Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Why people voted Labour or Tory at the general election

SystemSystem Posts: 11,687
edited July 2017 in General

imagepoliticalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Why people voted Labour or Tory at the general election

 

Read the full story here


«13

Comments

  • Options
    surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    First
  • Options
    surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    edited July 2017
    deleted
  • Options
    surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    surbiton said:

    surbiton said:

    I do hope Brexiters would read this soberly. The consequences are quite big. I work with industry. It is not the loss single market which is losing me sleep. It is the customs union. I cannot imagine the paperwork that would be have to be dealt with [ even if it was dealt with electronically ].

    I have been saying this for some time. The only way out of this is a second referendum. People must decide on Brexit when they would know the consequences rather than it being just a bloody wish.

    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jul/14/chance-second-brexit-referendum-people-rethink

    Now definitely off to bed.
  • Options
    surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    .

  • Options
    surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    .

  • Options
    fitalassfitalass Posts: 4,279
    And yet Corbyn and the Labour party still failed to win the last GE by quite a large margin...
    Just imagine if Corbyn or Momentum are allowed to present the same manifesto again, especially up against a new Conservative Leader in a post Brexit era.. Something that the PCP are no doubt pondering right now....

    You are wrong to immediately assume that the Labour party will automatically be more electable, or even more likely to become the largest party in a post Corbyn era when its equally obvious that neither May, Davis, Johnson or Hammont will be their opponents at the next GE.
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,705
    So 'Anti-Tory' (15) and 'Anti-Labour' (16) are tied (so much for the 'anti-Tory majority' (sic)) and Corbyn was a greater negative motivator (14) than May (4)........It does underline what a shambles the Tory manifesto was though......
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,705
    If Labour are led by someone who isn’t quite so polarising as Corbyn (or without the interesting backstory) then if all things are equal then Labour should end up as the largest party

    Up to a point, Lord Copper - Corbyn was also a strong motivator of Labour voters (13%, third highest) - so maybe the two go hand in hand - Labour voters rally round a leader who motivates Tories to vote against him......

    I think we can file the rest of the hypothesis ('all things being equal') under 'wild speculation'.......
  • Options
    geoffwgeoffw Posts: 8,171
    "For the many, not the few" (© ACL Blair) is a slogan I find divisive and menacing.
    And literally untrue – surely one of Labour's core values is to stand up for minorities of various sorts.
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,705
    geoffw said:

    surely one of Labour's core values is to stand up for minorities of various sorts.

    Jews?
  • Options
    geoffwgeoffw Posts: 8,171

    geoffw said:

    surely one of Labour's core values is to stand up for minorities of various sorts.

    Jews?
    Well no, obviously not. Being inclusive doesn't mean including everyone!
  • Options
    tlg86tlg86 Posts: 25,190
    So Brexit wasn't a factor for Labour voters (perhaps it's in other)?
  • Options
    geoffwgeoffw Posts: 8,171
    The Christian minority* is also excluded, obviously.

    * https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/may/23/no-religion-outnumber-christians-england-wales-study

    I think a pattern is emerging.
  • Options
    JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 39,035
    Let's hope the more fervent Corbynites don't get ideas from this story:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-40622273
  • Options
    IcarusIcarus Posts: 904
    51.5% want to be in customs union, 33.8% don't.
  • Options
    geoffwgeoffw Posts: 8,171
    "Paying a fee for access to this customs union ... " could have been expressed as "paying a fee to be behind the EU's Common External Tariff ".
    I wonder if as many as 24.5% of respondents would go for that?
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,705
    Icarus said:

    51.5% want to be in customs union, 33.8% don't.

    Well, if we're playing the 'adding up numbers to come to debatable conclusions' game

    58% don't want to be in the Single Market, 27% do.....
  • Options
    DecrepitJohnLDecrepitJohnL Posts: 13,300
    edited July 2017
    fitalass said:

    And yet Corbyn and the Labour party still failed to win the last GE by quite a large margin...
    Just imagine if Corbyn or Momentum are allowed to present the same manifesto again, especially up against a new Conservative Leader in a post Brexit era.. Something that the PCP are no doubt pondering right now....

    You are wrong to immediately assume that the Labour party will automatically be more electable, or even more likely to become the largest party in a post Corbyn era when its equally obvious that neither May, Davis, Johnson or Hammont will be their opponents at the next GE.

    Why is it obvious that neither May, Davis, Johnson or Hammond will be their opponents at the next GE?

    Where else will the Conservative Party find its new leader if not from the senior members of the Cabinet? It is in government so does not have the luxury of promoting a promising junior minister straight into Number 10. The last few leaders to take over in government were Jim Callaghan (Chancellor and former Home and Foreign Secretary), Gordon Brown (Chancellor) and John Major (Foreign Secretary and former Chancellor). And because Theresa May is too weak to reshuffle the Cabinet, its senior members are likely to be the same in two years time as now.

    The only ways the Conservatives escape is if a deal is stitched up where Amber Rudd finds a safe seat -- probably Maidenhead where Theresa May will be standing down, or the Chancellor falls on his sword because he suddenly realises that he too works in the overpaid public sector where even a woman can carry a red box, thus enabling a reshuffle.
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,705

    fitalass said:

    And yet Corbyn and the Labour party still failed to win the last GE by quite a large margin...
    Just imagine if Corbyn or Momentum are allowed to present the same manifesto again, especially up against a new Conservative Leader in a post Brexit era.. Something that the PCP are no doubt pondering right now....

    You are wrong to immediately assume that the Labour party will automatically be more electable, or even more likely to become the largest party in a post Corbyn era when its equally obvious that neither May, Davis, Johnson or Hammont will be their opponents at the next GE.

    Why is it obvious that neither May, Davis, Johnson or Hammond will be their opponents at the next GE?

    Where else will the Conservative Party find its new leader if not from the senior members of the Cabinet? It is in government so does not have the luxury of promoting a promising junior minister straight into Number 10. The last few leaders to take over in government were Jim Callaghan (Chancellor and former Home and Foreign Secretary), Gordon Brown (Chancellor) and John Major (Foreign Secretary and former Chancellor). And because Theresa May is too weak to reshuffle the Cabinet, its senior members are likely to be the same in two years time as now.

    The only ways the Conservatives escape is if a deal is stitched up where Amber Rudd finds a safe seat -- probably Maidenhead where Theresa May will be standing down, or the Chancellor falls on his sword because he suddenly realises that he too works in the overpaid public sector where even a woman can carry a red box, thus enabling a reshuffle.
    Your logic is sound but the GE could be nearly 5 years away. Goodness knows plenty can change in 5 weeks, let alone 5 years. Remember Majors stints in the "Great Offices of State" amounted to only 18 months - so the next PM could be a junior minister or even on the back benches...
  • Options
    GeoffMGeoffM Posts: 6,071
    geoffw said:

    ...surely one of Labour's core values is to stand up for minorities of various sorts.

