a month simply isn't that effective, and may to an extent even be counter-productive. Going in hard and early has failed abysmally in Wales, which probably has a lot to do with incarcerating a lot of not particularly well-off people in cramped, low quality housing with nothing much to do but watch TV. The disease runs through individual households like a dose of salts and then gets passed around when they all get lonely and/or bored to tears, and start visiting each others' houses - something that the authorities, save in truly egregious cases like massive house parties, are essentially powerless to prevent.

    In the final analysis, more cautious folk (especially old or rich cautious folk, who may have the luxury of not being forced to go out to work each morning) can exercise discretion, but the disease is going to keep on propagating itself through those who don't care or can't afford to care for the rest of the Winter. I'm still not at all sure how much or how little of the improvement we saw through late Spring and into Summer was to do with all the desperate measures enacted to suppress the virus, and how much was the product of the warm weather. But I suspect that it is mainly the latter.

    In short, more and lengthier lockdowns (and I'm as sure as I can be that everyone will be following the Welsh example in fairly short order after Christmas) may take the edge off the illness - at horrendous economic cost - but the only way we're getting any real relief is when a very substantial proportion of the population has been immunised and/or when the warm weather returns. The rest of the Winter is going to be fucking terrible.
    Wales has not failed because its lockdown was too early and too hard. It has failed because the lockdown was too short and the exit was too liberal.

    I write this from the discomfort of my damp coastal Welsh cave.
    A month in lockdown and Dorset figures have plummeted, to the extent that we ought to be in Tier 1. Wealthier and better at dealing with outside activity (the urban areas are all coastal) than many other places must help.
    I am sure there will be some relaxation announced tomorrow. Top of the list will be the northern cities where numbers are falling going into T2
    It's all academic. It'll be back into yet another full national lockdown shortly after Christmas.
    But it's politics - some recognition for the improvement up north, and trying to address the perceived unfairness given the length of their restrictions. If they make the relaxation from the weekend, it'll make little difference anyway, as you say. For the same reason there might be some extra areas in T1.
    Yes, you can see the government making the tiers a bit more fine-grained, with low-incidence areas (with Tory MPs who have been voluble on this issue) being moved to Tier 1 where they are currently lumped into larger tier 2 regions. It works on public health grounds, on compassionate grounds, and on cynical throw backbenchers a bone before asking for their support on Brexit grounds.
  • stodge said:

    The inability of a significant number of people in some areas of the country to observe even the most basic of public health precautions in a desperate attempt to live what they consider a "normal" life has brought us to the point when even a 4-week national "lockdown" (albeit much looser than that in March and April) has failed to significantly slow the virus in some areas and in others case numbers are rising sharply.

    There's probably a significant element of truth to that argument, but it may also be that any form of lockdown short of herding people into their homes and nailing or welding the doors shut for a month simply isn't that effective, and may to an extent even be counter-productive. Going in hard and early has failed abysmally in Wales, which probably has a lot to do with incarcerating a lot of not particularly well-off people in cramped, low quality housing with nothing much to do but watch TV. The disease runs through individual households like a dose of salts and then gets passed around when they all get lonely and/or bored to tears, and start visiting each others' houses - something that the authorities, save in truly egregious cases like massive house parties, are essentially powerless to prevent.

    In the final analysis, more cautious folk (especially old or rich cautious folk, who may have the luxury of not being forced to go out to work each morning) can exercise discretion, but the disease is going to keep on propagating itself through those who don't care or can't afford to care for the rest of the Winter. I'm still not at all sure how much or how little of the improvement we saw through late Spring and into Summer was to do with all the desperate measures enacted to suppress the virus, and how much was the product of the warm weather. But I suspect that it is mainly the latter.

    In short, more and lengthier lockdowns (and I'm as sure as I can be that everyone will be following the Welsh example in fairly short order after Christmas) may take the edge off the illness - at horrendous economic cost - but the only way we're getting any real relief is when a very substantial proportion of the population has been immunised and/or when the warm weather returns. The rest of the Winter is going to be fucking terrible.
    Wales has not failed because its lockdown was too early and too hard. It has failed because the lockdown was too short and the exit was too liberal.

    I write this from the discomfort of my damp coastal Welsh cave.
    Absolutely spot on and from my detached home by the sea with park behind and mountain views, plus heating on

    My wife and I know we are truly blessed and made the right decision in 1976 to buy our home for £15,000

    I am not quoting today'value

  • GaussianGaussian Posts: 831

    Gaussian said:

    IanB2 said:

    Mortimer said:

    stodge said:

    The inability of a significant number of people in some areas of the country to observe even the most basic of public health precautions in a desperate attempt to live what they consider a "normal" life has brought us to the point when even a 4-week national "lockdown" (albeit much looser than that in March and April) has failed to significantly slow the virus in some areas and in others case numbers are rising sharply.

