Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Revised seat projection approach from Martin Baxter points

SystemSystem Posts: 12,183
edited June 2013 in General

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Revised seat projection approach from Martin Baxter points to UKIP starting to win Commons seats on a 16% share not 23%

As has been highlighted a fair bit recently UKIP have a real challenge converting the substantial poll shares now being reported into seats because of the way the first past the post system operates with the smaller parties.

Read the full story here


«1

Comments

  • redcliffe62redcliffe62 Posts: 342
    edited June 2013
    Interesting analysis.
    A UKIP/Tory coalition has to be a possibility despite the swivel eyed loons comments. This assumes a UKIP vote is not seen as a wasted vote.
    Crazy things happening in Oz last hour or so, with the removed PM Rudd trying to get back. Unions (who control Labor in Oz) trying to avoid secret ballot at 9am tomorrow after caucus confirms a spill is on and threatening those who support him to be deselected.
  • redcliffe62redcliffe62 Posts: 342
    tim said:

    Labour majority on 31%.
    Don't we all love the Tory addiction to FPTP

    With minority party seats including those in Northern Ireland I think 30% is enough is it not if Tories are on 30% or below?
  • asjohnstoneasjohnstone Posts: 1,276
    This chart seems to imply that at 14% or below the UKIP hurts the tories, but above this threshold they take votes equally off Labour and Tory.

    Does anyone have a basis for this ?
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,395
    redcliffe - A petition been circulating since midday for a ballot, 30 required, less than Rudd got in his last challenge. On the unions mixed messages, some saying the leadership up to MPs, as 30-32 MPs will lose their seats anyway according to the polls with Gillard, I would expect most have now decided to tell the unions to go hang!! Anyway, off now, will catch up this evening
    http://www.abc.net.au/news/
  • FinancierFinancier Posts: 3,916
    Latest YouGov / The Sun results 25th June - CON 32%, LAB 40%, LD 11%, UKIP 11%; APP -33 - See more at: http://yougov.co.uk/news/2013/06/26/update-labour-lead-8/#sthash.4DzOc3kw.dpuf
  • redcliffe62redcliffe62 Posts: 342
    edited June 2013
    HYUFD said:

    redcliffe - A petition been circulating since midday for a ballot, 30 required, less than Rudd got in his last challenge. On the unions mixed messages, some saying the leadership up to MPs, as 30-32 MPs will lose their seats anyway according to the polls with Gillard, I would expect most have now decided to tell the unions to go hang!! Anyway, off now, will catch up this evening
    http://www.abc.net.au/news/

    If it is a private ballot and numbers are close at about 50 each then she will lose as people at the end move back to Rudd. She is (privately) refusing to have a secret ballot as that remains her best hope to name and shame the waverers. Labor democracy at its best! "Unions and the faceless men" led by John McTernan as they call it here.
    Abbott saying it in parliament right now. AWU boss said PM Rudd polls collapsed and Rudd should be replaced. Polls worse but unions saying a different story, what about the people not the unions?
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    It's worth noting that UKIP's rise, up to any remotely likely level, assists the Lib Dems (presumably at the Conservatives' expense).

    Meanwhile, back in the real world, UKIP's polling is falling.
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    @asjohnstone The table is simply showing how the parties perform assuming the Lib Dems stay constantly at 9% and UKIP take votes equally from Labour and the Conservatives. But it's not saying that's going to happen.

    In those conditions, UKIP's rise actually benefits Labour. With an 8 point gap between Labour and the Conservatives and UKIP polling 14%, the seat gap is 136. With the same 8 point gap and UKIP polling 24%, the seat gap grows to 157.
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    OT the new Forth Crossing names is to be announced today:

    "Caledonia Bridge, Queensferry Crossing and St Margaret's Crossing are reported to be the most popular."

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-23047293

    Funnily enough "300 Years of Unionist Oppression" didn't make it onto the ballot......

    Meanwhile UKIP back on 11 in YouGov - lowest since early May and the locals boost.
  • FinancierFinancier Posts: 3,916
    edited June 2013
    More Chaos in Labour Wales

    Education Minister Leighton Andrews has resigned following a row over his defence of a school which faced closure under his own surplus places policy.

    Mr Andrews had been seen holding a banner in support of Pentre Primary School in his Rhondda constituency.

    And First Minister Carwyn Jones failed to defend him from opposition claims he undermined his own policy.

    Mr Jones had previously rebuked Mr Andrews for his actions in defending a local hospital from possible cuts.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-23056173

    Welsh Government Publishes Advice on How to Have A Career in the Sex Industry

    The First Minister has launched an investigation as the Welsh Government is heavily criticised for offering career advice on how to earn hundreds of pounds a night working in the sex industry.

    Before it was suddenly removed, the Business Wales website included practical tips on becoming a stripper and running a lap dancing club, erotic boutique and escort agency.

    They were among hundreds of “start up business ideas” listed on the website which allowed job hunters to download free “business startup factsheets”.

    Helpful hints included that strippers and lap dancers “can expect to earn an average £232 per evening”, with annual incomes that “can range from £24,000 to £48,000”.

    Users interested in setting up an escort agency are advised that “the escorts provide companionship to the client when attending events such as a formal dinner or the theatre”.

    Clients typically include single businessmen and women, according to the Welsh Government guide, who hire an escort to accompany them to events and holidays.

    “Escort agencies usually have several escorts on their books. Agencies charge escorts an ‘introduction fee’ of between 25% and 55% of what the client pays to the escort,” the factsheet says.

    “Clients typically pay between £120-£250 per hour for an escort’s time and company.”

    http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/welsh-government-publishes-advice-how-4710231

    It is to be wondered which Labour assembly member has the relevant experience.
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    @tim Looking at the current odds, I can't work out whether I prefer the 7/4 with Ladbrokes on UKIP tallying 5-10% or the evens with Paddy Power that UKIP will poll less than 8%.
  • FinancierFinancier Posts: 3,916
    British teachers are among the best paid in Europe – but work fewer hours in the classroom, an international report found.

    The average primary school teacher in England earned £27,832 in 2011, much more than in France, Spain and Italy. Scottish primary school teachers take home even more – £30,168.

    Yet English primary teachers teach for just 684 hours a year, compared to 936 in France and 770 in Italy.

    It means that while an English primary teacher earns £40.69 per hour spent in the classroom, a French teacher gets just £22.27.

    Only three other countries in Europe have higher pay rates for primary school teachers.

    The revelation comes in a report by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, which represents industrialised nations.

    It will add to concerns that public sector staff are hugely overpaid compared to their competitors.

    Our GPs are also among the best remunerated in the world.Despite the findings, a poll yesterday by teaching union NASUWT revealed that 53 per cent of teachers say their job satisfaction has fallen over the last year.

    Some 78 per cent said their biggest concern was workload and 45 per cent were unhappy with pay levels. Teaching unions are preparing for nationwide strike action before the end of the year.

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2348127/Teachers-England-best-paid-world-They-earn-spend-time-classroom.html#ixzz2XIYhV0kv

    British pupils spend far less time learning core subjects like the 3Rs and science than their counterparts in other Western nations, the study revealed.

    Secondary school pupils in the UK spend less than half their time on reading, writing, literature, mathematics, science and foreign languages - one of the few countries to structure the school day like this.

    But in countries like France and Ireland, students spend approaching 60 per cent of their time on such key subjects.

    The OECD report found that British pupils spend just 46 per cent on ‘core subjects’ - mathematics, science, modern languages and reading, writing and literature.

    By contrast, French pupils spend 57 per cent of their time on these subjects, while in Germany they spend 54 per cent of their time and in Ireland 56 per cent.

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2348618/British-pupils-miss-3Rs-Children-spend-time-core-subjects-Western-countries.html#ixzz2XIZJhjKH
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    tim said:

    antifrank said:

    @tim Looking at the current odds, I can't work out whether I prefer the 7/4 with Ladbrokes on UKIP tallying 5-10% or the evens with Paddy Power that UKIP will poll less than 8%.

