GOP Turnout Est 1.25 million Democrats 1.09 million.
Mitt Romney got 1.41 million in the GE in 2012. More people voted in the GOP primary in Milwaukee than voted GOP in the GE of 2012, the entire city seems like it revolted against Trump.
Trump is Hitler talk really brings the people out.
GOP Turnout Est 1.25 million Democrats 1.09 million.
Mitt Romney got 1.41 million in the GE in 2012. More people voted in the GOP primary in Milwaukee than voted GOP in the GE of 2012, the entire city seems like it revolted against Trump.
Trump is Hitler talk really brings the people out.
GOP Turnout Est 1.25 million Democrats 1.09 million.
Mitt Romney got 1.41 million in the GE in 2012. More people voted in the GOP primary in Milwaukee than voted GOP in the GE of 2012, the entire city seems like it revolted against Trump.
Trump is Hitler talk really brings the people out.
Typo? 1.25m is less than 1.41m?
In the whole state. But in the city of Milwaukee more people voted in the GOP primary than voted GOP in the GE 4 years ago, we are talking about 80% turnout which is historically high for a normal election much less a primary.
Every resident seems to have gotten out to vote against Trump.
Take Waukesha county (Milwaukee suburbs), so far Cruz alone has got 63k votes and the count is still going on, Romney got 78k in the GE of 2012.
GOP Turnout Est 1.25 million Democrats 1.09 million.
Mitt Romney got 1.41 million in the GE in 2012. More people voted in the GOP primary in Milwaukee than voted GOP in the GE of 2012, the entire city seems like it revolted against Trump.
Trump is Hitler talk really brings the people out.
Typo? 1.25m is less than 1.41m?
In the whole state. But in the city of Milwaukee more people voted in the GOP primary than voted GOP in the GE 4 years ago, we are talking about 80% turnout which is historically high for a normal election much less a primary.
Every resident seems to have gotten out to vote against Trump.
Cruz will enjoy tonight, but "New York values" will return to haunt him
He doesn't care about N.Y. he can become the nominee without it.
Cruz only needs to win Indiana now to be the GOP nominee by my calculations. Trump needs to win Indiana plus everything else and by a margin to be the nominee.
In Cruz vs Clinton, it's hard not to see a Clinton victory.
Who'd thought it: a week ago we all taking about Cruz's (alleged) five affairs. And now he is practically favourite for the Republican nomination.
Yup, smaller margin than against Trump but maybe less chance of an upset.
Agreed. Trump could win, because he had crossover appeal. He could have gotten working class Democrats from the rust belt and traditional Republicans. Of course, he might have crashed and burned, but he could have won.
I simply don't see have Cruz achieves anything more than a cruising Clinton victory.
The next question is this: will Cruz being the nominee help or hinder the Repiblicans in Senate and Gubnatorial races this autumn?
Pretty sure you know the answer to that. Surely the question is whether the damage in the convention passing over Trump to pick Cruz is worth the benefit? If not, can anyone else pull off that equation?
Remember everyone, if you need to fall ill do so in the next hour. After that, try to leave it for 48 hours. Just because many junior doctors are being tw@ts.
55 - 45 is good for my model. 63+ was brown trousers time according to my model for Hillary.
Sanders probably wins Wyoming 75-25 but it only has 14 delegates.
Wyoming ought to be peak Bernie. Hillary has a series of friendly primaries after that. Pretty sure he'll take it to the convention now though. He is still closing the gap on her in the national polls (the HuffPost average has it down to 7.4%). The race seems like running ahead of a steamroller. She shouldn't get caught because Bernie's too slow in the game but she has to keep going and paying him, rather than the Republicans, the attention.
It seems to be the consensus that ANYONE who has their money in a 'tax haven' (eg Panama) as opposed to a 'low tax jurisdiction' (eg Guernsey) is doing so to hide nefarious activities such as money laundering sanctions busting and tax evasion. There can be NO other reason.
After the Panama revelations anyone with money in such a jurisdiction is now coming under scrutiny. After the Iceland PM the second casualty looks like being the new President of FIFA.
Remember everyone, if you need to fall ill do so in the next hour. After that, try to leave it for 48 hours. Just because many junior doctors are being tw@ts.
