An everyday person thrown into a sad situation, who is trying to use the horrible experience for good. And who is getting the expected grief for doing so.
An everyday person thrown into a sad situation, who is trying to use the horrible experience for good. And who is getting the expected grief for doing so.
Jeff Bezos. Amazon became the second trillion dollar company after Apple recently. He is consequently the world's richest man (among those with publicly declared wealth), owns the Washington Post - thus helping to protect the Press from wannabe demagogues like Trump - and is a bit like Musk with his own rocket company without being an obnoxious twat. Amazon also big in cloud computing (a big deal unnoticed by most people) and with Alexa is changing homes across America. Has Amazon Instant Video also recently made a play for sports rights in the US?
There is a lot going on there that affects the life of your average American.
Jeff Bezos. Amazon became the second trillion dollar company after Apple recently. He is consequently the world's richest man (among those with publicly declared wealth), owns the Washington Post - thus helping to protect the Press from wannabe demagogues like Trump - and is a bit like Musk with his own rocket company without being an obnoxious twat. Amazon also big in cloud computing (a big deal unnoticed by most people) and with Alexa is changing homes across America. Has Amazon Instant Video also recently made a play for sports rights in the US?
There is a lot going on there that affects the life of your average American.
Yes, but he won it in 1999. That doesn't rule him out (Obama and G W Bush were each chosen twice), but it makes him a bit less likely. Would be worth a punt if the odds are good.
F1: just in case the weather forecast's wrong, I've put tiny sums (literally pence) on the following to 'win' first practice (brackets is the boosted odds, fifth the odds top 3): Sirotkin, 1001 (1301) Ericsson, 751 (901) Stroll, 301 (376) Leclerc, 301 (376)
As I said, tiny stakes, but if it rains it's entirely possible only a few times will get out for a trundle. Forecast is for it to be dry, but the forecasts have been weirdly wrong this year.
Tories ahead by 3 with ICM, Remain ahead 52-48. On the latter point, it's actually 46-42 without DK/WS, which raises a question I hadn't thought of previously: do the pollsters apply a spiral-of-silence adjustment to Brexit numbers? Should they?
Mr. JS, saw that a little while ago. It's a perfectly reasonable theory. If you look at those who suffer learning difficulties, men are disproportionately over-represented. The same occurs at the time end of IQ. The notion that men might have a flatter bell curve with slighter higher ends, and women might have a higher peak in the middle and lower ends, is entirely feasible.
Some people hate it because it suggests that more of the most intelligent people are men than women. Nobody, of course, has a problem with men being disproportionately violent, stupid, having learning difficulties etc.
They've given it to "you" before (as in the people who produce content on the internet) so maybe they could give it to "bots" and make the story all about the manipulation of social media for political ends.
It's a question I've thought of - are astronaut's lives being risked due to getting the 270-1 failure odds for commercial crew, when the true probability for Soyuz might be ~ 150-1 or so and not launching a mission up at 200-1 probability of failure or so. Soyuz has been solid and reliable, but how much of that is down to luck rather than judgement. If anything like this was found in a 2020 Starliner or Crew-Dragon they'd be grounded for yonks.
An everyday person thrown into a sad situation, who is trying to use the horrible experience for good. And who is getting the expected grief for doing so.
Gonzalez would be a decent bet if there's some movement on gun control - and heaven forbid, but what we all know is likely to happen at some point. Although I wonder if they might give it to the Parkland kids in general as there are other high profile activists among them. Might be worth clarifying with Hills if they will pay out on Gonzalez if it goes to the Parkland kids.
Much more important than linking Manchester and Sheffield.
Yeah, the Yorkshire idiots just whinge even when money is being spent on them. Instead, spend the money on people who really appreciate it and dual the A428 between Caxton Gibbett and the Black Cat.
I drove to near Oxford on Sunday to do a walk. It's quite slow past St Neots to the Black Cat, great along the A421 past Bedford to Milton Keynes, and after that becomes a really slow and ponderous drive.
