Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Extraordinary. Trump wants Farage to be Britain’s Ambassador t

2456

Comments

  • Options
    JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 39,090
    rcs1000 said:

    Didn't Saudi Arabia attempt to tell us who we should send as ambassador a few years ago? And didn't we, quite rightly, tell them diplomatically to F off?

    There's a difference between saying "you choice of ambassador is hurting our relations. We suggest you change him," and "We want *this* guy."
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,152

    SeanT said:

    SeanT said:

    The idea that Trump will be a great friend to the UK is killed with this Tweet. No friend would have sent it. If Farage were any kind of patriot he would immediately disown it.

    The only good news from all of this is that Farage's cuddle-up-close to the Donald totally and utterly discredits him as a serious political figure. Not that he was widely seen that way before, of course.

    Bedwetting lefty nonsense. Lol.

    Nope - fact. If Trump had any regard for this country or its head of state that Tweet would not have been posted. You know it, but you have no problem with it because you are a highly partisan right-winger.

    No, I'm just not an effeminate lefty nitwit. Trump is a game changer. He does things differently. The whole western world is changing. The culture wars have turned, finally, in favour of the right. Some of it will be ugly and weird and sad, some of it will be brilliant and wonderful and long overdue.

    Rejoice.
    But is Trump of the right or just an American nationalist? Remember Trump not only beat Hillary, he humiliated the Republican establishment.
    I think Trump is a Reactionary, in that all he does is to provoke a reaction. He is the Lord of Misrule. The Abbot of Unreason. Appointed to preside over the Feast of Fools, with the power to command anyone to do anything.

    It is Roman Saturnalia, when the ordinary rules of life were subverted as masters served their slaves, and the offices of state were held by slaves.
    I think Saturnalia was just over a week, not four years.

    Caligula appointing his horse as Consul is more like it.
    I agree - a four year Saturnalia is more accurately a Freak Show. But the American public wanted the old order stood on its head. That is what Trump offered. It is Bread and Circuses, with some doubt whether the bread will ever arrive, but no doubt about the circus being camped on the White House lawn.

    No, the American public wanted Clinton. Trump was not their first choice.

    Not where it counted they didn't.....
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 54,074

    http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2016/11/21/kobachs-extreme-vetting-proposal-is-revealed-in-photos-with-trump/?mod=e2tw

    can't they afford briefcases or something? or ...perhaps they did it on purpose?

    I'm pretty sure this was deliberate.
  • Options
    PlatoSaidPlatoSaid Posts: 10,383
    Isabel Oakeshott
    One thing is clear: team Trump wants to see the back of Kim Darroch.
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 54,074

    rcs1000 said:

    Didn't Saudi Arabia attempt to tell us who we should send as ambassador a few years ago? And didn't we, quite rightly, tell them diplomatically to F off?

    There's a difference between saying "you choice of ambassador is hurting our relations. We suggest you change him," and "We want *this* guy."
    I think after objecting to our choice, they attempted to tell us who would be acceptable. And we said, non.
  • Options
    JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 39,090

    Cyclefree said:

    Incidentally I share SO's concerns about Trump's advisors and the views some of them have - on white supremacy, anti-semitism, racism etc. The fact that groups like the KKK are celebrating is not good news and Britain should, for its own self-respect, be careful not to be seen as sharing or endorsing such views. It is no use criticising Corbyn for his repellent views and associations and giving a free pass to Trump.

    Realpolitik is fine. We will need to build as good a relationship as we can with the US but we need to be clear - and in public if need be - that we have certain values and that white supremacy, anti-semitism etc are not part of them.

    Hear, hear.

    The silence of so many right wingers on here and elsewhere about Trump's embrace of white supremacists, when they rightly attacked Corbyn for his tolerance and even embrace of anti-Semitism, is deafening. Turns out those attacks on Corbyn were all about partisanship, not principle.
    Totally agree with both of you. My early optimism about Trump post-election have evaporated. I see no reason to think that he'll take the US or the world in a good direction.
  • Options
    JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 39,090
    rcs1000 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Didn't Saudi Arabia attempt to tell us who we should send as ambassador a few years ago? And didn't we, quite rightly, tell them diplomatically to F off?

    There's a difference between saying "you choice of ambassador is hurting our relations. We suggest you change him," and "We want *this* guy."
    I think after objecting to our choice, they attempted to tell us who would be acceptable. And we said, non.
    I didn't know that. But that's still different from what Trump's done.
  • Options
    PlatoSaidPlatoSaid Posts: 10,383
    This is all highly entertaining. I was watching this unfold last night and Trump isn't dancing to anyone's tune.

    His direct video message is just a taste of things to come.
  • Options
    daodaodaodao Posts: 821

    It's also worth noting the impact of a Farage appointment on negotiations with the EU over Brexit. Not exactly the best mood music.

    It doesn't really matter how smoothly the negotiations with the EU go over Brexit. Two years after A50 is invoked, the UK will be thrown out of the EU with no substantive agreement in place and no extension to negotiations, due to the veto of one or more of the remaining EU states. I voted no, notwithstanding my expectation that it would be a very hard Brexit. It is in the EU's interest to make Brexit as painful as possible for the UK. The UK's only possible European ally post Brexit may have to be Russia.
  • Options

    SeanT said:

    SeanT said:

    The idea that Trump will be a great friend to the UK is killed with this Tweet. No friend would have sent it. If Farage were any kind of patriot he would immediately disown it.

    The only good news from all of this is that Farage's cuddle-up-close to the Donald totally and utterly discredits him as a serious political figure. Not that he was widely seen that way before, of course.

    Bedwetting lefty nonsense. Lol.

    Nope - fact. If Trump had any regard for this country or its head of state that Tweet would not have been posted. You know it, but you have no problem with it because you are a highly partisan right-winger.

    No, I'm just not an effeminate lefty nitwit. Trump is a game changer. He does things differently. The whole western world is changing. The culture wars have turned, finally, in favour of the right. Some of it will be ugly and weird and sad, some of it will be brilliant and wonderful and long overdue.

    Rejoice.
    But is Trump of the right or just an American nationalist? Remember Trump not only beat Hillary, he humiliated the Republican establishment.
    I think Trump is a Reactionary, in that all he does is to provoke a reaction. He is the Lord of Misrule. The Abbot of Unreason. Appointed to preside over the Feast of Fools, with the power to command anyone to do anything.

