Will Greig's line stay firmly Mayite and in favour of an "orderly withdrawal", or will he manage to move the position even further, say towards EFTA/EEA? He's been doing this by stealth so far, no reason to think this is the final dictat.
And on a different tack, if you're a craven Labour re-leaver like Flint, would you really want to be on the same side as the Mail? Does this open up more space for continuity remain in Labour?
Will Greig's line stay firmly Mayite and in favour of an "orderly withdrawal", or will he manage to move the position even further, say towards EFTA/EEA? He's been doing this by stealth so far, no reason to think this is the final dictat.
And on a different tack, if you're a craven Labour re-leaver like Flint, would you really want to be on the same side as the Mail? Does this open up more space for continuity remain in Labour?
Apologies for going on-topic if that's bad form.
Flint isn't a coward, she listens to her constituents. And had to with @Tissue_Price of this parish breathing down her neck.
This is an utter indictment of Theresa May and her strategy, the Conservative government, and the Senior Civil Service. All have been/are negligent in their jobs.
This is an utter indictment of Theresa May and her strategy, the Conservative government, and the Senior Civil Service. All have been/are negligent in their jobs.
Will heads roll? Of course they won’t.
Oooo! It is getting exciting. The game's afoot .....
This is an utter indictment of Theresa May and her strategy, the Conservative government, and the Senior Civil Service. All have been/are negligent in their jobs.
Will heads roll? Of course they won’t.
I'm looking forward to the Chilcot style inquiry into Brexit.
I suspect it'll do so much damage to many, Leavers in particular, especially their pre referendum comments.
This is an utter indictment of Theresa May and her strategy, the Conservative government, and the Senior Civil Service. All have been/are negligent in their jobs.
This is an utter indictment of Theresa May and her strategy, the Conservative government, and the Senior Civil Service. All have been/are negligent in their jobs.
Will heads roll? Of course they won’t.
It is a basic failure of Government.
A basic failure of a Tory government.
The coalition increasingly is being recognised as a golden period of good government, when sensible LDs kept the swivel eyed loons away from the sharp objects.
This is an utter indictment of Theresa May and her strategy, the Conservative government, and the Senior Civil Service. All have been/are negligent in their jobs.
Will heads roll? Of course they won’t.
It is a basic failure of Government.
A basic failure of a Tory government.
The coalition increasingly is being recognised as a golden period of good government, when sensible LDs kept the swivel eyed loons away from the sharp objects.
It would be a basic failure of any Government. That it is May's Govt. is why the letters should go in....
This is an utter indictment of Theresa May and her strategy, the Conservative government, and the Senior Civil Service. All have been/are negligent in their jobs.
Will heads roll? Of course they won’t.
I'm looking forward to the Chilcot style inquiry into Brexit.
I suspect it'll do so much damage to many, Leavers in particular, especially their pre referendum comments.
And Osbourne will come out of it smelling of shit.....
This is an utter indictment of Theresa May and her strategy, the Conservative government, and the Senior Civil Service. All have been/are negligent in their jobs.
Will heads roll? Of course they won’t.
It is a basic failure of Government.
I don’t think basic quite covers it.
It is a fundamental failure of government. It suggests that Britain no longer has a governing class or civil service of sufficient quality to be viable as an independent state.
This is an utter indictment of Theresa May and her strategy, the Conservative government, and the Senior Civil Service. All have been/are negligent in their jobs.
Will heads roll? Of course they won’t.
I'm looking forward to the Chilcot style inquiry into Brexit.
I suspect it'll do so much damage to many, Leavers in particular, especially their pre referendum comments.
And Osbourne will come out of it smelling of shit.....
Well I'm sure that'll keep you warm at night if WTO/No Deal sees the country Rejoin the EU.
This is an utter indictment of Theresa May and her strategy, the Conservative government, and the Senior Civil Service. All have been/are negligent in their jobs.
Will heads roll? Of course they won’t.
It is a basic failure of Government.
A basic failure of a Tory government.
The coalition increasingly is being recognised as a golden period of good government, when sensible LDs kept the swivel eyed loons away from the sharp objects.
You'd have to go a long way back in history to find a period in which British government has been worse than the period since 2015. Lord North anyone?
This is an utter indictment of Theresa May and her strategy, the Conservative government, and the Senior Civil Service. All have been/are negligent in their jobs.
