Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » “It’s the switcher’s wot won it” – will that be the verdict

SystemSystem Posts: 12,265
edited August 2016 in General

imagepoliticalbetting.com » Blog Archive » “It’s the switcher’s wot won it” – will that be the verdict on Owen Smith’s victory?

I surprised a few friends in a previous posting when I declared I was a bit of a fan of Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell. I will surprise a few more when I say I am admirer of my former BBC boss John Birt. My enthusiasm stems in part from the fact that I was a Father of the Chapel for National Union of Journalists in Television News.

Read the full story here


«134

Comments

  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 29,261
    Not knowing the date the result was due to be announced I came on here and genuinely thought Owen Smith had won!

  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,654

    Not knowing the date the result was due to be announced I came on here and genuinely thought Owen Smith had won!

    Daily "Saving Labour" advert.
  • PlatoSaidPlatoSaid Posts: 10,383
    Ed West
    The 10 factors driving US polarisation. From Jonathan Haidt's speech https://t.co/u263U5BoUp https://t.co/f66eTotinM
  • edmundintokyoedmundintokyo Posts: 17,709
    I take it Don is aware of pb's QTWTAIN traditions?
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,654
    Owen Smith has been deeply unimpressive to my mind.
  • Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,822
    edited August 2016
    The most interesting bit of Don's article is this:

    I say I am admirer of my former BBC boss John Birt. My enthusiasm stems in part from the fact that I was a Father of the Chapel for National Union of Journalists in Television News. Under the Birt regime there were lots of extra journalist jobs and progressive policies on equality and diversity

    Well, quite. How else would you measure the quality of a BBC boss?
  • AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670
    I see Apple's completely legal and above board tax arrangements in Ireland where nothing of the sort.

    http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-16-2923_en.htm
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 39,334
    This strikes me as wishful thinking again, Don. The more Owen opens his mouth the more I find my Labour member friends dislike him. One has gone from actively supporting, to tolerating, to holding his nose and now decided to plump for Corbyn as the lesser of two idiots.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 62,075
    Good afternoon, everyone.

    This leadership election feels like it's been going on for far too long.
  • MP_SEMP_SE Posts: 3,642
    Is Don Brind working on the Owen Smith campaign?
  • david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,998
    "she has no doubt “that I am [i.e. she is] in for some abuse, it is unfortunately to be expected in this day and age"

    No, it's to be expected in that party. The Lib Dems and Tories seemed to manage to hold leadership contests without that sort of atmosphere.
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 29,261
    Pulpstar said:

    Not knowing the date the result was due to be announced I came on here and genuinely thought Owen Smith had won!

    Daily "Saving Labour" advert.
    Yes. I skim read. Rather tiresome. Somehow I seem to have little sympathy for 'twitter addict' Laura who would clearly love nothing better than to be angrily tweeted at by a 'baying mob' so she can get a few more followers.
  • MTimTMTimT Posts: 7,034
    Of course, the moment I post, a new thread.

    FPT @ John_M

    Hereabouts, we get a related issue. Townies buy up land and build their McMansions in the middle of nowhere, then demand that a shopping mall be built to service their needs. Locals ask WTF did you move here? We like the isolation and want to keep it that way.

    That said, I type this from a farm within the agricultural preserve that has Fios and up to 500Mbs/500Mbs should I be prepared to pay for it. ;)
  • oxfordsimonoxfordsimon Posts: 5,844
    MP_SE said:

    Is Don Brind working on the Owen Smith campaign?

    That is what was reported the other day.

    Such things should be made clear on all relevant threads IMHO
  • MTimT said:

    Of course, the moment I post, a new thread.

    FPT @ John_M

    Hereabouts, we get a related issue. Townies buy up land and build their McMansions in the middle of nowhere, then demand that a shopping mall be built to service their needs. Locals ask WTF did you move here? We like the isolation and want to keep it that way.

    That said, I type this from a farm within the agricultural preserve that has Fios and up to 500Mbs/500Mbs should I be prepared to pay for it. ;)

    500Mbs up....bloody hell that one big fat pipe.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,654
    MP_SE said:

    Is Don Brind working on the Owen Smith campaign?

    Yes.
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    Why should Labour have all the fun?

    @asabenn: Hearing Ukip's National Executive Committee has rejected @mickmcgough & @VAylingUKIP's bid to unresign after they quit in pro-Woolfe protest
  • mattmatt Posts: 3,789
    Does Mr Brind have an interest to declare?
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 62,075
    Mr. P, honestly.

    UKIP are at risk of utterly squandering a fantastic opportunity to hammer Labour in the north.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,387
    I am a Laura.

    Electing Jez last year has had, for me, the desired effect of reigniting a socialist zeal within the party. Now, with that established, it is time to move on to the next stage in the process - convincing the voters, not just the party membership. To do that, we need a new leader; not necessarily Owen - there is nothing so stop him resigning the day after he is elected, after all.
  • PlatoSaidPlatoSaid Posts: 10,383
    Yowser on academic purification

    Ed West
    The ratio is now 5:1, with figures of between 10 and 40 to 1 in the social sciences https://t.co/rNYZ7U37qC
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 82,554
    edited August 2016
    PlatoSaid said:

    Yowser on academic purification

    Ed West
    The ratio is now 5:1, with figures of between 10 and 40 to 1 in the social sciences https://t.co/rNYZ7U37qC

    Safe space required for right wingers in academia in US...
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 29,261

    I am a Laura.

    Electing Jez last year has had, for me, the desired effect of reigniting a socialist zeal within the party. Now, with that established, it is time to move on to the next stage in the process - convincing the voters, not just the party membership. To do that, we need a new leader; not necessarily Owen - there is nothing so stop him resigning the day after he is elected, after all.