    Back them both, there's an excellent chance of a juicy middle of 5-7.99%

    I've done just that.
  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/business/spendingreview/article3800475.ece

    Setting out plans to cut public spending by £11.5 billion in 2015-16, the Chancellor will impose a further squeeze on the wages of six million workers by abolishing incremental pay. He will also tell councils to pool their budgets to cut costs; flesh out proposals to cap spending on housing and incapacity benefits; and unveil a five-year programme of infrastructure spending.

    About 60,000 expatriate pensioners will lose their winter fuel allowance under a new “temperature test”. Anyone living in a region of Europe with warmer average temperatures than the warmest part of Britain will forfeit the annual payment, worth up to £300.

    The change will not come into effect until after 2015 because of David Cameron’s pledge not to touch pensioner benefits in this Parliament.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,544
    edited June 2013
    Sadly, perhaps because of time, Martin Baxter's regional prediction page doesn't allow for factoring in UKIP.
  • Mick_PorkMick_Pork Posts: 6,530

    Lawrence Family To Ask May For Public Inquiry

    The parents of the murdered student will urge the Home Secretary to launch a public inquiry into the latest "smear" claims.

    The Lawrence family will meet the Home Secretary to ask for a new public inquiry into claims that police secretly hunted for information to smear their campaign.

    Michael Mansfield QC, who represents the family of murdered student Stephen Lawrence, said they also want the inquiry to investigate all cases of undercover activity carried out by Scotland Yard's former Special Demonstration Squad throughout the 1980s and 1990s.

    It follows claims by one of the squad's former undercover officers, Peter Francis, that he was told to dig up "dirt" on the Lawrence family, friend Duwayne Brooks, who witnessed the murder, and campaigners shortly after Stephen's death in 1993

    Allegations have also been made that officers secretly bugged meetings they held with Mr Brooks and his lawyers.

    Earlier this week Mrs May said Mr Francis's claims would instead be investigated in two ongoing inquiries - one into the undercover operations of the Special Demonstration Squad and another into alleged police corruption in the original Lawrence inquiry.

    After the announcement, Mr Lawrence said he had "no confidence" that these would get to the bottom of the issue.

    http://news.sky.com/story/1108171/lawrence-family-to-ask-may-for-public-inquiry
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,544
    Financier said:

    British teachers are among the best paid in Europe – but work fewer hours in the classroom, an international report found.

    The average primary school teacher in England earned £27,832 in 2011, much more than in France, Spain and Italy. Scottish primary school teachers take home even more – £30,168.

    Yet English primary teachers teach for just 684 hours a year, compared to 936 in France and 770 in Italy.

    It means that while an English primary teacher earns £40.69 per hour spent in the classroom, a French teacher gets just £22.27.

    Only three other countries in Europe have higher pay rates for primary school teachers.

    The revelation comes in a report by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, which represents industrialised nations.

    It will add to concerns that public sector staff are hugely overpaid compared to their competitors.

    Our GPs are also among the best remunerated in the world.Despite the findings, a poll yesterday by teaching union NASUWT revealed that 53 per cent of teachers say their job satisfaction has fallen over the last year.

    Some 78 per cent said their biggest concern was workload and 45 per cent were unhappy with pay levels. Teaching unions are preparing for nationwide strike action before the end of the year.

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2348127/Teachers-England-best-paid-world-They-earn-spend-time-classroom.html#ixzz2XIYhV0kv

    British pupils spend far less time learning core subjects like the 3Rs and science than their counterparts in other Western nations, the study revealed.

    Secondary school pupils in the UK spend less than half their time on reading, writing, literature, mathematics, science and foreign languages - one of the few countries to structure the school day like this.

    But in countries like France and Ireland, students spend approaching 60 per cent of their time on such key subjects.

    The OECD report found that British pupils spend just 46 per cent on ‘core subjects’ - mathematics, science, modern languages and reading, writing and literature.

    By contrast, French pupils spend 57 per cent of their time on these subjects, while in Germany they spend 54 per cent of their time and in Ireland 56 per cent.

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2348618/British-pupils-miss-3Rs-Children-spend-time-core-subjects-Western-countries.html#ixzz2XIZJhjKH

    Is time spent out of class ion preparation, marking etc, factored in on the same basis for each country?

  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    Plato said:

    Setting out plans to cut public spending by £11.5 billion in 2015-16, .

    Which as R4 has been pointing out is less than 2% of government spending. Truly "Much ado about Nothing"....

  • Mick_PorkMick_Pork Posts: 6,530
    akwasi sarpong ‏@akwasisarpong 1h

    Nick Clegg forces rethink on UK visa bond plan http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2013/jun/25/nick-clegg-visa-bond-theresa-may … "The policy has not yet been signed off" details still being discussed
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 53,936
    Today is quite an important day for the government and the tories in particular in that they are setting out a significant part of the stall that they will fight the next election on. How that is received will set the agenda and the political discussion for some time.

    It is a discussion that Labour are having trouble producing anything coherent on. Labour's response today will be looked at very closely. It is also a discussion in which UKIP takes no part at all given their lack of Westminster representation. I suspect that the obvious downward share on their support will continue.

    When did UKIP last poll less than the Lib Dems? Before the locals I think. I would not be at all surprised to see that within the next week.

    Given that the Brits don't take the Euros remotely seriously I wonder what sort of a boost they will get from that in Westminster polling. I think Tim's and antifrank's bets here offer far better value than OGH's. Politics is going to get increasingly serious over the next couple of years and this always squeezes the minority parties.
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @KathViner
    Julia Gillard calls leadership ballot for 7pm Canberra time tonight. Extraordinary. All live updates here http://gu.com/p/3gpex/tw
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,667

    Financier said:

    British teachers are among the best paid in Europe – but work fewer hours in the classroom, an international report found.

    The average primary school teacher in England earned £27,832 in 2011, much more than in France, Spain and Italy. Scottish primary school teachers take home even more – £30,168.

    Yet English primary teachers teach for just 684 hours a year, compared to 936 in France and 770 in Italy.

    It means that while an English primary teacher earns £40.69 per hour spent in the classroom, a French teacher gets just £22.27.

    Only three other countries in Europe have higher pay rates for primary school teachers.

    The revelation comes in a report by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, which represents industrialised nations.

    It will add to concerns that public sector staff are hugely overpaid compared to their competitors.

    Our GPs are also among the best remunerated in the world.Despite the findings, a poll yesterday by teaching union NASUWT revealed that 53 per cent of teachers say their job satisfaction has fallen over the last year.

    Some 78 per cent said their biggest concern was workload and 45 per cent were unhappy with pay levels. Teaching unions are preparing for nationwide strike action before the end of the year.

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2348127/Teachers-England-best-paid-world-They-earn-spend-time-classroom.html#ixzz2XIYhV0kv

    British pupils spend far less time learning core subjects like the 3Rs and science than their counterparts in other Western nations, the study revealed.

    Secondary school pupils in the UK spend less than half their time on reading, writing, literature, mathematics, science and foreign languages - one of the few countries to structure the school day like this.

    But in countries like France and Ireland, students spend approaching 60 per cent of their time on such key subjects.

    The OECD report found that British pupils spend just 46 per cent on ‘core subjects’ - mathematics, science, modern languages and reading, writing and literature.

    By contrast, French pupils spend 57 per cent of their time on these subjects, while in Germany they spend 54 per cent of their time and in Ireland 56 per cent.

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2348618/British-pupils-miss-3Rs-Children-spend-time-core-subjects-Western-countries.html#ixzz2XIZJhjKH

    Is time spent out of class ion preparation, marking etc, factored in on the same basis for each country?

    Of course not. Neither is the fact that class sizes here are generally a lot bigger - meaning there will inevitably be more work that needs to be done outside the classroom.

    What's interesting is that our teachers tend to be much younger than they are elsewhere. If teaching is the cushy, long holiday, over-paid profession Gove, the Mail and right wingers in general like to imply, why is it that we lose so many experienced teachers?

