politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » House majority betting moves sharply to the Democrats after 3 bad midwest state polls for Trump/GOP
The three states, Michigan,Minnesota and Wisconsin were surveyed by NBC News/Marist polls and are,of course, in the part of the US where Trump very much exceeded expectations at WH2016.
Possibly a good time to lay the Democrats. There will be more twists and turns yet.
I am no prophet (see my loses on the US election for evidence) but I'm thinking October is going to see a big swing the generic ballot to the Dems as health insurance premiums come due knocking the shine off any minimal tax cuts voters are feeling.
Possibly a good time to lay the Democrats. There will be more twists and turns yet.
I can see very little prospect of the Republicans retaining the House. Trump's ratings are similar to those of Obama in 2010 and 2014, which should result in a big swing to the Dems.
If real wage growth continues to stagnate of the face of strong GDP growth, they are in real trouble - and perhaps even so if wages do rise. People might be fine with abolishing Obamacare, but messing with the Affordable Care Act is a different matter...
Possibly a good time to lay the Democrats. There will be more twists and turns yet.
I am no prophet (see my loses on the US election for evidence) but I'm thinking October is going to see a big swing the generic ballot to the Dems as health insurance premiums come due knocking the shine off any minimal tax cuts voters are feeling.
I'm not saying the Democrats won't come good in the end. It is apparent that there is a Trumpian floor. I'm speculating that in the intervening period there will be more polling that is less favourable to the Democrats, lengthening their price, temporarily at least.
Possibly a good time to lay the Democrats. There will be more twists and turns yet.
I am no prophet (see my loses on the US election for evidence) but I'm thinking October is going to see a big swing the generic ballot to the Dems as health insurance premiums come due knocking the shine off any minimal tax cuts voters are feeling.
I'm not saying the Democrats won't come good in the end. It is apparent that there is a Trumpian floor. I'm speculating that in the intervening period there will be more polling that is less favourable to the Democrats, lengthening their price, temporarily at least.
No mention of who is defending in these states - as they were surprise Trump wins, I assume there are a number of Democratic defences and perhaps a smattering of marginal Republican congressional districts in these statez. And how much does rust belt swing really predict Deep South swing? As GE 2017 Tory change was predicated on Leave / Remain, what variables might be salient here?
The loss of how many seats are implied by these polls?
No mention of who is defending in these states - as they were surprise Trump wins, I assume there are a number of Democratic defences and perhaps a smattering of marginal Republican congressional districts in these statez. And how much does rust belt swing really predict Deep South swing? As GE 2017 Tory change was predicated on Leave / Remain, what variables might be salient here?
The loss of how many seats are implied by these polls?
If the current generic polling holds till November, and the Dems finish c.7% ahead, they'd probably have a majority of 30-40 in the House.
Trade is going to be a key issue in the agricultural states: https://www.politico.com/story/2018/07/26/trump-trade-war-midwest-anxiety-743413 ‘What if this president’s wrong? What if he’s not successful?” said Kirk Leeds, CEO of the Iowa Soybean Association. “There doesn’t appear to be any, any movement forward, in any public way. Are we settling in because we just don’t see any escape or resolutions in the foreseeable future? That’s scary.”
Leeds said the $12 billion in subsidies could buy Trump time politically, placating nervousness in states critical to the GOP’s midterm prospects, especially since the checks are expected to arrive not long before November.
But the value of those checks, when divvied up — there are some 40,000 soybean farmers in Iowa alone — is in question. Leeds said he heard from one farmer who calculated he’d likely receive just a few thousand dollars in subsidies, even as he’s down $150,000 for the season…
Of course a grand trade bargain with China, the EU, or even both, is a possibility, but I'm pretty sceptical that Trump can manage the volte face and negotiations to agree anything substantive in the limited time available.
BTW, Hamilton is available at 5 on Betfair to win in Hungary (and also to top FP1), which I think is good enough odds to have a think about.
I’ll have some of that 5 to win the race, thanks.
