politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Keiran Pedley looks at whether Cameron could fight the 2020 general election
Since the Conservatives somewhat unexpectedly won a majority in May most of the media attention has been focused on who the next Labour leader will be. But what about the Conservatives?
My instinct is that Cameron will be more tempted to take any EU-related criticism on the chin. But nevertheless he will step down before the election. He will will have been PM for 9 or so years, and LOTO for another five.
Stepping down isn't always about your chance of winning.
I think he will however be more confident in asserting "his candidate" for the succession.
the annual publicity competitions that are strictly and i'm a celeb are of varying quality but seeing who the participants are is always interesting to see - so far so yawn for 2015 strictly for example.
The new annual labour leadership competition however offers great promise and whilst 2015 is a 'first effort' to iron out any wrinkles, I'm sure by 2016, the Labour Leader get me out of here show will be unmissable.....
John Cruddas has sent a letter to each of the Labour Leadership candidates, with five key questions:
There is a large part of the electorate Labour must win back who vote pragmatically for the party which offers them the best prospect of personal economic advancement. How will you win back these voters?
How will you convince the electorate that public spending and their taxes are secure with Labour and that we are the party of fiscal responsibility?
Immigration remains a significant national issue, particularly amongst socially conservative voters. How will you address concerns about the impact on services and provision, and about identity and belonging that are causing many of these voters to desert Labour?
Our welfare system has neither the trust nor the confidence of a majority of the electorate. There is a widespread belief that it gives to those who don’t deserve and abandons those who do. What approach to reform would you take?
Can you indicate how you might start a process of renewing the image, the practices and the politics of the party in order to reverse its growing cultural exclusivity and widen its appeal in the country?
He might be tempted, but I think his rivals and potential successors would not let him even if he tried now. And win or lose, the EU ref would provide them an opportunity to see that he does not change his mind.
the annual publicity competitions that are strictly and i'm a celeb are of varying quality but seeing who the participants are is always interesting to see - so far so yawn for 2015 strictly for example.
The new annual labour leadership competition however offers great promise and whilst 2015 is a 'first effort' to iron out any wrinkles, I'm sure by 2016, the Labour Leader get me out of here show will be unmissable.....
Put your money of Kirsty Gallacher.
She's got my vote sewn up and the vote of every other hormonal and perverted middle England gentleman, who watches and votes.
John Cruddas has sent a letter to each of the Labour Leadership candidates, with five key questions:
There is a large part of the electorate Labour must win back who vote pragmatically for the party which offers them the best prospect of personal economic advancement. How will you win back these voters?
How will you convince the electorate that public spending and their taxes are secure with Labour and that we are the party of fiscal responsibility?
Immigration remains a significant national issue, particularly amongst socially conservative voters. How will you address concerns about the impact on services and provision, and about identity and belonging that are causing many of these voters to desert Labour?
Our welfare system has neither the trust nor the confidence of a majority of the electorate. There is a widespread belief that it gives to those who don’t deserve and abandons those who do. What approach to reform would you take?
Can you indicate how you might start a process of renewing the image, the practices and the politics of the party in order to reverse its growing cultural exclusivity and widen its appeal in the country?
Isn't this a set of questions that he should have asked a month ago? Votes are already being registered. It is too late to really engage with the debate. There will be an urgency to vote quickly - particularly from the enthusiastic new supporters. The time for policy/process discussion is fast running out.
Talking to a lifelong Labour supporter today, he has his ballot pack and hasn't decided who to vote for. He is not going to vote Corbyn but doesn't know who he will support. And he is hoping that the result is a party that splits into two. Not quite sure I see the logic of that.
But of all my left-leaning friends, he is the only one not actively supporting Corbyn.
Cruddas - well this intervention is too little, too late. As each hour goes by, the more votes are being cast and the less influence anyone can have on things. I imagine that the majority of votes will be cast quickly - the zeal of the Corbyn converts will ensure that.
John Cruddas has sent a letter to each of the Labour Leadership candidates, with five key questions:
There is a large part of the electorate Labour must win back who vote pragmatically for the party which offers them the best prospect of personal economic advancement. How will you win back these voters?
How will you convince the electorate that public spending and their taxes are secure with Labour and that we are the party of fiscal responsibility?
Immigration remains a significant national issue, particularly amongst socially conservative voters. How will you address concerns about the impact on services and provision, and about identity and belonging that are causing many of these voters to desert Labour?
Our welfare system has neither the trust nor the confidence of a majority of the electorate. There is a widespread belief that it gives to those who don’t deserve and abandons those who do. What approach to reform would you take?
Can you indicate how you might start a process of renewing the image, the practices and the politics of the party in order to reverse its growing cultural exclusivity and widen its appeal in the country?
Cameron also said he'd do the full 5yrs during a foreign trip press conf after the election.
I hope he steps down/hands over to new leader with about 18 months to go. He's done more than most PMs and I can't see [m]any positive reasons to stay on. Going out on his own terms is much better than events beating you to it.
