Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » If Sky News is right a move to get rid of Bercow is sensati

SystemSystem Posts: 12,215
edited March 2015 in General

imagepoliticalbetting.com » Blog Archive » If Sky News is right a move to get rid of Bercow is sensational

The Government has reportedly tabled a motion to stop John Bercow's re-election as Speaker of the House of Commons pic.twitter.com/tuugM1lqQH

Read the full story here


«13

Comments

  • EPGEPG Posts: 6,653
    They can't stop his re-election, unless they have a majority against him in 2015.
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    I didn't know there was an election for the Speaker until the next Parliament. What are the Tories up to ? Do they know something ?
  • Ave_itAve_it Posts: 2,411
    Maybe we are going for an extension to the Parliamentary term to keep Labour out!!!
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    Con gain a seat, Lab lose one +2 swing.
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    Ave_it said:

    Maybe we are going for an extension to the Parliamentary term to keep Labour out!!!

    That's the only thing the scoundrels can do to keep their snouts in the trough ! Or, is the World Wildlife Fund campaigning to save the Lib Dems going extinct ?
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,041
    TGOHF said:

    Con gain a seat, Lab lose one +2 swing.

    How many more speakers can we bump off?? ;)
  • Stark_DawningStark_Dawning Posts: 9,713
    Silly hype. It's just a dry procedural rule change:

    'Under existing procedures, if a Speaker’s re-election is opposed there is a public vote of all MPs which can deter opponents from voting against the incumbent for fear of being blacklisted if the bid to dump them fails.

    Under Mr Hague’s plan, around a dozen MPs would be required to call out in the Commons that they opposed Mr Bercow staying in the job he has held since 2009. A secret ballot would then be held, allowing MPs to vote against Mr Bercow without fear of reprisals.'


    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3011690/Plot-oust-Bercow-William-Hague-use-day-MP-change-rules-make-easier-oust-Speaker-election.html

  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,411
    TGOHF said:

    Con gain a seat, Lab lose one +2 swing.

    With the way deputies work its no actual gain.
  • Ave_itAve_it Posts: 2,411
    Let's make it a 17 year parliament so I can get my huge private pension before Labour *s it up!

  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,736
    TGOHF said:

    Con gain a seat, Lab lose one +2 swing.

    Why i thought there were 1 deputy from same side as speaker and 2 from other side so effectively no difference if CON or LAB speaker?
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,736
    Super YG will presumably make ELBOW close to CROSSOVER due to large sample size?
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    edited March 2015
    Who will the Kippers support ! Euro sceptic Bercow ?
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,736
    See Jezza "may face police charge"

    Can GUIDO start a petition to stop this happening please
  • Where would the Conservatives find an expert in HoC procedure to provide the right advice for this move ?
    Has Bercow made an enemy in current or previous staff?
    Innocent face.
  • ArtistArtist Posts: 1,893
    edited March 2015
    I don't see why the Lib Dems are getting themselves mixed up with something like this.

    Lindsay Hoyle's good performance at the budget may have swayed a few MPs against Bercow.
  • kjohnwkjohnw Posts: 1,456

    See Jezza "may face police charge"

    Can GUIDO start a petition to stop this happening please

    can't believe Mark Thomson was promoted to DG after biting colleague, yet Clarkson gets the boot for giving a split lip. hypocrisy.

    did police pursue Farages attackers? thought not....
  • SquareRootSquareRoot Posts: 7,095
    I do hope that that little man bercow goes. He is absolutely ghastly and his departure would mean his ghastly wife's contributions would become even more valueless and less worth reporting.

    Perhaps she can take him away for 25 yrs of dirty weeks in Cornwall
  • FloaterFloater Posts: 14,207
    LMAO at Bercow - poisonous little man
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 52,133
    edited March 2015

    Super YG will presumably make ELBOW close to CROSSOVER due to large sample size?

    It was 0.1% in favour of the Tories when I included the Times YG, but including Survation now makes it 0.0%!!
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    It's a BERCOUP !!
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,736
    See EICIPM has won the toss and will go 2nd tomorrow.

