Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » I’m starting to think that UKIP could surprise us at GE2015

13»

Comments

  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 43,847
    rcs1000 said:



    Wind is unlikely to get much cheaper, because the costs - i.e. concrete, land, interconnection and people - don't scale well. In the case of solar, there are some innovations in the works that could see prices halve or third from here. (And, in fact, prices have fallen from $4/watt to $0.70 - or more than 80% - over the past five years.) In fact, one of the reasons that utilities are so reluctant to invest in new capacity is the risk that demand that goes to dispatchable power generation could be hammered by this. (In Germany, the majority of new solar installations are being done without subsidy, because it's cheaper to generate your own electricity now, than to buy it off the grid.)

    As an aside re blackouts, it is worth remembering that almost all the gas plant that has been taken off-line in the last two years has been mothballed rather than dismantled. All these plants could be brought back on-line within two years if wholesale power prices (and the gas spread) were to improve.

    "As an aside re blackouts, it is worth remembering that almost all the gas plant that has been taken off-line in the last two years has been mothballed rather than dismantled."

    A spy tells me that Spondon C is being dismantled as we speak - it closed in March 2012. Only 200-odd MW, but still useful. It was built in the early-mid 1990s.

    As I recall, when built it had the capability of switching in the matter of seconds from gas to oil burning - if the gas supply was interrupted, it could switch over to oil firing without an interruption to supplies. I wonder if this is a common feature of gas power stations?

    It should also be noted that even mothballed plants cost a fortune in maintenance, especially if it's seriously believed they'll be needed again in short order.
  • JonathanDJonathanD Posts: 2,400
    edited October 2013
    SeanT said:

    Offtopic - the Royal Mail has taken the entire £5k I offered for some of their shares - it has left my account.

    Does this mean I will get the full £5k OF shares I reqiested, or do they hand back the cash they don't use, or what? Any share-dealing brainiacs know the skinny?

    Also, when can I start selling? Some say tomorrow some say Tuesday. Confusing.


    No, the full amount of money you have committed will be taken from your account and then you will be refunded any money left over. I could see you being limited to only £750 worth of stock, if the government get panicked about the rich doing well out of this offer.

    Not sure about trading begin date
  • You don't have certainty in a free market.

    Weird thing about British politics: The left stopped doing socialism and made a big song-and-dance about it. But meanwhile the right have given up doing free markets, and everybody's too polite to mention it.

    Who ever claimed electicity was a totally free market? It's highly regulated, with massive government influence via the planning system, carbon emission targets, and infrastructure planning, harnessing the private sector to actuall build and run the power stations.

    That's exactly why Ed Miliband's comments were so irresponsible. The electricity companies have no choice but to look extremely carefully at what governments may throw at them.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,829

    rcs1000 said:



    Wind is unlikely to get much cheaper, because the costs - i.e. concrete, land, interconnection and people - don't scale well. In the case of solar, there are some innovations in the works that could see prices halve or third from here. (And, in fact, prices have fallen from $4/watt to $0.70 - or more than 80% - over the past five years.) In fact, one of the reasons that utilities are so reluctant to invest in new capacity is the risk that demand that goes to dispatchable power generation could be hammered by this. (In Germany, the majority of new solar installations are being done without subsidy, because it's cheaper to generate your own electricity now, than to buy it off the grid.)

    As an aside re blackouts, it is worth remembering that almost all the gas plant that has been taken off-line in the last two years has been mothballed rather than dismantled. All these plants could be brought back on-line within two years if wholesale power prices (and the gas spread) were to improve.

    "As an aside re blackouts, it is worth remembering that almost all the gas plant that has been taken off-line in the last two years has been mothballed rather than dismantled."

    A spy tells me that Spondon C is being dismantled as we speak - it closed in March 2012. Only 200-odd MW, but still useful. It was built in the early-mid 1990s.

