56% in Venice (and environs), really? I knew there was some sentiment, but that is high, even recognising the relatively recent formation of the modern Italian state and historical Venetian sovereignty.
I note that in every case where separatist sentiment is surging (bar Sardinia), the secessionist part is at least as rich as its host
Interesting indeed. Someone yesterday was suggesting an impact of increased globilization wherein we still care, in identity terms, with our very immediate neighbours, but harder to identify with the larger national boundaries. If regions are wealthier and feel a lack of connection to the larger state like that, it would explain why they are more keen to break away.
But doesn't that line above contradict the bit immediately below, placing support for Venetian independence as part of the trend of 'strident nativism' of the poor and ill-educated? Do the poor and ill-educated make up the majority in a wealthy/average region? I guess with so many different areas no trend will be perfect in any case, too many local factors.
Some tough issues for the EU to grapple with in particular.
I'm surprised support for Bavarian independence is still as high as 26%. I suppose there's still nostalgia among CSU supporters for the Kingdom of Bavaria.
Interesting piece, thanks Alastair. Our attitudes to secession are coloured by our general attitudes - why, for instance, are we generally sympathetic to the Catalans but hostile to pro-Russian Ukranians?
On the whole, small countries work best insofar as they have the power to influnce events - it's not accidental that Switzerland and the Scandinavian countries are top of most "nice to live in" lists, and some of the ex-Soviet and ex-Baltic small countries seem to be doing well. The two snags are that historically small countries got invaded by big ones (less common now) and globalisation makes it harder to control your fate (but this applies to medium-sized countries too).
Perhaps the long-term goal of the EU should be to hold the ring for the big stuff that needs a continent-wide negotiating punch, while leaving as much as possible to small countries regions that people readily identify with. In theory this is built into the subsidiarity principle, but in practice national governments have been able to block empowerment of the regions. Maybe Juncker should be positively encouraging Scottish and Cornish separatism...
I'm surprised support for Bavarian independence is still as high as 26%. I suppose there's still nostalgia among CSU supporters for the Kingdom of Bavaria.
I'm surprised support for Bavarian independence is still as high as 26%. I suppose there's still nostalgia among CSU supporters for the Kingdom of Bavaria.
At the time of Pangaea Scotland was nowhere near England but on the equator. It was only when the Laurentian continent collided with Avalonia that the two became joined.
I'm surprised support for Bavarian independence is still as high as 26%. I suppose there's still nostalgia among CSU supporters for the Kingdom of Bavaria.
The existence of so many very low populated countries probably makes it easier to sell the idea of separation, particularly in Europe where, as pointed out, some things are hardly likely to change, like currency, or at least that would be the idea.
At the time of Pangaea Scotland was nowhere near England but on the equator. It was only when the Laurentian continent collided with Avalonia that the two became joined.
I'm surprised support for Bavarian independence is still as high as 26%. I suppose there's still nostalgia among CSU supporters for the Kingdom of Bavaria.
Immediately after WW2 there was a surge in secessionism in NW Germany among people who wanted to re-establish Hanover as a state. As Lower Saxony is effectively Hanover plus Oldenburg, Brunswick and a few other bits I suppose they got their way.
FPT - Some of my pleasantest chill-holidays have been down in Devon like Marquee Mark and others on the last thread - it seems to manage rural peace and views without too much tourist-trappery, which can be a hazard in Cornwall. I usually stay at my cousin's windmill, which she rents out as a variety holiday cottage (not intended as an advert, just an illustration of the pleasures available):
Interesting piece, thanks Alastair. Our attitudes to secession are coloured by our general attitudes - why, for instance, are we generally sympathetic to the Catalans but hostile to pro-Russian Ukranians?
On the whole, small countries work best insofar as they have the power to influnce events - it's not accidental that Switzerland and the Scandinavian countries are top of most "nice to live in" lists, and some of the ex-Soviet and ex-Baltic small countries seem to be doing well. The two snags are that historically small countries got invaded by big ones (less common now) and globalisation makes it harder to control your fate (but this applies to medium-sized countries too).
Perhaps the long-term goal of the EU should be to hold the ring for the big stuff that needs a continent-wide negotiating punch, while leaving as much as possible to small countries regions that people readily identify with. In theory this is built into the subsidiarity principle, but in practice national governments have been able to block empowerment of the regions. Maybe Juncker should be positively encouraging Scottish and Cornish separatism...
A Europe of city-states, and a Federal EU manging continent-wide issues is a rather attactive one for many. A United States of Europe.