    There's probably a significant element of truth to that argument, but it may also be that any form of lockdown short of herding people into their homes and nailing or welding the doors shut for a month simply isn't that effective, and may to an extent even be counter-productive. Going in hard and early has failed abysmally in Wales, which probably has a lot to do with incarcerating a lot of not particularly well-off people in cramped, low quality housing with nothing much to do but watch TV. The disease runs through individual households like a dose of salts and then gets passed around when they all get lonely and/or bored to tears, and start visiting each others' houses - something that the authorities, save in truly egregious cases like massive house parties, are essentially powerless to prevent.

    In the final analysis, more cautious folk (especially old or rich cautious folk, who may have the luxury of not being forced to go out to work each morning) can exercise discretion, but the disease is going to keep on propagating itself through those who don't care or can't afford to care for the rest of the Winter. I'm still not at all sure how much or how little of the improvement we saw through late Spring and into Summer was to do with all the desperate measures enacted to suppress the virus, and how much was the product of the warm weather. But I suspect that it is mainly the latter.

    In short, more and lengthier lockdowns (and I'm as sure as I can be that everyone will be following the Welsh example in fairly short order after Christmas) may take the edge off the illness - at horrendous economic cost - but the only way we're getting any real relief is when a very substantial proportion of the population has been immunised and/or when the warm weather returns. The rest of the Winter is going to be fucking terrible.
    Wales has not failed because its lockdown was too early and too hard. It has failed because the lockdown was too short and the exit was too liberal.

    I write this from the discomfort of my damp coastal Welsh cave.
    A month in lockdown and Dorset figures have plummeted, to the extent that we ought to be in Tier 1. Wealthier and better at dealing with outside activity (the urban areas are all coastal) than many other places must help.
    I am sure there will be some relaxation announced tomorrow. Top of the list will be the northern cities where numbers are falling going into T2
    It's all academic. It'll be back into yet another full national lockdown shortly after Christmas.
    A national lockdown is nailed on from 28 Dec. We will be up to 60,000 daily cases by then.
    Still doesn't make sense to lock down Cornwall when cases in London are going through the roof. Introducing a localised tier 4 would be useful though.

    Frankly we need Tier 6 in London at the moment 😠
    What happened? People believing that it couldn't happen again after the first wave?

  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,190
    Scott_xP said:
    Far be it for me to cheerlead for Johnson and Brexit, although I am not entirely sure mid-pandemic is necessarily the time for a fair analysis.
  • contrariancontrarian Posts: 5,818
    rcs1000 said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Have to wonder what the hell people are doing once the circuit breakers run out.

    The evidence surely is that, with no vaccine, the virus was always going to do what the virus was going to do, whatever any administration does. Just like any large scale natural phenomenon.

    Maybe we have slowed the virus down and spaced it out, at the cost of enormous collateral damage. But the notion of 'saving lives' is clearly utterly bogus. We may have 'delayed deaths' but at the cost of hastening other deaths, and maybe causing many unnecessary deaths.

    1. The collateral damage happens anyway. Hence the overwhelming evidence from the US that places without lockdowns end up with the same (or even worse) economic performance.

    2. How is "saving lives" bogus? Look at Sweden (which, by the way, has now locked down). It's death rate is 3-4x it's neighbours. Will there be a rush of Norwegians doing "catch up dying" in a few months?
    Well look at Germany. Praised to the skies here at the beginning. Suddenly, now, absolutely horrendous numbers. Full panic total lockdown.

    Would you call that 'catch up dying....??'
  • Scott_xP said:
    That is worrying.

    I wonder if it is true. There is a long-standing anomaly in our trade with America, which is we both think we have a trade surplus, and we can't both be right. Or most likely we are both right but include different things. Anyway, I can't be bothered to investigate but it leaves me suspicious of any US trade story.
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 35,895

    Far be it for me to cheerlead for Johnson and Brexit, although I am not entirely sure mid-pandemic is necessarily the time for a fair analysis.

    Is Italy not also mid-pandemic?

    And doesn't have Brexit?

    That I think is the point...
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 17,177

    Scott_xP said:
    Far be it for me to cheerlead for Johnson and Brexit, although I am not entirely sure mid-pandemic is necessarily the time for a fair analysis.
    And would it hurt to show the scale from zero?
  • stodge said:

    The inability of a significant number of people in some areas of the country to observe even the most basic of public health precautions in a desperate attempt to live what they consider a "normal" life has brought us to the point when even a 4-week national "lockdown" (albeit much looser than that in March and April) has failed to significantly slow the virus in some areas and in others case numbers are rising sharply.

    There's probably a significant element of truth to that argument, but it may also be that any form of lockdown short of herding people into their homes and nailing or welding the doors shut for a month simply isn't that effective, and may to an extent even be counter-productive. Going in hard and early has failed abysmally in Wales, which probably has a lot to do with incarcerating a lot of not particularly well-off people in cramped, low quality housing with nothing much to do but watch TV. The disease runs through individual households like a dose of salts and then gets passed around when they all get lonely and/or bored to tears, and start visiting each others' houses - something that the authorities, save in truly egregious cases like massive house parties, are essentially powerless to prevent.

