Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Farage’s biggest mistake was to duck the Eastleigh by elect

SystemSystem Posts: 12,217
edited May 2015 in General

imagepoliticalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Farage’s biggest mistake was to duck the Eastleigh by election

The very public row that has broken out between Farage and his party’s only MP, Douglas Carswell, was one that had been widely predicted. The only issue was what would spark it off.

Read the full story here


«134

Comments

  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    First!
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    Even with only one MP (currently) UKIP are adding to the gaiety of the nation - I suspect Carswell may end up an independent - not sure he could cope with returning to the tender mercies of the Tory Whips. Anyone seen any mock ups of TPD recently? There is one of Miliband partying in Ibiza good taste prevents me from sharing.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,655
    Farage is a start-up CEO. A man who inspires great personal loyalty, who can think (and argue) on his feet, who has a vision of the future he genuinely believes in, and who can improvise.

    And he has taken UKIP from an anti-EU protest vote to a serious political force.

    But the skills needed for start-up CEO and big company CEO are radically different. Bill Gates and Jeff Bezos are the exceptions: most start-up CEOs make rotten big company CEOs and vice-versa.

    Ducking Eastleigh is by-the-by. UKIP needs a process person. An organiser. A person who can delegate. Nigel Farage is not that person.

    The resignation that wasn't is merely a symptom of this problem. Without a professional leader UKIP will continue to hemorrhage talent, and will underperform its potential.
  • edmundintokyoedmundintokyo Posts: 17,708
    rcs1000 said:

    Farage is a start-up CEO. A man who inspires great personal loyalty, who can think (and argue) on his feet, who has a vision of the future he genuinely believes in, and who can improvise.

    And he has taken UKIP from an anti-EU protest vote to a serious political force.

    But the skills needed for start-up CEO and big company CEO are radically different. Bill Gates and Jeff Bezos are the exceptions: most start-up CEOs make rotten big company CEOs and vice-versa.

    Ducking Eastleigh is by-the-by. UKIP needs a process person. An organiser. A person who can delegate. Nigel Farage is not that person.

    The resignation that wasn't is merely a symptom of this problem. Without a professional leader UKIP will continue to hemorrhage talent, and will underperform its potential.

    Who do you suggest they hire? I'm thinking Carly Fiorina.
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    @rcs1000 you have a bad habit of making very sensible posts. Those are absolutely discouraged on this website

    I very much doubt that Carswell will end up a Tory (despite my desire for Cameron to reach out to him). It's a strong possibility he ends up as an independent (although he'd need to resign again and fight another by-election & there's a good chance he wouldn't win so you need to factor that into the odds). I wouldn't be surprised if he takes the middle route and nominally remains UKIP, but in name only, and does/votes as he sees fit
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    edited May 2015
    Good morning fellow insomniacs!

    UKIP clearly have some deciding to do. I quite like Carswell's attitude to this Short money. A grown up party serious about small government would have no problem with a proper scrutiny committee and proper set of accounts. I think that Farage has spent too long as MEP to appreciate the importance of this.

    It is symptomatic of Farage's one man band approach to the party that he cannot allow this. If Farage could not win a seat in this election, will he ever get such a chance again? I doubt it. Why should UKIP win by-elections when the euro-ref is on the way? The only by-elections they have ever won were the Clacton and Rochester ones, and those circumstances look unlikely to recur.

    It is decision time for UKIP: get serious and professional or take the Farage "It's my party, and I will cry if I want to!" approach.
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    I had an email from party HQ, 10 000 have joined the LDs in the last week. Extraordinary! It does show that there is potential for a healthy bounce back, particularly if the LDs pick the right leader. Doubly so if Labour pick the wrong one, or if UKIP implode. Jackpot for all three!
  • Beverley_CBeverley_C Posts: 6,256
    UKIP seems to be the modern-day Liberals, a party that can safely receive protest votes without any danger of winning the election..
  • madasafishmadasafish Posts: 659
    UKIP at present is not a party. It's a cult..

  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,655

    I had an email from party HQ, 10 000 have joined the LDs in the last week. Extraordinary! It does show that there is potential for a healthy bounce back, particularly if the LDs pick the right leader. Doubly so if Labour pick the wrong one, or if UKIP implode. Jackpot for all three!

    One of my (Tory) colleagues lamented "If I'd known Ed Davey was in danger of losing, I'd have voted for him".

    Bizarre.
  • SimonStClareSimonStClare Posts: 7,976
    Morning all.

    A clash of personality and principle was always on the cards with these two, just didn’t expect it to erupt so soon after GE2015. – If Farage is not careful, UKIP’s only MP could walk.


    o/t - has the dreaded wrap around SPIN advertisement been cast into the fiery pit?
  • PClippPClipp Posts: 2,138
    Not bizarre at all, Mr RCS. Now that they have bought their way back to an overall majority, the Conservatives are bringing forth all the hard-line Tory policies that they could not implement while they were in coalition with the Liberal Democrats - and which they kept totally our of sight during the election campaign. First off the starting block was Mrs May with the Snoopers Charter.