    As I recall, when built it had the capability of switching in the matter of seconds from gas to oil burning - if the gas supply was interrupted, it could switch over to oil firing without an interruption to supplies. I wonder if this is a common feature of gas power stations?

    It should also be noted that even mothballed plants cost a fortune in maintenance, especially if it's seriously believed they'll be needed again in short order.
    I take your 200MW, and I raise you 4.1 gigawatts

    Keadby, gas 1.4GW, mothballed
    Roosevote, gas, 0.4GW, mothballed
    Barking B, gas, 0.5GW, mothballed
    Teeside, gas, 1.8GW, mothballed
  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    Big diff from Tony

    Xlibris1 @Xlibris1
    Interesting fm Crick on Cameron milestone - 1,258 days in office Of the 23 people appointed to Cabinet 15 still there & likly 2015 Stable !
  • RichardNabaviRichardNabavi Posts: 3,413
    edited October 2013
    SeanT said:

    Also, when can I start selling? Some say tomorrow some say Tuesday. Confusing.

    If you applied via one of the on-line brokers such as Hargreaves Lansdown or Barclays, you can deal as soon as your account shows the share allocations, which should be tomorrow ('conditional dealing').

    If you applied directly via the government website, you can't deal until Tuesday (the date of 'full listing'), or whenever you get confirmation of the allocation (which might be later, especially if you applied by post).
  • CD13CD13 Posts: 6,366

    Edmund,

    Those badgers are too clever for us by half. I think we have to implement the McArthur strategy and nuke them. Send hunters in with orders to shoot anything that looks like a badger, If they polish off a few foxes, dogs, green party supporters (Neil had better stay away) or Brian May, then it's a bonus. And to make sure, gas the setts.

    Brock, this means you.

    And thanks from me to Chuka. I was cautious about this privatisation until he convinced me; then I had a little gamble.
  • fitalassfitalass Posts: 4,320
    I have just seen the clip of the 'badgers moving the goal posts', still laughing.
  • dr_spyndr_spyn Posts: 11,301
    edited October 2013
    Gas and Electricity stats 2013 Sept.

    https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/244580/qep_sep_13.pdf

    Mine of data for those of you who want to read it.
  • TheWatcherTheWatcher Posts: 5,262
    rcs1000 said:

    rcs1000 said:



    Wind is unlikely to get much cheaper, because the costs - i.e. concrete, land, interconnection and people - don't scale well. In the case of solar, there are some innovations in the works that could see prices halve or third from here. (And, in fact, prices have fallen from $4/watt to $0.70 - or more than 80% - over the past five years.) In fact, one of the reasons that utilities are so reluctant to invest in new capacity is the risk that demand that goes to dispatchable power generation could be hammered by this. (In Germany, the majority of new solar installations are being done without subsidy, because it's cheaper to generate your own electricity now, than to buy it off the grid.)

    As an aside re blackouts, it is worth remembering that almost all the gas plant that has been taken off-line in the last two years has been mothballed rather than dismantled. All these plants could be brought back on-line within two years if wholesale power prices (and the gas spread) were to improve.

    "As an aside re blackouts, it is worth remembering that almost all the gas plant that has been taken off-line in the last two years has been mothballed rather than dismantled."

    A spy tells me that Spondon C is being dismantled as we speak - it closed in March 2012. Only 200-odd MW, but still useful. It was built in the early-mid 1990s.

    As I recall, when built it had the capability of switching in the matter of seconds from gas to oil burning - if the gas supply was interrupted, it could switch over to oil firing without an interruption to supplies. I wonder if this is a common feature of gas power stations?

