Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » How steep is Starmer’s mountain?

1235

Comments

  • My take on Starmer is that he is part of the problem for Labour, not the solution.

    It is mentioned downthread that the 2019 GE was about Corbyn, not so much Brexit. Sorry but that is rubbish.

    Corbyn did well in 2017 when both parties lied about their commitment to Brexit, that GE was not about Brexit at all and the red wall did not seem too fussed about Corbyn and his links with supposed terrorists, Marxism etc

    Fast forward to 2019 and it was all about Brexit, though I concede that Boris was a much more charismatic opponent than May.

    When the 2024 GE comes around and Starmer is banging on about rejoining the EU, free movement of people, possibly the Euro and Schengen then he has about as much chance of regaining those seats as I do of being PM.

    If the Tories mess up Brexit you will see the emergence of the Brexit Party in some form or other, they would definitely take votes in those constituencies that Labour need to win back. It's possible they may split the Tory vote and allow Labour back in, but not with Starmer in charge.

    Labour missed a massive opportunity in not voting Lisa Nandy as leader.
  • FlatlanderFlatlander Posts: 4,872

    Your lack of understanding of some basic realities is embarrassing. Come here, ask a local to show you the places where manufacturing output rose under Thatcher. It wasn't any of the towns you claim to know about. Locally to me Thatcher did her famous walk in the wilderness. Did the Head Wrightsons Steelworks have (a) higher output or (b) lower output when it was a steelworks and not a business park of half-let offices? How about the pit towns across the Durham coalfield where industrial jobs have 20 years later been replaced by warehouses.

    How did the removal of manufacturing output and their replacement with rubble and eventually warehouses have anything to do with changes to transition controls 20 years years later?

    Warehouses staffed by a lot of people from Eastern Europe if local experience is anything to go by.

    Once upon a time, before the Brexit wars, even the Guardian noticed this - even if it was just to have a dig at Next...

    https://www.theguardian.com/business/2014/nov/28/next-polish-workers-british-retailer-poland-uk-minimum-wage-yorkshire-warehouse

    Is there really an argument that this hasn't depressed local wages?

  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 53,830

    'Instead of doctors, they send police to kill us': locked-down Rio faces deadly raids

    Maria Diva do Nascimento was worried as she set off for her job at one of Rio de Janeiro’s biggest hospitals wearing a face mask she hoped would keep her alive.

    It had been two days since she had heard from her son Allyson, a 20-year-old drug trafficker whose job made social isolation impossible.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/18/rio-de-janeiro-police-raid-coronavirus

    To be fair, Brazil is pretty startling from the policing point of view.

    The police, armed like military units, go into some of the poor districts for a gun battle with the locals and then withdraw.

    It's a country occupying itself, in places.
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 24,017

    Amazing what you can do when you have state survillence.
    All states have surveillance, I think at one stage we had the most CCTV in the world? Doubt that is still the case now.
  • CharlieSharkCharlieShark Posts: 451
    justin124 said:

    Labour lost its deposit at the Enfield Southgate by election held in December 1984 following the death of Anthony Berry in the Brighton bombing outrage. Portillo was elected as the new MP.
    There was also a by election at Hove in November 1973 when Tim Sainsbury was first elected. In both cases the Deposit threshold was still 12.5% - rather than the 5% we have seen since the mid-1980s.
    Thanks and exactly. 2 by-elections and 1 GE and on old rules. These are 36 and 46 years ago. They have no relevance to today, it's a different world.
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826

    What impact do you see swathes of red tape and large tariffs having?
    If it happens negative so I hope it doesn't happen.

    But I think the positives will outweigh the negatives.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 83,131
    edited May 2020

    To be fair, Brazil is pretty startling from the policing point of view.

    The police, armed like military units, go into some of the poor districts for a gun battle with the locals and then withdraw.

    It's a country occupying itself, in places.
    My point was the Guardian's description of this individual "job" and that because of it he couldn't possibly socially isolate.

    Will somebody think of the criminals in this pandemic...
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 24,017
    kinabalu said:

    You believe the measure was driven by fairness more than by deficit reduction?
    I think so. There is a lot about council housing that seems unfair to many. Some of that is down to lies, myths, misunderstandings and exaggerations but some of it is real and unfair.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 83,131
    Coronavirus lockdown measures in Scotland could begin to be lifted from 28 May, the first minister has announced.

    Nicola Sturgeon said the easing of restrictions would mean people would be able to meet up with others outside their household and be allowed more outdoor activities.
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 53,830

    My point was the Guardian's description of this individual "job" and that because of it he couldn't possibly socially isolate.