    So all those who had forgotten that the Conservatives were an authoritarian party (among other characeristics) are realising that there is a need for somebody to stand up for liberal values - and that has to be the Liberal Democrats. There is nobody else.

    10,000 new members since the election and counting.....
  • ThomasNasheThomasNashe Posts: 5,331
    Interview with Carswell coming up on R4 Today shortly ...
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,949
    PClipp said:

    Not bizarre at all, Mr RCS. Now that they have bought their way back to an overall majority, the Conservatives are bringing forth all the hard-line Tory policies that they could not implement while they were in coalition with the Liberal Democrats - and which they kept totally our of sight during the election campaign. First off the starting block was Mrs May with the Snoopers Charter.

    So all those who had forgotten that the Conservatives were an authoritarian party (among other characeristics) are realising that there is a need for somebody to stand up for liberal values - and that has to be the Liberal Democrats. There is nobody else.

    10,000 new members since the election and counting.....

    I remember how bullish you were 5 weeks ago. How dismissive of those saying you would get smashed.

    Why should we listen to a thing you say?
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 28,869
    rcs1000 said:

    Farage is a start-up CEO. A man who inspires great personal loyalty, who can think (and argue) on his feet, who has a vision of the future he genuinely believes in, and who can improvise.

    And he has taken UKIP from an anti-EU protest vote to a serious political force.

    But the skills needed for start-up CEO and big company CEO are radically different. Bill Gates and Jeff Bezos are the exceptions: most start-up CEOs make rotten big company CEOs and vice-versa.

    Ducking Eastleigh is by-the-by. UKIP needs a process person. An organiser. A person who can delegate. Nigel Farage is not that person.

    The resignation that wasn't is merely a symptom of this problem. Without a professional leader UKIP will continue to hemorrhage talent, and will underperform its potential.

    Very true.
  • PClippPClipp Posts: 2,138

    I remember how bullish you were 5 weeks ago. How dismissive of those saying you would get smashed. Why should we listen to a thing you say?

    Because we have a corrupt system where 72 milion pounds can buy you Tories your way back into office. It will be very interesting to see what the final figures for expenditure turn out to be.

  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @SunPolitics: EXCL - Burnham backed by nearly a quarter of Labour MPs as he bids to be next party leader: http://t.co/58B1ATS1h7

    ToriesForBurnham™
  • SquareRootSquareRoot Posts: 7,095
    PClipp said:

    I remember how bullish you were 5 weeks ago. How dismissive of those saying you would get smashed. Why should we listen to a thing you say?

    Because we have a corrupt system where 72 milion pounds can buy you Tories your way back into office. It will be very interesting to see what the final figures for expenditure turn out to be.

    72 million. Do you have a link for that. I thought the cap was much lower.
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    Douglas Carswell has burned his bridges with the Conservative party under the current leader. While it would be well-advised to welcome him back, I cannot imagine him humiliating himself by returning under this Prime Minister.

    He had not done his due diligence on UKIP very well if he has not expected regular rucks with its current leader. Politburo purges and flounces are a longstanding feature of UKIP's short history.

    So he's a bit stuck. He can go independent if he so wishes and even argue that he need not submit himself to a by-election again because his beliefs have not changed and he has articulated them twice in the last year to his patient electorate. But what is he actually going to achieve as an independent MP?
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,672
    Carswell may have made a mistake in leaving the Tories, but if he were to rejoin them now he would be revealing himself as completely untrustworthy. You can get away with betraying your electorate once, but twice? Surely not. I cannot believe that Carswell is that kind of man.
  • PClippPClipp Posts: 2,138
    That was the figure in the Tory war chest at the beginning of the year, Mr Root, according to the Boundary Commission. How much they finally spent, we do not yet know of course.

    There is a cap on expenditure for an individual candidate in the long campaign and the short campaign periods. And then there is the national campaign. And there is also the time before the long campaign starts. So, effectively, the cap is not very effective, if you have enough money.
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @BBCNormanS: UKIP's @DouglasCarswell says "not willing to accept" the £650,000 Parliamentary cash on offer to @UKIP @BBCr4today
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    PClipp said:

    Not bizarre at all, Mr RCS. Now that they have bought their way back to an overall majority, the Conservatives are bringing forth all the hard-line Tory policies that they could not implement while they were in coalition with the Liberal Democrats - and which they kept totally our of sight during the election campaign. First off the starting block was Mrs May with the Snoopers Charter.

    So all those who had forgotten that the Conservatives were an authoritarian party (among other characeristics) are realising that there is a need for somebody to stand up for liberal values - and that has to be the Liberal Democrats. There is nobody else.

    10,000 new members since the election and counting.....

    I took a less optomistic view of LD fortunes, though even I expected double figures of LD MPs.

    We will see very quickly the difference between Conservative majority government and the coalition, and I think a large number of people will change their minds on coalition. It will be seen as a golden period of good government. Theressa May's snoopers charter is a good example, but will not be the only one.