It is true that many of the older countries were forged by war, conquest and colonialism. Now that those have gone, perhaps we can revert to older more local forms.
Also worth noting is that seccessionism is not just a European phenomenon. West Papua wants a referendum, and the Rohingya are not the only Myamarese people wanting autonomy, as indeed do the Sikhs, Sind, Mindanao etc etc.
I'm surprised support for Bavarian independence is still as high as 26%. I suppose there's still nostalgia among CSU supporters for the Kingdom of Bavaria.
At the time of Pangaea Scotland was nowhere near England but on the equator. It was only when the Laurentian continent collided with Avalonia that the two became joined.
Not strictly true. Only the very north western tip of Scotland, north and west of Ullapool along a line delineated by the Moine Thrust, was on the far side of the Iapetus. At the same time parts of New Foundland were on the other side along with the bulk of Scotland and the rest of the British Isles.
Incidently the Iapetus was discovered and named by my tutor at Cardiff University, Rodney Gayer.
"If (Theresa May is) allowed to remain leader she’ll stay put till 2022."
In the extremely unlikely event that she is still prime minister when the Commons vote on the Brexit deal, which may happen in 2019, she will resign within hours if she loses the vote.
The chance of her fighting the next general election is tiny in any scenario.
A Europe of city-states, and a Federal EU manging continent-wide issues is a rather attactive one for many.
A "Europe of a 100 flags" - the dream of Yann Fouéré and many on the European far right, including the fans of Julius Evola. Gabriele D'Annunzio could have gone for that dream too, I reckon.
Interesting seeing as it was the Czech government that announced it wanted English-speakers to use “Czechia” henceforth a couple of years ago.
And what’s wrong with its traditional name in English, “Bohemia”, anyway?
According to my quick browse of wikipedia, Bohemia is about half/two thirds of the Czech republic. It'd be a bit like renaming the UK to England.... *waits to be bludgeoned by a turnip*
I was musing on whether there are many national entities wanting merger with neighbouring countries.
The reunification of Germany, Vietnam, Yemen, all spring to mind. There is apparently a movement in Moldova to unify with Romania, and Greek Cypriots wanted to join Greece in the sixties. Newfoundland joined Canada in 1947, after being a separate Dominion. Any other postwar voluntary mergers?
I was musing on whether there are many national entities wanting merger with neighbouring countries.
The reunification of Germany, Vietnam, Yemen, all spring to mind. There is apparently a movement in Moldova to unify with Romania, and Greek Cypriots wanted to join Greece in the sixties. Newfoundland joined Canada in 1947, after being a separate Dominion. Any other postwar voluntary mergers?
Aren't the first three examples of entities that were forcibly split up in the first place?
I was musing on whether there are many national entities wanting merger with neighbouring countries.
The reunification of Germany, Vietnam, Yemen, all spring to mind. There is apparently a movement in Moldova to unify with Romania, and Greek Cypriots wanted to join Greece in the sixties. Newfoundland joined Canada in 1947, after being a separate Dominion. Any other postwar voluntary mergers?
Aren't the first three examples of entities that were forcibly split up in the first place?
I was musing on whether there are many national entities wanting merger with neighbouring countries.
The reunification of Germany, Vietnam, Yemen, all spring to mind. There is apparently a movement in Moldova to unify with Romania, and Greek Cypriots wanted to join Greece in the sixties. Newfoundland joined Canada in 1947, after being a separate Dominion. Any other postwar voluntary mergers?
There are the Koreas,and China/Taiwan, notwithstanding obvious difficulties therein.
I was musing on whether there are many national entities wanting merger with neighbouring countries.
The reunification of Germany, Vietnam, Yemen, all spring to mind. There is apparently a movement in Moldova to unify with Romania, and Greek Cypriots wanted to join Greece in the sixties. Newfoundland joined Canada in 1947, after being a separate Dominion. Any other postwar voluntary mergers?
On separatism and recent rallies, it is handy how protestors think of the international audience, I presume, by including english language signs. Maybe I'm wrong, but I cannot think of another reason there would be signs saying 'We are Catalans; We are Spanish' in English during a unity rally.
I was musing on whether there are many national entities wanting merger with neighbouring countries.
The reunification of Germany, Vietnam, Yemen, all spring to mind. There is apparently a movement in Moldova to unify with Romania, and Greek Cypriots wanted to join Greece in the sixties. Newfoundland joined Canada in 1947, after being a separate Dominion. Any other postwar voluntary mergers?
There are the Koreas,and China/Taiwan, notwithstanding obvious difficulties therein.
