politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » No deal, yet
"On a couple of issues, some differences do remain" – UK PM Theresa May on failure to reach deal with EU in #Brexit talks https://t.co/UEqjIb9s51 pic.twitter.com/b5OqkrAsXy
It's hard to see the DUP getting on board now - their grassroots will be screaming blue murder and they will be forced to take a harder line.
The only way to take a credible harder line on no GB/NI border is to reverse support for Brexit.
That would really put the UK government on the spot.
The people of Northern Ireland did vote to stay in the UK, i.e. the Single Market and the Customs Union. It is the DUP which is reneging on the people's democratic wishes. The DUP have no MPs in the mainland - so they should not worry about the rUK.
Still not sold on how we get a 3018 election. Would involve Tory MPs voting for an early election in which they would lose their seats.
Do they register their protest at the cravenness of their party in allowing pigdog traitors to kowtow to Johnny Foreigner. Or do they suck it up for fear of a Jezza govt.
An incredible amount of criticism on here of May. What would those who criticise her do that she is not?
Understand as I think Faisal Islam pointed out, that leaving the EU did not specifically entail any one measure or measures. Including leaving the single market, freedom of movement, and all the rest.
She allowed both her natural instincts (limited as they are) together with her Brexito-loons to dictate the pace.
One is that May agreed to a lot of stuff but did not clear it with the DUP and so has backed away from an agreement at the last minute.
The other is that she did not agree and that the EU has tried to bounce her into an agreement through leaking the details of their proposal.
All the Remainers on here all day have assumed it was the first. It is equally as likely it was the second and there appears to be no evidence to support one contention over the other.
I would like to think that the Remainers would learn a lesson from this, but I very much doubt they will.
Still not sold on how we get a 3018 election. Would involve Tory MPs voting for an early election in which they would lose their seats.
It would need the DUP to support a No Confidence Vote. A Dissolution follows autimatically in the absence of an Affirmative Confidence Vote within 14 days.
An incredible amount of criticism on here of May. What would those who criticise her do that she is not?
This is PB, spiritual home of armchair generals everywhere. Are you new here?
Welcome back John!
Thank you Mortimer. While I have mostly retired from the fray, I do drift in occasionally to allow the warring tribes an opportunity to bask in the radiance of my presence, so this is not unprecedented .
Actually, everyone has missed the real story of the day. Both the EU and the UK (for all their protestations and positioning) are obviously keen to do a deal.
My guess - contrary to what I have long planned upon - is that ultimately a deal will therefore be done.
I think real progress. For the first time, this government has been serious about Brexit in the recent couple of weeks. The points of difference look to be defined and narrow, so they should be bridgeable. Admittedly this is just the first and easiest of at least three rounds of Brexit talks. But progress nevertheless.
One is that May agreed to a lot of stuff but did not clear it with the DUP and so has backed away from an agreement at the last minute.
The other is that she did not agree and that the EU has tried to bounce her into an agreement through leaking the details of their proposal.
All the Remainers on here all day have assumed it was the first. It is equally as likely it was the second and there appears to be no evidence to support one contention over the other.
I would like to think that the Remainers would learn a lesson from this, but I very much doubt they will.
D'unt matter which it is. She is PM and it's her job to get us a good deal. This she seems manifestly not able to do. Although of course we shall wait and see.
Yes, it is progress in that the UK and EU are minded to do a deal.
But being "minded" counts for nothing if you can't get the backing to sign that deal, and the effect of today is that this backing is less, not more likely.
I can’t tell whether it’s May that’s the big issue here - that she just isn’t very good - or whether Brexit is so complex that any PM would be in this mess.
Actually, everyone has missed the real story of the day. Both the EU and the UK (for all their protestations and positioning) are obviously keen to do a deal.
My guess - contrary to what I have long planned upon - is that ultimately a deal will therefore be done.
I said that on the previous thread.
Throw the DUP into the sea if the bugger up the Brexit deal.
I don't know the ins and outs of it all, but the tone in that brief "No deal" press conference seemed remarkably warm and conciliatory considering that the EU are in control and want to grind Britain's face into the dirt. Maybe it's not as most on here want it to be- from either side- and a deal might actually be in the offing.
An incredible amount of criticism on here of May. What would those who criticise her do that she is not?
That's exceedingly easy in this case: Discussed potential wording with Arlene Foster.
May knows what the DUP and majority in NI want without having to check with them. She knows they don't want to be separated from the UK in any further ways than at present.
