Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » If the GE2015 outcome was as the current betting suggests t

SystemSystem Posts: 12,250
edited October 2013 in General

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » If the GE2015 outcome was as the current betting suggests then LAB would probably avoid a coalition

Unlike all previous general elections over the past 20 years there are no spread betting prices which give a really good pointer to current betting sentiment.

Read the full story here


«13

Comments

  • PolruanPolruan Posts: 2,083
    First, or broken Vanilla... who knows?
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 62,061
    308 seats would guarantee Labour either the government or a swift second vote. They might prefer the latter.
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    PMQs is back. Who is writing Eds questions today ? Len or Hugh ?
  • I think Mike is right on this, assuming of course that the final seat numbers are similar to those implied by the betting markets. And what a disaster it would be; things are going to be tough whoever is in power. Despite the progress made by the coalition, there is a lot more to do to get the public finances, education and welfare back on track. A weak minority government, led by Ed Miliband, in hock to the unions, and at the mercy of all sorts of vested interests and pork-barrelling murky deals, would be just about the worst possible option for addressing these problems.

    I've been concerned about the implications for the economy and the financial markets of such an outcome for some time. I had thought that there was about a year from now before this would begin to matter - i.e. ample time for anyone with an ISA or pension fund to move investments out of companies which are likely to be hit by UK economic instability, rising interest rates and a falling pound - but we've already seen the damage Ed Miliband has done to the share prices of our electricity generating companies and to investment in generation capacity.

    Of course it may not come to this; the predictive power of the betting markets 20 months ahead of an election is not particularly high. However, better to plan for the worst whilst hoping for the best.
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,658

    I think Mike is right on this, assuming of course that the final seat numbers are similar to those implied by the betting markets. And what a disaster it would be; things are going to be tough whoever is in power. Despite the progress made by the coalition, there is a lot more to do to get the public finances, education and welfare back on track. A weak minority government, led by Ed Miliband, in hock to the unions, and at the mercy of all sorts of vested interests and pork-barrelling murky deals, would be just about the worst possible option for addressing these problems.

    I've been concerned about the implications for the economy and the financial markets of such an outcome for some time. I had thought that there was about a year from now before this would begin to matter - i.e. ample time for anyone with an ISA or pension fund to move investments out of companies which are likely to be hit by UK economic instability, rising interest rates and a falling pound - but we've already seen the damage Ed Miliband has done to the share prices of our electricity generating companies and to investment in generation capacity.

    Of course it may not come to this; the predictive power of the betting markets 20 months ahead of an election is not particularly high. However, better to plan for the worst whilst hoping for the best.

    Quite right Richard, though it does make you wonder why HMG have been pratting about for the first 3 years.
  • philiphphiliph Posts: 4,704
    Is it an illusion or has Ed increased the number of shadow jobs on his team?

    There appear to be a lot of lower ranked positions issued but very few people removed from the payroll. Is he giving more of his MPs a reason to be loyal to him by using the good old 'pay roll' stick and carrot?
  • I certainly doubt the Lib Dems will go into coalition with Labour, unless Clegg and Alexander (and others, probably) quit. Too much bad blood. There are two other possibilities, I suppose; the top Lib Dems could lose their seats (not out of the question) or there could be change at the top of Labour. Presumably Balls would have to go, but who else? Or would the departure of Mr Too Far Too Fast be enough to placate the Lib Dems...?
  • I'm with the always undramatic Mr Nabavi on this ...

    Beasts will emerge from the sea; dark clouds will cover the sky; birds will fly south, never to return; rumours of witches and demons will spread; there will be pestilence and drought; the crops will fail; evil shadows will prowl a devastated countryside; in the cities children will starve; perpetual frost will cover the land; the churches will burn; there will be no hope; all will be lost; England will slide into the ocean's depths; nothing; there will be nothing; the end.
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,587
    I think that's a good analysis, and suspect that the LibDems on current polling would prefer a period of rethinking too before rushing into a new coalition with anyone.
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,658

    I'm with the always undramatic Mr Nabavi on this ...

    Beasts will emerge from the sea; dark clouds will cover the sky; birds will fly south, never to return; rumours of witches and demons will spread; there will be pestilence and drought; the crops will fail; evil shadows will prowl a devastated countryside; in the cities children will starve; perpetual frost will cover the land; the churches will burn; there will be no hope; all will be lost; England will slide into the ocean's depths; nothing; there will be nothing; the end.

    Given you're in Iceland, I'll take it that's the view from your Hotel window.

    regards to Noggin the Nog.
  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    Very good piece from Brendan O'Neill on press regulation issues

    http://www.cityam.com/article/1381279702/rejection-proposals-self-regulation-dire-news-our-press
  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    Mark Easton is baffled - ICM tells him almost everything he assumed was wrong

    "More of the 1,031 people surveyed feel bin collections, parks and libraries, schools and bus services have improved than those who think they are worse. But the responses indicate people think the quality of elderly care, hospitals, police and road maintenance is lower.

    Councils say funding remains a concern. The Local Government Association says overall the results are testament to the resilience of councils, but says that unless finances become sustainable, satisfaction levels will decline.

    It is five years since the bail-out of the banks marked a new era of austerity in Britain amid warnings that deep cuts to state spending would see the standard of public services plunge.

    But today's poll by ICM suggests six out of 10 people think service quality has been maintained or improved. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-24454006
  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    LOL

    RT @AdamWagner1: LIVE images from new Home Office minister's office: pic.twitter.com/dJ7DKys7xE
  • I'm with the always undramatic Mr Nabavi on this ...

    Beasts will emerge from the sea; dark clouds will cover the sky; birds will fly south, never to return; rumours of witches and demons will spread; there will be pestilence and drought; the crops will fail; evil shadows will prowl a devastated countryside; in the cities children will starve; perpetual frost will cover the land; the churches will burn; there will be no hope; all will be lost; England will slide into the ocean's depths; nothing; there will be nothing; the end.

    Given you're in Iceland, I'll take it that's the view from your Hotel window.

    regards to Noggin the Nog.

    Not much of a view currently as it's still pretty dark. The snow's gone though. Travelling home today.

  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    edited October 2013
    Oh errr - does he own others than the Indy? Most of his tweets are in Russian - this was in English.

    Alexander Lebedev @lebedevalex
    And we cannot pay for some newspapers issues accordingly.Debt in arrears about 5 mio USD.One should initiate bankruptcy procedure?
  • Heh heh, new Shadow Chief Secretary to the Treasury on 5 Live talking about the IMF upgrade of the UK's GDP growth. He's manfully trying to walk the tightrope between grumpiness at one of Labour's main attack lines being weakened and implied approval of the Government's actions. 'Cost of living crisis' blah blah blah...
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    tim said:

    TGOHF said:

    PMQs is back. Who is writing Eds questions today ? Len or Hugh ?

