Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » As nominations open tonight’s key numbers in the LAB leader

SystemSystem Posts: 12,218
edited June 2015 in General

imagepoliticalbetting.com » Blog Archive » As nominations open tonight’s key numbers in the LAB leadership race

All three front runners for the LAB leadership – Burnham/Kendal/Cooper have seen increases in their MP nomination totals. The other two – Corbyn/Creagh – have seen no change and they are still a very long way off the 35 that’s required.

Read the full story here


«1

Comments

  • Blofelds_CatBlofelds_Cat Posts: 154
    First, and not a Labour man, so probably for Burnham
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 63,137
    2nd - preference
  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    Andy Burnham's attempts to portray himself as a man of the people backfired today when he was exposed for not knowing the price of petrol.

    The Labour leadership hopeful said he thought a litre of unleaded costed £1.60. But according to the latest government figures the average forecourt price is currently around £1.16p...

    Today he admitted he had spoken to Unite boss 'Red' Len McCluskey last week about the leadership election...

    Mr Burnham appeared to position himself as the 'heir to Ed' as he praised Labour's election manifesto as the 'best' of all those he had stood on as a Labour candidate since he was elected in 2001.

    He said: 'I say it was the best manifesto I have stood on in the four general elections I have stood for Labour.'

    'I pay tribute to Ed Miliband. He did something important in refocusing our party on inequality'.


    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3117195/Burnham-tanks-exposed-not-knowing-price-petrol-guessing-litre-cost-1-60.html#ixzz3caVQ9sgV
    Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,952
    Fourth - like Burnham last time....
  • dr_spyndr_spyn Posts: 11,300
    MP abused by vicar.

    www.itv.com/news/2015-06-09/mp-nadine-dorries-speaks-out-about-abuse-by-vicar/

  • SquareRootSquareRoot Posts: 7,095
    Does Burnham drive?? if he doesn't he may have an excuse, if he does, he is a complete dork.. Anyone who drives knows how much fuel costs..
  • SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    Strong geographical clustering of support among MP's for Kendall, Burnham and Cooper.

    Kendall's support is concentrated mainly on east, south London MP's and Cardiff.
    Cooper's support is more widespread but still it tends to cluster around west London, Birmingham and Sunderland.
    Burnham's is still almost exclusively from the north.

    Of course the ideological makeup of MP's would be equally interesting.
  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    edited June 2015
    Even if he doesn't drive - surely if you're going to spout about the concerns of ordinary people and say you're an ordinary Joe, then there's some things you learn.

    IIRC politicians haven't known a) the rate of VAT [AJ], b) the cost of petrol [AB], c) the OAP [NC], weekly family shopping bill [EM].

    It's not hard is it? And they were out by miles or didn't know a simple fact in AJ's case.

    Does Burnham drive?? if he doesn't he may have an excuse, if he does, he is a complete dork.. Anyone who drives knows how much fuel costs..

  • SquareRootSquareRoot Posts: 7,095
    Plato said:

    Even if he doesn't drive - surely if you're going to spout about the concerns of ordinary people and say you're an ordinary Joe, then there's some things you learn.

    IIRC politicians haven't known a) the rate of VAT [AJ], b) the cost of petrol [AB], c) the OAP [NC], weekly family shopping bill [EM].

    It's not hard is it? And they were out by miles or didn't know a simple fact in AJ's case.

    Does Burnham drive?? if he doesn't he may have an excuse, if he does, he is a complete dork.. Anyone who drives knows how much fuel costs..

    To be fair as a widower, I have no idea what the weekly shop is, but I would guess it was £1200-150 plus or minus booze???
  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    When I was flush - I didn't know the price of anything in Tesco. I just filled a trolley and threw half of it away or fed it to my furry quadrupeds.

    My real issue is that it doesn't need to be the *personal* experience of politician - afterall most of them are in the top 10% of earners. However, if they're going to take a position, it's surely just sensible to actually *know* what others live on and spend as a % of their net income.

    This really annoys me when they get it wrong. Politicians who get all outraged and damp eyed, then don't even know some basic cost of living facts?? It's risible faux behaviour.

    Plato said:

    Even if he doesn't drive - surely if you're going to spout about the concerns of ordinary people and say you're an ordinary Joe, then there's some things you learn.

    IIRC politicians haven't known a) the rate of VAT [AJ], b) the cost of petrol [AB], c) the OAP [NC], weekly family shopping bill [EM].

    It's not hard is it? And they were out by miles or didn't know a simple fact in AJ's case.

    Does Burnham drive?? if he doesn't he may have an excuse, if he does, he is a complete dork.. Anyone who drives knows how much fuel costs..

    To be fair as a widower, I have no idea what the weekly shop is, but I would guess it was £1200-150 plus or minus booze???
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,952

    Does Burnham drive?? if he doesn't he may have an excuse, if he does, he is a complete dork.. Anyone who drives knows how much fuel costs..

    Even if you don't drive, you have to be hugely unattentive not to notice those bloody great signs with 119.9p every few hundred yards in urban areas.

    I think there is a business to be made in providing a weekly news service to MP's. Price of a pint, of a loaf, of a litre of fuel, together with a brief summary of soap plotlines....
  • The European Union (Referendum) Bill has been read a second time by 544-53.
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633

    The European Union (Referendum) Bill has been read a second time by 544-53.

    Who were the 53 ?
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    TGOHF said:

    The European Union (Referendum) Bill has been read a second time by 544-53.

    Who were the 53 ?
    The Nats?
  • Life_ina_market_townLife_ina_market_town Posts: 2,319
    edited June 2015
    TGOHF said:

    Who were the 53 ?

    The Scottish Nationalists, Welsh Nationalists and SDLP all put their names to the reasoned amendment, which was defeated by a smaller majority, as Labour did not vote against it. Presumably the nationalists voted against the second reading as well, but it looks as if they failed to get 10 votes out.
  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    @foxinsoxuk OT Did you see the placebo surgery Horizon prog the other day? It's fascinating stuff - should be on iPlayer.
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633

    TGOHF said:

    Who were the 53 ?

    The Scottish Nationalists, Welsh Nationalists and SDLP all put their names to the reasoned amendment, which was defeated by a smaller majority, as Labour did not vote against it. Presumably the nationalists voted against the second reading as well, but it looks as if they failed to get 10 votes out.
    The SNP voted against a referendum - ooh my sides.
  • AndreaParma_82AndreaParma_82 Posts: 4,714
    Official nominations