    There is a lot of ground to recover for the LDs, but I do not detect the same fratricidal infighting that is breaking out in the other losing parties of UKIP and Labour.

    It is important that the last few years in government are reflected on, but they should not turn into navel gazing.

    As one of the signaturies of the US Declaration of Independence said "We must surely hang together, or we shall surely hang seperately"
  • SimonStClareSimonStClare Posts: 7,976
    edited May 2015
    It takes a certain chutzpah for a one man parliamentary party to have a backbench rebellion.

    :lol:
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    antifrank said:

    Douglas Carswell has burned his bridges with the Conservative party under the current leader. While it would be well-advised to welcome him back, I cannot imagine him humiliating himself by returning under this Prime Minister.

    He had not done his due diligence on UKIP very well if he has not expected regular rucks with its current leader. Politburo purges and flounces are a longstanding feature of UKIP's short history.

    So he's a bit stuck. He can go independent if he so wishes and even argue that he need not submit himself to a by-election again because his beliefs have not changed and he has articulated them twice in the last year to his patient electorate. But what is he actually going to achieve as an independent MP?

    He can remain an independent voice in UKIP. He is the parliamentary party, and it would be absurd for UKIP to expel their only MP. He is not without friends in the party, and Farage is not without other opponents.
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @politicshome: Carswell says Farage will see 'good sense' over opposition funding http://t.co/gfzxWZNSUD http://t.co/63fXOnuT6m
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    Labour's 'ground game' and 5 million conversations...
    Speaking from Washington DC, Mr Messina said: “It was amusing to see all these polls saying, ‘Oh, Labour’s talking to more people’, and I kept thinking to myself, ‘That’s great, because we are talking to the right people, over and over and over again’.

    “We were having as many as eight to ten conversations with undecided voters in the final week, while Labour was still, in the final week, mailing every single person in the constituency. And that just didn’t make sense.”
    http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/politics/article4438656.ece
  • Beverley_CBeverley_C Posts: 6,256
    edited May 2015

    It takes a certain chutzpah for a one man parliamentary party to have a backbench rebellion

    Brilliant!
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @DavidJonesMP: Douglas Carswell's every utterance, every breath, every tic of body language, scream: "What the heck have I got myself into?" @BBCr4today
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @MediaGuido: Think @POLITICOEurope are still getting the hang of this whole British politics thing. http://t.co/rxywSOAwd9 http://t.co/et4wWDvmrJ

    George Osborne; genius,,,
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,044
    Scott_P said:

    Labour's 'ground game' and 5 million conversations...

    The new plan... "one hundred MILLION conversations"... titter
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    RobD said:

    The new plan... "one hundred MILLION conversations"... titter

    Start with the 60 million free owls you promised, then we can talk...
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,044
    Scott_P said:

    RobD said:

    The new plan... "one hundred MILLION conversations"... titter

    Start with the 60 million free owls you promised, then we can talk...
    Did someone say owls??

    http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/06/20/article-2662719-1EEE326200000578-499_634x359.jpg
  • MillsyMillsy Posts: 900
    Maybe Carswell will join the Lib Dems, or start his own party? Or he's just too idealistic for party politics
  • DecrepitJohnLDecrepitJohnL Posts: 13,300
    Scott_P said:

    @SunPolitics: EXCL - Burnham backed by nearly a quarter of Labour MPs as he bids to be next party leader: http://t.co/58B1ATS1h7

    ToriesForBurnham™

    Burnham opposed by more than three quarters? In a five-runner race, support from just over a fifth of MPs is surely just par for the course, to mix sporting metaphors.
  • SquareRootSquareRoot Posts: 7,095
    Millsy said:

    Maybe Carswell will join the Lib Dems, or start his own party? Or he's just too idealistic for party politics

    He reminds me of the Yes Minister story about "The Economy drive"

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cvJLf6REaUc
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453

    Burnham opposed by more than three quarters? In a five-runner race, support from just over a fifth of MPs is surely just par for the course, to mix sporting metaphors.

    But Burnham is also the union favoured candidate
    Unions are employing call-centre staff to persuade their members to vote in Labour’s leadership contest, as they try to maintain their influence over the outcome.

    The rules were changed last year to limit the power of the unions to choose Labour’s next leader. Yet senior party figures are worried by how easy it has become for unions to sign up potentially hundreds of thousands of affiliates within weeks.

    Unions that want to sign up their members as an “affiliate” — with the right to vote on the Labour leadership — only have to phone them up, ask for confirmation of their address and get an assurance that they want to affiliate to Labour.

    No money needs to change hands, yet this procedure then gives them the same voting rights as full Labour party membership, which costs £46.56 a year.
    http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/politics/article4438615.ece
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340

    Scott_P said:

    @SunPolitics: EXCL - Burnham backed by nearly a quarter of Labour MPs as he bids to be next party leader: http://t.co/58B1ATS1h7

    ToriesForBurnham™

    Burnham opposed by more than three quarters? In a five-runner race, support from just over a fifth of MPs is surely just par for the course, to mix sporting metaphors.
    At this stage nearly a quarter is very good going. There will still be lots of Don't Knows.