Will heads roll? Of course they won’t.
It is a basic failure of Government.
A basic failure of a Tory government.
The coalition increasingly is being recognised as a golden period of good government, when sensible LDs kept the swivel eyed loons away from the sharp objects.
You'd have to go a long way back in history to find a period in which British government has been worse than the period since 2015. Lord North anyone?
1968-81 probably. The politicians were more talented than they are today, but the outcomes were worse.
It must be working my 83 year old father , drives every day to buy his Daily Mail.
He was a strong brexit supporter , due to his concern over immigration. Yesterday out of the blue , he said " I do not know now if I made the right decision "
I was left astounded. Never asked him , why the second thoughts. I will let him tell me , when he is ready.
This is an utter indictment of Theresa May and her strategy, the Conservative government, and the Senior Civil Service. All have been/are negligent in their jobs.
Will heads roll? Of course they won’t.
It is a basic failure of Government.
I don’t think basic quite covers it.
It is a fundamental failure of government. It suggests that Britain no longer has a governing class or civil service of sufficient quality to be viable as an independent state.
That’s quite depressing.
Not entirely fair, it has a governing class briefing against its civil service and rejecting its recommendations. There’s no evidence that the civil service wasn’t able to deliver realistic assessments of the impact of Brexit and implement appropriate programmes if instructed and funded to do so.
This is an utter indictment of Theresa May and her strategy, the Conservative government, and the Senior Civil Service. All have been/are negligent in their jobs.
Will heads roll? Of course they won’t.
It is a basic failure of Government.
I don’t think basic quite covers it.
It is a fundamental failure of government. It suggests that Britain no longer has a governing class or civil service of sufficient quality to be viable as an independent state.
That’s quite depressing.
Maybe we should join a larger, supranational organisation with a competent bureaucracy....?
This is an utter indictment of Theresa May and her strategy, the Conservative government, and the Senior Civil Service. All have been/are negligent in their jobs.
Will heads roll? Of course they won’t.
It is a basic failure of Government.
I don’t think basic quite covers it.
It is a fundamental failure of government. It suggests that Britain no longer has a governing class or civil service of sufficient quality to be viable as an independent state.
That’s quite depressing.
The country voted for free unicorns, you cannot blame the governing class for not being able to deliver unrealistic promises.
This is an utter indictment of Theresa May and her strategy, the Conservative government, and the Senior Civil Service. All have been/are negligent in their jobs.
Will heads roll? Of course they won’t.
It is a basic failure of Government.
I don’t think basic quite covers it.
It is a fundamental failure of government. It suggests that Britain no longer has a governing class or civil service of sufficient quality to be viable as an independent state.
That’s quite depressing.
The country voted for free unicorns, you cannot blame the governing class for not being able to deliver unrealistic promises.
You can blame the governing class for failing to explain that the best they can offer is a donkey with an ice-cream cone blu-tacked to its forehead and neglecting to tell the country how much it will cost.
This is an utter indictment of Theresa May and her strategy, the Conservative government, and the Senior Civil Service. All have been/are negligent in their jobs.
Will heads roll? Of course they won’t.
It is a basic failure of Government.
A basic failure of a Tory government.
The coalition increasingly is being recognised as a golden period of good government, when sensible LDs kept the swivel eyed loons away from the sharp objects.
You'd have to go a long way back in history to find a period in which British government has been worse than the period since 2015. Lord North anyone?
1968-81 probably. The politicians were more talented than they are today, but the outcomes were worse.
If we end up with no deal that outcome will be far worse than anything that has affected the U.K. since 1945.
Discovery? I have a jigsaw of the 'West Ryding of Yorkeshyre' taken from the same map. I believe you can get similar for all the counties of England. It was more difficult than I thought because the well known places of today were often obscure in 1610. When I was at grammar school in the 1950s we had Houses that were named after the wapentakes. I was in Ainsty.
Mr. Eagles, if the choice was false why was it presented?
Because the people proposing didn't think Leave would win/had other ambitions, hadn't really thought about it.
Gove thought the worse thing that would happen to the UK would be if Remain won by a landslide, he thought an Indyref style result would keep it on the agenda for the next decade.
Gove thought Leave were going to lose, he spent the 21st-23rd of June 2016 ensuring that Leavers wouldn't try and topple David Cameron when Remain won.