Contrary to received opinion, I rather think that votes for secession, and the vote for Brexit, and the vote for Trump, and the extraordinary statistic that 40% of the British electorate voted for Corbyn and McDonnell, are symptoms of an excessive feeling of social and economic security: people think they haven't got much to lose, not because they have nothing, but because they think there's really no risk.
In the case of European secessionist movements, the EU is surely part of the reason why they feel so secure. Why cling to Spain for safety, when you can cling to the EU? It is not as though most of the continental European countries have a long history of consistent national identity. Take Veneto, for example. It was an independent state for centuries until 1797. Since then it has been ruled by Napoleon, by the Habsburgs, briefly independent again but allied with Sardinia, then under Austrian rule again, then briefly back under the nominal rule of the French, then part of Italy, was a battleground in the First World War, then under Fascist Italy, then a vassal state of the Nazis, then lost some bits to Yugoslavia, and finally joined the Italian republic. Culturally it has little in common with the Italian south. Given all this, and the economic and human-rights safety net of the EU, is it any wonder that secession doesn't seem an outlandish idea?
I was musing on whether there are many national entities wanting merger with neighbouring countries.
The reunification of Germany, Vietnam, Yemen, all spring to mind. There is apparently a movement in Moldova to unify with Romania, and Greek Cypriots wanted to join Greece in the sixties. Newfoundland joined Canada in 1947, after being a separate Dominion. Any other postwar voluntary mergers?
There are the Koreas,and China/Taiwan, notwithstanding obvious difficulties therein.
China and Hong Kong and Macau.
Sikkim joined India in the Seventies too.
Of course, China has a number of areas that aren't 100% happy being part of the Celestial Empire...
I'm surprised support for Bavarian independence is still as high as 26%. I suppose there's still nostalgia among CSU supporters for the Kingdom of Bavaria.
I’m in favour of bringing back Prussia
The Allies deliberately sought to erase Prussian identity after WWII.
The main problem the EU will have if Catalonia becomes independent is that it will unravel the consensus in the East.
No wonder Victor Orban is keen to recognise Catalonia, for example. There are ample areas of Romania, Serbia or Slovakia where Hungarians are in a majority.
Historically, small border disputes in Eastern Europe have a habit of engulfing the entire continent in War.
The most ridiculous example of a territory that clearly does not belong to its present country is South Tyrol. An ancient entity, the Tyrol, was split, and the southern portion given to Italy as a war prize after WW1.
It is even today overwhelmingly German speaking. I would have thought if Catalonia does make it, South Tyrol will surely want to re-join the rest of the Tyrol in Austria
Contrary to received opinion, I rather think that votes for secession, and the vote for Brexit, and the vote for Trump, and the extraordinary statistic that 40% of the British electorate voted for Corbyn and McDonnell, are symptoms of an excessive feeling of social and economic security: people think they haven't got much to lose, not because they have nothing, but because they think there's really no risk.
Thats a borderline psychotically panglossian reading of events to be honest, and a great illustration of the point of view satirised in this cartoon : https://thenib.com/radical-centrism-101
I was musing on whether there are many national entities wanting merger with neighbouring countries.
The reunification of Germany, Vietnam, Yemen, all spring to mind. There is apparently a movement in Moldova to unify with Romania, and Greek Cypriots wanted to join Greece in the sixties. Newfoundland joined Canada in 1947, after being a separate Dominion. Any other postwar voluntary mergers?
Aren't the first three examples of entities that were forcibly split up in the first place?
I'm surprised support for Bavarian independence is still as high as 26%. I suppose there's still nostalgia among CSU supporters for the Kingdom of Bavaria.
Immediately after WW2 there was a surge in secessionism in NW Germany among people who wanted to re-establish Hanover as a state. As Lower Saxony is effectively Hanover plus Oldenburg, Brunswick and a few other bits I suppose they got their way.
The Guelph Party opposed Hanover's incorporation into the German Empire, and their successors managed to win Bundestag seats into the 1950s.
I'm surprised support for Bavarian independence is still as high as 26%. I suppose there's still nostalgia among CSU supporters for the Kingdom of Bavaria.
I’m in favour of bringing back Prussia
The Allies deliberately sought to erase Prussian identity after WWII.
Were we still allies of the Soviets during that period?
I'm surprised support for Bavarian independence is still as high as 26%. I suppose there's still nostalgia among CSU supporters for the Kingdom of Bavaria.
I’m in favour of bringing back Prussia
The Allies deliberately sought to erase Prussian identity after WWII.