    But MPs have a limited role now. They get to nominate, but after that they get no more formal say than any other member.
  • DecrepitJohnLDecrepitJohnL Posts: 13,300
    Scott_P said:

    Labour's 'ground game' and 5 million conversations...

    Speaking from Washington DC, Mr Messina said: “It was amusing to see all these polls saying, ‘Oh, Labour’s talking to more people’, and I kept thinking to myself, ‘That’s great, because we are talking to the right people, over and over and over again’.

    “We were having as many as eight to ten conversations with undecided voters in the final week, while Labour was still, in the final week, mailing every single person in the constituency. And that just didn’t make sense.”
    http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/politics/article4438656.ece

    Yes, the key to victory was Messina's sophisticated targeting of voters. There was no great popular uprising in support of Cameroonism or in defence of bacon sandwiches, and next time Labour will also have better voter targeting.
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453

    next time Labour will also have better voter targeting.

    That's what they said last time...
  • richardDoddrichardDodd Posts: 5,472
    Please..please..please let it be Burnham..I really do think that one day he will break down and cry at the dispatch box
  • DecrepitJohnLDecrepitJohnL Posts: 13,300
    Scott_P said:

    @MediaGuido: Think @POLITICOEurope are still getting the hang of this whole British politics thing. http://t.co/rxywSOAwd9 http://t.co/et4wWDvmrJ

    George Osborne; genius,,,

    The BBC last Saturday reported that David Cameron's reshuffle was prompted by LibDem ministers having lost their seats.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,964
    Good morning, everyone.

    The unions determining Labour's leader? What could possibly go wrong?

    I think Mr. Smithson may be right, but another problem was Farage's self-destructive comment on resignation. This had the twin effects of making tactical voting against him even more likely, and making him duplicitous when he resigned for three days and then rose again.

    Carswell's perspective seems a bit peculiar to me. Not just the refusal to take the money, but not seeming to get why his own party might just be a little bit peeved.
  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    It costs £46.56 to join Labour and £25 to join the Conservatives. That's a huge difference.

    What does it cost to join the LDs or SNP or UKIP or PC as a full member?
  • richardDoddrichardDodd Posts: 5,472
    Labour should trust who the Unions support...they made a great choice last time...will they never learn.
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    Plato said:

    It costs £46.56 to join Labour and £25 to join the Conservatives. That's a huge difference.

    What does it cost to join the LDs or SNP or UKIP or PC as a full member?

    @hugorifkind: Non-discounted party membership fees for 1 year: Lib Dem £12, SNP, £12, Conservative, £25, Ukip £30, Labour, £46.50.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,975
    Nah Mike, you're presupposing a lot.

    1) Farage is crap in Westminster elections, he always loses, he even once finished third in a two horse race

    2) UKIP only win Westminster seats when they have the incumbent MP
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @arusbridger: Prince Charles's black spider memos to be published today... http://t.co/LAdPYJUpzO
  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    Strikes me that Labour can't even run a cost efficient membership organisation - no wonder they're so wasteful with HMG finances.
    Scott_P said:

    Plato said:

    It costs £46.56 to join Labour and £25 to join the Conservatives. That's a huge difference.

    What does it cost to join the LDs or SNP or UKIP or PC as a full member?

    @hugorifkind: Non-discounted party membership fees for 1 year: Lib Dem £12, SNP, £12, Conservative, £25, Ukip £30, Labour, £46.50.
  • PongPong Posts: 4,693
    Scott_P said:

    @arusbridger: Prince Charles's black spider memos to be published today... http://t.co/LAdPYJUpzO

    Today is the day the nation decides whether Charles becomes king....
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,672
    antifrank said:

    Scott_P said:

    @SunPolitics: EXCL - Burnham backed by nearly a quarter of Labour MPs as he bids to be next party leader: http://t.co/58B1ATS1h7

    ToriesForBurnham™

    Burnham opposed by more than three quarters? In a five-runner race, support from just over a fifth of MPs is surely just par for the course, to mix sporting metaphors.
    At this stage nearly a quarter is very good going. There will still be lots of Don't Knows.

    But MPs have a limited role now. They get to nominate, but after that they get no more formal say than any other member.

    Not sure what the exact rules are, but if a quarter of Labour MPs nominate Burnham they are probably disbarred from nominating anyone else. That may make it a lot harder for some leadership contenders to get the nominations they need to stand.

    That said what does "nearly a quarter" mean? A quarter is 58; you need 35 nominations. 35 is closer to 58 than zero.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,964
    Mr. P, could be very interesting.