Any chance of the PLP deciding to appoint its own leader? I am not sure whether this would require simply a change in Standing Orders or effectively outright UDI but it might appeal to circa 200 members of the PLP who would continue to provide the Leader of the Opposition
John Cruddas has sent a letter to each of the Labour Leadership candidates, with five key questions:
There is a large part of the electorate Labour must win back who vote pragmatically for the party which offers them the best prospect of personal economic advancement. How will you win back these voters?
How will you convince the electorate that public spending and their taxes are secure with Labour and that we are the party of fiscal responsibility?
Immigration remains a significant national issue, particularly amongst socially conservative voters. How will you address concerns about the impact on services and provision, and about identity and belonging that are causing many of these voters to desert Labour?
Our welfare system has neither the trust nor the confidence of a majority of the electorate. There is a widespread belief that it gives to those who don’t deserve and abandons those who do. What approach to reform would you take?
Can you indicate how you might start a process of renewing the image, the practices and the politics of the party in order to reverse its growing cultural exclusivity and widen its appeal in the country?
John Cruddas has sent a letter to each of the Labour Leadership candidates, with five key questions:
There is a large part of the electorate Labour must win back who vote pragmatically for the party which offers them the best prospect of personal economic advancement. How will you win back these voters?
How will you convince the electorate that public spending and their taxes are secure with Labour and that we are the party of fiscal responsibility?
Immigration remains a significant national issue, particularly amongst socially conservative voters. How will you address concerns about the impact on services and provision, and about identity and belonging that are causing many of these voters to desert Labour?
Our welfare system has neither the trust nor the confidence of a majority of the electorate. There is a widespread belief that it gives to those who don’t deserve and abandons those who do. What approach to reform would you take?
Can you indicate how you might start a process of renewing the image, the practices and the politics of the party in order to reverse its growing cultural exclusivity and widen its appeal in the country?
Isn't this a set of questions that he should have asked a month ago? Votes are already being registered. It is too late to really engage with the debate. There will be an urgency to vote quickly - particularly from the enthusiastic new supporters. The time for policy/process discussion is fast running out.
Talking to a lifelong Labour supporter today, he has his ballot pack and hasn't decided who to vote for. He is not going to vote Corbyn but doesn't know who he will support. And he is hoping that the result is a party that splits into two. Not quite sure I see the logic of that.
But of all my left-leaning friends, he is the only one not actively supporting Corbyn.
Cruddas - well this intervention is too little, too late. As each hour goes by, the more votes are being cast and the less influence anyone can have on things. I imagine that the majority of votes will be cast quickly - the zeal of the Corbyn converts will ensure that.
Does "socially conservative" in the Cruddas piece mean anything other than anti-immigration? What else do people mean by it?
Any chance of the PLP deciding to appoint its own leader? I am not sure whether this would require simply a change in Standing Orders or effectively outright UDI but it might appeal to circa 200 members of the PLP who would continue to provide the Leader of the Opposition
That would be a formal declaration of (civil) war, so it's extremely unlikely.
I don't see Cameron staying on. Takes too many holidays. Prime Ministers who really, really like being Prime Minister and have to be dragged out of No 10 seem to be workaholics (Maggie Thatcher, Gordon Brown). The exception was Blair but that was because he thought he'd been crowned rather than elected.
Any chance of the PLP deciding to appoint its own leader? I am not sure whether this would require simply a change in Standing Orders or effectively outright UDI but it might appeal to circa 200 members of the PLP who would continue to provide the Leader of the Opposition
That's what I was talking about on the previous thread.
"New Labour" suddenly announced they have 200 MPs, leaving Old Labour with the unions...
Any chance of the PLP deciding to appoint its own leader? I am not sure whether this would require simply a change in Standing Orders or effectively outright UDI but it might appeal to circa 200 members of the PLP who would continue to provide the Leader of the Opposition
That's what I was talking about on the previous thread.
"New Labour" suddenly announced they have 200 MPs, leaving Old Labour with the unions...
I think it's unlikely. Cameron has always done exactly what he said he would do.
The amusing line that is being spun is that the interviewer asked the question twice: once when Sam wasn't around and once when she was...and got different answers...
John Cruddas has sent a letter to each of the Labour Leadership candidates, with five key questions:
There is a large part of the electorate Labour must win back who vote pragmatically for the party which offers them the best prospect of personal economic advancement. How will you win back these voters?
How will you convince the electorate that public spending and their taxes are secure with Labour and that we are the party of fiscal responsibility?
Immigration remains a significant national issue, particularly amongst socially conservative voters. How will you address concerns about the impact on services and provision, and about identity and belonging that are causing many of these voters to desert Labour?
Our welfare system has neither the trust nor the confidence of a majority of the electorate. There is a widespread belief that it gives to those who don’t deserve and abandons those who do. What approach to reform would you take?
Can you indicate how you might start a process of renewing the image, the practices and the politics of the party in order to reverse its growing cultural exclusivity and widen its appeal in the country?
Isn't this a set of questions that he should have asked a month ago? Votes are already being registered. It is too late to really engage with the debate. There will be an urgency to vote quickly - particularly from the enthusiastic new supporters. The time for policy/process discussion is fast running out.
Talking to a lifelong Labour supporter today, he has his ballot pack and hasn't decided who to vote for. He is not going to vote Corbyn but doesn't know who he will support. And he is hoping that the result is a party that splits into two. Not quite sure I see the logic of that.