Were we still allies of the Soviets during that period?
FPT - Some of my pleasantest chill-holidays have been down in Devon like Marquee Mark and others on the last thread - it seems to manage rural peace and views without too much tourist-trappery, which can be a hazard in Cornwall. I usually stay at my cousin's windmill, which she rents out as a variety holiday cottage (not intended as an advert, just an illustration of the pleasures available):
Contrary to received opinion, I rather think that votes for secession, and the vote for Brexit, and the vote for Trump, and the extraordinary statistic that 40% of the British electorate voted for Corbyn and McDonnell, are symptoms of an excessive feeling of social and economic security: people think they haven't got much to lose, not because they have nothing, but because they think there's really no risk.
Thats a borderline psychotically panglossian reading of events to be honest, and a great illustration of the point of view satirised in this cartoon : https://thenib.com/radical-centrism-101
Almost beyond parody.
Since my point was a very pessimistic one, perhaps you don't know the meaning of Panglossian.
The main problem the EU will have if Catalonia becomes independent is that it will unravel the consensus in the East.
No wonder Victor Orban is keen to recognise Catalonia, for example. There are ample areas of Romania, Serbia or Slovakia where Hungarians are in a majority.
Historically, small border disputes in Eastern Europe have a habit of engulfing the entire continent in War.
The most ridiculous example of a territory that clearly does not belong to its present country is South Tyrol. An ancient entity, the Tyrol, was split, and the southern portion given to Italy as a war prize after WW1.
It is even today overwhelmingly German speaking. I would have thought if Catalonia does make it, South Tyrol will surely want to re-join the rest of the Tyrol in Austria
They do have a very high degree of autonomy though, and Schengen, the single-market / customs union and the Euro mean there’s little to practically divide them from their fellow Tyroleans any more. I’ve read that the similar impact on the everyday lives of Basques across the Franco-Spanish border is one of the reasons why Basque separatism has died down in recent years.
I was musing on whether there are many national entities wanting merger with neighbouring countries.
The reunification of Germany, Vietnam, Yemen, all spring to mind. There is apparently a movement in Moldova to unify with Romania, and Greek Cypriots wanted to join Greece in the sixties. Newfoundland joined Canada in 1947, after being a separate Dominion. Any other postwar voluntary mergers?
The United Arab Republic, and Senegambia, although they only lasted briefly.
I was musing on whether there are many national entities wanting merger with neighbouring countries.
The reunification of Germany, Vietnam, Yemen, all spring to mind. There is apparently a movement in Moldova to unify with Romania, and Greek Cypriots wanted to join Greece in the sixties. Newfoundland joined Canada in 1947, after being a separate Dominion. Any other postwar voluntary mergers?
There are the Koreas,and China/Taiwan, notwithstanding obvious difficulties therein.
China and Hong Kong and Macau.
Sikkim joined India in the Seventies too.
Southern British Cameroons joined formerly French Cameroon in the early 60s, although many Anglophones in Cameroon now regret that as the Francophones run the country today.
FPT - Some of my pleasantest chill-holidays have been down in Devon like Marquee Mark and others on the last thread - it seems to manage rural peace and views without too much tourist-trappery, which can be a hazard in Cornwall. I usually stay at my cousin's windmill, which she rents out as a variety holiday cottage (not intended as an advert, just an illustration of the pleasures available):
That looks to have a rather splendid location, Nick!
Yes, it's lovely - from the 360-degree viewing room at the top one can see everything from distant hills to the edge of the sea. One needs good legs to stay there as the living room/kitchen, bedroom, bathroom and viewing area are each on their own floor, but if one doesn't mind that it's pretty nice, and as peaceful as anywhere in Britain. My cousin's husband, a former RAF test pilot with an eventful career, has his private plane parked in a hangar at the end of a nearby field and would probably show it off if urged - my cousin gave him a flight in a Biggin Hill Spitfire for his 75th birthday, and he looped the loop, to the terror of the organisers.
They live quietly in a little cottage and grow apples, with a little income from the mill, while I dash about doing animal welfare and political stuff and travelling constantly. Sneaking bits of us envy each other, I think. Happiness comes in various packages, doesn't it?
I was musing on whether there are many national entities wanting merger with neighbouring countries.
The reunification of Germany, Vietnam, Yemen, all spring to mind. There is apparently a movement in Moldova to unify with Romania, and Greek Cypriots wanted to join Greece in the sixties. Newfoundland joined Canada in 1947, after being a separate Dominion. Any other postwar voluntary mergers?