  • redcliffe62redcliffe62 Posts: 342
    Leadership ballot in Oz between Rudd possibly and Gillard in less than 3 hours time. Very nasty behind the scenes with union threats to people who are anti Gillard. She might just hold on.
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    DavidL said:


    It is a discussion that Labour are having trouble producing anything coherent on.

    And what they are producing is getting a lot of stick from the left:

    http://labourlist.org/2013/06/ken-clarke-gordon-brown-and-why-balls-and-miliband-are-wrong-to-back-tory-spending-plans/
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    DavidL said:

    When did UKIP last poll less than the Lib Dems? Before the locals I think. I would not be at all surprised to see that within the next week. .

    Mid April - tho in truth they had been level pegging since the beginning of March:

    http://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/owxdo60pb6/YG-Archives-Pol-Trackers-Voting-Trends-with-UKIP-250613.pdf
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,012
    tim said:

    What will UKIP's vote share be at the next General Election?
    0-5% 5/2
    5-10% 7/4
    10-15% 7/2
    15-20% 6/1
    20-25% 14/1
    25%+ 16/1


    7/4 should be 4/6

    Bolted on.

    Were it not 2yr money I would even think of having a flirt myself.
  • MillsyMillsy Posts: 900
    Wasn't Rudd defeated last year..and two years before that? They must be desperate
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 42,962

    Financier said:

    British teachers are among the best paid in Europe – but work fewer hours in the classroom, an international report found.

    The average primary school teacher in England earned £27,832 in 2011, much more than in France, Spain and Italy. Scottish primary school teachers take home even more – £30,168.

    Yet English primary teachers teach for just 684 hours a year, compared to 936 in France and 770 in Italy.

    It means that while an English primary teacher earns £40.69 per hour spent in the classroom, a French teacher gets just £22.27.

    Only three other countries in Europe have higher pay rates for primary school teachers.

    The revelation comes in a report by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, which represents industrialised nations.

    It will add to concerns that public sector staff are hugely overpaid compared to their competitors.

    Our GPs are also among the best remunerated in the world.Despite the findings, a poll yesterday by teaching union NASUWT revealed that 53 per cent of teachers say their job satisfaction has fallen over the last year.

    Some 78 per cent said their biggest concern was workload and 45 per cent were unhappy with pay levels. Teaching unions are preparing for nationwide strike action before the end of the year.

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2348127/Teachers-England-best-paid-world-They-earn-spend-time-classroom.html#ixzz2XIYhV0kv

    British pupils spend far less time learning core subjects like the 3Rs and science than their counterparts in other Western nations, the study revealed.

    Secondary school pupils in the UK spend less than half their time on reading, writing, literature, mathematics, science and foreign languages - one of the few countries to structure the school day like this.

    But in countries like France and Ireland, students spend approaching 60 per cent of their time on such key subjects.

    The OECD report found that British pupils spend just 46 per cent on ‘core subjects’ - mathematics, science, modern languages and reading, writing and literature.

    By contrast, French pupils spend 57 per cent of their time on these subjects, while in Germany they spend 54 per cent of their time and in Ireland 56 per cent.

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2348618/British-pupils-miss-3Rs-Children-spend-time-core-subjects-Western-countries.html#ixzz2XIZJhjKH

    Is time spent out of class ion preparation, marking etc, factored in on the same basis for each country?

    Of course not. Neither is the fact that class sizes here are generally a lot bigger - meaning there will inevitably be more work that needs to be done outside the classroom.

    What's interesting is that our teachers tend to be much younger than they are elsewhere. If teaching is the cushy, long holiday, over-paid profession Gove, the Mail and right wingers in general like to imply, why is it that we lose so many experienced teachers?

    Is that right? It'd be interesting to see the relevant age profiles.

    It is also important to know if classroom assistants in the UK are classed as 'teachers'; in some cases I have seen them included, in others not. They also make comparisons to other countries difficult.

    One thing springs to mind: education (especially primary schools) are dominated by women (three-quarters of all teachers), could mothers taking long breaks from their jobs to bring up their own children be skewing the results?

    How does the table in 1.3.2 compare to other European countries?

    https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/182407/DFE-RR151.pdf
  • Mick_PorkMick_Pork Posts: 6,530
    tim said:

    antifrank said:

    @tim Looking at the current odds, I can't work out whether I prefer the 7/4 with Ladbrokes on UKIP tallying 5-10% or the evens with Paddy Power that UKIP will poll less than 8%.

    Back them both, there's an excellent chance of a juicy middle of 5-7.99%

    General Election 2010: Ukip challenge 'cost Tories a Commons majority'

    The UK Independence Party's small but significant showing at the polls may have cost David Cameron a majority in the Commons, voting figures suggest.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/ukip/7693877/General-Election-2010-Ukip-challenge-cost-Tories-a-Commons-majority.html
    Given that the swivel eyed loons and other tories thought the kippers mere 3.1% might have cost them a majority last time, guess what they would blame a Cammie and Osbrowne failure on again if the kippers doubled or even trebled that?

    Perhaps the fops should bang on about Europe and immigration more? That always ends well for them. ;^ )
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 53,936

    DavidL said:


    It is a discussion that Labour are having trouble producing anything coherent on.

    And what they are producing is getting a lot of stick from the left:

    http://labourlist.org/2013/06/ken-clarke-gordon-brown-and-why-balls-and-miliband-are-wrong-to-back-tory-spending-plans/
    The labour leadership will not mind getting some grief from their left. Unlike disgruntled tories they have nowhere else to go and it boosts their credibility with centre and swing voters in that they instantly look more moderate.

    What they cannot cope with is plans that fall apart at the first hint of a challenge or make very little sense. The mixed messages of whether they will borrow more or not, whether they will restore the tory cuts or not, whether any new spending requires to be "funded" by cuts elsewhere and where that "where" might be are causing them more difficulties.

    Personally, I think this is because they have not done enough homework over the last couple of years. They need to work out what their priorities are for spending and what is not a priority.

    Incidentally, I think you are underestimating the implications of Osborne's statement today. It is not simply the cuts but the attempts to control managed expenditure that are important. This is the part of government expenditure that has been rising since the election and is usually referred to as the "automatic stabilisers". Making it clear that this spending will not be allowed to increase to reflect the economic situation is a radical change which will involve more caps on benefits etc. than we have seen so far.

  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    I do wish Martin Baxter and others would keep up. My ARSE has been predicting Kipper seats for several months now.
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    Millsy said:

    Wasn't Rudd defeated last year..and two years before that? They must be desperate

    Gillard is trying to make this the last time
    Gillard is putting conditions on this ballot.

    Whomever wins tonight is the leader of the Labor Party.

    Whomever loses needs to exit politics.

    The Prime MInister says if she loses, she will exit politics.

  • Mick_PorkMick_Pork Posts: 6,530
    edited June 2013
    David Jack ‏@DJack_Journo

    Ex-pat pensioners will lose winter fuel allowance under "temperature test" to be announced by Osborne today http://bit.ly/12ojyeN
    Cammie reveals how Osbrowne's new 'temperature test' may work.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCovGqMiZyA


    What could possibly go wrong? ;^ )
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,012
    Mick_Pork said:

    tim said:

    antifrank said:

    @tim Looking at the current odds, I can't work out whether I prefer the 7/4 with Ladbrokes on UKIP tallying 5-10% or the evens with Paddy Power that UKIP will poll less than 8%.

    Back them both, there's an excellent chance of a juicy middle of 5-7.99%

    General Election 2010: Ukip challenge 'cost Tories a Commons majority'

    The UK Independence Party's small but significant showing at the polls may have cost David Cameron a majority in the Commons, voting figures suggest.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/ukip/7693877/General-Election-2010-Ukip-challenge-cost-Tories-a-Commons-majority.html
    Given that the swivel eyed loons and other tories thought the kippers mere 3.1% might have cost them a majority last time, guess what they would blame a Cammie and Osbrowne failure on again if the kippers doubled or even trebled that?