But of all my left-leaning friends, he is the only one not actively supporting Corbyn.
Cruddas - well this intervention is too little, too late. As each hour goes by, the more votes are being cast and the less influence anyone can have on things. I imagine that the majority of votes will be cast quickly - the zeal of the Corbyn converts will ensure that.
Does "socially conservative" in the Cruddas piece mean anything other than anti-immigration? What else do people mean by it?
I think Cameron will go, if Cameron stays it will be determined by, inter alia, the following
1) A huge victory for IN in the EU referendum, a loss and Dave's a gone, a close victory for IN, and who knows
2) How the Corbynite wing of the Tory Party, the Eurosceptics, deal with the result, whatever it is
I don't follow your logic for 1). As far as I'm concerned, just because he didn't want to leave us to leave the EU doesn't mean he couldn't govern triumphantly over the subsequently Independent UK.
All things are possible. I get the distinct impression that Samantha Cameron's views on the subject are at least as important as David Cameron's. Never mind persuading the electorate of a change of mind, I wouldn't like to have to make that case to an unyielding Samantha Cameron.
I think Cameron will go, if Cameron stays it will be determined by, inter alia, the following
1) A huge victory for IN in the EU referendum, a loss and Dave's a gone, a close victory for IN, and who knows
2) How the Corbynite wing of the Tory Party, the Eurosceptics, deal with the result, whatever it is
I don't follow your logic for 1). As far as I'm concerned, just because he didn't want to leave us to leave the EU doesn't mean he couldn't govern triumphantly over the subsequently Independent UK.
All things are possible. I get the distinct impression that Samantha Cameron's views on the subject are at least as important as David Cameron's. Never mind persuading the electorate of a change of mind, I wouldn't like to have to make that case to an unyielding Samantha Cameron.
I think that Dave is astute enough to not follow Blair or Thatcher. Always leave them wanting more. He will not be short of things to do afterwards as an elder statesman, though it does make me feel old to have a retired PM who is younger than me!
John Cruddas has sent a letter to each of the Labour Leadership candidates, with five key questions:
There is a large part of the electorate Labour must win back who vote pragmatically for the party which offers them the best prospect of personal economic advancement. How will you win back these voters?
How will you convince the electorate that public spending and their taxes are secure with Labour and that we are the party of fiscal responsibility?
Immigration remains a significant national issue, particularly amongst socially conservative voters. How will you address concerns about the impact on services and provision, and about identity and belonging that are causing many of these voters to desert Labour?
Our welfare system has neither the trust nor the confidence of a majority of the electorate. There is a widespread belief that it gives to those who don’t deserve and abandons those who do. What approach to reform would you take?
Can you indicate how you might start a process of renewing the image, the practices and the politics of the party in order to reverse its growing cultural exclusivity and widen its appeal in the country?
Isn't this a set of questions that he should have asked a month ago? Votes are already being registered. It is too late to really engage with the debate. There will be an urgency to vote quickly - particularly from the enthusiastic new supporters. The time for policy/process discussion is fast running out.
Talking to a lifelong Labour supporter today, he has his ballot pack and hasn't decided who to vote for. He is not going to vote Corbyn but doesn't know who he will support. And he is hoping that the result is a party that splits into two. Not quite sure I see the logic of that.
But of all my left-leaning friends, he is the only one not actively supporting Corbyn.
Cruddas - well this intervention is too little, too late. As each hour goes by, the more votes are being cast and the less influence anyone can have on things. I imagine that the majority of votes will be cast quickly - the zeal of the Corbyn converts will ensure that.
Does "socially conservative" in the Cruddas piece mean anything other than anti-immigration? What else do people mean by it?
I normally think of as the opposite of 'socially liberal' - so (slightly stereotypically) anti gay marriage, pro capital punishment, pro harsh on drugs etc.
John Cruddas has sent a letter to each of the Labour Leadership candidates, with five key questions:
There is a large part of the electorate Labour must win back who vote pragmatically for the party which offers them the best prospect of personal economic advancement. How will you win back these voters?
How will you convince the electorate that public spending and their taxes are secure with Labour and that we are the party of fiscal responsibility?
Immigration remains a significant national issue, particularly amongst socially conservative voters. How will you address concerns about the impact on services and provision, and about identity and belonging that are causing many of these voters to desert Labour?
Our welfare system has neither the trust nor the confidence of a majority of the electorate. There is a widespread belief that it gives to those who don’t deserve and abandons those who do. What approach to reform would you take?
Can you indicate how you might start a process of renewing the image, the practices and the politics of the party in order to reverse its growing cultural exclusivity and widen its appeal in the country?
Isn't this a set of questions that he should have asked a month ago? Votes are already being registered. It is too late to really engage with the debate. There will be an urgency to vote quickly - particularly from the enthusiastic new supporters. The time for policy/process discussion is fast running out.
Talking to a lifelong Labour supporter today, he has his ballot pack and hasn't decided who to vote for. He is not going to vote Corbyn but doesn't know who he will support. And he is hoping that the result is a party that splits into two. Not quite sure I see the logic of that.