    In the final analysis, more cautious folk (especially old or rich cautious folk, who may have the luxury of not being forced to go out to work each morning) can exercise discretion, but the disease is going to keep on propagating itself through those who don't care or can't afford to care for the rest of the Winter. I'm still not at all sure how much or how little of the improvement we saw through late Spring and into Summer was to do with all the desperate measures enacted to suppress the virus, and how much was the product of the warm weather. But I suspect that it is mainly the latter.

    In short, more and lengthier lockdowns (and I'm as sure as I can be that everyone will be following the Welsh example in fairly short order after Christmas) may take the edge off the illness - at horrendous economic cost - but the only way we're getting any real relief is when a very substantial proportion of the population has been immunised and/or when the warm weather returns. The rest of the Winter is going to be fucking terrible.
    Wales has not failed because its lockdown was too early and too hard. It has failed because the lockdown was too short and the exit was too liberal.

    I write this from the discomfort of my damp coastal Welsh cave.
    Absolutely spot on and from my detached home by the sea with park behind and mountain views, plus heating on

    My wife and I know we are truly blessed and made the right decision in 1976 to buy our home for £15,000

    I am not quoting today'value

    Has Drakeford changed the rules again in the last hour Big G?
  • Gaussian said:

    Gaussian said:

    IanB2 said:

    Mortimer said:

    stodge said:

    The inability of a significant number of people in some areas of the country to observe even the most basic of public health precautions in a desperate attempt to live what they consider a "normal" life has brought us to the point when even a 4-week national "lockdown" (albeit much looser than that in March and April) has failed to significantly slow the virus in some areas and in others case numbers are rising sharply.

    There's probably a significant element of truth to that argument, but it may also be that any form of lockdown short of herding people into their homes and nailing or welding the doors shut for a month simply isn't that effective, and may to an extent even be counter-productive. Going in hard and early has failed abysmally in Wales, which probably has a lot to do with incarcerating a lot of not particularly well-off people in cramped, low quality housing with nothing much to do but watch TV. The disease runs through individual households like a dose of salts and then gets passed around when they all get lonely and/or bored to tears, and start visiting each others' houses - something that the authorities, save in truly egregious cases like massive house parties, are essentially powerless to prevent.

    In the final analysis, more cautious folk (especially old or rich cautious folk, who may have the luxury of not being forced to go out to work each morning) can exercise discretion, but the disease is going to keep on propagating itself through those who don't care or can't afford to care for the rest of the Winter. I'm still not at all sure how much or how little of the improvement we saw through late Spring and into Summer was to do with all the desperate measures enacted to suppress the virus, and how much was the product of the warm weather. But I suspect that it is mainly the latter.

    In short, more and lengthier lockdowns (and I'm as sure as I can be that everyone will be following the Welsh example in fairly short order after Christmas) may take the edge off the illness - at horrendous economic cost - but the only way we're getting any real relief is when a very substantial proportion of the population has been immunised and/or when the warm weather returns. The rest of the Winter is going to be fucking terrible.
    Wales has not failed because its lockdown was too early and too hard. It has failed because the lockdown was too short and the exit was too liberal.

    I write this from the discomfort of my damp coastal Welsh cave.
    A month in lockdown and Dorset figures have plummeted, to the extent that we ought to be in Tier 1. Wealthier and better at dealing with outside activity (the urban areas are all coastal) than many other places must help.
    I am sure there will be some relaxation announced tomorrow. Top of the list will be the northern cities where numbers are falling going into T2
    It's all academic. It'll be back into yet another full national lockdown shortly after Christmas.
    A national lockdown is nailed on from 28 Dec. We will be up to 60,000 daily cases by then.
    Still doesn't make sense to lock down Cornwall when cases in London are going through the roof. Introducing a localised tier 4 would be useful though.

    Frankly we need Tier 6 in London at the moment 😠
    What happened? People believing that it couldn't happen again after the first wave?

    New variant spreading faster, according to Matt Hancock.
  • stodge said:

    The inability of a significant number of people in some areas of the country to observe even the most basic of public health precautions in a desperate attempt to live what they consider a "normal" life has brought us to the point when even a 4-week national "lockdown" (albeit much looser than that in March and April) has failed to significantly slow the virus in some areas and in others case numbers are rising sharply.

    There's probably a significant element of truth to that argument, but it may also be that any form of lockdown short of herding people into their homes and nailing or welding the doors shut for a month simply isn't that effective, and may to an extent even be counter-productive. Going in hard and early has failed abysmally in Wales, which probably has a lot to do with incarcerating a lot of not particularly well-off people in cramped, low quality housing with nothing much to do but watch TV. The disease runs through individual households like a dose of salts and then gets passed around when they all get lonely and/or bored to tears, and start visiting each others' houses - something that the authorities, save in truly egregious cases like massive house parties, are essentially powerless to prevent.