    I do think formal or informal rules need to be laid down governing the behaviour when it comes to politics and comparable issues for heirs (even those down the track but in direct line of succession).
  • richardDoddrichardDodd Posts: 5,472
    The Unions will select someone who is good for the Unions...not the UK.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,044
    Pong said:

    Scott_P said:

    @arusbridger: Prince Charles's black spider memos to be published today... http://t.co/LAdPYJUpzO

    Today is the day the nation decides whether Charles becomes king....
    Is this like when TND tweets about an interesting poll?
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,964
    Mr. Pong, ha, if nations had a veto over the next monarch Edward II would never have got the gig.
  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    Fascinating stuff from Mr Messina. Surely Labour had the money/volunteers to do it if they'd wanted to? The human waves of union members leafleting/canvassing could have been used in a different configuration.

    "The predictions were so far off because no company combined online, telephone and mobile phone polls because they were too expensive. “We were able to do that because we had volunteer capacity to do it . . . you gotta go all the way and get this. It’s expensive, it’s difficult, but you’re gonna miss a bunch of close races if you don’t.”
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,975
    I actually feel sorry for Mark Reckless (I know)

    Persuaded to defect by Carswell, he's now lost his seat, and were Carswell to leave UKIP, Reckless will be thinking "OMFG, what the hell was I thinking, was I even thinking?"
  • ChameleonChameleon Posts: 4,264
    PClipp said:

    That was the figure in the Tory war chest at the beginning of the year, Mr Root, according to the Boundary Commission. How much they finally spent, we do not yet know of course.

    There is a cap on expenditure for an individual candidate in the long campaign and the short campaign periods. And then there is the national campaign. And there is also the time before the long campaign starts. So, effectively, the cap is not very effective, if you have enough money.

    What does the boundary commission have to do with it? The cap is effective, you can't spend unlimited amounts of money when it matters. You also have to remember that Labour had similar if not higher levels of funding.

    Tbh you just sound quite bitter that your party were conclusively rejected at the ballot box in this election.
  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    And lo, the EdStone was rolled away...

    Good morning, everyone.

    The unions determining Labour's leader? What could possibly go wrong?

    I think Mr. Smithson may be right, but another problem was Farage's self-destructive comment on resignation. This had the twin effects of making tactical voting against him even more likely, and making him duplicitous when he resigned for three days and then rose again.

    Carswell's perspective seems a bit peculiar to me. Not just the refusal to take the money, but not seeming to get why his own party might just be a little bit peeved.

  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,706
    Plato said:

    Strikes me that Labour can't even run a cost efficient membership organisation - no wonder they're so wasteful with HMG finances.

    They do have quite a few members wrt other parties. Can't be all bad.
  • felixfelix Posts: 15,173

    I had an email from party HQ, 10 000 have joined the LDs in the last week. Extraordinary! It does show that there is potential for a healthy bounce back, particularly if the LDs pick the right leader. Doubly so if Labour pick the wrong one, or if UKIP implode. Jackpot for all three!

    Entirely predictable - anyone who joins a party after an election defeat probably needs their head examining. for me it's on a par with all moaning and wailing of u/c women about their despair following last Thursday's result. Get over yourselves ffs. :)
  • Scrapheap_as_wasScrapheap_as_was Posts: 10,069

    I actually feel sorry for Mark Reckless (I know)

    Persuaded to defect by Carswell, he's now lost his seat, and were Carswell to leave UKIP, Reckless will be thinking "OMFG, what the hell was I thinking, was I even thinking?"

    First Sol, now the TPD - are they all coming in to our new party then???
  • DecrepitJohnLDecrepitJohnL Posts: 13,300
    Plato said:

    Fascinating stuff from Mr Messina. Surely Labour had the money/volunteers to do it if they'd wanted to? The human waves of union members leafleting/canvassing could have been used in a different configuration.

    "The predictions were so far off because no company combined online, telephone and mobile phone polls because they were too expensive. “We were able to do that because we had volunteer capacity to do it . . . you gotta go all the way and get this. It’s expensive, it’s difficult, but you’re gonna miss a bunch of close races if you don’t.”

    Why didn't the Conservatives do it last time? The reason is they'd not studied the reports from the Obama campaign.
  • woody662woody662 Posts: 255
    Plato said:

    Fascinating stuff from Mr Messina. Surely Labour had the money/volunteers to do it if they'd wanted to? The human waves of union members leafleting/canvassing could have been used in a different configuration.

    "The predictions were so far off because no company combined online, telephone and mobile phone polls because they were too expensive. “We were able to do that because we had volunteer capacity to do it . . . you gotta go all the way and get this. It’s expensive, it’s difficult, but you’re gonna miss a bunch of close races if you don’t.”

    If our experience was anything to go by, Labour were just talking to themselves and only going to known Labour households and in the end dropped nearly 2000 votes from last time. It was no wonder they always boasted of a great reception on the Labour doorstep because it was a core vote campaign which left them nowhere to go.
  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    :smiley: at your new avatar
    Jonathan said:

    Plato said:

    Strikes me that Labour can't even run a cost efficient membership organisation - no wonder they're so wasteful with HMG finances.

    They do have quite a few members wrt other parties. Can't be all bad.
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216

    Nah Mike, you're presupposing a lot.