    The smallest minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities.
    Ayn Rand

  • Options
    rkrkrkrkrkrk Posts: 7,908
    Very interesting polling.
    Suggests Brexit not that significant for Labour voters?

    And also that the manifesto and policies were a clear positive for Labour.
    Logically then they should keep them for next time around.
  • Options
    archer101auarcher101au Posts: 1,612
    edited July 2017
    People don't understand what the customs union is - they are simply responding to press pressure and think that it is some kind of 'lite' single market.

    Remaining in the customs union is utterly pointless if we have left the SM, which is why even the EEA members are not members of the customs union. The fact that EEA members are not in the CU, yet somehow manage to trade effectively with the EU without massive problems at their borders, demonstrates quote clearly that being outside the CU is not going to create unsolvable logistical problems after Brexit.

    BTW the wording in the poll is completely incorrect and misleading.
    Icarus said:

    51.5% want to be in customs union, 33.8% don't.

  • Options
    SquareRootSquareRoot Posts: 7,095
    rkrkrk said:

    Very interesting polling.
    Suggests Brexit not that significant for Labour voters?

    And also that the manifesto and policies were a clear positive for Labour.
    Logically then they should keep them for next time around.

    Next time the Tories will (hopefully )actually focus on the ball not the man.

    The shenanigans at the moment are pathetic.. the greasy pole and all that.
  • Options
    JonathanJonathan Posts: 20,901
    rkrkrk said:

    Very interesting polling.
    Suggests Brexit not that significant for Labour voters?

    And also that the manifesto and policies were a clear positive for Labour.
    Logically then they should keep them for next time around.

    Anti Tory = Anti Brexit
  • Options
    DecrepitJohnLDecrepitJohnL Posts: 13,300

    fitalass said:

    And yet Corbyn and the Labour party still failed to win the last GE by quite a large margin...
    Just imagine if Corbyn or Momentum are allowed to present the same manifesto again, especially up against a new Conservative Leader in a post Brexit era.. Something that the PCP are no doubt pondering right now....

    You are wrong to immediately assume that the Labour party will automatically be more electable, or even more likely to become the largest party in a post Corbyn era when its equally obvious that neither May, Davis, Johnson or Hammont will be their opponents at the next GE.

    Why is it obvious that neither May, Davis, Johnson or Hammond will be their opponents at the next GE?

    Where else will the Conservative Party find its new leader if not from the senior members of the Cabinet? It is in government so does not have the luxury of promoting a promising junior minister straight into Number 10. The last few leaders to take over in government were Jim Callaghan (Chancellor and former Home and Foreign Secretary), Gordon Brown (Chancellor) and John Major (Foreign Secretary and former Chancellor). And because Theresa May is too weak to reshuffle the Cabinet, its senior members are likely to be the same in two years time as now.

    The only ways the Conservatives escape is if a deal is stitched up where Amber Rudd finds a safe seat -- probably Maidenhead where Theresa May will be standing down, or the Chancellor falls on his sword because he suddenly realises that he too works in the overpaid public sector where even a woman can carry a red box, thus enabling a reshuffle.
    Your logic is sound but the GE could be nearly 5 years away. Goodness knows plenty can change in 5 weeks, let alone 5 years. Remember Majors stints in the "Great Offices of State" amounted to only 18 months - so the next PM could be a junior minister or even on the back benches...
    True but unless Hammond resigns, as suggested, or one of the others does, it is hard to see how this star backbencher or junior minister can be promoted. Theresa May cannot sack, demote or reshuffle anyone. (And I've just noticed I forgot to add May herself to the list of Callaghan, Brown and Major as senior cabinet members who took over as prime minister.)
  • Options
    DecrepitJohnLDecrepitJohnL Posts: 13,300

    fitalass said:

    And yet Corbyn and the Labour party still failed to win the last GE by quite a large margin...
    Just imagine if Corbyn or Momentum are allowed to present the same manifesto again, especially up against a new Conservative Leader in a post Brexit era.. Something that the PCP are no doubt pondering right now....

    You are wrong to immediately assume that the Labour party will automatically be more electable, or even more likely to become the largest party in a post Corbyn era when its equally obvious that neither May, Davis, Johnson or Hammont will be their opponents at the next GE.

    Why is it obvious that neither May, Davis, Johnson or Hammond will be their opponents at the next GE?

    Where else will the Conservative Party find its new leader if not from the senior members of the Cabinet? It is in government so does not have the luxury of promoting a promising junior minister straight into Number 10. The last few leaders to take over in government were Jim Callaghan (Chancellor and former Home and Foreign Secretary), Gordon Brown (Chancellor) and John Major (Foreign Secretary and former Chancellor). And because Theresa May is too weak to reshuffle the Cabinet, its senior members are likely to be the same in two years time as now.

    The only ways the Conservatives escape is if a deal is stitched up where Amber Rudd finds a safe seat -- probably Maidenhead where Theresa May will be standing down, or the Chancellor falls on his sword because he suddenly realises that he too works in the overpaid public sector where even a woman can carry a red box, thus enabling a reshuffle.
    Your logic is sound but the GE could be nearly 5 years away. Goodness knows plenty can change in 5 weeks, let alone 5 years. Remember Majors stints in the "Great Offices of State" amounted to only 18 months - so the next PM could be a junior minister or even on the back benches...
    True but unless Hammond resigns, as suggested, or one of the others does, it is hard to see how this star backbencher or junior minister can be promoted. Theresa May cannot sack, demote or reshuffle anyone. (And I've just noticed I forgot to add May herself to the list of Callaghan, Brown and Major as senior cabinet members who took over as prime minister.)
    Even going back to the war, we can add Sir Alec Douglas Home (Foreign Secretary), Harold Macmillan (Chancellor) and Sir Anthony Eden (Foreign Secretary). Even Churchill himself in 1940, though First Lord of the Admiralty, had previously been Chancellor of the Exchequer.

    https://www.gov.uk/government/history/past-prime-ministers
  • Options
    RecidivistRecidivist Posts: 4,679

    People don't understand what the customs union is - they are simply responding to press pressure and think that it is some kind of 'lite' single market.