    Andy

    PLP Nominations
    Debbie Abrahams MP for Oldham East and Saddleworth
    Heidi Alexander MP for Lewisham East
    Dave Anderson MP for Blaydon
    Luciana Berger MP for Liverpool, Wavertree
    Clive Betts MP for Sheffield South East
    Kevin Brennan MP for Cardiff West
    David Crausby MP for Bolton North East
    Alex Cunningham MP for Stockton North
    Wayne David MP for Caerphilly
    Peter Dowd MP for Bootle
    Michael Dugher MP for Barnsley East
    Bill Esterson MP for Sefton Central
    Paul Farrelly MP for Newcastle-Under-Lyme
    Yvonne Fovargue MP for Makerfield
    Pat Glass MP for North West Durham
    Mary Glindon MP for North Tyneside
    Lilian Greenwood MP for Nottingham South
    Nia Griffith MP for Llanelli
    Andrew Gwynne MP for Denton and Reddish
    Harry Harpham MP for Sheffield Brightside & Hillsborough
    Carolyn Harris MP for Swansea East
    Dan Jarvis MP for Barnsley Central
    Graham Jones MP for Hyndburn
    Barbara Keeley MP for Worsley and Eccles South
    Ian Lavery MP for Wansbeck
    Emma Lewell-Buck MP for South Shields
    Justin Madders MP for Ellesmere Port and Neston
    Chris Matheson MP for City of Chester
    Kerry McCarthy MP for Bristol East
    Andy McDonald MP for Middlesbrough
    Conor McGinn MP for St Helens North
    Liz McInnes MP for Heywood and Middleton
    Ian Mearns MP for Gateshead
    Albert Owen MP for Ynys Mon
    Lucy Powell MP for Manchester Central
    Angela Rayner MP for Ashton-Under-Lyne
    Christina Rees MP for Neath
    Rachel Reeves MP for Leeds West
    Steve Rotheram MP for Liverpool, Walton
    Owen Smith MP for Pontypridd
    Jo Stevens MP for Cardiff Central
    Nick Thomas-Symonds MP for Torfaen
    Anna Turley MP for Redcar
    Karl Turner MP for Kingston Upon Hull East
    Derek Twigg MP for Halton
    Alan Whitehead MP for Southampton Test
    Iain Wright MP for Hartlepool
    Stephen Hepburn MP for Jarrow
    Holly Lynch MP for Halifax
    Rachael Maskell MP for York Central
    Yasmin Qureshi MP for Bolton South East
    Valerie Vaz MP for Walsall South
    Lisa Nandy MP for Wigan
  • AndreaParma_82AndreaParma_82 Posts: 4,714
    Mary

    PLP Nominations
    Thangham Debonnaire MP for Bristol West
    Susan Elan Jones MP for Clwyd South
    Mike Kane MP for Wythenshawe and Sale East
    Stephen Kinnock MP for Aberavon
    Tulip Siddiq MP for Hampstead and Kilburn
  • AndreaParma_82AndreaParma_82 Posts: 4,714
    Jeremy

    PLP Nominations
    Grahame Morris MP for Easington
    Diane Abbott MP for Hackney North and Stoke Newington
    Ronnie Campbell MP for Blyth Valley
    Kelvin Hopkins MP for Luton North
    Clive Lewis MP for Norwich South
    John McDonnell MP for Hayes and Harlington
    Kate Osamor MP for Edmonton
    Dennis Skinner MP for Bolsover
    Cat Smith MP for Lancaster and Fleetwood
    Frank Field MP for Birkenhead
    Jon Trickett MP for Hemsworth
  • AndreaParma_82AndreaParma_82 Posts: 4,714
    Liz

    PLP Nominations
    Kevin Barron MP for Rother Valley
    Tom Blenkinsop MP for Middlesbrough South and East Cleveland
    Jenny Chapman MP for Darlington
    Ann Coffey MP for Stockport
    Simon Danczuk MP for Rochdale
    Gloria De Piero MP for Ashfield
    Stephen Doughty MP for Cardiff South and Penarth
    Julie Elliott MP for Sunderland Central
    Louise Ellman MP for Liverpool, Riverside
    Chris Evans MP for Islwyn
    Paul Flynn MP for Newport West
    Mike Gapes MP for Ilford South
    Margaret Hodge MP for Barking
    Tristram Hunt MP for Stoke-On-Trent Central
    Peter Kyle MP for Hove
    Ivan Lewis MP for Bury South
    Fiona Mactaggart MP for Slough
    Pat McFadden MP for Wolverhampton South East
    Jessica Morden MP for Newport East
    Toby Perkins MP for Chesterfield
    Steve Reed MP for Croydon North
    Johnny Reynolds MP for Stalybridge and Hyde
    Joan Ryan MP for Enfield North
    Barry Sheerman MP for Huddersfield
    Gavin Shuker MP for Luton South
    Nick Smith MP for Blaenau Gwent
    Angela Smith MP for Penistone and Stocksbridge
    Wes Streeting MP for Ilford North
    Gisela Stuart MP for Birmingham, Edgbaston
    Stephen Timms MP for East Ham
    Stephen Twigg MP for Liverpool, West Derby
    Phil Wilson MP for Sedgefield
    Jim Dowd MP for Lewisham West & Penge
    Emma Reynolds MP for Wolverhampton North East
    Chuka Umunna MP for Streatham
    Siobhain McDonagh MP for Mitcham and Morden
  • AndreaParma_82AndreaParma_82 Posts: 4,714
    Yvette

    PLP Nominations
    Ian Austin MP for Dudley North
    Lyn Brown MP for West Ham
    Chris Bryant MP for Rhondda
    Liam Byrne MP for Birmingham, Hodge Hill
    Ruth Cadbury MP for Brentford and Isleworth
    Vernon Coaker MP for Gedling
    Judith Cummins MP for Bradford South
    Jim Cunningham MP for Coventry South
    Geraint Davies MP for Swansea West
    Jack Dromey MP for Birmingham, Erdington
    Coleen Fletcher MP for Coventry North East
    Vicky Foxcroft MP for Lewisham, Deptford
    Kate Green MP for Stretford and Urmston
    David Hanson MP for Delyn
    Sharon Hodgson MP for Washington and Sunderland West
    Diana Johnson MP for Hull North
    Kevan Jones MP for North Durham
    Helen Jones MP for Warrington North
    Khalid Mahmood MP for Birmingham, Perry Barr
    Shabana Mahmood MP for Birmingham, Ladywood
    Seema Malhotra MP for Feltham and Heston
    Stephen McCabe MP for Birmingham, Selly Oak
    Catherine McKinnell MP for Newcastle Upon Tyne North
    Matthew Pennycook MP for Greenwich and Woolwich
    Jess Phillips MP for Birmingham Yardley
    Bridget Phillipson MP for Houghton and Sunderland South
    Stephen Pound MP for Ealing North
    Marie Rimmer MP for St Helens South and Whiston
    Virendra Sharma MP for Ealing, Southall
    Paula Sherriff MP for Dewsbury
    Ruth Smeeth MP for Stoke-on-Trent North
    John Spellar MP for Warley
    Adrian Bailey MP for West Bromwich West
    Nick Brown MP for Newcastle Upon Tyne East
    Helen Goodman MP for Bishop Auckland
    Fabian Hamilton MP for Leeds North East
    John Healey MP for Wentworth and Dearne
    Melanie Onn MP for Great Grimsby
    Geoffrey Robinson MP for Coventry North West
    Andrew Slaughter MP for Hammersmith
    Jonathan Ashworth MP for Leicester South
  • TomsToms Posts: 2,478
    From the Mail, apparently:
    "Andy Burnham's attempts to portray himself as a man of the people backfired today when he was exposed for not knowing the price of petrol."

    So, it appears the Mail thinks that by definition an ordinary person must own a car. How sad, etc, is that?
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,591
    edited June 2015

    Does Burnham drive?? if he doesn't he may have an excuse, if he does, he is a complete dork.. Anyone who drives knows how much fuel costs..

    Even if you don't drive, you have to be hugely unattentive not to notice those bloody great signs with 119.9p every few hundred yards in urban areas.
    I am apparently one of the unattentive.

