An excellent Times Red Box article from Lisa Nandy this morning indicating the depth of her thinking and ability to think differently.
...but she is still a lightweight. Starmer is the only serious candidate that Labour have to offer at the moment who stands a chance, which is probably why they will not elect him.
Nonsense- when she says, “ No one would begrudge Mr Johnson a holiday, but given the magnitude of recent developments and the nebulous position of the UK on the international stage, the PM should by now have recalled parliament to set out what steps the government will take to protect the safety of our serving personnel, and have outlined what steps he is taking to try to defuse the mounting tensions between the US and Iran.”,
one can only agree that recalling MPs to allow them to share their insight and intelligence on a subject where many (if not most) of them have a mastery of the subject is a natural and obvious step forward. Diplomacy is best served by sharing one’s thoughts widely rather than behind the curtain efforts.
She still comes across as a lightweight. Very nice, but, like Jo Swinson, a lightweight and not PM material. Of the potential women candidates there is only Emily Thornberry and Yvette Cooper who have gravitas for the role, neither of whom appear to stand a chance.
Didn’t people say that about Thatcher prior to her election?
An excellent Times Red Box article from Lisa Nandy this morning indicating the depth of her thinking and ability to think differently.
...but she is still a lightweight. Starmer is the only serious candidate that Labour have to offer at the moment who stands a chance, which is probably why they will not elect him.
On the Yougov Labour members poll they will elect him
Yes, if it is correct. I hope it is. I would like to see a return to having a decent and effective opposition to drag the Tories back to the centre ground.
An excellent Times Red Box article from Lisa Nandy this morning indicating the depth of her thinking and ability to think differently.
...but she is still a lightweight. Starmer is the only serious candidate that Labour have to offer at the moment who stands a chance, which is probably why they will not elect him.
Nonsense- when she says, “ No one would begrudge Mr Johnson a holiday, but given the magnitude of recent developments and the nebulous position of the UK on the international stage, the PM should by now have recalled parliament to set out what steps the government will take to protect the safety of our serving personnel, and have outlined what steps he is taking to try to defuse the mounting tensions between the US and Iran.”,
one can only agree that recalling MPs to allow them to share their insight and intelligence on a subject where many (if not most) of them have a mastery of the subject is a natural and obvious step forward. Diplomacy is best served by sharing one’s thoughts widely rather than behind the curtain efforts.
She still comes across as a lightweight. Very nice, but, like Jo Swinson, a lightweight and not PM material. Of the potential women candidates there is only Emily Thornberry and Yvette Cooper who have gravitas for the role, neither of whom appear to stand a chance.
Didn’t people say that about Thatcher prior to her election?
An excellent Times Red Box article from Lisa Nandy this morning indicating the depth of her thinking and ability to think differently.
...but she is still a lightweight. Starmer is the only serious candidate that Labour have to offer at the moment who stands a chance, which is probably why they will not elect him.
I’m not sure that Starmer has the X factor to be leader.
I also think there is method to Trump's madness. The new testament way of dealing with them had failed for the last 30 years, the old testament way may yet work. Violence and threats is all they understand, Trump is speaking their language when he says he's picked out 52 targets etc... It's a huge warning shot that he's got his boot on their proverbial neck. It may offend our liberal sensibilities, but my guess is that it will prove highly effective.
Hmm, we'll see. I just don't think they have the cojones tbh, especially now that their master strategist who would draw up any retaliation plan is dead.
The strategic "retaliation" is clear enough. Build a nuclear capability. That way, Maximum Moron keeps his dick in his pants.
An excellent Times Red Box article from Lisa Nandy this morning indicating the depth of her thinking and ability to think differently.
...but she is still a lightweight. Starmer is the only serious candidate that Labour have to offer at the moment who stands a chance, which is probably why they will not elect him.
Nonsense- when she says, “ No one would begrudge Mr Johnson a holiday, but given the magnitude of recent developments and the nebulous position of the UK on the international stage, the PM should by now have recalled parliament to set out what steps the government will take to protect the safety of our serving personnel, and have outlined what steps he is taking to try to defuse the mounting tensions between the US and Iran.”,
one can only agree that recalling MPs to allow them to share their insight and intelligence on a subject where many (if not most) of them have a mastery of the subject is a natural and obvious step forward. Diplomacy is best served by sharing one’s thoughts widely rather than behind the curtain efforts.
I would also add where has this thing about politicians rushing back from holiday cone from?
There will be teams working on the ground to prepare reports and intelligence.
I’d assume there is a means of secure communication for Johnson
You don’t actually need him in London saying stuff
Hmm, we'll see. I just don't think they have the cojones tbh, especially now that their master strategist who would draw up any retaliation plan is dead.
The strategic "retaliation" is clear enough. Build a nuclear capability. That way, Maximum Moron keeps his dick in his pants.
That was going to happen in 5 years anyway, when the current nuclear deal ended. That's a nothing move, and hopefully it means the EU nations will finally grow a pair and fuck up Iran's economy.
An excellent Times Red Box article from Lisa Nandy this morning indicating the depth of her thinking and ability to think differently.
...but she is still a lightweight. Starmer is the only serious candidate that Labour have to offer at the moment who stands a chance, which is probably why they will not elect him.
Nonsense- when she says, “ No one would begrudge Mr Johnson a holiday, but given the magnitude of recent developments and the nebulous position of the UK on the international stage, the PM should by now have recalled parliament to set out what steps the government will take to protect the safety of our serving personnel, and have outlined what steps he is taking to try to defuse the mounting tensions between the US and Iran.”,
one can only agree that recalling MPs to allow them to share their insight and intelligence on a subject where many (if not most) of them have a mastery of the subject is a natural and obvious step forward. Diplomacy is best served by sharing one’s thoughts widely rather than behind the curtain efforts.
I would also add where has this thing about politicians rushing back from holiday cone from?
There will be teams working on the ground to prepare reports and intelligence.
I’d assume there is a means of secure communication for Johnson
You don’t actually need him in London saying stuff
I’m glad that somebody can read between the lines. Raises quizzical 🤨
It’s clear that the article is aimed at Labour Party voters but (a) it’s in The Times (the evil organ of Murdochism); and (b) it’s featherweight in its insight and intelligence.
An excellent Times Red Box article from Lisa Nandy this morning indicating the depth of her thinking and ability to think differently.
...but she is still a lightweight. Starmer is the only serious candidate that Labour have to offer at the moment who stands a chance, which is probably why they will not elect him.
