politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Farage’s biggest mistake was to duck the Eastleigh by election
The very public row that has broken out between Farage and his party’s only MP, Douglas Carswell, was one that had been widely predicted. The only issue was what would spark it off.
Even with only one MP (currently) UKIP are adding to the gaiety of the nation - I suspect Carswell may end up an independent - not sure he could cope with returning to the tender mercies of the Tory Whips. Anyone seen any mock ups of TPD recently? There is one of Miliband partying in Ibiza good taste prevents me from sharing.
Farage is a start-up CEO. A man who inspires great personal loyalty, who can think (and argue) on his feet, who has a vision of the future he genuinely believes in, and who can improvise.
And he has taken UKIP from an anti-EU protest vote to a serious political force.
But the skills needed for start-up CEO and big company CEO are radically different. Bill Gates and Jeff Bezos are the exceptions: most start-up CEOs make rotten big company CEOs and vice-versa.
Ducking Eastleigh is by-the-by. UKIP needs a process person. An organiser. A person who can delegate. Nigel Farage is not that person.
The resignation that wasn't is merely a symptom of this problem. Without a professional leader UKIP will continue to hemorrhage talent, and will underperform its potential.
Farage is a start-up CEO. A man who inspires great personal loyalty, who can think (and argue) on his feet, who has a vision of the future he genuinely believes in, and who can improvise.
And he has taken UKIP from an anti-EU protest vote to a serious political force.
But the skills needed for start-up CEO and big company CEO are radically different. Bill Gates and Jeff Bezos are the exceptions: most start-up CEOs make rotten big company CEOs and vice-versa.
Ducking Eastleigh is by-the-by. UKIP needs a process person. An organiser. A person who can delegate. Nigel Farage is not that person.
The resignation that wasn't is merely a symptom of this problem. Without a professional leader UKIP will continue to hemorrhage talent, and will underperform its potential.
Who do you suggest they hire? I'm thinking Carly Fiorina.
@rcs1000 you have a bad habit of making very sensible posts. Those are absolutely discouraged on this website
I very much doubt that Carswell will end up a Tory (despite my desire for Cameron to reach out to him). It's a strong possibility he ends up as an independent (although he'd need to resign again and fight another by-election & there's a good chance he wouldn't win so you need to factor that into the odds). I wouldn't be surprised if he takes the middle route and nominally remains UKIP, but in name only, and does/votes as he sees fit
UKIP clearly have some deciding to do. I quite like Carswell's attitude to this Short money. A grown up party serious about small government would have no problem with a proper scrutiny committee and proper set of accounts. I think that Farage has spent too long as MEP to appreciate the importance of this.
It is symptomatic of Farage's one man band approach to the party that he cannot allow this. If Farage could not win a seat in this election, will he ever get such a chance again? I doubt it. Why should UKIP win by-elections when the euro-ref is on the way? The only by-elections they have ever won were the Clacton and Rochester ones, and those circumstances look unlikely to recur.
It is decision time for UKIP: get serious and professional or take the Farage "It's my party, and I will cry if I want to!" approach.
I had an email from party HQ, 10 000 have joined the LDs in the last week. Extraordinary! It does show that there is potential for a healthy bounce back, particularly if the LDs pick the right leader. Doubly so if Labour pick the wrong one, or if UKIP implode. Jackpot for all three!
I had an email from party HQ, 10 000 have joined the LDs in the last week. Extraordinary! It does show that there is potential for a healthy bounce back, particularly if the LDs pick the right leader. Doubly so if Labour pick the wrong one, or if UKIP implode. Jackpot for all three!
One of my (Tory) colleagues lamented "If I'd known Ed Davey was in danger of losing, I'd have voted for him".
A clash of personality and principle was always on the cards with these two, just didn’t expect it to erupt so soon after GE2015. – If Farage is not careful, UKIP’s only MP could walk.
o/t - has the dreaded wrap around SPIN advertisement been cast into the fiery pit?
Not bizarre at all, Mr RCS. Now that they have bought their way back to an overall majority, the Conservatives are bringing forth all the hard-line Tory policies that they could not implement while they were in coalition with the Liberal Democrats - and which they kept totally our of sight during the election campaign. First off the starting block was Mrs May with the Snoopers Charter.
So all those who had forgotten that the Conservatives were an authoritarian party (among other characeristics) are realising that there is a need for somebody to stand up for liberal values - and that has to be the Liberal Democrats. There is nobody else.