    Osbornes reshuffle will be vocalised by a puppet porpoise
    Not sure anyone outside Toxteth understands this..
  • edmundintokyoedmundintokyo Posts: 17,709
    Why wouldn't Balls want a coalition? The LibDems seem pretty accommodating, and by then Labour will presumably have racked up a whole bunch of sounds-good, works-badly electoral panders that they'll be happy to have an excuse to get rid of. In any case Labour would obviously rather have close to a guarantee of a full term rather than always having to look over their shoulder in case Clegg's successor thought he could gain a couple of seats with a new election.

    I know some Labour people were unenthusiastic about a coalition last time, but they were obviously exhausted and in any case they didn't really have the numbers.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 62,061
    An interesting, if rather depressing, piece on Congo here:
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-24396390

    Wasn't it called Zaire a few decades ago? I'd guess, from the article, that was under Mobutu.
  • Incidentally, this was state of the seats market on Sporting Index on October 19th 2009:

    Con 355-360
    Lab 203-208
    LD 49-52

    That was actually six seats higher for Labour than it had been a week before.

    http://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2009/10/19/the-money-starts-going-back-on-labour/
  • tim said:

    @lucymanning: Critical borders report finds 650k alerts on drug/tobacco smuggling deleted.Only 2/3 passenger movements checked. 2 recommendations redacted


    But they drove a Go Home Van around, why is everyone being so picky

    Err, it was a Labour disaster.
  • dr_spyndr_spyn Posts: 11,301
    edited October 2013
    Noggin the Nog - is that as illegal as Muffin the Mule?

    Re LDs - much depends on the composition of the party in Parliament after the GE and which faction is in the ascendant. If Labour was the largest party, it might not follow that the LDs are prepared to go into Coalition with Ed M, or that Ed M decides conditions like the emasculation of Ed B and LDs holding Treasury posts are unacceptable. The horse trading might take longer next time round.
  • RichardNabaviRichardNabavi Posts: 3,413
    edited October 2013
    tim said:

    @Richard

    Labour will spend less than Osborne as a % of GDP though.
    I'll bet on that if you like

    Of course they will, because the coalition's reforms will be bearing fruit and in any case they won't have any choice - the financial markets will see to that. I'd expect a Labour government to have to cut more drastically than Osborne will be planning to do. But it will be done in a panic with maximum damage to confidence and to services, rather like under Callaghan or as we've seen in some of the Euro area countries.
  • I should add on a personal note that if the Lib Dems do go into coalition with Labour in two years' time then I might have to reconsider my LD membership. I've been appalled by all the McBride revelations, and by Labour's opportunism, continued financial incontinence and all-round march towards socialism. If the Lib Dems are prepared to enter coalition with a party like that, well it might have to be 'not in my name'.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,192

    Incidentally, this was state of the seats market on Sporting Index on October 19th 2009:

    Con 355-360
    Lab 203-208
    LD 49-52

    That was actually six seats higher for Labour than it had been a week before.

    http://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2009/10/19/the-money-starts-going-back-on-labour/

    Not very useful then. But I agree with the premise that both of the major parties would want to give more serious consideration to minority government this time around. The situation is not quite as terrifying as it was in 2010. Osborne has set out a credible path that a government of any complexion will follow with the odd gesture here and there. Unlike the last government who didn't even leave a spending review behind because it would have been awkward.

    Labour would also probably want yet another election under the old boundaries to improve their chance of stealing an advantage.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 53,230
    The Coalition is only part way through its 5 year programme. At the end of that 5 year period the voters will judge on what has been achieved. You wouldn't judge the quality of a souffle on the basis of how the eggs look. A fixed Parliament gives the luxury of "wait and see...".

    Most people will judge the outcomes on polling day. I suspect the LibDems will be considered to have done a reasonable job by a significant proportion of their 2010 voters, albeit grudgingly. Those voters will have to assess whether Labour has anything extra to offer. I suspect many will come to the conclusion that they don't. Over the next 18 months, the LibDem 2010 vote will move away from Labour and towards LibDem/can't be arsed.

    The Tories will also pick up a "grudging respect" element to their vote too. They only need to convince 1 in 200 of the voters each month that yes, actually, things are getting better - and their polling position in May 2015 will look a whole lot rosier than it does today.

    I can certainly see cross-over with Labour being achieved and maintained by next Conference season.
  • BobajobBobajob Posts: 1,536
    A distinctly odd response from Carlotta and the ever-crackers TGOHF. Of course I support the price control on fares, which are among the most expensive in Europe despite the fact that our 'privatised' railway receives four times the public subsidy that it ever did under BR.

    I was merely pointing out the PB Tory hypocrisy.

    @Alan - when does the marriage tax cut kick in?
  • tim said:

    @Richard

    Labour will spend less than Osborne as a % of GDP though.
    I'll bet on that if you like

    Of course they will, because the coalition's reforms will be bearing fruit and in any case they won't have any choice - the financial markets will see to that. I'd expect a Labour government to have to cut more drastically than Osborne will be planning to do. But it will be done in a panic with maximum damage to confidence and to services, rather like under Callaghan.

    The innocent will perish; wickedness will conquer; ceaseless earthquakes and volcanos will batter the west; in the north locusts will swarm; hurricanes will lash the south and east ...

  • MikeKMikeK Posts: 9,053
    edited October 2013
    UK GENERAL ELECTION 2015: Is it weighting which influences the polls? http://ukgeneralelection2015.blogspot.com/2013/10/is-it-weighting-which-influences-polls.html?spref=tw

    As with most of the polls UKIP is being unfairly weighted.
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    IMF also updated predictions on other countries

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financialcrisis/10365206/IMF-sours-on-BRICs-and-doubts-eurozone-recovery-claims.html

    "It said the economies of Brazil, China, and India will be 8pc to 14pc smaller in 2016 than had been assumed just two years ago, a revision that calls into question some of the giddiest claims that the newcomers will soon surge past the decaying West.

    Since emerging markets now make up half the global economy, the IMF has had to cut its world forecast to 2.9pc this year and 3.6pc in 2014, with plenty of “downside risks”, especially in Europe."
  • dr_spyndr_spyn Posts: 11,301
    @Tim's influence over Pb ads - Chums Autumn Winter Collection at top of page.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 53,230

    An interesting, if rather depressing, piece on Congo here:
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-24396390

    Wasn't it called Zaire a few decades ago? I'd guess, from the article, that was under Mobutu.

    Mr Dancer, I've seen Kinshasa from the relative safety of the other side of the Congo River in Brazzaville. Near as I ever wanted to get.


  • BobajobBobajob Posts: 1,536

    I think that's a good analysis, and suspect that the LibDems on current polling would prefer a period of rethinking too before rushing into a new coalition with anyone.