But of all my left-leaning friends, he is the only one not actively supporting Corbyn.
Cruddas - well this intervention is too little, too late. As each hour goes by, the more votes are being cast and the less influence anyone can have on things. I imagine that the majority of votes will be cast quickly - the zeal of the Corbyn converts will ensure that.
Does "socially conservative" in the Cruddas piece mean anything other than anti-immigration? What else do people mean by it?
I normally think of as the opposite of 'socially liberal' - so (slightly stereotypically) anti gay marriage, pro capital punishment, pro harsh on drugs etc.
Even the kippers seem socially liberal by that definition! The only people who seem to fit are the Islamists.
If Cameron stayed he would be accused of having lied in 2015.
Good point. Tory Prime Ministers have done that before. Remember when Tory PM Tony Blair was adamant in the 2005 General Election that he would serve the full term as PM, then handed over to Gordon in 2007?
Any chance of the PLP deciding to appoint its own leader? I am not sure whether this would require simply a change in Standing Orders or effectively outright UDI but it might appeal to circa 200 members of the PLP who would continue to provide the Leader of the Opposition
That's what I was talking about on the previous thread.
"New Labour" suddenly announced they have 200 MPs, leaving Old Labour with the unions...
John Cruddas has sent a letter to each of the Labour Leadership candidates, with five key questions:
There is a large part of the electorate Labour must win back who vote pragmatically for the party which offers them the best prospect of personal economic advancement. How will you win back these voters?
How will you convince the electorate that public spending and their taxes are secure with Labour and that we are the party of fiscal responsibility?
Isn't this a set of questions that he should have asked a month ago? Votes are already being registered. It is too late to really engage with the debate. There will be an urgency to vote quickly - particularly from the enthusiastic new supporters. The time for policy/process discussion is fast running out.
Talking to a lifelong Labour supporter today, he has his ballot pack and hasn't decided who to vote for. He is not going to vote Corbyn but doesn't know who he will support. And he is hoping that the result is a party that splits into two. Not quite sure I see the logic of that.
But of all my left-leaning friends, he is the only one not actively supporting Corbyn.
Cruddas - well this intervention is too little, too late. As each hour goes by, the more votes are being cast and the less influence anyone can have on things. I imagine that the majority of votes will be cast quickly - the zeal of the Corbyn converts will ensure that.
Does "socially conservative" in the Cruddas piece mean anything other than anti-immigration? What else do people mean by it?
I normally think of as the opposite of 'socially liberal' - so (slightly stereotypically) anti gay marriage, pro capital punishment, pro harsh on drugs etc.
Social conservative means to be resistant to change, or at least the pace of change, in social issues such as marriage, drugs etc IMHO. I don't think you necessarily have to be a social conservative to be against immigration on the current scale - you might just be worried about jobs, school places etc.
His main target is the Electoral Commission, the body responsible for overseeing elections. Pickles says he is ‘immensely disappointed’ with the commission, so does he think it should be scrapped?
‘I think we should look at its function. I have a very careful idea as to whether it’s necessary [to disband it] and I am personally announcing there is going to be a review,’ he says. ‘I am going to call for evidence, we are going to look at its long term future but we are also looking at a number of specific issues with regard to electoral registration, with regard to the conduct of polls. We are going to look to ensure that when you get a postal vote there is a reasonable certainty that you are the person who that postal vote is going to’.
At the outset, why did the Electoral Commission not investigate Tower Hamlets and electoral fraud generally? ‘I think has been too obsessed with voter registration and increasing the number of people at the polls regardless of the quality’.
If Cameron stayed he would be accused of having lied in 2015.
Good point. Tory Prime Ministers have done that before. Remember when Tory PM Tony Blair was adamant in the 2005 General Election that he would serve the full term as PM, then handed over to Gordon in 2007?
Any chance of the PLP deciding to appoint its own leader? I am not sure whether this would require simply a change in Standing Orders or effectively outright UDI but it might appeal to circa 200 members of the PLP who would continue to provide the Leader of the Opposition
That's what I was talking about on the previous thread.
"New Labour" suddenly announced they have 200 MPs, leaving Old Labour with the unions...
But "New" would have no money and no members.
On the plus side - none of the debts....
Seems to me that when the party comes out of this mess (and that could five years or more away) the union link will be the focus of a final showdown.
The people's flag is palest pink It's not the colour you might think White collar workers stand and cheer The Labour government is here
We'll change the country bit by bit So nobody will notice it And just to show that we're sincere We'll sing The Red Flag once a year
The cloth cap and the woolen scarf Are images outdated For we're the party's avant garde And we are educated
So raise the rolled umbrella high The college scarf, the old school tie And just to show that we're sincere We'll sing The Red Flag once a year
Three letters. P. P. E.
Followed by an Oxon.
I also quite like various historic versions,
The workers' flag is palest pink Since Gaitskell dipped it in the sink Now Harold's done the same as Hugh The workers' flag is brightest blue.
Or more recently,
New Labour's flag is palest pink It's not as red as you might think And Tony's added shades of blue He does not care for me and you
The latter could by the Corbynista anthem.