    It is Roman Saturnalia, when the ordinary rules of life were subverted as masters served their slaves, and the offices of state were held by slaves.
    I think Saturnalia was just over a week, not four years.

    Caligula appointing his horse as Consul is more like it.
    And not even the whole horse, just the nether region.
  • Options

    SeanT said:

    SeanT said:

    The idea that Trump will be a great friend to the UK is killed with this Tweet. No friend would have sent it. If Farage were any kind of patriot he would immediately disown it.

    The only good news from all of this is that Farage's cuddle-up-close to the Donald totally and utterly discredits him as a serious political figure. Not that he was widely seen that way before, of course.

    Bedwetting lefty nonsense. Lol.

    Nope - fact. If Trump had any regard for this country or its head of state that Tweet would not have been posted. You know it, but you have no problem with it because you are a highly partisan right-winger.

    No, I'm just not an effeminate lefty nitwit. Trump is a game changer. He does things differently. The whole western world is changing. The culture wars have turned, finally, in favour of the right. Some of it will be ugly and weird and sad, some of it will be brilliant and wonderful and long overdue.

    Rejoice.
    But is Trump of the right or just an American nationalist? Remember Trump not only beat Hillary, he humiliated the Republican establishment.
    I think Trump is a Reactionary, in that all he does is to provoke a reaction. He is the Lord of Misrule. The Abbot of Unreason. Appointed to preside over the Feast of Fools, with the power to command anyone to do anything.

    It is Roman Saturnalia, when the ordinary rules of life were subverted as masters served their slaves, and the offices of state were held by slaves.
    I think Saturnalia was just over a week, not four years.

    Caligula appointing his horse as Consul is more like it.
    I agree - a four year Saturnalia is more accurately a Freak Show. But the American public wanted the old order stood on its head. That is what Trump offered. It is Bread and Circuses, with some doubt whether the bread will ever arrive, but no doubt about the circus being camped on the White House lawn.

    No, the American public wanted Clinton. Trump was not their first choice.

    Not where it counted they didn't.....

    That, of course, is different.

  • Options
    Meanwhile, here's Charles Grant's take on how the EU is shaping up to deal with Brexit:

    https://twitter.com/patrickwintour/status/800968433710075904

    It doesn't make for comfortable reading.
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,152

    SeanT said:

    SeanT said:

    The idea that Trump will be a great friend to the UK is killed with this Tweet. No friend would have sent it. If Farage were any kind of patriot he would immediately disown it.

    The only good news from all of this is that Farage's cuddle-up-close to the Donald totally and utterly discredits him as a serious political figure. Not that he was widely seen that way before, of course.

    Bedwetting lefty nonsense. Lol.

    Nope - fact. If Trump had any regard for this country or its head of state that Tweet would not have been posted. You know it, but you have no problem with it because you are a highly partisan right-winger.

    No, I'm just not an effeminate lefty nitwit. Trump is a game changer. He does things differently. The whole western world is changing. The culture wars have turned, finally, in favour of the right. Some of it will be ugly and weird and sad, some of it will be brilliant and wonderful and long overdue.

    Rejoice.
    But is Trump of the right or just an American nationalist? Remember Trump not only beat Hillary, he humiliated the Republican establishment.
    I think Trump is a Reactionary, in that all he does is to provoke a reaction. He is the Lord of Misrule. The Abbot of Unreason. Appointed to preside over the Feast of Fools, with the power to command anyone to do anything.

    It is Roman Saturnalia, when the ordinary rules of life were subverted as masters served their slaves, and the offices of state were held by slaves.
    I think Saturnalia was just over a week, not four years.

    Caligula appointing his horse as Consul is more like it.
    I agree - a four year Saturnalia is more accurately a Freak Show. But the American public wanted the old order stood on its head. That is what Trump offered. It is Bread and Circuses, with some doubt whether the bread will ever arrive, but no doubt about the circus being camped on the White House lawn.

    No, the American public wanted Clinton. Trump was not their first choice.

    Not where it counted they didn't.....

    That, of course, is different.

    One candidate was dumb as a brick to ignore that.

    The other is now President Elect.
  • Options
    AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670
    I hope no one had money on the North Carolina governorship contest. Looks like the lose is trying shenanigans to end run round the result, and the NC legislature is apparebtly considering a court packing bill to get round the election of a liberal justice their supreme court. Bonkers.
  • Options
    CD13CD13 Posts: 6,351
    edited November 2016
    We're all acting very British here, and Trump's acting all American. It may go down well in the USA. They still expect us to be stiff and follow form. They pride themselves on not doing that.

    "That Farage guy gets things done," may well be Trump's meaning. "That's why we get on."

    Don't mistake everything Trump does as the act of a buffoon.
  • Options
    MonksfieldMonksfield Posts: 2,237

    SeanT said:

    SeanT said:

    The idea that Trump will be a great friend to the UK is killed with this Tweet. No friend would have sent it. If Farage were any kind of patriot he would immediately disown it.

    The only good news from all of this is that Farage's cuddle-up-close to the Donald totally and utterly discredits him as a serious political figure. Not that he was widely seen that way before, of course.

    Bedwetting lefty nonsense. Lol.

    Nope - fact. If Trump had any regard for this country or its head of state that Tweet would not have been posted. You know it, but you have no problem with it because you are a highly partisan right-winger.

    No, I'm just not an effeminate lefty nitwit. Trump is a game changer. He does things differently. The whole western world is changing. The culture wars have turned, finally, in favour of the right. Some of it will be ugly and weird and sad, some of it will be brilliant and wonderful and long overdue.

    Rejoice.

    If the right wing view of the culture wars is that it means the president-elect of the US gets to humiliate the government and the head of state of a close ally then I am not sure that the right will be in the ascendant for as long as you think.
    As far as I can see 'winning the culture wars' seems to be about little more than having free rein to go around insulting and showing a general lack of respect to whichever individuals, groupings or nations are not deemed to be true believing imbibers of the kool aid. None of the headbangers have as yet provided an alternative answer that can't be boiled down thus.

  • Options
    rcs1000 said:

    http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2016/11/21/kobachs-extreme-vetting-proposal-is-revealed-in-photos-with-trump/?mod=e2tw

    can't they afford briefcases or something? or ...perhaps they did it on purpose?

