North Ward on Oxford (Lib Dem Defence)
Last Local Election (2012): Lab 29, Lib Dem 13, Green 5, Ind 1 (Lab overall majority of 10)
Last election in ward:
2010: Lib Dem 1,303 (45%), Con 715 (24%), Lab 489 (17%), Green 413 (14%)
Candidates duly nominated: Time Bearder (Lib Dem), Sushila Dhall (Green), Louise Upton (Lab), John Walsh (Con)
Comments
Cheers to Mr. Hayfield for this.
On drugs: I've taken practically none (Nothing illegal, the only legal one I take a fair amount of is caffeine). Then again, I very rarely drink either.
MikeK Posts: 1,322
TwistedFireStopper said:
» show previous quotes
I do have a very good reason to want "women and others in full body burqas and niqabs swanning around my local high street"
Freedom.
---------------------------
No, Twisted. That way lies the road to slavery. You have a funny idea of freedom, I suppose you also support female genital mutilation in the name of freedom?
However, if we're speaking of freedom I must say it's completely indefensible that many of those advocating it for the burkha and niqab did not welcome such freedom for the publication of the Danish cartoons.
Obviously not, but you're a bit of a cock, so I guess I could make an exception in your case.
http://www.thenews.com.pk/Todays-News-13-25441-Muslim-women-lose-dignity-in-the-name-of-Halala-in-UK
Muslim women made to sleep with clerics to get a divorce. Ugh!!!!!!!!
http://rickstrassman.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=61&Itemid=60
Only alcohol, and I think max was 3 glasses of wine. I occasionally wonder if I've missed anything. Another glass and I might have become a Daily Telegraph columnist, or something. Next life!
Discuss.
Perhaps we should have a referendum conducted under AV on banning the Burqa.
That said, I do have quite a few peyote in my greenhouse.... That might be of interest.
tim caught in public wearing a burqa - claims it was a "cover up"
Anyway, I'm off for the night.
1) No Ban
2) Complete ban
3) Force some women to wear, you know the tracksuit wearing, tattooed ladies you see on the Jeremy Kyle show
To answer your question: Ken Clarke, Baroness Williams, and Harriet!
1) Alcohol (I'm a terrible Muslim, I know)
2) Tobacco
3) Weed, but that was as a passive smoker at a concert when this stoner must have smoked about 600 joints in six hours.
A decision to keep drinking may be better made when the evidence is in, and with a clear head.
My most memorable drug experience was medicinal. When I had appendicitis, I was doped to the eyeballs on morphine. Fabulous.
Although if we're counting morphine, morphine rocks.
As an aside, the full burqa is not a religious item (at least not required by the Qu'ran).
It was very very rare (mainly worn by whack jobs in the desert) until the 19th century, when the Brits occupied Egypt. Being good Liberals they promptly banned the burqa as representing the subjugation of women. Naturally, this lead to nationalists adopting the burqa as a symbol of rejection of Western values...
It's this history that makes me so nervous about permitting it in the UK. It is, very simply, an expression of 'apartness' and a rejection of everything our society stands for.
YouGov/Sun poll tonight: Labour have a 1 point lead. CON 34%, LAB 35%, LDEM 11%, UKIP 11%. Small Libs conference bounce closes the gap.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/swedish-court-rules-that-it-is-okay-to-masturbate-in-public-8826589.html
Con, 32.41, 31.65, 30.50, 31.19, 29.76, 31.00, 32.43, 32.89, 33.29
Lab, 42.64, 42.60, 40.95, 40.43, 39.24, 39.05, 38.96, 38.58, 37.79
LD, 10.59, 10.95, 11.40, 10.71, 10.00, 10.15, 10.22, 9.84, 9..36
UKIP, 8.73, 9.05, 11.55, 11.62, 14.33, 13.10, 11.78, 11.84, 12.29
Lab Lead, 10.23, 10.95, 10.45, 9.24, 9.48, 8.05, 6.52, 5.68, 4.50
So changes from Jan this year to Sep
Con plus 0.88
Lab minus 4.85
LD minus 1.23
UKIP plus 3.56
Lab lead minus 5.73
COA 45%
Lab 35%
Or if you prefer:
Lefties 46%
Tory/UKIP 45%
I'm not a libertarian so I wouldn't ban them completely personally but they make a good issue for arguing over the principle that should apply when considering the rights and wrongs of restricting freedom when it comes to clothing, in particular (imo) that it should be considered on a case by case basis dependent on context i.e. court rooms.
