FPT: Mr. Eagles, go and check that map. You've started new threads twice today, right after I posted it.
Honestly. Anyone would think you were doing it on purpose.
Sales of the Mail will drop sharply.
That's a safe prediction, they've been dropping sharply for some time and there's no reason to expect the change of political direction to change this trend.
FPT: Mr. Eagles, go and check that map. You've started new threads twice today, right after I posted it.
Honestly. Anyone would think you were doing it on purpose.
Sales of the Mail will drop sharply.
That's a safe prediction, they've been dropping sharply for some time and there's no reason to expect the change of political direction to change this trend.
As with most papers. I doubt very much if the editorial line has much impact on sales either way.
I have flagged this up over the last few days and doubt it will effect circulation or the on line paper we receive. The daily version has moved pro TM and the sunday version lessened it's remain stance
As I said earlier my good wife has joined the conservative party today for the first time at 79
So she has neutralised one of the entryist Ukippers
I have flagged this up over the last few days and doubt it will effect circulation or the on line paper we receive. The daily version has moved pro TM and the sunday version lessened it's remain stance
As I said earlier my good wife has joined the conservative party today for the first time at 79
So she has neutralised one of the entryist Ukippers
Will be good to get some young blood into the party...
I’ve had my surgery and I’m still alive... So fantastic news!
Well done and great for you to be over your operation but take time to recover.
When I had my bi-lateral hernia surgery last November I was back in hospital 10 days later with suspected problems which turned out to be fatigue due to impatience to be up and running (and posting on here) too soon
FPT: Mr. Eagles, go and check that map. You've started new threads twice today, right after I posted it.
Honestly. Anyone would think you were doing it on purpose.
Sales of the Mail will drop sharply.
That's a safe prediction, they've been dropping sharply for some time and there's no reason to expect the change of political direction to change this trend.
As with most papers. I doubt very much if the editorial line has much impact on sales either way.
Since my dad died, my mum has cut down buying the Mail from seven days a week to Saturday and Sunday only. My dad used to love having it around to read it all day when he was ill. My mum, however, has decided she would just get it at the weekends for the bigger crosswords. I'm sure part of her decision was related to the tone of the paper which she definitely resents.
I have flagged this up over the last few days and doubt it will effect circulation or the on line paper we receive. The daily version has moved pro TM and the sunday version lessened it's remain stance
As I said earlier my good wife has joined the conservative party today for the first time at 79
So she has neutralised one of the entryist Ukippers
Will be good to get some young blood into the party...
Every little helps and she has had a personal message from Brendon.
She has joined due to her revulsion at Corbyn and those around him
The most important bit in that piece is the line about Barnier seeing his job as negotiating the withdrawal agreement rather than anything else. Once out, I strongly suspect there will be little appetite within the EU for negotiating any sort of long-term FTA with Britain. Certainly not as a priority. So we either stay in the transition stage indefinitely or end up in a No-Deal scenario two years later.
FPT: Mr. Eagles, go and check that map. You've started new threads twice today, right after I posted it.
Honestly. Anyone would think you were doing it on purpose.
Sales of the Mail will drop sharply.
That's a safe prediction, they've been dropping sharply for some time and there's no reason to expect the change of political direction to change this trend.
As with most papers. I doubt very much if the editorial line has much impact on sales either way.
Since my dad died, my mum has cut down buying the Mail from seven days a week to Saturday and Sunday only. My dad used to love having it around to read it all day when he was ill. My mum, however, has decided she would just get it at the weekends for the bigger crosswords. I'm sure part of her decision was related to the tone of the paper which she definitely resents.
To be honest Alastair she would be better paying £9.99 per month and get the actual paper, including sundays, downloaded with all the daily puzzles. My wife loves them
The most important bit in that piece is the line about Barnier seeing his job as negotiating the withdrawal agreement rather than anything else. Once out, I strongly suspect there will be little appetite within the EU for negotiating any sort of long-term FTA with Britain. Certainly not as a priority. So we either stay in the transition stage indefinitely or end up in a No-Deal scenario two years later.
This is the bit I never get with remain, theres hardly a stream of nations begging us to come back. If this had been France whuch had voted leave the commission would be falling over itself to get a remain vote.