    Perhaps the fops should bang on about Europe and immigration more? That always ends well for them. ;^ )

    I think society is changing in what it wants from its politics that much is obvious. We now have 2x centre-right parties espousing broadly similar ideas. That battle will be fought on competence and on competence right now the Cons are winning.

    As for the Kippers, I have long said and continue to believe that of the, say, 15% now, 50% of that will go back to the Cons leaving mid to high single figure % for the Kippers (at best) in the GE, of which some will be ex-Lab.

    So the issue still remains what the 2010 Lab=LD contingent does.
  • Leadership ballot in Oz between Rudd possibly and Gillard in less than 3 hours time. Very nasty behind the scenes with union threats to people who are anti Gillard. She might just hold on.

    I wouldn't be at all surprised if Rudd didn't contest it.
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @journodave
    Kevin Rudd to speak in the next 15 minutes on the leadership #spill
  • Mick_PorkMick_Pork Posts: 6,530
    tim said:

    JackW said:

    I do wish Martin Baxter and others would keep up. My ARSE has been predicting Kipper seats for several months now.


    Predicting 5 UKIP seats.
    Oh dear
    Not quite so easy to see where those seats may be when you consider that any marginals will get targeted hard by the lib dems, tories and labour.

    Take Eastleigh,
    Conservatives target Southampton Itchen and Eastleigh for next general election seats

    TWO Hampshire constituencies are on a Conservative list of 40 “must win” seats for the next election – and the fight is already under way.

    Labour-held Southampton Itchen and Eastleigh – retained by the Liberal Democrats in a by-election, in February – are on a newly-released target list.

    Campaign managers have already been recruited for the general election, still almost two years away, and promised extra freedom to run their operations.

    Usually young and energetic, they have been urged to fight local campaigns – even if that involves ignoring messages from Tory central office.

    And candidates are in place in all 40 seats except for Eastleigh, where Maria Hutchings fought and lost for the Conservatives earlier this year.

    In Southampton Itchen, Royston Smith, the Tory leader on Southampton City Council, has been picked to fight the successor to John Denham, who is standing down.

    http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/news/district/eastleigh/10507196.Tories_target_seats_in_Hampshire
    Doesn't look like the kippers will be getting as amusing a candidate as Maria Hutchings to go up against in 2015.





  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,667

    Financier said:

    British teachers are among the best paid in Europe – but work fewer hours in the classroom, an international report found.

    The average primary school teacher in England earned £27,832 in 2011, much more than in France, Spain and Italy. Scottish primary school teachers take home even more – £30,168.

    Yet English primary teachers teach for just 684 hours a year, compared to 936 in France and 770 in Italy.

    It means that while an English primary teacher earns £40.69 per hour spent in the classroom, a French teacher gets just £22.27.

    Only three other countries in Europe have higher pay rates for primary school teachers.

    The revelation comes in a report by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, which represents industrialised nations.

    It will add to concerns that public sector staff are hugely overpaid compared to their competitors.

    Our GPs are also among the best remunerated in the world.Despite the findings, a poll yesterday by teaching union NASUWT revealed that 53 per cent of teachers say their job satisfaction has fallen over the last year.

    Some 78 per cent said their biggest concern was workload and 45 per cent were unhappy with pay levels. Teaching unions are preparing for nationwide strike action before the end of the year.

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2348127/Teachers-England-best-paid-world-They-earn-spend-time-classroom.html#ixzz2XIYhV0kv

    British pupils spend far less time learning core subjects like the 3Rs and science than their counterparts in other Western nations, the study revealed.

    Secondary school pupils in the UK spend less than half their time on reading, writing, literature, mathematics, science and foreign languages - one of the few countries to structure the school day like this.

    But in countries like France and Ireland, students spend approaching 60 per cent of their time on such key subjects.

    The OECD report found that British pupils spend just 46 per cent on ‘core subjects’ - mathematics, science, modern languages and reading, writing and literature.

    By contrast, French pupils spend 57 per cent of their time on these subjects, while in Germany they spend 54 per cent of their time and in Ireland 56 per cent.

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2348618/British-pupils-miss-3Rs-Children-spend-time-core-subjects-Western-countries.html#ixzz2XIZJhjKH

    Is time spent out of class ion preparation, marking etc, factored in on the same basis for each country?

    Of course not. Neither is the fact that class sizes here are generally a lot bigger - meaning there will inevitably be more work that needs to be done outside the classroom.

    What's interesting is that our teachers tend to be much younger than they are elsewhere. If teaching is the cushy, long holiday, over-paid profession Gove, the Mail and right wingers in general like to imply, why is it that we lose so many experienced teachers?

    Is that right? It'd be interesting to see the relevant age profiles.

    It is also important to know if classroom assistants in the UK are classed as 'teachers'; in some cases I have seen them included, in others not. They also make comparisons to other countries difficult.

    One thing springs to mind: education (especially primary schools) are dominated by women (three-quarters of all teachers), could mothers taking long breaks from their jobs to bring up their own children be skewing the results?

    How does the table in 1.3.2 compare to other European countries?

    https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/182407/DFE-RR151.pdf

    We have a very young teaching workforce at both primary and secondary level, according to the OECD:

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2013/jun/25/uk-primary-school-teachers-youngest-oecd

    About 60% of UK primary school teachers are 40 or younger, and 31% are 30 or younger. Across OECD member nations an average of 13% of primary school teachers are under 30.
    In secondary schools only Brazil and Indonesia have more teachers 40 or below than the UK, and only Indonesia has more under 30.
    In Italy, 85% of primary teachers are over 40, in Sweden 72% and in Germany 71%. In Finland, Germany, Austria, Spain and Sweden fewer than 10% of secondary school teachers are 30 or younger. The OECD data covers both state and independent schools.
    In its analysis the OECD reported: "The relatively young teaching force in the UK stands in stark contrast to the situation in many European countries where inflexible employment conditions coupled with declining youth populations have led to ageing teacher populations."
    Andreas Schleicher, the OECD's deputy director for education and skills, said there were advantages and disadvantages for the UK. Younger teachers were more likely to have more recent, up-to-date training, while older teachers were more experienced.
    Part of the reason may be the structure of teachers' pay in the UK. In England the starting salary for a primary school is above the OECD average, and the salary with 10 years' experience is about £6,000 higher. "But in England, teachers' salaries at the top of the scale do not increase when a teacher has had more than 10 years' experience, so teachers salaries eventually fall behind the OECD average of $45,602 [£29,484]," the OECD noted.


  • NeilNeil Posts: 7,983
    God bless the Australian Labor party - pass the popcorn!
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,543
    The "temperature test" is a neat phrase which will catch attention and approval (in the same way that the "bedroom tax" caught attention and opprobrium) - people generally like things that affect someone else. People won't follow the details of the statement and it'll distract from some of the nastier stuff. I agree up to a point with DavidL that Labour's stance (nicer austerity or less austerity?) is obscure to most people, but Balls is going through the necessary period of reining in expectations - better to take the hit now than later. So I'd expect a short-term narrowing of the lead, but strategically the Labour position remains better.

    On topic, UKIP are clearly drifting down a bit but they've shown their potential if anther favourable event comes along.
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 42,962

    Financier said:

    British teachers are among the best paid in Europe – but work fewer hours in the classroom, an international report found.

    The average primary school teacher in England earned £27,832 in 2011, much more than in France, Spain and Italy. Scottish primary school teachers take home even more – £30,168.

    Yet English primary teachers teach for just 684 hours a year, compared to 936 in France and 770 in Italy.

    It means that while an English primary teacher earns £40.69 per hour spent in the classroom, a French teacher gets just £22.27.

    Only three other countries in Europe have higher pay rates for primary school teachers.

    The revelation comes in a report by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, which represents industrialised nations.

    It will add to concerns that public sector staff are hugely overpaid compared to their competitors.

    Our GPs are also among the best remunerated in the world.Despite the findings, a poll yesterday by teaching union NASUWT revealed that 53 per cent of teachers say their job satisfaction has fallen over the last year.

    Some 78 per cent said their biggest concern was workload and 45 per cent were unhappy with pay levels. Teaching unions are preparing for nationwide strike action before the end of the year.