    Why on earth would he do that?
  • SimonStClareSimonStClare Posts: 7,976
    matt said:

    Does Mr Brind have an interest to declare?

    Is it that transparent..! :lol:
  • oxfordsimonoxfordsimon Posts: 5,844

    I am a Laura.

    Electing Jez last year has had, for me, the desired effect of reigniting a socialist zeal within the party. Now, with that established, it is time to move on to the next stage in the process - convincing the voters, not just the party membership. To do that, we need a new leader; not necessarily Owen - there is nothing so stop him resigning the day after he is elected, after all.

    Labour does not stand a chance of winning from the Left. Smith is certainly not the answer.

    The focus should be on becoming electable - not trying to sell something for which the electorate has never voted.
  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    We've had two chuckle inducing threads today. Let's go for a triple whammy ....

    Next Thread : By Rod Crosby

    "Donald Trump - Black Votes Matter - He'll Win DC In A Landslide"
  • david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,998
    I don't doubt that there will be switchers. However:

    1. There needs to be an awful lot of them. Corbyn won nearly 60% of the vote in a four-way contest last year. Had it gone to 2PP, as they do in Australia, it would probably have been something like 65-35. All else being equal, Smith would need to win over one in four 2015 Corbyn votes.

    2. Not all else is equal. We know that today's Labour party is to the left of that which formed last year's electorate. We know that from the one poll that there has been and we can strongly suspect it from the natural flow that left-wing protest activists have been attracted and centrist ones have drifted off in non-renewals. Some may have rejoined in order to vote but the net effect will be to Corbyn's benefit.

    3. The electorate is hugely bigger than it was. It's hard to believe that these are all people who joined in order to stop Corbyn. Far more likely is that they're 38-degreers and the like who've joined to protect him. Certainly the Saving Labour site believes that it's signed up a lot. has it though? It seems counter-intuitive to me that people would join a party that they weren't previously a member of in order to save it.

    4. We have the CLP nominations. These are a very imperfect guide and are a representation of those who are motivated to turn out and discuss in meetings, not the membership / selectorate as a whole. All the same, Corbyn enjoyed a substantial majority of both CLPs and votes.

    Having said all that, much of the above argument is supposition and circumstantial. We have no first-grade hard facts. That which we do have is partial, old or unreliable. Perhaps most of the supporters who signed up did do so to stop Corbyn. Perhaps there has been a big swing. Perhaps these last few weeks have convinced tens of thousands of members that Owen Smith is the man to lead Labour to victory. Perhaps - but I think probably not.
  • MTimTMTimT Posts: 7,034
    PlatoSaid said:

    Yowser on academic purification

    Ed West
    The ratio is now 5:1, with figures of between 10 and 40 to 1 in the social sciences https://t.co/rNYZ7U37qC

    I was going to say that it is probably worse than that in the US, but then I see these are US figures.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,654
    JackW said:

    We've had two chuckle inducing threads today. Let's go for a triple whammy ....

    Next Thread : By Rod Crosby

    "Donald Trump - Black Votes Matter - He'll Win DC In A Landslide"

    "Band" on the run.
  • MTimTMTimT Posts: 7,034

    MTimT said:

    Of course, the moment I post, a new thread.

    FPT @ John_M

    Hereabouts, we get a related issue. Townies buy up land and build their McMansions in the middle of nowhere, then demand that a shopping mall be built to service their needs. Locals ask WTF did you move here? We like the isolation and want to keep it that way.

    That said, I type this from a farm within the agricultural preserve that has Fios and up to 500Mbs/500Mbs should I be prepared to pay for it. ;)

    500Mbs up....bloody hell that one big fat pipe.
    I'm on the 50/50 plan - don't see need for more than that for what I do.
  • John_MJohn_M Posts: 7,503
    edited August 2016
    MTimT said:

    Of course, the moment I post, a new thread.

    FPT @ John_M

    Hereabouts, we get a related issue. Townies buy up land and build their McMansions in the middle of nowhere, then demand that a shopping mall be built to service their needs. Locals ask WTF did you move here? We like the isolation and want to keep it that way.

    That said, I type this from a farm within the agricultural preserve that has Fios and up to 500Mbs/500Mbs should I be prepared to pay for it. ;)

    Well quite. Rural broadband is one of those subjects that sounds straightforward, until you try and make the investment case for it. BT has a de facto monopoly in projects like Superfast Cymru because every other provider has simply laughed politely and then disappeared in a cloud of dust. Not only must the initial infrastructure be installed, it must be sustained and updated.

    At the risk of sound like a pound-shop Alistair Meeks, if you've decide to immure yourself in the boonies, you cannot expect services to be on par with NW1.

    That said, the challenge of Internet access in remote places is being tackled by the private sector even if sometimes it's merely a bycatch. It really does not need state intervention.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,654
    MTimT said:

    MTimT said:

    Of course, the moment I post, a new thread.

    FPT @ John_M

    Hereabouts, we get a related issue. Townies buy up land and build their McMansions in the middle of nowhere, then demand that a shopping mall be built to service their needs. Locals ask WTF did you move here? We like the isolation and want to keep it that way.

    That said, I type this from a farm within the agricultural preserve that has Fios and up to 500Mbs/500Mbs should I be prepared to pay for it. ;)

    500Mbs up....bloody hell that one big fat pipe.
    I'm on the 50/50 plan - don't see need for more than that for what I do.
    Who needs a shopping mall with Amazon anyway :) ?
  • Jeremy Corbyn will comfortably be re-elected. The membership has undergone it's biggest change in the last 12 months and is even more pro-Corbyn than before. Many mainstream members who voted for Corbyn think it's too soon to ditch him. Others feel this is their last chance to have 'true socialism' and they're not going to let that slip away. Then another group recognises he hasn't been good enough but are more annoyed a the MPs who they think have never given him a fair chance and/or hold ordinary members in contempt.

