Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Methinks that Burnham’s nationalise the railways plan could

13»

Comments

  • OchEyeOchEye Posts: 1,469
    Dair said:

    Ruth Davidson is running scared of the SNP and has given up any hope of holding on to her list seat. Possible she also believes there is less chance of fictitious burly men in Edinburgh

    Looks like the Scottish Conservatives are giving up on Glasgow. This is the first sign of how much of a wipe out the Loyalists are facing in 2016 should there be significant numbers of split votes.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-33797255

    Looks like many people are beginning to be afraid of the SNP

    http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/13576914.Journalist_who_found_alleged_flaws_in_police_investigation_into_Emma_Caldwell_murder_says_he_was_unlawfully_spied_on/

    http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/13573343.SNP_under_fire_over_indyref_omission_from_conference_agenda/?ref=ar

    Pretty soon we should have the interesting sight of the members of the SNP being afraid of the elite of the party.
  • IndigoIndigo Posts: 9,966
    edited 2015 06
    .
  • DairDair Posts: 6,108
    edited 2015 06
    nt
  • RecidivistRecidivist Posts: 4,679
    edited 2015 06
    Pauly said:

    EPG said:



    :D

    "Government can't run a bank better than the private sector. "

    I point out that the reason the government ended up owning the shares in the first place was that the private sector failed dismally at running a whole set of banks.

    The wider problem is that we have a whole set of economic notions like this one which are deeply ingrained but which are dreadful guides to action. They might sound sensible, but so did the phlogiston theory at one point. You wouldn't get very far running a chemical plant using it.

    Maybe it is better for banks to be in private hands. Maybe it is much better to have them run by the state. I don't know. And neither does anyone else.
  • AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    'Former president Bill Clinton had a private telephone conversation in late spring with Donald Trump at the same time that the billionaire investor and reality-television star was nearing a decision to run for the White House, according to associates of both men.

    Four Trump allies and one Clinton associate familiar with the exchange said that Clinton encouraged Trump’s efforts to play a larger role in the Republican Party and offered his own views of the political landscape'
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/bill-clinton-called-donald-trump-ahead-of-republicans-2016-launch/2015/08/05/e2b30bb8-3ae3-11e5-b3ac-8a79bc44e5e2_story.html

    LOL, Bill Clinton knew exactly what he was doing!
    Memories of Perot indeed
    Is Perot = Ross Perot (doing a quick google search)?
    Yes(!)
    I've probably made you feel old again :grin:
    Nah, the story of Ross Perot is not general knowledge. It's the sort of political intrigue that interests pbers...
    What is the story of Ross Perot, as it happens....
    Perot was a billionaire who stood for the Presidency in 1992. Fundamentally a Republican, Perot became disillusioned with Reagan and largely bankrolled his own campaign (don't worry - he had plenty of money). For a while it looked like he would win, but in the end he won a respectable 19% but no electoral college seats - helping Bill Clinton into the White House. He stood again in 1996, but his moment had passed.
    I thought Perot voters split 50/50 Republican/Democrat when forced to choose between Clinton/Bush.
Sign In or Register to comment.