Boris was focussing on winning the 2019 Tory leadership contest so he thought the referendum was the best way of appealing to Tory members. Prior to Feb 2016 Boris was very pro EU, just look at his comments.
People like Fox etc weren't Leavers until late 2015/16 they were Eurosceptics but thought the UK should Remain in the EU, they really didn't have any intellectual heft when it came to the reality of what Leave meant other than in abstract concepts.
Mr. Eagles, if the choice was false why was it presented?
Because Cameron’s top priority was remaining PM, which required him to give the Brexit ultras what they wanted, and minimising the risk of constitutional chaos came rather a long way below that priority.
Mr. Slade, how very dare you mock my fantastic find?!
Incidentally, surprised there are two Morleys. Second one threw me, as it took a while for me to find 'Ledes'.
Mr. Eagles, and Cameron, who included it in the manifesto and seemed oddly complacent about the very tight polling?
Do you think we'll end up with no deal, then a second referendum?
No, I think we'll leave no matter what in March 2019.
If it is sustained No Deal/WTO Brexit then the question is not if but when we Rejoin the EU.
Most Leavers said No Deal/WTO Brexit wasn't going to happen, their credibility will be shot to pieces a bit like the Tories after Black Wednesday or the appeasers in 1940.
Mr. Slade, how very dare you mock my fantastic find?!
Incidentally, surprised there are two Morleys. Second one threw me, as it took a while for me to find 'Ledes'.
Mr. Eagles, and Cameron, who included it in the manifesto and seemed oddly complacent about the very tight polling?
Do you think we'll end up with no deal, then a second referendum?
No, I think we'll leave no matter what in March 2019.
If it is sustained No Deal/WTO Brexit then the question is not if but when we Rejoin the EU.
Most Leavers said No Deal/WTO Brexit wasn't going to happen, their credibility will be shot to pieces a bit like the Tories after Black Wednesday or the appeasers in 1940.
I think that much would depend on who got the blame, the government or the EU, and in which proportions.
Mr. Slade, how very dare you mock my fantastic find?!
Incidentally, surprised there are two Morleys. Second one threw me, as it took a while for me to find 'Ledes'.
Mr. Eagles, and Cameron, who included it in the manifesto and seemed oddly complacent about the very tight polling?
Do you think we'll end up with no deal, then a second referendum?
No, I think we'll leave no matter what in March 2019.
If it is sustained No Deal/WTO Brexit then the question is not if but when we Rejoin the EU.
Most Leavers said No Deal/WTO Brexit wasn't going to happen, their credibility will be shot to pieces a bit like the Tories after Black Wednesday or the appeasers in 1940.
I'm doubtful if no deal/WTO will actually happen. We may get very close to it, within an inch or two of th edge of the cliff, but when supermarkets start warning of foood shortages there will be panic buying and a collapse in sterling and this will create an atmosphere of crisis in which anything could happen, including a second referendum or extension of article 50. Which I think is what the EU is hoping for - a humiliated U.K. being forced to seek terms.
Yes, the Dems will almost lose there. If that happens then to gain control of the senate they need to hold all their other seats, win AZ and NV and then one of either TX or TN. A big ask, frankly - MO, FL and IN all look vulnerable. It’s not impossible that the GOP will end up with 55 seats.
FPT: Thanks. Interesting, and I will do you the courtesy of a detailed comment. London effect? I suspect we are about to get - as so often - a national imposition of the solution to a London problem.
Parliament thinks you are being charged more than average.
2. I would expect to see the Tenancy Agreement on request, first, before anything else. Not sure if this is a legal requirement without some serious digging. It may well be an "in practice" legal requirement.
3. Some of that is dodgy. eg They could not legally charge the inventory fee if you pull out before the inventory had been done. That reference fee is about double or treble what it should be. I pay £15 for a decent credit report, and it is not rocket science to interpret.
That should be a Holding Deposit, which should probably be returned on pullout minus the value of work done for your tenancy.
Not sure what work is being done for the contract fee - unless it is your mods to the agreement. In which case you should get it back if they did not do the mods.
If it is an "admin" fee I can understand it -I set up a tenancy last week and it took the best part of 2 days work, and involved roughly 120 pages of gumf for the tenant. One page of this was a list of tickboxes to prove that the tenant had received all the other gumf, because the Govt have taken to making LL rights dependent on proving to have given the T various different bits of paper.