Mr. B2, be fair. There shouldn't've been one at Monaco. Button tried a stupid move for a non-points position.
Not that I'm still annoyed about it.
Mr. W, ****ing hell. She might as well don a gimp suit if she's going that far. What's the point of leaving if we're going to let the EU dictate our regulations?
The 1922 Committee should (figuratively) put her in a sack, throw her in the Thames and get a PM who has a spine, brain, and guts (or at least a couple of them).
On the plus side, it does make my 6.5 on another vote pre-2020 seem good value.
Edited extra bit: that does assume Peston's right. And we all recall how accurate he was just as the polling closed on the referendum.
Yes, it is progress in that the UK and EU are minded to do a deal.
But being "minded" counts for nothing if you can't get the backing to sign that deal, and the effect of today is that this backing is less, not more likely.
May has the numbers in Parliament for a deal. Does she have the numbers in her party?
One is that May agreed to a lot of stuff but did not clear it with the DUP and so has backed away from an agreement at the last minute.
The other is that she did not agree and that the EU has tried to bounce her into an agreement through leaking the details of their proposal.
All the Remainers on here all day have assumed it was the first. It is equally as likely it was the second and there appears to be no evidence to support one contention over the other.
I would like to think that the Remainers would learn a lesson from this, but I very much doubt they will.
D'unt matter which it is. She is PM and it's her job to get us a good deal. This she seems manifestly not able to do. Although of course we shall wait and see.
To get a good deal she first has to not sign any bad deals.
To summarise the day - no deal is better than a bad deal.
I can’t tell whether it’s May that’s the big issue here - that she just isn’t very good - or whether Brexit is so complex that any PM would be in this mess.
Or that it is both.
Brexit needs someone with the wisdom of Solomon. It has someone with all the nous of Frank Spencer (“Some Mothers do ‘Ave ‘Em) handling it.
"Belgian MEP Philippe Lamberts earlier told the BBC's Laura Kuenssberg that the UK had made a concession on the Irish border.
The BBC's political editor said Mr Lamberts had said the UK was prepared to accept that Northern Ireland may remain in the EU's customs union and single market in all but name"
I can’t tell whether it’s May that’s the big issue here - that she just isn’t very good - or whether Brexit is so complex that any PM would be in this mess.
Maybe a bit of both, but perhaps an even bigger factor is that the great British public decided not to give her the majority she was seeking, thus making it impossible for her to carry out the negotiations properly.
"Belgian MEP Philippe Lamberts earlier told the BBC's Laura Kuenssberg that the UK had made a concession on the Irish border.
The BBC's political editor said Mr Lamberts had said the UK was prepared to accept that Northern Ireland may remain in the EU's customs union and single market in all but name"
How the f can one part of UK remain in Single Market? I suppose we might see Sunderland and Swindon's car plants move to Belfast.
I can’t tell whether it’s May that’s the big issue here - that she just isn’t very good - or whether Brexit is so complex that any PM would be in this mess.
Maybe a bit of both, but perhaps an even bigger factor is that the great British public decided not to give her the majority she was seeking, thus making it impossible for her to carry out the negotiations properly.
Her own fault. She was bequeathed a majority by David Cameron, and there was no need to have a general election for another three years.
Actually, everyone has missed the real story of the day. Both the EU and the UK (for all their protestations and positioning) are obviously keen to do a deal.
My guess - contrary to what I have long planned upon - is that ultimately a deal will therefore be done.
Today has been reassuring on that front. May/Davis may need to be seen to clearly win something somewhere along the line though.
It's high risk, but it could work. Theresa May's calculation up to now is to be the hardest of Brexits and never be outflanked. Going for soft Brexit may split the hard core. Some hardliners will resist it; others will bank a form of Brexit even if it isn't what they want.
I don't know the ins and outs of it all, but the tone in that brief "No deal" press conference seemed remarkably warm and conciliatory considering that the EU are in control and want to grind Britain's face into the dirt. Maybe it's not as most on here want it to be- from either side- and a deal might actually be in the offing.
Let’s face it. the EU DON’T want us to leave. They’d prefer we sent them different MEP’s of course, but they want us to stay. if they can get May off the hook, and keep her on-side tbey will.
I can’t tell whether it’s May that’s the big issue here - that she just isn’t very good - or whether Brexit is so complex that any PM would be in this mess.
