One of the main challenges for the Tory Party at the next election is holding on to all those voters dubbed the Blue Liberals in the marginals and the previously Lib Dem held seats which are now Tory seats. Without David Cameron, that challenge becomes harder, but who best to appeal to those voters?
Comments
...to point out that he will be mayor of London, or an unsuccessful loser.
Also, if he wins in London then he will be busy being Mayor and if he loses then he hasn't done so well after all.
But stranger things have happened.
What is his position on Europe? Is he his father's son on that at least?
A leader needs to be able to lead, and for people to loyally follow him. When they do not - for instance Major's bastards or the Blairites in Brown's camp - the party gets into trouble.
By threatening to resign over Heathrow, Zac is proving he might be a good constituency MP, but is showing disloyalty to the party. If he was leader, MPs would be asking themselves why they cannot behave in the same way.
I actually quite like it when an MP goes against his/her party, and especially when they think it is the wish of their constituents. It means they're a good MP. But they would not necessarily make a good party leader for the same reason.
There is another old Etonian in parliament who might fit the bill rather well, though ...
Without the Lib Dems to keep them under control, the unfettered Tory have bolted off to destroy whatever green credentials they more or less had. On environmental matters, the Tories are holed below the waterline.
The "sunshine and happiness" Conservatives, so carefully crafted by Mr Cameron all those years ago, are splitting and are sunk.
Macmillan and Thatcher were both quite good at going against the party line as well and that helped them get the leadership - indeed, in Thatcher's case it's hard to see how she would have become leader at all if she hadn't been so truculent and disloyal towards Heath. Even Eden had his moments.
Generally speaking the most successful politicians are semi-principled opportunists - people who can win support by making principled stands, but know when to ditch principles if it's necessary to gain power. I don't know enough about Goldsmith to judge whether he fits that bill or not.
The main reason I'm sceptical about him is not his background or his rebellious streak - it's the fact that he's never held a government post so he is not so much inexperienced as unexperienced. I would be very surprised if the next Tory leader is not at the very least currently a Minister of State.
Not sure I can see Zac Goldsmith winning over much of the country beyond the south. But if Labour are in shambles/elect a Miliband leader he might be able to win by default.
Mr. Dodd, indeed, like Caroline Lucas jetting off all over the place.
He's got the zeal of someone who has a great deal of money and a pet hobbyhorse. That he's never had a *job* in HMG tells me that he likes being awkward. That's fair enough - we need folks that rub against the grain, but he's no leader.
He reminds me of Carswell, rather than Look At Me David Davis.
PS Piece in Times yesterday about How To Succeed At Eton from the headmaster there > http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/magazine/article4464808.ece
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/mar/17/budget-2015-george-osborne-announce-uk-tidal-power-scheme
I do love the way International Greenies feel the need to congregate in far flung places where they gather to discuss the terrible habits of other people..who want to fly to foreign climes for their hollies.
Former Labour Minister Frank Field and eight fellow senior MPs have written to party chiefs urging them to make it much easier to sack failing Labour leaders. Under their proposal, if 30 anonymous Labour MPs call for a vote of confidence in the leader and the leader loses, he or she would be out.
Writing in today’s Mail on Sunday Mr Field says Labour must be ruthless with ‘deadbeat’ leaders. ‘We made catastrophic errors with Gordon Brown and Ed Miliband,’ he writes. ‘It was impossible to change them when we were hurtling towards defeat.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3123136/Labour-plot-bring-David-Miliband-second-raters-fail.html#ixzz3d1IrWf2c
Mr. Moses, a perhaps interesting move. I wonder if the party bigwigs will approve.
But not the next one, assuming the vacancy arises in or around 2018.
In fact since all the polling was way off beam, its difficult to know from polls leading up to the GE who was voting for whom.
Implications, we have no idea what dinosaurs look like if we can't get a baboon right
http://m.imgur.com/a/BEz4r
There's a fascinating bit in this docu about clawed wing birds that live in the Amazon. They use them to climb trees, then float downwards. For anyone interested - it'll be on iPlayer BBC4 Fossil Wonderland Ep 2 of 3.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bird
It was one incident among several that made me think that referenda really work in making more people feel engaged in the decisions, rather than thinking of politics as something is done to them.