    The idea of a weekly list of these things to MPs sounds like an ok idea though, they'll keep getting asked these things and silly as it is it does cause embarrassment.
  • AndreaParma_82AndreaParma_82 Posts: 4,714
    Totals

    Yvette 41 noms, Liz 36, Jeremy 11, Mary 5, Andy 53
  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    Petrol was last £1.60 in 2012 if my quick Googling is accurate http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/petrol-strike-is-off-but-prices-to-hit-160-795822
    kle4 said:

    Does Burnham drive?? if he doesn't he may have an excuse, if he does, he is a complete dork.. Anyone who drives knows how much fuel costs..

    Even if you don't drive, you have to be hugely unattentive not to notice those bloody great signs with 119.9p every few hundred yards in urban areas.
    I am apparently one of the unattentive.

    The idea of a weekly list of these things to MPs sounds like an ok idea though, they'll keep getting asked these things and silly as it is it does cause embarrassment.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,952
    Toms said:

    From the Mail, apparently:
    "Andy Burnham's attempts to portray himself as a man of the people backfired today when he was exposed for not knowing the price of petrol."

    So, it appears the Mail thinks that by definition an ordinary person must own a car. How sad, etc, is that?

    Bit hard to make the case for the squeezed-middle, cost-of-living-crisis Labour core policies when you don't know how much your voters are paying for those essentials in their lives. Out of touch doesn't cover it.

    Just piss-poor politics.
  • AndreaParma_82AndreaParma_82 Posts: 4,714
    Stella


    PLP Nominations
    Debbie Abrahams MP for Oldham East and Saddleworth
    Stella Creasy MP for Walthamstow
    Stephen Doughty MP for Cardiff South and Penarth
    Kate Green MP for Stretford and Urmston
    Dan Jarvis MP for Barnsley Central
    Fiona Mactaggart MP for Slough
    Wes Streeting MP for Ilford North
    Stephen Twigg MP for Liverpool, West Derby
    Jamie Reed MP for Copeland
    Gareth Thomas MP for Harrow West

  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,721
    edited June 2015
    Personally I would like to see the Bill passed, and enacted, so that we could get on with helping to put the issue to bed for ever and pushing the Kippers right out into the cold.

    I've not been really involved witn serious campaigning for a while, but I'd be up for working for IN. As I did in 1975.
  • AndreaParma_82AndreaParma_82 Posts: 4,714
    Caroline

    PLP Nominations
    Tom Blenkinsop MP for Middlesbrough South and East Cleveland
    Ann Coffey MP for Stockport
    Alex Cunningham MP for Stockton North
    Nic Dakin MP for Scunthorpe
    Wayne David MP for Caerphilly
    Julie Elliott MP for Sunderland Central
    Jim Fitzpatrick MP for Poplar and Limehouse
    Caroline Flint MP for Don Valley
    Yvonne Fovargue MP for Makerfield
    Barry Gardiner MP for Brent North
    Mary Glindon MP for North Tyneside
    Carolyn Harris MP for Swansea East
    George Howarth MP for Knowsley
    Graham Jones MP for Hyndburn
    Gerald Kaufman MP for Manchester Gorton
    Stephen Kinnock MP for Aberavon
    Siobhain McDonagh MP for Mitcham and Morden
    Jessica Morden MP for Newport East
    Albert Owen MP for Ynys Mon
    Johnny Reynolds MP for Stalybridge and Hyde
    Joan Ryan MP for Enfield North
    Owen Smith MP for Pontypridd
    Angela Smith MP for Penistone and Stocksbridge
    Gisela Stuart MP for Birmingham, Edgbaston
    Anna Turley MP for Redcar
    Karl Turner MP for Kingston Upon Hull East
    Alan Whitehead MP for Southampton Test
    Phil Wilson MP for Sedgefield
    Jim Dowd MP for Lewisham West & Penge
    Toby Perkins MP for Chesterfield
  • richardDoddrichardDodd Posts: 5,472
    Toms If you are a man of the people, pontificating about their cruel persecution then it might help if you know the price of effin petrol...even if he doesn't drive he must be chauffeured past dozens of filling stations every effin day.
  • AndreaParma_82AndreaParma_82 Posts: 4,714
    John

    PLP Nominations
    Kevin Barron MP for Rother Valley
    Clive Betts MP for Sheffield South East
    Ruth Cadbury MP for Brentford and Isleworth
    Simon Danczuk MP for Rochdale
    Clive Efford MP for Eltham
    Louise Ellman MP for Liverpool, Riverside
    Fabian Hamilton MP for Leeds North East
    Harry Harpham MP for Sheffield Brightside & Hillsborough
    Madeleine Moon MP for Bridgend
    Paula Sherriff MP for Dewsbury
    Andrew Slaughter MP for Hammersmith
    Derek Twigg MP for Halton
    Paul Blomfield MP for Sheffield Central
    John Healey MP for Wentworth and Dearne
    Ivan Lewis MP for Bury South
    Holly Lynch MP for Halifax
    Gordon Marsden MP for Blackpool South
  • AndreaParma_82AndreaParma_82 Posts: 4,714
    Angela

    PLP Nominations
    Maria Eagle MP for Garston and Halewood
    Bill Esterson MP for Sefton Central
    Mike Gapes MP for Ilford South
    Pat Glass MP for North West Durham
    Nia Griffith MP for Llanelli
    Mark Hendrick MP for Preston
    Sharon Hodgson MP for Washington and Sunderland West
    Kelvin Hopkins MP for Luton North
    Liz McInnes MP for Heywood and Middleton
    Stephen Pound MP for Ealing North
    Marie Rimmer MP for St Helens South and Whiston
    Tulip Siddiq MP for Hampstead and Kilburn
  • TomsToms Posts: 2,478
    edited June 2015

    Toms said:

    From the Mail, apparently:
    "Andy Burnham's attempts to portray himself as a man of the people backfired today when he was exposed for not knowing the price of petrol."

    So, it appears the Mail thinks that by definition an ordinary person must own a car. How sad, etc, is that?

    Bit hard to make the case for the squeezed-middle, cost-of-living-crisis Labour core policies when you don't know how much your voters are paying for those essentials in their lives. Out of touch doesn't cover it.

    Just piss-poor politics.
    It's the idea that a car is essential to just about everyman is, to me, the sad thing. Diatribe alert! Maybe I'd better take it no further.
  • AndreaParma_82AndreaParma_82 Posts: 4,714
    Tom