10,000 new members since the election and counting.....
Not bizarre at all, Mr RCS. Now that they have bought their way back to an overall majority, the Conservatives are bringing forth all the hard-line Tory policies that they could not implement while they were in coalition with the Liberal Democrats - and which they kept totally our of sight during the election campaign. First off the starting block was Mrs May with the Snoopers Charter.
So all those who had forgotten that the Conservatives were an authoritarian party (among other characeristics) are realising that there is a need for somebody to stand up for liberal values - and that has to be the Liberal Democrats. There is nobody else.
10,000 new members since the election and counting.....
I remember how bullish you were 5 weeks ago. How dismissive of those saying you would get smashed.
Farage is a start-up CEO. A man who inspires great personal loyalty, who can think (and argue) on his feet, who has a vision of the future he genuinely believes in, and who can improvise.
And he has taken UKIP from an anti-EU protest vote to a serious political force.
But the skills needed for start-up CEO and big company CEO are radically different. Bill Gates and Jeff Bezos are the exceptions: most start-up CEOs make rotten big company CEOs and vice-versa.
Ducking Eastleigh is by-the-by. UKIP needs a process person. An organiser. A person who can delegate. Nigel Farage is not that person.
The resignation that wasn't is merely a symptom of this problem. Without a professional leader UKIP will continue to hemorrhage talent, and will underperform its potential.
I remember how bullish you were 5 weeks ago. How dismissive of those saying you would get smashed. Why should we listen to a thing you say?
Because we have a corrupt system where 72 milion pounds can buy you Tories your way back into office. It will be very interesting to see what the final figures for expenditure turn out to be.
I remember how bullish you were 5 weeks ago. How dismissive of those saying you would get smashed. Why should we listen to a thing you say?
Because we have a corrupt system where 72 milion pounds can buy you Tories your way back into office. It will be very interesting to see what the final figures for expenditure turn out to be.
72 million. Do you have a link for that. I thought the cap was much lower.
Douglas Carswell has burned his bridges with the Conservative party under the current leader. While it would be well-advised to welcome him back, I cannot imagine him humiliating himself by returning under this Prime Minister.
He had not done his due diligence on UKIP very well if he has not expected regular rucks with its current leader. Politburo purges and flounces are a longstanding feature of UKIP's short history.
So he's a bit stuck. He can go independent if he so wishes and even argue that he need not submit himself to a by-election again because his beliefs have not changed and he has articulated them twice in the last year to his patient electorate. But what is he actually going to achieve as an independent MP?
Carswell may have made a mistake in leaving the Tories, but if he were to rejoin them now he would be revealing himself as completely untrustworthy. You can get away with betraying your electorate once, but twice? Surely not. I cannot believe that Carswell is that kind of man.
That was the figure in the Tory war chest at the beginning of the year, Mr Root, according to the Boundary Commission. How much they finally spent, we do not yet know of course.
There is a cap on expenditure for an individual candidate in the long campaign and the short campaign periods. And then there is the national campaign. And there is also the time before the long campaign starts. So, effectively, the cap is not very effective, if you have enough money.
Not bizarre at all, Mr RCS. Now that they have bought their way back to an overall majority, the Conservatives are bringing forth all the hard-line Tory policies that they could not implement while they were in coalition with the Liberal Democrats - and which they kept totally our of sight during the election campaign. First off the starting block was Mrs May with the Snoopers Charter.
So all those who had forgotten that the Conservatives were an authoritarian party (among other characeristics) are realising that there is a need for somebody to stand up for liberal values - and that has to be the Liberal Democrats. There is nobody else.
10,000 new members since the election and counting.....
I took a less optomistic view of LD fortunes, though even I expected double figures of LD MPs.
We will see very quickly the difference between Conservative majority government and the coalition, and I think a large number of people will change their minds on coalition. It will be seen as a golden period of good government. Theressa May's snoopers charter is a good example, but will not be the only one.
There is a lot of ground to recover for the LDs, but I do not detect the same fratricidal infighting that is breaking out in the other losing parties of UKIP and Labour.
It is important that the last few years in government are reflected on, but they should not turn into navel gazing.