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2348127/Teachers-England-best-paid-world-They-earn-spend-time-classroom.html#ixzz2XIYhV0kv

    British pupils spend far less time learning core subjects like the 3Rs and science than their counterparts in other Western nations, the study revealed.

    Secondary school pupils in the UK spend less than half their time on reading, writing, literature, mathematics, science and foreign languages - one of the few countries to structure the school day like this.

    But in countries like France and Ireland, students spend approaching 60 per cent of their time on such key subjects.

    The OECD report found that British pupils spend just 46 per cent on ‘core subjects’ - mathematics, science, modern languages and reading, writing and literature.

    By contrast, French pupils spend 57 per cent of their time on these subjects, while in Germany they spend 54 per cent of their time and in Ireland 56 per cent.

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2348618/British-pupils-miss-3Rs-Children-spend-time-core-subjects-Western-countries.html#ixzz2XIZJhjKH

    Is time spent out of class ion preparation, marking etc, factored in on the same basis for each country?

    Of course not. Neither is the fact that class sizes here are generally a lot bigger - meaning there will inevitably be more work that needs to be done outside the classroom.

    What's interesting is that our teachers tend to be much younger than they are elsewhere. If teaching is the cushy, long holiday, over-paid profession Gove, the Mail and right wingers in general like to imply, why is it that we lose so many experienced teachers?

    Is that right? It'd be interesting to see the relevant age profiles.

    It is also important to know if classroom assistants in the UK are classed as 'teachers'; in some cases I have seen them included, in others not. They also make comparisons to other countries difficult.

    One thing springs to mind: education (especially primary schools) are dominated by women (three-quarters of all teachers), could mothers taking long breaks from their jobs to bring up their own children be skewing the results?

    How does the table in 1.3.2 compare to other European countries?

    https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/182407/DFE-RR151.pdf

    We have a very young teaching workforce at both primary and secondary level, according to the OECD:

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2013/jun/25/uk-primary-school-teachers-youngest-oecd

    About 60% of UK primary school teachers are 40 or younger, and 31% are 30 or younger. Across OECD member nations an average of 13% of primary school teachers are under 30.
    In secondary schools only Brazil and Indonesia have more teachers 40 or below than the UK, and only Indonesia has more under 30.
    In Italy, 85% of primary teachers are over 40, in Sweden 72% and in Germany 71%. In Finland, Germany, Austria, Spain and Sweden fewer than 10% of secondary school teachers are 30 or younger. The OECD data covers both state and independent schools.
    In its analysis the OECD reported: "The relatively young teaching force in the UK stands in stark contrast to the situation in many European countries where inflexible employment conditions coupled with declining youth populations have led to ageing teacher populations."
    Andreas Schleicher, the OECD's deputy director for education and skills, said there were advantages and disadvantages for the UK. Younger teachers were more likely to have more recent, up-to-date training, while older teachers were more experienced.
    Part of the reason may be the structure of teachers' pay in the UK. In England the starting salary for a primary school is above the OECD average, and the salary with 10 years' experience is about £6,000 higher. "But in England, teachers' salaries at the top of the scale do not increase when a teacher has had more than 10 years' experience, so teachers salaries eventually fall behind the OECD average of $45,602 [£29,484]," the OECD noted.
    Cheers for that, and it appears that answers the question to some degree: pay scales are better for young teachers, whilst worse for older, more experienced ones.

    I'm not sure that there's a problem here.
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453

    strategically the Labour position remains better.

    "Borrowing is bad. We will do more." is not a strategically superior position.
  • Mick_PorkMick_Pork Posts: 6,530
    edited June 2013
    TOPPING said:

    We now have 2x centre-right parties espousing broadly similar ideas. That battle will be fought on competence and on competence right now the Cons are winning.

    As for the Kippers, I have long said and continue to believe that of the, say, 15% now, 50% of that will go back to the Cons leaving mid to high single figure % for the Kippers (at best) in the GE, of which some will be ex-Lab.

    So the issue still remains what the 2010 Lab=LD contingent does.

    I refer you to Osbrowne's omnishambles and how that gifted little Ed and labour their current poll lead if you seriously think competence is such a strong point for the tories while that toxic liability is in place.

    Regardless, the battle in 2015 is going to be on trust with the tories trying to hammer labour, little Ed and Balls all day every day that they can't be trusted with the economy again after the bank crash, while little Ed has to make the case that he can be trusted as PM and that the tories and Osbrowne can't be trusted with public services and growth and that the tories will deliver endless austerity.

    That's hardly very speculative since CCHQ and Crosby are quite clearly going to go after little Ed and labour on trust and the economy while little Ed's tory triangulation on cuts shows you that they know perfectly well where the attacks will come from.

    7-9% for the kippers hardly looks that far fetched and a lot of people think that's toughly where it will be. Some of it will be ex-Lab but that won't stop Farage and the kippers from driving a great many tory MP's to running about like headless chickens over Europe and immigration yet again. It's what they do best.

    The 2010 Lab=LD are just more voters to be won over and no different to those other voters who have abandoned their parties since 2010 or can be won over in 2015. It's just another way of slicing the voter pool who are up for grabs.
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    So Ukip need a lower % of the vote for a maj than the Cons ?

    Mmmm.

    Is there a similar table for the imminent Peoples Assembly surge ??
  • NeilNeil Posts: 7,983
    Rudd to announce....
  • NeilNeil Posts: 7,983
    Run Rudd, run!!!

    Rudd runs!

    Bless.
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    Neil said:

    God bless the Australian Labor party - pass the popcorn!

    Live coverage of Rudd statement;

    http://media.smh.com.au/news/national-times/live-kevin-rudd-fronts-the-media-4521844.html

    They make our own dear Tories seem like models of loyalty and discipline, don't they!
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,667

    Financier said:

    British teachers are among the best paid in Europe – but work fewer hours in the classroom, an international report found.

    The average primary school teacher in England earned £27,832 in 2011, much more than in France, Spain and Italy. Scottish primary school teachers take home even more – £30,168.

    Yet English primary teachers teach for just 684 hours a year, compared to 936 in France and 770 in Italy.

    It means that while an English primary teacher earns £40.69 per hour spent in the classroom, a French teacher gets just £22.27.

    Only three other countries in Europe have higher pay rates for primary school teachers.

    The revelation comes in a report by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, which represents industrialised nations.

    It will add to concerns that public sector staff are hugely overpaid compared to their competitors.

    Our GPs are also among the best remunerated in the world.Despite the findings, a poll yesterday by teaching union NASUWT revealed that 53 per cent of teachers say their job satisfaction has fallen over the last year.

    Some 78 per cent said their biggest concern was workload and 45 per cent were unhappy with pay levels. Teaching unions are preparing for nationwide strike action before the end of the year.

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2348127/Teachers-England-best-paid-world-They-earn-spend-time-classroom.html#ixzz2XIYhV0kv

    British pupils spend far less time learning core subjects like the 3Rs and science than their counterparts in other Western nations, the study revealed.

    Secondary school pupils in the UK spend less than half their time on reading, writing, literature, mathematics, science and foreign languages - one of the few countries to structure the school day like this.

    But in countries like France and Ireland, students spend approaching 60 per cent of their time on such key subjects.

    The OECD report found that British pupils spend just 46 per cent on ‘core subjects’ - mathematics, science, modern languages and reading, writing and literature.

    By contrast, French pupils spend 57 per cent of their time on these subjects, while in Germany they spend 54 per cent of their time and in Ireland 56 per cent.

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2348618/British-pupils-miss-3Rs-Children-spend-time-core-subjects-Western-countries.html#ixzz2XIZJhjKH

    Is time spent out of class ion preparation, marking etc, factored in on the same basis for each country?

    Of course not. Neither is the fact that class sizes here are generally a lot bigger - meaning there will inevitably be more work that needs to be done outside the classroom.

    What's interesting is that our teachers tend to be much younger than they are elsewhere. If teaching is the cushy, long holiday, over-paid profession Gove, the Mail and right wingers in general like to imply, why is it that we lose so many experienced teachers?