That sort of sums up our much vaunted "influence" in Europe tp me .
FPT: Mr. Eagles, go and check that map. You've started new threads twice today, right after I posted it.
Honestly. Anyone would think you were doing it on purpose.
Sales of the Mail will drop sharply.
That's a safe prediction, they've been dropping sharply for some time and there's no reason to expect the change of political direction to change this trend.
As with most papers. I doubt very much if the editorial line has much impact on sales either way.
Since my dad died, my mum has cut down buying the Mail from seven days a week to Saturday and Sunday only. My dad used to love having it around to read it all day when he was ill. My mum, however, has decided she would just get it at the weekends for the bigger crosswords. I'm sure part of her decision was related to the tone of the paper which she definitely resents.
To be honest Alastair she would be better paying £9.99 per month and get the actual paper, including sundays, downloaded with all the daily puzzles. My wife loves them
She knows that but my mum is a very late adopter to the online world. She's only just got her own facebook account and she refuses point blank to do online banking.
FPT: Mr. Eagles, go and check that map. You've started new threads twice today, right after I posted it.
Honestly. Anyone would think you were doing it on purpose.
Sales of the Mail will drop sharply.
That's a safe prediction, they've been dropping sharply for some time and there's no reason to expect the change of political direction to change this trend.
As with most papers. I doubt very much if the editorial line has much impact on sales either way.
Since my dad died, my mum has cut down buying the Mail from seven days a week to Saturday and Sunday only. My dad used to love having it around to read it all day when he was ill. My mum, however, has decided she would just get it at the weekends for the bigger crosswords. I'm sure part of her decision was related to the tone of the paper which she definitely resents.
To be honest Alastair she would be better paying £9.99 per month and get the actual paper, including sundays, downloaded with all the daily puzzles. My wife loves them
She knows that but my mum is a very late adopter to the online world. She's only just got her own facebook account and she refuses point blank to do online banking.
My wife has her own facebook account and manages mail plus very well. You do not need to read the politics in it as otherwise it has lots of interesting content
Are those owed refunds of goods by the company within their rights, morally, to walk into a store and simply take them?
Morality has nothing to do with the law. The law will not provide protection to anyone seeking to assert their 'moral' rights by walking into a store and taking something without paying for it.
People who did not receive their goods are creditors of the old company and have to proceed accordingly.
The USA Supreme Court nomination process has taken a dramatic twist.
It turns out the Republicans just happen to have a letter lying around signed by 65 female high school acquaintances of Kavanaugh saying he didn't seem like a rapists when he was in high school.
Amazing they had this letter ready and good to go.
Are those owed refunds of goods by the company within their rights, morally, to walk into a store and simply take them?
Morality has nothing to do with the law. The law will not provide protection to anyone seeking to assert their 'moral' rights by walking into a store and taking something without paying for it.
People who did not receive their goods are creditors of the old company and have to proceed accordingly.
Consider whether the customer, who is owed their £29.99, is morally entitled to put themselves ahead of employees, the pension scheme, or supplies owed thousands (or millions)
That was discussed earlier and when the actual deal is agreed with a fanfare, as it will be, by TM and the EU 27 reality meet the the politics and the 'probably' she said today may well be very different.
Lisa Nandy said yesterday she was inclined to vote for the deal
That was discussed earlier and when the actual deal is agreed with a fanfare, as it will be, by TM and the EU 27 reality meet the the politics and the 'probably' she said today may well be very different.
Lisa Nandy said yesterday she was inclined to vote for the deal
And how she gets to a GE I have no idea
There's many a slip twixt cup & lip - but I do hope we get a reasonable deal and the JRMs and Gina Millers of this world can retreat into their well deserved obscurity and the footnotes of history. There are so many dangerous nutters on the world stage it will be one less problem if the UK and EU can reach a sensible accommodation.
Del Quentin Wilber ✔ @DelWilber !!! Prosecutor says that Manafort is cooperating with special counsel investigation !!!
4:24 PM - Sep 14, 2018
Mueller prosecutor Andrew Weissmann did not immediately expand on what cooperation is required under the deal.... according to Politico.
It will be a while before we know how significant it might be.