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/may/10/election-2015-where-the-votes-switched-and-why
And he echoed the Kipper loss comments, and also Tories very prominent Blue Collar appeals.
The science will have changed a lot since those days.
Annoyingly, I cannot remember which dinosaur it was, or which museum. So this might in fact be a very unreliable memory...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3123192/BLACK-DOG-Vine-s-whines-Tory-triumph.html
That sounds a bit like it, thanks,. but my memory has it as being a land-based dinosaur. Mind you, I bet such mistakes were quite common in the early days - did the people doing the reconstructions know the context of how they were found along with the bones?
EDIT - there's another one that the scientists had upside down and thought the spines were legs/legs were spines. It must be a nightmare to work out WTF is going on with some of them.
That sounds a bit like it, thanks,. but my memory has it as being a land-based dinosaur. Mind you, I bet such mistakes were quite common in the early days - did the people doing the reconstructions know the context of how they were found along with the bones?
David Smith in The Sunday Times points out ... ''Scottish Nationalists hoping to build an economic future on North Sea oil will have discovered that the cupboard is bare. The OBR expects only £2bn of North Sea revenues in the 20 years from 2020 – in total – down £37bn from the OBR’s assessment a year ago.''
On topic, Mr TSE is having a little bit of a cheeky Sunday Morning laugh
I hadn't noticed, but it does beg the question why Chris Leslie is on SP. The next big economic statement in still a month away, he won't be shadow chancellor after September, he is not a candidate in any race. Why bother?
A shining example of the future Leaders of the Labour party?
I think you may still be in baby haze
How's that charter renewal going then...?
A larger problem in this area is the Politicians Pet Scheme. Wind power was promoted because you could put up nice big windmills now. The fact that performance/cost was constrained by physical limits was ignored. But you could have something to show for the next election.
By comparison solar has been improved at 6-8% per year, compound, over decades now. There are plenty of improvements in pipeline. We are actually at the point where solar is just about competitive with coal/gas without subsidy.
The other part of the puzzle - storage - is being driven by the electric car revolution. Again, batteries have been improving at 6-8% per year, compound. The preferred solution of the oil companies and government, hydrogen, has stalled despite billions being spent. Again, due to basic physical factors.
I agree but maybe a large % of voters think differently?
But if not, is he a male version of Hazel Blears?
"Were you borrowing too much?"
"That didn't cause the banking crisis..."
We are now in an even worse position to counter the next recession since the government debt has doubled since the start of the last recession.
Zero inflation makes it harder to increase tax or reduce spending by stealth.
He added: “When it was reported I was ill there were some pretty foul tweets saying ‘I hope he dies’.
http://www.sundaypost.com/news-views/uk/nick-robinson-was-scared-by-independence-referendum-attacks-1.883912
I think you're an MI5 plant, myself.....
http://www.libdemvoice.org/liberal-democrat-committee-appointments-in-the-lords-spotlight-the-talent-on-our-benches-46415.html#utm_source=tweet&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=twitter
Why the praise for Sean Connery?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/SNP/11673678/David-Starkey-criticised-after-comparing-SNP-to-Nazis.html
How will Cybernattery respond?
'We won't dignify such foolish remarks with comment'?
Or something less temperate.....
it was a mistake to apologise to SNP trolls/bully boys.
Polly says Osborne would be Labour's dream candidate for Tory leader. I have topped up on that news.
Tom Newton-Dunn says Osborne will announce new policy at PMQs. I wonder if it will be the one MarqueeMark hinted at?
'New Tory MP branded a 'Nazi' and 'slag' by SNP supporters after making a joke about Oliver Cromwell's suppression of Scots in her maiden Commons speech'
They always need to find something to be offended and outraged about.
The sooner they get FFA the better then they will have something to really whine about.
http://cronkitenews.asu.edu/assets/images/12/02/10-giffords-ship2-full.jpg
David Cameron is going to retire from the ring undefeated in 3 or 4 years time. That is a continuity candidate scenario if there ever was one. Continuity means an established cabinet minister with some TV personality and a perceived ability to reach out to the successful coalition of centre right voters Cameron has built.
That means Osborne, Hunt, Javid or anyone else who really manages to shine in cabinet office during this Parliament. In the unlikely event that he wins Mayor Zac will not even be an MP. And if he doesn't why on earth would the Tories want a loser as leader?