    Remaining in the customs union is utterly pointless if we have left the SM, which is why even the EEA members are not members of the customs union. The fact that EEA members are not in the CU, yet somehow manage to trade effectively with the EU without massive problems at their borders, demonstrates quote clearly that being outside the CU is not going to create unsolvable logistical problems after Brexit.

    BTW the wording in the poll is completely incorrect and misleading.

    Icarus said:

    51.5% want to be in customs union, 33.8% don't.

    Trade happens when you've got something the other party wants at the right price. Napoleon bought British coats for the Russian campaign despite having personally instigated a trade war with Britain. If Brexiters were coming up with ways of improving our trading position by creating better goods and services I might take them a bit more seriously.
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 60,987
    Good morning, everyone.

    Quite surprised the anti-Labour reason is 1 point ahead of the anti-Conservative reason.

    F1: I'm afraid my tip isn't the most thrilling: http://enormo-haddock.blogspot.co.uk/2017/07/united-kingdom-pre-race-2017.html

    On the plus side, I did have an 8 winner (effectively, it was 26 each way for pole for Raikkonen) pre-practice.
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,937
    Just over 20% of Labour votes were essentially negative; close to 40% of Tory ones were. The anti-Labour vote much bigger than the anti-Tory one. Corbyn specifically a net drag on Labour's return. Interesting, but not surprising. Suggests the Tory vote has the potential to fall further than Labour's, but that there is still a significant upside for them if they can pull through their current shitshow - especially with the Labour left consumed by hubris.
  • Options
    foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    edited July 2017
    rkrkrk said:

    Very interesting polling.
    Suggests Brexit not that significant for Labour voters?

    And also that the manifesto and policies were a clear positive for Labour.
    Logically then they should keep them for next time around.

    All parties rushed their manifestos because of the snap election, so none were as fettled as they should be. It is quite likely that Labour will be better prepared next time.

    I cannot see May enjoying the conference season. Surely she is toasted enough already?

  • Options
    JonathanJonathan Posts: 20,901

    Just over 20% of Labour votes were essentially negative; close to 40% of Tory ones were. The anti-Labour vote much bigger than the anti-Tory one. Corbyn specifically a net drag on Labour's return. Interesting, but not surprising. Suggests the Tory vote has the potential to fall further than Labour's, but that there is still a significant upside for them if they can pull through their current shitshow - especially with the Labour left consumed by hubris.

    The trick in politics is to be popular with your tribe without being a recruiting sergeant for your opponents.

    Blair got this
    Cameron got this

    May, Corbyn not so much.
  • Options
    daodaodaodao Posts: 821

    geoffw said:

    surely one of Labour's core values is to stand up for minorities of various sorts.

    Jews?
    The founder and leading member of Momentum, Jon Lansman, is Jewish, as was the previous Labour party leader, Ed Miliband.

    The Labour party takes action against prominent members who express/endorse antisemitic views, such as Ken Livingstone and Naz Shah.
  • Options
    daodaodaodao Posts: 821
    edited July 2017
    Jonathan said:

    rkrkrk said:

    Very interesting polling.
    Suggests Brexit not that significant for Labour voters?

    And also that the manifesto and policies were a clear positive for Labour.
    Logically then they should keep them for next time around.

    Anti Tory = Anti Brexit
    The Labour party and its leaders are not anti-Brexit, but wish to achieve a different style of Brexit than the Tories. In GB, parties that are anti-Brexit, the LDs/Greens/SNP/PC, performed poorly at the last GE. Parties that endorse Brexit gained over 80% of the vote.
  • Options
    JonathanJonathan Posts: 20,901
    Hate the word hubris. Using it smacks of, well, hubris. Isn't there a punchier Anglo-Saxon or at least Norman equivalent?
  • Options
    geoffwgeoffw Posts: 8,171
    edited July 2017
    Icarus said:

    51.5% want to be in customs union, 33.8% don't.


    Trade happens when you've got something the other party wants at the right price. Napoleon bought British coats for the Russian campaign despite having personally instigated a trade war with Britain. If Brexiters were coming up with ways of improving our trading position by creating better goods and services I might take them a bit more seriously.

    Those would be the coats which lost Bony the Russia campaign due to their tin buttons?
    http://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/napoleons-army-may-have-suffered-from-the-greatest-wardrobe-malfunction-in-history-92535444/
  • Options
    JonathanJonathan Posts: 20,901
    daodao said:

    Jonathan said:

    rkrkrk said:

    Very interesting polling.
    Suggests Brexit not that significant for Labour voters?

    And also that the manifesto and policies were a clear positive for Labour.
    Logically then they should keep them for next time around.

    Anti Tory = Anti Brexit
    The Labour party and its leaders are not anti-Brexit, but wish to achieve a different style of Brexit than the Tories. In GB, parties that are anti-Brexit, the LDs/Greens/SNP/PC, performed poorly at the last GE. Parties that endorse Brexit gained over 80% of the vote.
    The Tories were dangerous in 2017. Their ideological hard Brexit needed to be stopped.
  • Options
    DecrepitJohnLDecrepitJohnL Posts: 13,300

    rkrkrk said:

    Very interesting polling.
    Suggests Brexit not that significant for Labour voters?

    And also that the manifesto and policies were a clear positive for Labour.
    Logically then they should keep them for next time around.

    All parties rushed their manifestos because of the snap election, so none were as fettled as they should be. It is quite likely that Labour will be better prepared next time.

    I cannot see May enjoying the conference season. Surely she is toasted enough already?

    Conference will be interesting as thousands of activists compare notes on where the election was lost -- with each other and with dozens of journalists in the bar.
  • Options
    MortimerMortimer Posts: 13,946
    Wonderful Matt cartoon this morning...
  • Options
    DecrepitJohnLDecrepitJohnL Posts: 13,300
    edited July 2017
    Deleted. There seems to be a glitch in the pb matrix so that edited posts appear as new ones.
  • Options
    DecrepitJohnLDecrepitJohnL Posts: 13,300
    Deleted

  • Options
    geoffwgeoffw Posts: 8,171
    geoffw said:

    Icarus said:

    51.5% want to be in customs union, 33.8% don't.


    Trade happens when you've got something the other party wants at the right price. Napoleon bought British coats for the Russian campaign despite having personally instigated a trade war with Britain. If Brexiters were coming up with ways of improving our trading position by creating better goods and services I might take them a bit more seriously.

    Those would be the coats which lost Bony the Russia campaign due to their tin buttons?
    http://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/napoleons-army-may-have-suffered-from-the-greatest-wardrobe-malfunction-in-history-92535444/
    Sorry @Recidivist, blockquote confusion.
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,937

    rkrkrk said:

    Very interesting polling.
    Suggests Brexit not that significant for Labour voters?