    I'm pretty sure this was deliberate.
    That much is fairly obvious. So team trump wants it out there, or kobachs, or both? and why does the WSJ report it as if they can't see it for what it is?
  • Options
    MonksfieldMonksfield Posts: 2,237
    PlatoSaid said:

    For anyone who missed this

    "Hah-Hah-Hah!
    The New York Post reported:

    Donald Trump scolded media big shots during an off-the-record Trump Tower sitdown on Monday, sources told The Post.

    “It was like a f–ing firing squad,” one source said of the encounter.

    “Trump started with [CNN chief] Jeff Zucker and said ‘I hate your network, everyone at CNN is a liar and you should be ashamed,’ ” the source said.

    “The meeting was a total disaster. The TV execs and anchors went in there thinking they would be discussing the access they would get to the Trump administration, but instead they got a Trump-style dressing down,” the source added...

    http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/11/trumps-media-meeting-set-brought-one-room-blasted-away/

    More here

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-21/these-mainstream-media-anchors-just-went-record-meeting-trump

    You'd have applauded even more if he'd had them taken out and shot wouldn't you?
  • Options
    timmotimmo Posts: 1,469
    As an alternative candidate for UK Ambassadour to the US how about Jacob Rees Mogg or further down the food chain Peter Bone.
  • Options
    JonathanJonathan Posts: 20,913
    Farages ego is beginning to exert a measurable gravitational effect. He's working against the national interest by undermining HMG. Maybe HM needs to have a quiet word.
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,152
    PlatoSaid said:

    Isabel Oakeshott
    One thing is clear: team Trump wants to see the back of Kim Darroch.

    He was Blair's man in Europe:

    https://www.gov.uk/government/people/kim-darroch

    I imagine Putin wouldn't be sorry to see him go either.
  • Options
    JonathanJonathan Posts: 20,913
    Are Peter Tactchell, George Galloway and Dianne Abbot in the running for ambassador?
  • Options

    PlatoSaid said:

    For anyone who missed this

    "Hah-Hah-Hah!
    The New York Post reported:

    Donald Trump scolded media big shots during an off-the-record Trump Tower sitdown on Monday, sources told The Post.

    “It was like a f–ing firing squad,” one source said of the encounter.

    “Trump started with [CNN chief] Jeff Zucker and said ‘I hate your network, everyone at CNN is a liar and you should be ashamed,’ ” the source said.

    “The meeting was a total disaster. The TV execs and anchors went in there thinking they would be discussing the access they would get to the Trump administration, but instead they got a Trump-style dressing down,” the source added...

    http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/11/trumps-media-meeting-set-brought-one-room-blasted-away/

    More here

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-21/these-mainstream-media-anchors-just-went-record-meeting-trump

    You'd have applauded even more if he'd had them taken out and shot wouldn't you?

    The white supremacists are in charge now. Get over it.

  • Options
    MonksfieldMonksfield Posts: 2,237

    Cyclefree said:

    Incidentally I share SO's concerns about Trump's advisors and the views some of them have - on white supremacy, anti-semitism, racism etc. The fact that groups like the KKK are celebrating is not good news and Britain should, for its own self-respect, be careful not to be seen as sharing or endorsing such views. It is no use criticising Corbyn for his repellent views and associations and giving a free pass to Trump.

    Realpolitik is fine. We will need to build as good a relationship as we can with the US but we need to be clear - and in public if need be - that we have certain values and that white supremacy, anti-semitism etc are not part of them.

    Hear, hear.

    The silence of so many right wingers on here and elsewhere about Trump's embrace of white supremacists, when they rightly attacked Corbyn for his tolerance and even embrace of anti-Semitism, is deafening. Turns out those attacks on Corbyn were all about partisanship, not principle.

    It was largely manufactured misrepresentation anyway Southam. It was always about partisanship.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 92,058

    SeanT said:

    SeanT said:

    The idea that Trump will be a great friend to the UK is killed with this Tweet. No friend would have sent it. If Farage were any kind of patriot he would immediately disown it.

    The only good news from all of this is that Farage's cuddle-up-close to the Donald totally and utterly discredits him as a serious political figure. Not that he was widely seen that way before, of course.

    Bedwetting lefty nonsense. Lol.

    Nope - fact. If Trump had any regard for this country or its head of state that Tweet would not have been posted. You know it, but you have no problem with it because you are a highly partisan right-winger.

    No, I'm just not an effeminate lefty nitwit. Trump is a game changer. He does things differently. The whole western world is changing. The culture wars have turned, finally, in favour of the right. Some of it will be ugly and weird and sad, some of it will be brilliant and wonderful and long overdue.

    Rejoice.

    If the right wing view of the culture wars is that it means the president-elect of the US gets to humiliate the government and the head of state of a close ally then I am not sure that the right will be in the ascendant for as long as you think.
    Agreed. I am baffled at the idea annoying lefties is worth our own brazen dancing to Trump's tune. We need to butter him up that's In our interests now, but just because he will do some things that may be good - everyone does - doesn't mean we need to line up for a bootlicking. We need to retain some dignity, remember the worry about not being Trump's first phone call, we're pathetic sometimes.
  • Options
    Good morning, everyone.

    F1: Malaysia's next race will be their last.
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/38061412

    A reasonable circuit, especially for a recent addition. Far rather lose Azerbaijan, though. Or Monaco.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 92,058
    edited November 2016
    Do we really want to start appointing career politicians as ambassadors anyway? Why not go the USA route and sell the posts to campaign contributors, that'd raise some money too. I'd rather have farage in the Lords, frankly, but he really seems like he wants to move to the USA.
  • Options
    timmotimmo Posts: 1,469
    kle4 said:

    Do we really want to start appointing career politicians as ambassadors anyway? Why not go the USA route and sell the posts to campaign contributors, that'd raise some money too.

    What about Paul Boateng.. Happened with him.
  • Options

    Cyclefree said:

    Incidentally I share SO's concerns about Trump's advisors and the views some of them have - on white supremacy, anti-semitism, racism etc. The fact that groups like the KKK are celebrating is not good news and Britain should, for its own self-respect, be careful not to be seen as sharing or endorsing such views. It is no use criticising Corbyn for his repellent views and associations and giving a free pass to Trump.

    Realpolitik is fine. We will need to build as good a relationship as we can with the US but we need to be clear - and in public if need be - that we have certain values and that white supremacy, anti-semitism etc are not part of them.

    Hear, hear.

    The silence of so many right wingers on here and elsewhere about Trump's embrace of white supremacists, when they rightly attacked Corbyn for his tolerance and even embrace of anti-Semitism, is deafening. Turns out those attacks on Corbyn were all about partisanship, not principle.

