Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Tonight’s local by-elections

2»

Comments

  • MarkSeniorMarkSenior Posts: 4,699
    AveryLP said:

    surbiton said:

    Swindon

    Con 1376 Lab 887 UKIP 426 LD 83

    Bad result for Labour !
    So too was Oulton.

    If you looked at it closely.

    Ed's best ignoring it all and staying ex communicado on holiday.

    "Crisis? What crisis?"

    Oulton was very poor for UKIP who won the larger CC division in May
  • Broken, sleazy Labour on the slide?
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,587
    edited August 2013
    Worth noting the years being compared with if we're drawing conclusions. We were doing well in 2012 (Swindon), not so much in 2011 (Oulton, Skelton) and 2010 was presumably on GE day (Merton). Thus the Swindon result isn't terrible and the Oulton result isn't fabulous. I'd guess the Merton figures will be well down all round.
  • fitalassfitalass Posts: 4,320
    Twitter
    The Economist ‏@TheEconomist 3m
    The White House announced on August 7th that Barack Obama was cancelling a Moscow summit with Vladimir Putin http://econ.st/15MMXal
  • Colliers Wood

    Labour Party: Caroline Cooper-Marbiah: 1685
    Conservative Party: Peter Lord: 441
    UKIP: Shafqat Janjua: 157
    Liberal Democrats: Phil Ling: 52
  • anotherDaveanotherDave Posts: 6,746

    AveryLP said:

    surbiton said:

    Swindon

    Con 1376 Lab 887 UKIP 426 LD 83

    Bad result for Labour !
    So too was Oulton.

    If you looked at it closely.

    Ed's best ignoring it all and staying ex communicado on holiday.

    "Crisis? What crisis?"

    Oulton was very poor for UKIP who won the larger CC division in May
    UKIP have placed above the LDs in all the results so far.

  • AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    surbiton said:

    AveryLP said:

    surbiton said:

    Swindon

    Con 1376 Lab 887 UKIP 426 LD 83

    Bad result for Labour !
    So too was Oulton.

    If you looked at it closely.

    Ed's best ignoring it all and staying ex communicado on holiday.

    "Crisis? What crisis?"

    In Oulton Labour's share of the votes went up from just under 30% to around 40%. If that is bad, I will take it.
    But as Mark Senior points out UKIP is falling hard.

    And on that basis the Labour win looks vulnerable.

    If Labour cannot assert their lead in mid term and win wards in, say, Swindon, then Ed ain't going to be in No 10 for 2015 Christmas. Probably won't even be LOTO.

  • MarkSeniorMarkSenior Posts: 4,699

    Worth noting the years being compared with if we're drawing conclusions. We were doing well in 2012 (Swindon), not so much in 2011 (Oulton, Skelton) and 2010 was presumably on GE day (Merton). Thus the Swindon result isn't terrible and the Oulton result isn't fabulous (though UKIP should feel a bit chuffed at their showing from a start of 0). I'd guess the Merton figures will be well down all round.

    UKIP were not starting from 0 , they were starting from winning the CC division in May !!!!!!!!!!
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,587

    Colliers Wood

    Labour Party: Caroline Cooper-Marbiah: 1685
    Conservative Party: Peter Lord: 441
    UKIP: Shafqat Janjua: 157
    Liberal Democrats: Phil Ling: 52

    That'll do. LibDems seem to have mislaid 93% of their vote!
  • Winning candidate and tired people in Merton

    https://twitter.com/WimbledonNews/status/365604755873083392/photo/1
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,587

    Worth noting the years being compared with if we're drawing conclusions. We were doing well in 2012 (Swindon), not so much in 2011 (Oulton, Skelton) and 2010 was presumably on GE day (Merton). Thus the Swindon result isn't terrible and the Oulton result isn't fabulous (though UKIP should feel a bit chuffed at their showing from a start of 0). I'd guess the Merton figures will be well down all round.

    UKIP were not starting from 0 , they were starting from winning the CC division in May !!!!!!!!!!
    Fair enough - I edited out my comment after seeing your earlier post, but you saw it first!

  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    AveryLP said:

    surbiton said:

    AveryLP said:

    surbiton said:

    Swindon

    Con 1376 Lab 887 UKIP 426 LD 83

    Bad result for Labour !
    So too was Oulton.

    If you looked at it closely.

    Ed's best ignoring it all and staying ex communicado on holiday.

    "Crisis? What crisis?"

    In Oulton Labour's share of the votes went up from just under 30% to around 40%. If that is bad, I will take it.
    But as Mark Senior points out UKIP is falling hard.

    And on that basis the Labour win looks vulnerable.

    If Labour cannot assert their lead in mid term and win wards in, say, Swindon, then Ed ain't going to be in No 10 for 2015 Christmas. Probably won't even be LOTO.

    That tells me UKIP's fall did not help the Tories ! Tories were after all only 28 behind last time.
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    fitalass said:

    Twitter
    The Economist ‏@TheEconomist 3m
    The White House announced on August 7th that Barack Obama was cancelling a Moscow summit with Vladimir Putin http://econ.st/15MMXal

    Sorry ! Is that news ?

  • AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    surbiton said:

    AveryLP said:

    surbiton said:

    AveryLP said:

    surbiton said:

    Swindon

    Con 1376 Lab 887 UKIP 426 LD 83

    Bad result for Labour !
    So too was Oulton.

    If you looked at it closely.

    Ed's best ignoring it all and staying ex communicado on holiday.

    "Crisis? What crisis?"