    In the final analysis, more cautious folk (especially old or rich cautious folk, who may have the luxury of not being forced to go out to work each morning) can exercise discretion, but the disease is going to keep on propagating itself through those who don't care or can't afford to care for the rest of the Winter. I'm still not at all sure how much or how little of the improvement we saw through late Spring and into Summer was to do with all the desperate measures enacted to suppress the virus, and how much was the product of the warm weather. But I suspect that it is mainly the latter.

    In short, more and lengthier lockdowns (and I'm as sure as I can be that everyone will be following the Welsh example in fairly short order after Christmas) may take the edge off the illness - at horrendous economic cost - but the only way we're getting any real relief is when a very substantial proportion of the population has been immunised and/or when the warm weather returns. The rest of the Winter is going to be fucking terrible.
    Wales has not failed because its lockdown was too early and too hard. It has failed because the lockdown was too short and the exit was too liberal.

    I write this from the discomfort of my damp coastal Welsh cave.
    Absolutely spot on and from my detached home by the sea with park behind and mountain views, plus heating on

    My wife and I know we are truly blessed and made the right decision in 1976 to buy our home for £15,000

    I am not quoting today'value

    Has Drakeford changed the rules again in the last hour Big G?
    I have no idea and to be honest I have stopped listening to him and will take steps to protect my family without any input from him

    He has been banned from over 150 pubs here in North Wales for a minimum of 18 months
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,190

    stodge said:

    The inability of a significant number of people in some areas of the country to observe even the most basic of public health precautions in a desperate attempt to live what they consider a "normal" life has brought us to the point when even a 4-week national "lockdown" (albeit much looser than that in March and April) has failed to significantly slow the virus in some areas and in others case numbers are rising sharply.

    There's probably a significant element of truth to that argument, but it may also be that any form of lockdown short of herding people into their homes and nailing or welding the doors shut for a month simply isn't that effective, and may to an extent even be counter-productive. Going in hard and early has failed abysmally in Wales, which probably has a lot to do with incarcerating a lot of not particularly well-off people in cramped, low quality housing with nothing much to do but watch TV. The disease runs through individual households like a dose of salts and then gets passed around when they all get lonely and/or bored to tears, and start visiting each others' houses - something that the authorities, save in truly egregious cases like massive house parties, are essentially powerless to prevent.

    In the final analysis, more cautious folk (especially old or rich cautious folk, who may have the luxury of not being forced to go out to work each morning) can exercise discretion, but the disease is going to keep on propagating itself through those who don't care or can't afford to care for the rest of the Winter. I'm still not at all sure how much or how little of the improvement we saw through late Spring and into Summer was to do with all the desperate measures enacted to suppress the virus, and how much was the product of the warm weather. But I suspect that it is mainly the latter.

    In short, more and lengthier lockdowns (and I'm as sure as I can be that everyone will be following the Welsh example in fairly short order after Christmas) may take the edge off the illness - at horrendous economic cost - but the only way we're getting any real relief is when a very substantial proportion of the population has been immunised and/or when the warm weather returns. The rest of the Winter is going to be fucking terrible.
    Wales has not failed because its lockdown was too early and too hard. It has failed because the lockdown was too short and the exit was too liberal.

    I write this from the discomfort of my damp coastal Welsh cave.
    Absolutely spot on and from my detached home by the sea with park behind and mountain views, plus heating on

    My wife and I know we are truly blessed and made the right decision in 1976 to buy our home for £15,000

    I am not quoting today'value

    BigG. I live in the Welsh mirror image of your house by the sound of it.

    The Bristol Channel, North Somerset and the tip of North Devon to the South. The Village green to the North, with views across the mountains at the head of the Ogwr Valley.

    There is a meteorological theory in coastal South Wales that if you can see the Somerset and Devon coast clearly, it is going to rain. If you can't see the Somerset and Devon coast clearly it is already raining.
  • Scott_xP said:

    Far be it for me to cheerlead for Johnson and Brexit, although I am not entirely sure mid-pandemic is necessarily the time for a fair analysis.

    Is Italy not also mid-pandemic?

    And doesn't have Brexit?

    That I think is the point...
    Brexit is happening no matter how much or what you post and maybe you need to come to terms with it
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 35,895

    Brexit is happening no matter how much or what you post and maybe you need to come to terms with it

    I have come to terms with it

    It's shit.

    It's the cheerleaders who have yet to make peace with their vote...
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,190
    Scott_xP said:

    Far be it for me to cheerlead for Johnson and Brexit, although I am not entirely sure mid-pandemic is necessarily the time for a fair analysis.

    Is Italy not also mid-pandemic?

    And doesn't have Brexit?

    That I think is the point...
    Scott, as you will have already gathered, I believe when reality bites the effects on the post Covid and post Brexit (even with a deal) economy will be brutal.

    I just don't believe the analysis mid pandemic is necessarily a reliable indicator.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,190

    Scott_xP said:

    Far be it for me to cheerlead for Johnson and Brexit, although I am not entirely sure mid-pandemic is necessarily the time for a fair analysis.

    Is Italy not also mid-pandemic?

    And doesn't have Brexit?