All of these plea bargains means that evidence is not being tested in court and the 'cooperation' being 'required' means that what emerges from that process is tainted.
FPT: Mr. Eagles, go and check that map. You've started new threads twice today, right after I posted it.
Honestly. Anyone would think you were doing it on purpose.
Sales of the Mail will drop sharply.
That's a safe prediction, they've been dropping sharply for some time and there's no reason to expect the change of political direction to change this trend.
As with most papers. I doubt very much if the editorial line has much impact on sales either way.
Since my dad died, my mum has cut down buying the Mail from seven days a week to Saturday and Sunday only. My dad used to love having it around to read it all day when he was ill. My mum, however, has decided she would just get it at the weekends for the bigger crosswords. I'm sure part of her decision was related to the tone of the paper which she definitely resents.
Living abroad I read all my news on-line apart from a few freebies occasionally.
Are those owed refunds of goods by the company within their rights, morally, to walk into a store and simply take them?
Morality has nothing to do with the law. The law will not provide protection to anyone seeking to assert their 'moral' rights by walking into a store and taking something without paying for it.
People who did not receive their goods are creditors of the old company and have to proceed accordingly.
Not the question I asked. I am aware that morality and the law are different.
The new editor is clearly sticking up for his core constituency – the middle classes. A house price crash suits them not.
A house price crash makes it easier to move up marker and/or a better area or even to London.
Yes - price crashes only really harm those cashing in their bricks so to speak. In 1980 I lost 20K on my flat and gained 25k on the house I wanted to buy. Pretty much a wash.
Are those owed refunds of goods by the company within their rights, morally, to walk into a store and simply take them?
Morality has nothing to do with the law. The law will not provide protection to anyone seeking to assert their 'moral' rights by walking into a store and taking something without paying for it.
People who did not receive their goods are creditors of the old company and have to proceed accordingly.
Not the question I asked. I am aware that morality and the law are different.
The answer to your question is a no. I was just putting it into a broader context.
Del Quentin Wilber ✔ @DelWilber !!! Prosecutor says that Manafort is cooperating with special counsel investigation !!!
4:24 PM - Sep 14, 2018
Mueller prosecutor Andrew Weissmann did not immediately expand on what cooperation is required under the deal.... according to Politico.
It will be a while before we know how significant it might be.
All of these plea bargains means that evidence is not being tested in court and the 'cooperation' being 'required' means that what emerges from that process is tainted.
This is not how justice should work.
Manafort has already been found guilty by a jury on multiple counts.
As for 'tainted' evidence, defences are well versed in making exactly that point, as we saw in Manafort's own trial - which is why it would need corroborating, as it was in Manafort's own case.
Are you saying that the criminal justice system ought never to be allowed to obtain evidence from confessed criminals in return for a degree of sentencing leniency ? That is how the justice system woks in many countries, including to some degree our own.
Del Quentin Wilber ✔ @DelWilber !!! Prosecutor says that Manafort is cooperating with special counsel investigation !!!
4:24 PM - Sep 14, 2018
Mueller prosecutor Andrew Weissmann did not immediately expand on what cooperation is required under the deal.... according to Politico.
It will be a while before we know how significant it might be.
All of these plea bargains means that evidence is not being tested in court and the 'cooperation' being 'required' means that what emerges from that process is tainted.
This is not how justice should work.
Manafort has already been found guilty by a jury on multiple counts.
As for 'tainted' evidence, defences are well versed in making exactly that point, as we saw in Manafort's own trial - which is why it would need corroborating, as it was in Manafort's own case.
Are you saying that the criminal justice system ought never to be allowed to obtain evidence from confessed criminals in return for a degree of sentencing leniency ? That is how the justice system woks in many countries, including to some degree our own.
It was a more general comment. Plea bargaining is used to settle 90% of court cases.
Del Quentin Wilber ✔ @DelWilber !!! Prosecutor says that Manafort is cooperating with special counsel investigation !!!
4:24 PM - Sep 14, 2018
Mueller prosecutor Andrew Weissmann did not immediately expand on what cooperation is required under the deal.... according to Politico.
It will be a while before we know how significant it might be.
All of these plea bargains means that evidence is not being tested in court and the 'cooperation' being 'required' means that what emerges from that process is tainted.