    Is that right? It'd be interesting to see the relevant age profiles.

    It is also important to know if classroom assistants in the UK are classed as 'teachers'; in some cases I have seen them included, in others not. They also make comparisons to other countries difficult.

    One thing springs to mind: education (especially primary schools) are dominated by women (three-quarters of all teachers), could mothers taking long breaks from their jobs to bring up their own children be skewing the results?

    How does the table in 1.3.2 compare to other European countries?

    https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/182407/DFE-RR151.pdf

    We have a very young teaching workforce at both primary and secondary level, according to the OECD:

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2013/jun/25/uk-primary-school-teachers-youngest-oecd

    About 60% of UK primary school teachers are 40 or younger, and 31% are 30 or younger. Across OECD member nations an average of 13% of primary school teachers are under 30.
    In secondary schools only Brazil and Indonesia have more teachers 40 or below than the UK, and only Indonesia has more under 30.
    In Italy, 85% of primary teachers are over 40, in Sweden 72% and in Germany 71%. In Finland, Germany, Austria, Spain and Sweden fewer than 10% of secondary school teachers are 30 or younger. The OECD data covers both state and independent schools.
    In its analysis the OECD reported: "The relatively young teaching force in the UK stands in stark contrast to the situation in many European countries where inflexible employment conditions coupled with declining youth populations have led to ageing teacher populations."
    Andreas Schleicher, the OECD's deputy director for education and skills, said there were advantages and disadvantages for the UK. Younger teachers were more likely to have more recent, up-to-date training, while older teachers were more experienced.
    Part of the reason may be the structure of teachers' pay in the UK. In England the starting salary for a primary school is above the OECD average, and the salary with 10 years' experience is about £6,000 higher. "But in England, teachers' salaries at the top of the scale do not increase when a teacher has had more than 10 years' experience, so teachers salaries eventually fall behind the OECD average of $45,602 [£29,484]," the OECD noted.
    Cheers for that, and it appears that answers the question to some degree: pay scales are better for young teachers, whilst worse for older, more experienced ones.

    I'm not sure that there's a problem here.

    I agree to an extent. The only caveat being we do not want to lose expoerienced teachers who are good at their jobs. But overall these stats do rather give the lie to the idea that teaching is a cushy number involving little more than good pay, short working hours and very long holidays. If that were the case we would have a far older teaching workforce as no-one would ever leave until they were forced to retire.

  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    Rudd's going for it....
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 43,408

    OT the new Forth Crossing names is to be announced today:

    "Caledonia Bridge, Queensferry Crossing and St Margaret's Crossing are reported to be the most popular."

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-23047293

    Funnily enough "300 Years of Unionist Oppression" didn't make it onto the ballot......

    Meanwhile UKIP back on 11 in YouGov - lowest since early May and the locals boost.

    Is that your usual doctored half quote to rubbish Scotland and try to cover your hatred of Scotland and all things Scottish. You really are one of the saddest gits on here, and there are many.
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,667

    The "temperature test" is a neat phrase which will catch attention and approval (in the same way that the "bedroom tax" caught attention and opprobrium) - people generally like things that affect someone else. People won't follow the details of the statement and it'll distract from some of the nastier stuff. I agree up to a point with DavidL that Labour's stance (nicer austerity or less austerity?) is obscure to most people, but Balls is going through the necessary period of reining in expectations - better to take the hit now than later. So I'd expect a short-term narrowing of the lead, but strategically the Labour position remains better.

    On topic, UKIP are clearly drifting down a bit but they've shown their potential if anther favourable event comes along.

    Not sure about that. The Tories wil want to highlight some of the "nastier stuff" because it is a great big dividing line between them and Labour. I'd expect further squeezes on some aspects of welfare aimed at the feckless, idle and sponging working poor - housing benefits, for example.

  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 43,408

    Plato said:

    Setting out plans to cut public spending by £11.5 billion in 2015-16, .

    Which as R4 has been pointing out is less than 2% of government spending. Truly "Much ado about Nothing"....

    Another union benefit for Scotland , the NAY sayers will trumpet it from the heights.
  • NeilNeil Posts: 7,983
    Rudd is standing to stop Abbott doing to Australia what the Tories did to the UK....
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    Part of Rudd's rationale is that Gillard is not offering a choice vs Abbott .......Ed......hellooo!
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    Queensferry crossing is the best name - unfortunately the other bridge is in Queensferry too...
  • redcliffe62redcliffe62 Posts: 342
    edited June 2013
    Rudd requested to challenge by colleagues, to provide Oz people with real choice, and he can do better, and are fearful of opposition getting a landslide victory. One to quit politics afterwards as both have agreed to that qualification. All or nothing for both. They really hate each other but he did not target her in his speech, all against the opposition. This is personality more than policy at this stage.
  • NeilNeil Posts: 7,983
    If TSE is around ... the lizard men may have stolen Jim Corr's money:

    http://www.rte.ie/news/2013/0624/458577-jim-corr-acc-bank/

  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    malcolmg said:


    Is that your usual doctored half quote to rubbish Scotland and try to cover your hatred of Scotland and all things Scottish. You really are one of the saddest gits on here, and there are many.

    And you are easily the most humourless. As you evidently missed it, it was a parody of James Kelly's two day long laughathon at attempting to blame Scottish mortality figures on the Union.

    FYI, I am Scottish - and you don't need to follow the SNP line to love things Scottish and Scotland. Indeed, holding differing opinions is part of what makes Scotland great - unless you are an SNP drone frightened of your own shadow...
  • davidthecondavidthecon Posts: 165
    Rudd should keep his beak out of UK politics. Go forth and multiply, you duplicitous little two faced wimp.
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,441
    Neil said:

    Rudd is standing to stop Abbott doing to Australia what the Tories did to the UK....

    Cameron in budgie smugglers ?

  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    Neil said:

    Rudd is standing to stop Abbott doing to Australia what the Tories did to the UK....

    And our "Double dip, nearly triple dip" recession......

  • Mick_PorkMick_Pork Posts: 6,530

    Not sure about that. The Tories wil want to highlight some of the "nastier stuff" because it is a great big dividing line between them and Labour. I'd expect further squeezes on some aspects of welfare aimed at the feckless, idle and sponging working poor - housing benefits, for example.

    They will and it will run the same risk it always has of retoxification. The tea party tories won't care of course but Cammie is a second rate Blair impersonator for a reason and he will be acutely aware that he is no longer polling well ahead of the tory brand. That was the entire purpose of him after all. Get rid of the nasty party tag for the tories while appealing to those lost tory voters Blair had scooped up.

  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,850
    Good morning, everyone.

    Interesting turn of events in Oz. Who will be Great and Powerful when the dust settles?

    As Optimus Prime said before his epic confrontation with Megatron: One shall stand, and one shall fall.
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216

    Rudd requested to challenge by colleagues, to provide Oz people with real choice, and he can do better, and are fearful of opposition getting a landslide victory. One to quit politics afterwards as both have agreed to that qualification. All or nothing for both. They really hate each other but he did not target her in his speech, all against the opposition. This is personality more than policy at this stage.

    I thought it was a good speech - he's "doing it for the country".......well, he would say that, wouldn't he!

  • SlackbladderSlackbladder Posts: 9,773
    It's all kicking off in both Texas and Oz this morning then..

    Did anyone see those senate scenes... well done those democrats and the protestors
  • redcliffe62redcliffe62 Posts: 342

    Good morning, everyone.

    Interesting turn of events in Oz. Who will be Great and Powerful when the dust settles?

    As Optimus Prime said before his epic confrontation with Megatron: One shall stand, and one shall fall.

    MYGUESS;

    If a secret ballot is allowed 53-47 to Rudd, if not secret then 53-47 to Gillard.
  • Mick_PorkMick_Pork Posts: 6,530

    Neil said:

    Rudd is standing to stop Abbott doing to Australia what the Tories did to the UK....

    Cameron in budgie smugglers ?