    Dave is a crap tosser clearly
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 52,133
    Scott_P said:

    It's a BERCOUP !!

    Speaker's Cornered!
  • SquareRootSquareRoot Posts: 7,095
    Next on the list is the appalling BBC. time for an end of the licence fee and make the buggers work for a living, no ratings=no income.. I couldn't give a toss about adverts , I never watch anything live so I fast forwards thro the ads, saves hours on a weekly round of tv progs .
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    Trouble at home...?
    Nicola Sturgeon has been forced to reassert she is the SNP leader after Alex Salmond undermined her demands for propping up a minority Labour government after the general election.

    The First Minister insisted that her predecessor is merely a member of her “team” and “I’m leading the SNP campaign” after he said he would install Ed Miliband in Downing Street regardless of whether a power-sharing deal was reached.
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/general-election-2015/11495619/Nicola-Sturgeon-Im-SNP-leader-not-Alex-Salmond.html

    Oh, wait, Eck swanning about drinking pink champagne and contradicting Nicola is all part of the masterplan.

    Riiiggghhhhtttttt...
  • SmarmeronSmarmeron Posts: 5,099
    @bigjohnowls
    Second? OMFG! This is an utter disaster for Milliband. Someone ring Con Home immediately.
  • Ave_itAve_it Posts: 2,411

    Super YG will presumably make ELBOW close to CROSSOVER due to large sample size?

    It was 0.1% in favour of the Tories when I included the Times YG, but including Survation now makes it 0.0%!!
    Everything counts (in small amounts)!
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 52,133
    Ave_it said:

    Super YG will presumably make ELBOW close to CROSSOVER due to large sample size?

    It was 0.1% in favour of the Tories when I included the Times YG, but including Survation now makes it 0.0%!!
    Everything counts (in small amounts)!
    Ave it! Didn't see you at the Shooting Star last week - maybe next time?

    If you want to go to 2 decimal places, it's Lab 0.02% ahead in fact! :lol:
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,587
    I know Bercow has his enemies, and not without reason, but are overt moves against the Speaker really a good idea for the sake of the office?
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,736
    kjohnw said:

    See Jezza "may face police charge"

    Can GUIDO start a petition to stop this happening please

    can't believe Mark Thomson was promoted to DG after biting colleague, yet Clarkson gets the boot for giving a split lip. hypocrisy.

    did police pursue Farages attackers? thought not....
    Somebody has put Farage in A&E?

    Must have missed that.


    Not sure police are pursuing Jezza just seen "may face police charge"

    5 million must be nailed on if GUIDO starts a petition surely
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    kle4 said:

    I know Bercow has his enemies, and not without reason, but are overt moves against the Speaker really a good idea for the sake of the office?

    That depends if the occupant has demeaned the office
  • SmarmeronSmarmeron Posts: 5,099
    @bigjohnowls
    Apparently the cops want to look at the papers from the BBC hearing. The rest is conjecture.
  • MP_SEMP_SE Posts: 3,642
    kjohnw said:

    See Jezza "may face police charge"

    Can GUIDO start a petition to stop this happening please

    can't believe Mark Thomson was promoted to DG after biting colleague, yet Clarkson gets the boot for giving a split lip. hypocrisy.

    did police pursue Farages attackers? thought not....
    Suprised the police and social services didn't pursue Nigel for a committing a thought crime.
    TGOHF said:

    Who will the Kippers support ! Euro sceptic Bercow ?

    Yes they will.

    Bully boy Dave bullying Bercow will only impress Tory fanboys.
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 43,363
    Scott_P said:

    Trouble at home...?

    Nicola Sturgeon has been forced to reassert she is the SNP leader after Alex Salmond undermined her demands for propping up a minority Labour government after the general election.

    The First Minister insisted that her predecessor is merely a member of her “team” and “I’m leading the SNP campaign” after he said he would install Ed Miliband in Downing Street regardless of whether a power-sharing deal was reached.
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/general-election-2015/11495619/Nicola-Sturgeon-Im-SNP-leader-not-Alex-Salmond.html

    Oh, wait, Eck swanning about drinking pink champagne and contradicting Nicola is all part of the masterplan.