    And also that the manifesto and policies were a clear positive for Labour.
    Logically then they should keep them for next time around.

    All parties rushed their manifestos because of the snap election, so none were as fettled as they should be. It is quite likely that Labour will be better prepared next time.

    I cannot see May enjoying the conference season. Surely she is toasted enough already?

    The next Labour manifesto will be much further to the left than the last one. The party leadership has decided that on 8th June 12.8 million people voted for socialism. I am not sure that's the right call.

  • Options
    geoffwgeoffw Posts: 8,171

    rkrkrk said:

    Very interesting polling.
    Suggests Brexit not that significant for Labour voters?

    And also that the manifesto and policies were a clear positive for Labour.
    Logically then they should keep them for next time around.

    All parties rushed their manifestos because of the snap election, so none were as fettled as they should be. It is quite likely that Labour will be better prepared next time.

    I cannot see May enjoying the conference season. Surely she is toasted enough already?

    The next Labour manifesto will be much further to the left than the last one. The party leadership has decided that on 8th June 12.8 million people voted for socialism. I am not sure that's the right call.

    Socialism – what's not to like?
  • Options
    Dura_AceDura_Ace Posts: 13,003

    Let's hope the more fervent Corbynites don't get ideas from this story:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-40622273

    More of this sort of thing!
  • Options
    daodaodaodao Posts: 821
    edited July 2017
    Jonathan said:

    daodao said:

    Jonathan said:

    rkrkrk said:

    Very interesting polling.
    Suggests Brexit not that significant for Labour voters?

    And also that the manifesto and policies were a clear positive for Labour.
    Logically then they should keep them for next time around.

    Anti Tory = Anti Brexit
    The Labour party and its leaders are not anti-Brexit, but wish to achieve a different style of Brexit than the Tories. In GB, parties that are anti-Brexit, the LDs/Greens/SNP/PC, performed poorly at the last GE. Parties that endorse Brexit gained over 80% of the vote.
    The Tories were dangerous in 2017. Their ideological hard Brexit needed to be stopped.
    If the UK is outwith the single market and customs union, and not subject to the jurisdiction of the ECJ, as both the Tories and Labour accept, it will be a hard Brexit.

    In any case, the EU27 will be making the decisions - the 4 freedoms are fundamental to the EU (and EEA membership) and all 4 need to be accepted without caveats for a soft Brexit.

    The seeds for Brexit were sown in autumn 1992 when the UK crashed out of the EEM. Its economy has not been fit to join the Euro (i.e. worse than Spain et al) and hence the UK has been on the outer fringe of the EU ever since. Look at how many Spanish companies now run or sell services to the UK - BAA/BA/CAF/Santander.
  • Options
    JonathanJonathan Posts: 20,901

    rkrkrk said:

    Very interesting polling.
    Suggests Brexit not that significant for Labour voters?

    And also that the manifesto and policies were a clear positive for Labour.
    Logically then they should keep them for next time around.

    All parties rushed their manifestos because of the snap election, so none were as fettled as they should be. It is quite likely that Labour will be better prepared next time.

    I cannot see May enjoying the conference season. Surely she is toasted enough already?

    The next Labour manifesto will be much further to the left than the last one. The party leadership has decided that on 8th June 12.8 million people voted for socialism. I am not sure that's the right call.

    There was some good stuff in there. Hadn't seen a more straightforward and popular expression of Labours offer since 97, which was far more radical.
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,937
    Jonathan said:

    daodao said:

    Jonathan said:

    rkrkrk said:

    Very interesting polling.
    Suggests Brexit not that significant for Labour voters?

    And also that the manifesto and policies were a clear positive for Labour.
    Logically then they should keep them for next time around.

    Anti Tory = Anti Brexit
    The Labour party and its leaders are not anti-Brexit, but wish to achieve a different style of Brexit than the Tories. In GB, parties that are anti-Brexit, the LDs/Greens/SNP/PC, performed poorly at the last GE. Parties that endorse Brexit gained over 80% of the vote.
    The Tories were dangerous in 2017. Their ideological hard Brexit needed to be stopped.

    Looks like both big party leaderships are very focused on securing a hard Brexit to me. That makes them both equally dangerous to the UK's economic prospects.

  • Options
    another_richardanother_richard Posts: 25,101

    rkrkrk said:

    Very interesting polling.
    Suggests Brexit not that significant for Labour voters?

    And also that the manifesto and policies were a clear positive for Labour.
    Logically then they should keep them for next time around.

    All parties rushed their manifestos because of the snap election, so none were as fettled as they should be. It is quite likely that Labour will be better prepared next time.

    I cannot see May enjoying the conference season. Surely she is toasted enough already?

    The next Labour manifesto will be much further to the left than the last one. The party leadership has decided that on 8th June 12.8 million people voted for socialism. I am not sure that's the right call.

    People thought that Labour were offering hope and fairness and support for the ordinary person against the rich and big business.

    It made a change from the grim misery and support for the establishment offered by the other parties and by Labour in 2015.
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,289

    Good morning, everyone.

    Quite surprised the anti-Labour reason is 1 point ahead of the anti-Conservative reason.

    F1: I'm afraid my tip isn't the most thrilling: http://enormo-haddock.blogspot.co.uk/2017/07/united-kingdom-pre-race-2017.html

    On the plus side, I did have an 8 winner (effectively, it was 26 each way for pole for Raikkonen) pre-practice.

    Not really. When you ask many Conservatives why they vote as they do, it is extremely common for the first words of reply to be along the lines of 'Labour would be terrible....".
  • Options
    JonathanJonathan Posts: 20,901

    Jonathan said:

    daodao said:

    Jonathan said:

    rkrkrk said:

    Very interesting polling.
    Suggests Brexit not that significant for Labour voters?

    And also that the manifesto and policies were a clear positive for Labour.
    Logically then they should keep them for next time around.

    Anti Tory = Anti Brexit
    The Labour party and its leaders are not anti-Brexit, but wish to achieve a different style of Brexit than the Tories. In GB, parties that are anti-Brexit, the LDs/Greens/SNP/PC, performed poorly at the last GE. Parties that endorse Brexit gained over 80% of the vote.
    The Tories were dangerous in 2017. Their ideological hard Brexit needed to be stopped.

    Looks like both big party leaderships are very focused on securing a hard Brexit to me. That makes them both equally dangerous to the UK's economic prospects.

    Starmer is the safer bet.
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,289
    daodao said:

    Jonathan said:

    rkrkrk said:

    Very interesting polling.
    Suggests Brexit not that significant for Labour voters?

