FPT, Charles - "Do us a favour and post the link to your website can you?
That way when we don't read it it's a deliberate choice rather than just laziness
Cheers!"
You're not the target audience, Charles. Lefties need to know what really goes on at PB - people such as yourself understandably don't care, because it doesn't affect you and presumably never will.
Incidentally, many PBers do read Scot Goes Pop. My most faithful fan comes from Lombardia.
people such as yourself understandably don't care, because it doesn't affect you and presumably never will.
As far as I can see it only effects people who put OGH at legal risk (IMHO he's got a conservative stance on this, but I can understand that he's risk adverse) and those individuals who are needlessly rude to others.
We all know you think you're superior to Plato for some reason. None of us really care - for most of us you are just two people who post on the same website. It's just boring to read your jibes.
Labour achieved 15.7 % in the 2009 EU elections. EdM is if anything more unsound than Brown was on the european question. I expect Labour's dismal run in EU elections to continue next year.
"As far as I can see it only effects people who put OGH at legal risk (IMHO he's got a conservative stance on this, but I can understand that he's risk adverse) and those individuals who are needlessly rude to others."
The former doesn't apply to me, and as for the latter - DON'T MAKE ME LAUGH. I could give you chapter and verse on the abuse I have been subjected to here, without the slightest protection from the moderators, and I'm supposed to accept that the real problem is me being beastly to that poor, delicate wee flower Plato?
IMO it's going to be very close between the LDs and Greens in the Euro election. Last time the LDs polled 13.7% and the Greens 8.1%. The Green vote stayed exactly the same as at the previous Euro election in 2004 so there must be a good chance they'll get about 8% again.
"As far as I can see it only effects people who put OGH at legal risk (IMHO he's got a conservative stance on this, but I can understand that he's risk adverse) and those individuals who are needlessly rude to others."
The former doesn't apply to me, and as for the latter - DON'T MAKE ME LAUGH. I could give you chapter and verse on the abuse I have been subjected to here, without the slightest protection from the moderators, and I'm supposed to accept that the real problem is me being beastly to that poor, delicate wee flower Plato?
Try harder, Charles. Or just stop trying.
Why don't you post it on you blog, and I'll go and read it later ;-)
"Why don't you post it on you blog, and I'll go and read it later ;-)"
I'm doing that as we speak. Anyone would think you're trying to slow me down.
Very sensible James - make yourself look ridiculous on a blog with a small readership rather than a large one. But given you're so smart....I wonder at you doing it at all?
"As far as I can see it only effects people who put OGH at legal risk (IMHO he's got a conservative stance on this, but I can understand that he's risk adverse) and those individuals who are needlessly rude to others."
The former doesn't apply to me, and as for the latter - DON'T MAKE ME LAUGH. I could give you chapter and verse on the abuse I have been subjected to here, without the slightest protection from the moderators, and I'm supposed to accept that the real problem is me being beastly to that poor, delicate wee flower Plato?
Try harder, Charles. Or just stop trying.
Why don't you post it on you blog, and I'll go and read it later ;-)
"Very sensible James - make yourself look ridiculous on a blog with a small readership rather than a large one. But given you're so smart....I wonder at you doing it at all?"
You don't seem to be listening, Carlotta. How unusual.
This is how UKIP did in the local elections when you just take the seats they contested into account. For example in Lincolnshire they polled 31% in seats contested compared to 24% overall:
This is how UKIP did in the local elections when you just take the seats they contested into account. For example in Lincolnshire they polled 31% in seats contested compared to 24% overall:
There will of course be a reason why they didn't contest the other ones, like that they didn't expect to do well, so this shouldn't be read to mean that their "real" level of Lincs support is 31%. That doesn't mean that the stat isn't interesting - UKIP's chances of winning seats depends very much on having a non-even spread of votes. If they got 31% in some seats in the GE they'd certainly pick up a few.
Hugely sad. One of the best authors of the late 20th/early 21st centuries as far as I am concerned. Not only able to have wild flights of fantasy and extraordinary leaps of imagination but more importantly also able to make them seem real and possible.
