I love the way she played this, she spent the whole time being the most reasonable voice on the stage then suddenly when you're least expecting it she hits you with DARK PSYCHIC FORCE
I love the way she played this, she spent the whole time being the most reasonable voice on the stage then suddenly when you're least expecting it she hits you with DARK PSYCHIC FORCE
I love the way she played this, she spent the whole time being the most reasonable voice on the stage then suddenly when you're least expecting it she hits you with DARK PSYCHIC FORCE
More context needed...
Unfortunately you have to watch the whole debate from the beginning to fully appreciate the moment
Warren seems to be going the full Trumpian moonbat on trade deals but I can't be sure because the stream went to shit as soon as Williamson called out the dark psychic force
Non-sarcastically, I'm starting to be genuinely persuaded by Williamson's analysis of this race, maybe you can't beat Trump with wonkery and policy, and traditional slogans won't work if you allow yourself to get comprehensively out-memed.
This is a tweet by Ian Murray, the Labour MP for Edinburgh South: “We are told a no deal Brexit will be fabulous for our country. Why then is the pound continuing to tank and our stock market plummeting? Markets don’t get these things wrong.”
Is there anyone else who finds his last sentence stunning? I thought the whole point of the Labour movement was based on the fact that markets *do* get things wrong. The final scene of Animal Farm comes to mind, as Murray completes the transformation predicted by Orwell.
This is a tweet by Ian Murray, the Labour MP for Edinburgh South: “We are told a no deal Brexit will be fabulous for our country. Why then is the pound continuing to tank and our stock market plummeting? Markets don’t get these things wrong.”
Is there anyone else who finds his last sentence stunning? I thought the whole point of the Labour movement was based on the fact that markets *do* get things wrong. The final scene of Animal Farm comes to mind, as Murray completes the transformation predicted by Orwell.
An important difference is Williamson's cult will probably more resemble John Lennon and Trump's Charles Manson....
Well, she kills people with the anti-vax stuff but yeah, and an election between rival cults respectively dedicated to light and darkness would be a weird and amazing thing.
Boris's headed notepaper is a bit rough, and Jacob Rees-Mogg might have anything to say about starting three paragraphs with the word so but he does use proper en-dashes, unlike Mr Farage.
Boris bringing up Peterborough in this way is a bit odd because with the best will in the world it was the Brexit party that was close there not the Tories
Boris's headed notepaper is a bit rough, and Jacob Rees-Mogg might have anything to say about starting three paragraphs with the word so but he does use proper en-dashes, unlike Mr Farage.
He started a sentence with 'And'. The Moggster will have him sent to the Tower for that. And no double spaces either!
Boris bringing up Peterborough in this way is a bit odd because with the best will in the world it was the Brexit party that was close there not the Tories
He's banking on voters having no knowledge of the actual Peterborough result. Which is a fair assumption.
On topic a weird outcome of the split on the right is Con and BXP competing to do the LibDems' Winning Here leaflets for them.
It’s interesting that everyone is threatening voters with a LibDem MP (there are worse fates in life). I guess for tactical voting to work they need to threaten people with something, and positing a Corbyn victory simply isn’t credible. Nevertheless two lots of extremists both threatening people with a moderate is certainly a new take on British politics.
This is a tweet by Ian Murray, the Labour MP for Edinburgh South: “We are told a no deal Brexit will be fabulous for our country. Why then is the pound continuing to tank and our stock market plummeting? Markets don’t get these things wrong.”
Is there anyone else who finds his last sentence stunning? I thought the whole point of the Labour movement was based on the fact that markets *do* get things wrong. The final scene of Animal Farm comes to mind, as Murray completes the transformation predicted by Orwell.
See also Owen Jones not knowing if he's in favour of a strong currency:
This is a tweet by Ian Murray, the Labour MP for Edinburgh South: “We are told a no deal Brexit will be fabulous for our country. Why then is the pound continuing to tank and our stock market plummeting? Markets don’t get these things wrong.”
Is there anyone else who finds his last sentence stunning? I thought the whole point of the Labour movement was based on the fact that markets *do* get things wrong. The final scene of Animal Farm comes to mind, as Murray completes the transformation predicted by Orwell.
Boris bringing up Peterborough in this way is a bit odd because with the best will in the world it was the Brexit party that was close there not the Tories
It’s an odd letter all round, reading like it was written in a hurry. The sentences from “Did you hear..” about Peterborough are the nub of the letter, yet have been put in the part that many people won’t read, near the end. That should either have been how the letter began, or put below the signature as a p.s. (which many people will read first, after looking to see who the letter is from).
And of course it doesn’t work, as you say. Trying a tactical squeeze using a factoid that is easily checkable as wrong is a *bold* move for the Tories. Presumably they are banking on the BXP not being able to move quick enough to respond. Also presumably, the reason the killer fact is buried within the letter arose from the author’s guilt that it isn’t correct in the first place.
On topic a weird outcome of the split on the right is Con and BXP competing to do the LibDems' Winning Here leaflets for them.
It’s interesting that everyone is threatening voters with a LibDem MP (there are worse fates in life). I guess for tactical voting to work they need to threaten people with something, and positing a Corbyn victory simply isn’t credible. Nevertheless two lots of extremists both threatening people with a moderate is certainly a new take on British politics.
There is an argument to be made there, if Brexit is the central issue, which lots of Lib Dems seem to believe it is, and the Lib Dems are on one extreme end of the Brexit debate (albeit only small differences with Labour now but previously less so) are they the moderates?
With such a heavy concentration on Brexit from all 3 and all 3 having quite extreme positions on the subject it can be argued.