    PLP Nominations
    Dave Anderson MP for Blaydon
    Jon Ashworth MP for Leicester South
    Ian Austin MP for Dudley North
    Adrian Bailey MP for West Bromwich West
    Kevin Brennan MP for Cardiff West
    Liam Byrne MP for Birmingham, Hodge Hill
    Ronnie Campbell MP for Blyth Valley
    Vernon Coaker MP for Gedling
    David Crausby MP for Bolton North East
    Jon Cruddas MP for Dagenham
    Judith Cummins MP for Bradford South
    Jim Cunningham MP for Coventry South
    Gloria De Piero MP for Ashfield
    Michael Dugher MP for Barnsley East
    Paul Farrelly MP for Newcastle-Under-Lyme
    Rob Flello MP for Stoke-On-Trent South
    Coleen Fletcher MP for Coventry North East
    Vicky Foxcroft MP for Lewisham, Deptford
    Louise Haig MP for Sheffield, Heeley
    Kevan Jones MP for North Durham
    Helen Jones MP for Warrington North
    Barbara Keeley MP for Worsley and Eccles South
    Ian Lavery MP for Wansbeck
    Emma Lewell-Buck MP for South Shields
    Clive Lewis MP for Norwich South
    Justin Madders MP for Ellesmere Port and Neston
    Khalid Mahmood MP for Birmingham, Perry Barr
    Shabana Mahmood MP for Birmingham, Ladywood
    Rob Marris MP for Wolverhampton South West
    Chris Matheson MP for City of Chester
    Stephen McCabe MP for Birmingham, Selly Oak
    Andy McDonald MP for Middlesbrough
    Conor McGinn MP for St Helens North
    Ian Mearns MP for Gateshead
    Grahame Morris MP for Easington
    Lisa Nandy MP for Wigan
    Kate Osamor MP for Edmonton
    Lucy Powell MP for Manchester Central
    Naz Shah MP for Bradford West
    Virendra Sharma MP for Ealing, Southall
    Ruth Smeeth MP for Stoke-on-Trent North
    John Spellar MP for Warley
    Jo Stevens MP for Cardiff Central
    Tom Watson MP for West Bromwich East
    David Winnick MP for Walsall North
    Iain Wright MP for Hartlepool
    Stephen Hepburn MP for Jarrow
    Jess Phillips MP for Birmingham Yardley
    Geoffrey Robinson MP for Coventry North West
    Jeff Smith MP for Manchester Withington
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,591
    Plato said:

    Petrol was last £1.60 in 2012 if my quick Googling is accurate http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/petrol-strike-is-off-but-prices-to-hit-160-795822

    kle4 said:

    Does Burnham drive?? if he doesn't he may have an excuse, if he does, he is a complete dork.. Anyone who drives knows how much fuel costs..

    Even if you don't drive, you have to be hugely unattentive not to notice those bloody great signs with 119.9p every few hundred yards in urban areas.
    I am apparently one of the unattentive.

    The idea of a weekly list of these things to MPs sounds like an ok idea though, they'll keep getting asked these things and silly as it is it does cause embarrassment.
    I'd like to think I'd have done ok with a guess, I recall it getting down to 105ish, but that it had picked up a bit. That said, I walk past a great big petrol sign most days, so I really should still have known.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 52,302
  • AndreaParma_82AndreaParma_82 Posts: 4,714
    Rushanara

    PLP Nominations
    Lyn Brown MP for West Ham
    Seema Malhotra MP for Feltham and Heston
    Chuka Umunna MP for Streatham
    Yasmin Quereshi MP for Bolton South East
  • AndreaParma_82AndreaParma_82 Posts: 4,714
    Ben

    PLP Nominations
    Heidi Alexander MP for Lewisham East
    Ben Bradshaw MP for Exeter
    Paul Flynn MP for Newport West
    Alan Johnson MP for Hull West and Hessle
    Diana Johnson MP for Hull North
    Susan Elan Jones MP for Clwyd South
    Peter Kyle MP for Hove
    Kerry McCarthy MP for Bristol East
    Stephen Timms MP for East Ham
    Chris Evans MP for Islwyn
    Frank Field MP for Birkenhead
  • AndreaParma_82AndreaParma_82 Posts: 4,714
    Deputy totals: Watson 50, Flint 30, Eagle 20, Healey 17, Bradshaw 12, Creasy 10, Ali 4
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 52,302

    Deputy totals: Watson 50, Flint 30, Eagle 20, Healey 17, Bradshaw 12, Creasy 10, Ali 4

    What's the threshold for the deputy ballot?
  • AndreaParma_82AndreaParma_82 Posts: 4,714
    Same as leader: 35

    Deputy totals: Watson 50, Flint 30, Eagle 20, Healey 17, Bradshaw 12, Creasy 10, Ali 4

    What's the threshold for the deputy ballot?
  • Danny565Danny565 Posts: 8,091
    Ugh at Stella struggling to make the ballot. They can't ignore one of the members' favourites, can they?
  • SimonStClareSimonStClare Posts: 7,976
    edited June 2015
    kle4 said:

    Plato said:

    Petrol was last £1.60 in 2012 if my quick Googling is accurate http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/petrol-strike-is-off-but-prices-to-hit-160-795822

    kle4 said:

    Does Burnham drive?? if he doesn't he may have an excuse, if he does, he is a complete dork.. Anyone who drives knows how much fuel costs..

    Even if you don't drive, you have to be hugely unattentive not to notice those bloody great signs with 119.9p every few hundred yards in urban areas.
    I am apparently one of the unattentive.

    The idea of a weekly list of these things to MPs sounds like an ok idea though, they'll keep getting asked these things and silly as it is it does cause embarrassment.
    I'd like to think I'd have done ok with a guess, I recall it getting down to 105ish, but that it had picked up a bit. That said, I walk past a great big petrol sign most days, so I really should still have known.
    Don't beat yourself up - I've walked passed entire shops in town every week for years and not realised there were there, until I needed them.

    I know the local price of fuel because I have to fill up the tank once, maybe twice a week and am always looking for best price. I doubt Burnham needs to watch the pennies quite as much as the average joe.
  • MikeKMikeK Posts: 9,053
    From the map it seems that Kendal is the prefered choice in London. Burnham on the other hand is clearly not a London favorite.
  • GeoffMGeoffM Posts: 6,071
    Who was looking at a spread on Ronchi earlier today?
  • notmenotme Posts: 3,293
    Toms said:

    Toms said:

    From the Mail, apparently:
    "Andy Burnham's attempts to portray himself as a man of the people backfired today when he was exposed for not knowing the price of petrol."

    So, it appears the Mail thinks that by definition an ordinary person must own a car. How sad, etc, is that?

    Bit hard to make the case for the squeezed-middle, cost-of-living-crisis Labour core policies when you don't know how much your voters are paying for those essentials in their lives. Out of touch doesn't cover it.

    Just piss-poor politics.
    It's the idea that a car is essential to just about everyman is, to me, the sad thing. Diatribe alert! Maybe I'd better take it no further.
    If you live outside a major metropolitan area, life without a car is very difficult.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 52,302
    notme said:

    Toms said:

    Toms said:

    From the Mail, apparently:
    "Andy Burnham's attempts to portray himself as a man of the people backfired today when he was exposed for not knowing the price of petrol."

    So, it appears the Mail thinks that by definition an ordinary person must own a car. How sad, etc, is that?

    Bit hard to make the case for the squeezed-middle, cost-of-living-crisis Labour core policies when you don't know how much your voters are paying for those essentials in their lives. Out of touch doesn't cover it.

    Just piss-poor politics.
    It's the idea that a car is essential to just about everyman is, to me, the sad thing. Diatribe alert! Maybe I'd better take it no further.
    If you live outside a major metropolitan area, life without a car is very difficult.
    Luckily Labour doesn't need to connect with people outside major metropolitan areas. ;)
  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    Arf

    notme said:

    Toms said:

    Toms said:

    From the Mail, apparently:
    "Andy Burnham's attempts to portray himself as a man of the people backfired today when he was exposed for not knowing the price of petrol."

    So, it appears the Mail thinks that by definition an ordinary person must own a car. How sad, etc, is that?

    Bit hard to make the case for the squeezed-middle, cost-of-living-crisis Labour core policies when you don't know how much your voters are paying for those essentials in their lives. Out of touch doesn't cover it.

