Categories
politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Johnson coming under pressure to sack the Number 10 advisor wh
politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Johnson coming under pressure to sack the Number 10 advisor who backs forced sterilisation
WATCH: Transport secretary Grant Shapps refuses to condemn Andrew Sabisky, a new adviser at No 10 who called for forced sterilisation of young women. #Ridge pic.twitter.com/xaBbXKEfq2
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
A good campaigning mind, but nowhere near as clever as he thinks, prone to gross over-reach, and totally lacking in the caution and discipline needed to be involved in governing.
At the moment, Johnson can afford bad headlines, and has political capital to burn. But that won't last forever, and then Cummings is finished.
Response: A MILLION!
Much more concerning are the leaked plans to eviscerate the BBC.
BTW, that is the highly sanitised version. Unlady-like language is being used.
Questionable? You need your head examined.
The noise may become too much, and the delivery too little.
The idea that Cummings is espousing though is 100% right - the government departments are crap, the arrangements of our state are questionable, and Johnny Everyone needs a bit of a kick.
I make no accusations against Sunak personally. But the role of TCI, one other fund and a well known US bank, along with various other funds with close links to RBS, has never been properly or fully told. It does not reflect well on them, the banks involved or the relevant regulatory authorities
Some might consider that some of what went on was potentially criminal.
I could not possibly comment.
After all, FGM, eugenics and killing the odd child are, apparently, no bar to the policy unit. Executing some civil service deadwood should only be a mental warm-up for such giant intelllects.
I have some highly controversial views on what should happen for lives blighted by demntia. They might be quite mainstream by the end of this century.
In addition to all the discussion from last night, another thing that has changed is that especially the young have grown up with all the services they use being funded by ads e.g. YouTube, Facebook, Instagram.
“The left” have wasted the last decade wanking on about trans rights and forgot what it means to maintain a liberal democracy.
Well, they didn't listen, so here it is. Enjoy!
I'm completely happy to see a million people die for the greater good, but I'm sure that the evidence available will never be enough for me to find it a greater good.
I have loads. One of my favourites is piano tuition and French lessons for the unemployed. Free of charge and compulsory. Imagine the impact.
We aren't talking about privatisation of the media here, the BBC is not the be all and end all, the sector is already private.
https://twitter.com/labour_history/status/1207614350363631616
The whole thread on Labour's responses to 1983 is worth a read, how far the same problems remain, is another matter.
The problem with this guy is not that his thoughts are inflammatory. It’s that they are inflammatory and gormless. All the media training in the world won’t make him less gormless.
I doubt he will make the end of 2020.
Unbelievable.
It is clear now though that Boris (Cummings) intends to castrate each in turn.
What purpose is intended?
In what way is this conservative?
For young people in particular there is no quesiton that the whole premise of the BBC and licence fee is irrelevant to most of them. The world has already changed and the government and parliament can only put off dealing with that change for so long.
The purpose I suspect is to stop BBC journalism reporting on what Johnson's shower are up to.
There are none so blind as those who do not wish to see.
(i) Women complaining that female sports are ranked down with para sports.
(ii) Paras complaining that para sports are ranked down with female sports.
Or am I still missing it?
https://twitter.com/siennamarla/status/1229050421680988160
Not wrong.
Angela Rayner is too thick to realise that she is helping to dig the BBC’s grave.
Why does she think we need it to remain as a public service broadcaster if she “is no big fan” of it?
That's for starters.
Meanwhile the old, who vote Tory, watch it 24/7.
So which party wants rid?
The department now run by the newly promoted minister disqualified her spouse from running a company until April 2029"
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/husband-of-business-minister-amanda-solloway-in-11-year-ban-hfg7097x5
MPs will not know what has hit them.
We still don’t have the full details on L’Affaire Arcuri, nor who paid for that villa.
Times are changing fast and the BBC are going to have to come up with a funding model that is not paid by tax
Because all I can see is a somewhat heavy-handed idea to reduce teenage pregnancy rates.
Absolutely nothing suggesting that defined groups of people shouldn't be allowed to ever reproduce at any life stage.
If she is involved that is different, but I assume you are not accusing her of this
The clue is in the link
However, all that matters is the voters and Boris will win or lose entirely on how he performs in their eyes, not some figure in the background
Where in his original words does he advocate either eugenics or enforced sterilisation?
"Eugenics are about selecting ‘for’ good things,” he says. “Intelligence is largely inherited and it correlates with better outcomes: physical health, income, lower mental illness. There is no downside to having IQ except short-sightedness"
This is progress. Excellent. Now, where does he advocate enforced sterilisation, please?