    Where I agree with Don is that those switching from Corbyn to Smith won't make a lot of noise because of fear of being abused on social media and also the natural human instinct of not wanting to admit you have made an error. But Corbyn's inbuilt lead is such that he near as damn it is unbeatable in the circumstances. Owen Smith will have done very well to reduce the Corbyn percentage from the 59.5% he received last time.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 82,554
    edited August 2016
    Re Internet. I believe we are really talking about a tiny percentage of people now who can't get any broadband.

    Actually a bigger issue is how slow BT / Virgin have been to roll out modern broadband bandwidth in areas that are well populated. The government targets talk about upto 10Mbs, which is aiming far too low, we really need ability for any location within a reasonable distance of a populated area should be able to get 100Mbs.

    We can't have the situation where as business located 2-3 miles from a town centre can't get 50-100Mbs+. That is a big limiting factor on where a modern business might locate.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,387

    I am a Laura.

    Electing Jez last year has had, for me, the desired effect of reigniting a socialist zeal within the party. Now, with that established, it is time to move on to the next stage in the process - convincing the voters, not just the party membership. To do that, we need a new leader; not necessarily Owen - there is nothing so stop him resigning the day after he is elected, after all.

    Why on earth would he do that?
    Stalking horse (of a kind). A chance to open the field up to a full range of candidates - except for the Jezzites.
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 39,334

    Jeremy Corbyn will comfortably be re-elected. The membership has undergone it's biggest change in the last 12 months and is even more pro-Corbyn than before. Many mainstream members who voted for Corbyn think it's too soon to ditch him. Others feel this is their last chance to have 'true socialism' and they're not going to let that slip away. Then another group recognises he hasn't been good enough but are more annoyed a the MPs who they think have never given him a fair chance and/or hold ordinary members in contempt.

    Where I agree with Don is that those switching from Corbyn to Smith won't make a lot of noise because of fear of being abused on social media and also the natural human instinct of not wanting to admit you have made an error. But Corbyn's inbuilt lead is such that he near as damn it is unbeatable in the circumstances. Owen Smith will have done very well to reduce the Corbyn percentage from the 59.5% he received last time.

    Not looking good for Smith.
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,296
    I see there is a Question Time debate a week on Thursday. That will definitely require popcorn!
  • oxfordsimonoxfordsimon Posts: 5,844
    edited August 2016
    One thing Don might like to correct is the bit about Emily Thornberry - she is no longer Shadow Defence.

    Since the never-ending reshuffle she now has two jobs - Shadow Foreign Secretary and Shadow Brexit Secretary.

    Details matter...(and I know it takes a lot of effort to keep up with the ever-changing Shadow team)
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 62,075
    Good to see you on, Mr. Manson :)
  • SimonStClareSimonStClare Posts: 7,976
    edited August 2016

    One thing Don might like to correct is the bit about Emily Thornberry - she is no longer Shadow Defence.

    Since the never-ending reshuffle she now has two jobs - Shadow Foreign Secretary and Shadow Brexit Secretary.

    Details matter...(and I know it takes a lot of effort to keep up with the ever-changing Shadow team)

    Any idea how many shadow front bench jobs remain unfilled, or split between MPs? - TIA.
  • Downing Street says tech giant 'welcome' to come to UK after EU orders Ireland to claw back £11bn

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2016/08/30/apple-ordered-to-pay-11bn-after-european-union-tax-investigation/
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,654

    Re Internet. I believe we are really talking about a tiny percentage of people now who can't get any broadband.

    Actually a bigger issue is how slow BT / Virgin have been to roll out modern broadband bandwidth in areas that are well populated. The government targets talk about upto 10Mbs, which is aiming far too low, we really need ability for any location within a reasonable distance of a populated area should be able to get 100Mbs.

    We can't have the situation where as business located 2-3 miles from a town centre can't get 50-100Mbs+. That is a big limiting factor on where a modern business might locate.

    Office internet 3/0.3; mobile internet 40/30 here.
  • oxfordsimonoxfordsimon Posts: 5,844

    I am a Laura.

    Electing Jez last year has had, for me, the desired effect of reigniting a socialist zeal within the party. Now, with that established, it is time to move on to the next stage in the process - convincing the voters, not just the party membership. To do that, we need a new leader; not necessarily Owen - there is nothing so stop him resigning the day after he is elected, after all.

    Why on earth would he do that?
    Stalking horse (of a kind). A chance to open the field up to a full range of candidates - except for the Jezzites.
    A third leadership campaign in 18 months would be the end of Labour. You cannot expect the electorate to take you seriously if you indulge in that sort of nonsense.

    Whoever wins on the 24th is there for the rest of this Parliament - anything else is unthinkable.
  • MTimTMTimT Posts: 7,034
    Pulpstar said:

    MTimT said:

    MTimT said:

    Of course, the moment I post, a new thread.

    FPT @ John_M

    Hereabouts, we get a related issue. Townies buy up land and build their McMansions in the middle of nowhere, then demand that a shopping mall be built to service their needs. Locals ask WTF did you move here? We like the isolation and want to keep it that way.