Margo MacDonald has drawn attention to the likely infiltration of the Scottish nationalist movement by MI5. I would like to point Margo in the direction of your blog and PB comments as areas worth investigation.
This is how UKIP did in the local elections when you just take the seats they contested into account. For example in Lincolnshire they polled 31% in seats contested compared to 24% overall:
There will of course be a reason why they didn't contest the other ones, like that they didn't expect to do well, so this shouldn't be read to mean that their "real" level of Lincs support is 31%. That doesn't mean that the stat isn't interesting - UKIP's chances of winning seats depends very much on having a non-even spread of votes. If they got 31% in some seats in the GE they'd certainly pick up a few.
More likely - and this was certainly the case in Lincolnshire - they lacked the local organisation on the ground to get candidates in all those constituencies.
Good evening: Patrick O'Flynn, political correspondent of the Daily Express, has joined UKIP and wants to stand as an MEP in 2014. All PBers can follow his fine example: joining, I mean.
This is how UKIP did in the local elections when you just take the seats they contested into account. For example in Lincolnshire they polled 31% in seats contested compared to 24% overall:
There will of course be a reason why they didn't contest the other ones, like that they didn't expect to do well, so this shouldn't be read to mean that their "real" level of Lincs support is 31%. That doesn't mean that the stat isn't interesting - UKIP's chances of winning seats depends very much on having a non-even spread of votes. If they got 31% in some seats in the GE they'd certainly pick up a few.
More likely - and this was certainly the case in Lincolnshire - they lacked the local organisation on the ground to get candidates in all those constituencies.
Thats probably very true. Nigel confessed yesterday that he grossly underestimated the potential UKIP vote in the May locals, and thought that 60/70 seats would be doing well. He and the UKIP executive won't make that mistake again.
Very sad about Iain Banks. 'The Wasp Factory' is one of those books I not only remember reading, but where I was and where my life was at when I read it. I don't think he bettered it, but maybe it just resonated with me at the time.
I have gone for UKIP mostly out of a wish fulfilment rather than any sense of certainty. I think it will be between Labour and UKIP but really don't have the confidence to say with any certainty one way or the other.
UKIP. No, Labour. No, UKIP. Or Labour. One of them, any way. Which shows you how irrelevant the Euros are, when either sceptic UKIP or phile Labour are both in with a shout. No one knows, or cares, who their MEP is anyway.
If the Tories narrowly beat UKIP and Labour that will be a big coup for them, given even Hague won the Euros in 1999 when the Tories were massacred 2 years later I am surprised they have not scored higher!
"I have a feeling that I'm about to get a comment moderated on another website from north of the border."
You absolutely are not going to get moderated if you've just left a comment on my blog, David. That sort of nonsense may go on here, but don't project it onto me.
In case you missed it shock Jock Alex Jones causing conspiracy theorist mayhem on Andrew Neil and shouting his head off http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-22832994
Mr. HYUFD, I knew that name was familiar. Jones is the chap who was an absolute shrieking lunatic when 'talking' with Piers Morgan about gun control, and managed to make Morgan look like the most sensible and delightful of chaps.
"I have a feeling that I'm about to get a comment moderated on another website from north of the border."
You absolutely are not going to get moderated if you've just left a comment on my blog, David. That sort of nonsense may go on here, but don't project it onto me.
If so, then respect to you sir.
Maybe drop the silly name calling and whatnot with you and Plato though, it's a bit er.....crap all round really.
Can we all pick on Tim Yeo instead please? I don't think he's been trashed enough today after his exposure as a hypocritical troughing pretend tree hugger. We surely can all unite in hating his guts even more now...?
Truly the embodiement of all that is wrong with our politicians today.
MorrisDancer - They invaded the court at one point in protest at Hollande's gay marriage bill, including one wearing a mask and carrying a flame http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-22833798
"No one knows, or cares, who their MEP is anyway."
By the sounds of it, the real problem is that no-one knows what the voting system is. None of us have been represented by a single MEP since 1999.