Nonsense- when she says, “ No one would begrudge Mr Johnson a holiday, but given the magnitude of recent developments and the nebulous position of the UK on the international stage, the PM should by now have recalled parliament to set out what steps the government will take to protect the safety of our serving personnel, and have outlined what steps he is taking to try to defuse the mounting tensions between the US and Iran.”,
one can only agree that recalling MPs to allow them to share their insight and intelligence on a subject where many (if not most) of them have a mastery of the subject is a natural and obvious step forward. Diplomacy is best served by sharing one’s thoughts widely rather than behind the curtain efforts.
She still comes across as a lightweight. Very nice, but, like Jo Swinson, a lightweight and not PM material. Of the potential women candidates there is only Emily Thornberry and Yvette Cooper who have gravitas for the role, neither of whom appear to stand a chance.
Didn’t people say that about Thatcher prior to her election?
Thatcher was an Oxford educated chemist and had charisma, unlike Nandy
I still haven’t had my Labour membership confirmed. Joined mid-December. Doesn’t bode well.
Maybe my jewish sounding name threw some red flags.
Eh, come on. That should be over now. And Gallowgate doesn't even sound jewish.
Who are you leaning to?
I’m still pretty open-minded. I like Jess Phillips, Lisa Nandy, and Keir Starmer although leaning towards Keir. I want to see them in person so I hope there’s a North East hustings.
An excellent Times Red Box article from Lisa Nandy this morning indicating the depth of her thinking and ability to think differently.
...but she is still a lightweight. Starmer is the only serious candidate that Labour have to offer at the moment who stands a chance, which is probably why they will not elect him.
On the Yougov Labour members poll they will elect him
Yes, if it is correct. I hope it is. I would like to see a return to having a decent and effective opposition to drag the Tories back to the centre ground.
The Tories have just won their biggest majority since Thatcher, the 'centre ground' is clearly not just pro EU fiscal conservatism and social liberalism for most voters
An excellent Times Red Box article from Lisa Nandy this morning indicating the depth of her thinking and ability to think differently.
...but she is still a lightweight. Starmer is the only serious candidate that Labour have to offer at the moment who stands a chance, which is probably why they will not elect him.
Nonsense- when she says, “ No one would begrudge Mr Johnson a holiday, but given the magnitude of recent developments and the nebulous position of the UK on the international stage, the PM should by now have recalled parliament to set out what steps the government will take to protect the safety of our serving personnel, and have outlined what steps he is taking to try to defuse the mounting tensions between the US and Iran.”,
one can only agree that recalling MPs to allow them to share their insight and intelligence on a subject where many (if not most) of them have a mastery of the subject is a natural and obvious step forward. Diplomacy is best served by sharing one’s thoughts widely rather than behind the curtain efforts.
She still comes across as a lightweight. Very nice, but, like Jo Swinson, a lightweight and not PM material. Of the potential women candidates there is only Emily Thornberry and Yvette Cooper who have gravitas for the role, neither of whom appear to stand a chance.
Didn’t people say that about Thatcher prior to her election?
Thatcher was an Oxford educated chemist and had charisma, unlike Nandy
Lisa Nandy is a Newcastle University graduate, which is far superior.
An excellent Times Red Box article from Lisa Nandy this morning indicating the depth of her thinking and ability to think differently.
...but she is still a lightweight. Starmer is the only serious candidate that Labour have to offer at the moment who stands a chance, which is probably why they will not elect him.
I’m not sure that Starmer has the X factor to be leader.
He is clever, whereas Corbyn is thick. This may prove unpopular with Boris fanbois on here, but the recent GE was not "won" by their man, it was lost comprehensively by Corbyn, who was about as hopeless as it is possible to be. A half decent Labour leader would have exposed Johnson for what he is. Blair would have torn him to pieces. Starmer is probably no Blair, but he has his intelligence and that is a start to bring British politics back to a sensible place, if that is at all possible.
Anyone who turns the 08 Obama, 12 Obama, 16 DNV into 20 Dem.
Recent American elections are about turnout, not people switching sides.
And as I am going to bang on relentlessly American polling 'likely to vote' screening is brutal - if you didn't vote at the last Presidential election then you'll probably be filtered out.
When is @HYUFD going to come along to excuse everything Trump is doing because a poll says he might beat Sanders?
I am not American but Americans elected Trump and may well re elect him, I suggest you direct your comments at Americans who actually have a vote next November unlike me
An excellent Times Red Box article from Lisa Nandy this morning indicating the depth of her thinking and ability to think differently.
...but she is still a lightweight. Starmer is the only serious candidate that Labour have to offer at the moment who stands a chance, which is probably why they will not elect him.
Nonsense- when she says, “ No one would begrudge Mr Johnson a holiday, but given the magnitude of recent developments and the nebulous position of the UK on the international stage, the PM should by now have recalled parliament to set out what steps the government will take to protect the safety of our serving personnel, and have outlined what steps he is taking to try to defuse the mounting tensions between the US and Iran.”,
one can only agree that recalling MPs to allow them to share their insight and intelligence on a subject where many (if not most) of them have a mastery of the subject is a natural and obvious step forward. Diplomacy is best served by sharing one’s thoughts widely rather than behind the curtain efforts.
I would also add where has this thing about politicians rushing back from holiday cone from?
There will be teams working on the ground to prepare reports and intelligence.
I’d assume there is a means of secure communication for Johnson
You don’t actually need him in London saying stuff
Particularly when he has previous in making matters considerably worse. Keep him on holiday as long as possible.
An excellent Times Red Box article from Lisa Nandy this morning indicating the depth of her thinking and ability to think differently.
...but she is still a lightweight. Starmer is the only serious candidate that Labour have to offer at the moment who stands a chance, which is probably why they will not elect him.
I’m not sure that Starmer has the X factor to be leader.
He is clever, whereas Corbyn is thick. This may prove unpopular with Boris fanbois on here, but the recent GE was not "won" by their man, it was lost comprehensively by Corbyn, who was about as hopeless as it is possible to be. A half decent Labour leader would have exposed Johnson for what he is. Blair would have torn him to pieces. Starmer is probably no Blair, but he has his intelligence and that is a start to bring British politics back to a sensible place, if that is at all possible.
I think your politician wishes are colouring your judgement. I don’t know Starmer but the little I have seen of him he speaks like a block of wood and looks like one when he is speaking as well.
Erudite seminars for lawyers are all very well, but charisma matters if you want to win an election
An excellent Times Red Box article from Lisa Nandy this morning indicating the depth of her thinking and ability to think differently.