    It should also be noted that even mothballed plants cost a fortune in maintenance, especially if it's seriously believed they'll be needed again in short order.
    I take your 200MW, and I raise you 4.1 gigawatts

    Keadby, gas 1.4GW, mothballed
    Roosevote, gas, 0.4GW, mothballed
    Barking B, gas, 0.5GW, mothballed
    Teeside, gas, 1.8GW, mothballed
    Teeside's being demolished right now.

    http://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/business/news/10719298.Power_station_to_be_demolished/

  • fitalassfitalass Posts: 4,320
    Gary Gibbon in his C4 Blog - Brexit and Ed Miliband
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    fitalass said:

    Gary Gibbon in his C4 Blog - Brexit and Ed Miliband

    I think Polly Toynbee first spotted the Miliband conundrum. Tricky one for UKIP -" vote Miliband get BREXIT.."....

  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 43,847
    rcs1000 said:



    "As an aside re blackouts, it is worth remembering that almost all the gas plant that has been taken off-line in the last two years has been mothballed rather than dismantled."

    A spy tells me that Spondon C is being dismantled as we speak - it closed in March 2012. Only 200-odd MW, but still useful. It was built in the early-mid 1990s.

    As I recall, when built it had the capability of switching in the matter of seconds from gas to oil burning - if the gas supply was interrupted, it could switch over to oil firing without an interruption to supplies. I wonder if this is a common feature of gas power stations?

    It should also be noted that even mothballed plants cost a fortune in maintenance, especially if it's seriously believed they'll be needed again in short order.

    I take your 200MW, and I raise you 4.1 gigawatts

    Keadby, gas 1.4GW, mothballed
    Roosevote, gas, 0.4GW, mothballed
    Barking B, gas, 0.5GW, mothballed
    Teeside, gas, 1.8GW, mothballed
    Yep, fair enough. But those plants will be costing a great deal of money to keep mothballed in more-or-less working order. How long can the companies be expected to take that hit?

    It's also interesting to see the working lives of these stations - Keadby was built in 1996, so had only 16-17 years commissioned. Roosecote had a little over 20 years. Not a great amount of time to pay back your investment, when the previous generation of stations mostly had 30+ years of working life.

    Having said that, there has always been reserve stations available at short order - Willington B was such at the end of its life. ISTR it was kept in working order, and able to be repowered within a few months.
  • fitalassfitalass Posts: 4,320
    Janet Daley in the Telegraph - Government turned energy companies into tax collectors: now they are fighting back

    "The energy companies are clearly tired of being cast as the demonic enemies of struggling Britain. First Ed Miliband threatens to freeze their prices (which is to say, their profits). Then David Cameron – recognising a no-win trap when he sees one – agrees that the Opposition has struck a nerve with its accusations of profiteering in the energy market.

    So today, the companies which have been cast as undisputed forces of darkness – who are, oddly, the dispensers of light and heat – have begun to fight back. One of the chief reasons for their price increases, they say, is that successive governments have forced them to become tax collectors: green taxes and the cost of subsidising new eco-friendly forms of energy production have all been loaded on to energy bills instead of being paid directly to HM Treasury. So instead of the sitting government getting the ignominy for higher taxes, the energy companies must take the blame – and then be chastised by politicians of all parties for their pains. The airlines, caught in a similar dilemma, have taken to printing very clearly on their websites precisely what proportion of your airfare is accounted for by fuel duty: the percentage is gratifyingly shocking and educative to the consumer."
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,829

    rcs1000 said:

    rcs1000 said:



    Wind is unlikely to get much cheaper, because the costs - i.e. concrete, land, interconnection and people - don't scale well. In the case of solar, there are some innovations in the works that could see prices halve or third from here. (And, in fact, prices have fallen from $4/watt to $0.70 - or more than 80% - over the past five years.) In fact, one of the reasons that utilities are so reluctant to invest in new capacity is the risk that demand that goes to dispatchable power generation could be hammered by this. (In Germany, the majority of new solar installations are being done without subsidy, because it's cheaper to generate your own electricity now, than to buy it off the grid.)

    As an aside re blackouts, it is worth remembering that almost all the gas plant that has been taken off-line in the last two years has been mothballed rather than dismantled. All these plants could be brought back on-line within two years if wholesale power prices (and the gas spread) were to improve.