There you go James, I didn't know that, and more importantly, I guess the vast majority of the population don't know either. I get the feeling that the British public don't really know what they want from the EU, but whatever it is, it's not "this".
I seem to have missed catgate. I don't get what the big deal is, PB is not just about nuanced political debate, we discuss numerous topics every day in the comment threads. Who cares if we talk about cats, or sports etc., if you don't want to read it just skip over it.
Morris Dancer - Indeed, but the bill has passed anyway so not likely to have much political impact, although it does underline the social conservatism in much off France
It's true that UKIP wouldn't have contested areas where they thought they weren't going to do as well, although on the other hand they would have obviously picked up some support in those divisions if they had stood, so in Lincolnshire for example they probably would have ended up with somewhere between 24% and 31% if they'd stood in every seat.
I think the method Rallings & Thrasher use when making notional calculations is to take the lowest share won by a particular party in the area in question and use that figure to fill in the missing gaps in wards/divisions where the party didn't stand.
In Lincolnshire the lowest UKIP share was 5.69% in Deeping St James (where well-known Labour candidate Phil Dilks was elected). So you'd use 5.69% for the 16 divisions where UKIP didn't stand rather than zero per-cent.
Good evening: Patrick O'Flynn, political correspondent of the Daily Express, has joined UKIP and wants to stand as an MEP in 2014. All PBers can follow his fine example: joining, I mean.
It will be helpful if joiners are paranoid as The Daily Express front pages.
Good evening: Patrick O'Flynn, political correspondent of the Daily Express, has joined UKIP and wants to stand as an MEP in 2014. All PBers can follow his fine example: joining, I mean.
It will be helpful if joiners are paranoid as The Daily Express front pages.
"No one knows, or cares, who their MEP is anyway."
Untrue. Farage and Dan Hannan are MEPs and are two of UK's best known politicians.
Farage is extremely well known.
Dan Hannan is completely unknown outside of the politico bubble. I very much doubt he would be recognised by more than a tiny proportion of the population when shown a picture of him. Indeed I suspect if you told people his name and asked whether they'd ever heard of him, most wouldn't have.
It's true that UKIP wouldn't have contested areas where they thought they weren't going to do as well, although on the other hand they would have obviously picked up some support in those divisions if they had stood, so in Lincolnshire for example they probably would have ended up with somewhere between 24% and 31% if they'd stood in every seat.
What we actually need is a thread where we can all guess the size of the UKIP vote/victory in the Euros next year. Over a year ago I was predicting on here they would come top of the poll, way before the Faragasm, and there were plenty of people ready to shoot me down. Of course I still may be wrong on that, but it's becoming more likely every day....I also said the Tories would get hammered, and I stick to that. A major chunk of even normally loyal Conservative voters are going to use those elections to send a very loud and clear message......
So I reckon, and I'm being honest here:
Turnout 50-55%
UKIP - 40% Labour - 25% Tories - 15% Lib Dems + Greens - approx 12% between them, no idea how it will split. Rest - 8%
i am not prepared to bet my left testicle on this though.
Good evening: Patrick O'Flynn, political correspondent of the Daily Express, has joined UKIP and wants to stand as an MEP in 2014. All PBers can follow his fine example: joining, I mean.
It had to happen. How long before Nigel Farrage is exclusively exposed as the mastermind of the plot to murder Princess Diana whilst simultaneously orchestrating the slump in house prices?
But, first, the speech. There was nothing in it. It said that Labour would cut spending on welfare – I mean social security – by (a) getting more people into work, (b) raising wages so that they don't have to be topped up with tax credits, and (c) building more houses to cut the cost of housing benefit. Not only that, a Labour government would strengthen public support for social security by linking benefits more to contributions people make when they are in work.
In other words, once you had referred to the footnotes, nothing. Ed Balls had delivered the footnotes three days earlier, in his "iron discipline" speech, saying that Labour would not spend more than the coalition, except on capital projects. So more, better-paid jobs would be paid for from the no-money tree; and the contributory principle would be paid for by taking from those contributing for less than five years to give to those who have contributed for longer.
