Any citizen should be allowed their property with equal protection of the law.
By all means advocate abolition of the political aspects of the monarchy, but state confiscation of private property is a different matter.
Elizabeth Saxe-Coburg-Goethe is not a citizen of this country and were the monarchy abolished would be a Stateless Person if no specific provision was made.
In any case, any "private" transactions were undertaken with effectively public funds and as such the benefits of such transactions should transfer back to the state as a public good.
Saxe-Coburg-Goethe = biggest LOL of the year. I thought you were giving it large the other night about how well educated you Scottish chappies are?
We haven't had such an entertaining Nat since 'Comical James' defenestrated himself - goodness knows what the demands will be if the SNP do get 46 seats.....I reckon 'free Unicorns' will be back on the table......
Do you think that will be an Owl Upgrade or will we get both?
Any citizen should be allowed their property with equal protection of the law.
By all means advocate abolition of the political aspects of the monarchy, but state confiscation of private property is a different matter.
Elizabeth Saxe-Coburg-Goethe is not a citizen of this country and were the monarchy abolished would be a Stateless Person if no specific provision was made.
In any case, any "private" transactions were undertaken with effectively public funds and as such the benefits of such transactions should transfer back to the state as a public good.
Saxe-Coburg-Goethe = biggest LOL of the year. I thought you were giving it large the other night about how well educated you Scottish chappies are?
We haven't had such an entertaining Nat since 'Comical James' defenestrated himself - goodness knows what the demands will be if the SNP do get 46 seats.....I reckon 'free Unicorns' will be back on the table......
Do you think that will be an Owl Upgrade or will we get both?
If Miliband's negotiating, how many guesses do you need?
Any citizen should be allowed their property with equal protection of the law.
By all means advocate abolition of the political aspects of the monarchy, but state confiscation of private property is a different matter.
Elizabeth Saxe-Coburg-Goethe is not a citizen of this country and were the monarchy abolished would be a Stateless Person if no specific provision was made.
In any case, any "private" transactions were undertaken with effectively public funds and as such the benefits of such transactions should transfer back to the state as a public good.
Saxe-Coburg-Goethe = biggest LOL of the year. I thought you were giving it large the other night about how well educated you Scottish chappies are?
We haven't had such an entertaining Nat since 'Comical James' defenestrated himself - goodness knows what the demands will be if the SNP do get 46 seats.....I reckon 'free Unicorns' will be back on the table......
Do you think that will be an Owl Upgrade or will we get both?
If Miliband's negotiating, how many guesses do you need?
The Opinium approval ratings make grim reading for Miliband, not only has he the lowest approval among his own VI (+40 vs Cameron +87) its also poor geographically:
TimT Interesting, and Rand Paul still won of course and is looking good for the Iowa caucuses. I also see no reason why Cruz should not run having taken third. Walker is flavour of the month at the moment, as many other dull midwestern governors were in 2012, Thune, Daniels etc but I cannot see him winning, Fiorina failed to win the California Senate race
Cruz only got 12% in a group that is essentially Conservatives and Libertarians (the latter explaining why Rand wins year in year out and then goes on to do nothing elsewhere). Walker nearly doubled his score.
Fiorina not winning in California is hardly a shock, but I grant she did not beat the spread either. But she is impressing some this time around. Having a nominee on the top of the ticket from a purple/blue state with union-bashing, budget-balancing conservative chops with a female, businesswoman running mate from a deep blue state will be a good base-extending ticket among swing voters and independents, while also getting out the base (because of Walker's very conservative cred).