    Riiiggghhhhtttttt...

    The Telegraph as a serious source of facts and analysis about the SNP? Alan Cochrane's admissions in his book would give any reasonable person cause to think thrice on that notion.

  • SimonStClareSimonStClare Posts: 7,976
    Evening all.

    Perhaps someone can answer me this: what did Bercow, hope to achieve by foisting an inexperienced Aussie Clerk on the House of Commons?
  • Ave_itAve_it Posts: 2,411

    Ave_it said:

    Super YG will presumably make ELBOW close to CROSSOVER due to large sample size?

    It was 0.1% in favour of the Tories when I included the Times YG, but including Survation now makes it 0.0%!!
    Everything counts (in small amounts)!
    Ave it! Didn't see you at the Shooting Star last week - maybe next time?

    If you want to go to 2 decimal places, it's Lab 0.02% ahead in fact! :lol:
    I was with Spandau Ballet! With 18,000 others!

    Hope you are well!
  • EPGEPG Posts: 6,653
    kle4 said:

    I know Bercow has his enemies, and not without reason, but are overt moves against the Speaker really a good idea for the sake of the office?

    Some people have not accepted that the levers of total social control were not handed them in 2010
  • kjohnwkjohnw Posts: 1,456

    kjohnw said:

    See Jezza "may face police charge"

    Can GUIDO start a petition to stop this happening please

    can't believe Mark Thomson was promoted to DG after biting colleague, yet Clarkson gets the boot for giving a split lip. hypocrisy.

    did police pursue Farages attackers? thought not....
    Somebody has put Farage in A&E?

    Must have missed that.


    Not sure police are pursuing Jezza just seen "may face police charge"

    5 million must be nailed on if GUIDO starts a petition surely
    http://metro.co.uk/2015/03/22/nigel-farage-attacked-by-anti-ukip-protesters-during-family-lunch-5115816/

  • SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    edited March 2015
    Trying to get rid of Bercow is a high risk strategy, what happens if Labour prefer Bercow after the election simply to cause problems within the Tory party?
    Also if Bercow stays he will want revenge, having a vengeful Speaker is not going to work for the Tories if in opposition.
  • MikeSmithsonMikeSmithson Posts: 7,382
    Judging by Mark Reckless Tweets I think UKIP is supporting Bercow.
  • SquareRootSquareRoot Posts: 7,095
    Scott_P said:

    kle4 said:

    I know Bercow has his enemies, and not without reason, but are overt moves against the Speaker really a good idea for the sake of the office?

    That depends if the occupant has demeaned the office
    He's not up to the job.. There are any number of reasons why he should go. he shouts like a girl at PMQ's and cannot control the house without threats..

    Bring back Betty Boothroyd!
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,736
    edited March 2015

    Next on the list is the appalling BBC. time for an end of the licence fee and make the buggers work for a living, no ratings=no income.. I couldn't give a toss about adverts , I never watch anything live so I fast forwards thro the ads, saves hours on a weekly round of tv progs .

    If you never watch live TV no need to buy a licence.

    You presumably like donating to good causes though
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 52,133
    Ave_it said:

    Ave_it said:

    Super YG will presumably make ELBOW close to CROSSOVER due to large sample size?

    It was 0.1% in favour of the Tories when I included the Times YG, but including Survation now makes it 0.0%!!
    Everything counts (in small amounts)!
    Ave it! Didn't see you at the Shooting Star last week - maybe next time?

    If you want to go to 2 decimal places, it's Lab 0.02% ahead in fact! :lol:
    I was with Spandau Ballet! With 18,000 others!

    Hope you are well!
    I'm good. Cool, one of the classier 80s bands - I saw Depeche Mode in 2013, they'll always be my faves!
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,587

    Evening all.

    Perhaps someone can answer me this: what did Bercow, hope to achieve by foisting an inexperienced Aussie Clerk on the House of Commons?

    Wasn't the idea that he would be freer to act with impunity as the Clerk would lack the knowledge to even internally question his actions?