    "As an aside re blackouts, it is worth remembering that almost all the gas plant that has been taken off-line in the last two years has been mothballed rather than dismantled."

    A spy tells me that Spondon C is being dismantled as we speak - it closed in March 2012. Only 200-odd MW, but still useful. It was built in the early-mid 1990s.

    As I recall, when built it had the capability of switching in the matter of seconds from gas to oil burning - if the gas supply was interrupted, it could switch over to oil firing without an interruption to supplies. I wonder if this is a common feature of gas power stations?

    It should also be noted that even mothballed plants cost a fortune in maintenance, especially if it's seriously believed they'll be needed again in short order.
    I take your 200MW, and I raise you 4.1 gigawatts

    Keadby, gas 1.4GW, mothballed
    Roosevote, gas, 0.4GW, mothballed
    Barking B, gas, 0.5GW, mothballed
    Teeside, gas, 1.8GW, mothballed
    Teeside's being demolished right now.

    http://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/business/news/10719298.Power_station_to_be_demolished/

    You are absolutely right. I missed that.
  • CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,477
    O/T: Alice Munro has won the Nobel Literature prize. I like her stories but I think the Nobel poo-bahs are wrong in saying that she's currently the best short story writer around. The best one, by far, is William Trevor - now in his 80's and still writing.
  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    Cyclefree said:

    O/T: Alice Munro has won the Nobel Literature prize. I like her stories but I think the Nobel poo-bahs are wrong in saying that she's currently the best short story writer around. The best one, by far, is William Trevor - now in his 80's and still writing.

    RT @Nobelprize_org: The Swedish Academy has not been able to get a hold of Alice Munro, left a phone message. #NobelPrize #Literature
  • JonathanDJonathanD Posts: 2,400
    SeanT said:

    JonathanD said:

    SeanT said:

    Offtopic - the Royal Mail has taken the entire £5k I offered for some of their shares - it has left my account.

    Does this mean I will get the full £5k OF shares I reqiested, or do they hand back the cash they don't use, or what? Any share-dealing brainiacs know the skinny?

    Also, when can I start selling? Some say tomorrow some say Tuesday. Confusing.


    No, the full amount of money you have committed will be taken from your account and then you will be refunded any money left over. I could see you being limited to only £750 worth of stock, if the government get panicked about the rich doing well out of this offer.

    Not sure about trading begin date
    I'm not rich!

    *remembers he made €50,000, just this morning*

    OK, I'm rich.

    And you're an exporter - re-balancing the economy single handedly.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,829

    rcs1000 said:



    "As an aside re blackouts, it is worth remembering that almost all the gas plant that has been taken off-line in the last two years has been mothballed rather than dismantled."

    A spy tells me that Spondon C is being dismantled as we speak - it closed in March 2012. Only 200-odd MW, but still useful. It was built in the early-mid 1990s.

    As I recall, when built it had the capability of switching in the matter of seconds from gas to oil burning - if the gas supply was interrupted, it could switch over to oil firing without an interruption to supplies. I wonder if this is a common feature of gas power stations?

    It should also be noted that even mothballed plants cost a fortune in maintenance, especially if it's seriously believed they'll be needed again in short order.

    I take your 200MW, and I raise you 4.1 gigawatts

    Keadby, gas 1.4GW, mothballed
    Roosevote, gas, 0.4GW, mothballed
    Barking B, gas, 0.5GW, mothballed
    Teeside, gas, 1.8GW, mothballed
    Yep, fair enough. But those plants will be costing a great deal of money to keep mothballed in more-or-less working order. How long can the companies be expected to take that hit?

    It's also interesting to see the working lives of these stations - Keadby was built in 1996, so had only 16-17 years commissioned. Roosecote had a little over 20 years. Not a great amount of time to pay back your investment, when the previous generation of stations mostly had 30+ years of working life.