    Will somebody think of the criminals in this pandemic...
    True - shades of "He was a good lad, out on the rob".
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 53,830

    All states have surveillance, I think at one stage we had the most CCTV in the world? Doubt that is still the case now.
    The most CCTCV connected to nothing, recording onto worn out tape etc etc.
  • justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527
    Sean_F said:

    Labour's loss of working class voters in former mining areas and the towns does look like a permanent shift. The huge rightward swing in seats like Don Valley, Rother Valley, Sedgefield, over the course of twenty years looks like a very profound shift in public opinion in those areas.

    Conversely, the Conservatives' loss of better off voters in big cities looks as if it permanent, too, but so far, the trade off has worked to the Conservatives' advantage.
    But the bulk of the shift in seats such as Sedgefield, Grimsby, Scunthorpe, Blyth Valley and Workington occurred in a single election - 2019. As evidence , that is far too thin to be seen as permanent.
  • SockySocky Posts: 404
    Nigelb said:

    I am unconvinced by the policy, which I see as an example of Tory-virtue signalling, but I'm open to evidence.

    Well quite.

    However in many areas getting a council house is akin to winning the lottery. The first debate we need to have is more fundamental - social housing: what are we trying to achieve?
  • justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527

    Thanks and exactly. 2 by-elections and 1 GE and on old rules. These are 36 and 46 years ago. They have no relevance to today, it's a different world.
    Labour's ousting of Portillo in 1997 was a major shock - and whilst Labour held on comfortably in 2001 the seat reverted to Tory hands in 2005. This rather confirmed the view that it would only fall to Labour in landslide years. That changed in 2017.
    Hove has seen more significant demographic change , but for many years was seen as a Tory v Liberal contest.
  • ClippPClippP Posts: 1,960

    'Instead of doctors, they send police to kill us': locked-down Rio faces deadly raids

    Maria Diva do Nascimento was worried as she set off for her job at one of Rio de Janeiro’s biggest hospitals wearing a face mask she hoped would keep her alive.

    It had been two days since she had heard from her son Allyson, a 20-year-old drug trafficker whose job made social isolation impossible.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/18/rio-de-janeiro-police-raid-coronavirus

    My sympathy goes to those who were terrorised by murderous drug gangs. Very sorry, Guardian.
  • RochdalePioneersRochdalePioneers Posts: 29,660

    If it happens negative so I hope it doesn't happen.

    But I think the positives will outweigh the negatives.
    The question is how we avoid it. Brexiteers have endlessly parroted "GATT24" as the solution. This - as the head of the WTO has pointed out - is bollocks. Going WTO means that the UK is hit by the bound rates - the ceilings when you have no trade agreements and no agreed schedules of tariffs. Something so appealing that no other country in the world does so.

    If the positives are to outweigh the financial disaster of both huge tariffs and huge costs of stopping vehicles to check goods then they must be absolutely massive. Can you give me a few examples?

  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,533
    justin124 said:

    Labour's ousting of Portillo in 1997 was a major shock - and whilst Labour held on comfortably in 2001 the seat reverted to Tory hands in 2005. This rather confirmed the view that it would only fall to Labour in landslide years. That changed in 2017.
    Hove has seen more significant demographic change , but for many years was seen as a Tory v Liberal contest.
    White working class ex industrial and coastal town seats like Bolsover, Mansfield and Grimsby are now solidly Tory.

    Urban seats with high numbers of graduates like Enfield Southgate and Gove are now solid Labour, it is social change that is unlikely to reverse


  • StockyStocky Posts: 10,272
    kinabalu said:

    You believe the measure was driven by fairness more than by deficit reduction?
    It was driven be efficiency. Efficient use of public money and efficient use of the social housing stock.
  • YorkcityYorkcity Posts: 4,382

    My take on Starmer is that he is part of the problem for Labour, not the solution.

    It is mentioned downthread that the 2019 GE was about Corbyn, not so much Brexit. Sorry but that is rubbish.

    Corbyn did well in 2017 when both parties lied about their commitment to Brexit, that GE was not about Brexit at all and the red wall did not seem too fussed about Corbyn and his links with supposed terrorists, Marxism etc

    Fast forward to 2019 and it was all about Brexit, though I concede that Boris was a much more charismatic opponent than May.

    When the 2024 GE comes around and Starmer is banging on about rejoining the EU, free movement of people, possibly the Euro and Schengen then he has about as much chance of regaining those seats as I do of being PM.

    If the Tories mess up Brexit you will see the emergence of the Brexit Party in some form or other, they would definitely take votes in those constituencies that Labour need to win back. It's possible they may split the Tory vote and allow Labour back in, but not with Starmer in charge.

    Labour missed a massive opportunity in not voting Lisa Nandy as leader.

    I totally disagree , Sir Keir Starmer looks to be as a possible PM.
    People can see that not just Labour voters.
    As for him campaigning to re -join the E U, no chance.
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826

    The question is how we avoid it. Brexiteers have endlessly parroted "GATT24" as the solution. This - as the head of the WTO has pointed out - is bollocks. Going WTO means that the UK is hit by the bound rates - the ceilings when you have no trade agreements and no agreed schedules of tariffs. Something so appealing that no other country in the world does so.