    I have no idea how true that could be, but Bercow's own explanation - that he wanted to split the roles, the old guard would not let him, so he thought it a good idea to hire someone patently unsuited for one of the roles - does not stand up to much scrutiny, so I'm at a loss.
  • JPJ2JPJ2 Posts: 380
    Scott_P

    "Nicola Sturgeon has been forced to reassert she is the SNP leader...."

    Anyone who believes anything that the Telegraph writes about Scottish politics just hasn't been paying attention.

    Reports by all their journalists are out and out unionist propaganda, nothing more.
  • Ave_itAve_it Posts: 2,411
    Next thread title

    'Plot to remove Bercow means LAB certain GE win'! :lol:
  • Moses_Moses_ Posts: 4,865
    Really odd that we forget that Bercow was elected by the majority of Labour MPs just to cause trouble on the other benches. We have very short memories we really do

    Payback time indeed.

    * innocent face*
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 52,133
    Moses_ said:

    Really odd that we forget that Bercow was elected by the majority of Labour MPs just to cause trouble on the other benches. We have very short memories we really do

    Payback time indeed.

    * innocent face*

    DUJBA!!!
  • SquareRootSquareRoot Posts: 7,095
    edited March 2015

    Next on the list is the appalling BBC. time for an end of the licence fee and make the buggers work for a living, no ratings=no income.. I couldn't give a toss about adverts , I never watch anything live so I fast forwards thro the ads, saves hours on a weekly round of tv progs .

    If you never watch live TV no need to buy a licence.

    You presumably like donating to good causes though
    Good point, but you only need to switch on the tv for 5 secs and its on BBC and you are caught..
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    JPJ2 said:

    Scott_P

    "Nicola Sturgeon has been forced to reassert she is the SNP leader...."

    Anyone who believes anything that the Telegraph writes about Scottish politics just hasn't been paying attention.

    Reports by all their journalists are out and out unionist propaganda, nothing more.

    Are you saying Nicola has not reasserted her authority, and that Eck is still in charge and calling the shots?

    Ok
  • GrandioseGrandiose Posts: 2,323

    Next on the list is the appalling BBC. time for an end of the licence fee and make the buggers work for a living, no ratings=no income.. I couldn't give a toss about adverts , I never watch anything live so I fast forwards thro the ads, saves hours on a weekly round of tv progs .

    If you never watch live TV no need to buy a licence.

    You presumably like donating to good causes though
    If you record them you need a TV licence. Only services not "broadcast live" are not covered, such as iPlayer.
  • EPGEPG Posts: 6,653

    Scott_P said:

    kle4 said:

    I know Bercow has his enemies, and not without reason, but are overt moves against the Speaker really a good idea for the sake of the office?

    That depends if the occupant has demeaned the office
    He's not up to the job.. There are any number of reasons why he should go. he shouts like a girl at PMQ's and cannot control the house without threats..

    Bring back Betty Boothroyd!
    I'm sorry that being a girl is a bad thing to Tories
  • SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100

    Judging by Mark Reckless Tweets I think UKIP is supporting Bercow.

    Since Bercow has been declared an enemy by Cameron, that is fare political game.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,587
    EPG said:

    Scott_P said:

    kle4 said:

    I know Bercow has his enemies, and not without reason, but are overt moves against the Speaker really a good idea for the sake of the office?

    That depends if the occupant has demeaned the office
    He's not up to the job.. There are any number of reasons why he should go. he shouts like a girl at PMQ's and cannot control the house without threats..

    Bring back Betty Boothroyd!
    I'm sorry that being a girl is a bad thing to Tories
    Um, how do you square that interpretation of the quoted statement with the part about bringing back Betty Boothroyd?
  • SmarmeronSmarmeron Posts: 5,099
    @EPG
    I have often thought, that for a party who profess a love of Britain, Tories seem to harbour an inordinate amount of hatred for the majority of its inhabitants.
  • SimonStClareSimonStClare Posts: 7,976
    kle4 said:

    Evening all.

    Perhaps someone can answer me this: what did Bercow, hope to achieve by foisting an inexperienced Aussie Clerk on the House of Commons?