Aren't the first three examples of entities that were forcibly split up in the first place?
Moldova was part of Romania too, until 1940.
But only since 1918, and there were a lot of non-Romanians in it.
Catalan nationalism is a left and right thing. Puigedemont - who leads the Catalan government - is from the centre right, as was his predecessor Artur Mas. This makes the independence coalition very fragile.
Contrary to received opinion, I rather think that votes for secession, and the vote for Brexit, and the vote for Trump, and the extraordinary statistic that 40% of the British electorate voted for Corbyn and McDonnell, are symptoms of an excessive feeling of social and economic security: people think they haven't got much to lose, not because they have nothing, but because they think there's really no risk.
In the case of European secessionist movements, the EU is surely part of the reason why they feel so secure. Why cling to Spain for safety, when you can cling to the EU? It is not as though most of the continental European countries have a long history of consistent national identity. Take Veneto, for example. It was an independent state for centuries until 1797. Since then it has been ruled by Napoleon, by the Habsburgs, briefly independent again but allied with Sardinia, then under Austrian rule again, then briefly back under the nominal rule of the French, then part of Italy, was a battleground in the First World War, then under Fascist Italy, then a vassal state of the Nazis, then lost some bits to Yugoslavia, and finally joined the Italian republic. Culturally it has little in common with the Italian south. Given all this, and the economic and human-rights safety net of the EU, is it any wonder that secession doesn't seem an outlandish idea?
It’s not just a lack of cultural affinity with the Italian South. It’s a disdain for it and resentment at having to subsidise it. L’Italia meridionale - as the South is known - is seen by some in the North of Italy as little better than Egypt or some quasi-African country.
And the south has not much love for the north in return. Italian unification was not peaceful - certainly in the south, where a minor civil war happened - and has always had an element of something imposed by the French and their allies in Savoy. A coherent and effective Italian state barely emerged before two world wars engulfed it. Little wonder Italians are keen on the EU.
I was musing on whether there are many national entities wanting merger with neighbouring countries.
The reunification of Germany, Vietnam, Yemen, all spring to mind. There is apparently a movement in Moldova to unify with Romania, and Greek Cypriots wanted to join Greece in the sixties. Newfoundland joined Canada in 1947, after being a separate Dominion. Any other postwar voluntary mergers?
The United Arab Republic, and Senegambia, although they only lasted briefly.
The Gambians were never really interested in Senegambia right from the start and it never really existed beyond paper. Similar to the various unions and federations Gadaffi kept trying to start, although it could be argued that to a large extent the modern African Union is his legacy.
There’s also the Russia-Belarus “Union State” which Belarus’s Lukashenko hoped would be a resurrection of the Soviet Union, but which never really got anywhere either. (Although when we went to Russia last month the immigration form was a joint Russian Federation / Republic of Belarus one.)
Contrary to received opinion, I rather think that votes for secession, and the vote for Brexit, and the vote for Trump, and the extraordinary statistic that 40% of the British electorate voted for Corbyn and McDonnell, are symptoms of an excessive feeling of social and economic security: people think they haven't got much to lose, not because they have nothing, but because they think there's really no risk.
In the case of European secessionist movements, the EU is surely part of the reason why they feel so secure. Why cling to Spain for safety, when you can cling to the EU? It is not as though most of the continental European countries have a long history of consistent national identity. Take Veneto, for example. It was an independent state for centuries until 1797. Since then it has been ruled by Napoleon, by the Habsburgs, briefly independent again but allied with Sardinia, then under Austrian rule again, then briefly back under the nominal rule of the French, then part of Italy, was a battleground in the First World War, then under Fascist Italy, then a vassal state of the Nazis, then lost some bits to Yugoslavia, and finally joined the Italian republic. Culturally it has little in common with the Italian south. Given all this, and the economic and human-rights safety net of the EU, is it any wonder that secession doesn't seem an outlandish idea?
It’s not just a lack of cultural affinity with the Italian South. It’s a disdain for it and resentment at having to subsidise it. L’Italia meridionale - as the South is known - is seen by some in the North of Italy as little better than Egypt or some quasi-African country.
And the south has not much love for the north in return. Italian unification was not peaceful - certainly in the south, where a minor civil war happened - and has always had an element of something imposed by the French and their allies in Savoy. A coherent and effective Italian state barely emerged before two world wars engulfed it. Little wonder Italians are keen on the EU.
