Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

The Masque of the Red Death – politicalbetting.com

SystemSystem Posts: 12,168
edited November 2020 in General
imageThe Masque of the Red Death – politicalbetting.com

Who are you planning to kill this Christmas? Is there an aged aunt who you haven’t seen for a while? Perhaps your parents? If you’re young enough, maybe you have your grandparents in your sights. After all, it is the time to spread peace, goodwill and Covid-19 to all mankind.

Read the full story here

«1345

Comments

  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,176
    edited November 2020
    First of the insomniacs.

    I think the government's overwhelming priority is to avoid the scenes we saw in Italy and presumably aren't seeing in Poland at the moment. It's not especially nice for the staff in the NHS who are probably having to work extra hard in not especially nice conditions to keep things this way.

    Life is about making tough choices and what we have at the moment is about as tough as it gets. The patterns across Europe are strikingly similar. What they say to me is that when it comes to it, a lot of people aren't nearly as inclined to protect the vulnerable from COVID as Alastair Meeks is.
  • paulyork64paulyork64 Posts: 2,507
    edited November 2020
    Second. Also up early while my wife gets ready for her 12 hour shift on a hospital ward. Was 50% covid +ve on her last shift and she desperately wants it below that today. With hopefully some more staff back after testing positive/ isolating.

    Planning on it being just the two of us for xmas day.

  • On topic I'm not going to pretend to have my finger on the pulse of the British family but I wonder if this isn't exaggerating how desperately everybody loves Christmas. I mean kids love the presents, but they can still get their presents. If the government calmly and reasonably says, "this disease is very bad, the vaccine will just be a few more months and then you can get together with your family", is everyone really going to say "fuck everything, we do this every year, I want to see the grandparents *now* and I don't care if their immune system is eating their lungs in January"?
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,176

    On topic I'm not going to pretend to have my finger on the pulse of the British family but I wonder if this isn't exaggerating how desperately everybody loves Christmas. I mean kids love the presents, but they can still get their presents. If the government calmly and reasonably says, "this disease is very bad, the vaccine will just be a few more months and then you can get together with your family", is everyone really going to say "fuck everything, we do this every year, I want to see the grandparents *now* and I don't care if their immune system is eating their lungs in January"?

    You might have thought that a killer virus being on the loose would have altered the behaviour of people considerably. Yet that hasn't happened with many people. My 74 year old dad still went to the pub twice a week when they were open, for example.
  • paulyork64paulyork64 Posts: 2,507
    Christmas. Spend hours cooking a meal I dont really like then a couple more washing up every utensil in your kitchen because you've used the lot.

    Great for the kids to open their presents but for me I enjoy christmas films and Christmas songs and can happily leave everything else.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,421
    ‘Gathering large groups of people together, whether concurrently or in quick succession, indoors for hours at a time in small unventilated rooms is pretty well everything we’ve been told for months not to do. It’s a recipe for disaster.’

    On the contrary, that is exactly what we’ve been doing in schools for the last three months, which is why even as infections stabilise in other groups they are skyrocketing among teenagers.

    This is particularly difficult as the government are now ordering that most of those in close contact with positive cases should not be sent home, as it does too much damage to their attendance records. So only the children sitting within one metre of a positive case are quarantined, not those who have been with them in a poorly ventilated room for six hours.
  • Love Christmas or not, the government ought by now to be giving more information so families can *plan* Christmas.
  • RogerRoger Posts: 19,914
    FTP.
    Nigelb said:
    Wonderful hand in the till moment!
  • Current Betfair prices:-

    Biden 1.04
    Democrats 1.04
    Biden PV 1.03
    Biden PV 49-51.9% 1.04
    Trump PV 46-48.9% 1.04
    Trump ECV 210-239 1.07
    Biden ECV 300-329 1.07
    Biden ECV Hcap -48.5 1.06
    Biden ECV Hcap -63.5 1.07
    Trump ECV Hcap +81.5 1.02

    AZ Dem 1.04
    GA Dem 1.04
    MI Dem 1.03
    NV Dem 1.03
    PA Dem 1.04
    WI Dem 1.05

    Trump to leave before end of term NO 1.1
    Trump exit date 2021 1.09
  • MysticroseMysticrose Posts: 4,688
    I only had to look at the title to know it was another portentous Alastair Meeks thread.

    The real problem isn't families gathering for a week, it's people out and about, especially boozing. But the 'hospitality industry' is worth maybe 1/4 of the country's GDP so taking the sword to it is problematic.

    The Gov't are doing okay at the moment with the controls. What we really should be emphasising above all else is WEAR A BLOODY MASK
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,421

    Love Christmas or not, the government ought by now to be giving more information so families can *plan* Christmas.

    Seriously? They haven’t even given us enough info to plan Brexit.

    I’ve been considering a complaint to the ASA about that ad they’ve put out telling people to look at their website for new information, when actually they don’t have the information yet.
  • MysticroseMysticrose Posts: 4,688

    Love Christmas or not, the government ought by now to be giving more information so families can *plan* Christmas.

    They are
  • MysticroseMysticrose Posts: 4,688

    On topic I'm not going to pretend to have my finger on the pulse of the British family but I wonder if this isn't exaggerating how desperately everybody loves Christmas. I mean kids love the presents, but they can still get their presents. If the government calmly and reasonably says, "this disease is very bad, the vaccine will just be a few more months and then you can get together with your family", is everyone really going to say "fuck everything, we do this every year, I want to see the grandparents *now* and I don't care if their immune system is eating their lungs in January"?

    I've a friend who is the biggest Christmas fruitcake I have ever encountered. She posts endlessly about Christmas throughout the year and seemingly lives for it. I mean, literally, in June she will tell us all how many days are left until Christmas. Before Remembrance day, her lights are up.

    I mention this because she is refusing to have a gathering this year, citing precisely your point Edmund.
  • Love Christmas or not, the government ought by now to be giving more information so families can *plan* Christmas.

    They are
    The government has said it will make an announcement next week.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,421

    I only had to look at the title to know it was another portentous Alastair Meeks thread.

    Disappointing header though. No sneaky fuckers or reluctant Turkish conscripts.
  • MysticroseMysticrose Posts: 4,688
    edited November 2020

    Love Christmas or not, the government ought by now to be giving more information so families can *plan* Christmas.

    They are
    The government has said it will make an announcement next week.
    And what's wrong with that? They have let it be known lockdown is definitely ending Dec 2nd and that we will go into tiers. Also that there will be a 1 week reprieve which will apply to the UK.

    I enjoy Boris bashing as a pastime but I can't see what the Gov't have done wrong. In fact they seem to be finally getting a balance on control of the virus.

    The real problem is that people are idiots and will flout the rules. Again. And do stupid things like NOT WEAR A MASK! They go out shopping, boozing, meeting up maskless and clueless. In summertime they flock to the beach.

    The real message should be to drill home mask wearing until the vaccine programme rolls out.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,600
    ydoethur said:

    ‘Gathering large groups of people together, whether concurrently or in quick succession, indoors for hours at a time in small unventilated rooms is pretty well everything we’ve been told for months not to do. It’s a recipe for disaster.’

    On the contrary, that is exactly what we’ve been doing in schools for the last three months, which is why even as infections stabilise in other groups they are skyrocketing among teenagers.

    This is particularly difficult as the government are now ordering that most of those in close contact with positive cases should not be sent home, as it does too much damage to their attendance records. So only the children sitting within one metre of a positive case are quarantined, not those who have been with them in a poorly ventilated room for six hours.

    Lock teenagers under the stairs for Christmas. Then the rest of us can party like its 1999.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,462
    edited November 2020

    Love Christmas or not, the government ought by now to be giving more information so families can *plan* Christmas.

    They are
    The government has said it will make an announcement next week.
    And there'll be another, different, one the week after!
    Seriously though I was involved in a discussion about this yesterday. It's not just 'family getting together'. No man, as Donne said, is an island. Grannie and Grandpa might not have been out anywhere, been in the same room as anyone else and so on, for two months, but, as @ydoethur said, any children aged between 5-18 have been at school, and students will have been at university and quite probably several of any family group will have been to work. And if there are two sets of grandparents the potential spread could reasonably be described as exponential.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,421

    Love Christmas or not, the government ought by now to be giving more information so families can *plan* Christmas.