    Surely the most likely outcome is an immediate purge of the Orange Bookers and a coup by the Beveridge Group - presuming they have enough MPs - which would then make a Lib-Lab Pact a natural choice. It would be interesting to see the breakdown of Liberal MPs who would retain their seat on current forecasts, and how they split along factional lines.

  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    Bobajob said:

    A distinctly odd response from Carlotta and the ever-crackers TGOHF. Of course I support the price control on fares, which are among the most expensive in Europe despite the fact that our 'privatised' railway receives four times the public subsidy that it ever did under BR.

    I was merely pointing out the PB Tory hypocrisy.

    @Alan - when does the marriage tax cut kick in?

    What fraction of RPI/CPI are rail fares ?

    A bit like the energy price wheeze this is just headline grabbing tinkering - but at least it is not damaging to investment in new power stations.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 53,230
    FPT - Bobajob, I have been to Boisdales many a time, but the live Cuban music kinda dilutes its claim to Scottishness (Tartan wallpaper notwithstanding)!
  • PolruanPolruan Posts: 2,083

    The Coalition is only part way through its 5 year programme. At the end of that 5 year period the voters will judge on what has been achieved. You wouldn't judge the quality of a souffle on the basis of how the eggs look.

    That's a good metaphor to employ, actually: as with a souffle, it's all about pumping up an unsustainable bubble at *just* the right time.
  • BobajobBobajob Posts: 1,536

    An interesting, if rather depressing, piece on Congo here:
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-24396390

    Wasn't it called Zaire a few decades ago? I'd guess, from the article, that was under Mobutu.

    Mr Dancer, I've seen Kinshasa from the relative safety of the other side of the Congo River in Brazzaville. Near as I ever wanted to get.


    Bizarrely both cities are capitals of their respective countries and, pedantry surrounding Vatican City apart, at a mile apart the closest two capitals in the world.
  • PolruanPolruan Posts: 2,083

    tim said:

    @Richard

    Labour will spend less than Osborne as a % of GDP though.
    I'll bet on that if you like

    Of course they will, because the coalition's reforms will be bearing fruit and in any case they won't have any choice - the financial markets will see to that. I'd expect a Labour government to have to cut more drastically than Osborne will be planning to do. But it will be done in a panic with maximum damage to confidence and to services, rather like under Callaghan.

    The innocent will perish; wickedness will conquer; ceaseless earthquakes and volcanos will batter the west; in the north locusts will swarm; hurricanes will lash the south and east ...

    Sounds like the Midlands will be very much the place to be.
  • OblitusSumMeOblitusSumMe Posts: 9,143
    Is everyone forgetting what happened after the last election?

    Brown was the incumbent Prime Minister, and he hung on in Downing Street until the Tories and Lib Dems reached an agreement on a Coalition, and so had the numbers to turf him out.

    If GE2015 is in line with the line betting above, then Miliband will not have the numbers to turf Cameron out of Downing Street, unless he has the Lib Dems on his side. Furthermore, to achieve such a distribution of seats it is quite likely that the Tories will have received more votes than Labour, and so there would be some electoral justification for a continuation of the Conservative-Lib Dem Coalition, though such a Coalition would itself be short of a majority.

    In my view, therefore, the only options will be for a formal Labour/Lib Dem Coalition, which would have a workable majority of more than 40, or another election to resolve the split seats/votes judgement of the electorate.
  • SchardsSchards Posts: 210
    TGOHF said:

    PMQs is back. Who is writing Eds questions today ? Len or Hugh ?

    Be interesting to see what Ed goes on. As, one by one, Labour's chickens come home to roost his options are increasingly limited:

    Economy - after IMF? don't think so
    Education - after OEDC? doubt it
    Health - after Burnham shambles? unlikely
    Cuts - after report shows majority feel services have improved? problematic

    I would predict something dull, sober and low key that doesn't invite a kicking
  • dr_spyndr_spyn Posts: 11,301
    Dan Snow's aunt has a new book out on outbreak of WW1 - Lloyd George was her Greet-Grandfather.

    http://www.amazon.co.uk/War-that-Ended-Peace-abandoned/dp/184668272X/ref=la_B000APOOI4_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1381306936&sr=1-1
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 43,847
    Bobajob said:

    A distinctly odd response from Carlotta and the ever-crackers TGOHF. Of course I support the price control on fares, which are among the most expensive in Europe despite the fact that our 'privatised' railway receives four times the public subsidy that it ever did under BR.

    I was merely pointing out the PB Tory hypocrisy.

    @Alan - when does the marriage tax cut kick in?

    No hypocrisy at all. See my last post in the previous thread for why you are comparing different pieces of fruit.

    (Note: you've nearly got the point above. One last intellectual push and you'll understand.)
  • I actually met a Lab --> Con switcher the other day. one of the old Professors in the department. TBF, I think he just tended to vote for whoever was already in power at the time.
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    tim said:

    @TGOHF

    Rail fares will rise faster than pay.

    And so might milk, but flat screen tvs and pertol might fall.

    Is there a term for someone who tries to construct arguments around a single data point ?
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    Schards said:

    TGOHF said:

    PMQs is back. Who is writing Eds questions today ? Len or Hugh ?

    Be interesting to see what Ed goes on. As, one by one, Labour's chickens come home to roost his options are increasingly limited:

    Economy - after IMF? don't think so
    Education - after OEDC? doubt it
    Health - after Burnham shambles? unlikely
    Cuts - after report shows majority feel services have improved? problematic

    I would predict something dull, sober and low key that doesn't invite a kicking
    Leveson surely..
  • BobajobBobajob Posts: 1,536
    tim said:

    Bobajob said:

    A distinctly odd response from Carlotta and the ever-crackers TGOHF. Of course I support the price control on fares, which are among the most expensive in Europe despite the fact that our 'privatised' railway receives four times the public subsidy that it ever did under BR.

    I was merely pointing out the PB Tory hypocrisy.

    @Alan - when does the marriage tax cut kick in?

    Of the measures Alanbrooke reckons will stuff the voters pockets with gold lets add them up.

    Extra money from train policy = £0
    Extra money from fuel policy = £0
    Extra money from marriage tax break (one month before election) = £16.67 for a quarter of married couples.

    We've never had it so good.

  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    tim said:

    On PMQ's I'd say Ed will place Cameron firmly on the spike of Leveson that Dave created for himself.

    Maybe a marker on A&E

    Yes - Ed only gets out of bed for "friends and family".
  • PolruanPolruan Posts: 2,083
    Schards said:

    TGOHF said:

    PMQs is back. Who is writing Eds questions today ? Len or Hugh ?