The most interesting thing Miliband said was after the speech, when he was asked about Labour's soliciting of "tax-efficient" donations. Thus was his sanctimony exposed. Worse than insincere, it was unwise. Do Miliband and his advisers ever think through the next question that they are going to be asked? If you condemn legal tax avoidance, then do you or your donors pay more tax than they have to? If you draw a distinction between predators and producers, then who do you mean by predators? The week before last, Miliband finally had an answer to this question, a year and a half after he invited it. In a speech to Google, a company described as "evil" by another Labour MP for failing to pay more tax than is required by law, Miliband identified Montgomery Burns, who is a cartoon character, as an example of what he meant by a predator.
And if you decide that you are going to take away the winter fuel allowance from top-rate tax-paying pensioners, surely you need to be ready for the next question, which is, "Are you going to take away free TV licences?" The social security system in this country is an inconsistent mixture of universal, means-tested and a few contributory benefits, but if you are going to propose a change it is better to invent a reason for it that will get Liam Byrne, Shadow Work and Pensions Secretary, through a radio interview in one piece.
"No one knows, or cares, who their MEP is anyway."
Untrue. Farage and Dan Hannan are MEPs and are two of UK's best known politicians.
Farage is extremely well known.
Dan Hannan is completely unknown outside of the politico bubble. I very much doubt he would be recognised by more than a tiny proportion of the population when shown a picture of him. Indeed I suspect if you told people his name and asked whether they'd ever heard of him, most wouldn't have.
Dan Hannan has been seen by at least 3 million people from this speech alone ;
"No one knows, or cares, who their MEP is anyway."
Untrue. Farage and Dan Hannan are MEPs and are two of UK's best known politicians.
Farage is extremely well known.
Dan Hannan is completely unknown outside of the politico bubble. I very much doubt he would be recognised by more than a tiny proportion of the population when shown a picture of him. Indeed I suspect if you told people his name and asked whether they'd ever heard of him, most wouldn't have.
Dan Hannan has been seen by at least 3 million people from this speech alone ;
"No one knows, or cares, who their MEP is anyway."
Untrue. Farage and Dan Hannan are MEPs and are two of UK's best known politicians.
Farage is extremely well known.
Dan Hannan is completely unknown outside of the politico bubble. I very much doubt he would be recognised by more than a tiny proportion of the population when shown a picture of him. Indeed I suspect if you told people his name and asked whether they'd ever heard of him, most wouldn't have.
Dan Hannan has been seen by at least 3 million people from this speech alone ;
"No one knows, or cares, who their MEP is anyway."
Untrue. Farage and Dan Hannan are MEPs and are two of UK's best known politicians.
Farage is extremely well known.
Dan Hannan is completely unknown outside of the politico bubble. I very much doubt he would be recognised by more than a tiny proportion of the population when shown a picture of him. Indeed I suspect if you told people his name and asked whether they'd ever heard of him, most wouldn't have.
Dan Hannan has been seen by at least 3 million people from this speech alone ;
If that's true, why on earth do political parties chose blokes in romper suits for their leaders ? Is that in part a cause for poltical disenchantment ?
The average age of the population is 40, the average adult is about 45, the average person on the electoral roll is probably about 47. Since young people have a poor turnout record, the average voter would be close to 55.
Really sad about Iain M Banks (I very much preferred his sci fi although the Crow Road was excellent). Excession, Use of Weapons, Player of Games, all truly first rank. One of the great things about his books was that he was brave enough to be funny in books that were not comedies.
Re Catnatgate, the only problem with prohibiting petty personal squabbles is that petty personal squabbles sometimes comprise 80% of the threads, especially on the slower news days. I fear pb might be a tad tumbleweedy without them.
Also, they can be fun. The idea of James Kelly making us rue the day we annoyed him, by reposting an old pb thread on the 98th most popular politics blog in Midlothian, is too delicious a pleasure to be lightly foregone.
Been raining then, or are the puddles the remains of Farages beer spills.