    They are
    The government has said it will make an announcement next week.
    And there'll be another, different, one the week after!
    Seriously though I was involved in a discussion about this yesterday. It's not just 'family getting together'. No man, as Donne said, is an island. Grannie and Grandpa might not have been out anywhere, been in the same room as anyone else and so on, for two months, but, as @ydoethur said, any children aged between 5-18 have been at school, and students will have been at university and quite probably several of any family group will have been to work. And if there are two sets of grandparents the potential spread could reasonably be described as exponential.
    Realistically, if they want to relax restrictions for Christmas they should close unis now and schools by the 9th December. The latter decision is likely to be forced on them anyway due to rising sick lists, and the former has already effectively happened. Making the decision now would allow for proper planning and mitigation of some of the issues raised (childcare, FSM children etc).

    But they are so stubborn and arrogant they won’t do it. One trust in Yorkshire that has worked out it can’t possibly continue like this and will be closing early has been ordered to change its mind (although it has refused; as is, amusingly, its right under Cummings’ botched reforms). Meanwhile they continue to talk as if exams are going to be happening next year, when the only way to make that happen is send all year groups home apart from 11 and 13, which they’ve also ruled out.

    I hope when all this is over these bastards are jailed good and hard. Because they will deserve it.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,421
    IshmaelZ said:

    On topic I'm not going to pretend to have my finger on the pulse of the British family but I wonder if this isn't exaggerating how desperately everybody loves Christmas. I mean kids love the presents, but they can still get their presents. If the government calmly and reasonably says, "this disease is very bad, the vaccine will just be a few more months and then you can get together with your family", is everyone really going to say "fuck everything, we do this every year, I want to see the grandparents *now* and I don't care if their immune system is eating their lungs in January"?

    This country now runs on institutionalised mawkishness. Picture an extended family gathering of obese poppy wearing retards standing round the Christmas table toasting Our NHS Carers at the end of the Queen's (gawd bless her) speech. Mess with that vision at your peril.
    Nut Nuts roasting by an open fire
    Turkey’s standing by the door...
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,462
    ydoethur said:

    Love Christmas or not, the government ought by now to be giving more information so families can *plan* Christmas.

    They are
    The government has said it will make an announcement next week.
    And there'll be another, different, one the week after!
    Seriously though I was involved in a discussion about this yesterday. It's not just 'family getting together'. No man, as Donne said, is an island. Grannie and Grandpa might not have been out anywhere, been in the same room as anyone else and so on, for two months, but, as @ydoethur said, any children aged between 5-18 have been at school, and students will have been at university and quite probably several of any family group will have been to work. And if there are two sets of grandparents the potential spread could reasonably be described as exponential.
    Realistically, if they want to relax restrictions for Christmas they should close unis now and schools by the 9th December. The latter decision is likely to be forced on them anyway due to rising sick lists, and the former has already effectively happened. Making the decision now would allow for proper planning and mitigation of some of the issues raised (childcare, FSM children etc).

    But they are so stubborn and arrogant they won’t do it. One trust in Yorkshire that has worked out it can’t possibly continue like this and will be closing early has been ordered to change its mind (although it has refused; as is, amusingly, its right under Cummings’ botched reforms). Meanwhile they continue to talk as if exams are going to be happening next year, when the only way to make that happen is send all year groups home apart from 11 and 13, which they’ve also ruled out.

    I hope when all this is over these bastards are jailed good and hard. Because they will deserve it.
    Yes; we've two teachers among our grandchildren ....... married couple. Different schools, but both have coronavirus cases among colleagues and in the classes they teach. Their plan, assuming the weather isn't too bad, is to visit their respective parents and stand outside, wishing them a Merry Xmas etc and chatting for a while, before going home to their own place and either the TV or a box-set or both. We, grandparents might well do the same, virtually!
    What else can one reasonably do?
  • felixfelix Posts: 15,164
    I agree with most of the header for once. Except singling out the government for allowing this relaxation which every other government in Europe will also be doing is unfair. I and most of our friends, family and acquaintances will not be having a normal Xmas with lots of social gatherings. I actually believe many will do similar. Some will be stupid and reckless - I just hope that too many innocents don't get caught out by their foolishness.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,868

    ydoethur said:

    ‘Gathering large groups of people together, whether concurrently or in quick succession, indoors for hours at a time in small unventilated rooms is pretty well everything we’ve been told for months not to do. It’s a recipe for disaster.’

    On the contrary, that is exactly what we’ve been doing in schools for the last three months, which is why even as infections stabilise in other groups they are skyrocketing among teenagers.

    This is particularly difficult as the government are now ordering that most of those in close contact with positive cases should not be sent home, as it does too much damage to their attendance records. So only the children sitting within one metre of a positive case are quarantined, not those who have been with them in a poorly ventilated room for six hours.

    Lock teenagers under the stairs for Christmas. Then the rest of us can party like its 1999.
    Wasn’t that 1959?
  • felixfelix Posts: 15,164
    One thing more - I strongly echo Mystiose's point about wearing masks by reminding folk that if you hate wearing them - and I do - you gonna find the ventilator in the ICU wards much worse!
  • RogerRoger Posts: 19,914
    FPT.
    Nigelb said:

    Someone else might need to be certified.
    This is just nuts, even by Trump’s standards.
    https://twitter.com/joshtpm/status/1330344762541559812

    Don't they have libel and slander laws in America?
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,421
    Roger said:

    FPT.

    Nigelb said:

    Someone else might need to be certified.
    This is just nuts, even by Trump’s standards.
    https://twitter.com/joshtpm/status/1330344762541559812

    Don't they have libel and slander laws in America?
    Yes, but they’re much weaker than ours. As a rough rule of thumb, you can say what you like about someone as long as it’s not overtly motivated by malice, and as long as you do not falsely attribute words or phrases to them.

    And the burden of proof is on the plaintiff.
  • IshmaelZIshmaelZ Posts: 21,830
    One thing is, the results of the Great US Thanksgiving Experiment will be in well before Christmas and by some accounts it's gonna be grim. Fauci doesn't seem happy. I doubt that will modify behaviour here generally but it might scare the government into changing the rules again.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,462
    IshmaelZ said:

    One thing is, the results of the Great US Thanksgiving Experiment will be in well before Christmas and by some accounts it's gonna be grim. Fauci doesn't seem happy. I doubt that will modify behaviour here generally but it might scare the government into changing the rules again.

    Good point. Worth watching the figures.
  • RogerRoger Posts: 19,914
    ydoethur said:

    Roger said:

    FPT.

    Nigelb said:

    Someone else might need to be certified.
    This is just nuts, even by Trump’s standards.
    https://twitter.com/joshtpm/status/1330344762541559812

    Don't they have libel and slander laws in America?
    Yes, but they’re much weaker than ours. As a rough rule of thumb, you can say what you like about someone as long as it’s not overtly motivated by malice, and as long as you do not falsely attribute words or phrases to them.

    And the burden of proof is on the plaintiff.
    Thank you. Though even in a system as lax as that I think the malice motivation would see her undone in this instance.
  • Love the rhetorical flourish of “Britannia waive the rules” from Mr Meeks there.
  • IshmaelZ said:

    On topic I'm not going to pretend to have my finger on the pulse of the British family but I wonder if this isn't exaggerating how desperately everybody loves Christmas. I mean kids love the presents, but they can still get their presents. If the government calmly and reasonably says, "this disease is very bad, the vaccine will just be a few more months and then you can get together with your family", is everyone really going to say "fuck everything, we do this every year, I want to see the grandparents *now* and I don't care if their immune system is eating their lungs in January"?

    This country now runs on institutionalised mawkishness. Picture an extended family gathering of obese poppy wearing retards standing round the Christmas table toasting Our NHS Carers at the end of the Queen's (gawd bless her) speech. Mess with that vision at your peril.
    Probably all Leave voters. (Cue accusations of elitism, including from those who Liked post above...).
    On topic, it is hard to understand this obsession with the great Christmas family gathering. One thought: why not have an extra bank holiday in the summer after the vaccine is here to allow for a delayed family celebration, announced at the same time as an extension of current rules through year-end? Give people something to look forward to.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,421
    Roger said:

    ydoethur said:

    Roger said:

    FPT.

    Nigelb said:

    Someone else might need to be certified.
    This is just nuts, even by Trump’s standards.
    https://twitter.com/joshtpm/status/1330344762541559812

    Don't they have libel and slander laws in America?
    Yes, but they’re much weaker than ours. As a rough rule of thumb, you can say what you like about someone as long as it’s not overtly motivated by malice, and as long as you do not falsely attribute words or phrases to them.

    And the burden of proof is on the plaintiff.
    Thank you. Though even in a system as lax as that I think the malice motivation would see her undone in this instance.
    Having listened, yes it’s pretty weird.