As one of the signaturies of the US Declaration of Independence said "We must surely hang together, or we shall surely hang seperately"
Douglas Carswell has burned his bridges with the Conservative party under the current leader. While it would be well-advised to welcome him back, I cannot imagine him humiliating himself by returning under this Prime Minister.
He had not done his due diligence on UKIP very well if he has not expected regular rucks with its current leader. Politburo purges and flounces are a longstanding feature of UKIP's short history.
So he's a bit stuck. He can go independent if he so wishes and even argue that he need not submit himself to a by-election again because his beliefs have not changed and he has articulated them twice in the last year to his patient electorate. But what is he actually going to achieve as an independent MP?
He can remain an independent voice in UKIP. He is the parliamentary party, and it would be absurd for UKIP to expel their only MP. He is not without friends in the party, and Farage is not without other opponents.
Labour's 'ground game' and 5 million conversations...
Speaking from Washington DC, Mr Messina said: “It was amusing to see all these polls saying, ‘Oh, Labour’s talking to more people’, and I kept thinking to myself, ‘That’s great, because we are talking to the right people, over and over and over again’.
“We were having as many as eight to ten conversations with undecided voters in the final week, while Labour was still, in the final week, mailing every single person in the constituency. And that just didn’t make sense.”
@DavidJonesMP: Douglas Carswell's every utterance, every breath, every tic of body language, scream: "What the heck have I got myself into?" @BBCr4today
Burnham opposed by more than three quarters? In a five-runner race, support from just over a fifth of MPs is surely just par for the course, to mix sporting metaphors.
Burnham opposed by more than three quarters? In a five-runner race, support from just over a fifth of MPs is surely just par for the course, to mix sporting metaphors.
But Burnham is also the union favoured candidate
Unions are employing call-centre staff to persuade their members to vote in Labour’s leadership contest, as they try to maintain their influence over the outcome.
The rules were changed last year to limit the power of the unions to choose Labour’s next leader. Yet senior party figures are worried by how easy it has become for unions to sign up potentially hundreds of thousands of affiliates within weeks.
Unions that want to sign up their members as an “affiliate” — with the right to vote on the Labour leadership — only have to phone them up, ask for confirmation of their address and get an assurance that they want to affiliate to Labour.
No money needs to change hands, yet this procedure then gives them the same voting rights as full Labour party membership, which costs £46.56 a year.
Burnham opposed by more than three quarters? In a five-runner race, support from just over a fifth of MPs is surely just par for the course, to mix sporting metaphors.
At this stage nearly a quarter is very good going. There will still be lots of Don't Knows.
But MPs have a limited role now. They get to nominate, but after that they get no more formal say than any other member.
Labour's 'ground game' and 5 million conversations...
Speaking from Washington DC, Mr Messina said: “It was amusing to see all these polls saying, ‘Oh, Labour’s talking to more people’, and I kept thinking to myself, ‘That’s great, because we are talking to the right people, over and over and over again’.
“We were having as many as eight to ten conversations with undecided voters in the final week, while Labour was still, in the final week, mailing every single person in the constituency. And that just didn’t make sense.”
Yes, the key to victory was Messina's sophisticated targeting of voters. There was no great popular uprising in support of Cameroonism or in defence of bacon sandwiches, and next time Labour will also have better voter targeting.
The unions determining Labour's leader? What could possibly go wrong?
I think Mr. Smithson may be right, but another problem was Farage's self-destructive comment on resignation. This had the twin effects of making tactical voting against him even more likely, and making him duplicitous when he resigned for three days and then rose again.
Carswell's perspective seems a bit peculiar to me. Not just the refusal to take the money, but not seeming to get why his own party might just be a little bit peeved.
Burnham opposed by more than three quarters? In a five-runner race, support from just over a fifth of MPs is surely just par for the course, to mix sporting metaphors.
At this stage nearly a quarter is very good going. There will still be lots of Don't Knows.
But MPs have a limited role now. They get to nominate, but after that they get no more formal say than any other member.
Not sure what the exact rules are, but if a quarter of Labour MPs nominate Burnham they are probably disbarred from nominating anyone else. That may make it a lot harder for some leadership contenders to get the nominations they need to stand.
That said what does "nearly a quarter" mean? A quarter is 58; you need 35 nominations. 35 is closer to 58 than zero.
I do think formal or informal rules need to be laid down governing the behaviour when it comes to politics and comparable issues for heirs (even those down the track but in direct line of succession).