    Be interesting to see what Ed goes on. As, one by one, Labour's chickens come home to roost his options are increasingly limited:

    Economy - after IMF? don't think so
    Education - after OEDC? doubt it
    Health - after Burnham shambles? unlikely
    Cuts - after report shows majority feel services have improved? problematic

    I would predict something dull, sober and low key that doesn't invite a kicking
    Cost of living, housing costs, low wages, zero hours. That kind of thing. The strategy is going to have to be cementing the idea of a recovery for the rich and more pain for those "ordinary hard-working families".

    It's possible that the 165,000 "middle class families" due to be fined for non-registration for self-assessment as a result of the child benefit changes could make an appearance too. Soft target, though some obvious answers available to Cameron about helping poorer families in other ways. It would probably need to be coupled with the higher earrners' childcare tax break to stick.
  • Anyone who owns property, or with a pension, or with savings in equities ought to be terrified by this. That term "easy-money" just screams "misery ahead".

    'Janet Yellen, a Backer of Pushing the Fed's Policy Boundaries'
    - Expected Nominee for Central-Bank Chief Has Easy-Money Leanings

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303918804579109500690940692.html
  • OblitusSumMeOblitusSumMe Posts: 9,143

    I actually met a Lab --> Con switcher the other day. one of the old Professors in the department. TBF, I think he just tended to vote for whoever was already in power at the time.

    These are uncertain and worrying times. There could be more such voters than is often assumed.
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    tim said:

    TGOHF said:

    tim said:

    @TGOHF

    Rail fares will rise faster than pay.

    And so might milk, but flat screen tvs and pertol might fall.

    Is there a term for someone who tries to construct arguments around a single data point ?

    Single data point?
    Your argument rests on the one month in the last forty when real wages didn't fall, now thats a single data point.
    Income tax fell - for low earners - not in your single data point.
  • dr_spyndr_spyn Posts: 11,301
    @Southamobserver thanks to you I'm now getting ads for Icelandic holidays on the header. When will the Crete ads turn up?
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    Surely everyone outside the press bubble is bored stupid by the Leveson enquiry.

    It really is Westminster navel gazing at its worst.

    So quite possibly Ed will go with it; and cost of living crisis (which seems to be code for public sector wage rises and a price and incomes policy in retro seventies style)
    TGOHF said:

    Schards said:

    TGOHF said:

    PMQs is back. Who is writing Eds questions today ? Len or Hugh ?

    Be interesting to see what Ed goes on. As, one by one, Labour's chickens come home to roost his options are increasingly limited:

    Economy - after IMF? don't think so
    Education - after OEDC? doubt it
    Health - after Burnham shambles? unlikely
    Cuts - after report shows majority feel services have improved? problematic

    I would predict something dull, sober and low key that doesn't invite a kicking
    Leveson surely..
  • anothernickanothernick Posts: 3,591

    Is everyone forgetting what happened after the last election?

    Brown was the incumbent Prime Minister, and he hung on in Downing Street until the Tories and Lib Dems reached an agreement on a Coalition, and so had the numbers to turf him out.

    If GE2015 is in line with the line betting above, then Miliband will not have the numbers to turf Cameron out of Downing Street, unless he has the Lib Dems on his side. Furthermore, to achieve such a distribution of seats it is quite likely that the Tories will have received more votes than Labour, and so there would be some electoral justification for a continuation of the Conservative-Lib Dem Coalition, though such a Coalition would itself be short of a majority.

    In my view, therefore, the only options will be for a formal Labour/Lib Dem Coalition, which would have a workable majority of more than 40, or another election to resolve the split seats/votes judgement of the electorate.

    If there is another hung Parliament both Lab and Con will talk to the Lib Dems. The Lib Dems might decide not to go into another coalition but both the larger parties will try to persuade them, if only to put themselves in a stronger position if they do have to call a second election.
    They will want to be able to say "we are only forcing you back to the polls because the Lib Dems refused our kind an generous coalition offer."
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 62,061
    Mr. Mark, it's a very great shame Congo's turned out the way it has.
  • stodgestodge Posts: 14,037
    Morning all :)

    Strange to muse on the thought that Ed Miliband might "go it alone" with 308 seats while David Cameron thought he couldn't with 306.

    As to what would happen, if those numbers finished up near the truth, I don't expect David Cameron would attmept to cling on by his proverbials - a net loss of 60 seats for the Coalition parties would hardly be seen as a vote of confidence.

    As for Labour, the question is whether they could a) persuade some of the other minor parties to offer a Supply and Confidence arrangementto maintain the Government or whether b) they would go to the Liberal Democrats directly seeking the same.

    Given that they would need only four or five extra votes to ensure they could outvote the combined Conservative-LD numbers, the former might not be unobtainable. In any case, would either the Conservatives or the Liberal Democrats want a quick second election ?

    No, on those numbers, it's Richard Nabavi's nightmare though I'm happy to be far more sanguine.
  • TheWatcherTheWatcher Posts: 5,262
    tim said:

    @SouthamObserver

    Apparently one group are being helped by Osborne to cushion themselves against the plague and pestilence

    Desperate mid-ranking bankers who can’t afford to live in London could be big users of Help to Buy

    “They’re in a difficult position – they’ve got families and are targeting a specific lifestyle which is increasingly unaffordable for them. They’re quite vocal about it, especially at compensation time – if you’re earning less than £500k, it’s very difficult to buy a house in central London and to pay school fees for several children.”


    But never fear George is here

    "The scheme places no ceiling on the incomes of people who can use it, and allows borrowers to take out 95% loan-to-value mortgages on properties worth up to £600k. "

    http://news.efinancialcareers.com/uk-en/152654/mid-ranking-young-bankers-now-priced-out-of-the-property-market/


    George Osborne, he's Mother Theresa really.

    Funny article. Did someone cut and paste it from The Onion?

  • SlackbladderSlackbladder Posts: 9,786
    Polruan said:

    Schards said:

    TGOHF said:

    PMQs is back. Who is writing Eds questions today ? Len or Hugh ?

    Be interesting to see what Ed goes on. As, one by one, Labour's chickens come home to roost his options are increasingly limited:

    Economy - after IMF? don't think so
    Education - after OEDC? doubt it
    Health - after Burnham shambles? unlikely
    Cuts - after report shows majority feel services have improved? problematic

    I would predict something dull, sober and low key that doesn't invite a kicking
    Cost of living, housing costs, low wages, zero hours. That kind of thing. The strategy is going to have to be cementing the idea of a recovery for the rich and more pain for those "ordinary hard-working families".

    It's possible that the 165,000 "middle class families" due to be fined for non-registration for self-assessment as a result of the child benefit changes could make an appearance too. Soft target, though some obvious answers available to Cameron about helping poorer families in other ways. It would probably need to be coupled with the higher earrners' childcare tax break to stick.
    Ed on the side of tax dodgers? Well...it's a thought...
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633

    Surely everyone outside the press bubble is bored stupid by the Leveson enquiry.