    It was largely manufactured misrepresentation anyway Southam. It was always about partisanship.
    I'm sure the Jewish Labour MP Ruth Smeeth would agree...
  • Options
    DavidLDavidL Posts: 51,404
    kle4 said:

    SeanT said:

    SeanT said:

    The idea that Trump will be a great friend to the UK is killed with this Tweet. No friend would have sent it. If Farage were any kind of patriot he would immediately disown it.

    The only good news from all of this is that Farage's cuddle-up-close to the Donald totally and utterly discredits him as a serious political figure. Not that he was widely seen that way before, of course.

    Bedwetting lefty nonsense. Lol.

    Nope - fact. If Trump had any regard for this country or its head of state that Tweet would not have been posted. You know it, but you have no problem with it because you are a highly partisan right-winger.

    No, I'm just not an effeminate lefty nitwit. Trump is a game changer. He does things differently. The whole western world is changing. The culture wars have turned, finally, in favour of the right. Some of it will be ugly and weird and sad, some of it will be brilliant and wonderful and long overdue.

    Rejoice.

    If the right wing view of the culture wars is that it means the president-elect of the US gets to humiliate the government and the head of state of a close ally then I am not sure that the right will be in the ascendant for as long as you think.
    Agreed. I am baffled at the idea annoying lefties is worth our own brazen dancing to Trump's tune. We need to butter him up that's In our interests now, but just because he will do some things that may be good - everyone does - doesn't mean we need to line up for a bootlicking. We need to retain some dignity, remember the worry about not being Trump's first phone call, we're pathetic sometimes.
    It would be a good thing for this country if all that special relationship crap went into the bin and never came out. We do have a very close working relationship with the US on security matters and have invested heavily in GCHQ etc to keep that relationship. That is in our national interest and gives us a layer of protection that we otherwise would not have. We will have a common approach to many world issues and may improve our chances of getting our way by working with the US much of the time. But the rest is cringeworthy and frankly beneath us. It is long past time it stopped.
  • Options
    DecrepitJohnLDecrepitJohnL Posts: 13,300
    edited November 2016
    SeanT said:

    SeanT said:

    The idea that Trump will be a great friend to the UK is killed with this Tweet. No friend would have sent it. If Farage were any kind of patriot he would immediately disown it.

    The only good news from all of this is that Farage's cuddle-up-close to the Donald totally and utterly discredits him as a serious political figure. Not that he was widely seen that way before, of course.

    Bedwetting lefty nonsense. Lol.

    Nope - fact. If Trump had any regard for this country or its head of state that Tweet would not have been posted. You know it, but you have no problem with it because you are a highly partisan right-winger.

    No, I'm just not an effeminate lefty nitwit. Trump is a game changer. He does things differently. The whole western world is changing. The culture wars have turned, finally, in favour of the right. Some of it will be ugly and weird and sad, some of it will be brilliant and wonderful and long overdue.

    Rejoice.
    Where the authoritarian right -- as opposed to the libertarian right -- is winning is here in good old Blighty. Porn sites are to be blocked -- and perhaps pb too since the betting angle has it classified as an adult site in my ISP's voluntary filter; ISPs are now required to store (and reveal) where you've been; and this morning it is floated that the NHS should demand proof of identity -- which looks like flying a kite for ID cards.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 92,058
    timmo said:

    kle4 said:

    Do we really want to start appointing career politicians as ambassadors anyway? Why not go the USA route and sell the posts to campaign contributors, that'd raise some money too.

    What about Paul Boateng.. Happened with him.
    I didn't know that. I hope he had some relevant background or I am equally annoyed.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 92,058
    CD13 said:

    We're all acting very British here, and Trump's acting all American. It may go down well in the USA. They still expect us to be stiff and follow form. They pride themselves on not doing that.

    "That Farage guy gets things done," may well be Trump's meaning. "That's why we get on."

    Don't mistake everything Trump does as the act of a buffoon.

    We aren't. We just don't like the idea from our perspective, and us being British about it is the point.
  • Options
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    Trump appears to have managed to piss off a bunch of the Brexiteers with this.

    Which is nice...
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 92,058

    Cyclefree said:

    Incidentally I share SO's concerns about Trump's advisors and the views some of them have - on white supremacy, anti-semitism, racism etc. The fact that groups like the KKK are celebrating is not good news and Britain should, for its own self-respect, be careful not to be seen as sharing or endorsing such views. It is no use criticising Corbyn for his repellent views and associations and giving a free pass to Trump.

    Realpolitik is fine. We will need to build as good a relationship as we can with the US but we need to be clear - and in public if need be - that we have certain values and that white supremacy, anti-semitism etc are not part of them.

    Hear, hear.

    The silence of so many right wingers on here and elsewhere about Trump's embrace of white supremacists, when they rightly attacked Corbyn for his tolerance and even embrace of anti-Semitism, is deafening. Turns out those attacks on Corbyn were all about partisanship, not principle.

    It was largely manufactured misrepresentation anyway Southam. It was always about partisanship.
    Not for all of us it wasnt. Too many reports of the problem for it to be nothing in both instances.
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,501
    At least it suggests that NF is not wholly committed to becoming Banks's pet Grillo.
  • Options
    CD13 said:

    We're all acting very British here, and Trump's acting all American. It may go down well in the USA. They still expect us to be stiff and follow form. They pride themselves on not doing that.

    "That Farage guy gets things done," may well be Trump's meaning. "That's why we get on."

    Don't mistake everything Trump does as the act of a buffoon.

    Trump says extreme things, not expecting them to happen but to get the subject on the table. He wants us to sack our current ambassador and replace him with someone more to his liking. He'll get his way too, I reckon.
    Farage was just a gambling chip for Trump.
  • Options
    Mr. JohnL, I'm concerned about how they're going to police such 'adult' sites. If it's rigorous, it means creating a database that would be a hacker's wet dream for the blackmail potential (ok, using PB isn't horrendous but most of the people on the Totally Secure Register would be checking frisky material). If it's not, then it won't work.

    Hadn't considered the ID card angle for hospitals. That would be alarming.
  • Options
    JonathanJonathan Posts: 20,913

    CD13 said:

    We're all acting very British here, and Trump's acting all American. It may go down well in the USA. They still expect us to be stiff and follow form. They pride themselves on not doing that.