    That said, I type this from a farm within the agricultural preserve that has Fios and up to 500Mbs/500Mbs should I be prepared to pay for it. ;)

    500Mbs up....bloody hell that one big fat pipe.
    I'm on the 50/50 plan - don't see need for more than that for what I do.
    Who needs a shopping mall with Amazon anyway :) ?
    Particularly with free delivery with Prime. Cheaper and more convenient. That's how we buy pretty much all the bulk stuff now, although I feel a bit guilty about all the packaging. At least we recycle faithfully.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 52,920
    O/T @rcs1000's favourite French minister Emmanuel Macron is resigning.
  • oxfordsimonoxfordsimon Posts: 5,844

    One thing Don might like to correct is the bit about Emily Thornberry - she is no longer Shadow Defence.

    Since the never-ending reshuffle she now has two jobs - Shadow Foreign Secretary and Shadow Brexit Secretary.

    Details matter...(and I know it takes a lot of effort to keep up with the ever-changing Shadow team)

    Any idea how many shadow front bench jobs remain unfilled, or split between MPs? - TIA.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Official_Opposition_Shadow_Cabinet_(United_Kingdom)

    It is quite incredible how much turmoil there has been...
  • taffystaffys Posts: 9,753
    Does Apple play into the US election? I read the company is a big Hillary backer.
  • BudGBudG Posts: 711
    "These confident predictions are made despite the fact that we have yet to have a single poll conducted among the 640,000 plus members and supporters entitled to vote."

    There have been 2 or 3 polls of Labour Party members carried out in the past month by yougov. However, it would seem that those who commissioned these polls do not want to make the results public.

    One has to wonder why.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 52,920
    taffys said:

    Does Apple play into the US election? I read the company is a big Hillary backer.

    Trump has previously attacked them for offshoring and not helping the FBI.

    http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/19/politics/donald-trump-apple-boycott/
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,158
    Scott_P said:

    Why should Labour have all the fun?

    @asabenn: Hearing Ukip's National Executive Committee has rejected @mickmcgough & @VAylingUKIP's bid to unresign after they quit in pro-Woolfe protest

    Are they now going to un-unresign?
  • david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,998

    Jeremy Corbyn will comfortably be re-elected. The membership has undergone it's biggest change in the last 12 months and is even more pro-Corbyn than before. Many mainstream members who voted for Corbyn think it's too soon to ditch him. Others feel this is their last chance to have 'true socialism' and they're not going to let that slip away. Then another group recognises he hasn't been good enough but are more annoyed a the MPs who they think have never given him a fair chance and/or hold ordinary members in contempt.

    Where I agree with Don is that those switching from Corbyn to Smith won't make a lot of noise because of fear of being abused on social media and also the natural human instinct of not wanting to admit you have made an error. But Corbyn's inbuilt lead is such that he near as damn it is unbeatable in the circumstances. Owen Smith will have done very well to reduce the Corbyn percentage from the 59.5% he received last time.

    And on these matters, I would trust HenryG considerably more than someone with a substantial but undeclared (here) interest in the outcome. (Actually, I'd trust Henry more than pretty much anyone on the internal Labour game).
  • Good to see you on, Mr. Manson :)

    Thanks MD. I can't resist a good Labour leadership thread!
  • MortimerMortimer Posts: 14,158
    edited August 2016
    John_M said:

    MTimT said:

    Of course, the moment I post, a new thread.

    FPT @ John_M

    Hereabouts, we get a related issue. Townies buy up land and build their McMansions in the middle of nowhere, then demand that a shopping mall be built to service their needs. Locals ask WTF did you move here? We like the isolation and want to keep it that way.

    That said, I type this from a farm within the agricultural preserve that has Fios and up to 500Mbs/500Mbs should I be prepared to pay for it. ;)

    Well quite. Rural broadband is one of those subjects that sounds straightforward, until you try and make the investment case for it. BT has a de facto monopoly in projects like Superfast Cymru because every other provider has simply laughed politely and then disappeared in a cloud of dust. Not only must the initial infrastructure be installed, it must be sustained and updated.

    At the risk of sound like a pound-shop Alistair Meeks, if you've decide to immure yourself in the boonies, you cannot expect services to be on par with NW1.

    That said, the challenge of Internet access in remote places is being tackled by the private sector even if sometimes it's merely a bycatch. It really does not need state intervention.
    Those in NW1 have a couple of direct interests in rural broadband working:

    - it expands markets for companies, expands flexible working conditions for employees and generally grows the economy. There is far more notional capacity for growth in BH20 than NW1...
    - this, and the fact that it presents a more equal society, is in the interest of all in our polity because it decreases the chance of sectional protest groups developing.


    Rural broadband Luddism is on par with these hilarious London independence movements. Selfish and pretty short sighted

    In Britain, those who are winning pay more to help those that are losing. Some might not like it, and want all those who voted Leave to be somehow penalised for metropolitan displeasure, but this is how we progress.
  • We have a choice between Chuckle Brothers. Corbyn is an unelectable dinosaur. Smith is a bit too eager, has a barmpot approach to Brexit and keeps saying offensive things. I'm voting for Smith because he is not Corbyn, not because he is Smith.

    There won't be enough switchers. And the membership added between last year's election and the freeze date will significantly vote for Corbyn having largely been registered supporters last year.

    As for electability you miss the key belief of Jezbollah members - conspiracy. Corbyn IS electable IS inspiring IS honest and transparent.; Polls suggesting he isn't are either produced by Tory firms like YouGov or biased due to being commissioned by hostile Tory papers like The Guardian and in any case once voters hear about His ideas via The Canary, they'll soon change their mind.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 82,554
    edited August 2016

    We have a choice between Chuckle Brothers.

    To me, to you, to me, to you...
  • nunununu Posts: 6,024
    edited August 2016
    tlg86 said:

    I see there is a Question Time debate a week on Thursday. That will definitely require popcorn!