Fascinating stuff from Mr Messina. Surely Labour had the money/volunteers to do it if they'd wanted to? The human waves of union members leafleting/canvassing could have been used in a different configuration.
"The predictions were so far off because no company combined online, telephone and mobile phone polls because they were too expensive. “We were able to do that because we had volunteer capacity to do it . . . you gotta go all the way and get this. It’s expensive, it’s difficult, but you’re gonna miss a bunch of close races if you don’t.”
Persuaded to defect by Carswell, he's now lost his seat, and were Carswell to leave UKIP, Reckless will be thinking "OMFG, what the hell was I thinking, was I even thinking?"
That was the figure in the Tory war chest at the beginning of the year, Mr Root, according to the Boundary Commission. How much they finally spent, we do not yet know of course.
There is a cap on expenditure for an individual candidate in the long campaign and the short campaign periods. And then there is the national campaign. And there is also the time before the long campaign starts. So, effectively, the cap is not very effective, if you have enough money.
What does the boundary commission have to do with it? The cap is effective, you can't spend unlimited amounts of money when it matters. You also have to remember that Labour had similar if not higher levels of funding.
Tbh you just sound quite bitter that your party were conclusively rejected at the ballot box in this election.
The unions determining Labour's leader? What could possibly go wrong?
I think Mr. Smithson may be right, but another problem was Farage's self-destructive comment on resignation. This had the twin effects of making tactical voting against him even more likely, and making him duplicitous when he resigned for three days and then rose again.
Carswell's perspective seems a bit peculiar to me. Not just the refusal to take the money, but not seeming to get why his own party might just be a little bit peeved.
I had an email from party HQ, 10 000 have joined the LDs in the last week. Extraordinary! It does show that there is potential for a healthy bounce back, particularly if the LDs pick the right leader. Doubly so if Labour pick the wrong one, or if UKIP implode. Jackpot for all three!
Entirely predictable - anyone who joins a party after an election defeat probably needs their head examining. for me it's on a par with all moaning and wailing of u/c women about their despair following last Thursday's result. Get over yourselves ffs.
Persuaded to defect by Carswell, he's now lost his seat, and were Carswell to leave UKIP, Reckless will be thinking "OMFG, what the hell was I thinking, was I even thinking?"
First Sol, now the TPD - are they all coming in to our new party then???
Fascinating stuff from Mr Messina. Surely Labour had the money/volunteers to do it if they'd wanted to? The human waves of union members leafleting/canvassing could have been used in a different configuration.
"The predictions were so far off because no company combined online, telephone and mobile phone polls because they were too expensive. “We were able to do that because we had volunteer capacity to do it . . . you gotta go all the way and get this. It’s expensive, it’s difficult, but you’re gonna miss a bunch of close races if you don’t.”
Why didn't the Conservatives do it last time? The reason is they'd not studied the reports from the Obama campaign.
Fascinating stuff from Mr Messina. Surely Labour had the money/volunteers to do it if they'd wanted to? The human waves of union members leafleting/canvassing could have been used in a different configuration.
"The predictions were so far off because no company combined online, telephone and mobile phone polls because they were too expensive. “We were able to do that because we had volunteer capacity to do it . . . you gotta go all the way and get this. It’s expensive, it’s difficult, but you’re gonna miss a bunch of close races if you don’t.”
If our experience was anything to go by, Labour were just talking to themselves and only going to known Labour households and in the end dropped nearly 2000 votes from last time. It was no wonder they always boasted of a great reception on the Labour doorstep because it was a core vote campaign which left them nowhere to go.
I had an email from party HQ, 10 000 have joined the LDs in the last week. Extraordinary! It does show that there is potential for a healthy bounce back, particularly if the LDs pick the right leader. Doubly so if Labour pick the wrong one, or if UKIP implode. Jackpot for all three!
Entirely predictable - anyone who joins a party after an election defeat probably needs their head examining. for me it's on a par with all moaning and wailing of u/c women about their despair following last Thursday's result. Get over yourselves ffs.
Persuaded to defect by Carswell, he's now lost his seat, and were Carswell to leave UKIP, Reckless will be thinking "OMFG, what the hell was I thinking, was I even thinking?"
It is easy to see how Farage and Carswell view 'short money' differently. In how each sees it, they are both right.
There is little political or philosophical difference between them.
They are disagreeing about a relatively small sum of money. A 'big' man never worries too much about money. Not an issue, or much of a problem.