Although being on the extreme end of an argument doesn't mean you are not right, abolition of slavery (or hundreds of more up to date examples) were the extreme end of a scale of thinking at one time.
An important difference is Williamson's cult will probably more resemble John Lennon and Trump's Charles Manson....
Well, she kills people with the anti-vax stuff but yeah, and an election between rival cults respectively dedicated to light and darkness would be a weird and amazing thing.
That is a pretty big minus, anti-vax stuff is incredibly stupid... still ignorance over ignorance and malice.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-49170387 "Over the last seven years the UK automotive industry was a real success story. We were averaging something like £2.5bn per annum", he says. "In the first six months of this year, it's not been half of that £2.5bn. It's £90m. It's been a massive drop off, because we have that fear of no-deal.
Just going by a few clips, Warren seems to me to have had the most memorable line, but the writer evidenly thinks Sanders out-liberaled her without fully embracing illegal immigration. They both seem to have zapped the moderates.
If Corbynistas like Bernie Sanders there must be something wrong with him.
Sanders and Warren (a bit more so the former) get the love on my Corbyn supporting twitter, other candidates get little bits and pieces, Biden is probably the only Democrat front runner I can't remember being shared among them for good reasons.
I think they just like left wing policies so they like Sanders and Warren TBH.
Are there any constituencies where women significantly outnumber men though ? If not I don't see it as an issue, your vote is worth the same no matter your gender.
F1: perusing the markets. Ladbrokes have added the market under each driver option. To be honest, that's kind of handy, although I suspect it'll annoy some people.
Boris bringing up Peterborough in this way is a bit odd because with the best will in the world it was the Brexit party that was close there not the Tories
It’s an odd letter all round, reading like it was written in a hurry. The sentences from “Did you hear..” about Peterborough are the nub of the letter, yet have been put in the part that many people won’t read, near the end. That should either have been how the letter began, or put below the signature as a p.s. (which many people will read first, after looking to see who the letter is from).
And of course it doesn’t work, as you say. Trying a tactical squeeze using a factoid that is easily checkable as wrong is a *bold* move for the Tories. Presumably they are banking on the BXP not being able to move quick enough to respond. Also presumably, the reason the killer fact is buried within the letter arose from the author’s guilt that it isn’t correct in the first place.
People who can write these letters well are few and far between, at least in the Tory party. However they do exist and I have seen what they produce.
The letter is well targeted to those people who think the LDs are NICE Tories - the people who elected LDs in the South West all those years. I suspect it will be delivered beyond its target area and that will not be good.
It would be interesting to see the LD equivalent. They tend to concentrate on Tories being the embodiment of all evil. The Tory leaflet assumes this will be the case and reacts to what it expects.
By and large the Tory Party is now pretty good at avoiding unnecessary by-elections, don't select candidates who are going to die etc, and that is a good tactic. This is an unnecessary by-election and a gift to the LDs.
Presume the Lib Dems have put out their personal letter from the candidate, used to be in blue, remember. Again a presumption but I suspect they have been constantly trying to squeeze the considerable Labour vote. Perhaps it will all balance out into a dead heat!!!!
Comments
https://twitter.com/johncardillo/status/1156381292038098944
https://twitter.com/r0bato/status/1156389552094949379
Beth! Beth! Beth!
https://twitter.com/ErickFernandez/status/1156374966692171777
https://twitter.com/HeerJeet/status/1156397682061008902
Is there anyone else who finds his last sentence stunning? I thought the whole point of the Labour movement was based on the fact that markets *do* get things wrong. The final scene of Animal Farm comes to mind, as Murray completes the transformation predicted by Orwell.
https://tinyurl.com/y6ouybuj
And of course it doesn’t work, as you say. Trying a tactical squeeze using a factoid that is easily checkable as wrong is a *bold* move for the Tories. Presumably they are banking on the BXP not being able to move quick enough to respond. Also presumably, the reason the killer fact is buried within the letter arose from the author’s guilt that it isn’t correct in the first place.
With such a heavy concentration on Brexit from all 3 and all 3 having quite extreme positions on the subject it can be argued.
Although being on the extreme end of an argument doesn't mean you are not right, abolition of slavery (or hundreds of more up to date examples) were the extreme end of a scale of thinking at one time.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-49170387
"Over the last seven years the UK automotive industry was a real success story. We were averaging something like £2.5bn per annum", he says.
"In the first six months of this year, it's not been half of that £2.5bn. It's £90m. It's been a massive drop off, because we have that fear of no-deal.
Just going by a few clips, Warren seems to me to have had the most memorable line, but the writer evidenly thinks Sanders out-liberaled her without fully embracing illegal immigration. They both seem to have zapped the moderates.
Farage will win. He doesn't have to actually make any decisions and isn't responsible for anything.
https://twitter.com/natesilver538/status/1156196712215719942?s=21
I think they just like left wing policies so they like Sanders and Warren TBH.
However, I’ve yet to seriously dabble in this market.
Suggests that a falling pound has not moved exports because our labour costs are too high.
NEW THREAD
The letter is well targeted to those people who think the LDs are NICE Tories - the people who elected LDs in the South West all those years. I suspect it will be delivered beyond its target area and that will not be good.
It would be interesting to see the LD equivalent. They tend to concentrate on Tories being the embodiment of all evil. The Tory leaflet assumes this will be the case and reacts to what it expects.
By and large the Tory Party is now pretty good at avoiding unnecessary by-elections, don't select candidates who are going to die etc, and that is a good tactic. This is an unnecessary by-election and a gift to the LDs.
2013 £524bn
2014 £520bn
2015 £520bn
2016 £557bn
2017 £617bn
2018 £634bn
https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/nationalaccounts/balanceofpayments/timeseries/ikbh/mret
And not for the first time.