This is not how justice should work.
Manafort has already been found guilty by a jury on multiple counts.
As for 'tainted' evidence, defences are well versed in making exactly that point, as we saw in Manafort's own trial - which is why it would need corroborating, as it was in Manafort's own case.
Are you saying that the criminal justice system ought never to be allowed to obtain evidence from confessed criminals in return for a degree of sentencing leniency ? That is how the justice system woks in many countries, including to some degree our own.
It was a more general comment. Plea bargaining is used to settle 90% of court cases.
I'd agree that it is used excessively in the US - usually against defendants who don't have the wherewithal to fund their own defence. That really isn't the case here.
Del Quentin Wilber ✔ @DelWilber !!! Prosecutor says that Manafort is cooperating with special counsel investigation !!!
4:24 PM - Sep 14, 2018
Mueller prosecutor Andrew Weissmann did not immediately expand on what cooperation is required under the deal.... according to Politico.
It will be a while before we know how significant it might be.
All of these plea bargains means that evidence is not being tested in court and the 'cooperation' being 'required' means that what emerges from that process is tainted.
This is not how justice should work.
Manafort has already been found guilty by a jury on multiple counts.
As for 'tainted' evidence, defences are well versed in making exactly that point, as we saw in Manafort's own trial - which is why it would need corroborating, as it was in Manafort's own case.
Are you saying that the criminal justice system ought never to be allowed to obtain evidence from confessed criminals in return for a degree of sentencing leniency ? That is how the justice system woks in many countries, including to some degree our own.
It was a more general comment. Plea bargaining is used to settle 90% of court cases.
I'd agree that it is used excessively in the US - usually against defendants who don't have the wherewithal to fund their own defence. That really isn't the case here.
Is anyone actually going to be tried and convicted?
Manafort already has.
For this charge? What’s the plea bargain about then?
Manafort had a charge list as long as your arm.
He himself opted to split the trial venues (a tactical decision which appears to have been badly misjudged) in the hope that he'd be found innocent in the first trial.
Del Quentin Wilber ✔ @DelWilber !!! Prosecutor says that Manafort is cooperating with special counsel investigation !!!
4:24 PM - Sep 14, 2018
Mueller prosecutor Andrew Weissmann did not immediately expand on what cooperation is required under the deal.... according to Politico.
It will be a while before we know how significant it might be.
All of these plea bargains means that evidence is not being tested in court and the 'cooperation' being 'required' means that what emerges from that process is tainted.
This is not how justice should work.
Manafort has already been found guilty by a jury on multiple counts.
As for 'tainted' evidence, defences are well versed in making exactly that point, as we saw in Manafort's own trial - which is why it would need corroborating, as it was in Manafort's own case.
Are you saying that the criminal justice system ought never to be allowed to obtain evidence from confessed criminals in return for a degree of sentencing leniency ? That is how the justice system woks in many countries, including to some degree our own.
Manafort has been subject to two different legal processes. The first trial in Virginia did, indeed, lead to a conviction rather than a guilty plea - but only on some of the charges. A mistrial was declared on the others.
Today's plea bargain is in relation to the case being considered by courts in DC as well as some of the outstanding charges in Virginia.
It is a very complicated picture and it is not easy to unpick it to fully see how today's plea bargain was agreed.
On cases of this complexity and importance to the understanding of how Trump's campaign operated, I still maintain that it is better for these things to be fully explored in open court. I know people are entitled to plead guilty. But the preponderance of plea bargains in these particular cases is not good at achieving real insight into the issues that concern people.
Del Quentin Wilber ✔ @DelWilber !!! Prosecutor says that Manafort is cooperating with special counsel investigation !!!
4:24 PM - Sep 14, 2018
Mueller prosecutor Andrew Weissmann did not immediately expand on what cooperation is required under the deal.... according to Politico.
It will be a while before we know how significant it might be.
All of these plea bargains means that evidence is not being tested in court and the 'cooperation' being 'required' means that what emerges from that process is tainted.
This is not how justice should work.
Manafort has already been found guilty by a jury on multiple counts.