There's a pretty well-known American parody called "The Foreman's Job" which I've always thought was quite funny, but also goes a long way to explaining why Americans don't "do" socialism, or at least not by that word. No idea where I first heard it but it must have been around for a while.
The working class can kiss my ass I've got the foreman's job at last The system I'll no more resist I'm going to be a capitalist
Now you can raise the standard high Beneath its shade to fight and die But brother, please don't count on me I've up and joined the bourgeoisie
(There is also an alternative version I'd not heard of before, replacing "the system.." line with "The working class can kiss my ass "You can tell old Joe I'm off the dole, He can stick the Red Flag up his 'ole" - but presumably that's an older - 40s? 50s? - version.)
John Cruddas has sent a letter to each of the Labour Leadership candidates, with five key questions:
There is a large part of the electorate Labour must win back who vote pragmatically for the party which offers them the best prospect of personal economic advancement. How will you win back these voters?
How will you convince the electorate that public spending and their taxes are secure with Labour and that we are the party of fiscal responsibility?
Isn't this a set of questions that he should have asked a month ago? Votes are already being registered. It is too late to really engage with the debate. There will be an urgency to vote quickly - particularly from the enthusiastic new supporters. The time for policy/process discussion is fast running out.
Talking to a lifelong Labour supporter today, he has his ballot pack and hasn't decided who to vote for. He is not going to vote Corbyn but doesn't know who he will support. And he is hoping that the result is a party that splits into two. Not quite sure I see the logic of that.
But of all my left-leaning friends, he is the only one not actively supporting Corbyn.
Cruddas - well this intervention is too little, too late. As each hour goes by, the more votes are being cast and the less influence anyone can have on things. I imagine that the majority of votes will be cast quickly - the zeal of the Corbyn converts will ensure that.
Does "socially conservative" in the Cruddas piece mean anything other than anti-immigration? What else do people mean by it?
I normally think of as the opposite of 'socially liberal' - so (slightly stereotypically) anti gay marriage, pro capital punishment, pro harsh on drugs etc.
Social conservative means to be resistant to change, or at least the pace of change, in social issues such as marriage, drugs etc IMHO. I don't think you necessarily have to be a social conservative to be against immigration on the current scale - you might just be worried about jobs, school places etc.
On that definition Jezza looks socially conservative. His ideas and outlook have not changed for decades!
Cameron would be accused of lying if he stuck around, but that would only really be a problem if his polling made him sticking around look vulnerable, in which case he'd probably not risk it anyway - I doubt people in general would mind him deciding to stay on if they were indicating they still liked him better than the alternatives. It's the internal tory opponents who'd kick up a fuss about lying.
Any chance of the PLP deciding to appoint its own leader? I am not sure whether this would require simply a change in Standing Orders or effectively outright UDI but it might appeal to circa 200 members of the PLP who would continue to provide the Leader of the Opposition
That's what I was talking about on the previous thread.
"New Labour" suddenly announced they have 200 MPs, leaving Old Labour with the unions...
But "New" would have no money and no members.
On the plus side - none of the debts....
Seems to me that when the party comes out of this mess (and that could five years or more away) the union link will be the focus of a final showdown.
- a demographically diverse group of MPs Not a single English or Welsh MP representing the SNP - not diverse at all.
With regard to education, that probably reflects as much as anything else the comparatively small size of the private sector in Scottish education, plus the tuition fees imbalance that rewards (or at any rate, for many years rewarded - not sure if it's still in place) Scottish students for going to Scottish universities, rather than ones in England.
In Scotland around 4% of children are privately educated, compared to 7% for the UK as a whole. The Sutton Trust has produced research for the H of C:
Summary •Almost a third (32%) of MPs in the new House of Commons was privately educated. This means that the new House is only a little more representative than that elected in 2010, when 35% of MPs had been to a fee-paying school. • The research brief, Parliamentary Privilege – the MPs, shows that around half (48%) of Conservative MPs were privately educated, compared to 14% of Liberal Democrats, 5% of SNP MPs for whom we have data and 17% of Labour MPs. Among other MPs, 24% went to a fee-paying school. However, the proportion of privately educated Conservative MPs has fallen from 54% in the last parliament and 73% in 1979. •With only 7% of the general population attending independent schools, MPs are over four times more likely to have gone to a fee-paying school than their constituents. Out of those MPs who were privately educated, almost one in ten went to Eton. •The research draws on data compiled by the Sutton Trust and public affairs consultant Tim Carr from public sources, requests to candidates in marginal constituencies and those in seats where the previous MP was not standing again. •Nine out of ten MPs are graduates. Of those who went to a UK university, 26% hold an Oxbridge degree and 28% went to another Russell Group university. Whilst the public might expect MPs to have good degrees, previous research by the Trust found that those from the richest fifth of neighbourhoods are still nine times more likely to go to the top universities than those from the poorest fifth.
Corbyn is going to struggle to have the support of more than about 15% of Labour MPs. It's difficult to see how this is going to work in Parliament.
He doesn't believe in whipping - so he probably doesn't care.
He will potentially have a huge mandate from the membership - as long as he can form a Shadow Cabinet (which, of course, is no longer elected), he can drive the party in the direction he wants to take irrespective of what the MPs want.