    That I think is the point...
    Brexit is happening no matter how much or what you post and maybe you need to come to terms with it
    More's the pity!
  • stodge said:

    The inability of a significant number of people in some areas of the country to observe even the most basic of public health precautions in a desperate attempt to live what they consider a "normal" life has brought us to the point when even a 4-week national "lockdown" (albeit much looser than that in March and April) has failed to significantly slow the virus in some areas and in others case numbers are rising sharply.

    There's probably a significant element of truth to that argument, but it may also be that any form of lockdown short of herding people into their homes and nailing or welding the doors shut for a month simply isn't that effective, and may to an extent even be counter-productive. Going in hard and early has failed abysmally in Wales, which probably has a lot to do with incarcerating a lot of not particularly well-off people in cramped, low quality housing with nothing much to do but watch TV. The disease runs through individual households like a dose of salts and then gets passed around when they all get lonely and/or bored to tears, and start visiting each others' houses - something that the authorities, save in truly egregious cases like massive house parties, are essentially powerless to prevent.

    In the final analysis, more cautious folk (especially old or rich cautious folk, who may have the luxury of not being forced to go out to work each morning) can exercise discretion, but the disease is going to keep on propagating itself through those who don't care or can't afford to care for the rest of the Winter. I'm still not at all sure how much or how little of the improvement we saw through late Spring and into Summer was to do with all the desperate measures enacted to suppress the virus, and how much was the product of the warm weather. But I suspect that it is mainly the latter.

    In short, more and lengthier lockdowns (and I'm as sure as I can be that everyone will be following the Welsh example in fairly short order after Christmas) may take the edge off the illness - at horrendous economic cost - but the only way we're getting any real relief is when a very substantial proportion of the population has been immunised and/or when the warm weather returns. The rest of the Winter is going to be fucking terrible.
    Wales has not failed because its lockdown was too early and too hard. It has failed because the lockdown was too short and the exit was too liberal.

    I write this from the discomfort of my damp coastal Welsh cave.
    Absolutely spot on and from my detached home by the sea with park behind and mountain views, plus heating on

    My wife and I know we are truly blessed and made the right decision in 1976 to buy our home for £15,000

    I am not quoting today'value

    BigG. I live in the Welsh mirror image of your house by the sound of it.

    The Bristol Channel, North Somerset and the tip of North Devon to the South. The Village green to the North, with views across the mountains at the head of the Ogwr Valley.

    There is a meteorological theory in coastal South Wales that if you can see the Somerset and Devon coast clearly, it is going to rain. If you can't see the Somerset and Devon coast clearly it is already raining.
    Yes sounds like it and we are both so fortunate

    New apartments are being built nearby marketing in excess of one million each
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758

    Scott_xP said:
    Far be it for me to cheerlead for Johnson and Brexit, although I am not entirely sure mid-pandemic is necessarily the time for a fair analysis.
    It’s also calculated in dollars so a lot of the decline is related to currency movements which may or may not be permanent
  • Scott_xP said:

    Brexit is happening no matter how much or what you post and maybe you need to come to terms with it

    I have come to terms with it

    It's shit.

    It's the cheerleaders who have yet to make peace with their vote...
    With respect I see no evidence you have come to terms with it
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 62,401
    edited December 2020
    Well worth reading from LA Times:


    "It’s tempting for anyone who isn’t in Trump’s camp to dismiss his failing effort as foolish, even laughable.

    But that’s a mistake. The president’s attacks on the honesty of the election and the legitimacy of Biden’s victory will have lasting effects, even if they don’t succeed in overturning the outcome.

    He has already succeeded in bending the Republican Party to his will and concocting an animating cause for his post-presidency: a grievance-fueled campaign against Biden and the Democrats he accuses of stealing the election — as well as against any Republicans who didn’t bend the rules the way he wanted."

    https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2020-12-13/trump-has-changed-tactics-in-his-election-fight-his-new-approach-is-more-dangerous
  • rcs1000 said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Have to wonder what the hell people are doing once the circuit breakers run out.

    The evidence surely is that, with no vaccine, the virus was always going to do what the virus was going to do, whatever any administration does. Just like any large scale natural phenomenon.

    Maybe we have slowed the virus down and spaced it out, at the cost of enormous collateral damage. But the notion of 'saving lives' is clearly utterly bogus. We may have 'delayed deaths' but at the cost of hastening other deaths, and maybe causing many unnecessary deaths.

    1. The collateral damage happens anyway. Hence the overwhelming evidence from the US that places without lockdowns end up with the same (or even worse) economic performance.

    2. How is "saving lives" bogus? Look at Sweden (which, by the way, has now locked down). It's death rate is 3-4x it's neighbours. Will there be a rush of Norwegians doing "catch up dying" in a few months?
    Well look at Germany. Praised to the skies here at the beginning. Suddenly, now, absolutely horrendous numbers. Full panic total lockdown.

    Would you call that 'catch up dying....??'
    Do you mean that UK residents who were spared death by the first lockdown are now dying in Germany? What?