Your first paragraph describes Catalan separatists' views of Spain perfectly. They want independence because they do not wish to subsidise what they see as feckless, ignorant Spanish peasants and because they see themselves as culturally superior. They don't like it when you point out Catalan wealth derives from it being a part of Spain. It's puzzling so many on the left back them. Less surprising that Farage, Putin et al do.
Contrary to received opinion, I rather think that votes for secession, and the vote for Brexit, and the vote for Trump, and the extraordinary statistic that 40% of the British electorate voted for Corbyn and McDonnell, are symptoms of an excessive feeling of social and economic security: people think they haven't got much to lose, not because they have nothing, but because they think there's really no risk.
In the case of European secessionist movements, the EU is surely part of the reason why they feel so secure. Why cling to Spain for safety, when you can cling to the EU? It is not as though most of the continental European countries have a long history of consistent national identity. Take Veneto, for example. It was an independent state for centuries until 1797. Since then it has been ruled by Napoleon, by the Habsburgs, briefly independent again but allied with Sardinia, then under Austrian rule again, then briefly back under the nominal rule of the French, then part of Italy, was a battleground in the First World War, then under Fascist Italy, then a vassal state of the Nazis, then lost some bits to Yugoslavia, and finally joined the Italian republic. Culturally it has little in common with the Italian south. Given all this, and the economic and human-rights safety net of the EU, is it any wonder that secession doesn't seem an outlandish idea?
It’s not just a lack of cultural affinity with the Italian South. It’s a disdain for it and resentment at having to subsidise it. L’Italia meridionale - as the South is known - is seen by some in the North of Italy as little better than Egypt or some quasi-African country.
And the south has not much love for the north in return. Italian unification was not peaceful - certainly in the south, where a minor civil war happened - and has always had an element of something imposed by the French and their allies in Savoy. A coherent and effective Italian state barely emerged before two world wars engulfed it. Little wonder Italians are keen on the EU.
Way back in the 1960s we used to employ a few Italians. The love between those from the north and south was obvious, expressed in arguments, and on odd occasions with knives.
Contingency plans in case the UK has to leave the EU with no deal in place are "well under way", a minister has said. Dominic Raab said while the UK had to "strive for the very best outcome" from Brexit negotiations, it had to "prepare for all eventualities".
Contrary to received opinion, I rather think that votes for secession, and the vote for Brexit, and the vote for Trump, and the extraordinary statistic that 40% of the British electorate voted for Corbyn and McDonnell, are symptoms of an excessive feeling of social and economic security: people think they haven't got much to lose, not because they have nothing, but because they think there's really no risk.
In the case of European secessionist movements, the EU is surely part of the reason why they feel so secure. Why cling to Spain for safety, when you can cling to the EU? It is not as though most of the continental European countries have a long history of consistent national identity. Take Veneto, for example. It was an independent state for centuries until 1797. Since then it has been ruled by Napoleon, by the Habsburgs, briefly independent again but allied with Sardinia, then under Austrian rule again, then briefly back under the nominal rule of the French, then part of Italy, was a battleground in the First World War, then under Fascist Italy, then a vassal state of the Nazis, then lost some bits to Yugoslavia, and finally joined the Italian republic. Culturally it has little in common with the Italian south. Given all this, and the economic and human-rights safety net of the EU, is it any wonder that secession doesn't seem an outlandish idea?
It’s not just a lack of cultural affinity with the Italian South. It’s a disdain for it and resentment at having to subsidise it. L’Italia meridionale - as the South is known - is seen by some in the North of Italy as little better than Egypt or some quasi-African country.
And the south has not much love for the north in return. Italian unification was not peaceful - certainly in the south, where a minor civil war happened - and has always had an element of something imposed by the French and their allies in Savoy. A coherent and effective Italian state barely emerged before two world wars engulfed it. Little wonder Italians are keen on the EU.
It is an extraordinary contrast. North of Rome, you could be in Bavaria or Switzerland. South of Rome, you could be in North Africa, despite which, Naples is my favourite Italian city.
Contingency plans in case the UK has to leave the EU with no deal in place are "well under way", a minister has said. Dominic Raab said while the UK had to "strive for the very best outcome" from Brexit negotiations, it had to "prepare for all eventualities".
Carlotta, do you have any idea who the future Tory leadership contender who said this is?
A year ago, a friend and I left a referendum results party early and passed a lone Brexiteer MP, a young star occasionally tipped for the Tory leadership. Drunkenly bellowing at a friend, he roared with success. “Sterling falling? Who the fuck cares if sterling’s falling? You’ll be all right; I’ll be all right. It’s a revolution!”