    "That Farage guy gets things done," may well be Trump's meaning. "That's why we get on."

    Don't mistake everything Trump does as the act of a buffoon.

    Trump says extreme things, not expecting them to happen but to get the subject on the table. He wants us to sack our current ambassador and replace him with someone more to his liking. He'll get his way too, I reckon.
    Farage was just a gambling chip for Trump.
    Paints Britain in a very weak light.
  • Options
    FF43FF43 Posts: 15,803
    edited November 2016
    rcs1000 said:

    http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2016/11/21/kobachs-extreme-vetting-proposal-is-revealed-in-photos-with-trump/?mod=e2tw

    @deugarbandier: can't they afford briefcases or something? or ...perhaps they did it on purpose?

    I'm pretty sure this was deliberate.

    And as it's a dog whistle, perhaps that's not going to happen. Otherwise they wouldn't need the subterfuge.

  • Options
    SquareRootSquareRoot Posts: 7,095
    Dave was right.. too many tweets make a twat.
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 76,002
    Does anyone know who the current US ambassador is ?

    I certainly don't.

    We should not rule it out at this stage. It is both an opportunity and a threat.
  • Options
    GeoffMGeoffM Posts: 6,071

    PlatoSaid said:

    For anyone who missed this

    "Hah-Hah-Hah!
    The New York Post reported:

    Donald Trump scolded media big shots during an off-the-record Trump Tower sitdown on Monday, sources told The Post.

    “It was like a f–ing firing squad,” one source said of the encounter.

    “Trump started with [CNN chief] Jeff Zucker and said ‘I hate your network, everyone at CNN is a liar and you should be ashamed,’ ” the source said.

    “The meeting was a total disaster. The TV execs and anchors went in there thinking they would be discussing the access they would get to the Trump administration, but instead they got a Trump-style dressing down,” the source added...

    http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/11/trumps-media-meeting-set-brought-one-room-blasted-away/

    More here

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-21/these-mainstream-media-anchors-just-went-record-meeting-trump

    You'd have applauded even more if he'd had them taken out and shot wouldn't you?

    The white supremacists are in charge now. Get over it.

    Are you working on the theory that if you say this often enough people might think it's true?
  • Options
    MonksfieldMonksfield Posts: 2,237
    kle4 said:

    Cyclefree said:

    Incidentally I share SO's concerns about Trump's advisors and the views some of them have - on white supremacy, anti-semitism, racism etc. The fact that groups like the KKK are celebrating is not good news and Britain should, for its own self-respect, be careful not to be seen as sharing or endorsing such views. It is no use criticising Corbyn for his repellent views and associations and giving a free pass to Trump.

    Realpolitik is fine. We will need to build as good a relationship as we can with the US but we need to be clear - and in public if need be - that we have certain values and that white supremacy, anti-semitism etc are not part of them.

    Hear, hear.

    The silence of so many right wingers on here and elsewhere about Trump's embrace of white supremacists, when they rightly attacked Corbyn for his tolerance and even embrace of anti-Semitism, is deafening. Turns out those attacks on Corbyn were all about partisanship, not principle.

    It was largely manufactured misrepresentation anyway Southam. It was always about partisanship.
    Not for all of us it wasnt. Too many reports of the problem for it to be nothing in both instances.
    In that case let's all look forward to everybody who joined the indignation train when Corbyn was at its buffers being as vocal and condemnatory about all forms of hate and discrimination.
  • Options
    MP_SEMP_SE Posts: 3,642
    edited November 2016
    PlatoSaid said:

    Isabel Oakeshott
    One thing is clear: team Trump wants to see the back of Kim Darroch.

    This whole mess was entirely preventable and has only occurred due to the stupidity and arrogance of UK politicians and diplomats (virtue signalling in parliament and cosying up to Clinton and ignoring Trump). Still doesn't mean Farage should be given a role.
  • Options

    Dave was right.. too many tweets make a twat.

    On this occasion, a twat makes too many tweets.
  • Options
    MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 37,631
    Pulpstar said:

    Does anyone know who the current US ambassador is ?

    I certainly don't.

    We should not rule it out at this stage. It is both an opportunity and a threat.

    I don't see the issue with sacking Darroch. From my limited experience and from talking to others the man is a fool. Wouldn't replace him with Nigel though, I'd send in someone like Soames.
  • Options
    JonathanJonathan Posts: 20,913

    Dave was right.. too many tweets make a twat.

    On this occasion, a twat makes too many tweets.
    Perfect
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 76,002

    Dave was right.. too many tweets make a twat.

    On this occasion, a twat makes too many tweets.
    He's going to be the president, most likely for the next 8 years by my reckoning. We need to deal with the world as it is !
  • Options
    rcs1000 said:

    Didn't Saudi Arabia attempt to tell us who we should send as ambassador a few years ago? And didn't we, quite rightly, tell them diplomatically to F off?

    No, not exactly.

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/british-ambassador-simon-collis-to-saudi-arabia-completes-hajj-pilgrimmage-after-converting-to-islam-a7309491.html

    This was dutifully fawned over by Islamist journalists paid for using our taxes:

    https://translate.google.co.uk/translate?hl=en&sl=id&u=http://www.bbc.com/indonesia/majalah/2016/09/160915_majalah_inggris_naikhaji&prev=search

    We really told those interfering Saudis, eh?
  • Options
    GeoffMGeoffM Posts: 6,071
    Pulpstar said:

    Does anyone know who the current US ambassador is ?

    I certainly don't.

    We should not rule it out at this stage. It is both an opportunity and a threat.

    The US ambassador to the UK?
    That's a Democrat fundraiser and activist called Barzun who bought his way into the job.
    wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_Barzun

    Our ambassador to them is a Blairite career EUphilic diplomat with a background in zoology.

    This is a great chance to get shot of both of them.
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    Meanwhile...

    @bbclaurak: Govt sources say May's 'cliff edge' comment was not an intentional hint at a transitional Brexit deal

    @cpmcgonagle: "The Prime Minister was offering a personal opinion and was not speaking on behalf of the Prime Minister..." twitter.com/bbclaurak/stat…

    Cluster...
  • Options
    FF43FF43 Posts: 15,803
    edited November 2016
    Major case of less majesty stupid autocorrect: lese majeste from Donald Trump. Not that he cares about any of that stuff, of course.