I’m done betting on FP times, way too many variables such as which tyres someone uses, what mode the engines are in etc. Almost anyone could top the sheets in P1 if they made the effort.
Trade is going to be a key issue in the agricultural states: https://www.politico.com/story/2018/07/26/trump-trade-war-midwest-anxiety-743413 ‘What if this president’s wrong? What if he’s not successful?” said Kirk Leeds, CEO of the Iowa Soybean Association. “There doesn’t appear to be any, any movement forward, in any public way. Are we settling in because we just don’t see any escape or resolutions in the foreseeable future? That’s scary.”
Leeds said the $12 billion in subsidies could buy Trump time politically, placating nervousness in states critical to the GOP’s midterm prospects, especially since the checks are expected to arrive not long before November.
But the value of those checks, when divvied up — there are some 40,000 soybean farmers in Iowa alone — is in question. Leeds said he heard from one farmer who calculated he’d likely receive just a few thousand dollars in subsidies, even as he’s down $150,000 for the season…
Of course a grand trade bargain with China, the EU, or even both, is a possibility, but I'm pretty sceptical that Trump can manage the volte face and negotiations to agree anything substantive in the limited time available.
The 2020 election is rather more of a conundrum.
Most of the stuff I've read on this story approaches it wrong. They talk about how free trade republicans are upset, or these farmers won't like having to take the state handouts.
The key question is - do these subsidies make up for the lost sales? If they don't, then there is going to be trouble for Trump.
Possibly a good time to lay the Democrats. There will be more twists and turns yet.
I agree. It'd be interesting to know the equivalent figures for Oct 2016. I assume that they weren't *this* bad but elections are always relative games and Trump only had to be more popular than Hillary, which was a low bar. his absolute popularity was less of an issue.
BTW, Hamilton is available at 5 on Betfair to win in Hungary (and also to top FP1), which I think is good enough odds to have a think about.
I’ll have some of that 5 to win the race, thanks.
I’m done betting on FP times, way too many variables such as which tyres someone uses, what mode the engines are in etc. Almost anyone could top the sheets in P1 if they made the effort.
While that's true, Hamilton is usually quick straight out of the box, and Mercedes don't deliberately run slow in the same way Ferrari has done this season. I think 5 is good odds.
The joker is going to be Ferrari's blown rear wing, if they bring it this weekend (and it works). Though it's likely only of real benefit for single lap pace (as it relies on running the turbo on electrical power, while using the energy of the exhaust gases for downforce benefit), qualifying position is almost as important in Hungary as it is in Monaco....
Trade is going to be a key issue in the agricultural states: https://www.politico.com/story/2018/07/26/trump-trade-war-midwest-anxiety-743413 ‘What if this president’s wrong? What if he’s not successful?” said Kirk Leeds, CEO of the Iowa Soybean Association. “There doesn’t appear to be any, any movement forward, in any public way. Are we settling in because we just don’t see any escape or resolutions in the foreseeable future? That’s scary.”
Leeds said the $12 billion in subsidies could buy Trump time politically, placating nervousness in states critical to the GOP’s midterm prospects, especially since the checks are expected to arrive not long before November.
But the value of those checks, when divvied up — there are some 40,000 soybean farmers in Iowa alone — is in question. Leeds said he heard from one farmer who calculated he’d likely receive just a few thousand dollars in subsidies, even as he’s down $150,000 for the season…
Of course a grand trade bargain with China, the EU, or even both, is a possibility, but I'm pretty sceptical that Trump can manage the volte face and negotiations to agree anything substantive in the limited time available.
The 2020 election is rather more of a conundrum.
Most of the stuff I've read on this story approaches it wrong. They talk about how free trade republicans are upset, or these farmers won't like having to take the state handouts.
The key question is - do these subsidies make up for the lost sales? If they don't, then there is going to be trouble for Trump.
If they lose the free traders AND fail to make good the farmers, it would be lose/lose.
The farmers really won't like being criticised for taking federal handouts if at the same time they are still losing money...