    --AS
  • Scott_xP said:

    Far be it for me to cheerlead for Johnson and Brexit, although I am not entirely sure mid-pandemic is necessarily the time for a fair analysis.

    Is Italy not also mid-pandemic?

    And doesn't have Brexit?

    That I think is the point...
    Brexit is happening no matter how much or what you post and maybe you need to come to terms with it
    More's the pity!
    I do accept many are upset about it.

    Maybe we need to be out and in time things will change, even including joining the single market and customs union

  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 35,895

    With respect I see no evidence you have come to terms with it

    It's fucking up my life on a daily basis

    I'm doing it

    I ain't digging it
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,190

    stodge said:

    The inability of a significant number of people in some areas of the country to observe even the most basic of public health precautions in a desperate attempt to live what they consider a "normal" life has brought us to the point when even a 4-week national "lockdown" (albeit much looser than that in March and April) has failed to significantly slow the virus in some areas and in others case numbers are rising sharply.

    There's probably a significant element of truth to that argument, but it may also be that any form of lockdown short of herding people into their homes and nailing or welding the doors shut for a month simply isn't that effective, and may to an extent even be counter-productive. Going in hard and early has failed abysmally in Wales, which probably has a lot to do with incarcerating a lot of not particularly well-off people in cramped, low quality housing with nothing much to do but watch TV. The disease runs through individual households like a dose of salts and then gets passed around when they all get lonely and/or bored to tears, and start visiting each others' houses - something that the authorities, save in truly egregious cases like massive house parties, are essentially powerless to prevent.

    In the final analysis, more cautious folk (especially old or rich cautious folk, who may have the luxury of not being forced to go out to work each morning) can exercise discretion, but the disease is going to keep on propagating itself through those who don't care or can't afford to care for the rest of the Winter. I'm still not at all sure how much or how little of the improvement we saw through late Spring and into Summer was to do with all the desperate measures enacted to suppress the virus, and how much was the product of the warm weather. But I suspect that it is mainly the latter.

    In short, more and lengthier lockdowns (and I'm as sure as I can be that everyone will be following the Welsh example in fairly short order after Christmas) may take the edge off the illness - at horrendous economic cost - but the only way we're getting any real relief is when a very substantial proportion of the population has been immunised and/or when the warm weather returns. The rest of the Winter is going to be fucking terrible.
    Wales has not failed because its lockdown was too early and too hard. It has failed because the lockdown was too short and the exit was too liberal.

    I write this from the discomfort of my damp coastal Welsh cave.
    Absolutely spot on and from my detached home by the sea with park behind and mountain views, plus heating on

    My wife and I know we are truly blessed and made the right decision in 1976 to buy our home for £15,000

    I am not quoting today'value

    BigG. I live in the Welsh mirror image of your house by the sound of it.

    The Bristol Channel, North Somerset and the tip of North Devon to the South. The Village green to the North, with views across the mountains at the head of the Ogwr Valley.

    There is a meteorological theory in coastal South Wales that if you can see the Somerset and Devon coast clearly, it is going to rain. If you can't see the Somerset and Devon coast clearly it is already raining.
    Yes sounds like it and we are both so fortunate

    New apartments are being built nearby marketing in excess of one million each
    We have had some really nasty David Wilson boxes put up in our village, the larger 4 bedroom ones with tiny yards sold easily for £550,000. My house has two bedrooms more and is in its own, not insubstantial walled garden. I am hoping these hideous carbuncles have dragged the price of my property up, so that when we re-enter a freedom of movement arrangement with the EU, I can bugger off to the South of France with my state pension, medical benefits and a handsome nest egg.
  • stodge said:

    The inability of a significant number of people in some areas of the country to observe even the most basic of public health precautions in a desperate attempt to live what they consider a "normal" life has brought us to the point when even a 4-week national "lockdown" (albeit much looser than that in March and April) has failed to significantly slow the virus in some areas and in others case numbers are rising sharply.

    There's probably a significant element of truth to that argument, but it may also be that any form of lockdown short of herding people into their homes and nailing or welding the doors shut for a month simply isn't that effective, and may to an extent even be counter-productive. Going in hard and early has failed abysmally in Wales, which probably has a lot to do with incarcerating a lot of not particularly well-off people in cramped, low quality housing with nothing much to do but watch TV. The disease runs through individual households like a dose of salts and then gets passed around when they all get lonely and/or bored to tears, and start visiting each others' houses - something that the authorities, save in truly egregious cases like massive house parties, are essentially powerless to prevent.

    In the final analysis, more cautious folk (especially old or rich cautious folk, who may have the luxury of not being forced to go out to work each morning) can exercise discretion, but the disease is going to keep on propagating itself through those who don't care or can't afford to care for the rest of the Winter. I'm still not at all sure how much or how little of the improvement we saw through late Spring and into Summer was to do with all the desperate measures enacted to suppress the virus, and how much was the product of the warm weather. But I suspect that it is mainly the latter.