    However, for a politician to tie up years of effort and hundreds of thousands of dollars suing somebody for so transparent and ludicrous a lie, with no certainty of winning (as proving malice is quite hard) is unlikely. Much more probable that they will try to get her struck from the bar on the grounds that she has lied about the law.
  • RogerRoger Posts: 19,914

    IshmaelZ said:

    On topic I'm not going to pretend to have my finger on the pulse of the British family but I wonder if this isn't exaggerating how desperately everybody loves Christmas. I mean kids love the presents, but they can still get their presents. If the government calmly and reasonably says, "this disease is very bad, the vaccine will just be a few more months and then you can get together with your family", is everyone really going to say "fuck everything, we do this every year, I want to see the grandparents *now* and I don't care if their immune system is eating their lungs in January"?

    This country now runs on institutionalised mawkishness. Picture an extended family gathering of obese poppy wearing retards standing round the Christmas table toasting Our NHS Carers at the end of the Queen's (gawd bless her) speech. Mess with that vision at your peril.
    Probably all Leave voters. (Cue accusations of elitism, including from those who Liked post above...).
    On topic, it is hard to understand this obsession with the great Christmas family gathering. One thought: why not have an extra bank holiday in the summer after the vaccine is here to allow for a delayed family celebration, announced at the same time as an extension of current rules through year-end? Give people something to look forward to.
    Certainly all Leave voters though I was thrown by the felix 'like'!
  • felixfelix Posts: 15,164
    edited November 2020
    Roger said:

    IshmaelZ said:

    On topic I'm not going to pretend to have my finger on the pulse of the British family but I wonder if this isn't exaggerating how desperately everybody loves Christmas. I mean kids love the presents, but they can still get their presents. If the government calmly and reasonably says, "this disease is very bad, the vaccine will just be a few more months and then you can get together with your family", is everyone really going to say "fuck everything, we do this every year, I want to see the grandparents *now* and I don't care if their immune system is eating their lungs in January"?

    This country now runs on institutionalised mawkishness. Picture an extended family gathering of obese poppy wearing retards standing round the Christmas table toasting Our NHS Carers at the end of the Queen's (gawd bless her) speech. Mess with that vision at your peril.
    Probably all Leave voters. (Cue accusations of elitism, including from those who Liked post above...).
    On topic, it is hard to understand this obsession with the great Christmas family gathering. One thought: why not have an extra bank holiday in the summer after the vaccine is here to allow for a delayed family celebration, announced at the same time as an extension of current rules through year-end? Give people something to look forward to.
    Certainly all Leave voters though I was thrown by the felix 'like'!
    Felix voted remain thicko!
  • Dura_AceDura_Ace Posts: 13,677
    Roger said:

    FPT.

    Nigelb said:

    Someone else might need to be certified.
    This is just nuts, even by Trump’s standards.
    https://twitter.com/joshtpm/status/1330344762541559812

    Don't they have libel and slander laws in America?
    All the Republicans who matter will go along with this if they think it has a chance of succeeding. Does anybody think Mitch McConnell would die on a cross to save American democracy?

    Events are unwinding very much in the fashion described by Sinclair Lewis in the novel It Can't Happen Here. Trump = Buzz Windrip.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,421
    Dura_Ace said:

    Roger said:

    FPT.

    Nigelb said:

    Someone else might need to be certified.
    This is just nuts, even by Trump’s standards.
    https://twitter.com/joshtpm/status/1330344762541559812

    Don't they have libel and slander laws in America?
    All the Republicans who matter will go along with this if they think it has a chance of succeeding. Does anybody think Mitch McConnell would die on a cross to save American democracy?
    Although Donald Trump and Mitch McConnell dying, on crosses or otherwise, might be very helpful to American democracy right now.
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,413
    ydoethur said:

    Dura_Ace said:

    Roger said:

    FPT.

    Nigelb said:

    Someone else might need to be certified.
    This is just nuts, even by Trump’s standards.
    https://twitter.com/joshtpm/status/1330344762541559812

    Don't they have libel and slander laws in America?
    All the Republicans who matter will go along with this if they think it has a chance of succeeding. Does anybody think Mitch McConnell would die on a cross to save American democracy?
    Although Donald Trump and Mitch McConnell dying, on crosses or otherwise, might be very helpful to American democracy right now.
    Can you see Biden sticking Pelosi on one ?
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,421

    ydoethur said:

    Dura_Ace said:

    Roger said:

    FPT.

    Nigelb said:

    Someone else might need to be certified.
    This is just nuts, even by Trump’s standards.
    https://twitter.com/joshtpm/status/1330344762541559812

    Don't they have libel and slander laws in America?
    All the Republicans who matter will go along with this if they think it has a chance of succeeding. Does anybody think Mitch McConnell would die on a cross to save American democracy?
    Although Donald Trump and Mitch McConnell dying, on crosses or otherwise, might be very helpful to American democracy right now.
    Can you see Biden sticking Pelosi on one ?
    Well, not really. The physical effort involved would be somewhat beyond the average 77 year old.
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,413
    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    Dura_Ace said:

    Roger said:

    FPT.

    Nigelb said:

    Someone else might need to be certified.
    This is just nuts, even by Trump’s standards.
    https://twitter.com/joshtpm/status/1330344762541559812

    Don't they have libel and slander laws in America?
    All the Republicans who matter will go along with this if they think it has a chance of succeeding. Does anybody think Mitch McConnell would die on a cross to save American democracy?
    Although Donald Trump and Mitch McConnell dying, on crosses or otherwise, might be very helpful to American democracy right now.
    Can you see Biden sticking Pelosi on one ?
    Well, not really. The physical effort involved would be somewhat beyond the average 77 year old.
    yeah but shes almost 81 so she wont put up a struggle.
  • ydoethur said:

    Dura_Ace said:

    Roger said:

    FPT.

    Nigelb said:

    Someone else might need to be certified.
    This is just nuts, even by Trump’s standards.
    https://twitter.com/joshtpm/status/1330344762541559812

    Don't they have libel and slander laws in America?
    All the Republicans who matter will go along with this if they think it has a chance of succeeding. Does anybody think Mitch McConnell would die on a cross to save American democracy?
    Although Donald Trump and Mitch McConnell dying, on crosses or otherwise, might be very helpful to American democracy right now.
    McConnell is surprisingly mandacious, for someone who looks like an innocent old lady.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,713
    Looks like just myself, Mrs Foxy and the boys on the day.

    Often I have had stray junior doctors over on Christmas or Boxing Day, particularly those working over the holidays with no local family. It seems appreciated, but not really on the cards this year though.
  • Dura_AceDura_Ace Posts: 13,677
    Xmas Day is a great hooning day due the sparsity of traffic and cops so I'll be taking the Fireblade for a rip. If I don't materialise on the 26th you'll know I rolled a 2.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 53,858
    Hmm... According to Hancock there is a good chance that the most vulnerable will be vaccinated by Christmas. If that is the case I would very much not want my 84 year old mother in law to spend Christmas on her own. My brother has a terminal condition. Again, he may well have been vaccinated by then.

    For me, this is the key. I am willing to take the risk for myself and let the younger members of my family make their own choices. For all bar 1% of those who get this it is a relatively trivial illness that many do not even know they've had. Whether the more vulnerable members can take part really depends on the vaccine. Here's hoping.
  • DavidL said:

    Hmm... According to Hancock there is a good chance that the most vulnerable will be vaccinated by Christmas. If that is the case I would very much not want my 84 year old mother in law to spend Christmas on her own. My brother has a terminal condition. Again, he may well have been vaccinated by then.

    IIUC the Pfizer vaccine needs an injection, then 2 weeks, then another injection, then another week, before you have immunity. So if you want the MiL to be immune by then, you'll need her to get her injection a week on Thursday at the latest.
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 34,682
    felix said:

    One thing more - I strongly echo Mystiose's point about wearing masks by reminding folk that if you hate wearing them - and I do - you gonna find the ventilator in the ICU wards much worse!

    The issue is that wearing a mask mainly protects others, not the wearer.

    Thus we see once again the country (and indeed all humankind) divide broadly into the two great tribes of the Altruists and the Selfish.
  • felix said:

    One thing more - I strongly echo Mystiose's point about wearing masks by reminding folk that if you hate wearing them - and I do - you gonna find the ventilator in the ICU wards much worse!