It's not Bono, it's U2. And they haven't said they're feeling "hurt" about anything. They've just asked the government if they can have a copy of what was said. That seems very reasonable.
It's not Bono, it's U2. And they haven't said they're feeling "hurt" about anything. They've just asked the government if they can have a copy of what was said. That seems very reasonable.
It looks like the Irish tax authorities still haven't found what they're looking for.
I say British but, to be honest, they're probably English tabbies for all practical purposes, and Scotland isn't adequately represented among them. I blame the union.
Nick Griffin doesn't seem to know what a terrorist is.
According to his Wikipedia biog, he was the co-founder of Umkhonto we Sizwe and instigator of the armed struggle. Surely that makes him a (former) terrorist?
Comments
@GdnPolitics: Ed Balls clarifies Labour position over pension spending http://bit.ly/13pFgSb
Reading this site does not give me that impression.
Which shows this site is not a good guide for winning any money.
http://www.oddschecker.com/politics-and-election/uk-european-election/most-votes-match-bet
When the outright betting was 2s Ukip and 10s Cons they had Cons fav... and a 4/5 shot to beat a 6/1 shot is 4/7?
That way when we don't read it it's a deliberate choice rather than just laziness
Cheers!"
You're not the target audience, Charles. Lefties need to know what really goes on at PB - people such as yourself understandably don't care, because it doesn't affect you and presumably never will.
Incidentally, many PBers do read Scot Goes Pop. My most faithful fan comes from Lombardia.
A year is a long time in politics, but I don't see Ukip's bubble deflating until January 2015.
We all know you think you're superior to Plato for some reason. None of us really care - for most of us you are just two people who post on the same website. It's just boring to read your jibes.
Be the bigger man.
The mods will rue the day they took on JK
View all odds
Most Votes
UKIP (4/5), Labour (7/4), Conservatives (7), Liberal Democrats (125)
The former doesn't apply to me, and as for the latter - DON'T MAKE ME LAUGH. I could give you chapter and verse on the abuse I have been subjected to here, without the slightest protection from the moderators, and I'm supposed to accept that the real problem is me being beastly to that poor, delicate wee flower Plato?
Try harder, Charles. Or just stop trying.
UKIP.
Rumour, as yet unconfirmed, that Hamilton may have a gearbox-related penalty. That would promote Bottas to 2nd and, helpfully, Webber to 4th.
Oh, and Nadal won in straight sets. Huzzah!
I'm doing that as we speak. Anyone would think you're trying to slow me down.
You don't seem to be listening, Carlotta. How unusual.
This is how UKIP did in the local elections when you just take the seats they contested into account. For example in Lincolnshire they polled 31% in seats contested compared to 24% overall:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0At91c3wX1Wu5dDlES3BYejV2WVk1QTNldy11c2ZtSGc#gid=0
http://scotgoespop.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/pbs-tory-moderators-lose-plot-yet-again.html
Now that James has sulked off, do you have any amusing cat videos for us while I cook dinner?
I haven't sulked off. I've just been busy fulfilling the promise I made to the moderators yesterday.
Way too young to be passing. RIP
Not much of advice, but....
http://politicalbetting.vanillaforums.com/discussion/comment/55365/#Comment_55365
Patrick O'Flynn, political correspondent of the Daily Express, has joined UKIP and wants to stand as an MEP in 2014. All PBers can follow his fine example: joining, I mean.
well, at least they are ethnic Scots.
He and the UKIP executive won't make that mistake again.
Very sad about Iain Banks. 'The Wasp Factory' is one of those books I not only remember reading, but where I was and where my life was at when I read it. I don't think he bettered it, but maybe it just resonated with me at the time.
Which shows you how irrelevant the Euros are, when either sceptic UKIP or phile Labour are both in with a shout. No one knows, or cares, who their MEP is anyway.
Untrue. Farage and Dan Hannan are MEPs and are two of UK's best known politicians.
No matter, I don't think I will be revisiting that one anytime soon.