    In short, more and lengthier lockdowns (and I'm as sure as I can be that everyone will be following the Welsh example in fairly short order after Christmas) may take the edge off the illness - at horrendous economic cost - but the only way we're getting any real relief is when a very substantial proportion of the population has been immunised and/or when the warm weather returns. The rest of the Winter is going to be fucking terrible.
    Wales has not failed because its lockdown was too early and too hard. It has failed because the lockdown was too short and the exit was too liberal.

    I write this from the discomfort of my damp coastal Welsh cave.
    Absolutely spot on and from my detached home by the sea with park behind and mountain views, plus heating on

    My wife and I know we are truly blessed and made the right decision in 1976 to buy our home for £15,000

    I am not quoting today'value

    BigG. I live in the Welsh mirror image of your house by the sound of it.

    The Bristol Channel, North Somerset and the tip of North Devon to the South. The Village green to the North, with views across the mountains at the head of the Ogwr Valley.

    There is a meteorological theory in coastal South Wales that if you can see the Somerset and Devon coast clearly, it is going to rain. If you can't see the Somerset and Devon coast clearly it is already raining.
    Yes sounds like it and we are both so fortunate

    New apartments are being built nearby marketing in excess of one million each
    We have had some really nasty David Wilson boxes put up in our village, the larger 4 bedroom ones with tiny yards sold easily for £550,000. My house has two bedrooms more and is in its own, not insubstantial walled garden. I am hoping these hideous carbuncles have dragged the price of my property up, so that when we re-enter a freedom of movement arrangement with the EU, I can bugger off to the South of France with my state pension, medical benefits and a handsome nest egg.
    I hope your dreams come true
  • NEW THREAD

  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 70,513

    Well worth reading from LA Times:


    "It’s tempting for anyone who isn’t in Trump’s camp to dismiss his failing effort as foolish, even laughable.

    But that’s a mistake. The president’s attacks on the honesty of the election and the legitimacy of Biden’s victory will have lasting effects, even if they don’t succeed in overturning the outcome.

    He has already succeeded in bending the Republican Party to his will and concocting an animating cause for his post-presidency: a grievance-fueled campaign against Biden and the Democrats he accuses of stealing the election — as well as against any Republicans who didn’t bend the rules the way he wanted."

    https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2020-12-13/trump-has-changed-tactics-in-his-election-fight-his-new-approach-is-more-dangerous

    Sorry, but ‘bend the rules’ is ridiculous.
    He was demanding they rip up US democracy completely.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 56,924
    Scott_xP said:
    While I know you want this to be Brexit related, I suspect it's nothing more than pandemic related noise.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 56,924

    rcs1000 said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Have to wonder what the hell people are doing once the circuit breakers run out.

    The evidence surely is that, with no vaccine, the virus was always going to do what the virus was going to do, whatever any administration does. Just like any large scale natural phenomenon.

    Maybe we have slowed the virus down and spaced it out, at the cost of enormous collateral damage. But the notion of 'saving lives' is clearly utterly bogus. We may have 'delayed deaths' but at the cost of hastening other deaths, and maybe causing many unnecessary deaths.

    1. The collateral damage happens anyway. Hence the overwhelming evidence from the US that places without lockdowns end up with the same (or even worse) economic performance.

    2. How is "saving lives" bogus? Look at Sweden (which, by the way, has now locked down). It's death rate is 3-4x it's neighbours. Will there be a rush of Norwegians doing "catch up dying" in a few months?
    Well look at Germany. Praised to the skies here at the beginning. Suddenly, now, absolutely horrendous numbers. Full panic total lockdown.

    Would you call that 'catch up dying....??'
    That'll be because - oh yes - they had a much less severe lockdown (schools open for instance) second time around.

    Even so.

    Their deaths per million are about (checks it...) under a third of the level of the UK.

    Presumably, though, that's about to go through the roof. Because. Ummm. Ummm.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 56,924

    Gaussian said:

    IanB2 said:

    Mortimer said:

    stodge said:

    The inability of a significant number of people in some areas of the country to observe even the most basic of public health precautions in a desperate attempt to live what they consider a "normal" life has brought us to the point when even a 4-week national "lockdown" (albeit much looser than that in March and April) has failed to significantly slow the virus in some areas and in others case numbers are rising sharply.

    There's probably a significant element of truth to that argument, but it may also be that any form of lockdown short of herding people into their homes and nailing or welding the doors shut for a month simply isn't that effective, and may to an extent even be counter-productive. Going in hard and early has failed abysmally in Wales, which probably has a lot to do with incarcerating a lot of not particularly well-off people in cramped, low quality housing with nothing much to do but watch TV. The disease runs through individual households like a dose of salts and then gets passed around when they all get lonely and/or bored to tears, and start visiting each others' houses - something that the authorities, save in truly egregious cases like massive house parties, are essentially powerless to prevent.

    In the final analysis, more cautious folk (especially old or rich cautious folk, who may have the luxury of not being forced to go out to work each morning) can exercise discretion, but the disease is going to keep on propagating itself through those who don't care or can't afford to care for the rest of the Winter. I'm still not at all sure how much or how little of the improvement we saw through late Spring and into Summer was to do with all the desperate measures enacted to suppress the virus, and how much was the product of the warm weather. But I suspect that it is mainly the latter.