    As to whether Donald Trump is a friend of the UK. Donald Trump is a friend of Donald Trump. And that's it. Just ask the many people who thought Trump was their friend. Alex Salmond for example. Anyone who who celebrates Trump as the apotheosis of the right had better get another apotheosis or they will be very disappointed.
  • Options
    GeoffMGeoffM Posts: 6,071
    Jonathan said:

    Dave was right.. too many tweets make a twat.

    On this occasion, a twat makes too many tweets.
    Perfect
    Infantile.
  • Options
    MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 37,631
    FF43 said:

    Major case of less majesty stupid autocorrect: lese majeste from Donald Trump. Not that he cares about any of that stuff, of course.

    As to whether Donald Trump is a friend of the UK. Donald Trump is a friend of Donald Trump. And that's it. Just ask the many people who thought Trump was their friend. Alex Salmond for example. Anyone who who celebrates Trump as the apotheosis of the right had better get another apotheosis or they will be very disappointed.

    Yes, that's pretty much it. Donald is only really interested in Donald. That's why his picks have been quite poor so far.
  • Options
    timmotimmo Posts: 1,469
    kle4 said:

    timmo said:

    kle4 said:

    Do we really want to start appointing career politicians as ambassadors anyway? Why not go the USA route and sell the posts to campaign contributors, that'd raise some money too.

    What about Paul Boateng.. Happened with him.
    I didn't know that. I hope he had some relevant background or I am equally annoyed.
    </blockquote
    He was appointed our British High Commissioner to South Africa in 2005 by Tony Blair.

  • Options
    JonathanDJonathanD Posts: 2,400
    MP_SE said:

    PlatoSaid said:

    Isabel Oakeshott
    One thing is clear: team Trump wants to see the back of Kim Darroch.

    This whole mess was entirely preventable and has only occurred due to the stupidity and arrogance of UK politicians and diplomats (virtue signalling in parliament and cosying up to Clinton and ignoring Trump). Still doesn't mean Farage should be given a role.
    Some of Trumps advisers, esp. Bannon, are very hostile towards the Tories and favourable to UKIP. They will be quite happy to destabilise the Tory leadership as much as possible as part of some global reallignment of the right towards Tea Partyism.

    I don't think this mess wasn't preventable, no matter how nice we were to Trump, since the divide is ideological.
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 54,074
    Alistair said:

    I hope no one had money on the North Carolina governorship contest. Looks like the lose is trying shenanigans to end run round the result, and the NC legislature is apparebtly considering a court packing bill to get round the election of a liberal justice their supreme court. Bonkers.

    I've just been reading about that; an absolutely astonishing story.
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    GeoffM said:

    Infantile.

    And thin-skinned, but he is going to be President.
  • Options
    Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 25,577
    edited November 2016
    rkrkrk said:

    If the Government hadn't dismissed out of hand the possibility of Farage having some form of go-between role, I doubt this would have happened. I agree that he is totally unsuited to being ambassador. But that doesn't mean his warm relations with Trump should he wasted.

    So it's the UK government's fault!?

    Nigel Farage is an opposition politician! Would David Cameron have appointed Ed Miliband as US ambassador?
    Unlikely, but if you read my post that wasn't my recommendation. Would he have appointed an opposition politician in an informal role if they had a special connection with the area? Absolutely, and he's done so before.
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 54,074
    timmo said:

    As an alternative candidate for UK Ambassadour to the US how about Jacob Rees Mogg or further down the food chain Peter Bone.

    JRM reminds me of Lord John Marbury.
  • Options
    JonathanJonathan Posts: 20,913
    JonathanD said:

    MP_SE said:

    PlatoSaid said:

    Isabel Oakeshott
    One thing is clear: team Trump wants to see the back of Kim Darroch.

    This whole mess was entirely preventable and has only occurred due to the stupidity and arrogance of UK politicians and diplomats (virtue signalling in parliament and cosying up to Clinton and ignoring Trump). Still doesn't mean Farage should be given a role.
    Some of Trumps advisers, esp. Bannon, are very hostile towards the Tories and favourable to UKIP. They will be quite happy to destabilise the Tory leadership as much as possible as part of some global reallignment of the right towards Tea Partyism.

    I don't think this mess wasn't preventable, no matter how nice we were to Trump, since the divide is ideological.
    Yup. They love the Tories in the same way they love the GOP establishment. May needs to be robust. This insult should not be tolerated.
  • Options
    Scott_P said:

    Meanwhile...

    @bbclaurak: Govt sources say May's 'cliff edge' comment was not an intentional hint at a transitional Brexit deal

    @cpmcgonagle: "The Prime Minister was offering a personal opinion and was not speaking on behalf of the Prime Minister..." twitter.com/bbclaurak/stat…

    Cluster...

    One has great sympathy for Mrs May. It must be hard work trying to run HMG, whilst at the same time dealing with the pile of shite left by her incompetent predecessor and deal with Osborne's treacherous rearguard action from behind his own lines.
  • Options
    GeoffMGeoffM Posts: 6,071
    Scott_P said:

    GeoffM said:

    Infantile.

    And thin-skinned, but he is going to be President.
    Is he?
  • Options
    tlg86tlg86 Posts: 25,208
    GeoffM said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Does anyone know who the current US ambassador is ?

    I certainly don't.

    We should not rule it out at this stage. It is both an opportunity and a threat.

    The US ambassador to the UK?
    That's a Democrat fundraiser and activist called Barzun who bought his way into the job.
    wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_Barzun

    Our ambassador to them is a Blairite career EUphilic diplomat with a background in zoology.

    This is a great chance to get shot of both of them.
    I see Darroch has his CMG and KCMG. Perhaps he could be bought off by giving him his GCMG?
  • Options
    Jonathan said:

    CD13 said:

    We're all acting very British here, and Trump's acting all American. It may go down well in the USA. They still expect us to be stiff and follow form. They pride themselves on not doing that.

    "That Farage guy gets things done," may well be Trump's meaning. "That's why we get on."

    Don't mistake everything Trump does as the act of a buffoon.

    Trump says extreme things, not expecting them to happen but to get the subject on the table. He wants us to sack our current ambassador and replace him with someone more to his liking. He'll get his way too, I reckon.
    Farage was just a gambling chip for Trump.
    Paints Britain in a very weak light.
    The British establishment is in a weak light.

    They went all-in on a Clinton win and lost.