...but she is still a lightweight. Starmer is the only serious candidate that Labour have to offer at the moment who stands a chance, which is probably why they will not elect him.
I’m not sure that Starmer has the X factor to be leader.
He is clever, whereas Corbyn is thick. This may prove unpopular with Boris fanbois on here, but the recent GE was not "won" by their man, it was lost comprehensively by Corbyn, who was about as hopeless as it is possible to be. A half decent Labour leader would have exposed Johnson for what he is. Blair would have torn him to pieces. Starmer is probably no Blair, but he has his intelligence and that is a start to bring British politics back to a sensible place, if that is at all possible.
I think your politician wishes are colouring your judgement. I don’t know Starmer but the little I have seen of him he speaks like a block of wood and looks like one when he is speaking as well.
Erudite seminars for lawyers are all very well, but charisma matters if you want to win an election
Will “Middle England” be afraid of a Labour government under Sir Keir? I doubt it.
An excellent Times Red Box article from Lisa Nandy this morning indicating the depth of her thinking and ability to think differently.
...but she is still a lightweight. Starmer is the only serious candidate that Labour have to offer at the moment who stands a chance, which is probably why they will not elect him.
I’m not sure that Starmer has the X factor to be leader.
He is clever, whereas Corbyn is thick. This may prove unpopular with Boris fanbois on here, but the recent GE was not "won" by their man, it was lost comprehensively by Corbyn, who was about as hopeless as it is possible to be. A half decent Labour leader would have exposed Johnson for what he is. Blair would have torn him to pieces. Starmer is probably no Blair, but he has his intelligence and that is a start to bring British politics back to a sensible place, if that is at all possible.
I think your politician wishes are colouring your judgement. I don’t know Starmer but the little I have seen of him he speaks like a block of wood and looks like one when he is speaking as well.
Erudite seminars for lawyers are all very well, but charisma matters if you want to win an election
Will “Middle England” be afraid of a Labour government under Sir Keir? I doubt it.
An excellent Times Red Box article from Lisa Nandy this morning indicating the depth of her thinking and ability to think differently.
...but she is still a lightweight. Starmer is the only serious candidate that Labour have to offer at the moment who stands a chance, which is probably why they will not elect him.
I’m not sure that Starmer has the X factor to be leader.
He is clever, whereas Corbyn is thick. This may prove unpopular with Boris fanbois on here, but the recent GE was not "won" by their man, it was lost comprehensively by Corbyn, who was about as hopeless as it is possible to be. A half decent Labour leader would have exposed Johnson for what he is. Blair would have torn him to pieces. Starmer is probably no Blair, but he has his intelligence and that is a start to bring British politics back to a sensible place, if that is at all possible.
I think your politician wishes are colouring your judgement. I don’t know Starmer but the little I have seen of him he speaks like a block of wood and looks like one when he is speaking as well.
Erudite seminars for lawyers are all very well, but charisma matters if you want to win an election
Will “Middle England” be afraid of a Labour government under Sir Keir? I doubt it.
And that’s the key.
If Boris messes it up horribly then that’s enough
If Boris does ok it won’t win people back
If Boris does ok then his opponents will have been wrong and he will probably deserve to be re-elected. There’s nothing wrong with saying that.
The issue might be that Boris does ok by betraying all his promises and therefore Labour winning back the “red wall” by default.
Anyone who turns the 08 Obama, 12 Obama, 16 DNV into 20 Dem.
Recent American elections are about turnout, not people switching sides.
And as I am going to bang on relentlessly American polling 'likely to vote' screening is brutal - if you didn't vote at the last Presidential election then you'll probably be filtered out.
Yes - highly unlikely that anyone who did NOT vote for Trump last time will do so in 2020. The question is whetwhe the Dems fan breach his ceiling.
An excellent Times Red Box article from Lisa Nandy this morning indicating the depth of her thinking and ability to think differently.
Yes, the usual waffle. But "thinking differently" tends to go unrewarded. Worse, it is often punished. For example, on this matter, indeed on any matter, the chance of a satisfactory outcome would in all probability be enhanced by "Boris" extending his Caribbean holiday indefinitely. But just try saying that. You'll get a torrent of abuse from the brain-dead consensus mongers.
So any sign of an Iranian retaliation yet? Think they're not sure what to do.
They tried goading the Americans last week, and got a pretty robust reply for their efforts. They can be pretty sure that any further escalation isn’t going to be met with indifference from the US military.
An excellent Times Red Box article from Lisa Nandy this morning indicating the depth of her thinking and ability to think differently.
...but she is still a lightweight. Starmer is the only serious candidate that Labour have to offer at the moment who stands a chance, which is probably why they will not elect him.
I’m not sure that Starmer has the X factor to be leader.
He is clever, whereas Corbyn is thick. This may prove unpopular with Boris fanbois on here, but the recent GE was not "won" by their man, it was lost comprehensively by Corbyn, who was about as hopeless as it is possible to be. A half decent Labour leader would have exposed Johnson for what he is. Blair would have torn him to pieces. Starmer is probably no Blair, but he has his intelligence and that is a start to bring British politics back to a sensible place, if that is at all possible.
I think your politician wishes are colouring your judgement. I don’t know Starmer but the little I have seen of him he speaks like a block of wood and looks like one when he is speaking as well.
Erudite seminars for lawyers are all very well, but charisma matters if you want to win an election
Will “Middle England” be afraid of a Labour government under Sir Keir? I doubt it.
And that’s the key.
If he purges the 'far-left' then probably not. It depends how it can forge a new identify away from Momentum and the STW/SWP mob.
He might be pretty good and reasonable, we'll see.
An excellent Times Red Box article from Lisa Nandy this morning indicating the depth of her thinking and ability to think differently.
...but she is still a lightweight. Starmer is the only serious candidate that Labour have to offer at the moment who stands a chance, which is probably why they will not elect him.
I’m not sure that Starmer has the X factor to be leader.
He is clever, whereas Corbyn is thick. This may prove unpopular with Boris fanbois on here, but the recent GE was not "won" by their man, it was lost comprehensively by Corbyn, who was about as hopeless as it is possible to be. A half decent Labour leader would have exposed Johnson for what he is. Blair would have torn him to pieces. Starmer is probably no Blair, but he has his intelligence and that is a start to bring British politics back to a sensible place, if that is at all possible.
I think your politician wishes are colouring your judgement. I don’t know Starmer but the little I have seen of him he speaks like a block of wood and looks like one when he is speaking as well.