    Just piss-poor politics.
    It's the idea that a car is essential to just about everyman is, to me, the sad thing. Diatribe alert! Maybe I'd better take it no further.
    If you live outside a major metropolitan area, life without a car is very difficult.
    Luckily Labour doesn't need to connect with people outside major metropolitan areas. ;)
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,721
    MikeK said:

    From the map it seems that Kendal is the prefered choice in London. Burnham on the other hand is clearly not a London favorite.

    I thought Kendal was the LD choice?
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 43,504
    I'm no fan of Burnham (I daresay you'd not noticed, it's not as if I'd made it obvious or anything) but these sorts of questions are slightly pathetic. It's easy for any politician to get caught out with them, and the actual knowledge means absolutely nothing.

    I'd rather have a politician who has a brain to sort out issues than one who has filled his brain with useless prices of grapefruits, bread and petrol just in case he gets asked worthless questions.

    They're just traps. If you say you don't know, you are classed as out-of-touch; if you get it too low, you are a liar. If you get it too high, then you are either a liar or get really expensive, posho ones.
  • richardDoddrichardDodd Posts: 5,472
    edited June 2015
    Burnham is not an ordinary Joe,, he is pitching to lead a major political party in the UK with a view to become PM..He will be arguing for the next five years on behalf of the downtrodden, who have to fill up their cars every week in order to get to work...if he cannot be arsed to find out from one of his many spads what the price of fuel is then he should be fired.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,032
    Who are this team pretending to be England?

    Win by 210 runs? Normally struggle to score that many.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,045

    Burnham is not an ordinary Joe,, he is pitching to lead a major political party in the UK with a view to become PM..He will be arguing for the next five years on behalf of the downtrodden, who have to fill up their cars every week in order to get to work...if he cannot be arsed to find out from one of his many spads what the price of fuel is then he should be fired.

    So he should fill his time finding out prices for everyday items, rather than doing the running the country stuff?
  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    Are you that guy in the Internet? :wink:
    RobD said:

    Burnham is not an ordinary Joe,, he is pitching to lead a major political party in the UK with a view to become PM..He will be arguing for the next five years on behalf of the downtrodden, who have to fill up their cars every week in order to get to work...if he cannot be arsed to find out from one of his many spads what the price of fuel is then he should be fired.

    So he should fill his time finding out prices for everyday items, rather than doing the running the country stuff?
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 43,504
    As an aside, what did the people criticising Burnham think of this story when it broke?

    http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2013/oct/01/david-cameron-price-of-bread

    The criticism was pathetic then, and it's pathetic now.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,045
    Plato said:

    Are you that guy in the Internet? :wink:

    RobD said:

    Burnham is not an ordinary Joe,, he is pitching to lead a major political party in the UK with a view to become PM..He will be arguing for the next five years on behalf of the downtrodden, who have to fill up their cars every week in order to get to work...if he cannot be arsed to find out from one of his many spads what the price of fuel is then he should be fired.

    So he should fill his time finding out prices for everyday items, rather than doing the running the country stuff?
    I am *a* guy in the Internet! (Honestly have no idea what your referring to!!)
  • blackburn63blackburn63 Posts: 4,492
    Burnham's car crash today was dreadful, I am vehemently anti labour but I want them to have a leader that can hold Cameron to account.
  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    https://twitter.com/Max_Fisher/status/608141639987691520/photo/1
    RobD said:

    Plato said:

    Are you that guy in the Internet? :wink:

    RobD said:

    Burnham is not an ordinary Joe,, he is pitching to lead a major political party in the UK with a view to become PM..He will be arguing for the next five years on behalf of the downtrodden, who have to fill up their cars every week in order to get to work...if he cannot be arsed to find out from one of his many spads what the price of fuel is then he should be fired.

    So he should fill his time finding out prices for everyday items, rather than doing the running the country stuff?
    I am *a* guy in the Internet! (Honestly have no idea what your referring to!!)
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 43,504
    RobD said:

    Plato said:

    Are you that guy in the Internet? :wink:

    RobD said:

    Burnham is not an ordinary Joe,, he is pitching to lead a major political party in the UK with a view to become PM..He will be arguing for the next five years on behalf of the downtrodden, who have to fill up their cars every week in order to get to work...if he cannot be arsed to find out from one of his many spads what the price of fuel is then he should be fired.

    So he should fill his time finding out prices for everyday items, rather than doing the running the country stuff?
    I am *a* guy in the Internet! (Honestly have no idea what your referring to!!)
    http://dilbert.com/strip/2015-06-07
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,045
    Plato said:

    twitter.com/Max_Fisher/status/608141639987691520/photo/1

    RobD said:

    Plato said:

    Are you that guy in the Internet? :wink:

    RobD said:

    Burnham is not an ordinary Joe,, he is pitching to lead a major political party in the UK with a view to become PM..He will be arguing for the next five years on behalf of the downtrodden, who have to fill up their cars every week in order to get to work...if he cannot be arsed to find out from one of his many spads what the price of fuel is then he should be fired.

    So he should fill his time finding out prices for everyday items, rather than doing the running the country stuff?
    I am *a* guy in the Internet! (Honestly have no idea what your referring to!!)
    Titter! Well, I question the benefit of knowing the price of a hundred random items from the kitchen cupboard, when our political leaders have bigger issues to grapple with. Thankfully, economists have found a way to combine these price rises into one value - inflation.
  • frpenkridgefrpenkridge Posts: 670
    I've not been able to remember the price of petrol since they stopped selling it in gallons.
  • CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,328
    I tend to agree with Josias Jessop that criticising politicians for not knowing the price of bread is a bit pathetic.

    Still, Labour made the cost of living for ordinary people a big part of its offering. So entirely predictable that you might be asked about it and sensible to be prepared for such a question.

    And if you don't know because you're too busy say so instead of pretending.

    It's the falseness and insincerity that grates. And it would not do MPs any harm to live like the rest of us. Their jobs are not, frankly, that more important than lots of other jobs where people have to work long hours, juggle family life and manage a budget etc.
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548

    Deputy totals: Watson 50, Flint 30, Eagle 20, Healey 17, Bradshaw 12, Creasy 10, Ali 4

    If Tom Watson is the answer, what is the question?

    Stella Creasy is good, Ben Bradshaw has his moments, but the rest!

  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 43,504
    Cyclefree said:

    I tend to agree with Josias Jessop that criticising politicians for not knowing the price of bread is a bit pathetic.

    Still, Labour made the cost of living for ordinary people a big part of its offering. So entirely predictable that you might be asked about it and sensible to be prepared for such a question.

    And if you don't know because you're too busy say so instead of pretending.

    It's the falseness and insincerity that grates. And it would not do MPs any harm to live like the rest of us. Their jobs are not, frankly, that more important than lots of other jobs where people have to work long hours, juggle family life and manage a budget etc.

    They'd get slated whatever they said if it is not the right answer. It's a deliberate trap.

    It's one of these cases where the question says more about the interviewer than it does the interviewee.

    About the only honest answer would be: "Look, I'm in a very fortunate situation where I can afford to buy (insert applicable consumable) without really thinking about the cost. I know many people are not in that position, and that is why we will try to reduce the price of (insert applicable consumable) and other everyday items for everyone."

    And even that would get slated.
  • EPGEPG Posts: 6,653

    Cyclefree said:

    I tend to agree with Josias Jessop that criticising politicians for not knowing the price of bread is a bit pathetic.