What we should be talking about is: who leads the OUT campaign? Both Farage and Carswell have correctly assessed that neither is the right man. But who?
Not bizarre at all, Mr RCS. Now that they have bought their way back to an overall majority, the Conservatives are bringing forth all the hard-line Tory policies that they could not implement while they were in coalition with the Liberal Democrats - and which they kept totally our of sight during the election campaign. First off the starting block was Mrs May with the Snoopers Charter.
So all those who had forgotten that the Conservatives were an authoritarian party (among other characeristics) are realising that there is a need for somebody to stand up for liberal values - and that has to be the Liberal Democrats. There is nobody else.
10,000 new members since the election and counting.....
I remember how bullish you were 5 weeks ago. How dismissive of those saying you would get smashed.
"This is lucky number seven. I have to stop some time, so this will be my last time running. “I’m 71 now so I think that’ll be enough, but I am delighted to be representing Blyth Valley for another five years, it is an absolute privilege and I thank everyone for voting"
I remember how bullish you were 5 weeks ago. How dismissive of those saying you would get smashed. Why should we listen to a thing you say?
Because we have a corrupt system where 72 milion pounds can buy you Tories your way back into office. It will be very interesting to see what the final figures for expenditure turn out to be.
I bet the Tories spent less than £72m
How about a bet: 1pt = a full £1m below £72m for Tory spent in the GE (official figures). I'll be any amount you want up to £5 per point
Not bizarre at all, Mr RCS. Now that they have bought their way back to an overall majority, the Conservatives are bringing forth all the hard-line Tory policies that they could not implement while they were in coalition with the Liberal Democrats - and which they kept totally our of sight during the election campaign. First off the starting block was Mrs May with the Snoopers Charter.
So all those who had forgotten that the Conservatives were an authoritarian party (among other characeristics) are realising that there is a need for somebody to stand up for liberal values - and that has to be the Liberal Democrats. There is nobody else.
10,000 new members since the election and counting.....
I remember how bullish you were 5 weeks ago. How dismissive of those saying you would get smashed.
Why should we listen to a thing you say?
How many UKIP MPs did you predict?
One. Consistently. (Check my competition entries it you doubt me.)
I also said that one would be a lonely, regret-laden figure.
Jeremy Clarkson could be set to reunite with his former Top Gear colleagues for a 'genius' new motoring show called House of Cars available exclusively on Netflix.
The outspoken television presenter, 55, who was sacked from the BBC for punching a producer, is reportedly planning to reunite with co-stars Richard Hammond and James May for a new programme.
...ITV had previously said that it had 'no plans' to enter negotiations with Clarkson but the broadcaster is thought to have altered its position when co-presenters May and Hammond declared they would also be leaving the BBC.
A bidding war is now said to be underway between Netflix and ITV, although one source said advertisement breaks on the latter could be a 'headache' due to 'potential conflicts of interest'.
Persuaded to defect by Carswell, he's now lost his seat, and were Carswell to leave UKIP, Reckless will be thinking "OMFG, what the hell was I thinking, was I even thinking?"
First Sol, now the TPD - are they all coming in to our new party then???
I'm going to call the labour election now for Burnham. He seems closest to the unions, and the one they'll plump for over the others. He's a known name and labour members like their comfort candidates.
I remember how bullish you were 5 weeks ago. How dismissive of those saying you would get smashed. Why should we listen to a thing you say?
Because we have a corrupt system where 72 milion pounds can buy you Tories your way back into office. It will be very interesting to see what the final figures for expenditure turn out to be.
I bet the Tories spent less than £72m
How about a bet: 1pt = a full £1m below £72m for Tory spent in the GE (official figures). I'll be any amount you want up to £5 per point
Does include the value of volunteers time? I understand that the Charity Commission wants that allowed for in Charitides accounts
Today is the day the nation decides whether Charles becomes king....
Is this like when TND tweets about an interesting poll?
lol
I'll wait to see whether or not they're actually "interesting"...
Ultimately, IMO, it's impossible for any future monarch to be as *clean* as QE2. She was cushioned by a compliant media during her younger, more politically inquisitive years and reached constitutional maturity long before the internet came about.
I'm going to call the labour election now for Burnham. He seems closest to the unions, and the one they'll plump for over the others. He's a known name and labour members like their comfort candidates.