Erudite seminars for lawyers are all very well, but charisma matters if you want to win an election
Will “Middle England” be afraid of a Labour government under Sir Keir? I doubt it.
And that’s the key.
If Boris messes it up horribly then that’s enough
If Boris does ok it won’t win people back
If Boris does ok then his opponents will have been wrong and he will probably deserve to be re-elected. There’s nothing wrong with saying that.
The issue might be that Boris does ok by betraying all his promises and therefore Labour winning back the “red wall” by default.
An excellent Times Red Box article from Lisa Nandy this morning indicating the depth of her thinking and ability to think differently.
...but she is still a lightweight. Starmer is the only serious candidate that Labour have to offer at the moment who stands a chance, which is probably why they will not elect him.
Nonsense- when she says, “ No one would begrudge Mr Johnson a holiday, but given the magnitude of recent developments and the nebulous position of the UK on the international stage, the PM should by now have recalled parliament to set out what steps the government will take to protect the safety of our serving personnel, and have outlined what steps he is taking to try to defuse the mounting tensions between the US and Iran.”,
one can only agree that recalling MPs to allow them to share their insight and intelligence on a subject where many (if not most) of them have a mastery of the subject is a natural and obvious step forward. Diplomacy is best served by sharing one’s thoughts widely rather than behind the curtain efforts.
I would also add where has this thing about politicians rushing back from holiday cone from?
There will be teams working on the ground to prepare reports and intelligence.
I’d assume there is a means of secure communication for Johnson
You don’t actually need him in London saying stuff
Exactly. If it were a domestic crisis then it would be different. Secure communications lines are technically pretty easy nowadays.
An excellent Times Red Box article from Lisa Nandy this morning indicating the depth of her thinking and ability to think differently.
...but she is still a lightweight. Starmer is the only serious candidate that Labour have to offer at the moment who stands a chance, which is probably why they will not elect him.
I’m not sure that Starmer has the X factor to be leader.
He is clever, whereas Corbyn is thick. This may prove unpopular with Boris fanbois on here, but the recent GE was not "won" by their man, it was lost comprehensively by Corbyn, who was about as hopeless as it is possible to be. A half decent Labour leader would have exposed Johnson for what he is. Blair would have torn him to pieces. Starmer is probably no Blair, but he has his intelligence and that is a start to bring British politics back to a sensible place, if that is at all possible.
I think your politician wishes are colouring your judgement. I don’t know Starmer but the little I have seen of him he speaks like a block of wood and looks like one when he is speaking as well.
Erudite seminars for lawyers are all very well, but charisma matters if you want to win an election
Will “Middle England” be afraid of a Labour government under Sir Keir? I doubt it.
And that’s the key.
If Boris messes it up horribly then that’s enough
If Boris does ok it won’t win people back
If Boris does ok then his opponents will have been wrong and he will probably deserve to be re-elected. There’s nothing wrong with saying that.
The issue might be that Boris does ok by betraying all his promises and therefore Labour winning back the “red wall” by default.
Anyone who turns the 08 Obama, 12 Obama, 16 DNV into 20 Dem.
Recent American elections are about turnout, not people switching sides.
And as I am going to bang on relentlessly American polling 'likely to vote' screening is brutal - if you didn't vote at the last Presidential election then you'll probably be filtered out.
Yes - highly unlikely that anyone who did NOT vote for Trump last time will do so in 2020. The question is whetwhe the Dems fan breach his ceiling.
I`m not sure this is true. Trump`s formidable social media compaigns could reach further tranches of new people who don`t usually vote.
An excellent Times Red Box article from Lisa Nandy this morning indicating the depth of her thinking and ability to think differently.
...but she is still a lightweight. Starmer is the only serious candidate that Labour have to offer at the moment who stands a chance, which is probably why they will not elect him.
I’m not sure that Starmer has the X factor to be leader.
He is clever, whereas Corbyn is thick. This may prove unpopular with Boris fanbois on here, but the recent GE was not "won" by their man, it was lost comprehensively by Corbyn, who was about as hopeless as it is possible to be. A half decent Labour leader would have exposed Johnson for what he is. Blair would have torn him to pieces. Starmer is probably no Blair, but he has his intelligence and that is a start to bring British politics back to a sensible place, if that is at all possible.
I think your politician wishes are colouring your judgement. I don’t know Starmer but the little I have seen of him he speaks like a block of wood and looks like one when he is speaking as well.
Erudite seminars for lawyers are all very well, but charisma matters if you want to win an election
Will “Middle England” be afraid of a Labour government under Sir Keir? I doubt it.
And that’s the key.
If Boris messes it up horribly then that’s enough
If Boris does ok it won’t win people back
If the government does well I will certainly consider voting for them despite finding the PM objectionable and untrustworthy and therefore being anyone but tory at the last GE. At that stage he will have a 4/5 year record to be judged on rather than his optimistic lies. If his record is genuinely good why not have more, its not what Im expecting but certainly plausible.
I’m still pretty open-minded. I like Jess Phillips, Lisa Nandy, and Keir Starmer although leaning towards Keir. I want to see them in person so I hope there’s a North East hustings.
Yes, I'm going to try and see some events. Starmer is quite good but I think it should be a woman. I want to vote for Nandy but that will be easier if she manages to electrify a room that I am in. Thus far I'm not picking up quite enough voltage from her. When I see her on the TV my jumper does not crackle and my hair remains resolutely in place. Phillips has some USP but I am put off by her being seemingly on the verge of tears whenever she speaks. Yes, I want passion, but still. Got to be one of these 2 though. RLB and Thornberry are not IMO electable.
An excellent Times Red Box article from Lisa Nandy this morning indicating the depth of her thinking and ability to think differently.
...but she is still a lightweight. Starmer is the only serious candidate that Labour have to offer at the moment who stands a chance, which is probably why they will not elect him.
I’m not sure that Starmer has the X factor to be leader.
He is clever, whereas Corbyn is thick. This may prove unpopular with Boris fanbois on here, but the recent GE was not "won" by their man, it was lost comprehensively by Corbyn, who was about as hopeless as it is possible to be. A half decent Labour leader would have exposed Johnson for what he is. Blair would have torn him to pieces. Starmer is probably no Blair, but he has his intelligence and that is a start to bring British politics back to a sensible place, if that is at all possible.