It seems to be the consensus that ANYONE who has their money in a 'tax haven' (eg Panama) as opposed to a 'low tax jurisdiction' (eg Guernsey) is doing so to hide nefarious activities such as money laundering sanctions busting and tax evasion. There can be NO other reason.
After the Panama revelations anyone with money in such a jurisdiction is now coming under scrutiny. After the Iceland PM the second casualty looks like being the new President of FIFA.
A tiny tip of an extremely fetid iceberg
Oh dear.
Moving money around to avoid tax is fair tax planning.
The problem that I have with the offshore havens is that the secrecy facilitates evasion as so easy to not declare profits on money invested.
Remember everyone, if you need to fall ill do so in the next hour. After that, try to leave it for 48 hours. Just because many junior doctors are being tw@ts.
Emergency cover is normal in this strike.
I refer the dishonourable gentleman to my previous post.
Remember everyone, if you need to fall ill do so in the next hour. After that, try to leave it for 48 hours. Just because many junior doctors are being tw@ts.
Emergency cover is normal in this strike.
I refer the dishonourable gentleman to my previous post.
The Patients Association has now come out against imposition:
Remember everyone, if you need to fall ill do so in the next hour. After that, try to leave it for 48 hours. Just because many junior doctors are being tw@ts.
Emergency cover is normal in this strike.
I refer the dishonourable gentleman to my previous post.
The Patients Association has now come out against imposition:
Again, I refer the dishonourable gentleman to my previous post.
Patient care is obviously less important to you than politics. As we saw about your 'defence' over Burnham and Stafford, which was based on a repeated series of lies.
Remember everyone, if you need to fall ill do so in the next hour. After that, try to leave it for 48 hours. Just because many junior doctors are being tw@ts.
Remember everyone, if you need to fall ill do so in the next hour. After that, try to leave it for 48 hours. Just because many junior doctors are being tw@ts.
Hunt completely blame free.
Are you saying the striking doctors and their association are completely blame free?
Jeremy Hunt’s tactics in junior doctors’ dispute attacked by senior Tory Sarah Wollaston says health secretary misrepresented evidence to win support in pursuit of ‘unachievable’ seven-day NHS
“Ministers are undermining their case and inflaming tensions by misquoting the evidence"
Remember everyone, if you need to fall ill do so in the next hour. After that, try to leave it for 48 hours. Just because many junior doctors are being tw@ts.
Hunt completely blame free.
Are you saying the striking doctors and their association are completely blame free?
Remember everyone, if you need to fall ill do so in the next hour. After that, try to leave it for 48 hours. Just because many junior doctors are being tw@ts.
Hunt completely blame free.
Are you saying the striking doctors and their association are completely blame free?
Are you saying Hunt is?
I see you cannot answer a simple question.
My answer: no-one involved is 100% without blame. But doctors who strike deserve to lose a great deal of the affection and respect that the pubic give them.
Remember everyone, if you need to fall ill do so in the next hour. After that, try to leave it for 48 hours. Just because many junior doctors are being tw@ts.
Hunt completely blame free.
Are you saying the striking doctors and their association are completely blame free?
Are you saying Hunt is?
I see you cannot answer a simple question.
My answer: no-one involved is 100% without blame. But doctors who strike deserve to lose a great deal of the affection and respect that the pubic give them.
For some years during my working life I was sporadically involved in negotiations with GP’s.They could be extremely intransigent, and frequently unscrupulous in the run-up to, and actually when, sitting across the table. I came to feel that some of the lawyers called upon to adjudicate in these situations were less than impressed.
That doesn’t say that I don’t think the juniors have right on their side this time. I’m just saying that some at least of the professional “parents” of the current crop of juniors could be very, very difficult to negotiate with.
Comments
But Cruz still wins.
Trump performed like the other neighboring states but Cruz got all the rest of the vote, there was zero splitting of the anti-Trump vote.
Who can beat Hillary with the current state of the Republican party ?
http://edition.cnn.com/election/primaries/states/wi/Rep
http://edition.cnn.com/election/primaries/states/wi/Dem
Cruz 53
Trump 31
Trump in the lead on the Illinois border, gets crushed in Waukesha county 59-23.