    Boooooooooo, booooooooooo that is all we will hear, and shouts of rubbish if anyone suggests Labour have to win over the Tory-Labour marginals.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 62,075
    Mr. Manson, the thread may be good, not so sure about the leadership...
  • Jeremy Corbyn will comfortably be re-elected. The membership has undergone it's biggest change in the last 12 months and is even more pro-Corbyn than before. Many mainstream members who voted for Corbyn think it's too soon to ditch him. Others feel this is their last chance to have 'true socialism' and they're not going to let that slip away. Then another group recognises he hasn't been good enough but are more annoyed a the MPs who they think have never given him a fair chance and/or hold ordinary members in contempt.

    Where I agree with Don is that those switching from Corbyn to Smith won't make a lot of noise because of fear of being abused on social media and also the natural human instinct of not wanting to admit you have made an error. But Corbyn's inbuilt lead is such that he near as damn it is unbeatable in the circumstances. Owen Smith will have done very well to reduce the Corbyn percentage from the 59.5% he received last time.

    And on these matters, I would trust HenryG considerably more than someone with a substantial but undeclared (here) interest in the outcome. (Actually, I'd trust Henry more than pretty much anyone on the internal Labour game).
    Well that's very kind David but I didn't spot the whole Corbyn surge until very late on last time (and only enough as a 'saver' so my confidence in understanding the party membership has dipped a little.

    The Labour Party membership reminds me of the Only Fools and Horses episode where Trigger gets an award from the mayor for his long service and for having the same broom for 20 years. Only later does Trigger explain in the pub his broom has had 17 heads and 14 handles but insists it's the same broom. Labour membership has gone through a hell of a lot of heads and handles in the last year but it's apparently the same party.
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 39,334
    Mortimer said:

    John_M said:

    MTimT said:

    Of course, the moment I post, a new thread.

    FPT @ John_M

    Hereabouts, we get a related issue. Townies buy up land and build their McMansions in the middle of nowhere, then demand that a shopping mall be built to service their needs. Locals ask WTF did you move here? We like the isolation and want to keep it that way.

    That said, I type this from a farm within the agricultural preserve that has Fios and up to 500Mbs/500Mbs should I be prepared to pay for it. ;)

    Well quite. Rural broadband is one of those subjects that sounds straightforward, until you try and make the investment case for it. BT has a de facto monopoly in projects like Superfast Cymru because every other provider has simply laughed politely and then disappeared in a cloud of dust. Not only must the initial infrastructure be installed, it must be sustained and updated.

    At the risk of sound like a pound-shop Alistair Meeks, if you've decide to immure yourself in the boonies, you cannot expect services to be on par with NW1.

    That said, the challenge of Internet access in remote places is being tackled by the private sector even if sometimes it's merely a bycatch. It really does not need state intervention.
    Those in NW1 have a couple of direct interests in rural broadband working:

    - it expands markets for companies, expands flexible working conditions for employees and generally grows the economy. There is far more notional capacity for growth in BH20 than NW1...
    - this, and the fact that it presents a more equal society, is in the interest of all in our polity because it decreases the chance of sectional protest groups developing.


    Rural broadband Luddism is on par with these hilarious London independence movements. Selfish and pretty short sighted

    In Britain, those who are winning pay more to help those that are losing. Some might not like it, and want all those who voted Leave to be somehow penalised for metropolitan displeasure, but this is how we progress.
    The easiest way to force BT to roll out rural broadband is to make broadband charges linked to speeds supplied. Given that the maximum network speed is 80mbit/s if the maximum speed that can be supplied to a property is just 2mbit/s then the price should come down by 95% for the broadband service cost (retail and wholesale). Just watch how quickly BT will invest in FTTP and other fibre lines if the government did that.
  • tlg86 said:

    I see there is a Question Time debate a week on Thursday. That will definitely require popcorn!

    Be interesting to see how Auntie manages that one. Jezbollah will demand to be in the audience to boo Owen and other failed traitors like Sadiq Khan. But thats not BBC good practice. So they need to both balance the audience and vet Corbyn supporters for lunacy.

    And on #wearehismedia we will see the twitter and facebook feeds flooded with Jezbollah militia denouncing Owen, Owen supporters, the BBC, the media, Dimbleby and other posters for their obvious bias against Him. You can spot people biased against Him - they're the people not denouncing people for bias.

    And people are complaining that they are being suspended. The Labour Party has turned into a nasty spiteful paranoid place under His leadership. Another reason he needs to go
  • John_MJohn_M Posts: 7,503
    edited August 2016
    Mortimer said:

    John_M said:

    MTimT said:

    Of course, the moment I post, a new thread.

    FPT @ John_M

    Hereabouts, we get a related issue. Townies buy up land and build their McMansions in the middle of nowhere, then demand that a shopping mall be built to service their needs. Locals ask WTF did you move here? We like the isolation and want to keep it that way.

    That said, I type this from a farm within the agricultural preserve that has Fios and up to 500Mbs/500Mbs should I be prepared to pay for it. ;)

    Well quite. Rural broadband is one of those subjects that sounds straightforward, until you try and make the investment case for it. BT has a de facto monopoly in projects like Superfast Cymru because every other provider has simply laughed politely and then disappeared in a cloud of dust. Not only must the initial infrastructure be installed, it must be sustained and updated.

    At the risk of sound like a pound-shop Alistair Meeks, if you've decide to immure yourself in the boonies, you cannot expect services to be on par with NW1.

    That said, the challenge of Internet access in remote places is being tackled by the private sector even if sometimes it's merely a bycatch. It really does not need state intervention.
    Those in NW1 have a couple of direct interests in rural broadband working:

    - it expands markets for companies, expands flexible working conditions for employees and generally grows the economy. There is far more notional capacity for growth in BH20 than NW1...
    - this, and the fact that it presents a more equal society, is in the interest of all in our polity because it decreases the chance of sectional protest groups developing.