    1) Farage is crap in Westminster elections, he always loses, he even once finished third in a two horse race

    2) UKIP only win Westminster seats when they have the incumbent MP

    chris g, late of this parish helpfully tweeted this reminder:

    Nigel #Farage losing here
    1994 Eastleigh
    1997 Salisbury
    2001 Bexhill
    2005 Thanet
    2006 Bromley
    2010 Buckingham
    2015 Thanet
  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    edited May 2015
    Someone referred to it as turning up at the funeral of someone you haven't seen in years.

    Quite.
    felix said:

    I had an email from party HQ, 10 000 have joined the LDs in the last week. Extraordinary! It does show that there is potential for a healthy bounce back, particularly if the LDs pick the right leader. Doubly so if Labour pick the wrong one, or if UKIP implode. Jackpot for all three!

    Entirely predictable - anyone who joins a party after an election defeat probably needs their head examining. for me it's on a par with all moaning and wailing of u/c women about their despair following last Thursday's result. Get over yourselves ffs. :)
  • woody662woody662 Posts: 255

    I actually feel sorry for Mark Reckless (I know)

    Persuaded to defect by Carswell, he's now lost his seat, and were Carswell to leave UKIP, Reckless will be thinking "OMFG, what the hell was I thinking, was I even thinking?"

    Made his bed.
  • It is easy to see how Farage and Carswell view 'short money' differently. In how each sees it, they are both right.

    There is little political or philosophical difference between them.

    They are disagreeing about a relatively small sum of money. A 'big' man never worries too much about money. Not an issue, or much of a problem.

    What we should be talking about is: who leads the OUT campaign? Both Farage and Carswell have correctly assessed that neither is the right man. But who?
  • logical_songlogical_song Posts: 9,932

    PClipp said:

    Not bizarre at all, Mr RCS. Now that they have bought their way back to an overall majority, the Conservatives are bringing forth all the hard-line Tory policies that they could not implement while they were in coalition with the Liberal Democrats - and which they kept totally our of sight during the election campaign. First off the starting block was Mrs May with the Snoopers Charter.

    So all those who had forgotten that the Conservatives were an authoritarian party (among other characeristics) are realising that there is a need for somebody to stand up for liberal values - and that has to be the Liberal Democrats. There is nobody else.

    10,000 new members since the election and counting.....

    I remember how bullish you were 5 weeks ago. How dismissive of those saying you would get smashed.

    Why should we listen to a thing you say?
    How many UKIP MPs did you predict?
  • AndreaParma_82AndreaParma_82 Posts: 4,714
    Already time for 2020 retirements announcements!

    Ronnie Campbell (Blyth Valley) apparently confirmed it is his last term

    www.newspostleader.co.uk/news/local/labour-s-ronnie-campbell-delighted-with-election-win-his-final-one-1-7251861


    "This is lucky number seven. I have to stop some time, so this will be my last time running.
    “I’m 71 now so I think that’ll be enough, but I am delighted to be representing Blyth Valley for another five years, it is an absolute privilege and I thank everyone for voting"

  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    PClipp said:

    I remember how bullish you were 5 weeks ago. How dismissive of those saying you would get smashed. Why should we listen to a thing you say?

    Because we have a corrupt system where 72 milion pounds can buy you Tories your way back into office. It will be very interesting to see what the final figures for expenditure turn out to be.

    I bet the Tories spent less than £72m

    How about a bet: 1pt = a full £1m below £72m for Tory spent in the GE (official figures). I'll be any amount you want up to £5 per point
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,949

    PClipp said:

    Not bizarre at all, Mr RCS. Now that they have bought their way back to an overall majority, the Conservatives are bringing forth all the hard-line Tory policies that they could not implement while they were in coalition with the Liberal Democrats - and which they kept totally our of sight during the election campaign. First off the starting block was Mrs May with the Snoopers Charter.

    So all those who had forgotten that the Conservatives were an authoritarian party (among other characeristics) are realising that there is a need for somebody to stand up for liberal values - and that has to be the Liberal Democrats. There is nobody else.

    10,000 new members since the election and counting.....

    I remember how bullish you were 5 weeks ago. How dismissive of those saying you would get smashed.

    Why should we listen to a thing you say?
    How many UKIP MPs did you predict?
    One. Consistently. (Check my competition entries it you doubt me.)

    I also said that one would be a lonely, regret-laden figure.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,964
    Mr. Eagles, you're too soft.
  • SlackbladderSlackbladder Posts: 9,780



    They are disagreeing about a relatively small sum of money. A 'big' man never worries too much about money. Not an issue, or much of a problem.

    Um I think that applies when it's your own money, not someone (the taxpayers) elses.
  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    It'd be the crowd puller Netflix wants http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3079127/Are-Clarkson-set-build-House-Cars-Netflix-Trio-said-come-genius-title-join-streaming-service-produce-new-programme.html?ITO=1490&ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490
    Jeremy Clarkson could be set to reunite with his former Top Gear colleagues for a 'genius' new motoring show called House of Cars available exclusively on Netflix.