    Still, Labour made the cost of living for ordinary people a big part of its offering. So entirely predictable that you might be asked about it and sensible to be prepared for such a question.

    And if you don't know because you're too busy say so instead of pretending.

    It's the falseness and insincerity that grates. And it would not do MPs any harm to live like the rest of us. Their jobs are not, frankly, that more important than lots of other jobs where people have to work long hours, juggle family life and manage a budget etc.

    They'd get slated whatever they said if it is not the right answer. It's a deliberate trap.

    It's one of these cases where the question says more about the interviewer than it does the interviewee.

    About the only honest answer would be: "Look, I'm in a very fortunate situation where I can afford to buy (insert applicable consumable) without really thinking about the cost. I know many people are not in that position, and that is why we will try to reduce the price of (insert applicable consumable) and other everyday items for everyone."

    And even that would get slated.
    Exactly. It's a demeaning question to the voters. Even if they know the price of bread, really, it doesn't affect MPs the same way it does people who struggle.
  • CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,328

    Cyclefree said:

    I tend to agree with Josias Jessop that criticising politicians for not knowing the price of bread is a bit pathetic.

    Still, Labour made the cost of living for ordinary people a big part of its offering. So entirely predictable that you might be asked about it and sensible to be prepared for such a question.

    And if you don't know because you're too busy say so instead of pretending.

    It's the falseness and insincerity that grates. And it would not do MPs any harm to live like the rest of us. Their jobs are not, frankly, that more important than lots of other jobs where people have to work long hours, juggle family life and manage a budget etc.

    They'd get slated whatever they said if it is not the right answer. It's a deliberate trap.

    It's one of these cases where the question says more about the interviewer than it does the interviewee.

    About the only honest answer would be: "Look, I'm in a very fortunate situation where I can afford to buy (insert applicable consumable) without really thinking about the cost. I know many people are not in that position, and that is why we will try to reduce the price of (insert applicable consumable) and other everyday items for everyone."

    And even that would get slated.
    I think if they gave that sort of answer the issue would probably go away. What is surprising is when politicians themselves raise an issue and are then unprepared for the obvious questions. That's just poor politics.

    But if they're asked a question and don't know, how refreshing would it be for them to say just that and that they'll go away and find out. Honesty rather than bluster.

    Mrs T was the only politician who gave the impression that she knew down to the last penny what everything in the country cost when the reality was that she had never really ever been a housewife in her life.

  • CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,328
    EPG said:

    Cyclefree said:

    I tend to agree with Josias Jessop that criticising politicians for not knowing the price of bread is a bit pathetic.

    Still, Labour made the cost of living for ordinary people a big part of its offering. So entirely predictable that you might be asked about it and sensible to be prepared for such a question.

    And if you don't know because you're too busy say so instead of pretending.

    It's the falseness and insincerity that grates. And it would not do MPs any harm to live like the rest of us. Their jobs are not, frankly, that more important than lots of other jobs where people have to work long hours, juggle family life and manage a budget etc.

    They'd get slated whatever they said if it is not the right answer. It's a deliberate trap.

    It's one of these cases where the question says more about the interviewer than it does the interviewee.

    About the only honest answer would be: "Look, I'm in a very fortunate situation where I can afford to buy (insert applicable consumable) without really thinking about the cost. I know many people are not in that position, and that is why we will try to reduce the price of (insert applicable consumable) and other everyday items for everyone."

    And even that would get slated.
    Exactly. It's a demeaning question to the voters. Even if they know the price of bread, really, it doesn't affect MPs the same way it does people who struggle.
    True enough. An unkind person might perhaps point out that MPs seemed to know the cost of things down to the last penny when it came to claiming their expenses........

  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,417
    Re: Bread If I was a politician I'd answer "round about a pound" !
  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    Nearly 400 complaints made following death of Olive Cooke, said the Fundraising Standards Board
    92-year-old, from Fishponds area of Bristol, was found with multiple injuries on May 6 after being seen to jump into Avon Gorge
    As inquest was opened last month, her granddaughter said charity letter deluge was not to blame, but fundraising issues needed to be addressed
    FRSB said it wanted public to be given more control over the way charities approach people and make it easier to opt out of unwanted contact


    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3117253/Hundreds-complaints-flood-just-one-month-charities-behave-death-one-Britain-s-oldest-poppy-sellers.html#ixzz3cbEENH5I
    Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 28,870
    FPT
    Cyclefree said:



    Let me be blunt. The "No" campaign has a lot of work to do. Telling someone worried about their job that the EU put someone out of work because of some plant in Turkey so leaving it can't be any worse does not strike me as a winning answer. Sovereignty and self-government are all very fine but a lot of people couldn't care less about self-government if it means they'll be unemployed.

    "No" have to show why staying in will be worse than now and that being "Out" will be better than staying in. And they have to do it in a pithy and believable way by people who don't seem either loony or obsessed. (This is not a dig at you.)

    I'm not a particular fan of the EU. I've become less of a fan as time goes on. But I have no idea how things will be were we to leave and I don't think anyone on the No side (publicly) has ever given a coherent answer to this question. Unless they do, they risk the same fate as the "Yes to Independence" campaign in Scotland which was equally unable to give a coherent answer to the currency question.

    No-one denies the 'No' campaign has much work to do. But what it *doesn't* have to do, and indeed musn't do is attempt to micro-predict which organisations Britain should and shouldn't subscribe to, what economic policy we must adopt, etc. in a vain attempt to mollify Mr. Nissan or anyone else, who will be taking a line that will not change. That is arguing on your opponent's terms. What they must do is shift the paradigm to their own terms.

    Of course you have no idea what the future outside the EU looks like. You don't have any idea what the future inside it looks like (except bleak). We can't predict the future, and as I've shown, companies move where the bottom line takes them. Only the other week a major Irish businessman said that if we left, Ireland would have to follow the UK out of the EU in order to compete economically and stop every company coming here.

    Furthermore, leaving the EU is hardly a leap into some unknown chasm -Australia, Singapore, Norway, Switzerland, etc. etc. even this country within living memory - all seem to somehow struggle on without the blessing of EU membership.

    Your mention of Scotland only highlights the differences. There is no currency question. There is no question over ministries of state having to be replicated; there is no question over diplomatic services having to be created. There is no issue of having to find an army. It's not a country cutting itself in half, it is a sovereign nation leaving a dysfunctional conglomerate.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,978
    edited June 2015
    Christ on a bike, some Kippers/outers are complete idiots*

    http://www.buzzfeed.com/jimwaterson/taste-the-diffidence#.fwXLnrdN0

    *I think I may have just violated the first rule of tautology club there.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,978
    edited June 2015
    DavidL said:

    Who are this team pretending to be England?

    Win by 210 runs? Normally struggle to score that many.

    I went into a meeting when England were 202/7, when I went into a meeting, when I left a little over an hour later it was 350/7.

    I haven't been this irked in a very long time
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,045
    Cyclefree said:

    EPG said:

    Cyclefree said:

    I tend to agree with Josias Jessop that criticising politicians for not knowing the price of bread is a bit pathetic.

    Still, Labour made the cost of living for ordinary people a big part of its offering. So entirely predictable that you might be asked about it and sensible to be prepared for such a question.

    And if you don't know because you're too busy say so instead of pretending.

    It's the falseness and insincerity that grates. And it would not do MPs any harm to live like the rest of us. Their jobs are not, frankly, that more important than lots of other jobs where people have to work long hours, juggle family life and manage a budget etc.