By the sounds of it, the real problem is that no-one knows what the voting system is. None of us have been represented by a single MEP since 1999.
You absolutely are not going to get moderated if you've just left a comment on my blog, David. That sort of nonsense may go on here, but don't project it onto me.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-22832994
I shall raise a glass of whisky to your memory.
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/06/09/nick-griffin-insults-nelson-mandela_n_3410608.html
Maybe drop the silly name calling and whatnot with you and Plato though, it's a bit er.....crap all round really.
Can we all pick on Tim Yeo instead please? I don't think he's been trashed enough today after his exposure as a hypocritical troughing pretend tree hugger. We surely can all unite in hating his guts even more now...?
Truly the embodiement of all that is wrong with our politicians today.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-22833798
I get the feeling that the British public don't really know what they want from the EU, but whatever it is, it's not "this".
It's true that UKIP wouldn't have contested areas where they thought they weren't going to do as well, although on the other hand they would have obviously picked up some support in those divisions if they had stood, so in Lincolnshire for example they probably would have ended up with somewhere between 24% and 31% if they'd stood in every seat.
I think the method Rallings & Thrasher use when making notional calculations is to take the lowest share won by a particular party in the area in question and use that figure to fill in the missing gaps in wards/divisions where the party didn't stand.
In Lincolnshire the lowest UKIP share was 5.69% in Deeping St James (where well-known Labour candidate Phil Dilks was elected). So you'd use 5.69% for the 16 divisions where UKIP didn't stand rather than zero per-cent.
Edited extra bit: a moment later Perry asks her if she's seen a weather forecast. Pay attention!
Dan Hannan is completely unknown outside of the politico bubble. I very much doubt he would be recognised by more than a tiny proportion of the population when shown a picture of him. Indeed I suspect if you told people his name and asked whether they'd ever heard of him, most wouldn't have.
So I reckon, and I'm being honest here:
Turnout 50-55%
UKIP - 40%
Labour - 25%
Tories - 15%
Lib Dems + Greens - approx 12% between them, no idea how it will split.
Rest - 8%
i am not prepared to bet my left testicle on this though.
http://www.politicshome.com/uk/article/79797/sunday_express_sunday_9th_june_2013.html
Though it certainly ticks the paranoia box.
Dan Hannan has been seen by at least 3 million people from this speech alone ;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94lW6Y4tBXs
To call him unknown is preposterous.
"no pleasure is worth forgoing to gain another three years in the geriatric ward"
I suspect that, of those of their constituents who know who they are, only a minority know that they are their MEP
http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/coffeehouse/2013/06/ed-balls-well-include-pensions-in-our-welfare-cap/
Tim is not the most obsessive person on this forum.
I think I made a similar estimate a few months ago. In the local elections the majority of voters would have been over 60 or even 65+ in some areas.
http://www.independent.ie/woman/celeb-news/u2-not-feeling-the-love-over-tax-29331241.html
I will miss him, he was a good racontuer as well.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OOytcpas7xs
I say British but, to be honest, they're probably English tabbies for all practical purposes, and Scotland isn't adequately represented among them. I blame the union.
Even despite the wink at the end...
15-year-old Matt makes wicket-taking debut
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sport/cricket/4961941/Matthew-Fisher-smashes-county-record-with-Tykes-debut.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2338507/Is-Rory-Kinnear-new-Doctor-Who-Bookmakers-suspend-bets-new-Time-Lord-BBC-bosses-offer-actor-role.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/wildlife/10108590/Aggressive-foreign-cows-attacking-British-ramblers.html
"It looks like the Irish tax authorities still haven't found what they're looking for."
Very good!
http://enormo-haddock.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/canada-post-race-analysis.html
With your Danish connections, do you have any perspectives on the Danish GPs strike?
It seems that 90% are threatening to leave their NHS because of harsh terms being imposed by the govt.
It was passed to me by a UK GP as an example of what may happen if GPs contracts are unilaterally changed by a govt:
http://cphpost.dk/news/politics/doctor-conflict-intensifies-gps-threaten-leave-health-service