Is there a futures market on how long (number of days) Theresa May will remain in office? I guess it has been swinging up and down frenziedly in the last week or two, with an exit date anything between 2017 and late 2019.
The only thing certain is that no one has a clue on this race - the pollsters admit as much quite explicitly - so Mr S is quite right to conclude that a Democrat win is the value bet. That doesn't mean it will happen, of course.
The pollsters admit they don’t have a clue on this one, anything could happen. Jones is probably the value bet, but can’t be bothered with this one myself.
A Jones win makes the Senate 51-49, which if the retiring John McCain keeps up his independence makes for a few interesting votes next year.
What does that matter? He could have EATEN children and shitkickers will still think the most important thing to vote for is tax cuts to the rich and removal of their healthcare.
New Year job; start making ‘welcome’ placards. Or something!!!!
I'm struggling to see any advantage we'd get from that.
Even if everything went perfectly he could turn on the head of a pin just a few days after and do something very much not in our mutual best interests.
This is a problem that her hideous inquiry has caused: such an obvious whitewash will mean that all other 'inquiries' by the Labour party will be seen in the same manner. Sadly for the accused and the accusers, and especially the truth.
New Year job; start making ‘welcome’ placards. Or something!!!!
I'm struggling to see any advantage we'd get from that.
Even if everything went perfectly he could turn on the head of a pin just a few days after and do something very much not in our mutual best interests.
Given the feeling about him I think he could turn quicker than that. Noisy demos around him, even on his way to the palace, might cause him to leave early, in a huff.
New Year job; start making ‘welcome’ placards. Or something!!!!
I'm struggling to see any advantage we'd get from that.
Even if everything went perfectly he could turn on the head of a pin just a few days after and do something very much not in our mutual best interests.
Quite. Unless there’s a major deal to announce between the two countries, the story will be that the President is in town and lots of people are unhappy about it.
In 1983, Louisiana Governor Edwin Edwards quipped to reporters "The only way I can lose this election is if I'm caught in bed with either a dead girl or a live boy".
This race is becoming the living embodiment of that quip. Just what does it take to break tribal politics in America?
Maybe it is time for the Democrats to quietly suggest he likes pineapple on his pizza...
The only thing certain is that no one has a clue on this race - the pollsters admit as much quite explicitly - so Mr S is quite right to conclude that a Democrat win is the value bet. That doesn't mean it will happen, of course.
New Year job; start making ‘welcome’ placards. Or something!!!!
I'm struggling to see any advantage we'd get from that.
Even if everything went perfectly he could turn on the head of a pin just a few days after and do something very much not in our mutual best interests.
We've already invited him, we're stuck. Macron managed it, so can we.
Shy bigots? "Moore — who has been accused of pursuing teenage girls while in his 30s — leads in most polls conducted via automated telephone interviews or online, in which respondents don’t have to interact with another human being to complete the survey." https://www.politico.com/story/2017/12/11/alabama-senate-moore-jones-polls-290501
Shy bigots? "Moore — who has been accused of pursuing teenage girls while in his 30s — leads in most polls conducted via automated telephone interviews or online, in which respondents don’t have to interact with another human being to complete the survey." https://www.politico.com/story/2017/12/11/alabama-senate-moore-jones-polls-290501
That's the most likely explanation. But there are others:
Are women, for example, less likely to answer robocalls? Or older voters? Or African Americans?
I don't know the answer to the question, but it would be interesting to see if robocalls tended to show bigger Republican vote shares in NJ/Virginia, for instance.
In 1983, Louisiana Governor Edwin Edwards quipped to reporters "The only way I can lose this election is if I'm caught in bed with either a dead girl or a live boy".
This race is becoming the living embodiment of that quip. Just what does it take to break tribal politics in America?
Maybe it is time for the Democrats to quietly suggest he likes pineapple on his pizza...
Roy Moore would surely lose if it was revealed that he had a boyfriend, or had voted for Hillary Clinton.
The gaming industry disputes that it's gambling, I believe.