    Having said that, there has always been reserve stations available at short order - Willington B was such at the end of its life. ISTR it was kept in working order, and able to be repowered within a few months.
    The answer is - not very long - they decided to take Teeside out of mothball and demolish it six days ago!

    I believe the capacity payments system includes a sum for mothballed plant - presumably offering just enough cash to keep stuff at cash zero.
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    Number of utility companies:
    1997: 14
    2010: 6
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 62,061
    Bad news, everyone.

    Swino, the feral pig who drank 18 cans of beer and then fought a cow, has died in a car accident:
    http://metro.co.uk/2013/10/07/rip-swino-pig-that-drank-18-cans-of-beer-and-bravely-fought-a-cow-dies-4137543/
  • TheWatcherTheWatcher Posts: 5,262
    rcs1000 said:

    rcs1000 said:



    "As an aside re blackouts, it is worth remembering that almost all the gas plant that has been taken off-line in the last two years has been mothballed rather than dismantled."

    A spy tells me that Spondon C is being dismantled as we speak - it closed in March 2012. Only 200-odd MW, but still useful. It was built in the early-mid 1990s.

    As I recall, when built it had the capability of switching in the matter of seconds from gas to oil burning - if the gas supply was interrupted, it could switch over to oil firing without an interruption to supplies. I wonder if this is a common feature of gas power stations?

    It should also be noted that even mothballed plants cost a fortune in maintenance, especially if it's seriously believed they'll be needed again in short order.

    I take your 200MW, and I raise you 4.1 gigawatts

    Keadby, gas 1.4GW, mothballed
    Roosevote, gas, 0.4GW, mothballed
    Barking B, gas, 0.5GW, mothballed
    Teeside, gas, 1.8GW, mothballed
    Yep, fair enough. But those plants will be costing a great deal of money to keep mothballed in more-or-less working order. How long can the companies be expected to take that hit?

    It's also interesting to see the working lives of these stations - Keadby was built in 1996, so had only 16-17 years commissioned. Roosecote had a little over 20 years. Not a great amount of time to pay back your investment, when the previous generation of stations mostly had 30+ years of working life.

    Having said that, there has always been reserve stations available at short order - Willington B was such at the end of its life. ISTR it was kept in working order, and able to be repowered within a few months.
    The answer is - not very long - they decided to take Teeside out of mothball and demolish it six days ago!
    .
    Only 6 days ago? There's a coincidence.

  • perdixperdix Posts: 1,806
    fitalass said:

    Janet Daley in the Telegraph - Government turned energy companies into tax collectors: now they are fighting back

    "The energy companies are clearly tired of being cast as the demonic enemies of struggling Britain. First Ed Miliband threatens to freeze their prices (which is to say, their profits). Then David Cameron – recognising a no-win trap when he sees one – agrees that the Opposition has struck a nerve with its accusations of profiteering in the energy market.

    So today, the companies which have been cast as undisputed forces of darkness – who are, oddly, the dispensers of light and heat – have begun to fight back. One of the chief reasons for their price increases, they say, is that successive governments have forced them to become tax collectors: green taxes and the cost of subsidising new eco-friendly forms of energy production have all been loaded on to energy bills instead of being paid directly to HM Treasury. So instead of the sitting government getting the ignominy for higher taxes, the energy companies must take the blame – and then be chastised by politicians of all parties for their pains. The airlines, caught in a similar dilemma, have taken to printing very clearly on their websites precisely what proportion of your airfare is accounted for by fuel duty: the percentage is gratifyingly shocking and educative to the consumer."

    I haven't read any of Cameron's views on energy prices except that ReD "struck a chord, but I don't believe Cameron would have said that the companies were "profiteering".

  • OblitusSumMeOblitusSumMe Posts: 9,143
    fitalass said:

    The airlines, caught in a similar dilemma, have taken to printing very clearly on their websites precisely what proportion of your airfare is accounted for by fuel duty: the percentage is gratifyingly shocking and educative to the consumer."

    She must mean air passenger duty, since there is no fuel duty on fuel for planes.