The real reason for this new expressway is to encourage development.
The allegation here, with some evidence to back it up, is that there were organised deselections along ethnic lines (a particular Kashmiri tribe forcing out Labour councillors - judging from the name, also British Asians - from other backgrounds).
Do we have any evidence for how widespread such practices are in general?
Mr. JS, saw that a little while ago. It's a perfectly reasonable theory. If you look at those who suffer learning difficulties, men are disproportionately over-represented. The same occurs at the time end of IQ. The notion that men might have a flatter bell curve with slighter higher ends, and women might have a higher peak in the middle and lower ends, is entirely feasible.
Some people hate it because it suggests that more of the most intelligent people are men than women. Nobody, of course, has a problem with men being disproportionately violent, stupid, having learning difficulties etc.
Point of order: people do complain about more men being diagnosed with learning difficulties because they worry it is because women aren't diagnosed, not that they don't have the condition. See also Autistic Spectrum Disorder and Heart Disease.
It's a question I've thought of - are astronaut's lives being risked due to getting the 270-1 failure odds for commercial crew, when the true probability for Soyuz might be ~ 150-1 or so and not launching a mission up at 200-1 probability of failure or so. Soyuz has been solid and reliable, but how much of that is down to luck rather than judgement. If anything like this was found in a 2020 Starliner or Crew-Dragon they'd be grounded for yonks.
There's a great article on Wayne Hale's blog about how NASA had to alter (i.e. bodge) their safety cases to allow US astronauts to fly on Soyuz.
I'm minded to agree with you. People in NASA will have been having kittens over the original issue; they'll be furious over this attempt to shift the blame. Trust will be lost.
The Commission claims that since services provide much of the value of goods, if the British were free to undercut EU standards on services, they would distort the playing field for goods. But this argument is weak: most of the services that feed into the production of goods, such as marketing, design, engineering, law and accountancy, are not regulated by the EU, so there are no EU standards to undercut. In any case the EU tolerates Switzerland being in the market for goods but not services.
The Commission claims that since services provide much of the value of goods, if the British were free to undercut EU standards on services, they would distort the playing field for goods. But this argument is weak: most of the services that feed into the production of goods, such as marketing, design, engineering, law and accountancy, are not regulated by the EU, so there are no EU standards to undercut. In any case the EU tolerates Switzerland being in the market for goods but not services.
Yes, he's quite right, it's a feeble argument by the EU. In any case, that objection if valid would apply to all free trade agreements.
When did Palestine become a big thing for the British left? I've been doing some searches on Hansard and, as far as I can tell, Corbyn didn't speak about it at all in his first 20 years in the Commons. He had much to say about Ireland and the Kurds, maybe they were taking too much of his focus then? Or was that just before Seamus had got into it?
Mr. Me, that's possible, but accurate diagnosis of psychological conditions is tricky generally. For example, bulimia has methods of purging. Most of us will be aware of the vomiting and laxative routes, but a third is excessive exercise. Far more women than men are diagnosed with bulimia.
But if a man ate a lot, exercised a lot, and was ripped, would we really consider him to be bulimic? Perhaps according to the technical definition. But if he isn't, is that definition valid for women?
It's a knotty area generally. Self-reporting's ropey as hell too. I recall as a study into PMS. It had women who self-diagnosed that way keep diaries. The entries didn't tally with their self-diagnosis in a statistically significant number of cases. (Then there's overlapping conditions. Depression is very common, and more common amongst women. Insomnia is a very frequent symptom. But both are taken of symptoms of PMS. So is the women in that example suffering depression, or PMS? Is depression the condition or the result of the condition?).
A further problem is the politically charged nature of gender differences.
[For those wondering about all the gender stuff, I studied psychology at university, which had mostly female lecturers (including a charmer who once joked about only saving the girls if the theatre caught fire) and about 95% female students. Lots of gender discussion was had].