I saw a video recently indicating that one publisher has applied for a patent for a system whereby if you're killed in multiplayer you're informed if your killer had a better weapon, and the same publisher has apparently applied for a patent to enable matchmaking that deliberately matches players wildly different in level and equipment. In short, it's aiming to maximise envy to get you to spend on virtual items (so-called 'pay to win').
I play videogames but never multiplayer, so this doesn't affect me directly at all, but I do think it's quite concerning.
Of course, lots of money has been shovelled into games before. I forget the title, might be EVE Online, but some virtual space battles have destroyed literally hundreds of thousands of pounds' worth of spacecraft, if not millions'.
The gaming industry disputes that it's gambling, I believe.
I saw a video recently indicating that one publisher has applied for a patent for a system whereby if you're killed in multiplayer you're informed if your killer had a better weapon, and the same publisher has apparently applied for a patent to enable matchmaking that deliberately matches players wildly different in level and equipment. In short, it's aiming to maximise envy to get you to spend on virtual items (so-called 'pay to win').
I play videogames but never multiplayer, so this doesn't affect me directly at all, but I do think it's quite concerning.
Of course, lots of money has been shovelled into games before. I forget the title, might be EVE Online, but some virtual space battles have destroyed literally hundreds of thousands of pounds' worth of spacecraft, if not millions'.
2 new polls yesterday, 1 for Survey Monkey gave Jones a 2 point lead while the other from Change Research gave Moore a 6 point lead.
Turnout is key, Democrats appear more motivated than Republicans and that could give the edge to Jones especially if there is high minority turnout. On a normal special election turnout Moore should win
The gaming industry disputes that it's gambling, I believe.
I saw a video recently indicating that one publisher has applied for a patent for a system whereby if you're killed in multiplayer you're informed if your killer had a better weapon, and the same publisher has apparently applied for a patent to enable matchmaking that deliberately matches players wildly different in level and equipment. In short, it's aiming to maximise envy to get you to spend on virtual items (so-called 'pay to win').
I play videogames but never multiplayer, so this doesn't affect me directly at all, but I do think it's quite concerning.
Of course, lots of money has been shovelled into games before. I forget the title, might be EVE Online, but some virtual space battles have destroyed literally hundreds of thousands of pounds' worth of spacecraft, if not millions'.
Mr. Teacher, it's rare for him to praise anything. He was partly nice about Dragon's Dogma and liked XCOM: Enemy Unknown and Portal, but (from memory, maybe he's become nice in the last couple of years) that's about it.
Mr. 1000, I used to visit the Escapist, and watch Zero Punctuation, regularly, but it's been a while.
Do enjoy his review style. I think the only one he got wrong was when he completely missed the point with The Last Of Us.
He's become a little bit of a parody of himself, and has a tendency to ramp up the gratuitous swearing just to get laughs. Still, one of the better reviewers out there.
Mr. Teacher, it's rare for him to praise anything. He was partly nice about Dragon's Dogma and liked XCOM: Enemy Unknown and Portal, but (from memory, maybe he's become nice in the last couple of years) that's about it.
He liked Doom. (Which, by the way, is rather good fun on the Switch.)
In 1983, Louisiana Governor Edwin Edwards quipped to reporters "The only way I can lose this election is if I'm caught in bed with either a dead girl or a live boy".
This race is becoming the living embodiment of that quip. Just what does it take to break tribal politics in America?
Maybe it is time for the Democrats to quietly suggest he likes pineapple on his pizza...
Roy Moore would surely lose if it was revealed that he had a boyfriend, or had voted for Hillary Clinton.
This is a problem that her hideous inquiry has caused: such an obvious whitewash will mean that all other 'inquiries' by the Labour party will be seen in the same manner. Sadly for the accused and the accusers, and especially the truth.
Whereas if Damien Green is cleared, it's a case of those lying cops trying to dirty the reputation of a decent and honest Tory.......
Mr. Teacher, it's rare for him to praise anything. He was partly nice about Dragon's Dogma and liked XCOM: Enemy Unknown and Portal, but (from memory, maybe he's become nice in the last couple of years) that's about it.
He liked Witcher 3 and is a big fan of Dark Souls.