    Problem is not wearing a mask is much more likely to condemn someone else to being ventilated.
    It's like those selfish bastards who roar around on motorbikes. Lots of lovely fun for them, but the noise pollution for those who live within a couple of miles of the road is no fun.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 53,858
    Foxy said:

    Looks like just myself, Mrs Foxy and the boys on the day.

    Often I have had stray junior doctors over on Christmas or Boxing Day, particularly those working over the holidays with no local family. It seems appreciated, but not really on the cards this year though.

    Foxy, my wife was asking about Derek Draper. He has apparently gained a sort of consciousness after being in a coma for the best part of 8 months. I am obviously aware of long Covid but I have not personally heard or read of another case like that. Is this relatively common, unusual or unique? If the first of these are there a lot of ICU beds filled long term in this way?
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 53,858

    DavidL said:

    Hmm... According to Hancock there is a good chance that the most vulnerable will be vaccinated by Christmas. If that is the case I would very much not want my 84 year old mother in law to spend Christmas on her own. My brother has a terminal condition. Again, he may well have been vaccinated by then.

    IIUC the Pfizer vaccine needs an injection, then 2 weeks, then another injection, then another week, before you have immunity. So if you want the MiL to be immune by then, you'll need her to get her injection a week on Thursday at the latest.
    I hadn't appreciated that. I knew you would need a booster but I thought that that was after a few months. That is going to be a logistical nightmare.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,462

    DavidL said:

    Hmm... According to Hancock there is a good chance that the most vulnerable will be vaccinated by Christmas. If that is the case I would very much not want my 84 year old mother in law to spend Christmas on her own. My brother has a terminal condition. Again, he may well have been vaccinated by then.

    IIUC the Pfizer vaccine needs an injection, then 2 weeks, then another injection, then another week, before you have immunity. So if you want the MiL to be immune by then, you'll need her to get her injection a week on Thursday at the latest.
    Sadly, I'm certain that I won't be protected by vaccination by Christmas, even given my age. I'm also not at all certain that the requisite systems will be in place to provide vaccination to all who are 'due' it.

    Yes I know Hancock has said everything will be in place, but that's all we've got to go von.
  • moonshinemoonshine Posts: 5,751
    felix said:

    One thing more - I strongly echo Mystiose's point about wearing masks by reminding folk that if you hate wearing them - and I do - you gonna find the ventilator in the ICU wards much worse!

    Currently there are 1421 ventilated patients in the UK out of 66 million residents. I can only assume mask wearing is being universally observed, or else it’s not as important as you say it is.
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 34,682

    Morning all. We are close to a vaccine - very close. So grim as this winter is and annoying as it is not to be allowed to see people, there is an end in sight. So why would anyone responsible want to bin off that future for something we can do later when it's safe?

    I've been making the point for ages about the release of students from university being a super-spreader event. It doesn't matter how desperate the pubs may be for drunken singalongs to "Last Christmas" (eugh) and big sitdown Christmas dinners. It doesn't matter how desperate people may be to see Granny and Aunt Flo and Cousin Vinny. It isn't safe. But it will be in the not to distant future.

    If we had a responsible government whose credibility on these matters was clear, then it would be a simple message. You've had to put up with so many privations this year and we have to ask for one more. But 2021 will be better than 2020 - the vaccine is nearly hear and we will defeat Covid. But until then it Isn't Safe for you to meet up with friends and family unless you want them or possibly you to die before the vaccine rolls out.

    Sadly we have wazzocks as a government so I won't be at all surprised to see Shagger announce something barely credible and a quarter baked, with knobbers like Jenrick sent onto the media to confuse it even further. The result? Too many people will go "fuck this" and January will be sobering.

    Personally, now there is definitely a vaccine on the horizon I find myself becoming more risk averse.

    If we had no prospect of a vaccine, I'd be shrugging my shoulders and thinking I'm going to catch it at some point anyway - but with a vaccine only months away why risk catching Covid now?

    How stupid that would be.
  • moonshinemoonshine Posts: 5,751
    DavidL said:

    DavidL said:

    Hmm... According to Hancock there is a good chance that the most vulnerable will be vaccinated by Christmas. If that is the case I would very much not want my 84 year old mother in law to spend Christmas on her own. My brother has a terminal condition. Again, he may well have been vaccinated by then.

    IIUC the Pfizer vaccine needs an injection, then 2 weeks, then another injection, then another week, before you have immunity. So if you want the MiL to be immune by then, you'll need her to get her injection a week on Thursday at the latest.
    I hadn't appreciated that. I knew you would need a booster but I thought that that was after a few months. That is going to be a logistical nightmare.
    Think we need to wait for the detail to see immunity levels after just the first jab and the marginal benefit of the second. Far be it from me to cast doubt on the integrity of big pharma but it’s certainly better for Pfizer to sell two doses per person rather than one.
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 17,450

    DavidL said:

    Hmm... According to Hancock there is a good chance that the most vulnerable will be vaccinated by Christmas. If that is the case I would very much not want my 84 year old mother in law to spend Christmas on her own. My brother has a terminal condition. Again, he may well have been vaccinated by then.

    IIUC the Pfizer vaccine needs an injection, then 2 weeks, then another injection, then another week, before you have immunity. So if you want the MiL to be immune by then, you'll need her to get her injection a week on Thursday at the latest.
    Sadly, I'm certain that I won't be protected by vaccination by Christmas, even given my age. I'm also not at all certain that the requisite systems will be in place to provide vaccination to all who are 'due' it.

    Yes I know Hancock has said everything will be in place, but that's all we've got to go von.
    Re the two injections, yes for full effect some will need both injections, and it will take a few weeks. However, immunity is not an on/off system, and there will be some, mainly the younger, who would only need one shot, and gain immunity quickly.
    Re Christmas, I suspect the government are having to allow some relaxation, because they know it will happen anyway. For all our sakes we should try to be good as much as possible, but this has been a rubbish year, and for many Christmas is a valuable time.
  • moonshine said:

    DavidL said:

    DavidL said:

    Hmm... According to Hancock there is a good chance that the most vulnerable will be vaccinated by Christmas. If that is the case I would very much not want my 84 year old mother in law to spend Christmas on her own. My brother has a terminal condition. Again, he may well have been vaccinated by then.

    IIUC the Pfizer vaccine needs an injection, then 2 weeks, then another injection, then another week, before you have immunity. So if you want the MiL to be immune by then, you'll need her to get her injection a week on Thursday at the latest.
    I hadn't appreciated that. I knew you would need a booster but I thought that that was after a few months. That is going to be a logistical nightmare.
    Think we need to wait for the detail to see immunity levels after just the first jab and the marginal benefit of the second. Far be it from me to cast doubt on the integrity of big pharma but it’s certainly better for Pfizer to sell two doses per person rather than one.
    "Far be it from me to X but X"
    Fine work there.
  • eekeek Posts: 28,398
    moonshine said:

    felix said:

    One thing more - I strongly echo Mystiose's point about wearing masks by reminding folk that if you hate wearing them - and I do - you gonna find the ventilator in the ICU wards much worse!

    Currently there are 1421 ventilated patients in the UK out of 66 million residents. I can only assume mask wearing is being universally observed, or else it’s not as important as you say it is.
    You miss the fact that fewer patients are being ventilated now compared to April as we know more about how to treat the disease before it gets to that stage to hopefully avoid it getting there.
  • For anyone who wants to have a brief, general introduction to why boosters are sometimes needed in vaccines, there's a few paragraphs here that should help immunise you to any leftist populist antivax bollocks you might stumble across:
    https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/conversations/downloads/vacsafe-understand-color-office.pdf
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 53,858
    moonshine said:

    DavidL said:

    DavidL said:

    Hmm... According to Hancock there is a good chance that the most vulnerable will be vaccinated by Christmas. If that is the case I would very much not want my 84 year old mother in law to spend Christmas on her own. My brother has a terminal condition. Again, he may well have been vaccinated by then.

    IIUC the Pfizer vaccine needs an injection, then 2 weeks, then another injection, then another week, before you have immunity. So if you want the MiL to be immune by then, you'll need her to get her injection a week on Thursday at the latest.
    I hadn't appreciated that. I knew you would need a booster but I thought that that was after a few months. That is going to be a logistical nightmare.
    Think we need to wait for the detail to see immunity levels after just the first jab and the marginal benefit of the second. Far be it from me to cast doubt on the integrity of big pharma but it’s certainly better for Pfizer to sell two doses per person rather than one.
    It's going to be a real challenge for the NHS to vaccinate 65m people once. Hancock points to the flu program but that is for a much smaller part of the population. Trying to ensure that 65m people get a second jab within a relatively short period of time more than doubles the problem. There must be a risk that a lot of people will only get partial inoculation. This is going to take months and months.
  • felixfelix Posts: 15,164

    felix said:

    One thing more - I strongly echo Mystiose's point about wearing masks by reminding folk that if you hate wearing them - and I do - you gonna find the ventilator in the ICU wards much worse!