Trade is going to be a key issue in the agricultural states: https://www.politico.com/story/2018/07/26/trump-trade-war-midwest-anxiety-743413 ‘What if this president’s wrong? What if he’s not successful?” said Kirk Leeds, CEO of the Iowa Soybean Association. “There doesn’t appear to be any, any movement forward, in any public way. Are we settling in because we just don’t see any escape or resolutions in the foreseeable future? That’s scary.”
Leeds said the $12 billion in subsidies could buy Trump time politically, placating nervousness in states critical to the GOP’s midterm prospects, especially since the checks are expected to arrive not long before November.
But the value of those checks, when divvied up — there are some 40,000 soybean farmers in Iowa alone — is in question. Leeds said he heard from one farmer who calculated he’d likely receive just a few thousand dollars in subsidies, even as he’s down $150,000 for the season…
Of course a grand trade bargain with China, the EU, or even both, is a possibility, but I'm pretty sceptical that Trump can manage the volte face and negotiations to agree anything substantive in the limited time available.
The 2020 election is rather more of a conundrum.
Most of the stuff I've read on this story approaches it wrong. They talk about how free trade republicans are upset, or these farmers won't like having to take the state handouts.
The key question is - do these subsidies make up for the lost sales? If they don't, then there is going to be trouble for Trump.
If they lose the free traders AND fail to make good the farmers, it would be lose/lose.
The farmers really won't like being criticised for taking federal handouts if at the same time they are still losing money...
Those factors are relatively minor I think. Are there many free trade republicans when it actually comes down to political pain in their districts/states? I doubt it. And the farmers get plenty of federal handouts/subsidies already and it hasn't bothered them before.
Mr. B, aye, but more engine power is always good. Summer break soon, but after that it's Spa and Monza. If Raikkonen gets a swanky new engine in Italy, that could prove rather handy.
In the (still unlikely) event of a wave that delivers the democrats the senate and a big majority in the house, I think we'd see the republican establishment turn on a dime. The only thing keeping the GOP hanging together at the moment is the belief that Trump is electorally more of an asset than a liability
Mr. B, a key betting snippet will be when Raikkonen gets the new spec engine. That particular race could see him be great value for pole.
Engine power not quite so important in Hungary, though - so that Red Bull might even be in the mix.
Yes. I think only Monaco and Singapore are slower races, it’s pretty much a street circuit in layout even though it’s in the country. Red Bull said last weekend that they took all the penalties they did for Ricciardo so as to avoid them in Hungary. They think they’ll compete for the podium this weekend.
Mr. B, aye, but more engine power is always good. Summer break soon, but after that it's Spa and Monza. If Raikkonen gets a swanky new engine in Italy, that could prove rather handy.
Monza will be very interesting - Ferrari's real competitive strength at the moment is getting the power down out of corners, which gives them maybe 0.5 sec a lap advantage; Hamilton is brilliant at gaining time in the braking zone.
Sacha Baron Cohen is probably doing more to help the Democrats than anything the Democrats have done themselves. Once again it's a Brit who has to be relied upon.
Even if you disagreed with every single thing Blair and Brown did, how can you think this shitshow of utter chaos and panic is better run than those governments?
The reason they voted LEAVE was apparently because they had to fill in too many forms. Presumably, the UK government will give them tens of thousands of £'s in subsidy without filling any forms.
Even if you disagreed with every single thing Blair and Brown did, how can you think this shitshow of utter chaos and panic is better run than those governments?
It shows what many people think of Brown and Blair that they prefer a government as inept as this one to theirs.
Even if you disagreed with every single thing Blair and Brown did, how can you think this shitshow of utter chaos and panic is better run than those governments?
It shows what many people think of Brown and Blair that they prefer a government as inept as this one to theirs.
This entire Brexit mess can be pin-pointed at Blair and Brown who were told that they really needed to introduce a contribution based welfare system and refused to make the minor changes required.
No, they are funding a legal challenge, not the payment of the fine. It's definitely not illegal. MPs can disagree with the electoral commission as much as the next person.