    The outspoken television presenter, 55, who was sacked from the BBC for punching a producer, is reportedly planning to reunite with co-stars Richard Hammond and James May for a new programme.

    ...ITV had previously said that it had 'no plans' to enter negotiations with Clarkson but the broadcaster is thought to have altered its position when co-presenters May and Hammond declared they would also be leaving the BBC.

    A bidding war is now said to be underway between Netflix and ITV, although one source said advertisement breaks on the latter could be a 'headache' due to 'potential conflicts of interest'.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,975

    I actually feel sorry for Mark Reckless (I know)

    Persuaded to defect by Carswell, he's now lost his seat, and were Carswell to leave UKIP, Reckless will be thinking "OMFG, what the hell was I thinking, was I even thinking?"

    First Sol, now the TPD - are they all coming in to our new party then???
    Next up Kim Philby.

    But if Churchill managed to re-rat....
  • SlackbladderSlackbladder Posts: 9,780
    I'm going to call the labour election now for Burnham. He seems closest to the unions, and the one they'll plump for over the others. He's a known name and labour members like their comfort candidates.

  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,718
    Charles said:

    PClipp said:

    I remember how bullish you were 5 weeks ago. How dismissive of those saying you would get smashed. Why should we listen to a thing you say?

    Because we have a corrupt system where 72 milion pounds can buy you Tories your way back into office. It will be very interesting to see what the final figures for expenditure turn out to be.

    I bet the Tories spent less than £72m

    How about a bet: 1pt = a full £1m below £72m for Tory spent in the GE (official figures). I'll be any amount you want up to £5 per point
    Does include the value of volunteers time? I understand that the Charity Commission wants that allowed for in Charitides accounts
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,975

    Mr. Eagles, you're too soft.

    I like to be magnanimous in victory.

    No point acting like Rome towards Carthage after the second Punic War
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,964
    Miss Plato, hope ITV gets it. Suspect they won't.
  • PongPong Posts: 4,693
    edited May 2015
    RobD said:

    Pong said:

    Scott_P said:

    @arusbridger: Prince Charles's black spider memos to be published today... http://t.co/LAdPYJUpzO

    Today is the day the nation decides whether Charles becomes king....
    Is this like when TND tweets about an interesting poll?
    lol

    I'll wait to see whether or not they're actually "interesting"...

    Ultimately, IMO, it's impossible for any future monarch to be as *clean* as QE2. She was cushioned by a compliant media during her younger, more politically inquisitive years and reached constitutional maturity long before the internet came about.

    I recon QE2 will be the last superhuman monarch.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 63,137

    I'm going to call the labour election now for Burnham. He seems closest to the unions, and the one they'll plump for over the others. He's a known name and labour members like their comfort candidates.

    Morning all,

    Bear in mind though, it is one member one vote now. The unions will have less of a direct say. And Labour have been clear that there will be no repeat of the nonsense where ballot papers came wrapped in pictures of Ed M.
  • richardDoddrichardDodd Posts: 5,472
    Slackbladder..Yes please....Cammo will be delighted...
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,949

    Mr. Eagles, you're too soft.

    I like to be magnanimous in victory.

    No point acting like Rome towards Carthage after the second Punic War
    North Korea seems to have a new form of execution the Romans would have liked.

    Execution by anti-aircraft gun.
  • DecrepitJohnLDecrepitJohnL Posts: 13,300
    Charles said:

    PClipp said:

    I remember how bullish you were 5 weeks ago. How dismissive of those saying you would get smashed. Why should we listen to a thing you say?

    Because we have a corrupt system where 72 milion pounds can buy you Tories your way back into office. It will be very interesting to see what the final figures for expenditure turn out to be.

    I bet the Tories spent less than £72m

    How about a bet: 1pt = a full £1m below £72m for Tory spent in the GE (official figures). I'll be any amount you want up to £5 per point
    Naughty. Conservatives can have spent as much as they liked before the official campaign, during which expenditure is limited by law. Of course, every party's official GE expenditure will be less than that. But Messina and Crosby didn't rock up to CCHQ on April Fools Day.

    That said, Conservatives were also said to have retained enough in the bank for a second election this year (so perhaps their private polling was not quite so bullish in real time as it became in hindsight).
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,044
    Pong said:

    RobD said:

    Pong said:

    Scott_P said:

    @arusbridger: Prince Charles's black spider memos to be published today... http://t.co/LAdPYJUpzO

    Today is the day the nation decides whether Charles becomes king....
    Is this like when TND tweets about an interesting poll?
    lol

    I'll wait to see whether or not they're actually "interesting"...

    Ultimately, IMO, it's impossible for any future monarch to be as *clean* as QE2. She was cushioned by a compliant media during her younger, more politically inquisitive years and reached constitutional maturity before the internet came about.