    Dont be ridiculous. Cammie is a serious PM for serious times.
    LBC 97.3 ‏@lbc973 15 Jun

    David Cameron's admitted that he sometimes works in his pyjamas. What else do you do in your pyjamas other than sleeping?


  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216

    Rudd should keep his beak out of UK politics. Go forth and multiply, you duplicitous little two faced wimp.

    He wasn't - he was just illustrating what would happen if we don't dump that useless cow Gillard and let Abbott wins the election. The fact that he trotted out our mythical "double dip recession" will not worry him or his supporters....
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    Based purely on appearance, Julia Gillard should win. Kevin Rudd looks like such a wet blanket. Julia Gillard looks cold, but you could imagine her being decent company after a bottle of win.
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    Who actually wears pyjamas nowadays, apart from children?
  • Mick_PorkMick_Pork Posts: 6,530
    LOL
    blackeyelined ‏@blackeyelined 18m

    Kevin Rudd: Abbott will copy the conservatives in UK and implement a slash and burn austerity program & plunge Australia into recession.
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    The Liberal Party were ready (no, not here - don't be silly!)

    http://youtu.be/NQ4oUYW2xZo
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    antifrank said:

    Based purely on appearance, Julia Gillard should win. Kevin Rudd looks like such a wet blanket. Julia Gillard looks cold, but you could imagine her being decent company after a bottle of win.

    A glamourous knitter to bootee!

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/25/gillard-ridiculed-knitting-royal-kangaroo
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    No UKIP vote is wasted ! It helps elect a better government.
  • QuincelQuincel Posts: 4,042
    New polls out in New York puts Weiner leading the Dem primary by 5 points. Still 10/1 available on him winning at Ladbrokes if you want it.
  • SquareRootSquareRoot Posts: 7,095
    @tim how much has Obama added to the US's national debt... round trillions will do.
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    Since Australia has a tiny deficit, has until recently been in surplus and is projected to return to surplus in 2015, it's not immediately obvious why any party would wish to go on an austerity programme.
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    tim praises Obama as the US house price index shows a yoy rise of 12%

    Sounds like a dangerous bubble.
  • Mick_PorkMick_Pork Posts: 6,530
    mango ‏@ByronBayMango 6m

    Kevin Rudd $1.15, Julia Gillard $4.75 to be leader of the Labor Party at the next federal election. http://centrebet.com/#Sports/1784434
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @GuidoFawkes
    Labour today will be showcasing their new "yeah but no but yeah but no, but you know what I mean" policy on spending. #SR13
  • CD13CD13 Posts: 6,366
    UKIP need publicity to maintain their current share, particularly news about European interference in our affairs. Failing that, a big dose of the two Eds or Cameron being indecisive.

    The Euro elections will be key, so betting on their share in a GE this far out is too risky for me.
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    Tee hee

    @GuidoFawkes
    I see @BBCRadio4 have scheduled the midday reply to @GeorgeOsborne's #spendingreview from the leader of the opposition, Mr @OwenJones84
  • OblitusSumMeOblitusSumMe Posts: 9,143
    tim said:

    Labour majority on 31%.
    Don't we all love the Tory addiction to FPTP

    That result puts the Tories more than 30 seats ahead of UKIP despite polling 5 percentage points less, and with two and a half times as many seats as the Lib Dems won on the same vote share in 2010.

    FPTP arguably working in the Tories favour.

    You would be hard pressed to find a result to more perfectly make the case for PR, though. One of the more delicious ironies being that some of the simpletons who fondly imagine that PR would lead to perennial Lib-Lab government would be faced with a scenario where Con+UKIP had won a majority of the vote...
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,701
    edited June 2013
    The truth is whether UKIP win a seat has very little to do with their national share and everything to do with whether or not they successfully target two or three seats. Personally I think they ought to aim for the highest possible national share rather than trying to win seats because IMO winning 20% would have more of a long-term impact than winning 10% and a couple of seats.
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    Andy_JS said:

    The truth is whether UKIP win a seat has very little to do with their national share and everything to do with whether or not they successfully target two or three seats. Personally I think they ought to aim for the highest possible national share rather than trying to win seats because IMO winning 20% would have more of a long-term impact than winning 10% and a couple of seats.

    They will be lucky to win double digits. I stand by my prediction of 6%. Maybe 1 seat.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,243
    What are seats 1 and 2 to fall - Boston & Skegness then North Thanet ?

    The map doesn't seem to show which UKIP seats fall 1st.

    I think UKIP's true value is about 14% at the moment.
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 37,412
    DavidL said:

    Today is quite an important day for the government and the tories in particular in that they are setting out a significant part of the stall that they will fight the next election on. How that is received will set the agenda and the political discussion for some time.

    It is a discussion that Labour are having trouble producing anything coherent on. Labour's response today will be looked at very closely. It is also a discussion in which UKIP takes no part at all given their lack of Westminster representation. I suspect that the obvious downward share on their support will continue.

    When did UKIP last poll less than the Lib Dems? Before the locals I think. I would not be at all surprised to see that within the next week.

    Given that the Brits don't take the Euros remotely seriously I wonder what sort of a boost they will get from that in Westminster polling. I think Tim's and antifrank's bets here offer far better value than OGH's. Politics is going to get increasingly serious over the next couple of years and this always squeezes the minority parties.

    I think 7% or so is the likeliest result for UKIP in 2015. That may be enough to win a seat or two.

    I think the most permanent effect of the Euro elections will be to boost UKIP's local government representation on the same day.

    If a by-election were to take place in Portsmouth South, or Ribble Valley, they'd be well placed to win it.

  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    The Guardian live blog on the Australian Labour Leadership election:

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/26/labor-leadership-spill-gillard-rudd-live
  • BenMBenM Posts: 1,795
    edited June 2013
    The Spending Review today just clinches the fact that Osborne is a massive, crowning failure.

    He's also hobbling himself and his Party economically right up to the next election.

    I know Tories have this touching faith that the economy will somehow spring back magically just because Government spending is cut, but back in the real world this is not the case and we face more stagnation now right up until 2015.

    Secretly perhaps Labour knows this and plays along while Osborne tightens the noose around the neck of the Tories' electoral chances.
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 42,962

    Financier said:

    British teachers are among the best paid in Europe – but work fewer hours in the classroom, an international report found.

    The average primary school teacher in England earned £27,832 in 2011, much more than in France, Spain and Italy. Scottish primary school teachers take home even more – £30,168.

    Yet English primary teachers teach for just 684 hours a year, compared to 936 in France and 770 in Italy.

    It means that while an English primary teacher earns £40.69 per hour spent in the classroom, a French teacher gets just £22.27.

    Only three other countries in Europe have higher pay rates for primary school teachers.

    The revelation comes in a report by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, which represents industrialised nations.

    It will add to concerns that public sector staff are hugely overpaid compared to their competitors.

    Our GPs are also among the best remunerated in the world.Despite the findings, a poll yesterday by teaching union NASUWT revealed that 53 per cent of teachers say their job satisfaction has fallen over the last year.

    Some 78 per cent said their biggest concern was workload and 45 per cent were unhappy with pay levels. Teaching unions are preparing for nationwide strike action before the end of the year.

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2348127/Teachers-England-best-paid-world-They-earn-spend-time-classroom.html#ixzz2XIYhV0kv

    British pupils spend far less time learning core subjects like the 3Rs and science than their counterparts in other Western nations, the study revealed.

    Secondary school pupils in the UK spend less than half their time on reading, writing, literature, mathematics, science and foreign languages - one of the few countries to structure the school day like this.

    But in countries like France and Ireland, students spend approaching 60 per cent of their time on such key subjects.

    The OECD report found that British pupils spend just 46 per cent on ‘core subjects’ - mathematics, science, modern languages and reading, writing and literature.

    By contrast, French pupils spend 57 per cent of their time on these subjects, while in Germany they spend 54 per cent of their time and in Ireland 56 per cent.