    And also that the manifesto and policies were a clear positive for Labour.
    Logically then they should keep them for next time around.

    Anti Tory = Anti Brexit
    The Labour party and its leaders are not anti-Brexit, but wish to achieve a different style of Brexit than the Tories. In GB, parties that are anti-Brexit, the LDs/Greens/SNP/PC, performed poorly at the last GE. Parties that endorse Brexit gained over 80% of the vote.
    People vote for candidates, and candidates who were remainders are in a bigger majority this parliament than the last....
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 60,987
    F1: the post-race ramble might be delayed, if I watch Wimbledon right after the race.
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,289

    rkrkrk said:

    Very interesting polling.
    Suggests Brexit not that significant for Labour voters?

    And also that the manifesto and policies were a clear positive for Labour.
    Logically then they should keep them for next time around.

    All parties rushed their manifestos because of the snap election, so none were as fettled as they should be. It is quite likely that Labour will be better prepared next time.

    I cannot see May enjoying the conference season. Surely she is toasted enough already?

    Conference will be interesting as thousands of activists compare notes on where the election was lost -- with each other and with dozens of journalists in the bar.
    Yesterday's Times reckoned the week after Tory Conference was the target date for demaying. Today's Sundays seem to suggest some are still aiming earlier.
  • Options
    JonathanJonathan Posts: 20,901
    IanB2 said:

    rkrkrk said:

    Very interesting polling.
    Suggests Brexit not that significant for Labour voters?

    And also that the manifesto and policies were a clear positive for Labour.
    Logically then they should keep them for next time around.

    All parties rushed their manifestos because of the snap election, so none were as fettled as they should be. It is quite likely that Labour will be better prepared next time.

    I cannot see May enjoying the conference season. Surely she is toasted enough already?

    Conference will be interesting as thousands of activists compare notes on where the election was lost -- with each other and with dozens of journalists in the bar.
    Yesterday's Times reckoned the week after Tory Conference was the target date for demaying. Today's Sundays seem to suggest some are still aiming earlier.
    Dismay
  • Options
    freetochoosefreetochoose Posts: 1,107
    Well I never not a single labour voter mentioned Brexit despite a handful of lefties on here droning on all day about it.

    I'm beginning to realise the penny will never drop for you poor souls.
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,289
    "I hear that she has told her closest friends that the election result was the most devastating thing to have happened in her life since the deaths of her parents when she was in her 20s. Mrs May’s inability, even a month on, to give a coherent explanation of why she thinks the election went so horribly wrong for her suggests that she has yet to process the trauma fully."

    "Mrs May is still in office because her party fears what it might do to itself in a chaotic and vicious Tory leadership contest. There is no widely agreed candidate to replace her as prime minister. There is no name that could be put to the cabinet and receive overwhelming support as the next occupant of Number 10."


    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jul/16/theresa-may-could-still-have-a-future---as-a-human-sponge
  • Options
    FF43FF43 Posts: 15,726
    edited July 2017
    The problem with this kind of poll is that people probably vote for this or that party because they know what they are doing, they are inspiring, the other lot are dangerous or incompetent, or because they always vote that way. This poll forces people to rationalize their vote by choosing THINGS.
  • Options
    JonathanJonathan Posts: 20,901

    Well I never not a single labour voter mentioned Brexit despite a handful of lefties on here droning on all day about it.

    I'm beginning to realise the penny will never drop for you poor souls.

    We all turn to you, who else has their finger well and truly on the pulse of the Labour party and its support.
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,937
    Jonathan said:

    Jonathan said:

    daodao said:

    Jonathan said:

    rkrkrk said:

    Very interesting polling.
    Suggests Brexit not that significant for Labour voters?

    And also that the manifesto and policies were a clear positive for Labour.
    Logically then they should keep them for next time around.

    Anti Tory = Anti Brexit
    The Labour party and its leaders are not anti-Brexit, but wish to achieve a different style of Brexit than the Tories. In GB, parties that are anti-Brexit, the LDs/Greens/SNP/PC, performed poorly at the last GE. Parties that endorse Brexit gained over 80% of the vote.
    The Tories were dangerous in 2017. Their ideological hard Brexit needed to be stopped.

    Looks like both big party leaderships are very focused on securing a hard Brexit to me. That makes them both equally dangerous to the UK's economic prospects.

    Starmer is the safer bet.

    Yep - I wish he had some meaningful role in the process, but he doesn't.

  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,705
  • Options
    freetochoosefreetochoose Posts: 1,107
    Jonathan said:

    Well I never not a single labour voter mentioned Brexit despite a handful of lefties on here droning on all day about it.

    I'm beginning to realise the penny will never drop for you poor souls.

    We all turn to you, who else has their finger well and truly on the pulse of the Labour party and its support.
    Thanks, you must be delighted to read that 0% of labour voters are concerned with Brexit. Sort of cxhimes with your raison d'etre.
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,937

    Well I never not a single labour voter mentioned Brexit despite a handful of lefties on here droning on all day about it.

    I'm beginning to realise the penny will never drop for you poor souls.

    Anti-Tory, anti-Theresa May = anti-Tory Brexit

  • Options
    freetochoosefreetochoose Posts: 1,107

    Well I never not a single labour voter mentioned Brexit despite a handful of lefties on here droning on all day about it.

    I'm beginning to realise the penny will never drop for you poor souls.

    Anti-Tory, anti-Theresa May = anti-Tory Brexit

    More delusion. Just accept it mate, the tories are obsessed with Brexit, your lot don't give a toss, never have.
  • Options
    rkrkrkrkrkrk Posts: 7,908
    Jonathan said:

    rkrkrk said:

    Very interesting polling.
    Suggests Brexit not that significant for Labour voters?

    And also that the manifesto and policies were a clear positive for Labour.
    Logically then they should keep them for next time around.

    Anti Tory = Anti Brexit
    Hmm... Not sure about that.
    The polling is saying is that Brexit wasn't the main issue for Labour voters..
    Doesn't mean they don't care about it.

    Tbh that doesn't surprise me that much. If you really hated brexit you'd vote lib dems and the election didn't really focus all that much on Brexit.
  • Options
    foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548

    Jonathan said:

    daodao said:

    Jonathan said:

    rkrkrk said:

    Very interesting polling.
    Suggests Brexit not that significant for Labour voters?

    And also that the manifesto and policies were a clear positive for Labour.
    Logically then they should keep them for next time around.