    Its hardly surprising Trump wants a less hostile British ambassador.
  • Options
    PlatoSaidPlatoSaid Posts: 10,383

    Has Plato linked to this yet?
    ttps://twitter.com/samkalidi/status/800844608053735425

    Being passive aggressive before 9am is so unattractive :wink:
  • Options
    GeoffM said:

    Scott_P said:

    GeoffM said:

    Infantile.

    And thin-skinned, but he is going to be President.
    Is he?
    He doesn't really need to be since his supporters are so thin skinned on his behalf.
  • Options
    GeoffM said:

    Scott_P said:

    GeoffM said:

    Infantile.

    And thin-skinned, but he is going to be President.
    Is he?
    Do you know something we don't ;-)
  • Options
    SimonStClareSimonStClare Posts: 7,976
    edited November 2016

    Jonathan said:

    CD13 said:

    We're all acting very British here, and Trump's acting all American. It may go down well in the USA. They still expect us to be stiff and follow form. They pride themselves on not doing that.

    "That Farage guy gets things done," may well be Trump's meaning. "That's why we get on."

    Don't mistake everything Trump does as the act of a buffoon.

    Trump says extreme things, not expecting them to happen but to get the subject on the table. He wants us to sack our current ambassador and replace him with someone more to his liking. He'll get his way too, I reckon.
    Farage was just a gambling chip for Trump.
    Paints Britain in a very weak light.
    The British establishment is in a weak light.

    They went all-in on a Clinton win and lost.

    Its hardly surprising Trump wants a less hostile British ambassador.
    What exactly has the British Ambassador done that could be considered as hostile? – Sir Kim Darroch was appointed as ambassador to the US on 20 Aug 2015, long before either Trump or Clinton were selected as party nominees and appears to have said very little about either. - Genuine question btw.
  • Options
    Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 25,577
    I do love the idea of us 'not kowtowing' to the US. Has everyone been in a coma for the last 70 odd years of British foreign policy?
  • Options
    timmotimmo Posts: 1,469
    MaxPB said:

    FF43 said:

    Major case of less majesty stupid autocorrect: lese majeste from Donald Trump. Not that he cares about any of that stuff, of course.

    As to whether Donald Trump is a friend of the UK. Donald Trump is a friend of Donald Trump. And that's it. Just ask the many people who thought Trump was their friend. Alex Salmond for example. Anyone who who celebrates Trump as the apotheosis of the right had better get another apotheosis or they will be very disappointed.

    Yes, that's pretty much it. Donald is only really interested in Donald. That's why his picks have been quite poor so far.
    Hang on .. Salmond decided to fall out with Trump not the other way around. It was a falling out of convenience because he was getting so
    Much bad publicity.
  • Options
    GeoffMGeoffM Posts: 6,071

    GeoffM said:

    Scott_P said:

    GeoffM said:

    Infantile.

    And thin-skinned, but he is going to be President.
    Is he?
    Do you know something we don't ;-)
    I know that it's unlikely Meeks will be POTUS without a recount in California.
  • Options

    Dave was right.. too many tweets make a twat.

    On this occasion, a twat makes too many tweets.
    Lol!
  • Options
    JonathanJonathan Posts: 20,913

    I do love the idea of us 'not kowtowing' to the US. Has everyone been in a coma for the last 70 odd years of British foreign policy?

    Sure, but the US rarely sees the need to humiliate us.
  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,148
    The 'many people are saying' device is what Trump uses when he wants to provoke while not personally associating himself with the contents, like with birtherism or Ted Cruz's father.
  • Options
    GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 20,920
    LOL! He'll be demanding we make Nige UK Prime Minister (from the Lords) next! :smiley:
  • Options
    JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 39,090

    Jonathan said:

    CD13 said:

    We're all acting very British here, and Trump's acting all American. It may go down well in the USA. They still expect us to be stiff and follow form. They pride themselves on not doing that.

    "That Farage guy gets things done," may well be Trump's meaning. "That's why we get on."

    Don't mistake everything Trump does as the act of a buffoon.

    Trump says extreme things, not expecting them to happen but to get the subject on the table. He wants us to sack our current ambassador and replace him with someone more to his liking. He'll get his way too, I reckon.
    Farage was just a gambling chip for Trump.
    Paints Britain in a very weak light.
    The British establishment is in a weak light.

    They went all-in on a Clinton win and lost.

    (Snip)
    Evidence, please.
  • Options

    Meanwhile, here's Charles Grant's take on how the EU is shaping up to deal with Brexit:

    https://twitter.com/patrickwintour/status/800968433710075904

    It doesn't make for comfortable reading.

    Charles Grant is about as neutral as Michael Heseltine, and his agenda is to stop and reverse Brexit.

    I'm sure the EU would have been happy to tell him just quite how awful they're going to have to be, and for him to write it.
  • Options
    Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 25,577
    Jonathan said:

    I do love the idea of us 'not kowtowing' to the US. Has everyone been in a coma for the last 70 odd years of British foreign policy?

    Sure, but the US rarely sees the need to humiliate us.
    Call me zany but I prefer this to being asked to drop bombs on people.
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,844
    SeanT said:

    I'm starting to wonder if Trump is a kind of mischievous genius.

    No, he's just a big kid that no one ever said no to.

    Unfortunately also POTUS.
  • Options
    rkrkrkrkrkrk Posts: 7,921

    rkrkrk said:

    If the Government hadn't dismissed out of hand the possibility of Farage having some form of go-between role, I doubt this would have happened. I agree that he is totally unsuited to being ambassador. But that doesn't mean his warm relations with Trump should he wasted.

    So it's the UK government's fault!?

    Nigel Farage is an opposition politician! Would David Cameron have appointed Ed Miliband as US ambassador?
    Unlikely, but if you read my post that wasn't my recommendation. Would he have appointed an opposition politician in an informal role if they had a special connection with the area? Absolutely, and he's done so before.
    Well I don't know what kind of informal role you have in mind but I think it's probabaly unprecedented to appoint the leader of an opposition party to basically anything like this.
  • Options
    JonathanJonathan Posts: 20,913

    Jonathan said:

    I do love the idea of us 'not kowtowing' to the US. Has everyone been in a coma for the last 70 odd years of British foreign policy?

    Sure, but the US rarely sees the need to humiliate us.
    Call me zany but I prefer this to being asked to drop bombs on people.
    You're zany.
  • Options

    Jonathan said:

    CD13 said:

    We're all acting very British here, and Trump's acting all American. It may go down well in the USA. They still expect us to be stiff and follow form. They pride themselves on not doing that.