    If the positives are to outweigh the financial disaster of both huge tariffs and huge costs of stopping vehicles to check goods then they must be absolutely massive. Can you give me a few examples?

    Tariffs aren't massive. The average tariff from memory is about 3% if that. The currency can swing by more than that. If there is a 3% tariff but our currency has fallen by 5% then are our exporters more or less competitive?

    The advantages are that we can control our own laws and money and if our government displeases us we can kick it out.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,533

    My take on Starmer is that he is part of the problem for Labour, not the solution.

    It is mentioned downthread that the 2019 GE was about Corbyn, not so much Brexit. Sorry but that is rubbish.

    Corbyn did well in 2017 when both parties lied about their commitment to Brexit, that GE was not about Brexit at all and the red wall did not seem too fussed about Corbyn and his links with supposed terrorists, Marxism etc

    Fast forward to 2019 and it was all about Brexit, though I concede that Boris was a much more charismatic opponent than May.

    When the 2024 GE comes around and Starmer is banging on about rejoining the EU, free movement of people, possibly the Euro and Schengen then he has about as much chance of regaining those seats as I do of being PM.

    If the Tories mess up Brexit you will see the emergence of the Brexit Party in some form or other, they would definitely take votes in those constituencies that Labour need to win back. It's possible they may split the Tory vote and allow Labour back in, but not with Starmer in charge.

    Labour missed a massive opportunity in not voting Lisa Nandy as leader.

    Starmer will rejoin the single market, he is not likely to rejoin the full EU, especially with the Euro.


    However Labour has more chance of winning middle class Tory Remainers in London and the South and more prosperous suburbs in the North and Midlands like Altrincham and Sale West and Broxtowe than it does of beating Boris in white working class Leave seats like Grimsby, Ashfield and Mansfield.

    In that sense Starmer was a better pick for them than Nandy
  • Dura_AceDura_Ace Posts: 14,232



    If the Tories mess up Brexit you will see the emergence of the Brexit Party in some form or other

    What is their policy going to be? Let's have another Brexit because the first one turned out shit?
  • ClippPClippP Posts: 1,960
    HYUFD said:

    Urban seats with high numbers of graduates like Enfield Southgate and Gove are now solid Labour, it is social change that is unlikely to reverse.

    Did you really mean that, young HY? Gove solidly Labour?
  • RochdalePioneersRochdalePioneers Posts: 29,660
    justin124 said:

    Labour's ousting of Portillo in 1997 was a major shock - and whilst Labour held on comfortably in 2001 the seat reverted to Tory hands in 2005. This rather confirmed the view that it would only fall to Labour in landslide years. That changed in 2017.
    Hove has seen more significant demographic change , but for many years was seen as a Tory v Liberal contest.

    Labour's problem up north remains that the Labour brand is so tarnished. A lot of work is needed by Starmer to wipe away the shame of Corbynism, but its much deeper than that. Absolute Power corrupts absolutely and there are too many places where Labour have ruled since the Danelaw (and the reverse it true in many southern towns). Voters eventually have enough and vote for a change which so often proves to be a disappointment. Where a "we listened, we've changed" approach can regain trust.

    The acute challenge faced by Labour is that in many of these places the CLP is run by Corbynite nutters...
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,617

    He didn't accept it. It never happened.

    Trying to pretend devolved arrangements are a border is absurd.
    Blimey Philip this is your lockdown game, right? You come on to PB with a particular transparently obvious and self-evident truth in mind. The sun rises in the East, for example. And then you spend all of your evidently otherwise vacant day arguing that the sun rises in the west. And to your immense credit you don't allow yourself to be deflected or interrupted.

    It is certainly impressive but also rather a waste of everyone's time.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,533
    ClippP said:

    Did you really mean that, young HY? Gove solidly Labour?
    Hove, sorry
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 44,520
    edited May 2020

    He didn't accept it. It never happened.

    Trying to pretend devolved arrangements are a border is absurd.
    If you truly believe that Boris Johnson did not go back on a 'no ifs no buts' commitment that under him there would be no border in the Irish Sea, this makes you a rather special sort of person. I doubt there are more than a dozen like you in the whole country.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,617
    kinabalu said:

    If you truly believe that Boris Johnson did not go back on a 'no ifs no buts' commitment that under him there would be no border in the Irish Sea, this makes you a rather special sort of person. I doubt there are more than a dozen like you in the whole country.
    The original internet definition of a troll was someone who came onto chatrooms, such as they were then, and then subtly tried to subvert them by arguing known illogicalities so everyone was diverted from the key arguments and ideally trying to get the existing chatroom members to turn on each other, the overall aim being to bring the chatroom into disarray.