    Wasn't the idea that he would be freer to act with impunity as the Clerk would lack the knowledge to even internally question his actions?

    I have no idea how true that could be, but Bercow's own explanation - that he wanted to split the roles, the old guard would not let him, so he thought it a good idea to hire someone patently unsuited for one of the roles - does not stand up to much scrutiny, so I'm at a loss.
    Cheers Mr kle4 – that’s certainly one theory that was on the table, I just thought there may have been a more principled reasoning behind it. - guess not.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,587
    edited March 2015
    Smarmeron said:

    @EPG
    I have often thought, that for a party who profess a love of Britain, Tories seem to harbour an inordinate amount of hatred for the majority of its inhabitants.

    I have often thought I would feel much more inclined to definitively call myself a lefty if some on the left did not pretend only Tories make statements implying disdain or hatred for other parts of or members of this country.
  • FloaterFloater Posts: 14,207
    Smarmeron said:

    @EPG
    I have often thought, that for a party who profess a love of Britain, Tories seem to harbour an inordinate amount of hatred for the majority of its inhabitants.

    So much so that it chose to replace them?
  • Moses_Moses_ Posts: 4,865
    Ave_it said:

    Let's make it a 17 year parliament so I can get my huge private pension before Labour *s it up!

    LOL .....I only need 11



    Interesting that the only real support for Bercow comes from the left. Meanwhile the lefty biter is fine to become a DG but the righty biffer has to be sacked and chased by plod.

    Can we not for the sake of being equal and fair to all concerned just say what Labour said when Prescott belted a protestor

    It's just john being john.... Nothing to see here move along.

    Leftie punch good rightie punch bad

    As always........




  • SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    edited March 2015
    Smarmeron said:

    @EPG
    I have often thought, that for a party who profess a love of Britain, Tories seem to harbour an inordinate amount of hatred for the majority of its inhabitants.

    All parties have sociopaths, and no party gets a majority of the votes and they don't need to get elected, so as long as they hate those who will never vote for them anyway they are deemed politically acceptable.
  • SquareRootSquareRoot Posts: 7,095
    kle4 said:

    EPG said:

    Scott_P said:

    kle4 said:

    I know Bercow has his enemies, and not without reason, but are overt moves against the Speaker really a good idea for the sake of the office?

    That depends if the occupant has demeaned the office
    He's not up to the job.. There are any number of reasons why he should go. he shouts like a girl at PMQ's and cannot control the house without threats..

    Bring back Betty Boothroyd!
    I'm sorry that being a girl is a bad thing to Tories
    Um, how do you square that interpretation of the quoted statement with the part about bringing back Betty Boothroyd?
    He has girly footstamping tantrums. Betty Boothroyd was a brilliant speaker, irrespective of her party allegiance. So was Lord Tonypandy, and in his own way Bernard Weatherill.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,916
    59% of voters think a Labour SNP coalition would be the worst possible election result
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3011217/Labour-SNP-coalition-WORST-possible-outcome-general-election-say-voters.html
  • Ishmael_XIshmael_X Posts: 3,664

    Next on the list is the appalling BBC. time for an end of the licence fee and make the buggers work for a living, no ratings=no income.. I couldn't give a toss about adverts , I never watch anything live so I fast forwards thro the ads, saves hours on a weekly round of tv progs .

    If you never watch live TV no need to buy a licence.

    You presumably like donating to good causes though
    Not true. Wrong. Erroneous. Incorrect. At variance with the actuality.
  • SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    HYUFD said:

    59% of voters think a Labour SNP coalition would be the worst possible election result
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3011217/Labour-SNP-coalition-WORST-possible-outcome-general-election-say-voters.html

    To put that in context that is similar to the 52% that say in the same poll that the current CON-LD coalition will be the worst possible election result.
  • TykejohnnoTykejohnno Posts: 7,362
    Lindsay Hoyle make a good speaker of the house commons good sense of northern humour.
  • What I don't get is if the Tories and LDs want rid of Bercow the easiest way to get rid of him would surely be to both stand candidates in Buckingham.