Will certainly make key votes interesting to watch...
Corbyn is going to struggle to have the support of more than about 15% of Labour MPs. It's difficult to see how this is going to work in Parliament.
He doesn't believe in whipping - so he probably doesn't care.
He will potentially have a huge mandate from the membership - as long as he can form a Shadow Cabinet (which, of course, is no longer elected), he can drive the party in the direction he wants to take irrespective of what the MPs want.
Will certainly make key votes interesting to watch...
I wonder if he'll start believing in whipping if Tory start to become less effective due to split votes on the Labour side?
The effect of a less rigid approach by Labour will be more government victories in parliament.
Once Labour have a new leader, Cameron will be only the second party leader since the modern model of party leadership became established in the 1920s, to have faced four permanent leaders of both other main parties. Baldwin is the other.
'Tory MP Zac Goldsmith, frontrunner in the group seeking the Conservative London mayoral nomination, has warned the “glee” of his party colleagues at the prospect of Jeremy Corbyn becoming Labour Party leader is “totally misplaced”. He said Corbyn could somehow capture the “zeitgeist” and ride the wave of support that confounded his critics, leading Britain into “very dangerous terrain”.'
The people's flag is palest pink It's not the colour you might think White collar workers stand and cheer The Labour government is here
We'll change the country bit by bit So nobody will notice it And just to show that we're sincere We'll sing The Red Flag once a year
The cloth cap and the woolen scarf Are images outdated For we're the party's avant garde And we are educated
So raise the rolled umbrella high The college scarf, the old school tie And just to show that we're sincere We'll sing The Red Flag once a year
Three letters. P. P. E.
Followed by an Oxon.
I also quite like various historic versions,
The workers' flag is palest pink Since Gaitskell dipped it in the sink Now Harold's done the same as Hugh The workers' flag is brightest blue.
Or more recently,
New Labour's flag is palest pink It's not as red as you might think And Tony's added shades of blue He does not care for me and you
The latter could by the Corbynista anthem.
There's a pretty well-known American parody called "The Foreman's Job" which I've always thought was quite funny, but also goes a long way to explaining why Americans don't "do" socialism, or at least not by that word. No idea where I first heard it but it must have been around for a while.
The working class can kiss my ass I've got the foreman's job at last The system I'll no more resist I'm going to be a capitalist
Now you can raise the standard high Beneath its shade to fight and die But brother, please don't count on me I've up and joined the bourgeoisie
(There is also an alternative version I'd not heard of before, replacing "the system.." line with "The working class can kiss my ass "You can tell old Joe I'm off the dole, He can stick the Red Flag up his 'ole" - but presumably that's an older - 40s? 50s? - version.)
There is also this version, courtesy of The Liberator Songbook, sometimes sung at the Lib Dem Glee Club:
The people's flag is slightly pink It's not as red as most folk think We must not let the people know What socialists thought long ago.
Chorus: Don't let the scarlet banner float We want the middle classes vote Let our old-fashioned comrades sneer We'll stay in power for many a year.
It seems such a shame to speculate on the Tory succession when there is so much fun to be had watching the contortions of Labour - I deliberately omit "party" since that has connotations of togetherness. The pleasure in this is not exclusively for Tories; imagine how much fun Len is having. With all this new technology both the puppeteer and the strings can be made scarcely visible.
'Tory MP Zac Goldsmith, frontrunner in the group seeking the Conservative London mayoral nomination, has warned the “glee” of his party colleagues at the prospect of Jeremy Corbyn becoming Labour Party leader is “totally misplaced”. He said Corbyn could somehow capture the “zeitgeist” and ride the wave of support that confounded his critics, leading Britain into “very dangerous terrain”.'
Economic vandalism and failed leftist fuckwittery is not the zeitgeist, Zac. Let's see how far, eg Royal Mail renationalisation goes, when all the posties have to scrub the value of the shares they were given at the sell-off. There'll be plenty of shoe-gazing and mumbling of "can't we do the Gas Board first?"
It seems such a shame to speculate on the Tory succession when there is so much fun to be had watching the contortions of Labour - I deliberately omit "party" since that has connotations of togetherness. The pleasure in this is not exclusively for Tories; imagine how much fun Len is having. With all this new technology both the puppeteer and the strings can be made scarcely visible.
Corbyn would remain secure until a credible “stop Jeremy” candidate emerged – perhaps Chuka Umunna, Rachel Reeves or Dan Jarvis.
Tom Watson, who is the overwhelming favourite to emerge as deputy leader, would also be a stabilising presence. Corbyn’s inner circle is confident that, far from plotting to bring him down, Watson will bolster the Islington North MP.
In the back room, Corbyn’s office would be far from the amateurish dysfunction that often characterised the Miliband project. Simon Fletcher, Corbyn’s campaign supremo and Ken Livingstone’s old chief of staff, is widely expected to stay on in the event of a victory. Continuity at the top would avoid a repeat of the chaotic early years of Miliband’s leadership. He went two years without a permanent chief of staff before appointing the unworldly Tim Livesey, a former adviser to the archbishop of Canterbury. Unlike Livesey – who once asked a dumbstruck special adviser who the Sky News anchor Adam Boulton was – Fletcher is an experienced and effective but genial presence at the heart of Project Corbyn.