    It really is Westminster navel gazing at its worst.

    So quite possibly Ed will go with it; and cost of living crisis (which seems to be code for public sector wage rises and a price and incomes policy in retro seventies style)


    TGOHF said:

    Schards said:

    TGOHF said:

    PMQs is back. Who is writing Eds questions today ? Len or Hugh ?

    Be interesting to see what Ed goes on. As, one by one, Labour's chickens come home to roost his options are increasingly limited:

    Economy - after IMF? don't think so
    Education - after OEDC? doubt it
    Health - after Burnham shambles? unlikely
    Cuts - after report shows majority feel services have improved? problematic

    I would predict something dull, sober and low key that doesn't invite a kicking
    Leveson surely..
    There has been a massive push on the cost of living - at every budget - raising the tax allowance.

    LDs and Cons take a bow - no support from Labour for that policy - if anything they want to reintroduce the 10p level so low earners can join in by "contributing".

  • PolruanPolruan Posts: 2,083

    Polruan said:

    Schards said:

    TGOHF said:

    PMQs is back. Who is writing Eds questions today ? Len or Hugh ?

    Be interesting to see what Ed goes on. As, one by one, Labour's chickens come home to roost his options are increasingly limited:

    Economy - after IMF? don't think so
    Education - after OEDC? doubt it
    Health - after Burnham shambles? unlikely
    Cuts - after report shows majority feel services have improved? problematic

    I would predict something dull, sober and low key that doesn't invite a kicking
    Cost of living, housing costs, low wages, zero hours. That kind of thing. The strategy is going to have to be cementing the idea of a recovery for the rich and more pain for those "ordinary hard-working families".

    It's possible that the 165,000 "middle class families" due to be fined for non-registration for self-assessment as a result of the child benefit changes could make an appearance too. Soft target, though some obvious answers available to Cameron about helping poorer families in other ways. It would probably need to be coupled with the higher earrners' childcare tax break to stick.
    Ed on the side of tax dodgers? Well...it's a thought...
    Cameron taking the line of describing Tory core voters who missed an administrative deadline in a terribly complex and frightening system as "tax dodgers". Well... it's a thought.
  • philiphphiliph Posts: 4,704
    tim said:

    Every time Osborne proclaims economic victory something like this happens.

    ONS ‏@statisticsONS
    Total Production decreased by 1.1% between July and August 2013 http://bit.ly/18X4L27 #GDP

    Ever heard of Holidays?

  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 53,230

    I actually met a Lab --> Con switcher the other day. one of the old Professors in the department. TBF, I think he just tended to vote for whoever was already in power at the time.

    These are uncertain and worrying times. There could be more such voters than is often assumed.
    Also worth remembering that in 2010, whilst from a distance we now think Gordon Brown was utterly reviled and only his mum would ever vote for him, there were significant numbers of people who actually thought he had done a good job in steering the UK off the rocks during the banking crisis. I know - I met such people whilst out canvassing. Those 2010 Labour voters are going to be more amenable to the idea that the Coalition has also done a good job on the economy. Ed Miliband would be ill-advised to assume they are in his pocket next time.
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    I would like to see a lower starting rate of income tax introduced, and for income tax to have a wider base. It would also be better to have multiple bands with smaller increments between them, rather than the current arrangement which has steep steps at various points and high marginal rares .
    TGOHF said:

    Surely everyone outside the press bubble is bored stupid by the Leveson enquiry.

    It really is Westminster navel gazing at its worst.

    So quite possibly Ed will go with it; and cost of living crisis (which seems to be code for public sector wage rises and a price and incomes policy in retro seventies style)


    TGOHF said:

    Schards said:

    TGOHF said:

    PMQs is back. Who is writing Eds questions today ? Len or Hugh ?

    Be interesting to see what Ed goes on. As, one by one, Labour's chickens come home to roost his options are increasingly limited:

    Economy - after IMF? don't think so
    Education - after OEDC? doubt it
    Health - after Burnham shambles? unlikely
    Cuts - after report shows majority feel services have improved? problematic

    I would predict something dull, sober and low key that doesn't invite a kicking
    Leveson surely..
    There has been a massive push on the cost of living - at every budget - raising the tax allowance.

    LDs and Cons take a bow - no support from Labour for that policy - if anything they want to reintroduce the 10p level so low earners can join in by "contributing".

  • dr_spyndr_spyn Posts: 11,301
    Ed Miliband has yet to convince voters he can be PM, poll of polls reveals
    Conference success only changed his rating from ‘dire’ to ‘poor’

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/ed-miliband-has-yet-to-convince-voters-he-can-be-pm-poll-of-polls-reveals-8867356.html
  • SlackbladderSlackbladder Posts: 9,786
    philiph said:

    tim said:

    Every time Osborne proclaims economic victory something like this happens.

    ONS ‏@statisticsONS
    Total Production decreased by 1.1% between July and August 2013 http://bit.ly/18X4L27 #GDP

    Ever heard of Holidays?

    Don't be silly, tim has his public duty in posting here 16 hours a day every day.. there's no time for holidays in that.
  • anothernickanothernick Posts: 3,591

    Polruan said:

    Schards said:

    TGOHF said:

    PMQs is back. Who is writing Eds questions today ? Len or Hugh ?

    Be interesting to see what Ed goes on. As, one by one, Labour's chickens come home to roost his options are increasingly limited:

    Economy - after IMF? don't think so
    Education - after OEDC? doubt it
    Health - after Burnham shambles? unlikely
    Cuts - after report shows majority feel services have improved? problematic

    I would predict something dull, sober and low key that doesn't invite a kicking
    Cost of living, housing costs, low wages, zero hours. That kind of thing. The strategy is going to have to be cementing the idea of a recovery for the rich and more pain for those "ordinary hard-working families".

    It's possible that the 165,000 "middle class families" due to be fined for non-registration for self-assessment as a result of the child benefit changes could make an appearance too. Soft target, though some obvious answers available to Cameron about helping poorer families in other ways. It would probably need to be coupled with the higher earrners' childcare tax break to stick.
    Ed on the side of tax dodgers? Well...it's a thought...
    I doubt Ed will raise the 165,000, though it is worth observing that the Tories have been very quiet about this. If there were 165,000 benefit claimants who had not filled in the forms correctly and and owed money to the taxpayer ministers would have been quick to condemn those involved.
  • philiphphiliph Posts: 4,704

    I actually met a Lab --> Con switcher the other day. one of the old Professors in the department. TBF, I think he just tended to vote for whoever was already in power at the time.