I've had a lot of days off this year for cancer treatment and recovering from general anaesthetics and I have spent more hours than I care to think playing through Witcher 3. Great game both visually and from a storytelling perspective.
It seems tens of thousands of those highly motivated black voters may not be eligible.
Its democracy Jim, but not as we know it (thank god).
If they voted last November I expect they will be able to vote today but even a 100% black turnout would not be enough for Jones to win given they largely vote Democrat anyway.
If Jones wins it will be white female and young and independent voters who will be decisive
It seems tens of thousands of those highly motivated black voters may not be eligible.
Its democracy Jim, but not as we know it (thank god).
If they voted last November I expect they will be able to vote today but even a 100% black turnout would not be enough for Jones to win given they largely vote Democrat anyway.
If Jones wins it will be white female and young and independent voters who will be decisive
Do they largely vote Democrat anyway? Or do they largely not vote?
Well, as might have been expected given the torrent of triumphalism on Saturday (anyone would think getting a deal on Friday was timed for the weekend press), May's and the Conservatives' numbers have moved a little higher in the new polling.
My view remains, for all the furore, the Devil remains in the detail. We have to pay at least £35 billion, maybe £40 billion and I suspect a great deal more to the EU that won't come into the public domain. We remain effectively members until April 2021 though politically we will have departed two years previously and will be completely impotent by-standers.
The Irish border question is the classic example of kicking the empty can of Guinness down the road. A fudge to satisfy the DUP leaves a lot of practical questions unresolved. Perhaps one of the more contentious areas will be the right for spouses (and other family members ?) of EU nationals currently resident here to come while it seems EU nationals will remain eligible for child benefit which seems a little odd given the determination of the LEAVE campaign to ensure the benefits system in the UK wasn't abused.
Good to see "criminality checks" being introduced for new arrivals but presumably the criminals already here will be fine until they are caught and presumably deported.
Is it a good deal ? In parts, yes, and like all negotiations we have gained in some areas and conceded in others. Naturally, those elements supporting the Government have accentuated the "wins" and not said very much at all about the concessions and the compromises. That might explain the froth and the triumphalist euphoria - it's easy to tell a nice story with a happy ending - much harder to tell the whole story including the less palatable elements,
It seems tens of thousands of those highly motivated black voters may not be eligible.
Its democracy Jim, but not as we know it (thank god).
If they voted last November I expect they will be able to vote today but even a 100% black turnout would not be enough for Jones to win given they largely vote Democrat anyway.
If Jones wins it will be white female and young and independent voters who will be decisive
Do they largely vote Democrat anyway? Or do they largely not vote?
90%+ of the black vote normally votes Democrat, Obama got it over 95%.
The key shift in the state is the white vote, Jones is getting about a third of the white vote in Alabama whereas only about 10 to 15% of the white vote in Alabama went for Obama and Hillary
Thinking about it I suspect one issue is that European states likely export to other European countries while American States likely sell lots to other American States but those aren't classed as exports.
If intra-EU trade was reclassified as not being exports then I suspect the graphic might look very different.
Thinking about it I suspect one issue is that European states likely export to other European countries while American States likely sell lots to other American States but those aren't classed as exports.
If intra-EU trade was reclassified as not being exports then I suspect the graphic might look very different.
Indeed. it's like the old one about Americans not having passports. Well you don't really need one when your country is the size of the EU.
Thinking about it I suspect one issue is that European states likely export to other European countries while American States likely sell lots to other American States but those aren't classed as exports.
If intra-EU trade was reclassified as not being exports then I suspect the graphic might look very different.
Indeed. it's like the old one about Americans not having passports. Well you don't really need one when your country is the size of the EU.
Yes, the percentage of Americans who have travelled outside the USA is not miles behind the percentage of Britains who have travelled outside Europe and those who do go abroad are most likely to have been to Canada or Mexico. 48% of Americans have not been outside the USA, 60% have not been outside North America and 28% have been to Europe. 44% of Britain's have been to North America
It seems tens of thousands of those highly motivated black voters may not be eligible.
Its democracy Jim, but not as we know it (thank god).