    Rural broadband Luddism is on par with these hilarious London independence movements. Selfish and pretty short sighted

    In Britain, those who are winning pay more to help those that are losing. Some might not like it, and want all those who voted Leave to be somehow penalised for metropolitan displeasure, but this is how we progress.
    As a Brexiteer who is actually both immured in the boonies (NP25) and has done a lot of work on rural broadband in Scotland, Wales and the Marches I take your point - but only up to a point.

    There are always opportunity costs. It was quite expensive to arrange broadband provision to the end of the Olchon valley (total population: 5 households). Would that money have been better spent improving access elsewhere? It's all about the tradeoffs.

    I went into a bit more detail on my adventures and travails with the various rural broadband projects on the previous thread. I shan't repeat those here.
  • PlatoSaidPlatoSaid Posts: 10,383

    Downing Street says tech giant 'welcome' to come to UK after EU orders Ireland to claw back £11bn

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2016/08/30/apple-ordered-to-pay-11bn-after-european-union-tax-investigation/

    :lol:
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,296
    nunu said:

    tlg86 said:

    I see there is a Question Time debate a week on Thursday. That will definitely require popcorn!

    Boooooooooo, booooooooooo that is all we will hear, and shouts of rubbish if anyone suggests Labour have to win over the Tory-Labour marginals.
    You reckon? I'd have thought the audience would be pro-Smith. I guess it depends how the BBC goes about picking it. The BBC does have the ability to surprise. The audience that Cameron faced just before the referendum was particularly angry.
  • runnymederunnymede Posts: 2,536
    These Brind articles really are a hoot.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,158
    PlatoSaid said:

    Downing Street says tech giant 'welcome' to come to UK after EU orders Ireland to claw back £11bn

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2016/08/30/apple-ordered-to-pay-11bn-after-european-union-tax-investigation/

    :lol:
    I hadn't realised the tax bill was £11bn, I thought it was just £1bn! Wow.
  • CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,503
    Smith is a really poor candidate. Hard to believe he was chosen over Angela Eagle. She could hardly have been as bad as him, surely?
  • Tissue_PriceTissue_Price Posts: 9,039

    Jeremy Corbyn will comfortably be re-elected. The membership has undergone it's biggest change in the last 12 months and is even more pro-Corbyn than before. Many mainstream members who voted for Corbyn think it's too soon to ditch him. Others feel this is their last chance to have 'true socialism' and they're not going to let that slip away. Then another group recognises he hasn't been good enough but are more annoyed a the MPs who they think have never given him a fair chance and/or hold ordinary members in contempt.

    Where I agree with Don is that those switching from Corbyn to Smith won't make a lot of noise because of fear of being abused on social media and also the natural human instinct of not wanting to admit you have made an error. But Corbyn's inbuilt lead is such that he near as damn it is unbeatable in the circumstances. Owen Smith will have done very well to reduce the Corbyn percentage from the 59.5% he received last time.

    And on these matters, I would trust HenryG considerably more than someone with a substantial but undeclared (here) interest in the outcome. (Actually, I'd trust Henry more than pretty much anyone on the internal Labour game).
    Well that's very kind David but I didn't spot the whole Corbyn surge until very late on last time (and only enough as a 'saver' so my confidence in understanding the party membership has dipped a little.

    The Labour Party membership reminds me of the Only Fools and Horses episode where Trigger gets an award from the mayor for his long service and for having the same broom for 20 years. Only later does Trigger explain in the pub his broom has had 17 heads and 14 handles but insists it's the same broom. Labour membership has gone through a hell of a lot of heads and handles in the last year but it's apparently the same party.
    More a Ship of Fools than a Ship of Theseus :)
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 62,075
    Miss Cyclefree, Eagle's unimpressive, but I agree. She would've been better.

    Smith's bloody awful.

    Where's Benn? Cooper? Johnson?
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,654
    Cyclefree said:

    Smith is a really poor candidate. Hard to believe he was chosen over Angela Eagle. She could hardly have been as bad as him, surely?

    Definitely superior, but she doesn't have a 29" penis so wasn't considered suitable for Labour's top job.
  • SimonStClareSimonStClare Posts: 7,976
    edited August 2016
    Cyclefree said:

    Smith is a really poor candidate. Hard to believe he was chosen over Angela Eagle. She could hardly have been as bad as him, surely?

    Angela Eagle is hardly a towering colossus, but I doubt she’d have tried to out mimic Corbyn, as Smith appears to be doing.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 82,554
    edited August 2016
    Cyclefree said:

    Smith is a really poor candidate. Hard to believe he was chosen over Angela Eagle. She could hardly have been as bad as him, surely?

    Eagle would have been no better. She was useless even when interviewed by friendlies like Pienaar. He setup her to with a why do you think you will do better than Corbyn etc etc etc...and her reply was literally well I am Northern working class gay woman...and Big John was ok, and what else, what policies do you have...well as a Northern working class gay woman I know what policies ordinary people want...ok and what would they be....radio silence...
  • Cyclefree said:

    Smith is a really poor candidate. Hard to believe he was chosen over Angela Eagle. She could hardly have been as bad as him, surely?

    Worse. Look at the "sins" that Owen has committed (didn't vote against Iraq, had a job, supported Labour government policy as a Labour candidate). Angela did them for real.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,654

    Miss Cyclefree, Eagle's unimpressive, but I agree. She would've been better.

    Smith's bloody awful.

    Where's Benn? Cooper? Johnson?

    Cooper had a go last time round and got soundly thumped so it couldn't have been her.