    They'd get slated whatever they said if it is not the right answer. It's a deliberate trap.

    It's one of these cases where the question says more about the interviewer than it does the interviewee.

    About the only honest answer would be: "Look, I'm in a very fortunate situation where I can afford to buy (insert applicable consumable) without really thinking about the cost. I know many people are not in that position, and that is why we will try to reduce the price of (insert applicable consumable) and other everyday items for everyone."

    And even that would get slated.
    Exactly. It's a demeaning question to the voters. Even if they know the price of bread, really, it doesn't affect MPs the same way it does people who struggle.
    True enough. An unkind person might perhaps point out that MPs seemed to know the cost of things down to the last penny when it came to claiming their expenses........

    Probably an intern.
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548

    Christ on a bike, some Kippers/outers are complete idiots*

    http://www.buzzfeed.com/jimwaterson/taste-the-diffidence#.fwXLnrdN0

    *I think I may have just violated the first rule of tautology club there.

    Stephen Woolfe saves the British Sausage!
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,978

    Christ on a bike, some Kippers/outers are complete idiots*

    http://www.buzzfeed.com/jimwaterson/taste-the-diffidence#.fwXLnrdN0

    *I think I may have just violated the first rule of tautology club there.

    Stephen Woolfe saves the British Sausage!
    It's enough to make me want to swap my regularly weekly shopping from Tesco & Waitrose to Sainsburys
  • DisraeliDisraeli Posts: 1,106
    edited June 2015
    Cyclefree said:


    True enough. An unkind person might perhaps point out that MPs seemed to know the cost of things down to the last penny when it came to claiming their expenses........

    LOL! *applause"
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548

    Christ on a bike, some Kippers/outers are complete idiots*

    http://www.buzzfeed.com/jimwaterson/taste-the-diffidence#.fwXLnrdN0

    *I think I may have just violated the first rule of tautology club there.

    Stephen Woolfe saves the British Sausage!
    It's enough to make me want to swap my regularly weekly shopping from Tesco & Waitrose to Sainsburys
    The No campaign make the Scottish Yestapo seem reasonable and mentally well balanced.

    It is going to be a long year.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,978

    Christ on a bike, some Kippers/outers are complete idiots*

    http://www.buzzfeed.com/jimwaterson/taste-the-diffidence#.fwXLnrdN0

    *I think I may have just violated the first rule of tautology club there.

    Stephen Woolfe saves the British Sausage!
    It's enough to make me want to swap my regularly weekly shopping from Tesco & Waitrose to Sainsburys
    The No campaign make the Scottish Yestapo seem reasonable and mentally well balanced.

    It is going to be a long year.
    https://twitter.com/JamieRoss7/status/608372306868637696
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,032

    DavidL said:

    Who are this team pretending to be England?

    Win by 210 runs? Normally struggle to score that many.

    I went into a meeting when England were 202/7, when I went into a meeting, when I left a little over an hour later it was 350/6.

    I haven't been this irked in a very long time
    Just watched the highlights. Root and Buttler both truly incredible.

    Might have been different if they had another bowler of Boult's class though.
  • AndreaParma_82AndreaParma_82 Posts: 4,714
    Hornchurch and Upminster CLP: Jowell and Lammy
    Harrow East CLP: Jowell and Thomas

    Gareth Thomas is now at 4 noms.1 day left
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548

    Christ on a bike, some Kippers/outers are complete idiots*

    http://www.buzzfeed.com/jimwaterson/taste-the-diffidence#.fwXLnrdN0

    *I think I may have just violated the first rule of tautology club there.

    Stephen Woolfe saves the British Sausage!
    It's enough to make me want to swap my regularly weekly shopping from Tesco & Waitrose to Sainsburys
    The No campaign make the Scottish Yestapo seem reasonable and mentally well balanced.

    It is going to be a long year.
    twitter.com/JamieRoss7/status/608372306868637696
    Two can play at this game! That new JCB is off my shopping list! Who will join me in a boycott of yellow earth moving equipment?
  • richardDoddrichardDodd Posts: 5,472
    RobD..What do you think SPAD stands for...It is his and their job to be aware of what questions might conceivably be asked during a cost of living Q and A...not too difficult is it.


  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,978
    DavidL said:

    DavidL said:

    Who are this team pretending to be England?

    Win by 210 runs? Normally struggle to score that many.

    I went into a meeting when England were 202/7, when I went into a meeting, when I left a little over an hour later it was 350/6.

    I haven't been this irked in a very long time
    Just watched the highlights. Root and Buttler both truly incredible.

    Might have been different if they had another bowler of Boult's class though.
    Southee's back on Friday.

    I'm quite optimistic now about the wisdom of buying tickets to three of the one dayers v Australia in September
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,978
    edited June 2015
    The UK general election was actually a huge win for the British left

    http://tinyurl.com/NoAmericanTanksInBaghdad
  • CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,328

    FPT

    Cyclefree said:




    Furthermore, leaving the EU is hardly a leap into some unknown chasm -Australia, Singapore, Norway, Switzerland, etc. etc. even this country within living memory - all seem to somehow struggle on without the blessing of EU membership.

    Your mention of Scotland only highlights the differences. There is no currency question. There is no question over ministries of state having to be replicated; there is no question over diplomatic services having to be created. There is no issue of having to find an army. It's not a country cutting itself in half, it is a sovereign nation leaving a dysfunctional conglomerate.
    Thank you for your answer.

    Of course Britain survived before 1973 - though not very well - hence the collective loss of self-confidence which, in part, propelled us in. But the world now is different. It will be a leap into the unknown. There is a big difference between never having joined and having to unpick yourself from an organisation you've been a member of for decades. That is likely to be more difficult and more costly than people might envisage, even if it's the best course.

    There aren't that many good examples: the Velvet divorce in Czechoslovakia is the only one I can think of. Otherwise in Europe what is there? Ireland leaving the UK; Yugoslavia; the break up of the Soviet Union. I'm not saying there will be war or civil strife. But there will be costs and those costs may well be borne by those least able to bear them - a bit like immigration, perhaps. So you need to think how to persuade those who will bear the costs to vote for you.

    Of course, Britain can survive and prosper without the EU - and can also survive and prosper within the EU.

    It's just that they would be, in some respects, different sorts of Britains.

    The "No" campaign is asking people to make a change to the status quo and so it needs to have a very compelling and attractive answer to people who will, rightly, be worried about what it means for them.

    "Britain will be a sovereign nation trading with the world" etc may be right and may be attractive as a general statement. It may not be enough for the man in his 50's who is worried that he might lose his job, find it difficult to get another one and worries that he will be the one bearing the sacrifice for the bright tomorrow. So the campaign will have to have an answer that makes sense to him.





  • MarkHopkinsMarkHopkins Posts: 5,584

    The UK general election was actually a huge win for the British left

    http://tinyurl.com/NoAmericanTanksInBaghdad


    Why is it everyone who loses wants voting reform, then they don't care about it when they get back in?

    Hmmm.

    Personally I've grown to like FPTP - it forces parties to form a much broader consensus than just piling up votes with their special interest groups.



  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,978

    The UK general election was actually a huge win for the British left

    http://tinyurl.com/NoAmericanTanksInBaghdad


    Why is it everyone who loses wants voting reform, then they don't care about it when they get back in?

    Hmmm.