    Anti Tory = Anti Brexit
    The Labour party and its leaders are not anti-Brexit, but wish to achieve a different style of Brexit than the Tories. In GB, parties that are anti-Brexit, the LDs/Greens/SNP/PC, performed poorly at the last GE. Parties that endorse Brexit gained over 80% of the vote.
    The Tories were dangerous in 2017. Their ideological hard Brexit needed to be stopped.

    Looks like both big party leaderships are very focused on securing a hard Brexit to me. That makes them both equally dangerous to the UK's economic prospects.

    What if hard Brexit is the only Brexit that exists? That seems to be the clear view of the EU27 as expressed by Barnier and Tusk.

    In which case I prefer the workers Brexit to the bosses Brexit.
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,937

    Well I never not a single labour voter mentioned Brexit despite a handful of lefties on here droning on all day about it.

    I'm beginning to realise the penny will never drop for you poor souls.

    Anti-Tory, anti-Theresa May = anti-Tory Brexit

    More delusion. Just accept it mate, the tories are obsessed with Brexit, your lot don't give a toss, never have.

    My lot absolutely do care about Brexit. The Labour leadership doesn't, I grant.

  • Options
    AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    Is this another thread where numerous posters miss the point that only the main reason was asked for?

    What stands out for me is how much of the Conservative vote was anti-Labour or anti-Corbyn. The equivalent among Labour supporters is much lower. Labour have serious brand problems.
  • Options
    DecrepitJohnLDecrepitJohnL Posts: 13,300
    Blair may be wrong but why is it delusional to suggest that (say) Angela Merkel has any great objection in principle to the sort of controls her own government imposed until recently?
  • Options
    freetochoosefreetochoose Posts: 1,107

    Well I never not a single labour voter mentioned Brexit despite a handful of lefties on here droning on all day about it.

    I'm beginning to realise the penny will never drop for you poor souls.

    Anti-Tory, anti-Theresa May = anti-Tory Brexit

    More delusion. Just accept it mate, the tories are obsessed with Brexit, your lot don't give a toss, never have.

    My lot absolutely do care about Brexit. The Labour leadership doesn't, I grant.

    Well I'm afraid to say your lot are a small minority - you have read the thread header as well as previous similar ones?
  • Options
    foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    On topic, the next election most likely takes place post Brexit. That means that the strongest reason to vote Tory will be history, but all the strong reasons to vote Labour will still be active issues.
  • Options
    felixfelix Posts: 15,124
    I was very puzzled by his claims. If they were true surely such a deal may have been offered to Cameron? If it were truly offered now the UK would surely grab it with both hands and why are they 'saying' this to him but not to anyone else. Very hard not to draw the obvious conclusion that he hopes straightforward lies are the only option left to him.
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 54,003
    My 23 year old assistant voted Labour to protest against Brexit. Specifically, she voted for Kate Hoey.
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,937

    Well I never not a single labour voter mentioned Brexit despite a handful of lefties on here droning on all day about it.

    I'm beginning to realise the penny will never drop for you poor souls.

    Anti-Tory, anti-Theresa May = anti-Tory Brexit

    More delusion. Just accept it mate, the tories are obsessed with Brexit, your lot don't give a toss, never have.

    My lot absolutely do care about Brexit. The Labour leadership doesn't, I grant.

    Well I'm afraid to say your lot are a small minority - you have read the thread header as well as previous similar ones?

    Anti-Tories, anti-Mays are a decent sized minority.

  • Options
    JonathanJonathan Posts: 20,901
    rcs1000 said:

    My 23 year old assistant voted Labour to protest against Brexit. Specifically, she voted for Kate Hoey.

    Don't you just love politics. It makes no sense in paper , but it works.
  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,076
    rcs1000 said:

    My 23 year old assistant voted Labour to protest against Brexit. Specifically, she voted for Kate Hoey.

    She'll be pleased to see Hoey drawing attention to the efforts of senior Labour figures to stop Brexit.

    https://twitter.com/KateHoeyMP/status/886214644389621760
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,289

    Well I never not a single labour voter mentioned Brexit despite a handful of lefties on here droning on all day about it.

    I'm beginning to realise the penny will never drop for you poor souls.

    Anti-Tory, anti-Theresa May = anti-Tory Brexit

    More delusion. Just accept it mate, the tories are obsessed with Brexit, your lot don't give a toss, never have.

    My lot absolutely do care about Brexit. The Labour leadership doesn't, I grant.

    Well I'm afraid to say your lot are a small minority - you have read the thread header as well as previous similar ones?
    Perpetually you miss the point that the coin is only half way to the floor.

    It doesn't matter so much what people think now; it will matter hugely come 2019, when the bad news facing us will be all too clear.
  • Options
    freetochoosefreetochoose Posts: 1,107

    Well I never not a single labour voter mentioned Brexit despite a handful of lefties on here droning on all day about it.

    I'm beginning to realise the penny will never drop for you poor souls.

    Anti-Tory, anti-Theresa May = anti-Tory Brexit

    More delusion. Just accept it mate, the tories are obsessed with Brexit, your lot don't give a toss, never have.

    My lot absolutely do care about Brexit. The Labour leadership doesn't, I grant.

    Well I'm afraid to say your lot are a small minority - you have read the thread header as well as previous similar ones?

    Anti-Tories, anti-Mays are a decent sized minority.

    Of course, the anti tories have always been there, always will, its nothing to do with Brexit. Only you and a few others on here need treatment for your obsession. I'm opening a Priory type home specialising in Brexit rehab.
  • Options
    eekeek Posts: 24,983
    edited July 2017
    I now have a new Hero for top class trolling from the front page of today's Sunday Times. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/amanda-spielman-of-ofsted-warns-about-impact-of-new-gcses-rqnqm30lg
    In one school she visited she was horrified — and said parents would be “surprised” — to see a class of 11-year-olds taken through GCSE mark schemes instead of being taught geography.
    Top marks to that Teacher for changing that day's lesson..
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,937

    Is this another thread where numerous posters miss the point that only the main reason was asked for?

    What stands out for me is how much of the Conservative vote was anti-Labour or anti-Corbyn. The equivalent among Labour supporters is much lower. Labour have serious brand problems.

    Yep - that was my point below. Labour got the support it did despite close to 40% of the Tory vote being inspired by anti-Labour voters. That said, over 20% of Labour votes were negative, too. All in all, though, it's pretty clear Corbyn and co are the Tories' best friends.

  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,076

    I'm opening a Priory type home specialising in Brexit rehab.

    "No, No, No."
  • Options
    freetochoosefreetochoose Posts: 1,107
    IanB2 said:

    Well I never not a single labour voter mentioned Brexit despite a handful of lefties on here droning on all day about it.