Yeah but in 2017 Corbyn was still thick but vastly outperformed early poll ratings so what changed? Under-the-radar denigration of his character by CCHQ's crack team of kiwi shit-posters? Corbyn did seem to have aged considerably since 2017, and there was even some speculation he'd had a stroke (never substantiated iirc).
An excellent Times Red Box article from Lisa Nandy this morning indicating the depth of her thinking and ability to think differently.
...but she is still a lightweight. Starmer is the only serious candidate that Labour have to offer at the moment who stands a chance, which is probably why they will not elect him.
Nonsense- when she says, “ No one would begrudge Mr Johnson a holiday, but given the magnitude of recent developments and the nebulous position of the UK on the international stage, the PM should by now have recalled parliament to set out what steps the government will take to protect the safety of our serving personnel, and have outlined what steps he is taking to try to defuse the mounting tensions between the US and Iran.”,
one can only agree that recalling MPs to allow them to share their insight and intelligence on a subject where many (if not most) of them have a mastery of the subject is a natural and obvious step forward. Diplomacy is best served by sharing one’s thoughts widely rather than behind the curtain efforts.
I would also add where has this thing about politicians rushing back from holiday cone from?
There will be teams working on the ground to prepare reports and intelligence.
I’d assume there is a means of secure communication for Johnson
You don’t actually need him in London saying stuff
The same place as the cult of populist politicians promising only they can solve peoples problems.
An excellent Times Red Box article from Lisa Nandy this morning indicating the depth of her thinking and ability to think differently.
...but she is still a lightweight. Starmer is the only serious candidate that Labour have to offer at the moment who stands a chance, which is probably why they will not elect him.
I’m not sure that Starmer has the X factor to be leader.
He is clever, whereas Corbyn is thick. This may prove unpopular with Boris fanbois on here, but the recent GE was not "won" by their man, it was lost comprehensively by Corbyn, who was about as hopeless as it is possible to be. A half decent Labour leader would have exposed Johnson for what he is. Blair would have torn him to pieces. Starmer is probably no Blair, but he has his intelligence and that is a start to bring British politics back to a sensible place, if that is at all possible.
I think your politician wishes are colouring your judgement. I don’t know Starmer but the little I have seen of him he speaks like a block of wood and looks like one when he is speaking as well.
Erudite seminars for lawyers are all very well, but charisma matters if you want to win an election
Charisma is as charisma does. Johnson beat a uniquely poor opponent with no real record to defend. That will not be the case next time if Starmer, Phillips or Nandy is Labour leader. He will own all that has happened.
Yep, Johnson showing who are most reliable allies are.
The US under Trump is explicitly and reliably America first. We dont know if its the start of a long term shift or a 4 year blip. If he gets re-elected UK and European politicians need to think seriously about radical changes in our defence and foreign policy.
I’m still pretty open-minded. I like Jess Phillips, Lisa Nandy, and Keir Starmer although leaning towards Keir. I want to see them in person so I hope there’s a North East hustings.
Yes, I'm going to try and see some events. Starmer is quite good but I think it should be a woman. I want to vote for Nandy but that will be easier if she manages to electrify a room that I am in. Thus far I'm not picking up quite enough voltage from her. When I see her on the TV my jumper does not crackle and my hair remains resolutely in place. Phillips has some USP but I am put off by her being seemingly on the verge of tears whenever she speaks. Yes, I want passion, but still. Got to be one of these 2 though. RLB and Thornberry are not IMO electable.
If they all make it onto the ballot, which I doubt, then it's those three for me. Order yet to be decided.
Yep, Johnson showing who are most reliable allies are.
Certainly under Trump.
Johnson also showing that Brexit doesn't change squat as far as those allies wanting to be our allies is concerned. Don't need to be in the EU to be allies.
Yep, Johnson showing who are most reliable allies are.
The US under Trump is explicitly and reliably America first. We dont know if its the start of a long term shift or a 4 year blip. If he gets re-elected UK and European politicians need to think seriously about radical changes in our defence and foreign policy.
Yep, Johnson showing who are most reliable allies are.
The US under Trump is explicitly and reliably America first. We dont know if its the start of a long term shift or a 4 year blip. If he gets re-elected UK and European politicians need to think seriously about radical changes in our defence and foreign policy.
No, he is explicitly Trump first. Everything else a distant second.
When host Chuck Todd asked if retaliation against US citizens should now be expected, Pompeo admitted: “It may be that there’s a little noise here in the interim.”....
Anyone who turns the 08 Obama, 12 Obama, 16 DNV into 20 Dem.
Recent American elections are about turnout, not people switching sides.
And as I am going to bang on relentlessly American polling 'likely to vote' screening is brutal - if you didn't vote at the last Presidential election then you'll probably be filtered out.
Yes - highly unlikely that anyone who did NOT vote for Trump last time will do so in 2020. The question is whetwhe the Dems fan breach his ceiling.
There will be a bunch of cowardly "NeverTrump"ers who will vote for him this time round as they understand the value of pushing ideological Republican hacks into lifetime Federal judge appointments, so Trump still has room to grow.
The question is does he push suburban whites who voted for him in 2016 into the DNV column this time out.
An excellent Times Red Box article from Lisa Nandy this morning indicating the depth of her thinking and ability to think differently.
...but she is still a lightweight. Starmer is the only serious candidate that Labour have to offer at the moment who stands a chance, which is probably why they will not elect him.
I’m not sure that Starmer has the X factor to be leader.
He is clever, whereas Corbyn is thick. This may prove unpopular with Boris fanbois on here, but the recent GE was not "won" by their man, it was lost comprehensively by Corbyn, who was about as hopeless as it is possible to be. A half decent Labour leader would have exposed Johnson for what he is. Blair would have torn him to pieces. Starmer is probably no Blair, but he has his intelligence and that is a start to bring British politics back to a sensible place, if that is at all possible.
I think your politician wishes are colouring your judgement. I don’t know Starmer but the little I have seen of him he speaks like a block of wood and looks like one when he is speaking as well.
Erudite seminars for lawyers are all very well, but charisma matters if you want to win an election
Will “Middle England” be afraid of a Labour government under Sir Keir? I doubt it.
And that’s the key.
If Boris messes it up horribly then that’s enough
If Boris does ok it won’t win people back
If Boris does ok then his opponents will have been wrong and he will probably deserve to be re-elected. There’s nothing wrong with saying that.
The issue might be that Boris does ok by betraying all his promises and therefore Labour winning back the “red wall” by default.
Sure but do you want to choose a leader based on winning if the other guy loses?
