Categories
Options
politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » This looks like how REMAIN will play the closing four weeks
politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » This looks like how REMAIN will play the closing four weeks
The poster above has started being circulated on Twitter and my guess is that its is part of the Saatchi & Saatchi campaign for IN. The clarity of approach with a very simple message and even the typeface appear to be Saatchi house style.
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
Remain is so not the "safety first" position with the EU. We are at a T junction in our dealings with the EU - pull out, or go balls deep....
"What Europe said to Dave Cameron when he asked for renegotiation"
Overnight, I reversed my position on Gary Johnson 4 POTUS - I'm now a net backer @ 999/1
I think those odds represent value - I wouldn't consider laying over 50/1 right now.
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/05/never-trump-2016-elections-libertarians-213917
Are there any other Gary Johnson backers on PB?
'Well I said tens of thousands, but....let's face it.....I lied. Still, I lied for something I truly believe in.
The risk with Remain are more political risks. Namely, that the EU will continue to draw power away from national political institutions.
Interestingly last time I wrote about posters I wrongly attributed 'Demon Eyes' (which I described as a failure) to the Saatchis. In fact it was conceived by Steve Hilton.
If the government don't have a plan in place for if they lose the referendum, then they are the ones crossing their fingers.
Nitwit Brokenshire said on Sky "...there's no magic bullet..." Oh yes there is. It's called Leave.
So it was Steve Hilton who was prescient?
They are the "official" Leave campaign.
https://twitter.com/MattJamesFord/status/735826513929633792
Yes, I suspect that this'll be a major theme of Remain from here in. It's well done but it doesn't really address any of Leave's complaints.
If there is no magic bullet for immigration under the current arrangements, then why did David Cameron pretend in 2015 that there was?
Why did he paint himself as a different alternative to labour lib dems, when the result has been exactly the same??
This is him admitting the conservative policy on this topic in 2015 was a complete and utter sham.
Leave wins June 23rd, new faces as PM & CotE, etc. Right lads, we're out; what are we going to do? Anyone any ideas?
Does that seem plausible to you?
They need Vote Leave's instructions on what to do in order to initiate basic contingency planning?
Pray tell who are you going to choose if in 2020 or sooner it's Theresa May a point or two ahead of Jeremy Corbyn, with Nicola Sturgeon waiting in the wings?
It's called democracy. Something remainers seem to hold in contempt.
What do we want? Well why aren't you telling us what we want?
So Cameron offered a referendum, even though he thinks one result could lead to WAR!!!
And is too incompetent to handle it, if Leave win?
Right.
I'm flabbergasted you're continuing to dig, but do go on.
Or, in some cases, the 1590s....
What do we want? Well why aren't you telling us what we want?
What we want is freedom. Freedom from Brussels. Why allow unelected bureaucrats to decide out fate?
The rest is up to British people over the course of time. I trust them to make the right decisions.
They generally do.
Let's party like it's 1958!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doublethink
Yes but you are treating yourself on company money, not taxpayer money.
You can;t see the difference though. People like you never can.
Sunil for propaganda minister please.
Basically he 's saying if we adopt a Norwegian approach post Brexit we'll become richer.
BUT a Norwegian approach basically says we WILL CONTINUE to pay the EC some money and obey some regulations - thus shooting Leave's argument to bits on money (less savings) and regulation (none vs some).
Clearly Brexit have no agreed plan if they win. Would anyone trust these people to organise a drinking session in a brewery? I would not.
I expect Remain to win with a large majority as voters realise what a mess Brexit is.
Cameron will announce his intention to resign as soon as a new Conservative Party leader is elected.
There will then be a (presumably quick) campaign to select a new leader - I guess pre summer. There will be several candidates - Tories like leadership elections - each, presumably, with different policy positions.
Once in place they will take the summer to convert statements of principle into detailed policy positions and then in the autumn will start the negotiation proper.
As a leaver I have proud to have no plan.
What happens to Britain, including and especially who does or doesn't come here, should be the result of the settled will of British citizens. I'm not going to dictate to them.
The soviets had a great, fantastic detailed plan. A five year one. and a 10-year one. So did Mao.
Look what happened there.
So you know where you can stick your plan.
But. Let's suppose it's Leave. Let's also suppose Article 50 is invoked sharpish. And the same team stays in place. We now have two years to negotiate. June 24th 2016 - June 23rd 2018 NOTHING CHANGES. Plenty of time for wrangling over who is doing or arguing for what.
The BrExit campaign are not the government, the Conservative Party is, after the referendum, guess what, the Conservative Party is still the government. The referendum is advisory, the Conservative Party in the event of a Leave vote have the full range of options from telling the voters to get lost, to repealing the European Communities Act (1972) and all stations in between. Which of those happens will be chosen by the Government elected at GE2015, and passed or rejected by Parliament. VLTC can stand on the sidelines and shout about what it wants, but that is the extent of its input.
If you're a fifth-former, fair enough. Otherwise, try not to sound like one.
My point is a genuine one though, and I raised it back when the Scots were deciding "in or oot" - apparently the civil service had done zero planning for an out vote, which I found somewhat worrying !
I'm surprised that you can still get away with it. Whenever I contract with a company - usually S&P500 - one of the clauses is that I have to stick to their travel policies.
Yes and to date the people, via their elected representatives have decided to stay in the EU. And now we are carving this out and asking the people directly.
All is good.
EU officials on the other hand are being paid out of taxpayers money and should not be so extravagant with it.
At a time when European politics is in absolute turmoil, almost nothing changed in the 18 6-seater constituencies:
Two seats went from one proletarian Catholic party (Sinn Féin) to another (PBP)
One seat went from one middle-class left party (SDLP) to another (Greens)
SF/SDLP and DUP/UUP each swapped a pair of seats within their own communities
And SF got one more seat from the SDLP
The demands of PB Remainers that everyone of Leave persuasion, from the official campaign, the unofficial campaigns, and now even Leavers on PB, must have a single policy programme for the next 15 years that we all intone as one are really quite bizarre. Enforced harmonisation is your thing, not ours.
Just chillax.
The same thing happened in the middle of the last Dáil down south. The other left parties can outflank them by promising sun/moon/stars.
Teenage students were filmed getting lap dances from a stripper they hired for their classroom graduation party
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3610774/Teenagers-filmed-getting-lap-dances-stripper-hired-classroom-graduation-party-telling-teachers-coming-talk-equal-rights.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Ossetia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Ossetia-Alania
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People_Before_Profit_Alliance