    The issue is that wearing a mask mainly protects others, not the wearer.

    Thus we see once again the country (and indeed all humankind) divide broadly into the two great tribes of the Altruists and the Selfish.
    I think the research shows it provides some protection for both but yes I agree.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,868
    edited November 2020
    moonshine said:

    felix said:

    One thing more - I strongly echo Mystiose's point about wearing masks by reminding folk that if you hate wearing them - and I do - you gonna find the ventilator in the ICU wards much worse!

    Currently there are 1421 ventilated patients in the UK out of 66 million residents. I can only assume mask wearing is being universally observed, or else it’s not as important as you say it is.
    As PB'ers will know, I spent part of the late summer in Lombardy, where people are still in shock from the spring first wave crisis, mask wearing when required was universal and when not required still widespread, including when walking about in the open. Yet the province is now deep in a second wave, the same as most other places.

    So mask wearing clearly isn't a key element of the answer. That doesn't make it a bad thing, and it should remain part of the strategy, but overly focussing on it, as a few PB'ers tend to do, is missing that the difference it is making appears to be at the margins.
  • ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    Dura_Ace said:

    Roger said:

    FPT.

    Nigelb said:

    Someone else might need to be certified.
    This is just nuts, even by Trump’s standards.
    https://twitter.com/joshtpm/status/1330344762541559812

    Don't they have libel and slander laws in America?
    All the Republicans who matter will go along with this if they think it has a chance of succeeding. Does anybody think Mitch McConnell would die on a cross to save American democracy?
    Although Donald Trump and Mitch McConnell dying, on crosses or otherwise, might be very helpful to American democracy right now.
    Can you see Biden sticking Pelosi on one ?
    Well, not really. The physical effort involved would be somewhat beyond the average 77 year old.
    yeah but shes almost 81 so she wont put up a struggle.
    My wife has just turned 81 and she is as feisty as ever when necessary
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,600

    IshmaelZ said:

    On topic I'm not going to pretend to have my finger on the pulse of the British family but I wonder if this isn't exaggerating how desperately everybody loves Christmas. I mean kids love the presents, but they can still get their presents. If the government calmly and reasonably says, "this disease is very bad, the vaccine will just be a few more months and then you can get together with your family", is everyone really going to say "fuck everything, we do this every year, I want to see the grandparents *now* and I don't care if their immune system is eating their lungs in January"?

    This country now runs on institutionalised mawkishness. Picture an extended family gathering of obese poppy wearing retards standing round the Christmas table toasting Our NHS Carers at the end of the Queen's (gawd bless her) speech. Mess with that vision at your peril.
    Probably all Leave voters. (Cue accusations of elitism, including from those who Liked post above...).
    On topic, it is hard to understand this obsession with the great Christmas family gathering. One thought: why not have an extra bank holiday in the summer after the vaccine is here to allow for a delayed family celebration, announced at the same time as an extension of current rules through year-end? Give people something to look forward to.
    They'd all just go and have a Bondi Beach-style Christmas bash. And there's bound to be some super spreader anti-vaxer there who has been hiding away....
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,868

    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    Dura_Ace said:

    Roger said:

    FPT.

    Nigelb said:

    Someone else might need to be certified.
    This is just nuts, even by Trump’s standards.
    https://twitter.com/joshtpm/status/1330344762541559812

    Don't they have libel and slander laws in America?
    All the Republicans who matter will go along with this if they think it has a chance of succeeding. Does anybody think Mitch McConnell would die on a cross to save American democracy?
    Although Donald Trump and Mitch McConnell dying, on crosses or otherwise, might be very helpful to American democracy right now.
    Can you see Biden sticking Pelosi on one ?
    Well, not really. The physical effort involved would be somewhat beyond the average 77 year old.
    yeah but shes almost 81 so she wont put up a struggle.
    My wife has just turned 81 and she is as feisty as ever when necessary
    She has a lot to put up with?
  • IanB2 said:

    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    Dura_Ace said:

    Roger said:

    FPT.

    Nigelb said:

    Someone else might need to be certified.
    This is just nuts, even by Trump’s standards.
    https://twitter.com/joshtpm/status/1330344762541559812

    Don't they have libel and slander laws in America?
    All the Republicans who matter will go along with this if they think it has a chance of succeeding. Does anybody think Mitch McConnell would die on a cross to save American democracy?
    Although Donald Trump and Mitch McConnell dying, on crosses or otherwise, might be very helpful to American democracy right now.
    Can you see Biden sticking Pelosi on one ?
    Well, not really. The physical effort involved would be somewhat beyond the average 77 year old.
    yeah but shes almost 81 so she wont put up a struggle.
    My wife has just turned 81 and she is as feisty as ever when necessary
    She has a lot to put up with?
    Yes !!!
  • Morning all. We are close to a vaccine - very close. So grim as this winter is and annoying as it is not to be allowed to see people, there is an end in sight. So why would anyone responsible want to bin off that future for something we can do later when it's safe?

    I've been making the point for ages about the release of students from university being a super-spreader event. It doesn't matter how desperate the pubs may be for drunken singalongs to "Last Christmas" (eugh) and big sitdown Christmas dinners. It doesn't matter how desperate people may be to see Granny and Aunt Flo and Cousin Vinny. It isn't safe. But it will be in the not to distant future.

    If we had a responsible government whose credibility on these matters was clear, then it would be a simple message. You've had to put up with so many privations this year and we have to ask for one more. But 2021 will be better than 2020 - the vaccine is nearly hear and we will defeat Covid. But until then it Isn't Safe for you to meet up with friends and family unless you want them or possibly you to die before the vaccine rolls out.

    Sadly we have wazzocks as a government so I won't be at all surprised to see Shagger announce something barely credible and a quarter baked, with knobbers like Jenrick sent onto the media to confuse it even further. The result? Too many people will go "fuck this" and January will be sobering.

    Well quite. Which leads to two observations:

    First, would any other Prime Minister be contemplating letting people have a week off from a crisis like this? We know that a week of fun and extended family will take about a month of restrictions to claw back.

    Second, the government has prided itself on not giving into pressure when it comes to sacking members of the government. Yet on something that actually matters, it appears set to give into the worst sort of pressure without even trying.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,868

    IanB2 said:

    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    Dura_Ace said:

    Roger said:

    FPT.

    Nigelb said:

    Someone else might need to be certified.
    This is just nuts, even by Trump’s standards.
    https://twitter.com/joshtpm/status/1330344762541559812

    Don't they have libel and slander laws in America?
    All the Republicans who matter will go along with this if they think it has a chance of succeeding. Does anybody think Mitch McConnell would die on a cross to save American democracy?
    Although Donald Trump and Mitch McConnell dying, on crosses or otherwise, might be very helpful to American democracy right now.
    Can you see Biden sticking Pelosi on one ?
    Well, not really. The physical effort involved would be somewhat beyond the average 77 year old.
    yeah but shes almost 81 so she wont put up a struggle.
    My wife has just turned 81 and she is as feisty as ever when necessary
    She has a lot to put up with?
    Yes !!!
    It must be tough for her, your spending the whole year bending her ear about how you're never going to eat chicken again, then when the anniversary comes along you book a table at Nando's.
  • ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    Dura_Ace said:

    Roger said:

    FPT.

    Nigelb said:

    Someone else might need to be certified.
    This is just nuts, even by Trump’s standards.
    https://twitter.com/joshtpm/status/1330344762541559812

    Don't they have libel and slander laws in America?
    All the Republicans who matter will go along with this if they think it has a chance of succeeding. Does anybody think Mitch McConnell would die on a cross to save American democracy?
    Although Donald Trump and Mitch McConnell dying, on crosses or otherwise, might be very helpful to American democracy right now.
    Can you see Biden sticking Pelosi on one ?
    Well, not really. The physical effort involved would be somewhat beyond the average 77 year old.
    yeah but shes almost 81 so she wont put up a struggle.
    My wife has just turned 81 and she is as feisty as ever when necessary
    Too much information there Big_G :wink:
    She has good cause on occasions living the last near 60 years with me

    And on Christmas my wife and I have already cancelled our family get together of 10 and will spend Christmas day on our own
  • IanB2 said:

    IanB2 said:

    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    Dura_Ace said:

    Roger said:

    FPT.