Milwaukee really hates Trump.
Sanders 48 Clinton 38
Cruz 39 Trump 3
There go Trump's hopes of winning CD-1,4 and 8.
That means that he will probably win CD-3 and 7.
CD-2 is the only one that we don't know yet.
The tradition of Hillary and Trump both losing the same states continues.
Sanders understated?
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/democratic_delegate_count.html
I make it 24 - 74
Terrible night for Trump, he still gets 6 delegates out of Wisconsin but that's way short of what he needed.
His chances for the nomination get downgraded again.
Trump now has only a 35% chance to get to 1237, plus 10% if he doesn't for a total of 41.5% for the nomination.
Cruz has a 2/3 chance if Trump doesn't get to 1237 for a total of 43% for the nomination.
Kasich has 10% chance if Trump doesn't get to 1237% for a total of 6.5%
And Person X has 9%.
Four very different states: Utah, Colorado, North Dakota, Wisconsin. Four victories.
Four white, rural mid-western/western states :P ?
At least he will never be President.
Democrats 1.09 million.
More people voted in the GOP primary in Milwaukee than voted GOP in the GE of 2012, the entire city seems like it revolted against Trump.
Trump is Hitler talk really brings the people out.
For Cruz it's much easier, deny Trump 1237 and Cruz probably becomes the nominee even if voters disagree.
The odds for Trump and Cruz to become the nominee are roughly the same at this point, and both have 0 chance of becoming president.
But in the city of Milwaukee more people voted in the GOP primary than voted GOP in the GE 4 years ago, we are talking about 80% turnout which is historically high for a normal election much less a primary.
Every resident seems to have gotten out to vote against Trump.
Take Waukesha county (Milwaukee suburbs), so far Cruz alone has got 63k votes and the count is still going on, Romney got 78k in the GE of 2012.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election_in_Wisconsin,_2012
Cruz only needs to win Indiana now to be the GOP nominee by my calculations.
Trump needs to win Indiana plus everything else and by a margin to be the nominee.
Both doable according to the polls.
Sanders probably wins Wyoming 75-25 but it only has 14 delegates.
Who'd thought it: a week ago we all taking about Cruz's (alleged) five affairs. And now he is practically favourite for the Republican nomination.
I simply don't see have Cruz achieves anything more than a cruising Clinton victory.
I am all green on the republicans, but best position is Cruz.
Quite red on Hillary though. I laid her early on and still haven't recovered.
"Only little people pay taxes" Leona Helmsley.
It seems to be the consensus that ANYONE who has their money in a 'tax haven' (eg Panama) as opposed to a 'low tax jurisdiction' (eg Guernsey) is doing so to hide nefarious activities such as money laundering sanctions busting and tax evasion. There can be NO other reason.
After the Panama revelations anyone with money in such a jurisdiction is now coming under scrutiny. After the Iceland PM the second casualty looks like being the new President of FIFA.
A tiny tip of an extremely fetid iceberg
Oh dear.
The UK has been rated "more of a tax haven" than the Channel Islands, in a financial transparency report.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-jersey-34638877
The problem that I have with the offshore havens is that the secrecy facilitates evasion as so easy to not declare profits on money invested.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/junior-doctors-strike-patients-association-says-it-is-glad-to-see-contract-imposition-being-a6970411.html
The chair of the BMA JDC on the latest dispute:
https://youtu.be/ufxPynjGTb0
Patient care is obviously less important to you than politics. As we saw about your 'defence' over Burnham and Stafford, which was based on a repeated series of lies.
Sarah Wollaston says health secretary misrepresented evidence to win support in pursuit of ‘unachievable’ seven-day NHS
“Ministers are undermining their case and inflaming tensions by misquoting the evidence"
My answer: no-one involved is 100% without blame. But doctors who strike deserve to lose a great deal of the affection and respect that the pubic give them.
I came to feel that some of the lawyers called upon to adjudicate in these situations were less than impressed.
That doesn’t say that I don’t think the juniors have right on their side this time. I’m just saying that some at least of the professional “parents” of the current crop of juniors could be very, very difficult to negotiate with.