    I really do think that @Philip_Thompson is doing this. Because no one could be that dense in what are otherwise fairly straightforward, easy-to-grasp issues.
  • Dura_AceDura_Ace Posts: 14,232
    TOPPING said:

    Blimey Philip this is your lockdown game, right? You come on to PB with a particular transparently obvious and self-evident truth in mind. The sun rises in the East, for example. And then you spend all of your evidently otherwise vacant day arguing that the sun rises in the west. And to your immense credit you don't allow yourself to be deflected or interrupted.

    It is certainly impressive but also rather a waste of everyone's time.
    We nearly had to do a GoFundMe to get him a new keyboard after he wore his out explaining how Johnson didn't actually send the letter that he did send.
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 24,017
    Nigelb said:

    There's an actual paper.
    https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/8/20-0633_article

    Which even describes the popularity of 'Latin rhythms'.
    It shows the power of a true super spreader, a 4hr workshop for dance teachers who then go across the nation to teach dozens of classes per week, each with dozens of people in close contact indoors.
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 44,520

    The difficulty lies in that PT is one of the few Brexiteers where from there 2018/early 2019 position the final deal was better than Mays deal, so for him it is an improvement. On the positions the PM and nearly all the cabinet laid out before they were in power, the final deal is a surrender compared to Mays deal.
    Sure, that's fine. No problem somebody arguing it's a better deal because it allows GB to do proper Brexit. But it's clear that Johnson misled people on the Irish Sea border. Rather than deny this - and look silly since it's undeniable - if I were Philip I would acknowledge it but say that deceiving the likes of the DUP was smart, ruthless politics and the end justified the means.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,989
    Dura_Ace said:

    We nearly had to do a GoFundMe to get him a new keyboard after he wore his out explaining how Johnson didn't actually send the letter that he did send.
    That was a funny one I have to admit. A classic PB moment.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,989
    I noted a week ago that anecdotally new northern Brexiteer Tory voters were started to turn on the Government and @HYUFD told me I didn’t know what I was talking about, from his flat in Essex. It’s nice that the polling is starting to prove me right.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,989
    On a similar note, driving through Blyth and Ashington, the amount of flags and other pro-NHS merchandise is verging on the ridiculous. The government will have to tread carefully on the NHS if they want to retain their new “red wall” voters. Brexit is not everything.
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 24,017
    Dura_Ace said:

    What is their policy going to be? Let's have another Brexit because the first one turned out shit?
    Pretty much. It wont have been a "proper" Brexit.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 83,131

    Meanwhile, in app news, uh-oh:
    twitter.com/SebastianEPayne/status/1262357454643499008?s=20

    Having downloaded it to have a look at it, I noted that since its initial roll out, not a single update has been pushed. That is incredibly unlikely for an app that is still actively being developed.
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 24,017
    Why isnt there a secretary of state for test track and trace? One should have been appointed in April, it is that important.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 83,131
    I see we are back to the old dividing lines on Brexit...

    Rachel Reeves: “We’re saying they mustn’t rush this and if they are not going to a secure deal, we mustn’t crash out without a deal, so that means taking the time that is necessary but it’s up to government to show that they can deliver the promises that they have made to the British people… that is getting a good deal and a good deal by the end of this year. If they are not in a position to do that then they need to come back and expand the timetable.”
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 44,520

    Don't be so literal meaning don't use facts?

    Fine you can use lies and myths like the City was being bailed out in 2010 causing the deficit of 2010 . . . But just know what you are saying is "literally" not true.

    I'd rather deal with literal facts.
    Now you've regressed from literal to anal.

    If the Coalition were not grappling with the costs of the City crash and bailout (since it happened before they came to power) one wonders what on earth they were grappling with. Many many books will need to be rewritten.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,924
    edited May 2020
    Low skilled , high paid , Priti Patel explaining why low paid people are no longer required
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 24,017

    I see we are back to the old dividing lines on Brexit...

    Rachel Reeves: “We’re saying they mustn’t rush this and if they are not going to a secure deal, we mustn’t crash out without a deal, so that means taking the time that is necessary but it’s up to government to show that they can deliver the promises that they have made to the British people… that is getting a good deal and a good deal by the end of this year. If they are not in a position to do that then they need to come back and expand the timetable.”

    For those who think no deal Brexit is rubbish (which I would certainly be part of) if we are going to get no deal, when do they prefer it happening?

    1 - 2020?
    2 - A later date before the end of the parliament?

    Im clearly 1, as its easier to make the economic adjustments coming out of the covid19 crash than it will be when we have already started our recovery.

    Most seem to prefer 2 - why? Is it in the hope it never happens?
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    kinabalu said:

    Now you've regressed from literal to anal.

    If the Coalition were not grappling with the costs of the City crash and bailout (since it happened before they came to power) one wonders what on earth they were grappling with. Many many books will need to be rewritten.
    They were grappling with the deficit. The deficit was the fact that the government was spending £4 for every £3 in taxes it took.