    Nigelb said:

    Someone else might need to be certified.
    This is just nuts, even by Trump’s standards.
    https://twitter.com/joshtpm/status/1330344762541559812

    Don't they have libel and slander laws in America?
    All the Republicans who matter will go along with this if they think it has a chance of succeeding. Does anybody think Mitch McConnell would die on a cross to save American democracy?
    Although Donald Trump and Mitch McConnell dying, on crosses or otherwise, might be very helpful to American democracy right now.
    Can you see Biden sticking Pelosi on one ?
    Well, not really. The physical effort involved would be somewhat beyond the average 77 year old.
    yeah but shes almost 81 so she wont put up a struggle.
    My wife has just turned 81 and she is as feisty as ever when necessary
    She has a lot to put up with?
    Yes !!!
    It must be tough for her, your spending the whole year bending her ear about how you're never going to eat chicken again, then when the anniversary comes along you book a table at Nando's.
    I have never been to Nando's and never said I am not going to eat chicken
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 43,355

    DavidL said:

    Hmm... According to Hancock there is a good chance that the most vulnerable will be vaccinated by Christmas. If that is the case I would very much not want my 84 year old mother in law to spend Christmas on her own. My brother has a terminal condition. Again, he may well have been vaccinated by then.

    IIUC the Pfizer vaccine needs an injection, then 2 weeks, then another injection, then another week, before you have immunity. So if you want the MiL to be immune by then, you'll need her to get her injection a week on Thursday at the latest.
    Sadly, I'm certain that I won't be protected by vaccination by Christmas, even given my age. I'm also not at all certain that the requisite systems will be in place to provide vaccination to all who are 'due' it.

    Yes I know Hancock has said everything will be in place, but that's all we've got to go von.
    Will be summer at least before they have done anything significant. We know for sure they are a bunch of useless twats, I await them saying MP's etc need it first as they are so important.
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 34,682

    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    Dura_Ace said:

    Roger said:

    FPT.

    Nigelb said:

    Someone else might need to be certified.
    This is just nuts, even by Trump’s standards.
    https://twitter.com/joshtpm/status/1330344762541559812

    Don't they have libel and slander laws in America?
    All the Republicans who matter will go along with this if they think it has a chance of succeeding. Does anybody think Mitch McConnell would die on a cross to save American democracy?
    Although Donald Trump and Mitch McConnell dying, on crosses or otherwise, might be very helpful to American democracy right now.
    Can you see Biden sticking Pelosi on one ?
    Well, not really. The physical effort involved would be somewhat beyond the average 77 year old.
    yeah but shes almost 81 so she wont put up a struggle.
    My wife has just turned 81 and she is as feisty as ever when necessary
    Too much information there Big_G :wink:
    She has good cause on occasions living the last near 60 years with me

    And on Christmas my wife and I have already cancelled our family get together of 10 and will spend Christmas day on our own
    Very sensible. Likewise Mrs P. and I will have Christmas on our own. We're going to enjoy the peace of it just being the two of us.
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 43,355
    eek said:

    moonshine said:

    felix said:

    One thing more - I strongly echo Mystiose's point about wearing masks by reminding folk that if you hate wearing them - and I do - you gonna find the ventilator in the ICU wards much worse!

    Currently there are 1421 ventilated patients in the UK out of 66 million residents. I can only assume mask wearing is being universally observed, or else it’s not as important as you say it is.
    You miss the fact that fewer patients are being ventilated now compared to April as we know more about how to treat the disease before it gets to that stage to hopefully avoid it getting there.
    Will not change him/her from continuing to spout moonshine, selfish dumb halfwit.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 53,858

    Morning all. We are close to a vaccine - very close. So grim as this winter is and annoying as it is not to be allowed to see people, there is an end in sight. So why would anyone responsible want to bin off that future for something we can do later when it's safe?

    I've been making the point for ages about the release of students from university being a super-spreader event. It doesn't matter how desperate the pubs may be for drunken singalongs to "Last Christmas" (eugh) and big sitdown Christmas dinners. It doesn't matter how desperate people may be to see Granny and Aunt Flo and Cousin Vinny. It isn't safe. But it will be in the not to distant future.

    If we had a responsible government whose credibility on these matters was clear, then it would be a simple message. You've had to put up with so many privations this year and we have to ask for one more. But 2021 will be better than 2020 - the vaccine is nearly hear and we will defeat Covid. But until then it Isn't Safe for you to meet up with friends and family unless you want them or possibly you to die before the vaccine rolls out.

    Sadly we have wazzocks as a government so I won't be at all surprised to see Shagger announce something barely credible and a quarter baked, with knobbers like Jenrick sent onto the media to confuse it even further. The result? Too many people will go "fuck this" and January will be sobering.

    Well quite. Which leads to two observations:

    First, would any other Prime Minister be contemplating letting people have a week off from a crisis like this? We know that a week of fun and extended family will take about a month of restrictions to claw back.

    Second, the government has prided itself on not giving into pressure when it comes to sacking members of the government. Yet on something that actually matters, it appears set to give into the worst sort of pressure without even trying.
    I think right or wrong a lot of people are going to disregard the advice or the law. This undermines the law and there is no real means of enforcing it. As @Dura_Ace has already adverted to there are very few police around on Christmas day and they have better things to do than break up Christmas dinners.

    To a certain extent, therefore, the government is doing no more than bowing to the inevitable. Whether they should or not is more complicated. Personally, I would go for robust advice but make it clear that there will be no enforcement. I think being mealy mouthed about the advice is the worst of both worlds and increases the proportion who will be reckless.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,462

    DavidL said:

    Hmm... According to Hancock there is a good chance that the most vulnerable will be vaccinated by Christmas. If that is the case I would very much not want my 84 year old mother in law to spend Christmas on her own. My brother has a terminal condition. Again, he may well have been vaccinated by then.

    IIUC the Pfizer vaccine needs an injection, then 2 weeks, then another injection, then another week, before you have immunity. So if you want the MiL to be immune by then, you'll need her to get her injection a week on Thursday at the latest.
    Sadly, I'm certain that I won't be protected by vaccination by Christmas, even given my age. I'm also not at all certain that the requisite systems will be in place to provide vaccination to all who are 'due' it.

    Yes I know Hancock has said everything will be in place, but that's all we've got to go von.
    Re the two injections, yes for full effect some will need both injections, and it will take a few weeks. However, immunity is not an on/off system, and there will be some, mainly the younger, who would only need one shot, and gain immunity quickly.
    Re Christmas, I suspect the government are having to allow some relaxation, because they know it will happen anyway. For all our sakes we should try to be good as much as possible, but this has been a rubbish year, and for many Christmas is a valuable time.
    Pfizer say that immunising using their vaccine requires two injection 2-3 weeks apart. Others don't, but Pfizer's is what we'll have first.
    Given the record systems we have, or ought to have, in GP surgeries, getting everyone done ought to be possible, but there are quite a lot of people who are not registered with a GP, or are registered with GP's away from their current homes. That situation may well have improved, of course, since I had anything to do with it, of course.
    If we were going to have some other arrangement, then there will have to be some system for identifying people who have had jab one, and ensuring they are called for jab two.
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 43,355

    IanB2 said:

    IanB2 said:

    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    Dura_Ace said:

    Roger said:

    FPT.

    Nigelb said:

    Someone else might need to be certified.
    This is just nuts, even by Trump’s standards.
    https://twitter.com/joshtpm/status/1330344762541559812

    Don't they have libel and slander laws in America?
    All the Republicans who matter will go along with this if they think it has a chance of succeeding. Does anybody think Mitch McConnell would die on a cross to save American democracy?
    Although Donald Trump and Mitch McConnell dying, on crosses or otherwise, might be very helpful to American democracy right now.
    Can you see Biden sticking Pelosi on one ?
    Well, not really. The physical effort involved would be somewhat beyond the average 77 year old.
    yeah but shes almost 81 so she wont put up a struggle.
    My wife has just turned 81 and she is as feisty as ever when necessary
    She has a lot to put up with?
    Yes !!!
    It must be tough for her, your spending the whole year bending her ear about how you're never going to eat chicken again, then when the anniversary comes along you book a table at Nando's.
    I have never been to Nando's and never said I am not going to eat chicken
    Their chicken is not bad at all, especially washed down with 8 bottles of beer. Have been once in Dublin and it was good if very simple.
  • StockyStocky Posts: 10,222
    IshmaelZ said:

    On topic I'm not going to pretend to have my finger on the pulse of the British family but I wonder if this isn't exaggerating how desperately everybody loves Christmas. I mean kids love the presents, but they can still get their presents. If the government calmly and reasonably says, "this disease is very bad, the vaccine will just be a few more months and then you can get together with your family", is everyone really going to say "fuck everything, we do this every year, I want to see the grandparents *now* and I don't care if their immune system is eating their lungs in January"?