Also useful for trying to force multicultists to state a single principle explicitly rather than let them have one principle in theory but in reality two because they ignore it when it conflicts with the multicult e.g. FGM, gender-based abortion etc.
Oxford North last contest/result was in 2012 Lab 516 Green 385 LD 353 Con 291
Canterbury Seasalter , there was a by election in May this year result
Con 789 UKIP 706 Lab 437 LD 93 TUSC 41
If you cannot give up for a month then think who is in control of your life, you or your addiction?
Two polls in a row might mark the start of a trend. But let's not get too carried away yet.
"Sky News, which played the leading role in securing the TV debates last time, is expected to take quite a hardline approach to UKIP, advocating that it does not take part.
The BBC, however, is highly aware of its public service remit and is thought to be more cautious, particularly after the Scottish National Party’s legal challenge in 2010 when the nationalists asked for a court order to force Alex Salmond to take part. Before this year’s local elections, the BBC offered UKIP a party political broadcast, which it was not legally required to do."
But it seems a bit churlish to go on about it when SeanT has just given me helpful advice downthread. Perhaps I'll have another drink. One has to start somewhere.
But we are going to disagree: you (I recall) are a supporter of multi-culturalism. I have no issue with immigration, but believe they should be prepared to integrate into British society rather than create a 'little wherever' here.
http://politicshome.com/uk/article/85138/the_daily_mail_friday_20th_september_2013.html
I am withdrawing from the position of UKIP PPC for Cambridge. My friends on PB will know before everybody else.
The timing of the UKIP conference didn't help---it was deemed important we only had positive stories.
If you're including UKIP, why not the Greens, they have an actual MP
Edit and it's Farage demanding to be in every debate that's scuppering it
I personally would not have thought that this requires withdrawal, but all part of the dirty business of politics.
Best have squeaky clean PPE graduates wet behind the ears it seems. We get the politicians that we deserve with these censorious attitudes.
LOL
UKIP Dudley North PPC saying it's close there with Labour just ahead but still counting
Brass neck is the popular phrase that comes to mind
I don't share your politics David, but I don't doubt you are a good man who wants to do his bit. UKIP is much the poorer this evening. You'll bounce back soon enough.
Lab 35%
Con 34%
LD 11%
UKIP 11%
Labour gain in Oxford by 37 votes.
To be fair, there could be local stuff that none of us knows about.
Who came second?
Oh wait you were talking about the by-election
Lab 367 Lib Dem 330 Green Party 236 Con 100
UKIP 644
Con 522
Lab 307
Lib Dem 147
Green 54
UKIP gain from Con
So the idea was to see by how much a poll varied from the average of the two polls before and the two polls after it. (The error here is any variance between polls, which will include the sampling error which is mathematically calcuable but also other sorts of error.)
http://img593.imageshack.us/img593/9607/xvlw.png
As I hope you can see the 95% confidence level is just under four; in fact, it lies in the 3.75 band. Thus we can be reasonably certain (95%) that the five-day polling average of which the middle poll was zero is going to be no more than 3%. (Being four polls averaging 3.75 and one at zero.) Adopting a 99% interval gives 3.6%, being four polls at 4.5 and one at zero.
So I dont have to feel guilty about not responding to the emails asking people to canvass in Oxford
http://openlylocal.com/wards/7891-North
Lab 1053
UKIP 478
Con 190
BNP 120
Green 33
NF 16
Spoilt 6
Not particularly close afterall