    Hillary Benn has superior oratory skills to the other runners but was afraid to put his head above the parapet this time round I think.
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 39,334
    This is how someone I know has put it, if the ruling is confirmed by the ECJ the Irish economy is under material threat.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,654
    RobD said:

    PlatoSaid said:

    Downing Street says tech giant 'welcome' to come to UK after EU orders Ireland to claw back £11bn

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2016/08/30/apple-ordered-to-pay-11bn-after-european-union-tax-investigation/

    :lol:
    I hadn't realised the tax bill was £11bn, I thought it was just £1bn! Wow.
    Interestingly AAPL's annual dividend totals to around $11 Bn.
  • CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,503

    Cyclefree said:

    Smith is a really poor candidate. Hard to believe he was chosen over Angela Eagle. She could hardly have been as bad as him, surely?

    Eagle would have been no better. She was useless even when interviewed by friendlies like Pienaar. He setup her to with a why do you think you will do better than Corbyn etc etc etc...and her reply was literally well I am Northern working class gay woman...and Big John was ok, and what else, what policies do you have...well as a Northern working class gay woman I know what policies ordinary people want...ok and what would they be....radio silence...
    She showed some courage in challenging in the first place. Which is more than any other Labour MP did, including Smith himself.

    She's not great but acquitted herself reasonably well at PMQs and has a certain authenticity that Smith seems (to me anyway) to lack. He just seems to me to be an oily opportunist.

  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,158
    Pulpstar said:

    RobD said:

    PlatoSaid said:

    Downing Street says tech giant 'welcome' to come to UK after EU orders Ireland to claw back £11bn

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2016/08/30/apple-ordered-to-pay-11bn-after-european-union-tax-investigation/

    :lol:
    I hadn't realised the tax bill was £11bn, I thought it was just £1bn! Wow.
    Interestingly AAPL's annual dividend totals to around $11 Bn.
    In terms of the public finances, I think it'd be equivalent to the UK getting a £100bn settlement! Absurdly large amount of money.
  • CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,503
    MaxPB said:

    This is how someone I know has put it, if the ruling is confirmed by the ECJ the Irish economy is under material threat.

    How?

  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,654
    RobD said:

    Pulpstar said:

    RobD said:

    PlatoSaid said:

    Downing Street says tech giant 'welcome' to come to UK after EU orders Ireland to claw back £11bn

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2016/08/30/apple-ordered-to-pay-11bn-after-european-union-tax-investigation/

    :lol:
    I hadn't realised the tax bill was £11bn, I thought it was just £1bn! Wow.
    Interestingly AAPL's annual dividend totals to around $11 Bn.
    In terms of the public finances, I think it'd be equivalent to the UK getting a £100bn settlement! Absurdly large amount of money.
    I calculated it as £153 Bn :o
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,158
    MaxPB said:

    This is how someone I know has put it, if the ruling is confirmed by the ECJ the Irish economy is under material threat.

    "Member states cannot give tax benefits to selected companies - this is illegal under EU state aid rules," said Commissioner Margrethe Vestager.

    What convenient timing for us :p
  • MarkHopkinsMarkHopkins Posts: 5,584
    MaxPB said:

    This is how someone I know has put it, if the ruling is confirmed by the ECJ the Irish economy is under material threat.


    Not if they IRexit...

  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,158
    Pulpstar said:

    RobD said:

    Pulpstar said:

    RobD said:

    PlatoSaid said:

    Downing Street says tech giant 'welcome' to come to UK after EU orders Ireland to claw back £11bn

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2016/08/30/apple-ordered-to-pay-11bn-after-european-union-tax-investigation/

    :lol:
    I hadn't realised the tax bill was £11bn, I thought it was just £1bn! Wow.
    Interestingly AAPL's annual dividend totals to around $11 Bn.
    In terms of the public finances, I think it'd be equivalent to the UK getting a £100bn settlement! Absurdly large amount of money.
    I calculated it as £153 Bn :o
    bonkers!
  • Interesting article....but the correction is classic Gaurdian...

    This article was amended on 30 August 2016. An earlier version said glass feet on the fire lookout’s wooden chair would help it conduct electricity if struck by lightning. In fact glass acts as an insulator so that the chair does not conduct electricity in the event of a strike.

    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/aug/30/us-national-parks-fire-lookout-forest-wildfire

  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 39,334
    Cyclefree said:

    MaxPB said:

    This is how someone I know has put it, if the ruling is confirmed by the ECJ the Irish economy is under material threat.

    How?

    Multinationals would begin their march out of Ireland I guess, that's a lot of jobs moving overseas.
  • taffystaffys Posts: 9,753
    ''How?''

    I read somewhere 700 US companies have Irish operations for tax efficiency.
  • MaxPB said:

    This is how someone I know has put it, if the ruling is confirmed by the ECJ the Irish economy is under material threat.

    They'll have to leave the EU.
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,296
    taffys said:

    ''How?''

    I read somewhere 700 US companies have Irish operations for tax efficiency.

    But would they be considered to be getting state aid?
  • CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,503
    MaxPB said:

    Cyclefree said:

    MaxPB said:

    This is how someone I know has put it, if the ruling is confirmed by the ECJ the Irish economy is under material threat.

    How?

    Multinationals would begin their march out of Ireland I guess, that's a lot of jobs moving overseas.
    Even if the corporate tax rate is lower than other EU countries?

    Has Ireland done many other similar sweetheart deals with other companies?

  • Jeremy Corbyn will comfortably be re-elected. The membership has undergone it's biggest change in the last 12 months and is even more pro-Corbyn than before. Many mainstream members who voted for Corbyn think it's too soon to ditch him. Others feel this is their last chance to have 'true socialism' and they're not going to let that slip away. Then another group recognises he hasn't been good enough but are more annoyed a the MPs who they think have never given him a fair chance and/or hold ordinary members in contempt.