    This country now runs on institutionalised mawkishness. Picture an extended family gathering of obese poppy wearing retards standing round the Christmas table toasting Our NHS Carers at the end of the Queen's (gawd bless her) speech. Mess with that vision at your peril.
    Good morning. Oh, such cynicism to wake up to. Love it.
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 43,355

    Christmas is a load of old wank at the best of times. Our lives are ordered by the approach of the next celebration, and each celebration makes us spend money we don't have on stuff we don't need or really even want. On Boxing Day there will be Easter eggs on supermarket shelves. Once Easter is out the way, it'll be holidays, then whatever celebration the marketing departments try to foist on us next. Chuck in Comic Relief and Children in Need. In September we have to get ready for Halloween, but you'll find mince pies and chocolate reindeer on the shelves as well. A quick sprint to Bonfire Night, Poppy Wearing, maybe a bit of Diwali and then It's Christmaaaaas!
    Somebody shoot me.

    I agree with your sentiments as there seems to be a celebration every day now. Though I do like a turkey dinner and mince pies. Christmas is for the children. Though nowadays with people scattered it is likely one of the few times families get together
  • Good morning, everyone.

    Mr. Stopper, ha. I must say I like both Easter and Bonfire Night a lot more. For Easter, it's cheaper and easier, and you don't really have to bother if you don't want to. Likewise, you can turn up to bonfires at night or not bother and no-one cares.

    Christmas present-buying is not great fun.
  • malcolmg said:

    IanB2 said:

    IanB2 said:

    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    Dura_Ace said:

    Roger said:

    FPT.

    Nigelb said:

    Someone else might need to be certified.
    This is just nuts, even by Trump’s standards.
    https://twitter.com/joshtpm/status/1330344762541559812

    Don't they have libel and slander laws in America?
    All the Republicans who matter will go along with this if they think it has a chance of succeeding. Does anybody think Mitch McConnell would die on a cross to save American democracy?
    Although Donald Trump and Mitch McConnell dying, on crosses or otherwise, might be very helpful to American democracy right now.
    Can you see Biden sticking Pelosi on one ?
    Well, not really. The physical effort involved would be somewhat beyond the average 77 year old.
    yeah but shes almost 81 so she wont put up a struggle.
    My wife has just turned 81 and she is as feisty as ever when necessary
    She has a lot to put up with?
    Yes !!!
    It must be tough for her, your spending the whole year bending her ear about how you're never going to eat chicken again, then when the anniversary comes along you book a table at Nando's.
    I have never been to Nando's and never said I am not going to eat chicken
    Their chicken is not bad at all, especially washed down with 8 bottles of beer. Have been once in Dublin and it was good if very simple.
    Nandos... was a metaphor ;)
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,462
    edited November 2020
    While I'm not as 'down' on the Christmas celebrations as some, what the xxxx is Black Friday?

    Is it to do with the chap in Robinson Crusoe?
  • FrankBoothFrankBooth Posts: 9,851
    'Britannia waives the rules'

    Well done Alastair. I am becoming increasingly skeptical that covid 19 is of such severity that it demands all these restrictions. There is no second wave of deaths comparable to the first. Perhaps 'long covid' is a sufficient threat to demand it but we aren't getting much data on it.
  • While I'm not as 'down' on the Christmas celebrations as some, what the xxxx is Black Friday?

    Is it to do with the chap in Robinson Crusoe?

    It used to be known as the Feast of St Amason
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,713
    DavidL said:

    Foxy said:

    Looks like just myself, Mrs Foxy and the boys on the day.

    Often I have had stray junior doctors over on Christmas or Boxing Day, particularly those working over the holidays with no local family. It seems appreciated, but not really on the cards this year though.

    Foxy, my wife was asking about Derek Draper. He has apparently gained a sort of consciousness after being in a coma for the best part of 8 months. I am obviously aware of long Covid but I have not personally heard or read of another case like that. Is this relatively common, unusual or unique? If the first of these are there a lot of ICU beds filled long term in this way?
    I understand that he developed multi organ failure while on ICU. I think he has been out of ICU onto a rehab ward for some time.

    It is recognised that covid causes severe clotting problems that persist for a couple of months, causing strokes, heart attacks etc.

    ICU is gruelling, ventilation particularly so, both physically and psychologically and take months to recover. The physically frail have very low survival rates on covid ICU. 90% of those on British ICU had no severe pre existing morbidities. Quite a few younger adults of all ethnicities when Mrs Foxy was working there last week.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 53,858
    Well I really like Christmas. My views on it are perfectly summed up in Tim Minchin's song Drinking white wine in the sun. It is not a religious festival for me but it is normally a delight to have so many of the family together playing games, catching up and eating and drinking far too much. I will really miss it this year.
  • rural_voterrural_voter Posts: 2,038
    edited November 2020

    DavidL said:

    Hmm... According to Hancock there is a good chance that the most vulnerable will be vaccinated by Christmas. If that is the case I would very much not want my 84 year old mother in law to spend Christmas on her own. My brother has a terminal condition. Again, he may well have been vaccinated by then.

    IIUC the Pfizer vaccine needs an injection, then 2 weeks, then another injection, then another week, before you have immunity. So if you want the MiL to be immune by then, you'll need her to get her injection a week on Thursday at the latest.
    Sadly, I'm certain that I won't be protected by vaccination by Christmas, even given my age. I'm also not at all certain that the requisite systems will be in place to provide vaccination to all who are 'due' it.

    Yes I know Hancock has said everything will be in place, but that's all we've got to go von.
    Re the two injections, yes for full effect some will need both injections, and it will take a few weeks. However, immunity is not an on/off system, and there will be some, mainly the younger, who would only need one shot, and gain immunity quickly.
    Re Christmas, I suspect the government are having to allow some relaxation, because they know it will happen anyway. For all our sakes we should try to be good as much as possible, but this has been a rubbish year, and for many Christmas is a valuable time.
    Pfizer say that immunising using their vaccine requires two injection 2-3 weeks apart. Others don't, but Pfizer's is what we'll have first.
    Given the record systems we have, or ought to have, in GP surgeries, getting everyone done ought to be possible, but there are quite a lot of people who are not registered with a GP, or are registered with GP's away from their current homes. That situation may well have improved, of course, since I had anything to do with it, of course.
    If we were going to have some other arrangement, then there will have to be some system for identifying people who have had jab one, and ensuring they are called for jab two.
    OKC, take vitamin D
    http://www.drdavidgrimes.com/2020/04/vitamin-d-and-immunity-important.html

    I'll wait. I fail to see how normal safety testing of any vaccine can be complete before end 2021, even though governments have signed blank cheques (and as usual, indemnified producers against legal claims).
  • F1: hmm.

    Leclerc's odds to be best of the rest have lengthened a little to 3.25. I think it's likelier to be a toss up between him and Perez (whose 1.67 is way too short with three races to go and just 4 points covering those two and Ricciardo).
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,713

    While I'm not as 'down' on the Christmas celebrations as some, what the xxxx is Black Friday?

    Is it to do with the chap in Robinson Crusoe?

    It is the Friday of Thanksgiving weekend, when traditionally Christmas shopping starts in the USA. Thanksgiving is a 4 day holiday in America, and the bigger occasion for family get together, like Christmas without presents really.
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,533
    DavidL said:

    moonshine said:

    DavidL said:

    DavidL said:

    Hmm... According to Hancock there is a good chance that the most vulnerable will be vaccinated by Christmas. If that is the case I would very much not want my 84 year old mother in law to spend Christmas on her own. My brother has a terminal condition. Again, he may well have been vaccinated by then.