    I'm beginning to realise the penny will never drop for you poor souls.

    Anti-Tory, anti-Theresa May = anti-Tory Brexit

    More delusion. Just accept it mate, the tories are obsessed with Brexit, your lot don't give a toss, never have.

    My lot absolutely do care about Brexit. The Labour leadership doesn't, I grant.

    Well I'm afraid to say your lot are a small minority - you have read the thread header as well as previous similar ones?
    Perpetually you miss the point that the coin is only half way to the floor.

    It doesn't matter so much what people think now; it will matter hugely come 2019, when the bad news facing us will be all too clear.
    In that case for the sake of your health you should try another approach for a couple of years, bury yourself in a time capsule and then emerge triumphant when the rest of us are all living in caves because of Brexit.
  • Options
    DecrepitJohnLDecrepitJohnL Posts: 13,300

    Is this another thread where numerous posters miss the point that only the main reason was asked for?

    What stands out for me is how much of the Conservative vote was anti-Labour or anti-Corbyn. The equivalent among Labour supporters is much lower. Labour have serious brand problems.

    Yes and no. You too have missed the point but in the other direction -- that *any reason at all* was asked for. Conservative supporters asked to rationalise their votes have very few choices since the party did not campaign in favour of anything. That's why a full 45% (anti-Corbyn, anti-Labour, best of a bad bunch, and better suited to govern) gave essentially the same answer, and that's without considering 21% said Brexit which is probably the only policy they could remember -- but Labour also committed to Brexit so aside from a handful of ex-LDs, that cannot be the actual reason.
  • Options
    felixfelix Posts: 15,124

    Is this another thread where numerous posters miss the point that only the main reason was asked for?

    What stands out for me is how much of the Conservative vote was anti-Labour or anti-Corbyn. The equivalent among Labour supporters is much lower. Labour have serious brand problems.

    Agreed - indeed the Survation poll last night shows the Tory vote holding up astonishingly well against an overwhelmingly negative media background. Labour looks more flaky and Despite the 'cult of Corbyn' we keep reading about Labour would be doing way better under more centrist leadership. And if the Tories did get their act together again.......
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,289

    Is this another thread where numerous posters miss the point that only the main reason was asked for?

    What stands out for me is how much of the Conservative vote was anti-Labour or anti-Corbyn. The equivalent among Labour supporters is much lower. Labour have serious brand problems.

    Yep - that was my point below. Labour got the support it did despite close to 40% of the Tory vote being inspired by anti-Labour voters. That said, over 20% of Labour votes were negative, too. All in all, though, it's pretty clear Corbyn and co are the Tories' best friends.

    I don't think you can conclude that, without looking at similar surveys from time past. As I said below, many conservatives justify their support first and foremost by keeping Labour from power, and it has been this way for decades.

    Indeed I was thinking yeterday that the middle class's traditional support for the Tories rests principally on trusting their safer hands on the economy and otherwise wanting to be left alone. Consequently the Tories get in when they focus in economic competence, and get turfed out whenever Tories delude themselves that the support they get indicates desire for all the other Tory-political stuff, which in reality few people want. Labour and Tory being pretty much level in middle class support right now is striking.

    The Tories' biggest problem right now is that their political obsession with the EU has once again led them to wander away from managing the economy.
  • Options
    felixfelix Posts: 15,124
    rcs1000 said:

    My 23 year old assistant voted Labour to protest against Brexit. Specifically, she voted for Kate Hoey.

    One can only hope her talents are related to her work rather than her understanding of politics.
  • Options
    JonathanJonathan Posts: 20,901
    felix said:

    Is this another thread where numerous posters miss the point that only the main reason was asked for?

    What stands out for me is how much of the Conservative vote was anti-Labour or anti-Corbyn. The equivalent among Labour supporters is much lower. Labour have serious brand problems.

    Agreed - indeed the Survation poll last night shows the Tory vote holding up astonishingly well against an overwhelmingly negative media background. Labour looks more flaky and Despite the 'cult of Corbyn' we keep reading about Labour would be doing way better under more centrist leadership. And if the Tories did get their act together again.......
    Or...

    Corbyn's Labour do better in real campaigns. Outside of the campaign polls flatter the Tories.

    Would be rather ironic if you started to draw comfort from the polls that deceived you so recently.
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,289

    IanB2 said:

    Well I never not a single labour voter mentioned Brexit despite a handful of lefties on here droning on all day about it.

    I'm beginning to realise the penny will never drop for you poor souls.

    Anti-Tory, anti-Theresa May = anti-Tory Brexit

    More delusion. Just accept it mate, the tories are obsessed with Brexit, your lot don't give a toss, never have.

    My lot absolutely do care about Brexit. The Labour leadership doesn't, I grant.

    Well I'm afraid to say your lot are a small minority - you have read the thread header as well as previous similar ones?
    Perpetually you miss the point that the coin is only half way to the floor.

    It doesn't matter so much what people think now; it will matter hugely come 2019, when the bad news facing us will be all too clear.
    In that case for the sake of your health you should try another approach for a couple of years, bury yourself in a time capsule and then emerge triumphant when the rest of us are all living in caves because of Brexit.
    Seeing the results of your own spell in a time capsule is hardly encouraging!
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,705

    Blair may be wrong but why is it delusional to suggest that (say) Angela Merkel has any great objection in principle to the sort of controls her own government imposed until recently?
    keine Rosinen herauszupicken

    Would you buy a reformed CAP from Mr Blair?
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,937

    Well I never not a single labour voter mentioned Brexit despite a handful of lefties on here droning on all day about it.

    I'm beginning to realise the penny will never drop for you poor souls.

    Anti-Tory, anti-Theresa May = anti-Tory Brexit

    More delusion. Just accept it mate, the tories are obsessed with Brexit, your lot don't give a toss, never have.

    My lot absolutely do care about Brexit. The Labour leadership doesn't, I grant.

    Well I'm afraid to say your lot are a small minority - you have read the thread header as well as previous similar ones?

    Anti-Tories, anti-Mays are a decent sized minority.

    Of course, the anti tories have always been there, always will, its nothing to do with Brexit. Only you and a few others on here need treatment for your obsession. I'm opening a Priory type home specialising in Brexit rehab.

    I fully accept the referendum result, even though I regret it. What terrifies me is the complete mess the government is making of the withdrawal process and the damage its incompetence will cause.