    Where I agree with Don is that those switching from Corbyn to Smith won't make a lot of noise because of fear of being abused on social media and also the natural human instinct of not wanting to admit you have made an error. But Corbyn's inbuilt lead is such that he near as damn it is unbeatable in the circumstances. Owen Smith will have done very well to reduce the Corbyn percentage from the 59.5% he received last time.

    And on these matters, I would trust HenryG considerably more than someone with a substantial but undeclared (here) interest in the outcome. (Actually, I'd trust Henry more than pretty much anyone on the internal Labour game).
    Well that's very kind David but I didn't spot the whole Corbyn surge until very late on last time (and only enough as a 'saver' so my confidence in understanding the party membership has dipped a little.

    The Labour Party membership reminds me of the Only Fools and Horses episode where Trigger gets an award from the mayor for his long service and for having the same broom for 20 years. Only later does Trigger explain in the pub his broom has had 17 heads and 14 handles but insists it's the same broom. Labour membership has gone through a hell of a lot of heads and handles in the last year but it's apparently the same party.
    More a Ship of Fools than a Ship of Theseus :)
    You're far better read than me!
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    Scott_P said:

    Why should Labour have all the fun?

    @asabenn: Hearing Ukip's National Executive Committee has rejected @mickmcgough & @VAylingUKIP's bid to unresign after they quit in pro-Woolfe protest

    Any chance of a UKIP leaders thread?

    I am all green on the race, but some candidates are more green than others.

    Any PB kippers fancy a summary of the candidates and prospects? Is Jarvis as nailed on as the prices suggest?
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,654
    MaxPB said:

    Cyclefree said:

    MaxPB said:

    This is how someone I know has put it, if the ruling is confirmed by the ECJ the Irish economy is under material threat.

    How?

    Multinationals would begin their march out of Ireland I guess, that's a lot of jobs moving overseas.
    Where would they move to though ?
    Where else in the EU to go ?
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 52,920
    MaxPB said:

    Cyclefree said:

    MaxPB said:

    This is how someone I know has put it, if the ruling is confirmed by the ECJ the Irish economy is under material threat.

    How?

    Multinationals would begin their march out of Ireland I guess, that's a lot of jobs moving overseas.
    Where else will they go in the EU that is outside the commission's reach?
  • French PM suggests naked breasts represent France better than a headscarf

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/aug/30/france-manuel-valls-breasts-headscarf-burkini-ban-row
  • Cyclefree said:

    Cyclefree said:

    Smith is a really poor candidate. Hard to believe he was chosen over Angela Eagle. She could hardly have been as bad as him, surely?

    Eagle would have been no better. She was useless even when interviewed by friendlies like Pienaar. He setup her to with a why do you think you will do better than Corbyn etc etc etc...and her reply was literally well I am Northern working class gay woman...and Big John was ok, and what else, what policies do you have...well as a Northern working class gay woman I know what policies ordinary people want...ok and what would they be....radio silence...
    She showed some courage in challenging in the first place. Which is more than any other Labour MP did, including Smith himself.

    She's not great but acquitted herself reasonably well at PMQs and has a certain authenticity that Smith seems (to me anyway) to lack. He just seems to me to be an oily opportunist.

    Eagle's Iraq vote destroyed her chances.

  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 39,334
    RobD said:

    MaxPB said:

    This is how someone I know has put it, if the ruling is confirmed by the ECJ the Irish economy is under material threat.

    "Member states cannot give tax benefits to selected companies - this is illegal under EU state aid rules," said Commissioner Margrethe Vestager.

    What convenient timing for us :p
    I doubt we'd go for such schemes. We have no need for such a large stimulus to attract companies to the UK. Tax rates are already competitive plus we have a solid labour force and flexible labour rules.
  • taffystaffys Posts: 9,753
    ''Multinationals would begin their march out of Ireland I guess, that's a lot of jobs moving overseas.''

    Even if Ireland were made to enforce its headline rate of Corporation tax across the board, its still pretty low though, right? and very few companies get Apple's deal.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 0
    edited August 2016
    Pulpstar said:

    RobD said:

    PlatoSaid said:

    Downing Street says tech giant 'welcome' to come to UK after EU orders Ireland to claw back £11bn

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2016/08/30/apple-ordered-to-pay-11bn-after-european-union-tax-investigation/

    :lol:
    I hadn't realised the tax bill was £11bn, I thought it was just £1bn! Wow.
    Interestingly AAPL's annual dividend totals to around $11 Bn.
    Insanely, Apple has to borrow to pay its dividend whilst sitting on a huge cash mountain overseas (which it can't remit to the USA without paying tax).
  • MaxPB said:

    This is how someone I know has put it, if the ruling is confirmed by the ECJ the Irish economy is under material threat.

    Yep, it's a biggie for sure. Throw in Brexit and the uncertainty in Ireland right now is sub-optimal.

  • TheWhiteRabbitTheWhiteRabbit Posts: 12,454

    Scott_P said:

    Why should Labour have all the fun?

    @asabenn: Hearing Ukip's National Executive Committee has rejected @mickmcgough & @VAylingUKIP's bid to unresign after they quit in pro-Woolfe protest

    Any chance of a UKIP leaders thread?

    I am all green on the race, but some candidates are more green than others.

    Any PB kippers fancy a summary of the candidates and prospects? Is Jarvis as nailed on as the prices suggest?
    You mean James, presumably. The UKIP electoral system is particularly opaque, not in terms of procedure, just in terms of opinions.
This discussion has been closed.