That ramble (of mine) makes me wonder if it'd be possible to dig out some old textbooks and see what there is on male and female brains and attitude towards things like risk and other politically relevant thingummyjigs.
Or, for that matter, ingroups and outgroups and the Cult.
Perversely, the very horribleness of Corbyn's Labour may be keeping some people in. Leaving aside aside Corbynites, some may want to change things (although I think that's a forlorn hope), and some may subconsciously feel that they've endured so much already that they can't bear to leave now because it means putting up with all the previous bullshit was for nothing.
Interesting read. Highlight for me was that they received no scientific criticisms of the paper at all.
Otoh it talks about gingering up the paper to be deliberately controversial, mentioning Summers and so on, which you'd not expect in a scientific paper. As someone wiser than me said, the trouble with setting out to offend people is that you can be *too* successful, and then you need to be a good fighter or a fast runner.
Mind you seeing Faisal Islam traduced by the CAA over grounding flights was very satisfying. He needs to apologise for his nonsense but I am not holding my breath
When did Palestine become a big thing for the British left? I've been doing some searches on Hansard and, as far as I can tell, Corbyn didn't speak about it at all in his first 20 years in the Commons. He had much to say about Ireland and the Kurds, maybe they were taking too much of his focus then? Or was that just before Seamus had got into it?
Ireland sorted itself out, ish, so he scouted around for other capitalist imperialist oppressors who also happened to run the world and bingo.
The Commission claims that since services provide much of the value of goods, if the British were free to undercut EU standards on services, they would distort the playing field for goods. But this argument is weak: most of the services that feed into the production of goods, such as marketing, design, engineering, law and accountancy, are not regulated by the EU, so there are no EU standards to undercut. In any case the EU tolerates Switzerland being in the market for goods but not services.
Yes, he's quite right, it's a feeble argument by the EU. In any case, that objection if valid would apply to all free trade agreements.
I asked about this a few threads ago - was told it’s to do with customs checks or something equally unconvincing by williamglen - would still like to know what the EU commission argument is that applies to UK goods but not, say, Japan’s under the economic partnership especially as most goods FTAs are moving to agreeing application of international standards (eg Japan now accepting international standards for EU cars)
Mind you seeing Faisal Islam traduced by the CAA over grounding flights was very satisfying. He needs to apologise for his nonsense but I am not holding my breath
I suspect we could cope with that. We did for many years with only minor grumbling
Mind you seeing Faisal Islam traduced by the CAA over grounding flights was very satisfying. He needs to apologise for his nonsense but I am not holding my breath
I suspect we could cope with that. We did for many years with only minor grumbling
And now Sky have had to say that a couple of UK providers have said they will not re-instate roaming charges. You could not make it up
Mind you seeing Faisal Islam traduced by the CAA over grounding flights was very satisfying. He needs to apologise for his nonsense but I am not holding my breath
I suspect we could cope with that. We did for many years with only minor grumbling
And now Sky have had to say that a couple of UK providers have said they will not re-instate roaming charges. You could not make it up
Mind you seeing Faisal Islam traduced by the CAA over grounding flights was very satisfying. He needs to apologise for his nonsense but I am not holding my breath
I suspect we could cope with that. We did for many years with only minor grumbling
And now Sky have had to say that a couple of UK providers have said they will not re-instate roaming charges. You could not make it up
Seems like a decent bet to me. It probably won't come in but 25/1 is too big.
Another decent bet - which I do expect to come in - is the Democrats to take the House in November. Nate Silver now has this as an 82% probability which would make the 1.47 available on Betfair a bit of a gift.
The latest batch of polls, with the honorable exception of YouGov, give the Dems double digit leads. Nate's polling average now puts them 8.6 points ahead. That gives them the House easily. Any more puts the Senate within reach, but personally I doubt that is going to happen.
Mr. Me, that's possible, but accurate diagnosis of psychological conditions is tricky generally.
It's not much of a stretch to say that all scientific problems are measurement problems.