As for 'tainted' evidence, defences are well versed in making exactly that point, as we saw in Manafort's own trial - which is why it would need corroborating, as it was in Manafort's own case.
Are you saying that the criminal justice system ought never to be allowed to obtain evidence from confessed criminals in return for a degree of sentencing leniency ? That is how the justice system woks in many countries, including to some degree our own.
It was a more general comment. Plea bargaining is used to settle 90% of court cases.
I'd agree that it is used excessively in the US - usually against defendants who don't have the wherewithal to fund their own defence. That really isn't the case here.
And incidentally, the Mueller investigation has now paid for itself.
Isn’t he already bankrupt?
Yes, but there are different states of bankruptcy. His assets have been forfeited to the state, which I guess means that a few dodgy banks are going to be SOL getting back some of their cash.
Given some of the ones he was dealing with, I'm not entirely sympathetic.
Given the centre-left likes the centre but the centre-right does not seem to, that suggests a 'centrist' party would just be soft left, rather than balanced (as the term implies).
Del Quentin Wilber ✔ @DelWilber !!! Prosecutor says that Manafort is cooperating with special counsel investigation !!!
4:24 PM - Sep 14, 2018
Mueller prosecutor Andrew Weissmann did not immediately expand on what cooperation is required under the deal.... according to Politico.
It will be a while before we know how significant it might be.
All of these plea bargains means that evidence is not being tested in court and the 'cooperation' being 'required' means that what emerges from that process is tainted.
This is not how justice should work.
Manafort has already been found guilty by a jury on multiple counts.
As for 'tainted' evidence, defences are well versed in making exactly that point, as we saw in Manafort's own trial - which is why it would need corroborating, as it was in Manafort's own case.
Are you saying that the criminal justice system ought never to be allowed to obtain evidence from confessed criminals in return for a degree of sentencing leniency ? That is how the justice system woks in many countries, including to some degree our own.
Manafort has been subject to two different legal processes. The first trial in Virginia did, indeed, lead to a conviction rather than a guilty plea - but only on some of the charges. A mistrial was declared on the others.
Today's plea bargain is in relation to the case being considered by courts in DC as well as some of the outstanding charges in Virginia.
It is a very complicated picture and it is not easy to unpick it to fully see how today's plea bargain was agreed.
On cases of this complexity and importance to the understanding of how Trump's campaign operated, I still maintain that it is better for these things to be fully explored in open court. I know people are entitled to plead guilty. But the preponderance of plea bargains in these particular cases is not good at achieving real insight into the issues that concern people.
The large majority of criminal cases in this country involve guilty pleas as well. You don't get to send people to trial for administrative convenience of they prefer the alternative.
As for the two jurisdictions, opting for separate trials was entirely Manafort's choice.
Mr. B, recall reading a news article about a psychological study into using a punching bag to blow off steam. Found that it worked, initially, to relieve stress, but getting that same release required increasing workout intensity and ended up creating more anger than it relieved.
Quote I had at the start of Journey to Altmortis is by Marcus Aurelius: How much more grievous are the consequences of anger than the causes of it.
Given the centre-left likes the centre but the centre-right does not seem to, that suggests a 'centrist' party would just be soft left, rather than balanced (as the term implies).
Evidence for the assertions about centres left and right?
Mr. Evershed, in the polling, the centre-left tends to quite like the centre, but the centre-right prefers the right.
There's also the current political landscape to consider. Sane Labour types would be the most obvious potential members. They can still be pretty left yet far to the right of Comrade Corbyn.
I can't help feeling that it would have been a lot less trouble for Paul Manafort to have registered as a lobbyist and paid the 37% tax on his foreign income, all things considered.
Comments
This is surprisingly interesting:
TRIGGER WARNING: Leavers of a sensitive disposition should go to their designated Safe Space rather than click on the link.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/sep/14/clegg-leads-pro-remain-grandees-on-diplomatic-mission-to-stop-brexit
FPT: Mr. Eagles, go and check that map. You've started new threads twice today, right after I posted it.
Honestly. Anyone would think you were doing it on purpose.
That's a safe prediction, they've been dropping sharply for some time and there's no reason to expect the change of political direction to change this trend.
See that’s what a truly great general looks like.