If they voted last November I expect they will be able to vote today but even a 100% black turnout would not be enough for Jones to win given they largely vote Democrat anyway.
If Jones wins it will be white female and young and independent voters who will be decisive
Do they largely vote Democrat anyway? Or do they largely not vote?
90%+ of the black vote normally votes Democrat, Obama got it over 95%.
The key shift in the state is the white vote, Jones is getting about a third of the white vote in Alabama whereas only about 10 to 15% of the white vote in Alabama went for Obama and Hillary
There's 90% turnout for black voters normally? Obama got 95% turnout? That's incredible in a nation with an average of 54.9% turnout for Obama's re-election in 2012.
A lot of US drugs and medicines are manufactured outside the US, aren't they? Is there a single indigenous Irish pharma company? But look at the exports coming out of there. I suspect the German number is so high because its big pharma companies - Bayer, Merck & Schering, etc - also do a lot of their production in Germany.
FDA GMP standards are different to EU GMP and it is very expensive to have a plant that is compliant with both regimes (big pharma does it, but most sane people have a regional manufacturing strategy).
Ireland's manufacturing is driven by being the location of choice for US biological manufacturing. Belgium is Takeda (Solvay) and UCB.
It seems tens of thousands of those highly motivated black voters may not be eligible.
Its democracy Jim, but not as we know it (thank god).
If they voted last November I expect they will be able to vote today but even a 100% black turnout would not be enough for Jones to win given they largely vote Democrat anyway.
If Jones wins it will be white female and young and independent voters who will be decisive
Do they largely vote Democrat anyway? Or do they largely not vote?
90%+ of the black vote normally votes Democrat, Obama got it over 95%.
The key shift in the state is the white vote, Jones is getting about a third of the white vote in Alabama whereas only about 10 to 15% of the white vote in Alabama went for Obama and Hillary
There's 90% turnout for black voters normally? Obama got 95% turnout? That's incredible in a nation with an average of 54.9% turnout for Obama's re-election in 2012.
Or maybe you didn't read what I wrote correctly.
As I said black turnout is not going to decisively change this race, the white vote, especially the female white vote will do but be pedantic if you wish
Impressive how this BBC news article on rising inflation manages not to say what the rate was before (or how large the increase is): http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-42320052
It seems tens of thousands of those highly motivated black voters may not be eligible.
Its democracy Jim, but not as we know it (thank god).
If they voted last November I expect they will be able to vote today but even a 100% black turnout would not be enough for Jones to win given they largely vote Democrat anyway.
If Jones wins it will be white female and young and independent voters who will be decisive
Do they largely vote Democrat anyway? Or do they largely not vote?
90%+ of the black vote normally votes Democrat, Obama got it over 95%.
The key shift in the state is the white vote, Jones is getting about a third of the white vote in Alabama whereas only about 10 to 15% of the white vote in Alabama went for Obama and Hillary
There's 90% turnout for black voters normally? Obama got 95% turnout? That's incredible in a nation with an average of 54.9% turnout for Obama's re-election in 2012.
Or maybe you didn't read what I wrote correctly.
As I said black turnout is not going to decisively change this race, the white vote, especially the female white vote will do but be pedantic if you wish
Not decisively alone but your claim that blacks already vote decisively for Democrats so there's no room for improvement isn't correct - they largely don't vote at all. If they turnout for Jones that will make a significant difference.
Given the dominance of the GOP in Alabama there will need to be many significant differences for Jones to win and that is but one piece in the puzzle but it shouldn't be ignored or dismissed.
A lot of US drugs and medicines are manufactured outside the US, aren't they? Is there a single indigenous Irish pharma company? But look at the exports coming out of there. I suspect the German number is so high because its big pharma companies - Bayer, Merck & Schering, etc - also do a lot of their production in Germany.
Schering doesn't exist more as it was bought up by Bayer. The other major German pharma players are Boehringer Ingelheim and Merck Serono.
One thing to bear in mind is that the volume of exports will depend on the therapy areas each company is focusing on. Something like ibuprofen will be high volume, low margin while a rare cancer drug will be low volume, high margin
It seems tens of thousands of those highly motivated black voters may not be eligible.