That's not to say that all measurements, or science, is useless, but that grand sweeping hypotheses that are tempting to use to explain a large number of disparate phenomena could end up obscuring more than they explain. It would be very easy to look at every gender difference and say, "that's an example of increased male variability." Most of the time it probably isn't.
Mind you seeing Faisal Islam traduced by the CAA over grounding flights was very satisfying. He needs to apologise for his nonsense but I am not holding my breath
I suspect we could cope with that. We did for many years with only minor grumbling
And now Sky have had to say that a couple of UK providers have said they will not re-instate roaming charges. You could not make it up
Well that's not a surprise, three of the four major providers have contracts that go beyond the minimum requirements and provide free roaming in non-EU countries, unless Mr Islam is saying the EU made them do that as well?
Let's not pretend the mobile providers did this out of the goodness of their hearts. It was because of the EU rule and they have tried to make a virtue out of the necessity. However, it should be fairly easy to shame them into keeping the policy, in the 21st century.
Mr. Me, that's possible, but accurate diagnosis of psychological conditions is tricky generally.
It's not much of a stretch to say that all scientific problems are measurement problems.
That's not to say that all measurements, or science, is useless, but that grand sweeping hypotheses that are tempting to use to explain a large number of disparate phenomena could end up obscuring more than they explain. It would be very easy to look at every gender difference and say, "that's an example of increased male variability." Most of the time it probably isn't.
IQ is a pretty rubbish measure which varies with education, social class and throughout life. It is not the constant that some pretend.
In terms of psychology, something like bulemia is only a pathological condition if it is causes physical, mental, or social suffering.
Let's not pretend the mobile providers did this out of the goodness of their hearts. It was because of the EU rule and they have tried to make a virtue out of the necessity. However, it should be fairly easy to shame them into keeping the policy, in the 21st century.
Three introduced free overseas roaming ages before the EU, it's an area of competition for the major networks. It's the MVNOs that will be the most likely to cut it but they serve customers looking for cheap deals so it will be a choice after that.
FPT malcolmg said: » show previous quotes The clown just cannot help himself, watches one episode of Hogan's Heroes and becomes a Nazi expert
You are probably the expert there. I don't support a party that has the word Nationalist in it. Is Scottish Nationalism a racist endeavour ? Best ask Jezza
Look at the state of this moron , he does not even know the name of the political party and just makes it up. Even thicker than imagined, but as he will be back under his rock by now I doubt he will get it.
Mr. Me, that's possible, but accurate diagnosis of psychological conditions is tricky generally.
It's not much of a stretch to say that all scientific problems are measurement problems.
That's not to say that all measurements, or science, is useless, but that grand sweeping hypotheses that are tempting to use to explain a large number of disparate phenomena could end up obscuring more than they explain. It would be very easy to look at every gender difference and say, "that's an example of increased male variability." Most of the time it probably isn't.
I'd disagree. Most scientific problems are about seeking order in chaos. Most of the progress that happens is when something becomes measurable. When it does there's a really good framework of statistics that becomes applicable. Applying that framework well isn't easy, but finishes up as very step-by-step and explicable. Most scientists' colleagues are very, very picky.
Mr. Me, that's possible, but accurate diagnosis of psychological conditions is tricky generally.
It's not much of a stretch to say that all scientific problems are measurement problems.
That's not to say that all measurements, or science, is useless, but that grand sweeping hypotheses that are tempting to use to explain a large number of disparate phenomena could end up obscuring more than they explain. It would be very easy to look at every gender difference and say, "that's an example of increased male variability." Most of the time it probably isn't.
I'd disagree. Most scientific problems are about seeking order in chaos. Most of the progress that happens is when something becomes measurable. When it does there's a really good framework of statistics that becomes applicable. Applying that framework well isn't easy, but finishes up as very step-by-step and explicable. Most scientists' colleagues are very, very picky.
The most pressing problem in science is 'Where does my next research grant come from?'