  • Options
    ThomasNasheThomasNashe Posts: 4,980
    edited July 2017
    I had made up my mind to break the habit of a lifetime and vote Tory (on anti-Corbyn grounds), but this declaration made me switch back to Labour just a couple of days before the vote:

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jun/06/theresa-may-rip-up-human-rights-laws-impede-new-terror-legislation

    So, I voted for the anti-Brexit, Rupa Huq, in Ealing Central and Acton (with apologies to Topping and Nunu).
  • Options
    felixfelix Posts: 15,124
    Jonathan said:

    felix said:

    Is this another thread where numerous posters miss the point that only the main reason was asked for?

    What stands out for me is how much of the Conservative vote was anti-Labour or anti-Corbyn. The equivalent among Labour supporters is much lower. Labour have serious brand problems.

    Agreed - indeed the Survation poll last night shows the Tory vote holding up astonishingly well against an overwhelmingly negative media background. Labour looks more flaky and Despite the 'cult of Corbyn' we keep reading about Labour would be doing way better under more centrist leadership. And if the Tories did get their act together again.......
    Or...

    Corbyn's Labour do better in real campaigns. Outside of the campaign polls flatter the Tories.

    Would be rather ironic if you started to draw comfort from the polls that deceived you so recently.
    Survation were the most accurate pollster of the GE campaign but I don't rely on them for much of anything generally. However, given the current circumstances the fact that the Tory support appears to be holding up quite well [ even on the evidence of local election results] is little short of miraculous. That must i believe be down to a weakness in the Labour off/leadership/both.
  • Options
    freetochoosefreetochoose Posts: 1,107

    Well I never not a single labour voter mentioned Brexit despite a handful of lefties on here droning on all day about it.

    I'm beginning to realise the penny will never drop for you poor souls.

    Anti-Tory, anti-Theresa May = anti-Tory Brexit

    More delusion. Just accept it mate, the tories are obsessed with Brexit, your lot don't give a toss, never have.

    My lot absolutely do care about Brexit. The Labour leadership doesn't, I grant.

    Well I'm afraid to say your lot are a small minority - you have read the thread header as well as previous similar ones?

    Anti-Tories, anti-Mays are a decent sized minority.

    Of course, the anti tories have always been there, always will, its nothing to do with Brexit. Only you and a few others on here need treatment for your obsession. I'm opening a Priory type home specialising in Brexit rehab.

    I fully accept the referendum result, even though I regret it. What terrifies me is the complete mess the government is making of the withdrawal process and the damage its incompetence will cause.

    You need to relax, you are becoming increasingly shrill and hyperbolic, every survey shows that nobody is either listening or concerned. You are a doom merchant, everybody avoids them.

  • Options
    tlg86tlg86 Posts: 25,190
    What is social murder?
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,937

    Jonathan said:

    daodao said:

    Jonathan said:

    rkrkrk said:

    Very interesting polling.
    Suggests Brexit not that significant for Labour voters?

    And also that the manifesto and policies were a clear positive for Labour.
    Logically then they should keep them for next time around.

    Anti Tory = Anti Brexit
    The Labour party and its leaders are not anti-Brexit, but wish to achieve a different style of Brexit than the Tories. In GB, parties that are anti-Brexit, the LDs/Greens/SNP/PC, performed poorly at the last GE. Parties that endorse Brexit gained over 80% of the vote.
    The Tories were dangerous in 2017. Their ideological hard Brexit needed to be stopped.

    Looks like both big party leaderships are very focused on securing a hard Brexit to me. That makes them both equally dangerous to the UK's economic prospects.

    What if hard Brexit is the only Brexit that exists? That seems to be the clear view of the EU27 as expressed by Barnier and Tusk.

    In which case I prefer the workers Brexit to the bosses Brexit.

    The EU27 have heard what government ministers have been saying for the last year. In the absence of any coherent UK proposals for how a future relationship might work they have reached the only conclusion about the UK's intentions it is possible to reach.

  • Options
    DecrepitJohnLDecrepitJohnL Posts: 13,300
    eek said:

    I now have a new Hero for top class trolling from the front page of today's Sunday Times. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/amanda-spielman-of-ofsted-warns-about-impact-of-new-gcses-rqnqm30lg

    In one school she visited she was horrified — and said parents would be “surprised” — to see a class of 11-year-olds taken through GCSE mark schemes instead of being taught geography.
    In my day, we did not do this.

    One reason exam pass rates went up year on year is that teachers and pupils became far more sophisticated in exam technique. We coffin-dodgers were expected to learn maths, say, or history, and then answer whatever questions were thrown at us.

    These days, teachers teach narrowly to the test and pupils are drilled into how to analyse questions to provide exactly what is demanded -- even if they know nothing. If the question is about triangles but you can remember neither geometry nor trigonometry, then before skipping to the next question, at least draw a flaming triangle because there will be 1 or 2 marks (out of 20) for that tiny part of the full, correct answer.
  • Options
    rkrkrkrkrkrk Posts: 7,908

    Is this another thread where numerous posters miss the point that only the main reason was asked for?

    What stands out for me is how much of the Conservative vote was anti-Labour or anti-Corbyn. The equivalent among Labour supporters is much lower. Labour have serious brand problems.

    Yep - that was my point below. Labour got the support it did despite close to 40% of the Tory vote being inspired by anti-Labour voters. That said, over 20% of Labour votes were negative, too. All in all, though, it's pretty clear Corbyn and co are the Tories' best friends.

    The Corbyn factor is real in repelling some Tory voters.
    But I think there is an anti-labour vote that's solid regardless of the leader.
  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,076
    tlg86 said:

    What is social murder?

    A term that seems to come from the writing of Engels in The Condition of the Working Class in England.
  • Options
    fitalassfitalass Posts: 4,279

    rkrkrk said:

    Very interesting polling.
    Suggests Brexit not that significant for Labour voters?

    And also that the manifesto and policies were a clear positive for Labour.
    Logically then they should keep them for next time around.

    All parties rushed their manifestos because of the snap election, so none were as fettled as they should be. It is quite likely that Labour will be better prepared next time.

    I cannot see May enjoying the conference season. Surely she is toasted enough already?

    The next Labour manifesto will be much further to the left than the last one. The party leadership has decided that on 8th June 12.8 million people voted for socialism. I am not sure that's the right call.

    Agreed. Take the Labour position on tuition fees, its already been tried and found to have failed in Scotland. Something worth remembering.
  • Options
    tlg86tlg86 Posts: 25,190

    tlg86 said:

    What is social murder?

    A term that seems to come from the writing of Engels in The Condition of the Working Class in England.
    It was probably bollocks in Engels' time in so far as poverty just became more obvious with urbanisation and industrialisation. It certainly shouldn't be applied to Grenfell Tower. Too bad John McDonnell didn't name any names.
This discussion has been closed.