How many of these people outraged at someone crowdsourcing his appeal, were also outraged at narrowing the scope of legal aid? Or do they think he shouldn’t be able to appeal a fine that could bankrupt him?
Comments
People might be fine with abolishing Obamacare, but messing with the Affordable Care Act is a different matter...
The loss of how many seats are implied by these polls?
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/07/26/trump-trade-war-midwest-anxiety-743413
‘What if this president’s wrong? What if he’s not successful?” said Kirk Leeds, CEO of the Iowa Soybean Association. “There doesn’t appear to be any, any movement forward, in any public way. Are we settling in because we just don’t see any escape or resolutions in the foreseeable future? That’s scary.”
Leeds said the $12 billion in subsidies could buy Trump time politically, placating nervousness in states critical to the GOP’s midterm prospects, especially since the checks are expected to arrive not long before November.
But the value of those checks, when divvied up — there are some 40,000 soybean farmers in Iowa alone — is in question. Leeds said he heard from one farmer who calculated he’d likely receive just a few thousand dollars in subsidies, even as he’s down $150,000 for the season…
Of course a grand trade bargain with China, the EU, or even both, is a possibility, but I'm pretty sceptical that Trump can manage the volte face and negotiations to agree anything substantive in the limited time available.
The 2020 election is rather more of a conundrum.
I’m done betting on FP times, way too many variables such as which tyres someone uses, what mode the engines are in etc. Almost anyone could top the sheets in P1 if they made the effort.
The key question is - do these subsidies make up for the lost sales?
If they don't, then there is going to be trouble for Trump.
BBC has 25C feeling like 28C. I feel really comfortable, which is a nice contrast to recent days. Anyway, hopefully that holds true all day.
Speaking of forecasts, Budapest has now changed from thunderstorms to dry throughout Sunday.
Fuck this shit.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-44957901
Gets a slot on the BBC News website.
The joker is going to be Ferrari's blown rear wing, if they bring it this weekend (and it works). Though it's likely only of real benefit for single lap pace (as it relies on running the turbo on electrical power, while using the energy of the exhaust gases for downforce benefit), qualifying position is almost as important in Hungary as it is in Monaco....
My guess is somehow he'll contrive to become even more erratic.
The farmers really won't like being criticised for taking federal handouts if at the same time they are still losing money...
Personally, I can't see why the BBC is covering either of them.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/scottlynchnyc/6301064446
Are there many free trade republicans when it actually comes down to political pain in their districts/states? I doubt it. And the farmers get plenty of federal handouts/subsidies already and it hasn't bothered them before.
https://twitter.com/ianbremmer/status/1022160481417609217
. Magical hypocrisy from the dear old Beeb.
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/uk-44963548
https://inews.co.uk/news/armageddon-scenario-no-deal-brexit/
Shame so many farmers voted to Leave.
https://twitter.com/WikiGuido/status/1022386520538443776
A kick in the knackers for red ball cricketers.
I'm guessing it was some time before the first test (by which I mean the first ever test).
Edit - that seems very harsh on Dom Bess. Incidentally I hope if Moeen comes back that it's Malan who makes way.
https://www.pressgazette.co.uk/bbc-lawyers-will-ask-permission-to-appeal-sir-cliff-richard-privacy-ruling-in-high-court-over-police-raid-footage/
https://www.nfuonline.com/news/brexit-news/eu-referendum-news/nfu-survey-of-members-on-eu-referendum/
I don't want to change the world
I'm not looking for a new England
https://twitter.com/yougov/status/1022389688743673857?s=21
Corbynista I suppose.
Horseshoe theory?
https://twitter.com/VeeCee30/status/1022363447202332674
In Neo Nazi world the holocaust never happened.
Privately, they think the holocaust did happen, and it was a good things.
And the illustration looks like a rather misconceived new set of Royal Mail stamps...
And is it actually illegal to pay someone else's fine?
Perhaps it is right that these matters are handled in a court of law - rather rhan having some unaccountable quango dish out large fines.