It is naughty to roll the Holding Deposit in with the Admin Fee.
4. Your only solution to 4 is to write modifications by hand on the spot, from the notes you made at the previous meeting, and face them down to comply with their contract.
Out of interest, what was the EPC figure? I think I have one E and all the rest are Cs or Ds; it is mainly old stock in good condition and properly renovated / ventilated.
Personally I self manage except for student HMOs, and do not charge any fees to anyone at all for anything, except if eg a cheque bounces and I get a bank fee for that. And for Court Fees if it comes to that (never has). For student HMOs we have a superb agent, but also top 20% properties. Tenant goodwill is worth far more than a couple of hundred £££ imo,
Personally I would go for the contract fee back, and probably cc the letter to the landlord - depending on your confidence level.
I will accept the no fees law. It will be coming in because TM is a Virtue Signaller, but it cost Ts more money.
I think that R +1 overall is the likeliest outcome in the Senate.
I think the whole Kavanaugh show probably put the senate out of reach for the Democrats actually - before that they were looking stronger. Was always a huge task though.
I think that R +1 overall is the likeliest outcome in the Senate.
I think the whole Kavanaugh show probably put the senate out of reach for the Democrats actually - before that they were looking stronger. Was always a huge task though.
It placed Red State Democrats in a very tricky position.
Mr. Slade, how very dare you mock my fantastic find?!
Incidentally, surprised there are two Morleys. Second one threw me, as it took a while for me to find 'Ledes'.
Mr. Eagles, and Cameron, who included it in the manifesto and seemed oddly complacent about the very tight polling?
Do you think we'll end up with no deal, then a second referendum?
No, I think we'll leave no matter what in March 2019.
If it is sustained No Deal/WTO Brexit then the question is not if but when we Rejoin the EU.
Most Leavers said No Deal/WTO Brexit wasn't going to happen, their credibility will be shot to pieces a bit like the Tories after Black Wednesday or the appeasers in 1940.
I'm doubtful if no deal/WTO will actually happen. We may get very close to it, within an inch or two of th edge of the cliff, but when supermarkets start warning of foood shortages there will be panic buying and a collapse in sterling and this will create an atmosphere of crisis in which anything could happen, including a second referendum or extension of article 50. Which I think is what the EU is hoping for - a humiliated U.K. being forced to seek terms.
There was a theory going round (someone may have posted the link here) that there was a secret contingency plan that, in the case of a No Deal, the US would step in to provide supplies. I could certainly see the Donald doing that to p1ss off Merkel et al...
I thought not much of it but then last week it turns out the US has kick started the process for a UK-US trade deal
I’m very surprised GG is (a) going in on an eight or nine, where I though he’d go in on a five or six and slowly ramp it up, and, (b) getting away with it with his readership, so far.
I’m not sure if that’s coincidence, or leadership, so far. Too early to tell.
Comments
Yes!
WTO membership? Only globalist cucks like Jacob Rees-Mogg will accept such a blatant affront to our sovereignty.
https://twitter.com/Durchiga/status/1054106909245128705
Lovely weather for the time of year...
Godwin! Godwin! Godwin! Godwin! Godwin! Godwin! Godwin!
https://twitter.com/youngvulgarian/status/1055046912070438912?s=19
What a bunch of ***** ** ******* *********.
They really loved me.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2018/10/24/european-parliament-debate-brexit-descends-chaos-senior-torys/
And on a different tack, if you're a craven Labour re-leaver like Flint, would you really want to be on the same side as the Mail? Does this open up more space for continuity remain in Labour?
Apologies for going on-topic if that's bad form.
C'est excellent. Je l'aime.
Will heads roll? Of course they won’t.
A few of them did chant 'I'd rather be a Paki than a Turk' which I took as a compliment.
https://twitter.com/MorrisF1/status/1055117428903079936
https://twitter.com/MorrisF1/status/1055118077116014592
Edited extra bit: taking, not taken, of course.
He makes Mr Meeks look like sunshine and rainbows!
Where you in your wig and gowns?
I suspect it'll do so much damage to many, Leavers in particular, especially their pre referendum comments.