Yep, Johnson showing who are most reliable allies are.
Certainly under Trump.
Johnson also showing that Brexit doesn't change squat as far as those allies wanting to be our allies is concerned. Don't need to be in the EU to be allies.
I am not so sure I can make the link you have here.
If we need US trade deals to offset our EU losses we might have to wave the stars and bars at Trump to project our support whether we like what he is doing or not.
Yep, Johnson showing who are most reliable allies are.
Certainly under Trump.
Johnson also showing that Brexit doesn't change squat as far as those allies wanting to be our allies is concerned. Don't need to be in the EU to be allies.
I am not so sure I can make the link you have here.
If we need US trade deals to offset our EU losses we might have to wave the stars and bars at Trump to project our support whether we like what he is doing or not.
A US trade deal has to go through Congress too and the Democrats hold the House at present
An excellent Times Red Box article from Lisa Nandy this morning indicating the depth of her thinking and ability to think differently.
...but she is still a lightweight. Starmer is the only serious candidate that Labour have to offer at the moment who stands a chance, which is probably why they will not elect him.
I’m not sure that Starmer has the X factor to be leader.
He is clever, whereas Corbyn is thick. This may prove unpopular with Boris fanbois on here, but the recent GE was not "won" by their man, it was lost comprehensively by Corbyn, who was about as hopeless as it is possible to be. A half decent Labour leader would have exposed Johnson for what he is. Blair would have torn him to pieces. Starmer is probably no Blair, but he has his intelligence and that is a start to bring British politics back to a sensible place, if that is at all possible.
I think your politician wishes are colouring your judgement. I don’t know Starmer but the little I have seen of him he speaks like a block of wood and looks like one when he is speaking as well.
Erudite seminars for lawyers are all very well, but charisma matters if you want to win an election
Will “Middle England” be afraid of a Labour government under Sir Keir? I doubt it.
And that’s the key.
If Boris messes it up horribly then that’s enough
If Boris does ok it won’t win people back
If Boris does ok then his opponents will have been wrong and he will probably deserve to be re-elected. There’s nothing wrong with saying that.
The issue might be that Boris does ok by betraying all his promises and therefore Labour winning back the “red wall” by default.
Sure but do you want to choose a leader based on winning if the other guy loses?
If it’s either that or not winning in either circumstance then it is no choice at all.
Did people predict Blair would do what he did when he was originally elected leader of the Labour Party?
Yep, Johnson showing who are most reliable allies are.
Certainly under Trump.
Johnson also showing that Brexit doesn't change squat as far as those allies wanting to be our allies is concerned. Don't need to be in the EU to be allies.
I am not so sure I can make the link you have here.
If we need US trade deals to offset our EU losses we might have to wave the stars and bars at Trump to project our support whether we like what he is doing or not.
A US trade deal has to go through Congress too and the Democrats hold the House at present
That is irrelevant. If we need to curry favour by showing demonstrable support for the U.S. Nation as they are embarking on some questionable foreign adventure we will. The lesson of Blair will not be learned, and with Brexit, the need may be more pressing.
An excellent Times Red Box article from Lisa Nandy this morning indicating the depth of her thinking and ability to think differently.
...but she is still a lightweight. Starmer is the only serious candidate that Labour have to offer at the moment who stands a chance, which is probably why they will not elect him.
I’m not sure that Starmer has the X factor to be leader.
He is clever, whereas Corbyn is thick. This may prove unpopular with Boris fanbois on here, but the recent GE was not "won" by their man, it was lost comprehensively by Corbyn, who was about as hopeless as it is possible to be. A half decent Labour leader would have exposed Johnson for what he is. Blair would have torn him to pieces. Starmer is probably no Blair, but he has his intelligence and that is a start to bring British politics back to a sensible place, if that is at all possible.
I think your politician wishes are colouring your judgement. I don’t know Starmer but the little I have seen of him he speaks like a block of wood and looks like one when he is speaking as well.
Erudite seminars for lawyers are all very well, but charisma matters if you want to win an election
Will “Middle England” be afraid of a Labour government under Sir Keir? I doubt it.
And that’s the key.
If Boris messes it up horribly then that’s enough
If Boris does ok it won’t win people back
If Boris does ok then his opponents will have been wrong and he will probably deserve to be re-elected. There’s nothing wrong with saying that.
The issue might be that Boris does ok by betraying all his promises and therefore Labour winning back the “red wall” by default.
Sure but do you want to choose a leader based on winning if the other guy loses?
Isn't that how it always works. Opposition parties don't win elections, governments lose them.
Yep, Johnson showing who are most reliable allies are.
Certainly under Trump.
Johnson also showing that Brexit doesn't change squat as far as those allies wanting to be our allies is concerned. Don't need to be in the EU to be allies.
I am not so sure I can make the link you have here.
If we need US trade deals to offset our EU losses we might have to wave the stars and bars at Trump to project our support whether we like what he is doing or not.
A US trade deal has to go through Congress too and the Democrats hold the House at present
That is irrelevant. If we need to curry favour by showing demonstrable support for the U.S. Nation as they are embarking on some questionable foreign adventure we will. The lesson of Blair will not be learned, and with Brexit, the need may be more pressing.
Except the Democrats oppose much of Trump's foreign policy and they hold half of Congress, in most of the Bush years Congress was still GOP controlled and Congressional approval is also needed for a US trade deal.
Yep, Johnson showing who are most reliable allies are.
Certainly under Trump.
Johnson also showing that Brexit doesn't change squat as far as those allies wanting to be our allies is concerned. Don't need to be in the EU to be allies.
I am not so sure I can make the link you have here.
If we need US trade deals to offset our EU losses we might have to wave the stars and bars at Trump to project our support whether we like what he is doing or not.
A US trade deal has to go through Congress too and the Democrats hold the House at present
That is irrelevant. If we need to curry favour by showing demonstrable support for the U.S. Nation as they are embarking on some questionable foreign adventure we will. The lesson of Blair will not be learned, and with Brexit, the need may be more pressing.
Except the Democrats oppose much of Trump's foreign policy and they hold half of Congress, in most of the Bush years Congress was still GOP controlled and Congressional approval is also needed for a US trade deal.
Whether this is Dominic Cummings parking Conservative tanks on Labour's lawn to retain the red/blue wall in four years' time, or marks a return to 1980s-style right wing attacks on corporate kleptocracy is not clear but it may be an issue to keep an eye on.
An excellent Times Red Box article from Lisa Nandy this morning indicating the depth of her thinking and ability to think differently.