    These are uncertain and worrying times. There could be more such voters than is often assumed.
    Also worth remembering that in 2010, whilst from a distance we now think Gordon Brown was utterly reviled and only his mum would ever vote for him, there were significant numbers of people who actually thought he had done a good job in steering the UK off the rocks during the banking crisis. I know - I met such people whilst out canvassing. Those 2010 Labour voters are going to be more amenable to the idea that the Coalition has also done a good job on the economy. Ed Miliband would be ill-advised to assume they are in his pocket next time.
    The financial crisis and having an incumbent PM who was seen by some as experienced, strong and knowledgeable to deal with it added a few percentage points to Labour at the last election, keeping them above the core vote level of 25% to 26%.
  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    LOL

    Европейский комиссар @MoodySlayerUK
    If Adolphe Miliband did kill someone's kitten Ed Milband will now have to take on 3 billion youtube viewers as well as the press.
  • SlackbladderSlackbladder Posts: 9,786
    tim said:

    Polruan said:

    Schards said:

    TGOHF said:

    PMQs is back. Who is writing Eds questions today ? Len or Hugh ?

    Be interesting to see what Ed goes on. As, one by one, Labour's chickens come home to roost his options are increasingly limited:

    Economy - after IMF? don't think so
    Education - after OEDC? doubt it
    Health - after Burnham shambles? unlikely
    Cuts - after report shows majority feel services have improved? problematic

    I would predict something dull, sober and low key that doesn't invite a kicking
    Cost of living, housing costs, low wages, zero hours. That kind of thing. The strategy is going to have to be cementing the idea of a recovery for the rich and more pain for those "ordinary hard-working families".

    It's possible that the 165,000 "middle class families" due to be fined for non-registration for self-assessment as a result of the child benefit changes could make an appearance too. Soft target, though some obvious answers available to Cameron about helping poorer families in other ways. It would probably need to be coupled with the higher earrners' childcare tax break to stick.
    Ed on the side of tax dodgers? Well...it's a thought...
    You reckon Cameron is actually thick enough to give the Mail,Telegraph and Express that line.
    Wow

    Yes, because Cameron would clearly use that term.

    fool.
  • MikeSmithsonMikeSmithson Posts: 7,382
    The anti-immigrant van ads banned by the Adveritising Standards Authority.
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-24452551

  • FrankBoothFrankBooth Posts: 9,985
    It wouldn't quite work on those seat numbers but I wonder if Cameron and Clegg would try to do a deal to keep Labour out? Just because Labour would have the most seats they wouldn't have any right to govern, as OGH has pointed out before. Question would be whether the Lib Dem grassroots would back such a deal? Be very difficult for Clegg to deal with the Tories if Labour was the largest Party, but what if the Tories had the most votes? Based on current polling I can't see the LDs backing the Tories unless there is no feasible alternative. However Ed's playing a slightly dangerous game if he wants to avoid coalition.

    My guess is in such a scenario Labour would govern as a minority, Clegg would step down (forced out?) and you'd have a new Lib Dem leader who might work more closely with Labour. Whether a coalition might form, who's to say? However there are plenty of Lib Dems who will have got used to government salaries and lifestyles. A five year minority administration does sound a bit flaky.
  • philiphphiliph Posts: 4,704
    tim said:

    philiph said:

    tim said:

    Every time Osborne proclaims economic victory something like this happens.

    ONS ‏@statisticsONS
    Total Production decreased by 1.1% between July and August 2013 http://bit.ly/18X4L27 #GDP

    Ever heard of Holidays?


    Quick, better tell the ONS they need to take account of holidays, bet they've never thought of that.

    Production fell by 0.5 per cent between July 2012 and August 2012, with manufacturing falling by 1.1 per cent

    Can't be bothered to look any further back, but Shelock, August is not a strong month for production. The ONS is measuring the total, not the total with allowances for days lost by strikes, holidays, sickies and people mindlessly posting on the web.
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    edited October 2013

    The anti-immigrant van ads banned by the Adveritising Standards Authority.
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-24452551

    "But the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) cleared the campaign of being offensive and irresponsible.......The advert said there had been 106 arrests in the area in the past week.....
    In its ruling, the ASA said the reference to the number of arrests was misleading because it did not relate to those detained in the specific areas where people would have seen the vans. It said the figure referred to arrests which occurred across a large part of north London more than two weeks before the campaign began.

    We concluded that the poster was unlikely to incite or exacerbate racial hatred and tensions in multi-cultural communities”

    So with a simple modification they can re-appear.....but I suspect the Home Office got more than enough free publicity from the Outrage Bus......
  • TheWatcherTheWatcher Posts: 5,262
    tim said:

    The anti-immigrant van ads banned by the Adveritising Standards Authority.
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-24452551

    They can't even get their stats right on the side of a van.

    IDS and Shapps would drive an ice cream van around selling "92's"

    "But the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) cleared the campaign of being offensive and irresponsible."
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,658
    tim said:

    Bobajob said:

    A distinctly odd response from Carlotta and the ever-crackers TGOHF. Of course I support the price control on fares, which are among the most expensive in Europe despite the fact that our 'privatised' railway receives four times the public subsidy that it ever did under BR.

    I was merely pointing out the PB Tory hypocrisy.

    @Alan - when does the marriage tax cut kick in?

    Of the measures Alanbrooke reckons will stuff the voters pockets with gold lets add them up.

    Extra money from train policy = £0
    Extra money from fuel policy = £0
    Extra money from marriage tax break (one month before election) = £16.67 for a quarter of married couples.

    Extra money from energy freeze = £0 and a blackout risk.

    We can play this all day, but the facts remain HMG can and will put money in pockets pre GE Milband can't. As you continually point out our mediocre CoE depends for his life and future prospects on re-relection. A man that desperate isn't going to save up cash for Ed Balls.

    So bribes will follow and the man who chose the CoL battleground will wonder why the other side have bullets to fire and he hasn't . A stupid strategy from a man more stupid than Osborne. Really where does Labour find them ?

    Anyhoo, here's Isabel Hardman's take , I know you always like to have your anecdotes from a journalist since you can't work things out for yourself. Nice to see George and Mikey smiling.

    http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/coffeehouse/2013/10/tory-cost-of-living-drive-begins-in-earnest/
  • PolruanPolruan Posts: 2,083

    tim said:

    Polruan said:

    Schards said:

    TGOHF said:

    PMQs is back. Who is writing Eds questions today ? Len or Hugh ?

    Be interesting to see what Ed goes on. As, one by one, Labour's chickens come home to roost his options are increasingly limited:

    Economy - after IMF? don't think so
    Education - after OEDC? doubt it
    Health - after Burnham shambles? unlikely
    Cuts - after report shows majority feel services have improved? problematic

    I would predict something dull, sober and low key that doesn't invite a kicking
    Cost of living, housing costs, low wages, zero hours. That kind of thing. The strategy is going to have to be cementing the idea of a recovery for the rich and more pain for those "ordinary hard-working families".