    In 2005, when Bercow was a Con the vote was Con 57%, Lab 20%, LD 20%, UKIP 3%
    In 2010 as speaker it was Bercow 44%, John Stevens 21%, Farage 17%, various others 18%

    Now if Bercow picked up much of the LD and Lab vote, then that suggests he didn't hold on to much of his Con vote.

    UKIP and Green are already standing against him and if Con and LD did too I couldn't see him winning
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,411
    HYUFD said:

    59% of voters think a Labour SNP coalition would be the worst possible election result
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3011217/Labour-SNP-coalition-WORST-possible-outcome-general-election-say-voters.html

    Good job it's been ruled out then.
  • OblitusSumMeOblitusSumMe Posts: 9,143
    Ishmael_X said:

    Next on the list is the appalling BBC. time for an end of the licence fee and make the buggers work for a living, no ratings=no income.. I couldn't give a toss about adverts , I never watch anything live so I fast forwards thro the ads, saves hours on a weekly round of tv progs .

    If you never watch live TV no need to buy a licence.

    You presumably like donating to good causes though
    Not true. Wrong. Erroneous. Incorrect. At variance with the actuality.
    You also need a licence if you record from live broadcasts to watch later.
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633

    What I don't get is if the Tories and LDs want rid of Bercow the easiest way to get rid of him would surely be to both stand candidates in Buckingham.

    In 2005, when Bercow was a Con the vote was Con 57%, Lab 20%, LD 20%, UKIP 3%
    In 2010 as speaker it was Bercow 44%, John Stevens 21%, Farage 17%, various others 18%

    Now if Bercow picked up much of the LD and Lab vote, then that suggests he didn't hold on to much of his Con vote.

    UKIP and Green are already standing against him and if Con and LD did too I couldn't see him winning

    No lance the boil before the GE. Force him to stand down,
  • YouGov/Sun poll tonight - Labour lead by one: CON 34%, LAB 35%, LD 8%, UKIP 12%, GRN 6%
  • MP_SEMP_SE Posts: 3,642
    edited March 2015

    YouGov/Sun poll tonight - Labour lead by one: CON 34%, LAB 35%, LD 8%, UKIP 12%, GRN 6%

    Tick tock as I am sure Nick will say.

    UKIP holding steady.
  • Ave_itAve_it Posts: 2,411
    LAB running away with it!

    CON all over!!!

    Forget the pension!!!!
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,411

    YouGov/Sun poll tonight - Labour lead by one: CON 34%, LAB 35%, LD 8%, UKIP 12%, GRN 6%

    Game is up for Dave. That Labour score is looking far too solid. Given what we know is happening in Scotland, the Tories are looking fucked in England.
  • Moses_Moses_ Posts: 4,865
    kle4 said:

    Smarmeron said:

    @EPG
    I have often thought, that for a party who profess a love of Britain, Tories seem to harbour an inordinate amount of hatred for the majority of its inhabitants.

    I have often thought I would feel much more inclined to definitively call myself a lefty if some on the left did not pretend only Tories make statements implying disdain or hatred for other parts of or members of this country.
    What KLE4 said !

    Could never be a lefty though in that sense of the word. Doesn't mean I don't have empathy or compassion for those less fortunate of course and I make good that by my deeds in the world.

    That's the issue and the problem with all lefties they think they have the monopoly on this.

    YOU DONT !
  • SmarmeronSmarmeron Posts: 5,099
    Ishmael_X

    You mean the letter I received from the licensing people telling me I didn't need one, was a forgery?
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    Tonight keeps on giving...

    CONSERVATIVE peer Baroness Warsi has sparked Tory fears she may defect - after agreeing to headline a wannabe Labour MP’s meeting on Islamaphobia.
  • tysontyson Posts: 6,117
    @ Ave It

    Hello my old chum. I am due to see Spandau this Saturday on their tour. How were they?
  • TykejohnnoTykejohnno Posts: 7,362
    Ave_it said:

    LAB running away with it!

    CON all over!!!

    Forget the pension!!!!

    Will we see a tory lead for rest of week ?