...but she is still a lightweight. Starmer is the only serious candidate that Labour have to offer at the moment who stands a chance, which is probably why they will not elect him.
I’m not sure that Starmer has the X factor to be leader.
He is clever, whereas Corbyn is thick. This may prove unpopular with Boris fanbois on here, but the recent GE was not "won" by their man, it was lost comprehensively by Corbyn, who was about as hopeless as it is possible to be. A half decent Labour leader would have exposed Johnson for what he is. Blair would have torn him to pieces. Starmer is probably no Blair, but he has his intelligence and that is a start to bring British politics back to a sensible place, if that is at all possible.
I think your politician wishes are colouring your judgement. I don’t know Starmer but the little I have seen of him he speaks like a block of wood and looks like one when he is speaking as well.
Erudite seminars for lawyers are all very well, but charisma matters if you want to win an election
Will “Middle England” be afraid of a Labour government under Sir Keir? I doubt it.
And that’s the key.
If Boris messes it up horribly then that’s enough
If Boris does ok it won’t win people back
If Boris does ok then his opponents will have been wrong and he will probably deserve to be re-elected. There’s nothing wrong with saying that.
The issue might be that Boris does ok by betraying all his promises and therefore Labour winning back the “red wall” by default.
Sure but do you want to choose a leader based on winning if the other guy loses?
If it’s either that or not winning in either circumstance then it is no choice at all.
Did people predict Blair would do what he did when he was originally elected leader of the Labour Party?
He was seen as someone who could positively win elections
I’m just surprised that Labour seems to be taking such a defensive stance this early
I’m still pretty open-minded. I like Jess Phillips, Lisa Nandy, and Keir Starmer although leaning towards Keir. I want to see them in person so I hope there’s a North East hustings.
Yes, I'm going to try and see some events. Starmer is quite good but I think it should be a woman. I want to vote for Nandy but that will be easier if she manages to electrify a room that I am in. Thus far I'm not picking up quite enough voltage from her. When I see her on the TV my jumper does not crackle and my hair remains resolutely in place. Phillips has some USP but I am put off by her being seemingly on the verge of tears whenever she speaks. Yes, I want passion, but still. Got to be one of these 2 though. RLB and Thornberry are not IMO electable.
Blimey, I think it’s Nandy that always looks on the verge of tears. She seems nice but looks like a nervous Simpsons child character. Phillips has developed an image that will go down well with affluent people who like to think they’re in touch with the working class I reckon
I really don't think Trump knows what he has got himself into bu attacking Iran.
A general lesson to be learned is that if you're an opposition group in a repressive country (see also Venezuela), you don't want Trump and his goons sticking their oars in.
An excellent Times Red Box article from Lisa Nandy this morning indicating the depth of her thinking and ability to think differently.
...but she is still a lightweight. Starmer is the only serious candidate that Labour have to offer at the moment who stands a chance, which is probably why they will not elect him.
I’m not sure that Starmer has the X factor to be leader.
He is clever, whereas Corbyn is thick. This may prove unpopular with Boris fanbois on here, but the recent GE was not "won" by their man, it was lost comprehensively by Corbyn, who was about as hopeless as it is possible to be. A half decent Labour leader would have exposed Johnson for what he is. Blair would have torn him to pieces. Starmer is probably no Blair, but he has his intelligence and that is a start to bring British politics back to a sensible place, if that is at all possible.
For once I agree with you Nigel.
What is also impressive about Starmer is that he has run the gauntlet of the last 4 years very effectively, such that without in any way being in the Corbyn camp he has cleverly kept his head down to emerge at the right time as a front runner who the Momentum cultists are going to find it very difficult to attack based on his record under Corbyn. As such he has the potential to be a unifying figure in a party all but destroyed by internal division.
He also has a highly creditable record of achievement prior to becoming an MP, with his relatively humble origins belying the assumption of the detractors that he could only have risen so far by hailing from a relatively privileged background.
You don't do all that against the odds without a lot of political and other nous. If he does succeed as leader, the Tories will underestimate him at their peril.
Diane Abbott's son... sounds like he's been on the waccy baccy to me. Whoever would have thought he would be charged with racially aggravated crimes having been brought up by Diane?
Probably explains her strange behaviour/seemingly heavy drinking in the last few years, the stress her son has brought on her
Whether this is Dominic Cummings parking Conservative tanks on Labour's lawn to retain the red/blue wall in four years' time, or marks a return to 1980s-style right wing attacks on corporate kleptocracy is not clear but it may be an issue to keep an eye on.
I think the red wall, i.e. meaning a string of small towns, is lost for good. Sedgefield and Bolsover are tiny. I'd not realised, having never been to these areas.
Small towns in my area like Ludlow or Ross-on-Wye have *never* voted Lab. They have rarely had a LD MP either.
Labour has to accept PR - only Lewis has done - and win an election at which this would be the issue. 'Win' these days means a hung parliament; Harold Wilson's 48% vote in 1966 for a left-wing manifesto isn't coming back.
Thornberry impresses me but apparently no-one else on PB likes her. I think she has far more charisma/gift of the gab than Starmer and like him would be continuity Miliband = electable and not too far left or right (like Wilson in his day).
In the wider world, this is rather 'concerning', but we probably guessed so
Whether this is Dominic Cummings parking Conservative tanks on Labour's lawn to retain the red/blue wall in four years' time, or marks a return to 1980s-style right wing attacks on corporate kleptocracy is not clear but it may be an issue to keep an eye on.
I think the red wall, i.e. meaning a string of small towns, is lost for good. Sedgefield and Bolsover are tiny. I'd not realised, having never been to these areas.
Small towns in my area like Ludlow or Ross-on-Wye have *never* voted Lab. They have rarely had a LD MP either.
Labour has to accept PR - only Lewis has done - and win an election at which this would be the issue. 'Win' these days means a hung parliament; Harold Wilson's 48% vote in 1966 for a left-wing manifesto isn't coming back.
Thornberry impresses me but apparently no-one else on PB likes her. I think she has far more charisma/gift of the gab than Starmer and like him would be continuity Miliband = electable and not too far left or right (like Wilson in his day).
In the wider world, this is rather 'concerning', but we probably guessed so
Morning everyone. Small point. Blair was PR friendly and appointed the Jenkins Commission to come up with something. Discussed a coalition with Ashdown, too, pre-election. Trouble was, John Prescott was totally opposed to any change in the electoral process, especially as the Labour Party had just won a massive majority.