    Of that £4 in spending per £3 in taxes, just how much do you think was the cost of the bailout?
  • ClippPClippP Posts: 1,960
    HYUFD said:

    Hove, sorry
    Are you sure you don´t have any inside information on this? It would be much more fun if it were really Gove. And fun is the trademake of the Boris Johnson administration , innit? That was why the people elected him.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,924

    Why isnt there a secretary of state for test track and trace? One should have been appointed in April, it is that important.
    Add it to Hancocks long list of failings
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    edited May 2020

    For those who think no deal Brexit is rubbish (which I would certainly be part of) if we are going to get no deal, when do they prefer it happening?

    1 - 2020?
    2 - A later date before the end of the parliament?

    Im clearly 1, as its easier to make the economic adjustments coming out of the covid19 crash than it will be when we have already started our recovery.

    Most seem to prefer 2 - why? Is it in the hope it never happens?
    I agree with you. I don't want it to happen, I'd rather have a deal, but if we're going to have it then better now than later.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,989

    They were grappling with the deficit. The deficit was the fact that the government was spending £4 for every £3 in taxes it took.

    Of that £4 in spending per £3 in taxes, just how much do you think was the cost of the bailout?
    Surely the bailout money was borrowed and thus the interest payments were contributing to the size of the deficit?
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,533

    I noted a week ago that anecdotally new northern Brexiteer Tory voters were started to turn on the Government and @HYUFD told me I didn’t know what I was talking about, from his flat in Essex. It’s nice that the polling is starting to prove me right.

    Wrong, the Tories had a comfortable 15% poll lead last weekend and Boris still leads Starmer as preferred PM

    https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/1261962214824652802?s=20

    https://twitter.com/ElectionMapsUK/status/1261751866624532482?s=20
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,617
    edited May 2020
    Dura_Ace said:

    We nearly had to do a GoFundMe to get him a new keyboard after he wore his out explaining how Johnson didn't actually send the letter that he did send.
    I don't know. My personal favourite, from a long list, is the championing of the government's complete and wholesale changing of the rules which, actually, remained wholly unchanged.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,924

    I noted a week ago that anecdotally new northern Brexiteer Tory voters were started to turn on the Government and @HYUFD told me I didn’t know what I was talking about, from his flat in Essex. It’s nice that the polling is starting to prove me right.

    Which polling?
  • OnlyLivingBoyOnlyLivingBoy Posts: 16,368

    I don't know, but no-one ever attacks it on the basis that it isn't terribly effective, they attack on the basis that it shows the the evil Tories deliberately wanted to screw over the poor. Perhaps if they started by acknowledging the entirely good intentions behind the policy, we might then be able to move on to a sensible discussion of effectiveness. That would be a great step forward, in this and in other political controversies.
    FWIW personally I don't think that Tories are evil. I just think they have a particular worldview that tends to see people as more of the author of their own misfortunes than they actually are. That, combined with a puzzling inattention to detail - so for instance, penalising people for living in houses that are too large with the intention of persuading them to move somewhere smaller, without first ascertaining whether there is anywhere smaller for them to move to, and then persevering with the policy even when it is clear that it's not working as it was meant to. And it does seem a bit odd to be so blind to the hardship it has caused. Maybe they think people are putting it on? Like I say, not evil, perhaps a bit incurious, a bit indifferent to what happens to people that they don't feel much connection to. Lots of them went to private or selective schools, I don't know if that's maybe a factor? Perhaps some trauma in their own early lives?
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826

    Surely the bailout money was borrowed and thus the interest payments were contributing to the size of the deficit?
    The interest payments were yes. How many pounds or pennies of the £4 do you think were going on interest payments to the bailout?
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,989

    Which polling?
    Boris’s approval ratings.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,924

    Labour's problem up north remains that the Labour brand is so tarnished. A lot of work is needed by Starmer to wipe away the shame of Corbynism, but its much deeper than that. Absolute Power corrupts absolutely and there are too many places where Labour have ruled since the Danelaw (and the reverse it true in many southern towns). Voters eventually have enough and vote for a change which so often proves to be a disappointment. Where a "we listened, we've changed" approach can regain trust.

    The acute challenge faced by Labour is that in many of these places the CLP is run by Corbynite nutters...
    4865 posts 1 topic
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,533
    ClippP said:

    Are you sure you don´t have any inside information on this? It would be much more fun if it were really Gove. And fun is the trademake of the Boris Johnson administration , innit? That was why the people elected him.
    Predictive text.

    Hove and Enfield Southgate elected a Tory MP under Cameron at least once but have elected Labour MPs since Cameron left.