Operation @SeanT progressing nicely - Newquay branch captured - on film! - today, adding to Falmouth and Gunnislake branches yesterday, just Penzance, St Ives and Looe left. Slumming it in Plymouth till Friday afternoon
Mr. Me, that's possible, but accurate diagnosis of psychological conditions is tricky generally.
It's not much of a stretch to say that all scientific problems are measurement problems.
That's not to say that all measurements, or science, is useless, but that grand sweeping hypotheses that are tempting to use to explain a large number of disparate phenomena could end up obscuring more than they explain. It would be very easy to look at every gender difference and say, "that's an example of increased male variability." Most of the time it probably isn't.
I'd disagree. Most scientific problems are about seeking order in chaos. Most of the progress that happens is when something becomes measurable. When it does there's a really good framework of statistics that becomes applicable. Applying that framework well isn't easy, but finishes up as very step-by-step and explicable. Most scientists' colleagues are very, very picky.
Strangely, we also need to study chaos. For instance the motion of planets I believe is chaotic. So there is no guarantee that the solar system won't conspire to spit out mother Earth to distant places.
Comments
Cornwall Council adds apostrophe to Land's End
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cornwall-45499594
But this is one of those markets which it's much better not to play. The winner might not yet be listed at all.
a) Stops libelling people on twitter
b) Commercial crew is a success and Tesla heads north in value.
But not this year.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emma_González
Mueller could also make sense. Hmm. Maybe a pound a time, for each.
Edited extra bit: no Ladbrokes market?
Edited extra bit 2: whilst browsing around, surprised to see an ESports market. If anyone here follows that sort of thing, may be worth a look.
There is a lot going on there that affects the life of your average American.
Haven't they awarded it to a campaign in the past?
https://twitter.com/sapinker/status/1038805168870096896
http://www.itv.com/news/meridian/2018-09-12/route-announced-for-oxford-cambridge-expressway/
Sirotkin, 1001 (1301)
Ericsson, 751 (901)
Stroll, 301 (376)
Leclerc, 301 (376)
As I said, tiny stakes, but if it rains it's entirely possible only a few times will get out for a trundle. Forecast is for it to be dry, but the forecasts have been weirdly wrong this year.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/blog/live/2018/sep/12/pmqs-may-corbyn-tory-leadership-brexit-gove-issues-call-for-unity-at-brexiter-anger-against-may-intensifies-politics-live
"Our engineers mucked up and drilled a hole in a spaceship. To deflect blame, we think an American astronaut did it in space."
https://arstechnica.com/science/2018/09/the-russians-are-really-pushing-a-nasa-astronaut-sabotaged-the-iss-theory/
The Russians are going a bit crazy. I can see cooperation in space ending soon, whatever that means for the ISS.
Some people hate it because it suggests that more of the most intelligent people are men than women. Nobody, of course, has a problem with men being disproportionately violent, stupid, having learning difficulties etc.
https://www.cer.eu/in-the-press/theresa-mays-chequers-plan-may-yet-have-some-life-it
Northern Powerhouse :-)
Soyuz has been solid and reliable, but how much of that is down to luck rather than judgement. If anything like this was found in a 2020 Starliner or Crew-Dragon they'd be grounded for yonks.
I drove to near Oxford on Sunday to do a walk. It's quite slow past St Neots to the Black Cat, great along the A421 past Bedford to Milton Keynes, and after that becomes a really slow and ponderous drive.
The real reason for this new expressway is to encourage development.
https://www.lutontoday.co.uk/news/deselected-labour-councillors-in-luton-ousted-as-part-of-organised-campaign-according-to-whatsapp-message-1-8563170
The allegation here, with some evidence to back it up, is that there were organised deselections along ethnic lines (a particular Kashmiri tribe forcing out Labour councillors - judging from the name, also British Asians - from other backgrounds).