    Personally I've grown to like FPTP - it forces parties to form a much broader consensus than just piling up votes with their special interest groups.



    You won't be a fan of FPTP after you've read my forthcoming piece on AV.
  • notmenotme Posts: 3,293
    edited June 2015

    notme said:

    Toms said:

    Toms said:

    From the Mail, apparently:
    "Andy Burnham's attempts to portray himself as a man of the people backfired today when he was exposed for not knowing the price of petrol."

    So, it appears the Mail thinks that by definition an ordinary person must own a car. How sad, etc, is that?

    Bit hard to make the case for the squeezed-middle, cost-of-living-crisis Labour core policies when you don't know how much your voters are paying for those essentials in their lives. Out of touch doesn't cover it.

    Just piss-poor politics.
    It's the idea that a car is essential to just about everyman is, to me, the sad thing. Diatribe alert! Maybe I'd better take it no further.
    If you live outside a major metropolitan area, life without a car is very difficult.
    Luckily Labour doesn't need to connect with people outside major metropolitan areas. ;)
    True. If you have lived your entire life in London, where you have the most extraordinary levels of public transport, the use of a car seems to be the kind of luxury the lower classes would be better with out. But those of with second homes in Cornwell really need that car, the tube only goes so far...
  • SquareRootSquareRoot Posts: 7,095
    If a journo had asked Dave about the cost of petrol and he had screwed up, the howls on here of a Tory Toff out of touch etc would have been unbearable.. when it happens to a champagne socialist, suddenly people want to defend Burnham

    WHY ???
  • watford30watford30 Posts: 3,474

    RobD..What do you think SPAD stands for...It is his and their job to be aware of what questions might conceivably be asked during a cost of living Q and A...not too difficult is it.


    It shouldn't be tricky. MPs only have to remember the cost of 3 items to avoid getting caught out. Petrol, Milk & Bread.
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,690

    If a journo had asked Dave about the cost of petrol and he had screwed up, the howls on here of a Tory Toff out of touch etc would have been unbearable.. when it happens to a champagne socialist, suddenly people want to defend Burnham

    WHY ???

    Because the posters from the Right on here are not daft enough to try and fight class warfare. It only seems to be those on the Left (and then only a select few) who fundamentally believe people are somehow less legitimate as leaders because they have been fortunate in their lives.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,591
    edited June 2015

    If a journo had asked Dave about the cost of petrol and he had screwed up, the howls on here of a Tory Toff out of touch etc would have been unbearable.. when it happens to a champagne socialist, suddenly people want to defend Burnham

    WHY ???

    Some have been making the point that even asking the question is just a silly trap, implicitly or in some cases explicitly defending both, or indeed any politician in that situation.

    Personally I don't care in the slightest if a politician is out of touch in almost any way. They could still be a very good representative for ordinary people, or have policies that benefit ordinary people (ideally everyone, but you cannot please everyone all of the time), whether they know the cost of a pint of milk or not*. Knowing ordinary people through shared experience can be a help, but it's not automatically going to be one, nor the lack mean you cannot be a help to them.

    *And that question is almost certainly even more of a trap than petrol - I've not paid above a £1.00 for 4pts in years, but then I don't buy single pints, which no doubt is more like 50-70p and not the equivalent of 25p I've been paying as a result.

    Good night all.
  • notmenotme Posts: 3,293
    I am at a loss, can someone please explain to me why the Welsh Assembly are planning on banning e-cigs in public places? Wasnt the reason that smoking was banned because of the impact it had on those who didnt smoke? What risk are e-cigs to others?

    I really cannot understand what is going on. I was always curious as to how the state of hysteria could arise that resulted in the banning of songs, christmas and things that people 'enjoyed', purely because they enjoyed them during the interregnum of the 17thC.

    These e-cigs are quite possibly the biggest breakthrough in public health since the discovery of penicillin, yet because people derive pleasure from it, they want to ban it.
  • TheWhiteRabbitTheWhiteRabbit Posts: 12,454
    notme said:

    I am at a loss, can someone please explain to me why the Welsh Assembly are planning on banning e-cigs in public places? Wasnt the reason that smoking was banned because of the impact it had on those who didnt smoke? What risk are e-cigs to others?

    I really cannot understand what is going on. I was always curious as to how the state of hysteria could arise that resulted in the banning of songs, christmas and things that people 'enjoyed', purely because they enjoyed them during the interregnum of the 17thC.

    These e-cigs are quite possibly the biggest breakthrough in public health since the discovery of penicillin, yet because people derive pleasure from it, they want to ban it.

    THe WA consider the primary choice facing (younger) people "Do I not smoke, or do I start using an e-cigarette?" and therefore they have come to the natural conclusion the e-cig is worse. Whereas most people consider the e-cig primarily an alternative to traditional cigarettes, where it is clearly better.

    I have no reason to favour the WA view. While I know of cig>e-cig switchers I have no evidence of a non-smoker>e-cig swing.
  • TheWhiteRabbitTheWhiteRabbit Posts: 12,454

    The UK general election was actually a huge win for the British left

    http://tinyurl.com/NoAmericanTanksInBaghdad

    Tim Farron, the well-known rightist.
  • SquareRootSquareRoot Posts: 7,095

    If a journo had asked Dave about the cost of petrol and he had screwed up, the howls on here of a Tory Toff out of touch etc would have been unbearable.. when it happens to a champagne socialist, suddenly people want to defend Burnham

    WHY ???

    Because the posters from the Right on here are not daft enough to try and fight class warfare. It only seems to be those on the Left (and then only a select few) who fundamentally believe people are somehow less legitimate as leaders because they have been fortunate in their lives.
    Well.. How would you describe the previous thread? I would have thought it was a class war thread.. Perhaps the left haven't gotten over their humiliation, whether it be Labour or LD.
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395

    The UK general election was actually a huge win for the British left

    http://tinyurl.com/NoAmericanTanksInBaghdad

    What utter twaddle. At first I thought this was a spoof article but it appears to be serious.
  • FregglesFreggles Posts: 3,486
    notme said:

    I am at a loss, can someone please explain to me why the Welsh Assembly are planning on banning e-cigs in public places? Wasnt the reason that smoking was banned because of the impact it had on those who didnt smoke? What risk are e-cigs to others?

    I really cannot understand what is going on. I was always curious as to how the state of hysteria could arise that resulted in the banning of songs, christmas and things that people 'enjoyed', purely because they enjoyed them during the interregnum of the 17thC.

    These e-cigs are quite possibly the biggest breakthrough in public health since the discovery of penicillin, yet because people derive pleasure from it, they want to ban it.

    It's strange, the local hospital bans staff from using them. They say it's because it will look to patients as if they are smoking, I suspect it's more about wanting them to just go cold turkey and not have smoking breaks of any kind.
    Whereas in the NHS organisation where I work we have had two staff members (one clinical) quit smoking via e-cigs, they happily puff away in the office.

  • FregglesFreggles Posts: 3,486

    The UK general election was actually a huge win for the British left

    http://tinyurl.com/NoAmericanTanksInBaghdad


    Why is it everyone who loses wants voting reform, then they don't care about it when they get back in?

    Hmmm.

    Personally I've grown to like FPTP - it forces parties to form a much broader consensus than just piling up votes with their special interest groups.



    You won't be a fan of FPTP after you've read my forthcoming piece on AV.

    positively tantric
Sign In or Register to comment.