    They are unlikely to vote Tory again until a pro single market Tory leader is elected, which is at least a generation away

  • LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 19,135
    eristdoof said:

    https://xkcd.com/1122/

    Btw the proper way to deal with outliers in statistical models is to downweight them, so that you are not throwing the data away but the results are skewed less by one or two questionable points. Of course this introduces the next question, "by how much do I downweight the outliers?"
    You have to be really careful because there's lots of ways to get it wrong. Essentially then outliers increase uncertainty, but that's not the same as not being able to draw any conclusions, only that they are tentative conclusions.

    One famous example where discarding an outlier lied to error was with the 1987 Great Storm. An aircraft observation over the Bay of Biscay was discarded because it was so far out compared to what was expected. When it was included in re-runs after the event it made a large difference.

    Modern data assimilation systems can make more nuanced judgements but the essential problem remains: when is an outlier bad data and when is it a sign of something dramatic and real?
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,533

    On a similar note, driving through Blyth and Ashington, the amount of flags and other pro-NHS merchandise is verging on the ridiculous. The government will have to tread carefully on the NHS if they want to retain their new “red wall” voters. Brexit is not everything.

    Boris is

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2020/05/15/boris-johnson-no-public-sector-pay-freeze-no-austerity-uk-emerges/
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,989
    HYUFD said:

    Wrong, the Tories had a comfortable 15% poll lead last weekend and Boris still leads Starmer as preferred PM

    https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/1261962214824652802?s=20

    https://twitter.com/ElectionMapsUK/status/1261751866624532482?s=20
    And what relevance does this have? As usual you just repute the point you thought I made, rather than what point I actually made. I said the polls were “starting to turn”, which they are. Boris’s approval rating is starting to decline. Keir Starmer has nothing to do with this.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,617

    On a similar note, driving through Blyth and Ashington, the amount of flags and other pro-NHS merchandise is verging on the ridiculous. The government will have to tread carefully on the NHS if they want to retain their new “red wall” voters. Brexit is not everything.

    https://local.theonion.com/area-man-not-exactly-sure-when-to-take-down-american-fl-1819566283
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,989
    HYUFD said:

    Boris is

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2020/05/15/boris-johnson-no-public-sector-pay-freeze-no-austerity-uk-emerges/
    Boris has a reputation for saying one thing and doing the other, doesn’t he? We will see.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,533

    And what relevance does this have? As usual you just repute the point you thought I made, rather than what point I actually made. I said the polls were “starting to turn”, which they are. Boris’s approval rating is starting to decline. Keir Starmer has nothing to do with this.
    They aren't to any significant degree, the latest poll gives a 1.5% swing to the Tories since GE 2019
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,934

    For those who think no deal Brexit is rubbish (which I would certainly be part of) if we are going to get no deal, when do they prefer it happening?

    1 - 2020?
    2 - A later date before the end of the parliament?

    Im clearly 1, as its easier to make the economic adjustments coming out of the covid19 crash than it will be when we have already started our recovery.

    Most seem to prefer 2 - why? Is it in the hope it never happens?
    Starmer seems, in fairness, to have seen that trap despite or possibly because of the bizarre positions he got Labour in when Shadow Brexit Secretary. His position now is that there should not be an extension. The not so subliminal message is that I accept that this is happening and if this is why you didn't vote Labour the last time please come home.

    For me, the last thing that the economy needs is a prolonged period of uncertainty about the terms of trade. Almost any terms of trade, even WTO, is better than that uncertainty but a deal with free market access is best of all.
  • SockySocky Posts: 404
    kinabalu said:

    If the Coalition were not grappling with the costs of the City crash and bailout (since it happened before they came to power) one wonders what on earth they were grappling with. Many many books will need to be rewritten.

    Fairer allocation of social housing was never going to save much if any money, so I doubt "austerity" was a significant driver.

    Occasionally governments do actually do things on principle.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,989
    HYUFD said:

    They aren't to any significant degree, the latest poll gives a 1.5% swing to the Tories since GE 2019
    Boris’s approval rating is declining. You might not like it but it’s a fact.

    Voting intention is irrelevant at this point.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,924

    Boris’s approval ratings.
    OK but VI still worse for Labour than GE 2019

    Lets hope that is about to change
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    kinabalu said:

    If you truly believe that Boris Johnson did not go back on a 'no ifs no buts' commitment that under him there would be no border in the Irish Sea, this makes you a rather special sort of person. I doubt there are more than a dozen like you in the whole country.
    I truly believe it.

    I truly believe that having Stormont agree to special arrangements is no more a border than having Holyrood agree to special arrangements for a devolved matter.

    Plus I've been consistent since before Boris resigned from May's government that the principle for me was democracy. May's backstop was undemocratic - a Stormont-determined special arrangement is democratic. If NI isn't happy with the arrangements then Stormont can and should end them.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,989

    OK but VI still worse for Labour than GE 2019

    Lets hope that is about to change
    I don’t think anyone is really paying attention to party politics at the moment, and who can blame them.

    Anecdotally nobody is saying they support Labour, the are simply criticizing the Government, and rightly so.