I don't understand this stuff about "how will Corbyn control his MPs?" That might be relevant if Labour were in government, and moderates were being asked to vote on very left-wing bills, but in Opposition it's a binary choice between accepting right-wing Tory legislation or not, which moderates won't have a problem with.
(And in any case, the grassroots will have something to say if rebel Labour MPs start making the difference between govt wins and defeats in Parliament.)
It seems such a shame to speculate on the Tory succession when there is so much fun to be had watching the contortions of Labour - I deliberately omit "party" since that has connotations of togetherness. The pleasure in this is not exclusively for Tories; imagine how much fun Len is having. With all this new technology both the puppeteer and the strings can be made scarcely visible.
I don't understand this stuff about "how will Corbyn control his MPs?" That might be relevant if Labour were in government, and moderates were being asked to vote on very left-wing bills, but in Opposition it's a binary choice between accepting right-wing Tory legislation or not, which moderates won't have a problem with.
(And in any case, the grassroots will have something to say if rebel Labour MPs start making the difference between govt wins and defeats in Parliament.)
To exploit a small Tory majority, Labour will need to ensure as close to 100% opposition turnout as possible on votes. That is harder if you do not enjoy the natural support of the people you're asking to turn up.
I think Cameron will be seeking a return to PR land and will be looking to follow in Tony Blair's steps and become a PR guru to world leaders and conglomerates. I'd expect that he'd resign with 6 - 12 months to go, that's assuming he isn't forced out after the EU ref, which would give him plenty time to get his business up and running and good to go in 2021.
Comments
We are spoilt
My instinct is that Cameron will be more tempted to take any EU-related criticism on the chin. But nevertheless he will step down before the election. He will will have been PM for 9 or so years, and LOTO for another five.
Stepping down isn't always about your chance of winning.
I think he will however be more confident in asserting "his candidate" for the succession.
It's this though.
He's been at the top table for over ten years, time to take a step back.
Plus I think it'll do wonders for any historical legacy, walking away on his own terms.
Some better news: my ability to comment during the day will now be curtailed.
Metaphor for the Labour Party?
The new annual labour leadership competition however offers great promise and whilst 2015 is a 'first effort' to iron out any wrinkles, I'm sure by 2016, the Labour Leader get me out of here show will be unmissable.....
There is a large part of the electorate Labour must win back who vote pragmatically for the party which offers them the best prospect of personal economic advancement. How will you win back these voters?
How will you convince the electorate that public spending and their taxes are secure with Labour and that we are the party of fiscal responsibility?
Immigration remains a significant national issue, particularly amongst socially conservative voters. How will you address concerns about the impact on services and provision, and about identity and belonging that are causing many of these voters to desert Labour?
Our welfare system has neither the trust nor the confidence of a majority of the electorate. There is a widespread belief that it gives to those who don’t deserve and abandons those who do. What approach to reform would you take?
Can you indicate how you might start a process of renewing the image, the practices and the politics of the party in order to reverse its growing cultural exclusivity and widen its appeal in the country?
http://labourlist.org/2015/08/five-questions-for-the-labour-leadership-candidates/
1) A huge victory for IN in the EU referendum, a loss and Dave's a gone, a close victory for IN, and who knows
2) How the Corbynite wing of the Tory Party, the Eurosceptics, deal with the result, whatever it is
She's got my vote sewn up and the vote of every other hormonal and perverted middle England gentleman, who watches and votes.
Talking to a lifelong Labour supporter today, he has his ballot pack and hasn't decided who to vote for. He is not going to vote Corbyn but doesn't know who he will support. And he is hoping that the result is a party that splits into two. Not quite sure I see the logic of that.
But of all my left-leaning friends, he is the only one not actively supporting Corbyn.
Cruddas - well this intervention is too little, too late. As each hour goes by, the more votes are being cast and the less influence anyone can have on things. I imagine that the majority of votes will be cast quickly - the zeal of the Corbyn converts will ensure that.
I hope he steps down/hands over to new leader with about 18 months to go. He's done more than most PMs and I can't see [m]any positive reasons to stay on. Going out on his own terms is much better than events beating you to it.
@politicshome: .@jeremycorbyn is 'barking up the wrong tree' in Scotland, says @AngusMacNeilSNP: http://t.co/2u9nZkHvVy http://t.co/ezdcZYRvb7
"New Labour" suddenly announced they have 200 MPs, leaving Old Labour with the unions...
But "New" would have no money and no members.
Islamophobic?
People who still wear hats?
As far as I'm concerned, just because he didn't want to leave us to leave the EU doesn't mean he couldn't govern triumphantly over the subsequently Independent UK.
https://twitter.com/iainmacwhirter/status/632173119147479040
He'll be a succesful PM and have departed on his own terms. That's very rare in politics.
Conservative MPs and Samantha Cameron are far bigger obstacles.
That way, all those second places would start looking like a success rather than a failure.
- Have you resigned yet
- You're a Blairite/incestuous cabal
- Daily Mail job application
- Confirmation bias [??]