The Opinium approval ratings make grim reading for Miliband, not only has he the lowest approval among his own VI (+40 vs Cameron +87) its also poor geographically:
LOL..Pity there isnt an Olympic event of "Straw Clutching"...you would be favourite fot a Gold
The only polls that matter are the regular who will you vote for polls..not who do you trust on the economy, who would you go for a pint with or who eats a bacon sandwich most elegantly
Major led Blair on who do you trust on the economy days before doomsday 97 and Callaghan led Thatcher by miles on who do you like in 79....these type of polls are irrelevant
The Opinium approval ratings make grim reading for Miliband, not only has he the lowest approval among his own VI (+40 vs Cameron +87) its also poor geographically:
LOL..Pity there isnt an Olympic event of "Straw Clutching"...you would be favourite fot a Gold
The only polls that matter are the regular who will you vote for polls..not who do you trust on the economy, who would you go for a pint with or who eats a bacon sandwich most elegantly
Major led Blair on who do you trust on the economy days before doomsday 97 and Callaghan led Thatcher by miles on who do you like in 79....these type of polls are irrelevant
The Opinium approval ratings make grim reading for Miliband, not only has he the lowest approval among his own VI (+40 vs Cameron +87) its also poor geographically:
LOL..Pity there isnt an Olympic event of "Straw Clutching"...you would be favourite fot a Gold
The only polls that matter are the regular who will you vote for polls..not who do you trust on the economy, who would you go for a pint with or who eats a bacon sandwich most elegantly
Major led Blair on who do you trust on the economy days before doomsday 97 and Callaghan led Thatcher by miles on who do you like in 79....these type of polls are irrelevant
More nonsense in that than academic waffle than Lewis Carroll and Spike Miligan put together...
Even if there is anything in those polls at all...thats still bad for the Cons in theory as five weeks of Miliband having the chance to change his perception to people who have only been given the biased Tory press version of him as a hapless geeky loser can only see his figures rise..whereas Flashman is a distinctly unimpressive figure in debate (he lost to Clegg in 2010) and his tendency to try and bully and bluster will surely see his personal stock fall
All in all its still looking bad for the Blues...though not as bad as for the Yellows...Mike reckons that his beloved Libs may do much better than expected because of "greater name recognition" for their Mps ..hmmm maybe but when the name recognition here in Sheffield is always "that c##t Clegg" ...name recognition may not be the silver lining it appears
Comments
Are you staying up for the SL innings, FU?
Net approval:
England:
Cameron: +1
Miliband: -23
Scotland:
Cameron: -23
Miliband: -36
http://ourinsight.opinium.co.uk/sites/ourinsight.opinium.co.uk/files/vi_24_02_2015.pdf
Fiorina not winning in California is hardly a shock, but I grant she did not beat the spread either. But she is impressing some this time around. Having a nominee on the top of the ticket from a purple/blue state with union-bashing, budget-balancing conservative chops with a female, businesswoman running mate from a deep blue state will be a good base-extending ticket among swing voters and independents, while also getting out the base (because of Walker's very conservative cred).
Con maj: 15
Hung Con largest: 34 > Con largest: 49
Hung Lab largest: 23 > Lab largest: 33
Lab Maj: 10
Only the Scots would rather see Miliband - Cameron lead:
England: +16
Scotland: -16
would be favourite fot a Gold
The only polls that matter are the regular who will you vote for
polls..not who do you trust on the economy, who would you go
for a pint with or who eats a bacon sandwich most elegantly
Major led Blair on who do you trust on the economy days before
doomsday 97 and Callaghan led Thatcher by miles on who do
you like in 79....these type of polls are irrelevant
http://www.stonybrook.edu/commcms/polisci/NorpothForecast.pdf
and Spike Miligan put together...
Even if there is anything in those polls at all...thats still bad for
the Cons in theory as five weeks of Miliband having the chance to
change his perception to people who have only been given the
biased Tory press version of him as a hapless geeky loser can
only see his figures rise..whereas Flashman is a distinctly unimpressive
figure in debate (he lost to Clegg in 2010) and his tendency to try
and bully and bluster will surely see his personal stock fall
All in all its still looking bad for the Blues...though not as bad as
for the Yellows...Mike reckons that his beloved Libs may do much
better than expected because of "greater name recognition" for their
Mps ..hmmm maybe but when the name recognition here in Sheffield
is always "that c##t Clegg" ...name recognition may not be the silver lining it appears