    I make no prediction for what is going to happen, I’m merely telling @HYUFD that his precious “red wall” Tory voters, that he knows nothing about, aren’t very happy with his man’s performance.
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 24,017

    Add it to Hancocks long list of failings
    No idea why it would be added to his list of responsibilities, he must have the biggest workload already.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 83,131
    edited May 2020
    New deaths in England, 122. Last 3 days, 29 / 59 / 27. Basically no historic deaths in these numbers.

    https://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2020/05/COVID-19-daily-announced-deaths-18-May-2020.xlsx

    Last Monday, it was 18 / 76 / 45

    So 115 vs 139.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 50,955

    Tariffs aren't massive. The average tariff from memory is about 3% if that. The currency can swing by more than that. If there is a 3% tariff but our currency has fallen by 5% then are our exporters more or less competitive?

    The advantages are that we can control our own laws and money and if our government displeases us we can kick it out.
    There’s far too much attention given to tariffs and far too little to the non-tariff barriers and the inevitable tsunami of extra admin and paperwork.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,533

    I don’t think anyone is really paying attention to party politics at the moment, and who can blame them.

    Anecdotally nobody is saying they support Labour, the are simply criticizing the Government, and rightly so.

    I make no prediction for what is going to happen, I’m merely telling @HYUFD that his precious “red wall” Tory voters, that he knows nothing about, aren’t very happy with his man’s performance.
    They clearly still are overall otherwise the Tories would not be polling at a higher voteshare than they have got at any general election since 1959
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,989
    HYUFD said:

    They clearly still are overall otherwise the Tories would not be polling at a higher voteshare than they have got at any general election since 1959
    So why are Boris’s approval ratings declining?
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,617

    OK but VI still worse for Labour than GE 2019

    Lets hope that is about to change
    Yes. Let's hope that SKS realises that he needs to give the old socialism thing one more push. That should bump the party's ratings up a tadge.
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 24,017
    IanB2 said:

    There’s far too much attention given to tariffs and far too little to the non-tariff barriers and the inevitable tsunami of extra admin and paperwork.
    Admin and paperwork that UK companies will, and will be expected to do, far more thouroughly than competitor countries. And then be really disappointed when they find out there is no redress for more powerful countries breaking the WTO rules, but will be when we break the rules against them.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,924

    I don’t think anyone is really paying attention to party politics at the moment, and who can blame them.

    Anecdotally nobody is saying they support Labour, the are simply criticizing the Government, and rightly so.

    I make no prediction for what is going to happen, I’m merely telling @HYUFD that his precious “red wall” Tory voters, that he knows nothing about, aren’t very happy with his man’s performance.
    I think you will be more in touch with red wall voters in the North than HYUFD.

    I do however fear once you have voted Tory once it is easy to justify sticking with it especially if you are a Brexiteer that wants immigration limited.

    Hope i am wrong and we win back all the red wall seats and more in 2024

    2021 LE will give us an early indication I expect
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 79,084
    I thought the reopening was meant to be tied into track and trace.
    It looks like the Gov't is pushing ahead with the whole reopening plan before track and trace is sorted though ?
  • SockySocky Posts: 404

    I’m merely telling @HYUFD that his precious “red wall” Tory voters, that he knows nothing about, aren’t very happy with his man’s performance.

    Perhaps their unhappiness is a step forward? For far too long no politician left or right bothered what they thought.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,924

    No idea why it would be added to his list of responsibilities, he must have the biggest workload already.
    Its an NHS app.
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 53,830
    edited May 2020
    NHS England data out - 122

    image

    image
  • ClippPClippP Posts: 1,960
    HYUFD said:

    Predictive text.
    Hove and Enfield Southgate elected a Tory MP under Cameron at least once but have elected Labour MPs since Cameron left.
    They are unlikely to vote Tory again until a pro single market Tory leader is elected, which is at least a generation away
    A prediction eh, young HY? It might be a good idea to share it with your colleagues in Hove.

    They could then stand aside to leave it to the Lib Dems to take the seat from Labour. It is, after all, what used to happen in Bolton West - an arrangement set up by no less than Churchill himself. This was discussed on here the other day.
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826

    So why are Boris’s approval ratings declining?
    Because those who didn't vote Tory a few months ago are not backing him as much or are more willing to say negative. Not because those who did have changed.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,934
    Pulpstar said:

    I thought the reopening was meant to be tied into track and trace.
    It looks like the Gov't is pushing ahead with the whole reopening plan before track and trace is sorted though ?
    That is what I have been complaining about for the last week. 3 conditions: mass testing: tickish; fast testing: nope; a working app for tracing: nope. One condition out of 3. A rise in the number of cases is almost inevitable. And what do we do then?
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 83,131
    edited May 2020
    Totally O/T, I don't know if people have been watching the Last Dance (documentary series of Jordan / Chicago Bulls).