Its democracy Jim, but not as we know it (thank god).
If they voted last November I expect they will be able to vote today but even a 100% black turnout would not be enough for Jones to win given they largely vote Democrat anyway.
If Jones wins it will be white female and young and independent voters who will be decisive
Do they largely vote Democrat anyway? Or do they largely not vote?
90%+ of the black vote normally votes Democrat, Obama got it over 95%.
The key shift in the state is the white vote, Jones is getting about a third of the white vote in Alabama whereas only about 10 to 15% of the white vote in Alabama went for Obama and Hillary
There's 90% turnout for black voters normally? Obama got 95% turnout? That's incredible in a nation with an average of 54.9% turnout for Obama's re-election in 2012.
Or maybe you didn't read what I wrote correctly.
As I said black turnout is not going to decisively change this race, the white vote, especially the female white vote will do but be pedantic if you wish
Not decisively alone but your claim that blacks already vote decisively for Democrats so there's no room for improvement isn't correct - they largely don't vote at all. If they turnout for Jones that will make a significant difference.
Given the dominance of the GOP in Alabama there will need to be many significant differences for Jones to win and that is but one piece in the puzzle but it shouldn't be ignored or dismissed.
In 2012 black turnout exceeded white turnout, so wrong.
Comments
https://twitter.com/JuddLegum/status/940418123332759552
Oh, one thing is pretty certain - Moore is an inveterate liar:
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2017/12/roy_moore_s_deceit_is_disqualifying.html
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-42314410
As the White House argues that an election victory absolves you of all crimes:
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/12/11/trump-accusers-sexual-harassment-289309
Which is an argument fit for a banana republic.
A Jones win makes the Senate 51-49, which if the retiring John McCain keeps up his independence makes for a few interesting votes next year.
New Year job; start making ‘welcome’ placards. Or something!!!!
Even if everything went perfectly he could turn on the head of a pin just a few days after and do something very much not in our mutual best interests.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-42318625
Has Ms Chakrabarti been busy?
This is a problem that her hideous inquiry has caused: such an obvious whitewash will mean that all other 'inquiries' by the Labour party will be seen in the same manner. Sadly for the accused and the accusers, and especially the truth.
This race is becoming the living embodiment of that quip. Just what does it take to break tribal politics in America?
Maybe it is time for the Democrats to quietly suggest he likes pineapple on his pizza...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-42318625
"Moore — who has been accused of pursuing teenage girls while in his 30s — leads in most polls conducted via automated telephone interviews or online, in which respondents don’t have to interact with another human being to complete the survey."
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/12/11/alabama-senate-moore-jones-polls-290501
It's official: the internet has now gone too far.
I have formulated a hypothesis and now I want to test it.
Edit - I have also just seen someone trying to take a Vauxhall Astra up a 1 in 8.
It did not end well...
Are women, for example, less likely to answer robocalls?
Or older voters?
Or African Americans?
I don't know the answer to the question, but it would be interesting to see if robocalls tended to show bigger Republican vote shares in NJ/Virginia, for instance.
That's like Caesar Plus
http://plus.faz.net/unternehmen/2017-12-12/still-und-starr-ruht-der-verkehr/90867.html
... just saying.
Mr. Brooke, not the first time the Germans have got bogged down in the snow, to their great consternation.
Interesting article on so-called 'skin betting':
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-42311533
The gaming industry disputes that it's gambling, I believe.
I saw a video recently indicating that one publisher has applied for a patent for a system whereby if you're killed in multiplayer you're informed if your killer had a better weapon, and the same publisher has apparently applied for a patent to enable matchmaking that deliberately matches players wildly different in level and equipment. In short, it's aiming to maximise envy to get you to spend on virtual items (so-called 'pay to win').
I play videogames but never multiplayer, so this doesn't affect me directly at all, but I do think it's quite concerning.
Of course, lots of money has been shovelled into games before. I forget the title, might be EVE Online, but some virtual space battles have destroyed literally hundreds of thousands of pounds' worth of spacecraft, if not millions'.