Maybe a bit of both, but perhaps an even bigger factor is that the great British public decided not to give her the majority she was seeking, thus making it impossible for her to carry out the negotiations properly.
Her own fault. She was bequeathed a majority by David Cameron, and there was no need to have a general election for another three years.
That too. However, that doesn't absolve voters of responsibility for the consequences of their votes. It was plain as a pikestaff that to negotiate Brexit she needed a majority, and preferably a large one.
Actually, everyone has missed the real story of the day. Both the EU and the UK (for all their protestations and positioning) are obviously keen to do a deal.
My guess - contrary to what I have long planned upon - is that ultimately a deal will therefore be done.
Not really. I tweeted something similar an hour ago.
I think I might have played rugby against him 25 years ago..
He'd have been 14 then, was it a schoolboy match?
Yes, I played for Marlborough against Eton that year. I think they beat us 7-5
Actually, I'm definitely wrong. He would have been in the year below me. I saw he was born 78 as well, and erroneously assumed he was in the same year as me. But I'm March, he's November.
Is that Yes/No support for independence or a second referendum? If the former then it's a very high starting point for Yes, and support has now clearly outgrown the SNP.
"Belgian MEP Philippe Lamberts earlier told the BBC's Laura Kuenssberg that the UK had made a concession on the Irish border.
The BBC's political editor said Mr Lamberts had said the UK was prepared to accept that Northern Ireland may remain in the EU's customs union and single market in all but name"
How the f can one part of UK remain in Single Market? I suppose we might see Sunderland and Swindon's car plants move to Belfast.
I'm more puzzled to know how some, or all, of the UK remains part of the EU's Customs Union on leaving the EU. That would seem to be neither in our interest, nor in their interest.
@matthewcarson: Reminder that the UK started the Brexit negotiations offering no transition period, 20 billion euros maximum, and no special arrangements for NI. Now it’s 2/3 years transition, 60 billion euros, and special arrangements for NI. The Art Of The Deal, by Theresa May.
@matthewcarson: Reminder that the UK started the Brexit negotiations offering no transition period, 20 billion euros maximum, and no special arrangements for NI. Now it’s 2/3 years transition, 60 billion euros, and special arrangements for NI. The Art Of The Deal, by Theresa May.
The DUP's position also seems to be that it wouldn't allow a special deal for Scotland or Wales (or London) either, as that would also be a threat to the union. So do ScotIndy win either way; either carve out separate deal with EU from rest of the UK and make a basis for independence from that, or argue that the straight jacket terms of a "one deal hits all countries" demands an independent Scotland to rejoin the EU?
One is that May agreed to a lot of stuff but did not clear it with the DUP and so has backed away from an agreement at the last minute.
The other is that she did not agree and that the EU has tried to bounce her into an agreement through leaking the details of their proposal.
All the Remainers on here all day have assumed it was the first. It is equally as likely it was the second and there appears to be no evidence to support one contention over the other.
I would like to think that the Remainers would learn a lesson from this, but I very much doubt they will.
D'unt matter which it is. She is PM and it's her job to get us a good deal. This she seems manifestly not able to do. Although of course we shall wait and see.
To get a good deal she first has to not sign any bad deals.
To summarise the day - no deal is better than a bad deal.
Well, what to make of all that? My guess is that a hard-Brexit mole in the May camp leaked some controversial stuff to enrage the DUP and scupper things. Very clever if so - Rees-Mogg and co. have now been forewarned and they can brand Theresa a saboteur if she attempts a stunt like that again.
@matthewcarson: Reminder that the UK started the Brexit negotiations offering no transition period, 20 billion euros maximum, and no special arrangements for NI. Now it’s 2/3 years transition, 60 billion euros, and special arrangements for NI. The Art Of The Deal, by Theresa May.
The transition is a good thing, surely? And I don’t recall the £20bn being described as the full liabilities. A far cry from the initial €100bn demand though.
Yes, I played for Marlborough against Eton that year. I think they beat us 7-5
Was it a particularly difficult conversion?
That must have been a stonking match. Two tries in total, in Boys Rugby; the matches I saw used to have 2 in the first 15 minutes.... once saw BNC win 60 something - 3...
Had Remain won 52%, I can't see the likes of Khan or the SNP calling for those parts of the nation that voted to Leave to do so separately. It's a rancid reductionism of politics.
When the Scots voted to stay in the UK, was there a call for those parts that voted to leave to separate?