Morning all,
Bear in mind though, it is one member one vote now. The unions will have less of a direct say. And Labour have been clear that there will be no repeat of the nonsense where ballot papers came wrapped in pictures of Ed M.
I remember how bullish you were 5 weeks ago. How dismissive of those saying you would get smashed. Why should we listen to a thing you say?
Because we have a corrupt system where 72 milion pounds can buy you Tories your way back into office. It will be very interesting to see what the final figures for expenditure turn out to be.
I bet the Tories spent less than £72m
How about a bet: 1pt = a full £1m below £72m for Tory spent in the GE (official figures). I'll be any amount you want up to £5 per point
Naughty. Conservatives can have spent as much as they liked before the official campaign, during which expenditure is limited by law. Of course, every party's official GE expenditure will be less than that. But Messina and Crosby didn't rock up to CCHQ on April Fools Day.
That said, Conservatives were also said to have retained enough in the bank for a second election this year (so perhaps their private polling was not quite so bullish in real time as it became in hindsight).
Today is the day the nation decides whether Charles becomes king....
Is this like when TND tweets about an interesting poll?
lol
I'll wait to see whether or not they're actually "interesting"...
Ultimately, IMO, it's impossible for any future monarch to be as *clean* as QE2. She was cushioned by a compliant media during her younger, more politically inquisitive years and reached constitutional maturity before the internet came about.
I recon QE2 will be the last superhuman monarch.
I think it is more to do with the fact she was Queen at 26. Charles has had a lot longer to do nothing.. so filling the time with his causes probably makes him more inclined to lobby.
Superb article from The Fink about his definition of Shy Tories - and how they aren't shy or Tories - just not interested in politics and want a moderate, mainstream HMG that is economically competent. Oh and they have a job.
How many seats has Cameron won since becoming Tory leader? It's a huge number that took two bites to get there - but it's landslide territory numbers from a terrible base.
That said, Conservatives were also said to have retained enough in the bank for a second election this year (so perhaps their private polling was not quite so bullish in real time as it became in hindsight).
Always good to have a contingency, in case your polling is wrong.
I remember how bullish you were 5 weeks ago. How dismissive of those saying you would get smashed. Why should we listen to a thing you say?
Because we have a corrupt system where 72 milion pounds can buy you Tories your way back into office. It will be very interesting to see what the final figures for expenditure turn out to be.
I bet the Tories spent less than £72m
How about a bet: 1pt = a full £1m below £72m for Tory spent in the GE (official figures). I'll be any amount you want up to £5 per point
Does include the value of volunteers time? I understand that the Charity Commission wants that allowed for in Charitides accounts
Labour would be more worried about that. With their armies of workers that must paid, oh, say the minimum wage? A living wage?
I remember how bullish you were 5 weeks ago. How dismissive of those saying you would get smashed. Why should we listen to a thing you say?
Because we have a corrupt system where 72 milion pounds can buy you Tories your way back into office. It will be very interesting to see what the final figures for expenditure turn out to be.
I bet the Tories spent less than £72m
How about a bet: 1pt = a full £1m below £72m for Tory spent in the GE (official figures). I'll be any amount you want up to £5 per point
Does include the value of volunteers time? I understand that the Charity Commission wants that allowed for in Charitides accounts
Carswell has refused it on principle but have any other opposition MPs ever refused it on principle? If not, why not?
Farage has a problem here because he's set a higher standard for loose-lipped candidates that have the other parties. I don't think it's been because the media have been intrusive (which they have), it's because he likes discipline. Farage hinted at his views in his resignation speech - he finds it irritating dealing with less-disciplined people who mouth off inappropriately.
Carswell is either a loose cannon or a free-thinker depending on your view. I'm sympathetic, but on that basis, I'd have to sympathise with the foot-in-mouth brigade too. I probably do as I was brought up to think that 'Sticks and stones ...'
You can see why Carswell left the Tories, so I'd expect Farage to make an issue of it. But there's a bit of my party, my rules. But being 100% of the MPs, he makes it awkward for the leader. Just imagine a Labour party with only Skiners, Fields, Corbyns and Hoey's.
As ever, an interesting article by Mary Riddell in Telegraph on Labour defeat. She raises a very good question: what was the point of Crudas doing all the policy work if most of it was totally ignored?