Turnout is key, Democrats appear more motivated than Republicans and that could give the edge to Jones especially if there is high minority turnout. On a normal special election turnout Moore should win
Do enjoy his review style. I think the only one he got wrong was when he completely missed the point with The Last Of Us.
And in a world where YouTubers cement their heads inside microwaves, I think he's probably still the right side of sane
I've heard good things about Doom elsewhere too, though.
It seems tens of thousands of those highly motivated black voters may not be eligible.
Its democracy Jim, but not as we know it (thank god).
https://twitter.com/simongerman600/status/940335925078437888
Hmm. It might have been Demon's Souls [the first game], but I recall Zero Punctuation ragging on it quite a bit.
May: "Social care is collapsing and wealthy voters need to pay more"
Tory voters: ".....we didn't mean like that, though"
If Jones wins it will be white female and young and independent voters who will be decisive
And I agree entirely on The Witcher 3. It's an outstandingly good game, the only drawback being it makes my fat PS4 scream like a jet engine at times.
Between it and The Last Of Us, I'm wondering if the secret ingredient to gaming excellence is a surrogate father-daughter relationship.
I can't think of any big Belgian pharmaceutical companies (Solvay?), so I presume there tax advantages to manufacturing drugs in the country.
Well, as might have been expected given the torrent of triumphalism on Saturday (anyone would think getting a deal on Friday was timed for the weekend press), May's and the Conservatives' numbers have moved a little higher in the new polling.
My view remains, for all the furore, the Devil remains in the detail. We have to pay at least £35 billion, maybe £40 billion and I suspect a great deal more to the EU that won't come into the public domain. We remain effectively members until April 2021 though politically we will have departed two years previously and will be completely impotent by-standers.
The Irish border question is the classic example of kicking the empty can of Guinness down the road. A fudge to satisfy the DUP leaves a lot of practical questions unresolved. Perhaps one of the more contentious areas will be the right for spouses (and other family members ?) of EU nationals currently resident here to come while it seems EU nationals will remain eligible for child benefit which seems a little odd given the determination of the LEAVE campaign to ensure the benefits system in the UK wasn't abused.
Good to see "criminality checks" being introduced for new arrivals but presumably the criminals already here will be fine until they are caught and presumably deported.
Is it a good deal ? In parts, yes, and like all negotiations we have gained in some areas and conceded in others. Naturally, those elements supporting the Government have accentuated the "wins" and not said very much at all about the concessions and the compromises. That might explain the froth and the triumphalist euphoria - it's easy to tell a nice story with a happy ending - much harder to tell the whole story including the less palatable elements,
The key shift in the state is the white vote, Jones is getting about a third of the white vote in Alabama whereas only about 10 to 15% of the white vote in Alabama went for Obama and Hillary
If intra-EU trade was reclassified as not being exports then I suspect the graphic might look very different.
Mr. Teacher, the music's excellent too, particularly the Skellige theme.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/dec/12/no-deal-brexit-cost-everyone-uk-1585-us-thinktank
https://yougov.co.uk/news/2014/11/21/british-people-far-more-well-travelled-americans/
Despite Brexit...
Or maybe you didn't read what I wrote correctly.
In-game music can make a huge difference to a game. Skyrim and Dragons Age Inquisition both have great music too, often diegetic.
Ireland's manufacturing is driven by being the location of choice for US biological manufacturing. Belgium is Takeda (Solvay) and UCB.
Germany is Bayer, Boehringer and Merck.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-42320052
Given the dominance of the GOP in Alabama there will need to be many significant differences for Jones to win and that is but one piece in the puzzle but it shouldn't be ignored or dismissed.
One thing to bear in mind is that the volume of exports will depend on the therapy areas each company is focusing on. Something like ibuprofen will be high volume, low margin while a rare cancer drug will be low volume, high margin
.....though if you fancy making a few quid on your expenses nudge nudge wink wink
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AGrvQ1c5khU.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/in-2012-black-voter-turnout-surpassed-white-turnout/
Romney still won Alabama by a 23% margin over Obama
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election_in_Alabama,_2012