The coalition increasingly is being recognised as a golden period of good government, when sensible LDs kept the swivel eyed loons away from the sharp objects.
No wonder that the likes of David Davis and Liam Fox didn't prepare for it.
https://twitter.com/NadineDorries/status/1055118034438885377
It is a fundamental failure of government. It suggests that Britain no longer has a governing class or civil service of sufficient quality to be viable as an independent state.
That’s quite depressing.
Or a Stalinist show trial? it could go either way.
He was a strong brexit supporter , due to his concern over immigration.
Yesterday out of the blue , he said " I do not know now if I made the right decision "
I was left astounded.
Never asked him , why the second thoughts.
I will let him tell me , when he is ready.
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/voters/
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-6307875/Winners-Royal-Observatory-Greenwichs-astronomy-photographer-year-2018-competition.html
Gove thought the worse thing that would happen to the UK would be if Remain won by a landslide, he thought an Indyref style result would keep it on the agenda for the next decade.
Gove thought Leave were going to lose, he spent the 21st-23rd of June 2016 ensuring that Leavers wouldn't try and topple David Cameron when Remain won.
Boris was focussing on winning the 2019 Tory leadership contest so he thought the referendum was the best way of appealing to Tory members. Prior to Feb 2016 Boris was very pro EU, just look at his comments.
People like Fox etc weren't Leavers until late 2015/16 they were Eurosceptics but thought the UK should Remain in the EU, they really didn't have any intellectual heft when it came to the reality of what Leave meant other than in abstract concepts.
Incidentally, surprised there are two Morleys. Second one threw me, as it took a while for me to find 'Ledes'.
Mr. Eagles, and Cameron, who included it in the manifesto and seemed oddly complacent about the very tight polling?
Do you think we'll end up with no deal, then a second referendum?
If it is sustained No Deal/WTO Brexit then the question is not if but when we Rejoin the EU.
Most Leavers said No Deal/WTO Brexit wasn't going to happen, their credibility will be shot to pieces a bit like the Tories after Black Wednesday or the appeasers in 1940.
FPT:
Thanks. Interesting, and I will do you the courtesy of a detailed comment. London effect? I suspect we are about to get - as so often - a national imposition of the solution to a London problem.
Parliament thinks you are being charged more than average.
2. I would expect to see the Tenancy Agreement on request, first, before anything else. Not sure if this is a legal requirement without some serious digging. It may well be an "in practice" legal requirement.
3. Some of that is dodgy. eg They could not legally charge the inventory fee if you pull out before the inventory had been done. That reference fee is about double or treble what it should be. I pay £15 for a decent credit report, and it is not rocket science to interpret.
That should be a Holding Deposit, which should probably be returned on pullout minus the value of work done for your tenancy.
Not sure what work is being done for the contract fee - unless it is your mods to the agreement. In which case you should get it back if they did not do the mods.
If it is an "admin" fee I can understand it -I set up a tenancy last week and it took the best part of 2 days work, and involved roughly 120 pages of gumf for the tenant. One page of this was a list of tickboxes to prove that the tenant had received all the other gumf, because the Govt have taken to making LL rights dependent on proving to have given the T various different bits of paper.
It is naughty to roll the Holding Deposit in with the Admin Fee.
4. Your only solution to 4 is to write modifications by hand on the spot, from the notes you made at the previous meeting, and face them down to comply with their contract.
Out of interest, what was the EPC figure? I think I have one E and all the rest are Cs or Ds; it is mainly old stock in good condition and properly renovated / ventilated.
Personally I self manage except for student HMOs, and do not charge any fees to anyone at all for anything, except if eg a cheque bounces and I get a bank fee for that. And for Court Fees if it comes to that (never has). For student HMOs we have a superb agent, but also top 20% properties. Tenant goodwill is worth far more than a couple of hundred £££ imo,
Personally I would go for the contract fee back, and probably cc the letter to the landlord - depending on your confidence level.
I will accept the no fees law. It will be coming in because TM is a Virtue Signaller, but it cost Ts more money.
I trust you reported the HB Fraudster.
Cheers
Was always a huge task though.
I thought not much of it but then last week it turns out the US has kick started the process for a UK-US trade deal
https://order-order.com/2018/10/17/us-puts-uk-trade-deal-front-queue/
I’m not sure if that’s coincidence, or leadership, so far. Too early to tell.