    I recon QE2 will be the last superhuman monarch.
    I think it is more to do with the fact she was Queen at 26. Charles has had a lot longer to do nothing.. so filling the time with his causes probably makes him more inclined to lobby.
  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    Superb article from The Fink about his definition of Shy Tories - and how they aren't shy or Tories - just not interested in politics and want a moderate, mainstream HMG that is economically competent. Oh and they have a job.

    http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/opinion/columnists/article4438536.ece

    How many seats has Cameron won since becoming Tory leader? It's a huge number that took two bites to get there - but it's landslide territory numbers from a terrible base.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,975

    Mr. Eagles, you're too soft.

    I like to be magnanimous in victory.

    No point acting like Rome towards Carthage after the second Punic War
    North Korea seems to have a new form of execution the Romans would have liked.

    Execution by anti-aircraft gun.
    Pigdog was appropriated from the North Koreans.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,044


    That said, Conservatives were also said to have retained enough in the bank for a second election this year (so perhaps their private polling was not quite so bullish in real time as it became in hindsight).

    Always good to have a contingency, in case your polling is wrong.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,949

    Charles said:

    PClipp said:

    I remember how bullish you were 5 weeks ago. How dismissive of those saying you would get smashed. Why should we listen to a thing you say?

    Because we have a corrupt system where 72 milion pounds can buy you Tories your way back into office. It will be very interesting to see what the final figures for expenditure turn out to be.

    I bet the Tories spent less than £72m

    How about a bet: 1pt = a full £1m below £72m for Tory spent in the GE (official figures). I'll be any amount you want up to £5 per point
    Does include the value of volunteers time? I understand that the Charity Commission wants that allowed for in Charitides accounts
    Labour would be more worried about that. With their armies of workers that must paid, oh, say the minimum wage? A living wage?
  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    Don't know about Labour/LDs but the Tory Battlebus volunteers paid CCHQ £50 to cover their own costs.

    Charles said:

    PClipp said:

    I remember how bullish you were 5 weeks ago. How dismissive of those saying you would get smashed. Why should we listen to a thing you say?

    Because we have a corrupt system where 72 milion pounds can buy you Tories your way back into office. It will be very interesting to see what the final figures for expenditure turn out to be.

    I bet the Tories spent less than £72m

    How about a bet: 1pt = a full £1m below £72m for Tory spent in the GE (official figures). I'll be any amount you want up to £5 per point
    Does include the value of volunteers time? I understand that the Charity Commission wants that allowed for in Charitides accounts
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,949

    Mr. Eagles, you're too soft.

    I like to be magnanimous in victory.

    No point acting like Rome towards Carthage after the second Punic War
    North Korea seems to have a new form of execution the Romans would have liked.

    Execution by anti-aircraft gun.
    Pigdog was appropriated from the North Koreans.
    Then Mr Reckless can consider his political demise to be rather easy.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,949
    Are there going to be 27 threads on how the Betfair Tories came a cropper this election?

    By UNDER-estimating the scale of victory?
  • CD13CD13 Posts: 6,366

    Carswell has refused it on principle but have any other opposition MPs ever refused it on principle? If not, why not?

    Farage has a problem here because he's set a higher standard for loose-lipped candidates that have the other parties. I don't think it's been because the media have been intrusive (which they have), it's because he likes discipline. Farage hinted at his views in his resignation speech - he finds it irritating dealing with less-disciplined people who mouth off inappropriately.

    Carswell is either a loose cannon or a free-thinker depending on your view. I'm sympathetic, but on that basis, I'd have to sympathise with the foot-in-mouth brigade too. I probably do as I was brought up to think that 'Sticks and stones ...'

    You can see why Carswell left the Tories, so I'd expect Farage to make an issue of it. But there's a bit of my party, my rules. But being 100% of the MPs, he makes it awkward for the leader. Just imagine a Labour party with only Skiners, Fields, Corbyns and Hoey's.

    Hmm ... might even be an improvement

  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,964
    edited May 2015
    Miss Plato, after the 2005 General Election the Conservatives had 198 seats. Today it has 331.

    Labour's gone from 355 to 232.

    Edited extra bit: and the Lib Dems from 62 to 8.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 63,137
    As ever, an interesting article by Mary Riddell in Telegraph on Labour defeat. She raises a very good question: what was the point of Crudas doing all the policy work if most of it was totally ignored?
  • SlackbladderSlackbladder Posts: 9,780

    I'm going to call the labour election now for Burnham. He seems closest to the unions, and the one they'll plump for over the others. He's a known name and labour members like their comfort candidates.

    Morning all,

    Bear in mind though, it is one member one vote now. The unions will have less of a direct say. And Labour have been clear that there will be no repeat of the nonsense where ballot papers came wrapped in pictures of Ed M.
    True, be the unions are already pushing for a delay so that they can 'sign up' affiates. You can bet your bottom dollar they will have a favourite, and push for that favourite all they can.

    and you can bet they won't be pushing for Chuka.

  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    If only you'd voted for AV...

    Are there going to be 27 threads on how the Betfair Tories came a cropper this election?

    By UNDER-estimating the scale of victory?

This discussion has been closed.