    It's possible that the 165,000 "middle class families" due to be fined for non-registration for self-assessment as a result of the child benefit changes could make an appearance too. Soft target, though some obvious answers available to Cameron about helping poorer families in other ways. It would probably need to be coupled with the higher earrners' childcare tax break to stick.
    Ed on the side of tax dodgers? Well...it's a thought...
    You reckon Cameron is actually thick enough to give the Mail,Telegraph and Express that line.
    Wow

    Yes, because Cameron would clearly use that term.

    fool.
    So seriously, how would he approach it? "The Leader of the Opposition is standing up for those who don't meet their responsibilities".... well, that's just a polite version of the same thing. Or were you citing something that might be a fair point (in a slightly warped worldview) but which we all agree Cameron couldn't allude to in a reply?
  • MikeSmithsonMikeSmithson Posts: 7,382
    edited October 2013

    The anti-immigrant van ads banned by the Adveritising Standards Authority.
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-24452551

    "But the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) cleared the campaign of being offensive and irresponsible.......The advert said there had been 106 arrests in the area in the past week.....
    In its ruling, the ASA said the reference to the number of arrests was misleading because it did not relate to those detained in the specific areas where people would have seen the vans. It said the figure referred to arrests which occurred across a large part of north London more than two weeks before the campaign began.

    We concluded that the poster was unlikely to incite or exacerbate racial hatred and tensions in multi-cultural communities”

    So with a simple modification they can re-appear.....but I suspect the Home Office got more than enough free publicity from the Outrage Bus......
    The Home Office was able to get away with this campaign while Jeremy Brown was LD minister. With Norman Baker there it's going to be a lot tougher for Theresa.

  • FrankBoothFrankBooth Posts: 9,985
    dr_spyn said:

    Ed Miliband has yet to convince voters he can be PM, poll of polls reveals
    Conference success only changed his rating from ‘dire’ to ‘poor’

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/ed-miliband-has-yet-to-convince-voters-he-can-be-pm-poll-of-polls-reveals-8867356.html

    You've got to start somewhere!
  • john_zimsjohn_zims Posts: 3,399
    @Tim

    And the New Labour idiots told us there were only 13,000 immigrants that would come to the UK from Eastern Europe,only 2 million out.
  • philiphphiliph Posts: 4,704
    edited October 2013

    tim said:

    The anti-immigrant van ads banned by the Adveritising Standards Authority.
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-24452551

    They can't even get their stats right on the side of a van.

    IDS and Shapps would drive an ice cream van around selling "92's"

    "But the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) cleared the campaign of being offensive and irresponsible."
    I think I would be tempted to put them back on the streets with the words 'Up to 106 people arrested in your area', as that ceases to be misleading, and it would indicate to the ASA that they are a bunch of useless paper shufflers.

    There really should be a threshold of something like 20,000 (there were just over 200) complaints before they get involved in wasting money by investigating and pontificating about things that really are unimportant.
  • The Home Office was able to get away with this campaign while Jeremy Brown was LD minister. With Norman Baker there it's going to be a lot tougher for Theresa.

    LOL!

    The lady who sorted Abu Quatada (and his family) is unlikely to be fazed by Norman Baker.
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    edited October 2013
    @tim - a Labour poster on immigration stats? Really?
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    edited October 2013

    The anti-immigrant van ads banned by the Adveritising Standards Authority.
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-24452551



    We concluded that the poster was unlikely to incite or exacerbate racial hatred and tensions in multi-cultural communities”

    So with a simple modification they can re-appear.....but I suspect the Home Office got more than enough free publicity from the Outrage Bus......

    The anti-immigrant van ads banned by the Adveritising Standards Authority.
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-24452551

    "But the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) cleared the campaign of being offensive and irresponsible.......The advert said there had been 106 arrests in the area in the past week.....
    In its ruling, the ASA said the reference to the number of arrests was misleading because it did not relate to those detained in the specific areas where people would have seen the vans. It said the figure referred to arrests which occurred across a large part of north London more than two weeks before the campaign began.

    We concluded that the poster was unlikely to incite or exacerbate racial hatred and tensions in multi-cultural communities”

    So with a simple modification they can re-appear.....but I suspect the Home Office got more than enough free publicity from the Outrage Bus......
    With Norman Baker there it's going to be a lot tougher for Theresa.
    Oh I don't know.....I'm sure Theresa can find a nice conspiracy to keep him diverted.....


    "Norman Baker, the new Home Office Minister who believes MI5 covered up the murder of Dr David Kelly, will not be granted access to classified documents on counter-terrorism issues.
    The Home Office told spy chiefs the Liberal Democrat conspiracy theorist will not learn their secrets, security sources said."

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2450671/Norman-Baker-closed-door-theory-David-Kelly-murdered.html#ixzz2hDNM6ciC
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    tim said:

    Bobajob said:

    A distinctly odd response from Carlotta and the ever-crackers TGOHF. Of course I support the price control on fares, which are among the most expensive in Europe despite the fact that our 'privatised' railway receives four times the public subsidy that it ever did under BR.

    I was merely pointing out the PB Tory hypocrisy.

    @Alan - when does the marriage tax cut kick in?

    Of the measures Alanbrooke reckons will stuff the voters pockets with gold lets add them up.

    Extra money from train policy = £0
    Extra money from fuel policy = £0
    Extra money from marriage tax break (one month before election) = £16.67 for a quarter of married couples.

    Extra money from raising the income tax allowance ?

    Thank GO for that one...
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,658

    dr_spyn said:

    Ed Miliband has yet to convince voters he can be PM, poll of polls reveals
    Conference success only changed his rating from ‘dire’ to ‘poor’

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/ed-miliband-has-yet-to-convince-voters-he-can-be-pm-poll-of-polls-reveals-8867356.html

    You've got to start somewhere!
    Of course, give him another 3 years and he might have progressed to weak or even average. Shame the election's getting in the way first.
  • TheWatcherTheWatcher Posts: 5,262
    tim said:

    And continuing the stats theme, here comes Madrassa Gove

    @jaffathecake: Uh oh, this man is Secretary of State for Education (http://t.co/kv6CRIqPEe via @jbolster) http://t.co/GdDnPgFyAy

    Quoting from The Onion again?

    'Throughout the session, I would appeal to my colleagues here particularly, and also to you, Secretary of State, to try to keep questions and answers short and pithy. We may not always manage the 140 characters of Twitter...'
  • john_zimsjohn_zims Posts: 3,399
    @Tim

    'And continuing the stats theme, here comes Madrassa Gove'


    And slightly more significant stats.


    England's young adults trail world in literacy and maths
    BBC News ‎- 1 day ago
    By Sean Coughlan BBC News education correspondent ... The OECD's Andreas Schleicher warned of a shrinking pool of skilled workers.