I'm surprised support for Bavarian independence is still as high as 26%. I suppose there's still nostalgia among CSU supporters for the Kingdom of Bavaria.
I’m in favour of bringing back Prussia
The Allies deliberately sought to erase Prussian identity after WWII.
Not least, much of historic Prussia is now in Poland and the Kalingrad Oblast of Russia, with an entirely different population!
Scotland haven't had 4 clean sheets in a row since 1997.
Nae problemo.
Will it be The Red Army v The Tartan Army next summer?
There has got to be at least 3 more episodes of angst and despair first. That goes with the territory. And even if we make the playoffs there are some draws we really wouldn't want (Portugal, Italy, Sweden, hell, even Wales) but we dream.
Contrary to received opinion, I rather think that votes for secession, and the vote for Brexit, and the vote for Trump, and the extraordinary statistic that 40% of the British electorate voted for Corbyn and McDonnell, are symptoms of an excessive feeling of social and economic security: people think they haven't got much to lose, not because they have nothing, but because they think there's really no risk.
Thats a borderline psychotically panglossian reading of events to be honest, and a great illustration of the point of view satirised in this cartoon : https://thenib.com/radical-centrism-101
Almost beyond parody.
Ummm. Is it?
I think the point Richard is making is that people don't feel there is much downside in demanding new arrangements.
Now, the question is whether they feel that way because they are struggling with no healthcare, no food, and no hope. Or whether it's because they feel secure that the the top part of Maslow's hierarchy of needs will continue to be met irrespective of who the government it.
Let's not forget: people in "the West" live longer, are healthier, better educated and have more material needs met than at any time in human history. What they struggle with is that the traditional measure of worth in the eyes of others is their social status - usually determined by them being in a secure and specialised job.
The reason Brexit got 52% (and not 40%) is because a significant number of affluent middle class eurosceptics also voted for it for constitutional reasons. It had broad enough roots right across the political spectrum, from left to right, for it to carry the day.
That makes it different to all the other examples cited, including Trump, who not only scored a minority of the vote, but was nationally outpolled by Hillary.
You knew it would end this way David, it always does.
2-2 against Slovenia away from home is not a bad result. It is those first 4 games that killed us. TBH there is not one international class player in this team. Strachan has done remarkable things with a very ordinary squad. But I suspect that is it for him.
Comments
Edit: and an excellent piece, thanks Alastair.
I note that in every case where separatist sentiment is surging (bar Sardinia), the secessionist part is at least as rich as its host
Interesting indeed. Someone yesterday was suggesting an impact of increased globilization wherein we still care, in identity terms, with our very immediate neighbours, but harder to identify with the larger national boundaries. If regions are wealthier and feel a lack of connection to the larger state like that, it would explain why they are more keen to break away.
But doesn't that line above contradict the bit immediately below, placing support for Venetian independence as part of the trend of 'strident nativism' of the poor and ill-educated? Do the poor and ill-educated make up the majority in a wealthy/average region? I guess with so many different areas no trend will be perfect in any case, too many local factors.
Some tough issues for the EU to grapple with in particular.
On the whole, small countries work best insofar as they have the power to influnce events - it's not accidental that Switzerland and the Scandinavian countries are top of most "nice to live in" lists, and some of the ex-Soviet and ex-Baltic small countries seem to be doing well. The two snags are that historically small countries got invaded by big ones (less common now) and globalisation makes it harder to control your fate (but this applies to medium-sized countries too).
Perhaps the long-term goal of the EU should be to hold the ring for the big stuff that needs a continent-wide negotiating punch, while leaving as much as possible to small countries regions that people readily identify with. In theory this is built into the subsidiarity principle, but in practice national governments have been able to block empowerment of the regions. Maybe Juncker should be positively encouraging Scottish and Cornish separatism...
https://www.geolsoc.org.uk/Plate-Tectonics/Chap4-Plate-Tectonics-of-the-UK/Caledonian-Orogeney
http://devonwindmills.co.uk/
It is true that many of the older countries were forged by war, conquest and colonialism. Now that those have gone, perhaps we can revert to older more local forms.
Also worth noting is that seccessionism is not just a European phenomenon. West Papua wants a referendum, and the Rohingya are not the only Myamarese people wanting autonomy, as indeed do the Sikhs, Sind, Mindanao etc etc.
Incidently the Iapetus was discovered and named by my tutor at Cardiff University, Rodney Gayer.
In the extremely unlikely event that she is still prime minister when the Commons vote on the Brexit deal, which may happen in 2019, she will resign within hours if she loses the vote.