Do we have any evidence for how widespread such practices are in general?
https://waynehale.wordpress.com/2011/01/07/certifying-soyuz/
I'm minded to agree with you. People in NASA will have been having kittens over the original issue; they'll be furious over this attempt to shift the blame. Trust will be lost.
The Commission claims that since services provide much of the value of goods, if the British were free to undercut EU standards on services, they would distort the playing field for goods. But this argument is weak: most of the services that feed into the production of goods, such as marketing, design, engineering, law and accountancy, are not regulated by the EU, so there are no EU standards to undercut. In any case the EU tolerates Switzerland being in the market for goods but not services.
https://twitter.com/jessbrammar/status/1039908236726620160
One employee without security clearance is not good. Two looks like a trend.
https://twitter.com/hugorifkind/status/1039875431405707266
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronan_Bennett
But if a man ate a lot, exercised a lot, and was ripped, would we really consider him to be bulimic? Perhaps according to the technical definition. But if he isn't, is that definition valid for women?
It's a knotty area generally. Self-reporting's ropey as hell too. I recall as a study into PMS. It had women who self-diagnosed that way keep diaries. The entries didn't tally with their self-diagnosis in a statistically significant number of cases. (Then there's overlapping conditions. Depression is very common, and more common amongst women. Insomnia is a very frequent symptom. But both are taken of symptoms of PMS. So is the women in that example suffering depression, or PMS? Is depression the condition or the result of the condition?).
A further problem is the politically charged nature of gender differences.
[For those wondering about all the gender stuff, I studied psychology at university, which had mostly female lecturers (including a charmer who once joked about only saving the girls if the theatre caught fire) and about 95% female students. Lots of gender discussion was had].
Mr. Meeks, I'll believe it when I see it.
Or, for that matter, ingroups and outgroups and the Cult.
Perversely, the very horribleness of Corbyn's Labour may be keeping some people in. Leaving aside aside Corbynites, some may want to change things (although I think that's a forlorn hope), and some may subconsciously feel that they've endured so much already that they can't bear to leave now because it means putting up with all the previous bullshit was for nothing.
Mind you seeing Faisal Islam traduced by the CAA over grounding flights was very satisfying. He needs to apologise for his nonsense but I am not holding my breath
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-45501004
Also not a surprise that the man is frequently seen alongside McDonnell and Burgon.
McDonnell is a fan of aggression towards politicians whom he opposes...
Another decent bet - which I do expect to come in - is the Democrats to take the House in November. Nate Silver now has this as an 82% probability which would make the 1.47 available on Betfair a bit of a gift.
The latest batch of polls, with the honorable exception of YouGov, give the Dems double digit leads. Nate's polling average now puts them 8.6 points ahead. That gives them the House easily. Any more puts the Senate within reach, but personally I doubt that is going to happen.
That's not to say that all measurements, or science, is useless, but that grand sweeping hypotheses that are tempting to use to explain a large number of disparate phenomena could end up obscuring more than they explain. It would be very easy to look at every gender difference and say, "that's an example of increased male variability." Most of the time it probably isn't.
In terms of psychology, something like bulemia is only a pathological condition if it is causes physical, mental, or social suffering.
malcolmg said:
» show previous quotes
The clown just cannot help himself, watches one episode of Hogan's Heroes and becomes a Nazi expert
You are probably the expert there. I don't support a party that has the word Nationalist in it. Is Scottish Nationalism a racist endeavour ? Best ask Jezza
Look at the state of this moron , he does not even know the name of the political party and just makes it up. Even thicker than imagined, but as he will be back under his rock by now I doubt he will get it.
says it all really
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mr._Smith_Goes_to_Washington
"Europe Elects
@EuropeElects
UK, ICM Research poll:
CON-ECR: 42% (+2)
LAB-S&D: 39% (-1)
LDEM-ALDE: 8%
UKIP-EFDD: 4% (-2)
GREENS-G/EFA: 3% (+1)
Field worKk 7/09/18 – 9/09/18
Sample size: 2,051"