    Why does everything Labour touches end in a cluster.uck?
  • edmundintokyoedmundintokyo Posts: 17,709
    Bobajob said:

    I think that's a good analysis, and suspect that the LibDems on current polling would prefer a period of rethinking too before rushing into a new coalition with anyone.

    Surely the most likely outcome is an immediate purge of the Orange Bookers and a coup by the Beveridge Group - presuming they have enough MPs - which would then make a Lib-Lab Pact a natural choice. It would be interesting to see the breakdown of Liberal MPs who would retain their seat on current forecasts, and how they split along factional lines.

    The interests of the remaining LibDem MPs are the main thing that might keep Cameron in power in a Hung Parliament. Everyone who stands to lose their seat from a Lib-Con deal will already have lost it, and some of the people who remain will be worried about the consequences of making a deal with Lab.
  • OblitusSumMeOblitusSumMe Posts: 9,143
    philiph said:

    tim said:

    philiph said:

    tim said:

    Every time Osborne proclaims economic victory something like this happens.

    ONS ‏@statisticsONS
    Total Production decreased by 1.1% between July and August 2013 http://bit.ly/18X4L27 #GDP

    Ever heard of Holidays?


    Quick, better tell the ONS they need to take account of holidays, bet they've never thought of that.

    Production fell by 0.5 per cent between July 2012 and August 2012, with manufacturing falling by 1.1 per cent

    Can't be bothered to look any further back, but Shelock, August is not a strong month for production. The ONS is measuring the total, not the total with allowances for days lost by strikes, holidays, sickies and people mindlessly posting on the web.
    The first line of the ONS release:

    "Users are reminded that all figures contained within this release are seasonally adjusted estimates."

    Sorry to spoil your fun tim, but I thought I'd point out the obvious to philip before he makes more of a fool of himself.

  • FrankBoothFrankBooth Posts: 9,985

    Bobajob said:

    I think that's a good analysis, and suspect that the LibDems on current polling would prefer a period of rethinking too before rushing into a new coalition with anyone.

    Surely the most likely outcome is an immediate purge of the Orange Bookers and a coup by the Beveridge Group - presuming they have enough MPs - which would then make a Lib-Lab Pact a natural choice. It would be interesting to see the breakdown of Liberal MPs who would retain their seat on current forecasts, and how they split along factional lines.

    The interests of the remaining LibDem MPs are the main thing that might keep Cameron in power in a Hung Parliament. Everyone who stands to lose their seat from a Lib-Con deal will already have lost it, and some of the people who remain will be worried about the consequences of making a deal with Lab.
    Clegg would have to get any deal with the Tories past his party. Judging by the polls done recently, I don't see Lib Dem members backing a Tory deal again unless there is no alternative. That said if anti-Clegg people keep leaving the party they could look quite different in 2015.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 62,061
    Mr. Smithson, they're not anti-immigrant. They're anti-illegal immigrant.
  • PolruanPolruan Posts: 2,083

    Mr. Smithson, they're not anti-immigrant. They're anti-illegal immigrant.

    Reluctantly I'd tend to agree in the context of the ASA ruling (the deliberate appropriation of language with an anti-immigrant history was unpleasant, but the substance of the ruling was that the ads stayed the right side of the line of that line). It's a pretty good result for government, to be honest, though I'd hope that the stats point would give them pause for thought about the ongoing flagrant misuse of numbers - not, of course, that the Home Office is the main offender.
  • MikeSmithsonMikeSmithson Posts: 7,382

    Bobajob said:

    I think that's a good analysis, and suspect that the LibDems on current polling would prefer a period of rethinking too before rushing into a new coalition with anyone.

    Surely the most likely outcome is an immediate purge of the Orange Bookers and a coup by the Beveridge Group - presuming they have enough MPs - which would then make a Lib-Lab Pact a natural choice. It would be interesting to see the breakdown of Liberal MPs who would retain their seat on current forecasts, and how they split along factional lines.

    The interests of the remaining LibDem MPs are the main thing that might keep Cameron in power in a Hung Parliament. Everyone who stands to lose their seat from a Lib-Con deal will already have lost it, and some of the people who remain will be worried about the consequences of making a deal with Lab.
    Clegg would have to get any deal with the Tories past his party. Judging by the polls done recently, I don't see Lib Dem members backing a Tory deal again unless there is no alternative. That said if anti-Clegg people keep leaving the party they could look quite different in 2015.
    Clegg would find a second CON-LD deal easier for his party to swallow if the alternative was a LAB minority government that didn't win on votes.



  • john_zimsjohn_zims Posts: 3,399
    @Tim

    '2 Million Eastern Europeans in the UK, I know you're clueless but really, don't just make stuff up.'

    656,395 in just 3 years registered on a voluntary basis,it's you that's clueless.

    'The Home Office publishes quarterly statistics on applications to the Worker Registration Scheme. Figures published in August 2007 indicated that some 656,395 persons were accepted on to the scheme between 1 May 2004 and 30 June 2007, of whom 430,395 were Polish nationals. However, as the scheme is voluntary, offers no financial incentive and is not enforced immigrants are free to ignore the scheme. They may work legally in the UK provided they have a Polish identity card or passport and a National Insurance number. This has led to some estimates of Polish nationals in the UK being much higher.[25]'
  • PolruanPolruan Posts: 2,083
    tim said:

    Those PB Tory Stats Genius Production Figures again

    April - Down 3.2%
    June - Down 3.2%
    September - Down 3.2%

    And worst of all, February, down a massive 9.7%

    Impact of February half-term skiing or Caribbean winter-sun breaks, surely?
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    Darling not available ?

    norman smith ‏@BBCNormanS 1m

    Speaker turns down Labour request for Urgent Commons question on #badgers
  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    edited October 2013
    Tory education news @toryeducation
    Bad first day at school for @TristramHuntMP RE skills. No one swallowing risible line about "huge improvements in GCSE results" under Labour

    Tory education news @toryeducation
    Sun leader: "...But these were rendered all but meaningless by the grade inflation Labour oversaw” @TristramHuntMP (2/2)
  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    Noman Baker is like an old woman with a basket on her bicycle compared to the Ice Queen.

    The Home Office was able to get away with this campaign while Jeremy Brown was LD minister. With Norman Baker there it's going to be a lot tougher for Theresa.

    LOL!

    The lady who sorted Abu Quatada (and his family) is unlikely to be fazed by Norman Baker.
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,658
    tim said:

    Those PB Tory Stats Genius Production Figures again

    April - Down 3.2%
    June - Down 3.2%
    September - Down 3.2%

    And worst of all, February, down a massive 9.7%

    chortle.

    oh dear pinning your hopes on Osborne's iffy stats. They'll get revised upwards with time like the two dips that weren't. Do I believe half collected data or what the blokes in the Midlands here are saying ? Not really that tough a call. But go on believe what you will, it keeps us entertained.
This discussion has been closed.