    In Oulton Labour's share of the votes went up from just under 30% to around 40%. If that is bad, I will take it.
    But as Mark Senior points out UKIP is falling hard.

    And on that basis the Labour win looks vulnerable.

    If Labour cannot assert their lead in mid term and win wards in, say, Swindon, then Ed ain't going to be in No 10 for 2015 Christmas. Probably won't even be LOTO.

    That tells me UKIP's fall did not help the Tories ! Tories were after all only 28 behind last time.
    Convince yourself, Surby!

  • MarkSeniorMarkSenior Posts: 4,699
    A bit better news for Lib Dems Hessle TC ( Hull West and Hessle ) 2 LD gains from Labour
    Council now LD 10 Lab 5 .
  • Or is it in fact broken, sleazy LibDems on the slide?
  • AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    SeanT said:

    Mediocre for Labour tonight. Tory plurality in 2015?

    That's the nowcast.

  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 22,423
    For Labour - Mid 1990's it ain't! Is it? ;)
  • AndreaParma_82AndreaParma_82 Posts: 4,714
    edited August 2013
    yes, in Mitcham and Morden only
    GIN1138 said:

    For Labour - Mid 1990's it ain't! Is it? ;)

  • AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    Note: The subject tim responds to the stimulus as predicted.
  • AveryLP said:

    Note: The subject tim responds to the stimulus as predicted.

    Hey, that's my line!
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,112
    edited August 2013
    tim said:

    fitalass said:

    Twitter
    The Economist ‏@TheEconomist 3m
    The White House announced on August 7th that Barack Obama was cancelling a Moscow summit with Vladimir Putin http://econ.st/15MMXal

    Congratulations fitalass, that's more contemporary than claiming Richard Nabavi and Antifrank stopped you posting betting tips or Carola stopped you being yourself

    MODERATED
    Considerably more contemporary than Cam's date nights, and that gets raised ad nauseam ;)
  • AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    Note: The subject Sunil responds to the stimulus as predicted.
  • GeoffMGeoffM Posts: 6,071
    SeanT said:

    Depressingly true. For men, variety and newness is all.

    A diamond mine runs out just as quickly as a tin mine.

  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    AveryLP said:

    surbiton said:

    AveryLP said:

    surbiton said:

    AveryLP said:

    surbiton said:

    Swindon

    Con 1376 Lab 887 UKIP 426 LD 83

    Bad result for Labour !
    So too was Oulton.

    If you looked at it closely.

    Ed's best ignoring it all and staying ex communicado on holiday.

    "Crisis? What crisis?"

    In Oulton Labour's share of the votes went up from just under 30% to around 40%. If that is bad, I will take it.
    But as Mark Senior points out UKIP is falling hard.

    And on that basis the Labour win looks vulnerable.

    If Labour cannot assert their lead in mid term and win wards in, say, Swindon, then Ed ain't going to be in No 10 for 2015 Christmas. Probably won't even be LOTO.

    That tells me UKIP's fall did not help the Tories ! Tories were after all only 28 behind last time.
    Convince yourself, Surby!

    I don't have to. The figures speak for themselves.
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549

    Colliers Wood

    Labour Party: Caroline Cooper-Marbiah: 1685
    Conservative Party: Peter Lord: 441
    UKIP: Shafqat Janjua: 157
    Liberal Democrats: Phil Ling: 52

    That'll do. LibDems seem to have mislaid 93% of their vote!
    Bermondsey ?
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,112
    edited August 2013
    tim said:



    Hope YouGov has the lead down to five tomorrow, when the PB Tories have to intellectualise As s Father's vote slipping despite the tossing it's just not right

    Come on tim, you know that we'd have already heard about it from the Sun if it were good for the blues. ;)
  • edmundintokyoedmundintokyo Posts: 17,709
    surbiton said:

    Has Michael Green replied to Lord Ashcroft's request to find out the number of Tory Party members.

    The delay could be because:

    - there are so many that it is taking ages for the "coffee mornings" to count them.

    - there is no organisation to do the count

    What's the secret ?

    Could be something stupider, like losing the database and not having any backups.

    Anyhow it seems like a good place to start for Messina. No point in trying to teach them advanced stuff about individually-tailored data-driven campaigns until they've mastered the basics like "how to count your members".
  • GeoffMGeoffM Posts: 6,071


    Could be something stupider, like losing the database and not having any backups.

    Yes; when troubleshooting just about anything it's usually cock-up rather than conspiracy. Occam's razor.

  • JohnLoonyJohnLoony Posts: 1,790
    Plato said:

    As I sign off

    Historical Pictures @HistoricalPics
    A 19-year-old Bill Clinton shaking hands with President Kennedy in Washington, 1963. pic.twitter.com/NdlLdYfnbZ

    http://t.co/NdlLdYfnbZ

    When Bill Clinton was 19, Kennedy had been dead for two years.
  • GeoffMGeoffM Posts: 6,071
    edited August 2013
    @JohnLoony That description still gave it a chance of being an accurate although rather gruesome photograph. I didn't look at it first time it was posted.

    Anyway, Clinton would have been 17 in 1963, not 19 so that "Historical Picture" can be safely binned.
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    tim said:


    Hope YouGov has the lead down to five tomorrow

    As a Farmer tim nearly gets his wish...

    @MSmithsonPB
    Today's YouGov sees the LAB lead down from yesterday's 8% to 4%
    CON 34
    LAB 38
    LD 9
    UKIP 12
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,112
    Tory to giant panda ratio in Scotland look set to take a big hit.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-23625465

  • new thread
This discussion has been closed.