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2348618/British-pupils-miss-3Rs-Children-spend-time-core-subjects-Western-countries.html#ixzz2XIZJhjKH

    Is time spent out of class ion preparation, marking etc, factored in on the same basis for each country?

    Of course not. Neither is the fact that class sizes here are generally a lot bigger - meaning there will inevitably be more work that needs to be done outside the classroom.

    What's interesting is that our teachers tend to be much younger than they are elsewhere. If teaching is the cushy, long holiday, over-paid profession Gove, the Mail and right wingers in general like to imply, why is it that we lose so many experienced teachers?

    Is that right? It'd be interesting to see the relevant age profiles.

    It is also important to know if classroom assistants in the UK are classed as 'teachers'; in some cases I have seen them included, in others not. They also make comparisons to other countries difficult.

    One thing springs to mind: education (especially primary schools) are dominated by women (three-quarters of all teachers), could mothers taking long breaks from their jobs to bring up their own children be skewing the results?

    How does the table in 1.3.2 compare to other European countries?

    https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/182407/DFE-RR151.pdf

    We have a very young teaching workforce at both primary and secondary level, according to the OECD:

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2013/jun/25/uk-primary-school-teachers-youngest-oecd

    About 60% of UK primary school teachers are 40 or younger, and 31% are 30 or younger. Across OECD member nations an average of 13% of primary school teachers are under 30.
    In secondary schools only Brazil and Indonesia have more teachers 40 or below than the UK, and only Indonesia has more under 30.
    In Italy, 85% of primary teachers are over 40, in Sweden 72% and in Germany 71%. In Finland, Germany, Austria, Spain and Sweden fewer than 10% of secondary school teachers are 30 or younger. The OECD data covers both state and independent schools.
    In its analysis the OECD reported: "The relatively young teaching force in the UK stands in stark contrast to the situation in many European countries where inflexible employment conditions coupled with declining youth populations have led to ageing teacher populations."
    Andreas Schleicher, the OECD's deputy director for education and skills, said there were advantages and disadvantages for the UK. Younger teachers were more likely to have more recent, up-to-date training, while older teachers were more experienced.
    Part of the reason may be the structure of teachers' pay in the UK. In England the starting salary for a primary school is above the OECD average, and the salary with 10 years' experience is about £6,000 higher. "But in England, teachers' salaries at the top of the scale do not increase when a teacher has had more than 10 years' experience, so teachers salaries eventually fall behind the OECD average of $45,602 [£29,484]," the OECD noted.
    Cheers for that, and it appears that answers the question to some degree: pay scales are better for young teachers, whilst worse for older, more experienced ones.

    I'm not sure that there's a problem here.

    I agree to an extent. The only caveat being we do not want to lose expoerienced teachers who are good at their jobs. But overall these stats do rather give the lie to the idea that teaching is a cushy number involving little more than good pay, short working hours and very long holidays. If that were the case we would have a far older teaching workforce as no-one would ever leave until they were forced to retire.
    There may be other reasons. Two mature engineers I know (one of whom is excellent) started off their post-uni careers as teachers (one physics, one maths). Both left teaching because, after (in one case) twenty years in the occupation, they were bored and wanted to stretch themselves a little.

    One current teacher I know has only been in teaching for around eight years and is already bored teaching essentially the same stuff year after year. She loves the kids, but she knows the subject matter backwards.

    Anecdotes, but I wonder how true it is of other teachers?
  • Mick_PorkMick_Pork Posts: 6,530
    surbiton said:

    Andy_JS said:

    The truth is whether UKIP win a seat has very little to do with their national share and everything to do with whether or not they successfully target two or three seats. Personally I think they ought to aim for the highest possible national share rather than trying to win seats because IMO winning 20% would have more of a long-term impact than winning 10% and a couple of seats.

    They will be lucky to win double digits. I stand by my prediction of 6%. Maybe 1 seat.
    That's on the low side though it's still about double what they got in 2010 lest we forget.

    I can't see any other viable strategy than NF focusing everything on one or two seats to try and get something out of the kipper 'surge'. I somehow doubt Farage would be happy to come out of the 2015 election still not an MP. One of the reasons the kippers are so easily ignored and fade after locals and other elections is that they have no MPs so have to shout from the sidelines or rely on the tories to bang on about Europe or immigration for them.

    Actually having an MP isn't a panacea either as the greens and Galloway show you that even managing to win one doesn't guarantee you blanket coverage and some kind of inevitable party upswing afterwards.


  • MillsyMillsy Posts: 900
    Andy_JS said:

    The truth is whether UKIP win a seat has very little to do with their national share and everything to do with whether or not they successfully target two or three seats. Personally I think they ought to aim for the highest possible national share rather than trying to win seats because IMO winning 20% would have more of a long-term impact than winning 10% and a couple of seats.

    It wouldn't help them if they got 49% at the election and zero seats
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,243
    Sean_F said:


    I think 7% or so is the likeliest result for UKIP in 2015. That may be enough to win a seat or two.

    I think the most permanent effect of the Euro elections will be to boost UKIP's local government representation on the same day.

    If a by-election were to take place in Portsmouth South, or Ribble Valley, they'd be well placed to win it.

    A prediction of 7% and to win either of those seats REALLY don't go together in my mind. I think Ribble Valley is a CON hold, Pompey South - possibly...
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 37,412
    tim said:

    Labour majority on 31%.
    Don't we all love the Tory addiction to FPTP

    It makes perfect sense for the Conservatives to support FPTP. It gives them more seats than PR and ensures that millions of unhappy voters support them rather than rival right wing parties.
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,543
    edited June 2013
    Quincel said:

    New polls out in New York puts Weiner leading the Dem primary by 5 points. Still 10/1 available on him winning at Ladbrokes if you want it.

    Link? Can't see it on Ladbrokes' mysterious site.

    Edit: Ah, i see it - now 4-1.
    http://search.ladbrokes.com/searchonline/controller?D=weiner&Dx=mode+matchallany&Ntk=all&Ntt=weiner&Ntx=mode+matchallany&Nty=1&search=true&N=4294285622&prevNav=0&className=Politics&eventId=216572240

    - what a crap site, really!
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,685
    edited June 2013
    Andy_JS said:

    The truth is whether UKIP win a seat has very little to do with their national share and everything to do with whether or not they successfully target two or three seats. Personally I think they ought to aim for the highest possible national share rather than trying to win seats because IMO winning 20% would have more of a long-term impact than winning 10% and a couple of seats.

    The Greens won a seat in 2010 with 0.9% of the national vote. UKIP are quite a long way behind that, but it does show it's possible.

    PS Also demonstrated that winning a seat doesn't necessarily open up a world of opportunity.
  • QuincelQuincel Posts: 4,042

    Quincel said:

    New polls out in New York puts Weiner leading the Dem primary by 5 points. Still 10/1 available on him winning at Ladbrokes if you want it.

    Link? Can't see it on Ladbrokes' mysterious site.

    http://sportsbeta.ladbrokes.com/Politics/US-Politics/2013-New-York-City-Mayoral-Election-N-1z141lkZ1z13zmqZ1z13zmh/

    Down to 3/1 though, sorry. The easiest way is just to type 'Weiner' into the search box which only brings up one bet.

    Also 3/1 at PP to win the entire race, and 7/4 to win the primary. Since hypothetical polls put any democratic candidate 20+ points ahead, they are basically the same thing.
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    Mark Wallace tweets: "Meanwhile, Down Under, Gillard takes a leaf out of Thatcher's book and seeks an election war bounce, but with her own party as Argentina."
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,243
    Can anyone explain to me how the maths for http://www.electoralcalculus.co.uk/conlist_scot.html#InvernessNairnBadenochandStrathspey works ?

    Labour have the largest chance of winning but are predicted to come 3rd - Massive uncertainty (And thus larger standard deviation on the Lib Dem vote perhaps ?) It is an intriguing seat from a betting perspective also.
    Fwiw I think the SNP might be value there but not bet on it yet. Shadsy chatted to me about this seat at the last pb.com meet, he reckons a Lib Dem hold (They are shortest on his site)
This discussion has been closed.