An excellent Times Red Box article from Lisa Nandy this morning indicating the depth of her thinking and ability to think differently.
...but she is still a lightweight. Starmer is the only serious candidate that Labour have to offer at the moment who stands a chance, which is probably why they will not elect him.
On the Yougov Labour members poll they will elect him
Yes, if it is correct. I hope it is. I would like to see a return to having a decent and effective opposition to drag the Tories back to the centre ground.
The Tories have just won their biggest majority since Thatcher, the 'centre ground' is clearly not just pro EU fiscal conservatism and social liberalism for most voters
People use centre ground like another brand rather than the actual centre of public opinion. Though a lot forget that.
Nandy on Pienaar was imo taken apart by Guto Harri when she had no response to the why are you still banging on about trades unions although if you are of the left then presumably this is music to your ears.
So any sign of an Iranian retaliation yet? Think they're not sure what to do.
They tried goading the Americans last week, and got a pretty robust reply for their efforts. They can be pretty sure that any further escalation isn’t going to be met with indifference from the US military.
Maybe. From thousands of miles away, it does look as if even right-wing commentators in America are wondering what Trump was thinking about.
An excellent Times Red Box article from Lisa Nandy this morning indicating the depth of her thinking and ability to think differently.
...but she is still a lightweight. Starmer is the only serious candidate that Labour have to offer at the moment who stands a chance, which is probably why they will not elect him.
On the Yougov Labour members poll they will elect him
Yes, if it is correct. I hope it is. I would like to see a return to having a decent and effective opposition to drag the Tories back to the centre ground.
The Tories have just won their biggest majority since Thatcher, the 'centre ground' is clearly not just pro EU fiscal conservatism and social liberalism for most voters
People use centre ground like another brand rather than the actual centre of public opinion. Though a lot forget that.
There is no centre. HYUFD is right that the centre-ground Boris won on is the opposite to that often envisaged, and to the one Cameron occupied.
Cameron's centre-ground: social liberalism & fiscal conservatism @HYUFD & Cummings centre-ground: social conservatism & fiscal liberalism
A world with the Middle East as a prosperous backwater would be a better place.
There was a lot of excitement about this a few years back when I was at Sony. I think it didn't get anywhere and they sold the tech and patents to Murata in the end.
Comments
There will be teams working on the ground to prepare reports and intelligence.
I’d assume there is a means of secure communication for Johnson
You don’t actually need him in London saying stuff
Who are you leaning to?
It’s clear that the article is aimed at Labour Party voters but (a) it’s in The Times (the evil organ of Murdochism); and (b) it’s featherweight in its insight and intelligence.
Recent American elections are about turnout, not people switching sides.
And as I am going to bang on relentlessly American polling 'likely to vote' screening is brutal - if you didn't vote at the last Presidential election then you'll probably be filtered out.
Erudite seminars for lawyers are all very well, but charisma matters if you want to win an election
And that’s the key.
If Boris does ok it won’t win people back
The issue might be that Boris does ok by betraying all his promises and therefore Labour winning back the “red wall” by default.
He might be pretty good and reasonable, we'll see.
Johnson also showing that Brexit doesn't change squat as far as those allies wanting to be our allies is concerned. Don't need to be in the EU to be allies.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jan/05/mike-pompeo-qassem-suleimani-killing-trump
...“there were in fact plots that [Suleimani] was working on that were aimed directly at significant harm to American interests throughout the region, not just in Iraq”.
But he was unable to provide specifics.
When host Chuck Todd asked if retaliation against US citizens should now be expected, Pompeo admitted: “It may be that there’s a little noise here in the interim.”....
The question is does he push suburban whites who voted for him in 2016 into the DNV column this time out.
If we need US trade deals to offset our EU losses we might have to wave the stars and bars at Trump to project our support whether we like what he is doing or not.
Did people predict Blair would do what he did when he was originally elected leader of the Labour Party?
An apparently viable architecture for the lithium/sulphur battery with three to four times the energy density of current lithium ion cells:
https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/6/1/eaay2757
A world with the Middle East as a prosperous backwater would be a better place.
So no it certainly is not irrelevant
FTSE chief executives 'earn average salary within three days'
It's not been Labour banging on about this but Boris, and now Andrea Leadsom.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-51000217
Whether this is Dominic Cummings parking Conservative tanks on Labour's lawn to retain the red/blue wall in four years' time, or marks a return to 1980s-style right wing attacks on corporate kleptocracy is not clear but it may be an issue to keep an eye on.
I’m just surprised that Labour seems to be taking such a defensive stance this early
What is also impressive about Starmer is that he has run the gauntlet of the last 4 years very effectively, such that without in any way being in the Corbyn camp he has cleverly kept his head down to emerge at the right time as a front runner who the Momentum cultists are going to find it very difficult to attack based on his record under Corbyn. As such he has the potential to be a unifying figure in a party all but destroyed by internal division.
He also has a highly creditable record of achievement prior to becoming an MP, with his relatively humble origins belying the assumption of the detractors that he could only have risen so far by hailing from a relatively privileged background.
You don't do all that against the odds without a lot of political and other nous. If he does succeed as leader, the Tories will underestimate him at their peril.
Probably explains her strange behaviour/seemingly heavy drinking in the last few years, the stress her son has brought on her
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7842415/Diane-Abbotts-privately-educated-son-28-charged-11-new-offences.html
Small towns in my area like Ludlow or Ross-on-Wye have *never* voted Lab. They have rarely had a LD MP either.
Labour has to accept PR - only Lewis has done - and win an election at which this would be the issue. 'Win' these days means a hung parliament; Harold Wilson's 48% vote in 1966 for a left-wing manifesto isn't coming back.
Thornberry impresses me but apparently no-one else on PB likes her. I think she has far more charisma/gift of the gab than Starmer and like him would be continuity Miliband = electable and not too far left or right (like Wilson in his day).
In the wider world, this is rather 'concerning', but we probably guessed so
https://twitter.com/rezamarashi/status/1214031169173348352?s=03
Trouble was, John Prescott was totally opposed to any change in the electoral process, especially as the Labour Party had just won a massive majority.
And England have declared!
Seems silly, as some of the leadership contenders would be pretty good deputies.
For example, Starmer as leader, but Phillips as Deputy would be pretty good as a team I would think.
Holding them at the same time, means less choice and combinations.
Cameron's centre-ground: social liberalism & fiscal conservatism
@HYUFD & Cummings centre-ground: social conservatism & fiscal liberalism