- Corbyn is GRRREAT!
I quite like: Three letters. P. P. E.
Followed by an Oxon.
I also quite like various historic versions, Or more recently, The latter could by the Corbynista anthem.
There's a pretty well-known American parody called "The Foreman's Job" which I've always thought was quite funny, but also goes a long way to explaining why Americans don't "do" socialism, or at least not by that word. No idea where I first heard it but it must have been around for a while. (There is also an alternative version I'd not heard of before, replacing "the system.." line with "The working class can kiss my ass "You can tell old Joe I'm off the dole, He can stick the Red Flag up his 'ole" - but presumably that's an older - 40s? 50s? - version.)
That seems likely to reduce the monies available to Labour.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/11802502/Lord-Janner-in-court-LIVE.html
http://www.suttontrust.com/researcharchive/parliamentary-privilege-the-mps-2015/
Summary
•Almost a third (32%) of MPs in the new House of Commons was privately educated. This means that the new House is only a little more representative than that elected in 2010, when 35% of MPs had been to a fee-paying school.
• The research brief, Parliamentary Privilege – the MPs, shows that around half (48%) of Conservative MPs were privately educated, compared to 14% of Liberal Democrats, 5% of SNP MPs for whom we have data and 17% of Labour MPs. Among other MPs, 24% went to a fee-paying school. However, the proportion of privately educated Conservative MPs has fallen from 54% in the last parliament and 73% in 1979.
•With only 7% of the general population attending independent schools, MPs are over four times more likely to have gone to a fee-paying school than their constituents. Out of those MPs who were privately educated, almost one in ten went to Eton.
•The research draws on data compiled by the Sutton Trust and public affairs consultant Tim Carr from public sources, requests to candidates in marginal constituencies and those in seats where the previous MP was not standing again.
•Nine out of ten MPs are graduates. Of those who went to a UK university, 26% hold an Oxbridge degree and 28% went to another Russell Group university. Whilst the public might expect MPs to have good degrees, previous research by the Trust found that those from the richest fifth of neighbourhoods are still nine times more likely to go to the top universities than those from the poorest fifth.
He will potentially have a huge mandate from the membership - as long as he can form a Shadow Cabinet (which, of course, is no longer elected), he can drive the party in the direction he wants to take irrespective of what the MPs want.
Will certainly make key votes interesting to watch...
The effect of a less rigid approach by Labour will be more government victories in parliament.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/labour/11803090/Jeremy-Corbyn-could-undermine-Northern-Ireland-peace-process-if-he-becomes-Labour-leader-rival-claims.html
'Tory MP Zac Goldsmith, frontrunner in the group seeking the Conservative London mayoral nomination, has warned the “glee” of his party colleagues at the prospect of Jeremy Corbyn becoming Labour Party leader is “totally misplaced”. He said Corbyn could somehow capture the “zeitgeist” and ride the wave of support that confounded his critics, leading Britain into “very dangerous terrain”.'
https://twitter.com/DPJHodges/status/632184338466119680
That caricature won't be true, of course, but it has enough truth to it.
Followed by an Oxon.
I also quite like various historic versions, Or more recently, The latter could by the Corbynista anthem.
There's a pretty well-known American parody called "The Foreman's Job" which I've always thought was quite funny, but also goes a long way to explaining why Americans don't "do" socialism, or at least not by that word. No idea where I first heard it but it must have been around for a while. (There is also an alternative version I'd not heard of before, replacing "the system.." line with "The working class can kiss my ass "You can tell old Joe I'm off the dole, He can stick the Red Flag up his 'ole" - but presumably that's an older - 40s? 50s? - version.)
There is also this version, courtesy of The Liberator Songbook, sometimes sung at the Lib Dem Glee Club:
The people's flag is slightly pink
It's not as red as most folk think
We must not let the people know
What socialists thought long ago.
Chorus:
Don't let the scarlet banner float
We want the middle classes vote
Let our old-fashioned comrades sneer
We'll stay in power for many a year.
Edit: Link http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2015/08/coups-splits-or-surprising-calm-what-jeremy-corbyn-era-would-look-labour
TBH, I'm not the teeniest bit interested in speculating about who'll take over from Cameron in 3+yrs.
Ho hum.
Interesting view on coup or not in that article
It is the only system guaranteed to lead to those on the right of the party being part of the ShadCab.
Whether that's "keep your enemies closer"/"pissing out the tent" or "stab in the back" territory might depend on the polls...
http://www.thenational.scot/comment/gordon-macintyre-kemp-would-scotland-now-be-independent-if-we-hadnt-had-oil.6344
He himself has said he doesn't enjoy the job, but it's a huge privilege and honour.
(And in any case, the grassroots will have something to say if rebel Labour MPs start making the difference between govt wins and defeats in Parliament.)
@kevverage: UK-wide pooling & sharing is demonstrably helping Scotland ... and this reinforces case for indy?
Man's an idiot. https://t.co/gEUsUU0O4p
I guess this will become commonplace for brits to so they can compete. Good old mass immigration, a benefit for us all
https://twitter.com/dailymailuk/status/632189447782703105
Yes, it's the sort of job I was looking for, as an interim position.