  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,736
    You do not need a TV licence if you only watch content after it's been shown on television. This includes TV programmes downloaded or streamed after broadcast using a catch-up service.

    So if you record live programme you do

    According to BBC
  • Ishmael_XIshmael_X Posts: 3,664
    Smarmeron said:

    Ishmael_X

    You mean the letter I received from the licensing people telling me I didn't need one, was a forgery?

    I mean you misunderstood it.
  • SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    Actually this Thread is old news OGH:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2882185/MPs-secret-plot-boot-Bercow-Speaker-General-Election-May.html

    This was published on Dec.20th 2014

    "John Bercow faces a secret cross-party bid to boot him out as Commons Speaker next year.
    MPs across the main parties are privately plotting to replace him with a new Speaker after the general election in May.
    In a dramatic move, they plan to change Commons' procedure to introduce a secret ballot for any motion to sack Mr Bercow."


  • Fat_SteveFat_Steve Posts: 361
    If there is a plot, then let us wish the plotters every success. They are doing God's work.
  • Ave_itAve_it Posts: 2,411

    Ave_it said:

    LAB running away with it!

    CON all over!!!

    Forget the pension!!!!

    Will we see a tory lead for rest of week ?

    Not till GE2020 when Camo steps down!
  • Moses_Moses_ Posts: 4,865

    Moses_ said:

    Really odd that we forget that Bercow was elected by the majority of Labour MPs just to cause trouble on the other benches. We have very short memories we really do

    Payback time indeed.

    * innocent face*

    DUJBA!!!
    DUEMA

    * another innocent face*

  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,411
    CON 34 (-1) LAB 35 (=) LIB 8 (=) UKIP 12 (=) GRN 6 (=)
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,411
    SNP gain Scots Tories lol
  • SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100

    YouGov/Sun poll tonight - Labour lead by one: CON 34%, LAB 35%, LD 8%, UKIP 12%, GRN 6%

    The return of the 35% strategy?

    Goodnight.
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    I don't care what happens to John Bercow next time, so long as the bets on his survival pay up this time.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,587
    Definitely feels like Labour are recovering a bit. Not doing Tory hopes for a sub 30 Labour score much good.
  • SmarmeronSmarmeron Posts: 5,099
    @Ishmael_X
    I think I understood it correctly, since it was the basis of the complaint I made against two of their inspectors.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,411
    From the Yougov megapoll the -> SNP switching was 44% of Lab 2010, 50% of LD and 20% of Con 2010 vote !

    That implies like 50%.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,916
    edited March 2015
    Speedy/TSE Interestingly a Tory government is the least unpopular and the most wanted, I remain of the view it will be a Tory minority government backed by the LDs and DUP, Opinium on Sunday had it Tory 36% Labour 33%, that could well be how it ends up

    Pulpstar Though confidence and supply has not
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,736
    This weeks Polls 3 LAB leads 3 ties and one Tory lead

    All 7 have EICIPM (2.32 Betfair was 2.54 yesrerday)
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,736
    Sun Politics ‏@SunPolitics 7m7 minutes ago
    Baroness Warsi sparks fears she may defect after agreeing to speak at wannabe Labour MP’s meeting on Islamophobia: http://sunpl.us/6013N1cF
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633

    Sun Politics ‏@SunPolitics 7m7 minutes ago
    Baroness Warsi sparks fears she may defect after agreeing to speak at wannabe Labour MP’s meeting on Islamophobia: http://sunpl.us/6013N1cF

    Con GAIN.
  • Ave_itAve_it Posts: 2,411
    I now think it will be LAB 63 CON 2 UKIP 15 LD 2 SNP 18
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,411
    edited March 2015
    HYUFD said:



    Pulpstar Though confidence and supply has not

    That's my point, the journalism around this election has been utterly uninformed, misleading and generally awful. I'm not even talking about the blatant partisanship on display either.

    Worse than debt/deficit mix ups.
  • SmarmeronSmarmeron Posts: 5,099
    @bigjohnowls
    That is a scary thought, don't even joke about it!
This discussion has been closed.