Interesting electoral fact: since 1992 only two seats in the wider regions of London / south east / East Anglia have moved from Labour to Conservative: Southampton Itchen and Thurrock, compared to about 31 seats across the country as a whole in that category. (Around 74 seats moved the other way. Boundary changes make the comparisons inexact). Southampton Itchen is effectively a swap with Southampton Test between 1992 and 2017, which leaves Thurrock as the only seat to switch in that part of the country since 1992. Those numbers would leave the Tories down 43 seats, but in fact they're only down 18 seats, which means they got a seat bonus of about 25 seats from the various boundary changes since 1992.
Well, what to make of all that? My guess is that a hard-Brexit mole in the May camp leaked some controversial stuff to enrage the DUP and scupper things. Very clever if so - Rees-Mogg and co. have now been forewarned and they can brand Theresa a saboteur if she attempts a stunt like that again.
Or it was the EU trying to bounce her into something. They have form on leaking.
"Belgian MEP Philippe Lamberts earlier told the BBC's Laura Kuenssberg that the UK had made a concession on the Irish border.
The BBC's political editor said Mr Lamberts had said the UK was prepared to accept that Northern Ireland may remain in the EU's customs union and single market in all but name"
How the f can one part of UK remain in Single Market? I suppose we might see Sunderland and Swindon's car plants move to Belfast.
I'm more puzzled to know how some, or all, of the UK remains part of the EU's Customs Union on leaving the EU. That would seem to be neither in our interest, nor in their interest.
They're all in cloud cuckoo land. The world's gone crazy.
Comments
Another referendum in 2019.
Just popping in to luxuriate in the schadenfreude.
See you at the next referendum.
Some might opt for the former.
BBC reporting disappointment in the EU, so counting your chickens comes into mind
She allowed both her natural instincts (limited as they are) together with her Brexito-loons to dictate the pace.
Apparently he taught Cameron. But not clear he was listening in those tutorials.
Mr. B2, I have mentioned it once or twice
Some on here should be ashamed of themselves how low you think of this country.
It's probably the only way the DUP can save face after their kamikaze support for Brexit in the first place.
One is that May agreed to a lot of stuff but did not clear it with the DUP and so has backed away from an agreement at the last minute.
The other is that she did not agree and that the EU has tried to bounce her into an agreement through leaking the details of their proposal.
All the Remainers on here all day have assumed it was the first. It is equally as likely it was the second and there appears to be no evidence to support one contention over the other.
I would like to think that the Remainers would learn a lesson from this, but I very much doubt they will.
My guess - contrary to what I have long planned upon - is that ultimately a deal will therefore be done.
But being "minded" counts for nothing if you can't get the backing to sign that deal, and the effect of today is that this backing is less, not more likely.
Throw the DUP into the sea if the bugger up the Brexit deal.
At least someone on our side seems to know how to negotiate.
Not that I'm still annoyed about it.
Mr. W, ****ing hell. She might as well don a gimp suit if she's going that far. What's the point of leaving if we're going to let the EU dictate our regulations?
The 1922 Committee should (figuratively) put her in a sack, throw her in the Thames and get a PM who has a spine, brain, and guts (or at least a couple of them).
On the plus side, it does make my 6.5 on another vote pre-2020 seem good value.
Edited extra bit: that does assume Peston's right. And we all recall how accurate he was just as the polling closed on the referendum.
I may have been a shade excessive. Maybe.
To summarise the day - no deal is better than a bad deal.
Brexit needs someone with the wisdom of Solomon. It has someone with all the nous of Frank Spencer (“Some Mothers do ‘Ave ‘Em) handling it.
BBC reports ......
"Belgian MEP Philippe Lamberts earlier told the BBC's Laura Kuenssberg that the UK had made a concession on the Irish border.
The BBC's political editor said Mr Lamberts had said the UK was prepared to accept that Northern Ireland may remain in the EU's customs union and single market in all but name"
https://twitter.com/MrTCHarris/status/937688219747012608
http://enormo-haddock.blogspot.co.uk/2017/12/2017-post-season-review.html
I just can't see the EU wanting to align their regulations with those of the UK.
Continent cut off by fuzzy thinking.
Had Remain won 52%, I can't see the likes of Khan or the SNP calling for those parts of the nation that voted to Leave to do so separately. It's a rancid reductionism of politics.
When the Scots voted to stay in the UK, was there a call for those parts that voted to leave to separate?
*sighs*