    IIUC the Pfizer vaccine needs an injection, then 2 weeks, then another injection, then another week, before you have immunity. So if you want the MiL to be immune by then, you'll need her to get her injection a week on Thursday at the latest.
    I hadn't appreciated that. I knew you would need a booster but I thought that that was after a few months. That is going to be a logistical nightmare.
    Think we need to wait for the detail to see immunity levels after just the first jab and the marginal benefit of the second. Far be it from me to cast doubt on the integrity of big pharma but it’s certainly better for Pfizer to sell two doses per person rather than one.
    It's going to be a real challenge for the NHS to vaccinate 65m people once. Hancock points to the flu program but that is for a much smaller part of the population. Trying to ensure that 65m people get a second jab within a relatively short period of time more than doubles the problem. There must be a risk that a lot of people will only get partial inoculation. This is going to take months and months.
    I share the sentiments in the leading article (as do large majorities in all parties, as today's Opinium shows), and am not shy of criticising the government. But ar council level I'm seriously impressed by the scale of preparations for mass vaccination. Sites have mostly been selected in every town and poractical preparations are under way. I agree there will be hitches with people forgetting to do ijection 2 on time, people not registered with GPs, and so on. But cutting the spread requires it to work for most people, and I'm actually fairly confident that that will happen.

    I've got an elderly uncle in Penzance who says he'd like to see me soon. I'll ber glad to, when we've been vaccinated. I wouldn't dream of gonig sooner.
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 37,376
    tlg86 said:

    On topic I'm not going to pretend to have my finger on the pulse of the British family but I wonder if this isn't exaggerating how desperately everybody loves Christmas. I mean kids love the presents, but they can still get their presents. If the government calmly and reasonably says, "this disease is very bad, the vaccine will just be a few more months and then you can get together with your family", is everyone really going to say "fuck everything, we do this every year, I want to see the grandparents *now* and I don't care if their immune system is eating their lungs in January"?

    You might have thought that a killer virus being on the loose would have altered the behaviour of people considerably. Yet that hasn't happened with many people. My 74 year old dad still went to the pub twice a week when they were open, for example.
    During the Black Death, many people partied like crazy, on the basis that they might as well enjoy one last fling.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,462
    edited November 2020

    DavidL said:

    moonshine said:

    DavidL said:

    DavidL said:

    Hmm... According to Hancock there is a good chance that the most vulnerable will be vaccinated by Christmas. If that is the case I would very much not want my 84 year old mother in law to spend Christmas on her own. My brother has a terminal condition. Again, he may well have been vaccinated by then.

    IIUC the Pfizer vaccine needs an injection, then 2 weeks, then another injection, then another week, before you have immunity. So if you want the MiL to be immune by then, you'll need her to get her injection a week on Thursday at the latest.
    I hadn't appreciated that. I knew you would need a booster but I thought that that was after a few months. That is going to be a logistical nightmare.
    Think we need to wait for the detail to see immunity levels after just the first jab and the marginal benefit of the second. Far be it from me to cast doubt on the integrity of big pharma but it’s certainly better for Pfizer to sell two doses per person rather than one.
    It's going to be a real challenge for the NHS to vaccinate 65m people once. Hancock points to the flu program but that is for a much smaller part of the population. Trying to ensure that 65m people get a second jab within a relatively short period of time more than doubles the problem. There must be a risk that a lot of people will only get partial inoculation. This is going to take months and months.
    I share the sentiments in the leading article (as do large majorities in all parties, as today's Opinium shows), and am not shy of criticising the government. But ar council level I'm seriously impressed by the scale of preparations for mass vaccination. Sites have mostly been selected in every town and poractical preparations are under way. I agree there will be hitches with people forgetting to do ijection 2 on time, people not registered with GPs, and so on. But cutting the spread requires it to work for most people, and I'm actually fairly confident that that will happen.

    I've got an elderly uncle in Penzance who says he'd like to see me soon. I'll ber glad to, when we've been vaccinated. I wouldn't dream of gonig sooner.
    I'm glad to read that, and especially that local authorities are very involved. We all (well most of us) know that bringing Cabinet members mates to 'manage' track and trace wasn't the most effective idea.

    And best wishes for your trip to Cornwall; lovely place to go, shame about the way the economics have gone.
  • LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 18,421
    Wasn't there a YouGov saying that people preferred to have lockdown over Christmas too more lockdown later?

    Then, on the other hand, you have things like this:

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/nov/22/let-us-disobey-churches-defy-lockdown-with-secret-meetings

    Whatever people tell opinion polls many will find an excuse for exempting the things they want to do. Permanent lockdown, with no strategy for bringing it to an end, will not hold.

    I'm not sure the vaccine is a big enough carrot. Everyone has already been told to expect only some people to receive it by mid-2021.

    I think it's possible that more people will die of Covid after the vaccine announcement on the 9th November then died before it.
  • StockyStocky Posts: 10,222
    edited November 2020
    DavidL said:

    Well I really like Christmas. My views on it are perfectly summed up in Tim Minchin's song Drinking white wine in the sun. It is not a religious festival for me but it is normally a delight to have so many of the family together playing games, catching up and eating and drinking far too much. I will really miss it this year.

    I love that Minchin song too, a real tear-jerker.
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 37,376
    Dura_Ace said:

    Xmas Day is a great hooning day due the sparsity of traffic and cops so I'll be taking the Fireblade for a rip. If I don't materialise on the 26th you'll know I rolled a 2.

    I find driving on Christmas Day a pretty frightening experience, as so many other drivers are drunk,
  • IshmaelZ said:

    On topic I'm not going to pretend to have my finger on the pulse of the British family but I wonder if this isn't exaggerating how desperately everybody loves Christmas. I mean kids love the presents, but they can still get their presents. If the government calmly and reasonably says, "this disease is very bad, the vaccine will just be a few more months and then you can get together with your family", is everyone really going to say "fuck everything, we do this every year, I want to see the grandparents *now* and I don't care if their immune system is eating their lungs in January"?

    This country now runs on institutionalised mawkishness. Picture an extended family gathering of obese poppy wearing retards standing round the Christmas table toasting Our NHS Carers at the end of the Queen's (gawd bless her) speech. Mess with that vision at your peril.
    Probably all Leave voters. (Cue accusations of elitism, including from those who Liked post above...).
    On topic, it is hard to understand this obsession with the great Christmas family gathering. One thought: why not have an extra bank holiday in the summer after the vaccine is here to allow for a delayed family celebration, announced at the same time as an extension of current rules through year-end? Give people something to look forward to.
    They'd all just go and have a Bondi Beach-style Christmas bash. And there's bound to be some super spreader anti-vaxer there who has been hiding away....
    I've spent a couple of Christmases on a tropical beach. Don't knock it till you've tried it!
  • nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483
    DavidL said:

    Morning all. We are close to a vaccine - very close. So grim as this winter is and annoying as it is not to be allowed to see people, there is an end in sight. So why would anyone responsible want to bin off that future for something we can do later when it's safe?

    I've been making the point for ages about the release of students from university being a super-spreader event. It doesn't matter how desperate the pubs may be for drunken singalongs to "Last Christmas" (eugh) and big sitdown Christmas dinners. It doesn't matter how desperate people may be to see Granny and Aunt Flo and Cousin Vinny. It isn't safe. But it will be in the not to distant future.

    If we had a responsible government whose credibility on these matters was clear, then it would be a simple message. You've had to put up with so many privations this year and we have to ask for one more. But 2021 will be better than 2020 - the vaccine is nearly hear and we will defeat Covid. But until then it Isn't Safe for you to meet up with friends and family unless you want them or possibly you to die before the vaccine rolls out.

    Sadly we have wazzocks as a government so I won't be at all surprised to see Shagger announce something barely credible and a quarter baked, with knobbers like Jenrick sent onto the media to confuse it even further. The result? Too many people will go "fuck this" and January will be sobering.

    Well quite. Which leads to two observations:

    First, would any other Prime Minister be contemplating letting people have a week off from a crisis like this? We know that a week of fun and extended family will take about a month of restrictions to claw back.

    Second, the government has prided itself on not giving into pressure when it comes to sacking members of the government. Yet on something that actually matters, it appears set to give into the worst sort of pressure without even trying.
    I think right or wrong a lot of people are going to disregard the advice or the law. This undermines the law and there is no real means of enforcing it. As @Dura_Ace has already adverted to there are very few police around on Christmas day and they have better things to do than break up Christmas dinners.

    To a certain extent, therefore, the government is doing no more than bowing to the inevitable. Whether they should or not is more complicated. Personally, I would go for robust advice but make it clear that there will be no enforcement. I think being mealy mouthed about the advice is the worst of both worlds and increases the proportion who will be reckless.
    Christmas for most makes up for the guilt and lack of time given to family over they year. Just forget this year apart from the kids then try to be more family oriented during the tear. Get a turkey crown a bottle of cava and watch the bloody telly
This discussion has been closed.