    "That Farage guy gets things done," may well be Trump's meaning. "That's why we get on."

    Don't mistake everything Trump does as the act of a buffoon.

    Trump says extreme things, not expecting them to happen but to get the subject on the table. He wants us to sack our current ambassador and replace him with someone more to his liking. He'll get his way too, I reckon.
    Farage was just a gambling chip for Trump.
    Paints Britain in a very weak light.
    The British establishment is in a weak light.

    They went all-in on a Clinton win and lost.

    (Snip)
    Evidence, please.
    Do you really think that the British establishment wanted Trump to win ?
  • Options
    tlg86tlg86 Posts: 25,208
    Nigelb said:

    SeanT said:

    I'm starting to wonder if Trump is a kind of mischievous genius.

    No, he's just a big kid that no one ever said no to.

    Unfortunately also POTUS.
    I'd suggest that that was part of the problem with David Cameron. No one ever said not to him. Until 23 June 2016.
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,844
    tlg86 said:

    Nigelb said:

    SeanT said:

    I'm starting to wonder if Trump is a kind of mischievous genius.

    No, he's just a big kid that no one ever said no to.

    Unfortunately also POTUS.
    I'd suggest that that was part of the problem with David Cameron. No one ever said not to him. Until 23 June 2016.
    And look how that turned out.
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    When Brexiteers fall out...

    @montie: Lovin' the Ukippers who welcome Trump's Tweet; I'm sure they'd react the same if Juncker had proposed Clegg be UK Ambassador to Brussels
  • Options
    JonathanJonathan Posts: 20,913
    Scott_P said:

    When Brexiteers fall out...

    @montie: Lovin' the Ukippers who welcome Trump's Tweet; I'm sure they'd react the same if Juncker had proposed Clegg be UK Ambassador to Brussels

    You are a genius, that's the answer. May should appoint Clegg to Washington.
  • Options
    JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 39,090

    Jonathan said:

    CD13 said:

    We're all acting very British here, and Trump's acting all American. It may go down well in the USA. They still expect us to be stiff and follow form. They pride themselves on not doing that.

    "That Farage guy gets things done," may well be Trump's meaning. "That's why we get on."

    Don't mistake everything Trump does as the act of a buffoon.

    Trump says extreme things, not expecting them to happen but to get the subject on the table. He wants us to sack our current ambassador and replace him with someone more to his liking. He'll get his way too, I reckon.
    Farage was just a gambling chip for Trump.
    Paints Britain in a very weak light.
    The British establishment is in a weak light.

    They went all-in on a Clinton win and lost.

    (Snip)
    Evidence, please.
    Do you really think that the British establishment wanted Trump to win ?
    Possibly not. But that's a very different thing to what you said above.

    So I guess the answer is no: you don't have any evidence.
  • Options
    PlatoSaidPlatoSaid Posts: 10,383
    Simon Richards
    Another US tech giant has announced a major UK expansion https://t.co/AbBe8aoOPx via @CityAM
  • Options
    tlg86 said:

    Nigelb said:

    SeanT said:

    I'm starting to wonder if Trump is a kind of mischievous genius.

    No, he's just a big kid that no one ever said no to.

    Unfortunately also POTUS.
    I'd suggest that that was part of the problem with David Cameron. No one ever said not to him. Until 23 June 2016.
    And then we discovered that he was possibly the worst Tory PM since Anthony Eden, even surpassing Heath in the incompetence stakes.
  • Options
    ParistondaParistonda Posts: 1,819
    GeoffM said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Does anyone know who the current US ambassador is ?

    I certainly don't.

    We should not rule it out at this stage. It is both an opportunity and a threat.

    The US ambassador to the UK?
    That's a Democrat fundraiser and activist called Barzun who bought his way into the job.
    wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_Barzun

    Our ambassador to them is a Blairite career EUphilic diplomat with a background in zoology.

    This is a great chance to get shot of both of them.
    Do we now need Trump's permission to get rid of our own ambassadors? Nothing stopping us getting rid of the current ambassador if we want to.

    If Theresa May really wants to tell Trump to do one, she should sack the current ambassador and replace him with anyone but Farage
  • Options
    JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 39,090
    It's interesting to see the intersection of people who screamed 'sovereignty!' during the referendum and those who applaud Trump's comments.

    You can also add in another set: the people who criticised the judges over A50.

    It's sovereignty, but not as we know it ...
  • Options
    GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 20,920
    If we want to do the deal with the US after Brexit I think we're going to have to accept Farage is "the man" unfortunately.

    We put all our eggs in the Clinton basket... And lost! Time to suck it up.
  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,148
    GIN1138 said:

    If we want to do the deal with the US after Brexit I think we're going to have to accept Farage is "the man" unfortunately.

    Perhaps Trump has just killed Brexit, for that very reason.
  • Options
    GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 20,920

    GIN1138 said:

    If we want to do the deal with the US after Brexit I think we're going to have to accept Farage is "the man" unfortunately.

    Perhaps Trump has just killed Brexit, for that very reason.
    Doubt it. We voted to LEAVE in the referendum and leave we shall.
  • Options
    PlatoSaidPlatoSaid Posts: 10,383

    ttps://www.twitter.com/jimwaterson/status/800957950818816000

    It's catnip to them. They can't resist it.
  • Options
    philiphphiliph Posts: 4,704
    edited November 2016

    Meanwhile, here's Charles Grant's take on how the EU is shaping up to deal with Brexit:

    https://twitter.com/patrickwintour/status/800968433710075904
    Patrick Wintour

    @patrickwintour

    http://www.cer.org.uk/insights/brussels-prepares-hard-brexit
    7:45 AM - 22 Nov 2016

    It doesn't make for comfortable reading.

    The real question is would the EU delivering an enforced hard Brexit bring in the law of unintended consequences? Could a hard Brexit in fact encourage others to leave rather than stop them?

    If it is a soft Brexit, others may look, shrug and say not worth the effort and pain to be in a place that is EU lite.

    If it is a hard Brexit then any other leavers will find a willing party with the 5th largest economy in the world on the doorstep willing to make a quick trade deal. Other members may look and say, UK is there, they will be a friend, they have survived OK, so there is no fear in leaving.

    Unintended consequences are often obvious if you look for them. I could see circumstances where an enforced hard Brexit would be fulfilling the criteria and thus result in speeding up the loss of other members from the EU.
This discussion has been closed.