    In short, more and lengthier lockdowns (and I'm as sure as I can be that everyone will be following the Welsh example in fairly short order after Christmas) may take the edge off the illness - at horrendous economic cost - but the only way we're getting any real relief is when a very substantial proportion of the population has been immunised and/or when the warm weather returns. The rest of the Winter is going to be fucking terrible.
    Wales has not failed because its lockdown was too early and too hard. It has failed because the lockdown was too short and the exit was too liberal.

    I write this from the discomfort of my damp coastal Welsh cave.
    A month in lockdown and Dorset figures have plummeted, to the extent that we ought to be in Tier 1. Wealthier and better at dealing with outside activity (the urban areas are all coastal) than many other places must help.
    I am sure there will be some relaxation announced tomorrow. Top of the list will be the northern cities where numbers are falling going into T2
    It's all academic. It'll be back into yet another full national lockdown shortly after Christmas.
    A national lockdown is nailed on from 28 Dec. We will be up to 60,000 daily cases by then.
    Still doesn't make sense to lock down Cornwall when cases in London are going through the roof. Introducing a localised tier 4 would be useful though.

    Frankly we need Tier 6 in London at the moment 😠
    Nothing will work short of a hard reset of the whole country. Close down industry, close all the shops, turn the army out on the streets, shoot anybody seen out of their house on sight. Continue for a month.

    That element of the population that hasn't frozen or starved to death should then be free of the virus.

    All you can do with any measure short of that is just slow it down a little.
    That was the Australian strategy. Six weeks of complete lockdown.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 77,891
    Anyone know what's happening with boxes 2, 8 and 9; intrastat and EC sales after 1st Jan ? B)
  • rcs1000 said:

    Gaussian said:

    IanB2 said:

    Mortimer said:

    stodge said:

    The inability of a significant number of people in some areas of the country to observe even the most basic of public health precautions in a desperate attempt to live what they consider a "normal" life has brought us to the point when even a 4-week national "lockdown" (albeit much looser than that in March and April) has failed to significantly slow the virus in some areas and in others case numbers are rising sharply.

    There's probably a significant element of truth to that argument, but it may also be that any form of lockdown short of herding people into their homes and nailing or welding the doors shut for a month simply isn't that effective, and may to an extent even be counter-productive. Going in hard and early has failed abysmally in Wales, which probably has a lot to do with incarcerating a lot of not particularly well-off people in cramped, low quality housing with nothing much to do but watch TV. The disease runs through individual households like a dose of salts and then gets passed around when they all get lonely and/or bored to tears, and start visiting each others' houses - something that the authorities, save in truly egregious cases like massive house parties, are essentially powerless to prevent.

    In the final analysis, more cautious folk (especially old or rich cautious folk, who may have the luxury of not being forced to go out to work each morning) can exercise discretion, but the disease is going to keep on propagating itself through those who don't care or can't afford to care for the rest of the Winter. I'm still not at all sure how much or how little of the improvement we saw through late Spring and into Summer was to do with all the desperate measures enacted to suppress the virus, and how much was the product of the warm weather. But I suspect that it is mainly the latter.

    In short, more and lengthier lockdowns (and I'm as sure as I can be that everyone will be following the Welsh example in fairly short order after Christmas) may take the edge off the illness - at horrendous economic cost - but the only way we're getting any real relief is when a very substantial proportion of the population has been immunised and/or when the warm weather returns. The rest of the Winter is going to be fucking terrible.
    Wales has not failed because its lockdown was too early and too hard. It has failed because the lockdown was too short and the exit was too liberal.

    I write this from the discomfort of my damp coastal Welsh cave.
    A month in lockdown and Dorset figures have plummeted, to the extent that we ought to be in Tier 1. Wealthier and better at dealing with outside activity (the urban areas are all coastal) than many other places must help.
    I am sure there will be some relaxation announced tomorrow. Top of the list will be the northern cities where numbers are falling going into T2
    It's all academic. It'll be back into yet another full national lockdown shortly after Christmas.
    A national lockdown is nailed on from 28 Dec. We will be up to 60,000 daily cases by then.
    Still doesn't make sense to lock down Cornwall when cases in London are going through the roof. Introducing a localised tier 4 would be useful though.

    Frankly we need Tier 6 in London at the moment 😠
    Nothing will work short of a hard reset of the whole country. Close down industry, close all the shops, turn the army out on the streets, shoot anybody seen out of their house on sight. Continue for a month.

    That element of the population that hasn't frozen or starved to death should then be free of the virus.

    All you can do with any measure short of that is just slow it down a little.
    That was the Australian strategy. Six weeks of complete lockdown.
    Australia started from a much lower incidence didn't it though? And much less travel.

    Eradication worked for them but I can't see it working for us. Plus with the vaccine I'm not sure we need it to, not as it stands.
This discussion has been closed.