The chance of her fighting the next general election is tiny in any scenario.
And what’s wrong with its traditional name in English, “Bohemia”, anyway?
The reunification of Germany, Vietnam, Yemen, all spring to mind. There is apparently a movement in Moldova to unify with Romania, and Greek Cypriots wanted to join Greece in the sixties. Newfoundland joined Canada in 1947, after being a separate Dominion. Any other postwar voluntary mergers?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-41541063
Sikkim joined India in the Seventies too.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/sep/27/banned-west-papua-independence-petition-un
In the case of European secessionist movements, the EU is surely part of the reason why they feel so secure. Why cling to Spain for safety, when you can cling to the EU? It is not as though most of the continental European countries have a long history of consistent national identity. Take Veneto, for example. It was an independent state for centuries until 1797. Since then it has been ruled by Napoleon, by the Habsburgs, briefly independent again but allied with Sardinia, then under Austrian rule again, then briefly back under the nominal rule of the French, then part of Italy, was a battleground in the First World War, then under Fascist Italy, then a vassal state of the Nazis, then lost some bits to Yugoslavia, and finally joined the Italian republic. Culturally it has little in common with the Italian south. Given all this, and the economic and human-rights safety net of the EU, is it any wonder that secession doesn't seem an outlandish idea?
No wonder Victor Orban is keen to recognise Catalonia, for example. There are ample areas of Romania, Serbia or Slovakia where Hungarians are in a majority.
Historically, small border disputes in Eastern Europe have a habit of engulfing the entire continent in War.
The most ridiculous example of a territory that clearly does not belong to its present country is South Tyrol. An ancient entity, the Tyrol, was split, and the southern portion given to Italy as a war prize after WW1.
It is even today overwhelmingly German speaking. I would have thought if Catalonia does make it, South Tyrol will surely want to re-join the rest of the Tyrol in Austria
Almost beyond parody.
They live quietly in a little cottage and grow apples, with a little income from the mill, while I dash about doing animal welfare and political stuff and travelling constantly. Sneaking bits of us envy each other, I think. Happiness comes in various packages, doesn't it?
And the south has not much love for the north in return. Italian unification was not peaceful - certainly in the south, where a minor civil war happened - and has always had an element of something imposed by the French and their allies in Savoy. A coherent and effective Italian state barely emerged before two world wars engulfed it. Little wonder Italians are keen on the EU.
There’s also the Russia-Belarus “Union State” which Belarus’s Lukashenko hoped would be a resurrection of the Soviet Union, but which never really got anywhere either. (Although when we went to Russia last month the immigration form was a joint Russian Federation / Republic of Belarus one.)
Scotland score!!!!
Had to manage who worked with who in those days.
This story seems (ahem) somewhat interesting:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-41542875
https://twitter.com/ariztegui/status/917028283555991552
Will try and write the post-race ramble, having watched highlights.
Identity's a complicated beast, and not helped by cackhanded, narrow-minded, short-sighted and bloody idiotic constitutional tinkering.
Dominic Raab said while the UK had to "strive for the very best outcome" from Brexit negotiations, it had to "prepare for all eventualities".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-41544588
Nae problemo.
A year ago, a friend and I left a referendum results party early and passed a lone Brexiteer MP, a young star occasionally tipped for the Tory leadership. Drunkenly bellowing at a friend, he roared with success. “Sterling falling? Who the fuck cares if sterling’s falling? You’ll be all right; I’ll be all right. It’s a revolution!”
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jul/17/tory-party-reputation-new-leader
We're going to the qualifiers ...............................
The Tartan Army will be great for the tournament.
Would love to see Barry Bannan perform on the highest stage too.
http://enormo-haddock.blogspot.co.uk/2017/10/japan-post-race-analysis-2017.html
I think the point Richard is making is that people don't feel there is much downside in demanding new arrangements.
Now, the question is whether they feel that way because they are struggling with no healthcare, no food, and no hope. Or whether it's because they feel secure that the the top part of Maslow's hierarchy of needs will continue to be met irrespective of who the government it.
Let's not forget: people in "the West" live longer, are healthier, better educated and have more material needs met than at any time in human history. What they struggle with is that the traditional measure of worth in the eyes of others is their social status - usually determined by them being in a secure and specialised job.
That makes it different to all the other examples cited, including Trump, who not only scored a minority of the vote, but was nationally outpolled by Hillary.
https://twitter.com/CalumSteeleSPF/status/917085272831090694