I'm going to call the labour election now for Burnham. He seems closest to the unions, and the one they'll plump for over the others. He's a known name and labour members like their comfort candidates.
Morning all,
Bear in mind though, it is one member one vote now. The unions will have less of a direct say. And Labour have been clear that there will be no repeat of the nonsense where ballot papers came wrapped in pictures of Ed M.
True, be the unions are already pushing for a delay so that they can 'sign up' affiates. You can bet your bottom dollar they will have a favourite, and push for that favourite all they can.
Comments
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/may/12/nigel-farage-i-want-to-fight-byelection-in-labour-held-seat
And he has taken UKIP from an anti-EU protest vote to a serious political force.
But the skills needed for start-up CEO and big company CEO are radically different. Bill Gates and Jeff Bezos are the exceptions: most start-up CEOs make rotten big company CEOs and vice-versa.
Ducking Eastleigh is by-the-by. UKIP needs a process person. An organiser. A person who can delegate. Nigel Farage is not that person.
The resignation that wasn't is merely a symptom of this problem. Without a professional leader UKIP will continue to hemorrhage talent, and will underperform its potential.
I very much doubt that Carswell will end up a Tory (despite my desire for Cameron to reach out to him). It's a strong possibility he ends up as an independent (although he'd need to resign again and fight another by-election & there's a good chance he wouldn't win so you need to factor that into the odds). I wouldn't be surprised if he takes the middle route and nominally remains UKIP, but in name only, and does/votes as he sees fit
UKIP clearly have some deciding to do. I quite like Carswell's attitude to this Short money. A grown up party serious about small government would have no problem with a proper scrutiny committee and proper set of accounts. I think that Farage has spent too long as MEP to appreciate the importance of this.
It is symptomatic of Farage's one man band approach to the party that he cannot allow this. If Farage could not win a seat in this election, will he ever get such a chance again? I doubt it. Why should UKIP win by-elections when the euro-ref is on the way? The only by-elections they have ever won were the Clacton and Rochester ones, and those circumstances look unlikely to recur.
It is decision time for UKIP: get serious and professional or take the Farage "It's my party, and I will cry if I want to!" approach.
Bizarre.
A clash of personality and principle was always on the cards with these two, just didn’t expect it to erupt so soon after GE2015. – If Farage is not careful, UKIP’s only MP could walk.
o/t - has the dreaded wrap around SPIN advertisement been cast into the fiery pit?
So all those who had forgotten that the Conservatives were an authoritarian party (among other characeristics) are realising that there is a need for somebody to stand up for liberal values - and that has to be the Liberal Democrats. There is nobody else.
10,000 new members since the election and counting.....
Why should we listen to a thing you say?
ToriesForBurnham™
He had not done his due diligence on UKIP very well if he has not expected regular rucks with its current leader. Politburo purges and flounces are a longstanding feature of UKIP's short history.
So he's a bit stuck. He can go independent if he so wishes and even argue that he need not submit himself to a by-election again because his beliefs have not changed and he has articulated them twice in the last year to his patient electorate. But what is he actually going to achieve as an independent MP?
There is a cap on expenditure for an individual candidate in the long campaign and the short campaign periods. And then there is the national campaign. And there is also the time before the long campaign starts. So, effectively, the cap is not very effective, if you have enough money.
We will see very quickly the difference between Conservative majority government and the coalition, and I think a large number of people will change their minds on coalition. It will be seen as a golden period of good government. Theressa May's snoopers charter is a good example, but will not be the only one.
There is a lot of ground to recover for the LDs, but I do not detect the same fratricidal infighting that is breaking out in the other losing parties of UKIP and Labour.
It is important that the last few years in government are reflected on, but they should not turn into navel gazing.
As one of the signaturies of the US Declaration of Independence said "We must surely hang together, or we shall surely hang seperately"
George Osborne; genius,,,
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/06/20/article-2662719-1EEE326200000578-499_634x359.jpg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cvJLf6REaUc
But MPs have a limited role now. They get to nominate, but after that they get no more formal say than any other member.
Yes, the key to victory was Messina's sophisticated targeting of voters. There was no great popular uprising in support of Cameroonism or in defence of bacon sandwiches, and next time Labour will also have better voter targeting.
The unions determining Labour's leader? What could possibly go wrong?
I think Mr. Smithson may be right, but another problem was Farage's self-destructive comment on resignation. This had the twin effects of making tactical voting against him even more likely, and making him duplicitous when he resigned for three days and then rose again.