A lot fewer pics of female 'celebs' in bikinis too.
As I said earlier my good wife has joined the conservative party today for the first time at 79
So she has neutralised one of the entryist Ukippers
When I had my bi-lateral hernia surgery last November I was back in hospital 10 days later with suspected problems which turned out to be fatigue due to impatience to be up and running (and posting on here) too soon
She has joined due to her revulsion at Corbyn and those around him
it's like entrusting Boris with the keys to a chastity belt
That sort of sums up our much vaunted "influence" in Europe tp me .
Are those owed refunds of goods by the company within their rights, morally, to walk into a store and simply take them?
People who did not receive their goods are creditors of the old company and have to proceed accordingly.
It turns out the Republicans just happen to have a letter lying around signed by 65 female high school acquaintances of Kavanaugh saying he didn't seem like a rapists when he was in high school.
Amazing they had this letter ready and good to go.
✔
@DelWilber
!!! Prosecutor says that Manafort is cooperating with special counsel investigation !!!
4:24 PM - Sep 14, 2018
https://twitter.com/daaronovitch/status/1040485861270405120?s=21
Lisa Nandy said yesterday she was inclined to vote for the deal
And how she gets to a GE I have no idea
It’ll lead to lenders asking for 50% plus deposits as LTVs decreasing sharply.
I wish you an entirely satisfactory recovery, at your own speed.
It will be a while before we know how significant it might be.
Why do they keep trying to slide in 'Trade Deal' things like 'GIs' when we're not allowed to talk about trade until we've left?
https://twitter.com/JamieFonzarelli/status/1040629095292436484
https://twitter.com/ReutersPolitics/status/1040632898846633985
https://twitter.com/BootstrapCook/status/1040618442880176128 Although that is shortly to be ex-darling when the hate machine kicks into action.
This is not how justice should work.
As for 'tainted' evidence, defences are well versed in making exactly that point, as we saw in Manafort's own trial - which is why it would need corroborating, as it was in Manafort's own case.
Are you saying that the criminal justice system ought never to be allowed to obtain evidence from confessed criminals in return for a degree of sentencing leniency ? That is how the justice system woks in many countries, including to some degree our own.
That really isn't the case here.
Interestingly, it would seem that Manafort's guilty plea is effectively pardon-proof:
https://www.emptywheel.net/2018/09/14/the-manafort-plea-is-pardon-proof/
And incidentally, the Mueller investigation has now paid for itself.
https://metro.co.uk/2018/09/14/brexfit-is-the-new-workout-that-lets-you-punch-boris-johnson-in-the-face-7944331/
He himself opted to split the trial venues (a tactical decision which appears to have been badly misjudged) in the hope that he'd be found innocent in the first trial.
He wasn't.
Today's plea bargain is in relation to the case being considered by courts in DC as well as some of the outstanding charges in Virginia.
It is a very complicated picture and it is not easy to unpick it to fully see how today's plea bargain was agreed.
On cases of this complexity and importance to the understanding of how Trump's campaign operated, I still maintain that it is better for these things to be fully explored in open court. I know people are entitled to plead guilty. But the preponderance of plea bargains in these particular cases is not good at achieving real insight into the issues that concern people.
His assets have been forfeited to the state, which I guess means that a few dodgy banks are going to be SOL getting back some of their cash.
Given some of the ones he was dealing with, I'm not entirely sympathetic.
The biggest c*nt in British politics!
Given the centre-left likes the centre but the centre-right does not seem to, that suggests a 'centrist' party would just be soft left, rather than balanced (as the term implies).
As for the two jurisdictions, opting for separate trials was entirely Manafort's choice.
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2018/sep/14/voodoo-doll-and-cannibalism-studies-triumph-at-ig-nobels
Haha! True!
Quote I had at the start of Journey to Altmortis is by Marcus Aurelius:
How much more grievous are the consequences of anger than the causes of it.
Just a bit of fun in the best possible taste
That is not about being a snowflake, it is about not wanting to further add to the febrile atmosphere that exists at the moment.
There's also the current political landscape to consider. Sane Labour types would be the most obvious potential members. They can still be pretty left yet far to the right of Comrade Corbyn.
They don't wish to be ones without a chair when the music stops.