    Interestingly, my car fuel receipts always have the VAT itemised, but they don't show how much fuel duty is paid.
  • CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,477
    Plato said:

    Cyclefree said:

    O/T: Alice Munro has won the Nobel Literature prize. I like her stories but I think the Nobel poo-bahs are wrong in saying that she's currently the best short story writer around. The best one, by far, is William Trevor - now in his 80's and still writing.

    RT @Nobelprize_org: The Swedish Academy has not been able to get a hold of Alice Munro, left a phone message. #NobelPrize #Literature
    I think the same happened with Doris Lessing a few years back.

  • anothernickanothernick Posts: 3,591

    fitalass said:

    Gary Gibbon in his C4 Blog - Brexit and Ed Miliband

    I think Polly Toynbee first spotted the Miliband conundrum. Tricky one for UKIP -" vote Miliband get BREXIT.."....

    I very much doubt that Miliband will make an unequivocal promise a referendum. And I also doubt that Europe will be a big issue at the general election so he will be under little pressure to do so.

  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 62,061
    Mr. T, careful. Keep making money like that and Red Ed will declare you a 'predator'.
  • MarkSeniorMarkSenior Posts: 4,699
    O/T
    The Nova Scotia provincial elections earlier this week resulted in a landslide victory for the Liberals ( their first since 1999 ) . They won 33 of the 51 seats a gain of 22 . The Conservatives won 11 seats up 1 and the outgoing ruling NDP just 7 seats . Most cabinet ministers including Premier Darrell Dexter lost their seats . The NDP did finish narrowly 2nd in % votes though not in number of seats .
  • dr_spyndr_spyn Posts: 11,301
    edited October 2013
  • tim said:

    "Osborne reveals the true aim of Help to Buy: to inflate house prices
    "Hopefully we will get a little housing boom and everyone will be happy as property values go up," the Chancellor reportedly told the cabinet."

    http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2013/10/osborne-reveals-true-aim-help-buy-inflate-house-prices

    Shocking revelation, who on earth can believe that is the point of Help To Buy?

    Brilliant, tim! You link to a New Statesman article, taking seriously a comment which in turn come from another article which clearly says it was a joke.
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,587
    fitalass said:

    Janet Daley in the Telegraph - Government turned energy companies into tax collectors: now they are fighting back

    The airlines, caught in a similar dilemma, have taken to printing very clearly on their websites precisely what proportion of your airfare is accounted for by fuel duty: the percentage is gratifyingly shocking and educative to the consumer."

    As noted by Oblitus she's wrong - there is NO tax on airline fuel duty (but there should be). She means air passenger duty. And this has resulted in politicians lowering the tax? Nope.

    It's a very ineffective campaign, because the gap between the moment of travel and the time people think about politics is too large, and nobody is campaigning to reduce it anyway. I make about 20 flights a year and I do vaguely notice it, but it's not something which passengers debate on the plane, in my experience. If you're busy flying to India or whatever you're not really preoccupied with analysing the ticket price components.

  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 43,847
    SeanT said:

    Mr. T, careful. Keep making money like that and Red Ed will declare you a 'predator'.

    Stop me when it gets annoying. At this precise moment I might be at my Most Obnoxious Ever, which is quite some feat, given my previous bouts of smugness.
    Nah, good luck to you. At least you're producing something that will (hopefully) bring a little entertainment and joy to people. You've got a skill, you're using it well, and you're reaping the rewards.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,574

    Number of utility companies:
    1997: 14
    2010: 6

    SSE, Scottish Power, EDF, British Gas, NPower, Eon.

    I have my leccy provided to me by iSupplyEnergy though.

    How many of these other companies are there ?
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,192

    Miss Plato, it sounds like Leveson is the arse many thought he was.

    "I don't need a lecture about freedom of speech, Mr. Gove, I really don't," he said, interrupting someone trying to get his point across.

    I think he did. He really did.

This discussion has been closed.