Carswell's perspective seems a bit peculiar to me. Not just the refusal to take the money, but not seeming to get why his own party might just be a little bit peeved.
What does it cost to join the LDs or SNP or UKIP or PC as a full member?
1) Farage is crap in Westminster elections, he always loses, he even once finished third in a two horse race
2) UKIP only win Westminster seats when they have the incumbent MP
That said what does "nearly a quarter" mean? A quarter is 58; you need 35 nominations. 35 is closer to 58 than zero.
I do think formal or informal rules need to be laid down governing the behaviour when it comes to politics and comparable issues for heirs (even those down the track but in direct line of succession).
"The predictions were so far off because no company combined online, telephone and mobile phone polls because they were too expensive. “We were able to do that because we had volunteer capacity to do it . . . you gotta go all the way and get this. It’s expensive, it’s difficult, but you’re gonna miss a bunch of close races if you don’t.”
Persuaded to defect by Carswell, he's now lost his seat, and were Carswell to leave UKIP, Reckless will be thinking "OMFG, what the hell was I thinking, was I even thinking?"
Tbh you just sound quite bitter that your party were conclusively rejected at the ballot box in this election.
Nigel #Farage losing here
1994 Eastleigh
1997 Salisbury
2001 Bexhill
2005 Thanet
2006 Bromley
2010 Buckingham
2015 Thanet
Quite.
There is little political or philosophical difference between them.
They are disagreeing about a relatively small sum of money. A 'big' man never worries too much about money. Not an issue, or much of a problem.
What we should be talking about is: who leads the OUT campaign? Both Farage and Carswell have correctly assessed that neither is the right man. But who?
Ronnie Campbell (Blyth Valley) apparently confirmed it is his last term
www.newspostleader.co.uk/news/local/labour-s-ronnie-campbell-delighted-with-election-win-his-final-one-1-7251861
"This is lucky number seven. I have to stop some time, so this will be my last time running.
“I’m 71 now so I think that’ll be enough, but I am delighted to be representing Blyth Valley for another five years, it is an absolute privilege and I thank everyone for voting"
How about a bet: 1pt = a full £1m below £72m for Tory spent in the GE (official figures). I'll be any amount you want up to £5 per point
I also said that one would be a lonely, regret-laden figure.
But if Churchill managed to re-rat....
No point acting like Rome towards Carthage after the second Punic War
I'll wait to see whether or not they're actually "interesting"...
Ultimately, IMO, it's impossible for any future monarch to be as *clean* as QE2. She was cushioned by a compliant media during her younger, more politically inquisitive years and reached constitutional maturity long before the internet came about.
I recon QE2 will be the last superhuman monarch.
Bear in mind though, it is one member one vote now. The unions will have less of a direct say. And Labour have been clear that there will be no repeat of the nonsense where ballot papers came wrapped in pictures of Ed M.
Execution by anti-aircraft gun.
That said, Conservatives were also said to have retained enough in the bank for a second election this year (so perhaps their private polling was not quite so bullish in real time as it became in hindsight).
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/opinion/columnists/article4438536.ece
How many seats has Cameron won since becoming Tory leader? It's a huge number that took two bites to get there - but it's landslide territory numbers from a terrible base.
By UNDER-estimating the scale of victory?
Carswell has refused it on principle but have any other opposition MPs ever refused it on principle? If not, why not?
Farage has a problem here because he's set a higher standard for loose-lipped candidates that have the other parties. I don't think it's been because the media have been intrusive (which they have), it's because he likes discipline. Farage hinted at his views in his resignation speech - he finds it irritating dealing with less-disciplined people who mouth off inappropriately.
Carswell is either a loose cannon or a free-thinker depending on your view. I'm sympathetic, but on that basis, I'd have to sympathise with the foot-in-mouth brigade too. I probably do as I was brought up to think that 'Sticks and stones ...'
You can see why Carswell left the Tories, so I'd expect Farage to make an issue of it. But there's a bit of my party, my rules. But being 100% of the MPs, he makes it awkward for the leader. Just imagine a Labour party with only Skiners, Fields, Corbyns and Hoey's.
Hmm ... might even be an improvement
Labour's gone from 355 to 232.
Edited extra bit: and the Lib Dems from 62 to 8.
and you can bet they won't be pushing for Chuka.