    No idea if it was by design, but basically every main protagonist (bar the coach, Phil Jackson), come off as absolute massive docuhebags.
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826

    I think you will be more in touch with red wall voters in the North than HYUFD.

    I do however fear once you have voted Tory once it is easy to justify sticking with it especially if you are a Brexiteer that wants immigration limited.

    Hope i am wrong and we win back all the red wall seats and more in 2024

    2021 LE will give us an early indication I expect
    I live in what was the red wall. I see no changes yet.
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 24,017

    Its an NHS app.
    I know, but if you have a team of 20 managers and due to unforeseen circumstances one of them ends up with 30% of the work/responsibility on his own, ffs dont give him more responsibilities?
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,989

    Because those who didn't vote Tory a few months ago are not backing him as much or are more willing to say negative. Not because those who did have changed.
    Well the Brexit supporting Tory voters I have on Facebook are constantly posting anti Boris memes. They seem to have changed their mind, but clearly it does not fit your narrative.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,989

    I live in what was the red wall. I see no changes yet.
    As do I. Why is your anecdotal view more valid than mine?
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,617
    edited May 2020

    I live in what was the red wall. I see no changes yet.
    How would you have done? You have been following the government's rules, as amended (not) last week and stayed at home to save lives and protect the NHS.
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826

    Well the Brexit supporting Tory voters I have on Facebook are constantly posting anti Boris memes. They seem to have changed their mind, but clearly it does not fit your narrative.
    Were they posting pro Boris memes before December's election?
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,989

    Were they posting pro Boris memes before December's election?
    Yes.
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 44,520
    Socky said:

    Fairer allocation of social housing was never going to save much if any money, so I doubt "austerity" was a significant driver.

    Occasionally governments do actually do things on principle.
    OK.

    Nevertheless I think all bar one can agree that although the Coalition did not assume office until 2010 they were not exempt from having to deal with the consequential costs of the 2008 bank crash.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 75,890

    Totally O/T, I don't know if people have been watching the Last Dance (documentary series of Jordan / Chicago Bulls).

    No idea if it was by design, but basically every main protagonist (bar the coach, Phil Jackson), come off as absolute massive docuhebags.

    Apparently, Jordan's own production company was responsible for the series, so probably not.

    As I have no interest in basketball this bit from the review gives me little interest in watching the thing.

    https://slate.com/culture/2020/05/the-last-dance-michael-jordan-bulls-wizards.html
    ...For a 10-part documentary that promised unprecedented access into Jordan’s world, that scene says it all: There is no getting to know “the real Michael Jordan.” Or, more precisely, this is who he is: an emotionally walled-off, dickish, phenomenal basketball player who doesn’t have much to give off the court. The big question I had going into The Last Dance was, “Is there anything more to Michael Jordan than basketball?” If this documentary is the final word on his legacy, the answer is: apparently not...
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    kinabalu said:

    OK.

    Nevertheless I think all bar one can agree that although the Coalition did not assume office until 2010 they were not exempt from having to deal with the consequential costs of the 2008 bank crash.
    Indeed. And the consequential costs of Brown borrowing during a boom.

    How much of government expenditure in 2010 do you think was due to bank bailouts? What proportion of expenditure?
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 79,084
    edited May 2020
    DavidL said:

    That is what I have been complaining about for the last week. 3 conditions: mass testing: tickish; fast testing: nope; a working app for tracing: nope. One condition out of 3. A rise in the number of cases is almost inevitable. And what do we do then?
    I think we should be able to turn some of the "mass" part of the testing into "fast", but we still need a working system which includes an app.
  • LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 19,135
    DavidL said:

    That is what I have been complaining about for the last week. 3 conditions: mass testing: tickish; fast testing: nope; a working app for tracing: nope. One condition out of 3. A rise in the number of cases is almost inevitable. And what do we do then?
    I think the government will have a few weeks of grace because many people will be wary of sending their kids to school, etc, and that may keep sufficient lid on things until they can sort out the contact tracing.
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826

    Yes.
    Fair enough.

    On my Facebook anti Boris memes are being shared by the same usual suspects who would share them last December too.
  • justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527
    HYUFD said:

    White working class ex industrial and coastal town seats like Bolsover, Mansfield and Grimsby are now solidly Tory.

    Urban seats with high numbers of graduates like Enfield Southgate and Gove are now solid Labour, it is social change that is unlikely to reverse


    Such seats are not 'solidly' Tory on the basis of a single election win - regardless of the majority on that occasion. Only in the event of the pattern being repeated over several elections can such a judgement reasonably be made. Seats such as Sittingbourne & Sheppey, Thanet South, Dover, Stevenage, Watford ,Hemel Hempstead, Welwyn & Hatfield may have appeared 'solidly' Labour in 1997 & 2001 but were clearly not so.
This discussion has been closed.